International Human ResorouceManagementby Manoj Gurusinghe

WORD COUNT 4500CHARACTER COUNT 30645

TIME SUBMITTED 30-JUN-2013 09:04AMPAPER ID 25190150

Language

1

2

Editing

3

4

5

6

FINAL GRADE

62 / 0

GRADEMARK REPORT

GENERAL COMMENTS

PAGE 1

PAGE 2

PAGE 3

LanguageLanguage It does help if your first language is not English to use the grammar check and also to ask someone who ismore familiar with the language to proof read your work.

PAGE 4

1.1. Ask yourself a critical question: what value does this historical description add to your work?

PAGE 5

PAGE 6

PAGE 7

2.2. What was said specifically if anything about TM?

PAGE 8

EditingEditing Error of typing, grammar, spelling, word/letter omision, punctuation no capital.

PAGE 9

3.3. You must proof read - silly spelling mistakes do not help your work.

PAGE 10

PAGE 11

PAGE 12

PAGE 13

PAGE 14

PAGE 15

PAGE 16

4.4. Your conclusion could have focussed on the 'findings' in relation to TM

5.5. See general assessment at the end of reference page

PAGE 17

PAGE 18

PAGE 19

PAGE 20

PAGE 21

PAGE 22

6.6. You have adequately covered the topic. Proper editing would have helped your work immensely as needlessspelling mistakes detract. Overall the assignment is of a satisfactory standard.

You show some understanding of the topic and related issues. But you tend to rely on lots of lists - of bullet points, ofsentences in separate paragraphs and need to ask yourself more critical questions - the most important one is perhaps"what value does inclusion of this add to my work?" - especially of all the appendices: were they really necessary orhelpful?Dave Clarke, Internal Moderator

CRITERION 1

70%+

60-69%

50-59%

PASS 40-49%

MARGINAL FAIL 30-39%

FAIL UP TO 29%

CRITERION 2

70%+

60-69%

50-59%

PASS 40-49%

MARGINAL FAIL 30-39%

FAIL UP TO 29%

CRITERION 3

70%+

60-69%

50-59%

PASS 40-49%

MARGINAL FAIL 30-39%

FAIL UP TO 29%

CRITERION 4

70%+

60-69%

RUBRIC: MG701 HRM

Generic Communication 5%

Clear precise assignment with excellent structure. Coherent and comprehensive argument.

Mostly clear precise assignment with good structure. Fairly coherent and well argued.

Well structured and relatively clear argument.

Structured OK with some argument but some description

Inadequate structure with some flaws in argument.

Poor structure and argument

Knowledge and Understanding 30%

Demonstrates excellent understanding of the topic, objectivity and reference to theory. Providesappropriate level of additional research.

Demonstrates clear understanding of the topic, objectivity and reference to theory Evidence of at least10+ relevant references which demonstrate that the student has deployed a range of literature sources.

Basic level of understanding of the topic, some reference to theory. Provides small amount of research,benchmarking may be limited or missing.

Shows some understanding of the topic but limited reference to theory or literature

Demonstrates only superficial understanding, theory limited or absent. Provides limited research,benchmarking may be limited or missing.

Very limited understanding of topic. Provides no contextual research.

Analysis 30%

Demonstrates clear and accurate analysis of research and conclusions drawn

Demonstrates acceptable analysis of research and conclusions drawn

Demonstrates some level of analysis of research and conclusions drawn

Some analysis shown but largely descriptive.

Demonstrates weak level of research and conclusions drawn

Demonstrates inadequate analysis.

Evaluation 30%

Fully evaluates implications, using appropriate reflective methods based on theory

Evaluates implications using appropriate reflective methods based on theory

50-59%

PASS 40-49%

MARGINAL FAIL 30-39%

FAIL UP TO 29%

CRITERION 5

70%+

60-69%

50-59%

PASS 40-49%

MARGINAL FAIL 30-39%

FAIL UP TO 29%

Adequately evaluates implications, using appropriate methods based on theory

Some evaluation of implications but perhaps using questionable methods or concepts.

Evaluates implications using poor or inappropriate methods.

Displays only weak evaluation, not reflective or based on theory.

Assignment Parameters 5%

Precisely meets guidelines on word count, presentation, and referencing. Must be within word count +/-10% to achieve overall Distinction.

Mostly meets guidelines on word count, presentation, and referencing.

Partially meets guidelines on word count, presentation, and referencing.

Meets guidelines on presentation and parameters but with several errors.

Guidelines on word count, presentation, and referencing generally disregarded

Guidelines on word count, presentation, and referencing fully disregarded