The diversity of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae within and between herds using pulsed-field gel...
Transcript of The diversity of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae within and between herds using pulsed-field gel...
www.elsevier.com/locate/vetmic
Veterinary Microbiology 109 (2005) 29–36
The diversity of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae within and
between herds using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis
Tim Stakenborg a,*, Jo Vicca b, Patrick Butaye a, Dominiek Maes b,Johan Peeters a, Aart de Kruif b, Freddy Haesebrouck b
a Veterinary and Agrochemical Research Centre, Groeselenberg 99, 1180 Brussels, Belgiumb Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium
Received 23 December 2004; received in revised form 9 May 2005; accepted 12 May 2005
Abstract
Over the years, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) has been proven a robust technique to type isolates with a high
resolution and a good reproducibility. In this study, a PFGE protocol is described for the typing of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae
isolates. The potential of this technique was demonstrated by comparing M. hyopneumoniae isolates obtained from the same as
well as from different herds. The use of two different restriction enzymes, SalI and ApaI, was evaluated. For each enzyme, the
resulting restriction profiles were clustered using the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic means (UPGMA). For both
obtained dendrograms, the included isolates of the related M. flocculare species clustered separately from all M. hyopneumoniae
isolates, forming the root of the dendrograms. The PFGE patterns of the M. hyopneumoniae isolates of different herds were
highly diverse and clustered differently in both dendrograms, illustrated by a Pearson’s correlation coefficient of only 0.33. A
much higher similarity was observed with isolates originating from different pigs of a same herd. The PFGE patterns of these
isolates always clustered according to their herd and this for both dendrograms. In conclusion, the results indicate a closer
relationship of M. hyopneumoniae isolates within a herd compared to isolates from different herds and this for both restriction
enzymes used. Since the described PFGE technique was shown to be highly discriminative and reproducible, it will be a helpful
tool to further elucidate the epidemiology of M. hyopneumoniae.
# 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: PFGE; M. hyopneumoniae; Molecular epidemiology; Typing
1. Introduction
Respiratory diseases are of major concern for pig
herds all over the world. Typically, Mycoplasma
hyopneumoniae plays an essential role and makes
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +32 2 3790437; fax: +32 2 3790690.
E-mail address: [email protected] (T. Stakenborg).
0378-1135/$ – see front matter # 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved
doi:10.1016/j.vetmic.2005.05.005
the host more vulnerable to infections with
secondary pathogens (Done, 1991). Depending on
the herd, the symptoms may remain subclinical or
steer towards a severe porcine respiratory disease
complex. Herd management and housing conditions
are crucial (Maes et al., 1996), but also the virulence
of the isolate is not to be neglected (Vicca et al.,
2003).
.
T. Stakenborg et al. / Veterinary Microbiology 109 (2005) 29–3630
Apart from virulence, differences between M.
hyopneumoniae isolates were already demonstrated at
antigenic level (Ro and Ross, 1983). At least in part,
these differences are the result of an isolate-specific
post-translational cleavage, as was shown for the P97
adhesin (Djordjevic et al., 2004). Also at genomic
level, M. hyopneumoniae isolates turn out to be very
heterogeneous. A remarkably high variety of isolates
was observed using AFLP (Kokotovic et al., 1999),
RAPD (Artiushin and Minion, 1996), field inversion
gel electrophoresis (Frey et al., 1992) or sequence
analysis of single genes (Wilton et al., 1998). Further
information on the typing of M. hyopneumoniae is
very sparsely available and epidemiological data on
the spreading of the disease are mainly obtained by
clinical observations, the detection of serum anti-
bodies or demonstration of the organism by nested
PCR on nasal swabs (Goodwin, 1985; Hege et al.,
2002; Vicca et al., 2002). Direct contact with infected
animals was shown to be a major risk factor (Morris
et al., 1995), but also transmission by air from other
herds or transport vehicles can (re)infect herds
originally free of M. hyopneumoniae (Goodwin,
1985; Hege et al., 2002; Rautiainen and Wallgren,
2001). Despite these studies, the routes of infection are
not always clear (Maes et al., 2000) and the spreading
of individual clones has not been examined in detail
owing to the limited number of isolates available and
the difficulty to standardize currently described
molecular typing techniques. RAPD generally lacks
interlaboratory reproducibility (Penner et al., 1993),
while the high number of fragments generated during
AFLP, usually of different intensities, complicates
data processing (Hong and Chuah, 2003). Multi-locus
sequence typing was shown to be a highly discrimi-
native and reproducible technique, but has not been
described for M. hyopneumoniae and is still too
expensive for small or medium-sized laboratories
(Olive and Bean, 1999). Therefore, pulsed-field gel
electrophoresis (PFGE), also with high discriminatory
power and interlaboratory reproducibility, remains a
method of choice for the typing of many bacteria
(Tenover et al., 1995; van Belkum et al., 1998).
Although most commonly used to monitor outbreaks,
PFGE also allows to examine chronic infections in
order to better understand transmission patterns
(Struelens et al., 2001). Therefore, in this study, a
PFGE protocol was optimised and used to compare
M. hyopneumoniae isolates obtained within a herd as
well as from different herds.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Strains and growth conditions
The J-reference strain (National Collection of Type
Cultures (NCTC) 10110), the USA 232 reference strain
(Minion et al., 2004), two Danish field isolates and a
total of 35 M. hyopneumoniae isolates, originating from
21 different Belgian and two different Lithuanian herds,
were used (Figs. 1 and 2). For both Lithuanian and for
eight Belgian herds, isolates from two to three different
pigs within the same herd were included. The isolates
are indicated using the following format: ‘F1.2A’,
where F1 represents the number of the herd, 2 indicates
the number of the pig and A is an arbitrary letter
representing the strain. Isolates originating from
Lithuania received the prefix LH, the Danish isolates
the prefix DK.
The 232 reference strain was received from the
College of Veterinary Medicine (Iowa State University,
USA), while the Danish strains were kindly provided
by the Danish Veterinary Institute (Copenhagen,
Denmark). All Belgian and Lithuanian field strains
were isolated from lungs of pigs at slaughter with
typical M. hyopneumoniae lesions and positive during
immunofluorescence (Kobisch et al., 1978). The
isolation was performed in broth medium according
to Friis (1975) and the identity of the isolates was
confirmed by means of a multiplex-PCR (Stakenborg
et al., in press). For PFGE analysis, the isolates were
cultivated in 40 ml Friis’ medium (Kobisch and Friis,
1996) at 37 8C for at least five days to the end of the
exponential or beginning of the stationary growth
phase. The virulence of eight isolates has been
determined in experimentally inoculated pigs. Isolates
F7.2C and DK Mp143 were of high virulence, isolate
F12.6A was moderately virulent and isolates F1.12A,
F5.6A, F9.8K, the J-strain and F13.7B were of low
virulence (Vicca et al., 2003). The M. flocculare Ms42
reference strain (NCTC 10143) and five Belgian M.
flocculare field isolates were also included and served
as an outgroup during clustering. The Salmonella
enterica serovar Braenderup reference strain H9812
was used as a size marker as proposed by PulseNet
T. Stakenborg et al. / Veterinary Microbiology 109 (2005) 29–36 31
Fig. 1. PFGE patterns of chromosomal DNA of M. hyopneumoniae and M. flocculare isolates restricted with ApaI. Cluster analysis was
performed with UPGMA using the Dice coefficient and a tolerance and optimisation level of 0.8%. Bands below 18 kbp were omitted for
analysis.
(Swaminathan et al., 2001; Hunter et al., 2005) and was
grown overnight at 37 8C on Columbia agar with 5%
ovine blood (Oxoid, UK).
2.2. PFGE
The isolates were harvested by centrifugation at
3000 � g for 15 min. The supernatant was placed in a
new sterile Falcon tube (BD Biosciences, NJ, USA)
and centrifuged a second time using the same
conditions. Both pellets were pooled in 2 ml washing
buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl, 10 mM EDTA, 25% (w/v)
glucose, pH 7.3) and centrifuged at 13000 � g for
5 min. The washed pellets were resuspended in 800 ml
resuspension buffer (75 mM NaCl, 25 mM EDTA, pH
7.3) and the optical density at 610 nm (OD610) was
determined. The bacterial suspension was adjusted to
an OD610 of 1.8 and 200 ml of this suspension was
T. Stakenborg et al. / Veterinary Microbiology 109 (2005) 29–3632
Fig. 2. PFGE patterns of chromosomal DNA of M. hyopneumoniae and M. flocculare isolates restricted with SalI. Cluster analysis was performed
with UPGMA using the Dice coefficient and a tolerance and optimisation level of 0.8%. Bands below 18 kbp were omitted for analysis.
mixed with an equal volume of 1% Seakem Gold agar
(Cambrex Bio Science, ME, USA) at 56 8C and
poured into Plexiglas molds (Bio-Rad, CA, USA) to
set into blocks (5 mm � 2 mm � 10 mm). The blocks
were hardened at 4 8C during 10 min followed by lysis
of the mycoplasma cells using 2 ml freshly prepared
lysis buffer (50 mM EDTA, 1% N-lauroyl-sarcoside,
0.1 mg/ml proteınase K, 10 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.0) for
18 h at 50 8C. Afterwards, the agarose blocks were
washed three times during 15 min with distilled water,
followed by three washing steps using sterile washing
buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl, 10 mM EDTA, pH 7.3).
Next, plugs were equilibrated during 15 min in 1�restriction buffer (delivered with the enzyme).
Subsequently, the DNA in the plugs was digested
using restriction buffer containing 30 units of ApaI
(Roche, Switzerland) or SalI (MBI Fermentas,
Lithuania) during 4 h at 37 8C. Before electrophoresis,
the plugs were rinsed with Tris-borate–EDTA (TBE
0.5�, 45 mM Tris-borate, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0) and
T. Stakenborg et al. / Veterinary Microbiology 109 (2005) 29–36 33
loaded in a 1% Seakem Gold agarose (Cambrex Bio
Science). Electrophoresis was performed for 18 h
under a constant temperature of 14 8C at 6 V/cm and
with a linear switch time rampage from 0.5 to 8.5 s
(CHEF Mapper, Bio-Rad). Salmonella Braenderup
plugs were prepared by the same protocol, but were
restricted with XbaI (Roche). Agarose gels were
stained with ethidium bromide and after destaining in
water for 30 min, the DNA fragments were visualized
using a Genegenius gel documentation system
(Westburg, The Netherlands).
2.3. Data analysis and clustering
The digital images were imported in the Bionu-
merics software (V3.5, Applied Maths, Belgium) and
bands were marked after standardization using the
Salmonella Braenderup restriction fragments. Calcu-
lation of similarity coefficients was performed using
the Dice algorithm. The unweighted pair group
method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) was used
for clustering. In order to attain a complete match
between strains analysed in duplicate, the band
position tolerance and optimisation were set to
0.8% and bands smaller than 18 kbp were omitted.
The observed PFGE patterns of strain 232 were
compared with the fragments determined in silico
based on its genome sequence (Minion et al., 2004).
The Pearson’s correlation coefficient was calculated
by comparing the Dice similarity coefficient matrices of
both restriction enzymes. In addition to the dendrograms
obtained for both restriction enzymes separately, a
cluster analysis on the average of both separate
dendrograms was calculated using BioNumerics, giving
both independent analyses the same equal weight.
The typeability of the PFGE technique for both
restriction enzymes was determined. To calculate the
discriminatory power, the Simpson’s index was used
(Hunter and Gaston, 1988) with and without including
multiple M. hyopneumoniae isolates originating from
a single farm.
3. Results
The described PFGE protocol resulted in clear
restriction fragments ranging from 18 to 250 kbp
(SalI) or 300 kbp (ApaI). Nicely separated bands were
obtained for the M. hyopneumoniae and the M.
flocculare isolates, for both restriction enzymes used
(Figs. 1 and 2). The Salmonella Braenderup strain
suited perfectly as a marker since well separated
bands, spanning the entire size-range, were obvious
after restriction with XbaI using the same protocol
(data not shown). For one M. hyopneumoniae isolate,
F20.1G, no profile could be obtained after restriction
with ApaI, resulting in a typeability of 97%, compared
to 100% for restriction with SalI. A clear, apparent
band was visible on top of the gel (data not shown),
representing the unrestricted genomic DNA. All other
restriction patterns were clustered for each restriction
enzyme using the UPGMA algorithm.
For strain 232 most restriction fragments deter-
mined in silico were observed on gel as well, although
three fragments differed in size. After restriction with
ApaI, the calculated band of 190 kbp appeared larger
on gel, while the calculated band of 171 kbp was
considerably smaller. After restriction with SalI, the in
silico determined band of 90 kbp was only about half
its size on gel.
The Simpson’s index of diversity gave for both
restriction enzymes a discrimination index of 0.997
provided that isolates from the same farm were
considered related and were not taken into account.
When all M. hyopneumoniae isolates were included,
the discrimination index was still as high as 0.990 for
SalI and 0.983 for ApaI.
All M. flocculare isolates included in this study
clustered together, separately from the M. hyopneu-
moniae isolates (lower than 40% similarity). Only
when six or more isolates were used, the M. flocculare
PFGE patterns formed the root of the tree (see Figs. 1
and 2). Whenever less M. flocculare PFGE patterns
were used, they clustered together, but in-between the
M. hyopneumoniae isolates (data not shown).
A high variety between the PFGE patterns of M.
hyopneumoniae isolates, originating from different
herds, was observed for both restriction enzymes used.
Only the isolates from herd 21 and 23 showed
identical profiles. With the exception of these latter
two isolates and F18.2A and F4.2C after restriction
with ApaI, isolates derived from different farms
showed less than 80% similarity. Clustering of the
highly diverse PFGE patterns generated largely
different dendrograms for both restriction enzymes
used. In other words, isolates showing a high
T. Stakenborg et al. / Veterinary Microbiology 109 (2005) 29–3634
similarity based on ApaI results, may differ largely for
the SalI restriction patterns, and vice versa. A weak,
but still positive, association between the similarity
coefficients for SalI and ApaI was calculated
(Pearson’s correlation coefficient = 0.33).
For the nine isolates tested in an experimental
infection model, no linkage between virulence and
PFGE patterns was observed. Neither did isolates of
the same geographical origin cluster together.
Conversely, PFGE patterns of isolates that were
obtained from different pigs originating from the same
herd clustered together. This was the case for all
isolates analysed and was apparent in both dendro-
grams. With the exception of isolates of herd 19 for
restriction with SalI and Lithuanian herd 3 after
restriction with ApaI, isolates derived from the same
farm showed over 80% similarity. The isolates of herd
15, herd 17 and Lithuanian herd 1 had identical PFGE
profiles for both enzymes used. Isolates of herd 11, 14
and 16 on the other hand had identical profiles for one
restriction enzyme, but small differences were
observed using the second restriction enzyme. The
multiple isolates of the other herds showed small
differences in their PFGE profiles for both enzymes
used.
4. Discussion
The validity of PFGE for molecular typing is well
established (Maule, 1998; Struelens et al., 2001) and
its high discriminatory power and reproducibility
was also apparent in this study. Moreover, the PFGE
protocol optimised for M. hyopneumoniae was
shown useful for the typing of M. flocculare isolates
as well. This was to be expected since both species
are highly related for both their biochemical
and serological characteristics (Kobisch and Friis,
1996; Stemke et al., 1992). Another porcine
mycoplasma, M. hyorhinis, is less related and initial
tests showed indeed that the PFGE protocol using
SalI or ApaI was not useful for the latter species (data
not shown).
An enormous heterogeneity between the studied M.
hyopneumoniae isolates originating from different
herds was observed. These findings are in agreement
with earlier findings obtained by RAPD (Artiushin and
Minion, 1996) and AFLP (Kokotovic et al., 1999). On
the other hand, PFGE patterns of M. hyopneumoniae
isolates originating from a single herd showed more
similarity compared to isolates from different herds.
Many strains from the same herd showed even
identical PFGE patterns, while for the other isolates
small differences were observed. These differences,
together with the high heterogeneity of strains in
general, indicate significant genome plasticity. This is
further substantiated by the comparison of PFGE
results and in silico generated data for strain 232.
These observed differences can be explained by a
single chromosomal inversion event (from 93–96 to
357–361 kbp). Also for the J-reference strain, geno-
mic differences have been reported after in vitro
passages (Frey et al., 1992). On the other hand, the
similarity of PFGE patterns of strains originating from
a single farm does not automatically imply that these
isolates are related, since PFGE is not suited to depict
phylogenetic trees (Davis et al., 2003; Struelens et al.,
2001; Tenover et al., 1995). A recent report on PFGE
of Escherichia coli isolates concluded that in the
absence of other data, six or more restriction patterns
may be needed to estimate the relatedness of isolates
(Davis et al., 2003). This is in agreement with our
calculation of the Pearson’s correlation coefficient,
which was indeed very low. However, both enzymes
show the same trend, namely isolates from the same
herd cluster together. Also, combining the two
enzymes in one single cluster-analysis, showed similar
results (data not shown). Although all isolates were
obtained from slaughter pigs and no relation to the age
of the pig can be made, these results strongly suggest
that isolates from a single herd are derived from only
one or a few ancestral clones.
It is still not known whether these observed genomic
differences are linked to phenotypical differences.
Many reports already demonstrated isolate-dependent
antigenic variations in Mycoplasma species (Bhugra
et al., 1995; Noormohammadi et al., 1997; Rosengarten
et al., 1993; Roske et al., 2001) and also for M.
hyopneumoniae, differences in surface antigens (Wise
and Kim, 1987) and lipid content (Chen et al., 1992)
have been reported. If our PFGE results are indeed
linked to differences on the proteonomic level, these
data may explain why vaccination, although normally
beneficial, often leads to an incomplete protection that
may vary between different herds (Morrow et al., 1994;
Maes et al., 1999).
T. Stakenborg et al. / Veterinary Microbiology 109 (2005) 29–36 35
Although PFGE patterns were similar within a herd,
an enormous variety between isolates was even visible
for isolates originating from a limited geographical
region. These observations are in contrast with an
earlier report where five Swiss strains seemed more
homogenous than five from other origins (Frey et al.,
1992). Probably, more clones of different countries
need to be investigated before definite conclusions can
be made. The same report suggested a possible link
between field inversion gel electrophoresis patterns and
virulence (Frey et al., 1992), but again this could not be
confirmed with our data.
5. Conclusion
In conclusion, the PFGE profiles of M. hyopneumo-
niae isolates originating from different herds were very
diverse, compared to the limited heterogeneity seen
within a herd. Further research may be needed to sustain
these data and to further elucidate the distribution,
stability and persistence of M. hyopneumoniae clones.
The proposed PFGE protocol proved a very useful and
reproducible tool to perform these studies.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by a grant of the Federal
Service of Public Health, Food Chain Safety and
Environment (Grant number S-6136).
The authors thank Veronique Collet and Sara
Tistaert for skilful technical assistance and Annelies
Pil for the numerous inspiring discussions.
References
Artiushin, S., Minion, F.C., 1996. Arbitrarily primed PCR analysis
of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae field isolates demonstrates
genetic heterogeneity. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 46, 324–328.
Bhugra, B., Voelker, L.L., Zou, N., Yu, H., Dybvig, K., 1995.
Mechanism of antigenic variation in Mycoplasma pulmonis:
interwoven, site-specific DNA inversions. Mol. Microbiol. 18,
703–714.
Chen, J.W., Zhang, L., Song, J., Hwang, F., Dong, Q., Liu, J., Qian,
Y., 1992. Comparative analysis of glycoprotein and glycolipid
composition of virulent and avirulent strain membranes of
Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae. Curr. Microbiol. 24, 189–192.
Davis, M.A., Hancock, D.D., Besser, T.E., Call, D.R., 2003. Evalua-
tion of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis as a tool for determining
the degree of genetic relatedness between isolates of Escherichia
coli O157:H7. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41, 1843–1849.
Djordjevic, S.P., Cordwell, S.J., Djordjevic, M.A., Wilton, J.,
Minion, F.C., 2004. Proteolytic processing of the Mycoplasma
hyopneumoniae cilium adhesin. Infect. Immun. 72, 2791–2802.
Done, S.H., 1991. Environmental factors affecting the severity of
pneumonia in pigs. Vet. Rec. 128, 582–586.
Frey, J., Haldimann, A., Nicolet, J., 1992. Chromosomal hetero-
geneity of various Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae field isolates.
Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 42, 275–280.
Friis, N.F., 1975. Some recommendations concerning primary iso-
lation of Mycoplasma suipneumoniae and Mycoplasma floccu-
lare a survey. Nord. Vet. Med. 27, 337–339.
Goodwin, R.F., 1985. Apparent reinfection of enzootic-pneumonia-
free pig herds: search for possible causes. Vet. Rec. 116, 690–
694.
Hege, R., Zimmermann, W., Scheidegger, R., Stark, K.D., 2002.
Incidence of reinfections with Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and
Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae in pig herds located in respira-
tory-disease-free regions of Switzerland—identification and
quantification of risk factors. Acta Vet. Scand. 43, 145–156.
Hong, Y., Chuah, A., 2003. A format for databasing and comparison
of AFLP fingerprint profiles. BMC Bioinform. 4, 7.
Hunter, P.R., Gaston, M.A., 1988. Numerical index of the discri-
minatory ability of typing systems: an application of Simpson’s
index of diversity. J. Clin. Microbiol. 26, 2465–2466.
Hunter, S.B., Vauterin, P., Lambert-Fair, M.A., Van Duyne, M.S.,
Kubota, K., Graves, L., Wrigley, D., Barrett, T., Ribot, E., 2005.
Establishment of a universal size standard strain for use with the
PulseNet standardized pulsed-field gel electrophoresis proto-
cols: converting the national databases to the new size standard.
J. Clin. Microbiol. 43, 1045–1050.
Kobisch, M., Tillon, J., Vannier, P., Magneur, S., Morvan, P., 1978.
Pneumonie enzootique a Mycoplasma suipneumoniae chez le
porc: diagnostic rapide et recherches d’anticorps. Rec. Med. Vet.
Alfort. 154, 847–852.
Kobisch, M., Friis, N.F., 1996. Swine mycoplasmoses. Rev. Sci.
Technol. 15, 1569–1605.
Kokotovic, B., Friis, N.F., Jensen, J.S., Ahrens, P., 1999. Amplified-
fragment length polymorphism fingerprinting of Mycoplasma
species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37, 3300–3307.
Maes, D., Deluyker, H., Verdonck, M., Castryck, F., Miry, C.,
Vrijens, B., Verbeke, W., Viaene, J., de Kruif, A., 1999. Effect
of vaccination against Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae in pig herds
with an all-in/all-out production system. Vaccine 17, 1024–
1034.
Maes, D., Verdonck, M., de Kruif, A., 2000. Enzootische pneumonie
bij varkens. Deel I: De ziekte (in Dutch) Tijdschr. Diergeneeskd.
69, 94–100.
Maes, D., Verdonck, M., Deluyker, H., de Kruif, A., 1996. Enzootic
pneumonia in pigs. Vet. Q. 18, 104–109.
Maule, J., 1998. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Mol. Biotechnol. 9,
107–126.
Minion, F.C., Lefkowitz, E.J., Madsen, M.L., Cleary, B.J., Swartzell,
S.M., Mahairas, G.G., 2004. The genome sequence of Myco-
T. Stakenborg et al. / Veterinary Microbiology 109 (2005) 29–3636
plasma hyopneumoniae strain 232, the agent of swine myco-
plasmosis. J. Bacteriol. 186, 7123–7133.
Morris, C.R., Gardner, I.A., Hietala, S.K., Carpenter, T.E., Ander-
son, R.J., Parker, K.M., 1995. Seroepidemiologic study of
natural transmission of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae in a swine
herd. Prev. Vet. Med. 21, 323–337.
Morrow, W., Iglesias, G., Stanislaw, C., Stephenson, A., Erickson,
G., 1994. Effect of a mycoplasma vaccine on average daily gain
in swine. J. Swine Health Prod. 2, 13–18.
Noormohammadi, A.H., Markham, P.F., Whithear, K.G., Walker,
I.D., Gurevich, V.A., Ley, D.H., Browning, G.F., 1997. Myco-
plasma synoviae has two distinct phase-variable major mem-
brane antigens, one of which is a putative hemagglutinin. Infect.
Immun. 65, 2542–2547.
Olive, D.M., Bean, P., 1999. Principles and applications of methods
for DNA-based typing of microbial organisms. J. Clin. Micro-
biol. 37, 1661–1669.
Penner, G.A., Bush, A., Wise, R., Kim, W., Domier, L., Kasha, K.,
Laroche, A., Scoles, G., Molnar, S.J., Fedak, G., 1993. Repro-
ducibility of random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD)
analysis among laboratories. PCR Methods Appl. 2, 341–345.
Rautiainen, E., Wallgren, P., 2001. Aspects of the transmission of
protection against Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae from sow to
offspring. J. Vet. Med. B. Infect. Dis. Vet. Public Health 48,
55–65.
Ro, L.H., Ross, R.F., 1983. Comparison of Mycoplasma hyopneu-
moniae isolates by serologic methods. Am. J. Vet. Res. 44,
2087–2094.
Rosengarten, R., Theiss, P.M., Yogev, D., Wise, K.S., 1993. Anti-
genic variation in Mycoplasma hyorhinis: increased repertoire of
variable lipoproteins expanding surface diversity and structural
complexity. Infect. Immun. 61, 2224–2228.
Roske, K., Blanchard, A., Chambaud, I., Citti, C., Helbig, J.H.,
Prevost, M.C., Rosengarten, R., Jacobs, E., 2001. Phase variation
among major surface antigens of Mycoplasma penetrans. Infect.
Immun. 69, 7642–7651.
Stakenborg, T., Vicca, J., Butaye, P., Imberechts, H., Peeters, J., de
Kruif, A., Haesebrouck, F., Maes, D. A multiplex PCR to
identify porcine mycoplasmas present in broth cultures. Vet.
Res. Comm., in press.
Stemke, G.W., Laigret, F., Grau, O., Bove, J.M., 1992. Phylogenetic
relationships of three porcine mycoplasmas, Mycoplasma
hyopneumoniae, Mycoplasma flocculare, and Mycoplasma
hyorhinis, and complete 16S rRNA sequence of M. flocculare.
Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 42, 220–225.
Struelens, M.J., De Ryck, R., Deplano, A., 2001. Analysis of
microbial genomic macrorestriction patterns by pulsed-
field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) typing. In: Dijkshoorn, L.,
Towner, K.J., Struelens, M. (Eds.), New Approaches for the
Generation and Analysis of Microbial Typing Data. Elsevier
B.V., Amsterdam, pp. 159–176.
Swaminathan, B., Barrett, T.J., Hunter, S.B., Tauxe, R.V., 2001.
PulseNet: the molecular subtyping network for foodborne bac-
terial disease surveillance, United States. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 7,
382–389.
Tenover, F.C., Arbeit, R.D., Goering, R.V., Mickelsen, P.A., Murray,
B.E., Persing, D.H., Swaminathan, B., 1995. Interpreting chro-
mosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel
electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial isolate typing. J. Clin.
Microbiol. 33, 2233–2239.
van Belkum, A., van Leeuwen, W., Kaufmann, M.E., Cookson, B.,
Forey, F., Etienne, J., Goering, R., Tenover, F., Steward, C.,
O’Brien, F., Grubb, W., Tassios, P., Legakis, N., Morvan, A., El
Solh, N., de Ryck, R., Struelens, M., Salmenlinna, S., Vuopio-
Varkila, J., Kooistra, M., Talens, A., Witte, W., Verbrugh, H.,
1998. Assessment of resolution and intercenter reproducibility
of results of genotyping Staphylococcus aureus by pulsed-field
gel electrophoresis of SmaI macrorestriction fragments: a multi-
center study. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36, 1653–1659.
Vicca, J., Maes, D., Thermote, L., Peeters, J., Haesebrouck, F., de
Kruif, A., 2002. Patterns of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae infec-
tions in Belgian farrow-to-finish pig herds with diverging dis-
ease-course. J. Vet. Med. B. Infect. Dis. Vet. Public Health. 49,
349–353.
Vicca, J., Stakenborg, T., Maes, D., Butaye, P., Peeters, J., de Kruif,
A., Haesebrouck, F., 2003. Evaluation of virulence of Myco-
plasma hyopneumoniae field isolates. Vet. Microbiol. 97, 177–
190.
Wilton, J.L., Scarman, A.L., Walker, M.J., Djordjevic, S.P., 1998.
Reiterated repeat region variability in the ciliary adhesin gene of
Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae. Microbiology 144, 1931–1943.
Wise, K.S., Kim, M.F., 1987. Major membrane surface proteins of
Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae selectively modified by covalently
bound lipid. J. Bacteriol. 169, 5546–5555.