The Sarasins' Collection of Historical Sri Lankan Crania
-
Upload
khangminh22 -
Category
Documents
-
view
0 -
download
0
Transcript of The Sarasins' Collection of Historical Sri Lankan Crania
1© 2020 The Anthropological Society of Nippon
IntroductionIn 1883, Swiss naturalists Paul and Fritz Sarasin em-
barked on their first journey to Sri Lanka (then Ceylon) to study an amphibian species, the Ceylon caecilians, and ele-phant embryonic development (Sarasin and Sarasin, 1886, 1893). Their expeditions were privately funded and their associated research for the Museum of Ethnology Basel, Switzerland was conducted on an honorary basis (Schmid, 2012). In their four subsequent expeditions to Sri Lanka (in 1890, 1902, 1907, and 1925), the Sarasins pivoted their at-tention from zoological studies to anthropological research on the Indigenous ‘Vedda’ people of the island. German bio-medical scientist Rudolph Virchow was among the first to recognize the biological links shared by South Asian Indige-nous groups (Virchow, 1886), and it is suggested that his work inspired the Sarasins to conduct detailed studies of the ‘Vedda’ people (Schwidetzky, 1983). In this material report, context is provided for the Sarasins’ collection, as an exam-ple of a skeletal series representing the biological heritage of
those ‘colonized’ from the late 19th and early 20th centuries.Among the data and collections acquired by the Sarasins
were over 400 artifacts, 500 photographs, and the skeletal remains of over 90 individuals affiliated with diverse ethnic groups of Sri Lanka (Sarasin and Sarasin, 1908; Schmid, 2012). Notable among the collection is the large number of crania of the ‘Vedda’ people (since the term ‘Vedda’ has been used in a derogatory sense within Sri Lanka, it is placed within quotation marks in this paper to avoid such pejorative associations). They are more appropriately known as Wan-nila Atto (forest people) or ‘Adivasi’ (original inhabitants) and appear in the literature also spelt as ‘Vanniyaletto,’ ‘Wannilaeto,’ and ‘Wanniya-laeto.’ The ‘Vedda’ people were considered by the Sarasins as a society on the verge of disap-pearance (Sarasin and Sarasin, 1893, 1907). The Sarasins’ collection at Basel comprises the largest single collection of ‘Vedda’ crania curated in a single museum or collection. A smaller, yet notable, number of crania belonging to the Tamil and Sinhala people from several parts of the island are also included in the Sarasins’ collection (Figure 1, Table 1). The main objective of this report is to present craniometric data and assess morphological variation among the ‘Vedda’ and other Sri Lankan ethnic groups using this valuable dataset. The raw data are provided as an online supplementary source to facilitate future studies.
Sri Lankans today are representatives of the original in-habitants of the island and later arrivals, forming a multieth-
Anthropological Science
The Sarasins’ Collection of Historical Sri Lankan CraniaSamanti Kulatilake1*
1Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Mount Royal University, 4825 Mount Royal Gate SW, Calgary, AB, Canada T3E 6K6
Received 20 May 2019; accepted 28 April 2020
Abstract Swiss naturalists Paul and Fritz Sarasin visited Sri Lanka on five occasions. Their later visits were focused on anthropological research on the Indigenous Wannila Atto (‘Vedda’) people and explo-ration of prehistoric settlements in Sri Lanka. Among the Sarasins’ anthropological and archaeological collections are skeletal material of several ethnic groups of Sri Lanka belonging to the 19th and early 20th centuries. This collection is curated at the Natural History Museum of Basel, Switzerland. The ethnolinguistic groups represented in the Sarasins’ collection include the ‘Vedda,’ Tamil, and Sinhala people of Sri Lanka, and it constitutes the largest ‘Vedda’ cranial collection housed at a single institution. The objective of this paper is to compare cranial variation of the Indigenous ‘Vedda’ and other Sri Lan-kan ethnic groups using this important dataset, while publishing the raw craniometric data for further studies. Observations on the dentition show that the Tamil and Sinhala individuals had high incidences of caries and dental abscesses that are typically associated with agriculturalists and that cribra orbitalia associated with iron deficiency was relatively common among all three ethnic groups. Betel quid chew-ing for recreational and cultural purposes, a practice that is widespread even today, had left dark stains on the teeth of many individuals of all groups in the sample. Multivariate statistical analyses on the craniometric data show that there is significant overlap among the three ethnic groups in terms of crani-al shape. These findings underscore the importance of considering the ‘Vedda,’ Tamil, and Sinhala groups from Sri Lanka as closely related, due to gene flow over millennia.
Key words: Sri Lanka, Wannila Atto, Vedda, Tamil, Sinhala
Advance PublicationMaterial Report
* Correspondence to: Samanti Kulatilake, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Mount Royal University, 4825 Mount Royal Gate SW, Calgary, AB, Canada T3E 6K6. E-mail: [email protected] online 8 August 2020 in J-STAGE (www.jstage.jst.go.jp) DOI: 10.1537/ase.200428
S. KULATILAKE2 Anthropological Science
nic, multicultural, and multireligious society. Anthropologi-cal and archaeological studies situate the ‘Vedda’ people as the descendants of the original hunter-gatherer people of Mesolithic Sri Lanka (Tennent, 1860; Kennedy, 1971; Deraniyagala, 1992; Kennedy, 2000; Hawkey, 2002; Kulatilake, 2016). In addition, the biological and cultural relationships between the ‘Veddoid’ people of southern and central India (e.g. Kadar, Chenchu) and the ‘Vedda’ of Sri Lanka have been discussed in the literature (Virchow, 1886; Duckworth, 1894; Kennedy, 2000; Majumder, 2010). The Tamil and Sinhala people, who were later arrivals, now con-stitute the majority of the population in Sri Lanka. Today, the Sinhala ethnic group makes up about 75% of the population, while the Sri Lankan and Indian Tamil ethnic groups togeth-er make up approximately 14% of the population. The ‘Vedda’ people have been acculturated and assimilated to the
mainstream Sinhala and Tamil cultures of the island over the centuries (Spittel, 1950; Wijesekera, 1964; Dharmadasa and Samarasinghe, 1990; de Silva and Punchihewa, 2011; Attanapola and Lund, 2013). Although there are no reliable data, people who self-identify as ‘Vedda’ today, would ac-count for less than 1% of the national population.
Several reports on the Sarasins’ collection exist. These include the multivolume original reports by the Sarasins (Sarasin and Sarasin, 1893), where they describe the physi-cal anthropology of the ‘Vedda,’ Tamil, and Sinhala groups. They used several existing methods to develop a graphing system on cranial variation (Sarasin and Sarasin, 1893: 124–150), the so-called ‘Sarasinian cranial curves’ (Schmid, 2012). Duckworth (1894) cited several measures and cranial indices reported by the Sarasins on ‘Vedda’ and Tamil crania to describe two crania collected from Nagyr, in present-day Pakistan. Hill published two studies on the ‘Vedda’ people’s biological traits (Hill, 1932, 1941) that referred to the Sarasins’ collection. The craniometric data published by Hill are primarily based on collections held in Great Britain, such as the Duckworth collection in Cambridge, and his focus was on the anthropometry and somatometry of the living ‘Vedda’ people of his time (Hill, 1941). Reports that refer-ence the Sarasins’ collection published in the 1970s include those by Kennedy (1971) and Kaufmann (1977). Kennedy enumerated the collection of ‘Vedda’ skeletal remains in the Sarasins’ collection in Basel and provided context for the collection, while referring to other collections of ‘Vedda’ skeletal material curated in several countries (Sri Lanka, Great Britain, Ireland, Germany, Australia, and India). How-ever, some of the collections and/or specimens are reported as missing from the repositories or were destroyed during the Second World War (e.g. the collection of the Royal Col-lege of Surgeons, London). An unpublished report by Bul-beck and colleagues notes the relevance of the Basel collec-tion in their exploration of human migrations to Australasia (personal communication). Other studies have used cranio-metric data on ‘Vedda’ skeletal material housed in Great Britain and Sri Lanka (Warusawithana-Kulatilake, 1996; Kulatilake, 2000; Stock et al., 2007), but do not include the Sarasins’ collection at Basel. Apart from the original de-scriptions provided by the collectors (Sarasin and Sarasin, 1893), the crania of the Tamil and Sinhala people in this collection have received little to no attention in early ac-counts, due to a focus on the Indigenous ‘Vedda’ people. This report is the first to provide data on the Tamil and Sinhala groups in the Sarasins’ collection, along with the ‘Vedda’ data. Craniometric data published on this collection by the Sarasins (1893) and Kaufmann (1977) include a smaller set of measurements. Furthermore, systematic re-cording following the techniques and methods of Howells (1973) was not previously undertaken. Therefore, this report is the first to provide detailed cranial measurements that can be replicated and compared with other datasets of global samples. Results from univariate and multivariate statistical analyses are also presented.
Materials and MethodsThe catalogue of materials of the Sarasins’ collection cu-
Table 1. The Sarasins’ collection: sample of observed adult crania from Sri Lanka by ethnic group
Ethnic group Male Female Total‘Vedda’ 22 19 41Tamil 14 10 24Sinhala 12 6 18Sinhala/Tamil 2 0 2
Figure 1. Map of locations in Sri Lanka where skeletal remains were collected by the Sarasins. (Map credits: Pam MacQuarrie.)
SARASINS’ COLLECTION OF HISTORICAL SRI LANKAN CRANIA 3
rated at the Natural History Museum of Basel (Naturhistor-isches Museum Basel) identifies a total of 98 individuals from the ‘Vedda,’ Tamil, and Sinhala ethnic groups (Fig-ure 2). The catalogue refers to fetuses and other skeletal ele-ments besides crania that are not reported in the present study. A total of 85 adult crania were observed (Table 1).
In the Sarasins’ collection, the ‘Vedda’ remains identified were mainly from inland forested regions and coastal areas in the eastern parts of the island in the Uva and Eastern prov-inces (see Figure 1). Of the 44 ‘Vedda’ individuals listed in the catalogue, only 41 were observed. The Natural History Museum of Basel housed 40 of these, while one skull was at the Ethnology Museum Basel (Museum der Kulturen). The individuals designated as Tamil included 24 observable cra-nia, whereas five Tamil individuals listed were not observed during this study. The Sarasins’ collection also included 18 crania of the Sinhalese ethnic group. Two crania in the col-lection were denoted as either Tamil or Sinhala. These were not included in the analysis. Sexing was performed by stand-ard osteological methods (Buikstra and Ubelaker, 1994). Many of the crania were associated with data sheets record-ed by the collectors. Overall, the majority of crania were complete and relatively well preserved.
The acquisition of craniometric data was based upon the methods described by Howells (1973). A battery of 49 crani-al measurements was used to acquire data on complete cra-nia. Standard osteometric techniques and tools were em-ployed. All measurements were recorded to the nearest millimetre. Measures of interobserver and intraobserver er-ror were found to be acceptable (Warusawithana-Kulatilake, 1996; Kulatilake, 2000). Due to preservation issues, the number of crania available for osteometry (Appendix) does not necessarily correspond to those listed in Table 1. All statistical procedures were conducted using the SPSS pro-gram.
To assess the nutritional/health status of the individuals in this skeletal series, the incidences of cribra orbitalia, dental enamel hypoplasia (DEH), caries, and dental abscesses were
examined. Standard osteological and dental observational methods were followed when making these assessments (Buikstra and Ubelaker, 1994; Bass, 2005; White et al., 2011).
ResultsA conventional exploration of cranial size and indices is
presented in Table 2. A high degree of size-based sexual di-morphism was observed within each of the ethnic groups. Therefore, male and female crania were considered sepa-rately in the analyses. The ‘Vedda’ crania were generally smaller than Tamil and Sinhala crania. There is a significant difference in male cranial size between the three groups [F(2,44) = 8.60, P = 0.001] and the male crania of the ‘Ved-da’ are significantly smaller than those of Tamil and Sinhala (P = 0.002 and 0.018, respectively). Univariate exploration of cranial indices showed that there were no significant dif-ferences when comparing the three ethnic groups. They were commonly dolichocranic, had high cranial vaults in relation to cranial breadth, with average facial and nasal breadth (Table 2).
A principal components analysis (PCA) using the Z-scores on all raw measurements was conducted to offer a more re-fined perspective on cranial shape. Due to the small sample sizes, the female crania were excluded from this analysis. The first four components explain approximately 52% of the total variation. PC 1 (24.3%) has high loadings on variables related to cranial and facial size (e.g. glabello-occipital length (GOL), basion–bregma height (BBH), bijugal breadth (JUB)) as well as variables that encode cranial height and facial projection from the Frankfort horizontal plane (e.g. vertex radius (VRR), prosthion radius (PRR)) (Table 3). PC 2 (11.0%) has high loadings on upper facial and cranial breadth dimensions such as interorbital breadth (EKB), bi-zygomatic breadth (ZYB), and biasterionic breadth (ASB). PC 3 (9.3%) expresses a focus on the upper facial region and parietal dimensions. Here, negative loadings on nasion–
Figure 2. Crania of males from the Sarasins’ collection: ‘Vedda’ (left), Tamil (centre), and Sinhala (right).
S. KULATILAKE4 Anthropological Science
prosthion height (NPH), indicating shorter upper facial re-gions, are discerned along with broader interorbital breadth (DKB). Cranial length variables (e.g. GOL and nasio- occipital length (NOL)) receive high loadings in PC 4 (7.3%). Other notable variables that include higher loadings in PC 4 are orbit height (OBH) and variables associated with the occipital bone. Maximum cranial breadth (XCB) receives negative loadings on PC 4.
Figure 3 shows scatter plots of the PC scores. When PC 1 and PC 2 are plotted (left), the Sinhala and Tamil groups cluster in the upper quadrants, with high loadings on cranial size-related variables (e.g. GOL, BBH, NOL), whereas the ‘Vedda’ crania scatter primarily in the lower quadrants, de-picting smaller sizes. In the scatterplots of PC 2 and PC3 (centre) and PC 2 with PC 4 (right), much overlap is ob-served. Overall, high degrees of cranial shape similarities are observed between the three ethnic groups.
The frequencies of selected pathologies (Figure 4) are presented in Table 4. Cribra orbitalia was highly prevalent (>54%) and commonly observed among individuals from all three ethnic groups (χ2 = 4.37, df = 2, P = 0.113). DEH was less obvious upon visual inspection. Although the Sinhala group shows a higher value, the difference is statistically insignificant (χ2 = 5.12, df = 2, P = 0.077). The Sinhala sam-ples showed higher incidences of caries (χ2 = 16.98, df = 2, P < 0.0001) compared to the ‘Vedda’ and Tamil, while den-tal abscesses were more prevalent among both Tamil and Sinhala samples (χ2 = 7.31, df = 2, P < 0.05) compared to the ‘Vedda’ individuals. A large number of individuals with-in the ‘Vedda,’ Tamil, and Sinhala ethnic groups had dark stains on the teeth associated with betel quid chewing (Fig-ure 4).
DiscussionThis study highlights the metrics and observations on the
historical cranial series of several ethnic groups from Sri Lanka, within the Sarasins’ collection in Basel, Switzerland. The majority of skeletal material in this collection is attrib-uted to the Indigenous Wannila Atto or ‘Vedda’ people. Cra-
nial remains identified as belonging to Tamil and Sinhala individuals comprise the remainder of this collection.
In this study the conventional cranial indices and the PCA of craniometric variables indicate that the ‘Vedda,’ Tamil and Sinhala people share a similar cranial shape. Early stud-ies of the ‘Vedda’’ have characterized these South Asian in-digenes as possessing ‘Australoid’ morphological traits, quite different from later migrants to the region (e.g. South Indian Tamil), who were thought to have ‘Caucasoid’ traits (Hill, 1941; Stoudt, 1961). The characteristic shape of a ‘Vedda’ cranium has been described as ‘dolichocranic’ or ‘hyperdolichocranic,’ with broad facial regions (Hill, 1941). However, the dolichocranic nature of the ‘Vedda’ cranium is not a characteristic that distinguishes it from other popula-tions of the subcontinent (Kulatilake, 2000; this study).
The Sarasins considered the ‘Vedda’ primarily from a bi-ological perspective (but see Streumer, 1997). The pheno-type of the ‘Vedda’ was thought to be different from other Sri Lankan groups (Sarasin and Sarasin, 1893). This view has persisted in the popular literature and collective imagination. However, anthropomorphic, dental, and genetic studies show only minor differences between the ‘Vedda,’ Tamil, and Sinhala people (Stoudt, 1961; Hawkey, 2002; Peiris et al., 2011; Ranaweera et al., 2014). These groups shared a common gene pool throughout prehistoric and historic times, and today no clearly discerned boundaries exist, mor-phologically (Kennedy, 1971; Bowles, 1977; Kulatilake, 2000; Kulatilake and Hotz, 2017), genetically (Ranasinghe et al., 2015), or linguistically (Dharmadasa, 1974; Brow, 1978; Dharmadasa and Samarasinghe, 1990). This study on the Sarasins’ collection of Sri Lankan crania further demon-strates that the ‘Vedda’ are not different from the other Sri Lankan groups based on their cranial morphology. However, ‘Vedda’ crania have been considered to be generally smaller in size compared to those of other ethnic groups of Sri Lan-ka, possibly due to encountering higher levels of environ-mental stress (Kennedy, 2000; Kulatilake, 2000).
Classical and molecular genetic studies show that the Sin-hala and Tamil people of Sri Lanka share strong biological links with each other; and are less connected to their ances-
Table 2. Cranial size and indices of the ‘Vedda,’ Tamil, and Sinhala
Vedda Tamil SinhalaMale Female Male Female Male Female
Mean SD N Mean SD N Mean SD N Mean SD N Mean SD N Mean SD NCranial global size (GOL + XCB + BBH)/3 146.3 2.6 21 139.2 4.0 15 150.2 3.0 14 144.03 3.1 10 149.5 3.4 12 141.0 4.2 5
Cranial index (XCB/GOL × 100) 71.7 4.1 22 71.8 4.1 16 71.0 3.2 14 72.5 4.1 10 73.4 3.4 12 73.1 1.5 5
Height–length index (BBH/GOL × 100) 73.7 2.9 21 74.1 2.8 15 73.2 2.5 14 73.9 2.9 10 74.2 2.9 12 75.1 2.5 5
Height–breadth index (BBH/XCB × 100) 103.2 5.9 21 103.4 3.8 15 103.3 5.4 14 102.1 6.1 10 101.3 5.3 12 102.7 2.3 5
Upper facial index (NPH/ZYB × 100) 48.4 3.2 21 50.2 3.0 12 51.0 2.5 14 52.7 2.9 10 50.7 3.1 11 51.4 2.1 5
Nasal index (NLB/NLH) 53.1 6.4 21 51.8 3.7 12 52.5 3.6 14 52.4 4.2 10 51.0 4.9 12 50.1 6.1 5
See Appendix for abbreviations.
SARASINS’ COLLECTION OF HISTORICAL SRI LANKAN CRANIA 5
tral groups in mainland South Asia, the Ancestral North Indians and Ancestral South Indians, respectively (Kshatriya, 1995; Moorjani et al., 2013; Ranaweera et al., 2014; Liu et al., 2017). For instance, Sri Lankan Tamils are more closely genetically related to the Sinhalese than they are to Indian
Table 3. Loadings matrix of the first four principal components extracted for the males’ Z-scores (‘Vedda,’ Tamil, and Sinhala)
Variable (Z-score)
Component1 2 3 4
GOL 0.6 –0.4 0.2 0.5NOL 0.6 –0.4 0.2 0.5BNL 0.7 –0.2 –0.3 0.1BPL 0.7 0.0 –0.3 –0.3XCB 0.4 0.4 0.1 –0.4BBH 0.5 –0.3 0.4 0.0STB 0.4 0.4 0.3 –0.3XFB 0.3 0.4 0.3 –0.3FMB 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.1AUB 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0ZYB 0.4 0.7 0.2 –0.1NPH 0.5 0.3 –0.5 0.1NLH 0.4 0.1 –0.3 0.4NLB 0.2 –0.1 0.4 0.1WNB 0.4 0.1 0.3 –0.2OBH –0.1 0.3 –0.1 0.5OBB 0.2 0.6 –0.3 0.4JUB 0.6 0.5 0.1 0.0EKB 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.3DKB 0.4 0.2 0.5 0.1IML 0.3 0.4 –0.2 –0.1XML 0.4 0.4 –0.3 –0.1WMH 0.4 0.2 –0.2 –0.1MDH –0.3 0.2 –0.1 0.2MDB 0.4 0.5 0.1 0.3ZMB 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.2WCB 0.3 0.2 0.1 –0.1ASB 0.2 0.5 –0.1 0.0MAB 0.4 0.4 –0.2 –0.1FOL –0.2 0.2 –0.2 0.1FRC 0.4 –0.3 0.2 0.2FRF 0.3 0.0 0.4 0.2FRS 0.0 –0.5 0.2 0.1PAC 0.3 –0.3 0.7 0.0PAF 0.0 0.0 0.6 –0.1PAS 0.3 –0.2 0.7 –0.3OCC 0.3 –0.1 –0.1 0.5OCF –0.1 0.0 0.0 0.6OCS 0.1 –0.3 –0.1 0.7VRR 0.7 –0.2 0.4 0.1NAR 0.8 –0.2 –0.1 0.1SSR 0.9 –0.3 –0.2 –0.1PRR 0.8 –0.2 –0.3 –0.2DKR 0.6 –0.3 –0.2 0.0ZOR 0.8 –0.2 –0.2 –0.1FMR 0.6 –0.4 –0.3 –0.2EKR 0.7 –0.4 –0.2 –0.3ZMR 0.7 –0.3 –0.2 –0.3AVR 0.7 –0.3 –0.3 –0.2
Bold type indicates loadings with absolute values ≥0.5. See Appen-dix for abbreviations.
Figure 3. Scatterplots of PCA on craniometric data (males): PC 1 and 2 (left), PC 2 and 3 (centre) and PC 2 and 4 (right).
S. KULATILAKE6 Anthropological Science
Tamils (Kshatriya, 1995; Ranasinghe et al., 2015). The uni-variate and multivariate statistical results from this study of crania indicate that there are no significant differences be-tween the Tamil and Sinhala ethnic groups of Sri Lanka. Although elements of linguistic, cultural, and religious di-versity may differentiate these two groups, it is futile to draw biological divisions between them.
The pathological conditions observed within this sample of cranial and dental remains offer insights into diet and dis-ease among these groups. A high incidence of cribra orbita-lia, typically representative of iron-deficiency anemia, was commonly observed among all ethnic groups in the sample. Observations on dental pathologies indicated that the Tamil and Sinhala groups had high incidences of caries and dental abscesses. The high reliance on rice as a starchy staple food among the Tamil and Sinhala people has been documented archaeologically and in historic sources (Knox, 1681; Parker, 1909; Deraniyagala, 1992). The incidence of dental caries and abscesses among the Tamil and Sinhala people repre-sented in this skeletal series reflects the global pattern of poor dental health typically associated with high- carbohydrate diets of settled agriculturalists (Smith, 1984). In contrast, the ‘Vedda’ people in the collection had signifi-cantly lower levels of caries and dental abscesses. Many ‘Vedda’ individuals in this sample may have subsisted on a more varied, cariostatic diet. Following a stable-isotope analysis of ‘Vedda’ skeletal material housed in Great Britain, Roberts et al. (2018) highlighted the continued dependence on tropical forest foraging for subsistence among historic ‘Vedda’ people of the 19th and early 20th centuries.
A large number of individuals in the Sarasins’ collection had betel quid stains on their teeth. In Sri Lanka, betel quid chewing is common among many rural and urban popula-tions (de Silva and Punchihewa, 2011). Betel quid consists of betel leaves (Piper betle), areca nut (Areca catechu), which is a psychoactive substance, and lime (aqueous calci-
um hydroxide paste). Dried tobacco leaves are sometimes added to form the quid. In the Sarasins’ skeletal samples from Sri Lanka’s historic times, there were no apparent dif-ferences in dark stains associated with betel quid chewing between males and females and between members of the different ethnic groups.
This study presents a hitherto unexplored craniometric dataset. This dataset, included as an online supplement, will be useful to conduct comparative craniometric studies on global populations (Howells, 1973; Pietrusewsky, 2019). Culturally or biologically affiliated descendants are increas-ingly showing an interest in scientific studies of their ances-tors represented in skeletal collections (Turnbull, 2016; Roberts et al., 2018; Wright et al., 2018). Future collabora-tions can provide the scientific community with an opportu-nity to develop community engagement and a level of trust in the care and study of ancestral human remains.
AcknowledgmentsI have been privileged to study the collection of skeletal
remains of Sri Lankan people, part of my own biological heritage. Funding for this research was received from a Mount Royal University, Faculty of Arts Endeavour Fund Grant. I gratefully acknowledge the permission and access to the skeletal collection and facilities at the Natural History Museum of Basel and Basel Ethnological Museum, which provide respectful guardianship and care for the collection. I thank Dr. Gerhard Hotz, curator of the collections, for his enthusiastic support and assistance. This paper stems from my study at Basel (2015) and an exploratory poster (2017). I thank Liselotte Mayer and the Basel museums’ staff for their support and assistance. I am grateful to Pam MacQuarrie for constructing the map of Sri Lanka on ArcGIS. I thank the journal editors and anonymous reviewers for valuable in-sights and comments that helped strengthen this paper.
Table 4. Observed pathology of ‘Vedda,’ Sinhala, and Tamil crania and dentition
Ethnic groupCribra orbitalia Caries Dental abscesses Dental enamel hypoplasia
n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%)Vedda (n = 38) 25 (65.8) 10 (41.7) 10 (26.3) 5 (13.2)Tamil (n = 24) 13 (54.2) 8 (33.3) 13 (54.2) 4 (16.7)Sinhala (n = 15) 13 (86.7) 13 (86.7) 9 (60.0) 6 (40.0)
Figure 4. Pathologies and observations: cribra orbitalia and periostitis (left), dental caries (centre), and betel quid stains on the teeth (right).
SARASINS’ COLLECTION OF HISTORICAL SRI LANKAN CRANIA 7
ReferencesAttanapola C.T. and Lund R. (2013) Contested identities of indige-
nous people: indigenization or integration of the Veddas in Sri Lanka. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 34: 172–187.
Bass W.M. (2005) Human Osteology: A Laboratory and Field Man-ual, 5th edn. Missouri Archaeological Society, Springfield.
Bowles G. (1977). The People of Asia. Scribner, New York.Brow J. (1978) Vedda Village of Anuradhapura: The Historical
Anthropology of a Community in Sri Lanka. University of Washington Press, Seattle, WA.
Buikstra J.E. and Ubelaker D.H. (1994) Standards for Data Collec-tion from Human Skeletal Remains. Arkansas Archaeological Survey, Fayetteville.
de Silva P. and Punchihewa A. (2011) Socio-Anthropological Re-search Project on Vedda Community in Sri Lanka. Department of Sociology, University of Colombo, Colombo.
Deraniyagala S.U. (1992) The Prehistory of Sri Lanka: An Ecolog-ical Perspective, Vols I and II. Department of Archaeological Survey, Colombo.
Dharmadasa K.N.O. (1974) The Creolization of an aboriginal lan-guage: The case of Vedda in Sri Lanka (Ceylon). Anthropo-logical Linguistics, 16: 79–106.
Dharmadasa K.N.O. and Samarasinghe S.W.R.d.A. (1990) The Vanishing Aborigines: Sri Lanka’s Veddas in Transition. Inter-national Centre for Ethnic Studies in association with NORAD and Vikas Publishing House, New Delhi.
Duckworth W.L. (1894) Description of two skulls from Nagyr. Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 23: 121–134.
Hawkey D.E. (2002) The peopling of South Asia: evidence for af-finities and microevolution of prehistoric populations of India and Sri Lankaa. Spolia Zeylanica, 39: 1–300.
Hill W.C.O. (1932) Anthropology of Veddahs. Nature, 130: 891–892.
Hill W.C.O. (1941) The physical anthropology of the existing Ved-das in Ceylon Part I. Ceylon Journal of Science, 3: 37–38.
Howells W.W. (1973) Papers of the Peabody Museum of Archaeol-ogy and Ethnology, Vol. 67: Cranial Variation in Man: A Study by Multivariate Analysis of Patterns of Difference among Recent Human Populations. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
Kaufmann B. (1977) Osteometrische Neubearbeitung der Sarasin-schen Weddasammlung des Basler Natur-historischen Muse-ums. Homo, 28: 21–35.
Kennedy K.A.R. (1971) The concept of the Vedda phenotypic pat-tern: a critical analysis of research on the osteological connec-tions of a remnant populations. Spolia Zeylanica, 32: 25–60.
Kennedy K.A.R. (2000) God-Apes and Fossil Men: Paleoanthro-pology of South Asia. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
Knox R. (1681) An Historical Relation of the Island of Ceylon in the East-indies. Richard Chiswell, London.
Kshatriya G.K. (1995) Genetic affinities of Sri Lankan populations. Human Biology, 67: 843–866.
Kulatilake S.D.W. (2000) Cranial diversity and the evolutionary history of South Asians. PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge.
Kulatilake S. (2016) The peopling of Sri Lanka from prehistoric to historic times. In: Schug G. R. and Walimbe S. R. (eds.), A Companion to South Asia in the Past. John Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, pp. 426–436.
Kulatilake S. and Hotz G. (2017). The Sarasins’ collection of Sri Lankan skeletal material. In: Canadian Association for Physi-cal Anthropology Forty-fifth Annual Meeting. Edmonton, p. 38.
Liu X., Lu D., Saw W.Y., Shaw P.J., Wangkumhang P., et al. (2017) Characterising private and shared signatures of positive selec-tion in 37 Asian populations. European Journal of Human
Genetics, 25: 499–508.Majumder P.P. (2010) The human genetic history of South Asia.
Current Biology, 20: R184–R187.Moorjani P., Thangaraj K., Patterson N., Lipson M., Loh P.R., et al.
(2013) Genetic evidence for recent population mixture in India. American Journal of Human Genetics, 93: 422–438.
Parker H. (1909) Ancient Ceylon: An Account of the Aborigines and a Part of the Early Civilisation. Luzac and Co., London.
Peiris H.R.D., Arambawatta A.K.S., Hewapathirana T.N., Nanayakkara C.D., Chandrasekara M., and Wickramanayake E. (2011) Nonmetric tooth crown traits in a Sri Lankan aborig-inal Vedda population. Homo, 62: 466–477.
Pietrusewsky M. (2019) Traditional morphometrics and biological distance: methods and an example. In: Katzenberg M.A. and Grauer A.L. (eds.), Biological Anthropology of the Human Skeleton, 3rd edn. John Wiley, New York, pp. 547–592.
Ranasinghe R., Tennekoon K.H., Karunanayake E.H., Lembring M., and Allen M. (2015) A study of genetic polymorphisms in mitochondrial DNA hypervariable regions I and II of the five major ethnic groups and Vedda population in Sri Lanka. Legal Medicine, 17: 539–546.
Ranaweera L., Kaewsutthi S., Win Tun A., Boonyarit H., Poolsuwan S., and Lertrit P. (2014) Mitochondrial DNA history of Sri Lankan ethnic people: their relations within the island and with the Indian subcontinental populations. Journal of Human Genetics, 59: 28–36.
Roberts P., Gillingwater T.H., Lahr M.M., Lee-Thorp J., MacCallum M., et al. (2018) Historical Tropical forest reliance amongst the Wanniyalaeto (Vedda) of Sri Lanka: an isotopic perspec-tive. Human Ecology, 46: 435–444.
Sarasin F. and Sarasin P. (1886) Outline of two years’ scientific re-searches in Ceylon. Journal of the Ceylon Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland, 9: 289–305.
Sarasin P. and Sarasin F. (1893) Ergebnisse naturwissenschaftlicher Forschungen auf Ceylon, Vol. 3: Die Weddas von Ceylon und Die Sie Umgebenden Volkerschaften. C.W. Kreidel’s Verlag, Wiesbaden [in German].
Sarasin P. and Sarasin F. (1907) Stone implements in Vedda caves. Spolia Zeylanica, 4: 188–190.
Sarasin P. and Sarasin F. (1908) Ergebnisse Naturwissenschaftlich-er Forschungen auf Ceylon, Vol. 4: Die Steinzeitlauf Ceylon [Results of Natural History Research in Ceylon, Vol. 4: The Stone Age of Ceylon]. C.W. Kreidel’s Verlag, Wiesbaden [in German].
Schmid A. (2012) The five Sri Lanka (Ceylon) expeditions, 1883–1925, Paul and Fritz Sarasin: measuring, collecting, and doing research. In: Fierz G. and Hughes S. (eds.), Expeditions—The World in a Suitcase. Museum der Kulturen Basel, pp. 4–9.
Schwidetzky I. (1983) Short history of Indian–German relations in physical anthropology. Anthropologischer Anzeiger, 41: 85–92.
Smith B.H. (1984) Patterns of molar wear in hunter-gatherers and agriculturalists. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 63: 39–56.
Spittel R.L. (1950) Vanished Trails: The Last of the Veddas. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Stock, J.T., Lahr M.M., and Kulatilake S. (2007) Cranial diversity in South Asia relative to modern human dispersals and global patterns of human variation. In: Petraglia M.D. and Allchin, B. (eds.), The Evolution and History of Human Populations in South Asia. Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 245–268.
Stoudt H.W. (1961) Ceylon National Museum’s Ethnographic Se-ries Publication No. 2: The Physical Anthropology of Ceylon. The Colombo Museum, Colombo.
Streumer P. (1997) The leaf-clad Vedda: an European contribution to Sri Lankan folk-lore. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Sri Lanka, 42: 59–78.
Tennent J.E. (1860) Ceylon: An Account of the Island—Physical, Historical and Topographical. Longman: London.
Turnbull P. (2016) Managing and mapping the history of collecting
S. KULATILAKE8 Anthropological Science
indigenous human remains. Australian Library Journal, 65: 203–212.
Virchow R. (1886) The Vẹddá’s of Ceylon and their relation to the neighboring tribes. Journal of the Ceylon Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, 9: 349–495.
Warusawithana-Kulatilake S. (1996) Cranial Variation and the Dis-persal of Modern Humans in South Asia. Tharanjee Prints, Colombo.
White T.D., Black M.T., and Folkens P.A. (2011) Human Osteolo-gy, 3rd edn. Elsevier/Academic Press, Amsterdam.
Wijesekera N.D. (1964) Veddas in Transition. M.D. Gunasena, Colombo.
Wright J.L., Wasef S., Heupink T.H., Westaway M.C., Rasmussen S., et al. (2018) Ancient nuclear genomes enable repatriation of Indigenous human remains. Science Advances, 4: eaau5064.
SARASINS’ COLLECTION OF HISTORICAL SRI LANKAN CRANIA 9A
ppen
dix.
D
escr
iptiv
e st
atis
tics o
n th
e cr
ania
l dim
ensi
ons (
mm
) of t
he ‘V
edda
,’ Ta
mil,
and
Sin
hala
adu
lt cr
ania
‘Ved
da’
Tam
ilSi
nhal
aM
ale
Fem
ale
Mal
eFe
mal
eM
ale
Fem
ale
Mea
nN
SDM
ean
NSD
Mea
nN
SDM
ean
NSD
Mea
nN
SDM
ean
NSD
Cra
nial
leng
th a
nd b
read
th re
late
dG
OL
glab
ello
-occ
ipita
l len
gth
178.
922
5.0
170.
016
7.1
184.
514
4.7
175.
410
5.6
181.
1712
5.5
170.
405
5.2
NO
Lna
sio-
occi
pita
l len
gth
175.
722
4.8
167.
315
6.8
180.
814
4.9
172.
910
5.6
178.
0012
5.4
168.
405
5.0
XC
Bm
axim
um c
rani
al b
read
th12
8.0
224.
612
1.9
164.
813
1.0
145.
012
7.1
105.
213
2.83
124.
112
4.60
54.
4A
UB
biau
ricul
ar b
read
th11
2.3
213.
810
4.1
165.
711
5.6
145.
611
0.9
105.
411
5.17
122.
910
8.60
53.
4A
SBbi
aste
rioni
c br
eadt
h10
2.3
223.
797
.116
5.6
103.
114
4.5
101.
410
4.5
103.
0012
4.0
97.6
05
2.6
XFB
max
imum
fron
tal b
read
th10
9.3
224.
210
4.2
164.
711
0.3
144.
410
7.2
102.
311
3.92
127.
510
5.40
54.
4FM
Bbi
fron
tal b
read
th96
.721
4.6
91.0
164.
598
.314
3.6
93.8
103.
398
.50
123.
393
.40
51.
5ST
Bbi
step
hani
c br
eadt
h10
5.5
225.
110
1.4
164.
710
6.5
144.
810
4.5
102.
810
9.25
125.
310
3.00
54.
3W
CB
min
imum
cra
nial
bre
adth
20.8
202.
318
.914
1.5
21.2
141.
820
.410
2.3
21.5
012
1.2
19.8
05
1.5
Cra
nial
hei
ght r
elat
edB
BH
basi
on–b
regm
a he
ight
131.
921
5.4
125.
815
2.5
135.
114
4.4
129.
610
5.2
134.
4212
5.9
128.
005
4.6
VR
Rve
rtex
radi
us12
2.3
215.
511
7.9
153.
712
6.6
143.
812
2.3
103.
912
6.42
124.
312
1.80
53.
3Fa
cial
pro
ject
ion
rela
ted
BN
Lba
sion
–nas
ion
leng
th97
.321
4.8
92.5
153.
610
1.8
143.
197
.510
4.0
102.
7512
3.2
95.4
05
2.9
BPL
basi
on–p
rost
hion
leng
th92
.621
4.3
87.7
123.
398
.014
4.1
95.2
105.
998
.83
124.
693
.40
53.
5N
AR
nasi
on ra
dius
95.4
214.
291
.415
4.0
98.2
142.
893
.410
3.8
101.
0812
3.3
94.0
05
1.6
SSR
subs
pina
le ra
dius
94.6
214.
089
.012
3.7
98.4
143.
393
.510
4.3
100.
0012
4.2
94.6
05
2.3
PRR
pros
thio
n ra
dius
99.5
214.
593
.812
4.3
103.
814
3.3
98.7
105.
010
5.25
124.
699
.20
53.
3D
KR
dacr
yon
radi
us85
.221
3.7
82.1
154.
287
.514
4.2
83.6
104.
389
.83
123.
384
.40
53.
8ZO
Rzy
goor
bita
le ra
dius
81.0
213.
476
.414
2.9
82.8
142.
980
.310
2.4
85.7
512
3.6
82.4
05
3.4
FMR
fron
tom
alar
e ra
dius
78.5
213.
675
.915
2.7
79.6
143.
177
.310
2.7
81.0
012
3.7
78.6
05
2.7
EKR
ecto
conc
hion
radi
us70
.721
3.0
68.1
142.
772
.614
3.0
70.3
102.
174
.92
123.
771
.80
52.
8ZM
Rzy
gom
axill
are
radi
us72
.021
3.1
67.8
132.
972
.714
2.6
69.5
103.
275
.83
124.
272
.00
52.
1AV
RM
1 al
veol
us ra
dius
78.1
214.
771
.813
3.4
79.6
143.
277
.910
3.0
82.1
712
5.5
77.0
05
4.2
Faci
al b
read
th re
late
dEK
Bbi
orbi
tal b
read
th94
.820
3.7
90.0
144.
495
.414
3.6
92.1
103.
395
.17
123.
387
.60
59.
0D
KB
inte
rorb
ital b
read
th21
.021
2.6
19.7
152.
021
.714
3.0
20.3
103.
021
.33
123.
520
.60
52.
6O
BB
orbi
t bre
adth
left
39.0
212.
037
.214
2.1
38.9
141.
337
.310
1.8
39.3
312
1.8
36.8
05
0.8
IML
mal
ar le
ngth
infe
rior
33.9
212.
929
.313
2.1
33.9
142.
932
.010
2.4
35.6
712
3.2
32.0
05
2.9
XM
Lm
alar
leng
th m
axim
um49
.221
4.2
43.1
132.
451
.314
2.9
48.1
101.
952
.00
123.
848
.60
52.
1N
LBna
sal b
read
th25
.221
2.4
23.0
121.
125
.214
1.8
24.5
101.
224
.75
121.
822
.80
52.
6W
NB
sim
otic
cho
rd8.
820
2.5
8.7
141.
28.
714
2.1
9.6
101.
69.
3312
2.1
9.60
51.
7M
AB
pala
te b
read
th59
.721
2.7
55.5
133.
061
.914
4.4
57.7
102.
861
.83
122.
557
.80
51.
3ZM
Bbi
max
illar
y br
eadt
h92
.721
4.6
88.0
126.
195
.914
4.3
91.4
104.
195
.18
115.
188
.60
53.
0ZY
Bbi
zygo
mat
ic b
read
th12
4.5
214.
111
3.5
136.
012
4.9
144.
911
8.9
104.
712
5.55
113.
811
6.00
53.
5JU
Bbi
juga
l bre
adth
109.
320
4.6
101.
014
4.3
111.
514
2.5
104.
510
3.4
110.
6411
3.7
102.
405
1.5
S. KULATILAKE10 Anthropological Science
App
endi
x.
(con
tinue
d)
‘Ved
da’
Tam
ilSi
nhal
aM
ale
Fem
ale
Mal
eFe
mal
eM
ale
Fem
ale
Mea
nN
SDM
ean
NSD
Mea
nN
SDM
ean
NSD
Mea
nN
SDM
ean
NSD
Faci
al h
eigh
t rel
ated
OB
Hor
bit h
eigh
t lef
t33
.521
2.3
32.6
142.
232
.514
1.5
31.5
102.
031
.58
121.
431
.00
51.
2N
PHna
sion
–pro
sthi
on h
eigh
t60
.321
4.1
56.9
124.
763
.614
3.0
62.6
103.
263
.58
124.
759
.60
52.
3N
LHna
sal h
eigh
t47
.821
3.2
44.5
122.
848
.114
3.0
46.9
102.
248
.75
123.
045
.60
52.
9W
MH
chee
k he
ight
20.6
212.
518
.213
2.7
20.5
142.
220
.110
1.6
20.6
712
1.6
19.0
05
2.0
Oth
erM
DH
mas
toid
hei
ght
29.2
213.
323
.816
2.9
27.8
142.
025
.610
2.9
28.6
712
1.9
23.6
05
3.8
MD
Bm
asto
id b
read
th20
.121
3.8
15.9
162.
520
.914
2.9
19.9
102.
821
.33
122.
118
.20
53.
3FO
Lfo
ram
en m
agnu
m le
ngth
36.9
202.
633
.315
2.7
35.3
141.
834
.710
1.3
35.3
312
3.0
34.4
05
2.5
Cho
rds,
frac
tions
, and
subt
ense
sFR
Cna
sion
–bre
gma
chor
d11
0.5
213.
510
6.9
152.
611
2.9
14.0
4.8
105.
610
4.7
111.
9212
3.3
104.
605
3.9
FRF
nasi
on–b
regm
a fr
actio
n50
.621
7.8
42.3
158.
051
.214
.06.
646
.410
4.6
51.6
712
4.6
46.6
05
4.9
FRS
nasi
on–b
regm
a su
bten
se27
.021
2.9
27.1
152.
426
.814
.02.
525
.410
2.5
25.7
512
2.5
26.4
05
2.1
PAC
breg
ma–
lam
bda
chor
d11
4.0
215.
710
8.9
166.
611
7.2
14.0
5.6
110.
010
5.8
115.
0812
9.7
106.
205
3.1
PAF
breg
ma–
lam
bda
frac
tion
59.2
214.
855
.015
7.0
59.4
14.0
6.8
57.4
105.
158
.75
124.
157
.80
55.
0PA
Sbr
egm
a–la
mbd
a su
bten
se25
.621
3.1
25.0
154.
226
.714
.03.
724
.410
2.7
26.1
712
4.0
22.8
05
2.4
OC
Cla
mbd
a–op
isth
ion
chor
d91
.921
5.2
88.3
157.
693
.414
.06.
493
.010
5.4
92.0
812
6.3
91.4
05
5.9
OC
Fla
mbd
a–op
isth
ion
frac
tion
48.5
218.
141
.715
7.8
46.5
14.0
9.4
43.6
107.
045
.00
124.
746
.60
56.
7O
CS
lam
bda–
opis
thio
n su
bten
se24
.621
2.4
23.0
153.
325
.114
.03.
925
.010
4.1
23.0
812
4.5
24.8
05
3.2