Microclimate effects of wind farms on crop yields

11
Reap the Whirlwind Microclimate effects of wind farms on crop yields Dan Kaffine CU Dept. of Economics and RASEI 7/22/2014

Transcript of Microclimate effects of wind farms on crop yields

Reap  the  Whirlwind  Microclimate  effects  of  wind  farms  on  crop  yields

Dan  Kaffine  CU  Dept.  of  Economics  and  RASEI  

7/22/2014    

Mo8va8on

• US  electricity  from  wind  has  grown  from  <1%  in  2007  to  nearly  5%  currently  –  growth  likely  to  conKnue  • With  that  growth,  increased  interest  in  understanding  potenKal  posiKve  and  negaKve  externaliKes  associated  with  wind  •  Emissions,  property  values,  health,  wildlife,  grid  stability,  O&M  impacts  on  fossil  fuel  plants,  jobs  

• Given  overlap  of  “Wind  Belt”  and  “Farm  Belt”  –  might  wind  power  affect  crops?  •  If  so,  important  implicaKons  for  private  and  social  welfare  

Wind  belt  and  farm  belt

Why  might  there  be  a  link?

• We  know  that  climate  (temp,  precip,  etc)  affects  crops  • We  also  know  that  wind  turbines  create  “microclimate”  effects  

•  Mixing  of  air  temperatures  •  Mixing  of  CO2  •  Humidity  effects  • Wind  speed  •  Scale  10-­‐60km  downwind  

• Do  these  microclimate  effects  also  impact  crops?  •  If  so,  is  it  a  posiKve  or  negaKve  impact?  

Science

Basic  idea

•  Examine  impact  of  wind  farms  on  crop  yields  following  Deschenes  and  Greenstone  (2007)  –  county-­‐level  panel    

 

𝑦↓𝑐𝑡 = 𝛼↓𝑐 +𝛽𝑊↓𝑐𝑡 + 𝛾𝑋↓𝑐𝑡 + 𝑌↓𝑡 + 𝜀↓𝑐𝑡     

•  Regress  yield  𝑦↓𝑐𝑡   in  county  c  at  Kme  t  against  wind  capacity  𝑊↓𝑐𝑡   •  Control  for  precipitaKon,  temperature,  etc  in   𝑋↓𝑐𝑡   •  County  fixed-­‐effects  and  year  fixed-­‐effects  to  remove  Kme-­‐invariant  county  characterisKcs  and  common  yield  shocks  over  Kme  

•  Data  sources  •  Wind  capacity  –  EIA-­‐860  •  Yields,  acreage,  producKon  –  NASS  census  (every  5  years)  •  Precip,  temp  –  various  sources  

 

Preliminary  work

•  Start  by  looking  at  Iowa  •  Lots  of  wind,  small  counKes  •  Average  county  size  is  30  km  x  30  km  •  99  counKes,  4  censii  of  data  (1997-­‐2012)  •  Corn  is  king  (also  look  at  soy,  oats  and  silage)  

•  First  cut:  simple  county  and  year  FE  model  • While  this  ignores  important  factors,  useful  first  akempt  to  see  if  the  relaKonship  we  expect  to  see  exists  • Will  be  further  refined  in  the  months  to  come  

Preliminary  results  -­‐  IA Crop  yield  

Corn  grain  (bu)   0.0197   11.80*   3,495*   0.0187*   10.24*   3,075*  

(0.0136)   (7.32)   (1,957)   (0.0114)   (6.18)   (1,691)  

Wind  measure   MW   MW/sqmi   MW/acre   MW   MW/sqmi   MW/acre  

County  FE   Y   Y   Y   N   N   N  

Ag  District  FE   N   N   N   Y   Y   Y  

Year  FE   Y   Y   Y   Y   Y   Y  

N   396   396   396   396   396   396  

Preliminary  results  -­‐  IA Crop  yield  

Corn  grain  (bu)   0.0197   11.80*   3,495*   0.0187*   10.24*   3,075*  

(0.0136)   (7.32)   (1,957)   (0.0114)   (6.18)   (1,691)  

Soy  (bu)   -­‐0.0030    -­‐0.941   -­‐206    -­‐0.0030   -­‐1.16   -­‐263  

(0.0032)   (1.71)   (328)   (0.0030)   (1.58)   (310)  

Oats  (bu)   0.0014   0.963   0.704    0.008   4.84    2.12  

(0.009)   (4.90)   (1.61)    (0.007)   (4.22)   (1.41)  

Corn  silage  (t)   -­‐0.000    -­‐0.715   -­‐7.76*   0.002    0.874    -­‐1.38  

(0.003)   (1.69)   (4.34)   (0.003)   (1.39)   (3.44)  

Wind  measure   MW   MW/sqmi   MW/acre   MW   MW/sqmi   MW/acre  

County  FE   Y   Y   Y   N   N   N  

Ag  District  FE   N   N   N   Y   Y   Y  

Year  FE   Y   Y   Y   Y   Y   Y  

N   396   396   396   396   396   396  

Next  steps

• Modestly  encouraging  results  •  Lots  to  do  

•  Definitely  need  to  include  precipitaKon  and  temperature  data  •  More  states  •  More  Census  data  (<1997)  

• Hopefully  preliminary  finding  holds  up  •  Point  esKmate  on  corn  suggests  about  ~$6/MWh  posiKve  benefit  •  Smaller  than  ~$30/MWh  CO2  avoidance  benefit  BUT  it’s  all  local  •  At  2013  generaKon  levels  and  prices,  ~$100  million  in  benefit  to  Iowans  

Thanks!

•  Email:  [email protected]