Paper wave UKM
-
Upload
terengganu -
Category
Documents
-
view
1 -
download
0
Transcript of Paper wave UKM
1
Wave climate simulation for southern region of the South China Sea 2
3
by 4
5
6
Ali Mirazei, Fredolin Tangang, Liew Juneng, Muzneena Ahmad Mustapha, Research Centre for 7
Tropical Climate Change System (IKLIM), Faculty of Science and Technology, National University of 8
Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia 9
10
Mohd Lokman Husain, Mohd Fadzil Akhir, Institute of Oceanography and Environment, Universiti 11
Malaysia Terengganu, Kuala Terengganu, Malaysia 12
13
Corresponding Author: Fredolin Tangang, Research Centre for Tropical Climate Change System 14
(IKLIM), Faculty of Science and Technology, National University of Malaysia, 43000 Bangi, Selangor, 15
Malaysia ([email protected]).
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Abstract 24
25
This study investigates long-term variability and wave characteristic trends in the southern region of 26
the South China Sea (SCS). We implemented the state-of-the art WAVEWATCH III spectral wave 27
model to simulate a 31-year wave hindcast. The simulation results were used to assess the inter-annual 28
variability and long-term changes in the SCS wave climate for the period 1979 to 2009. The model was 29
forced with Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR) winds and validated against altimeter data 30
and limited available measurements from an Acoustic Wave and Current (AWAC) recorder located 31
offshore of Terengganu, Malaysia. The mean annual significant wave height and peak wave period 32
indicate the occurrence of higher wave heights and wave periods in the central SCS and lower in the 33
Sunda shelf region. Consistent with wind patterns, the wave direction also shows southeasterly 34
(northwesterly) waves during the summer (winter) monsoon. This detailed hindcast demonstrates 35
strong inter-annual variability of wave heights, especially during the winter months in the SCS. 36
Significant wave height correlated negatively with Niño3.4 index during winter, spring and autumn 37
seasons but became positive in the summer monsoon. Such correlations correspond well with surface 38
wind anomalies over the SCS during El Nino events. During El Niño Modoki, the summer time 39
positive correlation extends northeastwards to cover the entire domain. Although significant positive 40
trends were found at 95% confidence levels during May, July and September, there is significant 41
negative trend in December covering the Sunda shelf region; however, the trend appears to be largely 42
influenced by large El Niño signals. 43
44
Keywords: South China Sea, WAVEWATCH IIITM
, significant wave height, Niño3.4, El Niño Modoki. 45
46
1 Introduction 47
48
Climate change is recognised as a major environmental issue influencing natural and human 49
systems. Coastal areas are most affected by a range of hazards connected with climate change, such as 50
increasing inundation due to storms and sea level rise resulting in coastal erosion. Moreover, increased 51
storminess changes the characteristics of waves. Surface ocean waves are formed when winds blow 52
across the water surface transferring their energy to the water. As surface winds over the ocean might 53
be changing both in strength and patterns due to climate change, ocean waves could be affected by 54
anthropogenic forcing of the climate system [Wang et al., 2004]. Ocean wave and storm surge 55
characteristics of the future climate are also expected to be different from that of the present [Mori et 56
al., 2010]. In assessing the impact of changes in waves on coastal and offshore environments, it is 57
crucial to understand the spatial and temporal variability of the wave climate. Long-term changes in 58
wave characteristics can modify the profile of the coast and the shape of sandy beaches through 59
changes in nearshore circulation and sediment transport characteristics [Wright et al., 1991; Bosserelle 60
et al., 2012]. Understanding the present wave climate is important in the context of assessing the long-61
term and future changes of waves associated with anthropogenic forcing. Recent studies on several 62
climate change scenarios suggested shifts of storm tracks and an increase of storm frequency and 63
hence, changes in the wave characteristics [IPCC, 2007]. Moreover, investigating the present wave 64
climate would provide valuable information on the possible impact of waves to coastal zones, such as 65
coastal flooding, inundation and erosion. 66
67
A combination of data analysis, including statistical and numerical modelling has been 68
employed to assess the present wave climate. In this study, a numerical wave model was used to 69
understand the long-term changes and spatial variability of waves in the southern region of the South 70
China Sea (SCS). A number of studies have employed numerical wave models to simulate ocean 71
surface wave characteristics in coastal areas with emphasis on long-term extreme wave climate impacts 72
[Lionello and Sanna, 2005; Music and Nickovic, 2008; Panchang et al., 2008; Cuchiara et al., 2009; 73
Hemer et al., 2010]. Swail et al. [1999] used a global spectral ocean wave model for two long-term (40 74
years) wave hindcasts to analyse the trends and variability of changes in waves. Regionally, Bosserelle 75
et al. [2012] implemented a third generation spectral wave model (WAVEWATCH III) with a 40-year 76
simulation to quantify the inter-annual variability and longer-term changes in the wave climate around 77
Western Australia. In other investigations, numerical wave models have been used to predict the future 78
wave climate under various global warming emission scenarios [Wang et al., 2004; Wang and Swail, 79
2006; Kriezi and Broman, 2008; Mori et al., 2010; Brown et al., 2012; Zacharioudaki et al., 2011]. 80
81
The SCS is a semi-enclosed marginal sea located in the western Pacific and covers an area from 82
the Malacca Straits including Singapore, to the Straits of Taiwan (Fig. 1). Monsoon winds and synoptic 83
systems, such as fronts and tropical cyclones dominate the SCS weather and climate [Chu et al., 1999; 84
Chu et al., 2000]. The SCS is an important natural resource for the surrounding nations in terms of: oil 85
and gas production, tourism and recreation, commerce, navigation and fisheries [Salahuddin and 86
Curtis, 2011]. However, the information on potential long-term changes of wave properties in the SCS 87
is fragmented and incomplete. It appears that long-term wave characteristics in the SCS have not been 88
recorded systematically. The number of studies on waves and their characteristics are limited and only 89
cover a short period of time [Qi et al., 2010; Chu et al., 2004; Chunxia et al., 2008; Jiang et al., 2010]. 90
As climate change is becoming more imminent, there is a need to assess the future wave climate in the 91
SCS under various greenhouse gasses emission scenarios and thus, the basis for such as assessment is 92
the understanding of the present wave climate. This research seeks to quantify the changes in wave 93
climate and variability in the southern extent of the SCS over the past 31 years. 94
95
The rest of this paper is organised as follows: The data set and methodology used in this study 96
and the model setup and validation are all described in Section 2. The results, followed by a detailed 97
discussion, are given in Section 3 and Section 4 concludes the paper. 98
99
2 Data and Method 100
101
2.1 Atmospheric data 102
103
Reliable and accurate global high-resolution (both temporally and spatially) surface wind data 104
are crucial for driving ocean wave models. The availability of such data is limited and restricted to only 105
small regions that have comprehensive marine observation networks. However, there are several 106
reanalysis wind products available, including those of the National Centres for Environmental 107
Prediction (NCEP) and the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF). Climate 108
Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR) is an NCEP product based on a high-resolution global coupled 109
atmosphere-ocean-land surface-sea ice system with a resolution of ~38 km (T382) and temporal 110
coverage of 31 years from 1979 to 2009 [Saha et al., 2010]. The CFSR data are a blended product of 111
conventional and satellite observations and available at an hourly time resolution in tropical regions. A 112
comparison with the QuickSCAT climatology for a period between September 1999 to October 2009 113
indicated smaller errors for the CFSR compared with the NCEP/NCAR reanalysis (R1) and 114
NCEP/DOE reanalysis (R2) [Xue et al., 2010]. 115
116
2.2 Wave model setup 117
118
This study employs WAVEWATCH IIITM
(WW3), which is an operational third generation 119
wave model from NCEP/NOAA [Tolman, 2002 2009]. WW3 has been widely validated against global 120
network buoys and altimeter data [Tolman, 2002; Bidlot et al., 2007; Hanson et al., 2009; Chawla et al., 121
2009]. The main physics of WW3 is mostly based on the WAM model [WAMDI group, 1988] but 122
subsequent improvement on its physics for shallow waters increases the model’s ability to simulate 123
shallow water processes, such as refraction and shoaling. In areas where the swell is generated nearby, 124
WW3 captures the wave height variability better than WAM [Padilla-Hernadez et al., 2004; NCEP, 125
2006]. WW3 also uses sub-grids to better resolve islands in the simulation for improved estimation of 126
refraction and wave energy reduction due to depth-induced breaking and obstructions blocking 127
[Tolman, 2009]. 128
129
A multi-grid WW3, which is a mosaic of grids with two-way exchange of information, was 130
implemented to simulate the wave characteristics in the southern SCS (Fig. 1) from 1979 to 2009. The 131
outer computational domain M1, covers the entire SCS and parts of the adjacent seas from 90° to 145° 132
E and 10° S to 45° N with 0.3 × 0.3° spatial grid resolution. Two nested domains of M2 and M3 with 133
computational grids of medium (0.25 × 0.25°) and fine (0.15 × 0.15°) resolutions, respectively, are 134
embedded within M1 to assess wave parameters approaching the southern extent of the SCS coastlines. 135
The use of high spatial resolution (e.g., M3 at 0.15° resolution) is expected to resolve well the 136
underlying bathymetry for the M3 domain, which is large enough to also properly account for the swell 137
components. 138
139
To better resolve the islands and shoals in the computation, the three computational grids are 140
embedded with an obstacle grid that is generated as described by Chawla and Tolman [2007]. The 141
bathymetric data was obtained from the ETOPO2 (NGDC, 2006) at 2-minute resolution (≈0.033°) (Fig. 142
1). The WW3 model automatically interpolates the forcing data in both space and time using a 143
quadratic scheme proportional to every grid resolution. As the SCS is located in a tropical area, no ice 144
coverage is used in the computation. 145
146
Different configurations of the model were examined to produce wave parameters. For input 147
and dissipation, the Tolman-Chalikov (TC) parameterisation was used because it performed better than 148
WAM4 in simulating wave parameters for the SCS [Tolman, 2009]. The TC approach also reduces 149
computation time. Additionally, all domains were set based on shallow water physics with default 150
values. 151
152
2.3 Model validation 153
154
The results of the WW3 model were validated with satellite altimeter data and limited three-155
month Acoustic Wave and Current (AWAC) directional wave data recorded nearshore at Terengganu 156
(102.92° E and 5.5° N) (Fig. 2a). The AWAC wave measurements are available in two-hourly intervals 157
covering a period from Jan-Apr 2009 and were provided by the Institute of Oceanography and 158
Environment (INOS), University Malaysia, Terengganu. The TOPEX/Poseidon (1992 to 2005) and 159
JASON (2005 to present) data for the SCS were obtained from the French Research Institute for 160
Exploration of the Sea (Ifremer). Figure 2b shows the sixteen satellite tracks considered in this study. 161
The altimeter data are available in high-resolution and are averaged every 5 records along each track 162
yearly and compared with simulated data that are interpolated along their appropriate tracks. However, 163
the altimeter data have limitations, especially with data sparseness, because the satellite only returns to 164
the same point after 10 days or more and only the sea surface directly below the satellite is measured. 165
166
Chu et al. [2004] validated the WW3 model against TOPEX/Poseidon wave measurements in 167
the SCS and they found good agreement between the simulated and observed data. Figures 3 and 4 168
represent scatter plots of simulated versus altimeter significant wave height (SWH) for all selected 169
tracks. The computed statistics for the entire year of 2009, including the coefficient of determination 170
(C.D.), bias and root mean square error (RMSE) are displayed. Generally, based on the scatter plots, 171
the model performed reasonably well in simulating the SWH. For most tracks, the simulated SWH 172
matches the observed with C.D. ranges between 0.8–0.9 and averaged RMSEs of 0.35 m. For these 173
tracks, the range of bias is between -0.1 to 0.1 m. The model underestimated the SWH in the Malacca 174
Straits and Gulf of Thailand (Passes 001 and 166) with smaller C.D.s of 0.66 and 0.59, respectively. In 175
the case of Malacca Straits, insufficient model resolution reduces its performance. In addition, higher 176
resolution of wind forcing is also required to capture wave characteristics in such a narrow water 177
channel. Moreover, the wave characteristics can be influenced by strong tidal currents, especially along 178
Peninsular Malaysia, the Gulf of Thailand and the west coast of Borneo [Fang et al., 1999]; however, 179
tidal effects were not included in the simulation. 180
181
In addition to satellite altimetry data, the model was also validated against a three-month record of 182
nearshore wave measurements at Terengganu (Fig. 5). The measurements were carried out using a 183
Nortek acoustic Doppler profiler and directional wave gauge (AWAC) for a period of Jan-Apr 2009. 184
Figure 4 shows the time series comparison of SWH and mean wave period between the model and 185
AWAC data. The comparison shows the reasonable ability of the model to reproduce the wave 186
parameters in the location with C.D. values of 0.96 and 0.98 for HS and TM, respectively. For Hs, the 187
C.D. (RMSE) value of 0.96 (0.22 m) is generally larger (smaller) compared with the value based on the 188
satellite tracks. 189
190
Due to the nearshore location of the AWAC, the insufficient resolution of the model resulted in 191
an underestimation of the wave height. On the other hand, short-lived local winds could also be a 192
reason why the model did not accurately reproduce short period waves in some regions [Bosserelle et 193
al., 2012]. In addition, the complexity of topography and existence of islands could cause refraction 194
and blocking of waves, which leads to an underestimation of wave heights and wave periods nearshore 195
and in coastal areas. 196
197
2.4 Analysis methods 198
199
The WW3 model has been set to output several parameters at 3-hourly intervals for the 31-year 200
hindcast. These outputs comprised three main wave parameters: the significant wave height, peak wave 201
period and mean wave direction. These parameters were used to investigate the inter-annual variability 202
and long-term changes of the wave climate in the southern SCS. Seasonal mean significant wave 203
heights were determined by combining: the Dec-Jan-Feb (DJF) monthly mean for winter, Mar-Apr-204
May (MAM) for spring, Jun-Jul-Aug (JJA) for summer and Sep-Oct-Nov (SON) for autumn. 205
Simulated parameters were averaged annually and identified as the mean annual wave height (Hs), peak 206
wave period (Tp) and mean wave direction (MWD). Moreover, the mean annual of the 99th
(H99) and 207
90th
(H90) percentiles of wave height, which are known as the largest 1% and 10% of the parameters, 208
respectively, were also calculated. To compute the annual mean wave direction, the mean wave 209
direction was first split into meridional and zonal components and averaged separately and then 210
recombined. Inter-annual variability of Hs was determined by calculating the standard deviation of the 211
monthly mean values of Hs. 212
213
Trends in the time series of Hs, Tp, MWD and H90were computed for each grid point of the M3 214
domain. The trend analysis of the year-grouped wave height climate was made by the linear least 215
square fitting of time series of Hs and H90, while the p-values of correlation were computed to 216
determine the significance of the trend. Additionally, trends in monthly wave height were computed to 217
identify the significance of changes during every month. Trends at 95% confidence (p-value < 0.05) 218
were considered statistically significant. The relationship between wave height variability and El Nino-219
Southern Oscillation (ENSO) was also investigated by correlating ENSO indices (Nino 3.4 and El Nino 220
Modoki) with Hs. 221
222
3 Results and discussion 223
224
The maximum Hs features prominently in the central region of the SCS (Fig. 6) where winds 225
can increase from 5 knots to over 40 knots in a matter of hours during the monsoon seasons. Hs 226
decreases gradually in the northeast-southwest direction towards the Sunda shelf where the values are 227
relatively lower. In the southern region of the SCS and in the Gulf of Thailand, Hs ranges from 0.5 to 1 228
m. The lower values of Hs in the Gulf of Thailand might be due to shadowing effects of Indo-China. In 229
the coastal region along Peninsular Malaysia and the west coast of Borneo, Hs values were lower than 230
0.5 m. The reduction of Hs in these regions could be due to complex bathymetry and insufficient model 231
resolution. The bathymetry in the SCS (Fig. 1) plays an important role because large amounts of wave 232
energy, generated in the central parts of the SCS, is reduced due to apparent differences of topography 233
between the Sunda shelf and the central SCS. On Sunda shelf, the gradual depth reduction allows the 234
swell to travel to coastal regions of Peninsular Malaysia with no sudden bathymetric interaction, except 235
in areas where islands are located. However, along the offshore region of Borneo, sudden reductions in 236
depth reduce the wave energy impact on coastal areas due to breaking and refraction. Moreover, this 237
region might still be influenced by extreme waves generated by typhoons tracking over the central and 238
northern regions of the SCS. However, whether they are accurately resolved in the CFSR winds is 239
beyond the scope of this paper. 240
241
The spatial pattern of the 99th
(not shown) and 90th
percentiles (Fig. 7) resembles Hs with the 242
maximum values reaching 4 m in the central SCS. Along the coast of Vietnam, H90 can reach as high as 243
3 m. However, these values reduce to between 1–2 m in the Gulf of Thailand and southern regions of 244
the SCS (Fig. 7). The obstruction effects of several islands in the southern region of the SCS were well 245
resolved. The existence of multiple islands in southern regions of the SCS obstructs wave propagations 246
resulting in a reduction of Hs and H90. In addition, the tides and surges change the mean water depth 247
and current fields [Wolf and Prandle, 1999]; therefore, lower Hs in the coastal areas could also be 248
associated with tidal currents, which were not included in the simulation. Figure 8 depicts the seasonal 249
changes of the mean Hs. Of the seasons, the winter monsoon has the highest mean Hs, ranging from 2 250
m in the southern part of the SCS to 3 m in the central region (Fig. 8). In comparison, the values are 251
much lower during JJA. This obvious contrast is because of higher intensity winds during the winter 252
monsoon. The MAM (SON) transitional season has a similar spatial pattern to that of the summer 253
(winter). 254
255
The mean peak wave period Tp, has high values in the central SCS (>12° N) and decreases 256
slightly towards the Sunda shelf and coastal region of Borneo (Fig. 9). Similar to the mean Hs, the Tp 257
values decrease while the waves travel towards the Gulf of Thailand due to the shadowing of Indo-258
China. Moreover, the reduction of Tp in southern regions of the study domain is due to the presence of 259
several islands, which prevent waves with longer wavelengths from propagating into this area. This 260
explains why the largest values of T90 (not shown) are simulated at the offshore Riau Islands. Along the 261
eastern coast of Peninsular Malaysia, Tp has an almost constant value of 6.5 s. However, T90 reaches 262
around 9 s along Peninsular Malaysia coasts. 263
264
The MWD is predominantly influenced by the monsoonal winds over this region. Starting 265
around November, the Siberian High pushes the airflow around an anticyclone that carries air from 266
Siberia across China and out over the SCS during the northeast monsoon (DJF). The mean MWD is 267
predominantly northeasterly during DJF and MAM (Fig. 10). However, the mean MWD in the Gulf of 268
Thailand becomes more southerly in the shadow of the Indo-China region. During the SON transitional 269
season, the mean MWD gradually becomes westerly in the central SCS and turns southward along 270
Peninsular Malaysia. At the beginning of the summer monsoon (JJA), the wind over the SCS becomes 271
predominantly south-southwesterly [Lau et al., 1998]. Therefore, as we expected, the MWD becomes 272
southwesterly starting late May and reverts back to northeasterly around mid-September. 273
274
The standard deviation of the individual monthly mean significant wave heights was used to 275
measure the inter-annual variability of each corresponding month. The inter-annual variability of 276
significant wave height in the southern sector of the SCS is greatest during the winter months, 277
especially December. The elongated area of high standard deviation extends from the north, in the 278
northeasterly-southeasterly direction, to south along the coastal region of Peninsular Malaysia (Fig. 279
11). The high inter-annual variability observed in December could be forced by coherent large 280
phenomena, such as the El Nino – Southern Oscillation (ENSO). Juneng and Tangang [2005] indicated 281
that the anomalous low-level winds over the SCS are largely modulated by ENSO, particularly during 282
winter. Moreover, since the mid-1980s, there has been a tendency for maximum warming to occur at 283
the central equatorial Pacific Ocean resulting in a different event known as El Nino Modoki [Ashok et 284
al., 2007; Weng et al., 2007, 2009; Ashok and Yamagata, 2009], which generates a different response 285
over the SCS [Feng et al., 2010]. The El Nino Modoki occurrences are represented by the El-Niño 286
Modoki (EMI) index [Ashok et al., 2007]; hence, it is of interest to investigate further the relationship 287
between wave climates in the SCS and these phenomena. 288
289
The mean values of significant wave height for each season were correlated with the Niño 3.4 290
and El-Niño Modoki (EMI) climate indices. The correlation between the Niño 3.4 and mean Hs 291
demonstrate significant values in the central sector (>12° N) of the SCS during the winter (DJF). This 292
is consistent with the work of Juneng and Tangang [2005], which indicated weaker winter monsoon 293
winds over the SCS during El Nino. Weaker winds correspond to weaker waves and lower significant 294
wave heights. However, in summertime (JJA), positive correlation values are observed for the entire 295
southern SCS and become significant in the offshore region of Peninsular Malaysia and the Karimata 296
Straits (Fig. 12). Juneng and Tangang [2005] indicated strengthening of summer monsoonal winds over 297
the southern region of the SCS during El Nino years. Furthermore, Hs in the Gulf of Thailand exhibits 298
positive correlation with Niño 3.4, except during SON (when there is a negative correlation). Similarly, 299
in the Celebes Sea region, the correlation values are positive in all seasons except SON. The strong 300
ENSO signals in the wave climate in this sea could be due to its open connection with the western 301
Pacific Ocean, which allows the swell from the Pacific Ocean to easily penetrate the area. In contrast 302
with this, the relationship is weaker in the Sulu Sea due to the blocking effect of the Philippines group 303
of islands. 304
305
Figure 13 indicates the correlation values between Hs and the EMI. During SON, DJF and 306
MAM, the correlation values are weaker compared with the conventional El Nino. Moreover, in the 307
winter season, the significant negative correlation can only be found over the northern region of the 308
study domain. In the southern region, Hs correlates only weakly but positively with EMI. This could be 309
associated with the existence of the anomalous cyclonic circulation over the eastern Peninsular 310
Malaysia during El Nino Modoki [Feng et al., 2010]. This cyclonic circulation strengthens the winter 311
monsoonal winds over this region during El Nino Modoki and hence, enhances the wave height. 312
During transitional seasons (i.e., SON and MAM), the relationship between Hs and EMI is non-313
significant for almost the entire study domain. However, in summer, the area that has positive and 314
significant correlation expands northward to cover the entire domain, except for the northern region of 315
the Vietnamese coast. The differences of correlation strength and spatial distribution between Nino3.4 316
and EMI are attributed to the changes in the low level wind field over the SCS during El Nino Modoki, 317
which are associated with the westward shifting of the anomalous anti-cyclonic circulation over the 318
western north Pacific region [Feng et al., 2010]. 319
320
Long-term trends in the surface wind influences the Hs trend [Young, 1999; Young et al., 2011; 321
Bosserelle et al., 2012]. Over the SCS, Juneng and Tangang [2010] indicated that the zonal wind has 322
increased significantly over a period from 1962-2007. However, if a period from 1979 to 2007 were to 323
be considered, the trend might not be as prominent [Juneng and Tangang, 2010, Figure 2f]. In the 324
present study, we quantified the long-term changes of trend in the time series of Hs from 1979 to 2009 325
by a monthly mean trend analysis. Figure 14 depicts a spatial distribution of significant trends of Hs at 326
the 95% statistical confidence level with areas of non-significant changes shaded with dots. Generally, 327
increasing positive trends of Hs are found to be significant in the central region of the SCS during May, 328
July and September (Fig. 14). In contrast, significant negative trends of Hs dominate the southern 329
region of the SCS during December. In other months, the trends are non-significant. We investigated 330
further these trends by examining the time series of three box-areas, as indicated in Figure 2. Figure 15 331
shows the time series of the 90th
percentiles of Hs for the three areas during July and December. For 332
comparison, the corresponding time series of the ERA-INTERIM are also shown. As expected, the 333
modelled 90th
percentiles of Hs are higher than those of the ERA-INTERIM due to the WW3 finer grid-334
resolution. Moreover, the two time series are also mostly in phase with respect to the inter-annual 335
variability. However, the modelled fluctuations are greater during winter, especially in conjunction with 336
the 1997/98 El Nino. The large inter-annual fluctuations and relatively short record could be the reason 337
why most of the trends of the modelled 90th
percentiles of Hs are not significant. 338
339
4 Conclusions 340
341
A third generation wave model (WW3) was applied to the simulation of wave climate in the 342
southern extent of the SCS during the 31-year period from 1979 to 2009. The outputs were well 343
validated against available is situ and altimeter data and hence, the computed wave characteristics from 344
the model outputs provide reasonable estimates of wave climate in the region in the absence of long-345
term wave observations. The spatial distribution of the modelled seasonal mean Hs (and H90) indicates 346
higher values in the northern region of the study domain, which decrease southwestwards. In the most 347
southern regions, lower amplitudes of Hs are associated with shadowing, island blocking and 348
refraction. Seasonally, the values are higher during winter (DJF) and lower during summer (JJA) and 349
spring (MAM). Also, the results demonstrate strong inter-annual variability, especially during the 350
winter months. The mean Hs correlates negatively with the Nino3.4 index for almost the entire region 351
during winter, spring and autumn seasons. However, the correlation sign reverses during the summer 352
monsoon. During El Nino Modoki, the positive correlation during summer extends northeastwards to 353
cover almost the entire domain. The trend analysis indicates positive and negative long-term trends of 354
mean Hs depending on the month and location. However, the long-term trends could be masked by the 355
large inter-annual variability. 356
357
Acknowledgements 358
359
This research is funded by the grants of MOHE LRGS/TD/2011/UKM/PG/01, MOSTI Science fund 360
04-01-02-SF0747 and Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia DIP-2012-020. 361
362
363
364
365
366
367
References: 368
369
Ashok, K., S. K. Behera, S. A. Rao, H. Y. Weng, and T. Yamagata (2007), El Nino Modoki and its 370
possible teleconnection, J. Geophys. Res., 112(C11007), doi:10.1029/2006JC003798. 371
372
Ashok, K., and T. Yamagata (2009), The EL Niño with a difference, Nature, 461, 481–484, 373
doi:10.1038/461481a. 374
375
Bidlot, J. R., J. G. Li, P. Wittmann, M. Faucher, H. S. Chen, J. M. Lefevre, T. Bruns, D. Greenslade, F. 376
Ardhuin, N. Kohno, S. Park and M. Gomez (2007), Inter-comparison of operational wave forecasting 377
systems, paper presented at 10th
International workshop on wave hindcasting and forecasting, Oahu, 378
Hawaii. 379
380
Bosserelle, C., C. B. Pattiaratchi, and I. Haigh (2012), Inter-annual variability and longer-term changes 381
in the wave climate of Western Australia between 1970 and 2009, Ocean Dyn., 62:63–76, 382
doi:10.1007/s10236-011-0487-3. 383
384
Brown, J. M., J. Wolf, and A. J. Souza (2012), Past to future extreme events in Liverpool Bay: model 385
projections from 1960-2100, Climate Change, 111:365–391, doi:10.1007/s10584-011-0145-2. 386
387
Chawla, A., and H. L. Tolman (2007), Automated grid generation for WAVEWATCH III, 388
NOAA/NWS/NCEP/OMB, Technical Note 254. 389
390
Chawla, A., H. L. Tolman, J. L. Lanson, E.-M. Devaliere, and V. M. Gerald (2009), Validation of a 391
Multi-Grid WAVEWATCH IIITM
modeling system, NOAA/MMAB Contribution no. 281. 392
393
Chu, P. C., Y. Qi, Y. Chen, P. Shi, and Q. Mao (2004), South China Sea wind-wave characteristics. Part 394
I: Validation of Wavewatch-III using TOPEX/Poseidon data, Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic 395
Technology, 21(11):1718–1733, doi:10.1175/JTECH1661.1. 396
397
Chu, P. C., S. Lu, and W. T. Liu (1999), Uncertainty of South China Sea prediction using NSCAT and 398
National Centers for Environmental Prediction winds during tropical storm Ernie, 1996, J. Geophys. 399
Res., 104(C5), 11,273–11,289, doi:10.1029/1998JC900046. 400
401
Chu, P. C., J. M. Veneziano, C. Fan, M. J. Carron, and W. T. Liu (2000), Response of the South China 402
Sea to Tropical Cyclone Ernie 1996, J. Geophys. Res., 105(C6), 13,991–14,009, 403
doi:10.1029/2000JC900035. 404
405
Cuchiara, D. C., E. H. Fernandes, J. C. Strauch, J. C. Winterwerp, and L. J. Calliari (2009), 406
Determination of the wave climate for southern Brazilian shelf, Continental Shelf Research, 29:545–407
555, doi:10.1016/j.csr.2008.09.025. 408
409
Chunxia, L., Y. Qi, and J. Liang (2008), The effect of sea waves on Typhon Imodo, 2nd
CAWCR 410
Modelling Workshop 2008, High Resolution Modelling, Nov. 25-28 Australia. 411
412
Fang, G., Y.-K. Kwok, K. Yu, and Y. Zhu (1999), Numerical simulation of principal tidal constituents in 413
the South China Sea, Gulf of Tonkin and Gulf of Thailand, Continental Shelf Research, 19(7):845–869, 414
doi:10.1016/s0278-4343(99)00002-3. 415
416
Feng, M., M. J. McPhaden, and T. Lee (2010), Decadal variability of the Pacific subtropical cells and 417
their influence on the southeast Indian Ocean, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37:L09606, 418
doi:10.1029/2010GL042796. 419
420
Hanson, J. L., B.A. Tracy, H. L. Tolma, and D. R. Scott (2009), Pacific hindcast performance of three 421
numerical wave model, J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 26:1614–1633. 422
423
Hemer, M. A., J. A. Church, and J. R. Hunter (2010), Variability and trends in the directional wave 424
climate of the southern hemisphere, Int.J. Climatol, 30:475–491, doi:10.1002/joc.1900. 425
426
IPCC AR4 (2007), Climate change 2007, Fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on 427
climate change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 428
429
Jiang, L. F., Z. X. Zhang, and Y. Q. Qi (2010), Simulation of SWAN and WAVEWATCH III in 430
Northern South China Sea, 20th
International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Beijing, 431
China, June 20–25, 2010. 432
433
Juneng, L., and F. T. Tangang (2005), Evolution of ENSO-related rainfall anomalies in Southeast Asia 434
region and its relationship with atmosphere-ocean variations in Indo-Pacific sector, Clim. Dyn., 435
25:337–350, doi:10.1077/s00382-005-0031-6. 436
437
Juneng, L., F. T. Tangang (2010), Long-term trends of winter monsoon synoptic circulations over the 438
maritime continent: 1962-2007, Atmos. Sci. Lett., 11(3): 199–203, doi:10.100/asl.272. 439
440
Kriiezi, E. E., and B. Broman (2008), Past and future wave climate in the Baltic Sea produced by the 441
SWAN model with forcing from the regional climate model RCA of the Rossby Center, In: IEEE/OES 442
US/EU-Baltic International Symposium (ed.), Tallinn, Estonia, 27-29 May 2008, pp 360–366. 443
444
Lau, K.-M., H.-T. Wu, and S. Yang (1998), Hydrologic processes associated with the first transition of 445
the Asian Summer Monsoon: A pilot satellite study, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 79:1871–1882. 446
447
Lionello, P., and A. Sanna (2005), Mediterranean wave climate variability and its links with NAO and 448
Indian Monsoon, Clim Dyn, 25:611–623, doi:10.1007/s00382-005-0025-4. 449
450
Mori, N., T. Yasuda, H. Mase, T. Tom, Y. Oku (2010), Projection of extreme wave climate change 451
under global warming, Hydrol Res Lett, 4:15–19. 452
453
Music, S., and S. Nikovic (2008), 44-year wave hindcast for the Eastern Mediterranean, Coastal 454
Engineering, 55:872–880, doi:10.1016/j.coastaleng.2008.02.024. 455
456
NCEP (2006), National Center for Environmental Prediction, Washington DC., available at 457
http://polar.ncep.noaa.gov/waves. 458
459
NGDC (2006), National Geophysical Data Center, available at 460
http://ngdc.noaa.gov/mgg/global/etopo2.html. 461
462
Padilla-Hernandez, R., W. Perrie, B. Toulany, P. C. Smith, W. Zhang, and S. Jimenez-Hernandez 463
(2004), Intercomparison of modern operational wave models, In: 8th
International workshop on wave 464
hindcasting and forecasting, North Shore, Oahu, Hawaii. 465
466
Panchang, V. G., C. Jeong, and D. Li (2008), Wave climatology in coastal Maine for aquaculture and 467
other applications, Estuaries and Coast: J. CERF, 31:289–299, doi:10.1007/s12237-007-9016-5. 468
469
Qi, Y. Q., Z. X. Zhang, and P. SHI (2010), Extreme wind, wave and current in deep water of South 470
China Sea, Int. J. Offshore and Polar Engineering, Vol.20, No.1, pp:18–23. 471
472
Saha S., S. Moorthi, H.-L. Pan, X. Wu, J. Wang, S. Nadiga, P. Tripp, R. Kistler, J. Woollen, D. 473
Behringer, H. Liu, D. Stokes, R. Grumbine, G. Gayno, J. Wang, Y.-T. Hou, H. Chuang, H.-M. H. Juang, 474
J. Sela, M. Iredell, R. Treadon, D. Kleist, P. van Delst, D. Keyser, J. Derber, M. Ek, J. Meng, H. Wei, R. 475
Yang, S. Lord, H. van den Dool, A. Kumar, W. Wang, C. Long, M. Chelliah, Y. Xue, B. Huang, J.-K. 476
Schemm, W. Ebisuzaki, R. Lin, P. Xie, M. Chen, S. Zhou, W. Higginsz, C.-Z. Zou, Q. Liu, Y. Chen, Y. 477
Han, L. Cucurull, R. W. Reynolds, G. Rutledge, and M. Goldberg (2010), The NCEP climate forecast 478
system reanalysis, Bull Amer Meteor Soc., 91:1015–1057. 479
480
Salahuddin, A., and S. Curtis (2011), Climate extremes in Malaysia and the equatorial South China 481
Sea, Global and Planetary Change, 78:83–91, doi:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2011.05.001. 482
483
Swail, V. R., A. T. Cox, and V. J. Cardone (1999), Analysis of wave climate trends and variability, 484
WMO Workshop on Advances in Marine Climatology (CLIMAR99), 8-15 September 1999, 485
Vancouver, B.C., p. 245–256. 486
487
Tolman, H. L. (2002), Validation of WAVEWATCH III version 1.15 for a global domain, 488
NCEP/NOAA/NWS, National Center for Environmental Prediction, Technical note 213, Washington. 489
490
Tolman, H. L. (2009), User manual and system documentation of WAVEWATCH III TM version 3.14, 491
NOAA/NWS/NCEP/MMAB Technical Note 276 492
493
WAMDI (1988), The WAM model – a third generation ocean wave prediction model, J Phys 494
Oceanogr., 18:1775–1810. 495
496
Wang, X. L., F. W. Zwiers, and V. R. Swail (2004), North Atlantic ocean wave climate change 497
scenarios for the Twenty-First century, J. Climate, doi:10.1175/1520–0442. 498
499
Wang, X. L., and V. R. Swail (2006), Trends of Atlantic wave extremes as simulated in a 40-yr wave 500
hindcast using kinematically reanalyzed wind fields, J. Clim., 15:1020–1035, doi:10.1175/1520-501
0442(2002)015<1020:TOAWEA>2.0.CO;2. 502
503
Weng, H., K. Ashok, S. K. Behera, S. A. Rao, and T. Yamagata (2007), Impacts of recent El Niño 504
Modoki on dry/wet conditions in the Pacific Rim during boreal summer, Clim. Dyn., 29:113–129, 505
doi:10.1007/s00382-007-0234-0. 506
507
Weng, H., S. K. Behera, and T. Yamagata 2009, Anomalous winter climate conditions in the Pacific rim 508
during recent El Niño Modoki and El Niño events, Clim. Dyn., 29:113–129, doi:10.1007/s00382-008-509
0394-6. 510
511
Wolf, J., and D. Prandle (1999), Some observation of wave-current interaction, Coastal Engineering 37, 512
471–485. 513
514
Wright, L. D., J. D. Boon, S. C. Kim, and J. H. List (1991), Modes of cross-shore sediment transport on 515
the shoreface of the Middle Atlantic Bight, Marine Geology, 96:19–51, doi:10.1016/0025-516
3227(91)90200-N. 517
518
Xue, Y., B. Huang, Z.-Z. Hu, A. Kumar, C. Wen, D. Behringer, and S. Nadiga (2010), An assessment of 519
oceanic variability in the NCEP climate forecast system reanalysis, Clim. Dyn., doi:10.1007/s00382-520
010-0954-4. 521
522
Young, I. R. (1999), Seasonal variability of the global ocean wind and wave climate, Int. J. Climatol., 523
19:931–950. 524
525
Young, I. R., S. Zieger, and A. V. Babanin (2011), Global trends in wind speed and wave height, 526
Science, doi:10.1126/science.1197219. 527
528
Zacharioudaki, A., S. Pan, and D. Simmonds (2011), Future wave climate over the west-European shelf 529
seas, Ocean Dyn., 61:807–827, doi:10.1007/s10236-011-0395-6. 530
531
90˚ 95˚ 100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚ 125˚ 130˚ 135˚ 140˚ 145˚
−10˚
−5˚
0˚
5˚
10˚
15˚
20˚
25˚
30˚
35˚
40˚
45˚
90˚ 95˚ 100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚ 125˚ 130˚ 135˚ 140˚ 145˚
−10˚
−5˚
0˚
5˚
10˚
15˚
20˚
25˚
30˚
35˚
40˚
45˚
90˚ 95˚ 100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚ 125˚ 130˚ 135˚ 140˚ 145˚
−10˚
−5˚
0˚
5˚
10˚
15˚
20˚
25˚
30˚
35˚
40˚
45˚
−8000
−6000
−4000
−2000
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
(m)
Μ2 = 0.25° × 0.25°
Μ1 = 0.31° × 0.31°
Μ3 = 0.15° × 0.15°
532
Fig. 1 Bathymetry and definition for three mosaic nested computational domains 533
534
535
100˚ 104˚ 108˚ 112˚ 116˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 104˚ 108˚ 112˚ 116˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚ South China Sea
Gulf of Thailand
Malacc
a Strait
Vietnam
Combodia
Laos
Thailand
Philip
pines
Singapore
Sabah
Sarawak
Indonesia
BruneiPeninsular
Malaysia
Sumatra
Celebes Sea
Sulu Sea
Kepulauan RiauPal
awan
Island
Tioman IslandJemaja Islands
Siantan Islands
a
c
b
Terengganu
AWAC
100˚ 104˚ 108˚ 112˚ 116˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 104˚ 108˚ 112˚ 116˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 104˚ 108˚ 112˚ 116˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 104˚ 108˚ 112˚ 116˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 104˚ 108˚ 112˚ 116˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 104˚ 108˚ 112˚ 116˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 104˚ 108˚ 112˚ 116˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 104˚ 108˚ 112˚ 116˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 104˚ 108˚ 112˚ 116˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 104˚ 108˚ 112˚ 116˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 104˚ 108˚ 112˚ 116˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 104˚ 108˚ 112˚ 116˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
153 229 051 127
077001 203
038 114 190
012
216
140064
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
Karimata Strait
536
Fig. 2 The area of focus of this study (left) and the coverage of Topex satellite tracks in the SCS (right) 537
538
0
1
2
3
4
5
6M
odel
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Altimeter
Pass 038
C.D. = 0.85
Bias = 0.09
RMSE = 0.36
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Mod
el
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Altimeter
Pass 012
C.D. = 0.86
Bias = −0.05
RMSE = 0.32
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Mod
el
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Altimeter
Pass 051
C.D. = 0.89
Bias = 0.12
RMSE = 0.35
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Mod
el
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Altimeter
Pass 064
C.D. = 0.81
Bias = −0.09
RMSE = 0.28
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Mod
el
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Altimeter
Pass 114
C.D. = 0.89
Bias = 0.16
RMSE = 0.38
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Mod
el
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Altimeter
Pass 127
C.D. = 0.72
Bias = −0.10
RMSE = 0.44
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Mod
el
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Altimeter
Pass 077
C.D. = 0.87
Bias = −0.04
RMSE = 0.30
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Mod
el
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Altimeter
Pass 166
C.D. = 0.59
Bias = −0.12
RMSE = 0.35
539
Fig. 3 Scatter diagram of Altimeter (along the tracks) and predicted significant wave height (model) in metres 540
541
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Mod
el
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Altimeter
Pass 190
C.D. = 0.93
Bias = 0.03
RMSE = 0.35
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Mod
el
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Altimeter
Pass 242
C.D. = 0.73
Bias = −0.07
RMSE = 0.27
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Mod
el
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Altimeter
Pass 216
C.D. = 0.88
Bias = 0.03
RMSE = 0.37
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Mod
el
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Altimeter
Pass 229
C.D. = 0.90
Bias = 0.02
RMSE = 0.36
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Mod
el
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Altimeter
Pass 179
C.D. = 0.65
Bias = −0.12
RMSE = 0.27
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Mod
el
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Altimeter
Pass 001
C.D. = 0.66
Bias = −0.14
RMSE = 0.37
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Mod
el
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Altimeter
Pass 203
C.D. = 0.81
Bias = −0.10
RMSE = 0.31
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Mod
el
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Altimeter
Pass 153
C.D. = 0.87
Bias = 0.08
RMSE = 0.40
542
Fig. 4 Same as Fig. 3 except for different tracks 543
0
1
2
3
Sig
nif
ican
t w
av
e h
eig
ht
(m)
0 200 400 600 800 1000
Two hourly record
0
1
2
3
Sig
nif
ican
t w
av
e h
eig
ht
(m)
0 200 400 600 800 1000
Two hourly records
C.D. = 0.96
Bias = 0.13
RMSE = 0.22
−− Model
−− AWAC
0
2
4
6
8
Mean
wav
e p
eri
od (
s)
0 200 400 600 800 1000
Two hourly record
0
2
4
6
8
Mean
wav
e p
eri
od (
s)
0 200 400 600 800 1000
Two hourly records
C.D. = 0.98
Bias = 0.28
RMSE = 0.75
−− Model
−− AWAC
544
545
Fig. 5 Comparison between modelled and measured (AWAC) significant wave height and mean wave period 546
during the period Jan-Mar 2009 547
548
549
100˚ 104˚ 108˚ 112˚ 116˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 104˚ 108˚ 112˚ 116˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 104˚ 108˚ 112˚ 116˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
0.9
0.9
0.9 0.91.
2
1.2 1.2
1.2
1.2
1.5
1.51.5
1.5
1.8
1.8
1.8
0
1
2
(m)
550
Fig. 6 Mean significant wave height for the period 1979-2009 model hindcast 551
552
100˚ 104˚ 108˚ 112˚ 116˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 104˚ 108˚ 112˚ 116˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 104˚ 108˚ 112˚ 116˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
4
4
4
4
4
5
5
66
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
(m)
553
Fig. 7 Mean 90th percentile wave height for the period 1979-2009 model hindcast 554
555
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
DJF
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
1
1.5
1.5
2
2
2.5
2.5
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
MAM
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
1
1
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
JJA
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
1
1.5
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
SON
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
1
1.5
1.5
2
0 1 2 3
m
556
Fig. 8 Seasonal mean wave height variability for the period 1979-2009 model hindcast 557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
100˚ 104˚ 108˚ 112˚ 116˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 104˚ 108˚ 112˚ 116˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 104˚ 108˚ 112˚ 116˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
6
6
6
6
7
7
7
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
(s)
570
Fig. 9 Mean peak wave period Tp, for the period 1979-2009 model hindcast 571
572
573
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
DJF
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
MAM
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
JJA
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
SON
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
0 60 120 180 240 300 360
deg
574
Fig. 10 Mean MWD variability for the period 1979-2009 model hindcast 575
576
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
JAN
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
0.2
0.20.
2
0.2
0.4
0.4
0.4
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
FEB
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.4
0.40.4
0.4
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
MAR
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
APR
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
0.2
0.2
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
MAY
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
0.20.2
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
JUN
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
0.2
0.2
0.4
0.4
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
JUL
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
0.2
0.2
0.4
0.4
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
AUG
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
0.2
0.20.
4
0.4
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
SEP
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
0.2
0.2
0.2
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
OCT
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
0.2
0.2
0.4
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
NOV
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
0.2
0.4
0.4
0.4
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
DEC
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
0.2
0. 2
0.2
0.4
0.4
0.40.6
0.6
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 577
Fig. 11 Inter-annual wave height variability for the period 1979-2009 model hindcast 578
579
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
DJF
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
MAM
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
JJA
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
SON
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
−0.5 −0.4 −0.3 −0.2 −0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
Correlation
580
Fig. 12 Correlation of seasonal mean HS with Niño 3.4 for winter (DJF); Spring (MAM); Summer (JJA) and 581
Autumn (SON) at 90% confidence level. Dotted shading shows non-significant correlations at 90% confidence 582
level 583
584
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
DJF
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
MAM
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
JJA
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
SON
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
−0.5 −0.4 −0.3 −0.2 −0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
Correlation
585
Fig. 13 Correlation of seasonal mean HS with El-Niño Modoki (EMI) for winter (DJF); Spring (MAM); Summer 586
(JJA) and Autumn (SON) at 90% confidence level. Dotted shading shows non-significant correlations at 90% 587
confidence level 588
589
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
JAN
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
FEB
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
MAR
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
APR
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
MAY
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
JUN
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
JUL
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
AUG
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
SEP
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
OCT
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
NOV
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
DEC
100˚ 105˚ 110˚ 115˚ 120˚
0˚
4˚
8˚
12˚
16˚
−0.020 −0.015 −0.010 −0.005 0.000 0.005 0.010 0.015 0.020
m/year
590
Fig. 14 Trend in monthly mean wave height for the period 1979-2009 for each month of year. Significant trends 591
at 90% confidence level are bounded by a solid red line. Dotted shading shows non-significant trends at 90% 592
confidence 593
level594
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Sig
nif
ican
t w
ave
hei
gh
t (m
)
1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 2008
a (Winter)
0
1
2
3
4
Sig
nif
ican
t w
ave
hei
gh
t (m
)
1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 2008
a (Summer)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Sig
nif
ican
t w
ave
hei
gh
t (m
)
1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 2008
b (Winter)
0
1
2
3
4
Sig
nif
ican
t w
ave
hei
gh
t (m
)
1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 2008
b (Summer)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Sig
nif
ican
t w
ave
hei
gh
t (m
)
1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 2008
c (Winter)
0
1
2
3
4
Sig
nif
ican
t w
ave
hei
gh
t (m
)
1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 2008
c (Summer)
595
Fig 15. Comparison of averaged 90th percentile of significant wave height in 3 bounded areas (a, b and c) during 596
December and July between ERA-INTERIM (blue line) and model (red line) 597
598
599