Persistence of mantle lithospheric Re-Os signature during lithosphere-asthenosphere interaction:...
-
Upload
irsp-ouidah -
Category
Documents
-
view
1 -
download
0
Transcript of Persistence of mantle lithospheric Re-Os signature during lithosphere-asthenosphere interaction:...
ORIGINAL PAPER
Persistence of mantle lithospheric Re–Os signature duringasthenospherization of the subcontinental lithospheric mantle:insights from in situ isotopic analysis of sulfidesfrom the Ronda peridotite (Southern Spain)
Claudio Marchesi Æ William L. Griffin ÆCarlos J. Garrido Æ Jean-Louis Bodinier ÆSuzanne Y. O’Reilly Æ Norman J. Pearson
Received: 2 February 2009 / Accepted: 13 July 2009 / Published online: 14 August 2009
� Springer-Verlag 2009
Abstract The western part of the Ronda peridotite massif
(Southern Spain) consists mainly of highly foliated spinel-
peridotite tectonites and undeformed granular peridotites that
are separated by a recrystallization front. The spinel tecto-
nites are interpreted as volumes of ancient subcontinental
lithospheric mantle and the granular peridotites as a portion
of subcontinental lithospheric mantle that underwent partial
melting and pervasive percolation of basaltic melts induced
by Cenozoic asthenospheric upwelling. The Re–Os isotopic
signature of sulfides from the granular domain and the
recrystallization front mostly coincides with that of grains in
the spinel tectonites. This indicates that the Re–Os radio-
metric system in sulfides was highly resistant to partial
melting and percolation of melts induced by Cenozoic
lithospheric thermal erosion. The Re–Os isotopic systematics
of sulfides in the Ronda peridotites thus mostly conserve the
geochemical memory of ancient magmatic events in the
subcontinental lithospheric mantle. Os model ages record two
Proterozoic melting episodes at *1.6 to 1.8 and 1.2–1.4 Ga,
respectively. The emplacement of the massif into the sub-
continental lithospheric mantle probably coincided with one
of these depletion events. A later metasomatic episode caused
the precipitation of a new generation of sulfides at *0.7 to
0.9 Ga. These Proterozoic Os model ages are consistent with
results obtained for several mantle suites in Central/Western
Europe and Northern Africa as well as with the Nd model
ages of the continental crust of these regions. This suggests
that the events recorded in mantle sulfides of the Ronda
peridotites reflect different stages of generation of the con-
tinental crust in the ancient Gondwana supercontinent.
Keywords Subcontinental lithospheric mantle �Partial melting � Proterozoic � Re–Os isotopes � Sulfide �Ronda massif
Introduction
The Re–Os isotopic system has proved to be an invaluable
tool in mantle petrology because the geochemical behavior
of these elements during mantle melting has been tradi-
tionally considered to minimize the influence of metaso-
matic processes on Os isotopic composition and to allow the
definition of the temporal evolution of mantle rocks (e.g.
Shirey and Walker 1998; Carlson 2005). However, the
possibility to obtain precise and accurate in situ Re–Os
Communicated by J. Hoefs.
Present Address:C. Marchesi (&) � J.-L. Bodinier
Geosciences Montpellier, UMR 5243, CC 60, CNRS-Universite
Montpellier II, Place E. Bataillon, 34095 Montpellier, France
e-mail: [email protected];
J.-L. Bodinier
e-mail: [email protected]
C. Marchesi � W. L. Griffin � S. Y. O’Reilly � N. J. Pearson
GEMOC ARC National Key Centre,
Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences,
Macquarie University, Sydney NSW 2109, Australia
e-mail: [email protected]
S. Y. O’Reilly
e-mail: [email protected]
N. J. Pearson
e-mail: [email protected]
C. J. Garrido
Instituto Andaluz de Ciencias de la Tierra (IACT),
CSIC-Universidad de Granada, Avenida Fuentenueva s/n,
18002 Granada, Spain
e-mail: [email protected]
123
Contrib Mineral Petrol (2010) 159:315–330
DOI 10.1007/s00410-009-0429-y
isotopic measurements in individual grains of platinum-
group alloys (Hirata et al. 1998) and sulfide minerals
(Pearson et al. 2002) showed that the Re–Os isotopic
composition of the mantle can be modified during melt-rock
percolation–reaction processes. In fact, distinct generations
of platinum-group minerals and sulfides have different
signatures in terms of Re–Os isotope ratios, thus leading to a
heterogeneous isotopic composition of the mantle at dif-
ferent length scales (Rehkamper et al. 1999; Alard et al.
2002, 2005; Griffin et al. 2002, 2004; Beyer et al. 2006; Frei
et al. 2006). Hence the influence of distinct episodes of
partial melting and melt percolation on the Re–Os isotopic
systematics of mantle peridotites is controversial.
In this paper, we examine the Re–Os isotopic variations
induced by partial melting and melt transport related to
‘‘asthenospherization’’ of the subcontinental lithospheric
mantle, using in situ isotopic analyses of sulfides in the
Ronda mantle peridotites (Southern Spain). One of the most
remarkable features of this orogenic peridotite massif is the
transition from a spinel-peridotite tectonite to a granular
peridotite domain, separated by a narrow gradient (Van der
Wal and Vissers 1993). Microstructural, modal and chemical
variations across this transition zone (hereafter called the
‘‘recrystallization front’’ to be consistent with previous
work) indicate that it was a narrow zone between a partial
melting and melt percolation region (the granular peridotite
domain) and a portion of ancient subcontinental lithospheric
mantle (the spinel tectonite domain) (Van der Wal and
Vissers 1993, 1996; Van der Wal and Bodinier 1996; Garrido
and Bodinier 1999; Lenoir et al. 2001; Vauchez and Garrido
2001). The formation of the Ronda recrystallization front has
been related by Van der Wal and Vissers (1993) and Lenoir
et al. (2001) to the well-established Cenozoic thermal
erosion of the subcontinental lithospheric mantle above
upwelling asthenosphere in the western Mediterranean
region (e.g. Platt and Vissers 1989; Vissers et al. 1995; Soto
and Platt 1999; Platt et al. 2003; Booth-Rea et al. 2007). We
show here that the Re–Os isotopic systematics of sulfide
grains in the granular peridotite domain and at the recrys-
tallization front mostly preserve the geochemical signature
of the spinel tectonite domain in spite of the pervasive
microstructural and compositional changes that affected the
main silicate phases. The Re–Os isotopic system in sulfides
appears thus to have been largely unaffected by melting and
allied metasomatic processes during asthenosphere–litho-
sphere interaction and retains the geochemical memory of
ancient magmatic events in the lithosphere.
Geological setting
The Ronda peridotite is the largest (*300 km2) known
exposure of subcontinental mantle peridotites on Earth. It is
located in the northern part of the Gibraltar arc and the
western Betic Cordillera (Southern Spain) (Fig. 1a), which
constitutes the westernmost segment of the Alpine belt in
Europe.
Modern petrological, structural and geochemical inves-
tigations of the western part of the Ronda peridotite (Van
der Wal and Vissers 1993, 1996; Van der Wal and Bodinier
1996; Garrido and Bodinier 1999; Lenoir et al. 2001;
Vauchez and Garrido 2001; Precigout et al. 2007; Bodinier
et al. 2008) have revealed the existence of three kilometre-
scale, petrological, geochemical and structural domains
(Fig. 1b), which broadly correspond to the four peridotite
facies identified by Obata (1980) in this massif. From
northwest to southeast, these tectono-magmatic domains
are: (1) a spinel (±garnet) tectonite domain subdivided
into the garnet–spinel mylonites, which mark the northern
and western boundaries of the massif, and a domain of
foliated spinel tectonites to the south. This domain records
a decompression and cooling event that brought this
Plagioclasetectonites
1 kmN
TangierGibraltar
Rondamassif
100 km
RX3
RX8
RX12
RX26
RX28
RX31
RX36
RX42
Garnet-spinel mylonites
Spinel tectonites
Granular peridotites
Plagioclase tectonites
Recrystallization front
Sample textures
granular
porphyroclastic
transitional
RX34
Betic Cordillera
MediterraneanSea(a)
(b)
DR93.11
DR93.10
RPD 07-18
07RV12A
07RV10B
RPD 07-11RPD 07-6B
Spineltectonites
Granularperidotites
RPD 07-9
RPD 07-15
N 36°30
W 5°15
Fig. 1 a Geographic location of the Ronda peridotite massif in the
Betic Cordillera (Southern Spain). b Geological map of the SW
region of the Ronda massif with the boundaries of the textural
domains identified by Van der Wal and Vissers (1993, 1996). Circlesindicate the locations of the sampling localities and the microstruc-
tural facies groups of the samples. Modified after Lenoir et al. (2001)
316 Contrib Mineral Petrol (2010) 159:315–330
123
fragment of the lithospheric mantle from *1150�C and
2.7 GPa to 900�C and 1.9 GPa (Precigout et al. 2007). This
substantial thinning of thick subcontinental lithospheric
mantle is corroborated by the presence of graphitized dia-
mond pseudomorphs in garnet pyroxenites (Davies et al.
1993). (2) The coarse granular peridotite domain roughly
coincides with Obata’s Seiland subfacies. It is located in the
central part of the Ronda peridotite massif and is separated
from the spinel tectonites by a narrow recrystallization front
(Van der Wal and Vissers 1996; Van der Wal and Bodinier
1996; Lenoir et al. 2001). Structural and geochemical data
on peridotite and pyroxenite show that the coarse-granular
peridotites are secondary in origin, and were developed at
the expense of older, porphyroclastic spinel tectonites by
annealing and partial melting (Van der Wal and Vissers
1996; Van der Wal and Bodinier 1996; Garrido and Bodi-
nier 1999; Lenoir et al. 2001; Vauchez and Garrido 2001).
(3) The plagioclase tectonite domain, which corresponds to
Obata’s (1980) plagioclase lherzolite facies, formed at the
expense of the granular peridotites. It records late low-
pressure cooling (\1 GPa) associated with strain localiza-
tion in subsolidus shear zones before the final emplacement
into the crust (Van der Wal and Vissers 1993, 1996).
The petrological, geochemical and structural zoning of
the Ronda massif records thinning and uplift of a thick and
old subcontinental lithospheric mantle, accommodated by
ductile shear zones (Precigout et al. 2007). This thinning
was followed by a short thermal event marked by the
propagation of a partial melting and recrystallization front
separating ‘‘asthenospherized’’ coarse-grained peridotites
from older spinel tectonites (Lenoir et al. 2001). This
extensional episode probably took place in a back-arc
setting in an orogenic wedge situated several hundred km
eastwards of the present site of emplacement (e.g. Booth-
Rea et al. 2007, and references therein). Southward to
westward retreat of the African slab during the Oligocene-
Early Miocene accounts for intense back-arc lithosphere
extension, leading to high-temperature conditions and
melting at the base of an extremely attenuated subconti-
nental lithospheric mantle (Garrido and Bodinier 1999;
Lenoir et al. 2001; Precigout et al. 2007).
Sampling and sulfide mineralogy
For this study we selected 26 mantle peridotites represen-
tative of the different structural domains of the western
Ronda massif; we obtained precise Os isotopic data for
sulfides in 18 of these samples (Fig. 1b) that have variable
degrees of serpentinization (30–50 vol.%). They are nine
porphyroclastic lherzolites and harzburgites from the spinel
tectonite and garnet–spinel mylonite domains, five lherz-
olites from the recrystallization front, showing transitional
microstructures between the spinel tectonites and the
granular peridotites, and four lherzolites and harzburgites
from the coarse-granular domain. The petrographic fea-
tures, mineralogy and whole-rock compositions of most of
these samples have been described by Van der Wal and
Bodinier (1996), Lenoir et al. (2001) and Soustelle et al.
(2009).
The distribution of accessory sulfides is rather hetero-
geneous at the thin section scale but generally several tens
of grains were detected in each section. No clear correla-
tion was observed between the sulfide abundance and the
rock-type or microstructure. Sulfides vary in diameter from
*30 to *150 lm and consist of ovoid rounded droplets or
irregularly shaped grains with lobate boundaries. They are
either embedded in aggregates of serpentine interstitial
between the main silicate minerals or enclosed as clusters
of small inclusions in the predominant mineral phases,
especially in large orthopyroxene porphyroclasts.
Sulfide composition is dominated by Fe–Ni–Cu–S pha-
ses (Table 1) as usually observed in mantle peridotites
(Lorand and Alard 2001; Griffin et al. 2002; Alard et al.
2005). Monomineralic Fe-rich pentlandite (Fe/Niat = 1.37–
2.29; N = 25 electron microprobe analyses) is by far the
most common sulfide phase in the mineral assemblage
whereas a Cu-rich phase (chalcopyrite and isocubanite)
was seldom detected, and mainly as an outer rim or
exsolution lamellae in the largest grains. The rather vari-
able composition of Fe-rich pentlandite does not show any
particular correlation with the sulfide grains’ microstruc-
tural position, the fertility of the sample, or the location in
the different peridotite domains. One or more Pt-rich
nuggets up to several microns across were detected in
several sulfide grains by the inspection of the time-resolved
signals collected during the laser microprobe analyses.
These Pt-rich discrete minerals occasionally occur within
the base metal sulfides of mantle peridotites (Alard et al.
2000; Luguet et al. 2001, 2003; Lorand et al. 2008). Some
large sulfide grains disseminated in the serpentine matrix
are partially replaced by iron hydroxides or dendritic
veinlets of magnetite ± native copper and small lamellae
of awaruite. This assemblage is common in partly ser-
pentinised peridotites from the Ronda massif and else-
where, and is interpreted as product of the reducing
conditions related to the incipient serpentinization of
olivine at low temperature (\300�C; Lorand 1985;
Gueddari et al. 1996; Lorand et al. 2000; Bach et al. 2004;
Alt et al. 2007).
Analytical techniques
Fe–Ni–Cu sulfides were searched for on *150 to 200 lm
thick sections of each sample by reflected light microscopy.
Contrib Mineral Petrol (2010) 159:315–330 317
123
Ta
ble
1R
epre
sen
tati
ve
elec
tro
nm
icro
pro
be
anal
yse
so
fsu
lfid
esin
the
Ro
nd
ap
erid
oti
tes
Do
mai
nS
pin
elte
cto
nit
eR
ecry
stal
liza
tio
nfr
on
tG
ran
ula
rp
erid
oti
te
Sam
ple
DR
93
.10
–H
arzb
urg
ite
(Van
der
Wal
and
Bo
din
ier
19
96
)
RP
D0
7-1
8–
Har
zbu
rgit
eR
X3
4–
Lh
erzo
lite
Len
oir
etal
.(2
00
1)
RX
28
–L
her
zoli
te
Len
oir
etal
.(2
00
1)
Gra
inD
R9
3.1
0S
8D
R9
3.1
0
S1
9
DR
93
.10
S2
8R
PD
07
-18
S6
RP
D0
7-1
8
S9
RX
34
S4
RX
34
S1
7R
X3
4S
42
RX
34
S4
3
RX
34
S4
6
RX
34
S4
9
RX
28
S9
RX
28
S1
3
Su
lfid
e
mic
rost
ruct
ure
Incl
usi
on
in
Op
x
Inte
rsti
tial
Incl
usi
on
in
Op
x
Inte
rsti
tial
Incl
usi
on
in
Ol
Inte
rsti
tial
Incl
usi
on
in
Op
x
Incl
usi
on
in
Op
x
Inte
rsti
tial
Inte
rsti
tial
Inte
rsti
tial
Inte
rsti
tial
Inte
rsti
tial
Fe
(wt%
)4
2.2
84
3.3
63
8.5
43
9.0
34
2.6
73
9.5
93
8.2
44
1.0
24
2.0
54
0.9
74
0.0
04
3.3
94
4.6
2
Ni
23
.27
21
.68
26
.80
25
.43
22
.10
25
.89
27
.94
24
.29
22
.83
24
.69
25
.61
21
.43
20
.48
Co
0.2
80
.22
0.3
30
.32
0.2
40
.30
0.2
90
.27
0.7
30
.44
0.2
40
.29
0.1
3
Cu
0.2
40
.61
0.2
60
.74
0.6
10
.00
0.0
00
.33
0.0
70
.01
0.1
10
.38
0.1
9
S3
2.2
83
2.9
13
3.0
93
2.9
03
2.9
63
3.0
13
3.0
63
3.1
23
3.1
63
3.0
23
3.1
53
2.7
63
3.2
6
O0
.36
0.1
70
.32
0.4
00
.24
0.4
70
.21
0.3
00
.24
0.8
30
.72
0.1
50
.76
To
tal
98
.71
98
.95
99
.32
98
.81
98
.82
99
.26
99
.74
99
.34
99
.07
99
.96
99
.83
98
.40
99
.44
Fe
(at%
)3
4.5
53
5.3
53
1.2
63
1.7
73
4.7
73
2.0
23
0.9
93
3.2
43
4.1
63
2.7
03
2.0
13
5.5
73
5.7
0
Ni
18
.09
16
.81
20
.67
19
.68
17
.14
19
.92
21
.54
18
.72
17
.64
18
.74
19
.50
16
.72
15
.59
Co
0.2
10
.17
0.2
50
.24
0.1
90
.23
0.2
20
.21
0.5
60
.34
0.1
90
.23
0.1
0
Cu
0.1
70
.44
0.1
80
.53
0.4
40
.00
0.0
00
.24
0.0
50
.00
0.0
80
.27
0.1
3
S4
5.9
54
6.7
44
6.7
44
6.6
34
6.7
94
6.5
04
6.6
64
6.7
54
6.9
24
5.9
04
6.2
24
6.7
94
6.3
5
O1
.03
0.4
90
.89
1.1
50
.68
1.3
20
.60
0.8
50
.68
2.3
32
.00
0.4
22
.14
Fe/
Ni
1.9
12
.10
1.5
11
.61
2.0
31
.61
1.4
41
.78
1.9
41
.74
1.6
42
.13
2.2
9
Op
xo
rth
op
yro
xen
e,O
lo
liv
ine
318 Contrib Mineral Petrol (2010) 159:315–330
123
Major element analyses of sulfide phases were obtained by
electron microprobe using a CAMECA SX 100 instrument
at the Geochemical Analysis Unit of GEMOC (Macquarie
University, Sydney, Australia). Accelerating voltage was
15 kV and beam current 20 nA, and a set of natural and
synthetic standards was used. Representative electron
microprobe analyses of sulfides are given in Table 1.
Re–Os in situ isotopic analyses were performed at GE-
MOC using the technique described in detail by Pearson
et al. (2002) and Griffin et al. (2002). A New Wave/Mer-
chantek UP 213 laser microprobe with a modified ablation
cell was coupled with a Nu Plasma Multicollector ICP-MS.
The laser was fired at a frequency of 5 Hz, with energies of
1–2 mJ/pulse and using a spot size of 80 lm. A dry aerosol
of Ir was bled into the gas line between the ablation cell
and the ICP-MS to provide a mass-bias correction with a
precision independent of the abundance of Os in the
unknown. During ablation runs, a standard NiS bead
(PGE-A) with 199 ppm Os (Lorand and Alard 2001) and187Os/188Os = 0.1064 (Pearson et al. 2002) was analyzed
between samples to monitor and correct any drift in the ion
counters. These corrections typically were less than 2%
over a long day’s analytical session. The overlap of 187Re
on 187Os was corrected by measuring the 185Re peak and
using 187Re/185Re = 1.6742. The data were collected using
the Nu Plasma time-resolved software, which allows the
selection of the most stable intervals of the signal for
integration. The selected interval is divided into 40 repli-
cates to provide a measure of the standard error. For sul-
fides [60 lm in diameter and containing at least 40 ppm
Os, an internal precision for 187Os/188Os of 0.1–1% (2 SEs)
was routinely obtained; for smaller grains or lower Os
contents the internal precision is 1–2%. Only individual
grains with 187Re/188Os \ 0.5 have been considered in this
study in order to apply precise corrections for the isobaric
interference of 187Re on 187Os (Nowell et al. 2008). The
Re–Os isotopic data of the sulfides are reported in Table 2.
cOs and model ages have been calculated by comparison
with the Os isotopic evolution of the primitive upper
mantle (PUM, present day187Os/188Os = 0.1296, 187Re/188Os = 0.4353, Meisel et al. 2001; Carlson 2005). The
PUM is a hypothetical upper mantle reservoir that has
never experienced a melt depletion or enrichment event
(Meisel et al. 2001). As such, true PUM almost certainly
does not exist anywhere within the mantle but is a fictive
concept generally used as reference for the Os isotopic
composition of the subcontinental lithospheric mantle (e.g.
Alard et al. 2002; Reisberg et al. 2005; Schilling et al.
2008). The uncertainties on TMA model ages include the
uncertainties in the measured 187Os/188Os and 187Re/188Os
according to the equation of Sambridge and Lambert
(1997). During this work Os contents in sulfides were
estimated by comparing the signal intensity on the sample
to that obtained on the PGE-A standard. The accuracy of
these data is limited by variations in ablation conditions,
the lack of an internal standard, the known small compo-
sitional heterogeneity of the particular bead of PGE-A used
as the isotopic standard, and especially by the probability
that maximum signals are not achieved during short runs
on small grains. Despite these uncertainties, the Os con-
tents reported here (Table 2) are believed to be represen-
tative of the volume sampled.
Results
Over 1,000 sulfide grains were entirely sampled during Os
isotopic measurements but only 88 had sufficiently high Os
concentrations to give usefully precise isotopic results; 80
of these grains had 187Re/188Os \ 0.5 and have been con-
sidered in the dataset (Table 2). 43 were found in spinel
tectonites, 21 in transitional lherzolites at the recrystalli-
zation front, and 16 in granular peridotites. The Os contents
of the analyzed sulfides vary between 14 and[900 ppm and
Re/Os (calculated from the measured 187Re/188Os) between
\0.01 and 0.075. These relatively high Os concentrations
indicate a magmatic rather than hydrothermal origin for the
grains, as hydrothermal fluids normally precipitate Fe-rich
sulfide phases (pyrrhotite–pyrite) with \100 ppb Os
(Luguet et al. 2004; Alard et al. 2005). In the Os versus
Re/Os diagram (Fig. 2a) the sulfide population of the Ronda
massif can be divided in two groups: (1) Group 1 is char-
acterized by low Re/Os (B0.004) and a large variability in
Os abundances (81–909 ppm); (2) Group 2 has higher
Re/Os (C0.004) and average lower Os concentration
(14–200 ppm) than Group 1. Both groups include sulfides
from the three peridotite domains but Group 1 mostly
consists of grains detected in the spinel tectonites.187Os/188Os varies between 0.1163 and 0.1204 in Group
1 and between 0.1139 and 0.1335 in Group 2 (Fig. 2b).
These values correspond to cOs = -12.1 to 3.1 but almost
all the grains (75/80) have 187Os/188Os lower than PUM
(cOs up to -2.1). 187Re/188Os spans from 0.002 to 0.02 in
Group 1 and from 0.02 to 0.34 in Group 2 (Fig. 3). No
systematic correlations exist between 187Os/188Os or187Re/188Os and the microstructural setting of the sulfides
(i.e., interstitial versus inclusion-type), the fertility of the
sample, or the location of the sample in the peridotite
domains (Fig. 3). In Group 1, calculated TRD (Walker et al.
1989) and TMA vary between 1.2 and 1.8 and 1.3 and
1.8 Ga, respectively. Group 2 has more variable TRD (-0.5
to 2.1 Ga), and TMA spans from -1.0 to 5.7 Ga because of
the large range in Re/Os. The few meaningless future ages
and ages older than 4.5 Ga reflect derivation of Os from a
source more radiogenic than PUM and the local distur-
bance of the Re–Os system.
Contrib Mineral Petrol (2010) 159:315–330 319
123
Table 2 Re–Os data on sulfides in the Ronda peridotites
Sample Sulfide
group
Sulfide
microstructure
187Os/188Os
2 SE 187Re/188Os
2 SE Re/Os Osa
(ppm)
2 SE cOs TRD
(Ga)
TMA
(Ga)
2 SDb
(Ga)
Spinel tectonite domain
RX8—Lherzolite (Lenoir et al. 2001)
RX8 S29 Group 2 Interstitial 0.1325 0.0012 0.26 0.0098 0.058 42 3 2.3 -0.39 -1.02 0.42
RX8 S50 Group 2 Interstitial 0.1335 0.0015 0.16 0.0260 0.035 28 2 3.1 -0.53 -0.84 0.34
RX8 S78 Group 2 Interstitial 0.1302 0.0008 0.09 0.0190 0.019 66 7 0.5 -0.07 -0.10 0.13
RX31—Lherzolite (Lenoir et al. 2001)
RX31 S8 Group 2 Interstitial 0.1228 0.0008 0.23 0.0032 0.050 77 11 -5.2 0.95 1.94 0.22
RX42—Harzburgite (Lenoir et al. 2001)
RX42 S21 Group 2 Inclusion in Ol 0.1214 0.0011 0.11 0.0019 0.025 30 3 -6.3 1.13 1.50 0.19
DR93.10–Harzburgite (Van der Wal and Bodinier 1996)
DR93.10 S5 Group 2 Inclusion in Opx 0.1201 0.0019 0.04 0.0019 0.010 43 6 -7.2 1.29 1.43 0.28
DR93.10 S6 Group 1 Inclusion in Opx 0.1190 0.0005 0.01 0.0003 0.001 105 7 -8.0 1.44 1.46 0.07
DR93.10 S8 Group 2 Inclusion in Opx 0.1199 0.0011 0.24 0.0186 0.054 34 6 -7.4 1.34 2.98 0.43
DR93.10 S14 Group 2 Interstitial 0.1214 0.0006 0.10 0.0480 0.023 103 18 -6.2 1.12 1.45 0.23
DR93.10 S19 Group 2 Interstitial 0.1219 0.0006 0.10 0.0108 0.022 58 11 -5.8 1.06 1.35 0.11
DR93.10 S20 Group 2 Interstitial 0.1191 0.0009 0.02 0.0004 0.004 60 12 -8.0 1.43 1.49 0.13
DR93.10 S21 Group 2 Interstitial 0.1191 0.0020 0.09 0.0260 0.020 67 5 -8.0 1.44 1.80 0.36
DR93.10 S23 Group 2 Interstitial 0.1215 0.0004 0.24 0.0220 0.053 116 10 -6.2 1.11 2.39 0.29
DR93.10 S24 Group 2 Inclusion in Opx 0.1211 0.0013 0.14 0.0100 0.031 36 4 -6.5 1.17 1.70 0.26
DR93.10 S27 Group 2 Inclusion in Opx 0.1201 0.0017 0.12 0.0024 0.027 14 1 -7.3 1.31 1.80 0.32
DR93.10 S28 Group 2 Inclusion in Opx 0.1222 0.0006 0.31 0.0028 0.069 61 3 -5.6 1.02 3.44 0.30
DR93.10 S3b Group 2 Inclusion in Opx 0.1209 0.0018 0.13 0.0118 0.029 65 19 -6.6 1.19 1.68 0.35
DR93.10 S6b Group 2 Interstitial 0.1219 0.0010 0.14 0.0400 0.030 75 3 -5.8 1.06 1.52 0.28
DR93.10 S9b Group 2 Interstitial 0.1203 0.0006 0.08 0.0118 0.019 200 22 -7.1 1.27 1.56 0.11
07RV 10B—Harzburgite (Soustelle et al. 2009)
07RV 10B S3 Group 2 Inclusion in Opx 0.1257 0.0008 0.14 0.0042 0.032 59 8 -2.9 0.54 0.79 0.16
07RV 10B S52 Group 2 Intersttial 0.1202 0.0003 0.16 0.0380 0.035 67 6 -7.2 1.30 2.00 0.28
07RV 12A—Harzburgite (Soustelle et al. 2009)
07RV 12A S2 Group 1 Interstitial 0.1187 0.0012 0.01 0.0012 0.002 81 13 -8.3 1.49 1.51 0.16
07RV 12A S3 Group 2 Interstitial 0.1198 0.0011 0.21 0.0090 0.046 61 9 -7.5 1.35 2.54 0.31
07RV 12A S5 Group 1 Inclusion in Opx 0.1183 0.0008 0.01 0.0004 0.002 241 32 -8.6 1.54 1.56 0.11
07RV 12A S8 Group 2 Inclusion in Opx 0.1187 0.0006 0.02 0.0014 0.005 63 6 -8.3 1.49 1.56 0.08
07RV 12A S10 Group 1 Inclusion in Opx 0.1193 0.0007 0.004 0.0011 0.001 425 137 -7.8 1.40 1.42 0.10
07RV 12A S11 Group 2 Interstitial 0.1169 0.0002 0.03 0.0016 0.006 60 9 -9.7 1.73 1.83 0.03
07RV 12A S12 Group 1 Interstitial 0.1163 0.0001 0.003 0.0002 0.001 643 128 -10.2 1.81 1.83 0.01
RPD 07-9—Harzburgite
RPD 07-9 S28 Group 2 Interstitial 0.1250 0.0007 0.25 0.0042 0.056 44 5 -3.5 0.64 1.46 0.22
RPD 07-9 S32 Group 2 Interstitial 0.1212 0.0002 0.10 0.0196 0.022 107 17 -6.4 1.16 1.48 0.09
RPD 07-9 S66 Group 2 Interstitial 0.1241 0.0003 0.09 0.0080 0.020 86 4 -4.2 0.76 0.96 0.06
RPD 07-9 S73 Group 2 Inclusion in Ol 0.1245 0.0009 0.22 0.0158 0.049 37 3 -3.9 0.71 1.40 0.26
RPD 07-9 S80 Group 2 Interstitial 0.1239 0.0008 0.08 0.0044 0.019 53 7 -4.3 0.78 0.96 0.14
RPD 07-9 S101 Group 2 Interstitial 0.1233 0.0008 0.16 0.0036 0.036 73 3 -4.8 0.87 1.35 0.16
RPD 07-9 S112 Group 2 Interstitial 0.1235 0.0010 0.16 0.0220 0.035 58 8 -4.6 0.84 1.29 0.24
RPD 07-11—Lherzolite
RPD 07-11 S7 Group 2 Interstitial 0.1242 0.0014 0.08 0.0010 0.017 42 4 -4.0 0.74 0.90 0.23
RPD 07-11 S31 Group 2 Interstitial 0.1241 0.0008 0.12 0.0032 0.027 20 2 -4.2 0.77 1.06 0.16
RPD 07-11 S33 Group 2 Interstitial 0.1267 0.0007 0.15 0.0096 0.033 33 6 -2.2 0.41 0.61 0.16
320 Contrib Mineral Petrol (2010) 159:315–330
123
Table 2 continued
Sample Sulfide
group
Sulfide
microstructure
187Os/188Os
2 SE 187Re/188Os
2 SE Re/Os Osa
(ppm)
2 SE cOs TRD
(Ga)
TMA
(Ga)
2 SDb
(Ga)
RPD 07-11 S50 Group 2 Inclusion in Opx 0.1240 0.0017 0.06 0.0015 0.014 27 2 -4.2 0.77 0.89 0.27
RPD 07-11 S54 Group 2 Interstitial 0.1216 0.0009 0.26 0.0066 0.058 31 3 -6.1 1.11 2.71 0.31
RPD 07-18—Harzburgite
RPD 07-18 S14 Group 1 Interstitial 0.1173 0.0009 0.02 0.0017 0.004 124 25 -9.4 1.67 1.74 0.12
RPD 07-18 S16 Group 2 Interstitial 0.1207 0.0004 0.04 0.0042 0.008 47 9 -6.8 1.22 1.33 0.06
RPD 07-18 S18 Group 1 Inclusion in Spl 0.1200 0.0003 0.01 0.0016 0.003 224 11 -7.3 1.32 1.36 0.04
Recrystallization front
RX3—Lherzolite (Lenoir et al. 2001)
RX3 S26 Group 2 Inclusion in Opx 0.1247 0.0007 0.10 0.0020 0.022 52 8 -3.7 0.68 0.87 0.13
RX26—Lherzolite (Lenoir et al. 2001)
RX26 S17 Group 2 Interstitial 0.1334 0.0016 0.20 0.0280 0.046 32 5 3.0 -0.52 -1.00 0.45
RX26 S19 Group 2 Interstitial 0.1299 0.0005 0.11 0.0022 0.024 51 5 0.3 -0.03 -0.05 0.09
RX34—Lherzolite (Lenoir et al. 2001)
RX34 S29 Group 2 Interstitial 0.1268 0.0007 0.14 0.0019 0.031 72 3 -2.1 0.39 0.57 0.14
RX34 S42 Group 2 Inclusion in Opx 0.1160 0.0011 0.12 0.0300 0.026 43 3 -10.4 1.85 2.50 0.30
RX34 S43 Group 2 Interstitial 0.1231 0.0015 0.17 0.0028 0.038 31 2 -5.0 0.90 1.45 0.33
RX34 S46 Group 2 Interstitial 0.1233 0.0018 0.09 0.0044 0.020 26 2 -4.8 0.87 1.09 0.31
RPD 07-6B—Lherzolite
RPD 07-6B S10 Group 2 Interstitial 0.1226 0.0020 0.07 0.0058 0.016 43 9 -5.3 0.96 1.14 0.32
RPD 07-6B S11 Group 2 Interstitial 0.1204 0.0007 0.22 0.0022 0.050 43 4 -7.0 1.26 2.56 0.20
RPD 07-6B S19 Group 2 Interstitial 0.1206 0.0010 0.10 0.0130 0.022 53 10 -6.9 1.24 1.58 0.19
RPD 07-6B S23 Group 2 Interstitial 0.1196 0.0007 0.23 0.0044 0.052 36 3 -7.7 1.38 2.89 0.20
RPD 07-6B S28 Group 2 Interstitial 0.1178 0.0012 0.27 0.0144 0.059 69 13 -9.1 1.62 4.05 0.51
RPD 07-6B S30 Group 2 Interstitial 0.1183 0.0006 0.07 0.0038 0.017 99 12 -8.6 1.54 1.85 0.10
RPD 07-6B S49 Group 1 Inclusion in Opx 0.1181 0.0007 0.01 0.0007 0.002 133 13 -8.7 1.56 1.59 0.10
RPD 07-6B S50 Group 2 Interstitial 0.1179 0.0008 0.09 0.0022 0.020 81 7 -9.0 1.60 2.01 0.13
RPD 07-6B S1b Group 2 Interstitial 0.1193 0.0004 0.07 0.0048 0.015 85 6 -7.8 1.40 1.65 0.07
RPD 07-6B S5b Group 2 Interstitial 0.1192 0.0007 0.07 0.0024 0.016 30 2 -7.9 1.42 1.69 0.11
RPD 07-6B S10b Group 2 Interstitial 0.1156 0.0012 0.27 0.0046 0.060 30 3 -10.8 1.92 4.88 0.42
RPD 07-6B S12b Group 2 Interstitial 0.1139 0.0011 0.28 0.0050 0.062 28 2 -12.1 2.13 5.69 0.43
RPD 07-6B S17b Group 2 Interstitial 0.1182 0.0018 0.07 0.0036 0.016 79 10 -8.7 1.55 1.85 0.28
RPD 07-15—Lherzolite
RPD 07-15 S11 Group 2 Inclusion in Opx 0.1172 0.0007 0.07 0.0240 0.016 61 13 -9.5 1.69 2.01 0.17
Granular peridotite domain
RX12—Harzburgite (Lenoir et al. 2001)
RX12 S3 Group 1 Inclusion in Cpx 0.1175 0.0001 0.002 0.0001 0.0004 909 108 -9.3 1.65 1.66 0.01
RX28—Lherzolite (Lenoir et al. 2001)
RX28 S2 Group 2 Inclusion in Opx 0.1248 0.0015 0.08 0.0006 0.018 112 17 -3.6 0.66 0.80 0.25
RX28 S11 Group 2 Inclusion in Opx 0.1238 0.0013 0.12 0.0028 0.026 68 7 -4.4 0.80 1.09 0.23
RX36—Harzburgite (Lenoir et al. 2001)
RX36 S2 Group 2 Interstitial 0.1236 0.0009 0.21 0.0046 0.047 32 1 -4.6 0.83 1.58 0.24
RX36 S28 Group 2 Interstitial 0.1193 0.0005 0.08 0.0156 0.018 42 4 -7.8 1.40 1.72 0.11
RX36 S49 Group 2 Interstitial 0.1219 0.0005 0.34 0.0044 0.075 90 9 -5.9 1.06 4.48 0.36
RX36 S50 Group 2 Interstitial 0.1225 0.0007 0.31 0.0026 0.068 39 2 -5.5 0.99 3.24 0.31
RX36 S57 Group 2 Inclusion in Opx 0.1219 0.0014 0.13 0.0400 0.030 30 4 -5.9 1.06 1.52 0.34
RX36 S60 Group 2 Interstitial 0.1207 0.0003 0.07 0.0064 0.015 65 6 -6.8 1.22 1.44 0.06
RX36 S62 Group 2 Inclusion in Opx 0.1208 0.0004 0.26 0.0040 0.059 62 5 -6.8 1.22 3.01 0.14
Contrib Mineral Petrol (2010) 159:315–330 321
123
Discussion
Effects of alteration on Os and Re mobility,
and the origin of sulfide groups
As the Ronda peridotites are variably serpentinised
(Garrido et al. 2000), interpretations of the variations of187Os/188Os and 187Re/188Os in Ronda sulfides in terms
of primary magmatic processes require first an assessment
of the potential effects of alteration of peridotite on Os and
Re mobility. The Ronda peridotites show serpentinite
assemblages characteristic of low fluid flux (Lorand et al.
2000; Garrido et al. 2000) that generates strongly reducing
conditions due to the production of H2 from reaction of
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
Re/
Os
(a)
Group 1
Group 2
Spinel tectonite
Recrystallization front
Granular peridotite
0 200 400 600 800
Os (ppm)
1000
0.115
0.120
0.125
0.130
0.135
187 O
s/18
8 Os
(b)
Group 1
Group 2
Spinel tectonite
Recrystallization front
Granular peridotite
Fig. 2 Os (ppm) versus Re/Os (a) and 187Os/188Os (b) in individual
sulfides from the Ronda peridotites. White-crossed circles Sulfide
inclusions in the main minerals of spinel tectonites, white circlesinterstitial sulfides in spinel tectonites, gray-crossed triangles sulfide
inclusions in the main minerals of transitional lherzolites from the
recrystallization front, gray triangles interstitial sulfides in transi-
tional lherzolites from the recrystallization front, black-crossedsquares sulfide inclusions in the main minerals of granular peridotites,
black squares interstitial sulfides in granular peridotites. Barsrepresent 2 SEs of Os, Re/Os and 187Os/188Os values
Group 1
Group 2
0.5
187Re/188Os
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4
187 O
s/18
8 Os
0.115
0.120
0.125
0.130
0.135
PUMAge = 739 360 Ma
Initial187Os/188Os = 0.1198 9MSWD = 66
Spineltectonite
RecrystallizationfrontGranularperidotiteSpl and Pl tectoniteswhole-rock
Fig. 3 187Re/188Os versus 187Os/188Os in sulfides from the Ronda
peridotites. Symbols as in Fig. 2. Bars represent 2 SEs of 187Re/188Os
and 187Os/188Os measurements. Data for Ronda whole-rock spinel
(Spl) and plagioclase (Pl) tectonites from Reisberg et al. (1991). Starindicates the Re–Os isotopic composition of the primitive upper
mantle (PUM, Meisel et al. 2001; Carlson 2005). The black solid lineis an ‘‘errorchron’’ line calculated for sulfides with 187Os/188Os lower
than PUM from the spinel tectonite and coarse-granular peridotite
domains
Table 2 continued
Sample Sulfide
group
Sulfide
microstructure
187Os/188Os
2 SE 187Re/188Os
2 SE Re/Os Osa
(ppm)
2 SE cOs TRD
(Ga)
TMA
(Ga)
2 SDb
(Ga)
DR93.11—Harzburgite (Van der Wal and Bodinier 1996)
DR93-11 S3 Group 2 Interstitial 0.1200 0.0007 0.09 0.0038 0.019 118 8 -7.3 1.31 1.63 0.13
DR93-11 S10 Group 2 Inclusion in Cpx 0.1208 0.0012 0.19 0.0050 0.042 49 13 -6.7 1.21 2.09 0.28
DR93-11 S18 Group 2 Interstitial 0.1211 0.0014 0.21 0.0144 0.046 53 3 -6.5 1.18 2.21 0.38
DR93-11 S23 Group 2 Interstitial 0.1205 0.0006 0.15 0.0040 0.034 42 2 -7.0 1.25 1.89 0.12
DR93-11 S31 Group 1 Inclusion in Spl 0.1204 0.0009 0.01 0.0017 0.001 169 31 -7.0 1.25 1.27 0.13
DR93-11 S36 Group 2 Interstitial 0.1239 0.0012 0.19 0.0104 0.043 50 4 -4.4 0.80 1.41 0.31
Ol olivine, Opx orthopyroxene, Spl spinel, Cpx clinopyroxene
cOs and model ages calculated by comparison with PUM (187Os/188Os = 0.1296; 187Re/188Os = 0.4353)a Semiquantitative values: measured by comparison of signal with PGE-A standardb Propagated 2SE analytical uncertainties on 187Os/188Os and 187Re/188Os
322 Contrib Mineral Petrol (2010) 159:315–330
123
water with iron-rich peridotite minerals and formation of
magnetite (Bach et al. 2004, 2006). Noble metals are
immobile under reducing conditions (Snow and Schmidt
1998; Rehkamper et al. 1999) and therefore the Os contents
of sulfides are not significantly affected by serpentiniza-
tion. This conclusion is supported by Os studies of sulfides
in heavily serpentinised abyssal peridotites, showing that
they still retain their primary Os isotope magmatic signa-
ture (Alard et al. 2005). Highly oxidizing fluids involved in
some types of seafloor weathering can mobilize Os (Snow
and Reisberg 1995), but this type of alteration is absent in
the Ronda peridotites (Lorand et al. 2000). On the other
hand, Re is considered to be highly mobile in fluids (Sun
et al. 2003, 2004), and therefore serpentinization or
weathering may induce both secondary Re depletion (Snow
and Schmidt 1998; Snow et al. 2000) and Re uptake
(Meisel et al. 1996; Batanova et al. 2008). Lorand et al.
(2000) attributed whole-rock Re depletion in the Ronda
peridotites to serpentinization. In our study, the analyzed
grains show a broad trend of increasing 187Re/188Os cou-
pled with less variable 187Os/188Os (Fig. 3), which is
inconsistent with Re loss by alteration. Furthermore, Re
depletion due to serpentinization should mostly have
affected easily altered intergranular sulfides, but these
grains show the same range of 187Re/188Os as those
included in silicates (Fig. 3). These observations lead us to
conclude that 187Os/188Os and 187Re/188Os ratios in Ronda
sulfides reflect primary magmatic processes.
Group 1 sulfides generally have high Os contents and
low Re/Os (Fig. 2a) that suggest they derive from grains
residual after melt extraction from the upper mantle (Alard
et al. 2000, 2002; Griffin et al. 2002; Bockrath et al. 2004).
Their relatively unradiogenic Os isotopic ratios (Fig. 2b)
indicate that they have evolved for a long time in a low
Re/Os environment and suggest that the influence of
metasomatic processes on their composition was minor.
Indeed, Group 1 consists mainly of sulfides from the spinel
tectonite domain of Ronda, where metasomatic processes
occurred by low-melt-fraction percolation (Garrido and
Bodinier 1999), and a small group of sulfide inclusions in
pyroxene and spinel at the recrystallization front and in the
coarse-granular domain (Fig. 2). As noted above, the
Os-isotope composition of sulfides in the Ronda massif is
generally not correlated with their microstructural position,
but the inclusion of these grains in primary minerals
probably helped to minimize their interaction with perco-
lating melts/fluids relatively enriched in Re (Burton et al.
1999; Alard et al. 2002).
Group 2 has higher Re/Os and generally lower Os
concentrations than Group 1 (Fig. 2a) suggesting it origi-
nated by reaction between oxidizing melts/fluids and pre-
existing grains during refertilization and/or melt-rock
reaction (Alard et al. 2000, 2002; Griffin et al. 2002). The
five grains with 187Os/188Os higher than PUM (Fig. 3) may
be derived from melts/fluids that preferentially scavenged
Os from highly radiogenic pyroxenites; a further six grains
have 187Os/188Os higher than PUM which may reflect their
origin from radiogenic mafic layers, but these sulfides
were not considered in the dataset as they have187Re/188Os [ 0.5.
Persistence of lithospheric Re–Os signature in sulfides
across the Ronda recrystallization front
The recrystallization front in the Ronda peridotite (Fig. 1b)
separates the spinel tectonite domain, interpreted as old,
veined lithospheric mantle, from the granular domain
where the microstructures and mineralogical assemblages
of peridotites and pyroxenites in the precursor spinel tect-
onites are obliterated (Van der Wal and Vissers 1996;
Garrido and Bodinier 1999; Lenoir et al. 2001; Vauchez
and Garrido 2001; Soustelle et al. 2009). Variations in the
concentrations of lithophile major- and trace-elements in
peridotites collected over a distance of *10 km along the
Ronda recrystallization front (Fig. 1b) are consistent with
the development of the coarse-granular domain by *5%
partial melting of refertilized spinel tectonites (Garrido and
Bodinier 1999; Lenoir et al. 2001; Soustelle et al. 2009).
Melting and refertilization processes associated with the
generation of the Ronda recrystallization front are well
illustrated by variations of the whole-rock YbN content and
CaO/MgO ratio of peridotites across the front (Fig. 4a, b).
The extraction of partial melts from the coarse-granular
peridotites is indicated by their more homogeneous and
statistically significant lower whole-rock YbN (Fig. 4a) and
CaO/MgO (Fig. 4b) relative to the precursor spinel tecto-
nites (Lenoir et al. 2001). At the recrystallization front,
coarse-granular peridotites are separated from the spinel
tectonites by the more fertile transitional peridotites,
characterized by relatively higher YbN (Fig. 4a) and CaO/
MgO (Fig. 4b) (Lenoir et al. 2001; Soustelle et al. 2009).
These geochemical variations indicate that these transi-
tional peridotites were refertilized by synchronous melt-
consuming reactions at and ahead of the peridotite melting
front, as also attested by the formation of undeformed
secondary clinopyroxene (Lenoir et al. 2001) variably
enriched in REE (Soustelle et al. 2009).
The above results show that partial melting and refer-
tilization associated with the development of the Ronda
recrystallization front, which are considered to have
occurred in the Cenozoic (Van der Wal and Vissers 1993;
Lenoir et al. 2001), efficiently overprinted and homoge-
nized the lithophile major- and trace-element heterogene-
ities of the former spinel tectonite domain (Fig. 4a, b). As a
consequence, one might expect some substantial difference
in the 187Re/188Os and 187Os/188Os ratios of sulfides from
Contrib Mineral Petrol (2010) 159:315–330 323
123
the coarse-granular peridotites and the recrystallization
front compared to those in the spinel tectonites. Partial
melting leading to the coarse-granular peridotites could
have induced a decrease of the 187Re/188Os ratio and more
restricted ranges in 187Re/188Os and 187Os/188Os in coarse-
granular peridotites compared to the spinel tectonites. On
the other hand, an expected effect of igneous refertilization
at the recrystallization front is a possible increase in187Re/188Os compared to that in the spinel tectonites. As
the thermal erosion of lithospheric mantle beneath the
western Mediterranean region occurred in the late Oligo-
cene-early Miocene (Platt et al. 1998; Soto and Platt 1999;
Booth-Rea et al. 2007), the influence of the potential187Re/188Os variations induced by this melting and melt
percolation event on the time-integrated 187Os/188Os can be
considered negligible.
Figure 4c, d shows that the distributions of 187Os/188Os
and 187Re/188Os in sulfides of peridotites from the different
domains are decoupled from variations of YbN and CaO/
MgO across the front and do not display the trends expected
for additional partial melting in the coarse-granular domain
and refertilization at the recrystallization front. This implies
that Re and Os in sulfides were largely unaffected by the
partial melting and melt transport that generated the Ronda
recrystallization front and that are recorded by lithophile
element variations at kilometric length-scales. This may
indicate that for low degrees of melting (*5%) such as
those that generated the coarse-granular peridotites from the
spinel tectonite domain (Lenoir et al. 2001), Re and Os are
not significantly fractionated in monosulfide solid solution,
which is the sulfide phase stable during mantle melting and
whose subsolidus product is Fe-rich pentlandite (Ballhaus
et al. 2001; Brenan 2002; Barnes et al. 2006). This is con-
sistent with experimental and natural data that show that
both Os and Re are compatible in monosulfide solid solution
and have similar partition coefficients with sulfide melt
(DOs/DReMSS/sulfide melt = 0.8–1.5; Lambert et al. 1999;
Brenan 2002; Barnes et al. 2006). Thus, the Re and Os
Fig. 4 Box plots summarizing the distributions of whole-rock YbN
(a) (N normalized to chondrite after Sun and McDonough 1989),
CaO/MgO (b), and 187Os/187Os (c) and 187Re/187Os (d) in sulfides for
peridotite samples from the different tectonic domains of the Ronda
massif (ST spinel tectonite domain, RF recrystallization front, CGcoarse-granular domain). Each box depicts the sampling distribution
between the 25th and 75th percentiles; the solid and dotted lineswithin the boxes mark the median and the mean value, respectively;
whiskers (error bars) above and below the boxes indicate the 90th and
10th percentiles, respectively. For the plots of 187Os/187Os and187Re/187Os in sulfides, we also show outliers (i.e., values outside the
10th and 90th percentiles) plotted as individual symbols (symbols as
in Fig. 2). The Ronda peridotite database for this figure encompasses
peridotites analyzed and/or compiled by Lenoir et al. (2001)
(including the samples selected for this study, Table 2), as well as
the new peridotites sampled in this study with notation RPD (Fig. 1;
Table 2)
ST RF CG
187 R
e/18
8 Os
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
CaO
/MgO
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
Yb N
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
187 O
s/18
8 Os
0.110
0.115
0.120
0.125
0.130
0.135
ST RF CG(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
c
324 Contrib Mineral Petrol (2010) 159:315–330
123
isotope compositions of sulfides in the coarse-granular
peridotites are mostly inherited from those of the ancient
lithospheric spinel tectonites. A rough positive correlation
between 187Os/188Os and 187Re/188Os can be observed
among sulfides with negative cOs from the spinel tectonite
and coarse-granular domains (Fig. 3). This population
scatters about an ‘‘errorchron’’ with an age of 739 ±360 Ma
(MSWD = 66) and initial 187Os/188Os = 0.1198, which
corresponds to a model age of 1.3 Ga, identical to that
obtained by whole-rock analysis of samples from the spinel
and plagioclase tectonite domains (Reisberg et al. 1991;
Reisberg and Lorand 1995). We interpret this weak corre-
lation as a mixing line among different generations of sul-
fides, as inferred for mantle xenoliths (Alard et al. 2002;
Griffin et al. 2002, 2004) and abyssal peridotites (Alard
et al. 2005).
Sulfides in lherzolites at the recrystallization front have
Re–Os isotope compositions similar to grains in spinel
tectonites and coarse-granular peridotites (Fig. 4c, d) and
only three of them show an evident decoupling between
relatively high 187Re/188Os and unradiogenic 187Os/188Os
(Fig. 3). These interstitial sulfides are probably products of
the refertilization (i.e., clinopyroxene-producing) reactions
which caused significant enrichment of Re relative to Os
and that occurred at and ahead of the recrystallization front
(Lenoir et al. 2001; Soustelle et al. 2009). The decoupling
between relatively low 187Os/188Os and high 187Re/188Os in
these grains is consistent with the relatively recent forma-
tion of the Ronda recrystallization front (probably Ceno-
zoic, Lenoir et al. 2001), as little 187Os ingrowth has
occurred since the Re enrichment event.
Variability of the Os model ages calculated for sulfides
187Os/188Os in sulfides from the Ronda peridotites shows
significant variations at the thin section scale (Table 2) as has
been generally noted in mantle rocks from both continental
and oceanic lithosphere (Alard et al. 2002, 2005; Griffin et al.
2002, 2004; Luguet et al. 2007). This implies that the whole-
rock Os isotope composition and model ages of such samples
are controlled by the modal abundance and Os contents of
distinct generations of sulfides in the sample and indicates
that the upper mantle is not adequately homogeneous in
terms of 187Os/188Os to be described by large-scale geo-
chemical reservoirs (Meibom et al. 2002).
Figure 5 shows the distributions of TRD and TMA
(excluding the few meaningless future ages and ages older
than 4.5 Ga) in individual sulfides from the different
structural domains of Ronda (Fig. 5a–c) and in the whole
massif (Fig. 5d). TRD ages cluster around three main peaks:
Rel
ativ
e pr
obab
ility
0.0 0.5 3.02.01.51.0 3.5 4.02.5 4.5 0.0 0.5 3.02.01.51.0 3.5 4.02.5 4.5
Rel
ativ
e pr
obab
ility
Model age (Ga) Model age (Ga)
Model age (Ga)
0.0 0.5 3.02.52.01.51.0 3.5 4.0 0.0 0.5 3.02.01.51.0 3.5 4.02.5 4.5
Model age (Ga)
Spinel tectonite Recrystallization front
Granular peridotite
(a)
Whole massif
(b)
(c) (d)
TRD
TMA
TRD
TMA
TRD
TMA
TRD
TMA
Fig. 5 Cumulative probability
plots of Os model ages (Ga) for
sulfides from the different
structural domains of Ronda
(a–c) and the whole massif (d).
Black solid line Re-depletion
ages (TRD, Walker et al. 1989);
gray dashed line model ages
(TMA)
Contrib Mineral Petrol (2010) 159:315–330 325
123
1.6–1.8, 1.2–1.4, and 0.7–0.8 Ga. No substantial differ-
ences exist among the Re-depletion ages calculated in the
three peridotite domains except for a minor peak at
*0.4 Ga that is shown only by sulfides at the recrystalli-
zation front (Fig. 5b). The distribution of TMA is less
homogeneous. Minor peaks corresponding to Archean
model ages are visible in all the domains: at *2.5 and
3.4 Ga in spinel tectonites (Fig. 5a); at *2.5, 2.8 and 4 Ga
at the recrystallization front (Fig. 5b); and at *3 Ga in the
granular domain (Fig. 5c). Proterozoic TMA ages generally
coincide with the values of TRD and mostly cluster around
*1.6–1.9, 1.3–1.5, and 0.9 Ga; a minor TMA model age of
*0.6 Ga is recorded in sulfides at the recrystallization
front (Fig. 5b).
The observation that Archean model ages are only
evident in the TMA distributions, and in particular at the
recrystallization front, suggests that they reflect second-
ary uptake of Re and do not represent real magmatic
events. In contrast, the different Proterozoic model ages
are generally well constrained both in TRD and TMA and
are evident in all the domains. Group 1, which we
interpret as derived from grains residual after melting,
shows model ages around the two most ancient Prote-
rozoic peaks. These age peaks are the most prominent
ones displayed by the distributions of both TRD and TMA
and suggest that the Ronda peridotites underwent two
main melting events at *1.6 to 1.8 and 1.2–1.4 Ga,
respectively. The *1.6 to 1.8 Ga peak is consistent with
the U–Pb age of 1783 ± 37 Ma reported by Sanchez-
Rodrıguez and Gebauer (2000); it was determined by
SHRIMP analysis of an inherited core of zircon in a
garnet pyroxenite from the spinel tectonite domain. A
prominent *1.2 to 1.4 Ga tectonothermal event in the
Ronda massif is documented both by a Sm–Nd ‘‘error-
chron’’ on clinopyroxene (Reisberg et al. 1989) and by
whole-rock Os model ages of peridotites and garnet
pyroxenites (Reisberg et al. 1991; Reisberg and Lorand
1995). Group 2, which probably formed by interaction of
ancient grains with younger metasomatic melts/fluids,
has more variable model ages and shows that a third
generation of sulfides precipitated in the Ronda perido-
tites at *0.7 to 0.9 Ga. Pan-African (0.5–0.9 Ga) ages
have been reported for zircons from high-grade meta-
morphic rocks in the Betic Cordillera (Zeck and
Whitehouse 1999; Zeck and Williams 2001) and the
western Mediterranean (Platt et al. 1998).
Significance of the magmatic events recorded
by Os isotopes
Frey et al. (1985) argued that the Ronda peridotites are
residues after moderate degrees of partial melting in the
garnet- and spinel-stability fields. In particular, the
relative depletion and homogenization of the coarse-
granular peridotites compared to refertilized spinel tecto-
nites ahead of the recrystallization front is ascribed to
2.5–6.5% partial melting in the Cenozoic (Lenoir et al.
2001). As mantle sulfides are normally exhausted after
12–30% partial melting (Luguet et al. 2003; Lorand and
Gregoire 2006; Alt et al. 2007) depending on sulfur
abundance and pressure (Mavrogenes and O’Neill 1999),
the preservation of residual sulfides could be expected in
the Ronda peridotites. Group 1 has the geochemical sig-
nature of residual sulfides (Fig. 2a) and its Os-isotope
composition records two different melting episodes at
*1.6 to 1.8 and 1.2–1.4 Ga, respectively. We propose
that one of these Proterozoic events probably coincided
with the emplacement of the massif into the refractory
subcontinental lithosphere. If we assume that the Ronda
peridotites accreted to the lithosphere at *1.6 to 1.8 Ga,
the residual grains with Os model ages of *1.2 to 1.4 Ga
may testify to the reworking of the lithosphere in the
Mesoproterozoic. Alternatively, if the massif became part
of the lithosphere at about 1.2–1.4 Ga, according to the
common interpretation of whole-rock Os isotopic data
(Reisberg et al. 1991; Reisberg and Lorand 1995), the
residual sulfides with Os model ages of *1.6 to 1.8 Ga
could be interpreted as inherited grains that survived
within the convective mantle for *0.2 to 0.6 Ga. Sulfides
in Group 2 with Os model ages of *0.7 to 0.9 Ga sug-
gest the percolation of metasomatic melts/fluids in the
Neoproterozoic when the massif was equilibrated at sub-
solidus conditions.
Considering the uncertainties inherent in model age
calculations, the three Proterozoic magmatic events rec-
ognized in the Ronda massif are consistent with similar
Os model ages obtained for several mantle peridotite
suites in Central and Western Europe (Meisel et al.
1996, 1997; Burnham et al. 1998; Snow et al. 2000;
Alard et al. 2002; Schmidt and Snow 2002; Malitch
2004) as well as in the geologically similar Beni Bousera
massif in Northern Morocco (Pearson et al. 2004). These
depletion events recorded in mantle rocks correspond to
the peaks of Nd model ages calculated for the crustal
basement of Hercynian Europe (Ben Othman et al. 1984;
Stosch and Lugmair 1984; Liew and Hofmann 1988;
Gilbert et al. 1994; Pin et al. 2002) and Northern Africa
(Polve 1983; Gasquet et al. 1992) (Fig. 6). The Prote-
rozoic Os model ages exhibited by sulfides in the Ronda
peridotites thus appear to correspond to different stages
of generation of the crustal mass of Gondwana, which
was later recycled in the Paleozoic. Interestingly, similar
mantle depletion ages recorded in osmium alloys provide
evidence for global episodes of generation of the Earth’s
continental crust at *1.2 and 1.9 Ga (Pearson et al.
2007).
326 Contrib Mineral Petrol (2010) 159:315–330
123
Conclusions
Re–Os in situ isotopic analyses of sulfides in the different
structural domains of the Ronda peridotite massif provide
insights into the geochemical behavior of this isotopic
system during partial melting and melt percolation induced
by asthenospherization of the subcontinental lithospheric
mantle. The Re–Os isotopic signature of sulfides in
peridotites at the recrystallization front and in the coarse-
granular domain mostly coincides with that in spinel tect-
onites. This implies that the Re–Os isotopic system in
sulfides was not significantly disturbed by a relatively
recent episode of partial melting and equilibration with
percolating melts. Only some sulfides in lherzolites at the
recrystallization front have unradiogenic Os isotopes cou-
pled with relatively high 187Re/188Os, which was probably
induced by recent Re enrichment related to the refertil-
ization reactions at the front. Thus, the Re–Os systematics
of the Ronda massif record an ancient, multistage mantle
evolution that was mostly unaffected by the Cenozoic
lithospheric thermal erosion. In particular, Re–Os isotopes
show that the Ronda peridotites experienced two melting
episodes in the Proterozoic, at *1.6 to 1.8 and *1.2 to
1.4 Ga, respectively. One of these events probably corre-
sponds to the emplacement of the massif into the subcon-
tinental lithospheric mantle. Metasomatic melts/fluids
invaded the mantle peridotites at *0.7 to 0.9 Ga and
precipitated a new generation of sulfides when the massif
was equilibrated at subsolidus conditions.
The Os model ages calculated for sulfides in the Ronda
peridotites coincide with similar results obtained for
several ultramafic bodies in Central/Western Europe and
Northern Africa as well as with Nd model ages of their
Hercynian crustal basement. This suggests that sulfides in
Ronda record different Proterozoic episodes of crustal
generation in the ancient Gondwana supercontinent.
The preservation of Proterozoic Os model ages in sul-
fides at the Ronda recrystallization front and in the coarse-
granular domain testifies to the capacity of the Re–Os
isotopic system to conserve the memory of ancient mag-
matic events (e.g. Shirey and Walker 1998; Carlson 2005;
Luguet et al. 2008). In particular, the persistence of the Os
isotopic signature of sulfides in an ‘‘asthenospherized’’
mantle domain that experienced relatively recent thermally
driven partial melting and recrystallization preserves the
geochemical imprint of a *2 Ga tectonic evolution.
Acknowledgments We thank Anders Meibom and an anonymous
reviewer for their constructive comments on the submitted version of
the manuscript. This study used instrumentation funded by Australian
Research Council LIEF and DEST Systemic Infrastructure Grants,
Macquarie University and Industry, and was supported by the Spanish
‘‘Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion’’ Grants BTE2006-1489,
PCI2006-A9-0580 and HF2008-0073, the Spanish Council for
Research (CSIC) Grant 2008-30I014, and the Junta de Andalucıa
research group RNM-131. C.M.’s research has been supported by a
postdoctoral fellowship from the Universidad de Granada (Spain) and
by a Marie Curie Intra European Fellowship within the Seventh
European Community Framework Programme. This is publication
number 603 from the GEMOC ARC National Key Centre
(http://www.es.mq.edu.au/GEMOC/).
References
Alard O, Griffin WL, Lorand J-P, Jackson SE, O’Reilly SY (2000)
Non-chondritic distribution of the highly siderophile elements in
mantle sulphides. Nature 407:891–894
Alard O, Griffin WL, Pearson NJ, Lorand J-P, O’Reilly SY (2002)
New insights into the Re-Os systematics of sub-continental
lithospheric mantle from in situ analysis of sulphides. Earth
Planet Sci Lett 203:651–663
Alard O, Luguet A, Pearson NJ, Griffin WL, Lorand J-P, Gannoun A,
Burton KV, O’Reilly SY (2005) In situ Os isotopes in abyssal
peridotites bridge the isotopic gap between MORBs and their
source mantle. Nature 436:1005–1008
Alt JC, Shanks WC, Bach W, Paulick H, Garrido CJ, Beaudoin G
(2007) Hydrothermal alteration and microbial sulfate reduction
in peridotite and gabbro exposed by detachment faulting at the
Mid-Atlantic Ridge, 15�200N (ODP Leg 209): a sulfur and
oxygen isotope study. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 8:Q08002.
doi:10.1029/2007GC001617
Bach W, Garrido CJ, Paulick H, Harvey J, Rosner M (2004)
Seawater–peridotite interactions: first insights from ODP Leg
209, MAR 15oN. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 5:Q09F26. doi:
10.1029/2004GC000744
Bach W, Paulick H, Garrido CJ, Ildefonse B, Meurer WP, Humphris
SE (2006) Unraveling the sequence of serpentinization reactions:
petrography, mineral chemistry, and petrophysics of serpenti-
nites from MAR 158 N (ODP Leg 209, Site 1274). Geophys Res
Lett 33:L13306. doi:10.1029/2006GL025681
Ballhaus C, Tredoux M, Spath A (2001) Phase relations in the Fe–Ni–
Cu–PGE–S System at magmatic temperature and application to
TRD OsRonda massif
TDM Ndcontinental crust
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
Rel
ativ
e pr
obab
ility
Model age (Ga)
Fig. 6 Cumulative probability plots of Os model ages (TRD) for
sulfides from the whole Ronda massif (black solid line) and Nd model
ages (TDM) for crustal rocks from Central/Western Europe and
Northern Africa (gray solid line). Whole-rock Nd isotopic data of
crustal rocks from Ben Othman et al. (1984), Stosch and Lugmair
(1984), Gasquet et al. (1992), Gilbert et al. (1994), and Pin et al.
(2002)
Contrib Mineral Petrol (2010) 159:315–330 327
123
massive sulphide ores of the Sudbury igneous complex. J Petrol
42:1911–1926
Barnes S-J, Cox RA, Zientek ML (2006) Platinum-group element,
Gold, Silver and Base Metal distribution in compositionally
zoned sulfide droplets from the Medvezky Creek Mine, Noril’sk,
Russia. Contrib Mineral Petrol 152:187–200
Batanova VG, Brugmann GE, Bazylev BA, Sobolev AV, Kamenetsky
VS, Hofmann AW (2008) Platinum-group element abundances
and Os isotope composition of mantle peridotites from the
Mamonia complex, Cyprus. Chem Geol 248:195–212
Ben Othman D, Fourcade S, Allegre CJ (1984) Recycling processes
in granite–granodiorite complex genesis: the Querigut case
studied by Nd–Sr isotope systematics. Earth Planet Sci Lett
69:290–300
Beyer EE, Griffin WL, O’Reilly S (2006) Transformation of
Archaean lithospheric mantle by refertilization: evidence from
exposed Peridotites in the Western Gneiss Region, Norway. J
Petrol 47:1611–1636
Bockrath C, Ballhaus C, Holzheid A (2004) Fractionation of the
Platinum-group elements during mantle melting. Science
305:1951–1953
Bodinier JL, Garrido CJ, Chanefo I, Bruguier O, Gervilla F (2008)
Origin of pyroxenite–peridotite veined mantle by refertilization
reactions: evidence from the Ronda peridotite (Southern Spain).
J Petrol 49:999–1025
Booth-Rea G, Ranero CR, Martınez-Martınez JM, Grevemeyer I
(2007) Crustal types and Tertiary tectonic evolution of the
Alboran sea, western Mediterranean. Geochem Geophys Geosyst
8:Q10005. doi:10.1029/2007GC001639
Brenan JM (2002) Re–Os fractionation in magmatic sulfide melt by
monosulfide solid solution. Earth Planet Sci Lett 199:257–268
Burnham OM, Rogers NW, Pearson DG, van Calsteren PW,
Hawkesworth C (1998) The petrogenesis of the eastern Pyrenean
peridotites: an integrated study of their whole-rock geochemistry
and Re–Os isotope composition. Geochim Cosmochim Acta
62:2293–2310
Burton KV, Schiano P, Birck J-L, Allegre CJ (1999) Osmium isotope
disequilibrium between mantle minerals in a spinel-lherzolite.
Earth Planet Sci Lett 172:311–322
Carlson RW (2005) Application of the Pt–Re–Os isotopic systems to
mantle geochemistry and geochronology. Lithos 82:249–272
Davies GR, Nixon PH, Pearson DG, Obata M (1993) Tectonic
implications of graphitized diamonds from the Ronda peridotite
massif, Southern Spain. Geology 21:471–474
Frei R, Gervilla F, Meibom A, Proenza JA, Garrido CJ (2006) Os
isotope heterogeneity of the upper mantle: evidence from the
Mayarı-Baracoa ophiolite belt in eastern Cuba. Earth Planet Sci
Lett 241:466–476
Frey FA, Suen CJ, Stockman HW (1985) The Ronda high temperature
peridotite: geochemistry and petrogenesis. Geochim Cosmochim
Acta 49:2469–2491
Garrido CJ, Bodinier J-L (1999) Diversity of Mafic rocks in the
Ronda Peridotite: evidence for pervasive melt-rock reaction
during heating of subcontinental lithosphere by upwelling
Asthenosphere. J Petrol 40:729–754
Garrido CJ, Bodinier J-L, Alard O (2000) Incompatible trace element
partitioning and residence in anhydrous spinel peridotites and
websterites from the Ronda orogenic peridotite. Earth Planet Sci
Lett 181:341–358
Gasquet D, Leterrier J, Mrini Z, Vidal P (1992) Petrogenesis of the
Hercynian Tichka plutonic complex (Western High Atlas,
Morocco): trace element and Rb–Sr and Sm–Nd isotopic
constraints. Earth Planet Sci Lett 108:29–44
Gilbert JS, Bickle MJ, Chapman HJ (1994) The origin of Pyrenean
Hercynian volcanic rocks (France–Spain): REE and Sm–Nd
isotope constraints. Chem Geol 111:207–226
Griffin WL, Spetius ZV, Pearson NJ, O’Reilly SY (2002) In situ Re–
Os analysis of sulfide inclusions in kimberlitic olivine: new
constraints on depletion events in the Siberian lithospheric
mantle. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 3(11). doi:10.1029/
2001GC000287
Griffin WL, Graham S, O’Reilly SY, Pearson NJ (2004) Lithosphere
evolution beneath the Kaapvaal Craton: Re–Os systematics of
sulfides in mantle-derived peridotites. Chem Geol 208:89–118
Gueddari K, Piboule M, Amosse J (1996) Differentiation of platinum-
group elements (PGE) and of gold during partial melting of
peridotites in the lherzolitic massifs of the Betico-Rifean range
(Ronda and Beni Bousera). Chem Geol 134:181–197
Hirata T, Hattori M, Tanaka T (1998) In situ osmium isotope ratio
analyses of iridosmines by laser ablation-multiple collector-
inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Chem Geol
144:269–280
Lambert DD, Foster JG, Frick L, Ripley EM (1999) Re–Os isotope
geochemistry of magmatic sulfide ore systems. Rev Econ Geol
12:29–58
Lenoir X, Garrido CJ, Bodinier J-L, Dautria J-M, Gervilla F (2001)
The recrystallization front of the Ronda Peridotite: evidence for
melting and thermal erosion of subcontinental lithospheric
mantle beneath the Alboran Basin. J Petrol 42:141–158
Liew TC, Hofmann AW (1988) Precambrian crustal components,
plutonic associations, plate environment of the Hercynian Fold
Belt of Central Europe: indications from a Nd and Sr isotopic
study. Contrib Mineral Petrol 98:129–138
Lorand J-P (1985) The behaviour of the upper mantle sulfide
component during the incipient serpentinization of ‘‘alpine-type’’
peridotites as exemplified by the Beni Bousera (Northern
Morocco) and Ronda (Southern Spain) ultramafic bodies.
Tschermak’s Mineral Petrogr Mitt 34:183–209
Lorand J-P, Alard O (2001) Platinum-group element abundances in
the upper mantle: new constraints from in situ and whole-rockanalyses of Massif Central xenoliths (France). Geochim Cos-
mochim Acta 65:2789–2806
Lorand J-P, Gregoire M (2006) Petrogenesis of base metal sulphide
assemblages of some peridotites from the Kaapvaal craton
(South Africa). Contrib Mineral Petrol 151:521–538
Lorand J-P, Schmidt G, Palme H, Kratz K-L (2000) Highly
siderophile element geochemistry of the Earth’s mantle: new
data for the Lanzo (Italy) and Ronda (Spain) orogenic peridotite
bodies. Lithos 53:149–164
Lorand J-P, Luguet A, Alard O, Bezos A, Meisel T (2008) Abundance
and distribution of platinum-group elements in orogenic lherz-
olites; a case study in a Fontete Rouge lherzolite (French
Pyrenees). Chem Geol 248:174–194
Luguet A, Alard O, Lorand J-P, Pearson NJ, Ryan C, O’Reilly SY
(2001) Laser-ablation microprobe (LAM)-ICPMS unravels the
highly siderophile element geochemistry of the oceanic mantle.
Earth Planet Sci Lett 189:285–294
Luguet A, Lorand J-P, Seyler M (2003) Sulfide petrology and highly
siderophile element geochemistry of abyssal peridotites: a
coupled study of samples from the Kane Fracture Zone (45�W
23�20 N, MARK Area, Atlantic Ocean). Geochim Cosmochim
Acta 67:1553–1570
Luguet A, Lorand J-P, Alard O, Cottin J-Y (2004) A multi-technique
study of platinum group element systematic in some Ligurian
ophiolitic peridotites, Italy. Chem Geol 208:175–194
Luguet A, Shirey SB, Lorand J-P, Horan MF, Carlson RW (2007)
Residual platinum-group minerals from highly depleted harz-
burgites of the Lherz massif (France) and their role in HSE
fractionation of the mantle. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 71:3082–
3097
Luguet A, Pearson DG, Selby D, Brenan J, Meisel T (2008) Highly
siderophile element geochemistry. Chem Geol 248:115–118
328 Contrib Mineral Petrol (2010) 159:315–330
123
Malitch K (2004) Osmium isotope constraints on contrasting sources
and prolonged melting in the Proterozoic upper mantle: evidence
from ophiolitic Ru–Os sulfides and Ru–Os–Ir alloys. Chem Geol
208:157–173
Mavrogenes JA, O’Neill HSC (1999) The relative effects of pressure,
temperature and oxygen fugacity on the solubility of sulfide in
mafic magmas. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 63:1173–1180
Meibom A, Sleep NH, Page Chamberlain C, Coleman RG, Frei R,
Hren MT, Wooden JL (2002) Re–Os isotopic evidence for long-
lived heterogeneity and equilibration processes in the Earth’s
upper mantle. Nature 419:705–708
Meisel T, Biino GG, Nagler TF (1996) Re–Os, Sm–Nd, and rare earth
element evidence for Proterozoic oceanic and possible subcon-
tinental lithosphere in tectonized ultramafic lenses from the
Swiss Alps. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 60:2583–2593
Meisel T, Melcher F, Tomascak P, Dingeldey C, Koller F (1997) Re–
Os isotopes in orogenic peridotite massifs in the Eastern Alps,
Austria. Chem Geol 143:217–229
Meisel T, Walker RJ, Irving AJ, Lorand J-P (2001) Osmium isotopic
compositions of mantle xenoliths: a global perspective. Geochim
Cosmochim Acta 65:1311–1323
Nowell GM, Pearson DG, Parman SW, Luguet A, Hanski E (2008)
Precise and accurate 186Os/188Os and 187Os/188Os measurements
by multi-collector plasma ionisation mass spectrometry, part II:
laser ablation and its application to single-grain Pt–Os and Re–
Os geochronology. Chem Geol 248:394–426
Obata M (1980) The Ronda Peridotite: Garnet-, Spinel-, and
Plagioclase-Lherzolite Facies and the P–T trajectories of a
high-temperature mantle intrusion. J Petrol 21:533–572
Pearson NJ, Alard O, Griffin WL, Jackson SE, O’Reilly SY (2002) In
situ measurement of Re–Os isotopes in mantle sulfides by laser
ablation multicollector-inductively coupled plasma mass spec-
trometry: analytical methods and preliminary results. Geochim
Cosmochim Acta 66:1037–1050
Pearson DG, Irvine GJ, Ionov DA, Boyd FR, Dreibus GE (2004) Re–
Os isotope systematics and platinum group element fractionation
during mantle melt extraction: a study of massif and xenolith
peridotite suites. Chem Geol 208:29–59
Pearson DG, Parman SW, Nowell GM (2007) A link between large
mantle melting events and continent growth seen in osmium
isotopes. Nature 449:202–205
Pin C, Linan E, Pascual E, Donaire T, Valenzuela A (2002) Late
Neoproterozoic crustal growth in the European Variscides: Nd
isotope and geochemical evidence from the Sierra de Cordoba
Andesites (Ossa-Morena Zone, Southern Spain). Tectonophysics
352:133–151
Platt JP, Vissers RLM (1989) Extensional collapse of thickened
continental lithosphere: a working hypothesis for the Alboran
Sea and Gibraltar Arc. Geology 17:540–543
Platt JP, Soto JI, Whitehouse MJ, Hurford AJ, Kelley SP (1998)
Thermal evolution, rate of exhumation, and tectonic significance
of metamorphic rocks from the floor of the Alboran extensional
basin, western Mediterranean. Tectonics 17:671–689
Platt JP, Whitehouse MJ, Kelley SP, Carter A, Hollick L (2003)
Simultaneous extensional exhumation across the Alboran Basin:
implications for the causes of late orogenic extension. Geology
31:251–254
Polve M (1983) Les isotopes du Nd et du Sr dans les lherzolites
orogeniques: Contribution a la determination de la structure et de
la dynamique du manteau superieur. Ph.D. thesis. Universite
Paris VII
Precigout J, Gueydan F, Gapais D, Garrido CJ, Essaifi A (2007) Strain
localisation in the subcontinental mantle—a ductile alternative to
the brittle mantle. Tectonophysics 445:318–336
Rehkamper M, Halliday AN, Alt J, Fitton JG, Zipfel J, Takazawa E
(1999) Non-chondritic platinum-group element ratios in oceanic
mantle lithosphere: petrogenetic signature of melt percolation?
Earth Planet Sci Lett 172:65–81
Reisberg L, Lorand J-P (1995) Longevity of sub-continental mantle
lithosphere from osmium isotope systematics in orogenic
peridotite massifs. Nature 376:159–162
Reisberg L, Zindler A, Jagoutz E (1989) Further Sr and Nd isotopic
results from peridotites of the Ronda Ultramafic Complex. Earth
Planet Sci Lett 96:161–180
Reisberg LC, Allegre CJ, Luck J-M (1991) The Re–Os systematics of
the Ronda Ultramafic Complex of Southern Spain. Earth Planet
Sci Lett 105:196–213
Reisberg L, Zhi X, Lorand J-P, Wagner C, Peng Z, Zimmermann C
(2005) Re–Os and S systematics of spinel peridotite xenoliths
from east Central China: evidence for contrasting effects of melt
percolation. Earth Planet Sci Lett 239:286–308
Sambridge M, Lambert DD (1997) Propagating errors in decay
equations: examples from the Re–Os isotopic system. Geochim
Cosmochim Acta 61:3019–3024
Sanchez-Rodrıguez L, Gebauer D (2000) Mesozoic formation of
pyroxenites and gabbros in the Ronda area (southern Spain),
followed by Early Miocene subduction metamorphism and
emplacement into the middle crust: U–Pb sensitive high-resolu-
tion ion microprobe dating of zircon. Tectonophysics 316:19–44
Schilling ME, Carlson RW, Viera Conceicao R, Dantas C, Bertotto
GW, Koester E (2008) Re–Os isotope constraints on subconti-
nental lithospheric mantle evolution of South America. Earth
Planet Sci Lett 268:89–101
Schmidt G, Snow J (2002) Os isotopes in mantle xenoliths from the
Eifel volcanic field and the Vogelsberg (Germany): age
constraints on the lithospheric mantle. Contrib Mineral Petrol
143:694–705
Shirey SB, Walker RJ (1998) The Re–Os isotope system in
cosmochemistry and high-temperature geochemistry. Annu Rev
Earth Planet Sci 26:423–500
Snow JE, Reisberg L (1995) Os isotopic systematics of the MORB
mantle: results from altered abyssal peridotites. Earth Planet Sci
Lett 133:411–421
Snow JE, Schmidt G (1998) Constraints on Earth accretion deduced
from noble metals in the oceanic mantle. Nature 391:166–169
Snow JE, Schmidt G, Rampone E (2000) Os isotopes and highly
siderophile elements (HSE) in the Ligurian ophiolites, Italy.
Earth Planet Sci Lett 175:119–132
Soto JI, Platt JP (1999) Petrological and structural evolution of high-
grade metamorphic rocks from the floor of the Alboran Sea
Basin, Western Mediterranean. J Petrol 40:21–60
Soustelle V, Tommasi A, Bodinier J-L, Garrido CJ, Vauchez A
(2009) Deformation and reactive melt transport in the mantle
lithosphere above a large-scale partial melting domain: the
Ronda peridotite massif, Southern Spain. J Petrol 50:1235–1266.
doi:10.1093/petrology/egp032
Stosch HG, Lugmair GW (1984) Evolution of the lower continental
crust: granulite facies xenoliths from the Eifel, West Germany.
Nature 311:368–370
Sun S-S, McDonough WF (1989) Chemical and isotopic systematics
of oceanic basalts: implications for mantle composition and
processes. Geol Soc Spec Publ 42:313–345
Sun W, Bennett VC, Kamenetsky VS (2003) Enhanced mantle-to-
crust rhenium transfer in undegassed arc magmas. Nature
422:294–297
Sun W, Bennett VC, Kamenetsky VS (2004) The mechanism of Re
enrichment in arc magmas: evidence from Lau Basin basaltic
glasses and primitive melt inclusions. Earth Planet Sci Lett
222:101–114
Van der Wal D, Bodinier J-L (1996) Origin of the recrystallisation
front in the Ronda peridotite by km-scale pervasive porous melt
flow. Contrib Mineral Petrol 122:387–405
Contrib Mineral Petrol (2010) 159:315–330 329
123
Van der Wal D, Vissers RLM (1993) Uplift and emplacement of
upper-mantle rocks in the western Mediterranean. Geology
21:1119–1122
Van der Wal D, Vissers RLM (1996) Structural petrology of the Ronda
Peridotite, SW Spain: deformation history. J Petrol 37:23–43
Vauchez A, Garrido CJ (2001) Seismic properties of an asthenosph-
erized lithospheric mantle: constraints from lattice preferred
orientations in peridotite from the Ronda massif. Earth Planet Sci
Lett 192:235–249
Vissers RLM, Platt JP, van der Wal D (1995) Late orogenic extension
of the Betic Cordillera and the Alboran Domain: a lithospheric
view. Tectonics 14:786–803
Walker RJ, Carlson RW, Shirey SB, Boyd FR (1989) Os, Sr, Nd, and
Pb isotope systematics of southern African peridotite xenoliths:
implications for the chemical evolution of subcontinental mantle.
Geochim Cosmochim Acta 53:1583–1595
Zeck HP, Whitehouse MJ (1999) Hercynian, Pan-African, Proterozoic
and Archean ion-microprobe zircon ages for a Betic-Rif core
complex, Alpine belt, W Mediterranean—consequences for its
P–T–t path. Contrib Mineral Petrol 134:134–149
Zeck HP, Williams IS (2001) Hercynian metamorphism in Nappe
Core Complexes of the Alpine Betic–Rif Belt, Western Medi-
terranean—a SHRIMP Zircon study. J Petrol 42:1373–1385
330 Contrib Mineral Petrol (2010) 159:315–330
123