Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day
-
Upload
khangminh22 -
Category
Documents
-
view
1 -
download
0
Transcript of Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day
September 14, 2012
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Pat DavidsonInvestor Relations
Oshkosh Corporation Analyst DaySeptember 14, 2012
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Forward-Looking Statements
This presentation contains statements that the Company believes to be “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements other than statements of historical fact, including, withoutlimitation, statements regarding the Company’s future financial position, business strategy, targets, projected sales, costs,earnings, capital expenditures, debt levels and cash flows, and plans and objectives of management for future operations, areforward-looking statements. When used in this presentation, words such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “intend,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “should,” “project” or “plan” or the negative thereof or variations thereon or similar terminology are generally intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other factors, some of which are beyond the Company’s control, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These factors include the cyclical nature of the Company’s access equipment, commercial and fire & emergency markets, especially in the current environment where there are conflicting signs regarding the future global economic outlook; the expected level and timing of the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) procurement of products and services and funding thereof; risks related to reductions in government expenditures in light of U.S. defense budget pressures and an uncertain DoDtactical wheeled vehicle strategy; risks that profit on the definitization of contracts with the DoD could differ from the Company’s estimates; increasing commodity and other raw material costs, particularly in a sustained economic recovery; the ability to increase prices to raise margins or offset higher input costs; risks related to the Company’s exit from its ambulanceand European mobile medical businesses, including the amounts of related costs and charges; risks related to facilities consolidation and alignment, including the amounts of related costs and charges and that anticipated cost savings may not be achieved; the Company’s ability to produce vehicles under the FMTV contract at targeted margins; the duration of the ongoing global economic weakness, which could lead to additional impairment charges related to many of the Company’s intangible assets and/or a slower recovery in the Company’s cyclical businesses than Company or equity market expectations; the potential for the U.S. government to competitively bid the Company’s Army and Marine Corps contracts; the consequences of financial leverage, which could limit the Company’s ability to pursue various opportunities; risks related to the collectability of receivables, particularly for those businesses with exposure to construction markets; the cost of any warranty campaigns related to the Company’s products; risks related to production or shipment delays arising from quality or production issues; risks associated with international operations and sales, including foreign currency fluctuations and compliance with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act; risks related to actions of activist shareholders; and the Company’s ability to successfully execute on its strategic road map and meet its long-term financial goals. Additional information concerning these and other factors is contained in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company assumes no obligation, and disclaims any obligation, to update information contained in this presentation. Investors should be aware that the Company may not update such information until the Company’s next quarterly earnings conference call, if at all.
3
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Charlie SzewsCEO
Oshkosh Corporation Analyst DaySeptember 14, 2012
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Doubling EPS by FY15
• MOVE strategy expected to deliver higher margins throughout the cycle
• The recovery from a deep cycle has commenced and is expected to overcome defense downturn
• Oshkosh has the processes and team to deliver MOVE
$2.05 to $2.15
$4.00 to $4.50
Oshkosh CorporationEPS Opportunity
23%-30% CAGR
FY12E(1) FY15E
5
(1) Excludes costs to exit ambulance and European mobile medical businesses
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Agenda
6
Welcome Pat Davidson
Doubling into a Global Industrial Charlie Szews
MOVE Delivers Wilson Jones
Supporting Our Recovery Outlook
Frank NerenhausenJohn UriasJim Johnson Todd Fierro
Processes and Team to Deliver MOVE:• Quality & Continuous Improvement• Global Procurement & Supply Chain• Innovation
Colleen MoynihanGreg FredericksenGary Schmiedel
Financial Summary Dave Sagehorn
Concluding Remarks Charlie Szews
Q & A Panel All Presenters
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Mission Driven
• 95 years performing mission critical work• Innovative, high performance culture• 13,000 dedicated employees working for customers around the world• Board of Directors and management team committed to driving
shareholder value
8
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Moving the World at Work
• Our vehicles move people and materials at work– Most protect people or property– Many lift people or property– All do so safely and efficiently
• Often share common customers/ distribution channels– JLG, Jerr-Dan, IMT, McNeilus and Pierce sell
into rental channel– Every segment sells to the U.S.
federal government• Share common components/suppliers,
technologies and manufacturing processes
9
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
History of Growth and Successful Transition
• Predominantly a small specialty truck company (1917 – mid 1990s)• Diversification strategy implemented in 1996 to grow organically
and by acquisition; grew into Fortune 500 (#337 in 2011)• Expanding global industrial company prior to recession• Economic downturn of 2008-2010 and Middle East conflicts resulted in a
more defense-centric company
$0.0
$2.0
$4.0
$6.0
$8.0
$10.0
FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11
($ in
Bill
ions
)
Annual Revenues
10
(1) From FY96 through FY08
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Transitioning Again –Global Industrial
• Defense led strong results in FY10 and FY11• Defense spending downturn requires another transition• Industrial recovery now in early stages• MOVE strategy expected to drive global expansion, higher margins
and superior shareholder returns over the cycle• Defense expected to remain profitable on significantly lower
volumes
12
FY15 Sales (1)FY10 SalesDefense Non-Defense
Non-Defense Sales Become Significant Majority of Revenue by FY15
(1) Based on Company estimates on September 14, 2012
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
MOVE – The Right Strategy
• Focuses on drivers that create highest shareholder value• Recognizes constraints of markets, balance sheet and
business valuations• Expected to drive higher incremental margins across non-defense
businesses over cycle• Targeting 23%-30% CAGR in EPS through FY15
14
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Market Recovery Overcomes Defense Downturn• Key North American markets in slow recovery
– Old fleets need to be renewed– Construction recovery expected to strengthen in FY13 and beyond
• Mining, infrastructure and economic development aiding key Oshkosh markets in Latin America, Australia, Middle East & Asia
• European recovery delayed, but expected to extend AWP cycle• Green solutions, rising safety standards and productivity
requirements suggest stronger demand for Oshkosh products• Oshkosh will manage its defense business to remain profitable
15
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Leveraging a Common Structure: Oshkosh Operating System
• Customer-centric application of lean principles– Sets guiding principles for
relationships with customers
• Improves processes needed todeliver key elements of MOVE
• Supports drive to improve cash flow
• Implementation gaining momentum
• Company-wide foundation for building shareholder value
16
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Focused Board and Management Team
• Successfully navigated through unprecedented economic conditions• Diverse & complementary backgrounds
– Continually developing/acquiring talent• Incentive compensation objectives strongly aligned
with shareholder interests• Acting decisively for shareholders
17
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
MOVE is Delivering in FY12• Raised outlook by one-third as year
progressed• Capturing access equipment recovery• Addressing challenges
– FMTV profitable; margins have continued to improve
– Exiting underperforming non-core businesses
• International sales up 31% YTD(1) FY12– 750 M-ATVs for U.A.E. for FY13
• Accelerating Oshkosh Operating System deployment
• Exercising prudent capital allocation strategy
Total Shareholder Return(CAGRs) Since 1996(2)
OSK 19.2%
All Peers 10.9%
S&P 500 6.6%
Total Shareholder ReturnCalendar YTD 2012(2)
OSK 24.8%
(1) Through June 30, 2012
(2) Through September 7, 2012
18
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Poised to Deliver Results
• MOVE strategy expected to deliver higher margins throughout cycle• Market recovery, from deep cycle, has commenced
– Is expected to overcome defense downturn • Oshkosh processes and team support execution of MOVE
$2.05 to $2.15
$4.00 to $4.50
Oshkosh CorporationEPS Opportunity
23%-30% CAGR
FY12E(1) FY15E
Industry Leading Brands
Access Equipment #1 Global
Fire Apparatus #1 Global
Airport Products #1 Global
Defense TWV #1 Global
Concrete Mixers #1 Americas
Refuse Collection #1 Americas
(1) Excludes costs to exit ambulance and European mobile medical businesses
19
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day
September 14, 2012
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Wilson JonesPresident and COO
Oshkosh Corporation Analyst DaySeptember 14, 2012
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
$2.05 to $2.15
$4.00 to $4.50
Oshkosh CorporationEPS Opportunity
23%-30% CAGR
FY12E (1) FY15E
Doubling EPS by FY15
• MOVE strategy expected to deliver higher margins throughout the cycle
• The recovery from a deep cycle has commenced, and is expected to overcome defense downturn
• Oshkosh has the processes and team to deliver MOVE
(1) Excludes costs to exit ambulance and European mobile medical businesses
22
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
0
2
4
6
Non-Defense Revenue (1)
($ in Billions)
Market Recovery and Growth
(1) Reflects estimated benefits of market recovery captured in financial estimates. Does not include benefits of other MOVE initiatives. Market recovery operating income growth opportunity from FY11 to prior peak sales levels for non-defense segments estimated at ~$500 million.
(2) Excludes costs to exit ambulance and European mobile medical businesses
24
~$220MOpportunity(FY12-FY15)
FY11 FY15EFY12E
~10% CAGR(FY12-FY15)
FY11 FY15EFY12E (2)
Non-Defense Operating Income (1) ($ in Millions)
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Deliver with Strong Sales, Inventory and Operations Planning
25
Volume and Margin
Capture
• Disciplined demand planning– Correlate demand factors, voice of
customer and order pipeline– Weekly course corrections– Right inventory in right regions
globally
• Integrated teams focused on lead time reduction– Reducing WIP & inventory– Increasing flexibility to react
• Strong incremental revenue opportunities
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Optimize Cost andCapital StructureTargeting 250 bps incremental operating income margin by FY15 (1)
• Product, process and overhead improvements
• Dedicated cost reduction teams
• No compromises: reduce cost structure with no negative impact to customers or brand
• Incrementally improved margins in economic recovery
• Opportunity not dependent on volume increases
(1) Versus FY11
26
Mission Deployment Center
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Optimize Cost andCapital StructureMeasure Processes, Drive Results
• Common tools and KPIs
27
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Delivering Results - Product
28
New offering
Previous offering
Weight ReductionIndustry’s Lightest Unit
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
New Platform++ Weight Reduction
New Frame+++ Weight Reduction
New Axles and Spindles
New CWT and Rear Hoods+++ Weight Reduction
New Turntable++ Weight Reduction
Breakdown of Major Sub-systems Redesign
29
Previous offering
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Redesign Reduces AWP Weight
30
“Moves to best-in-class weight”
Pre MOVEAWP
Post MOVEAWP
Comp 1 Comp 2 Comp 3 Comp 4
DramaticWeight
Reduction
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Delivering Results -Process Improvement
• Commercial Segment 4 in 1 line efficiency has improved by more than 20%
• Commonizedplatforms simplify fixturing
• Flexible fixturingenables multiple products to be produced on one line to free up space
31
Realizing strong efficiencies with 4 in 1 line
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Delivering Results -Overhead Reduction• Transferred 450/510 AWP
production from Belgium to Romania, permitting closure of 25,000 sq. ft. facility
• Achieving quality, delivery and cost targets– Defects per unit well below goal– Positive trend for on time
delivery– 109% of labor savings goal
attained
• Additional insourcingpossibilities
32
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Optimize Cost Progression
(1) Net of investment costs and compared with consolidated FY11 operating income margins.
33
0
50
100
150
200
250
FY12E FY13E FY14E FY15E
~5bps
~75 bps
~130 bps
250 bps
Targeted Operating Income Margin Impact
• Targeting 250 bps of consolidated operating income margin improvement by FY15 in addition to absorption benefit from higher sales volume(1)
• Expect annualized 60+ bps impact for FY13 from actions implemented YTD in FY12
(Bas
is P
oint
s O
pera
ting
Inco
me
/ Sal
es)
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Value InnovationDriving ~$350 million incremental annual revenue by FY15
(1)
• Disciplined, resourced execution of multi-generational product and technology plans in all segments
• Integrated project teams charged with improving product launch processes and adherence to project KPIs
• Customer First focus driving all innovation(1) Compared with FY12.
34
$0
$100
$200
$300
$400
FY13E FY14E FY15E
~$175
~$250
~$350Incremental Revenue vs FY12E
($ in Millions)
(Mill
ions
of D
olla
rs)
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Value Innovation -RS Scissor• Opens new markets for JLG
• Innovation targeting price-value segment
• Field validation underway
• Global customers pleased with RS quality and value
35
Tianjin Facility
New RSScissor
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Global Presence
36
Countries where Oshkosh has a presence
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Emerging Market Expansion> 25% of revenues by FY15 (30% by FY16)
• Expanding sales, service and manufacturing operations • Forward deploying business development professionals for defense• Developing products for global markets• Leveraging international facilities across segments
37
17%~20%
>25%Sales Outside the U.S.
~10%-15% CAGR (FY12-FY15)
FY11 FY15EFY12E
(Per
cent
of R
even
ue)
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
MOVE-ing Forward
• Right Strategy
• Recovery has Begun
• Right Processes & Team
38
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day
September 14, 2012
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Frank NerenhausenAccess Equipment
Oshkosh Corporation Analyst DaySeptember 14, 2012
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
The Access Equipment Advantage
43
JLG is positioned for sustained industry leading performance
Global Leader in Access Equipment
Industry Leading
Innovation
Superior Product Range
Full Spectrum Parts, Service, and Support
Flexible Manufacturing
and Supply Chain
Global Market Presence
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Broadest Product Portfolio: Elevating People and Materials Safely and Efficiently
44
Product Innovation: A clear JLG advantage
JLG Aerial Work PlatformsPlatform Heights 6’ – 150’
TelehandlersMax Lift Capacity5,500lb – 12,000lbMax Lift Height18’ – 55’
Jerr-Dan Recovery Vehicles
Straight Boom Lifts Scissor Lifts Vertical Lifts
CompactJLG Military
Wreckers Carriers
Articulated Boom Lifts
Skytrak Lull
Rotators
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Industry Leading Lifecycle Solutions: A Clear JLG Advantage
45
Leading Systems and ProcessesLeading Systems and Processes
Worldwide Parts and Service Network• Full range of JLG program
and competitive parts• Extended service network
Customer Support• Cutting edge training• Industry-leading call centers
Enabling Technology• Online Express• Mobile Apps• Telematics
Next Phase of Equipment Life• Pre-owned• Reconditioning
Deep installed base provides runway for growth
Deep Experience World Class Solutions
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Global Market Presence: A Clear JLG Advantage
46
3 Regional Headquarters9 Manufacturing Facilities19 Sales and Service Centers4 Parts Distribution Centers3 Engineering Centers
Customer Support in all Regions
Leveraged Global Supply Chain
Global Product
Platforms
Flexible Global
Operations
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
North American Rental Companies are Refreshing Their Fleets, Increasing Market Penetration
48
Total Construction Spending(Y-O-Y % Change)
NA Rental Equipment Access - Fleet Age(AWP and TMH)
NA Rental Equipment Company Fleet Utilization
50
55
60
65
70
75
1Q'10 2Q'10 3Q'10 4Q'10 1Q'11 2Q'11 3Q'11 4Q'11 1Q'12 2Q'12Ind. Avg.
40
45
50
55
60
2009 2010 2011 2012
(Age
in M
onth
s)
Age (months)
-20
-10
0
10
20
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012E 2013E 2014E 2015EUnited States Canada
NA Rental Equipment Company CapEx (Y-O-Y % Change)
Source: IHS Global data/projections Source: Rouse Rental Report
Based on International Rental News/Dan Kaplan sample of medium to large NA rental equipment companies (United Rental, RSC, HERC, Ameco, Neff).
‐90
‐60
‐30
0
30
60
90
120
150
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
CapEx
Based on International Rental News/Dan Kaplan sample of medium to large NA rental equipment companies (United Rental, RSC, H&E, HERC).
(% C
hang
e)(%
Util
izat
ion)
(% C
hang
e)
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12E FY13E FY14E FY15E
17 13 4 4 7 13 14 16 20
8067
13 1235
57 59 59 60
(Uni
ts in
Tho
usan
ds)
Telehandlers AWPs
North America – Strong Rental and Market Conditions, Sustained Growth Cycle• Favorable construction spending outlook• Rental industry robust
– Fleet age 55+ months (near peak)– Utilization near 70% (trending up)– Strong CapEx plans
• Rental penetration continues upward trajectory• Energy projects, industrial retooling driving demand
Source: AEM data and Company estimates
(1) Prior Telehandler peak volume of 23,000 units in FY06
49
97
80
17
42
70 73 75 80
FY15E still well short of
prior peak unit volume
16
(1)
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
EAME – Some Bright Spots Despite Economic Uncertainty• Nordics, Benelux and Germany• Russia (infrastructure), South Africa (mining)
and Middle East (energy and infrastructure)• Relative stability in agriculture• Economic uncertainty in Southern Europe
Source: AEM data and Company estimates
50
FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12E FY13E FY14E FY15E
4020 18 27 29 30 31 33
54
15 1219 20 21 24 28
(Uni
ts in
Tho
usan
ds)
Telehandlers AWPs
94
3530
46 49 5155 61
FY15E AWP volume ~50% of peak;
Telehandler volume higher as 60% of demand comes
from Ag
JLG primarily serves the AWP market in EAME
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Latin America – Brazil Remains Attractive, Construction Strengthening Throughout
• Major projects with over $500 billion in investment expected in Brazil
• Rental concept strengthening• Product adoption increasing in Mexico, Chile and
Panama• Inconsistent supply of capital
Source: AEM data and Company estimates
51
FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12E FY13E FY14E FY15E1 0 1 2 2 2 2 23
23
5 68
911
(Uni
ts in
Tho
usan
ds)
Telehandlers AWPs
42
4
78
10
13
Demand driven by Olympics,
FIFA World Cup and mining
11
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Asia Pacific – Australia Steady, China in Early Phase of Adoption• Australia energy, mining and supporting infrastructure• Rental concept emerging in China• Vietnam, Indonesia and Malaysia showing potential• Singapore adoption growing• Slow recovery in Japan and South Korea
Source: AEM data and Company estimates
52
FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12E FY13E FY14E FY15E
3 1 2 1 1 1 1 2
14
5 6 8 9 11 13 13
(Uni
ts in
Tho
usan
ds)
Telehandlers AWPs
17
6 89
1012
14 15
Product adoption drives growth
faster than GDPincrease
JLG – Led Formation of
China Work Safety Committee (WSC)
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Access Equipment Sales Outlook(1)
(1) Sales to external customers
54
$0.0
$0.5
$1.0
$1.5
$2.0
$2.5
$3.0
$3.5
$4.0
FY11 FY12E FY13E FY15E
$2.0
~$2.8 $2.8 – $3.0
~$4.0
(Sal
es in
Bill
ions
)
• Cost pass throughs of emission standards changes, Caterpillar telehandler volume and pricing expected to lift sales beyond $3.2 billion prior peak
• Sales growth expected to accelerate in FY14, and particularly in FY15, as fleet expansion follows U.S. nonresidential construction recovery
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Access Equipment Operating Income Margin Outlook
• Steady margin improvement expected over next three years• Operating income margin in the last cycle peaked at 11.3%• Operating income margins reduced by ~ $50 million of annual
intangible amortization
55
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
14.0%
16.0%
18.0%
20.0%
FY11 FY12E FY13E FY15E
3.2%
~7.7%9.5%-10.0%
~15.0%
(Ope
ratin
g In
com
e M
argi
n %
)
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Access Equipment Operating Income Margin Drivers
• MOVE impact expected to accelerate in FY14 and FY15 as FY12 and FY13 investments provide returns
• Numerous “O” initiatives already providing benefits56
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
14.0%
16.0%
18.0%
20.0%
Prior Peak(FY08)
FY12E "M"Initiatives
"O"Initiatives
"V"Initiatives
"E"Initiatives
FY15E
11.3%
~7.7%
~15.0%
(Ope
ratin
g In
com
e M
argi
n %
)
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day
September 14, 2012
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
John UriasDefense
Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day
September 14, 2012
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
The Oshkosh Defense Advantage
60
Defense Engineering & Product
Development
Scalable Manufacturing & Operations
Vertical Integration of Specialized
Components
Defense Program
Management
Vehicle Fleet Modernization
Service, Lifecycle
Sustainment
Defense industry expertise that leverages the full capabilities of Oshkosh Corporation
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Leading Global Defense Tactical Vehicle Portfolio
61
Heavy Equipment Transporter (HET)
Heavy Expanded Mobility Tactical Truck (HEMTT)
Palletized Load System (PLS)
Logistics Vehicle System Replacement (LVSR)
Medium Tactical Vehicle Replacement (MTVR)
Family of Medium Tactical Vehicles (FMTV)
MRAP All-Terrain Vehicle (M-ATV) Base Variant
M-ATV Special Forces Variant
Light Combat Tactical All-Terrain Vehicle (L-ATV)
HMMWV Modernization Solutions
SandCat Tactical Protector Vehicle (TPV)
Ground Mobility Vehicle (GMV) 1.1
Heavy
Light
Medium& MRAP
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
L-ATVThe Oshkosh JLTV Solution
• The future of light tactical vehicles
• JLTV EMD contract award– 22 prototypes– Testing and evaluation
• Oshkosh JLTV solution – Oshkosh TAK-4i intelligent
independent suspension system– Latest automotive technologies– Advanced crew protection
system
62
The Oshkosh JLTV solution was designed with a purpose – to keep Warfighters safe on future battlefields with unpredictable terrain, tactics, and threats.
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Defense Product Lifecycle Solutions
63
RecapitalizationIn-factory modernization to the latest configuration; returned with zero mile/hour warranty
ResetIn-theater or in-factory upgrade to restore capability
Tech Upgrades/KitsAdding new capability on an urgent needs basis
Field Maintenance and SupportField Service Reps provide technical support in-theater; full range of logistics and training solutions support operational readiness
Defense vehicle engineering, design and supply chain expertisecreates differentiation for our aftermarket solutions
Military Experience Quality Management SystemLean Processes
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Global Defense Spending Forecast
65
East Asia2012a 23,7872017f 32,987CAGR 6.76%12‐17(f) 172,063
East Europe2012a 6,6252017f 6,994CAGR 1.09%12‐17(f) 40,232
Latin America2012a 14,9162017f 20,280CAGR 6.34%12‐17(f) 103,809
MENA2012a 37,9532017f 44,905CAGR 3.42%12‐17(f) 248,005
North America2012a 206,5912017f 198,135CAGR ‐0.83%12‐17(f) 1,224,340
Russia & CIS2012a 21,5672017f 28,108CAGR 5.44%12‐17(f) 150,570
South Asia2012a 17,9512017f 25,210CAGR 7.03%12‐17(f) 129,020
South East Asia2012a 8,7592017f 11,696CAGR 5.96%12‐17(f) 129,020
South Europe2012a 11,2052017f 12,360CAGR 1.98%12‐17(f) 68,893
West Europe2012a 63,8702017f 63,772CAGR ‐0.03%12‐17(f) 363,249
- U.S. Defense spending represents nearly 50% of global spend 2012-2017- Regional spending increases driven by air and sea- Ground vehicle opportunities exist
Source: Jane’s Defence Budgets, June 13, 2012
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
U.S. DOD ProgramAcquisition Budget
(1)
(1) Based on FY13 Presidential Budget request; does not reflect Sequestration impact
66
Aircraft, $47.6
C4I Systems, $8.2
Ground Systems,
$10.9 Missile Defense, $9.0
Missiles & Munitions,
$10.2
Mission Support, $50.4
RDT&E S&T, $11.9
Ship-building & Maritime,
$22.6 Space Systems, $8.0
Proposed FY13 Weapon Systems Base & OCO: $178.8 Billion
Combat Vehicles,
$1.7 Heavy
Tactical Vehicles,
$1.0
Medium Tactical
Vehicles, $0.4
Light Tactical
Vehicles, $0.5
Support Equipment,
$6.3
Weapons, $1.0
Proposed FY13 Ground Systems Base & OCO: $10.9 Billion
JLTV and GMV are only new
start programs in next three
years
45% reduction in tactical vehicle acquisition from FY13-17(1) reflects new Defense strategy, lower operational tempo, and force reduction
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Macro Defense Market Trends
67
Macro market trends will redefine the competitive landscape for vehicle contracts of all types and sizes
U.S. Defense
Spending
Vertical Integration
Export Policies to Support U.S. Industrial Base
U.S. Acquisition
Reform
International Business
Opportunities
Offset Req’t
Competitive Landscape
Reset
“I've made clear, and I'll continue to do so, that if sequestration is allowed to go into effect, it'll be a disaster for national defense and it would be a disaster, frankly, for defense communities as well.”
Leon PanettaU.S. Defense Secretary
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Adapting to the Domestic Defense Spending Downturn
68
Current Operations Profile
New Vehicle Production Aftermarket &
Modernization
Tech & Product Development
Future Operations Profile
New Vehicle Production
Aftermarket & Modernization
Tech & Product Development
HEAVY, MEDIUM & MRAP VEHICLES MEDIUM, MRAP & LIGHT VEHICLES
– Compete to win in the Light vehicle segment– Optimize our cost structure
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Capture International Business
69
Tanker HET HEMTT MTT FMTV M-ATV TPV
OshkoshDefense Vehicles
Operating in more than
20 Countries
MTVR
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Deliver Product Lifecycle Solutions
70
Technology kits to modernize existing vehicle fleets
Total lifecycle support –anywhere in the world
Independent Suspension Upgrade Kits
Crew ProtectionUpgrade Kits
Unmanned Ground Vehicle Upgrade Kits
Operational Readiness
Field Service
Field Upgrades
Reset
Recapitalization
Vehicle Service Years
0
10
20
Baseline Defense Revenue
72September 14, 20122012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day
$0.0$1.0$2.0$3.0$4.0$5.0$6.0$7.0$8.0
FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12E FY13E FY14E FY15E
Net Sales ($ in Billions)Sales Baseline Target
JLTV EMDGMV 1.1
HMMWV UpgradesInt’l M-ATV
MSVSP-19R, and More
Family of Heavy Tactical Vehicles (FHTV)
M-ATV
Family of Medium Tactical Vehicles (FMTV)
Medium Tactical Vehicle Replacement (MTVR)
Logistics Vehicle System Replacement (LVSR)
Vehicle Support, Aftermarket and Lifecycle Sustainment Services
SandCat
Int’l M-ATV and Other
(1) Baseline assumed in Oshkosh’s EPS outlook
(1)
$1.5-$2.0$0.8-$1.5
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
$0.0
$0.5
$1.0
$1.5
$2.0
$2.5
$3.0
$3.5
$4.0
$4.5
$5.0
FY11 FY12E FY13E FY14E FY15E
(Sal
es in
Bill
ions
)
Baseline (1)
Baseline(1)
$4.4
~ $3.9
$3.3 - $3.4
$2.0 Target
$1.5 Target
• Baseline sales in FY15E, assuming no contract wins, decline to $800 million
• Target sales for FY15E is $1.5 billion based on initiatives to drive global and aftermarket sales
Defense Sales Outlook
73
(1) Baseline assumed in Oshkosh’s EPS outlook
$1.5
$0.8
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Defense Operating Income Margin Outlook
• Company will adjust cost structure as needed to remain profitable• New contract wins present upside to Baseline
74
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
14.0%
16.0%
FY11 FY12E FY13E FY14E FY15E
12.4%
~5.5% 5.0%-5.5%Baseline
~3.0% Baseline~2.0%(O
pera
ting
Inco
me
Mar
gin
%)
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day
September 14, 2012
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
September 14, 2012
Jim JohnsonFire & Emergency
Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
The Fire & Emergency Advantage
79
InnovationLeader
PremierDistribution and Service
Unrivaled Product
Performance
#1 Brands
Leading global provider of specialty vehicles that serve, protect and save lives
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Delivering Market Leading Products
80
Custom Pumpers Rescues Aerials Commercial Pumpers
Aircraft Rescue & Firefighting
Broadcast
Pierce Fire Apparatus
Oshkosh Airport Products
Frontline Communications Products
Diverse solutions for fire, emergency and broadcast professionals
Command Military Simulators
Airport Snow Removal
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Going Global to Offset Domestic Pressure
81
Fire & Emergency headquartersManufacturing facilitiesFire and ARFF dealersSnow Removal dealersFrontline dealersCompany owned sales/service Changi Airport Commissioning Ceremony, Singapore
Added 22 dealers in Asia in past 3 years
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Leveraging Premier Dealer Network• Pierce
– Domestic– 30 exclusive dealers with ~300
sales representatives– 60 service centers with more than
600 service technicians– Direct sales to Department of Defense– International dealer network
– Added 11 new dealers in FY12• Airport
– Domestic dealers and direct sales representatives
– 60 international sales representatives and dealers
• Oshkosh international offices– Dubai, United Arab Emirates– Beijing and Shanghai, China– Moscow, Russia– Singapore– New Delhi, India
82
Atlantic Emergency Solutions
Oshkosh Warehouse, Singapore
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Domestic Fire Market Drivers Stabilizing
84
Housing prices and property taxes appear to have bottomedRecent Headlines
More contract signings pointto housing recovery- Associated Press, August 2012
Housing starts projected to rise significantly over next 3 years- Moody’s
Firefighters feel the squeeze of shrinking budgets- Governing magazine
Municipal-debt defaults will remain infrequent and isolated events…- Moody’s
HOUSING PRICES & LOCAL PROPERTY TAXES
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Poised for Success in Challenging U.S. Market
• Lower federal funding expected to impact FY13
• Expect modest municipal recovery beginning in FY14
• Improving cost structure– Exiting under-performing
businesses– Rightsizing
• Targeting market share growth of core products– Custom pumpers– Aerials
Source: Fire Apparatus Manufacturers Association and Company estimates
85
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
U.S. Fire Apparatus Market (Units)
Expect U.S. fire markets to bottom in
FY13, modest improvement on the
horizon
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
International Market Growth Opportunities• Expect continued growth in
developing countries– Investing in safety and security– Expanding infrastructure
• World air traffic projected to continue growing– Middle East and Asia Pacific
expected to increase 8%-10% per year
– Driving increased demand for Oshkosh Airport Products
• International customers seeking technologically superior products
(1) Source: Air Traffic Growth (regional growth in passenger kilometers) per International Civil Aviation Organization
86
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
World Air Traffic 2012 - 2014 Projected Average Annual Growth Rate
Pierce Industrial Pumper, Liaoning Province, China
(1)
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Capitalizing on International Opportunities
87
Recent ordersPierceOshkosh Airport
Recent Headlines
Strategic Action Plan to Improve Aviation Safety in Africa-International Civil Aviation Organization
India Invests in Airport Development-Asian Aviation
Oshkosh Fire & Emergency Sales Surge in China-Fire Engineering
China to Build 70 Airports by 2015-The Telegraph
Airport conquest accounts in
Europe
Chongqing, China
17 high rise pumpers
Brasilia, Brazil30 custom pumpers
SingaporeChangi Airport
7 ARFF & Pierce
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Fire & Emergency Sales Outlook
• Businesses exited represent sales of ~$70M in FY12E and ~$15M in first half of FY13E
• Expect domestic fire apparatus to bottom in FY13E then begin slow recovery
• Solid airport products and broadcast growth expected from FY13E – FY15E, buoyed by international demand
89
$0$100$200$300$400$500$600$700$800$900
$1,000
FY11 FY12E FY13E FY15E
$800 (1) ~$825 (1)
$725-$750~$825
(Sal
es in
Mill
ions
)
(1) Includes sales of exited businesses
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
-2.0%
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
(0.4%) (0.8%)
2.0% - 2.5%
~6.0%
Fire & EmergencyOperating Income Margin Outlook
• Exit of under performing businesses lifts margins ~2% in FY13; when exit complete, Company will seek to accelerate margin improvement
• Operating income margin expected to recover to mid-single digits in FY14
90
(1) Excludes impact of non-cash impairment charges
(2) Excludes costs to exit ambulance and European mobile medical businesses
FY11 FY12E FY13E FY15E(2)(1)
(Ope
ratin
g In
com
e M
argi
n %
)
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
-2.0%
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
Prior Peak(FY08)
FY12E "M"Initiatives
"O"Initiatives
"V"Initiatives
"E"Initiatives
FY15E
9.3%
(0.8%)
~6.0%
Fire & Emergency Operating Income Margin Drivers
91
(1) Excludes costs to exit ambulance and European mobile medical businesses
(1)
• Margins impacted by emerging market investments
• Over time, Company will seek to accelerate margin recovery targets despite soft domestic markets
(Ope
ratin
g In
com
e M
argi
n %
)
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
September 14, 2012
Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Todd FierroCommercial
Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day
September 14, 2012
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
The Commercial Advantage: Street Smart, Street Tough
95
Broadest Product Line
Direct Distribution,
Customer Intimacy
Scalable, Flexible
Manufacturing & Operations
Access to Technology, Alternative
Fuels Leadership
Innovation and New Product Development
Best in class Aftermarket Service and
Support
Integrated factory
Refuse collection vehicle product line
Alternative fuel technology
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Broadest Product Line
96
Standard
Front Loader Rear Loader
Bridgemaster Front Discharge
ConcreteMixers
Refuse Collection Vehicles
Articulating CranesDominator Batch Plants
Side Loader
Service Bodies, Cranes, Plants
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Distribution and Operations Advantages
• Operations Advantages– Scalable and flexible capacity– Lean manufacturing initiatives
97
• Distribution Advantages– 23 factory owned
branch locations– Customer intimacy
via direct sales force– Parts distribution managed
close to customers
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Construction: Tremendous Opportunity with Modest Recovery
Sources: Unit data - Truck Mixer Manufacturing Board; Housing Starts – U.S. Census Bureau
99
Housing Starts and Mixer Shipments (1959-2011)
Housing Starts and Mixer Shipments (1959-2011)
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
Mixer U
nits Shipped
Hou
sing
Sta
rts
(000
s)
Housing Starts Mixer Units Shipped
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500
Mix
er U
nits
Shi
pped
Housing Starts (in '000's)
Mixer Units Shipped Linear (Mixer Units Shipped)
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
U.S. Mixer Market Unit Growth Analysis
• Housing starts assumptions: 0.8 million in FY13; 1.2 million in FY14; and 1.4 million in FY15
• Concrete mixer parts demand is up 25% YTD June FY12 and up >100% from the recessionary low
• Wallboard loader demand recovery recently started
100
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
Mar
ket S
ize
(Uni
ts)
FY12 - FY15 CAGR 46%
< 50% of FY06
Volume
0.00.20.40.60.81.01.21.41.61.82.0
2011 2012E 2013E 2014E 2015E
Hou
sing
Sta
rts
In M
illio
ns
Housing Starts Forecast
Moodys Portland Cement AssociationGlobal Insight Average Analyst Estimate
Assumed one year delay in
mixer demand vs. starts correlation!
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Significant Opportunity with Modest RCV Recovery• RCV market expected to be driven by:
– Population growth – CAGR 1%– Market recovery / fleet age – CAGR 1%– Construction and demolition – CAGR 1%
101
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
10,000
FY00 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12E FY13E FY14E FY15E
Mar
ket S
ize
(uni
ts)
Realistic projections based on
historical data
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Commercial Sales Outlook
• Housing recovery expected to drive strong concrete mixer demand by FY15– > 40% concrete mixer FY12E - FY15E sales CAGR
• Modest refuse collection vehicle growth outlook103
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
FY11E FY12E FY13E FY15E
Mixer and Other Refuse
$565
~$680 $725 – $750
~$1,250
(Sal
es in
Mill
ions
)
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
FY11 FY12E FY13E FY15E
0.7%
~4.0%4.5% - 5.0%
>10.0%
Commercial Operating Income Margin Outlook
• Margin improvement expected to accelerate in FY14 and FY15 as concrete mixer volumes recover
104
(Ope
ratin
g In
com
e M
argi
n %
)
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
Prior Peak(FY00)
FY12E "M"Initiatives
"O"Initiatives
"V"Initiatives
"E"Initiatives
FY15E
8.2%
~4.0%
>10.0%
Commercial Operating IncomeMargin Drivers
• Reasonable market recovery assumptions drive significant fixed cost absorption benefits
• Growth in Americas outside U.S. is included in “M” initiatives driver• Segment continues to study emerging market initiatives outside
of the Americas105
(Ope
ratin
g In
com
e M
argi
n %
)
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day
September 14, 2012
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
September 14, 2012
Colleen MoynihanQuality & Continuous ImprovementOshkosh CorporationAnalyst Day
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012110
Provide Coaching and Training
Deploy SystemsAnd Standards
Measure Results And Delight
Q&CI Priorities Support MOVE
Customer First
Customer Supporting Systems
Customer Satisfaction
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
The Oshkosh Operating System and Our Deployment Journey
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
One SystemCustomer First Guiding Principles
• Develop deep understanding of our customers
• Provide superior performance and quality
• Promote a “Customer First” culture
113
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
One Team Customer Supporting Systems
• Align our objectives and establish plans to deliver improvement
• Create processes that provide value to our customers
• Use lean tools to continually improve costs, performance and delight our customers
114
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
One OshkoshCustomer Satisfaction
• Verify customer satisfaction and reinforce partnership
• Develop customer-supplier relationships, internally and externally
• Utilize measurement systems to drive improvement
115
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Oshkosh Operating SystemAccelerates MOVE• Create
common way of thinking and operating
• Establish standard set of practices that will improve our business
• Engage all of our employees in delighting our customers
116
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Oshkosh Operating System Deployment
117
From Jamie Flinchbaugh and Andy Carlino, Hitchhiker’s Guide to Lean
The OOS Journey
Phase Zero:Exploration
Phase One:Building the foundation
Phase Two:Expanding with tools and deeper thinking
Phase Three:Integration and reinforcement
Phase Four:Building the momentum
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Oshkosh Operating System Deployment Expanding with Tools and Deeper Thinking
118
Communication Deploy a top down communication strategy
EducationImplement an education program for OOS principles, systems and tools (Oshkosh University)
Tools and Methods Define, develop and deploy the OOS tools, methods, and measurement systems
Application Execute OOS projects to meet business performance targets
Infrastructure Implement organizational structure to deploy and sustain OOS across the enterprise
Leadership Engagement Strengthen leadership behaviors to reinforce OOS
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Oshkosh Operating System Deployment Launch Oshkosh University
119
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Oshkosh Operating SystemStandardize Tools and Methods
120
We’ve Got It… We’ve Found It…
We’re Developing It…
SixPilot
Projects
Business Unit
Procedures
External Best
Practices
OshkoshQuality ManagementSystem
Customer Acceptance Validation
Customer Quality
Experience
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
The Oshkosh Operating System and Execution of our MOVE Strategy
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Before: Excessive WIP, inefficient cell layout, wait time
After: Reduced WIP, improved labor utilization
OOS Project Results: • Reduced Work In Process by 50% - raw and finished
booms• Reduced floor space usage through consolidation of
800 boom upper fly and carrier tube build cells• Reduced wait time… New layout enabled use of 5th
overhead crane which reduced wait time
JLG - Boom Fab Cell Flow Improvement
Before: Masking tape and paper applied to all openings.
After: New primer surface eliminated need for taping and unmasking
OOS Project Results: • Reduced indirect supplies through changes in material
selection• Reduced direct labor involved in taping and
unmasking
Pierce Appleton – Cab Paint Improvement
Oshkosh Operating System ResultsIncreasing Manufacturing Efficiency
122
Before: Operator utilization at 73% of takt time
After: Operator utilization at 92% of takt time
OOS Project Results: • Redeployed assemblers to new business needs• Reduced overtime• Reduced floor space usage by 20,000 sq. ft.
Defense – Line Balance Improvement
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012123
Before: Parts received in separate wire baskets
After: Parts paired and received in returnable container
OOS Project Results: • Improved inventory control by receiving parts in sets• Reduced material handling• Improved safety through ergonomic improvements
Before: Excessive inventory, no visual control
After: Reduced inventory, improved labor utilization
OOS Project Results: • Reduced inventory and parts shortages• Reduced non-value added walk time and wait time• Improved safety through ergonomic improvements
Defense – Material Presentation
JLG - Boom Fab Cell Material Improvement
Oshkosh Operating System ResultsOptimizing Material Flow
Before: Racking congested plant floor space
After: Additional 5,000 sq. ft. for production
OOS Project Results: • Reduced inventory significantly • Reclaimed valuable production floor space• Improved production efficiency in part delivery by
shortening chain from supermarket to production line
McNeilus – Material Flow Improvement
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Def
ects
per
Uni
t
FY12 Q3 ActualFY11 Baseline
FMTV Pre-Delivery Inspection Results
FMTV Internal Customer Inspection Results
FY12 Q3 ActualFY11 Baseline
FY12 Q3 ActualFY11 Baseline
FMTV External Customer Inspection Results
124
Oshkosh Operating System ResultsImproving Product Quality
81% Reduction
50% Reduction
Contract Goal
74% Reduction
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012125
Oshkosh Operating System ResultsExpanding Lean to Business Processes
Visual Management in Corporate Finance
Standard Work to Align and Execute our Objectives
Through Strategy DeploymentValue Stream Mapping
the Product Development Process
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Oshkosh Operating SystemHow We Will Succeed
126
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
September 14, 2012
Oshkosh CorporationAnalyst Day
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Greg FredericksenGPSC
Oshkosh CorporationAnalyst DaySeptember 14, 2012
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
GPSC Four Priorities
130
Competitiveness
Delivery /Supply Chain
Quality / Launch
NPD - Program Management
Suppliers Must Perform To All Four Priorities
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Building a World Class Procurement Organization• Talent and expertise upgraded• Active participation in design process to drive cost & quality• Cost management leveraging size & scale across the segments• Forensic cost tool box to address all cost drivers
131
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
High Impact Successes
• M-ATV supplier management
• Access Equipment Tianjin plant start up
• Access Equipment global capacity management
• FMTV
132
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Cross Segment Synergies
• Fabrications/commodities – weldments, steel, etc.• Powertrain – engines, transmissions and component
“dress” items• Driveline – axles, drive components and
suspension systems• Hydraulics – cylinders, valves, hoses and fittings• Chassis – configurations across multiple manufacturers• Wheels and tires – including components and the
assembly process to provide our plants a single subassembly to install
133
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
• Optimize cost– Past four years we have
minimized material cost impacts to our products
– Supplier development improvements
– Forensic cost driver analysis
134
MOVE is Deployed
• Value innovation– Supplier technology to OSK first– NPD supplier management– SCRIPs
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Future Focus• Operational excellence:‒ Cost driver analytics tied to our NPD process‒ Continued development of Supplier Cost Reduction &
Improvement Process (SCRIPs) • Lean supply chain: increase inventory turns / reduce lead times• Advance supplier metrics• Evolution of GPSC academy to suppliers
135
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Oshkosh CorporationAnalyst Day
September 14, 2012
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Gary SchmiedelTechnology
Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day
September 14, 2012
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
OSK Engineering Priorities
138
Innovation Leadership
NPD Program Management
CompetitivenessCost & Weight
Quality &Launch
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012 139
Innovation Leadership
NPD Program Management
Quality &Launch
Competitiveness Cost & Weight
“Improve our Customers’ Work”
“Flawlessly Launch to Customers”
“Provide Best Value for our Customers”
“Effectively Deliver What Customers
Want”
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Cross Segment Collaboration
140
• Engineering Summit Annual
• Best Practices Sharing Ongoing
• Core Competency Teams• Project Reviews
Quarterly
• Engineering Leadership Discussions
• Project Team Meetings Weekly
Access Equipment
Engineering
Access Equipment
EngineeringCommercial Engineering
Fire & Emergency Engineering
Defense Engineering
Corporate Engineering
• Competitive Events
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Vehicle Mobility
142
Oshkosh continues as the gold standard for off road mobility
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Safety Systems
143
Cab Crush Resistance Frontal Impact Protection
SkyGuard™ Control Panel Protection
Unsurpassed Visibility and Cab Roominess
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Safety Systems
Electronic stability control
144
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Autonomy• Cargo Unmanned Ground Vehicle (Cargo-UGV)
– Customer evaluation completed August 2012– System suitable for a wide range of host vehicles– Vehicle remains human driveable– Full autonomy– Shadow mode– Remote control
145
Handheld tele-operation controller
Autonomous vehicles operating in dusty conditions
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
New Products – Access Equipment
147
• Telehandlers– Emissions updates: EU machines to
Stage IIIB, NA machines to Tier 4i– Improved visibility
• 1500SJ– 150 foot working height– Transportable without oversize height
or width permits
• RS Scissors – Manufactured in Tianjin, China– 6m and 10m configurations
• 340AJ– Named “Best Product of the Year” by
Hire and Rental Industry Association – 34 foot lift, 17 foot up and over
capability– Dual fuel (propane/gasoline) or diesel
engines available
New North American and European Telehandler Configurations
1500SJ RS Scissors 340AJ
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
New Products – Defense
• Joint Light Tactical Vehicle (JLTV)• HMMWV upgrades and replacements• Ground Mobility Vehicle (GMV)• Multi Mission Recovery System (MMRS)
148
Joint Light Tactical Vehicle
(JLTV)
HMMWV Suspension
Upgrade
Ground Mobility Vehicle (GMV)
Multi-Mission Recovery System (MMRS)
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
New Products –Fire & Emergency
149
Dash Cab Forward aerial
3000 gallon capacity Global Striker
H-Series with Oshkosh broom subsystem
Pierce Industrial Pumper – Chongqing, China
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
New Products – Commercial
• Compressed natural gas continues to grow as an alternative fuel– CNG variants available in all primary product configurations
• Main stream products refined for cost and weight improvements• Niche products address specific markets
150
Extended reach Zero Radius side loader
Organics front loader
Ready mix market embracing CNG as a fuel
CNG Powered front and rear loadersContender front loader Split rear loader, 60/40
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day
September 14, 2012
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Dave Sagehorn CFO
Oshkosh CorporationAnalyst Day
September 14, 2012
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Consolidated Sales Bridge
• Defense sales upside exists from baseline levels• Expect MOVE to significantly offset Defense segment sales decline• Assumes no acquisitions(1) Sales decline to baseline level, assuming no new sales capture beyond current Oshkosh programs
154
$0.0
$2.0
$4.0
$6.0
$8.0
$10.0
FY12E DefenseDecline
"M"Initiatives
"V"Initiatives
"E"Initiatives
FY15E
(Sal
es in
Bill
ions
)
~$8.1
$6.5-$6.9
(1)
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Consolidated Operating IncomeMargin Bridge
• Expect MOVE to more than offset impact of lower Defense sales on operating income margins
• Potential for Defense operating income upside from sales above baseline level
(1) Excludes costs to exit ambulance and European mobile medical businesses
155
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
FY12E DefenseDecline
"M"Initiatives
"O"Initiatives
"V "Initiatives
"E"Initiatives
FY15E
(Ope
ratin
g In
com
e M
argi
n %
)
4.3%-4.4%
9.2%-9.8%
(1)
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Doubling EPS by FY15
• Other FY15 Assumptions– Interest expense and other ~$55 million– Tax rate ~34%– Share count ~ 90.5 million
$2.05 to $2.15
$4.00 to $4.50
Oshkosh CorporationEPS Opportunity
23%-30% CAGR
FY12E(1) FY15E
156
(1) Excludes costs to exit ambulance and European mobile medical businesses
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Consolidated Free CashFlow (FCF) (1) Summary
• FY12E FCF higher than previous expectations due to timing of Defense customer payments
• FY13E FCF expected to be lower than FY12 due to shift in sales to more working capital intensive segments and continued “performance-based payment” drawdown in Defense segment
• Expect all FY13E – FY14E FCF to be attributable to Access Equipment segment• FY15E reflects higher earnings and stabilization of working capital requirements
(1) Defined as cash flow from operations less net capital expenditures
157
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
$350
FY12E FY15E
$175-$200
$300-$350
(Dol
lars
in M
illio
ns)
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
FY13 Early View Estimates
158
Full Year Low High
Sales (billions) $7.5 $7.8
Operating Income (millions) $380 $420
Diluted EPS $2.35 $2.60
• Comments on First Quarter– Seasonally lowest sales and EPS quarter– International M-ATV sales begin in Q2– Potential customer pause pending outcome of November elections
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
FY13 Early View Estimates (Continued)
159
• Corporate expenses up ~10% (higher IT investment)• Tax rate of ~33%• CapEx of ~$70 million• Free cash flow $75 - $100 million• Share count of ~91.5 million
Segment expectations
Measure Access Equipment Defense Fire &
Emergency Commercial
Sales(billions) $2.8-$3.0 $3.3-$3.4 $0.72-$0.75 $0.72-$0.75
Operating Income Margin 9.5%-10.0% 5.0%-5.5% 2.0%-2.5% 4.5%-5.0%
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Disciplined Capital Allocation Framework
• Continually review capital structure• Apply free cash flow to uses that we believe provide highest returns• Expect to opportunistically use capital for share repurchases or acquisitions
161
Return capital to shareholders
Re-invest in core business
Invest in external growth
opportunities
Hold cash
Reduce debt
Long-term targeted capital
structure
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Solid Debt Metrics
• Manageable debt maturities• Appropriate fixed / floating mix• Responsible leverage profile
162
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
$350
$400
FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20
Deb
t Lev
el ($
mill
ions
)
Debt Maturity Schedule
TLA TLA Amort Senior Notes
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Jun 08 Dec 08 Jun 09 Dec 09 Jun 10 Dec 10 Jun 11 Dec 11 Jun 12
Fixe
d R
ate
Deb
t Per
cent
age
Fixed / Floating Debt Ratio
Fixed / Floating Debt Ratio Optimal Target Range
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12
Leve
rage
Leverage
Leverage Covenant Optimal Target Range
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Returning Capital to Shareholders
• Driving share price over the long-term• Share Repurchase Program
– Invest in attractive internal rate of return opportunities– Established 10b5-1 share repurchase program
• While maintaining a solid balance sheet
163
Enhancing long-term shareholder value
Shares repurchased since July 31(1)
~547,000
Average price per share $24.40
(1) As of September 7, 2012
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
External Growth Opportunities
• Opportunistic acquirer mindset– Right target– Right time– Right price
….No compelling need to make an acquisition at this time
• Potential deal characteristics– Target similar to existing products, but different end markets– Market leader– Large enough to make a difference, but not too big– Domestic or internationally located
• Focused on improving OSK valuation
164
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Oshkosh CorporationAnalyst Day
September 14, 2012
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
The Road to Doubling to a Global Industrial
September 14, 2012
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Doubling EPS by FY15
• MOVE strategy expected to deliver higher margins throughout the cycle
• The recovery from a deep cycle has commenced and is expected to overcome defense downturn
• Oshkosh has the processes and team to deliver MOVE
$2.05 to $2.15
$4.00 to $4.50
Oshkosh CorporationEPS Opportunity
FY12E(1)
23%-30% CAGR
FY15E
170
(1) Excludes costs to exit ambulance and European mobile medical businesses
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Non-GAAP ReconciliationsThe table below presents a reconciliation of the Company’s presented non-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures ($ in millions, except per share amounts)
172
Fiscal 2012 EstimatesOperating income (loss):
As presented $ (6.6) $ (6.6) $ 345.0 $ 355.0Costs to exit ambulance and
European mobile medical businesses (18.0) (14.0) (18.0) (14.0)GAAP $ (24.6) $ (20.6) $ 327.0 $ 341.0
Operating income (loss) margin:As presented (0.8)% (0.8)% 4.3% 4.4% Impact of costs to exit ambulance and
European mobile medical businesses (2.2)% (1.7)% (0.2)% (0.2)%GAAP (3.0)% (2.5)% 4.1% 4.2%
EPS:As presented $ 2.05 $ 2.15 Impact of costs to exit ambulance and
European mobile medical businesses, net of tax (0.15) (0.12)GAAP $ 1.90 $ 2.03
Fiscal 2012E to 2015E EPS CAGR (1)
As presented 23% 30%Based on GAAP EPS 25% 33%
ConsolidatedLow High
Fire & EmergencySegment
Low High
(1) CAGR – compound annual growth rate
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Non-GAAP Reconciliations (continued)The table below presents a reconciliation of the Company’s presented non-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures ($ in millions)
173
Non-DefenseAs reported:
Consolidated $ 7,584.7 $ 500.9 6.6%Less Defense segment (4,359.9) (543.0)Plus Corporate expense - 107.1
Non-Defense segments $ 3,224.8 $ 65.0 2.0%Plus goodwill and long-lived asset impairment charges - 4.8
Non-GAAP – non-Defense segments as presented $ 3,224.8 $ 69.8 2.2%
Fire & EmergencyAs reported $ 782.3 $ (8.2) (1.0)%Plus goodwill and long-lived asset impairment charges - 4.8Non-GAAP Fire & Emergency as presented $ 782.3 $ (3.4) (0.4)%
(1) To external customers
Operating Income (Loss)$ % of RevenueRevenue
(1)
Fiscal 2011
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Non-GAAP Reconciliations (continued)
The table below presents a reconciliation of the Company’s presented non-GAAP free cash flow measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures ($ in millions)
174
Low High Low High Low High
GAAP --Net cash provided by operating activities 224.0$ 249.0$ 149.0$ 174.0$ 385.0$ 435.0$ Additions to:
Property, plant & equipment (54.0) (54.0) (70.0) (70.0) (80.0) (80.0) Equipment held for rental (6.0) (6.0) (12.0) (12.0) (10.0) (10.0)
Proceeds from sale of:Property, plant & equipment 8.0 8.0 - - - - Equipment held for rental 3.0 3.0 8.0 8.0 5.0 5.0
Non-GAAP -- free cash flow as presented 175.0$ 200.0$ 75.0$ 100.0$ 300.0$ 350.0$
Fiscal 2012E Fiscal 2013E Fiscal 2015E
2012 Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day September 14, 2012
Oshkosh Corporation Analyst Day
September 14, 2012
• Charles L. Szews• Charles L. Szews is Oshkosh Corporation Chief Executive Officer (CEO).
Most recently, Szews served as President and CEO, a position he was appointed to in January 2011. Szews joined the company in 1996 as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), was appointed Executive Vice President in October 1997, and appointed President and Chief Operating Officer (COO) in October 2007. Szews was elected to the Oshkosh Board of Directors in 2007, a position he holds in addition to his other responsibilities.
• Prior to joining Oshkosh, Szews spent eight years with Fort Howard Corporation, holding a series of positions with increasing responsibility, most recently as vice president and controller.
• Szews holds a bachelor's degree summa cum laude in business administration from the University of Wisconsin - Eau Claire. He received his certified public accountant certification in 1980 and has 10 years of independent auditing experience with Ernst & Young.
• Szews currently also serves on the board of directors of Gardner Denver, Inc., a recognized leader in compressed air and gas, vacuum and fluid transfer technologies to industries throughout the world.
177September 2012Analyst Day Executive Biographies
Executive Biographies
• Wilson R. Jones• Wilson R. Jones is Oshkosh Corporation President and Chief Operating
Officer (COO), a position he was appointed to in August 2012. Most recently, Jones served as Executive Vice President and President, Access Equipment where he drove domestic and international growth, customer experiences with access products and strategically developed the segment’s global position.
• Prior to joining the Access Equipment segment, Jones was Executive Vice President and President, Fire & Emergency, a position which he was promoted to in September 2008. Jones was also the President of Pierce Manufacturing Inc.; he was appointed to this position in July 2007.
• In addition, Jones has served as Vice President of Sales and Marketing for the Fire & Emergency segment. Jones joined Oshkosh Corporation in 2005 as the Vice President and General Manager of the Airport Products Business Unit, where he led a strategic international initiative for the company.
• Jones has been in specialty vehicle manufacturing for more than 20 years. Jones has served on the Board of Directors for the Fire Apparatus Manufacturers’ Association and the American Ambulance Association. Jones holds a bachelor’s of business administration degree from the University of North Texas.
178September 2012Analyst Day Executive Biographies
Executive Biographies
179September 2012Analyst Day Executive Biographies
Executive Biographies• Frank R. Nerenhausen• Frank R. Nerenhausen is Oshkosh Corporation Executive Vice President
and President, Access Equipment, a position he was appointed to in August 2012. Nerenhausen oversees all aspects of the company’s Access Equipment segment, which includes JLG Industries, Inc. and Jerr-Dan Corporation.
• Most recently, Nerenhausen served as Oshkosh Corporation’s Executive Vice President and President, Commercial, where he was responsible for all companies within the Commercial business segment including McNeilus, CON-E-CO, London Machinery and IMT.
• Nerenhausen has had positions of increasing responsibility in various functional areas since joining Oshkosh Corporation in 1986. Nerenhausenhas a bachelor’s of Business Administration degree in Finance and Management Information Systems and an MBA with a marketing emphasis from the University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh.
• John M. Urias• John M. Urias is Oshkosh Corporation Executive Vice President and
President, Defense. He was appointed to this position in October 2011. Urias is responsible for leading all aspects of the company’s global defense business, including vehicle programs, new product development, life-cycle sustainment and aftermarket services.
• Urias is a former Army major general with 31 years of distinguished service. Before retiring from the Army, he served as commanding general of the Joint Contracting Command – Iran/Afghanistan in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom. His additional Army experience includes serving as the program executive officer of Air, Space & Missile Defense and deputy for systems acquisition at the Tank-Automotive and Armaments Command (TACOM).
• Prior to joining Oshkosh, Urias worked for Raytheon Company, where he most recently served as vice president of programs for Raytheon Integrated Defense Systems. In this role, he served as an advisor with senior international and domestic government officials. He also identified and developed new business opportunities, supported international business efforts, and was a key participant in national theater and security programs.
• Urias holds a master’s degree in national security and strategic studies from the Naval War College, a master’s degree in electrical engineering from the Naval Postgraduate School, and a bachelor’s degree in biological sciences from the University of California, Davis.
180September 2012Analyst Day Executive Biographies
Executive Biographies
• James W. Johnson• James W. Johnson is Executive Vice President and President, Fire &
Emergency. He is responsible for the overall operations of the entire Fire & Emergency Segment, consisting of the Pierce®, Oshkosh® Airport Products, Oshkosh Specialty Vehicles and Frontline™ brands.
• Prior to his current role, Johnson was the Sr. Vice President of Sales and Marketing for Pierce Manufacturing. He first joined Oshkosh Corporation in 2007, as the Director of Dealer Development for Pierce. Johnson has been in specialty vehicle manufacturing for 10 years, holding positions of increasing responsibility in sales and marketing in the recreational vehicle industry with Coachmen Industries and Forest River, Inc. He is also an attorney who spent several years practicing law in Indianapolis, Indiana focusing on commercial litigation.
• Johnson holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Business from Indiana University, Bloomington and a Juris Doctorate degree from Indiana University, Indianapolis.
181September 2012Analyst Day Executive Biographies
Executive Biographies
182September 2012Analyst Day Executive Biographies
Executive Biographies• Todd Fierro• Todd Fierro is Senior Vice President and President, Commercial. Fierro
oversees all aspects of the company’s Commercial segment, which includes McNeilus, CON-E-CO, London Machinery and IMT.
• Fierro joined Oshkosh in April 2011 as Vice President of Operations for the Commercial segment. He was instrumental in driving improved operational efficiencies and quality, while launching the principles and tools of the Oshkosh Operating System throughout the Commercial operations.
• Fierro has nearly 18 years of experience with Ford Motor Company, where he held a number of operations and engineering leadership positions. Prior to coming to Oshkosh, he managed start-up operations for Bloom Energy and Eclipse Aviation. Fierro has a bachelor’s degree in Manufacturing Engineering from Wayne State University.
183September 2012Analyst Day Executive Biographies
Executive Biographies• Colleen Moynihan• Colleen Moynihan is Oshkosh Corporation Senior Vice President,
Quality & Continuous Improvement, joining the company in July 2011. Moynihan is responsible for leading the deployment of the Oshkosh Operating System and implementing a Global Quality Management System.
• Moynihan brings 26 years of quality, manufacturing operations, and engineering experience to Oshkosh Corporation. She came to Oshkosh from Caterpillar Incorporated, one of the world’s largest manufacturers of construction and mining equipment. As Director of Global Quality & Manufacturing Engineering at Caterpillar, Moynihan unified all business divisions under one Quality Management System and led Manufacturing Engineering implementation of the Caterpillar Production System.
• Prior to Caterpillar, Moynihan progressed through multiple transformational leadership positions at Ford Motor Company, and was one of the pioneers in the evolution of the Ford Production System. During her last four years, as Global Quality Director of Ford Powertrain, her expertise contributed to Ford’s industry-leading quality reputation.
• Moynihan is certified as a Six Sigma Black Belt. She holds a master’s degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, and a bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering from the State University of New York at Stony Brook.
• Gregory L. Fredericksen• Gregory (Greg) L. Fredericksen is Oshkosh Corporation
Executive Vice President, Chief Procurement Officer, a position he was appointed in May 2010. Prior to this, Greg served as Senior Vice President, Chief Procurement Officer which he was appointed to in February 2008 when joining Oshkosh.
• Greg is responsible for procurement of all materials and capital equipment throughout the company, acquisition of all logistics services, supplier development and supplier quality programs, and procurement support for new product development and acquisitions.
• Greg brings 23 years of purchasing and supplier quality experience from General Motors, where he began his career in 1986 with Saturn Corporation. He held various executive positions at GM in Corporate Advance Purchasing, GM Truck Group and GM Supplier Quality through 2001. At that time he was appointed to an executive position in Worldwide Purchasing for the GM-FIAT Joint Venture Group in Europe from 2001 through 2004. Prior to coming to Oshkosh he was Executive Director, Global Purchasing for global steel and structures system requirements at GM.
• Greg received a bachelor’s degree in business administration from Central Michigan University in 1983 and participated in a GM-Harvard Business School senior management program in 2001.
184September 2012Analyst Day Executive Biographies
Executive Biographies
• Gary W. Schmiedel• Gary W. Schmiedel is Oshkosh Corporation Executive Vice President,
Technology, a position he was appointed to in February 2011. Schmiedel oversees all aspects of the company’s technology development efforts supporting all four business segments.
• Most recently, Schmiedel served as Senior Vice President, Defense Engineering and Technology where he oversaw engineering efforts in product training, Integrated Logistics Support, vehicle design, research and development, systems engineering and new product development. He has been a leader in advanced products and corporate electronics, supporting all business units within the company.
• Schmiedel has had various engineering-focused positions of increasing responsibility since his start with the company in 1983 as a liaison at the Aberdeen Test Center. After Oshkosh’s acquisition of JLG Industries, Inc., Schmiedel led integration efforts of engineering teams and has been a leader in the MRAP All-Terrain Vehicle (M-ATV) production and variant development. He oversaw the development of Oshkosh’s TerraMax™ unmanned ground vehicle efforts and also led the implementation of the TAK-4™ independent suspension system into numerous vehicles.
• Schmiedel holds a bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering from Michigan Technological University and is also a licensed professional engineer.
185September 2012Analyst Day Executive Biographies
Executive Biographies
186September 2012Analyst Day Executive Biographies
Executive Biographies
• David M. Sagehorn• David M. Sagehorn is Oshkosh Corporation Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer responsible for directing the company’s overall financial policies, as well as managing all financial functions including accounting, investor relations, credit, information technology and insurance.
• Sagehorn joined Oshkosh in March 2000 in the role of senior manager, mergers and acquisitions, and subsequently assumed roles of increasing responsibility, including director and vice president of business development; vice president, finance for Oshkosh’s defense group; and vice president and treasurer for the corporation before being promoted to his current position. He was also responsible for mergers & acquisitions (M&A) and strategic planning for the corporation, supporting the company’s growth and diversification strategies.
• Prior to joining Oshkosh, Sagehorn worked in corporate finance at CNH Global (formerly Case Corporation). He began his career at a public accounting firm in Madison, Wis., achieving the position of audit manager.
• Sagehorn holds a bachelor's degree in accounting from the University of Wisconsin – Platteville and an MBA from Marquette University. He is a certified public accountant.
187September 2012Analyst Day Executive Biographies
Executive Biographies
• Patrick N. Davidson• Patrick Davidson has been with Oshkosh Corporation since 2006 as the vice
president of investor relations. He is responsible for communications with analysts, investors and financial media. He works cross-functionally with strong support throughout Oshkosh to educate and inform stakeholders regarding the company and its strategies so that Oshkosh is appropriately and accurately valued by the investing community.
• Prior to his work at Oshkosh, Davidson spent 14 years at Harley-Davidson, Inc. in a variety of positions including factory supervisor, Asia-Pacific marketing, corporate purchasing and director of investor relations. He began his career at Motorola as a product engineer in the semiconductor products sector in Austin, Texas and spent time at S.C. Johnson Wax in Racine, Wisconsin.
• Davidson holds a bachelor of science degree in Chemical Engineering from the University of Wisconsin-Madison, and a master’s degree in business administration from Northwestern University’s Kellogg School of Management.
Appendix: Commonly Used Acronyms
ARFF Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting MECV Modernized Expanded Capability Vehicle
AWP Aerial Work Platform MRAP Mine Resistant Ambush Protected
CNG Compressed Natural Gas MSVS Medium Support Vehicle System (Canada)
DoD Department of Defense MTT Medium Tactical Truck
EAME Europe, Africa & Middle East NPD New Product Development
EMD Engineering & Manufacturing Development OI Operating Income
FHTV Family of Heavy Tactical Vehicles PLS Palletized Load System
FMS Foreign Military Sales PUC Pierce Ultimate Configuration
FMTV Family of Medium Tactical Vehicles RCV Refuse Collection Vehicle
HEMTT Heavy Expanded Mobility Tactical Truck RFP Request for Proposal
HET Heavy Equipment Transporter ROW Rest of World
HEWATT HEMTT-Based Water Tender SMP Standard Military Pattern (Canadian MSVS)
HMMWV High Mobility Multi-Purpose Wheeled Vehicle TACOM Tank-automotive and Armaments Command
JLTV Joint Light Tactical Vehicle TDP Technical Data Package
JPO Joint Program Office TFFT Tactical Fire Fighting Truck
JROC Joint Requirements Oversight Council TPV Tactical Protector Vehicle
JUONS Joint Urgent Operational Needs Statement TWV Tactical Wheeled Vehicle
L-ATV Light Combat Tactical All-Terrain Vehicle UCA Undefinitized Contract Action
LVSR Logistic Vehicle System Replacement UIK Underbody Improvement Kit (for M-ATV)
M-ATV MRAP All-Terrain Vehicle
188