OFFICIAL~#GAZEJJE - Goa Printing Press

~,/

I . I (':"~REG.D.GOA-S. ., J::~sj;a

Pan~ji, 30th March, 2000 (Chaitra 10, 1922) I' SERIES II No. 53

...."'.... . ..~ i\ .. .' ... .

OFFICIAL~#GAZEJJEGOVERNMENT OF GOA

Note: There is a Supplement and-Two Extraordinary issues to the Offic:ialGazette. Sr. !/, NiJ. 52 dated 23-3-2000 asjo![ows:-

_ Supplement dated 23-3-2000 from. page.~ 969 to 992 regardingOrders fTOm Department of Ulb(JUr,

J) £Xlra~)rdinarydated 23-3-2000from pages 993 !o994 regardingNOl(fkarion froJll Depar/mellI (~( Elections.

2) Extraordinary dated 28-3-2000 ji·om pages 995 to 996regurdingOrder from Department (~f: Pdnchay«ti Raj and CommunityDevelopmelu. -.t..

GOVERNMENT OF GOADepartment of IrrigationOffice of the Chief Engineer

Order

No.3125-4/87IIRRG/1478

The reversion ofthe incumbent atS!. No. I, Shri S. B. Gaudefrom the post of Assistant Engineer (Elect./Mech.) on a ad-hocbasis to the post of Technical Assistant made vide OrderNo. 3/25-4/871IRRG/86 dated 20-4-1999 is hereby revoked fromthe date of issue of the aforesaid order.

This issues with the approval of the Government conveyedvide No. 916 dated 10-3-2000.

By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.

S. D. Sayanak, Chief Engineer (Irrg.) & Ex-Officio Add!.Secretary.

Panaji, 15th March, 2000.

---••+--Department of .Labour

>:?~derNo.IRMlCONIMAP/(93)197/9082

Whereas the Government of Goa is of the opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between th~ management ofthe Mapusa

Urban Co-operative Bank Limited, Mapusa, Bardez-Goa, and its

workmanShri Sushant Sakhararn Palkar, Clerk, in respect ofthe

matter specified in the Schedule annexed h~reto (hereinafter

referred to as the 'said dsipute'); .; ..

: And where~s the Government ofGo~'considers it expedient torefer the said dispute for adjudication.

Now, therefore, in e~erciseofthe poWers conferred by-clause(d) of sub-section (I) of section 10 ofthe Industrial· DisputesAct, 1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947) (hereinafterreferred to as the'said Act'), the Government of Goa hereby refers the saiddispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal of Goa, atPanaji-Goa, constituted under sectibn 7-A of the said Act.

SCHEDULE.

"Whether the action of the management of the MapusaUrban Co-operative Bank Limited, Mapusa, Bardez-Goa, interminating the services of Shri Sushant Sakharam Palkar,Clerk with effect from 24-9·-1997, is legal and justified?

If not, to what relief the workman is entitled?"


R. S. Mardolker, Commissioner, Labour & Ex-Officio JointSecretary.

Panaji. 9th June, 1998.

Order

No. CLlES]-H/97/ESII9230

On the recommendation of Goa Public Service Commissionconveyed vide their letter No. COMIIIBI28(3)197 dated 18c 3-98,the Government is pleased to appoint Dr. (Mrs.) Shannila Q.

. Borkar on temporary basis on the post ofJr. Anaesthetistin E.ll':I, Hospital at Margao (Group 'A" Ga"etted) in the pay scale .ofRi;. 8000-275-135001- plus N.P.A. as admissible imderthe rul¢splus E. S. I. Allowance ofRs. 2001- p. m. with effect from the dateof taking over- the charge as per the temis ;and conditionscontained in the Government Memorandurn No. CLlESI-H/97-ESV307dt.15·4-98.

Dr. (Mrs.) Sharmila G. Sorkar has been·examined by· theMedical,Board of the Goa Medical College and found fit.

She shall be on probation for a period of two years.

By order and in the name of the Governor of.Goa.

R. S. Mardolker, Commissioner of Labour. & Ex-OfficioJt. Secretary.

Panaji, 17th June, 1998.

998SERIES I1.No. 53

OFFICIAL GAZETTE - GOVT. OF GOA30TH MARCH, 2000

Order

No. CUESI-H/97/ESI/93 10 .

,.: On the Pecommendation of Goa Pub.lic. ServiceCommissionconveyed vide their leller No. COM/I/S/28(3)/96dated12-S-1998 the Government is pleased to app<:>int l)r~Vishal'Vishwanath Gude on temporary basis on the post of Sr.Gynaecologist and Obstetrician in E. S. I. Hospital at Margao(Group 'A' Gazelled) in the pay scale of Rs.I0,000-IS,200plus N.P.A. as admissible under themles plus ESI Allowances of Rs. 200/-1'. m. with effect from the date of takingI )ver the charge. as per the terms and conditions contafnedIn the GovernmentMemo~ndum No. CLIESI-H/97-ESI1l36S"dated 10-6'1998.

Dr. Gude h.as already "!>.een medically examined in May;1996 by the Medical Board of Goa Medical College .anddeclared fit before joining as Jr. Gynaecologist and Obstetrician in Directorate of Health Services, where he is stillworking,

He shall be on probation for ,a period of two years.

By order and in the·name of the Governor of Goa.

R. S. Mardolker, Commissioner, Labour & Ex-Officio Jt.Secretary.

Panaji,22ndJulle, 1998.

Order

No. IRMICON-MAP/(78)/97-9819403

Whereas the Government of Goa is of the opinion that anindus.trial dispute exists between the managementofMis. NilimaTwines and Ropes Pvt. Limited, Thivim Industrial Estate,karaswada, Bardez-Goa, and their workman Kum. Bharati R.Harmalkar. Helper; in respect of the mailer specified in theSchedule annexed hereto (hereinafter referred to as the 'saiddispute');

And whereas the Government of Goa 'considers it./ ..

expedient to refer the said dispute for adjudication.

c; Now; therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause(J) ofsub-section (I) ofsection 10 ofthe IndustrialDisputes Act,1947 (CentralActl4 of.1947) (hereinafter referred to as the 'saidAct'), the Government of Goa hereby refers the said dispute foradjudication to the Industriaf Tribunal of Goa at Panaji Goa,constituted under section 7-Aof the said Act.

SCHEDULE

(I)"Whelherthe action of the manag~ment of Mis. NilimaTwi""s and Ropes Pvt. Limited, Thi"im, Industrial Estate,Kara~",ada,BardezGoa, in :erm,in~jing the services of Kum.

Bharati R. Harmalkar, Helper, with effect from 16-6-1997, is'legal andjustifiedT'.

(2) Ifnot, to what reliefthe workman is entitledT'.

By order and in the name ofthe Governor ofGoa.

R. S. Mardolker, Commissioner, Labour & Ex-Officio. Joint S~cretary.

Panaji, 24th June. 1998.

Order

No.IRMICON-MAP/(74)/97/9399

Whereas the Government of Goa is' of the opinion that anindustrial dispute exists between the managementofM/s. NilimaTwines and RopesPvl. Limited, Thivim Industrial Estate,Karaswada, Bardez Goa: and its workman Kum. Deepali D.Sur.likar, Helper,.in respect ofthe mailer specified in the Scheduleannexed hereto'(hereinafter referred fo as the 'said dispute');

And whereas the OoyernmentofGoaconsiders it expedient torefer the said dispute for adjudication.

Now, therefore,. in exercise of the powers conferred by clause(d) of sub-section (1) ofsection 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act,1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947) (hereinafter referred to as the 'saidAct'), the Government of Goa herebyrefers the said dispute foradjudication to the Industrial Tribunal of Goa at Panaji-Goa,constituted under Section T-A of the said Act.

SCHEDULE

(I) "Whetherthe action ofthe managementof Mis. NilimaTwines and Ropes Pvt. Limited, Thivim. Industrial Estate,Karaswada, Bardez Goa, in terminating the services of Smt.Deepali D. Surlikar, Helper, with effectfrom 16;6-1997, is lega}and justified? .

(2) If not, to what relief the workman!s entitled?".


R. S. Mardolker, Commissioner, Labour & Ex-OfficioJoint Secretary.


Order

No.IRMlCON/SG/(9)/98/939S

Whereas the Government of Goa is of the opinion that anindustrial disputeexists between the-fuanagementoffueMlldgaum

. Urban Co-operativlfBank Limited;Margao, Goa and their WOrkmen Ms. Amita S. P. Sardessai represented by the Financial

SERIES II No. 53OFFICIAL GAZEITE - GOVT. OF GOA 999

30TH MARCH, 2000

Institutions Employees Union in respect ofthe matterspeclfied inthe Schedule annexed hereto (hereinafter referred to as the 'saiddispute'); .

And whereas the Government ofGoa considers it expedient l()

refer the said dispute for adjudication. .' .' .

Now. therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause(d) of sub-section (I) ofsection Ioofthe Industrial Disputes Act,1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947) (hereinafter referred to as the 'saidAct'), the Government of Goa hereby.refers the said dispute foradjudication to the Industrial Tribunal of Goa, at Panaji-Goa,constituted under section 7-A of the said Act.

SCHEDULE

"( I) Whether the demand raised by ·theFinancialInstitutions Employees Union for regularisation of serviceson permanent basis of Miss. Amita S. P. Sardessai, Clerk,with effect from 20-5-1985, by the management of theMadgaum Urban Co-operative Bank Limited, Margao, "islegal andjustified?

(2) If not, to what relief the workman is entitled?".


R. S. Mardolker, Cpmmissioner, Labour & Ex-OfficioJoint Secretary.


order

No.IRMlCON-MAP/(77)/97/9402

Whereas the Government of Goa is of the opinion that anindustrial dispute exists between the managenientofM/s. NilitnaTwines and Ropes Pvt. Limited, Thivim Industrial Estate,Karaswada, Bardez Goa, and their workman Kum. Sugandha R.Panjikar, Helper, in respect ofthe matter specified in the Scheduleannexed hereto (hereinafter referred to as the 'said dispute');

And whereas the GovernmentofGoaconsiders it expedient torefer the said dispute for adjudication.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers ,conferred by clause(d) ofsub-section (I) ofsection 10 ofthe Indu~trialDisputes Act,1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947) (hereinafter referred to as the 'saidAct'), the Government of Goa hereby refers the said dispute foradjudication to the Industrial Tribunal of Goa at Panaji-Goa,constituted under section 7-A of the said'Act. . ,

SCHEDUlE

(l) "Whether the action ofthe management ofMis. NilimaTwines and Ropes PVt. Limited, Thivim Industrial Estate,Karaswada, Bardez Goa, in te!lT!inating the services of Kum.Sugandha R. Panjikar, Helper, with effect from 16-6-1997, islegal and justified?

(2) If not, to" what relief the workman is entitled .,,,


R. S.Mardolker, Commissioner, Labour & Ex-OfficiI'Joint Secretary.

Panaji, 24th June,) 998.

order

No.IRM/CONIMAP/(72)l97/9401

Whereas the Government of Goa is of the opinion that anindustrial dispute,exists between the. management ofMis. NilimaNets Pvt. Limited Thivim Industrial Estate, Karaswada.Bardez-Goa, and their workman Kum. Nutan S. Divkar, Helper,in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule annexedhereto (hereinafter referred to as the 'said dispute');

And whereas the Government ofGoa considers itexpedient torefer the 'said dispute' for adjudiaation.

Now, therefore, in exercise ofthe powers conferred by clause(d) of sub-section (1) of section 10 of the Industrial DisputesAct, 1947 (Central Act 14 of.1947)(hereinafter referred to as the'said Act'), the Government' of Goa hereby refers the saiddispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal of Goa atPanaji-Goa, constituted under section 7-A of t?e said Act.

SCHEDULE

"(1) Whether the action of the management ofMis. Nilima Nets Pvt. Litnited, Thivim,Irrdustrial Estate,Karaswada, Bardez Goa. interminating-: the-services ofKum. Nutan S. Divkar, Helper, with effect from 16-6-19~7,is

legal and justified? .

(2) If not, to what relief the workman is entitled ?" 1

By order and in the name of Governor of Goa.

R. S. Mardolker, Cotnmissioner, Labour & Ex-OfficioJoint Secretary.


Order

No.IRM/CONIMAP/(73)/97/9404

Whereas the Government of Goa is of the. opinion that anindustrial dispute exists between the management ofMis. Nilima

Twines and Ropes Pvt. Limited, Thivi'll IndUstrial Estate,Karaswada, Bardez-GOli, and their workman Kum. Kalpana B.Kandolker, Helper, in respect ofthe Il)atter specified in the Sched·ule annexed hereto (hereinafter referred to as the 'said dispute' j:

1000SERIES 1I No. 53

OFFICIJ\L GAZETIE - GOVT. OF GOA30TH MARCH, iooo

And whereas the Government afOoa considers it expedient torefer the said dispute for adjudication.

Now, therefore', in exercise of the powers conferred by'clause(d) of sub-section( 1) of section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act,1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947) (hereinafterreferred to as the'~aid

Act'), the Government of Goa hereby refers the said dispute for'adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal of Goa at Panaji-Goa,constituted under section 7-A of the said Act.

SCHEDULE

"( I) Whether the action of the management ofMis. NilimaTwines and Ropes Pvt. Ltd., Thivim Industrial Estate,Karaswada, Bardez Goa, in terminating the services of Kum.KalpanaB. Kandolker, Helper, with effect from 16-6-1997, islegal and justified?

(2) If not, to what relief the workman is entitled?"




Order

order

No. IRM/CON/SG/(44)/95/9838

Whereas the Government of Goa is of the opinion that an'indusiri~1 dispute exists between the management ~fMls.ManikTiIesPvt. Limited, CanaconacGoa, and theirworkmen respresented'by Goa Shrameek Sangh, in respect ofthe matter specified in theSchedule annexed hereto (hereinafter referred to as the 'saiddispute');

And whereas the Government ofGo'a considers it expedient torefer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause(d) of sub-section (1) ofsection 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act,1947 (Central Act 14 of I947)(hereinafter referred to as the 'saidAct'), the Government ofGoa hereby refers the said dispute foradjudication to the Industrial Tribunal of Goa atPanaji-Goa,constituted under section 7-A of the said Act. .

SCHEDULE

"(1) Whether theaction of the management of MIs. ManikTiles Pvt. Limited, Canacona-Goa, in terminating theservices of the following 13 workmen with effect from7-10-95, is legal and juStified?

(2) If not, to what relief the workmen are entitled?"

No.IRM/CONIMAP/(75)/97-98/9400

Whereas the Government of Goa is of "the opinion that anindustrial dispute ex~sts between the management ofMis. Nilima Twines and Ropes Pvt. Ltd., Thivim IndustrialEstate, Karaswada, Bardez-Goa, and their workman Kum. RatanS. Tuleskar, Helper, in respect of the matter specified in theSchedule annexed he~eto (hereinafter referred to as the 'saiddispute' );

(1) Shri Nagraj Hadpad(2) Shri Subhash A. Velip(3) Shri Satish Velip(4) Shri Maruti Gade).<ar(5) Shri RavikantBandekar

. (6) Shri Mahabaleshwar Mirashi(7) Shri Gurunath Gawade

(8) ShriMahabaleshwarNaik·(9) Shri RajashreeOlswal

(10) Smt.SavitaNaik(11) Smt. Prasheela Dessai(12) Smt. RadhaNaik(13) Smt.MangalaNaik

~ ..

And whereas the Government afOoa considers it expedient torefer the said dispute for adjudication.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause(d) of sub-section (1) ofsection 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act,1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947) (hereinafter referred to as the 'saidAct'), the Government of Goa hereby refers the said dispute for·adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal of Goa at Panaji-Goa,constituted under section 7-A of the said Act.

SCHEDULE

"( I) Whether the action of the management ofMis. NilimaTwines and Ropes Pvt. Limited, Thivim Industrial Estate,Karaswada, Bardez Goa, in terminating the services of Kum.Ratan S. Tuleskar, Helper, with iffect from 16-6-1997, is legaland justified?

(2) If not, to w,hat relief the workman is entitled?"

By o~der and in the name ofthe Governor of Goa.



By order and in the name of the Governor ofOoa.

R. S. Mardolker, CommiSSioner, Labour &. Ex-OfficioJoint Secretary.

Panaji, 23rd July, 1998.

Order

No. IRM/CON/SG/(43)/9719880

Whereas the Government of Goa IS of the opinion that anindustrial dispute· exists between the Irrigation Department,Gogol, Margao-Goa, and their two workmen namely S/ShriSubhash B. Patil and Pradeep Hublikar, in respect of the matterspecified in the Schedule annexec! ,hereto (hereinafter referredto as the 'said dispute'); ,

And whereas the Government ofGoa considers itexpedient torefer the said dispute for adjudication; , ,

Now, therefore, in exercise of the pow~rs conferredbydause(d) of sub-section (I) ofsection 10 ofthe Industrial D,i;putesAct,

SERIES II Na. 53

OFFICIAL GAZETTE - GOVT. OF GOA 100130TH MARCH, 20IJO

1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947) (hereinafter referred to as the 'saidAct'), the Government of Goa hereby refers the said dispute foradjudication to the Industrial Tribunal of Goa, at Panaji-Goa,constituted under section 7-A of the said Act.'

SCHEDULE

"( I) Whether the action of the Irrigation Department,Margao-Goa, in terminating the services of SIShri. SubhashB. Patil and Pradeep Hublikar, both-Gauge Readers, witheffect from 1-12-1996, is legal andjustified?

(2) If not, towhat relief the workmen are entitled?"

By order and in the name of the GovernOr of Goa.

R. S. Mardalker, Commissioner, Labour & Ex-OfficioJoint Secretary.

Panaji. 27th July, 1998.

Order

No. IRWCONIP/(205)/1998/988 I

Whereas the Government of Goa is of the opinion~ that anindustrial dispute exists between the management of Mis. ShreeChitra-lVIandir, Marcella-Goa, and their workman Shri VaikhuntGaonkar, Doorkeeper. n,presented by the GoaTrade and Commercial Workers' Union, in respect .of the matter specified in theSchedule annexed hereto (hereinafter referred to "' ·th~ 'saiddispute');

And whereas the Government afOoa considers itexpedie,nt torefer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause(d) of sub-section (I) of section 10 of the Industrial DisputesAct, 1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947) (hereinafter referred 10 as the'said Act'), the Government ofGoa hereby refers the said disputefor adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal of Goa, at Panaji Goa,constituted under section 7-A of the said Act. .

SCHEDULE

"( I) Whether the action of the management of Mis. ShreeChitta-Mandir, Marcela-Goa, in refusing the employment tothe workman Shri VaikhuntGaonkarwith effect from 6-1-1997,is legal and justified?




Panaji, 27th July, 1998.

Order

No.IRWCON/SG/(54)/97/9885

Whereas the Government of Goa is of the opinion that ~n

industrial dispute exists betwee~ the management of Mis. BastQuepemConsumers Co-Operative Society Limited,CurchoremGoa, and theirworkmen represented by GoaTrade and CommercialWorkers' Union, in respect ofthe matter specified in the Scheduleannexed hereto hereinafter referred to as the 'said dispute');

And whereas the Government ofGoa considers it expedient torefer the said dispute for adjudication. .

Now, therefore~in exercise ofthe p,owers conferred by clause(d) of sub-se'ction (I) of section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act.1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947) (hereinafterreferred to as the 'saidAct'), the Government of Goa hereby refers the said dispute foradjudication to the Industrial Tribunal of Goa at Panaji-Goa,constituted under section 7-A of the said Act.

SCHEDULE

"(1) Whether the demands raised by the Goa Trade andCommercial Workers' Unioll' vide their letter No: Lt. EastQuepem Consumers Co-op. Society Ltd.102/96 dated23-10-1996, before the management of Mis. East QuepemConsumers Co-operative Society Ltd., Clirchorem,are justified? .

(2) If not, to what relief the workmen are entitled?"



Panaji, 27th July, 1998.

Order

No.IRM/CON/SG/(32)!9812070

Whereas the Government of Goa is the opinion that antrial dispute exists between the management of Mis. Rex Instru

ments Pvt. Ltd., Margao-Goa, and their workman Shri. Donald 1.

Dias, Jr.Engineer, in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule annexed hereto (hereinafter referred to as the 'said dispute ');

And whereas the Government of Goa considers it expedientto refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause(d) of suh-section (I)'of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes

Act, 1947 (Central Act i4 of 1947) (hereinafter referred to as the

'said Act'), the Governm~nt of qoa hereh:Y'refers the said dispute for adjudication to the Indusirial Tribunal of Goa at Panaji-Goa, constituted under Section 7-A of the said Act. .

-

1002SERIES II No. 53

OFFICIAL GAZETIE - GOVT. OF GOA30TH MARCH, 2000

SCHEDULE

..( 1) Whether the action of the management of Mis. RexInstruments Pvt. Ltd., St. Jose de Areal, in terminating theservices of Shri Donald J. Dias, Jr. Engineer, with effectfrom 30-10-96, is legal and justified? .

(2) Ifnot, to what relief the workman is entitled?"

By ~er and in the name of the Governor of Goa.

R. S. MardoLker, Commissioner, Labour & Ex-Officio JointSecretary.

Panaji, 12th April, 1999.

Order

No.IRM/CON/P/( 186)/199812071

Whereas the Government of Goa is of the opinion that anindustrial dispute exists between.tbe management of Mis. MRFLimited, Usgao, Ponda-Goa, and their workman Shri DennyFernandes, represented by the Goa MRF Employees' Union,in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule annexed hereto{he,reinafter referred to as the 'said dispute');

And whereas the Government of Goa considers it expedientto refer the said dispute for adjudication.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause(d) of sub-section (I) of section 10 of the Industrial DisputesAct, 1947 (Central Aetl4 of 1947) (hereinafter referred to as the'said Act'), the Government of Goa hereby refers the said dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal of Goa, at PanajiUna, constituted under section 7-A of the said Act.

SCHEDULE

"( I) Whether the action of the management of Mis. MRFLtd...Usgao, Ponda Goa, in terminating the services of ShriDenny Fernandes, with effect from 17-2-1997, is legal andjustified?


By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa,

R. S. MardoLker, Commissioner, Labour & Ex-Officio JointSecretary.


Order

No. I~/CON-MAP/(3)/99/2072

Whereas the Government of Goa is of the opinion that anindustrial dispute exists between the Kadamba Transport

Corporation Limited, Panaj; Goa, and their workmall ShriBabu Potdar, Conductor, in respect of the matter specifiedin the Schedule annexed hereto (hereinafter referred to' as the'said dispute');

. And whereas the Government of Goa considers it expedientto refer the said dispute for adjudication.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause(d) of sub-section (I) of section 10 of the Industrial DisputesAct, I947)(Central Act 14 of 1947) (hereinafter referred to asthe 'said Act'), the Government of Goa hereby refers the saiddispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal of Goa atPanaji-Goa, constituted under section 7-A of the said Act.

SCHEDULE

"(I) Whether the action of the Kadamba TransportCorporation'Limited, Panaji-Goa, in disrniss~ng from services

. Shri Babu Potdar, Conductor, with effect from 16-5-1997, islegal and justified ?

(2) If not, to what relief the workman is entitled ?"


R. S. MardoLker, Commissioner, Labour & Ex-OfficioJoint Secretary.

Panaji, 12th ~pril, 1999.

Order

No.IRM/CONIMAP/(62)19712073

Whereas the Government of Goa is of the opinion that anindustrial dispute exists between the management of Mis. Whispering Palms Beach Resort, Candolim, Bardez Goa, and their workman Shri Sanjeev N. Sawant,Carpentry-in-Charge,.in respect ofthe mailer specified in the Schedule annexed hereto (hen,inafterreferred to as the 'said dispute');

And whereas the Government of Goa considers it expedientto refer the said dispute for adjudication.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause(d) of sub-section (I) of section 10 of the Industrial DisputesAct, 1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947) (hereinafter referred to as the'said Act'), the Government of Goa hereby refers the said dis

pute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal of Goa at PanajiGoa, constituted under section 7-A of the saW Act.

SCHEDULE

"( I) Whether the action of the management of Mis.

Whispering Palms Beach Resort, Candolim, Bardez, Goa, interrninatingtheservices ofShri Sanjeev N. Sawant, 'Carpentryin-Charge' ,with effect from 18-2-1997, is legal and justified .)

SERIES II No. 53OFFICIAL GAZETIE - GOVT. OF GOA 1003

30TH MARCH, 2000

(2) If not to what relief the workman is entitled?"

, By order andin the name qf the Governor of Goa.



Order

No. IRM/CON/P/( 186)/97/2074.

Whereas the Government of Goa is of the opinion that anindustrial dispute exists between the management of Mis.MRF Ltd.,Usgao, Ponda-Goa, and their workman Shri RohidasNaik, represented by the Goa MRF Employees Union, inrespect of the matter specified in the Schedule annexedhereto (hereinafter referred to as the ·'said dispute');

And whereas the Government of Goa considers itexpedient to refer the said dispute for adjudication.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred byclause (d) of sub-section (I) of section 10 oJ the IndustrialDisputes Act, 1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947) (hereinafterreferred to as the 'said Act'), the Government of Goa herebyrefers the said dispute for adjudication to the IndustrialTribunal of Goa, at Panaji-Goa, constituted under section7-A of the said Act.


Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred byclause (d) of sub-section (I) of secti'on 10 of the IndustrialDisputesAct, 1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947) (hereinafter referredto as the 'said Act'), the Government of Goa hereby refers.the said dispute 'for adjudieation to the Industrial Tribunalof Goa at Panaji-Goa, constituted under section7.-A of the said Act.

SCHEDULE.

"(I) Whether the action of the management of Mis. ToughSealsLimited, Bethora, PondaGoa; in refusing to concede' thefollowing demands of the workmen represented by the GoaTrade and Commercial Worker's Union, Panaji-Goa, is legaland justified ?

I. FLAT-RISE AND PAY·SCALES:

a) The Union calls upon the management to take a freshlook at the Pay-Scales and the designations applicableto the workers and correctly grade each worker inconsultation with the Union.

b) The Union demands a J:lat-Rise ofRs. 500/- per monthto each worker; to be added 10 the existing salary as on1-12-1996. The total of the Flat-Rise of Rs. 500/- permonth PLUS the existing salary of each worker as on1-12-1996 should be placed in the respective Pay-Scalesgiven below at the appropriate stage.

SCHEDULE GRADE DESI~,NATtON PAY - SCALES

"~I I) Whether the action of the management of Mis. MRFLtd., Usgao, Ponda-Goa, in terminating the services ofShri. Rohidas Naik, with effect from 20·2-1997. is legal andjustified?

I Moulder

SupervisorIn-charge

975-~ I225-fl!!-1525-70-1875-80-22755 5 5 5

1275-70-1625-~2025-2Q-2475-.lill-29755 5 5 5

(2) If not; to what relief the workman is entitled?"

By order and in the name of tlie Governor of Goa.

R. S. Mardo/ker, Commissioner, L1lbour & Ex-OfficioJoint Secretary.

Panaji. 12th April, 1999.

Order

No.IRMlCONIP/(232)/1998/2098.

Whereas the Government of Goa is of the opinion that anindustrial dispute exists between the management ofMis. ToughSeals Pvt. Limited, Bethora, Ponda Goa, and their workmen represented by Goa Tracie and Commercial Worker's Union, PanajiGoa, in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule annexedhereto (hereinafter referred to as the.'said dispute');

2. SENIORITY iNCREMENTS: Those workers who havecompleted five years as on-I-I-1997shall.be paid ONEEXTRA INCREMENT.

3. HOUSE RENTALLOWANCE (HRA): That each workcrought to be paid a House Rent'Allowance at the rate ofRs.400/- per month.

4. FIXED DEARNESS ALLOWANCE (VDA): That eachworker ought to be paid a.l'ixedDearnessAlIowance oCRs.400/- per month, with effect fro~ 1-1-1997.

5. VARIABLE DEARNESS ALLOWANCE (VDA): Thatwith effect from 1-1-1997 each worker be paid a VariableDearness Allowance at the rale of Rs. 1/50 on the AAICPIbase 1500 points (1960-100).

The Variable Dearness Allowance should be revised everyquarter.

6. TRA VELLING ALLOWANCE: That each worker be paid'.Rs.2oo/- per month towards Travelling Allowance with effectfrom 1-1-1997. ..

H)(}4SiRlES Ii No. 53

OFFICIAL GAZETIE - GOVT. OF'GOA30TH MARCH. 2000

7. WASHINGALLOWANCEAND UNIFORM5:Thateachworker be paid Rs. SOl-per ni'<irith towards Washing Allowanl:c. Two pairs of Uniforms be issued in month of January,c\lC'ry year.

.:' -, .......-", '," -, , ..... '-'," .. " .. ,.~ .. !X SHIFT ALLOWANCE: That with effect from I" 1-1997

eath worker be paid the followi"ngShift-Allowance.

2nd shifL 51' per shift

3rd shifL 10/- per shift\>:.

9. TEA AND SNACKS: That the management should ensure lhat the workers are served TWO <:;1)l1S QF 'j'EA ANDSNACKS twice in each shih~' ,.,........ ,

Z. If.' ~'6t,.l() what relief the workmen are entitled ?"

By order andin the name of the,Governor of Goa.

R: Sdi1ardolker;:Commissioner, Labour & Ex'Officio Joint, Secretary.


Orde-r

iNo.IRM/CON/SG/(Z7)/98/Z,1 00

..,' ;; ,:':,",;.' '):,",1 • /,·.-'r>;:i',-,;:> .. " .", ..10. LEAVE FACILITIES :;rhe",orke~sshouldb.e eligible

to the follow'ing Leave FaCiliiies:' '" .' . .

.. .','Privilege Leave

Casual Leave

Sick Leave

Holidays

30,daysper annum-';;lth-accumulation

, ~p\O 100 days;

.;:' \pclay~ per annumwith the benefitto encash;

, , Ip'days per annumwith the benetlt to

) .. ascu~ul~teupto 30",q~ys;

.... 12rlays per annum.

"Whereas the 'Government of Goa is of the opinion that anindustrial'dispute'exists between' the Kadamba TransportCorporation'Limited, Panaji Goa; and their workman' ShriIna'Cib; Fenland~si 'Conductor, ,'in respect of-the·matter spe(d M

fied'in the"Schedule annexed hereto (hereinafter referred ,toas the"said"dispule');'

Ah'd' whereas the Government of Goa considers it expedient tbrefer·1the:; said disptitefor: adjudication.

Now:,' ,therefore;': in, ~exercise j of"the- powers:"conferred byc1atis'e'(d)'of'sul)"section (I) of sectlon ·lO'of 'the IndustrialDispUtes' Ac\;'1947 (Central' Acti4 of 1947) (hereinafter

.referred' toas'the"said Act'), the Government of Goa herebytefers"'tbe"'$aid dispute Tor adjudicatiort, to the InduslrialTribtin'al"Of Goa'.'a! Panaji-d'oa, 'constituted under ,ection7-A of the said Act.

.. /.-::;-!-?/:,:';;'-!~

II. SAFETY, REST ROOM: To be discussed.

12. INCREMENTS : Th~teach worker b~ paid Incrementsin the mO,nth of January, ~yerY'_:y'ear.

13. SALARY SLIPS: Should be issu~<I;o' ea~h worker.

14.HOURS OF WORK OVERTIME:.

a) In case a worker is required to work (Voluntarily) formore than eight !(8Nh'dJr~;h\:s1\ill be paid doublethe rate ofwag6s!,,!ii i,',

b) Iry case a work~L,i~re9\!ir')~,to,,'r0~k on HolidayslWeekly off-daY~;.he ~hali b') pa;idd\lublethe rate ofwages and be giWn: a~a:i~ 9Pl1)pens~tory~off withintcn-days'from daie~ ',.!>' ,,. "i,; .;

15. CONFIRMATION LEITERS "All those workers whohave completed six months ofiser.vice;>shouldbe,issuedConfirmation Letters. ·'jl\

... • ' , " _,' '-", ;".;".,:'I",r;:';(; ',';' j.- ,

16. PROVIDENT FUND: That each worker should becovered under the Provident Fund Scheme and its benefits.

17. FIRST'AID-BOX: Mully eqUipperlFil'slcAid-Boxshouldbe maintained in the factory premises.

!SCHEDuLE

"'(I j:Whether the action: of the Karlaniba TransportCoiporatioh-l!.td:; Panaji-Goa, hi dismHsing 'from- servicesShti' InacioFernandes, Conductot,with effect from 6·5-1997.is legal and justified?

(-Zl'!fnot, t()'what relief the Workman is entitled ?"

BY' oiMr and in the name ofth'e Governor of Goa.

'R,' S. 'Mardolker, Commissioner, Labour and' Ex-OfficioJoint Secretary.

Panaji,IZthApriI1999.

Order

",u,,~p. IRM/CON/(74)197/2,1 0 I,

Wberea~lh",Ciqvernmentqf Gqa is of tl)e qpinion that an,in~~str\?~;,d\~~Jil~,pists. between the \<.a4,am:b? rran,~porlC?r~(>rat~on Llmlted,Pa?aJI,and theIr w?rkman S~lfl DattaS.Bl1osle~' r~lim~ertled by Kadamb~ Trail!;l;'oWCorporali~n

,.: "~ :: '.. ,,(. I -" '"'' ',"'." , ,." _',:.',.' \ .', , ' _."," ",'" ': ,,' " "" ,_.": '

Dti~ers~nefAl1ied Emplqyees Association, in 'respect of themalter specified fn the Schedule atlnexed lieret6(hereinafterreferred to~!;('the "said ''dispute');

SERIES II No. 53OFFICIAL GAZETTE - GOVT. OF GOA

/1005

30TH 't!ARCH/2000And whereas the Government of Goa considers it expe

dient to refer the said dispute for adjudjcation.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the power. conferred byclause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 10 of the Indus,rialDisputes Act. 1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947) (lier~nafte'rreferred to as the 'said Act') ihe Governmenttof Goahereliyrefers the said dispute for adjudication to the IndustrialTribunal of Goa at Fanaji-Goa, constituted under section7-Aof the said Act.,

SCHEDULE

"(1) Whether the action of MIs. Kadamba TransportCorporation Limited, Panaji-Goa, in tenninating the servicesofShri Datta S. Bhosle, with effect from 16-3-97, is legal andjustified?

(2) If not, to what relief the workman is enti~~dI.?"


R. S. Mardolker, Commissioner, Labour & Ex-Officio Joint~ecretary.


Order

No.IRM/CONlPl(243)/l998/2102 '

Whereas the Government of Goa is of the opinion that anindustrial dispute exists between Mis. MRF Ltd., Usgao,Panda-Goa, and their workman Shri Anthony Dias, traineeworkman, in respect of the matter specified in the ·Scheduleannexed hereto (hereinafter rderred to as the 'said dispute');

And whNeas the Government of Goa considers it .expedient to refer the said dispute for adjudication. .

Now, therefore, in exercise of the pow~rs conferred.,by ,clause (d) of sub-section (I') of section 10 of the IndustrialDisputes Act, 1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947) (hereinafterreferred to asthe 'said Act'), the Goverm'nent of Goa hereby

·.refers the said dispute for adjudication to the IndustrialTribunal of Goa, at Panaji Goa, constituted under section7-A of the said Act.

SCHEDULE

"(1) Whether the action of Mis. MRF Ltd., Usgao,Ponda-Goa, in termin~ting-the services of their workman,Shri Anthony Dias; with effect from 31-10-1997, is legal andjustified? .

(2) If not, to what~eliefthe workman is entitled?"

By order and in ihe name of the Governor of Goa.

R. S. Mardolker"Commissioner, Labour & Ex-Officio IointSecretary.

Panaji, 12th April,! 999.

Order

No.IRM/CONNSCI(37)/98f2104.

Whereas the Government of Goa is of ihe opinion that ari>industrial dispute exists between the management of Mis.Prasad Petroleum:Zuarinagar-Goa, and their workman Shri .Ashok Naik, in respect of the matter specified in the Scliedule .'annexed hereto (hereinafter referred to as the 'said dispute');'

And whereas the Governme~'t of Goa considers itexpedient to refer the said dispute for adjudication.

Now, !herefore, in exercise of -the 'po,¥ers .conferred byclause (d) of sub-section (1) of section IO of the IndustiialDisputes Act, 1947 (Central Act 14'of 1947) (hereinaflertoas the 'said Act'), the Government of Gila hereby refers thesaid dispute for adjudi9tion to the Indllstrial Tribunal ofGoa, ,at Panaji-Goa, constituted under section 7:A of the saidAct., _'

SCHEDULE

"(I) Whether the aClion ofthe management ofMis. Prasad'Petroleum, Zuarinagar-GOli, in terminating the servicesbfShriAshokNaik, with effect from 30-9-1996, is legal andjustified?

(2) If not, to what relief the workman is entitl~d ?"

By order and in theJlame of the, Governor of Goa.

R. S. Matdolker, Commissioner, Labour & Ex·OfficioJointSecretary.


Order

No.IRMfCON/SG/(44Jt98/2106

Whereas the Government of Goa is if the opinion th~tan

industrial ,dispute exists betweenllie management ofiM/s.Supreme Earth Movers, Margao Goa, and their workman! SluiNazir Ansari, Showel Operator, in respect of the matterspecified in the Schedule annexed hereto (hereinafter referredto as the 'said dispute');

And whereas the Government of Goa consid~rs i._\expedient to refer the said dispute for a~judi<:ation.

Now, therefore, in exercise of th"" pi)\yers confe~ O-yclause (d) of sub-section (1) ofs~ction 10 of the IndllstrialDisputes Act, 1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947) (hereinafterreferred 'to as the 'said Act'), the Governme!,t of Goa lierebyrefers the said disputeforiadjudicatiOli 'to the IndustrialTribunal of Goa at Panaji_Goa, constituied under section7-A of the said Act. '

SCHEDULE

,"( I) Whethertheaction ofthe maniig,~uie~tofM/s' SupreJM'Earth Movers, Margao-Goa: iti iennin,aiil)gthe,~rv}~~s.~iShri.'Nazir Ansari, Showel Operator, witliHfe9t frow'30i6-l998iis "legal a~djustified? ... , ' ". ',,' ,

f' ...

OFFICIAL GAZETTE - GOVT. OF GOA


1006SERIES 1I No. 53 , 30TH MARCH, 2000

And whereas the Government of Goa considers it expedient to refer the said dispute for adjudication.


. ·R. S. Mardo/ker, Commissioner, Labour and Ex-OfficioJoint Secretary.

Panaji, 12th April 1999.

No.IRMlCON/SG/(41 )/98/21 ();I

Whereas the Government of Goa is of tile opinion that anindustriaL dispute exists, -between the. man'agement of Mis.Indopack, St. Jose-do-Areal,' Goa, and their workman KutJl.Rakhi Babaji Kerkar, in respect of the matter specified in theSchedule annexed here'to (hereinafter referred to as the "saiddispute");

And whereas the Government of Goa considers itexpedient to refer th.esaid dispute for adjudication.

No'w, therefore, in -~xercise of the pow,ersconferred byclause (d) of sub-section (I) of section 10 of the IndustrialDisputes Act, 1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947) (hereinafterreferred to as the "said Act") the Government of Goa herebyrefers the said ·dispute for adjudication to the Industrial'Tribunal of Goa at Panaji Goa, constituted section 7-Aof thesaid Act.

SCHEDULE

"( I) Whether the action of the martagement of Mis. IndoPack, St. Jose-de-Areal, Goa, in terminating the services ofKum.Rakhi B. Kerkar,helper, with effect from 11-7-1998, islegal andjustified?



R. S. Mardo/ker, Commissioner, Labour and Ex-OfficioJoint Secretary.


Orde.r

No.lRM!CON/(l01)/97I21 12

Whereas the Government of Goa is of the opinion that anindustrial dispute exists betw~en the management of Mis. 0Herald, PanajiGoa, and their workman, Shri VijaykantS. Naik,Foreman, in respect of the matter specified in the Sched~le

.annexed hereto (hereinafter referred to rs the "sajd dispute");

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by'e1~use '(d) of sub-section (l) of section 10 of the Industrial

. Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947) (hereinafter. referred to as the "said Act"), the Government of Goa herebyrefers the said dispute for adjudication to the IndustrialTribunal of Goa atPanaji Goa, constituted under section7-A of the said Act.

SCHEDULE

"( I) Whether the action of the management of Mis. 0Herald, Panaji'Goa, in terminating the servicesofShri.VijayakantS. Naik, Foreman, witheffectfrom 31-10-97, is legal andjustified?





Order

No.IRM/CONIMAP/(24)/94/21 13

Whereas the Government of Goa is of the opinion that anindustrial dispute exists between the maf!.agement of. MIs.Panjikar Printers, Moira, Bardez-Goa, and .their workmanShri Rajendra Cnadankar, Printer, in respect of the matterspecified in the Schedule annexed hereto (hereinafterreferred to as the "said dispute");

And whereas the Government of Ooa considers itexpedient (0 refer the said dispute for adj';ldication.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred byclause (d) of.sub-section (l) of section 10 of the IndustrialDisputes Act, 1947 (Central Act, 14 of 1947) (hereinafterreferred to as the "said Act"), the Government of Goa herebyrefers the said dispute for adjudication to the IndustrialTribunal of Goa at Panaji Goa, constituted under section7-A of the said Act.

SCHEDULE

"( I )Whereas the action of the managementofMis PanjikarPrinters, Moira, Bardez Goa, in terminating the services ofShri Rajendra Chodankar,Printer, with effect from 16-5-1994,is legal and justified?



R. S. Marda/ker, Commissioner, Labour and Ex-OfficioJoint Secretary.

Panaji, 12th April 1999.

f

SERIES 11 No. 53

Or.der

OFFICIAL GAZETrE - GOVT. OF GOA

SCHEDULE

100730TH MARCH, 2000

No. IRM/CONNSC/( I0)198/2456

Whereas the Government of Goa is of the opinion.thatanindustrial dispute exists between· the management ·ofM/s.PrasAd Petroleum, Zuarinagar-Goa, and therr workman Shri}oaquim Vaz, in respect of the matter specified in the

: Schedule annexed hereto (hereinafter referred to as the 'saiddispute' );


Now, therefore: in exercise of the powers conferred byclause (d) of sub.section (I) of section-IOof the IndustrialDispute& Act, 19'4'/ (Central Act 14 of 1947). (hereinafterref~rred to as the 'said Act'), the Government of Goa herebyrefers the said dispute for adjudicatiol1" to the IndustrialTribunal of Goa, at Panaji-Goa, constituted under ses:tion7-A of the said Act.

.sCHEDULE

"( 1) Whether the action of the management of Mis. PrasadPetr6"leum, Zuarinagar-Goa, -in tenninating the services of

'Shri Joaquim Vaz, with effect from 22-8-1996, is legal andjustified ?

(2) If not, to what relief the workman isentitled ?"

By 'order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.

R, S. Mardolker, Commissioner, Labour& Ex-Officio JointSec~etary.


Order

No.IRM/CON/(P)/(192)f199712111.

Whereas the Government of.Goa is of the opinion that anIndustrial Dispute exists between the management of Mis.MRFLimited, Usgao, Panda-Goa, and their workman Shri.Mohan. Gaonkar, represented by the Goa MRF Employees'Union,. in respect of the matter specified iII the ~chedule

annexed hereto (hereinafter referred to as the 'said dispute');


Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers <:conferred byclause (d) of sub-section (I) of section 10 of the IndustrialDisputes Act, 1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947) (hereinafterreferred to as the 'said Act'), the' Government of Goa herehyrefers ,the said dispute for adjudication to the IndustrialTribunal of Goa at Panaji-Goa, co"nstituted under Section7-A of the said Act..

'~(ll Whether the action of the management 'of Mis,MRFLimited, Usgao,Ponda-Goa, in terminating the servicesof Shri'Mohan Gaonkar, with effect from 13-9-1996, is'legal and justified?

(2) Ifnot,to what r~lief the worKman is entitle'!"".

By-order and in the ':lame of the Governor of Go~..

R. S. Mardolker, Commissioner, Labour & Ex·Officio JointSecretary:


order

No,IRM/COM/(98)/97/2148

Whereas the Government of Goa is orthe opinion that'anindustrial dispute exists between the employer Mis. Hede andCo., Panaji-Goa, and their workman Shri Mahadev A.Madgaonkar, Peon, in respect of the matter specified in theSchedule annexed hereto (hereinafter referred to as the 'saiddispute');


Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred hyclause (d) of sub-section (I) of section 10 of the IndustrialDisputes Act, 1947 (Central Act, 14 of 1947) (her~inafterreferred to as the '·said Act'), the Government of Goa- herebyrefers the said dispute for adjudication to the IndustrialTribunal of Goa, at Panaji Goa, constituted under section7-A of the said Act. .

SCHEDULE

"(I) Whetherthe action oftheemployer Mis. Hede and ¢o.:Panaji-Goa , in refusing employment to ShriMahadey A,Madgaonkar, Peon, with effect from 8-.12-1997, is legaI'!andjustified? .

(2) If not, to what relief the workman isentitiedT'


R. S. Mardolker, Commissioner, Labour& Ex-Officio JointSecretary.

Panaji, 15thApril, 1999.

Order

No. CLIESTIPFG/(34)/99/2223

On the recommendation of Goa 'Public ServiceCommission vide their letter No,COM/I/5/28( 1)/92:98lVoL Idated 4-12-1998, Government is pleased to appoint'

1008'SElYES II No: '53

OFFICIAL GAZETTE - GOVT. OF GOA30TH MARCH. 2000

.P;.Pravin R Bhat as Insur ~c~Medical Officer (Group "A"Gazetted) under the ESI Sc~errje in the pay scale ofRs. 8000

-275·13500/- .plus other allowances as admissible under the. rules. Dr. Bhat stands posted'in ESI Hospital at Margao,

-Dr. Bhat has already been examined'by the Medical Boardofihe Goa Medical College and found fit.: His appointmentis subject to verificatiorl of character and antecede~ts.

Dr. Bhat .shall be on probation for a period of 2 years.


R. S. Mardolker, Commissioner,Labour & Ex-Officio JointSecretary.

Panaji, 21 st Aprjl. 1999.

Order

No. CLIESTIPFG/(35)/99/2224

On recommendation of Goa Public Service Commissionvide their letier No. COMl1 15/28(l)/9i:-98/Vol. I dated4-12-1998. Government is pleased to appoint Dr. VijayrajR. Dessai as Insurance Medical Officer (Group "A'"Gazetted ) under the ESI Scheme in the pay scale ofRs. 8000-275-135001- plus other allowances as admissibleunder the rules. Dr. Dessai stands posted in ESI Hospital atMargao.

The appointment is subject to the production of MedicalFitness Certificate from the Medical Board within 3 monthsand. also .subject to the verification of character andante'cedents.

Dr. Dessaishall be on probation for·a pedod of two years.


R. S. Mardolker, Commissioner, Labour & Ex.OfficioJointSecretary. '

Panaji, 2IstApril. 1999.

Order

No. IRMICON/(45)/98/2233

Whereas {he GOv~rnment of Goa is of the opinion tfiat anihdustrial dispute exists between MIs. Crompton GreavesLimited, Carraswado, Bardez-Goa,.and their workmen represented by the Crompton Greaves Employees Union, Betim,Bardez-Goa, in respect of the matter specified in the Scpeduleannexed hereto (hereinafter referred toas'.Jhe 'said(fispute');

. And whereas the Government of Goa con.siders itexpedielit to refer the said dispUte fGr adjudication.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred byclause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 10 of thelrffJustrialDisputes Act, 1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947) (hereinafterreferred to as the 'said Act'), the Government of Goa herebyrefers. the said dispute for adjudicatio.n to the Industrial1'ribunal of Goa,at Panaji-Goa constituted und'l!' section 7- .A of the said Act. . .

SCHEDULE

"( I) Whether the following Charter of Demand, served by,Crompton Greaves Limited EmployeesUnion vide their letterdated 22-5-1998, on behalfof the workmen employed by MIs.Crompton Greaves Motors, a business unit afMls. CromptonGreavesUd., at Karaswada, BardezGoa, is legal andjustifIed?'

DEMANDS

Demand No. (I) Rise·in Basic Wages: Our present basicwages are extremely low. They &re not at all consistent withthe skills'displayed by the workmen in producing the goods.The work that workmen carry out is highly skilled'W.drk andthe basic wages of workmen must be raised in sucl1 a wayso as to justify the skills required in performing the jobs.

The Union, therefore, demands that the basic wages 'ofall the workers should be raised by Rs. 500/- pei month.

Demi:md No. (2) Rise in fixed dea'rness allowmice,.: Thepresent fixed dearness allowance which the workers aregetting isthe bare minimum compared to the ever increasinginflation, whilethe basic wages are dependent on the skillsrequired to perform a job, the fixed dearness allowancedepends upon the rise in prices of essential goods neededto keep the body and soul together. The present fixed dearne~s allowance is not able to do justice to the aspiration ofth<> workmen. It should, therefore, be raised by Rs. 800/- pe,.month, so justice could be done,

Demand No. (3) Rise in variable dearness allo>vance~' As .the .consumer price index is ever increasing in India, especially in Goa, where the li~ing standard is the highest in Iqdia.the variable dearness allowance'~ssumes sped.al significa,;,tion. If the rate at which the variable dearl1essallow~tn·ce iscalculated is sufficiently decent, then the variable de~,ness

alIbwance will increase so as to compensate for the rl'ge inprices of essential goods, and therefore, we are aspiring fora decent variable dearness allowance rate.

Keeping this mind, all the workers should be granted araise of Rs. 300/- per month in their variable dearness allowance, and the rate of variable dearness allowance should beRs. 3/" per point rise or fall.

Demllnd No. (4) Rise in house rent allowance: Houseaccommodation or house construction-or repairs-_-in Goa hasbecome the costliest with the land prices rising by leaps andbounds. Workmen have to pay mOre Ql1 rents atid are, also'required to pay more on house repairs;;A large part of thewages of workmen are spent on their house accommodationl

.building ,house:repairsl construction.

~---

''!!ER1ES 11 No, 53OFFICIAL GAZETIE~GOVT OF GOA 1009

30TH MARCH, 2000

The house rent of all the workmen should, therefore, beraised by Rs. 4001- per month.

Demand No. "(5) Ri~e in conveyancesallowimce : Transport fares and petrol prices are revised upward in Goa almostevery year and the present transport fares ,and petrol pricesare Indeed exhorbitant. All the workmen should,;thereklre, .get conveyance allowance- consistent with the rise in transport fares and petrol prices. Their conveyance allowanceshould be raised by Rs. -4001" per month.

~Demand No. (6) Rise in education allowance: Educational expenses are on the rise and. considering the samepresent meagre allowance paid for education is reallynegligible. It should be raised at least bo/ Rs. 3001- permorth.

~mand No. (7) Rise in special allowance: All the workers should be given a rise of Rs. 3001-, in their specialallow~nce.

Dem(lnd No. (8) 'Rise in washing allowance; All theworkers ,should be granted a rise of Rs. 2001- per month, intheir wa.1>ing allowance.

Deman~ No. (9) Bonus under Payment of BonusACT: 20% Bonus should be paid to all the workersirrespective\of the nature and status of their service or jobs.

Demand ilia. (10) Pay scales a~d grQdes: All the workers,should be grapted proper and suitable pay scales and gradeskeeping in vi¥w the modern service conditions.

Demand No\ (1 j) Privilege leave: Privilege leave shouldbe increased ftpm 17 days to 25 days, excluding Sundays,public and fest!yal Holidays.

Demand No.' (12) Sick leave: Minimum 7 days of sickleave should be granted, as sickness on account ofindustrialhazards is on the raise.

Demand No. (15): The present Leave Travel Allowanceof Rs. 1500/- per year, per' worker, should be increased toRs. 50001- per month, per employee, as Travel fares andaccommodation have increased manyfold during the last 3years. The increase is sought in order to·compensa~e thetremenddus rise as indicated above.

Demand No. (16) Loansfor Workers: Permanent workersshould be granted loans of Rs. 250001- per worker withoutinterest and suitable instalments should be deducted fromtheir salaries, say Rs. 5001- per month, towards, repayment.

Demand No. (17) Transfer ofworkers: Transfer of workersfrom one factory to another factory should not be made underany conditions.

Demand No. (18) Emergency/power failure: In situationemergency of power failure, the Company shOuld bear theconsequent losses. The COmpaflY should nOt force theworkers to work on Sundays or Holidays or off days or onleave days.

Demand No. (19) Overtime: Overtime;·if instructed todo, should ,be paid double the days wages',\calculated and

;~.- . ~

=_ )""

based upon the basic wages, FDA, VDA and all theallowances. If, Overtime is done on a Sunday or a -paidHoliday, one day off should be given, in addition to whathas been stated above.

Demand No. (20) Period of settlement: The period ofsettlement should be three years effectively from the dateyou receive this Charter of demands,

Demand No. (if) Caveat: The Union reserves the rightto delete, add or amend any demand at the time, or duringthe negotiations on' the Charter of demands.

-'

Demand No. (22): The Union calls upon you to start withit, negotiations on the Charter of Demands, within 15 daysin the interest of justice and -fair play and peace and goodindustrial relations.

(2) If not, to what relief the workmen are entitled '!"


R.S. Mardolker, Commissioner, Labour & Ex-OfficioJointSecretary.

Panaji, 22nd April,1999.

Order

No. IRM/CONIP/(236)1998/:2334

Whereas the Government of Goa is of the opini'on that anindustrial dispute exists between the management of Mis'.MRF Limited, Usgao, Ponda Goa and their workman, ShriSuresh Naik, represented by the Goa MRF Employees Union"Ponda Goa, in respect of the matter specifred in the Scheduleannexed hereto (hereinafter referred to as the 'said dispute');

And whereas the Governmen-t ·of Goa considers it expedient to refer the said dispute for adjudication.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred byclause ,(d) of sub-section (I) of section 10 of the·fndustrial

. Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947) .(hereinafterreferred to as the 'said Act'), the Government of Goa,hereby refers the said dispute Jor adjudication to theIndustrial Tribunal of Goa, at Panaji Goa, cOllstitutedunder section 7-A of the said Act.

SCHEDULE

"( I) Whether the-action of the management of Mis. MRFLimited, tJsgao, PondaGoa, in terminating the services ofShriSuresh Naik, with effect from 19-3-1997, is legal andjustified?


,Byorder and in the name of the Goveronl- ofDoa.

R. S. Mardolker; (2ommissioner, Labour & Ex-Officio JointSecretary.

Panaji,30th April, 1999.

, .'

1010SERIES JJ No. 53

Order

OFFICIAL GAZETIE - GOVT.OF GOA

SCHEDULE

30TH MARCH, 2000

No.IRM/CON/P/(242)Jl99812579

I'Whereas the Government of Goa is of the opinion tha; an

Industrial dispute exists betwe.e.n Mis. MRFLimite1, US,l;'ao,Pond a-Goa, and their workman Shri Veney Lobo, Tr~inee

Workman, in respect of the matter specified in the Sc~edule

annexed hereto (hereinafter referred to as the 'said dispute');

And whereas the Government of Goa considers ·itexpedient to refer the said dispute for a.djudication.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred byclause (d) of sub-section (I) of section 10 of the IndustrialDisputes Act, 1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947) (hereinafterreferred to as the 'said Act') the Government of Goa herebyrefers the said dispute for adjudication to the IndustrialTribunal of Goa, at Panaji, Goa constituted under section7-A of the said Act.

SCHEDULE

"(I) Whether the action of the management of MIs. MRFLimited, Usgao, Ponda-Goa, in terminating the services oftheworkmanShri Veney B. Lobo, with effect from 31-10-1997, islegal andjustified?

(2) lfnot, to what relief the workman is entitled?".

By order and the in the name of the Governor of Goa.

R. .S. Mardo/ker, COmmissioner, Labour and Ex-OfficioJoint Sep:etary.

Panaji, 17th May, 1999.

Order

No.IRM/CON/P/(237)Jl998/266l\,

Whereas the Government of Goa is of the opinion that anindustrial dispute exists between .the. management of Mis.MRF Limited, Usgao, Ponda-Goa, and their workman ShriPrashant Dessai, represented by the Goa MRF Employees'Union, Ponda-Goa in respect of the matter specified in theSchedule annexed hereto (hereinafter referred to as the 'said

dispute');

And whereas the "Government of Goa considers it expedient to refer the said dispute for adjudication.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the p'owers conferred byclause (d) of sub-section (I) of section 10 of the IndustrialDisp,utes Act, 1947 (Central Act 14 of 194.( ) (hereinafterreferred to as the 'said act'), the Government of.Goa herebyrefers ,the said dispute for adjudication to the IndustrialTribunal of Goa, at Panaji-Goa, constituted under section7-A 'Of the said Act.

"(I) Whether the action of tIie management of Mis. MRFLimited, Usgao', Ponda-Goa; in demoting the workman ShriPrashantDessai, from his original Grade-V to lower GradeiII,with effect from 13-3-1997, is legal andjustified?

(2) If not, to what relief the workman is entitled ?".



Panaji,25thMay, 1999.

Order

No. IRM/COM/P/( 188)/199812667

Whereas the Government of Goa is of the opinion that anindustrial dispute exists. between the management of Mis.MRF Limited, Usgao, Ponda-Goa, and their workman Shri.Santana Costa, represented by' the Goa MRF Employees'Union, Ponda-Goa, in respect of the matter specified in theSchedule annexed hereto (hereinafter referred to as the 'saiddispute' );

And whereas the Government of Goa consjders it expedient to refer the said dispute for adjudication.

Now j therefore, .in exercise of the powers conferred byclause (d) of sub-section (I) of section 10 of the IndustrialDisputes' Act, 1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947) (hereinafterreferred to as the 'said Act'), the Government of Goa herebyrefers the said dispute for adjudication to the IndustrialTribunal of Goa at Panaji-Goa.

SCHEDULE

"( I)Whether the action of the management of M/s.MRFLimited, Usgao, Ponda-Goa, in terminating the services ofShri Santana Costa, with effect from 28-10-1996, is legaland justified?

(2) Unot to what relief workman is entitled?".

'By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.


Panaji, 25th May, 1999.

Order

No. IRM/CONIMAP/(53)/981259 I

Whereas the Government of Goa is of the opinion that anindustrial dispute exists between the management of

~-

SERIES II No. 53

OFFICIAL GAZETTE~ GOVT. OF GOA mil

30TH MARCH, 2000

Mis. Crompton Greaves Limited, Tivim, Industrial Estate,Carras'N.ado, Bardez Goa, and their workman Shri. VinodBarde, in respect of the matter specified in the. Scheduleannexed hereto (hereinafter referred to as the 'said dispute');

And whereas the Government of Goa considers it expe--dient to refer the said dispute for adjudication.

. -' ", , -! . -.-Now. therefore, in -e'xercise of the powers'-conferred by

clause (d) of sub-section (I) of section 10 of the IndustrialDispules Act, 1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947) (hereinafterreferred to as the 'said Act'), the Government of Goa herebyrefers the said dispute for adjudication to the IndustrialTribunal of Goa at Panaji-Goa, constituted under section7-A of the said Act.

SCHEDULE

"( I) Whether the action of the management of Mis.Crompton Greaves Limited, Tivim Industrial Estate,Carraswado, Mapusa, in dismissing Shri Vinod Barde,Operator, from services with effect 19-11·1998, is legal andjustified'?

(2) Ifnot, to what relief the workrnan is entitled'?".


R. 5. Mardolker, Commissioner, Labour & Ex-OfficioJoint Secretary.

Panaji, 18thMay, 1999.

Office 6f the Inspector of Factories and Boilers

.Notice

Notice

No.IFBIBOE/991

The Board ofExaminers underthe Goa, Daman and Diu BoilerOperation Engineers Rules, 1983, declare the following can·didates tohave passed in the examination conducted from 15thDecember, 1999 to.23rd December, 1999, for a certificate of proficiency as a Boiler Operation Engineer.

s. S. Prabhu Desai, Secretary, -Board of Examiners u~der theGoa, D~man &Diu Boiler Attendant's kules, 1983.

Panaji,3rd January, 2000.

---+++--•

Department of Law and Judiciary

(Establishment Division)

Order

No. LSI I077/93

No.IFBIBAE/991

The Board ofExaminers underthe Goa, Daman and Diu BoilerAttendants' Rules, 1983, declare the following candidates tohave passed in the examination conducted on 20th and 21stDecember, 1999 for certificate ofCompetency ofBoiler Attendantof Class mentioned in Column 3 Qlthe Schedule below againsttheir respective names:-

S. No.

SCHEDULE

Name of. the candidates Examination

The Governor of Goa is 'pleased to appoint Shri MaheshJ. Rane, Advocate, as Additional Government Advocate to

appear in· the matters before the High Court of Judicature atBombay, Panaji Bench, Goa, with immediate effect and untilfurther orders.

2. He will be paid as per the existing terms'and conditionsas contained in this Department's Office Memorandum dated8-5·1989 as applicable to the Additional Government i'dvo.cates.

l. Shri Rayan Zacharius Rodrigues

2. Shri Ajay A. Pagui3. Shri Somnath Uttam Tuyenkar4. Shri Ganu G. Tari5. Shri Ram Lalit Chaudary6. Shri Prakas'h Yadav7. Shri Ranganath R. Naik

8. Shri Altredo Menino Rebello9. Shri Kerkar Tulsidas Kashinath

Second BoilerAttendant~do~

-do--do-~do

~do-

First Class BoilerAttendant~do~

-do-


Ash(}k N. P. Dessai, Under Secretary (Law).


Notification

No.2-1-97/LD,5. S. Prabhu Desai, Secretary, Board of Examiners under the

noa, Daman &Diu Boiler Attendant's Rules, 1983.

Panaji,3rd January, 2000.

In exercise of the powers conferred by section 16 of theGoa, Daman' & Diu Civil COlirts Act, 1965 (Act 16 of 1965),read with Rule 7 of the Goa Civil Service (Judicial Branch)

--_.__.._---


OFFICIAL GAZETTE - GOVT. OF GOA30TH MARcH, 2000

Rules. 1992 (hereinafter referred to as the "said Rules"), theGovernment of Goa in consultation with the Goa PublicService Commission, h~reby appoints Shri Devidas M. Kerkar,to the post of Civil Judge, Junior Division, under Grade IIJunior Branch of the Civil Service (Judicial Branch), in apurely temporary capacity with effect from the date he as-.sumes charge of the post in. the paiscale ofRs. 8<\00-275;13500/- subject to the following terms and conditions:-

I) He shall be on probation fora period of two yearswhich may be reduced or extended by the competentauthority.

il) The appointment may be terminated at any time byamonth's notice given by either side, viz. the appointeeor the appointing authority, without assigning anyreason. The appointing auth.ority however, reservesthe. right to terminate the services of the appointeeforthwith or before the expiration of the stipulatedperiod of notice by making payment to him a sumequivalent to the pay and allowances for the periodof notice of,the unexpired portion thereof.

iii) The appointment carries with it the liability to servein any part of the State of Goa.

IV) . Other conditions of service will be governed by therelevant rules and orders in force,from time to time.

The appointment is Jurther subject to:-

(i) production ofa certificate offitness to the Government(Law and Judiciary Department, Secretariat Annexe)from the competent authority (viz. Medical Board!/Civil Surgeon D. M. O./Authorized MedicalAttendant).

(ii) submission of a declaration in the from enclosed(Annexure I), to the Government (Law and JudiciaryDepartment, Secretariat Annexe) and in the event ofthe candidate having more than one wife living, orbeingmarried to a person having more than one wifeliving the appointment will be subject to his beingexempted from the enforcement of the requirement

in this behalf.

(iii) taking of an oath of allegiance/faithfulness to theConstitution of India (or making of a solemnaffirmation to that effect) in the prescribed form.

(iv) production of the following original certificates tothe Government (Law & Judiciary. Department,Secretariat Annexe) (where these have not beenproduced already at the selection stage):-

(a) Degree Certificates of educational and ·otherqualifications.

(b) Certificate of Birth.

(c) Character certificates in the prescribed form(Annexure II) attested by a Distri.ct Magistrate or

Sub-Divisional Magistrate or by their SuperiorOfficers.

(d) Certificates in the prescribed form in support ofcandidate's claiming to belong to a ScheduledCaste or Tribe/Anglo-Indian Community.

(e) Discharge Certificates in the prescribed form ofprevious employment, if any.

(v) The appointment is subject to decision of Hon'blethe Supreme Court and Hon'ble High Court in therespective Writ Petitions in which the validity of therules is under challenge.

(vi) The appointment is subject to the decision ofthe Hon'bleSupreme Court and the Hon'ble High Court in theirrespective Writ Petition in which the validity of theRul,es is under challenge.

(vii) No travelling allowance will be allowed for joining theappointment. .

(viii) This issues with the concurrence of Bombay HighCourt conveyed vide their letter no. A. 3902/0)97dated 12-2-2000.

For and on behalf of the Government of Goa.

Ashok N. P. Dessai, Under Secretary (Law).


Notification

No.2-1-97/LD

In exercise of the powers conferred by section 16 of theGoa, Daman & Diu Civil Courts Act, 1965 (Act 16 of 1965),read with Rule 7. of the Goa Civil Service (Judicial Branch)Rules, 1992 (hereinafter referred to as the "said Rules"), the

Government of Gl'a, in consultation with the Goa PublicService Commission, hereby appoints Smt. Shaikh Shabnam

nee Agha Shabnam to the post of Civil Judge, Junior Division, under Grade II Junior Branch of the Civil Service (Judicial Branch), in a purely temporary capacity witheff~ctfromthe date she assumes c1>afge.. of the post in the pay scale

of Rs. 8000-275-13,500/- subject to the following terms and·conditions:- ...

i) She shall be on probation for a period of two yearswhich may be reduced or extended by the competentauthority.

ii) The appointment may be terminated at any· timeby a month's notice given by either side, viz. theappointee or the appointing authority, withoutassigning any reason. The appointing authorityhowever, reserves the right to terminate the servicesof the appointee forthwith or before the expiration

=======.._., --

SER/ES /F No. 53OFFICIAL GAZEITE~ GOVT.OFGOA 1013

30TH MARCH, ,2000

iii)

",of the stipulated period of notice by making payment,;:toher' a sum equivalent to the pay and allowances

:for ,the--period of notice: ,or- the unexpired: portion'thereof.'

Theappointll)ent carries with!! thelia,bility to'serve',in' any part' of the State of Goa. .' /

iV)"Otheiconditions of service will be governed bythe relevant rules and "orders in force, from timeto .. time.

The appointment is further subject to:-

ii) .. ,production of a certifica,te of fitness to the Gov.,',e~nmeni,-(Lawand Judiciary D,epartment, SecretariatApne,,~) from the competent· authority (viz.Medic~l Board/Civil SurgeonD. M: O./Authorized

,Medical Attendant).

(ii) submission of a declaration in the form enclosed.(A~n\,~.ureI), to the Government (Law and JudiciaryDepartment, Secretariat_J\nn~xe) and in, the eventof the candidate having morethan one wife living,lot-being married to a person ihaving ,more than onewife living, the appointment will be .subject to hisbeingexempted from the enforcement of therequirement in this behalf. .

. ,','. I.;

(iii) taking of an oath of allf.!iiance/faithfulness to theConstitution of India (or making ofa solemnaffirmation to that effect) in the prescribed form.

(iv) pr{)ducHon df the following original' certificates to. t~e Government (L.aw & ,Judiciary Department,,Se?refa~iatAnnexeY (where these have not been;'pioduc~d already al Ihe selection stage):-

(a) I)egr~eCertifica.tes 'of educational and otherqualifications.

(b) Certifi.cate of Birth.

(clCharacter certificates in' the prescribed form(Annexure II) attested by, a District Magistrateor Sub-Divisional Magistrate or by theirSuperior Officers.

(d)C~~ificatesin the prescribed form in support ofcandidate's claiming to belong to a ScheduledCaste or Tribe/Anglo-Indian Community.

Di~chargeCertificatesin the prescribed form ofprevious emploYll)ent.. if ,any.

(,,) T~e~ppointment is subject t{) decision of Hon'ble'ihe Supreme Court and Hon'ble High Court in the

respective Writ Petitions in 'which the validity ofthe rules is under challenge.

'(vi)., The appointment is subject to the decision of the, ,Hon'bleSupreme Court and the Hon'ble High Court

intheiHespective Writ Petition in which the validityof the Rules is unde" challange.

-_......============

(vii)' No travelling allowance will be ~Ilowed for joiningthe appointment.

-,(viii);, Thisissues with the' concurrence qfBom,bay HighCourt conveyed vide their letter no, A. ,902/G197dated 12-2-2000.

For. and on behalf of the Government ,ofGoa.


Panaji', 15th March, 2000.

:N-otifit;!,ati;.on,

No.2-1-97/LD

In exercise of the powers conferred by section 16 of the'Goa, Dainan & Diu CivilCouris Act, 1965 (Act 16 of 1965).read 'with Rule 1 ,of the Goa Civil Service (Judicial'Branch) Rules, 1992 (hereinafter referred' to as the "saidRules"), the Government of Goa, in consultation with GoaPublic Service Commssion, hereby appoipts Shri Cholu M.GatinS-;:·'to'the: post of Civil Judge,- Junior;Division, underGrade'lI'Junior Brarich of the Civil Service (Judicial Branch) .in a purely temporary capacity' with effect from the date heassumes charge of the post in the pay scale of Rs. 8000-275

''CJ3,500/-'subject to the following terms and conditions:-

i) He shall be on probation for a period of two yearswhich may 'be reduced or extended by the 'competent.authority. '

ii) The appointment may be terminated at any time bya month's notice given by either side, viz. the appointeeor theappointing authority ;withoutassigning 'anyreaspn.

'The appointing' atithotity -however; ,reserves the right:;to terminate::the:;servites: of 'tHe appointee forthwith

or before the expirationofthe stipulated period ofnoticeby making payment to him a sum equivalent. to l.hepay and allowances for the peridd of nolice or theunexpired portion thereof.

iii) The appointment carries with ittheliabiliiy to servein any part-of the State of Goa!,')

iv) Other conditions of service will be governed by therelevant rules 'and orders"-in forbe) from time to time.

The appoi~tment 'is further subject t~:~ .

(i) production of acertific~teof fitri~s~'totheG6vernment(Law and Judiciary Department, Secretariat Annexe)from competent· autho~ity (vi~. Medical Board/Civilsurgeon D. M. O.lAuthorized Medical Attendant).

(ii) submission of a declaration in the form enclosed(Annexure I), to the Government (Law- an(1 JudiciaryDepa'rtment; Sectetariat Annexeyand-jn:lheevent of.

---~--~--~--.--------'-~-------"


OFFICIAL GAZEITE - GOVT. OF GOA30TH MARCH, 2000

the candidate having more than one,wife living, orbeing married to a person having more than one wifeliving, the appointment will be subject to his beingexempted from the enforcement of the. requirement inthis behalf.


(iv) production of the following original certificates to t~e

Government (Law & Judiciary Department, SecretariatAnnexe) (where these have not been produced alreadyat the selection stage):-

(a) Degree Certificates of educational and otherqualifications.


(c) Character certificates in the prescribed form(Annexure II) attested by a District Magistrate orSub-Divisional Magistrate or by their SuperiorOfficers,

(d) Certificates in the prescribed form in support ofcandidate's claiming to belong to a ScheduledCaste or Tribe/Anglo-Indian Community.

(e) Discharge Certificates in the prescribed form ofprevious employment, if any.

(v) The appointment is subject to decision of Hon'ble theSupremeCourt and Hon'ble High Court in the respectiveWrit Petitions in which the validity of the rul~s isunder challenge.

(vi) The appointment is subject to the decision oftheHon'bleSuprethe Court and the Hon'ble High Court in theirrespective Writ Petition in which the validity of theRules is under challenge.

(vii) No travelling allowance will be allowed for joining theappointment.

(viii) This issues with the concurrence of BombayHigh Court conveyed vide their letter no. A. 39021IG/97/dated 12-2-2000.




Notification

No.2-1-97/LD

In exercise of the powers conferred by section 16 of theGoa, Daman & Diu Civil Courts Act, 1965 (Act 16 of 1965),

read with Rule 7 ofthe Goa Civil Service (Judicial Branch) Rules,1992 (hereinafterrefel1'ed to as the "said Rules"), the Governmentof Goa in consultation with the Goa Public Service Commssion,hereby appoints Shri Edgar P. Fernandes, to the post ofCiv.H Judge, Junior Division, under Grade II Junior Branch ofthe' Civil Service (Judicial Branch), in a purely temporarycapacity with effect from' the date he assumes charge of thepost in the pay scale of Rs. 8000-275-13,500/- subject to thefollowing terms and conditions:-

i) He shall be on probation for a period of two yearswhich may be reduced .or extended by the competentauthority.

ii) The appointment may be terminated at any time bya month's notice given by eitherside, viz. the appointeeor the appointing authority, without assigning any reason.The appointing authority however, reServes the right.to terminate the services of the appointee forthwithor before the expiration ofthe stipulated period of noticeby making payment to him a sum equivalent to thepay and allowances for the period of notice ur theunexpired portion thereof.

iii) The appointment carries with it the liability to servein any part of the State of Go'a.

iv) Other conditions of service will be governed hy therelevant rules and orders in force, from time to time.


(i) production of a' certificate of fitness to theGovernme'nt (Law and Judiciary Department.Secretariat Annexe) from competent authority(viz. Medical Board/Civil Surgeon D.M. O.lAuthorized Medical Attendant).

(ii) submission of a declaration in the from enclosed(Annexure I), to the Government (Law and JudiciaryDepartment, Secretariat Annexe) and in· the eventof the candidates having more than one wife living,or being. married :to a person having more thanone wife living, the appointment will be subjectto his being exempted from the enforcement of therequirement in this behalf.

(iii) taking of an oath of allegiance/faithfulness to theConstitution of India- (or making of a solemnaffirmation to that effect) in the prescribed form.

(iv) production of the following original certificates tothe Government (Law & Judiciary Department,Secretariat Annexe) (where these have not beenproduced already at the selection stage);-

(a) Degree Certificates ofeducational and.otherquali-fications. .


(c) Character certificates in the prescribed form(Annexure II) attested by a District Magistrateor Sub-Divisional Magistrate or by theirSuperior Officers.

,-----

SERIES /[ No. 53

OFFICIAL GAZETTE - GOVT. OF GOA 101530TH MARCH, 2000

(d) Certiticates in the prescribed form in supportof candidate's claiming to belong to a ScheduledCaste or Tribe/Anglo-Indian Community.

(e) Discharge Certificates in the prescribed form ofprevious em_ployment. if -any.

(v) The appointment is subject to decisidn ofHon'blethe Supreme Court and Hon'ble High Court inthe respective Writ-Petitions in which the validityof the rules is under· challenge.

(vi) The appointment is subject to the decision ofthe Hon'ble SupremeCourt and the Hon'ble HighCourt in their respective Writ Petition in whichthe validity of the Rules in under challenge.

(vii) No u'avelling allowance will be allowed forjoiningthe appointment.

(viii) This issues with the concurrence of BombayHigh Court conveyed vide their lelterno. A. 3902/G/97/dated 12-2-2000.




Notification

No.2-1-97ILD

In exercise of the powers conferred ,by section 16 of theGoa, Daman & Diu Civil Courts Act, 1905 (Act 16 of 1965),read with Rule 7 ofthe Goa Civil Service (Judicial Branch) Rules,1992 (hereinafter referred to as the "said Rules"), the Governmentof Goa in sons~tation with the Goa Public Service Commssion,hereby appoints Kum. Durga V. Sawant to the post of CivilJudge, Junior Division, under Grade II Junior Branch of theCivil Service (Judicial Branch), in a purely temporary capacityWIth effect from the date she assumes charge of the post inthe pay scale of Rs. 8000-275-13,500/- subject to the followingterms and conditions:-

i) She shall be on probation for a period of two years.which may be reduced or extended by the competentauthority.

ii) The appointment may be terminated at any time bya month's notice given by either side, viz. the appointeeor -the appointing authority. without assigning anyreason. The appointing authority however, reservesthe light to tenninate the services of the appointeeforthwith or before the expiration of the stipulatedperiod of notice by making payment to her a sumequivalent to the pay and allowances for the periodof notice or the unexpired portion thereof,

iii) The appointment carries with it the liability to servein any part of the State of Goa.

iv) Other conditions of service will be governed by therelevant rules and orders in force, from time to time.


(i) production of a certificate of fitness to the. Government (Law and Judiciary Department,Secretariat Annexe) from the competent authority(viz. Medical Board/Civil Surgeon D.M. O.lAuthortzed Medical Attendant).

(ii) submission of a declaration in the form enclosed(Annexure I), to the Government (Law and JudiciaryDepartment, Secretariat Annexe) and in the eventof the candicate having more than one wife living,or being married to a person having mOre thanone wife living, the appointment will be subjectto his being exempted from the enforcement of therequirement in this behalf.


(iv) production of the following original certificates to

the Government (Law & Judiciary Department.Secretariat Annexe) (where these have not heenproduced already at the selection stage);-

(a) Degree Certificates of educational and otherqualifications.


(c) Character certificates in the prescribed form(Annexure II) attested by a DistrictMagistrate or . Sub-Divisional Magistrate orby their Superior Officers.

(d) Certificates in the prescribed form in supportof candidates claiming to belong to aScheduled Caste or Tribe/Anglo-IndianCommunity.

(e) Discharge Certificates in the prescribed formof previous employment, if' any.

(v) The appointment is subject to decision of Hon'ble theSupreme Court and Han'ble High Court in the respective

.Writ Petitions in which the validity of the rules isunder challenge.

(vi) The appointment is subject to thedecision ofthe Hon'bleSupreme Court and the Hon'ble High Court in th'eirrespective Writ Petition in which the validity of theRules is under challenge,

(vii) No travelling allowance will be allowed for joining theappointment.

(viii) This issues with the concurrence of Bombay High Courtconveyed vide their letter 110. A. 3902/G/97/dated12-2-2000,


Ashok N. P. Dessai, Under .Secretary (Law).


OFFICIAL GAZETTE - GOVT. OF GOA10SE


Department of Personnel

Order

N.o.6/3/89,PER

Sanction of the Government is hereby accorded for theupgradation of the post of Director of Fisheries, Panaji fromthe scale of pay of Rs. 10,000-325-15,200 to the scale of payof Rs. 12,000-375-16,500, with immediate effect.

This is issued with the concurrence of Finance Departmentvide their U. O. No. Fin (R&C)/47012000 dated 22-2"2000.


J. S. Monteiro, Under Secretary (Personnel).


Or<ier

No.2/6/94-PER

Read: Order No. 2/6/94-PER dated 24-11-1998.

Government order dated 24-1 1-1998, read above, is herebyrescinded with immediate effect.




Order

No.7/1/95-PER

On recommendation of Departmental of Promotion

Committee as conveyed by the Goa Public Service

Commission vide its leller No. COMIII/II/36(2)/96 dated

9-3-2000, Governor of Goa is pleased to promote on regular

basis Shri Thekke Kunath Mohandas, Superintending

Engineer to the post of Chief Engineer (Public Works

Department), Panaji, Group 'A', in the pay scale of

Rs. 18,400-500-22,400 with immedi~te effect.

30TH MARCH, 2000

Department of Planning

Directorate of Planning, Statistics & Evaluation

Notification

No. 402/28/96-DPSE/l0882

Consequent upon the Government of India, Ministry ofAgriculture's decision to set up a Monitoring Committee, theGovernment of Goa is pleased to constitute· the State LevelMonitoring Committee of the following officers to supervisethe data entry work of Agricultural Census, 1995-96 and InputSurvey 1996-97 and to Coordinate between theNIC andconcernedDepartmentofStateGovernment and Agricultural Census Divisionof Ministry of Agriculture, New Delhi, as follows:

1. Commissioner & Secretary

(Finance & Planning) - Chairman

2 Joint Director, Agricultural Census,

Ministry of Agriculture, Government

of India Member

3. Representative from NIC Member

4. Representative from Regional

Computer Centre Member

5. Director, Directorate of Planning,

Statistics & Evaluation Panaji. - Convenor

6. Technical Officer Incharge of

Agricultural Census (Dy. Director),

Directorate of Planning, Statistics & - Member

Evaluation, Panaji SeFetary.

By order and in the name oftne Governor of Goa.

Dr. KS.R. V.s. Chalam, Director and Dy. Agricultural CensusCommissioner.

Panaji, 13th December, 1999.

Order

No. 4-9-89/PLG/DPSE (Part)/235

.The following Statistical Officers of Common Statistical.

Cadre are promoted as Deputy Director Group 'A' Gazetted in

the pay scale of Rs. 8000-275-13500 on ad hoc basis for a

period of six months with immediate effect and posted in thefollowing departments

He shall be on probation for a period of 2 years.51. No. Name of Officer Place of posting

G




l. Shri M. G. Naik . DirectorofPlanning, Statistics & Evaluation, Panaji'~ainst post upgradedvide order No. 4-12-92/PLG//DPSE dated 25-02-2000 ti II30-9-2000.

2. Shri Mohan. Rane .

SERIES II No. 53OFFICIAL GAZETIE - GOVT. OF GOA

SI.No. Name of Officer Place of posting

Directorate of Fisheries,Panaji against the postcreated vide order No.FSHlPLG.IFSI98-991336dated 25-02-2000.

101730TH MARCH, 2000

Department of Public Works

Office of the Ohief Engineer

'Order

53,

No.4-9-89IPLGIDPSE(Part)/234


Panaji, 28th February, 2000.

Order

to

Isa

inar,

seeshe!id .

at

No.7-2/86-PWD&UD/(PF)/58

By order and in the name of the Governor ofGoa.

Panaji, 15th March 2000.

They shall be on probation for a period of two years.

On recommendation of Goa Public Service Commission,conveyed vide its letter No. COM/I/5/36( 1)/91 dated 19-01-1999,Government is pleased to -appoint the below mentioned candidates to the post ofArchitectural Assistant, Group 'B' Gazetted.in the scale of pay of Rs. 5500-175_9000, plus other admissibleallowances and post them in the Architectural Wing of PublicWorks Department, Altinho, Panaji, Goa, with effect from thedates of their taking"overthe charge, in the existing vacancies.

I. Shri Gomakant J. Mahambre.

2. Smt. Hemangui P.Lawande.

Theirappointment is subject to the tenns & conditions stipulatedin the O. M. No. 7113-2/86-PW&UD) (P.F.)l168 & 169 dated24-06-1999.

T K. Mohandas, Chief Engineer, PWD & Ex-officio Add!._Secretary to the Government.

Place of postingName of the- OfficerSI. No.

Dr. K S. R. V. S. Chalam, Director and Ex-Officio JointSecretary (Planning).

On the recommendation ofGoa Public Service Commissionas communicated vide their letter No.COM/II/1 1/38(2)/92 dated10-01'-2000, the Governor is pleased to promote the followingStatistical Officer of Common Statistical Cadre as DeputyDirector Group 'A' Gazetted in the pay scale ofRs. 8000-275-

. -13500 on regular basis with immediate effect and posted infollowing departments.

2. Shri V. B. Gharse

I. Shri Suresh Shanbhogue DirectorofPI,mning,Statistics & Evaluation, Panajiagainst the vacancy of ShriS. S. Kolvekar promoted.

Directorate Of Planning,Statistics & Evaluation,Panaji, against the vacancyofShriRV. Urankarretired.

--ttt--

Department of Revenue

Notification

No. 22/87/98-RD

int

,~


The above officers will be probation for a period of two

years from the date of their promotion.

3.. Shri Suinaht He Bhat

4. Dr. Y. Durga Prasad

Directorate of HealthServices, Panaji against thevacancy of Shri H. K.Rivinder retired.

DirectorofPlanning, Statistices & Evaluation, Panajiagainst the vacancy of ShriG. K. Verlekar retired.

Whereas by Government Notification No. 22/87/98-RD dated1-2-1999, published in the Official Gazette, Series 11, No. 46,dated 11-2-1999 page 669-702, and in two newspapers (i)Gomantak Times dated 5-2-1999 and (ii) Rashtramat dated7-2-1999, it was notified undet section 4 of the Land AcquisitionAct, 1894 (Central Act I of 1894) (hereinafter referred to asthe "said Act"), that the land sp<:cified in the schedule appendedto the said Notification (hereinafter referred to as the "saidland"), was needed for public purpose viz. for agricultural plotto Naguem and ZanOdem village of Quepem Taluka.

And whereas in the opinion of the Government of Goa(hereinafter referred \0 as "Government"), a portion of the saidland as specified in the appended Schedule hereto is not requiredfor the aforesaid purpose.

ion98,.G.:.~:

.oflieslateons'97-

the.

Dr. K S. R. V. 'S. Chalam, Director and Ex.-Officio Joint

Secretary (Planning).

Panaji, 28th February, 2000.

Now, therefore, the Government is pleased to deciare undersub-section (I) of section 415 of the said Act that it has with

, 'dr~wn from acquisition thepoIiion ofthesaid1andmoteparticularlydescribed in the schedule append.ed hereto for the aforesaidpublic purpose and that the aforesaidGovern~entNotification

ielO

2

700

500

4500

3900

2100

6900

1350

3050

2250

10502700

1575

3775

5825

11500

30TH MARCH, 2000 '

Antonio Fernandes.Joseph Sequeira.Ltiiza Travasso.Piedade pourado.Vinayak Jaganath Prabhu Pavaskar.Shantaram Baburao Prabhu Pavaskar.Govind Laxman Prabhu Pavaskar.Shivram Baburao Prabhu Pavaskar.Chandru Jaganath Prabhu Pavaskar.Pandurang Baburao Prabhu Malkarnekar.AtmaramBaburao Prabhu Pavaskar.Minino Diniz.Salvador Rodrigues.Kashinath Ghansham Rege Malkarnekar 2325Bhawani Jaiwant Rege Mallarnekar.Prasad Nilkant Sinai Malkarnekar.Siinao Sequeira.Jeonordo Rebello.Mrs. Rita Rebello.Josefina Rebello.Haridas Devidas.Anand Devidas.Daltaram Laxman Prabhu Pavaskar.Radha Krishna Prabhu Pava.skar.Caitano Sequeira.Mathews Fernandes.Shridhar Sinai Bobe Caculo.Shantabai Sinao Bobe Caculo.Mohan Sinai Bobe Caculo.Pandurang Sinao Bobe Caculo.

T' Piedade Jose Oliver.Inacio Dias.Shridhar Sinai Bobe Caculo.Shantabai Sinai Bobe Cac~1o.

Mohan Sinai Bobe Caculo.Pandurang. Sinai Bobe Caculo.Piedade Jose Oliver.Inacio Dais.Shridhar Sinai Bobe Caculo.Shantabai Sinai Bobe Caculo.Mohan Sinai Bobe Caculo.

. Pandurang Sinai Bobe Caculo.Piedade Jose. Oliver.Shridhar Sinai Bobe Caculo.Shantabai Sinai Bobe Caculo.Mohan Sinai Bobe Caculo.Pandurang Sinai Bobe Caculo.Pedru Simao Costa.-do-Manuel Xavier Vaz.-do-Simao Lowrenso Costa.-do-Manuel Xavier Vaz.-do-Manuel Xavier Vaz.Francisco GoesiNono Burabo Gaonkar.Gopika Devu G~onkar.

-do-27n 0

20/2 0T:

20/3 0

20/3 0

T:

20/4 0

T:20/5 0

T:20/6 0

20n 0

To19/11 019/12 0

19/13 0

3525

5900

5400

30900

25100

3

Approx. areain sq. mrs.


Village: Nagvem and Zanodem

2

Name of the person believedto .be interested.

Shaikh Abdul Wahab.Shaikh Hamza.Piedade Colaco.-do-Ananta Vishnu Chari.Vasant Nadkarni.Dinanath Nadkarni.Auduta Nadkarni.Narshiva Nadkarni.

T: Shivram Naik.Mukunda Naik.Mahadeva Naik.Shantu Naik.Vishnu Naik

25/4 0 Kassim.T: francisco Costa.

Lowenso Fernandes.Joana Carvalho.Francisco Augustinho Costa.

25/5 0 Shaikh Abdul Wahab.Shaikh Hamza.

25/6 0 Vasant Nadkarni.Dinanath Nadkarni.Auduta Nadkarni.Narshiva Nadkarni.

T: Laxman Barkelo Naik.Pascoal Colaco.

25n 0 Shaikh Abdul Wahab.Shaikh Hamza.

T: Francisco Costa.Pedru Carvalho.Gajanan Babuli Raikar.Remedio Rodrigues.

25/8 0 Lokmu Shano Gaonkar.T: Francisco Colaco.

2519 0 Tato Malk.arnekar.T: Jose Colaco.

Salvador Barreto.Joao Rosario Rodrigues.'Pascoal Mascrenhas..

20/1 0 Antonio Fernandes.

25/1 0

T:25/2 0

T:25/3 0

Survey No.1Sub-Div.No.

SCHEDULE

Taluka: Quepem

(Description of the said land to be withdrawn from acquisition)


shall be deemed to be modified tothat extent so far as it relatesto the said land. The per~ons interested in the said land, maylodge to the Special Land Acquisition Officer, S. 1. P., South,Goa I. D. Complex, Margao, within a period of thirty days fromthe date of this Notification claims under .sub,sectio", (2) of·'section 48 of the said Act. for the damages suffered by themin consequence of the notice or of any proceedings thereunderand for costs reasonably incurred by, them in prosecution ofthe proceedings under the said Act relating to the said land.

OFFICIAL GAZETIE - GOVT. OF GOA 1019SERIES II No. 53 30TH MARCH, 2000

2 3 2 3 53

26/1 0 Communidade of Nagvem. 14000 19/3 0 Mathews Fernandes. 1725Suryaji Balkrishna.Sinai Malkarnekar. 19/4 0 Milgree Babisto Gonsalves. 1950 f2612 0: Shaikh Abdul Wahab. 14200 19/5 0 Anna Maria Fernandes. 2050Shaikh Hamza. Crispino. Fernandes.

T: Minguel Costa.' i9/6 0 Inacio Pedro Diniz. 1975 :JGasper Mascr~hhas. 19n 0 Tato Malkarnekar. 9925

Fedeste Costa. 'T: Pedro Santan Pereira.

2613 0 SurayajiBalkrishna Sinai Malkarn~k\22600Shanta Gopal Malkarnekar.Ganesh Poklo Kolkar.

T: Shanta Babu Gaonkar. , Mariano Pereira.Manuel Xavier Vaz. . . \'10...., 19/8 0 Inacio Pedro Dinez. 1100Caitano Gonsalves. ~. 19/9 0 Anna -Maria Fernandes. 1050 "'"Laximan Barkelo Naik. Crispino Fernandes.Francisco Goes. 19/10 0 Milagrees Babtisto Gonsalves. 1000 tto

Caitano Rebello. 26n 0 Sebastiana Pereira. 5125

26/4 0 Surayaji Balkrishna Sinai Malkarnekar. 3200 Joaquim Rodrigues. Ise26/5 0 Shaikh Hamza. 16875 26/8 0 Tato Malkarnekar. 225 tesT: Sebestiao Simao Costa.

Shaikh Abdul Wahab.26/9 0 Tato'Malkarnekar. 375 :he

T: Simao Lourenso Costa. T: Sebestiao Simao Costa. lidFranciscO" Rodrigues. 26110 0 Narshiv Nadkarni. 15825 at

261.6 d: Tato Malkarnekar. 16000 Auduth Nadkarni.T: Marathi Gomes. Vasant Nadkarni.

Antonio Sequeira. Dinanath Nadkarni.Sebastiao Sim'ao Costa. Joana Fernandes.

Fondu Yesso Gaonkar. T: Xavier Fernandes. Isa

Shantu ·Babu Gaonkar. Joana Carvelho. ,in

20/8 0 Haridas Devidas. 225 Sebestiao Fernandes. ar,16/2 0 Shridhar Sinai Bobe Caculo. 7600

Anand Devidas. Shantabai Sinai Bobe Caculo.20/9 0 Haridas Devidas. 800 Mohan Sinai Bobe Caculo.

Anand Devidas. Pandurang Sinai Bobe Caculo.20110 0 Daltaram Laximan Prabhu Pavaskar. 700 T: Milagres D'Costa.

Radha Krishna Prabhu Pavaskar. 16/3 0 -do- 6500 intT: Caitano Sequeira. T: Kusta Surya Gaonkar.

20111 0 Haridas Devidas. 575 16/4 0 -do- 5700

Anand Devidas. T: Z. Gaonkar.

20112 0 Daltaram Laximan Prabhu Pavaskar. 1150 18/1 0 -do- 2400

Radha Krishna Prabhu Pavaskar.T: Joaquim Fernandes.

Caitano Sequeira.20/1 0 Timblo Diago. 7500

T: 20/3 0 Annindo Joaquim Fernandes. 36700·20113 0 Haridas De\iidas. 800 Caitano D'Costa.

Anand Devidas. T: Krishna Vishnu Gaonkar.20114 0 Daltaram Laximan Prabhu Pavaskar. 575 Deu Vishnu Gaonkr . ~on

Radba Krishna Prabhu Pavaskar. Ramchandra Vishnu Gaonkar. .8,

T: Caitano Sequeira. Sharputo Shaba Oaonkar. 10.

20115 0 Haridas Devidas. 450 19/2 0 Shridhar Sinai Bobe Caculo. ·1(OOJ :ll-:

Anand Devidas. Shantabai Sinai Bobe Caculo. lof

20116 0 Daltaram Laximan Prabhu Pavaskar. 1100 Mohan Sinai Bobe Caculo. ies

Radha Krishna Prabhu Pavaskar.Pandurang Sinai Bobe Caculo. ate

T: Krishna :Vishnu Naik. lnST: Caitano -Sequeira. 19/3 0 -do~ 4600 n-20117 0 Haridas Devidas. 850 T: Antonio Fernandes.Anand Devidas. JohanBari'eto.

19/1 0 Darnodar'Daltaram Sinai Malkarnekar. 1950 Milagress D'Costa. Ihe.Gajanan Daltaram Sinai Malkarnekar. Vishnu Shankar Naik.

,Ram,esh Daltaram Sinai Malkarnekar.

Boundaries:1.9/2 0 -do- 13800T: Minino Diniz.

Antonio Rodrigues. North: S. No. 24, 26/1.

Luzinho Travasso. South: Road. :io

Sebestiao Sequeira. East: Village Zanodem..

Santan Ferrao. West: S. No. 22, 21, 18.

r:::=- -==============================

GOVERNMENT PRINTING PRESS.PANAJt - GOA.

PRICE - Rs. 12.00

1

Bandora

2000.

(1'------4':'

Total: .2000 \i

30TH MARCH, 2000

2

of the said land)

Village:

Names of the persons believed Approx Areato be interested in sq. mts.

Boundaries:,North: S. No. 256.South: S. No. 256.East: S, No. 256.West: S. No. 256.

(Description

Ponda

SOffiDULE

Survey No.1Sub·Div. No.

256 part 0: Comunidade of Bandora.Gajanan Dharmaji Dangi.Government of Goa.B.D.O.

Taluka:

Order

No. DCSIl-5/2000 (Consumer) Part-I

Read: Government Order No. 11114-8-9I1CSD/dated 1-8-96

The Government of Goa is pleased to accept the resignationof Mrs. Mangala Sane, as Member of the Consumer DisputesRedressal State Commission, with effect from 8-2-2000.


George Kuruvilla, Director of Civil Supplies and PriceControl and Ex. Officio Joint Secretary.

-Panaji, 16th March, 2000.


D. M. Borkar, Under Secretary (Revenue).


Department of Weights & Measures

---+++---

5. The Government also authorise under sub-section (2) ofsection 4 of the said Act, the following officers to do the actsspecified therein in respect of the said lanG!.

I. The Collector, North Goa District, Panaji.

2. Deputy CollectorlSDO, Ponda.

3. AsttExecutiveEngineer, Central WaterCommission,

F-2, Municipal Building, Khadapaband, Ponda.

4. Director of Settlement & Land Records, Panaji.

6. A rough plan of the said land is avilable for inspectionin the office of the Deputy CollectorlSDO, Ponda for a periodof 30 days from the date of publication of this Notificationin the Official Gazette.

1


2

North: Village Cotarli.South: Canal.East: Canal.West: Village Nagvem,15/1,ro?d.

No. 22/6/2000-RD


-D. M. Borkar, Under Secl:cary (Revenue).


Total: ....409700

4. The Government further appoints under clause (c) ofsection3 of the said Act Deputy CollectorlSDO, Ponda to performthe functions of a Collector, North Goa District, Pailaji underthe said Act in respect of the said land.

Notification

And whereas in the opinion of the Government the provisionsof sub-section (I) of section 17 of the Land Acquisition Act,1894 (Central Act I of 1894) (hereinafter referred to as "thesaid Act") are applicable.

Now, therefore, the Government hereby notifies under subsection (I) of section 4 of the said Act, that the said landis likely to be needed for the purpose specified above.

The Government further directs under sub-section (4) ofsection 17 of the said Act that the provisisotls of section 5Aof the said Act shall not apply in respect of the said land.

2. All persons interested in the said land are hereby warnednot to obstruct of interfere,with any surveyor or other personsemployed upon the said land for the purpose of the saidacquisition. Any contract for the disposal of the said landby sale, lease, mortgage, assignment, exchange or otherwiseor any outlay commenced or improvements made thereon withoutthe sanction of the Collector appointed under paragraph 4 below,after ·the date of the publication of this Notification, will underclause (seventh) of section 24 of the· said Act be disregardedby him while assessing compensation for such parts of thesaid land as may be finally acquired.

3. If the Government is satisfied that the said land is neededfor the aforesaid purpose,· a declaration to that effect undersection 6 of the said Act will be published in the Official Gazetteand in two daily newspapers and public notice thereof shallbe given in due course. If the acqulsition is abandoned whollyor in part the fact will also be notified in the same manner.

Whereas it appears to the Government of Goa (hereinafterreferred to as "the Government") that the land specified in theSchedule hereto (hereinatier referred to as the "said land") islikely to be needed for public purpose, viz. for constructionof office building for Central Water Commission at Bandorain Panda Taluka.

1020SERIES l/ No. 53

OFFICIAL~#GAZEJJE - Goa Printing Press

Documents

Transcript of OFFICIAL~#GAZEJJE - Goa Printing Press