Prepared for submission to JCAP

Properties of white dwarfs inEinstein-Λ gravity

H.L. Liu,a,1 G.L. Lüa

aSchool of Physical Science and Technology, Xinjiang University,Urumuqi, 830046, China

E-mail: heleiliu@xju.edu.cn

Abstract. In this paper, we explore the properties of white dwarfs with the modified TOVequation in Einstein-Λ gravity, the equilibrium configurations predict a maximum mass limitfor white dwarfs same as the Chandrasekhar limit when we consider Λ to be very small(Λ <10−16 m−2), by increasing Λ, the maximum mass and radius of white dwarf are reduced.We study effects of the cosmological constant on the physical properties of white dwarf suchas M − ρc relation, M − R relation, Schwarzschild radius, average density, compactness,gravitational redshift and dynamical stability. The gravitational redshift is a decreasingfunction of cosmological constant, because the gravitational redshift of white dwarf should bepositive, we also find an upper limit for Λ, namely, Λ < 3× 10−14 m−2. Our investigation ofdynamical stability shown that the white dwarfs follow the dynamical stability in Einstein-Λgravity.

1Corresponding author.

arX

iv:1

805.

0033

3v4

[gr

-qc]

9 D

ec 2

018

Contents

1 Introduction 1

2 4-dimensional hydrostatic equilibrium equation in Einstein-Λ gravity 1

3 Equation of state and boundary conditions 3

4 Structure properties of white dwarf in Einstein-Λ gravity 44.1 Schwarzschild radius 54.2 Average density 64.3 Compactness 64.4 Gravitational redshift 64.5 Dynamical stability 7

5 Conclusions 7

1 Introduction

Tolman, Oppenheimer, and Volkoff(TOV) made the first attempt for obtaining Einsteinianhydrostatic equilibrium equation for stars [1–3], the physical characteristics of stars using TOVequation have been investigated by many authors [4–10]. Recently, the study of modifiedgravity has attracted many researchers’s attention, a large number of modified theories ofgravity such as F (R) [11, 12], F (G) [13], dilaton gravities [14], gravity’s rainbow [15], Einstein-Λ gravity [16], massive gravity [17] and post-Newtonian theory [18] have been proposed.Compact objects provide an arena for understanding the properties of modified gravity thatdiffer from Einstein’s general relativity, because the gravitational field of white dwarf is muchweaker than neutron star, the modified TOV equation in gravity’s theory has been appliedto neutron stars [11–20], but has rarely been explored for white dwarfs [21–24].

In this work, we aim at exploring the effect of modified TOV equation in Einstein-Λgravity in white dwarfs, and expect to see interesting features of these modifications insidestellar objects.

The plan of this paper is as follows. First, we briefly review the 4-dimensional hydrostaticequilibrium equation in Einstein-Λ gravity, then we recall the equation of state (EOS) andboundary conditions. In section 4, we present the structure properties of white dwarf inEinstein-Λ gravity. We conclude with a short summary in the last section.

2 4-dimensional hydrostatic equilibrium equation in Einstein-Λ gravity

To get the properties of white dwarfs in Einstein-Λ gravity, we introduce the hydrostaticequilibrium equation in Einstein-Λ gravity firstly [15, 16]. The action of Einstein gravity withthe cosmological constant in 4 dimensions is given by:

IG = − 1

16π

∫(R− 2Λ)

√−gd4x+ IMatt, (2.1)

– 1 –

where g is the determinant of the metric tensor, R is the Ricci scalar which is defined byR = gµνRµν , Λ is the cosmological constant, IMatt is the action of matter field. Varying theaction (2.1) with respect to gµν , one obtains the equation of motion for this gravity:

Gνµ + Λgνµ = KT νµ , (2.2)

where K = 8πGc4

, Gνµ and T νµ are the symmetric Ricci tensor and energy-momentum tensorsof the matter field, respectively.

Assume a spherical symmetric metric in Einstein-Λ gravity as

ds2 = f(r)dt2 − dr2

g(r)− r2(dθ2 + sin2θdϕ2), (2.3)

The energy-momentum tensor in the local frame is

Tµν = −Pgµν + (c2ρ+ P )UµUν , (2.4)

where P and ρ are pressure and density of the fluid, respectively, Uµ is the four-velocity.Using eqs. (2.2) and (2.3), the components of energy-momentum for 4-dimensions as

followsT 0

0 = ρc2 & T 11 = T 2

2 = T 33 = −P. (2.5)

Considering the metric eq. (2.3) and eq. (2.5) for perfect fluid, we can obtain the com-ponents of eq. (2.2) with the following forms

Kc2r2ρ = Λr2 + (1− g)− rg′, (2.6)

Kr2fP = −Λr2f − (1− g)f + rgf ′, (2.7)

4Krf2P = −4Λrf2 + 2(gf)′f + r(g′f ′ + 2gf ′′)f − rgf ′2, (2.8)

where f , g, ρ and P are functions of r, the prime and double prime denote the first andsecond derivatives with respect to r, respectively.

Using Eqs. (2.6)-(2.8), and after some calculations, we obtain

dP

dr+f ′

2f(c2ρ+ P ) = 0. (2.9)

We get f ′ from eq. (2.7) as follow

f ′ =[r2(Λ +KP ) + (1− g)]f

rg. (2.10)

Based on eq. (2.6), g can be given by

g = 1 +Λ

3r2 − c2KM

4πr, (2.11)

whereM is a function of r: M =∫

4πr2ρ(r)dr. By inserting eqs. (2.10)and(2.11) in eq. (2.9),we get the the hydrostatic equilibrium in Einstein-Λ gravity as

dP

dr= (c2ρ+ P )

[3c2GM + r3(Λc4 + 12πGP )]

c2r[6GM − c2r(Λr2 + 3)]. (2.12)

For Λ = 0, the usual TOV equation will be recovered perfectly [1–3].As it was shown, the obtained hydrostatic equilibrium equation in Einstein-Λ gravity

depends to the cosmological constant Λ.

– 2 –

Figure 1. Chandrasekhar’s equation of state.

3 Equation of state and boundary conditions

We use the equation of state(EOS) of white dwarfs obtained by Chandrasekhar [25], whichare constituted of electron degenerate matter,

P =8πc

3(2π~)3

∫ kF

0

k2

(k2 +m2ec

2)1/2k2dk, (3.1)

and

kF = ~(3π2ρ

mpµ)1/3. (3.2)

where ~ = h/2π, h is the Plank’s constant, k is the momentum of electrons, µe is the meanmolecular weight per electron (we choose µe = 2 for our work), mp is the mass of a proton.The Chandrasekhar’s EoS of the electron degenerate matter was shown in Fig. 1.

The hydrostatic equilibrium equation in Einstein-Λ gravity, accompanied by the aboveEoS, can be solved numerically with boundary conditions M(r = 0) = 0 and ρ(r = 0) = ρc,where ρc is the central density of the white dwarf.

In figure 2, we compare the Newtonian solutions with those in general relativity(non-modified Einstein gravity), i.e., Λ = 0 case. Figure 2 confirms that in the Newtonian case,with the increase of ρc, M increases and R decreases, until it saturates to a maximum massMmax ∼ 1.44M�, which is the famous Chandrasekhar limit. We further confirm that in thegeneral relativistic case, with the increase of ρc, M increases and R decreases until it reachesMmax = 1.41M� at ρc = 3.6×1013 kg/m3. A further increase in ρc results in a slight decreasein M , indicating the onset of an unstable branch, which is absent in the Newtonian case. Forlow density white dwarfs having ρc < 1011 kg/m3, the Newtonian and general relativisticM −ρc curves are identical. However, for ρc > 1011 kg/m3, general relativistic effects become

– 3 –

Figure 2. Comparison of solutions in the Newtonian case (solid lines) and the general relativisticcase (dotted lines). (a) Variation of ρc with M , (b) M −R relations.

important, leading to a slightly smaller M compared to the Newtonian case, as a result,resulting in a smaller Mmax.

4 Structure properties of white dwarf in Einstein-Λ gravity

In this part, we will show the results obtained from our calculations. So far, the value of thecosmology constant is still an open question, it allowed us to consider it as a free parameter.The effects of cosmological constant on neutron stars have been investigated [16], as the nega-tive values of the cosmological constant are not logical for explaining the structure of neutronstar. In this work, we only take the effects of variation of the positive cosmological constantinto account to obtain the maximum mass of white dwarf by employing the Chandrasekhar’sEOS. Although the Λ-effect in white dwarf has not yet been confirmed, it still can serve asan useful toy model, especially in the theoretical discussion.

Our results are presented in table 1 which shows the maximum mass of white dwarfwith different cosmological constant Λ. It’s notable that, the maximum mass of white dwarfreduces to the result that was obtained in Einstein gravity when Λ was very small(Λ < 10−16).On the other hand, our results show that, by increasing Λ, the maximum mass of white dwarfdecreases. The maximum mass of white dwarfs with the cosmological constant are in therange Mmax ≤ 1.41M�. According to our results in table 1, the cosmological constant hasno significant effect on the properties of white dwarfs when it’s value is less than 10−16 m−2.In order to conduct further investigations, in figures 3 and 4, we show the gravitationalmass versus central mass density and radius, different lines represent different values of thecosmological constant. It’s evident from figures 3 and 4 that the behavior of mass as a functionof the central mass density (or radius) is highly sensitive to the variation of cosmologicalconstant. Meanwhile, figure 4 reveals that larger the Λ is, smaller the radius R is, which meansthat we can regard Λ as an external pressure which prevents the increasing mass of whitedwarf. Interestingly, one can also see that initially R increases with M and then decreasingwith M for Λ > 1× 10−17 in figure 4, which indicates that the effect of Einstein-Λ gravity ismore sensitive to the low mass white dwarfs, their radius become smaller in Einstein-Λ gravity.We also investigate the properties such as Schwarzschild radius, average density, compactness,gravitational redshift and dynamical stability of white dwarf in Einstein-Λ gravity.

– 4 –

Λ(m−2) Mmax(M�) R(km) RSch(km) ρ̄(1011kg m−3) σ(10−2) z(10−2)

1.00× 10−18 1.41 1070 4.16 5.47 0.39 0.191.00× 10−17 1.41 1070 4.16 5.47 0.39 0.191.00× 10−16 1.41 1063 4.15 5.56 0.39 0.191.00× 10−15 1.37 1009 4.04 6.31 0.40 0.185.00× 10−15 1.24 877 3.65 8.70 0.42 0.141.00× 10−14 1.12 790 3.30 10.74 0.42 0.102.00× 10−14 0.94 692 2.79 13.54 0.40 0.043.00× 10−14 0.82 631 2.42 15.52 0.38 -0.007

Table 1. Structure properties of white dwarf with different values of Λ, where Mmax, R, RRsch,ρ̄, σ,z are Maximum mass, radius, Schwarzschild radius, average density and compactness of whitedwarfs, respectively. The central density is 2× 1013 kg/m3.

Figure 3. Gravitational mass of white dwarf versus central density, different line represents differentΛ, Λ = 1 × 10−18(solid), 1 × 10−17(dash), 1 × 10−16(dash dot), Λ = 1 × 10−15(dot) and Λ = 5 ×10−15(dash dot dot).

4.1 Schwarzschild radius

The Schwarzschild radius of Einstein-Λ gravity in the presence of the cosmological constantis [15, 16]

RSch =

[(3GMc2

+√

9G2M2

c4+ 1

Λ

)] 13

Λ13

− 1[Λ2

(3GMc2

+√

9G2M2

c4+ 1

Λ

)] 13

. (4.1)

The results show that the Schwarzschild radius is a decreasing function of the cosmologicalconstant when Λ > 1× 10−16 m−2, for Λ < 1× 10−16 m−2, the cosmological constant doesn’taffect the Schwarzschild radius.

– 5 –

Figure 4. Gravitational mass of white dwarf versus radius for Λ = 1 × 10−18(solid), Λ = 1 ×10−17(dash), Λ = 1×10−16(dash dot), Λ = 1×10−15(dot), Λ = 5×10−15(dash dot dot), respectively.

4.2 Average density

Now, using the effective mass and radius obtained in the Einstein-Λ gravity, the averagedensity of a white dwarf has the following form:

ρ̄ =3M

4πR3, (4.2)

The central density of the white dwarf in table 1 is 2.0× 1013 kg/m3, the average density forwhite dwarfs in table 1 is less than the central density.

4.3 Compactness

The compactness of a spherical object indicates the strength of gravity. It was defined as theratio of Schwarzschild radius to the radius of object:

σ = RSch/R, (4.3)

We can see from table 1, σ is almost same for these white dwarfs, which indicates that thestrength of gravity is almost same for these white dwarfs.

4.4 Gravitational redshift

The gravitational redshift in Einstein-Λ gravity is [15, 16]:

z =1√

1 + ΛR2

3 −2GMc2R

− 1, (4.4)

Because the radius of white dwarf is greater than the Schwarzschild radius, the gravitationalredshift is very small (two orders of magnitude less than a neutron star, see Ref. [15, 16, 26]for more details ), the results can be found in the last column of table 1. The results show that,the gravitational redshift is a decreasing function of the cosmological constant, it’s notablethat, when Λ = 3× 10−14 m−2, the redshift becomes negative. As white dwarfs are compactobjects, the gravitational redshift should be positive, therefore, we can give the cosmologicalconstant an upper limit as Λ < 3× 10−14 m−2.

– 6 –

Figure 5. Adiabatic index versus radius for Λ = 1.0 × 10−16(solid), Λ = 1.0 × 10−15(dash),Λ = 5.0× 10−15, where the central density is 2× 1013 kg/m3.

4.5 Dynamical stability

Chandrasekhar introduced the dynamical stability of the stellar model against the infinites-imal radial adiabatic perturbation [27]. The dynamical stability condition is satisfied whenthe adiabatic index is over than 4

3 (i.e. γ > 43) everywhere within the isotropic star, where γ

is defined in the following form:

γ =ρc2 + P

c2P

dP

dρ. (4.5)

The stability condition had been developed and applied to astrophysical cases by manyauthors [28–31]. Based on this stability condition, we investigate the adiabatic index versusthe radius of white dwarfs in Einstein-Λ gravity in figure 5. As one can see, these stars aredynamically stable.

In order to investigate internal structure of the white dwarf in the presence of cosmologi-cal constant in Einstein-Λ gravity, we plot the pressure, density and mass versus distance fromthe center of a white dwarf in figure 6, in which the pressure and density are maximum at thecenter and decrease monotonically towards the boundary. One can also see clearly that thelarger cosmological constant will make pressure and density decrease faster from the centerto the surface. In the right panel, the mass increases monotonically towards the boundary,it is always positive within the star with different cosmological constants, for a given radius,the mass is decreasing as Λ increase, which indicates that Λ prevents the increasing mass ofwhite dwarf.

5 Conclusions

In this paper, we discussed the properties of white dwarf with modified TOV equationin Einstein-Λ gravity. We investigated the maximum mass of white dwarfs by using theChandrasekhar equation of state of electron degenerate matter, our results showed that forΛ < 10−16 m−2, the cosmological constant did not affect the maximum mass and radius of

– 7 –

Figure 6. Pressure (left), density (middle) and mass (right) versus radius for Λ = 1× 10−16(solid),Λ = 1× 10−15(dash), Λ = 5× 10−15(dash dot), where the central density is set as 2× 1013 kg/m3.

white dwarfs. By increasing Λ, the maximum mass and radius of white dwarf are reduced. Be-sides, we also investigated the effects of cosmological constant on the other properties of whitedwarf such as: the Schwarzschild radius, average density, compactness, gravitational redshiftand dynamical stability. The results indicated that the cosmological constant was a decreas-ing function of the maximum mass of white dwarfs when Λ > 10−16 m−2, for Λ < 10−16 m−2,the cosmological constant didn’t affect the properties of white dwarf (see table 1 for moredetails). In addition, the gravitational redshift gave an upper limit of cosmological constantas Λ < 3 × 10−14 m−2. Also, our results showed that white dwarf in Einstein-Λ gravity wasdynamically stable.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank anonymous referee for helpful and insightful comments. We wish tothank B. Eslam Panah for useful discussions. This work has been supported by the NationalNatural Science Foundation of China under Nos. 11803026, 11473024, XinJiang UniversityScience Fund, and the XinJiang Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars under No.QN2016YX0049.

References

[1] R.C. Tolman, Effect of imhomogeneity on cosmological models, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 20 (1934)169.

[2] R.C. Tolman, Static solutions of einstein’s field equations for spheres of fluid, Phys. Rev. 55(1939) 364.

[3] J.R. Oppenheimer and G. M. Volkoff, On Massive neutron cores, Phys. Rev. 55 (1939) 374.

[4] R.R. Silbar and S. Reddy, Neutron stars for undergraduates, Am. J. Phys. 72 (2004) 892.

[5] G. Narain, J. Schaffner-Bielich and I.N. Mishustin, Compact stars made of fermionic darkmatter, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 063003.

[6] G.H. Bordbar, M. Bigeli, and T. Yazdizadeh, Structure of neutron star with a quark core, Int.J. Mod. Phys. A 21 (2006) 5991.

[7] X. Li, F. Wang and K.S. Cheng, Gravitational effects of condensate dark matter on compactstellar objects, JCAP 10 (2012) 031.

[8] A.M. Oliveria, H.E.S. Velten, J.C. Fabris and I.G. Salako, Newtonian view of generalrelativistic stars, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 3170.

– 8 –

[9] H.L. Liu, X.D. Zhang, D.H. Wen, One possible solution of peculiar type Ia supernovaeexplosions caused by a charged white dwarf, Phys. Rev. C 89 (2014) 104043.

[10] D. Wen, H. Liu, X. Zhang, The mass limit of white dwarfs with strong magnetic fields ingeneral relativity, Chin. Phys. B 23 (2014) 089501.

[11] A.V. Astashenok, S. Capozziello and S.D. Odintsov, Magnetic Neutron Stars in f(R) gravity,Astrophys. Space Sci. 355 (2015) 333.

[12] D. Momeni, H. Gholizade, M. Raza and R. Myrzakulov, Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoffequations in nonlocal f(R) gravity, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 30 (2015) 1550093.

[13] G. Abbas, D. Momeni, M. Aamir Ali, R. Myrzakulov and S. Qaisar, Anisotropic Compact Starsin f(G) Gravity, Astrophys. Space Sci. 357 (2015) 158.

[14] S.H. Hendi, G.H. Bordbar, B. Eslam Panah and M. Najafi, Dilatonic Equation of HydrostaticEquilibrium and Neutron Star Structure, Astrophys. Space Sci. 358 (2015) 30.

[15] S.H. Hendi, G.H. Bordbar, B. Eslam Panah and S. Panahiyan, Modified TOV in gravity’srainbow: properties of neutron stars and dynamical stability conditions, JCAP 09 (2016) 013.

[16] G. H. Bordbar, S. H. Hendi, B. Eslam Panah, Neutron stars in Einstein-Λ gravity: thecosmological constant effects, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 131 (2016) 315.

[17] T. Katsuragawa, S.Nojiri, S.D. Odintsov, M. Yamazaki, Relativistic stars in deRham-Gabadadze-Tolley massive gravity, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 124013.

[18] K. Glampedakis, G. Pappas, H.O. Silva and E. Berti, Post-Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoffformalism for relativistic stars, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 024056.

[19] A.V. Astashenok, S. Capozziello and S.D. Odintsov, Further stable neutron star models fromf(R) gravity, JCAP 12 (2013) 040.

[20] M. Orellana, F. Garcia, F.A. Teppa and G.E. Romero, Structure of neutron stars in R-squaredgravity, Gen. Rel. Grav. 45 (2013) 771.

[21] U. Das, B. Mukhopadhyay, Imprint of modified Einstein’s gravity on white dwarfs: UnifyingType Ia supernovae, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 24 (2015) 1544026.

[22] U. Das and B. Mukhopadhyay, Modified Einstein’s gravity as a possible missing link betweensub- and super-Chandrasekhar type Ia supernovae, JCAP 05 (2015) 45.

[23] R. K. Jain, C. Kouvaris and N. G. Nielsen, White dwarf critical tests for modified gravity, Phys.Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 151103.

[24] G. A. Carvalho, R. V. Lobato, P. H. R. S. Moraes, JoséD. V. Arbañil, R. M. Marinho Jr, M.Malheiro, Stellar equilibrium configurations of white dwarfs in the f(R, T ) gravity, Eur. Phys.J. C 77 (2017) 871.

[25] S. Chandrasekhar, The highly collapsed configurations of a stellar mass, Mon. Not. Roy.Astron. Soc. 95 (1935) 207.

[26] B. Eslam Panah, G. H. Bordbars, S. H. Hendi, R. Ruffini, Z. Rezaei and R. Moradi, Expansionof magnetic neutron stars in an energy (in) dependent spacetime, Astrophys. J. 848 (2017) 24.

[27] S. Chandrasekhar, The Dynamical Instability of Gaseous Masses Approaching theSchwarzschild Limit in General Relativity, Astrophys. J. 140 (1964) 417.

[28] J. M. Bardeen, K. S. Thonre, and D. W. Meltzer, A catalogue of methods for studying thenormal modes of radial pulsation of general-relativistic stellar models, Astrophys. J. 145 (1966)505.

[29] H. Knutsen, On the stability and physical properties of an exact relativistic model for asuperdense star, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 232 (1988) 163.

[30] M. K. Mak and T. Harko, Isotropic stars in general relativity, Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2585.

– 9 –

[31] M. Kalam, S. M. Hossein and S. Molla, Neutron Stars: A Comparative Study, arXiv:1510.07015.

– 10 –