Efforts of Affordable Housing Supply Models-Futile or Worthwhile?
THE CITY OF CALGARY'S AFFORDABLE HOUSING ...
-
Upload
khangminh22 -
Category
Documents
-
view
7 -
download
0
Transcript of THE CITY OF CALGARY'S AFFORDABLE HOUSING ...
V04
The City’s Vision
2
Increased Housing Supply
Non-market housing supply sufficient
to provide homes to a minimum of
6% of households in Calgary,
consistent with the national average.
In 2016, meeting this standard would
require 15,000 new units.
A transformed housing system in
Calgary, where collaboration between
stakeholders drives better
outcomes for individuals and
communities through safe,
affordable housing solutions.
Improved Housing System
19% earning below $60,000
and overspending
453,626HOUSEHOLDS
3% in non-market
housing
78% served
by the private market
CIP Conference 2017
V04
The City’s Strategy
3
1. Get the Calgary community building
2. Leverage City land
3. Strengthen intergovernmental partnerships
4. Improve the housing system
5. Regenerate City-owned properties
6. Design and build new City units
A new strategic direction through six key objectives:
CIP Conference 2017
V04
1. Get the Calgary Community Building
4
Support housing developers to get new homes in the ground for those in need.
• ALL QUALIFYING AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECTS THROUGH
APPROVAL PROCESS WITHIN 6 MONTHS, 80% OF THE TIME
• 1,500 UNITS SUPPORTED BY CITY PROGRAMSCIP Conference 2017
V04
2. Leverage City Land
5
Provide City land to contribute to affordable housing development.
• 10 PARCELS OF CITY LAND SOLD AT BELOW-MARKET
VALUE
CIP Conference 2017
V04
3. Strengthen Intergovernmental Partnerships
6
Recommend solutions to the federal and provincial governments.
• PARTICIPATION IN 3 SIGNIFICANT INTERGOVERNMENTAL
PROJECTS
CIP Conference 2017
V04
4. Improve the Housing System
7
Leverage research, programs, and partnerships to transform outcomes for people.
.
• 5 PROGRAMS TO IMPROVE OUTCOMES FOR TENANTS
DELIVERED
CIP Conference 2017
V04
5. Regenerate City-owned Properties
8
Lead strategic reinvestment to preserve homes for the highest-need residents.
• REDEVELOPMENT INITIATED FOR 3 EXISTING SITES
• 2 BUILDINGS WITH LIFECYCLE IMPROVEMENTS
CIP Conference 2017
V04
6. Design and Build New City Units
9
Model tenant-centered design and placemaking for inclusive communities.
.
CIP Conference 2017
• 160 NEW UNITS DELIVERED
• 110 UNITS IN DEVELOPMENT
V04 15CIP Conference 2017
Future City Shaping –
Greenline
INTEGRATED CIVIC
FACILITIES
Beddington
Quarry Park
V04 16
THANKS
Teresa Goldstein – [email protected]
Jen Arntfield – [email protected]
CIP Conference 2017
Research Collaboration and Resilient Affordable Housing
Gary Barron
Formerly : Research Associate, Westman Centre for Real Estate Studies
Currently: Research Social Planner, City of Calgary
June 19, 2017
Overview
2
• What is research?• Research method/process• University research values• Collaborative housing research• Evaluating research collaboration• Communicating research• Questions
Systematically investigating phenomena to
understand them and contribute to knowledge
Methods are about how we acquire information
Validity and reliability
Can do research with intent:
To develop theory
To intervene in the phenomena (applications)
What is Research?
What is Research?
Not evaluation
Assessment of a program, policy, or practice in relation to desired outcome
Evaluation can use research methods and contribute to research
What is Research?
Not development
“R&D”
Development is applying research derived knowledge to create new technologies, interventions, and so on.
What is Research?
6
Not a panacea
Answers to research questions often lead to more questions
More data and information does not necessarily lead to solutions
Knowing is not equivalent to knowing what to do or how to do it
Research Methods
Methods are political in their design and in their consequences
We can “cheat” by strategically choosing methods to show desired results
For example, by choosing methods that truncate, or cut out information that is inconvenient for us.
Research Process: Have a plan
Research begins with a question
Methods should be chosen based on the question
Some methods are better than others for a particular question
Want to be sure your question does not presuppose an answer or incorporate bias into it
Universities & Research
• Academic Values
Primarily concerned with contributions to knowledge
Applied research often considered “inferior/secondary”
Peer reviewed publication is primary product
All research must submit to ethics review
•Can take months, often only weeks
Collaborative/engaged Research
10
• Gather people with common interests
• Agree upon common values
• Agree upon a common objective
• Organize
• Communicate
• Be patient (Particularly time intensive)
• Share resources
Partners
Non-profit sector Private sectorScholars(Primary Team)
Government
U of CAlain VerbekeRon Kneebone
Katrina MilaneySasha Tsenkova
Jeannette Waegemakers SchiffBarry WylantJessica ShawRebecca Saah
External to U of CFrank Warnock
Veronica WarnockStephen Gaetz
Cameron GrahamEric Weissman
Government of Alberta, Alberta Seniors and
Housing
The City of Calgary, Calgary Housing
Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation
Calgary Housing Affordability Collective
(Alpha House,Attainable Homes,Calgary Homeless
Foundation,Calgary Housing
Company,Federation of Calgary
Communities,Horizon Housing Society,
Immigrant Services Calgary,
InHouse Housing Society,The Mustard Seed,Silvera for Seniors,
United Way,Vibrant Communities
Calgary,YWCA)
Momentum
The Doorway
Boardwalk
Calgary Real Estate Board
Calgary Residential Rental Association
Canadian Home Builders’ Association
Urban Development Institute
Urban Land Institute
Urban Systems
Institutes
Westman Centre for Real Estate Studies
The School of Public Policy
The O’Brien Institute for Public Health
Canadian Observatory on Homelessness
Group for Research with Indigenous Peoples
Alberta Health Services Aboriginal Health Strategic Clinical Network
Financial products, credit, literacy supports
Policies, regulations, governance
Organizations, people, cultures, values, practices
Benefits to society
Housing System Improved
affordability
Overall Benefits of Housing Affordability Research ProgramLevel 1
Benefits
Level 2
Stakeholders
UsersNon-profit & Private-sector
services/developers/builders Government Scholars
Overall Benefits of Housing Affordability Research ProgramLevel 1
Benefits
Level 2
Stakeholders
Level 3
Objectives
criteria
UsersNon-profit & Private-sector
services/developers/builders Government Scholars
Comfort/
security
Timely
accessBalanced
budget
Dignity/
respect
Land
supplyKnowledgePublic
expenditure
Global
recognitionCapital
financing
Timely
approvals/
Regulatory
ease
Standard
waitlist
Credit/
loans
Reduced
housing
problems/
homelessness
Shared
information/
expertise
PartnershipsExternal
grants
Optics
Prov/City
Competitive
advantageClarify
roles/
relsSustainable/
resilient cityRecognize
diversity
Overall Benefits of Housing Affordability Research ProgramLevel 1
Benefits
Level 2
Stakeholders
Level 3
Objectives
criteria
Level 4
Research
Domains
UsersNon-profit & Private-sector
services/developers/builders Government Scholars
Comfort/
security
Timely
accessBalanced
budget
Dignity/
respect
Land
supplyKnowledgePublic
expenditure
Global
recognitionCapital
financing
Timely
approvals/
Regulatory
ease
Standard
waitlist
Credit/
loans
Reduced
housing
problems/
homelessness
Organizations, people,
standards,
practices
Policy and
regulatory
environment
Finance, credit,
and risk
Shared
information/
expertise
PartnershipsExternal
grants
Optics
Prov/City
Competitive
advantageClarify
roles/
relsSustainable/
resilient cityRecognize
diversity
Overall Benefits of Housing Affordability Research ProgramLevel 1
Benefits
Level 2
Stakeholders
Level 3
Objectives
criteria
Level 4
Research
Domains
UsersNon-profit & Private-sector
services/developers/builders Government Scholars
Comfort/
security
Timely
accessBalanced
budget
Dignity/
respect
Land
supplyKnowledgePublic
expenditure
Global
recognitionCapital
financing
Timely
approvals/
Regulatory
ease
Standard
waitlist
Credit/
loans
Reduced
housing
problems/
homelessness
Organizations, people,
standards,
practices
Policy and
regulatory
environment
Finance, credit,
and risk
Level 5
Research
Projects
Shared
information/
expertise
Any number of research projects
PartnershipsExternal
grants
Optics
Prov/City
Competitive
advantageClarify
roles/
relsSustainable/
resilient cityRecognize
diversity
Housing Affordability Collaborative Research Program
Domains
Financial products, credit, literacy supports
Organizations, people, cultures, values, practices
Policies, regulations, governance
What organizations make up the housing system?
How do they relate to one another, influence housing choices of residents, and affect housing affordability in cities?
What are the policies and regulations that structure the housing system?
How do they affect housing market performance and affordability problems?
How do these affect housing affordability?
What are their limitations?
Domains
Financial products, credit, literacy supports
Organizations, people, cultures, values, practices
Policies, regulations, governance
Alain VerbekeRon Kneebone
Sasha TsenkovaJessica Shaw
Frank WarnockVeronica WarnockCameron Graham
Katrina MilaneyJeannette Waegemakers Schiff
Barry WylantRebecca Saah
Stephen GaetzCameron Graham
Eric Weissman
Non-profit sector Private sectorScholars GovernmentInstitutes
Partners
Ho
usi
ng
Aff
ord
abili
ty R
ese
arch
Pro
gram
Ou
tco
mes
Spatialreach
Projectcomplexity
Regional
governance
structure
Vision*
(area within
region)
*For long-term infrastructural/spatial development
Master plan
(number of
projects,
multiple
sites)
Project
(Site
specific)
Local Project
-
Local partner/Tri-council
funding
National Project
-
National/local
partner/Tri-council
funding
Int’l Project
-
Int’l/national/local
partner/Tri-council
funding
Int’l
Project
n
Note: Items made of dotted lines imply a planning hierarchy and additional necessary planning processes on a) project level and/or master plan level in the case of long-term development plans; b) b) on a project level if a master plan already exists
Collaboration
Knowledge Translation Plan Output Examples
Non-profit sector Private sectorScholars Government
Peer reviewed papers
National/int’lScholarly conference
presentations
University specific newsletters
Face-to-face meetings
Tailoredexecutive summaries
White papers
Applied projects
Face-to-face meetings
Tailoredexecutive summaries
White papers
Applied projects
Face-to-face meetings
Tailoredexecutive summaries
White papers
Applied projects
Public
Press releases
Local radio
Newspapers/web articles
News broadcasts
Research Program Conferences/workshops
Website
Gary Barron
Research Social Planner, City of Calgary
Jessica Abt
Director, Westman Centre for Real Estate Studies
Multi-Sectoral Partnerships for Social and Affordable
Housing
Penny Gurstein School of Community and
Regional Planning, UBC
Presented at: CIP Conference, Calgary ALTA
June 19, 2017
The Issues o While the market is building housing it is not building a
full spectrum of housing o Increasing gap between the cost of housing and the
incomes earned by lower and middle class people o Need to re-conceptualize the housing delivery system to
make it equitable and secure for all forms of tenure – tenure neutrality
o Requires a multi-sectoral approach, including all levels of
government, the private for-profit and nonprofit sectors, as well as community involvement n Effective way of producing affordable housing within
limited resources, capacity, and to meet local needs
Crisis in Affordablility o Spending more than 30% of household income
on housing is the conventional threshold for indicating stress related to housing costs n This is one of the factors that place people at
risk of homelessness o Over two fifths of renters and one quarter of
homeowners in the Lower Mainland exceed that threshold
o One-quarter of renters are paying more than 50% of household income on rent
Crisis is beyond people in extreme poverty o In 2016 in Vancouver:
n It took 11.8 times the median household income of $70,500 to afford the median home of $830,100
n A one-bedroom apartment rented for an average of $1,900 per month and a two-bedroom at $3,130
Housing Location by Occupation
o Over half of Metro Vancouver police live south of the Fraser River; 450 live in Langley Township; only 1/10 live in Vancouver
o More than 60% of Metro Vancouver doctors
live in Vancouver and West Vancouver
Crisis of Inclusivity o Lack of affordability impacts the health of
individuals and communities: n A precipitating factor in sprawl and income
segregation n Results in people forced to live in inadequate
housing and paying disproportionate amount of income for housing
o Where are people housed who don’t qualify for social housing but can’t afford market housing? (i.e., service workers, teachers, nurses, policemen, firemen)
What Needs to be Done? Affordable Housing is not just Social Housing o Affordable housing
n Usually rental, that does not cost over 30% of gross income to those whose income is between 60% and 120% of Average Mean Income in a locality
n The % of income spent on housing, that will be deemed affordable, can be higher if it is served by public transit, &/or in a walkable neighbourhood, close to shopping and work, so the household doesn’t need a car
o Workforce housing
n Affordable to those whose income is between 80% and 200% of A.M.I. in a locality
n In the lower ranges that will necessarily be rental housing, but in the mid to higher ranges, it can be owner occupied housing
Definitional Issues o The definitions and criteria for allocation and
eligibility of recipients, governance and management policies, and typologies of housing forms and use, vary widely
o This housing may or may not be managed by
the government, may include rental or ownership (with restrictions on resale), and may be universal or targeted to particular groups.
General Trends Internationally
n Housing for “Intermediate sector” and “key workers” well recognized – the “missing middle”
n History of aspiring for increased Low-Cost Home
Ownership n Increased government spending through a National
Affordable Housing Program (i.e., UK) n Increasing sophistication in shared-equity financing
Cases of Multi-Sectoral Partnerships in BC
o Employer Assisted Housing o Community Land Trusts o Shared Equity Financing
Employee Assisted Housing o Program – rental or homeownership – that
is financed or in some way assisted by an employer
o Most help employees purchase homes, but
they can also provide rental assistance or increase the amount of housing
Whistler Housing Authority , Whistler, BC
n Combination of price restricted ownership units and managed rental units
Community Land Trusts o A non-profit corporation created to
acquire and hold land for the benefit of a community and provide secure affordable access to land and housing for community residents
o Dual ownership structure – land + buildings
The Use of Community Land Trusts (CLT): o Deed Restrictions to Keep Units Affordable in
perpetuity
o Allow Seller the Appreciation in Building Value and Improvements, but Remove Appreciation in Land Value
o Fixed Option to Purchase by CLT on Resale o Specify Class of Qualified Future Buyers
Land Trust Portfolio Project q Will house broad range of Vancouver residents, from the
most vulnerable to those who need affordable housing o Land Trust Foundation given 99-year leases on four City-
owned sites o Foundation is working with co-op and non-profit housing
providers to develop the affordable housing to be operated by the partner
o Non-profit partners have invested $4M of their own equity to the projects + the City’s land contribution + customized mortgage by Vancity + proceeds of the commercial space sale n This equity will ensure that these homes remain
affordable over the long-term
Shared Equity Financing
o Purchaser benefits from lower mortgage
payments in exchange for sharing any appreciation in the value of their home with another party
o When the unit is sold, residents recoup value appreciation of only their share of the unit to ensure long-term affordability
Multiple Non-Profit Housing Providers Working Together – Storeys, Richmond, BC * Gross capital construction costs: $43 million * 129 units in total * A diverse range of low-income tenants - seniors, people with mental health challenges, women fleeing abuse, people recovering from additions, youth, and families * The site also includes community amenities - a gym, social enterprise space and non-profit offices
Turning point
society
Atira Women's Resource Society
Pathways Clubhouse
Canadian Mental Health
Coast Foundation
Society
Tikva Housing Society
S.U.C.C.E.S.S.
City of Richmond
Government of Canada
BC Housing
Non-profit consortium: Each of the non-profit partners will contribute equity to the project, to
a combined total of $1,950,000.
$26,361,021 capital funding and land lease ($6.5 million estimated land value) for 60 years, + technical staff support
construction financing and mortgage
Organizational Framework $1 million funding through the Homelessness Partnership Strategy CPA
Development
Consultants
Strengths and Weaknesses Successes • Combined equity of the non-profits and various
government partners • Collaborative approach that spreads out risk and
increases leadership and commitment from the various actors
Challenges • Complexity of working with multiple agencies with
differing agendas • Uncertainty in the process of trying new
approaches
How to Move Forward o Change in political awareness and cultural thinking -
Only then will there be a reallocation of public and private funds
o Recognize housing as a right – Right for people to be
decently located and housed o Continually reassess the underlying values, attitudes and
myths in our planning policies and housing delivery systems
o Need to ask the right questions including:
Where will our Children live?