Planning with ASO - US-Analytics
-
Upload
khangminh22 -
Category
Documents
-
view
3 -
download
0
Transcript of Planning with ASO - US-Analytics
Introduction
Difficult Choices in Purgatory
Planning with BSO (Live Demo)
Planning with ASO (Live Demo)
Planning with Hybrid (Live Demo)
Which option should you deploy?
Agenda
17+ Years Hyperion Implementation Experience
Certified in both Planning and Essbase
Prior Practice Lead at Hyperion Partner Firm
Co-Editor of the Book “Developing Essbase
Applications: Advanced Techniques for Finance
and IT Professionals”
Find me on LinkedIn:
http://www.linkedin.com/in/jaketurrell/
Background
Developing Essbase Applications
● Over 50 years of expert experience between
the covers.
● Advanced content written so that developers at
all levels will gain assistance and insight.
● Chock full of experience proven best practices.
● Collaboratively written by a team of respected
and sought after Essbase developers.
● Source code at
www.developingessbasebook.com
● Includes all download access to all source
code & scripts.
● Purchase your copy today and energize your
Essbase career!
Plan Type Basics
BSO ASO
BSO was the only option prior to Essbase 7.
ASO was introduced in Essbase version 7, but was not
supported by Hyperion Planning until Planning 11.1.2.3.
Hybrid was introduced with Essbase version
11.1.2.3.500. Hybrid Aggregation Mode is actually an
option within BSO cubes.
Block Storage Option Aggregate Storage Option Hybrid Aggregation Mode
Hybrid BSO
ASO
There used to be only one option, BSO. Now there
are up to three options, depending on version!
Relatively few clients have deployed ASO plan types
in Hyperion Planning in production environments.
The release of Hybrid Aggregation Mode for BSO
cubes in version 11.1.2.3.500 represented a “partial”
release of functionality with significant limitations.
Published Essbase roadmaps indicate a second
release with significant new functionality for Hybrid
Aggregation Mode is on the way.
Difficult Choices in Purgatory
BSO is an established choice, however it suffers from
performance issues with large dimensions.
ASO Plan Types can address the limitations
associated with large dimensions, however this option
is new and has an entirely different set of limitations.
Hybrid Aggregation Mode will eventually represent the
best of both worlds, however this option is brand
spanking new and we know significant updates are on
the way.
ASO Plan Types may eventually become irrelevant.
Difficult Choices in Purgatory
Difficult Choices in Purgatory
This is new and
unproven technology.
Be conservative!
I can make
it work!
Making a choice requires a detailed understanding of
current limitations and reasonable guesses about
future functionality.
What do you do now if you need to deploy a Hyperion
Planning application with very large dimensions?
Let’s explore the options and limitations . . .
Difficult Choices in Purgatory
Starts with Workforce Planning 11.1.2.3 (BSO).
Introduces ASO Plan Types.
Introduces Hybrid Aggregation Mode for BSO.
All demos feature specific Workforce Planning calcs.
Leverages public City of Chicago employee data.
32,439 Employees
1099 Unique Jobs
35 Departments
The Demo
Pro’s
● Highly Developed, Mature & Stable Technology
● Fully supported with EPMA, Calc Manager, Etc.
● Rich calculation features & functionality.
Con’s
● Poor performance with very large dimensions.
Planning with BSO
Demo – BSO Plan Type
Workforce Planning (Out of the Box)
Loaded City of Chicago Public Sector Employee Data
Added Assumptions for: ● Salary Basis
● Hours per Week
● Working Days
● Employee Type
● Grade
● Pay Type
● Start Month
● Merit Month
● Tax Region
● Health Plan
● Performance
Demo – BSO Plan Type
Example Calculation: Bonus ● Depends on Adjusted Salary (Salary, Merit & Overtime)
● Depends on Bonus Basis (Paid Annually, Bi-Annually, Quarterly)
● Depends on Bonus % (Depends on Target for Grade & Performance)
Complex calculation at Lev0 Job, Entity and Employee.
These dimensions are subsequently aggregated.
Not very fast on large Employee dimensions.
Pro’s
● Supports HUGE dimensions.
● No sparse aggregations required.
Con’s
● Not supported with EPMA as of version 11.1.2.3.500.
● Few production implementations of ASO Plan Types.
● Users cannot deploy an ASO plan type without a
corresponding BSO Plan Type.
Planning with ASO
Planning with ASO – Minor Limitations
Historically, ASO has not had strong support for
calculations that occur at leaf nodes in the database
and then get aggregated to upper levels.
There are three options:
● Calculate and Aggregate in Memory (Can be very slow.)
● Export / Import Method (Requires Extra Members in Outline)
● Procedural Calculation or Allocation
Planning with ASO – Minor Limitations
Suppress Missing Blocks – This concept does not
exist for ASO cubes, as there are no blocks. This
means that forms that drill into two or more very large
dimensions sometimes will not render. BSO performs
well using this technique.
Demo – ASO Plan Type
Demonstrates some Workforce Planning input forms and
calculations.
Focuses on Bonus calculation.
Bonus has some aspects that work well in an ASO
world, and others might not.
Demo – ASO Plan Type
Bonus Basis is the first step in the bonus calculation.
This member determines when the bonus is actually
paid and applies a factor to spread out the payment.
● Quarterly – ¼ paid in Mar, Jun, Sep & Dec
● Bi-Annually – ½ paid in Jun & Dec.
● Annually – All paid in Dec.
This calculation works well in an ASO Plan Type
because it is only calculated at Level 0, and does not
need to be aggregated up any dimensions.
Demo – ASO Plan Type
Rec. Bonus % is the second step in the bonus
calculation. This member determines the Target
Bonus based upon Grade, and then applies a
multiplier based upon Performance.
This calculation also works well in an ASO Plan Type
because it is only calculated at Level 0, and does not
need to be aggregated up any dimensions.
Bonus is the final step.
● [Adjusted Salary] * [Rec. Bonus %] * [Bonus Basis]
But what about retrieves at upper level Employees and
upper level Jobs?
Let’s review three options:
● Calculate and Aggregate in Memory (Can be very slow.)
● Export / Import Method (Requires Extra Members in Outline)
● Procedural Calculation or Allocation
Demo – ASO Plan Type
Option #1 – Calculate in Memory
Works well on small-ish dimensions.
Does not work well with 30,000+ Employees and
1000+ Jobs and 35 Entities.
Demo – ASO Plan Type
Hope you’re not in a hurry!!!
Option #2 – Export / Import Method
This is how procedural calculations were performed in
ASO before procedural calculations were introduced.
Demo – ASO Plan Type
Bonus_ (Formula Member) Bonus (Stored Member)
Report
Script Load
Rule
Hidden
From Users
Users
Report Here
Option #2 – Export / Import Method
Important downfalls:
● Requires batch processing to tie export and import together.
● No way to launch upon save of form.
● Can’t pass parameters to Report Scripts.
● Good method for Reporting cubes, but not Planning cubes.
Demo – ASO Plan Type
Option #3 – Procedural Calculation (or Allocation)
Two Options:
● MaxL Script (Preferable for Batch)
● Calc Manager (Preferable for Anything Else – So Easy!)
Demo – ASO Plan Type
Step 1: Create Variables (Run Time Prompts)
Step 2: Create MDX Member Formulas (Optional)
Step 3: Create Calc Manager Rule
Step 4: Associate Rule with Save of Form (Optional)
Step 5: Test
Demo – Calc Manager Procedural Calc
Enabling Hybrid Aggregation Mode
Use ASODYNAMICAGGINBSO in Essbase Config File.
Parameter Usage
None Disables Hybrid Aggregation Mode
Partial Enables Hybrid Aggregation Mode, but only for simple unary operators
(+, - and ~). Any other calculations are performed in block storage
mode.
Full Enables Hybrid Aggregation Mode for simple unary operators and
member formulas . . . however there is a long list of formula limitations.
Pro’s
● Will eventually represent the best of both worlds
(BSO & ASO).
● Simple config file setting on a BSO cube.
● Works with EPMA.
Con’s
● Brand spanking new. (Danger Will Robinson!!!)
● Significant formula limitations (as of 11.1.2.3.500).
● Data extraction limitations.
Planning with Hybrid Aggregation Mode
Hybrid Limitation Details
Calculations always occur. However, they may be
forced into Block Storage Mode, and may be very slow.
There is a limited set of supported functions for member
formulas (as of 11.1.2.3.500):
● @CHILDREN
● @EXP
● @INT
● @ISMBR
● @MIN
● @MINSRANGE
● @MOD
● @MODE
● @NOTEQUAL
● @POWER
● @RANGE
● @REMAINDER
● @ROUND
● @VAR
● @VARIANCEP
● @VARPER
Hybrid Limitation Details
The following scenarios will force Essbase calculations
into Block Storage Mode (as of 11.1.2.3.500):
● Time Balance Tags
● Attribute Calcs
● Cross-Dims in Formulas
● Dynamic Calc Members with Formulas that are Target of Transparent Partitions
● Queries with Two-Pass and One Pass Calcs from Same Dimension
● XOLAP
Hybrid Limitation Details
The following scenarios will allow Hybrid Aggregation
Mode (as of 11.1.2.3.500):
● Sparse Member with Formula . . . Only References Sparse Members
● Dense Member with Formula . . . Only References Dense Members
● Sparse Member with Formula . . . References Mixed Members
(But Dense Members are Stored)
Hybrid Limitation Details
CONFUSED??? Limit use of member formulas.
Place complex calculation logic in business rules.
Ensure that member formulas do not violate the Hybrid
Aggregation Mode rules.
Do not use time balance settings.
Do not use attribute dimensions.
Test, Test, Test and Test Again!
Demo – Hybrid Plan Type
Calculate Bonus at Lev0 Job, Entity and Employee
Clear All Upper Level Blocks
Retrieve Total Company Bonus
No Sparse Aggregation Required!!!
Monitor The Application Logs!
Good Message:
Hybrid Aggregation Mode enabled.
Bad Message:
Hybrid Aggregation Mode disabled for [Member Name X]
due to . . .
Demo – Avoid Disaster with Hybrid
QRYGOVEXECBLK [appname [dbname]] n
Sets max number of blocks query can retrieve before
being terminated.
QRYGOVEXECTIME [appname [dbname]] n
Sets max amount of time (seconds) a query can execute
before being terminated.