Passive, 2-Stage Biofilter Treatment Systems for Reduction of ...

37
PD-Sw205w 1 PD-Sw205w 1 FOSNRS 2: Passive, 2-Stage Biofilter Treatment Systems for Reduction of Nitrogen from OWS – Pilot Study Results April 7, 2014 Josefin Hirst, P.E. The Florida Onsite Sewage Nitrogen Reduction Strategies (FOSNRS) Project SSSA Onsite Wastewater Conference April 7-8, 2014 Hazen and Sawyer, P.C.

Transcript of Passive, 2-Stage Biofilter Treatment Systems for Reduction of ...

PD-S

w20

5w

1

PD-S

w20

5w

1

FOSNRS 2: Passive, 2-Stage BiofilterTreatment Systems for Reduction of Nitrogen from OWS – Pilot Study ResultsApril 7, 2014Josefin Hirst, P.E.

The Florida Onsite Sewage Nitrogen Reduction Strategies (FOSNRS) Project

SSSA Onsite Wastewater ConferenceApril 7-8, 2014

Hazen and Sawyer, P.C.

PD-S

w20

5w

2

Presentation overview

■ FOSNRS Task A: Nitrogen treatment and reduction options for Florida

■ Pilot test results■ Summary■ Questions and answers

PD-S

w20

5w

3

PD-S

w20

5w

3

FOSNRS Task A: Nitrogen treatment and reduction options for Florida

PD-S

w20

5w

4

Review of biological nitrogen reduction for onsite wastewater treatment

Primary Treatment

Mineralization of organic Nto

ammonia (NH4)

Nitrification

Ammonia oxidized to nitrate (NO3)

by nitrifying bacteria, requires oxygen

Denitrification

Nitrate converted to N2 gas by denitrifying bacteria in

anoxic environment; requires supply of electron donor

Dispersal

Effluent discharge to thesoil or landscape for final treatment

PD-S

w20

5w

5

What are “Passive” nitrogen reduction systems (PNRS)?

■ Most current N-reducing onsite systems are mechanical treatment units, with pumps, blowers, controls

■ Passive definition for this project: Passive nitrogen reduction systems (PNRS) are OSTDS that reduce effluent N using reactive media for denitrification and a single liquid pump, if necessary.

■ Earlier work showed feasibility of bench-scale “passive” two stage biofiltration concepts (Smith et. al., 2008)

Treatment MediaEffluent TN

(mg/L)TN

Reduction (%)Zeolite & Sulfur Media 2.2 97Expanded Clay & Sulfur 2.6 96.2

PD-S

w20

5w

6

Task A was designed to further the concepts developed in previous work

■ Developed detailed performance data for passive biofiltration designs with various media configurations

■ Produced scalable design criteria from pilot scale biofilters for subsequent full-scale testing

■ Evaluated single pass and recirculating stage 1 biofilters

■ Evaluated twenty-two biofilters consisting of nine unsaturated Stage 1 biofilters, nine saturated Stage 2 biofilters, and four vertically stacked biofilter designs.

PD-S

w20

5w

7

A unique pilot facility was constructed at UF research center

■ University of Florida, Institute for Food & Agricultural Sciences (IFAS)

■ 475 acres of land in SE Hillsborough County

■ Facility conducts agricultural research & trials for vegetables, fruit and ornamental plants

■ Experts in soil and water science onsite

Source: http://gcrec.ifas.ufl.edu/

PD-S

w20

5w

8

Test facility included numerous treatment trains

■ All used two-stage biofilters:● Stage 1 Nitrification● Stage 2 Denitrification

■ Stage 1 unsaturated filters included 2 media layers and evaluated 15” and 30” media depths

■ We also evaluated single pass and recirculating stage 1 biofilters

■ For denitrification, we evaluated both lignocellulosic and sulfur denitrification biofilters

PD-S

w20

5w

9

Various nitrification media were studied

Zeo-Pure clinoptilolite Expanded polystyrene

Examples of Stage 1 Media

Expanded clayTorpedo sand

PD-S

w20

5w

10

Various denitrification media were also studied

Elemental Sulfur

Lignocellulosics

Examples of Stage 2 Media

Oyster shell (alkalinity amendment)

PD-S

w20

5w

11

PNRS test facility construction

Setting up tanks

Mixing Media Batches

Gravel Underdrain

PD-S

w20

5w

12

Placing media in tanks

PD-S

w20

5w

13

Two stage single pass biofilters

Stage 1 HLR 3 gal/d-ft2

Stage 2 HLR 5.6 gal/d-ft2

PD-S

w20

5w

14

We tested five trains of two-stage single pass treatment units

PD-S

w20

5w

15

Two-stage single pass biofilters

Stage 1 Unsaturated Biofilters - Nitrification

Stage 2 Saturated Upflow Biofilters - Denitrification

PD-S

w20

5w

16

Stage 1 recirculating biofilters schematic

Nitrified EffluentHolding Tank

Stage 1 HLR 3 gal/d-ft2

Recycle Ratio 3:1

Stage 1

PD-S

w20

5w

17

Horizontal stage 2 biofilters schematic

Peristaltic Pump

Sample Ports

Nitrified Effluent

Nitrified Effluent

Stage 2 HLR 10 gal/d-ft2

PD-S

w20

5w

18

Four recirculating stage 1 trains were followed by four stage 2 horizontal biofilters

PD-S

w20

5w

19

Stage 1 recirculating biofilters & Stage 2 horizontal saturated biofilters

Stage 2 Saturated Biofilters - Denitrification

Stage 1 Unsaturated Biofilters -Nitrification

Pump Tank

Nitrified Effluent

Pump Tank

PD-S

w20

5w

20

PD-S

w20

5w

20

Pilot test results

PD-S

w20

5w

21

PNRS pilot testing influent STE quality

cBOD5 TSS TN TKN NH3‐NTotal 

Alkalinity

Septic ta

nk efflue

nt (STE) n 10 10 9 10 9 9

mean 66.8 90.9 55.5 55.8 46.3 332

std. dev. 27.0 136.1 19.9 18.8 19.1 87

min 22 15 30 30 20 210

max 94 467 80 80 67 430

PD-S

w20

5w

22

Stage 1 nitrification biofilters mean effluent values

Biofilter cBOD5 TSS TN TKN NH3‐N (NO3+NO2)

Single Pass

XCLAY – 15” 2.0 1.2 44.7 3.5 0.510 41.2

XCLAY – 30” 2.0 1.5 42.5 3.4 0.417 39.1

CLINO – 15” 2.0 2.2 41.0 3.1 0.012 37.9

CLINO – 30” 2.0 1.3 44.5 3.3 0.020 41.2

Recirculating

SAND – 30” 2.2 4.0 30.8 2.9 0.255 28.0

XCLAY – 30” 2.0 2.2 34.5 2.4 0.015 32.1

CLINO – 15” 2.2 2.3 35.3 2.6 0.010 32.7

CLINO – 30” 2.0 2.5 33.0 4.0 0.010 29.0

PD-S

w20

5w

23

Stage 1 single pass biofilters nitrogen time series

Single Pass Expanded Clay: 30 inch depth Single Pass Clinoptilolite: 30 inch depth

CLINO – 30”XCLAY – 30”

PD-S

w20

5w

24

Recirculating Expanded Clay: 30 inch depth

Stage 1 recirculating biofilters nitrogen time series

CLINO – 30”XCLAY – 30”

Recirculating Clinoptilolite: 30 inch depth

PD-S

w20

5w

25

UNSAT-EC1

UNSAT-EC3

UNSAT-CL1

UNSAT-CL3

UNSAT-CL5

UNSAT-SA2

UNSAT-EC4

UNSAT-CL2

UNSAT-CL4

Nitr

ate

& N

itrite

Nitr

ogen

, mg/

L

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

Quartiles: shaded boxMedian: solid lineMean: dotted line

_

_

UNSAT-EC1

UNSAT-EC3

UNSAT-CL1

UNSAT-CL3

UNSAT-CL5

UNSAT-SA2

UNSAT-EC4

UNSAT-CL2

UNSAT-CL4

Amm

onia

Nitr

ogen

, mg/

L

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

1.1

1.2

1.3

1.4

1.5

Quartiles: shaded boxMedian: solid lineMean: dotted line

_

_

Stage 1 nitrification biofilters effluentnitrogen box and whisker plots

Single Pass Recirculating Single Pass Recirculating

Am

mon

ia N

itrog

en, m

g N

/L

Nitr

ate

& N

itrite

Nitr

ogen

, mg

N/L

PD-S

w20

5w

26

Stage 2 denitrification biofilters mean effluent values

Biofilter C‐BOD5 TSS TN TKN NH3‐N (NO3+NO2)

Upflow

SULFUR‐30% 2.0 2.8 1.3 1.2 0.32 0.075

LIGNO‐50% 61.0 1.5 8.3 2.2 0.87 6.18

SULFUR‐80% 6.0 6.2 2.6 2.6 1.14 0.047

LIGNO‐25% 2.0 3.0 17.3 3.1 0.62 14.2

LIGNO‐30% 4.5 7.5 5.9 5.6 4.71 0.22

Horizon

tal

SULFUR‐80% 13.3 1.5 2.5 2.4 1.35 0.11

SULFUR‐30% 8.5 3.5 1.6 1.6 0.58 0.035

LIGNO‐50% 89.5 13.0 10.0 10.0 0.27 0.020

GLYCEROL 10 2.5 3.8 3.8 3.12 0.07

PD-S

w20

5w

27

Stage 2 upflow single pass biofilters nitrogen time series

SULFUR-80%LIGNO-50%

PD-S

w20

5w

28

Stage 2 horizontal biofilters nitrogen time series

SULFUR-80%LIGNO-50%

PD-S

w20

5w

29

DENIT-SU4

DENIT-LS3DENIT-S

U3DENIT-LS2DENIT-LS4DENIT-S

U1DENIT-S

U2DENIT-LS1DENIT-G

L1

Nitr

ate

& N

itrite

Nitr

ogen

, mg/

L

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

DENIT-SU4

DENIT-LS3DENIT-S

U3DENIT-LS2DENIT-LS4DENIT-S

U1DENIT-S

U2DENIT-LS1DENIT-G

L1

Tota

l Nitr

ogen

, mg/

L

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

22

24

26

28Quartiles: shaded boxMedian: solid lineMean: dotted line

Stage 2 denitrification biofilters effluentnitrogen box and whisker plots

Mean = 14.2

Upflow HorizontalUpflow Horizontal

Nitr

ate

& N

itrite

Nitr

ogen

, mg

N/L

Tota

l Nitr

ogen

, mg

N/L

PD-S

w20

5w

30

Single pass systemstotal nitrogen removal

SULFURLIGNOCELLULOSIC

PD-S

w20

5w

31

Recirculating systemstotal nitrogen removal

SULFURLIGNOCELLULOSIC

PD-S

w20

5w

32

Vertical sampler profile in Upflow biofilterslignocellulosic issues

PD-S

w20

5w

33

Lignocellulosic biofilters hydraulic retention time issues

PD-S

w20

5w

34

Solute profile in sulfur upflow biofiltersulfate production vs nitrate reduction

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

01020304050607080

0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24

Sulfa

te, m

g/L

NOX‐N, m

g/L

Distance from Inlet, inches

SULFUR BIOFILTER

NOX‐N, DAY 107 NOX‐N, DAY 242 NOX‐N, DAY 305

SULFATE, DAY 107 SULFATE, DAY 242 SULFATE, DAY 305

PD-S

w20

5w

35

Single pass vs recirculating biofilters: sulfate

PD-S

w20

5w

36

Lessons learned from pilot test

■ Encouraging results from pilot PNRS; several system configurations capable of > 95% N reduction

■ Sulfate production vs nitrate reduction

■ Highly reactive elemental sulfur media

■ Lignocellulosic retention time issues

■ Recommended evaluation of combination lignocellulosic and elemental sulfur denitrification systems for full-scale treatment units

PD-S

w20

5w

37

PD-S

w20

5w

37

Questions?Josefin Edeback-Hirst, P.E.Hazen and Sawyer, P.C.10002 Princess Palm Avenue, Suite 200Tampa, FL [email protected]