RP1145 - World Bank Documents & Reports

MINISTRYOFFISHERIESANDMARINERESOURCES

SIERRALEONE

ResettlementActionPlan(RAP)fortheWestAfricaRegionalFisheriesProgram(WARFP),SierraLeone

DRAFTFINALREPORT

Prepared by:

S A Larmie, P O Box GP20200, Accra May, 2011

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

wb371432

Typewritten Text

RP1145

wb371432

Typewritten Text

wb371432

Typewritten Text

Ministry of Fisheries and Marine Resources

RAP for the West Africa Regional Fisheries Program (WARFP), Sierra Leone Page i

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................................... I

LIST OF TABLES ..................................................................................................................................................... IV

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ......................................................................................................................... V

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................................... VI

1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 1

1.1 BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................................................. 1

1.2 PURPOSE OF THE RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN (RAP) ............................................................................................. 1

1.3 REPORT OUTLINE .............................................................................................................................................. 2

2.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AND PROJECT SITES ................................................................ 3

2.1 PROJECT COUNTRY SETTING ................................................................................................................................ 3

2.2 BENEFITS OF THE PROJECT .................................................................................................................................. 5

2.2.1 Primary Benefits ....................................................................................................................................... 5

2.2.2 Indirect Benefits ....................................................................................................................................... 5

2.3 PROJECT LOCATION ........................................................................................................................................... 6

2.3.1 Location ................................................................................................................................................... 6

2.3.2 Marine Exposure ...................................................................................................................................... 6

2.3.3 Topography and Sea‐Bed Contours ......................................................................................................... 7

2.3.4 Geology .................................................................................................................................................... 7

2.3.5 Access ....................................................................................................................................................... 7

2.3.6 Existing Utilities ....................................................................................................................................... 8

2.3.7 Existing Land Use and Ownership ............................................................................................................ 8

2.4 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................................................................... 9

2.4.1 Project Engineering ................................................................................................................................ 10

2.4.2 Development Stages .............................................................................................................................. 12

2.4.3 Public Private Partnerships (PPP) ........................................................................................................... 12

2.4.4 Social and Environmental conditions at proposed project site .............................................................. 12

3.0 CENSUS AND SOCIO‐ECONOMIC CONDITIONS ........................................................................................ 14

3.1 SOCIO‐ECONOMIC CONDITION OF PROJECT SITE ..................................................................................................... 14

3.1.1 Demographic characteristics, Religion and Traditional Authority ......................................................... 14

3.1.2 Local economy/Occupation ................................................................................................................... 14

3.1.3 Social infrastructure ............................................................................................................................... 14

3.1.4 Household sizes/Characteristics............................................................................................................. 15

3.1.5 Water and Sanitation ............................................................................................................................. 15

3.2 IDENTIFICATION OF PAPS AND AFFECTED PROPERTIES ............................................................................................ 15

3.3 SOCIO‐ECONOMIC CONDITION OF PAPS .............................................................................................................. 15

3.3.1 Major occupation of PAPs ...................................................................................................................... 15

3.3.2 Impact on assets and livelihoods ........................................................................................................... 16

3.3.3 Income Levels of PAPs ............................................................................................................................ 16


RAP for the West Africa Regional Fisheries Program (WARFP), Sierra Leone Page ii

3.3.4 Vulnerable People .................................................................................................................................. 17

4.0 COUNTRY LEGAL, REGULATORY AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK ....................................................... 18

4.1 NATIONAL LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ................................................................................................. 18

4.2 INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK ............................................................................................................................. 21

4.3 LAND TENURE ................................................................................................................................................ 23

4.4 PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS INVOLVED IN LAND ADMINISTRATION .................................................................................... 24

5.0 WORLD BANK SAFEGUARD POLICIES ....................................................................................................... 25

5.1 SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND WORLD BANK OPERATIONS ................................................................................. 25

5.2 PROJECT LINKAGE WITH THE WORLD BANK SAFEGUARD POLICY ON INVOLUNTARY RESETTLEMENT ................................. 25

5.3 THE WORLD BANK’S SAFEGUARD POLICY ON INVOLUNTARY RESETTLEMENT, OP 4.12 .................................................. 25

5.4 GAPS BETWEEN SIERRA LEONE REGULATIONS AND WORLD BANK POLICIES ................................................................ 26

5.5 PROJECT MEASURES TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH WORLD BANK POLICY ................................................................. 27

6.0 PROJECT IMPACTS ON ASSETS AND LIVELIHOODS ................................................................................... 28

6.1 ASSESSMENT OF SOCIAL IMPACTS ....................................................................................................................... 28

7.0 ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA AND ENTITLEMENTS .............................................................................................. 30

7.1 PRINCIPLES AND OBJECTIVES .............................................................................................................................. 30

7.1.1 Regulatory Framework .......................................................................................................................... 30

7.1.2 Fair and adequate compensation .......................................................................................................... 30

7.1.3 Compensation payment ......................................................................................................................... 30

7.1.4 Community involvement and sensitisation ............................................................................................ 30

7.2 IDENTIFICATION OF VULNERABLE GROUPS ............................................................................................................ 31

7.3 ASSISTANCE TO VULNERABLE PEOPLE ................................................................................................................... 31

7.4 DESCRIPTION OF ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA ................................................................................................................. 31

7.5 ENTITLEMENT ................................................................................................................................................. 32

7.6 COMPENSATION DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................................................... 34

7.7 PROCEDURES FOR DELIVERY OF ENTITLEMENTS ..................................................................................................... 34

8.0 METHODS OF VALUING AFFECTED ASSETS .............................................................................................. 36

8.1.1 Basis of Valuation .................................................................................................................................. 36

8.2 VALUATION METHOD ...................................................................................................................................... 36

8.2.1 Structures ............................................................................................................................................... 36

8.2.2 Livelihood (Supplementary Assistance) .................................................................................................. 36

8.2.3 Economic Plants ..................................................................................................................................... 37

8.3 VALUATION AND COMPENSATION OPINION .......................................................................................................... 37

8.4 CUT‐OFF DATE ............................................................................................................................................... 37

8.5 COMPENSATION PAYMENT PROCEDURE .............................................................................................................. 38

8.6 ENGAGEMENT AND CONSULTATION WITH AFFECTED PERSONS ................................................................................. 38

9.0 CONSULTATIONS AND DISCLOSURE ........................................................................................................ 39

9.1 CONSULTATIONS WITH PAPS AND OTHER STAKEHOLDERS ........................................................................................ 39


RAP for the West Africa Regional Fisheries Program (WARFP), Sierra Leone Page iii

9.2 CONSULTATIONS PROCESSES AND AWARENESS OF BANK SAFEGUARDS REQUIREMENTS ................................................ 39

9.3 DOCUMENTATION OF CONSULTATION ................................................................................................................. 39

9.4 DISCLOSURE AND DISSEMINATION ...................................................................................................................... 40

9.4.1 What has been done .............................................................................................................................. 40

9.4.2 What needs to be done .......................................................................................................................... 40

10.0 GRIEVANCE MANAGEMENT AND REDRESS MECHANISM ........................................................................ 41

10.1 POTENTIAL GRIEVANCES/DISPUTES...................................................................................................................... 41

10.2 GRIEVANCE MANAGEMENT AND REDRESS MECHANISM ........................................................................................... 41

10.2.1 Overview ............................................................................................................................................ 41

10.2.2 Objective ............................................................................................................................................ 41

10.3 THE GRIEVANCE REDRESS PROCESS .................................................................................................................... 42

10.3.1 Receipts of complaints ....................................................................................................................... 42

10.3.2 Determining and implementing the redress action ........................................................................... 42

10.3.3 Verifying the redress action ............................................................................................................... 42

10.3.4 Dissatisfaction and Alternative Actions ............................................................................................. 43

10.3.5 Appeal to Court .................................................................................................................................. 43

10.3.6 Documentation and Tracing .............................................................................................................. 43

10.4 SCHEDULE FOR GRIEVANCE REDRESS ................................................................................................................... 43

11.0 ADMINISTRATIVE AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF RAP .......................... 45

12.0 INSTITUTIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES AND IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE ................................................... 47

12.1 INSTITUTIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES ....................................................................................................................... 47

12.2 RAP MANAGEMENT TEAMS .............................................................................................................................. 47

12.3 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN AND INSTITUTIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES ................................................................................ 47

13.0 MONITORING PLANS AND EVALUATION ................................................................................................. 49

13.1 INTERNAL MONITORING AND EVALUATION ........................................................................................................... 49

13.1.1 Purpose and Responsibility ................................................................................................................ 49

13.1.2 Monitoring and Evaluation Plan Indicators ....................................................................................... 49

13.1.3 Independent Impact Evaluation ........................................................................................................ 50

13.1.4 Reporting ........................................................................................................................................... 51

13.2 COMPLETION AUDIT ........................................................................................................................................ 51

13.2.1 Audit Components ............................................................................................................................. 51

13.2.2 Responsibility and Timeframe ........................................................................................................... 51

14.0 COST AND BUDGET ................................................................................................................................. 52

14.1 RAP BUDGET ................................................................................................................................................. 52

14.2 SOURCE OF FUNDING ....................................................................................................................................... 53

ANNEXES ............................................................................................................................................................. 54

ANNEX 1: STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION ................................................................................................................. 55

ANNEX 2: VALUATION AND COMPENSATION ............................................................................................................. 69


RAP for the West Africa Regional Fisheries Program (WARFP), Sierra Leone Page iv

ANNEX 3: CERTIFICATION OF VALUATION ................................................................................................................. 70

ANNEX 4: COMPENSATION PROFILE OF AFFECTED PEOPLE /PROPERTIES .......................................................................... 72

ANNEX 5: LISTS OF MEMBERS OF THE SAND MINING DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION ..................................................... 107

ANNEX 6: COMPENSATION CLAIM FORM ............................................................................................................... 118

ANNEX 7: COMPENSATION RECEIPT FOR CLAIMANT ................................................................................................. 120

ANNEX 8: GRIEVANCE AND RESOLUTION FORM ....................................................................................................... 122

ANNEX 9: COMMITMENT LETTER FROM MINISTRY OF LANDS, COUNTRY PLANNING AND THE ENVIRONMENT ....................... 124

ANNEX 10: LIST OF MEMBERS OF GRIEVANCE REDRESS COMMITTEE FROM KISSY DOCKYARD COMMUNITY ............................ 131

ANNEX 11: SAMPLE QUESTIONNAIRE USED IN THE CENSUS AND SOCIO‐ECONOMIC SURVEY ............................................... 133

ANNEX 12: PHOTO ALBUM OF THE ENTIRE RAP PROCESS ............................................................................................. 138

List of Tables

TABLE 1: WAVE HEIGHTS AT CLINE BAY .................................................................................................................................. 7

TABLE 2: INCOME LEVELS ................................................................................................................................................... 16

TABLE 3: INSTITUTIONS AND THEIR MANDATES /INTERESTS ...................................................................................................... 21

TABLE 4: COMPARISON OF SIERRA LEONEAN REGULATIONS WITH WORLD BANK POLICIES .............................................................. 26

TABLE 5: SOCIAL IMPACTS/ ISSUES ....................................................................................................................................... 28

TABLE 6: ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA ............................................................................................................................................. 32

TABLE 7: ENTITLEMENT MATRIX .......................................................................................................................................... 33

TABLE 8: PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR GRIEVANCE REDRESS ........................................................................................................ 43

TABLE 9: INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK .................................................................................................................................. 45

TABLE 10: IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ...................................................................................................................................... 48

TABLE 11: PROPOSED RAP BUDGET .................................................................................................................................... 53

List of Figures

FIGURE 1: LOCATION MAP OF SIERRA LEONE SHOWING THE PROVINCES ....................................................................................... 4

FIGURE 2: EXISTING PLAN AT KISSY DOCKYARD ........................................................................................................................ 8

FIGURE 3: PROPOSED FUTURE PLAN OF PHASE 1 ...................................................................................................................... 9

FIGURE 4: COMPONENTS OF PHASE 1 ................................................................................................................................... 10

List of Plates

PLATE 1: SITE PHOTOS, KISSY DOCKYARD. ............................................................................................................................. 13


RAP for the West Africa Regional Fisheries Program (WARFP), Sierra Leone Page v

Acronyms and Abbreviations

CCLME Canary Current Large Marine Ecosystem

ESA Environmental and Social Assessment

GEF Global Environmental Facility

GoSL Government of Sierra Leone

IDA International Development Agency

MFMR Ministry of Fisheries and Marine Resources

NGO Non‐Governmental Organisation

FMCO Fisheries Management and Coordination Office

PRAO Regional Fisheries Program for West Africa

RAP Resettlement Action Plan

RCA Replacement Cost Approach

RP Resettlement Plan

RPF Resettlement Policy Framework

SEA Strategic Environmental Assessment

SL Sierra Leone

SLEPA Sierra Leone Environmental Protection Agency

SRFC Sub‐Regional Fisheries Commission

WARFP West Africa Regional Fisheries Program

WB World Bank


RAP for the West Africa Regional Fisheries Program (WARFP), Sierra Leone Page vi

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

About 990 people will be affected under the proposed Harbour Project. The project affected

people are mainly residential occupants (house owners and tenants), small shop/business

operators, food vendors, sand miners (Canoe owners and workers/Shovel men/Truck

Drivers/Sand Agents and Sellers), and fishermen.

The impacts of the project include permanent relocation of kiosks, total demolition of about 43

residential structures, physical displacement of about 43 households with 607 members

(comprising house owners and their families, and tenants), loss of livelihoods and source of

income for about 32 food vendors and 378 sand miners. The types of properties to be affected are

wide‐ranging. They include residential houses, uncompleted building, and wooden structures.

Some trees and economic plants to be affected include palm, banana, mango, pawpaw, orange,

apple, fignut and sugar cane.

The affected structures and plants are found within the area of immediate project influence which

is estimated at 2,500 square metres from the coast line. The present legislation in Sierra Leone

considers all land 50 metres landward of the 0 contour as belonging to the Port Authority. The

area at Kissy cove is hence considered to be under the jurisdiction of the Sierra Leone Ports

Authority and hence, no land acquisition issue for the project as this is GoSL land.

Taking cognisance of the mandatory statutory requirements and certification for land ownership

and property development, none of the affected properties surveyed qualified as statutorily

certified developments and therefore according to Sierra Leonean laws do not qualify for direct

compensation. However, according to the World Bank policy on involuntary resettlement, they

will be provided with resettlement assistance but no compensation for land.

Generally, the impacts are of high magnitude with total demolition of most of the affected

properties.

The Total Compensation Payable for the project affected persons at Kissy Dockyard is estimated at

USD 399,960.34 (Three Hundred and Ninety‐Nine Thousand, Nine Hundred and Sixty Dollars and

Thirty‐Four Cents) as at the date of valuation.

A total resettlement action plan budget of USD 642,558.36 (Six Hundred and Forty‐Two Thousand,

Five Hundred and Fifty‐Eight Dollars and Thirty‐Six Cents) is proposed for the implementation of

the RAP. This amount includes the expenditure of the proposed RAP management teams to be

constituted, grievance processes, the compensations payable to project affected people and the

total amount for land acquisition and preparation.


RAP for the West Africa Regional Fisheries Program (WARFP), Sierra Leone Page 1

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background

Through the intermediary of the World Bank, the Sub‐Regional Fisheries Commission (SRFC) has

acquired a grant from the Global Environment Facility (GEF) and the Government of Japan (PHRD),

for the preparation of a Regional Fisheries Program for West Africa (PRAO).

The SRFC through the World Bank has further negotiated additional funding for extra

infrastructural development project for Liberia and Sierra Leone. This project aims at constructing

a jetty in Sierra Leone for the enhancement of the fishing industry.

This program covers 9 coastal countries and its development objective is to sustainably increase

wealth generated from the exploitation of the fisheries resources of these countries through:

i. good governance and sustainable fisheries management,

ii. reducing illegal fishing, and

iii. increasing the value and the benefits generated by the fisheries products as well as this

value captured by the countries.

The construction of the jetty triggers two of the ten World Bank safeguard policies; the

Involuntary resettlement policy, OP 4.12 and the Environmental Assessment, OP 4.01. An

environmental and social assessment (ESA) has been conducted in both countries and the findings

indicated the positive social and economic impact the project stands to generate, but it also

highlighted the potential negative social impacts associated with the project particularly in Sierra

Leone.

This has culminated in the need for the preparation and implementation of a Resettlement Action

Plan during the project preparatory phase before the construction of the jetty or any related civil

works so as to mitigate these negative social impacts from this investment.

Mr. Seth Larmie of Ghana was contracted to prepare the Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) for the

project and was assisted by Mr Ebbin Abaka‐ Yankson.

This Resettlement Action Plan is prepared to contribute to the smooth execution of the Project by

offering mitigation and monitoring solutions to any adverse social impacts including livelihood

issues which have emerged from the implementation of the project.

1.2 Purpose of the Resettlement Action Plan (RAP)

The preparation of the RAP is a requirement for projects that entail involuntary resettlement,

issues of compensation, acquisition of land, impact on livelihood, or restricted access to natural

resources under the World Bank safeguard policy on Involuntary Resettlement.



The objective for this RAP is to provide a road map to implement the actions, institutional

arrangements, schedules and budgets that will take care of anticipated resettlements. These

arrangements are also to ensure that there is a systematic process for the different stages of the

implementation of an action plan that assures participation of affected persons, involvement of

relevant institutions and stakeholders, adherence to both World Bank and Government of Sierra

Leone procedures and requirements, and payment of compensation for affected persons.

Thus, in meeting this World Bank requirement, the RAP provides guidance to project stakeholders

to adequately address all resettlement related challenges.

1.3 Report Outline

The RAP has the following outline:

1. Introduction

2. Description of the Proposed Project

3. Relevant Country Legal, Regulatory and Administrative Framework

4. Social Assessment and Socio‐Economic Surveys

5. Potential Project impacts on Assets and Livelihood

6. Valuations, Eligibility and Entitlements

7. Grievance Redress Mechanisms

8. Budget and Sources of Funding

9. Monitoring and Evaluation

10. Stakeholder Consultations and Participation 11. References



2.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AND PROJECT SITES

2.1 Project Country Setting

Sierra Leone is located on the west coast of Africa and covers an area of about 72,000 square

kilometres (28,000 square miles). It extends from latitude 7 degrees north to 10 degrees north,

and from longitude 10 degrees west to 14 degrees west. The Republic of Guinea borders it on the

north and northeast, and the Republic of Liberia borders it on the east and southeast. On the west

and southwest, the Atlantic Ocean extends approximately 340 kilometres (211 miles). Figure 1

shows the location map of Sierra Leone and its provinces.

The current system of government in Sierra Leone, established under the 1991 constitution, is

modelled on the following structure of government: the Legislature, the Executive and the

Judiciary. Sierra Leone is a Republic with an Executive President and a multi‐party system of

government with a 124‐seat parliament (112 elected members and 12 paramount chiefs).

Administratively, Sierra Leone is divided into 4 provinces or administrative regions —the Western

Area, and three provinces (Northern, Eastern, and Southern provinces). The Western Area

includes the capital, Freetown. Northern Province is divided into five districts, Southern Province

into four, and Eastern Province into three. Each district is headed by a district chairman who is

elected.

The districts are also subdivided into constituencies and each constituency is represented by a

member of parliament. The constituencies are divided into chiefdoms, which are controlled by

paramount chiefs. The chiefdoms are further divided into wards represented by local government

councillors. At the lowest level i.e. the community level, there are sections and villages. There are

149 chiefdoms and 394 wards in Sierra Leone. The chiefs are hereditary rulers who are elected for

life. The representatives and councillors are all elected.

At the local level, there are 12 district councils and 5 town councils outside the Western Area. The

five town councils are Bo, Kenema, Makeni, Bonthe and Koidu each headed by a Mayor. These are

large urban settlements in the provinces. The Western Area has a rural area council and a city

council for Freetown, the nation’s capital. The Freetown City Council is headed by the Mayor of

Freetown and has 49 councillors. There are 49 ward committees in the Freetown City Council and

each headed by a councillor. There are in addition to the councillors 10 selected residents. The

project area falls under the Jurisdiction of the Freetown City Council.

The actual site within the estuary chosen for the location of the harbour complex, also known as

Kissy, lies within Cline Bay, between the cliff of Ardon Point and Cline Point.



W E S T A F R I C A

S I E R R A L E O N E

20°E0° 20°E

20°S

0°

20°N

A F R I C A

Sierra LeoneWEST AFRICA

FREETOWN

Makeni

Kenema

Bo

G U I N E A

L I B E R I ANational Capital

District Capital

Trunk Road

International Boundary

District Boundary0 20 40 60 Km.

River

L E G E N D

Figure 1: Location Map of Sierra Leone showing the Provinces



Sierra Leone has one of the richest marine fishing zones in all of West Africa with an estimated

maximum sustainable yield of between 170,000 and 300,000 Tons annually. However, the

complete lack of proper fish landing and handling facilities is not only preventing the country from

benefiting fully from this resource but also prevents Sierra Leone from earning much needed

foreign exchange from trans‐shipment of foreign caught fish and the repair and servicing of

fishing vessels operating in Sierra Leone's coastal waters. The few existing facilities, besides being

practically obsolete, also suffer from a whole range of setbacks such as acute shortage of all kinds

of spares, lubricants, fuel and unsteady water and power supplies. None of the existing facilities

conform to the high standards required for the export of processed fish to countries like the USA,

Japan and EEC members.

2.2 Benefits of the Project

2.2.1 Primary Benefits

Sustainably increase wealth generated from the exploitation of the fisheries resources of these

countries through:

i. good governance and sustainable fisheries management,

ii. reducing illegal fishing, and

iii. increasing the value and the benefits generated by the fisheries products as well as this

value captured by the countries.

2.2.2 Indirect Benefits

In addition to the direct macroeconomic benefits, many other indirect social and economic

benefits would be associated with the proposed development. These include:

provision substantial employment opportunities for the local people;

temporary employment from construction activities; and

increase the supply of fish protein for the population at large



2.3 Project Location

2.3.1 Location

The site within the estuary chosen for the location of the harbour complex, also known as Kissy,

lies within Cline Bay, between the cliff of Ardon Point and Cline Point.

2.3.2 Marine Exposure

Tides

At the northern mouth of the estuary, sand bars of considerable magnitude obstruct the flow of

water from and into the estuary and consequently the velocity of the tidal stream is very great. In

the dry season, during spring tides, the flood stream runs from 1 to 1.5 knots lasting for about 5

hours, and the stream on the ebb tide varies from 2 to 2.5 knots for about 7 hours. In the wet

season, however, when the tidal prism is augmented by the flood discharge from the river, the

ebb stream attains velocities in the region of 5 knots. The tide brings in fair quantities of silt from

the upper reaches of the estuary.

The Highest Astronomical Tide or maximum tidal range goes up to 3.38 metres above the Lowest

Astronomical Tide or Chart Datum. Mean High Water Springs, also known as MHWS, are 3.0

metres above Chart Datum whereas Mean Low Water Springs or MLWS are 0.40 metres above

Chart Datum. Mean High Water Neaps or MHWN are 2.30 metres above Chart Datum whereas

Mean Low Water Neaps or MLWN are 1.0 metre above Chart Datum.

Winds

The two principal winds are the northeast trades and the southwest trades. The northeast trades

are the prevailing winds during the dry months (December to April) whereas the latter during the

rainy season (May to November).

The northeast trades blowing over the coast are known as the Maritime Trades and are relatively

cool and humid. The southwest trades are the Southeast Trades from the southern hemisphere,

deflected at right angles as they cross the Equator. Near the coast the prevailing seasonal winds

are affected by land breezes. The most frequent wind directions are from northwest and

southwest with speeds ranging from 4 to 12 knots.

Waves and Swells

Almost a perennial swell of moderate height, coming in from the Atlantic disturbs ships at their

moorings within the estuary. This phenomenon is particularly evident during the wet season when

both frequency and amplitude are greatest. The maximum amplitude is in the region of 1.0 metre.

Wind waves, usually not higher than 1.0 metre, only occur for brief spells usually just before the

change of seasons about May and October. Within Cline Bay waters are relatively calm and the

wave height generally less than 0,50 metres. However, higher waves occur very briefly during



season changes (March‐April & September‐October). Although no actual wave records for Cline

Bay exist, personal opinions of those familiar with the area suggest maximum wave heights in the

region of 1.20 to 1.80 metres. However, an approximate idea of the significant wave heights at

Cline Bay is given in Table 1 below.

Table 1: Wave heights at Cline Bay

Direction Fetch Length

(m)

Average Depth

(m)

Maximum Wind

Speed (mph)

Wave Length

(m)

Significant Wave

Height (m)

Northwest 6700 11 30 11.5 1.2

North 6100 7 30 10.4 1.1

Northeast 5800 11 30 9.8 1.1

East 7600 9 30 11.5 1.2

2.3.3 Topography and Sea‐Bed Contours

Kissy bay is a flat cove within the larger Cline Bay which stretches from Cline Point all the way to

Ardon Point. The area behind the cove rises from a gently undulating terrain to the West to a

gentle cliff towards the East. A small oil refinery and tank farm are situated on the top of the cliff.

The area behind the cove is sparsely built‐up. The area at the root of the cliff shows a marked

accumulation of sand. The depth of the water in the cove is very shallow, deepening out along the

cliff towards its end. There is a light littoral drift in a predominantly easterly direction. The ‐10.0

metre contour lies approximately 400 metres away from the shoreline. There are no reports of

the area ever having been dredged although it is believed that some dredging did take place in

front of the existing facilities of the Sierra Fishing Company.

2.3.4 Geology

Evidence from the ruins of Perseverance Pier and the more recent service jetty of the Sierra

Fishing Company show that piles have been successfully driven in the area. Borings taken in

connection with the ferry terminal on the ‐1,0 metre contour on the opposite side of Cline Bay

show a thin mud layer about half a metre thick overlying 8 metres of sand and clay, below which

lie a further 7 metres of pink clay and sand. Borings taken closest to the proposed fishing harbour

complex are those taken for the oil terminal at Ardon point. These show sand to a depth of 7

metres below bed level.

2.3.5 Access

Access to the proposed new fishing terminal is off the existing dual carriageway leading inland

from the main port area in Freetown. Once off the dual carriageway, a secondary narrow two lane

paved road, approximately 600 metres long, leads to the entrance of the proposed harbour along

Pilgrim's Way, Figure 2.

The dual carriageway is in a fair state of repair; the secondary road, although paved, is in need of

maintenance. The areas to either side of this road are relatively free of obstruction.



2.3.6 Existing Utilities

Electricity, telephone and water supply are presently being supplied to the Sierra Fishing

Company, albeit on a very irregular basis. The recent commissioning of the Bumbuna hydro‐

electric dam should stabilise the power supply but standby power will still need to be provided for

the cold storage facilities. The proposed harbour complex will be provided with its own standby

generation and water storage facilities.

2.3.7 Existing Land Use and Ownership

The present legislation in Sierra ‐ Leone considers all land 50 metres landward of the 0 contour as

belonging to the Port Authority. The area at Kissy cove is hence considered to be under the

jurisdiction of the Sierra Leone Ports Authority. The area covering the Sierra Fishing Company's

existing facilities is leased on a freehold basis to the company.

F

Figure 2: Existing Plan at Kissy Dockyard



Figure 3: Proposed Future Plan of Phase 1

2.4 Project Description

The new terminal facility will be constructed in phases and Phase 1 as shown in the figure below

will be provided with:

An offloading and servicing quay, 220 m long;

A transhipment quay (bonded), 72 m long;

An export quay for a reefer (bonded), 100 m long;

Port administration and third party buildings;

Processing facility for lease and utilities

Fisheries Quay: The fisheries quay will be dredged to ‐5.0 m below Chart Datum and will serve as

the main unloading quay for fresh fish destined for both the local and export markets, including

the processing facilities that may be located inside the port area, Figure 4 above.

Transhipment Quay: The transhipment quay will be located over the ‐5.0 m contour and will serve

as a direct transhipment quay for frozen products destined for the export market. These products

may either be stored temporarily inside the cold storage facility or transhipped directly.



Reefer Quay: The proposed reefer quay will be located on the ‐8.0 m contour to enable the largest

reefers to ultimately call at the terminal.

Figure 4: Components of Phase 1

Port Administration Buildings: The port’s buildings will include all the buildings required to run the

port plus one model factory shell, namely:

Main port building – 480 m2;

Ministry of Fisheries and Natural Resources building ‐ 305 m2;

Port operations building – 50 m2;

Hygiene facilities – 120 m2

Various (security, customs, etc.) – 50m2

Workshops – 100m2

One factory unit in shell form – 5,000 m2 for lease to third parties.

2.4.1 Project Engineering

Dredging

Dredging of the estuary bottom will be carried out in front of the repair yard, landing jetty and

perhaps in front of the trans‐shipment terminal. The minimum guaranteed depth in front of the

jetties will be around 5.0 metres below Chart Datum. Pending further on‐site investigations, the

depth of water in front of the transhipment terminal will be in the region of 8.0 metres below

Chart Datum, requiring no dredging.



Reclamation

If laboratory testing shows that the above dredged material is suitable for landfill, it will be

pumped ashore to form the reclamation area. Further sand will be dredged from predetermined

sites within the estuary, subject to an environmental impact study, and pumped ashore to

complete the reclamation. The fill will be levelled off to ensure a finished land level 5.38 m above

Chart Datum or 2.38 m above High Water Spring Tide (HWST). The reclaimed area will enable 3

plots, each of 5,000 m2 to be set aside for commercial processing as the need arises. The rest of

the area will be paved in block paving and will include areas for parking, services and utilities.

Figure 5 illustrates a typical cross section.

Quays

The proposed quay structure for the entire reclamation, consisting of the unloading quay, the

transhipment quay and the reefer quay, will be in sheet piles with a reinforced concrete cope

beam. The crown level of the cope beam will be 5.38 m above Chart Datum or 2.38 m above

HWST. The rear of the reclamation will be retained by a rubble slope over a geotextile filter.

Access Roads and Parking

The access road from the main road, Pilgrim's way, will be repaired. No widening is envisaged.

Inside the port area, paved access roads will be constructed to service all the factory plots, office

blocks and various other services. Unauthorised vehicles and persons will not be permitted within

the port area. The port security will be as per the International Ship and Port Facility Security Code

(ISPS Code).

Services and Utilities

Within the area of the proposed port, a comprehensive package of services will be installed to

render the port a self‐contained work area. This will include sewage treatment, water supply, fuel

supply and standby generation. The fuel storage facilities within the port area will also provide

fuel for the quayside refuelling facilities. The refuelling facilities at the unloading terminal will

consist of 2 metered hydrants inside a service duct at the quayside. Similarly, fresh water will also

be supplied at the above points from the water storage tanks. Both fuel and water storage will be

designed for at least 7 days supply.

Power will be metered out to various users as well as to the general port infrastructure, such as

the telephone system, lighting and air conditioning of the port administration block and other

offices and street lighting. Adequate lighting facilities will also be incorporated to permit night

time operations, such as transhipment and sorting, thereby increasing efficiency and turnover. It

is estimated that approximately 3,000 KVA would be required if Phase I is completed as indicated.

Boat Yard

The repair of fishing vessels will be carried out via a mobile 100 Ton gantry operating on a

reclaimed area at the root of the rubble retaining bank. A 50 m wide reclamation area will be

reclaimed adjacent to the port area, Figure 6, and vessels brought ashore by the gantry may be

parked to one side for repair. Two workshops will be constructed to service the vessels under



repair. The boat pen under the gantry will be 7 metres wide and 25 m long with a draft at low tide

of around 4.0 m. A 100 Ton gantry would be able to service most of the vessels at Freetown.

Pending detailed geotechnical investigations, the boat pen under the gantry may be constructed

using concrete blocks.

2.4.2 Development Stages

The Phase 1 development illustrated in Figure 3 will provide Sierra Leone with the basic port

facilities to land, tranship or process and re‐export its fishery products in accordance with its

international obligations. Phase 1 is a precautionary approach and future expansion, if required,

may be carried out. The reefer berth may be extended by another 100 m to permit larger vessels

to berth along the reefer quay. Additional cold storage may be constructed to handle the increase

in exports. This would allow the larger reefers to pick up trade directly en‐route. Additional

processing facilities may also be constructed within the areas set aside for such activities and

reclaimed under Phase 1.

2.4.3 Public Private Partnerships (PPP)

It is envisaged that the Sierra Leone Ports Authority (SLPA) will own and operate the basic port

infrastructure, i.e. the quays, port buildings and the reclaimed areas. The port authority would be

responsible for water and mains electricity supply and waste water treatment. Included in the

Phase 1 port buildings is one factory unit in shell form divided into 5 separate units for lease to

third parties (fish processors). The aim of this initiative is to set a high standard of construction

and hygiene for the initial investors and provide the Sierra Leone Ports Authority with an early

revenue stream. The remaining two plots would be developed under PPP guidelines. The rest of

the typical ports services like cold storage, ice supply, refuelling, vessel repair and stand‐by power

generation will be farmed out under PPP initiatives to provide the private sector with investment

opportunities.

2.4.4 Social and Environmental conditions at proposed project site The Kissy Dockyard site is situated at the estuary of the stream, not far from the Port of Freetown and under the Freetown City Council, Ward 361 jurisdiction. The boundary of the site is essentially occupied by irregular dwellings, occupied by sea sand mining operators whose activity is currently predominant on the site. More than 250 people are engaged in this activity. It is a densely populated area with about 50 residential structures within the confines of the project area. Plate 1 shows some photos of the site. On an environmental level, Kissy Dockyard site does not have any particular ecological sensitivity issue in terms of biodiversity (no Marine Protected Areas; no mangroves, no spawning zone), but there is intense landing and sale of sea sand.



Residential Dwellings Landing and sale of sea sand Boats for sand transport

Plate 1: Site Photos, Kissy Dockyard.



3.0 CENSUS AND SOCIO‐ECONOMIC CONDITIONS

The project will impact directly on the residents of lower Kissy dockyard which consists of a shanty

community established during the civil war in the late nineties. In order to know exactly and

completely the impacts of the Project and the resettlement assistance required, a census and

socio‐economic survey of the affected people and assets were undertaken. The survey periods

for the project are:

18th to 21st February 2011 (First Mission); and

13th to 15th April 2011 (Second Mission).

The census survey involved identification of affected persons and their affected properties. The

methodology for the socio‐economic data included interviews with affected persons,

administration of questionnaires coupled with consultations with the Sand Mining Development

Association, Councillor of Kissy Dockyard, Traditional and Opinion Leaders as well as relevant

literature review.

3.1 Socio‐economic condition of project site

3.1.1 Demographic characteristics, Religion and Traditional Authority

The population of the affected site is estimated at about 1,000 with a sex ratio of 7 males to 3

females. The population is predominantly youth between 20 – 40 years. The adult population

(ages between 40 and 60) represent 25% of the total population at the project site.

About 90% of the inhabitants are Moslems and the main language spoken here is the Creole

(Krio). The Temnes are the main ethnic group found here. Other tribes found here include Limba,

Mende, Madingo, Susu and Fullah.

There is one traditional council headed by the Chief, Pa Combrabai Sesay. The traditional

authority plays key roles in maintaining law and order in the communities and settling of disputes

among the local people.

3.1.2 Local economy/Occupation

The people at Kissy Dockyard community are mainly fishmongers, sand miners with few of them

involved in small retail businesses. The commercial activities are dominated by petty trading and

hawking, dressmaking, tailoring, handicrafts, hairdressing and fitting mechanics.

3.1.3 Social infrastructure

The site is fairly well linked to the rest of the capital. There are about 2 primary schools, 3 junior

secondary schools (St. Helena, Western Churchill, 4 senior secondary schools (Independent



Memorial Government Secondary School, Ahmadiya Secondary School, and Government

Technical School) and 1 tertiary institution (Institute of Advance Management and Technology,

IAMTEC). There is also one Arabic school in the community. There are also about 5 privately

owned clinics, 2 health posts. The Kissy Dockyard community has also got a market at the Ferry

terminal and a police station.

3.1.4 Household sizes/Characteristics

The size of each household on the average is between the range of 8‐10. The men are mostly the

bread winners in the community. The households’ characteristics are predominantly mixture of

the nuclear and extended family systems.

3.1.5 Water and Sanitation

About 95% of the total population of the Kissy Dockyard community have access to safe water as

a result of the provision of pipe borne water. There are no proper sanitary and waste disposal

facilities. Solid and liquid waste mainly effluents from public and domestic toilets wastes are

mostly dumped into the sea.

3.2 Identification of PAPs and Affected Properties

About 990 people will be affected under the proposed Harbour Project. The affected people

includes: House owners, tenants, sand mining workers and traders. The types of properties to be

affected are wide‐ranging. Details of the affected properties are shown under Annex 2

(Valuations and Compensations for Kissy Dockyard Harbour Project) and Annex 4 (Compensation

Profile of PAPs).

The common and dominant structures to be affected are residential structures (Mud block, Solid

sandcrete concrete, Mud, Plastic and Zinc sheets). Other structures to be affected include

wooden kiosks, and Tarpaulin shed. The common trees/plants to be affected are Banana,

Pawpaw, Mango, Coconut, Fignut, and Local apple.

3.3 Socio‐economic condition of PAPs

3.3.1 Major occupation of PAPs

Generally, the major occupation or work of the project affected people at Kissy Dockyard can be

group into the following:

Fisher folks (Fishermen/Fish Mongers);

Business men and women (deals in petty trading, palm oil);

Government workers (Security personnel, Fisheries officer);

Petty traders (mostly is small provision kiosks and under shed);

Sand mining (Canoe owners and workers/Shovel men/Truck Drivers/Sand Agents and Sellers)



Artisans (mostly carpenters, masons and mechanics);

Drinking spot (Palm wine Sellers); and

Food vendors (operating on table tops under shed);

3.3.2 Impact on assets and livelihoods

The project affected people are mainly residential occupants (house owners and tenants), small

shop/business operators, food vendors, sand miners (Canoe owners and workers/Shovel

men/Truck Drivers/Sand Agents and Sellers), and fishermen.

The impacts of the project include permanent relocation of kiosks, total demolition of about 43

residential structures, physical displacement of about 43 households with 607 members

(comprising house owners and their families, and tenants), loss of livelihoods and source of

income for about 32 food vendors and 378 sand miners. Properties to be affected include

residential houses, uncompleted building, and wooden structures. Some trees and economic

plants to be affected include palm, banana, mango, pawpaw, orange, apple, fignut and sugar

cane.

The affected structures and plants are found within the area of immediate project influence

which is estimated at 2,500 square metres from the coast line.

3.3.3 Income Levels of PAPs

The estimated ranges of income/revenue or sales levels of common and major occupations of

PAPs at the project site are provided in Table 2.

Table 2: Income Levels

No. Occupation or Job activity Revenue/Sales (from small to large) Comment

Le USD

1 Sand Mining

Boat owners

Boat workers

Shovel men

Truck Drivers

Sand sellers

500,000

20,000

60,000

300,000

200,000

119

5

14

71

48

Daily income

2 Provision shop 35,000 – 50,000 8 ‐ 12 Daily revenue

3 Fishermen 150,000 – 200,000 36 – 48 Daily revenue

4 Security Personnel 250,000 – 350,000 60 – 83 Monthly income

5 Petty Trader 20,000 – 35,000 5 – 8 Daily sales

6 Artisans (carpenters/ Mason) 200,000 – 300,000 48 – 71 Monthly revenue

7 Drinking bar operators 25,000 – 40,000 6 – 10 Daily sales

8 Food vendors (Rice and stew) 80,000 – 130,000 20– 31 Daily sales



3.3.4 Vulnerable People

Based on the socio‐economic conditions, field observations, as well as consultations with contact

persons or representatives of affected people, none of the affected property owners or users in

Kissy Dockyard community could be deemed vulnerable for the purpose of receiving special

attention or additional livelihood benefits as at date of the census/socio‐economic study.



4.0 COUNTRY LEGAL, REGULATORY AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK

4.1 National Legal and Regulatory Framework

Some relevant laws and regulations are the following:

The Constitution of Sierra Leone, 1991

The Land Policy, 2005

Environmental Protection Agency Act, 2008 and the Environmental Protection Agency

(Amendment) Act, 2010

The Local Government Act, 2004

The Sierra Leone Maritime Administration Act, 2000

The Factories Act, 1974

The Fishery Products Regulations, 2007 (The Public Health Act, 1960)

The Constitution of Sierra Leone, 1991

This is an Act to make provision for a new Constitution of Sierra Leone, and for connected

purposes. The Constitution includes some provisions to protect the right of individuals to private

property, and also sets principles under which citizens may be deprived of their property in the

public interest (described in Section 21). Section 21 provides that:

No property of any description shall be compulsorily taken possession of, and no interest in or right

over property of any description shall be compulsorily acquired, except where the following

conditions are satisfied, that is to say:

a) the taking of possession or acquisition is necessary in the interest of defence, public

order, public morality, public health, town and country planning, the development or

utilisation of any property in such manner as to promote the public benefit or the public

welfare of citizens of Sierra Leone; and

b) the necessity therefore is such as to afford reasonable justification for the causing of any

hardship that may result to any person having any interest in or right over the property;

and

c) provision is made by law applicable to that taking of possession or acquisition:

i. for the prompt payment of adequate compensation; and

ii. securing to any person having an interest in or right over the property, a right of

access to the court or other impartial and independent authority for the

determination of his interest or right, and the amount of any compensation to

which he entitled and for the purpose of obtaining prompt payment of that

compensation.



Environmental Protection Agency Act, 2008 and the Environmental Protection Agency

(Amendment) Act, 2010

The Environmental Protection Agency Act, 2008 is an Act to establish the Environmental

Protection Agency (EPA) ‐ Sierra Leone, to provide for the effective protection of the environment

and for other related matters.

Sections 24 of the Act list project activities requiring an Environmental Impact Assessment license.

Sections 25 and 26 of the Act describe factors for determining whether a project requires as

environmental impact assessment and the contents of environmental impact assessment

respectively. The Act describes the procedures to be followed to obtain permits for both existing

and proposed undertakings through the conduct of environmental impact assessments.

The Environmental Protection Agency (Amendment) Act, 2010 is an Act to amend the

Environmental Protection Agency Act, 2008. The amendment sought to give executive powers to

the Board.

The Local Government Act, 2004

This is an Act to consolidate with amendments, the law on local government, and to provide for

the decentralisation and devolution of functions, powers and services to local councils and for

other matters connected therewith. The Act establishes the local council as the highest political

authority in the locality and who shall have legislative and executive powers to be exercised in

accordance with this Act. This Act in its First Schedule under section 2 establishes the localities

namely: Districts, Towns, and Cities. The part II of this schedule also establishes the number of

Paramount Chiefs in each local council. The Third Schedule establishes the functions devolved to

the local councils. The Fourth and Fifth Schedules establish departments under each local council,

and Valuation list and Rate Books respectively.

National Lands Policy, 2005

Some relevant portions of the Policy are described as follows:

Acquisition, Security of tenure and protection of land rights

Provided that payment of adequate compensation in reasonable time will be made, government

may acquire land wherever and whenever appropriate to, among other things.

Secure and control areas of urban expansion.

Facilitate urban renewal and redevelopment programmers.

Implement any rural or urban improvement programme.

Provide social infrastructure.

Provide promptly serviced or un‐serviced lands at prices, which can secure socially and

economically acceptable patterns of economic development.

Provide for the purpose of national defence, national security, national health and conflict

resolution.

Protect areas of historical, cultural or ecological interest.



The principle describes land as a common national or communal property resource held in trust

for the people and which must be used in the long term interest of the people of Sierra Leone.

Such principle only holds where it does not violate existing rights of private ownership

Compensation to be paid for lands acquired through compulsory Government acquisition will be

fair and adequate and will be determined, among other things, through negotiations that take into

consideration government investment in the area.

Local Authority Assemblies, (District and Town Council), may negotiate for land for development

purpose and concessionary prices or as gift, but all such grants should be properly documented

and processed.

No interest in or right over any land belonging to an individual or family can be disposed of

without consultation with the owner or occupier of the land.

No interest in or right over any land belonging to an individual or family can be compulsorily

acquired without payment, in reasonable time, of fair and adequate compensation.

Ways to minimize land tenure disputes

Conflicts with respect to land use will have to be resolved at local, district, regional or national

level before any economic activity commences.

Land Ministry will pursue the following to minimize land tenure disputes and their associated

ethnic conflicts;

a. Implementation of a programme for the production of large scale maps of land parcels and

buildings in all urban areas and locations, where disputes are prevalent.

b. enactment of legislation to require individual, traditional, family and other land owners to

survey and demarcate their land boundaries with the approval of the Survey’s Division in the

Ministry of Lands, Country Planning and the Environment.

c. Establishment of an early warning mechanism to detect potential areas of land disputes for

the purpose of taking preventive measures.

d. The Chief Justice shall create a special division of the High Court properly equipped to deal

solely with land cases.

The Sierra Leone Maritime Administration Act, 2000

This is an Act to establish an autonomous body for the registration of ships and other vessels, the

licensing and safety of maritime personnel and for the regulation and development generally of

maritime, coastal and inland water transport and for other matters connected therewith. This act

establishes the Administration to regulate and develop improved standards of performance,

practice and safety in the shipping industry in Sierra Leone, including the coastal and inland water

transport system, and in the maritime environment.



The Factories Act, 1974

The Factories Act, 1974 is an Act to consolidate and amend the law relating to factories and is

applicable to factories belonging to or in the occupation of the state. This Act establishes under

Section 8 that;

(1) Before any person occupies or uses as a factory any premises which were not so occupied or

used by him at the commencement of this Act, or at the date of application of the Act to such

premises, he shall apply for the registration of such premises by sending to the Chief Inspector

a written notice containing particulars set out in the First Schedule.

(2) Upon receipt of such notice and on being satisfied that the premises are suitable for use as a

factory of the nature stated in the notice, the Chief Inspector shall cause the premises to be

registered and shall issue to the applicant a certificate of registration in the form set out in the

Second Schedule.

The Act under Section 8 establishes the First Schedule which provides particulars to be submitted

by occupier or intending occupier of a factory. The Second Schedule also under section 8 provides

a template for the certificate of registration of a factory.

The Fishery Products Regulations, 2007 (The Public Health Act, 1960)

The general objective of these Regulations is to pursue a high level of protection of human life

and health and the protection of consumers’ interests, wherever in the world, including fair

practices in food trade, taking account of, where appropriate, the protection of animal health and

welfare and the environment.

These regulations shall aim also to achieve the free movement in the world of fishery products

and feed for aquaculture animals manufactured or marked according to the general principles and

requirements thereof.

4.2 Institutional Framework

The table below describes the mandate of institutions which may be associated with the project.

Table 3: Institutions and their Mandates /Interests No. Institution/Organisation Mandate and interest in project

1.0 Ministry of Fisheries and Marine Resources

Lead ministry representing the GoSL to implement the project It is the Government ministry responsible for the management, development and conservation of the fisheries resources of Sierra Leone –marine, inland and aquaculture.

2.0 FMCO, West Africa Regional Fisheries Programme_Sierra Leone (WARFP)

Created with the development objective of sustainably increasing wealth generated from the exploitation of fisheries resources in Sierra Leone. It is the office which will see to the construction and management of the jetty to enhance the fishing industry in Sierra Leone.

3.0 Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Sierra Leone

Established by an Act of Parliament for effective protection of the environment This Act establishes and mandates the EPA to amongst others;

Advice the Minister on the formulation of policies on all aspects of the environment and in particular make



No. Institution/Organisation Mandate and interest in project

recommendation for the protection of the environment.

Issue environmental permits and pollution abatement notices for controlling the volume, types, constituents and effects of waste discharges, emissions, deposits or other source of pollutants of substances which are hazardous or potentially dangerous to the quality of the environment or any segment of the environment.

Prescribe standards and guidelines relating to ambient air, water and soil quality, the pollution of air, water, land and other forms of environmental pollution including the discharge of waste and the control of toxic substances.

Ensure compliance with any laid down environmental impact assessment procedures in the planning and execution of development projects, including compliance in respect of existing projects.

Impose and collect environmental protection levies in accordance with this Act or regulations made under this Act.

4.0 Institutional Support for Fisheries Management, ISFM

This 3 year EU funded project aims to enable the Sierra Leone Ministry of Fisheries and Marine Resources to establish a realistic picture of the status of fisheries resources, thus contributing to the development of fisheries management measures.

5.0 Sierra Leone Marine Administration

Established by an Act of Parliament in July 2000 with regulatory powers over maritime transport including coastal and river transportation The act establishes the Administration to carry out amongst others the following functions:

to administer, in addition to the administration of the Registration of Shipping Act, 1965 referred to in the new Clause (14), any other legislation relating to maritime affairs;

to ensure the safety of navigation in the territorial sea;

to fulfil flag state and port state responsibilities in an effective manner having regard to the relevant international maritime convections, codes and other instruments;

to deal with maritime search and rescue matters including the coordination of the search and rescue operations of the Armed Forces of Sierra Leone, the Ports Authority, and the Department of Fisheries and Marine Resources;

to regulate shipping in inland waterways, including the safety of navigation therein;

to pursue the ratification or accession and implementation of international maritime conventions in conjunction with other appropriate agencies of Government.

6.0 Institute of Marine Biology and Oceanography

Academic department involved in teaching and research into oceanography and the marine environment



No. Institution/Organisation Mandate and interest in project

7.0 Ministry of Lands, Country Planning and Environment.

Government ministry responsible for development of appropriate policies and programmes and carrying out activities relating to land and land tenure, state lands, acquisition of lands and buildings, surveys, mapping and triangulation, enforcement of planning and building control through court action and the demolition of unauthorized structures, preparation of urban structure and detailed plans, action area plans, and subject plans for distribution of lands

8.0 Freetown City Council The city of Freetown is politically divided into eight municipalities or wards in 3 main areas comprising the East End, Central Freetown and West End. The three westernmost wards of the city constitute the West End of Freetown. These wards host the remains of centuries‐old Portuguese towers and fortresses, most of the city's nicer tourist hotels, a number of casinos, and the Lumley Golf Course, Beach, and Club House, and the proposed location of the fishing harbour.

9.0 The World Bank Funding agency financing the project.

9.0 NGO‐ Conservation Society of Sierra Leone

The Conservation Society for Sierra Leone promotes the wise use and management of Sierra Leone’s Natural Resources through Education, Advocacy, Research and Site Action including sea turtle conservation programme along Lumley beach.

4.3 Land Tenure

The National Land Policy acknowledges the problems that beset land administration and land tenure in Sierra Leone and describes these as including:

General indiscipline in the land market

Indeterminate boundaries

Illegal acquisition of State lands

Inadequate security of land tenure

Difficulty to access land for development purposes

Weak land administration and management systems

Low level consultation, coordination and cooperation

Inadequate coordination with neighbouring countries

The National Land Policy, 2005 is however seen as providing a foundation for the review of

existing laws and the enacting of new ones, to regulate and streamline access to, and the use of

land. The categories of land ownership recognised in Sierra Leone are as follows:

State public land: defined as lands ceded by the Colonial Government to the Government of Sierra Leone after Independence in 1961, Unoccupied Land, and land compulsorily or other acquired by the government.

Private land: land in which the owner has a freehold interest.

Communal (Chiefdom or Community) land; land held in trust by the Chief on behalf of the community.



Family land: is that in which the principle interest in the land is vested in a ‘family’ group with a common ancestry.

The Ministry of Land is empowered to carry out all land management and two important

functions it performs are administration of all state and public lands and the acquisition of

property and the payment of compensation.

The Western Area of Sierra Leone is a small but valuable part of the country. Land titles in the

Western Area, including Freetown, are derived either from a grant of State land, or, more

commonly, are claims to possessory title to State land based on adverse possession. It is

generally believed that the main reason conveyance of land in the Western Area of Sierra Leone

is so fraught with confusion is because the received law provides that courts hearing land matters

give unqualified reception to statutory declarations. This situation is seen as an inherent

weakness and which has been unscrupulous exploited by parties as evidenced by the numerous

land litigations in courts, (Williams et al, 2006).

There is currently no system of registration of titles in Sierra Leone. The Registration of

Instruments Act, Cap 256 of the Laws of Sierra Leone 1960 created a system of registration of

instruments of conveyance. In this system, it is the conveyance itself which confers title, not the

registration of the instruments under which the conveyance was executed.

4.4 Public Institutions involved in Land Administration

Management of state land

The Ministry of Land and Country Planning has the mandate to manage state lands, embark on

compulsory acquisition, oversees surveyors and surveying, mapping, planning, town planning

schemes, development of standards, building codes etc but not the registration of deeds.

Land Dispute Resolution

The Local Courts are the only judicial forum available for many embroiled in land disputes, as they

are the courts of first instance for matters relating to customary law. They are empowered by the

Local Courts Act, No 20 of1963 to dispense justice in consonance with the doctrines of equity,

good conscience and natural justice. However, according to Shaun Williams et al (2006) they have

been widely criticized for the low standard of justice they provide, referral of cases to higher

courts under the control of Customary Law Officers, the close association which exists between

Local Court Chairman and ruling families and the barriers to access by women created by the

dominance of Local Courts by men.



5.0 WORLD BANK SAFEGUARD POLICIES

5.1 Sustainable Development and World Bank operations

Sustainable development is central to poverty alleviation. The WBG’s environmental and social

agendas have evolved gradually. The main focus in the 1970s and 1980s was on mitigating the

potential environmental and social damage associated with projects, especially ones financing

physical investments in infrastructure, energy, and agriculture. Gradually, a more comprehensive

and positive agenda has developed.

Ten of the 100‐some World Bank policies, dealing with environmental, social and legal issues, are

considered safeguard policies. Their application helps Bank’s borrowers decide what actions and

programs need to be taken to ensure the environmental soundness and sustainability of projects.

The entire investment portfolio of the Bank is subject to systematic screening.

5.2 Project Linkage with the World Bank Safeguard Policy on Involuntary Resettlement

The construction of the jetty triggers the World Bank safeguards policy on involuntary

resettlement; OP 4.12. The project entails issues of compensation, acquisition of land, and impact

on livelihood. In meeting this World Bank requirement, the RAP provides guidance to project

stakeholders to adequately address all resettlement related challenges. These arrangements are

also to ensure that there is a systematic process for the different stages of the implementation of

an action plan that assures participation of affected persons, involvement of relevant institutions

and stakeholders, adherence to both World Bank and Government of Sierra Leone procedures

and requirements, and outline compensation for affected persons.

5.3 The World Bank’s safeguard policy on involuntary resettlement, OP 4.12

The World Bank’s safeguard policy on involuntary resettlement, OP 4.12, (September 2006) is to

be complied with where involuntary resettlement may , impact on livelihoods, acquisition of land

or restrictions to natural resources, may take place as a result of the project. It includes

requirements that:

a. Involuntary resettlement should be avoided where feasible, or minimised, exploring all viable

alternative project designs.

b. Where it is not feasible to avoid resettlement, resettlement activities should be conceived

and executed as sustainable development programs, providing sufficient investment

resources to enable persons displaced by the project to share in project benefits.

c. Displaced persons should be meaningfully consulted and should have opportunities to

participate in planning and implementing resettlement programs. Encourage community

participation in planning and implementing resettlement.



d. Displaced persons should be assisted in their efforts to improve their livelihoods and

standards of living or at least to restore them, in real terms, to pre‐displacement levels or to

levels prevailing prior to the beginning of project implementation, whichever is higher.

e. Assistance should be provided to affected people regardless of the legality of land tenure.

According to OP 4.12, the resettlement plan should include measures to ensure that the displaced

persons are:

a. informed about their options and rights pertaining to resettlement;

b. consulted on, offered choices among, and provided with technically and economically

feasible resettlement alternatives; and

c. provided prompt and effective compensation at full replacement cost for losses of assets

attributed directly to the project.

If the impacts include physical relocation, the resettlement plan should include measures to

ensure that the displaced persons are:

i. Provided assistance (such as moving allowances) during relocation; and

ii. Provided with residential housing, or housing sites, or as required, agricultural sites for

which a combination of productive potential, location advantages, and other factors is at

least equivalent to the advantages of the old site.

Where necessary to achieve the objectives of the policy, the resettlement plan also should include

measures to ensure that displaced persons are:

a. offered support after displacement, for a transition period, based on a reasonable estimate of

the time likely to be needed to restore their livelihood and standards of living; and

b. provided with development assistance in addition to compensation measures, such as land

preparation, credit facilities, training, or job opportunities.

5.4 Gaps between Sierra Leone Regulations and World Bank Policies

There are significant gaps between Sierra Leonean regulations and World Bank policies. These are

summarised in Table 4.

Table 4: Comparison of Sierra Leonean Regulations with World Bank Policies

Topic Sierra Leone legislation requirement WB policy requirement

Timing of

compensation

payment

Prompt Prior to displacement

Calculation of

compensation

Adequate Full replacement cost

Squatters No provision. Are deemed not to be

eligible

Are to be provided resettlement assistance

(but no compensation for land)

Resettlement Any amount of compensation to which

the displaced person is entitled.

Affected people who are physically

displaced are to be provided with

residential housing, or housing sites, or, as



Topic Sierra Leone legislation requirement WB policy requirement

required, agricultural sites (…) at least

equivalent to the old site. Preference to be

given to land‐based resettlement for

displaced persons whose livelihoods are

land‐based.

Resettlement

assistance

No specific provision with respect to

additional assistance and monitoring.

Affected people are to be offered support

after displacement, for a transition period

Vulnerable groups No specific provision Particular attention to be paid to

vulnerable groups, especially those below

the poverty line, the landless, the elderly,

women and children, indigenous peoples,

ethnic minorities…

Information and

consultation

The owner/occupier of the land must

be formally notified in advance of the

intent to enter.

Displaced persons and their communities

are provided timely and relevant

information, consulted on resettlement

options, and offered opportunities to

participate in planning, implementing, and

monitoring resettlement.

Grievance Access to Court of Law or other

impartial and independent Authority

Appropriate and accessible grievance

mechanisms to be established

5.5 Project Measures to ensure compliance with World Bank Policy

In general the Sierra Leonean laws and regulations make provision for resettlement framework,

including land acquisition and compensation matters. There are however some differences

between the World Bank guidelines and the Sierra Leonean laws as indicated above.

This Resettlement Action Plan combines the World Bank Safeguard Policy on involuntary

resettlement (OP 4.12) and the national laws. In circumstances where gaps exists between

national laws and World Bank policy, the World Bank policy applies in such cases as provided in

the table above. The Resettlement Action Plan is therefore the main guide for the implementation

of land acquisition and compensation under the project.



6.0 PROJECT IMPACTS ON ASSETS AND LIVELIHOODS

The project is expected to have extensive impacts on both assets and livelihoods. Provisions are

made under this RAP to minimize all such impacts including those of socio‐ economic significance

and on environmentally sensitive sites. Provisions are also made in this RAP to accommodate all

potential situations, including cases that entail actual displacement and livelihood restoration

assistance in accordance with the World Bank Policy on Involuntary Resettlement, OP4.12.

6.1 Assessment of social impacts

The potential social impacts associated with the project are described in the Table 5 below:

Table 5: Social impacts/ issues Type of impact Description of Potential Impact/ Issue Social Significance

Terrestrial Activities /Environment

Physical displacement

The Project will result in the physical displacement of some

parts of the Kissy Dockyard community.

The project will displace over 400 individuals (families of

house owners and tenants who are mainly squatters) who

have colonized the flanks of the bay.

Major

Employment and loss of

livelihood

The sand miners will lose their source of livelihood.

Income from rent will be lost by house/property owners and

food vendors

Some households are engaged in petty trading –table

top/small shops at the area. There will be temporary break in

these income generating activities should they be relocated

because of the project. These activities could however be re‐

established at new locations.

Major

Major

Moderate

Deprivation of use of

land

The present legislation in Sierra Leone considers all land 50

metres landward of the 0 contour as belonging to the Port

Authority. The area at Kissy cove is hence considered to be

under the jurisdiction of the Sierra Leone Ports Authority and

hence, no land acquisition issue.

The acquisition of this site will lead to deprivation of use of

land by the squatters.

If need be, the project may invoke Section 21 of the

Constitution of Sierra Leone for compulsory acquisition while

ensuring that the provisions of the WB OP 4.12 and this RAP

Major

Moderate to Major



are also met.

Loss of structures/

properties

The residential buildings (mainly concrete blocks with zinc

roofing as well as make shift huts) at the flank of the bay

belonging to the squatters will be lost to the project.

Major

Impact on vulnerable groups

The project did not identify any vulnerable groups/ persons in

the project affected community

None

Impact on Social and

Cultural Structures

The Project will disrupt social and cultural structures when

the community is displaced from its current location. These

will however be re‐ established at the new site to be provided

by the project.

Moderate

Impact on educational

and health facilities

There are no health/educational facilities at or close to the proposed site.

Minor

Impact on Cultural

Heritage/ Archaeological

interest

There are no known sites of significant cultural heritage or

archaeological interest in the vicinity of the proposed landing

sites. The risks to cultural heritage would be on buried

resources encountered during excavation on land.

Minor

Impacts on communal

use for recreation

The local beach is stony and does not offer any recreational

opportunities to the community.

Minor

Marine /Near‐shore Activities/ Environment

Impacts on artisanal

fishing

The project will not affect artisanal fish landing sites. The

beach fronts of the proposed project site do not serve as artisanal

fish landing sites.

Negligible

Impact on livelihoods of

artisanal fishermen

No local fish mongering site exist at the beach fronts abutting

the Kissy community.

Minor

Impacts on cultural

heritage/archaeological

interest

It is not known whether there are significant cultural heritage

resources or archaeological interests or coastal wrecks occur

in the project marine or near‐shore environment. Buried

cultural heritage resources could also be damaged during

trenching or ploughing of seabed.

Minor to Moderate

Impacts on Human

Health and Safety

Accidents and unplanned events that may occur during the

Project activities could result in collision of Project vessels

with fishing boats and nets or other vessels causing damage

to vessels and equipment, or injury or loss of life.

Old and poorly maintained project vessels could breakdown

at sea resulting in threat to life and equipment.

Minor to Major



7.0 ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA AND ENTITLEMENTS

7.1 Principles and objectives

These principles are intended to minimize negative impacts. However, it will not always be

feasible to avoid displacement or land acquisition. In addition to impact minimization measures,

mitigation measures are therefore needed, hence this RAP.

7.1.1 Regulatory Framework

Any impact of the Project on sea, land and/or people (land acquisition, resettlement, and

livelihood restoration of affected people) will be addressed in compliance with the Constitution of

Sierra Leone, with other Sierra Leonean regulations and international convention to which the

country subscribes, and with the World Bank safeguard policy on involuntary resettlement (OP

4.12). Where there are gaps or inconsistencies between Sierra Leonean laws and the World Bank

policy, the World Bank policy OP 4.12 will apply.

7.1.2 Fair and adequate compensation

One paramount principle of World Bank safeguards is that where people are affected by an

undertaking, the aim of compensation or resettlement must be that they should be “no worse‐off

if not better off” after the compensation or resettlement has taken place. The compensation

package will include loss of income or livelihood restoration assistance or relocation assistance as

appropriate plus a disturbance allowance.

7.1.3 Compensation payment

Compensation principles will be as follows:

Compensation shall be paid prior to displacement or destruction;

Compensation will be at full replacement value.

By contrast with the depreciated or net value of a structure, the “replacement value” includes the

full cost of materials and labour required to reconstruct a building of similar surface and standing.

In other words, the affected person must be able to have their structure rebuilt in a different

location using the compensation paid for the old building.

7.1.4 Community involvement and sensitisation

The Kissy Dockyard Community which is within the project area has been sensitized on the project

and likely project impacts and the extent of their involvement to ensure project success

throughout the preparation of the RAP. This sensitization will be continuous and measures

instituted to address negative project impacts will be well communicated to the community.



7.2 Identification of Vulnerable groups

Field assessment in the community has not identified any likely vulnerable persons. This section is

therefore included in the RAP for guidance purposes.

Vulnerable groups are those at risk of becoming more vulnerable due to the displacement,

compensation, and resettlement process. Vulnerable people include, but not limited to:

Disabled persons, whether mentally or physically;

The elderly, usually above 60 years;

Widows;

Children; and

Female heads of households.

7.3 Assistance to vulnerable people

Assistance to vulnerable people may include the following:

Identification of vulnerable people and identification of the cause and impacts of their

vulnerability through direct interviews. This step is critical because often vulnerable people

do not participate in community meetings (because most often they are shielded by the

society and fronted by other individuals), and their disability/vulnerability may remain

unknown.

Identification of required assistance at the various stages of the process: negotiation,

compensation, moving;

Implementation of the measures necessary to assist the vulnerable person; and

Monitoring and continuation of assistance after resettlement and/or compensation, if

required.

Assistance may take the following forms, depending upon vulnerable persons’ requests and

needs:

Assistance in the compensation payment procedures (e.g., going to the bank with then

person to cash the compensation cheque);

Assistance in the post payment period to secure the compensation money and reduce risks

of misuse/robbery;

Assistance in moving: providing vehicle, driver and assistance at the moving stage;

Assistance in building: providing materials, workforce, or building houses; and

Health care if required at critical periods: moving and transition period.

7.4 Description of Eligibility Criteria

Project affected persons are described as persons affected by land acquisition, relocation, or loss

of incomes associated with the acquisition of land and/or other assets, and restriction of access to

legally designated sites and protected areas.



Based on the social structure of the Kissy Dockyard locality and the nature of the project, the most

likely affected persons will be the squatters (families of house owners and tenants, table top food

vendors) and sand miners (including truck drivers, masons, agents, labourers) within the project

site.

Table 6: Eligibility criteria

Category of affected persons Assets Type of compensation

Persons with formal legal rights

to land.

Physical and non‐physical assets

such as residential structures,

productive lands, farm lands,

cultural sites commercial/

business properties, tenancy,

income earning opportunities,

and social and cultural networks

and activities

To be provided compensation for

land lost and other assistance

Persons without formal legal

rights to land at time of

notification but have claims to

property recognized by

community leaders

To be provided compensation for

land lost and other assistance

Persons with no recognizable

legal right or claim to land they

are occupying, e.g. squatters

To be provided resettlement

assistance in lieu of

compensation for land occupied.

Persons encroaching on land

after the notification/cut‐off

date.

Not eligible for compensation or

any form of resettlement

assistance

7.5 Entitlement

The entitlement matrix for compensation issues for the Projects is given in the Table 7 below.



Table 7: Entitlement Matrix Asset Type of impact Entitled person Eligibility criteria Entitlement

Land

Permanent acquisition of land

Landowner (individual) Person with formal legal right to land /without formal legal right to land but have claims to property recognized by the State

Replacement with an equivalent piece of land located in the vicinity of the affected area. If land is not available then cash compensation at full replacement value, based on market rates, as well as disturbance allowance (10%)

Temporary acquisition of land

Landowner (individual) As above Full reinstatement to pre‐project conditions; Rent will be paid for the length of time the land is temporarily acquired.

Acquisition of RoWs Landowner (individual) As above Cash compensation to be negotiated based on market value of land; Disturbance allowance (10%)

Structures Destruction of permanent immovable structures

Owner Confirmed owner (with evidence) of affected structure irrespective of land ownership

Resettlement to a similar dwelling in a similar location, or Cash compensation at full replacement value of structure, based on market rates. Cost of moving Disturbance allowance (10%)

Occupant Tenant Cost of moving Disturbance allowance (3 months’ rent)

Temporary displacement of moveable structure

Owner Confirmed owner (with evidence) of affected structure irrespective of land ownership

Cost of displacing the affected structure Cost of moving the affected structure back to project affected land Disturbance allowance of 10%

Livelihood Businesses Business person as distinct from owner of structure

Been operating business on project affected land irrespective of ownership (includes squatters)

Cash compensation for temporary loss of income Assistance to livelihood restoration (15%)

Use of communal resources

User of such resources (individuals/ communities)

Use of communal resources for livelihood

Assistance to identify and access similar resource elsewhere Cash compensation for temporary loss of income



7.6 Compensation Description

In this context, the compensation is the amount required, to put the owner or user of a

structure in the same position as if his/her use and enjoyment has not been disrupted. In

general, the compensation due the affected person comprises:

a) the cost of destruction of standing structure or full replacement of the affected property or

land rent charges;

b) disturbance to the owner/user of the structure [estimated at 10% of (a)]; and

c) an amount representing loss of income or livelihood for the period of the disruption of the

commercial value of the property or asset [estimated at 15% of (a)].

7.7 Procedures for Delivery of Entitlements

Entitlements may range from cash payments to the provision of new land and compensation for

other lost properties. Compensation will be paid before owners/occupiers are made to vacate

their properties for commencement of construction works. Payments will be funded like any

other activity under the project’s administrative and financial management rules and manuals.

Compensation committee: The committee will comprise representatives of the affected persons

(2 to 3no.), Freetown City Council, Ward Committee, Ministry of Land, Country Planning and

Environment, and EPA‐SL. The committee will be chaired by the representative of the Ministry

of Fisheries and Marine Resources.

Consultations: The affected persons have been engaged in active consultations at the beginning

of the project and any displacement should not be last hour notice. This process will continue

throughout the project and RAP implementation. Their input to the process is essential and

their cooperation will be forthcoming when the project objective has been adequately

explained to them. They will have access to the Resettlement Plan and be encouraged to

provide input.

Notification: Affected persons will be notified through both formal (in writing) and informal

(verbal) manner, for example at community meetings called by the Ward Committee and also

through the Ministry of Fisheries and Marine Resources.

Documentation: The names and addresses of affected persons have been compiled and kept in

a database. Claims and assets will be included in the database. The Ministry of Lands, Country

Planning and Environment and the Ministry of Fisheries and Marine Resources will maintain

records of these. The records are also important especially for future monitoring activities.

Contract Agreement: A contract listing of all property being surrendered and the types of

compensation (both cash and kind) would be prepared. The contracts will be presented at

meetings prior to signing. The handing over of property and compensation payments will be

made in the presence of the affected persons and the Compensation Committee, and in public.



Time Provisions: The affected persons may negotiate with the Compensation Committee on

time frames and terms of payment, but no construction work can begin until the project

affected persons have been compensated in full or resettled.

Redress of grievances: If affected persons are not satisfied with proposed entitlements or its

implementation, they can seek redress through the Grievance Committee. If the affected

persons are still not satisfied they could take it up further to the law courts.

Financial obligations: It is the responsibility of the Sierra Leonean Government through the

Ministry of Fisheries and Marine Resources to pay compensation and FMCO of the WARFP,

Sierra Leone will facilitate this through the sector Minister.



8.0 METHODS OF VALUING AFFECTED ASSETS

8.1.1 Basis of Valuation

Taking cognisance of the mandatory statutory requirements and certification for land ownership

and property development, none of the affected properties surveyed qualified as statutorily

certified developments and therefore according to Sierra Leonean laws do not qualify for direct

compensation. However, according to the World Bank policy on involuntary resettlement, they

are to be provided resettlement assistance but no compensation for land.

The purpose of the valuation exercise is to assess the loss to the affected persons as part of the

Assessment of Resettlement Issues under the project. The scope of the valuation covers all

assets on the site. Disruptions to accommodation and business activities were considered as far

as it may be appropriate for payment of compensation for the period of disruption of the

activity.

The bases of this valuation are derived from the World Bank’s Involuntary Resettlement Policy,

OP 4.12; the Resettlement Policy Framework developed for the project; and Section 21 of the

1991 Constitution of Sierra Leone. The valuation is based on market valuation, and tested on

value to the owner and not to the acquiring agency.

8.2 Valuation Method

8.2.1 Structures

The Replacement Cost Approach (RCA) was adopted for the valuation of the structures. The RCA

is based on the assumption that cost and value are related. It involves finding the estimate of

the gross replacement cost of a structure which is the estimated cost of constructing a

substitute structure, having the same gross area as that existing, at prices current at the relevant

date.

8.2.2 Livelihood (Supplementary Assistance)

Losses of income for businesses were estimated from net daily/monthly profit of the business

verified by an assessment of visible stocks and activities. In addition to the compensation,

disturbance allowances of 10% of total compensation were considered.

The estimation of supplementary assistance for affected commercial structures or business

units was generally based on the following factors:

estimated income obtained from the use of the business/commercial unit; and

estimated period of disruption of business activities.



Generally, loss of income will be minimal. An alternative site with similar conditions will be

acquired by the Government of Sierra Leone through the Ministry of Fisheries and Marine

Resources for the PAPs (a commitment letter to this effect from the Ministry of Lands, Country

Planning and the Environment is attached as Annex 9); hence, business will not be greatly

affected by the proposed project in most cases. The period of partial disruption is expected to

be within 1 to 14 days.

The lack of proper book keeping coupled with speculative income/revenue/sales figures

obtained from the field makes it impossible to determine the actual loss of income for each

case. In such situations the supplementary assistance or loss of livelihood applied was generally

determined and accepted to be 15% of the value of the property to be affected. For the

purposes of this RAP, the supplementary assistance applied in case of loss of income was 15% of

the value of the property to be affected. In addition to the compensation, disturbance

allowances of 10% of total compensation were considered.

8.2.3 Economic Plants

The Enumeration Approach was adopted for the crops affected by the project. The

Enumeration Approach involves taking census of the affected crops and applying flat realistic

rate. The counting was done by the number of plants/trees.

8.3 Valuation and Compensation Opinion

Having taken cognisance of the relevant value indicators like type of property, the extent and

effect of impact, economic and institutional factors, amongst others, and having adopted the

Replacement Cost and Enumeration Approach, the total Compensation Payable to the PAPs at

Kissy Dockyard under the proposed harbour construction project is estimated at USD399,960.34

(Three Hundred and Ninety‐Nine Thousand, Nine Hundred and Sixty Dollars and Thirty‐Four

Cents) as at the dates of valuation.

Annex 2 shows the valuation of the affected properties. Annex 3 shows the Certification of

Value and Annex 4 shows the compensation profile for each affected person.

8.4 Cut‐Off Date

The cut‐off date is Wednesday, 13thApril 2011. The enumeration of the affected properties was

completed on the date and the affected persons were duly informed about the intended

project. This enumeration date is the cut‐off date for the final inventory of affected properties

to be considered for compensation payment. The same date has been adopted as the effective

date of valuation.



8.5 Compensation Payment Procedure

Compensation will be paid to affected persons prior to the destruction of the affected

structures. Each eligible affected person will sign a compensation claim form, WARFP‐SL Form

C1 (as shown in Annex 6) together with the authorized WARFP project representative and in the

presence of a witness before receiving the compensation cash or cheque.

The compensation claim form clarifies mutual commitments as follows:

On the project side: commitment to pay the agreed compensation, including all its

components (disturbance, livelihood assistance);

On the affected person’s side: commitment to vacate the land by the agreed date.

The FMCO of WARFP will issue a compensation receipt, WARFP‐SL Form C2 (as shown in Annex

7) to the claimant or recipient confirming compensation amount collected.

8.6 Engagement and Consultation with Affected Persons

The valuation of the assets was done with the engagement and participation of the PAPs. The

PAPs have the opportunity to do their own valuation if they have doubts or misgivings through

the facilitation of the project for further negotiations between them (PAPs) and the FMCO.



9.0 CONSULTATIONS AND DISCLOSURE

As an alternative mitigative measure for the impacts, extensive consultations have been carried

out mainly with the affected persons for implementation of the resettlement plan. This is aimed

at addressing any grievances that may arise.

9.1 Consultations with PAPs and other stakeholders

Project affected persons (PAPs) were consulted and involved in the RAP development process.

Other stakeholders consulted include:

Ministry of Fisheries and Marine Resources;

Ministry of Lands and Country Planning;

Member of Parliament, Kissy Dockyard Area;

Executives of the Sand Mining Development Association;

Councillor, Kissy Dockyard;

Traditional Leaders; and

Community opinion leaders.

List of persons contacted and reports of the stakeholder meetings are provided in Annex 1.

9.2 Consultations Processes and Awareness of Bank Safeguards Requirements

The project awareness among affected persons is high at this stage of the project since the

community consultation and sensitization process so far have been satisfactorily carried out by

the World Bank Consultants together with the FMCO. In addition to these meetings, door‐to‐

door consultations would be held with the affected persons in the project area. Semi‐structured

interviews were held with some of the affected persons. This approach was adopted to explore

the range of opinion and views on the issue. The affected properties were also visited to

observe and document the extent of potential damage.

Through the consultation meetings, the project affected persons have been sensitized on the

requirements and provisions of the World Bank Social Safeguard Policies. The PAPs have been

consulted and involved with the detailed plans for the payments of compensations and other

forms of entitlements due them.

9.3 Documentation of Consultation

The documentation of consultation activities is a very important component of any resettlement

plan. The records of consultations in the form of minutes and reports have been attached to this

RAP report in Annex 1.



9.4 Disclosure and Dissemination

The responsibility for both the disclosure and dissemination of this RAP lies with the Ministry of

Fisheries and Marine Resources.

9.4.1 What has been done

Declaration of cut‐off dates

The PAPs were directly informed and are aware about the project and the cut‐off dates. This

was done during the census and socio‐economic survey. This is to ensure that no new

construction or capital investment or improvements are made on the affected property.

9.4.2 What needs to be done

Draft RAP Disclosure

The World Bank requires that the draft RAP be submitted for public disclosure purposes. The

Fisheries Management and Coordination Office (FMCO) of the WARFP, Sierra Leone should

ensure that copies of the RAP or extracts of the RAP are sent to the appropriate public

information centres to enable the PAPs, and other stakeholders such as Councillor, Member of

Parliament and opinion leaders access the document. A public notice of the RAP disclosure

should be placed at the post office to inform the public about the presence of the documents at

the Ward. A local radio announcement should also be made to that effect. Other

avenues/media for disclosure which may be equally effective and appropriate could be

considered by GoSL through the MFMR.

Duration of Disclosure

In view of the fact that the impacts are considered to be of relatively moderately high

magnitude (although the compensations appear straightforward), a maximum of 14 days (from

date of public notification) would be allowed for receipt of public comments.

Response to Disclosure

The FMCO will collate feedback from the disclosure and relay them to the RAP Consultant to be

incorporated during the finalisation of the RAP.



10.0 GRIEVANCE MANAGEMENT AND REDRESS MECHANISM

10.1 Potential grievances/disputes

In practice, grievances and disputes that arise during the course of implementation of a

resettlement and compensation program may be related to the following issues:

Mistakes in inventorying or valuing properties;

Disagreement on plot boundaries, either between the affected person and the

expropriation agency;

Disputed ownership of a given asset (two or more affected people claiming that the

affected asset is theirs);

Disagreement on plot/asset valuation; and

Disagreement on the resettlement package (the location of the resettlement site does not

suit them; proposed housing or resettlement plot characteristics are not in their view

adequate).

10.2 Grievance management and redress mechanism

10.2.1 Overview

Since the entire project implementation and resettlement programme was carried out with the

participation and consultation of the project‐affected persons (PAPs), it is expected that no

major grievance issue will arise. Nonetheless, appropriate channels have been created for PAPs

to express a grievance against the resettlement/compensation programme. Efforts should also

be made to avoid grievances through continuous sensitization and information sharing.

In such compensation and resettlement operations, it often appears that many grievances

derive from misunderstandings of project policy, which can usually be resolved through

adequate mediation. Most grievances can be settled with additional explanation efforts and

some mediation. This is why a first instance of dispute handling will be set up with the aim of

settling disputes amicably.

10.2.2 Objective

The objectives of the grievance process are to

Provide affected people with avenues for making a complaint or resolving any dispute

that may arise during the course of the implementation and determination of

entitlements of compensation and implementation of the project;

Ensure that appropriate and mutually acceptable redress actions are identified and

implemented to the satisfaction of complainants; and

Avoid the need to resort to judicial proceedings.



Court cases are known to be cumbersome and time consuming. It is therefore proposed here to

make available a simple procedure for affected persons to be able to follow easily, and which

will provide aggrieved people with an avenue for amicable settlement without necessarily

opening a Court case. Aggrieved people would however remain free to open a Court case

without having registered their grievance.

10.3 The Grievance Redress Process

The general steps of the grievance process comprise:

Receipt of complaints;

Determining and implementing the redress action;

Verifying the redress action; and

Dissatisfaction and alternative actions.

10.3.1 Receipts of complaints

Complaints would be lodged in writing with the Deputy Project Coordinator of the (WARFP) at

the Ministry of Fisheries and Marine Resources office near the project site for redress. The

Project will determine the redress action in consultation with the complainant if necessary and

with the representative of the PAPs.

10.3.2 Determining and implementing the redress action

The grievance redress team will determine the redress action in consultation with the

complainant if necessary. The proposed redress action and the timeframe in which it is to be

implemented will be discussed within 1 week of receipt of the grievance. The grievance issue

should be resolved within 2 weeks of receipt of complaints, unless it requires further

investigation which could go to 4 weeks.

10.3.3 Verifying the redress action

The grievance redress team will visit the affected property site or get in touch with the

complainant to confirm that the redress action is carried out. If the complainant is not satisfied

with the outcome of the redress action, additional steps may be taken to resolve the issue or

reach an amicable agreement. Verification should be completed within one week of the redress

action being taken.

The Grievance Redress Management Committee will issue a grievance resolution form, WARFP‐

SL Form R1 (as shown in Annex 8) to the complainant confirming resolution of grievance.



10.3.4 Dissatisfaction and Alternative Actions

If the complainant is not satisfied with the decision of the grievance redress committee, he/she

can bring it to the attention of the Member of Parliament Constituency 101. The Member of

Parliament in consultation with FMCO will set up an appropriate mediation team at the project

town level to resolve the issue within 2 weeks from the date of receipt of such a decision at the

Council level, unless further investigations is required.

Membership of the mediation team will include:

The 15 member Grievance Committee from the Kissy Dockyard Community which include;

o A representative from the Council

o A representative from a Religious body;

o A representative from the Traditional Council;

o A representative from a development oriented NGO.

Attached as Annex 10 are the lists of members of the grievance redress committee at Kissy

Dockyard.

10.3.5 Appeal to Court

Courts of law will be a “last resort” option, in view of the above mechanism. The Sierra Leonean

Constitution allows any aggrieved person the right to access to Court of law. If the complainant

still remains dissatisfied with the mediation effort of the district assembly, the complainant has

the option to pursue appropriate recourse via judicial process in Sierra Leone.

10.3.6 Documentation and Tracing

A complaint log book and file will be opened for all complaints at the project level. The

complainant’s name, date of complaint, nature of complaint, follow‐up actions and their dates

will all be logged for future referencing.

10.4 Schedule for Grievance Redress

The schedule is summarised in the Table 8 below which suggests a period of about 14 working

days to identify and resolve project grievances.

Table 8: Proposed schedule for Grievance Redress Steps Process Description Time frame Other information

1 Identification of grievance

Face to face; phone; letter, e‐mail; recorded during public/community interaction; others

1 Day Email address; hotline number

2 Grievance assessed and logged

Significance assessed and grievance recorded or logged (i.e. in a log book).

1 Day Significance criteriaLevel 1 –one off event; Level 2 – complaint is



Steps Process Description Time frame Other information

widespread or repeated; Level 3‐ any complaint (one off or repeated) that indicates breach of law or policy or this RPF provisions

3 Grievance is acknowledged

Acknowledgement of grievance through appropriate medium.

2 Days

4 Development of response

‐Grievance assigned to appropriate party for resolution ‐Response development with input from management/ relevant stakeholders

2 Day

5 Response signed off

Redress action approved at appropriate levels

2 Day Project staff of WARFP would sign off

6 Implementation and communication of response

Redress action implemented and update of progress on resolution communicated to complainant

One week

7 Complaints Response

Redress action recorded in grievance log book Confirm with complainant that grievance can be closed or determine what follow up is necessary

within one week

8 Close grievance Record final sign off of grievance If grievance cannot be closed, return to step 2 or recommend third‐party arbitration or resort to court of law

2 Days Final sign off on by Project Coordinator of WARFP, Sierra Leone



11.0 ADMINISTRATIVE AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF RAP

This section outlines the institutional arrangements for implementing resettlement or

compensation related activities. Some institutions to participate in the exercise are identified as

follows:

Table 9: Institutional framework

No. Institution Responsibility

1.0 FMCO of WARFP, Ministry of

Fisheries and Marine Resources,

MFMR, Sierra Leone

Overall supervision implementation of the Resettlement

Action Plan.

Trigger the process through inventory of affected persons

and assets and implement plan in close consultation with

Consultant.

To provide funds for compensation payment.

2.0 Freetown City Council To monitor process and approve in consonance with city

development plans and objectives.

3.0 Councillors, Ward 361 Represent community and assist in inventory of affected

persons.

4.0 Ministry of Land and Country

Planning

To assist in the valuation and compensation payment

process and reporting. Identification and selection of new

sites to relocate community

5.0 Consultant, NGO (e.g.

Conservation Society of Sierra

Leone)

Guide assist with implementation of the RAP and capacity

building.

NGOs to help with monitoring and validation of the

implementation of the safeguards instruments and action

plans and some sensitization/education and capacity

building activities

The WARFP, Sierra Leone, in conjunction with the Sierra Leonean Ministry of Fisheries and

Marine Resources has the overall responsibility for implementing this Resettlement Action Plans

with World Bank approval. It will ensure that all compensation, resettlement and rehabilitation

activities are carried out satisfactorily before construction work commences.

Much of the work will be spearheaded by the FMCO of WARFP, Sierra Leone, with the assistance

of local authorities to ensure that:

Communities are properly and adequately informed (timely) of the Plans, and also their

rights and options relating to their properties that may be affected by the project.

Coordinate activities on resettlement or compensation plans

Ensure timely provision of compensation, in cash and/ or kind

Attend to any grievances submitted by the affected persons



The WARFP will engage and involve all sections of the community in discussions on the Plan.

They will:

Schedule open meetings to ensure that all stakeholders are informed and they are fully

aware of their rights and options regarding the resettlement activity

Identify impacts on lands and assets and the members of the community to be affected

and to what extent they will be affected

Consider voluntary contributions or negotiated land acquisition

Facilitate alternatives including compensations in kind and exemptions from local

contributions



12.0 INSTITUTIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES AND IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE

12.1 Institutional Responsibilities

The main institutions involved with the implementation of the resettlement activities are:

The Fisheries Management and Coordination Office, WARFP, Sierra Leone.

Ministry of Fisheries and Marine Resources (MFMR);

Ministry of Land and Country Planning;

Consultant

Selected contractor.

The implementation activities will be under the overall guidance of the office of the Fisheries

Management and Coordination Office, WARFP, Sierra Leone.

12.2 RAP Management Teams

The RAP Management Teams which will be set by the FMCO will consist of three smaller teams

namely:

Compensation Disbursement Team;

Grievance Redress Team; and

Monitoring and Evaluation Team.

The Compensation Disbursement Team will be responsible for organising and ensuring that

compensations payable to PAPs are made in line with the provisions and procedures of this RAP.

The Grievance Redress Team will be responsible for receiving and logging complaints and

resolving disputes. The team will undertake follow‐ups on all measures taken to resolve each

grievance or dispute to ensure that redress actions are implemented by whoever is mandated to

undertake such action.

The Monitoring and Evaluation Team will be responsible for the monitoring of the RAP

implementation programme to ensure that stated targets are met and project affected persons

are duly compensated in line with the RAP requirements.

12.3 Implementation Plan and Institutional Responsibilities

The implementation schedule defines the duration and timing of the key milestones and tasks

to be undertaken. The sequence of implementation activities and responsibilities are

summarized the Table 10 below.



Table 10: Implementation Plan

Main tasks Specific tasks Responsibility Timelines Comments

Consultations

and Preparation

of draft RAP

Report

Consultations with

PAPs/ communities

Safeguard Consultant,

FMCO WARFP, Sierra

Leone

February 18, 2011 ‐ April 15, 2011

Completed

Census, Socio‐

economic survey and

Valuation

Safeguard Consultant

February 18, 2011 ‐

April 15, 2011

Completed

Declaration of cut‐off

dates

Safeguard Consultant 13 to 14 April 2011 Completed

Budgeting of Costs FMCO, WARFP/Ministry of

Lands and Country

Planning, World Bank

Consultant

April, 2011 Completed

Draft RAP Report Safeguard Consultant Feb to April 2011 Draft stage

Draft RAP

Review and

Disclosure

Draft RAP Disclosure

in Sierra Leone

FMCO WARFP, Sierra

Leone, Safeguard

Consultant

April 2011 14 days

proposed

Draft RAP Disclosure‐

international

World Bank April 2011 ‐

Draft RAP Review World Bank April 2011 ‐

Final RAP RAP Finalisation Safeguard Consultant One week after

draft review by the

World Bank

‐

RAP

Implementation

Formation of RAP

Management Teams

FMCO WARFP, Sierra

Leone

May 2011 ‐

Compensation

disbursement

Compensation

disbursement team/

FMCO WARFP, Sierra

Leone

June 2011 to end

of Project

‐

Grievance redress Grievance Redress Team

June 2011 to end

of Project

‐

Construction Construction of

Harbour

Selected Contractor and

Consultant (J. A. Sciortino)

June 2011 to end

of Project

‐

Monitoring and

Evaluation

Internal monitoring

and evaluation

Monitoring Team June 2011 to end

of project

‐

Confirm arrangements

for managing funds

FMCO, WARFP and MFMR June 2011 to end

of project

‐

Completion Audit FMCO WARFP, Sierra

Leone

2 months period To commence

immediately

after end of

Project



13.0 MONITORING PLANS AND EVALUATION

To ensure that the implementation of the resettlement is carried out in accordance with the

relevant requirements of this resettlement plan, the actions will be monitored and evaluated

internally by a RAP team to be constituted by the Fisheries Management and Coordination

Office of the Ministry of Fisheries and Marine Resources, MFMR.

13.1 Internal Monitoring and Evaluation

13.1.1 Purpose and Responsibility

The purpose of the internal monitoring and evaluation will be to verify that:

actions and commitments described in this resettlement plan are implemented;

eligible people to be affected by the works receive their full compensation; and

complaints and grievances lodged by PAPs are followed‐up with and resolved.

13.1.2 Monitoring and Evaluation Plan Indicators

The RAP team will be expected to develop and implement a Monitoring and Evaluation Plan

(MEP). The main indicators that the MEP will measure include: (i) impacts on affected

individuals, households, and communities to be maintained at their pre‐project standard of

living, and better; (ii) improvement of communities affected by the project; and (iii)

management of disputes or conflicts.

The Fisheries Management and Coordination Office will undertake the routine internal

monitoring and evaluation of the implementation of the resettlement issues so as to ensure

that all the responsible units follow the schedule and comply with the principles of the

resettlement plan. The monitoring programme will provide a continuous feedback on the

implementation of the RAP. Monitoring teams will be constituted and will report regularly to

the FMCO of the WARFP, Sierra Leone. The team will include EPA‐SL and appropriate

departments under the Ministry of Lands and Country Planning.

The monitoring and evaluation will be the main mechanism to alert the FMCO of any delays and

problems and these activities will help measure the extent to which the main objectives of the

RAP have been achieved. An evaluation programme will be implemented periodically to also

check on compliance with action plan and provide lessons to amend strategies, especially in the

longer term. NGOs will also help with monitoring and validation of the implementation of the

safeguards instruments and action plans and some sensitization and education and capacity

building activities.

The evaluation will be based on current WB procedures and also national provisions on

resettlement/compensation.



Through the monitoring and evaluation, the FMCO will establish a reporting system for the

project RAP that will:

(i) provide timely information to the project about all resettlement and compensation

issues arising as a result of RAP related activities;

(ii) identify any grievances, especially those that have not yet been resolved at the local level and which may require resolution at the higher levels;

(iii) document completion of project resettlement and compensation that are still pending,

including for all permanent and temporary losses; and

(iv) evaluate whether all PAPs have been compensated in accordance with the requirements

of this RAP and that PAPs have better living conditions and livelihoods.

13.1.3 Independent Impact Evaluation

The independent impact evaluation will determine:

(i) If compensation payments have been completed in a satisfactory manner; and

(ii) If there are improvements in livelihoods and well‐being of PAPs.

Several indicators will be used to measure these impacts. These include, among others, a

comparison of income levels before‐and‐after; access to livelihoods and employment; and

changes in standards of housing and living conditions.

The following methods will be used for measuring impacts:

(i) questionnaires with data stored in a database for comparative analysis (before‐after

and with‐without);

(ii) documentation and recording of PAPs situation, including subsequent uses of

assets/improvements;

(iii) relocation/resettlement and Compensation Reports, including status of land impacts;

percentage of individuals selecting cash or a combination of cash and in‐kind

compensation; proposed use of payments;

(iv) number of grievances and time and quality of resolution; and

(v) ability of individuals and families to re‐establish their pre‐resettlement activities, in

terms of other alternative incomes.

The RAP team will maintain basic information on all physical or economic displacement arising

from the project. This includes an update, for example on a bimonthly basis, of the following:

(i) number of households and individuals physically or economically displaced by the

project;

(ii) length of time from project identification to payment of compensation to PAPs;

(iii) timing of compensation in relation to commencement of physical works;

(iv) amount of compensation paid to each PAP household (if in cash), or the nature of

compensation (if in kind);

(v) number of people raising grievances in relation to each sub‐project; and

(vi) number of unresolved grievances.



13.1.4 Reporting

The monitoring unit will submit periodic (preferably bimonthly) reports to the FMCO, and

copied to the MFMR. The report will at least cover status of compensation disbursement,

nature of complaints, redress actions and follow‐ups.

13.2 Completion Audit

World Bank Group guidance (OP 4.12) states that upon completion of the project, the project

proponent oversees an assessment to determine whether the objectives of the resettlement

programme have been achieved.

The audit will allow the FMCO, and other relevant stakeholders to verify that all resettlement

measures identified in the RAP have been implemented, and that compensation and

reinstatement works have been completed in compliance with OP 4.12.

13.2.1 Audit Components

The audit of the RAP implementation will includes (i) a summary of RAP performance of the

project; (ii) a compliance review of RAP implementation process; and (iii) a progress report on

the quality of RAP implementation in terms of application of guidelines provided in this RAP.

The audit will verify results of monitoring of RAP implementation indicators, and assess whether

the project achieved the resettlement objectives. A specific measure of whether livelihood and

living standards have been restored or enhanced will be completed. The audit will also assess

the efficiency, effectiveness, impact, and sustainability of RAP project activities. The aim is to

learn lessons for application to future projects or other projects in the sector and in the country.

Finally, the audit will ascertain whether the resettlement entitlements were appropriate, as

defined in this RAP.

Socio‐Economic Assessment

The purpose of socio‐economic assessment, which is part of the evaluation process, is to ensure

that PAPs livelihood and well‐being have improved, and have not worsened as a result of the

project. An assessment will be undertaken on payment of compensation, and restoration of

income and livelihoods. Monitoring of living standards will continue after resettlement.

13.2.2 Responsibility and Timeframe

The FMCO is solely responsible for the completion audit. However, the assignment can be

contracted out to external auditors or consultants. The completion audit is to be undertaken on

completion of the RAP timetable.



14.0 COST AND BUDGET

14.1 RAP Budget

The budget is developed from the mitigation/livelihood restoration measures to be developed.

It covers resettlement activities including compensation cost for affected assets.

The cost is derived from expenditures relating to (1) administrative costs, (2) relocation and

transfer, and (3) income and means of livelihood restoration plan. These bullet points give the

cost centres:

Administrative costs

Operation and support staff

Training and monitoring

Technical assistance

Relocation and transfer

Cost of moving and transporting affected properties

Cost of site and infrastructure development and services

Subsistence allowance during transition

Cost of replacement of businesses and downtime

Income and means of livelihood restoration plans

Cost of estimating income losses

Cost of income restoration plans

The proposed budget for the implementation of the RAP is presented in Table 11. The budget

describes the estimated cost for each of the resettlement activities. The proposed budget of

USD 642,558.36 (Six Hundred and Forty‐Two Thousand, Five Hundred and Fifty‐Eight Dollars

and Thirty‐Six Cents) is subject to update and revision during the implementation.



Table 11: Proposed RAP Budget

No. Cost item Estimated cost/ (USD) Comment

1.0 Budget for RAP management and

implementations (Administrative

Cost)

Include allowances for RAP

Management Team members,

grievance redress costs

1.1 Kissy Dockyard RAP Management

Teams

6,000.00 To be shared equally among the 3

teams.

1.2 Completion Audit 2,000.00 Local expert engagement cost

1.3 Grievance Redress 4,000.00

1.4 Sub‐total –RAP Implementation 12,000.00 Rap Management Teams and

Grievance Redress Process

2.0 Resettlement Compensations and

Assistances to PAP

Based on full replacement cost as

well as loss of income/

supplementary assistance)

2.1 Compensation and Resettlement

Assistance

399,960.34

2.2 Sub‐total –compensation payable 399,9600.34 Total compensation payable

3.0 Land Acquisition

3.1 Land Acquisition and Preparation 200,000.00 50m x500m area at Hastings (about

16km from Freetown)

3.2 Sub‐total –Land Acquisition 200,000.00 Total amount for land acquisition

and Preparation

4.0 Sub‐total‐all of above 611,960.34 (No. 1.4 + No. 2.2 + No. 3.2)

5.0 Contingency 30,598.02 5% of sub‐total‐all of above (4.0)

6.0 Total RAP Budget 642,558.36 Subject to review during

implementation

14.2 Source of Funding

The FMCO of the WARFP, Sierra Leone through the Ministry of Fisheries and Marine Resources

(MFMR) will provide funds for the RAP activities on behalf of the Government of Sierra Leone.

The FMCO of the WARFP, Sierra Leone will also pay compensation directly to the affected

people through the various implementation teams to be formed for that purpose.



ANNEXES

Annex 1 Stakeholder Consultation

Annex 2 Valuation and Compensation

Annex 3 Certification of Value

Annex 4 Compensation profile of affected people /properties

Annex 5 Lists of Members of the Sand Mining Development Organisation

Annex 6 Compensation Claim Form

Annex 7 Compensation Receipt for Claimant

Annex 8 Grievance and Resolution Form

Annex 9 Commitment letter from Ministry of Lands, Country Planning and the Environment

Annex 10 List of members of Grievance Redress Committee from Kissy Dockyard Community

Annex 11 Sample Questionnaire used in the Census and Socio‐Economic Survey

Annex 12 Photo album of the entire RAP Process.



Annex 1: Stakeholder Consultation

Series of consultation meetings were held among the key stakeholders. These are chronicled as

follows and the minutes/ reports are presented thereafter.

Meeting

no.

Date Key participants Purpose of meeting

1.0 19/02/11 Mr. Mohammed K. Kamar, Secretary of All

Youth Organisation; Moses S. Cassell,

Chairman of Local Courts and Representative

of Chief of Kisssy Dockyard

To meet with leaders of main

identifiable groups to explain the

project to them and the

associated resettlement issues.

2.0 21/02/11 Dr. Saccon Kabia (Minister, MFMR)

Mr. Alpha A. Bangura (Director, MFMR)

FMCO, WB Consultants

To formally introduce the WB

consultants working on the RAP

to the Minister.

3.0 21/02/11 Pa Combrabai Sesay (Chief of Kissy

Dockyard); Mr. Mohammed K. Kamar Little

(Leader, All Youth Organisation).

Introduce of WB consultants and

briefing of the proposed project

to the community

4.0 22/02/11 Field Assistants; WB Consultants; Project

Coordinators,FMCO

To meet with the field assistants

and brief them on the nature of

the survey and prepare for it.

5.0 24/02/11 Beatrix Allah‐Mensah, Dr. Sankoh; Mr.

Koroma, WB Consultants.

To update the WB Social

Development Specialist on the

latest development following the

different consultation meetings

with the chief and leaders of Kissy

Dockyard Community

6.0 09/04/11 Director of Fisheries, Hon. Minister of

Fisheries & Marine Resources Hon. Minister

of Lands, Councillor of Kissy Dockyard, Youth

Group Leaders, Local Authorities,

Community members, FMCO

Briefing of the proposed harbour

by the two Ministers and

assurance from the Government

to compensate PAPs

appropriately.



Annex 1.1: Minutes of Meeting at Kissy Dockyard Proposed Harbour Construction Site,

Saturday 9th April, 2011

1.0 The meeting commenced at about 02:15p.m. at the arrival of the two Ministers. An

estimated 85 people attended the meeting. These included the Minister of Lands, the Minister

of Fisheries & Marine Resources, Youth Group Leaders, Local Authorities, etc. as indicated on

the attendance list.

2.0 After prayers and courtesies, the two youth leaders and a local Authority were asked

to address the meeting. They welcomed the Ministers and everyone.

3.0 One of the speakers, Mr Foday said they understand from some authorities that a

project construction for a harbour is to take place on this site but that it is not clear to them as

to what will be their fate as occupants of the land. They would be grateful to know their fate

without which they would continue to put on resistance to any activity on the proposed site. At

this point there was a lot of argument and angry protests from the crowd which was steadily

increasing.

4.0 After a while the youths tempered down to listen to the Ministers address. The two

Ministers responded as follows that:

The construction project to be funded by the World Bank is a reality and that no one can stand on its way.

Government would lose the World Bank grant in ten days time if an RAP study is not conducted immediately and this must take place next week with World Bank consultants from Ghana.

We the Ministers will assure you that affected persons will be compensated including alternative sites for relocation.

We the Ministers also noted that several ad hoc meeting have taken place between you the occupants, your local authorities, the Ministry and the Project personnel. We hope that this is the final meeting for the RAP to take off.

5.0 At the end of the Ministers address many attendants were happy and asked several

questions of clarification which were responded to by the Ministers.

6.0 It was unanimously agreed that a committee of 15 people will be formed and

presented to the Ministries on Monday 11/04/11 at 11:30 a.m., and that the committee will be

working with the Ministry personnel and the Bank Consultant to undertake the RAP studies or

census on the 13th and 14th April, 2011.

7.0 The vote of thanks was given by the Chairlady, Madam Ajarah.



Recorded by

…………………………………………….

M. Koroma

ATTENDANCE LIST ON RAP MEETING, 09/04/11

NAME DESIGNATION

1. Alpha A. Bangura Director of Fisheries

2. Dr Saccoh Kabia Hon. Minister of Fisheries & Marine Resources

3. Mr Pat Sowe Hon. Minister of Lands

4. Abdul Salam Councilor of Kissy Dockyard

5. Rtd. Abndul Rahman Kamara Member of Parliament

6. Dr Salieu Sankoh Co‐ordinator, WARFP‐Project

7. Momodu Koroma Deputy Co‐ordinator, WARFP‐Project

8. Chief Pa Alimamy Local Chief

9. Foday Bangura Sahida Chairman, Houseowners Association

10. Alhaji T. Fofonah Secretary, Houseowners Association

11. Mohamed Abass Kamara Chairman, Sand Ground

12. Mrs Taymay Conteh Spokeswoman/Secretary

13. Mrs Rukie Kamara Spokeswoman

14. Alimamy Bangura Chairman, Boatowners

15. Augustine Bokarie Kamara Sand Salesman

16. Mohamed A. Kamara Chairman, dockyard Development Association



Annex 1.2: Report of the Consultation with Some Leaders of Kissy Dockyard Community

1.0 The consultation was held on the 19th February 2011 at about 2.45pm in the Offices of

the Ministry of Fisheries and Marine Resources Office, Kissy Dockyard.

2.0 The meeting was attended by six persons comprising:

Mr. Mohammed K. Kamar, Kissy Dockyard Leader, All Youth Organisation

Moses S. Cassell, Chairman of Local Courts for Kissy Dockyard and Representative

of Chief of Kisssy Dockyard

Emmanuel S. Koroma, Secretary to the Sand Mining Youth Development

Organisation

Mr. Mahmodu Koroma, Deputy Coordinator, WARFP

Mr. Seth Larmie, World Bank RAP Consultant

Mr.Ebbin Abaka‐Yankson, Consultant

3.0 The purpose of the meeting was to (1) meet with leaders of main identifiable groups

in the Kissy Dockyard community to explain the project to them and the associated

resettlement issues, (2) listen to any concerns they may have related to the project, (3) assist in

planning for a Community meeting and subsequently (4) assist to begin the process of selecting

Community members to form a Committee to oversee the implementation of the resettlement

plan.

4.0 Mr. Mahmodu Koroma introduced the Consultants and gave the reason for the

meeting. He also acted as the interpreter. He further indicated the importance of having the

three leaders to attend this meeting since they are well respected as influential leaders of the

Kissy Dockyard community.

5.0 The Consultants briefed the community leaders about the project highlighting the

overall aim of the proposed project and the benefits that will emanate from it to the

community. He further described the possible negative social impacts which may include loss of

livelihood as well as possible relocation of some members of the community.

6.0 He explained that though people are squatting illegally on the land required for the

project, they will be assisted to move to other places of their choice in accordance with the

basic principles followed by the Bank which will ensure that nobody becomes worse off as a

result of the implementation of the project including their livelihood.

7.0 The meeting discussed the opportunities the project will bring to the community

including employment and improvement in standard of living. The leaders were assured of the

involvement of the entire community in the decision making process with respect to the

determination of compensation and other assistance packages.

8.0 The community leaders reacted to the project by firstly providing some basic

information on their socio‐ economic circumstances:



Most of them have lived in Kissy Dockyard since 1999, at the peak of the Rebel

War.

Sand mining is the main occupation in the Dockyard.

They depend on the sales of the beach sand for their living

The sand is mined from Lungi and transported to the Kissy Dockyard by boat and

loaded by man power.

About 250‐300 people work as sand miners, drivers, carpenters and sand

contractors/agents and therefore about 1500 to 2000 persons depend on this

business for their day to day living.

They own about 15 boats which transport the mined sand from Lungi.

They own about 30 trucks which convey the sand to various construction sites all

over Freetown.

Most of them are also part‐time fishermen with their women mostly fish mongers

and traders

There about 15 other small groups along the coast involved in the sand mining

business. 9.0 The leaders commended the World Bank for a project of this nature and see it as an opportunity for the development of both the community at Kissy Dockyard and its environs. The leaders indicated their support to the Ministry to implement the project.

10.0 They agreed in principle that they are illegal occupants of the land and are satisfied

with the fact that they will be compensated and assisted to relocate to a place of their choice, if

need be.

11.0 The Chief’s representative suggested that the persons to be directly affected by the

project be informed as early as possible. He again mentioned that a date must be determined to

meet with these PAPs to explain how they will be affected by the proposed project.

12.0 The leaders emphasised on the impact on their livelihood including the need for the

project to provide the local fishermen with a dockyard to dock and repair their boats.

13.0 Other issues brought up included the current poor sanitation and water supply

situation in the community.

14.0 The meeting agreed on the need to meet the community at large as early as possible.

The leaders would organise this meeting to occur within the next few days.

15.0 This initial meeting lasted about one hour.



Annex 1.3: Report of Consultation Meeting at the Ministry of Fisheries and Marine Resources

(MFMR)

1.0 This consultation meeting was held on 21 February 2011 at about 1300hrs in the

Office of the Minister of Fisheries and Marine Resources (MFMR) and attended by key project

persons.

2.0 The meeting was attended by ten persons comprising:

Dr. Saccon Kabia (Minister, MFMR)

Mr. Alpha A. Bangura (Director, MFMR)

Mr. T. D. K. Taylor (Assistant Director, MFMR)

Ms Mariam Marrah (Personal Assistant to the Minister)

Dr. Salieu Sankoh (Coordinator, WARFP)

Mr. Mahmodu Koroma (Deputy coordinator, WARFP)

Mr. Saidu Sesay (Procurement Specialist, WARFP)

Mr. Dalton Myers (Accountant, WARFP)

Mr. Seth Larmie (WB RAP Consultant, Team Leader)

Mr.Ebbin Abaka‐Yankson (Consultant)

3.0 The purpose of the meeting was to formally introduce the consultants working on the

Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) for the development of Kissy Fishery Port to the Ministry and

also for the consultants to obtain confirmation of the scope and extent of the project to assist in

the identification of properties and persons to be affected including all livelihood concerns.

4.0 Dr. Salieu Sankoh introduced the World Bank consultants and other members of the

WARFP team to the Minister and confirmed the reasons for the meeting. Dr. Salieu Sankoh used

the opportunity to highlight the resettlement issues related to the project and the specific terms

of reference of the RAP consultants.

5.0 The Ministry emphasized its interest and commitment to the development of a shore

based port facility rather than an island based port. It was indicated that this preference has

little implication on resettlement related issues.

6.0 In the discussions that followed, clarification was sought from the Ministry on the on‐

shore boundaries of the project to assist in determining the total number of people and

properties to be affected.

7.0 Reference was made to earlier conceptual designs presented by Messrs J A Sciortino

which quoted 50m from the zero contour as belonging to the Ports Authority, by legislation.

Thus, if the distance to be covered by the port project along the water front is estimated to be

500m then the total area of immediate project influence is estimated to within 2,500 square

metres.



8.0 This area must be secured for port security and human safety as well as aesthetic

reasons, hence the requirement for resettlement considerations.

9.0 The Ministry currently has no firm choice for a site to relocate project affected

persons and will rely on the preferences of the people as determined from the RAP to make an

informed decision.

10.0 The Minister confirmed the resolve of the government to implement the project and

to satisfactorily attend to all related resettlement issues

11.0 Finally, the Minister, Dr. Saccon Kaiba thanked the team for the meeting and assured

the consultants of his personal support to ensure the successful preparation of a good RAP

document.

12.0 The meeting lasted about 30 minutes.



Annex 1.4: Report of Consultation with Traditional Leaders and Representatives of Different

Groups of Kissy Dockyard Community

1.0 The consultation was held on the 21st February 2011 at about 3.15pm under an

aluminium roofed wooden shed at Kissy Dockyard Community.

2.0 The meeting was attended by the following persons:

1. Pa Combrabai Sesay (Chief of Kissy Dockyard)

2. Mr. Mohammed K. Kamar Little (Leader, All Youth Organisation)

3. Mr. Alieu Koroma (Vice Chairman, Sand Ground)

4. Mr. Foday H. Banguru (House owner)

5. Mr. Sayo Kamara (House owner)

6. Mr. Edward Koroma (House owner)

7. Mr. Mohammed Korgbo (House owner)

8. Mr. Mohammed Bangura (House owner)

9. Mr. Kelfullah A. Kamara (Secretary general)

10. Mr. Mohammed A. Turay (Rep. Of Little Rock Development Association)

11. Mr. Ishmael Bangura (Chairman, Docyard Youth)

12. Mr. Arrico Bangura (Resedident, Kissy Dockyard)

13. Mr. Issah Conteh (Member, Sand Ground)

14. Mr. Ibrahim Kamana (Chairman, Area Rulers Association)

15. Mr. Serie Kanu (Member, Sea Side Organisation)

16. Mr. Lamin M. Suma (Luxurious Social Club)

17. Miss Rugiatu Kanu (Member, Use Your Brain Group)

18. Mr. John Korgbo (Chairman, Watcham Boys)

19. Mr. Joseph Biya (Watcham Boys)

20. Mr. Joseph Sandy (Member, Sea Side Organisation)

21. Mr. Emmanuel John Conteh

22. Mr. Abdul Kamara (Member, Sand Ground)

23. Mr. Mahmodu Koroma (Deputy Coordinator, WARFP_Sierra Leone)

24. Mr. Seth Larmie (World Bank RAP Consultant)

25. Mr.Ebbin Abaka‐Yankosn (Consultant)

3.0 The purpose of the meeting was to (1) to meet with the traditional leaders and youth

leaders of recognised groups, (2) to introduce ourselves and brief them about the proposed

project. (3) to guide them form the grievance redress committee whose mandate will be to: act

as spokes group for the project affected persons (PAPs), act as channel of grievance redress,

help in deciding compensation arrangements, facilitate the census survey and handle any issues

of compensation and resettlement, (4) To walk through the community to identify and assess

structures to be affected by the proposed project.

4.0 Mr. Mahmodu Koroma introduced the Consultants to the gathering and gave the

reason for the meeting. He also acted as the interpreter. He thanked the various leaders for



their presence and further indicated the importance of having them at the meeting since they

are well respected and represent the people of Kissy Dockyard community.

5.0 The Consultants briefed the community leaders about the project highlighting the

overall aim of the proposed project and the benefits that will emanate from it to the

community. He explained to them the possible negative social impacts which may include loss

of livelihood as well as possible relocation of some members of the community.

6.0 Mr. Larmie further explained that though people are squatting illegally on the land

required for the project, they will be assisted to move to other places of their choice in

accordance with the basic principles followed by the World Bank which will ensure that nobody

becomes worse off as a result of the implementation of the project including their livelihood.

7.0 Together with Mr. Mahmodu Koroma, they iterated the opportunities the project will

bring to the community including employment and improvement in standard of living. The

leaders were assured of the involvement of the entire community in the decision making

process with respect to the determination of compensation and other assistance packages.

8.0 Touching on the main issue of the day, the meeting discussed the importance of

forming a seven to nine member grievance redress committee who will perform the following

functions:

act as spokes group for the project affected persons (PAPs)

act as channel of grievance redress

help in deciding compensation arrangements and

facilitate the census survey.

9.0 The consultants suggested to the gathering that the group should comprise

representatives of the following groups and stakeholders:

Women groups

Vulnerable including the disabled

Traditional and Religious leaders

PAPs including Sand miners, owners of residential structures to be affected

10.0 The chief and leaders of the youth groups commended the World Bank for a project of

this nature and see it as an opportunity for the development of both the community at Kissy

Dockyard and its environs.

11.0 The chief also commended the consultants for the entire consultation process and the

fact that the locals especially the traditional authorities have been consulted and involved at the

conceptual stage of the project. The chief and leaders indicated their support to the Ministry to

implement the project.



12.0 Responding to the concerns of alternative livelihood support for the sand miners, Mr.

Larmie assured them that they (PAPs) would indicate which place they would want to be

relocated to and other resettlement packages ranging from cash compensation to restoration of

their source of livelihood as per the terms and provisions of the World Bank’s social safeguards

on involuntary resettlement.

13.0 Mr. Larmie and Mr. Momodu Koroma iterated the benefits and associated

employment opportunities that the project will bring to the locals of Kissy Dockyard. The

following were mentioned as components of the propose harbour:

Cold Stores

o Rental of cold storage space o Bonded store for exports

Ice Production

o Sale to fishing vessels o Sale to processing plants

Fish Processing

o Purchase and processing of marine products for export

Vessel construction and maintenance

o Construction of new fishing craft o Maintenance of fishing and patrol craft

14.0 Together with the chief and leaders, the consultants were led into the community to

assess the number and types of properties to be affected.

15.0 The meeting agreed that the grievance redress committee be formed by 4.00pm the

next day.

16.0 The meeting lasted about two and half hours.



Annex 1.5: Report of Meeting held with the Project Team of the Ministry of Fisheries and

Marine Resources (MFMR) and Field Assistants.

1.0 The meeting was held on the 22nd February 2011 at about 2.20pm in the WARFP

Project Office of the Ministry of Fisheries and Marine Resources Office, Youyi Building.

2.0 The meeting was attended by eight persons comprising:


Mr. Mahmodu Koroma (Deputy coordinator, WARFP)

Mr. Thomas Lebbie (Research and Teaching Assistant, Institute of Marine Biology and

Oceanography. Forah Bay College, University of Sierra Leone)

Miss Kadiatu Seaport kamara (Research and Teaching Assistant, Institute of Marine Biology

and Oceanography. Forah Bay College, University of Sierra Leone)

Mr. Almamy Sesay (Assistant Fisheries Officer, MFMR)

Mr. Chrispin Kessebeh (Assistant Fisheries Officer, MFMR)

Mr. Seth Larmie (World Bank RAP Consultant)

Mr.Ebbin Abaka‐Yankosn (Consultant)

3.0 The purpose of the meeting was to (1) meet with the field assistants and brief them

on the nature of the survey (2) to go through the questionnaire with the field assistants (3)

prepare for the census survey the following day

4.0 Dr. Salieu Sankoh introduced the field assistants to the consultants. Mr. Mahmodu

Koroma highlighted on the nature of the census survey and the key issues to consider during the

survey.

5.0 The consultants took the field assistants through the questions to be administered.

6.0 The consultants indicated that the census survey will be done by three separate

groups with three members in each group.

7.0 The groups comprise:

Group 1

Mr. Almamy Sesay

Mr. Chrispin Kessebeh

A local from Kissy Dockyard Community

Group 2

Miss Kadiatu Seaport Kamara

Mr. Thomas Lebbie


Group 3

Mr. Seth Larmie

Mr. Ebbin Abaka‐Yankson




8.0 In the discussions that followed, it was decided that three (3) pictures would be taken

for each affected property in other to get a good visual description of the structure to help in

the valuation process.

9.0 Details of the picture should include:

The front view of the structure with the owner standing in front of the structure. The

reference number of the structure must also be seen.

The rear/back view of the structure.

Side view of the structure.

10.0 These details are needed in other to detect additional structures that may be

constructed after the cut‐off date during which the valuation of the affected properties would

be done.

11.0 The reference numbers of the structures would include the following details:

Number of structure: This is a three digit number beginning from 001.

Date of the census. E.g. 22‐02‐11.

Name of the Ministry i.e. Ministry of Fisheries and Marine Resources (MFMR).

A sample reference number of a structure would look like this: 001/22‐02‐11/MFMR. The

reference numbers would be marked with blue and white paints on the affected structure.

12.0 Items to be used in the census incude:

Digital camera

Paints (Blue and White) and brushes.

13.0 The census survey groups agreed to meet at Kissy Dockyard at 7.00 am the next day to

begin the census. The meeting was brought to a close at 3.50pm.



Annex 1.6: Report of Meeting with Project Coordinator and WB Social Development Specialist

at the WARFP Project Office, Youyi Building

1.0 This meeting was held on 24 February 2011 at about 11.30hrs in the WARFP Project

Office of the Minister of Fisheries and Marine Resources (MFMR).

2.0 The meeting was attended by 4 persons comprising:


Beatrix Allah‐Mensah (WB Social Development Specialist)

Mr. Seth Larmie (WB RAP Consultant, Team Leader)

Mr. Ebbin Abaka‐Yankson (Consultant)

3.0 The purpose of the meeting was for the consultants and the project coordinator to

update the WB Social Development Specialist on the latest development following the

different consultation meetings with the chief and leaders of Kissy Dockyard Community. It

was also a meeting to highlight the works remaining and to firm up on timelines to complete

the RAP as per the TOR.

4.0 Dr. Salieu Sankoh, the project coordinator gave a brief account of the current status of

the project.

5.0 Briefing the World Bank’s social development specialist, Mr. Larmie highlighted the

reasons the locals gave for their refusal to allow the census survey of the affected persons and

properties to take place in the community.

6.0 As a result of recent demolishing exercise which took place in the community, the

locals were not comfortable with the idea that their structures will be marked during the

census survey exercise.

7.0 The residents in Kissy Dockyard have always blamed the Sierra Fisheries for previous

demolishing exercise that took place some time back and since have developed this bias

against big fishing companies including construction of fishing harbours.

8.0 The locals were afraid of immediate evacuation due to experience from similar

projects involving resettlement issues.

9.0 The sand miners were also afraid of losing their source of livelihood when the project

commences.

10.0 The locals wanted to get clarifications and assurance from their political leaders and

officials from the Ministry of Fisheries and Marine resources.



11.0 They wanted to meet with the following political leaders:

Member of Parliament (MP)

Councillor

Minister of Fisheries

Director of Fisheries

12.0 In the discussions that followed, Dr. Sankoh indicated the efforts the Ministry and the

project team are making to meet with the political leaders in charge of the Kissy Dockyard in

the shortest possible time to address the situation.

13.0 He continued to explain that the councillor and the Member of Parliament (MP) for

the Kissy Dockyard area have agreed to meet with the minister and director of Fisheries and

Marine Resources to help resolve the issue.

14.0 Reacting to issues discussed, Beatrix Allah‐Mensah emphasised the need for the

project team and the Ministry to get the issues resolved so as to enable the consultants meet

the deadline for the preparation of the resettlement action plan.

15.0 She further discussed that in all cases, the World Bank provisions on involuntary

resettlements need be employed and that the locals have to be engaged in all aspect of the

resettlement process.

16.0 For safety reasons, the meeting decided that the ground works need to be done

properly before the consultants can enter the community.

17.0 As a result of the developments, the meeting decided on the following timelines:

Second Field Mission 22/03/11 to 08/04/11

o Conduction of census survey 23/03/11 to 31/03/11

o Valuation of Affected Properties 02/04/11 to 07/04/11

Reporting 08/04/11 to 12/04/11

Submission of Draft Report 13/04/11

18.0 The consultants agreed to return to Sierra Leone on 22 March, 2011 hoping that by

then the ministry would have resolved the current problem.

19.0 The meeting lasted for 2 hours.



Annex 2: Valuation and Compensation



Annex 3: Certification of Valuation



CERTIFICATION OF VALUE

This is to certify that we have inspected all the properties described in this Report under the

Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) for the West Africa Regional Fisheries Program (WARFP), Sierra

Leone

The appraisal has been conducted in an objective manner in accordance with the Code of

Professional Ethics of the Sierra Leone Institution of Surveyors (SLIS) to which we are affiliated.

To the best of our knowledge and belief, the statements of fact contained in this Report and

upon which opinions herewith are based are true and correct.

We declare that we do not have any present or prospective interest in the subject property and

have no personal bias with respect to the properties involved.

In our professionally considered opinion, having regard to the legal, physical, economic and

institutional factors, the affected properties in Kissy Dockyard have been assigned the following

values as at the date of valuation;

Description/

Location

Compensation/

Replacement (Le)

Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)

Total (Le)

Kissy Dockyard 1,407,451,300.00 140,110,130.00 132,271,995.00 1,679,833,425.00

PREPARED BY:

Mr. Somua Lahai

Quantity Surveyor

(HND, Civil and Building Engineering)

Date: 14th April, 2011



Annex 4: Compensation profile of affected people /properties



AFFECTED RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES

Name of Claimant: Abu Bakarr kamara

Property Location: Kissy Dockyard

Affected Property: Entire Structure

Activity: Residence

Contact: 088‐141782

ID/Picture Number: 001A/PHOTO001

VALUATION SUMMMARY

No. Description Comment Area (ft2)

Rate(Le)

Replacement Cost (Le)

Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)

Total Comp.(Le)

1 Mud Block and Zinc Sheets Demolition 348.39 20,000.00 6,967,800.00 696,780.00 1,045,170.00 8,709,750.00

Name of Claimant: Abu Bakarr kamara II



Activity: Residence

Contact: 077‐321071


VALUATION SUMMMARY


Rate(Le)


Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)

Total Comp.(Le)

2 Concrete Block and Zinc Sheets Demolition 192.26 40,000.00 7,690,400.00 769,040.00 1,153,560.00 9,613,000.00

Name of Claimant: Brima Sesay



Activity: Residence

Contact: 088‐787580


VALUATION SUMMMARY


Rate(Le)


Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)

Total Comp.(Le)

3 Zinc Sheets Demolition 171.00 60,000.00 10,260,000.00 1,026,000.00 1,539,000.00 12,825,000.00



Name of Claimant: Foday Kamara



Activity: Residence

Contact: 077‐236667


VALUATION SUMMMARY


Rate(Le)


Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)

Total Comp.(Le)

4 Zinc Sheets Demolition 342.00 60,000.00 20,520,000.00 2,052,000.00 3,078,000.00 25,650,000.00

Name of Claimant: Mohamed Kargbo



Activity: Residence

Contact: ‐


VALUATION SUMMMARY


Rate(Le)


Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)

Total Comp.(Le)

5 Timber Zinc Demolition 270.00 35,000.00 9,450,000.00 945,000.00 1,417,500.00 11,812,500.00

Name of Claimant: Salieu Kudos


Affected Property: Entire Structure, Mango and Pawpaw Trees

Activity: Residence

Contact: 088‐142092

ID/Picture Number: 006A1/PHOTO015

VALUATION SUMMMARY

No. Description Comment Area (ft2)/No.

Rate(Le)


Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)

Total Comp.(Le)

6 Zinc Sheets

Concrete

Mango

Pawpaw

Demolition

Destruction

Destruction

288.39

2

2

70,00000

50,000

50,000

20,187,300.00

100,000.00

100,000.00

2,018,730.00

‐

‐

3,028,095.00

‐

25,234,125.00

100,000.00

00,000.00

25,434,125.00



Name of Claimant: Salieu Kudos



Activity: Residence

Contact: 088‐142092


VALUATION SUMMMARY


Rate(Le)


Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)

Total Comp.(Le)

7 Tarpaulin Demolition 180.00 20,000.00 3,600,000.00 360,000.00 540,000.00 4,500,000.00

Name of Claimant: Brima Kanneh



Activity: Residence

Contact: 077‐824927


VALUATION SUMMMARY


Rate(Le)


Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)

Total Comp.(Le)

8 Mud, Zinc Demolition 502.99 50,000.00 25,149,600.00 2,514,960.00 3,772,440.00 31,437,000.00

Name of Claimant: Edward Koroma


Affected Property: Entire Structure, Mango Tree

Activity: Residence

Contact: 077‐610932


VALUATION SUMMMARY


Rate(Le)


Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)

Total Compensation

9 Mud Block

Zinc

Mango

Demolition

Destruction

387.51

1

50,00000

50,000

19,179,200.00

50,000.00

1,917,920.00

‐

2,876,880.00

‐

24,219,375.00

50,000.00

24,269,375.00



Name of Claimant: Edward Koroma



Activity: Residence

Contact: 077‐610932


VALUATION SUMMMARY


Rate(Le)


Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)

Total Comp.(Le)

10 Concrete, Zinc Demolition 239.74 80,000.00 19,179,200.00 1,917,920.00 2,876,880.00 23,974,000.00

Name of Claimant: Sorie Conteh



Activity: Residence

Contact: 077‐421127


VALUATION SUMMMARY


Rate(Le)


Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)

Total Comp.(Le)

11 Concrete, Zinc Demolition 359.61 80,000.00 28,768,800.00 2,876,880.00 4,315,320.00 35,961,000.00

Name of Claimant: Wudie Gbondo


Affected Property: Entire Structure, Mango, Orange Palm Trees

Activity: Residence

Contact: 033‐924648


VALUATION SUMMMARY


Rate(Le)


Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)

Total Comp.(Le)

12 Zinc Sheets

Concrete

Mango

Orange

Palm

Demolition

Destruction

Destruction

Destruction

359.61

1

1

1

80,000

50,000

50,000

100,000

28,768,800.00

50,000.00

50,000.00

100,000.00

2,876,880.00

‐

‐

‐

4,315,320.00

‐

‐

‐

35,961,000.00

50,000.00

50,000.00

100,000

36,161,000.00






Activity: Residence

Contact: 033‐924648


VALUATION SUMMMARY


Rate(Le)


Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)

Total Comp.(Le)

13 Concrete, Zinc Sheets Demolition 309.61 80,000 24,768,800.00 2,476,880.00 3,715,320.00 30,961,000.00




Activity: Residence

Contact: 033‐924648


VALUATION SUMMMARY


Rate(Le)


Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)

Total Comp.(Le)

14 Wood, Zinc Sheets Demolition 170.00 20,000.00 3,400,000.00 340,000.00 510,000.00 4,250,000.00




Activity: Residence

Contact: 033‐924648


VALUATION SUMMMARY


Rate(Le)


Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)

Total Comp.(Le)

15 Concrete,

Zinc Sheets Demolition 96.13 80,000.00 7,690,400.00 769,040.00 1,153,560.00 9,613,000.00






Activity: Residence

Contact: 033‐924648


VALUATION SUMMMARY


Rate(Le)


Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)

Total Comp.(Le)

16 Mud Block, Zinc Sheets Demolition 251.60 50,000.00 12,580,000.00 1,258,000.00 1,887,000.00 15,725,000.00

Name of Claimant: Saio Kamara

Property Location: 40A Queen Elizabeth Road,Kissy Dockyard

Affected Property: Entire Structure, Mango, Orange, Apple, Coconut, Banana Trees

Activity: Residence

Contact: 076‐446934

ID/Picture Number: 011A1‐3/PHOTO032/ PHOTO033/ PHOTO034

VALUATION SUMMMARY


Rate(Le)


Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)

Total Comp.(Le)

17 Zinc Sheets

Concrete

Coconut

Orange

Apple

Banana

Mango

Demolition

Destruction

Destruction

Destruction

Destruction

Destruction

1,249.43

1

1

1

1

1

50,000

100,000

50,000

100,000

50,000

50,000

62,471,500.00

100,000.00

50,000.00

100,000.00

50,000.00

50,000.00

6,247,150.00

‐

‐

‐

‐

‐

9,370,725.00

‐

‐

‐

‐

‐

78,089,375.00

100,000.00

50,000.00

100,000.00

50,000.00

50,000.00

78,439,375.00



Name of Claimant: Foday Bangura

Name of Rep.: Fatima Bangura

Property Location: 38A Queen Elizabeth Road,Kissy Dockyard


Activity: Residence

Contact: 077‐708300


VALUATION SUMMMARY


Rate(Le)


Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)

Total Comp.(Le)

18 Zinc Sheets

Concrete

Mango

Demolition

Destruction

864.91

1

50,000

50,000

43,245,500.00

50,000.00

4,324,550.00

‐

6,486,825.00

‐

54,056,875.00

50,000.00

54,106,875.00

Name of Claimant: Alhaji Gibril Fofanah



Activity: Residence

Contact: 077‐282413/033‐807513


VALUATION SUMMMARY


Rate(Le)


Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)

Total Comp.(Le)

19 Zinc Sheets

Concrete

Mango

Demolition

Destruction

256.26

1

50,000

50,000

12,813,000.00

50,000.00

1,281,300.00

‐

1,921,950.00

‐

16,016,250.00

50,000.00

16,066,250.00



Name of Claimant: Ibrahim Morlai Fofanah



Activity: Residence

Contact: 033‐700407


VALUATION SUMMMARY


Rate(Le)


Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)

Total Comp.(Le)

20 Concrete, Zinc Sheets Demolition 352.39 50,000.00 17,619,500.00 1,761,950.00 2,642,925.00 22,024,375.00

Name of Claimant: Alimamy Tarawally

Name of Rep.: Mohamed A. Tarawally (son)


Affected Property: Entire Structure, Pawpaw

Activity: Residence

Contact: 077‐438772


VALUATION SUMMMARY


Rate(Le)


Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)

Total Comp.(Le)

21

Zinc Sheets

Concrete

Pawpaw

Demolition

Destruction

256.26

1

50,000

50,000

12,813,000.00

50,000.00

1,281,300.00

‐

1,921,950.00

‐

16,016,250.00

50,000.00

16,066,250.00

Name of Claimant: Ibrahim A. Kamara



Activity: Tenant in Alimamy Tarawally’s House

Contact: 077‐217669

ID/Picture Number: ‐

VALUATION SUMMMARY

No. Description Comment Resettlement Assist. (Le)

Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)

Total Compensation (Le)

22 Tenant Displacement 200,000.00 20,000.00 30,000.00 250,000.00



Name of Claimant: Bobson Gberete

Name of Rep.: Ismael Sankoh (Tenant)



Activity: Residence

Contact: ‐


VALUATION SUMMMARY


Rate(Le)


Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)

Total Comp.(Le)


Name of Claimant: Ishmael Sankoh



Activity: Tenant in Bobson Gberete’s House

Contact:


VALUATION SUMMMARY


Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)



Name of Claimant: Mohamed S. Kamara



Activity: Tenant in Bobson Gberete’s House

Contact:


VALUATION SUMMMARY


Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)





Name of Claimant: Musa Tarawally



Activity: Residence

Contact: ‐


VALUATION SUMMMARY


Rate(Le)


Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)

Total Comp.(Le)


Name of Claimant: Alimamy Tarawally

Name of Rep.: Ibrahim Tarawally (son)



Activity: Residence

Contact: 077‐438772/077‐217669/076‐530355


VALUATION SUMMMARY


Rate(Le)


Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)

Total Comp.(Le)


Name of Claimant: Mrs Kadiatu Kargbo

Property Location: 20A Queen Elizabeth Road, Kissy Dockyard


Activity: Residence

Contact: 077‐835100

ID/Picture Number: 019A/DSCN0706

VALUATION SUMMMARY


Rate(Le)


Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)

Total Comp.(Le)




Name of Claimant: Fatmata White Kamara



Activity: Residence

Contact: 088‐717935

ID/Picture Number: 001B/IMAG0407

VALUATION SUMMMARY


Rate(Le)


Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)

Total Comp.(Le)

29 Mud Block, Zinc Sheets Demolition 576.78 30,000.00 17,303,400.00 1,730,340.00 2,595,510.00 21,629250.00

Name of Claimant: Alusine Suma



Activity: Tenant in Fatmata White Kamara ’s House

Contact: 077‐899268


VALUATION SUMMMARY


Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)



Name of Claimant: Yaya Conteh



Activity: Tenant in Fatmata White Kamara ’s House

Contact: 077‐899268


VALUATION SUMMMARY


Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)





Name of Claimant: Fatmata Kamara

Name of Rep.: Alhaji Kamara (son)

Property Location: 42c Queen Elizabeth, Kissy Dockyard


Activity: Residence

Contact: 088‐427812

ID/Picture Number: 002B/SAM_1379

VALUATION SUMMMARY


Rate(Le)


Disturbance(Le)

Livelihood (Le)

Total Comp.(Le)

32 Mud Block, Zinc Sheets Demolition 576.78 30,000.00 17,303,400.00 1,730,340.00 2,595,510.00 21,629250.00

Name of Claimant: Sheik Abass Mansaray

Property Location: 43B Queen Elizabeth, Kissy Dockyard


Activity: Residence

Contact: 088‐538202


VALUATION SUMMMARY


Rate(Le)


Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)

Total Comp.(Le)


Name of Claimant: Isha Bangura

Name of Rep.: Pa Sulley Bangura

Property Location: 42A Queen Elizabeth, Kissy Dockyard


Activity: Residence

Contact: 078‐425900/076‐999859


VALUATION SUMMMARY


Rate(Le)


Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)

Total Comp.(Le)

34 Concrete, Zinc Sheets Demolition 192.26 50,000.00 9,613,000.00 961,300.00 1,441,950.00 12,016,250.00



Name of Claimant: Ya Yaebu Munu

Property Location: 42B Queen Elizabeth Road, Kissy Dockyard

Affected Property: Entire Structure, Banana Trees

Activity: Residence

Contact: 077‐859496


VALUATION SUMMMARY


Rate(Le)


Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)

Total Comp.(Le)

35

Zinc Sheets

Concrete

Banana

Demolition

Destruction

192.26

4

50,000

50,000

9,613,000.00

200,000.00

961,300.00

‐

1,441,950.00

‐

12,016,250.00

200,000.00

12,216,250.00

Name of Claimant: Kelfallah A. Kamara

Name of Rep:. Daughter

Property Location: 42 Queen Elizabeth, Kissy Dockyard


Activity: Residence

Contact: 077‐596215

ID/Picture Number: 006B1/IMAG0416

VALUATION SUMMMARY


Rate(Le)


Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)

Total Comp.(Le)

36 Concrete, Zinc Sheets Demolition 192.26 50,000.00 9,613,000.00 961,300.00 1,441,950.00 12,016,250.00

Name of Claimant: Saidu Kargbo

Property Location: 42 off Queen Elizabeth, Kissy Dockyard


Activity: Residence

Contact: 077‐596215

ID/Picture Number: 006B2/DSCN0711

VALUATION SUMMMARY


Rate(Le)


Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)

Total Comp.(Le)

37 Zinc Sheets

Concrete

Banana

Demolition

Destruction

192.26

4

50,000

50,000

9,613,000.00

200,000.00

961,300.00

‐

1,441,950.00

‐

12,016,250.00

200,000.00

12,216,250.00



Name of Claimant: Patrick Kamara



Activity: Tenant in Saidu Kargbo ’s House

Contact: ‐


VALUATION SUMMMARY


Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)



Name of Claimant: Mohamed Kargbo



Activity: Residence

Contact: 077‐596215

ID/Picture Number: 006B3

VALUATION SUMMMARY


Rate(Le)


Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)

Total Comp.(Le)

39 Concrete, Zinc Sheets Demolition 352.39 50,000.00 17.619,500.00 1,761,950.00 2,642,925.00 22,024,375.00

Name of Claimant: Lamin Bangura

Property Location: 42I Queen Elizabeth, Kissy Dockyard


Activity: Residence

Contact: 088‐385546


VALUATION SUMMMARY


Rate(Le)


Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)

Total Comp.(Le)

40 Zinc Sheets

Concrete

Banana

Mango

Demolition

Destruction

Destruction

640.78

8

2

50,000

50,000

50,000

32,039,000.00

400,000.00

100,000.00

3,203,900.00

‐

‐

4,805,850.00

‐

‐

40,048,750.00

400,000.00

100,000.00

40,548,750.00



Name of Claimant: Salieu Bangura

Property Location: 41K Queen Elizabeth, Kissy Dockyard


Activity: Residence

Contact: 078‐468103


VALUATION SUMMMARY


Rate(Le)


Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)

Total Comp.(Le)


Name of Claimant: Mr. Issa Sesay

Property Location: 42H Queen Elizabeth, Kissy Dockyard


Activity: Residence

Contact: 088‐534221


VALUATION SUMMMARY


Rate(Le)


Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)

Total Comp.(Le)

42 Zinc Sheets

Concrete

Banana

Coconut

Butter Pea

Demolition

Destruction

Destruction

Destruction

897.04

13

2

1

50,000

50,000

100,000

50,000

44,852,000.00

650,000.00

200,000.00

50,000.00

4,485,200.00

‐

‐

‐

6,727,800.00

‐

‐

‐

56,065,000.00

650,000.00

200,000.00

50,000.00

56,965,000.00

Name of Claimant: Mohamed Borbor



Activity: Tenant in Issa Sesay’s House

Contact: ‐


VALUATION SUMMMARY


Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)





Name of Claimant: Kelfela Sankoh



Activity: Tenant in Issa Sesay’s House

Contact: ‐


VALUATION SUMMMARY


Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)



Name of Claimant: Mr Ibrahim Bah

Property Location: 40K Queen Elizabeth, Kissy Dockyard


Activity: Residence

Contact: 088‐598386


VALUATION SUMMMARY


Rate(Le)


Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)

Total Comp.(Le)

45 Mud Block,

Zinc Sheets

Banana

Mango

Demolition

Destruction

Destruction

448.52

4

11

30,000

50,000

50,000

13,455,600.00

400,000.00

100,000.00

1,345,560.00

‐

‐

2,018,340.00

‐

‐

16,819,500.00

200,000.00

550,000.00

17,569,500.00

Name of Claimant: Saidu Bangura



Activity: Tenant in Ibrahim Bah’s House

Contact: 088‐598386


VALUATION SUMMMARY


Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)





Name of Claimant: Mr Alimamy Kamara




Contact: 088‐598386


VALUATION SUMMMARY


Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)



Name of Claimant: Mr Hassan Sesay




Contact: 088‐598386


VALUATION SUMMMARY


Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)



Name of Claimant: Siema Taylor

Property Location: 42J Queen Elizabeth, Kissy Dockyard


Activity: Residence

Contact: 077‐637568


VALUATION SUMMMARY


Rate(Le)


Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)

Total Comp.(Le)

49 Zinc Sheets

Concrete

Mango

Banana

Pawpaw

Fignut

Demolition

Destruction

Destruction

Destruction

Destruction

288.39

1

1

1

1

50,000

50,000

50,000

50,000

50,000

14,419,500.00

50,000.00

50,000.00

50,000.00

50,000.00

1,441,950.00

‐

‐

‐

2,162,925.00

‐

‐

‐

18,024,375.00

50,000.00

50,000.00

50,000.00

50,000.00

18,224,375.00



Name of Claimant: Mrs Baindu M. Clarks

Property Location: 42G Queen Elizabeth, Kissy Dockyard


Activity: Residence

Contact: ‐


VALUATION SUMMMARY


Rate(Le)


Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)

Total Comp.(Le)

50 Mud Block,

Zinc Sheets

Mango

Banana

Pawpaw

Demolition

Destruction

Destruction

Destruction

288.39

2

9

2

30,000

50,000

50,000

50,000

8,651,700.00

100,000.00

450,000.00

100,000.00

865,170.00

‐

‐

1,297,755.00

‐

‐

10,814,625.00

100,000.00

450,000.00

100,000.00

11,464,625.00

Name of Claimant: Mohamed Bangura

Property Location: 42G off Queen Elizabeth, Kissy Dockyard

Affected Property: Entire Structures

Activity: Residence

Contact: 088‐870385

ID/Picture Number: 014B/IMAG0422/IMAG0423/IMAG0424/IMAG0425

VALUATION SUMMMARY


Rate(Le)


Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)

Total Comp.(Le)

51 Concrete,

Mud, Zinc

Mango

Banana

Cane sugar

Demolition

Destruction

Destruction

Destruction

1794.08

4

1

4

30,000

50,000

50,000

50,000

53,822,400.00

200,000.00

50,000.00

200,000.00

5,382,240.00

‐

‐

8,073,360.00

‐

‐

67,278,000.00

200,000.00

50,000.00

200,000.00

67,728,000.00



Name of Claimant: Abubakarr Sesay


Affected Property: Displacement

Activity: Tenant in Mohamed Bangura’s House

Contact: 088‐870385

VALUATION SUMMMARY


Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)



Name of Claimant: Dulla Sillah


Affected Property: Entire Structures

Activity: Residence

Contact: 088‐856612

ID/Picture Number: 015B1‐5/SAM_1407/SAM_1408/SAM_1409/SAM_1410/SAM_1411

VALUATION SUMMMARY


Rate(Le)


Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)

Total Comp.(Le)

53 Concrete,

Mud, Zinc

Mango

Banana

Pawpaw

Demolition

Destruction

Destruction

Destruction

1381.56

1

6

4

40,000

50,000

50,000

50,000

55,262,400.00

50,000.00

300,000.00

200,000.00

5,526,240.00

‐

‐

8,289,360.00

‐

‐

69,078,000.00

50,000.00

300,000.00

200,000.00

69,628,000.00

Name of Claimant: Alhaji Kamara



Activity: Tenant in Dulla Sillah’s House

Contact: 088‐856612

VALUATION SUMMMARY


Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)





Name of Claimant: Alie Sesay




Contact: 088‐856612

VALUATION SUMMMARY


Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)



Name of Claimant: Bernard Sankoh




Contact: 088‐856612

VALUATION SUMMMARY


Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)



Name of Claimant: Osman Koroma




Contact: 088‐856612

VALUATION SUMMMARY


Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)





Name of Claimant: Mohamed Bah




Contact: 088‐856612

VALUATION SUMMMARY


Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)



Name of Claimant: Alusine Sesay




Contact: 088‐856612

VALUATION SUMMMARY


Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)



Name of Claimant: Alfred B. Koroma

Property Location: 40C off Queen Elizabeth, Kissy Dockyard


Activity: Residence

Contact: 088‐858605/076‐844396


VALUATION SUMMMARY


Rate(Le)


Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)

Total Comp.(Le)

60 Concrete, Zinc Sheets Demolition 448.52 50,000.00 22,426,000.00 2,242,600.00 3,363,900.00 28,032500.00



Name of Claimant: Mohamed Sillah

Property Location: 40C2 off Queen Elizabeth, Kissy Dockyard


Activity: Residence

Contact: 088‐652711


VALUATION SUMMMARY

No. Description Comment Area (ft2) Rate(Le)


Disturbance (Le)

Livelihood (Le)

Total Comp.(Le)

61 Zinc Sheets

Concrete

Banana

Demolition

Destruction

85.50

10

50,000

50,000

2,565,000.00

500,000.00

256,500.00

‐

384,750.00

‐

3,206,250.00

500,000.00

3,706,250.00



AFFECTED LIVELIHOOD (FOOD AND DRINK SELLERS)

Name of Claimant: Hassana Fonah


Activity: Palm wine seller

Contact: 077‐387202

ID/Picture Number: DSCN0651

VALUATION SUMMARY

No. Description Period of

Disturbance

(Days)

Estimated

Daily

Income (le

Livelihood/

Resettlement

Assist. (Le)

Disturbance

(Le)

Total

Compensation

(Le)

62 Palm wine

Seller

14 45,000.00 630,000.00 63,000.00 693,000.00

Name of Claimant: Rugiatu Kanu


Activity: Rice seller

Contact: 077‐368641


VALUATION SUMMARY


Disturbance

(Days)

Estimated

Daily

Income (le

Livelihood/

Resettlement

Assist. (Le)

Disturbance

(Le)

Total

Compensation

(Le)

63 Rice Seller 14 130,000.00 1,820,000.00 182,000.00 2,002,000.00

Name of Claimant: Alusine Kororma

Name of Rep.: Rugiatu Kanu (Wife)


Activity: Provision shop

Contact: 077‐368641


VALUATION SUMMARY


Disturbance

(Days)

Estimated Daily

Income (Le)

Livelihood/

Resettlement

Assist. (Le)

Disturbance

(Le)

Total

Compensation

(Le)

64 Rice Seller

Relocation of

Shop

14

‐

70,000.00

‐

980,000.00

250,000.00

98,000.00

‐

1,078,000.00

250,000.00

1,328,000.00



Name of Claimant: Famata Kargbo


Activity: Fried Cake Seller

Contact: 078‐120619


VALUATION SUMMARY


Disturbance

(Days)

Estimated

Daily

Income (le

Livelihood/

Resettlement

Assist. (Le)

Disturbance

(Le)

Total

Compensation

(Le)

65 Cake seller 14 30,000.00 420,000.00 42,000.00 462,000.00

Name of Claimant: Asatu Barrie


Activity: Fried Cake Seller

Contact: 078‐120619


VALUATION SUMMARY


Disturbance

(Days)

Estimated

Daily

Income (le

Livelihood/

Resettlement

Assist. (Le)

Disturbance

(Le)

Total

Compensation

(Le)

66 Cassava

Gravy

14

30,000.00 420,000.00 42,000.00 462,000.00

Name of Claimant: Marie Kanu


Activity: Fresh Cow Milk Seller

Contact: 088‐465340


VALUATION SUMMARY


Disturbance

(Days)

Estimated

Daily

Income (le

Livelihood/

Resettlement

Assist. (Le)

Disturbance

(Le)

Total

Compensation

(Le)

67 Fresh Cow

Milk Seller

14

30,000.00 420,000.00 42,000.00 462,000.00



Name of Claimant: Famata Sesay


Activity: Local Drink Seller

Contact: ‐


VALUATION SUMMARY


Disturbance

(Days)

Estimated

Daily

Income (le

Livelihood/

Resettlement

Assist. (Le)

Disturbance

(Le)

Total

Compensation

(Le)

68 Local Drink

Seller

14 30,000.00

420,000.00

42,000.00

462,000.00

Name of Claimant: Mariatu Konte


Activity: Rice Seller

Contact: 077‐421127


VALUATION SUMMARY


Disturbance

(Days)

Estimated

Daily

Income (Le)

Livelihood/

Resettlement

Assist. (Le)

Disturbance

(Le)

Total

Compensation

(Le)

69 Rice Seller 14 80,000.00

1,120,000.00

112,000.00

1,232,000.00

Name of Claimant: Zenam Kamara



Contact: 077‐421127

ID/Picture Number:

VALUATION SUMMARY


Disturbance

(Days)

Estimated

Daily

Income (Le)

Livelihood/

Resettlement

Assist. (Le)

Disturbance

(Le)

Total

Compensation

(Le)

70 Rice Seller 14 80,000.00

1,120,000.00

112,000.00

1,232,000.00



Name of Claimant: Famata Kamara



Contact: 077‐421127

ID/Picture Number:

VALUATION SUMMARY


Disturbance

(Days)

Estimated

Daily

Income (Le)

Livelihood/

Resettlement

Assist. (Le)

Disturbance

(Le)

Total

Compensation

(Le)

71 Rice Seller 14 80,000.00

1,120,000.00

112,000.00

1,232,000.00

Name of Claimant: Sampa Kamara



Contact: 077‐421127

ID/Picture Number:

VALUATION SUMMARY


Disturbance

(Days)

Estimated

Daily

Income (Le)

Livelihood/

Resettlement

Assist. (Le)

Disturbance

(Le)

Total

Compensation

(Le)

72 Rice Seller 14 80,000.00

1,120,000.00

112,000.00

1,232,000.00

Name of Claimant: Sarh Bangura



Contact: 077‐421127

ID/Picture Number:

VALUATION SUMMARY


Disturbance

(Days)

Estimated

Daily

Income (Le)

Livelihood/

Resettlement

Assist. (Le)

Disturbance

(Le)

Total

Compensation

(Le)

73 Rice Seller 14 80,000.00

1,120,000.00

112,000.00

1,232,000.00



Name of Claimant: Ramatu Bangura



Contact: 077‐421127

ID/Picture Number:

VALUATION SUMMARY


Disturbance

(Days)

Estimated

Daily

Income (Le)

Livelihood/

Resettlement

Assist. (Le)

Disturbance

(Le)

Total

Compensation

(Le)

74 Rice Seller 14 80,000.00

1,120,000.00

112,000.00

1,232,000.00

Name of Claimant: Fatu Bangura


Activity: Wood Seller

Contact: ‐


VALUATION SUMMARY


Disturbance

(Days)

Estimated

Daily

Income (Le)

Livelihood/

Resettlement

Assist. (Le)

Disturbance

(Le)

Total

Compensation

(Le)

75 Wood Seller

Relocation

of Shop

14

‐

20,000.00

‐

280,000.00

100,000.00

28,000.00

‐

308,000.00

100,000.00

408,000.00

Name of Claimant: Salaymatu Kamara


Activity: Soft Drinks Seller

Contact: 088‐348532


VALUATION SUMMARY


Disturbance

(Days)

Estimated

Daily

Income (Le)

Livelihood/

Resettlement

Assist. (Le)

Disturbance

(Le)

Total

Compensation

(Le)

76 Soft Drinks

Seller

14

30,000.00

420,000.00

42,000.00

462,000.00



Name of Claimant: Jonta Deensie


Activity: Soft Drinks Seller

Contact: 088‐383682

ID/Picture Number: DSCN0668 (pink dress)

VALUATION SUMMARY


Disturbance

(Days)

Estimated

Daily

Income (Le)

Livelihood/

Resettlement

Assist. (Le)

Disturbance

(Le)

Total

Compensation

(Le)

77 Packed

Lunch Seller

14

137,000.00 1,918,000.00 191,800.00 2,109,800.00

Name of Claimant: Asanatu Sesay


Activity: Seller

Contact: 088‐383682

ID/Picture Number: DSCN0668 (green scarf)

VALUATION SUMMARY


Disturbance

(Days)

Estimated

Daily

Income (Le)

Livelihood/

Resettlement

Assist. (Le)

Disturbance

(Le)

Total

Compensation

(Le)

78 Seller 14

30,000.00

420,000.00

42,000.00

462,000.00

Name of Claimant: Isha Kabba


Activity: Sandals Seller

Contact: 088‐383682

ID/Picture Number: DSCN0668 (blue blouse)

VALUATION SUMMARY


Disturbance

(Days)

Estimated

Daily

Income (Le)

Livelihood/

Resettlement

Assist. (Le)

Disturbance

(Le)

Total

Compensation

(Le)

79 Sandals

Seller

14

30,000.00

420,000.00

42,000.00

462,000.00



Name of Claimant: Jenah Mammie


Activity: Sandals Seller

Contact: ‐


VALUATION SUMMARY


Disturbance

(Days)

Estimated

Daily

Income (Le)

Livelihood/

Resettlement

Assist. (Le)

Disturbance

(Le)

Total

Compensation

(Le)

80 Soft Drink

Seller

14

30,000.00

420,000.00

42,000.00

462,000.00

Name of Claimant: YaAlmamy Bangura


Activity: Soft Drink Seller

Contact: ‐


VALUATION SUMMARY


Disturbance

(Days)

Estimated

Daily

Income (Le)

Livelihood/

Resettlement

Assist. (Le)

Disturbance

(Le)

Total

Compensation

(Le)

81 Soft Drink

Seller

14

30,000.00

420,000.00

42,000.00

462,000.00

Name of Claimant: Fatmatu Turay


Activity: Provisions Seller

Contact: 077‐610932


VALUATION SUMMARY


Disturbance

(Days)

Estimated

Daily

Income (Le)

Livelihood/

Resettlement

Assist. (Le)

Disturbance

(Le)

Total

Compensation

(Le)

82 Provisions

Seller

14

30,000.00

420,000.00

42,000.00

462,000.00



Name of Claimant: Foday Bangura


Activity: Provisions Seller

Contact: ‐


VALUATION SUMMARY


Disturbance

(Days)

Estimated

Daily

Income (Le)

Livelihood/

Resettlement

Assist. (Le)

Disturbance

(Le)

Total

Compensation

(Le)

83 Provisions Seller

Relocation of

Shop

14

‐

50,000.00

‐

700,000.00

150,000.00

70,000.00

‐

770,000.00

150,000.00

920,000.00

Name of Claimant: Rebecca Sesay


Activity: Soft Drinks/Water Seller

Contact: ‐


VALUATION SUMMARY


Disturbance

(Days)

Estimated

Daily

Income (Le)

Livelihood/

Resettlement

Assist. (Le)

Disturbance

(Le)

Total

Compensation

(Le)

84 Soft

Drinks/Water

Seller

14

30,000.00

420,000.00

42,000.00

462,000.00

Name of Claimant: Isata Kargbo


Activity: Cassava Leaves Seller

Contact: ‐


VALUATION SUMMARY


Disturbance

(Days)

Estimated

Daily

Income (Le)

Livelihood/

Resettlement

Assist. (Le)

Disturbance

(Le)

Total

Compensation

(Le)

85 Cassava

Leaves Seller

14

20,000.00

280,000.00

28,000.00

308,000.00



Name of Claimant: Famata Kamara


Activity: Assorted Items Seller

Contact: 088‐632860


VALUATION SUMMARY


Disturbance

(Days)

Estimated

Daily

Income (Le)

Livelihood/

Resettlement

Assist. (Le)

Disturbance

(Le)

Total

Compensation

(Le)

86 Assorted

Items Seller

14

35,000.00

490,000.00

49,000.00

539,000.00

Name of Claimant: Famata Kamara II


Activity: Drink/Water Seller

Contact: 088‐632860


VALUATION SUMMARY


Disturbance

(Days)

Estimated

Daily

Income (Le)

Livelihood/

Resettlement

Assist. (Le)

Disturbance

(Le)

Total

Compensation

(Le)

87 Drink/Water

Seller

14

35,000.00

490,000.00

49,000.00

539,000.00

Name of Claimant: Ima Kamara


Activity: Rice and Stew Seller

Contact: ‐


VALUATION SUMMARY


Disturbance

(Days)

Estimated

Daily

Income (Le)

Livelihood/

Resettlement

Assist. (Le)

Disturbance

(Le)

Total

Compensation

(Le)

88 Rice and

Stew Seller

14

100,000.00

1,400,000.00

140,000.00

1,540,000.00



SAND MINING DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION

Name of Claimant: Boat owners

Name of Rep.: Almamy Bangura (Chairman)


Activity: Boat owner

Contact: 077‐516237


VALUATION SUMMARY

No. Description No. of

Claimant

Period of

Disturbance

(Days)

Estimated

Daily Income

(Le)

Livelihood/

Resettlement

Assist. (Le)

Disturbance

(Le)

Total

Compensation

(Le)

89 Boat

owners

16 14

500,000.00

112,000,000.00

11,200,000.00

123,200,000.00

Name of Claimant: Boat workers

Name of Rep.: Almamy Bangura (Chairman)


Activity: Boat workers

Contact: 077‐516237


VALUATION SUMMARY


Claimant

Period of

Disturbance

(Days)

Estimated

Daily Income

(Le)

Livelihood/

Resettlement

Assist. (Le)

Disturbance

(Le)

Total

Compensation

(Le)

90 Boat

Workers

224 14

20,000.00

62,720,000.00

6,272,000.00

68,992,000.00



Name of Claimant: Shovel Men Group

Name of Rep.: Mohamed Fullar (Chairman)


Activity: Boat workers

Contact: 077‐368641

ID/Picture Number: DSCN0678/DSCN0680

VALUATION SUMMARY


Claimant

Period of

Disturbance

(Days)

Estimated

Daily Income

(Le)

Livelihood/

Resettlement

Assist. (Le)

Disturbance

(Le)

Total

Compensation

(Le)

91 Shovel

men

64 14

60,000.00

53,760,000.00

5,376,000.00

59,136,000.00

Name of Claimant: Sand Sellers Association

Name of Rep.: Emmanuel S. Koroma (Secretary)


Activity: Sand Sellers/Agents

Contact: 088‐540305


VALUATION SUMMARY


Claimant

Period of

Disturbance

(Days)

Estimated

Daily Income

(Le)

Livelihood/

Resettlement

Assist. (Le)

Disturbance

(Le)

Total

Compensation

(Le)

92 Sand

Sellers/

Agents

29 14

200,000.00

81,200,000.00

8,120,000.00

89,320,000.00



Name of Claimant: Truck Drivers Association

Name of Rep.: Junior Jones (Chairman)


Activity: Truck Drivers

Contact: 078‐607017/076‐900424


VALUATION SUMMARY


Claimant

Period of

Disturbance

(Days)

Estimated

Daily Income

(Le)

Livelihood/

Resettlement

Assist. (Le)

Disturbance

(Le)

Total

Compensation

(Le)

93 Truck

Drivers

45 14

300,000.00

189,000,000.00

18,900,000.00

207,900,000.00



Annex 5: Lists of Members of the Sand Mining Development Organisation



SAND MINING DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION

Boat Owners and Workers

Honesty Boat 1. Augustine B. Kamara (Owner)

2. Alie Sesay

3. Seidu Kamara

4. Gibrilla Kargbo

5. Ibrahim Bangura

6. Abdulai Sillah

7. Ibrahim Bangura (2)

8. Alusine Bangura

9. Kabba Dumbuya

10. Mohammed B. Kamara

11. Ibrahim Fomoh

12. Issa Sesay

13. Hassan Sankoh

Shaban Tours Boat 1. Emmanuel S. Koroma (Owner)

2. Foday Kargbo

3. Mohammed Turay

4. Boi Kamara

5. Alie Kargbo

6. Bobson Dugba

7. Hassan Sesay

8. Bockrie Pastor Sesay

9. Yoyoh Sesay

10. Augustine Koroma

11. Alie Kargbo (2)

12. Ansu Turay

13. Peter Koroma

14. Alfred K. Bangura

15. Lasn Fofonah

Super Sport (1) Boat 1. Abu Kamara (Owner)

2. Mohamed S. Koroma

3. Mohamed Sesay

4. Aruna Kanu

5. Ismile Bangura



6. Sentigie Sesay

7. Alie Sesay

8. Alie Bangura

9. Mohamed Kamara

10. Mohamed Bangura

11. Musa Trouaue

12. Pa Mohamed Kamara

13. Abdul Daddy Kargbo

14. Kobba Dumbuya

15. Alieha Kamara

Tin Go Bee Boat 1. Issa Conteh (owner)

2. Foday Kamara

3. Sorie Kamara

4. Joseph Beor

5. Sallu Kudus

6. Sorie Bah Sheriff

7. Abu Sheriff

8. Alhaji Bangura

9. Ibrahim Sheriff

10. Ihanu Bangura

11. Saidu

12. Mohamed Kargbo

13. Alhaji Conteh

14. Nabieu Sowar

15. Pa Hassan Fomah

Moyah Star Boat 1. Karim Kama (owner)

2. Captain Osman Bangura

3. Almamy Sheriff

4. Mohamed Mansaray

5. Alusine Kamara

6. Morlai Kargbo

7. James Massaynop

8. Abu Bakarr Kamara

9. Ibrahim Kargbo

10. Mohamed Kamara

11. Alimamy Conteh

12. Ibrahim Bangura

13. Hassa Kamara



14. Mohamed Kamara

15. Ibrahim Sheriff

Be Patient Boat 1. Alie Koroma

2. Captain Alpha Bundu

3. Foday Kamara

4. Gbassay Bangura

5. Saidu Conteh

6. Alie Kargbo

7. Mohamed Muray

8. Amidu Kargbo

9. Osman Jallah

10. Mustapha Sheriff

11. Obrilla Kamara

12. Mohamed Turay

13. Ibrahim Benjame

14. Shorke Bangura

Kalamerah Boat 1. Abdul Kamara (owner)

2. Foday Kamara

3. Alimany Kamara

4. Zamin Kamara

5. Hassan Kamara

6. Osman Kamara

7. Abubakar Kanu

8. Saidu Hassa Bangura

9. Momoh Kamara

10. Mohamed Dyfan

11. Abubakar Turay

12. Musa Bangura

13. Santigie Kanu

14. Alimany Dumbuya

Confidence Boat 1. Ismail Conteh

2. Captain Shaka Bangura

3. Kemoh Kamara

4. Musa Kamara

5. Musa Bangura

6. Daddy Kamara



7. Ibrahim Cole

8. Alusine Mansaray

9. Mohamed Mansaray

10. Fohard Kamara

11. Pa Brima Sesay

12. Santigie Bangura

13. Abdul Kamara

14. Alie Sesay

15. Idrisu Bangura

Super Sport (2) Boat 1. Abu Turay (owner)

2. Captain Said Conteh

3. Alimamy Loko

4. Alansan Bangura

5. Ibrahim Kamara

6. Alusine Kamara

7. Alhaji Turay

8. Edward Kamara

9. Foday Sankoh

10. Mohamed Conteh

11. Buya Sankoh

12. Alusine Bangura

13. Alpha Conteh

14. Mohamed Abass Kamara

15. Hassan Somura

Take Advice Boat 1. Abu Lego Man Kamara (owner)

2. Captain Ibrahim Bangura

3. Osman Kamara

4. Momodu Kamara

5. Amadu Barie

6. Momoh Alpha

7. Francis Alpha

8. Sinneh Bangura

9. Amadu Sesay

10. Mohamed Fullah

11. Mohamed Janneh Kamara

12. Foday Kamara

13. Mamud Sesay

14. Saidu Kamara

15. Alhaji Kamara



Take Courage Boat 1. Sorie Conteh (owner)

2. Captain Sherburah Bangura

3. Hassan Kamara

4. Sorie Kamara

5. Idrisa Kamara

6. Chick Bangura

7. Abubakar Bangura

8. Abdul Kamara I

9. Abdul Kamara II

10. Momoh Yessah

11. Alhaji Mohamed Kamara

12. Abu S. Kamara

13. Buya S. Kamara

14. Abu Conteh

15. Idrisa Conteh

We All Na Wan Boat 1. Boat Owner

2. Captain Sherburah Bangura

3. Abu Limba

4. Alimamy Kamara

5. Bai Conteh

6. Sinneh Kargbo

7. Sorie Loko

8. Abdul Waharb

9. Alusine Daramy

10. Dauda Kamara

11. Osman Conteh

12. Hassan T. Kamara

13. Mohamed Kamara

14. Mohamed Sesay

15. Idrisa Sesay

Surprise Boat 1. Keifallah A. Kamara

2. Captain Mohamed Bangura

3. Sallu Kamara

4. Abubakar Sumah

5. Mohamed Sheriff

6. Obassay Bangura

7. Mohamed S. Sesay



8. David Syuer

9. Mohamed Bangura

10. Lamin M. Sesay

11. Ibrahim Kamara

12. Sorie Kamara

13. Fohard Kabia

14. Osman Kargbo

15. Lamin Kamara

Justice Boat 1. Abass Turay (owner)

2. Captain Ibrahim Jallah

3. Musa Kamara

4. Abass Bangura

5. Gbrihla Sherif

6. Abubakarr Mansaray

7. Thamu Mansaray

8. Abubakar Kamara

9. Amadu Bangura

10. Basiru Kamara

11. Hassan Kamara

12. Brima Kamara

13. Idrisa Kamara

14. Sadikie Koroma

15. Mohamed Kamara

Cunky Me Boat 1. Alimamy Bangura (owner)

2. Captain Gbrilla Kamara

3. Saidu B. Jallah

4. Abubakar Bangura

5. Bai Kamara

6. Kapri Kargbo

7. Ibrahim Yusuf

8. Said Kamara

9. Momoh Kamara

10. Mohamed A. Bangura

11. Shaka Kamara

12. Morlai Sankoh

13. Shaka Sesay

14. Gbassay Kamara

15. Mohamed Sillah



Sea United Boat 1. Foday Koroma (Owner)

2. Captain Mohamed Kamar I

3. Mohamed Kamara II

4. Mohamed S. Bangura

5. Karim Koroma

6. Ibrihim Koroma

7. Sheka Kamara

8. Ibrihim Modo Kamara

9. Saidu Bangura

10. Ibrihim Bangura

11. Ibrihim Jallah

12. Issa Kamara

13. C. D. Kanu

14. Mohamed Kamara III

Shovel Men Association

1. Junior Mark Fuller

2. Mohamed Sala

3. Salifu Conteh

4. Abu S. Kamara

5. Alpha Bangura

6. Hassan Bangura

7. Komba

8. Francis A. Kabis

9. Salieu Conteh

10. Augustine S. Conteh

11. Ibrahim S. Sesay

12. Lamin Kamara

13. Paul David Makeni

14. Augustine Jengbeh

15. Amara K. Shaker

16. Ola Dixon

17. Aliman Bangura

18. Saidu Kamara

19. Duraman Kamara

20. Mohamed Fuller

21. Mohamed Diafin

22. Seveh Abdul Kargbo

23. Mohamed Vandy

24. Alpha Conteh



25. Hassan Sandi

26. Ibrahim B. Kamara

27. Sorie Kamara

28. Alimamy Mansaray

29. Joseph Conteh

30. Kalisu Bangura

31. Mohamed Kabia

32. James Fanda

33. Mohamed S. Kamara

34. Mohamed Kamara

35. Bossem B. Kamara

36. Vincent Y. Conteh

37. Idrissa Conteh

38. Salieu Bangura

39. Tallis

40. Yahya Samba

41. Joseph Kamara

42. Osman Kamara

43. Mohamed Bangura

44. Saidu A. Kamara

45. Mohamed Kamara

46. Minkinlu Kamara

47. Santigie Thiamu Kamara

48. Abu Bakarr Bangura

49. Niebiu Soniba Kamara

50. Alhajie Kamara

51. Alhajie S.Mansaray

52. Mohamed F. Bangura

53. Ibrima Sesay

54. Imurana Koroma

55. Ibrima Kamara

56. Mohamed Bangura I

57. Mohamed Koroma

58. Mohamed Sankoh

59. Ibrima Jallah

60. Abdul Haja Kamara

61. Alhajie Koroma

62. Mohamed Kallah

63. Mohamed S. Sankoh

64. Umaru Sesay



San‐San‐Gron Drivers Association

1. Ibrahim Bangura

2. Alimamy Kalokoh

3. Sorie Conteh

4. Jenour Jones

5. Habillu Kamara

6. Prince Kain

7. Mayah Conteh

8. Abdul Bai Koroma

9. Issa Jalloh

10. Sorie Sesay

11. Molai Bangura

12. Bamba Kamara

13. Amidu Jalloh

14. Ibrahim Koroma

15. Malie Conteh

16. Salifu Conteh

17. Bakarr Sesay

18. Alusine Bangura

19. Bai Conteh

20. Mohamed Tarawally

21. Sahr. John

22. Sarh Kappah

23. Mohamed Turay

24. Hassan Thulla

25. Sheka Sesay

26. Samai Bakarie

27. Mamoud Kamara

28. Abdul Raman Kamara

29. Mohamed Toronka

30. Papa Kamara

31. Mandulai

32. John Bangura

33. Abdul Wahab

34. Abubakarr B. Kanu

35. Hassan Bangura

36. Chernoh Jalloh

37. Obai Kamara

38. Ortame Kamara

39. Hassan Fofanah

40. Hair Sheku



41. Issac Zizo

42. Nana Father

43. Alpha Bah

44. Albert Conteh

45. Abudulah Koroma

Sand Sellers

1. Mohamed Janneh

2. Mohamed Abass Kamara

3. Ibrahim Conteh

4. Sago Conteh

5. Musa Turay

6. Alugustine Koroma

7. Bakara Kamara

8. Niabu Suloia

9. Mohamed Tabea

10. Abdul Kamara

11. Succay Kamara

12. Osman Jalloh

13. Edward Kokoma

14. Mohamed S. Kamara

15. Samul Karama

16. Saua Kudde

17. N. Faalie Sesay

18. Umanu Sesay

19. Anibe Issa Conteh

20. Assan Samura

21. Santos Kamara

22. Mohamed Thullah

23. Ibrahim Sankoh

24. Bambay Kamara

25. Mohamed Kolokoh

26. Abdul Kamara

27. Amour Lemally

28. Alime Kamara

29. Foday 31



Annex 6: Compensation Claim Form



WARFP Form C1 COMPENSATION CLAIM FORM

WEST AFRICA REGIONAL FISHERIES PROJECT, SIERRA LEONE

RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN, KISSY DOCKYARD HARBOUR PROJECT

‐COMPENSATION CLAIM FORM‐

Affected Person Information:

Name of claimant: ……….……………….…………………………… Sex: …….….………. Age: ………….…………

Name of Representative/Contact Person: ……………….………………………………………………………………………….

Region: ………………………......... Town: ……………………..……… Suburb: ………………..………....................

Affected property: …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Total Compensation Due:

Affected property value

(Le)

Disturbance

(Le)

Livelihood support

(Le)

Total compensation

(Le)

Compensation Payment Proposal:

Name of recipient: ………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Payment Date: ………………………..………………………

Signature or Thumb print of claimant /recipient: …………………………..………...............................................

Administered by (MFMRL/FMCO Rep): ……………………………………………………………………………

Name of Witness …………………………………………………………………………………............................

(Witness could be Councilor or Member of Parliament)

Signature of Witness ………………………………………………………………………………….......................

Remarks:…………………………………………………………………………………………………...…………………………………………

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….



Annex 7: Compensation Receipt for Claimant



WARFP Form C2 COMPENSATION RECEIPT



‐COMPENSATION RECEIPT‐

Received from MINISTRY OF FISHERIES AND MARINE RESOURCES

the sum of………………………………………….………………………………………………….……………………..

………………………………………………………………………………………………….… Leones

being compensation on payable for affected properties.

Le …………………………….…..…………………… Cheque No.. …………..……………………………….

Date: ………………………………………………..

………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………….

MFMR Officer/Project Rep (Name) MFMRL Officer/Project Rep (Signature)

WARFP Form C2 COMPENSATION RECEIPT



‐COMPENSATION RECEIPT‐

Received from MINISTRY OF FISHERIES AND MARINE RESOURCES

the sum of………………………………………….………………………………………………….……………………..

………………………………………………………………………………………………….… Leones

being compensation on payable for affected properties.

Le …………………………….…..…………………… Cheque No.. …………..……………………………….

Date: ………………………………………………..

………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………….

MFMR Officer/Project Rep (Name) MFMRL Officer/Project Rep (Signature)



Annex 8: Grievance and Resolution Form



WARFP Form R1 GRIEVANCE AND RESOLUTION FORM



‐GRIEVANCE AND RESOLUTION FORM‐ Name (Filer of Complaint): ……………………………………………………………………………………………………… ID Number (PAPs ID number): …………………………………………………………………………………………………. Contact Information (house number/ mobile phone) :………………………………………………………….. Nature of Grievance or Complaint: ………………………………………………………………………………………………………. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. Date Individuals Contacted Summary of Discussion ……………………………………... ……………………………………. ………………………………………… Signature………………………………………………… Date: ……………………………………………….. Signed (Filer of Complaint): ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... Name of Person Filing Complaint (if different from Filer): …………………………………………………………………… Position or Relationship to Filer: ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. Review/Resolution Date of Conciliation Session: …………………………………………………………………………………… Was Filer Present?: Yes No Was field verification of complaint conducted? Yes No Findings of field investigation:……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. Summary of Conciliation Session Discussion………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. Issues……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Was agreement reached on the issues? Yes No If agreement was reached, detail the agreement below: If agreement was not reached, specify the points of disagreement below: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Signed (Conciliator): …………………………………………. Signed (Filer): ……………………………………………….. Signed: ……………………………………………………………… (Independent Observer) Date: …………………………………………………………………….



Annex 9: Commitment letter from Ministry of Lands, Country Planning and the

Environment



Annex 10: List of members of Grievance Redress Committee from Kissy Dockyard

Community



Members of Kissy Dockyard Grievance Redress Committee

1. Coucillor Abdul Salam

2. Sulley Gbla

3. Foday Sahid Bangura

4. Pa Alimamy Yaroh

5. Ms. Nanah Kalsay

6. Alhaji S. Fofanah

7. Sorie Conteh

8. Alimamy Bangura

9. Agaratu Timbo



Annex 11: Sample Questionnaire used in the Census and Socio‐Economic Survey



Social Safeguard Support to the West Africa Regional Fisheries Program, Sierra Leone

(Resettlement Action Plan, RAP)

Description of Affected Assets and Persons, Kissy Dockyard Community

Name of Enumerator..................................................................Date...............................................

Building Reference Number.........................................................

A. BIO‐DATA

1. Name of Respondent: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

2. Sex: Male Female

3. Age (in completed years) …………………………

4. House No. / Tel. No.: ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

5. Highest Educational Level: None Primary JHS/MSLC SHS/Sec.

Tech/Voc/Commercial Training College (Nursing, teaching etc.)

Polytechnic. University Other

(specify)…………………………………………………

6. Nationality: Sierra Leonean Non‐ Sierra Leonean (name country) …………………………

7. If Sierra Leonean, what ethnic group:………………………………………………………………...

8. Religion: Christian Moslem Traditional religion Other

(specify)………………………

9. Marital Status: Married Single Divorced Widow/er

Separated Consensual Union

B. Buildings/ Structures

1) Type of building/structure

Permanent Non‐permanent

2) Number of rooms...............................

3) Condition of walls

Aluminium sheets Concrete block Plastic sheets

Wood Clay/mud other, specify.............................................



4) Condition of roof

Aluminium sheets Concrete block Plastic sheets

Wood Clay/mud other, specify.............................................

5) Condition of floor and surface

Concrete Wooden Clay/mud other,

specify.............................................

6) Sanitary facilities available

Toilet Bathroom Not available

7) Number of people permanently inhabited...................................................

8) Number of people periodically inhabited......................................................

9) Economic trees to be affected........................................................................

C. Household

1) Who is the head of the household? a. Father b. Mother

2) Name of head of household............................................................................

3) Contact Address

Telephone number..............................................................

4) Names and contact addresses of heads of households in you dwelling, if applicable.

I. ........................................................................ .................................................

I. ........................................................................ ..................................................

II. ........................................................................ ..................................................

5) Composition of people

Adult Males............................ Adult Females...............

Children (below 18 yrs).......................

6) Occupation of Adult occupants

.............................................................................................................................................................

7) Total estimated household cash income

..................................................................



8) Total estimated household daily expenditure

................................................................................

9) Education level of adult occupants

Primary Secondary Vocational Tertiary illiterate

10) Educational level of children

Primary Secondary Vocational Tertiary illiterate

D. Wealth/Poverty Identification

1) Do you own…..

# Type of property Tick as appropriate

1 TV. set

2 DVD Player

3 Electric Iron

4 Personal Computer

5 Bed

5 Set of living room furniture

7 Refrigerator

8 Deep freezer

9 Others, specify ………………..

2) Do you own any form of transportation in the community or elsewhere? Yes No

3) If yes, which type of transportation and other items do you own?

Motorbike Bicycle Private vehicle Commercial vehicle other,

specify................

E. Water and Sanitation

1) What is your source of water for domestic use? Pipe borne water Well borehole

Other specify ……………………………………………………



2) What toilet facility do you use?

One used by respondent’s household only Share with other households

Public toilet Neighbour’s toilet Sea

3) How does your household get rid of its rubbish?

Throw it away into the sea Burn it Bury it Communal Rubbish dump

Metal Container (skip) Other, (specify) ………………………………..

F. The Proposed Project

1) What have you heard about the proposed harbour project?

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

2) From where did you hear about it……………………………………………………………………………………………….

3) How do you expect to be involved in the project? ………………………………………………………………………

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

4) What positive impacts do you expect the project to have on you?

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

On women …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

On children ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

5) What other economic benefits do you expect from the project?

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

6) What negative impacts do you expect the project to have on you?

……………………………………………………………………..………………………………………………………………………………

On women …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

On children …………..……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

G. Compensation Package

1) Household wishes on compensation package

Cash Compensation

Similar structure built elsewhere

Alternative livelihood restoration, Specify.............................................................................



Annex 12: Photo album of the entire RAP Process



Interactions between the Ministers of Lands, Country Planning and Environment and Fisheries and

Marine Resources, Director of Fisheries with the Kissy Dockyard community

Briefing by the FMCO and the WB Consultants with the people of the Kissy Dockyard



Meetings and Interactions with Traditional Leaders, Youth Leaders and some community members

of Kissy Dockyard

The Census and Socio‐economic Survey



Activities and Conditions at Kissy Dockyard Community

The Census and Survey Teams

RP1145 - World Bank Documents & Reports

Documents

Transcript of RP1145 - World Bank Documents & Reports