Supramolecular Thermotropic Liquid Crystalline Materials with Nematic Mesophase Based on Methylated...
Transcript of Supramolecular Thermotropic Liquid Crystalline Materials with Nematic Mesophase Based on Methylated...
Supramolecular Thermotropic Liquid Crystalline
Materials with Nematic Mesophase Based on
Methylated Hyperbranched Polyethylenimine and
Mesogenic Carboxylic Acida
Yu Chen,1,2 Zhong Shen,2 Lionel Gehringer,2 Holger Frey,*2 Salah-Eddine Stiriba*3
1 Department of Chemistry, Tianjin University, 300072 Tianjin, P.R. China2 Institut fur Organische Chemie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universitat, Duesbergweg 10-14, 55099 Mainz, GermanyFax: (þ49) 6131 3924078; E-mail: [email protected]
3 Instituto de Ciencia Molecular (ICMOL), Universidad de Valencia, Vicent Andres Estelles s/n, Burjassot, 46100 Valencia, SpainFax: (þ34) 96 3543949; E-mail: [email protected]
Received: September 7, 2005; Revised: October 31, 2005; Accepted: November 2, 2005; DOI: 10.1002/marc.200500628
Keywords: dendrimers; hyperbranched; mesogen carboxylic acid; nematic phase; polyethylenimine; SAXS; self-assembly;supramolecular liquid crystal
Introduction
The construction of supramolecular liquid crystalline (LC)
materials from polymeric backbones by self-assembly is a
topic of great interest in supramolecular chemistry.[1] This
is due to the intriguing properties displayed by these
Summary: Supramolecular interaction of fully methylatedhyperbranched polyethylenimines (PEI) with a mesogen-based carboxylic acid, 5-(p-cyanobiphenoxy)pentanoic acid,results in the formation of supramolecular complexesexhibiting thermotropic liquid crystalline (LC) mesophases.In contrast to the common smectic mesophases of mostdendritic LC polymers, nematic LC phases were observed.The complexation of PEI and the mesogen units is due toelectrostatic interaction between the carboxylate groups andthe ammonium end groups of PEI. LC properties wereinvestigated by a combination of differential scanningcalorimetry, polarizing light optical microscopy, and X-raydiffractometry.
Schematic illustration of the supramolecular assembly ofCBPA with PEIMe backbone.
Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2006, 27, 69–75 � 2006 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Communication DOI: 10.1002/marc.200500628 69
a : Supporting information for this article is available at thebottom of the article’s abstract page, which can be accessedfrom the journal’s homepage at http://www.mrc-journal.de, orfrom the author.
materials and potential applications, like the fabrication of
optical data-storage systems and non-linear optical materi-
als. The specific driving forces for the assembly of the LC
components via non-covalent interactions can be hydrogen
bonding,[2] ionic interaction,[3] or coordination complexa-
tion.[4] Compared with the conventional chemical synthesis
of functional supramolecular materials involving the
formation of covalent bonds, the use of self-assembly in
supramolecular chemistry offers several advantages:
straightforward synthetic methodology, convenient isola-
tion of the products, and often a low number of synthetic
steps. In addition, the resulting structures can be capable of
reversible adaptive rearrangement in response to any
changes in their environment (e.g., solvent or temperature).
Avariety of linear polymers has been used as a backbone,
combined with various low molecular compounds to form
supramolecular side-chain LC polymers.[2–4] However,
less progress has been achieved for branched polymer
topologies in supramolecular LC materials.[5] Compared
with linear polymers, dendrimers[6] and hyperbranched
polymers[7] display compact structures and possess lower
viscosity, which may represent an advantage for potential
applications in this field. Recently, Ujiie et al. have report-
ed the complexation of poly(amidoamine) dendrimers
(PAMAM) with primary amino-terminated groups with
alkanoic acids via proton-transfer reaction, affording ionic
LC dendrimers with smectic A phase as well as disordered
hexagonal columnar mesophases.[5a] In the same context,
ionic thermotropic supramolecular dendritic systems with
liquid crystal potential have been prepared by Serrano et al.
using the spontaneous assembly of carboxylic acids at the
surface of amino-terminated PPI as well as in combination
with PAMAM dendrimers.[5c] Furthermore, commercially
available hyperbranched polyethylenimines (PEIs) have
also been complexed with fatty acids,[5b] however, in
analogy to the ionic LC dendrimers, only lamellar meso-
phases were obtained. Very recently, Tsiourvas and fellow-
workers have reported the preparation of supramolecular
LC materials exhibiting smectic A phases, based on the
complexation of pyridinylated hyperbranched polyglycerol
and cholesterol-based carboxylic acids via hydrogen bond-
ing.[5d] However, due to the smectic A phases, the viscosity
of such dendrimers or hyperbranched polymers is usually
high, which is prohibitive for application. One strategy to
overcome this problem would be the use of less viscous
mesomorphic materials displaying nematic mesophases.[8]
In some recent works, we have been able to demonstrate low
solution viscosites for alkyl-substituted hyperbranched
polyglycerols, which is correlated to their compact
structure.[9] To date, only few macromolecular dendritic
architectures, where nematic phases are displayed, have
been reported.[10] Supramolecular thermotropic LC den-
drimers or hyperbranched polymers exhibiting nematic
mesophases have not been described. Here, we report the
formation of nematic mesophases in supramolecular
complexes prepared from the non-covalent interaction of
methylated hyperbranched (PEIMe)s with a mesogen-
based carboxylic acid, namely, 5-(p-cyanobiphenoxy)pen-
tanoic acid (CBPA).
Experimental Part
Materials
Hyperbranched polyethylenimine PEI10K (Mn ¼ 1�104 g �mol�1, Mw=Mn ¼ 2.5, NH2:NH:N¼ 33:40:27), 18-crown-6 (99%) and 40-hydroxy-4-biphenylcarbonitrile (97%)were purchased from Aldrich. PEI1.8K (Mn ¼ 1 800 g �mol�1,Mw=Mn ¼ 1.14, NH2:NH:N¼ 37:35:28) was purchased fromPolysciences, Inc. Aldehyde (37%), methyl-5-bromopentano-ate (97%), and sodium hydroxide (p.a) were purchased fromAcros. Formic acid (98–100%) was obtained from RiedelDe-Haen AG.
Synthesis of 5-(p-cyanobiphenoxy)pentanoic acid (CBPA)
A mixture of 18-crown-6 (0.51 g, 2 mmol), finely groundpotassium carbonate (6.50 g, 47 mmol), 40-hydroxy-4-biphenylcarbonitrile (5.02 g, 25.7 mmol), and methyl-5-bromopentanoate (6.50 g, 33.7 mmol) in acetone (80 ml) wasrefluxed for 16 h under vigorous stirring. The mixture wascooled and filtered. Subsequently, the solution was concen-trated in vacuum and recrystallized from ethanol, yieldingmethyl-5-(p-cyanobiphenoxy)pentanoate as a white solid.Yield: 7.50 g, 24.4 mmol (95%).
1H NMR (CDCl3): d¼ 7.69 (d, 2H, Ar–H), 7.64 (d, 2H,Ar–H), 7.53 (d, 2H, Ar–H), 6.98 (d, 2H, Ar–H), 4.02 (t, 2H,CH2CH2O), 3.69 (s, 3H, COOCH3), 2.37 (t, 2H, CH2CH2-COO), 1.84 (m, 2H, C2CH2O), 1.73 (m, 2H, CH2CH2COO).
This ester (6.3 g, 20 mmol) was added to a sodium hydroxidesolution (100 ml, 3 N). THF was then added until a homo-geneous suspension was formed. The reaction mixture wasstirred at room temperature for 4 d. After hydrolysis comple-tion, the suspension was neutralized with a solution ofhydrochloric acid (5 N) at 0 8C. The crude product wasobtained as a white precipitate, which was filtered off andwashed with diethyl ether and water. The crude materialwas recrystallized from ethanol to yield the pure acid. Yield:3.61 g, 60%.
1H NMR (d6-DMSO): d¼ 12.04 (br s, 1H, CH2COOH),7.86 (d, 2H, Ar–H), 7.82 (d, 2H, Ar–H), 7.68 (d, 2H, Ar–H),7.03 (d, 2H, Ar–H), 4.00 (t, 2H, CH2CH2O), 2.23 (t, 2H,CH2CH2COO), 1.73 (m, 2H, CH2CH2O), 1.56 (m, 2H,CH2CH2COO).
Synthesis of Fully Methylated PEI
A mixture of 40 ml formaldehyde (37%) and 40 ml formic acidwas stirred at room temperature for 1 h; afterwards a solution of2 g of PEI in 10 ml of deionized water was added dropwise. Themixture was gently refluxed overnight at 95 8C. After cooling atroom temperature, the volatile fractions were removed undervacuum. The resulting brown residue was treated with a
70 Y. Chen, Z. Shen, L. Gehringer, H. Frey, S.-E. Stiriba
Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2006, 27, 69–75 www.mrc-journal.de � 2006 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
saturated sodium hydroxide aqueous solution until pH> 10,and subsequently extracted three times with chloroform. Theorganic phase was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate,filtered, and evaporated to yield yellow oil. Then the productwas purified by dialysis against chloroform.
1H NMR (CDCl3): d¼ 2.19 (s, CH3N–), 2.21 (s, CH3N–),2.29–2.62 (br, ––CH2CH2N–).
13C NMR (CDCl3): d¼ 42.8, 42.9, 45.8, 52.9, 53.0, 55.9,56.0, 57.2, 57.5, 57.6–60.
Characterization
1H NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker ARX 300spectrometer, operated at 300 MHz. DSC measurements werecarried out on a Perkin-Elmer 7 series thermal analysis systemin the temperature range �70 to 150 8C at heating rates of10 K �min�1. Melting points are extrapolated to heating rate 0.The melting point of indium (156 8C) was used for calibration.IR spectra were recorded on a Nicolet 5DXC FT-IR spectro-meter. Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) measurements ofthe complex were performed in transmission geometry withBraun Single wire detector (40 kV and 30 mA) using Cu Karadiation (wavelength 0.1542 nm) at room temperature. Datawere recorded by a small angle Kratky compact camera. Wideangle X-ray diffraction (WAXD) of the materials was per-formed in transmission geometry with D500 Simens y/2yganiometer, with single point detector, secondary monochro-
mator, using Cu Ka radiation (wavelength 0.1542 nm) at roomtemperature, and the scan step was 0.028. The textures of themesophases were observed with a polarizing optical micro-scope (Leica ORTHOLUX II POL-BK with Leica DC 200)equipped with a Mettler FP52 hot-stage connected to a MettlerFP5 temperature control unit.
Results and Discussion
Commercially available hyperbranched PEIs containing
primary, secondary, and tertiary amine groups have been
directly mixed with long chain fatty acids and investigated
with respect to their thermal and LC properties, affording
lamellar mesophases.[5b] We were interested in the com-
bination with carboxylic acids comprising calamitic meso-
genic units. It is known that amidation reaction of PEIs with
fatty acids can occur at elevated temperatures (120–
150 8C).[11] Such thermal conditions may occur in the
characterization of the obtained supramolecular LC poly-
mers by means of DSC, TGA, and polarized optical
microscopy (POM). Amidation is undesired, since it would
complicate the characterization results. In order to avoid the
possible amidation side reaction, we transformed the
primary and secondary amines of PEI into tertiary amino-
groups. Two hyperbranched PEI samples with different
Scheme 1. Synthesis of methylated PEI (abbreviated PEIMe) from PEI and comparison of the respective1H NMR spectra.
Supramolecular Thermotropic Liquid Crystalline Materials with Nematic Mesophase Based . . . 71
Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2006, 27, 69–75 www.mrc-journal.de � 2006 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
molecular weight, namely PEI10K (Mn ¼ 104 g �mol�1,
Mw=Mn ¼ 2.5, NH2:NH:N¼ 33:40:27, respectively)
and PEI1.8K (Mn ¼ 1 800 g �mol�1, Mw=Mn ¼ 1.14,
NH2:NH:N¼ 37:35:28, respectively) were methylated in
presence of formaldehyde and formic acid in water as a
solvent to PEI10KMe and PEI1.8KMe derivatives, as
shown in Scheme 1, using a procedure similar to that
developed for the synthesis of tris(2-dimethylaminoethyl)-
amine.[12] The degree of methylation was monitored by 1H
NMR spectroscopy. New signals at 2.12 and 2.13 ppm are
due to the protons of the methyl groups in PEIMe. Full
methylation of the primary and secondary amine groups of
PEI is confirmed by the disappearance of the broad
resonances of primary and secondary amines at 1.67 ppm,
as well as from the integration ratio of methyl and methyl-
ene units.
The THF solution of the mesogen-based carboxylic acid
CBPA was added dropwise into the dichloromethane
solution of the obtained methylated PEIs, PEI10KMe and
PEI1.8KMe, and the molar ratio (x) of CBPA and amine
groups of PEIMe varied in the range of 0.1–0.7. The
mixture was shaken for 1 h and then slowly evaporated at
room temperature. After complete evaporation of the sol-
vents, the resulting complexes (PEI10KMe-CBPAx) and
(PEI1.8KMe-CBPAx) were thoroughly dried. All final
polyelectrolyte-mesogen surfactant complexes were vis-
cous and opaque, except for those prepared with a low
degree of complexation (x¼ 0.1).
The thermal behavior of all polymer complexes was
investigated by combining POM, DSC, and X-ray diffrac-
tion (SAXS and WAXS). The LC behavior of the
supramolecular complexes PEI10KMe-CBPAx and
PEI1.8KMe-CBPAx is evident from the direct observation
using POM, showing fluid, strongly birefringent domains,
which coalesced upon increasing the temperature (Figure
S1, supplementary materials). Except for the complexes
with low degree of complexation (x¼ 0.1), which were
found to be amorphous, all materials exhibit an LC phase at
ambient temperature.
DSC analysis of all complexes and their precursors has
been carried out (Table 1), confirming the results of the
POM observations. The glass transition temperature (Tg) of
each complex (PEIMe-CBPAx) was enhanced in compar-
ison to the methylated PEI, once the fraction of CBPA
component was increased in the complex; however, the Tg
values are still below room temperature, as illustrated in
Figure 1.
The mesogenic precursor CBPA exhibited only a mono-
tropic nematic mesophase on cooling from the isotropic
phase in the range of 103–123 8C, as evidenced by DSC
Table 1. Thermal transition data of PEI10KMe-CBPAx, PEI1.8KMe-CBPAx and CBPA obtained from DSC and POM analysis.
Complexa) Thermal transitions (8C) from DSC[DH (kJ �mol�1 mesogen)]b)
Thermal transitions (8C) from POMe)
Heating Cooling Heating Cooling
CBPA C 139[37.3] I I 121[-1.23] N 107[-31.4] C C 138 i I 123 N 103 CPEI10KMe-CBPA0.1 g -29 I –c) I IPEI10KMe-CBPA0.3 g -8 N 69[0.30] I I �14 gd) N 73 I i 63 NPEI10KMe-CBPA0.5 g -7 N 68[0.96] I I 64[-0.46] N -11 g N 95 I i 84 NPEI10KMe-CBPA0.7 g 1 N 81[2.84] I I 79[-0.27] N -4 g N 98 I i 90 NPEI1.8KMe-CBPA0.1 g -30 I –c) I IPEI1.8KMe-CBPA0.3 g -12 N 61 [0.25] I I �14 gd) N 58 I IPEI1.8KMe-CBPA0.5 g -4 N 60[0.29] I I 45[-0.17] N -7 g N 89 I I 80 NPEI1.8KMe-CBPA0.7 g 4 N 70[0.08] I I 63[-0.08] N -0.6 g N 97 I I 91 N
a) Nomenclature: PEIXMe-CBPAx: PEIMe, methylated hyperbranched polymer; X: Mn of PEI; CBPA: 5-( p-CBPA); x: molar ratio ofCBPA/amine groups of PEIMe.
b) Data were obtained from the second scan; C: crystalline, I: isotropic, N: nematic, g: glass.c) Not observed.d) Transition from isotropic to nematic phase was not observable.e) Heating and cooling rates 2 K �min�1.
Figure 1. Tg of PEI10KMe-CBPAx and PEI1.8KMe-CBPAx as afunction of the molar ratio of CBPA and tertiary amine groups ofPEIME polymers.
72 Y. Chen, Z. Shen, L. Gehringer, H. Frey, S.-E. Stiriba
Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2006, 27, 69–75 www.mrc-journal.de � 2006 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
and POM. DSC traces of the PEI10KMe-CBPA and
PEI1.8KMe-CBPA complexes prepared with x¼ 0.3–0.7
ratio show a glass-to-mesophase transition and a meso-
phase-to-isotropic liquid transition. Both the transition
enthalpy and the fluid character of the mesophase observed
by POM suggest the presence of nematic order. However,
commonly nematic systems can only be supercooled to
about 1–2 degrees below Tn,i. It should be noted that
the considerable deviation between heating and cooling
(Table 1) is unusual for an isotropic-nematic transition.
Unfortunately, the textures observed by POM remained
unspecific, even after extended periods of annealing close to
the transition temperature. The isotropization temperatures
are PEIMe molecular weight dependent and are indeed
considerably lower than the melting point of pure CBPA.
For all complexes with x� 0.7, the melting endotherm of
pure CBPA was not observed by DSC and POM. This
implies that all CBPA molecules are complexed with the
PEIMe backbone. The complex PEIMe-CBPAx with an
excess of CBPA mesogen (x¼ 1.4) has also been prepared.
In this case, the DSC curves clearly show the melting point
of the CBPA precursor that is due to the expected phase
separation between the excess of free CBPA and the com-
plex PEIMe-CBPA (cf. supplementary material).
FT-IR analysis of the PEIMe-CBPAx complexes has also
been carried out (Figure 2). The band intensity of the cyano
group at 2 223 cm�1 was used as internal reference to
normalize the spectra. The peak at 1 707 cm�1 is character-
istic for the stretching bond frequency n (C O) originating
from self-assembly of the carboxylic acid groups of CPBA.
For the complexes with x¼ 0.1, the band at 1 707 cm�1
showed very low intensity, indicating that the hydrogen
bonds between the carboxylic acid groups of CBPA were
broken and proton transfer took place between the CBPA
carboxylic acid groups and the amine groups of PEIMe,
resulting in electrostatic interaction between PEIMe and
CBPA. With increasing fraction of CPBA a new band cen-
tered at 1 716 cm�1 gradually appeared, considerably
weaker than the band of the carboxylic acid groups of
CBPA at 1 707 cm�1. It should be noted that the frequency
n (C O) of free aliphatic carboxylic acids was usually in the
range of 1 740–1 760 cm�1,[13] thus, the band at 1 716 cm�1
in the complexes with x¼ 0.3–0.7 is assigned to the (C O)
frequency of CBPA carboxylic acids in the complex
structure PEI10KME-CBPAx (Figure 2).
It has been established by previous studies on the pro-
tonation titration of hyperbranched PEIs[14] that primary
amines are protonated first, followed by secondary amines,
and then tertiary ones due to the short-range electrostatic
repulsive interaction mechanism; moreover, full protona-
tion of PEIs can only be achieved when pH is below 2. In our
case, the molar ratio of CBPA to the amine groups of
PEIME is equal to the ratio of CBPA and amino groups
involved in the complexation between both components
(Figure 3).
Further evidence concerning the structure of the LC
phases was obtained from X-ray diffraction analysis of
PEIMe-CBPAx complexes (Figure 4).
The SAXS profile of the complex, PEI10KMe-CBPA0.5
was recorded at room temperature. No scattering peak
corresponding to the long period, i.e., long-range order can
be observed (supplementary material). This observation
rules out the formation of a smectic phase. In the WAXS
Figure 2. FT-IR spectra of PEI10KMe, CBPA, and PEI10KMe-CBPAx complexes.
Figure 3. Schematic illustration of the supramolecular assemblyof CBPA with PEIMe backbone.
Supramolecular Thermotropic Liquid Crystalline Materials with Nematic Mesophase Based . . . 73
Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2006, 27, 69–75 www.mrc-journal.de � 2006 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
profile of the complex, only a diffuse halo-centered at
2y¼ 208 (d¼ 4.4 A) is observed, which is typical for the
lateral distance between the mesogens. These values are in
agreement with literature reports on side-chain polymers
containing cyanobiphenyl mesogens.[15] In summary, these
results support the formation of a nematic LC phase by the
supramolecular complex of CBPA with PEIMe, in agree-
ment with the other experimental data.
Conclusion
Supramolecular complexation of methylated hyperbran-
ched PEIs PEI10KMe and PEI1.8KMe with mesogen-
containing carboxylic acid, CBPA, based on proton transfer
from the acid moieties to the tricoordinated amine-
containing PEIMe enables the formation of supramolecular
complexes exhibiting thermotropic LC phases. The struc-
tral analysis of the mesophases supports nematic order.
Nematic phases are unusual for dendritic LC-polymers and
offer intriguing potential for switching and further electro-
optical application.
Acknowledgements: The Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia(Spain) is acknowledged for support to (S.-E.S.) through ‘‘Ramony Cajal’’ program. Juana Kirsten is acknowledged for help withPOM-measurements. The Alexander von Humboldt Foundation isalso gratefully acknowledged for support to (S.-E.S) through thefollow-up program.
[1] [1a] T. Kato, Struct. Bonding (Berlin) 2000, 96, 95, andreferences therein; [1b] T. Kato, in: Handbook of LiquidCrystals, D. Demus, J. W. Goodby, G. W. Gray, H. W. Spiess,V. Vill, Eds., Wiley-VCH, Weinheim 1998, Vol. 2B, p. 969,
and references therein; [1c] J.-M. Lehn, ‘‘SupramolecularChemistrys Concepts and Perspectives’’, VCH, Weinheim1995, and references therein; [1d] M. J. Krische, J. M. Lehn,Struct. Bonding (Berlin) 2000, 96, 3, and references therein;[1e] C. G. Bazuin, ‘‘Mechanical and ThermophysicalProperties of Polymer Liquid Crystals’’, W. Brostow, Ed.,Chapman and Hall, London 1998, Vol. 3, chap. 3, andreferences therein.
[2] [2a] C. G. Bazuin, C. Brodin, Macromolecules 2004, 37,9366; [2b] G. Ambrozic, M. Zigon, Macromol. RapidCommun. 2000, 21, 53; [2c] T. Kato, O. Ihata, S. Ujiie, M.Tokita, J. Watanabe, Macromolecules 1998, 31, 3551;[2d] X. Wu, G. Zhang, H. Zhang, Macromol. Chem. Phys.1998, 199, 2101; [2e] T. Kato, Y. Kubota, T. Uryu, S. Ujiie,Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 1617; [2f] T. Kato, H.Kihara, S. Ujiie, T. Uryu, J. M. J. Frechet, Macromolecules1996, 29, 8734; [2g] F. A. Brandys, C. G. Bazuin, Chem.Mater. 1996, 8, 83; [2h] U. Kumar, T. Kato, J. M. J. Frechet,J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 6630; [2i] T. Kato, H. Kihara,T. Uryu, A. Fujishima, J. M. J. Frechet, Macromolecules1992, 25, 6836; [2j] T. Kato, J. M. J. Frechet, Macro-molecules 1989, 22, 3818.
[3] [3a] P. Y. Vuillaume, C. G. Bazuin, Macromolecules 2003,36, 6378; [3b] C. G. Bazuin, J. Boivin, A. Tork, H. Tremblay,E. Bravo-Grimaldo,Macromolecules 2002, 35, 6893; [3c] A.Tork, G. Bazuin, Macromolecules 2001, 34, 7699; [3d] F. A.Brandys, P. Masson, D. Guillon, C. G. Bazuin, Macromol.Chem. Phys. 2001, 202, 856; [3e] C. G. Bazuin, A. Tork,Macromolecules 1995, 28, 8877; [3f] S. Ujiie, K. Iimura,Macromolecules 1992, 25, 3174; [3g] W. J. Macknight, E. A.Ponomarenko, D. A. Tirell, Acc. Chem. Res. 1998, 31, 781,and references therein.
[4] J. Ruokolainen, J. Tanner, G. ten Brinke, O. Ikkala, M.Torkkeli, R. Serimaa, Macromolecules 1995, 28, 7779.
[5] [5a] S. Ujiie, Y. Yano, A. Mori, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 2004,411, 1525; [5b] S. Ujiie, S. Takagi, M. Sato, High Perform.Polym. 1998, 10, 139; [5c] R. Martin-Rapun, M. Marcos, A.Omenat, J. Barbera, P. Romero, J. Serrano, J. Am.Chem. Soc.2005, 127, 7397; [5d] T. Felekis, L. Tziveleka, D. Tsiourvas,C. M. Paleos, Macromolecules, 2005, 38, 1705.
[6] [6a] A. W. Bosman, H. M. Hanssen, E. W. Meijer,Chem.Rev.1999, 99, 1665; [6b] M. Fischer, F. Vogtle,Angew. Chem. Int.Ed. Engl. 1999, 38, 884; [6c] G. R. Newkome, C. N.Moorefield, F. Vogtle, ‘‘Dendritic Molecules: Concepts,Synthesis, Perspectives’’, VCH, Weinheim 2001; [6d] S.Hecht, J. M. J. Frechet, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2001,40, 74; [6e] F. W. Zheng, S. C. ZimmermanChem. Rev. 1997,97, 1681. [6f] J. M. J. Frechet, J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Chem.2003, 41, 3713; [6g] S. Hecht, J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Chem.2003, 41, 1047.
[7] [7a] A. Sunder, J. Heinemann, H. Frey,Chem. Eur. J. 2000, 6,2499; [7b] B. I. Voit, J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Chem. 2000, 38,2505; [7c] M. Jikei, M. Kakimoto, Prog. Polym. Sci. 2001,26, 1233; [7d] C. Gao, D. Yan, Prog. Polym. Sci. 2004, 29,183; [7e] C. R. Yates, W. Hayes, Eur. Polym. J. 2004, 40,1257.
[8] [8a] R. Elsasser, G. H. Mehl, J. W. Goodby, M. Veith,Angew.Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2688; [8b] I. M. Saez, J. W.Goodby, R. M. Richardson, Chem. Eur. J. 2001, 7, 2758;[8c] I. M. Saez, J. W. Goodby, J. Mater. Chem. 2001, 11,2845; [8d] I. M. Saez, J. W. Goodby, J. Mater. Chem. 2003,13, 2727; [8e] I. M. Saez, J. W. Goodby, Chem. Eur. J. 2003,9, 4869.
[9] [9a] S.-E. Stiriba, H. Kautz, H. Frey, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002,124, 9698; [9b] Y. Chen, Z. Shen, H. Frey, J. Perez-Prieto,
Figure 4. WAXD diagram of PEI10KMe-CBPA0.5 recorded atroom temperature.
74 Y. Chen, Z. Shen, L. Gehringer, H. Frey, S.-E. Stiriba
Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2006, 27, 69–75 www.mrc-journal.de � 2006 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
S.-E. Stiriba, Chem. Comm. 2005, 755; [9c] Y. Chen, Z.Shen, L. Pastor-Perez, H. Frey, S.-E. Stiriba, Macromole-cules 2005, 38, 227.
[10] For non-supramolecular systems with dendritic structures,displaying a nematic phase see: [10a] V. Percec, P. Chu, G.Ungar, J. Zhou, J. Am.Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 11441; [10b] L.Tajber, A. Kocot, J. K. Vij, K. Merkel, J. Zalewska-Rejdak,G. H. Mehl, R. Elsasser, J. W. Goodby, M. Veith,Macromolecules 2002, 35, 8601.
[11] C. Aymonier, U. Schlotterbeck, L. Antonietti, P. Zacharias,R. Thomann, J. C. Tiller, S. Mecking, Chem. Comm. 2002,3018.
[12] J. Queffelec, S. G. Gaynor, K. Matyjaszewski, Macromole-cules 2000, 33, 8629.
[13] T. L. Lebedeva, G. A. Shandryuk, T. I. Sycheva, V. S.Bezborodov, R. V. Tal’roze, N. A. PlatB, J.Mol. Struct. 1996,354. 89.
[14] M. Borkovec, G. J. M. Koper, Macromolecules 1997, 30,2151.
[15] [15a] G. W. Gray, J. W. Goodbye, ‘‘Smectic Liquid Crystals,Textures and Structures’’, Heyden, Philadelphia 1984;[15b] H. Finkelmann, ‘‘Liquid Crystallinity in Polymers,Principles and Fundamental Properties’’, VCH, New York1992.
Supramolecular Thermotropic Liquid Crystalline Materials with Nematic Mesophase Based . . . 75
Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2006, 27, 69–75 www.mrc-journal.de � 2006 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
1
Copyright WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 69469 Weinheim, Germany, 2005.
Supporting Information for Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2006, 27, 69.
Supramolecular Thermotropic Liquid Crystalline Materials with Nematic Mesophase Based on
Methylated Hyperbranched Polyethylenimine and Mesogenic Carboxylic Acid
Y. Chen, Z. Shen, L. Gehringer, H. Frey,* S.-E. Stiriba*
E-mail : [email protected]
Content:
Figure S1. Polarizing optical microscopy of (a) PEI1.8KMe-CBPA0.5 at 68℃ (heating) ; (b)
PEI10KMe-CBPA0.3 at 27℃ (upon cooling).
Figure S2. DSC thermograms of CBPA and PEI1.8KMe-CBPA complexes obtained in second cooling.
Figure S3. DSC thermograms of CBPA and PEI10KMe-CBPA complexes obtained in second cooling.
Figure S4. SAXS profile of the complex PEI10KMe-CBPA0.5, recorded at room temperature
2
Figure S1. Polarizing optical microscopy of (a) PEI1.8KMe-CBPA0.5 at 68℃ (heating) ; (b) PEI10KMe-CBPA0.3 at 27℃ (upon cooling).
Figure S2. DSC thermograms of CBPA and PEI1.8KMe-CBPA complexes.
-40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
x=1.4
x=0.7
T (oC)
Exo
ther
m
CBPA
x=0.5
3
Figure S3. DSC thermograms of CBPA and PEI1.8KMe-CBPA complexes.
-40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
x=0.3
x=0.1
x=0.7
T (oC)
Exo
ther
m
x=0.5
Figure S4. SAXS profile of the complex PEI10KMe-CBPA0.5, recorded at room temperature
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 90
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
Inte
nsity
(a.u
.)
2θθθθ(deg)