Is it possible for the old to resist Pepsi cola
-
Upload
independent -
Category
Documents
-
view
0 -
download
0
Transcript of Is it possible for the old to resist Pepsi cola
CONTENT
Introduction............................................3
Definition..............................................4
The study...............................................5
Discussions and analysis................................6
Suggestions.............................................9
Conclusion.............................................10
2
Introduction
Since Pepsi Company was founded in 1902, managers in this
company have always endeavored to improve Pepsi cola to
make it adapt to the changing market and then to seize
the market further. They occasionally distribute
questionnaires and make surveys to know about consumers’
psychology as managers attempt to change the production
method and find appropriate advertising ways to satisfy
consumers’ needs (Bowles Jr et al, 1984).
3
However, some surveys still indicate that the sale of
Coca-Cola is larger than that of Pepsi Cola. The factors
resulting in Pepsi Cola only in the second place in the
competition are diverse, however, this article only
explores whether the old group, which accounts for the
majority of population, especially in developed
countries, refuses this kind of soft drink or not and
whether the factor of health indeed plays a crucial role
in the old’ s purchase.
This article has been organized in the following way. The
definitions of consumer, consumer behavior together with
4
health are explained in the first part. In the second
part, an experiment is introduced about who has reading
nutrition labels habit and the findings are also listed.
The third and fourth parts are the extension of the
second one, that is, analysis of the findings and some
reasonable suggestions to the company. Therefore, the
third and fourth parts are the cores of the whole
article. The last part is my conclusion about the whole
article.
Definitions
Some important factors and their effects are analyzed on
5
the basis of explanations of their definitions. Schiffman
(1995) suggested that the term, consumer was always
divided into two different groups, that is, personal
consumer and organizational consumer. However, in this
article, the main focus is personal consumer which is
widely connected with ordinary people’ life. Schiffman
considered that Personal consumer was referred to a kind
of persons who purchased and used products or service for
the sake of their own use or transferring the values to
the other individual persons, for instance, as a present
to their relatives. In this situation, this kind of
6
persons was described as final consumer who tried to
occupy the value of products by alone.
It is also necessary to introduce the concept of consumer
behavior, because only this term, the definition of
consumer cannot analyze factors influencing consumers
exactly. Engel (1995) considered consumer behavior as a
process which involved making decisions and taking
actions for the sake of getting, using and disposal of
new purchases. According to this explanation, researchers
also emphasize on how to consume what consumers acquire
and how to deal with these products after consuming them.
7
This is due to the fact that the methods consumers’
dealing with consuming products and their attitudes to
the products will indicate the degree of consumers’
satisfaction and whether consumers decide to buy the same
goods again, which is beneficial for companies to change
marketing strategies. USA Marketing Association (AMA)
also gave a definition of consumer behavior, that is, the
function of the exchange was based on emotions,
perception, actions and context together with the dynamic
procedure that those factors above influenced each other
(Loudon & Della Bitta, 1988). This definition implies
8
that some reasons may affect consumers’ decisions and
those reasons are changeable and even affect each other,
more importantly, consumer behavior, in effect, is a
process of change.
As Ware Jr says in 1987, the definition of health had two
dimensions: quantity and quality. Quantity referred to
the life span, meaning people have less opportunity of
getting diseases and getting stuck in disorder and live a
healthy and happy life so that people lived a longer
life. However, in the developed countries, there is
merely no difference in life span, the quality is
9
introduced which means the quality of living
circumstance, healthcare and so forth. However, how to
live a health life and to avoid falling ill are people’s
primarily focus.
The study
Some researchers have claimed that health indeed had a
role in affecting consumer behavior. However, it is
necessary to test whether the old resist Pepsi Cola and
whether the factor of health gives rise to the
resistance. An experiment is operated by Ranilovic´
(2006) who selected 1,011 subjects that were all over 15
10
years old randomly by telephone and asked whether they
had nutrition labels reading habits and consulted reasons
why they had tendencies to do this.
After collecting data, analyzing by building models, the
result was that people who were over 55 years old tend to
read nutrition labels on the food packaging, which
accounted for 42% in the total percent. In contrast, the
young below 25 seldom read. Meanwhile, 80% participants
also mentioned their reasons why they read nutrition
labels on the packaging, in summary, there are three main
reasons, namely, curiosity (35%), health counseling (17%)
11
and hope for eating healthier (30%). Interestingly, these
reasons were so strongly related with age that young and
low-educated subjects considered curiosity satisfaction
as their main task while the old and educated
participants tend to choose hope for health diet as the
reason to read nutrition labels.
Discussions and analysis
It is acknowledged that health food and regular exercise
can efficiently prevent chronic diseases from happening,
such as high blood pressure, obesity and so forth.
Nutrition labels is a useful tool to help people to find
12
more healthy food and remove some food junk. Therefore,
nutrition labels is so linked to the pursuit of health
that persons reading nutrition labels are more likely to
live a healthy life than those who do not. It is also
evidenced in some earlier studies (Satia et al., 2005)
that highest educational office lady, students paid
attention to read nutrition labels in order to keep fit
and need a special diet to become healthy. Grossman
(1972) also calculated data via operations and
formulations to find that the investment in health
program was higher with the increase of the age, because
13
of life cycle which is inevitable to make persons grow
old and finally leave them in poor physical conditions.
At the same time, as the bottle of Pepsi cola(No.122978)
says, Pepsi cola contains a great deal of Carbohydrates
and 1g Carbohydrate produces 4cal energy. Therefore, a
bottle of 600ml Pepsi cola totally produces 400cal
energy, which is occupied with three tenths of the basic
need every day. It means drinking Pepsi cola a lot may
causes obesity and then obesity can lead to high blood
pressure and some other chronic diseases which can reduce
the year people live. Another important point is that
14
more Caffeine is involved in Pepsi cola, which can
combine with other elements to convert into a substance
to affect digestion of Calcium which is a crucial element
to reinforce our skeleton (Tahmassebi, 2006). Thus, it is
not extremely suitable for the old and the young to drink
Pepsi Cola. From the point of these arguments, it seems
that people over 55 years old are more likely to resist
Pepsi cola for the sake of health.
Energy Protein
Carbohydrate
OfwhichSugars
Fat OfwhichSaturates
Fibre Sodium/Salt
TypicalvaluesPer100ml
182KJ(43Kcal)
Nil 10.7g 10.6g Nil Nil Trace Nil
Per250ml
445KJ(107Kcal)
Nil 26.5g 26.5g Nil Nil 0.1g Nil
15
Ingredients: Carbonated Water, Sugar, Color (Caramel
E150d), Phosphoric Acid, Flavorings (including Caffeine).
From a packaging of a bottle of Pepsi, No.122978.
However, the result reveals mentioned above that the old
as well as educated persons read nutrition labels in
order to pursue health, which means, due to not accepting
compulsory education, even if the old person is over 55,
he maybe do not emphasize on health lifestyle and then
accept Pepsi cola instead of resisting it. The another
study can help us understand completely.
In Paul and Rana’ study conducted in 2012, by means of
16
distributing structured questionnaires to almost 1000
persons who encountered in the street accidentally, they
exploited whether education was associated with the
willing of purchasing organic food and then analyzed the
data carefully. By comparing with these data and building
mathematics models, they found P value of education was
0.02 which represented there existed a strong link
between buying organic food and education in mathematics.
Furthermore, the result interprets that education is
positively linked to purchase, in other words, the longer
time people study in schools, the more organic food they
17
buy. It also reveals that higher educated persons pay
attention to health and try to balance their nutrition
via a healthy diet. This is due to the fact that they
become literate to read and know what the food packaging
says and search for more information related to health.,
what is the most important that they acquire a great deal
of knowledge about health, understand the importance of
health and develop a habit of willing to understand more
gradually. That is the reason why some companies launch a
short education program to strength potential consumers’
awareness of health and replenish nutrition knowledge
18
which is beneficial for their products promotion.
Suggestions
In conclusion, there are two main groups resisting Pepsi,
namely, the old focusing on health and the old as well as
well - educated persons. In order to attract the first
group successfully, new types of Pepsi cola should be
innovated by Pepsi Company, which do not include
unhealthy components. In past 5 years, managers of Pepsi
Company has already been aware of this trend and then
launched Pepsi Extreme which includes less Carbohydrate.
If managers want to seize market further, they should
19
modify existing products and make these products
healthier.
Aiming to the second group, Pepsi managers can hold a
consumer education program, because the educated persons
have a strong willing to learn new things (LaForge,
1989).During the program, Pepsi managers are advised to
broadcast Pepsi cola’s beneficial aspects of components,
for instance, Caffeine in cola can remove persons”
fatigue and keep brains clear in order to make a
concentration and to think critically. Meanwhile,
20
managers should insist Pepsi cola’s core culture and its
primary target market, that is, the youngsters and the
culture created to attract the youth. Since according to
the definition of consumers, one kind of consumers
purchases products to satisfy other’s needs (Schiffman,
1995), thus, it is interesting to imagine that as the
most popular soft drink among youngsters, it attracts the
elderly to buy Pepsi cola for their grandsons or
granddaughters to delight them, because the elderly
usually have strong desires to live in a happy family and
endeavor to do numerous things to maintain family bonds
21
(LaForge, 1989).
Conclusion
Generally, the old are not addicted to Pepsi cola,
however, by the experiment mentioned above, it clearly
presents that the over 55 years old and educated persons
are more likely to resist to Pepsi cola, because the
majority of them develop a habit of reading nutrition
labels which is strongly related to the health, in the
meantime, Pepsi cola contains many components which are
damaging to health, the educated persons emphasize on
health and they have the capacities of reading and
22
understanding these information.
Some suggestions are proposed for Pepsi Cola Company to
attract the old. The first one is to innovate some new
and healthier types as the focus the old consider is not
the sense of exciting the soft drink offer, but the
healthier diets and the sense of comfort. The second
point is to attract the young continuously in order to
appeal the elderly, because the young usually do not have
the ability to earn money, as long as they eager to
purchase Pepsi Cola, they will demand it from the old. In
this way, can Pepsi cola Company seize market further.
23
REFERENCE
Engel, J. F., Blackwell, R. D. and Minard, P. W. (1995).
Consumer Behavior. New York: the Dryden Press.
Grossman, M. (1972, Mar-Apr). On the Concept of Health
Capital and the Demand for Health. Journal of Political
Economy,Vol. 80, No. 2,, pp. 223-225.
J.A.,Galanko,J.A.and Neuhouser,M.L. (2005). Food
nutrition label use is associated with demographic,
24
behavioural and psychosocial factors and dietary
intake among African Americans in North Carolina.
Journal of the American Dietetic Association,Vol.105 No.3, pp. 392-
403.
Jasmina Ranilovic , Irena Colic´ Baric. (2011). Difference
between younger and older populations in nutrition.
British Food Journal,Vol.113(1), pp. 109-121.
Jr, J. E. (1987). Standards for validating health
measures: Definition and content. Journal of Chronic
Diseases,Vol,40,Issue,6, pp. 473-480.
Justin Paul,Jyoti Rana. (2012). Consumer behavior and
purchase intention for organic food. Journal of Consumer
Marketing,Vol,29,No.6, pp. 412-422.
JW Bowles Jr, NH Pronko. (1948). Identification of Cola
beverages: II. A further study. Journal of Applied
Psychology.
LaForge, M. (1989). learned helplessness as an
explanation of elderly consumer complaint behavior.
Journal of Business Ethics,Vol.8,, pp. 359-366.
Loudon, D.L. , Della Bitta, A.J. (1988). Consumer
behavior : concepts and applications. McGraw-Hill series
in marketing.
25
Satia,J.A.,Galanko,J.A.,Neuhouser,M.L. (2005). Food
nutrition label use is associated with
demographic,behavioural and psychosocial factors and
dietary intake among African Americans in North
Carolina. Journal of the American Dietetic
Association,Vol.105,No.3, pp. 392-403.
Schiffman, L. G. and Kanuk, L. L. (1995). Consumer Behavior.
New York: Prentice Hall.
Tahmassebi, J. (2006, Jan). Soft drinks and dental
health: A review of the current literature. Journal of
Dentistry,Volume 34, Issue 1, pp. 2-11.
26