SMN2 splicing modifiers improve motor function and longevity in mice with spinal muscular atrophy
Transcript of SMN2 splicing modifiers improve motor function and longevity in mice with spinal muscular atrophy
DOI: 10.1126/science.1250127, 688 (2014);345 Science
et al.Nikolai A. Naryshkinmice with spinal muscular atrophy
splicing modifiers improve motor function and longevity inSMN2
This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only.
clicking here.colleagues, clients, or customers by , you can order high-quality copies for yourIf you wish to distribute this article to others
here.following the guidelines
can be obtained byPermission to republish or repurpose articles or portions of articles
): August 16, 2014 www.sciencemag.org (this information is current as of
The following resources related to this article are available online at
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/345/6197/688.full.htmlversion of this article at:
including high-resolution figures, can be found in the onlineUpdated information and services,
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/suppl/2014/08/06/345.6197.688.DC1.html can be found at: Supporting Online Material
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/345/6197/688.full.html#relatedfound at:
can berelated to this article A list of selected additional articles on the Science Web sites
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/345/6197/688.full.html#ref-list-1, 24 of which can be accessed free:cites 56 articlesThis article
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/345/6197/688.full.html#related-urls1 articles hosted by HighWire Press; see:cited by This article has been
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/collection/medicineMedicine, Diseases
subject collections:This article appears in the following
registered trademark of AAAS. is aScience2014 by the American Association for the Advancement of Science; all rights reserved. The title
CopyrightAmerican Association for the Advancement of Science, 1200 New York Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20005. (print ISSN 0036-8075; online ISSN 1095-9203) is published weekly, except the last week in December, by theScience
on
Aug
ust 1
6, 2
014
ww
w.s
cien
cem
ag.o
rgD
ownl
oade
d fr
om
on
Aug
ust 1
6, 2
014
ww
w.s
cien
cem
ag.o
rgD
ownl
oade
d fr
om
on
Aug
ust 1
6, 2
014
ww
w.s
cien
cem
ag.o
rgD
ownl
oade
d fr
om
on
Aug
ust 1
6, 2
014
ww
w.s
cien
cem
ag.o
rgD
ownl
oade
d fr
om
on
Aug
ust 1
6, 2
014
ww
w.s
cien
cem
ag.o
rgD
ownl
oade
d fr
om
on
Aug
ust 1
6, 2
014
ww
w.s
cien
cem
ag.o
rgD
ownl
oade
d fr
om
on
Aug
ust 1
6, 2
014
ww
w.s
cien
cem
ag.o
rgD
ownl
oade
d fr
om
MOTOR NEURON DISEASE
SMN2 splicing modifiers improvemotor function and longevity in micewith spinal muscular atrophyNikolai A. Naryshkin,1 Marla Weetall,1 Amal Dakka,1 Jana Narasimhan,1 Xin Zhao,1
Zhihua Feng,2 Karen K. Y. Ling,2 Gary M. Karp,1 Hongyan Qi,1 Matthew G. Woll,1
Guangming Chen,1 Nanjing Zhang,1 Vijayalakshmi Gabbeta,1 Priya Vazirani,1
Anuradha Bhattacharyya,1 Bansri Furia,1 Nicole Risher,1 Josephine Sheedy,1
Ronald Kong,1 Jiyuan Ma,1 Anthony Turpoff,1 Chang-Sun Lee,1 Xiaoyan Zhang,1
Young-Choon Moon,1 Panayiota Trifillis,1 Ellen M. Welch,1 Joseph M. Colacino,1
John Babiak,1 Neil G. Almstead,1 Stuart W. Peltz,1* Loren A. Eng,3 Karen S. Chen,3
Jesse L. Mull,4 Maureen S. Lynes,4 Lee L. Rubin,4 Paulo Fontoura,5 Luca Santarelli,5
Daniel Haehnke,5 Kathleen D. McCarthy,3 Roland Schmucki,5 Martin Ebeling,5
Manaswini Sivaramakrishnan,5 Chien-Ping Ko,2 Sergey V. Paushkin,3 Hasane Ratni,5
Irene Gerlach,5 Anirvan Ghosh,5 Friedrich Metzger5*
Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a genetic disease caused by mutation or deletion
of the survival of motor neuron 1 (SMN1) gene. A paralogous gene in humans, SMN2,
produces low, insufficient levels of functional SMN protein due to alternative splicing
that truncates the transcript. The decreased levels of SMN protein lead to progressive
neuromuscular degeneration and high rates of mortality. Through chemical screening
and optimization, we identified orally available small molecules that shift the balance
of SMN2 splicing toward the production of full-length SMN2 messenger RNA with high
selectivity. Administration of these compounds to D7 mice, a model of severe SMA,
led to an increase in SMN protein levels, improvement of motor function, and
protection of the neuromuscular circuit. These compounds also extended the life
span of the mice. Selective SMN2 splicing modifiers may have therapeutic potential
for patients with SMA.
Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is the lead-
ing genetic cause of infant mortality with
an incidence of 1 in 11,000 live births (1–3).
SMA is characterized by progressive degen-
eration of anterior horn a motoneurons,
as well as muscle weakness and atrophy that
affect mainly proximal muscles. The disorder is
associated with a high rate of mortality due to
respiratory complications (4). Clinically, SMA
disease phenotypes range from severe type I to
mild types III and IV. Patients are classified
based on the age of onset, clinical severity, and
the ability to achieve milestones of motor co-
ordination development (5). There is currently
no treatment for the disease except supportive
care to improve quality of life by minimizing
disability and discomfort (6, 7).
The disease SMA is caused by deletion or mu-
tation of the survival of motor neuron 1 (SMN1)
gene, which encodes the SMN protein (8, 9).
Humans carry two paralogous SMN1 and SMN2
genes that are ubiquitously expressed, with the
SMN protein principally produced from SMN1
full-length (FL) mRNA. The coding regions of
SMN1 and SMN2 differ only in a translationally
silent C-to-T transition at nucleotide 840, lead-
ing to alternative splicing and exclusion of exon 7
frommost SMN2 transcripts. The resultingmRNA,
referred to as D7, encodes an unstable SMND7
protein that is rapidly degraded (10, 11). How-
ever, the low levels of SMN2 transcripts that
include exon 7 produce small amounts of fully
functional SMN protein. SMN protein is a ubi-
quitously expressed 38-kD protein that is involved
in multiple cellular functions including pre-mRNA
splicing, small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (snRNP)
biogenesis, transcription, stress response, apo-
ptosis, axonal transport, and cytoskeletal dynam-
ics (12–14). The exact mechanism by which SMN
protein deficiency leads to motoneuron loss is
unclear (15).
Though the lack of the SMN1 gene is the un-
derlying cause of the disease, SMN2 is the pri-
mary disease-modifying gene in SMA (16). In SMA
patients, the number of SMN2 genes varies be-
tween two and six copies in a somatic cell (17), and
SMNprotein levels generally correlatewith SMN2
copy number (16, 18). Similarly, the severity of
disease inversely correlates with SMN2 copy num-
ber and the amount of functional SMN protein
(16, 19, 20). Relative to the levels of SMN in
healthy individuals, SMN protein levels are re-
duced by ~70, ~50, and ~30% in type I, II and
III patients, respectively (17, 21). This suggests
that moderate differences in SMN protein lev-
els can modify disease severity.
To determine whether pharmacologically in-
creasing SMN levels would ameliorate pheno-
types associated with the loss of the SMN1 gene,
we sought to identify compounds that selectively
modulate SMN2 pre-mRNA splicing to include
exon 7 (illustrated schematically in fig. S1). By
using a HEK293H human embryonic kidney cell
line harboring an SMN2 minigene to screen a
library of small molecules (fig. S2), we identified
several chemical classes of compounds that pro-
mote the inclusion of exon 7 in the SMN2mRNA
(see supplementary materials and methods). Af-
ter further optimization of these splicing modi-
fiers, we identified three series of compounds
that were orally available (SMN-C1, SMN-C2,
and SMN-C3) (Fig. 1A and fig. S2). With nano-
molar potency, these compounds increased FL
SMN2mRNA levels and concomitantly reducedD7
mRNA levels in SMA type I patient fibroblasts after
24 hours of treatment (Fig. 1B). The abundance of
SMN protein was also increased in these fibro-
blasts, as determined byWestern blot analysis (Fig.
1C). Fibroblasts fromSMAtype I, II, and III patients
and from an unaffected control exhibited different
baseline levels of SMNprotein (DF), but SMN levels
increased in a dose-dependent manner when the
cells were treated with SMN-C1 or SMN-C2, as de-
termined by homogeneous time-resolved fluores-
cence (HTRF) (Fig. 1D).
To ensure that the increase in SMN protein
levels also occurred in disease-relevant cells, we
quantified SMN protein in Islet-1 positive moto-
neurons and Islet-1 negative cells (mainly glia
and neuronal stem cells) in cell cultures gen-
erated from patient-derived induced pluripotent
stem cells (iPSCs). Treatment with SMN-C3 in-
creased SMN protein levels in cells from SMA
type I (Fig. 1E) and II patients (fig. S3). Quan-
titatively, the increase was similar in Islet-1–
positive motoneurons and Islet-1–negative cells
(Fig. 1E and fig. S3). Thus, these small-molecule
splicing modifiers can modulate SMN2 splicing
toward exon 7 inclusion and thereby increase the
production of SMN protein in different cell types
and across SMA disease severities.
We next characterized the selectivity of the
SMN splicing modifiers in SMA type I fibro-
blasts by performing RNA sequence analysis
on cells treated with SMN-C3 (500 nM) or with
control solvent [0.5% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)].
SMN-C3 treatment altered the expression of
very few of the 11,714 genes that were expressed
under either control or treatment conditions
(Fig. 2A). Specifically, six genes each were up- or
down-regulated by a factor > 2 (log2 > 1 or < –1)
(fig. S4) after SMN-C3 treatment [confirmed by
quantitative real-time polymerase chain reac-
tion (RT-qPCR); see fig S4], indicating that this
compound did not induce widespread changes
in gene expression. Notably, SMN-C3 did not
cause deregulated expression of gene families
involved in DNA or RNA metabolism or cell
688 8 AUGUST 2014 • VOL 345 ISSUE 6197 sciencemag.org SCIENCE
1PTC Therapeutics, 100 Corporate Court, South Plainfield, NJ07080, USA. 2Section of Neurobiology, Department ofBiological Sciences, University of Southern California, LosAngeles, CA 90089, USA. 3SMA Foundation, 888 SeventhAvenue, Suite 400, New York, NY 10019, USA. 4Departmentof Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology and the Harvard StemCell Institute, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138,USA. 5Roche Pharmaceutical Research and EarlyDevelopment, Roche Innovation Center Basel, F. Hoffmann-LaRoche, Grenzacherstrasse 124, 4070 Basel, Switzerland.*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
(F.M.); [email protected] (S.W.P.)
RESEARCH | REPORTS
survival (fig. S4). Treatment of cells with SMN-C1
(100 nM) produced a similar gene expression
profile as that observed with SMN-C3 (fig. S5).
Among the genes whose expression was altered
by SMN-C3, there are several candidates that
could conceivably play a role in the regulation of
SMN expression or protein function and thus
contribute to the compound’s therapeutic effect
(see below). For example, DNA polymerase N
(POLN), a low-fidelity DNA polymerase (22) that
is up-regulated by SMN-C3, is involved in DNA
repair and homologous recombination (23, 24).
PAP-associated domain containing 4 protein
(PAPD4), which is down-regulated by SMN-C3,
is a noncanonical poly(A) polymerase that reg-
ulates the generation and stability of micro-
RNAs as well as adenylation of microRNAs after
cleavage byDicer (25–28). However, to date, none
of these genes has been directly linked to SMN
expression and/or function or to SMA patho-
genesis. It is also possible that indirect pathways
(e.g., involving microRNA regulation) may play a
role in SMN regulation.
A separate analysis of annotated splice junc-
tions within the transcripts identified a few sin-
gle splice junctions that were affected by SMN-C3
treatment without changes in the overall abun-
dance of the corresponding mRNAs (Fig. 2B).
Among the affected splice junctions were the
SMN2 exon 7 junctions, confirming the RT-PCR
results. SMN-C3 treatment also induced changes
in multiple splice junctions of PDXDC1 (Fig. 2B),
a gene of unknown function that is the most
strongly down-regulated gene on a transcrip-
tional level. Similar results were seen when SMA
type I patient fibroblasts were treatedwith SMN-
C1 (100 nM) (fig. S5). These results suggest that
the SMN splicingmodifiers are highly specific for
processing of SMN2 pre-mRNA.
We also assessed the role of several cis-acting
splicing regulatory elements in the activity of our
splicing modifiers. We evaluated the Exinct
SCIENCE sciencemag.org 8 AUGUST 2014 • VOL 345 ISSUE 6197 689
Fig. 1. Small molecules modulate SMN2 alternative splicing and increase
SMN protein levels in cells from SMA patients. (A) Chemical structures of
SMN-C1, SMN-C2, and SMN-C3 small molecules. (B) RT-PCR analysis of
SMN2 mRNAs. (Top) SMN-C1 treatment for 24 hours increases the level of FL
mRNA and reduces the level of mRNA lacking exon 7 (D7) in SMA type I patient
fibroblasts. (Bottom) The effects of SMN-C1, SMN-C2, and SMN-C3 on FL and
D7 mRNA levels in SMA type I patient fibroblasts are concentration-dependent.
(C) (Left) Western blot of SMN protein in SMA type I patient fibroblasts after
48 hours of continuous treatment with SMN-C3. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate
dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was used as a loading control. (Right) The effects of
SMN-C1, SMN-C2, and SMN-C3 on SMN protein abundance are concentration-
dependent. GAPDH and actin were used as loading controls. (D) HTRFanalysis
(48) of the SMN protein after 48 hours of continuous treatment with SMN-C1
(left) and SMN-C2 (right) in fibroblasts from SMA type I, II, and III patients or
from an unaffected control (carrier). (E) (Left) Motoneuron cultures gener-
ated from iPSCs derived from a SMA type I patient. Cells were treated with
DMSO (control) or SMN-C3 (300 nM) and immunostained for SMN and
Islet-1. Scale bar, 100 mm. (Right) The effect of SMN-3 on SMN protein levels
in Islet-1–positive motoneurons and Islet-1–negative cells is concentration-
dependent. (B to E) Data represent mean T SEM (error bars) of three or four
independent samples per data point. Concentration-dependence data were
fitted to a Hill equation.
RESEARCH | REPORTS
(extended inhibitory context)/ESE1 (exonic splic-
ing enhancer 1), ESE2, and ESE3/TSL2 (terminal
stem-loop 2) in exon 7 and the intronic splicing
silencer (ISS)–N1 (29–33) in intron 7 in the
context of an SMN2 minigene. Several point
mutations in these elements affected splicing
of the SMN2 exon 7, consistent with published
evidence (fig. S6). However, in all cases, SMN-C3
retained the ability to correct splicing toward
exon 7 inclusion, indicating that these mutations
did not disrupt structures critical for compound
activity. These results point to a more complex
mechanism of action involving additional cis-
and trans-acting factors.
We next investigated whether the SMN splic-
ingmodifiers are active in animalmodels of SMA.
To assess compound activity on SMN2 splicing
and SMN protein in blood and tissues, we used
the C/C-allele SMAmouse model. These animals
have a mild form of SMA and live a normal life
span but show muscle weakness, peripheral
necrosis, and reduced body weight gain (34). In
pharmacokinetic studies, all three compounds
showed excellent brain penetration in adultmice
(fig. S7). The SMN2 pre-mRNA splicing in
whole blood from untreated adult C/C-allele
mice generated ~40% FL and 60% D7 transcripts.
Adult C/C-allele mice were given either 1 dose
(single dosing) or 10 consecutive daily doses (mul-
tiple dosing) of 10mg/kg SMN-C3.Within 4 hours
after single or multiple dosing, SMN2 FL mRNA
increased to 90% of total mRNA, and D7 mRNA
was reduced to 10%. The levels of FL and D7
mRNA returned to baseline within 32 hours in
both dosing regimens (Fig. 3A), suggesting that
the mRNA response kinetics were similar after
single or multiple dosing. The kinetics of the
FL mRNA increase correlated well with that of
SMN-C3 plasma levels (Fig. 3B). SMN protein
levels were increased by ~50 to 70% over base-
line in brain and quadricepsmuscle after a single
oral dose (peaking at 24 hours) and bymore than
200% above baseline in brain and quadriceps
muscle after 10 days of repeated daily oral dosing
(Fig. 3C). We observed similar effects with an-
other compound. SMN-C2 treatment at 20mg/kg
per day shifted alternative SMN2 splicing toward
FL mRNA (fig. S8) in brain and quadriceps mus-
cle and resulted in marked elevation of SMN
protein levels in brain, spinal cord and quadri-
ceps muscle to levels above those measured in
control mice (heterozygous littermates) (fig. S8).
In another experiment in which we treated C/C-
allele mice for 10 days orally with SMN-C3 at
10 mg/kg per day, SMN protein levels became
elevated in all tissues that we evaluated. In mus-
cle tissues, these levels were similar to those mea-
sured in control mice (Fig. 3D). Thus, repeated
oral dosing of adult C/C-allele mice with SMN2
splicingmodifiers can shift SMN2 splicing toward
the production of FLmRNA and thereby increase
SMN protein in multiple relevant tissues in vivo.
We next tested the SMN splicing modifier
compounds in the D7 model of SMA. These mice
have a severe form of SMA and die within 3
weeks after birth (35). Inmice treatedwith SMN-
C3 by intraperitoneal injection once daily from
postnatal day 3 (P3) through P9, SMN protein
levels in the brain and quadriceps muscle were
elevated in a dose-dependent manner by up to
150% (Fig. 3E) and 90% (Fig. 3F), respectively.
Similarly, SMN-C2 treatment induced a dose-
dependent increase in SMN protein levels in
brain and spinal cord (fig. S8).
We next assessed the effect of treatment with
SMN2 splicing modifiers on motor function and
life span of D7 mice. The animals were treated
with SMN-C3 at doses of 0.3, 1, and 3 mg/kg per
day by intraperitoneal injections from P3 through
P23 and thereafter at doses of 1, 3, and 10 mg/kg
per day, respectively, by oral gavage. At P16, vehicle-
treated D7 mice were much smaller than heterozy-
gous littermate controls and appeared moribund.
In contrast, D7 mice treated with the high dose of
SMN-C3 showed a phenotype similar to that of
heterozygous controls (Fig. 3G). SMN-C3 treat-
ment induced a dose-dependent bodyweight gain
in the D7 mice, with some animals showing a
body weight that was ~80% that of heterozygous
controls (Fig. 3H). SMN-C3 normalized the mo-
tor behavior of D7 mice, illustrated by the ability
of the mice to right themselves as quickly as het-
erozygous controls (Fig. 3I) and by their level of
locomotor activity (see movies S1 to S3). Most
importantly, whereas vehicle-treated mice died
within 3 weeks after birthwith amedian survival
of 18 days, SMN-C3 treatment increased survival
in a dose-dependentmanner to amedian survival
time of 28 days in the low-dose (0.3 mg/kg per
day) group. In the two higher-dose groups (1 and
3 mg/kg per day), ~90% of animals survived be-
yond P65 when the study was completed (Fig.
3J). Similar effects were observed with SMN-C2
treatment at 1 mg/kg per day intraperitoneally
(P3 through P23) and 6 mg/kg per day by oral
gavage thereafter with marked body weight gain
and survival beyond 150 days after birthwhen the
study was completed (fig. S8).
690 8 AUGUST 2014 • VOL 345 ISSUE 6197 sciencemag.org SCIENCE
Fig. 2. SMN splicing modifiers demonstrate high specificity as assessed
by RNA sequencing. (A) Difference in total transcript expression of SMN-
C3 (500 nM) versus DMSO-treated SMA type I patient fibroblasts (set to 1 for
each transcript) for 11,714 human genes with an RPKM (reads per kilobase
per million reads) ≥ 1 in either DMSO or SMN-C3 treatment conditions. Abun-
dance of mRNA is shown as log2 fold change (Log2FC) values (0 = no change,
+1 = doubling, –1 = reduction by half). SMN2 is highlighted by the arrow,
showing no significant change in total mRNA abundance. (B) Differential
effects of treatment on individual splice junctions in human transcripts. For
each splice junction, spanning reads were counted in both treated and con-
trol conditions. Affected splice junctions are characterized by either ab-
solute difference in counts (D) or relative changes (Log2FC). The product
p = D x Log2FC was used to rank splice junctions (up-regulated in blue, down-
regulated in red). The top 114 splice junctions with p > 100 are shown
(~300,000 splice junctions analyzed in total).Twenty splice junctions showed
p > 300. Note that two SMN2 transcript variants [NM_022875 (var a) and
NM_022877 (var c)] share the critical target splice junction 5′ of intron 7. For
STRN3, a switch between variants NM_014574 and NM_001083893 is
observed. Fifteen splice junctions belong to PDXDC1 with all splice junctions
similarly affected. PDXDC2P is a pseudogene, probably identified due to the
strong similarity between the PDXDC1 and PDXDC2P transcripts around
that junction (not resolved by the mapping algorithm). Data represent
analysis of RNA sequencing data from three different experimental samples
per group.
RESEARCH | REPORTS
Finally, we demonstrated that this effect on D7
mouse survival and body weight gain was as-
sociated with changes in the hallmark neuro-
muscular pathology of SMA. We evaluated the
number of motoneurons in the spinal cord, neu-
romuscular junction (NMJ) phenotype, and
muscle atrophy in D7 mice treated from P3 to
P14 with SMN-C3 at different doses. In a dose-
dependent manner, SMN-C3 prevented spinal
cord motoneuron loss (Fig. 4, A and B), splenius
capitis NMJ denervation (Fig. 4, C and D), and
extensor digitorum longus (EDL) muscle atro-
phy, with complete prevention at the highest
dose (Fig. 4, E and F). SMN-C3 treatment also
prevented phenotypes associated with SMN
deficiency in the mouse, including tail and eye
necrosis. Evaluation of adult mice at P65 dem-
onstrated that the weight of tibialis anterior
muscle and the innervation of splenius capitis
muscle NMJs were near normal, indicating
that the effect was preserved into adulthood
(fig. S9).
We have shown that treatment with SMN2
splicing modifiers starting early after birth pre-
vents muscle atrophy in amousemodel of severe
SMA. The compounds also increase life span and
body weight gain and preventmotor dysfunction
andneuromuscular deficits into adulthood. In con-
trast to our findings, other small-molecule com-
pounds have exhibited only modest effects on life
span in D7 mice [reviewed in (36)]. Adult D7 mice
treated with SMN-C3 from P3 were near normal,
suggesting that SMN2 splicing modifiers have the
SCIENCE sciencemag.org 8 AUGUST 2014 • VOL 345 ISSUE 6197 691
Fig. 3. SMN splicing modifiers increase SMN protein expression and
provide therapeutic benefit to D7 mice. (A) Relative expression of SMN2
FL and D7 mRNA in whole blood after once daily oral doses of SMN-C3
(10 mg/kg per day) on day 1 (blue) and day 10 (red) in adult C/C-allele mice.
(B) Levels of SMN-C3 in plasma of C/C-allele mice after SMN-C3 treatment
(10 mg/kg per day) on days 1 and 10. (C) SMN protein levels in quadriceps
muscle (open circles) and brain (solid circles) of C/C-allele mice after once
daily oral doses of SMN-C3 (10 mg/kg) on days 1 and 10. (D) SMN protein in
the brain, spinal cord, quadriceps, and longissimus muscle of C/C-allele mice
and heterozygous littermates after 10 daily oral doses of vehicle or SMN-C3
at 10 mg/kg. (E and F) SMN protein levels in the brain (E) and quadriceps
muscle (F) of D7 mice after seven daily intraperitoneal doses (P3 through
P9) of vehicle or SMN-C3 (0.1, 0.3, or 1 mg/kg). (G to J) Mice were treated
from P3 to P23 once daily with vehicle or SMN-C3 by intraperitoneal injection at
0.3, 1, or 3 mg/kg, and thereafter once daily by oral gavage with 1, 3, or 10 mg/kg.
(G) Appearance of a vehicle-treated D7 mouse (D7 Veh), a SMN-C3–treated D7
mouse (D7 SMN-C3), and a vehicle-treated heterozygous mouse (HET Veh). (H)
Body weight from P3 through P60. Numbers at right indicate survivors at P60
among 10 (HET) or 16 (D7)mice per group. (I) Righting reflex of D7mice. Shown is
the mean time (from three trials) for a mouse to right itself after being put onto its
back, assessed at P9 and P16 (also seemovie S1). (J) Kaplan-Meier survival curves
from P3 to P65. (A to F and H to J) RT-PCR and protein data represent means T
SEM (error bars) of four to six animals per data point; data in (G) to (J) from 16 D7
mice and 10 HETmice per group. **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001, as assessed by
one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni test (D) or
Dunnett’s test using vehicle-treated animals (E and F) or HETmice (I) as control.
RESEARCH | REPORTS
potential to provide sustained protection when
administered throughout the life span of amouse.
Splicing modulators have been described that
target various steps of spliceosome assembly
[e.g., modulators that affect splicing at the pre-
spliceosomal complex A, U2 snRNP function, SR
protein activity, and progression of complex A to
complex B (37–43)], thus producing widespread
changes in pre-mRNA splicing. For example,
chlorhexidine, clotrimazole, and flunarizine were
found to affect alternative splicing of 1444, 874,
and 326 transcripts, respectively (43). In contrast,
the splicing modifiers described here are more
selective, affecting the alternative splicing of only
a few transcripts. We have shown that these com-
pounds retain the ability to modify splicing of the
SMN2 pre-mRNA in exon or intron 7 after intro-
ducing a series of singlemutations in these regions.
We speculate that these molecules interact with
specific primary or secondary RNA structures in
the SMN2 pre-mRNA that are distinct and com-
plex (44), or with specific protein-RNA complexes.
Future identification and characterization of the
binding targets of the SMN2 splicing modifiers
will help to elucidate the molecular basis of
their selectivity.
The splicingmodifiers reported here are orally
bioavailable compounds that penetrate into all
of the tissues we tested—including brain, spinal
cord, and muscle—and consequently exert their
action on SMN2 splicing in all cells of the body.
The global correction of SMN2 splicing to in-
crease SMN protein in all tissues is likely to have
advantages relative to modalities that target only
the central nervous system (45–47). The prom-
ising preclinical activity of the SMN2 splicing
modifiers suggests that this strategy may merit
investigation as a possible therapy for patients
with SMA.
REFERENCES AND NOTES
1. J. Pearn, Lancet 315, 919–922 (1980).
2. E. A. Sugarman et al., Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 20, 27–32 (2012).
3. T. O. Crawford, C. A. Pardo, Neurobiol. Dis. 3, 97–110 (1996).
4. J. A. Markowitz, P. Singh, B. T. Darras, Pediatr. Neurol. 46, 1–12
(2012).
5. S. J. Kolb, J. T. Kissel, Arch. Neurol. 68, 979–984 (2011).
6. A. Lewelt, T. M. Newcomb, K. J. Swoboda, Curr. Neurol.
Neurosci. Rep. 12, 42–53 (2012).
7. C. H. Wang et al., J. Child Neurol. 22, 1027–1049 (2007).
8. S. Lefebvre et al., Cell 80, 155–165 (1995).
9. C. L. Lorson, E. Hahnen, E. J. Androphy, B. Wirth, Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96, 6307–6311 (1999).
10. S. Cho, G. Dreyfuss, Genes Dev. 24, 438–442 (2010).
11. B. G. Burnett et al., Mol. Cell. Biol. 29, 1107–1115 (2009).
12. C. Fallini, G. J. Bassell, W. Rossoll, Brain Res. 1462, 81–92
(2012).
692 8 AUGUST 2014 • VOL 345 ISSUE 6197 sciencemag.org SCIENCE
Fig. 4. SMN splicing modifiers prevent neuromuscular pathology in D7 mice. Animals were treated from P3
through P14 once daily with vehicle or SMN-C3 by intraperitoneal injection at 0.3 or 3 mg/kg.The number of ventral
horn motoneurons in lumbar segments three to five (L3 to L5), the innervation of splenius capitis NMJs, and EDL muscle cross-sectional area were assessed at
P14 by immunohistochemical methods. (A) Immunomicrographs showing L3-to-L5 motoneurons labeled with choline acetyltransferase antibodies. Scale
bar, 100 mm. (B) Quantification of the number of motoneurons in L3-to-L5 spinal cord segments. (C) Immunomicrographs showing the innervation pattern
of the splenius capitis muscle. NMJs are labeled with a-bungarotoxin for acetylcholine receptor clusters (red) and anti-synaptophysin and neurofilament
antibodies for presynaptic nerve terminals (green). Scale bars, 40 mm (upper panel); 20 mm (lower panel). Dashed boxes indicate NMJs shown at a higher
magnification in the lower panel. (D) Quantification of NMJ innervation. (E) Cross sections of EDL muscles. Scale bar, 100 mm. (F) Quantification of the total
cross-sectional area of EDL muscles. (B, D, and F) Data represent means T SEM (error bars) of five to seven mice per group. **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001, as
assessed by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test using vehicle-treated D7 mice as a control.
RESEARCH | REPORTS
13. B. Schrank et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94, 9920–9925
(1997).
14. S. Paushkin, A. K. Gubitz, S. Massenet, G. Dreyfuss, Curr. Opin.
Cell Biol. 14, 305–312 (2002).
15. A. H. Burghes, C. E. Beattie, Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 597–609
(2009).
16. M. D. Mailman et al., Genet. Med. 4, 20–26 (2002).
17. T. O. Crawford et al., PLOS ONE 7, e33572 (2012).
18. B. Wirth et al., Hum. Genet. 119, 422–428 (2006).
19. M. Feldkötter, V. Schwarzer, R. Wirth, T. F. Wienker, B. Wirth,
Am. J. Hum. Genet. 70, 358–368 (2002).
20. E. Arkblad, M. Tulinius, A. K. Kroksmark, M. Henricsson,
N. Darin, Acta Paediatr. 98, 865–872 (2009).
21. S. J. Kolb et al., BMC Neurol. 6, 6 (2006).
22. K. Takata, T. Shimizu, S. Iwai, R. D. Wood, J. Biol. Chem. 281,
23445–23455 (2006).
23. G. L. Moldovan et al., Mol. Cell. Biol. 30, 1088–1096
(2010).
24. L. Zietlow, L. A. Smith, M. Bessho, T. Bessho, Biochemistry 48,
11817–11824 (2009).
25. A. M. Burroughs et al., Genome Res. 20, 1398–1410
(2010).
26. Z. S. Kai, A. E. Pasquinelli, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 5–10
(2010).
27. T. Katoh et al., Genes Dev. 23, 433–438 (2009).
28. E. R. Kinjo et al., Exp. Neurol. 248, 546–558 (2013).
29. N. N. Singh, R. N. Singh, E. J. Androphy, Nucleic Acids Res. 35,
371–389 (2007).
30. C. L. Lorson, E. J. Androphy, Hum. Mol. Genet. 9, 259–265
(2000).
31. L. Cartegni, M. L. Hastings, J. A. Calarco, E. de Stanchina,
A. R. Krainer, Am. J. Hum. Genet. 78, 63–77 (2006).
32. N. N. Singh, R. N. Singh, RNA Biol. 8, 600–606 (2011).
33. N. N. Singh, E. J. Androphy, R. N. Singh, Crit. Rev. Eukaryot.
Gene Expr. 14, 271–285 (2004).
34. M. Osborne et al., Hum. Mol. Genet. 21, 4431–4447
(2012).
35. T. T. Le et al., Hum. Mol. Genet. 14, 845–857 (2005).
36. J. Seo, M. D. Howell, N. N. Singh, R. N. Singh, Biochim. Biophys.
Acta 1832, 2180–2190 (2013).
37. K. O’Brien, A. J. Matlin, A. M. Lowell, M. J. Moore, J. Biol. Chem.
283, 33147–33154 (2008).
38. A. N. Kuhn, M. A. van Santen, A. Schwienhorst, H. Urlaub,
R. Lührmann, RNA 15, 153–175 (2009).
39. D. Kaida et al., Nat. Chem. Biol. 3, 576–583 (2007).
40. M. Hasegawa et al., ACS Chem. Biol. 6, 229–233
(2011).
41. M. G. Berg et al., Mol. Cell. Biol. 32, 1271–1283 (2012).
42. J. G. Chang et al., PLOS ONE 6, e18643 (2011).
43. I. Younis et al., Mol. Cell. Biol. 30, 1718–1728 (2010).
44. N. N. Singh et al., Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 8144–8165
(2013).
45. M. A. Passini et al., Sci. Transl. Med. 3, 72ra18 (2011).
46. Y. Hua et al., Nature 478, 123–126 (2011).
47. K. Sahashi et al., EMBO Mol. Med. 5, 1586–1601 (2013).
48. F. Degorce et al., Curr. Chem. Genomics 3, 22–32
(2009).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank O. Khwaja, C. Czech, T. Kremer, L. Müller, W. Muster,
S. Kirchner, L. Green, E. Pinard, J. Kazenwadel, C. Horn, O. Spleiss,
C. Sarry, P. Kueng, F. Knoflach, L. Himmelein, F. Birzele,
K. von Herrmann, A. Mollin, J. Hedrick, M. Dumble, I. Huq,
P. Martin, D. Mankoff, S. Jung, J. Crona, M. Haley, T. Yang, S. Choi,
S. Hwang, M. Dali, W. Lennox, S. Yeh, J. Yang, J. Petruska,
J. Breslin, J. Baird, B. Scharf, T. Tripodi, G. Ryan, J. Tivade, J. Du,
D. Minn, C. Romfo, and C. Trotta for help and support with this
project. This work was supported by grants from the SMA
Foundation and the Harvard Stem Cell Institute. F. Hoffmann-La
Roche and PTC Therapeutics have filed three patent applications
entitled “Compounds for Treating Spinal Muscular Atrophy”
(WO2013/101974 A1, WO2013/112788 A1, and WO2013/119916 A2).
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS
www.sciencemag.org/content/345/6197/688/suppl/DC1
Materials and Methods
Figs. S1 to S9
Tables S1 to S4
References (49–56)
Movies S1 to S3
23 December 2013; accepted 24 June 2014
10.1126/science.1250127
LIPID CELL BIOLOGY
Polyunsaturated phospholipidsfacilitate membrane deformation andfission by endocytic proteinsMathieu Pinot,1,2 Stefano Vanni,1 Sophie Pagnotta,3 Sandra Lacas-Gervais,3
Laurie-Anne Payet,4 Thierry Ferreira,4 Romain Gautier,1 Bruno Goud,2
Bruno Antonny,1* Hélène Barelli1
Phospholipids (PLs) with polyunsaturated acyl chains are extremely abundant in a few
specialized cellular organelles such as synaptic vesicles and photoreceptor discs, but their
effect on membrane properties is poorly understood. Here, we found that polyunsaturated
PLs increased the ability of dynamin and endophilin to deform and vesiculate synthetic
membranes. When cells incorporated polyunsaturated fatty acids into PLs, the plasma
membrane became more amenable to deformation by a pulling force and the rate of
endocytosis was accelerated, in particular, under conditions in which cholesterol was
limiting. Molecular dynamics simulations and biochemical measurements indicated that
polyunsaturated PLs adapted their conformation to membrane curvature. Thus, by
reducing the energetic cost of membrane bending and fission, polyunsaturated PLs may
help to support rapid endocytosis.
Most cellularmembranes contain phospho-
lipids (PLs) with saturated and mono-
unsaturated acyl chains. However, in a
few specialized organelles, such as syn-
aptic vesicles, up to 80% of PLs contain
at least one polyunsaturated acyl chain (1, 2).
Such high levels suggest that polyunsaturated
lipids might endow membranes with specific
physicochemical properties.
In photoreceptor discs, which are perfectly
flat, polyunsaturated PLs facilitate the conforma-
tional change of rhodopsin (3). The influence of
polyunsaturated PLs on protein machineries that
act on curvedmembranes is unclear. Nevertheless,
exogenous treatment of neurons with polyun-
saturated fatty acids facilitates SNARE (soluble
N-ethylmaleimide–sensitive factor attachment
protein receptor) assembly (4) and the recycling
of synaptic vesicles (5, 6). Furthermore, poly-
unsaturated PLs make pure lipid bilayers more
flexible (7).
We studied the effect of polyunsaturated PLs
on the activity of the guanosine triphosphatase
(GTPase) dynamin and the banana-shaped pro-
tein endophilin, which cooperate in membrane
fission by assembling into spirals around the neck
of membrane buds (8, 9). We used liposomes or
giant unilamellar vesicles (GUVs) with a fixed
composition in terms of PL polar head groups
and varied the ratio between mono and polyun-
saturated PLs (tables S1 and S2; also see sup-
plementary materials and methods). We chose
C16:0-C18:1 and C18:0-C22:6 PLs (Fig. 1A) because
they are the most abundant of each PL class.
Dynamin hydrolyzed guanosine triphosphate
(GTP) 7.5 times faster on large liposomes con-
tainingpolyunsaturatedPLs comparedwithmono-
unsaturated PLs (Fig. 1B and fig. S1A). Moreover,
polyunsaturated PLs eliminated the sharp re-
sponse of dynamin to membrane curvature (Fig.
1C and fig. S1B) (10). Because GTP hydrolysis oc-
curs through contacts between dynaminmolecules
within the assembled spiral (11), these results
suggest that polyunsaturated PLs facilitate dynamin
self-assembly on flat membranes.
Using electron microscopy, we analyzed our
liposomes incubated with dynamin, endophilin,
and GTP, amixture optimal formembrane fission
(12). Before incubation, the liposomes displayed
a similar size distribution (radiusR=30 to 200nm)
(Fig. 1, D and E). After incubation, polyunsatu-
rated liposomes were consumed into small vesi-
cles (R ≈ 20 nm), whereas monounsaturated
liposomes appeared unchanged (Fig. 1, D and E,
and fig. S2, A and D). When GTP hydrolysis was
blocked, characteristic endophilin-dynamin spi-
rals (8, 9) formed on polyunsaturated liposomes,
but not on monounsaturated liposomes (Fig. 1D
and fig. S2, B, C, and E). Thus, polyunsaturated
membranes are sensitized to the mechanical ac-
tivities of the endophilin-dynamin complex.
Adhesion of liposomes to the electron micros-
copy grid can lead to an overestimate of au-
thentic fission owing to membrane breakage on
the stiff support (13). To overcome this caveat, we
used fission assays based on visualization ofmod-
el membranes by fluorescence microscopy. First,
we incubated GUVs with dynamin, endophilin,
and GTP and monitored the GUV diameter over
time (12). GUVs containing polyunsaturated PLs
showed a 14 to 30% decrease in size within
1 hour, suggesting consumption by membrane
fission, whereas GUVsmade ofmonounsaturated
SCIENCE sciencemag.org 8 AUGUST 2014 • VOL 345 ISSUE 6197 693
1Institut de Pharmacologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire,Université Nice Sophia Antipolis and CNRS, 06560 Valbonne,France. 2Unité Mixte de Recherche 144, Institut Curie andCNRS, F-75248 Paris, France. 3Centre Commun deMicroscopie Appliquée, Université Nice Sophia Antipolis, ParcValrose, 06000 Nice, France. 4Signalisation et TransportsIoniques Membranaires, Université de Poitiers and CNRS,Poitiers, France.*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
RESEARCH | REPORTS