Head Quarters - West Bengal State Electricity Board ...

First Issue For Members only

Head Quarters

�

�

�

�

�

�

Different

Sub-Committees

2013-14

Technical Article

Zonal Committees

2013-14

Important

correspondences

Members List

CEC 2013-14

INSIDE Kolkata stages are now swayed and vibrant with Shakespeare. Mostly with tragedy about the corrupting effect of ambition written in early 17th century. Shakespeare’s company apparently desired the support of James I and this seems to have prompted them to choose a theme that flattered his descent from the Scottish kings and catered to his interest in witchcraft. In the play Macbeth encounters three witches who prophesy that he will become king. Inspired by this, Macbeth and his Fair Lady murder king Duncan and seize the throne. Despite suffering the tortures of a guilty conscience, Macbeth entangles himself in committing further crimes to consolidate his power, including the murder of the entire family of the nobleman Macduff. Lady Macbeth engulfed by madness commits suicide; finally fugitive Macduff returns from England to kill Macbeth in battle. Macbeth’s ghost is said to haunt Glamis Castle, lamenting Duncan’s death.

The legacy of Macbeth and his tragedy still so vibrant in establishments, if not so much in individuals although madly driven by evil ambition in manipulating the vital positions. Diction of development flows with ever gaining momentum. Some towards transporting and delivery of the energetic electricals, some for its production - thus remains to be the life of the lifelines, the development with an eye to infrastructural care as envisaged by caring governance. Consciously or not so many are striving from concept to consequence. Unfortunately, masked faces of guidance representing advisory are now unmasked in hovering and queer stature only to prove the antithesis of the very purpose they are supposed to stand for.

Macbeth is capable of good, but chooses the path of evil. Once the crime is committed, once the forces of good embodied by a troubled conscience are overcome, Macbeth’s human feelings degenerate till ultimately he has no feeling. He can receive the news of the death of his once beloved wife without feeling. He gets cut off from humanity and from God; he loses his desire to live until at last he sinks into utter despair in which state life has no meaning for him.

This is the last stage of damnation. Ah-ha! Stages are now swayed and vibrant with Shakespeare.

Power News v 2

BFT COMMITTEE :

Secretary Er. Sajal Bag

Treasurer Er. Malabika Jana

Members Er. Snigdha Mondal

Er. Tapan Kr. Basu

Er. Tanmoy Das

JOURNAL & POWER NEWS COMMITTEE :

Editor Er. Satyaban Roy

Convenor Er. Kamalesh Biswas

Members Er. Rita Chakraborty

Er. Bibhas Bhattacharya

Er. Biswadev Pandit

Er. Mousumi Bhowmick

Er. Sujit Nath

Er. Hafsha Rahaman

CO-ORDINATION COMMITTEE

(FAETO/AIPEF/EIPEF/DPL & WBPDCL)

Members Er. Samir Das

Er. Sanjoy Kr. Bhunia

Er. Biswadev Pandit

Er. Pathik Kr. Nayek

Er. Subhadra Gopal Datta

Er. Sadique Islam

Er. Subhrendu Sarkar

Er. Kamalesh Biswas

Er. Moupali Mukherjee

Er. Ujjwal Roy

MAS COMMITTEE :

Convenor Er. Prabhat Kr. Pal

Treasurer Er. Hafsha Rahaman

Members Er. Subhendu Dalal

Er. Partha Dutta

Er. Subhrendu Sarkar

DIFFERENT SUB-COMMITTEES

OF WBSEBEA

2013 - 2014

OFFICE BEARERS AND MEMBERS OF

CENTRAL EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE :

2013 - 2014

President :

Er. Samir Das, Addl. CE

Vice-President :

Er. Prabhat Kr. Pal, Addl. CE

Er. Subhrendu Sarkar, SE (E)

Hony. Secretary :

Er. Sanjoy Kr. Bhunia, SE (E)

Hony. Asst. Secretary :

Er. Biswadev Pandit, DE (E)

Hony. Treasurer :

Er. Subhadra Gopal Datta, SE (E)

Hony. Asst. Treasurer :

Er. Soumitra Biswas, SE (E)

Hony. Members :

1. Er. Siddhartha Ghosh, SE (C)

2. Er. Bibhas Bhattacharya, SE (C)

3. Er. Kamalesh Biswas, SE (E)

4. Er. Rafikul Islam, SE (E)

5. Er. Ashish Biswas, SE (E)

6. Er. Paresh Routh, SE (E)

7. Er. Pathik Kr. Nayek, SE (E)

8. Er. F. A. Khan, DE (E)

9. Er. Barnali Saha, DE (E)

10. Er. Srinibash Routh, SE (E)

11. Er. Ujjwal Roy, AE (U)

Co-opted Members :

1. Er. Satyaban Roy, CE

2. Er. Debananda Saha, SE (E)

Power News v 3

WEBSITE COMMITTEE

Editor Er. Soumitra Biswas

Convenor Er. Debika Deb

Members Er. Sujit Nath, Er. Bidyut Bera, Er. Mrinal Das, Er. Haran Pal

TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE

Convenor Er. Biswadev Pandit

Members Er. Samir Das, Er. S. K. Bhunia, Er. Satyaban Roy, Er. Sanat Kr. Biswas, Er. Pankaj Sahu

Er. Kamalesh Biswas, Er. Pathik Kr. Nayek, Er. Ajoy Kr. Das Mahapatra, Er. Asit Karmakar

Er. Subhamoy Dasgupta, Er. Sabyasachi Roy, Er. Bibhas Bhattacharya, Er. Dipti Basu

Er. Dibya Kanti Neogi

Preface: Ministry of Power, Government of India,

has launched the Restructured Accelerated Power

Development and Reforms Programme (R-APDRP)

in July 2008 with focus on establishment of base

line data, fixation of accountability, reduction of AT&C

losses up to 15% level through strengthening & up-

gradation of Sub Transmission and Distribution

network and adoption of Information Technology

during XI Plan. Projects under the scheme shall be

taken up in two parts. Part-A shall include preparation

of Base-line data for the project area covering

Consumer Indexing, G!S Mapping, Metering of

Distr ibut ion Transformers and Feeders, and

Automatic Data Logging for al l Distr ibut ion

Transformers and Feeders and SCADA / DMS

system (only in the project area having more than 4

lacs population and annual input energy of the order

of 350 MU). It would include Asset mapping of the

entire distribution network at and below the 11kV

transformers and include the Distr ibut ion

Transformers and Feeders, Low Tension lines, poles

and other distribution network equipment. It will also

include adoption of IT applications for meter reading,

billing & collection; energy accounting & auditing;

MIS; redressal of consumer gr ievances;

establishment of IT enabled consumer service

centers etc. The base line data and required system

shal l be ver i f ied by an independent agency

appointed by the Ministry of Power. Part-B shall

include regular distribution strengthening projects

and will cover system improvement, strengthening

and augmentation etc.

SAP was rolled out in WBSEDCL in most of the

RAPDRP part -A project areas in West Bengal. Its

effect is so prominent and debatable that it has

become the centre point of discussion in different

tiers of our hierarchy. Prior to this, we have long time-

ISSUES IN IMPLEMENTATION OF SAP IN WBSEDCL BUSINESS DOMAINISSUES IN IMPLEMENTATION OF SAP IN WBSEDCL BUSINESS DOMAINISSUES IN IMPLEMENTATION OF SAP IN WBSEDCL BUSINESS DOMAINISSUES IN IMPLEMENTATION OF SAP IN WBSEDCL BUSINESS DOMAINISSUES IN IMPLEMENTATION OF SAP IN WBSEDCL BUSINESS DOMAIN

Krishnendu Dutta, A.E.(IT & C),Serampore (D) Division

tested epoch-making in-house software developed

in Oracle environment that is performing well in

billing related activities and is supposed to be the

backbone of revenue monitoring system. Oracle

based system run in different establishments of

WBSEDCL regarding in house business modules like

bi l l ing, payment, accounts and employee

information. In Oracle environment, each system was

modularized under each division having one server

only and these could be communicated with other

units via BSNL 2 MBPS leased line architecture. The

system was developed & supported by our learned

in-house engineers and so the software process

lifetime costs were negligible like cost of requirement

analysis, freezing of requirements, design, coding,

uni t test ing, stress and volume test ing and

maintenance. Maintenance is the entire main thing

that software is into, which covers almost 69% of

the SDLC (Software Development Life Cycle). And

it’s the maintenance that incurs major production

issues which actually come from after roll-out of any

new patch. So maintenance being the most crucial

part of SDLC and during post-implementation of the

software, Oracle based system enforces practically

zero maintenance cost in both LT & HT model billing

system. If all these sound good for an organization,

then what was the need for SAP implementation?

Unfortunately, this most competent and versatile

billing related application software developed in

Oracle is gradually being substituted by SAP

applications only in the name of ERP - business

management software that allows an organization

to use a system of integrated applications to manage

their business. Wel l , we cannot deny the

technological advancement to cope up with the pace

of reforms and restructuring. ERP is welcome as it

integrates all facets of an operation, including

Power News v 4

network planning and development, energy billing,

payroll, employee information, store management

etc. But to the best of knowledge, another ERP

namely ORACLE E-business suite was previously

purchased from Oracle Corporation and a good

number of engineers were also trained in 11 i. Our

Engineers were more famil iar with Oracle

environment as they were engaged in the dealing

with this RDBMS since inception level. In short,

WBSEDCL is having abundant resource of

manpower well familiar with Oracle environment than

SAP environment. The answer was, however,

explained by the so-called software think-tank like

this. “SAP was required to centralize the entire

business processes l ike bi l l ing, employee

information, payroll, CRM etc. Centralization is all

that the corporate level of an organization needs to

capture business data and management information

for better decision making at the corporate level.

Decentralized architecture had some drawbacks

regarding reporting and information and it could be

diverse across the regions depending upon the state

of view of the local administrators.” But centralization

could also be achieved with Oracle 11i with havoc

expertise and proficiency of our engineers in Oracle

domain instead of offering the development and

support activity of SAP billing to an outside vendor

ultimately leading to no control of us in our own

revenue management software. The biggest USP of

Oracle ERP, as we know is that it is based on Oracle

Database, which in itself is a market leader. So .the

Oracle ERP is best placed to take advantage of the

advances in the database technology. The buzzword

is “If it is in the database, you will get it and get it

fast!!” As far as the components of the suite itself

are concerned, Oracle Financials is a market leader;

Oracle HRMS and Payroll are already catching up

pretty fast. So the market indications are pretty

positive and you have enough consultants in the

market to cash in.

Now let us see what is SAP?

SAP stands for System Applications and Products

in Data Processing. It’s an ERP software started by

5 IBM engineers in 1970s.The SAP Utilities (IS-U)

component is a sales and information system that

supports all business processes and utility services

of a utility company. You can use IS-U for managing

and billing residential, commercial and industrial, and

prospective customers. IS-U is integrated with the

Service Management (PM-SMA), Customer Service

(CS) and Sales and Distribution (SD) application

components, enabling you to bill service orders,

service contracts, and the sale of goods.

SAP Utilities

l IS-U/CCS

l With Basic Functions you manage addresses and

regional structures, as well as generating dates

and schedules for meter readings, billings, and

budget billings.

l With Master Data you manage data that remains

fixed for long periods of time. In IS-U, this data

includes the business partners, contracts and

contract accounts, connection objects (buildings

and real estate) and the premises, installations,

and device locations contained therein.

l With Device Management you manage the

installations, meter reading, and the certification

of all devices for a utility company.

l The IS-U. Billing component is used for billing

the following standard divisions: Electricity, gas,

water/waste water, distr ict heat ing, and

multimedia services (for example, cable TV).

l The IS-U Invoicing component enables you to

group services and invoice them on one bill. You

can also use the component to calculate and

charge fees and taxes.

l Intercompany Data Exchange (IDE) is a solution

that covers the requirements that have arisen

from the deregulation of energy markets. IDE

covers the following areas:

l Management of deregulation data

l Process execution

l Management of data exchange processes etc.

Post Migration Issues from Legacy to SAP:

In our legacy system, information was stored in

tables which were accessed by different schema.

There are mainly two types of information i.e. Master

data and Transactional data. Normally Master data

remains fixed for a long period of time and is also

called Static data while Transactional data is

populated each time any local or remote process is

executed. In table format most of the data can be

retrieved using one composite primary key i.e.

Customer or billing information can be retrieved with

the combination of office code and consumer no or

consumer id at user’s discretion apart from menu

driven reports. This means uniqueness is maintained

among all consumers across West Bengal. However,

in SAP, robust concepts are introduced. These are

MRU, PORTION, INSTALLATION, DEVICE and

SMRD. The meter reading unit abbreviated as MRU

is the concatenation of <bill office code><billing

zone><quarterly/monthly><MR> and PORTION (for

bi l l ing) is l ike <bi l l off ice code><bi l l ing

Power News v 5

zone><quarterly/monthly><PR>. The logic is not

easily conceivable for any DCC-in-charge. For any

customer care centre, unique billing zone is identified

for metering and billing activity. Consumer in SAP is

mapped to installation and meter is mapped to

device. Hence, comes the major difference between

the two systems. In legacy reading is taken in terms

of reading period or accounting month. For a

particular month say 10 number zones are to be

billed. Then these 10 zones are mapped to a

particular month. Other zones are mapped to other

accounting months. Thus in a span of three months,

all billing zones are covered within a supply. This is

the quarterly billing process. Reading is taken after

every 90 days (30 days for monthly billing) and so

bill for every consumer in every month is ascertained.

But in SAP, billing is carried out in terms of scheduled

meter reading date and not against any particular

accounting month. Also, these scheduled meter

reading dates are captured from legacy database

where the reading date pattern of legacy billing

zones are frozen. But these dates are not mapped

to any particular accounting month and accounting

year which often creates confusion to the meter

readers at supply level. More to add that there inflicts

a paradigm shift in conception of billing logic from

the conventional billing system with which our

engineers were accustomed to.

Let’s talk about the unbilling issue. It is seen in

every month report that many CCCs have thousands

of unbilled consumers. But if one could go through

past records of that CCC through legacy system, it

was far lesser that that. None but the inherent logic

of SAP is responsible for this. According to experts,

the primary problem lies in the scheduled meter

reading dates and the non-existence of subjective

mapping between scheduled meter reading date and

accounting month. Normally SMRD ranges are taken

in between 16th of previous month to 15th of current

month. These are to be calculated for three months

to cover all consumers. But, it is seen that some

zones those are to billed in the next accounting

month comes in the 16th-15th loop due to their

haphazard scheduled meter reading date are also

treated as unbilled. Any CCC with more no of zones

is to suffer from this issue. This creates confusion in

the management about the actual scenario and the

incorrect reporting. As a result, site authorities face

lot of criticisms from top management for this

fictitious unbilling.

The funniest thing is that you will struggle to bill

actual unbilled consumers in your system. One single

billing involves eight rigorous steps right from order

creation to spooling. So if you have a minimum 80

numbers of unbilled consumers, end user has to

perform 80 x 8 = 640 operations to get the billing

done. Think about the time required to complete the

job as well as the human efforts. If there is any meter

replacement, then device deletion and attachment

increases the total steps further. This is because

there is no batch process generation of unbilled

consumers one at a time in SAP.

It is a pithy saying that “To err is human”.

Generally any software is developed to catch

repetitive human error through its various validations,

be it web based or PC based to acquire most correct

user data. End user cannot be blamed for wrong

entry in database because of absence of validation.

In legacy system the validation was robust and even

there were chances of rectification after validity of

garbage data. But in SAP, absence of validation

makes newspaper headlines. Several occurrences

of meter-roll-over cases are surfacing throughout the

state. For example, any meter with 4 digit dial should

produce its maximum reading 9999 and then roll over

to 0. SAP can’t capture this yet and thus end user

has to capture this error from assuming system that

this is 5 digit meter and the consumption comes as

={(99999-9999)+1}=90001 instead of 1 unit. So, it’s

easy to find why such crore bills were hitting the

headlines. After reading entry which is now being

carried out by outside agencies in most of the CCCs

in West Bengal, one has to manually check the

plausibility clause one by one which is tedious,

cumbersome and time wasting job to perform for all

the SMRD in every month.

Next comes the concept of batch process i.e.

bunch of processes scheduled to run in a particular

non-working hours of the day. SAP solely depends

on batch processes for billing, defaulter notice and

disconnection generation, where as in legacy these

can be carried out any day by any end user preferring

the due dates as per his or her choice. The same

flexibility is not available in batch process. It is often

seen that batch process fails often resulting in partial

billing and thus creating disturbance in bill sorting

and delivery. Batch process is not reliable at all. The

dunning batch process runs every week end so the

due dates expired before that particular weekend will

only be defaul ted as defaul ter not ice and

disconnection order generation. Even cases are

found that even after expiry of due dates notice is

not generated. The funny thing is that in legacy

system, one can understand how many consumers

are paid and how many defaulter notices are

generated. But, in SAP, this process still remains like

a black box. Whatever will be the outcome is not

Power News v 6

known. DCC in-charge depends solely on the

message about the spool preparation completion and

to act accordingly. This message is shown only once.

If he or she unmindfully ignores it, there are chances

of no notice generation. Moreover, this alert message

does not flash often either. Even sometimes HT

related pop-up comes in LT related bill window.

The reporting in oracle database is seamlessly

easy as compared to SAP. Where as to generate

report from SAP one has to depend on database

snapshot of web portal. Database snapshot cannot

be compared with the real time live production

database of oracle system. As a result portal often

reflects historical data only. So, to extract any report

for any particular day, say number of unpaid industrial

consumers for this month as on date, one has to run

a sample historical report from portal and then

manually check the data in live database through

payment checker fp!9 to get actual payment status.

This is laborious process and consumes manpower.

Effectively to send a disconnection team to field list

preparation takes more t ime than the actual

execution of disconnection in consumer premises.

But, it is very difficult to retrieve the live data from

data centre production server for an end user. For,

example say one is running industrial defaulter list

from portal, the report what is coming is not

convincing , even short payment amounting less than

one rupee (often in paisa !!) comes in report. A

sample is listed below.

Contract Installation Name Address INR

Account Number

162181013 2089367 M/s. SUPER AGRO INDIA M/s. Super Agro India 1 496.92

162135511 2089194 M/s. VANEETA M/s. Vaneeta Petrochem Ind (P) Ltd. 1 0.23

162135602 2089180 Mr. MEWALAL DUBEY Mr. Mewalal Dubey 1 0.03

162140040 2089198 M/s. MOHIT M/s. Mohit Engineering 1 11,865.07

162140048 2089257 M/s. MATSU LIME M/s. Matsu Lime Company 1 0.32

162141212 2089284 SAJJAN ENTERPRISE Sajjan Enterprise Pvt. Ltd. 1 0.41

162145037 2089313 UNITED WAX United Wax Industries 1 0.07

Payment processing is very tough in fpl9. As

payment related authorization is generally not

granted to DCC level, It is granted to Circle Level

Manager (F & A). So it often creates problem in

regeneration unlike legacy system where control

over billing is at hand. Also, single shot billing is not

available. All eight steps need to be performed to

generate individual bill if that consumer is not billed

in his billing zone batch system. In many aspects of

SAP authorization are distr ibuted throughout

different level. It causes communication problem and

hinders progress activity.

One thing is surprising that for any Company to

adopt particular software for its commercial usage

in respective business domain, the Company has to

freeze the requirements first. Requirements analysis

is critical to the success of a systems or software

project. The requirements should be documented,

actionable, measurable, testable, traceable, related

to identified business needs or opportunities, and

defined to a level of detail sufficient for system

design. This is not clear to us whether in SAP, such

requirements analysis was made to determine

whether the stated requirements are clear, complete,

consistent and unambiguous, for resolving any

apparent conflicts. The vendor responsible for

development of the software might have not

identified our needs, might have not evaluated the

system for feasibil i ty and on the other hand,

WBSEDCL might have not tested the software as

per requirements to fit into its business domain, might

have not encouraged the vendor to prepare a data

model from the frozen requirements to have the

required designs and coding. Hence, lies the big gap.

More defects identified in later stages invite more

rework which demands more costs to fix the problem.

One issue tracker has been developed by the

vendor to track the software related problem there.

The site authorities put the software bugs there for

getting fixed it by the vendor. As on date, 52098

issues in the software were put in the tracker.

Imagine the numbers of issues relating to the

software which deals with our revenue management

system. For giving a piece of information to the

learned readers of this article, only a mere 1375 bugs

were attended and closed by the vendor which has

astonishingly outsourced that areas of work and the

status of others are kept as HOLD, WAITING NEW,

REOPENED etc. It is vivid that there are plenty of

unattended and unsolved issues. Issues are not

Power News v 7

attended regularly and thus increase consumer

grievances, ultimately leading to tarnish of the image

of the company. With so many bottlenecks in the

software, it is surprising to see how UAT (User

acceptance test) of the software was done and

passed for deployment at site!

As previously stated, software is at sole hand of

M/S TCS. The engineers of WBSEDCL are in dark

about SAP internal logic unlike oracle based system.

When any software patch is updated, end user has

no idea what the patch is all about and whether the

patch has arrested the previous bug.

All these lead to erroneous implementation of

SAP system which results reduction of flexibility, loss

of revenue, increased consumer grievance etc. Also,

huge amount of money is getting wasted to pay

towards development cost, maintenance cost and

production support and hardware & network resource

cost. The key takeaway here is that, as with any ERP

solution, SAP and Oracle both have their strengths

and weaknesses. One solution may be the best fit

for one organization, while not a good fit for others,

even within the same industry. The only way to make

sense of the pros and cons in a way that is

meaningful to your organization is to engage in a

robust ERP software select ion process that

considers your requirements, pr ior i t ies, and

competitive advantages to find the right fit. Oracle

has a slight advantage in average implementation

duration and an even larger advantage in average

implementation cost, at 20% less than SAP. SAP,

on the other hand, has the lowest business risk of

the two, measured via the probability of a material

operational disruption at the time of go-live.

POWER THEFT AND ITS SOCIAL IMPACT

B. Pandit, Assistant Secretary, WBSEBEA

Theft of electricity is the greatest menace for any

electricity distribution company. The very existence

of the company may be jeopardized, if the theft of

electricity is allowed to occur for narrow political or

personal gains. Considering the importance of the

matter, the law of the land has been made stringent

by implementing and amending the Electricity Act in

2003 and in 2007. The offence has been made non-

bail able one. This means the offenders have to get

bail from the court after arrest by the police. Provision

has been created for formation of Special Court for

speedy disposal of electricity theft cases and there

is also provision for formation of special police station

which will take care of the offence of the theft of

electricity exclusively. It is true that there are some

real problems towards tackling this theft of electricity.

Perhaps, this is the only business where the

measuring instruments (energy meters) remain in the

custody of the consumers. This is apart from the

easily available bare conductor in the remote villages

making the system theft-pron. So, task of prevention

of electricity is not so easy one so that the same

can be prevented by the utility persons only. What

we need a tremendous support from the society as

whole. Unfortunately, in our society electricity theft

is not looked upon with same view on theft of other

commodities. As a result many people do this crime

openly without caring of any criticism from the

society.

As per provision of the law, India Government

is determined to provide electricity to its all citizen

in time bound manner. This task is laid on the

different distribution agencies of the country. As such

in case of West Bengal, the responsibility of sending

Power News v 8

power to the remotest corner of the State has laid

on WBSEDCL and proudly enough it is doing the

same with whole hearted support f rom the

Government of West Bengal. Because of the same

effort, the number of consumers has been increased

from 80 lacs to 120 lacs by last two years itself. As

the electric lines are expanded rapidly, the security

on these lines is being jeopardized. As a result, ATC

Loss of the company is increasing day by day. If the

same is not taken care of properly, the company may

loss its financial balance and for this purpose, we

need social help. It is needless to mention here that

WBSEDCL has to procure electricity by paying price

for the same and being a government owned

organisation it will not be able to allow the misuse

of public money in form stealing of electricity. If

WBSEDCL do not get back the full price of electricity,

it will not be able to develop its financial health which

will ultimately affect the society as a whole. So, let

the people know that now-a-days utility cannot

provide free electricity to any consumer. For getting

quality power in reasonable price, the theft of

electricity to be stopped and this can only be possible

with social help. Not only loss of Government

revenue, power theft poses great threat to life and

property. In course of taking unauthorised power (see

the picture), they destroy all kind of safety for life

and property. Many deaths can be avoided by

avoiding theft of electricity.

‘CONSERVATION OF ENERGY’ is a popular term

of modern t ime. Unauthorised users misuse

electricity grossly, because they do not pay for the

same. So from that angle also, the theft of electricity

should be stopped. So we should raise slogan “STOP

THEFT OF ELECTRICITY, SAVE THE SOCIETY

AND ENJOY QUALITY POWER”.

PAN DETAILS OF WBSEBEA

Pow

er N

ew

s v

9

ZONAL COMMITTEES OF WBSEBEA FOR 2013 - 2014 AT A GLANCE

ZONE HOWRAH NADIA MALDA MEDINIPUR

Er. Amitabh Biswas

Er. Abhijit Banerjee

Er. Tarun Kr. Ghosh

Er. Samir Sardar

1. Er. Soumava Sarkar

2. Er. Kinkar Singh

3. Er. Jibanlal Mallick

4. Er. Hasibur Rahaman

5. Er. Milan Das

6. Er. Sagarika Mitra

7. Er. Biswajit Mahato

PRESIDENT

VICE PRESIDENT

SECRETARY

ASST. SECRETARYCUM TREASURER

MEMBERS

Er. Siddhartha Roy

Er. Amitava Bardhan Roy

Er. Indrajit Naskar

Er. A. K. Ghosal

1. Er. Abhisek Bhuian

2. Er. Rumrum Das Roy

3. Er. Souvik Sarkar

4. Er. Narayan Ch. Das

5. Er. Soumyadeep Biswas

6. Er. Tarun Acharya

7. Er. Sibashis Ghosh

Er. Debangsu Das

Er. Pranay Pal

Er. Abhisek Dey

Er. Mrinmay Nath

1. Er. Arindam Kar

2. Er. Shakti Kumar Singh

3. Er. Amit Kr. Ujjain

4. Er. Debraj Rakshit

5. Er. Dipankar Biswas

6. Er. Pradip Kr. Nag

7. Er. Sankhadeep Bhattacharya

8. Er. Sumit Chowdhury

Er. Binoy Sen

Er. Goutam De

Er. Rajesh Kundu

Er. Somraj Roy

1. Er. Manik Pal

2. Er. Soumen Adhikari

3. Er. Souvik Bera

4. Er. Debabrata Bairagi

5. Er. Sumanta Roy

6. Er. Satyaban Mondal

7. Er. H. K. Ram

8. Er. Santanu Mondal

9. Er. Baisakhi Sahu

Pow

er N

ew

s v

10


ZONE NORTH 24 PGS BURDWAN BANKURA SILIGURI

Er. Tapas Halder

Er. Sukanta Biswas

Er. Nilkantha Biswas

Er. Bhim Kumar Ghosh

1. Er. Sisir Chowdhury

2. Er. Amit Kr. Pal

3. Er. Mrinal Kanti Biswas

4. Er. Basanta Mallick

5. Er. Sanjib Mondal

6. Er. Ajay Sarkar

7. Er. Sourav Das

8. Er. Tanushree Mukherjee

9. Er. Tapas Chakraborty

PRESIDENT

VICE PRESIDENT

SECRETARY


MEMBERS

Er. Sanjoy Kr. Ghosh

Er. Zahirul Haque

Er. Kallol Kanti Das

Er. Santanu Samanta

Er. Sohel Hasan

1. Er. Gobinda Murmu

2. Er. Biraj Kishor Mondal

3. Er. Koushik Mondal

4. Er. Arup Modi

5. Er. Krishnendu Mukherjee

6. Er. Supriya Dey

7. Er. Usha Ghosh

8. Er. Asit Dey

9. Er. Samaresh Kundu

Er. Ashok Ranjan Giri

Er. Dayamay Shyam

Er. Amitabha Chowdhury

Er. Ashok Samal

1. Er. Chiranjit Banerjee

2. Er. Sandip Sahana

3. Er. Jayanta Majhi

4. Er. Niladri Kundu

5. Er. Sukanta Chakraborty

6. Er. Amit Paul

7. Er. Poulami Karmakar

8. Er. Haradhan Chakraborty

Er. Ashok Kr. Sinha

Er. Dinesh Dey

Er. Mohan Kisku

Er. Mainak Ghosh

1. Er. Supriyo Sinha

2. Er. Debasish Chaki

3. Er. Anil Kr. Pandey

4. Er. Sambhunath Modak

5. Er. Soumen Das

6. Er. Nandanandan Biswas

7. Er. Bidip Ranjan Barman

8. Er. Sibu Sarkar

9. Er. Abhisek Kaparia

10. Er. Dipen Khawas

11. Er. Prosenjit Ghosh

Pow

er N

ew

s v

11


ZONE PPSP SALT LAKE BIDYUT BHAVAN HOOGHLY

Er. Tarun Kr. Mitra

Er. Swapan Mitra

Er. Ashis Nath

Er. Dukhanbandhu Murmu

1. Er. Joydeep Chakraborty

2. Er. Mahendra Tibriwalla

3. Er. Subhajit Samanta

4. Er. Joy Roy

5. Er. Susanta Kr. Mal

6. Er. Somnath Bose

7. Er. Debasish Naskar

8. Er. Subhajit Saha

PRESIDENT

VICE PRESIDENT

SECRETARY


MEMBERS

Er. Subhomoy Dasgupta

Er. Tapas Kundu

Er. Niladri Ghosh

Er. Subrata Saha

1. Er. Ram Prasad Mondal

2. Er. Sarmistha Maiti Poddar

3. Er. Ranjit Kr. Mondal

4. Er. Supratim Pal

5. Er. Arijit Bhattacharya

6. Er. Rajat Tikadar

7. Er. Tara Chand Singh

8. Er. Priyo Ranjan Das

Er. Satyabrata Mallick

Er. Arup Kr. Chatterjee

Er. Tapan Kr. Basu

Er. Hafsa Rahaman

1. Er. Kalyan Chakraborty

2. Er. Tanmoy Das

3. Er. Haran Pal

4. Er. Debasish Pal

5. Er. Mrinal Das

6. Er. Anindya Roy

7. Er. Sourav Chakraborty

8. Er. Mousumi Bhowmick

9. Er. Palash Majumdar

10. Er. Mrinal Ghosh

Er. Mathur Bhar

Er. Anup Kr. Hazra

Er. Rik Prasad Biswas

Er. Amaresh Malakar

1. Er. Arindam Sinha

2. Er. Ayan Basak

3. Er. Sujay Dutta

4. Er. Siddhartha Dey

5. Er. Shyamal Joardar

6. Er. Rakesh Kundu

7. Er. Madhusudan Roy

Pow

er N

ew

s v

12


ZONE TAMLUK BERHAMPUR SOUTH 24 PGS RAMMAM

Er. P.K. Maity

Er. Subhendu Dey

Er. Subhendu Chakraborty

Er. Subhendu Barui

1. Er. Soumen Mondal

2. Er. Krishna Gopal Panda

3. Er. Dipak Mondal

4. Er. S.P.Chakraborty

5. Er. Biplab Biswas

6. Er. Diprohor Mukherjee

7. Er. Anirudhha Hazra

PRESIDENT

VICE PRESIDENT

SECRETARY


MEMBERS

Er. Binimoy Dutta

Er. Debasish Deb

Er. Dilip Kr. Saha

Er. Uttam Roy

1. Er. Joydip Sarkar

2. Er. Pinaki Ranjan Dhali

3. Er. Ranjan Singh

4. Er. Somnath Basak

5. Er. Md. Nasiruddin

6. Er. Mohan Chakraborty

7. Er. Anubhu Dey

8. Er. Diptendu Nandi

9. Er. Subhra Ghoshal

10. Er. Tuhin Mondal

11. Er. Siraj Hossain

Er. Gopal Bose

Er. Subir Kr. Dan

Er. Md. Sadique Islam

Er. Siddheswar Das

1. Er. Subhas Kr. Sen

2. Er. N. K. Biswas

3. Er. S. N. Naskar

4. Er. A. Neogi

5. Er. Susanta Swaries

6. Er. Debasish Mondal

7. Er. Sk. Milan

8. Er. Debanjan Basu

9. Er. Surankor Chowdhury

10. Er. Pronoy Mondal

Er. Pranab Roy

Er. Rakesh Sinha

Er. Suman Sengupta

Er. Ayanangshu Sahu

1. Er. Abhisek Kundu

2. Er. Soumya Chakraborty

3. Er. Tanmoy Chakraborty

4. Er. Soumik Roy

Power News v 13

MEETING WITH CMD/WBSEDCL

Ref. : WBSEBEA/Admin/2013-14/6 Dt. : 13.5.13

To

The Chairman and Managing Director

WBSEDCL

Bidyut Bhavan, 7th Floor

Salt Lake, Kolkata - 700 091

Sub : Submission of agendum of discussion on

16/05/2013.

Sir,

We are happy to know that you have allotted a

time slot for accepting our representation on

16/05/2013. In this context, we are submitting the

agendum of discussion so that the same may be

fruitful.

Agendum

1) Re-view of Restructuring of WBSEDCL

2) Filling up of vacant post at the earliest.

3) Placement of all Chief Engineer in appropriate

position.

4) Stopping of re-employment & extension of

service at all level.

5) Posting of Engineer as departmental head in

HRD Department, MR Cell and Vigi lance

Department.

6) Proper planning of Power purchase towards

reduction of expenditure.

7) Inclusion of New Town Electric Supply Company

Ltd in WBSEDCL’s fold.

8) Framing up of transparent & structured Transfer

Policy.

9) Stopping of non-viable/ unplanned project at

micro level as well as in macro level.

10) Financial health of WBSEDCL and future road

map.

11) Miscellaneous (Vigilance, S&LP activities and

misuse of money).

Yours faithfully,

Sd/-

(Sanjoy Kr. Bhunia)

Hony. Secretary

WBSEBEA

IMPORTANT CORRESPONDENCES

REGULARISATION OF 2005 BATCH ENGINEER


To

The Director-HR

WBSEDCL, Bidyut Bhavan


Sub : Reminder of earlier communication

related to regularisation of ‘excluded

service period’ of the batch of engineers

appointed in 2005 and some other issues.

Sir,

We are hereby enclosing our previous

correspondence to you on the above mentioned matter

and we are sorry to say that the matter is still unsettled.

During our various discussions with you, we have

mentioned that the solution of the above problem would

be a Win-Win solution where both the engineers and

organisation will be benefited equally.

So, we are once again requesting you to give your

kind intervention into the matter and solve the

problem at the earliest.

Yours faithfully,

Sd/- (Sanjoy Kr. Bhunia)

Hony. Secretary, WBSEBEA

PROPOSAL FOR MODIFIED PROMOTION POLICY


To

The Chairman & Managing Director

West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd.

Vidyut Bhawan, 7th Floor, A- Block


Sub : Proposal for immediate implementation of

moddified promotion policy and assured career

progression scheme (APCS) for the engineer

upto Senior Deputy Chief Engineer level.

Respected Sir,

We are hereby submitting our proposal on policy

of assured career progression scheme (ACPS) for

the engineers working in WBSEDCL./WBSETCL. In

this connection we are to mention that we have

already discussed the matter with you and now we

are placing our proposal for your kind perusal and

consideration.

Yours faithfully,

Sd/-

(Sanjoy Kr. Bhunia)

Hony. Secretary

WBSEBEA

Power News v 14

PREAMBLE:

In exercise of power conferred by Department of

Power and NES vide No. 79/PO/O/Cell-lll/ 3R-29/

2006 Dated, 05/03/2008 and in pursuance of the

decision of the Board of Directors of West Bengal

State Electr ic i ty Distr ibut ion Company Ltd

(WBSEDCL) in its meeting Dated, 06/02/2009, the

WBSEDCL Revision of Pay and Allowances Rules,

2009 (ROPA, 2009) of employees of WBSEDCL was

introduced with an effect from 1st Day of January,

2006. Accordingly, an O.O. No. 89, dated 16.02.2009

of the Director (HR): WBSEDCL was issued on ROPA

of Employees of WBSEDCL.

Though WBSBEA’s all demands were not fulfilled

through ROPA, 2009 but we accepted those with a

hope that WBSEDCL management would take care

all our issues on subsequent date to give proper

justice to the Engineers who are the backbone of

this organisation.

Of all other resources, human resources can be

the most important. With the development of modern

management, this resource was tried to make more

and more effective. In the present modern days, for

any modern organisation it is the priced possession.

Scientific and modern “Human Resource Policy” as

we understand is yet to be inked and adopted in our

organisation. Still, we do have some established

activities to run the show. To ensure sustainable

improvement of performance of the organisation, a

comprehensive and scientific “HR” policy comparable

to the best power utilities in India is a must. The

policy must cover the following major areas:

l Timely and quality recruitment at the induction

level.

l To ensure career growth of all employees, by

creating required scope and maintaining a

transparent promotion policy i.e career growth

management policy. This will motivate and uphold

the dignity of the employee; which in turn improve

the bonding between the employees and the

organisation.

l To remunerate the employees properly for

rendering their services.

l To reassign delegation of power with extension

of statutory financial limits.

l To adopt and adhere rotational transfer policy.

Proposal for Modified Promotion Policy and Assured CareerProgression Scheme (ACPS) with designation

Submitted byWest Bengal State Electricity Board Engineers Association (WBSEBEA)

l To create training calendar and adherence of

professional technical & management course(s).

We have many demands to place before you in

respect of Revision of Pay Structures and Allowances

and other HR & welfare policies which are already

due. We are working on these issues. We are

examining the Pay structures and other benefits

existing in the leading power utilities in India like

POWERGRID, BHEL, NTPC, NHPC, DVC etc. It is

seen that we, the Engineers of WBSEDCL (a leading

power utility in India) are the most deprived section

of employees in this organisation. Our Pay structures

& Allowances and career progression/promotional

scheme are no match with the other leading power

utilities in India. So, we will place our detailed

demand regarding Pay structures in due course. But

as we are facing acute stagnat ion problem

particularly in the post of superintending Engineer,

so we would like to address this long burning issue

before you for immediate solution of the problem to

motivate Senior management level engineers and

to uphold their dignity for ensuring a sustainable

improvement of performance of the organisation.

SHORTCOMING OF THE EXISTING CAREERPROGRESSION SCHEME (CPS) WITH A BACKGROUND

OF EARLIER ASSURED PROMOTION SCHEME (APS)

We, the Graduate Engineers are the worst

sufferer in this organisation. In WBSEB regime also

we were the most sufferer section of employees in

respect of Pay packages as wel l as career

promotional scheme. We, the Engineers Association,

as a whole, had long glorious movement and

personal sacrifice to resolve the long pending

stagnation issues and career promotional issues. At

that time graduate Assistant Engineers were used

to stay in the same post for more than 18 years.

Few of them were promoted to the Divisional

Engineer post as per vacancy through an unscientific

interview system. Many engineers even had to

complete their full length of service in the Divisional

Engineer post, particularly in the Electrical cadre.

With our constant persuasion, agitation, movement

and with the intervention of the Government, the then

management ult imately adopted an “Assured

Promotion Scheme (APS)” in the year 2001 with the

stipulat ions that an Assistant Engineer after

completion of total 8(eight) years of continuous

Power News v 15

service will get promotion to the next higher post

i.e. in the post of Divisional Engineer. Similarly, an

Divisional Engineer after completion of total 16

(sixteen) years of continuous service from the

induction level and 8 (eight) years of continuous

service in Divisional Engineer ’s post wil l get

promotion to the next higher post i.e. in the post of

Superintending Engineer. But as the stagnation of

engineers were very much acute dur ing

implementation stage of that APS and as the major

section of engineers in the rank of DE (A) had

crossed 18/19 years of services at that time, so they

got promoted to the Superintending Engineer post

after completion of 21 (Twentyone) years of total

service adhering initial condition of fulfilling 3 (Three)

years locking period as per the then prevailing rule

of that APS system. Those engineers, now in the

senior management level i .e. In the post of

Superintending Engineer, got suffered at that time

by way of not getting Superintending Engineer post

on the date of implementation of APS. Rather, they

got the Superintending Engineer post af ter

completion of 21 (Twentyone) years of service

instead of eligibility years of 16 (Sixteen) years of

service due to bizarre and unscientific conception in

that APS Policy. Still those senior management level

Engineers are also suffering a lot at present.

After formation of WBSEDCL in the year 2007

and subsequent implementation of ROPA, 2009, we

observed that the term APS has been replaced by

CPS i.e. Career Progression Scheme keeping the

eligibility years unaltered for promotion up to the third

level i.e. in Superintending Engineer post like APS

but without addressing the acute stagnation problem

of engineers in particular. Situation was worsened

due to abolition of intermediate scale of pay and

designations like Sr. AE, SR. DE and DY. CE during

implementation of ROPA, 2009, unlike other leading

power utilities in India like POWERGRID, BHEL,

NTPC, NHPC, DVC etc. At that t ime we, the

Engineers Association demanded to modify the CPS

with new Pay Band and Grade Pay with new

designation in between Superintending Engineer

post and Additional Chief Engineer post. We may

also refer to the Promotional policy of Engineers of

Govt. of West Bengal, implemented in ROPA , 2009,

wherein an Superintending Engineer after

completion of 1(one) year in the his post were

allowed to get Pay Band : PB - 5 with grade pay of

Rs. 8700/-. Ultimately, after long persuasion from our

side, the then CMD: WBSEDCL & WBSETCL

principally agreed for extension of the CPS. But

unfortunately, it was observed that only Pay Band :

PB-5 with a new formulated grade Pay of Rs. 8100/

- (which had no reference in the ROPA, 2009 of

WBSEDCL) without any designation was allowed to

the class-l employees after completion of total 25

(Twenty five) years of continuous service from the

induction level, subject to completion of 9 (Nine)

years of cont inuous service in the post of

Superintending Engineer or equivalent level. So,

acute stagnation particularly in the Engineering

cadre was going on and it is still continuing.

REASONS BEHIND THE DEMAND FOR IMPLEMENTATIONOF “ASSURED CAREER PROGRESSION SCHEME (ACPS)WITH NEW DESIGNATION” WITH EFFECT FROM

01.04.2009.

1. There is an acute stagnat ion that exists

particularly in the Engineering cadre in the post

of Superintending Engineer.

2. Where Engineers are the main backbone of the

company’s business in power sector,

nontechnical officers in HR&A cadre and F&A

cadre are getting quicker promotion. The situation

as was existing in the erstwhile WBSEB regime

is still continuing at the present.

3. At present when Engineers are getting promotion

(as per policy, one third of the interviewers only

get promotion through interview system) to the

post of Additional Chief Engineer from the post

of Superintending Engineer after completion of

total 28/29 years of service, on the other hand

officers from HR&A cadre and F&A cadre are

getting the equivalent rank after completion of 18/

19 years of total service. That means non-

technical officers are getting the equivalent post

of Additional Chief Engineer at least 10 (Ten)

years earlier than the Engineers which is an

unfortunate stigma of this glorious organisation

lasting for the long time. It is seen from the very

beginning that the pivotal role of the Engineering

Service was not given due cognizance while

deciding the career progression scheme.

4. Even after the bifurcation of WBSEB in to two

companies namely WBSEDCL and WBSETCL,

still there exists the glaring disparities between

the career value of Engineer officers and the non-

technical officers which are very much frustrating

and demoralizing to the senior management level

Engineers.

5. We have worked out our position in the post of

Superintending Engineer i.e. total length of

services, no. of Engineers stagnated in this post

and from the table below it can be seen how the

acute stagnation is there in the Engineering cadre :

Power News v 16

6. The above Stagnation of Engineers is due to

wrong HR Policy of the organisation as well as

thinking of wrong concept while implementing

Promotional/Career progression Policy. We have

thoroughly examined the HR Policies and

promotional policies adopted in other leading

power utilities in India like POWERGRID, BHEL,

NTPC, DVC, NHPC etc. and the organisation

wise pictures showing the Pay Band/Pay Scale,

Grade Pay, Designation of Engineers/Executives

in each Pay Band/Pay Scale and Eligibility years

for promotion in each post. Side by side our

system of pay structures and promotional criteria

including CPS has also been shown.

POSITION OF STAGNANT ENGINEERS OF WBSEDCL IN THE POST OF SUPERINTENDING

ENGINEER WITH LENGTH OF SERVICE UP TO DATE ARE GIVEN BELOW:

Sl. No. Year of Joining Number of Existing Total Length of

in WBSEB Engineers Designation Service till date

1. ’79 (Electrical) 5 Superintending Engineer 33 years


3. ’80 (Civil) 1 Superintending Engineer 32 years

4. ’81 (Mechanical) 1 Superintending Engineer 31 years


6. ’82 (Civil ) 1 Superintending Engineer 30 years

















TOTAL NO. OF ENGINEERS EXISTING IN THE POST OF SUPERINTENDING ENGINEERS AS ON DATE

AS PER ABOVE CHART IS 231 NOS. OUT OF WHICH, 219 Nos. ENGINEERS HAVE NOT YET BEEN

CALLED FOR APPEARING BEFORE THE INTERVIEW BOARD BY THE MANAGEMENT FOR THE NEXT

PROMOTIONAL POST OF ADDITIONAL CHIEF ENGINEER.

Power News v 17

EXISTING PAY-STRUCTURE AND PROMOTION/CAREER PROGRESSION SCHEME FOR ENGINEER/

OFFICERS OF WBSEDCL/WBSETCL AS PER ROPA 2009 (w.e.f. 1/1/2006) VIDE

O.O. No. 89 Dated 16/02/2009 of DIRECTOR (HR): WBSEDCL

SI. Pay Band Name of Grade Designation Eligibility for Remarks

No. (Rs) Pay Band Pay(Rs) Promotion in

years

8. 15600-39100 PB4 5400 AE/AM 8(eight)

9. 15600-39100 PB4 6600 DE/Mgr 8(eight) Under CPS

10. 15600-39100 PB4 7600 SE/Sr. Mgr 9(nine) Under CPS

10A. 37400-67000 PB5 8100 SE/Sr. Mgr No specific PB 5 with Grade

years. As per Pay 8100 but

vacancy without any new

interview designation has

called for from been awarded

the common w.e.f. 1/4/2009

gradation list subject to

(without CPS). completion of

total 25 years of

continuous service

including 9 years

in SE/equiv post

11. 37400-67000 PB5 8700 Addl. CE Min. 1(One)

/AGM yr. & subject

to vacancy in

the higher post

(without CPS)

12. 37400-67000 PB5 8900 CE/GM

EXISTING PAY-STRUCTURE AND CAREER MANAGEMENT POLICY FOR EXECUTIVES

(GROUP - A) OF Damodar Valley Corporation (DVC) w.e.f. 1/3/2012


No. (Rs) Pay Band Pay(Rs) Promotion in

years

1. 15600-39100 5650 AE/GET/AM 4(four)

2. 15600-39100 6600 Ex. Engr/Dy Mgr 6(six)

3. 15600-39100 7600 Sr. Div.Engr/Mgr 5(five)

4. 37400-67000 8700 SE/Sr. Mgr 4(four)

5. 37400-67000 8800 Dy. CE /DGM 2(two)

6. 37400-67000 8900 CE-II/GM 1(one)

7. 37400-67000 10000 CE-l/Sr. GM 1(one)

8. 37400-67000 10000+150 Principal CE/ 1(one)

(Spl Pay) Chief GM

9. 37400-67000 10000+300 Director (Tech)/

(Spl Pay) Director (HR)

Power News v 18

EXISTING PAY-STRUCTURE AND CAREER MANAGEMENT POLICY

FOR EXECUTIVES OF POWERGRID w.e.f. 01/01/2007

SI. Pay Scale Name of Grade Designation Eligibility for Remarks

No. (Rs) Pay Band Promotion in

years

1. 20600-46500 E2 AE/Engineer 1(one)

2. 24900-50500 E3 Sr Engineer 3(three)

3. 29100-54500 E4 Dy Manager 3(three)

4. 32900-58000 E5 Manager 4(four)

5. 36600-62000 E6 Chief Manager 4(four)

6. 43200-63000 E7 Dy General Manager

7. 51300-73000 E7A & E8 Addl General

Manager &

General Manager

8. 62000-80000 E9 Executive Director

EXISTING PAY-STRUCTURE AND CAREER MANAGEMENT

POLICY FOR EXECUTIVES OF NTPC w.e.f. 01/01/2007



years

1. 20600-46500 E1 AE 3(three)

2. 24900-50500 E2 SrAE 1(one)

3. 24900-50500 E2A Engineer 3(three)

4. 29100-54500 E3 Sr. Engineer 3(three)

5. 32900-58000 E4 Dy. Manager 3(three)

6. 36600-62000 E5 Manager 4(four)

7. 43200-66000 E6 Sr. Manager 4(four)

8. 51300-73000 E7 Dy General Manager 4(four)

9. 51300-73000 E7A Addl. General Manager 2(two)

10. 51300-73000 E8 General Manager 3(three)



FOR EXECUTIVES OF BHEL w.e.f. YEAR 2009



years

1. 24900-50500 E1 Engineer 4(four)

2. 29100-54500 E2 Sr. Engineer 4(four)

3. 32900-58000 E3 Dy. Engineer 3(Three)

4. 36600-62000 E4 Manager 4(four)

5. 43200-66000 E5 Sr. Manager 3(Three)

6. 43200-66000 E6 Dy General Manager 3(Three)

7. 51300-73000 E6A Sr. Dy. General Manager 1(one)

8. 51300-73000 E7 Addl. General Manager

9. 51300-73000 E8 General Manager


Power News v 19


FOR EXECUTIVES OF NHPC w.e.f. 01/01/2007



years

1. 16400-40500 E1 AE

2. 20600-46500 E2 TE

3. 29100-54500 E3 Asst. Manager

4. 32900-58000 E4 Dy. Manager

5. 36600-62000 E5 Manager

6. 43200-66000 E6 Sr. Manager

7. 51300-73000 E7 Chief Engineer

8. 51300-73000 E8 General Manager


— From the above tables it is seen that there are 8 (eight) stages of grade i.e. promotional post from

Assistant Engineer to Chief Engineer or equivalent level post with different Pay Scale/Pay Band in

POWERGRID, NHPC & DVC. Similarly there are 9(nine) stages of grade i.e. promotional post from Assistant

Engineer to Chief Engineer or equivalent level post with different Pay Scale/Pay Band in BHEL and 10

(Ten) stages of grade i.e. promotional post from Assistant Engineer to Chief Engineer or equivalent level

post with different Pay Scale/Pay Band in NTPC. Whereas in WBSEDCL there are only 5 (Five) stages of

grade i.e. promotional post from Assistant Engineer to Chief Engineer or equivalent level post with different

Pay Scale/Pay Band. That means, compared to other leading power utilities in India, WBSEDCL are having

short of 3 (Three) to 5 (Five) stages of 5 promotional post which is obviously the main reason for inviting

suffocating condition in the total promotional system and has created acute stagnation, particularly in

Graduate engineering cadre.

OUR PROPOSAL:

To get rid of this suffocating condition of acute stagnation particularly for the Graduated Engineers of

this organisation. We, the West Bengal State Electricity Board Engineers Association proposes the

following modification of the present promotional Policy/Career Progression Scheme as a immediate

solution of the problem subject to formulation of detailed “Time Bound Career Management Policy’’ for

the Engineers/Executives of this organisation for kind consideration of the management of WBSEDCL/

WBSETCL.

PROPOSED ASSURED CAREER PROGRESSION SCHEME(ACPS) WITH

DESIGNATION, PAY BAND & GRADE PAY FOR CLASS-I ENGINEERS


No. (Rs) Pay Band Pay (Rs.) Promotion in

years

1 15600-39100 PB4 5400 AE 8(eight)

2 15600-39100 PB4 6600 DE 5(Five)) Under ACPS

3 15600-39100 PB4 7600 SE 4(four) Under ACPS

4 37400-67000 PB5 8600 Dy. Chief Engineer 2(Two) Under ACPS

5 37400-67000 PB5 8700 Sr. Dy. Chief Engineer 1(one) Under ACPS

6 37400-67000 PB5 8700+150 Addl. CE 1(one) Selection post

(Spl Pay)

7 37400-67000 PB5 8900 CE 1(one) Selection post

8 37400-67000 PB5 10000 ED Selection post

Power News v 20

Method of Promotion and Qualifying Marks :

For getting promotion of class-l Engineer at

regular intervals under Assured Career ProgressionScheme (ACPS), the following principles shall have

to be drawn up:

1. Performance Appraisal Report (PAR): Max. 30marks (Av. of last three years. For A - 10 marks,

B-08 marks, C-06 marks, D-0 mark).

2. Qualification : 20 marks {Induction level

qualification - 20 marks, one level below - 10

marks & two levels below - 05 marks).

3. Experience i.e. Eligibility Years: 15 marks (Min.)

for completion of min. eligibility years. 02 (two)

marks for extra year of service.

4. Attendance : 15 marks ( Record average 70%

attendance during last 03 (three) years)

5. Field/Site Experience: 10 marks {Min. 03 years

experience in field/site posting for promotion up

to the post of SE and Min. 05 years experience

in field/site posting for promotion above SE post,

except in cases of specialized/expertise to be

predefined which are required to meet the

organization needs).

6. Suitability Test : 10 marks

l Qualifying marks for promotion: 60 marks.

l Selection shall be Seniority cum Merit Basis.

l Pay protection of Senior Employees than his

junior counterpart shall be strictly maintained.

Stagnation Promotion: promotion from Sr. Dy. CE

level post to Addl.CE post & beyond, candidate who

i) Have spent 02 (two) years more than the normal

eligibility period

ii) Have performed well

iii) Are not likely to knock on the doors for becoming

Chief Engineer in future.

Pre-retirement Promotion : promotion three months

prior to retirement for those who

i) Have spent min. 01 (one) year more than the

normal eligibility period for promotion.

ii) Have performed wel l and deserving for

appreciation.

Existing CPS Proposed Modified ACPS

Assistant

Engineer

Divisional

Engineer

Superintending

Engineer

Superintending Engineer i.e.

without change of

designation but with PB-5

Band Pay and Grade Pay of

Rs. 8100.00 w.e.f. 01.06.2009

8 years

8 years

9 years

Assistant

Engineer

Divisional

Engineer

Superintending

Engineer

Dy. Chief Engineer i.e. with new

designation along with PB-5


Rs. 8600.00 w.e.f. 01.06.2009

8 years

5 years

4 years

2 years

Senior Dy. Chief Engineer i.e. with

new designation along with PB-5


Rs. 8700.00 w.e.f. 01.06.2009

UNDER ASSURED CARRIER PROGRESSION SCHEME (ACPS)

with New Designation & Grade Pay

Power News v 21

It is proposed that under Modified Assured Career

Progression Scheme (ACPS), a Graduate Engineer

(Assistant Engineer) being inducted in the Pay band

of 15600-39100 in PB 4 with Grade Pay of Rs.5400/-

shall be entitled to get promotion in the next rank of

Divisional Engineer after completion of 8 (eight) years

continuous service and will be allowed in pay band of

15600-39100 with Grade Pay of Rs. 6600/-.

A Divisional Engineer, shall be entitled to get

promotion in the next rank of Superintending Engineer

after completion of total 13 years of continuous service

and will be allowed in the pay band of 15600-39100 in

PB 4 with Grade Pay of Rs. 7600/-.

A Superintending Engineer, shall be entitled to get

promotion in the next rank of Deputy Chief Engineer

after completion of total 17 (seventeen) years of

continuous service and will be allowed in the Pay Band

(PB-5) of 37400-67000 with Grade Pay of Rs. 8600/-.

A Deputy Chief Engineer, shall be entitled to get

promotion in the next rank of Senior Deputy Chief

Engineer after completion of total 19 (nineteen) years

of continuous service subject to 2 (two) years

continuous service in the Deputy Chief Engineer level

post and will be allowed in the Pay Band (PB- 5) of

37400-67000 with Grade Pay of Rs. 8700/-.

To give due weightage, it is proposed to allow a

special pay of Rs 150/- in the grade pay of Additional

Chief Engineer in Pay Band (PB) 5 i.e. Rs. 8700/- plus

Rs. 150/- (Special pay).

The date of effect of Assured Career Progression

Scheme (ACPS) for promotion up to and including

Superintending Engineer level shall be from 1/1/06 i.e.

as per ROPA 2009. And the date of effect for promotion

under modified Assured Career Progression Scheme

from Superintending Engineer to senior Dy. Chief

Engineer shall be from 1/6/09.

Promotion of Engineers shall be extended up to

Executive Director level and selection shall be made

from the in-house Chief Engineers.

OTHER BENEFITS TO BE EXTENDED TO THE DY.

CHIEF ENGINEER

Company vehicle shall be provided to all Deputy

Chief Engineer on chargeable basis as extended in

case of Additional Chief Engineer, for official journey

to and from residence.

Mobile/telephone etc facilities as provided to the

Additional Chief Engineers shall be extended to all

Deputy Chief Engineers, The same facilities shall also

to be extended to all Class-l Engineers.

Proper sitting arrangements with all sorts of

infrastructural facilities as extended to the Additional

Chief Engineers shall also to be provided to all Deputy

Chief Engineers.

CONCLUSION

With the untiring effort of the Engineers in particularand the employees of the organisation, both WBSEDCL& WBSETCL have achieved progressively substantialprofit and also trying to provide quality services, whichis an unique and excellent example of character anddetermination in the INDIAN POWER SECTOR. Afterunbundling of erstwhile WBSEB and enforcement ofElectricity Act 2003, WBSEDCL and WBSETCL hadformed. M/S PWC was appointed as Consultant forrestructuring of the organisation. One of the keyconsiderations in the re-design of the organisation wasto encourage performance driven culture & motivationamong the employees. But PWC was silent on thisissue while recommending their suggestions forrestructuring which is very much unfortunate. Thoughthey took many references from the other leading powerutilities in India while designing the organisationstructure and policies for introduction in ourorganisation, but astonishingly, were silent regardingCareer progress of the Employees of this organisation.However, the Engineers of this organisation took thechallenges to cope up with the reform in spite of manyodds and rendered their best. For which WBSEDCL

has got the 4th. India Energy Summit Award’2010 and

India-Tech Excellence Award’2010. WBSETCL also got

best Transmission System Availability Award with Gold

Shield for the year 2007-08 from ministry of Power, Govt.

of India and Power Line Award’ 2012 for Best Performance

in Transmission in India. Still Engineers are trying theirbest to take new challenges in the present complexmarket in the power business adopting newtechnologies to give quality power and services to theirconsumers. We have seen that the presentmanagement is also thinking to bring innovative ideasand allowing new technology in the organisation forsurvival in this present competitive market and isrethinking of some changes in respect of organisationstructures, manpower planning and policies toeradicate all existing lacunas in the system as pointedout be WBSEBEA time to time. We also hope that thepresent management will give due cognizance of ourlegitimate demand, examining the service condition ofthe engineers in the other similar organisation and willdefinitely resolve our long pending stagnation issuesby way of immediate implementation of MODIFIED

PROMOTIONAL POLICY & ASSURED CAREER

PROGRESSION SCHEME (ACPS) as proposed by us forassured career growth of engineers and maintaining atransparent promotion policy for upholding the dignity ofengineers and to get rid of the suffocating condition ofacute stagnation of senior level Engineers for sustainableimprovement of this organisation which may improve

better bonding between Engineers and the organization.

Yours faithfully,



Power News v 22

OBSERVATION OF PROPOSED WBSEDCL

EMPLOYEES' SERVICE REGULATION,

MEDICAL & LTC


To

The Director (HR)


7th Floor, Salt Lake, Kolkata - 700 091

Sub : Submission of observat ion of

WBSEBEA on the matter of draft

Employees’ Service Regulat ion,

Medical and LTC Regulations.

Ref : Yours memo no. WBSEDCL/BC/46/

397(8) dated 08/05/2013

Dear Sir,

In reference to the above we are hereby

submitting our preliminary observation on the matter

of draf t of WBSEDCL Employees’ Service

Regulation, Medical and LTC Regulation for your

kind perusal and necessary consideration. However,

shortly we are going submit our final observation on

the same. We hope you will consider our observation

before finalization of the Employees’ Service

Regulation, Medical and LTC Regulations.

Yours faithfully,

Sd/-

(Sanjoy Kr. Bhunia)

Hony. Secretary

WBSEBEA

WEST BENGAL STATE ELECTRICITYBOARD ENGINEERS’ ASSOCIATION

Observations on the draft WBSEDCL Employees’

Service Regulations Medical and LTC Regulations

General observations: The words “generally”,

“ordinarily”, “competent authority”, “appropriate

authority” are words which have the propensity to

invite disputes and misinterpretation. Hence, those

terms may have to be fully clarified.

Specific Observations:

1) Refer Chapter I, clause 2

Observation: Whether the contents as appearing

would br ing into coverage, the employees

subsequently absorbed e.g. Ex-employees of

WBREDC, Singur-Haripal Co-Operative Society. The

issue relating to coverage would also arise in case

of future absorptions.

2) Refer Chapter I, clause 5

The sentence as appearing “If the company is

satisfied..............................”.

Observation : The sentence appears to be

vague, as who would constitute as the company is

not at all clear. Moreover, page 2, Clause-6; chapter

1 of existing ESR had conferred the powers to ‘Board’

only, which in the current context would be ‘Board

of Directors’.

3) Refer Chapter I, clause 10.1

The Contents : The first sentence “......................

except incase of Career Progression Scheme (CPS),

i f not ment ioned otherwise special ly in the

appointment/promotion order, subject to extension

depending upon the performance of the employee

concerned”.

Observation :

a) Whether promotion be termed as appointment?

b) “If not mentioned otherwise specially in the

appointment/promotion order” is a content which

is subject to dispute and misinterpretation.

Hence, the contents that would be mentioned in

the “appointment/promotion order” require full

disclosure to avoid any future action based on

discretion.

4) Refer Chapter II

Observation :

a) The definition of ‘Board of Directors’ is missing.

b) ‘Officiate’ has not been included in the definition.

c) ‘Presumptive pay of a post’ has not been included

in the definition.

d) ’Leave on Average (or half average) pay has not

been included in the definition.

5) Refer Chapter II, clause 12.3

The insertion of the words “registered under the

Companies Act, 1956” appears to be unnecessary

to define the company.


Observation : That “Service as a probationer

provided that such service is followed by confirmation.”

is not covered in the relevant clause relating to Duty.

This implies that service as a probationer would not

be counted as a Duty. Further, notes to Duty as

appearing in the existing ESR is also missing.


Observation : In the definition of Employee ‘part

time employees’ should also be excluded.


Observation :

a) “Step children”, “Legitimate Children”, “Adopted

Children” should have been used to ensure

completeness.

Power News v 23

b) The word ‘generally’ appearing before ‘residing’

as earlier stated is a confusing word and has the

likelihood to invite disputes.

c) The definition of the word ‘Son’ is observed to be

different for the purpose of death gratuity and

medical, LTC purpose?

d) The contents appearing under clause 12.12, sub

para IV A and as appearing under para 8 under

“Rules on Leave Travel Concession/Home Travel

Concession” deals with similar object but are

conflicting to each other.

Existing regulations in this context stipulates that

Leave Travel Concession is admissible to the

spouse of an employee working in other

organization not having similar benefit. On the

contrary, this proposed framework contemplates to

bring spouses under coverage entitled to receive

such benefit but opting not to avail such benefit.

e) The proposed draft to bring sons upto the age of

25 years under the coverage of medical and

Leave Travel concession provided the son is a

student of a regular course appears to have the

likelihood to invite disputes. The matter relating

to regular course appears to be not tenable if

compared with the regulat ions of best

organisations. Hence the dispute area relating to

“regular course” should be deleted.


Observation : The definition of ‘Head Quarter’

as proposed by stating ‘or otherwise specified by an

administrative order’ will open the doors to use

discretion and/or interpretation. There is a clear

guideline as to what would constitute to ‘Head

Quarter’ in ROPA.


Observation : The definition as proposed is in

conflict as defined in “Schedule of Delegation of

Power”.


Observation :

a) “............................for the transaction of the

business” is incomplete in the context as to whose

business stands not specified.

b) “All Sundays are generally considered.........” is

again unspecific as the word ‘generally’ does not

convey any specif ic meaning. In fact, the

proposed insertion is not at all required.


Observation : “Remuneration” appears to be not

a befitting term in context of the contents covered.

The apt word appears to be “Pay”.


Observation : The sub clause “unhealthiness of

the locality in which the work is performed" as

appearing in the existing stands omitted.


Observation : The reason for use of ‘Subsistence

allowance’ instead of ‘Subsistence grant’ is not

understood.

15) Refer Chapter III, clause 14.3

Observation : The sub clause (3) has been

referred under the same clause, which cannot

happen in reality.

13) Refer Chapter III, clause 15

Observation : The said clause cannot be

accepted.


Observation : Who would constitute as ‘the

Chairman’ needs to be defined. Moreover, it would

not be rationale to confer such power on a sole

authority. The appropriate authority would have to

be the ‘Board Of Directors’.

15) Refer Chapter III, clause 17.1, Note 3

Observation : Who can be referred to as

‘appointing authority’ is not understood being not

defined in the chapter under definition.

16) Refer Chapter III clause 19

Observation : Refer the word ‘employment’. The

use of such word has made the contents unclear.

The correct word would be ‘employee’.


Observation : The proposed contents appear to

be incomplete and hence may have to be aligned

with the contents as appearing at clause 26, chapter

III of existing regulations.


Observation : That “if he remains absent from

duty, on leave or otherwise, for a continuous period

exceeding 2 years” needs to be inserted.

19) Refer Chapter III clause 30.1

Observation : May refer “20”.May review whether

it would be ’20 years’.

20) Refer Chapter III clause 31

Observation :

a) The heading portion of the clause has been

proposed for a change to “Superannuation”. The

existing description of this clause is “Compulsory

Retirement”. The proposed change is not a

welcome change as the word “Compulsorily” has

been used in this clause and in later chapter the

Power News v 24

word “Compulsory Retirement” has been used in

reference with Punishment Regulations. Hence

the similarity of words and the proposed change

has the high propensity of the usage of discretion

and misinterpretation. Hence, “Compulsory

Retirement” as a description of this clause may

be retained.

b) 'but in a very special case, exception may,

however, be made with the approval of the

Chairman of the Company' cannot be acceded

to and hence requires to be deleted.

21) Refer Chapter IV, clause 32

Observation : “by the Company from time to

time" used twice.

22) Refer Chapter IV, clause 35.1

Observation: Who can be referred to as

‘competent authority’? The use of ‘competent

author i ty ’ is ambiguous and portrays non-

transparency.


Observation : ‘controlling officer’ as appearing

may have to be replaced by ‘appointing authority’.


Observation : The contents as appearing in the

said clause are not all tenable and hence require an

out and out review.


Observation : For completeness ‘explanation’ to

the clause is required.


The insertion of ‘and will be considered as

misconduct’ is unnecessary and unwanted.


Observation :

a) There is no Grievance Handling Committee in the

said clause to represent the matters pertaining

to Hydel units.

b) The units to be covered under the Corporate

Handling Committee are not clearly perceptible.

Moreover, it would be unjust to head General

Manager (HR&A) a committee who would also

address the grievances of officers of equivalent

rank. Hence, Director (HR) should preferably

head the committee.


Observation : Only prior sanction has been

specified whereas in the regulations of GOWB, there

are scopes for post sanction on certain activities with

KMDA, WB Housing Board and etc.

29) Refer Chapter IV, clause 50.1

Observation :

a) The declaration of asset should be extended to

all employees.

b) In line with (a) above, consequently, 'However,

in special, case...................’ would stand deleted.


Observation : It could not be understood as to

how transactions in Shares, Debentures, Securities

or Mutual Funds for more than Rs. 100000 and Rs.

50000 in relation to Class I, II and Class III, IV

employees respectively during a calendar year would

fall under speculation. The question arises that would

transactions in Futures, Options, Commodities,

hedge funds and OTCEI dealings would not be

termed as ‘speculative transactions’. Will going short

and long not constitute to ‘speculative transactions’.

What would constitute to ‘Securities’ needs clear

outlay. It is further added that the explanation to the

clause contradicts the contents.

31) Refer Chapter IV, clauses 52 & 53

Observation : The clause should preferably cover

the mutual trust and respect between superior and

subordinates and accordingly clause 56 (g) also

requires review.

32) Refer Chapter IV, clause 56(s),(j),(q),(x),(ad)

Observation :

a) Clause 56(g): Besides insubordination, act of

disrespect by a superior to a subordinate needs

to be brought under coverage.

b) Clause 56(j): The use of ‘ intel lectual

property............................Company’ appears to

be unnecessary.

c) Clause 56(q): Harassment to “Working man”

needs to be brought under the coverage.

d) Clause 56(x): The use of words “safety

standards” requires review as perhaps the

company is yet to form any safety standard. It is

further added that safety guidelines and safety

standards are different.

e) Clause 56(ad): The ‘IT Laws’ as used in the

clause would not refer to any relevant law in force

and hence requires to be correctly dealt with.


Observation :

a) ‘Compulsory retirement or compulsorily retired’

wherever appearing in the clause requires to be

deleted as observed earlier.

b) What would constitute as the “terminal dues” as

appearing at clause 57(f) requires clarity since

Power News v 25

sum at the credit of Provident Fund at the time of

retirement cannot be attached for the purpose of

recovery.

c) ‘Forfeiture of Gratuity ‘as proposed cannot be

made applicable to the employees covered under

Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, hence the

stipulation would become redundant for the said

employees. Moreover, i t is unjust to keep

provision for forfeiture of gratuity those are covered

under DCRB Regulations as the proposed action

intends to have a discriminating effect.

d) Contents appearing under sub clauses (i) and (j)

requires clarity with explanation.


Observation :

a)”Officers appointed on contract basis “as appearing

in sub clause (b) should preferably be deleted.

b) “More than 3" as appearing in sub clause (c)

should preferably be deleted.

c) “Prior permission of the competent authority” as

appearing in note 1 to sub clause ( c) is not clear

and hence should preferably be deleted.

35 Refer Chapter IV, clause 60

Observation :

a) The contents covered under suspension requires

review on the rationale that an employee alleged

should preferably be excluded from the coverage

as allegations can be backed by malafide

intentions with a view to harass.

b) “Pending investigation and drawl and disposal of

the disciplinary proceedings” needs a review as

without show cause notice suspension cannot be

carried out.


Observation : What about ‘Substantive Pay’

when it has been separately defined.


Observation : Separate guidelines should

preferably be framed for re-employed and retired

employees.

38) Refer Chapter IV, clause 67.1 (c ),(c )(i) and note

Observation : “or inadequate” to be deleted and

‘or enhancing the penalty’ also to be deleted. Further

reference of regulation 63.2(b) in the note is

confusing and could not be construed.

39) Refer Chapter V, clause 69.3

Observation : “unless a higher rate of pay is

specially sanctioned by the special approval of the

CMD/MD” would lead to practice of indiscrimination as

such power should not be vested on a sole authority.

40) Refer Chapter V, clause 70

Observation : The contents of the first para and

sub-clause (d) since not aligned have resulted into

contradiction to each other. The first para says about

al lowing for assuming higher responsibi l i t ies

whereas sub clause (d) states about allowing the

same on holding additional charge in an identical

post. This should be preferable aligned with the

contents of ROPA.


Observation: "Special achievement” requires

clear explanation to obviate any disparity.


Observation : Though the existing regulation has

similar clause, the issue arises as to whether the

clause should be allowed as the same has the

likelihood to inculcate disparities. Approval should

preferably be from the BOD in the event the clause

is intended to be retained.


Observation : Existing regulation has the

coverage on ‘Officiating Pay’ under clauses 83, 84,

85 and 86. The reason for proposed deletion requires

clear understanding.

44) Refer Chapter V, clause 79(iii)

Observation : The amount of Rs. 1000.00 should

preferably be Rs. 10000.00.


Observation : Reason for deletion of p.m. could

not be construed. Further, proposed deletion of

existing clauses 91 (b)(i) and (ii) could not be also

understood.


Observation : What about transfer beyond

20 kms?

47) Refer Chapter VI, clause 86

Observation :

a) ‘Half-pay Leave due’ has been explained in

clause 86(V) (a), but where is clause 86(V) (b)?

b) ‘Half-pay Leave due’ and ‘Commuted Leave’ is

defined naming the same clause i.e 86(V)(a).


Observation: The clause says that an employee

will not be allowed to avail leave not more than 8

times in a calendar year.

This is clearly objectionable. The contents appear

in the following manner “Except on medical grounds,

an employee may be allowed to avail leave (except

Power News v 26

Casual Leave) not more than eight times in a

calendar year”.


Observation : The wrong reference of “clause-

(i) above”


Observation : “Leave preparatory to retirement”

should have been but not covered. The same is

covered in the existing regulations vide clause 103 (iii).


Observation: Whether probationers would be

entitled for earned Leave at similar terms?


Observation : Notes to ‘Commuted Leave’ is

found to have been missed out and has resulted to

insufficient clarity.


Observation : Will ‘Leave Salary on child care’

not find a place in the stated clause.

54) Refer Medical Attendance and treatment

regulations 2013

Observation :

a) The word ‘generally’ as pointed out earlier

b) The dependency on the basis of monthly income

of Rs. 6000 p.m. is based on which rational

requires clear understanding.

55) Refer LTC Rules

Observation :

a) The probationers stands proposed for removal

from the admissibility criteria. Similarly, Deputed

employees are kept outside the scope.

b) Contents of Clause 8 as pointed out earlier.


To

The Secretary

West Bengal State Regularity Commission

Paura Bhavan, Salt Lake

Sub : Suggestion on the proposed Regulation called

‘Draft West Bengal Electricity Regularity

Commission (Standard of Performance of

Licensees Related to Consumer Service)

under No. WBERC/Regulation/42/2013-14/

0378 dt. 21/05/2013 and subsequent

notification no. WBERC/Regulation/42/2013-

14/0357 dt. 11/06/2013.

Sir,

We, the West Bengal State Electricity Board

Engineers’ Association, would like to put forward our

view on some points related to the above notification.

As per the provision 15.0 of the notification no. 46/

WBERC dt. 31/05/2010, there is provision for

compensation for non- compliance of Standard of

Performance. There, it is mentioned ‘If a licensee

fails to meet the standard as specified against

various service areas laid down in this regulations,

he shall be liable to pay in addition to any other

penalty which the licensee is liable to pay in terms

of the act or other regulations a compensation to

the affected person as specified below.....’

Although in its heading, it has been mentioned

that ‘Determination of compensation.................’

apparently there is no methodology of calculation of

the rate of compensation for non-compliance of

Standard of Performance in various field. Practically

calculation of compensation in such cases can never

be realistic assignment as there is no specific

determinant in this regard. It is also seen that the

amount has no relation even with the per day

consumption of the consumer. As a result the same

is being grossly misused by different persons with

vested interest. Moreover, we do believe that there

must be some logic in favour of the amount of

compensat ion. So, we propose that this

compensation should be in proportion with the same

exists in other states like Bihar, Gujarat, Mumbai,

Punjab, Nagaland, Orissa and in view of that we are

placing our proposal for the rate of compensation

as follow :

a) ‘Failure to comply with the time period as

specified in regulations 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 7.0 and

12.0 of these regulations the compensation will

be at the rate of Rs. 500/- for each additional day

of delay or part thereof.’............existing

Proposed- Rate should be Rs. 50/- per day with

maximum limit will Rs. 5000/- which to be adjusted

with monthly energy bill. The claim to be made

within one month from the date of connection.

b) ‘Failure to comply with any other standard of

performance as specified in regulations 9.0, 10.0

and 11.0, in this regulations except for wrongful

disconnection and delay in reconnection - at the

rate of Rs. 500/- for each additional day / slab of

time or part thereof, as the case may be,

PROPOSED REGULATION OF WBERC

Power News v 27

irrespective of whether the place is urban or

rural.’............existing

Proposed - Rate should be Rs. 50/- per day with

maximum limit wil l Rs. 5000/- which to be

adjusted with monthly energy bill. The claim to

be made within one month from the date of re-

connection.

c) Compensation for delay in reconnection:

i) 'If a licensee fails to supply electricity through

reconnection within the time limit specified in

the Supply Code, he shall be liable to pay

compensation to the consumer at the rate of

Rs. 500/- for each additional day of delay or

part thereof.’............existing

Propose - Rate should be Rs. 50/- per day

with maximum limit will Rs. 5000/- which to

be adjusted with monthly energy bill.

The claim to be made within one month from

the date of re-connection.

d) Compensation for wrongful disconnection:

i) ‘Notwithstanding anything to the contrary

contained in the Supply Code, where a

wrongful disconnection, not authorized by the

Act or Regulations, takes place, the licensee

shal l be l iable to pay to the consumer

concerned compensation within 15 days from

the date of order of the concerned Grievance

Redressal Off icer of the l icensee/

Ombudsman as specified below :’

Item Existing Proposed

For HT industrial and

HT commercial

categories of

consumers

For LT industrial and

LT commercial

categories of

consumers

For all other

categories of

consumers

Rs. 5,000/- per instance plus the

amount paid by the consumer to the

licensee in getting reconnection plus

Rs. 500/- per day or part thereof during

which period the supply remained

wrongfully disconnected































In all the cases claim to be made within one

month from the date of declaration by appropriate

authority that the disconnection in question is

unlawful.

Moreover, it is seen in the ‘Draft West Bengal

Electricity Regularity Commission (Installation and

operation of Consumers’ meter)’ that the Commission

has suggested some guide lines related to the

sealing of meter (7.0) and type of meter the licensee

will use(4.4.3). In this case our suggestion is that

the licensees should have the liberty which seals or

which meters they will use, depending upon the

design of the meter and demography of the area

where the meter will be used. The commission can

suggest the accuracy class of the meter only. In case

of seals, the onus is on the licensees to prove any

theft case in the court of law. So, it should have the

liberty to use seal of its choice. In fact at present,

the design of the meter itself has taken care of

recording the event of ‘Cover Open’ of the meter

which was previously detected by checking of seals.

This has made the use of meter’s body seals as

redundant.

We are ready to discuss all the point mentioned

above and we hope that you will kindly consider our

proposal for the interest of WBSEDCL as well as for

those who are real suffers.

Thanking you.

Yours faithfully,



Power News v 28

EXTENSION OF DATE FOR OPTION


To

The Managing Director

WBSETCL

Bidyut Bhavan, Salt Lake City

Kolkata - 700 091

Sub : Extension of date for submission of Option Form by the employees of WBSEDCL, now posted on

deputation to WBSETCL, for their absorption in WBSETCL.

Ref. : i) Circular No. 29/2012 Dated 15.12.2012 of The MD : WBSETCL & Circulated vide Memo. No.

Corp/HR&A/Circular/3042 Dated 15.12.2012.

ii) Our letter ref. no. WBSEBEA/Policy/12-13/61, Dated 26.12.2012 asking clarifications on different

points against the Terms & Conditions mentioned in the Circular No. 29/2012, dated 15.12.2012

of the MD: WBSETCL.

iii) Circular No. 01/2013 Dated 05.01.2013 of The MD: WBSETCL & Circulated vide Memo. No.

Corp/HR&A/Circular/26 Dated 05.01.2013.

iv) Our letter ref. no. WBSEBEA/Policy/ 12-13/61 Dated 26.12.12

v) Circular No. 02/2013 Dated 16.01.2013 of the MD: WBSETCL

vi) Circular No. 07/2013 Dated 12.03.2013 of the MD: WBSETCL

Dear Sir,

We, the WBSEBEA, had demanded for proper clarifications of the different aspect as regards arrangements

of funds for payments of Staff terminal benefit on absorption to WBSETCL, transfer of CP fund and GP fund from

WBSEDCL to WBSETCL, introduction of employees service regulation (ESR) in WBSETCL, medical insurance

benefit to all future retired employees of WBSETCL etc. before exercising the option for better clarity for the

future opted employees. It was also pointed out that as the matter is serious in nature which involves proper

arrangements with regards to “Staff Terminal Benefits”, “Transfer of personnel” etc. in accordance with Kolkata

Gazette vide Notification No. 12-PO/O/III/3R-29/2006, dated 25.01.2007, we demanded that for transparency, a

bipartite agreement between WBSEDCL and WBSETCL authorities, duly approved / authenticated by Govt. of

W.B. is essential. But the same has not yet been finalized.

Of late, CMD: WBSEDCL had called one meeting on 15.05.2013 at conference hall at Vidyut Bhavan

taking all the recognized Unions and Associations regarding issues related to repatriation. After going

through the MOM of the said meeting, circulated under the signature of the CMD: WBSEDCL vide memo.

no.CHR/675/13/131 dated 31.05.2013, it has been surprisingly noticed that our point wise deliberations,

explanations on the different clauses of the Gazette Notification vis-a-vis our suggestions given in the said

meeting has not been recorded properly.

However, the matter has been discussed amongst us i.r.o. the record notes of minutes as circulated by

CMD:WBSEDCL on 31.05.2013 and as per the decision of that meeting, we are going to submit one letter

to him on behalf of WBSEBEA explaining our stand regarding issues related to repatriation.

In the above context, we, on behalf of WBSEBEA would like to request you to kindly extend, the last date for

exercising option from 30.06.2013 to a suitable date so that, before the last date for exercising option, all the

dispute, doubt, differences or issue which have been arisen, can be solved with the involvement of the Govt. of

W.B. in line with cl. no. 10(1) of the above mentioned Gazette notification. It may also be mentioned here that,

few days back, when we, on behalf of WBSEBEA met with you for discussion on different issues including

repatriation, you have assured that there will not be any problem for extension of last date for exercising the

option. So kindly issue one circular immediately on this issue with extension of time for exercising option.

Thanking you.

Yours Truly,

Sd/-

(Sanjoy Kr. Bhunia)


Power News v 29


To

The Chairman & Managing Director

WBSEDCL

Bidyut Bhavan, 7th Floor, A-Block

Salt Lake City, Kolkata - 700 091

Sub : Repatriation of Employees of WBSEDCL who

are on deputation to WBSETCL.

Ref. : MOM held on 15.05.2013 at conference room

at Vidyut Bhavan regarding repatriation issues

in presence of Official/Representatives of

recognized Unions & Associat ions and

circulated vide Memo No. CHR/675/13/131

dated 31.05.2013 of the CMD: WBSEDCL.

Dear Sir,

We have gone through the above subject MOM,

circulated under the signature as referred above and

which was received at this end on 01.06.2013. First

of all, we are extremely amazed to find out that the

proceedings as drawn in the said minutes does not

f ind place, the material contents which were

del iberated on behalf of WBSEB Engineers’

Association in the said meeting. If, it can be

recapitulated correctly, on that day several pertinent

and relevant aspects according to the Gazette

Notification No. 12PO/0/111/3R-29/2006 dt. 25.01.2007

was pointed out by our Association which, are

inherently linked to this vital issue of repatriation.

But the outcome of the proceedings in form of

the MOM appears to be an abbreviated version which

only touches up on the issues on a very general

manner, not to mention that the material issues

remain uncovered.

The WBSEBEA, a recognized and responsible

association, are proud of their engineers and the

employees of both WBSEDCL & WBSETCL for their

untiring effort for achieving progressively substantial

profit and improvement of quality of services, cannot

keep silent on this issue and always eager to sort

out all lacunas and to see all the interest and right

of the employees of the company, particularly for our

engineers member. So, what we have said before in

different occasion to the CMD; WBSEDCL and the

MD: WBSETCL both verbally and in writing and also

hereby attempt to recapitulate the entire issues which

were pointed by us in the said meeting with the

expectation that those issues are taken into

consideration while finalizing or taking the next steps

towards the repatriation.

We made our submission in the said meeting in

the following manner :

l The option for rendering future services in

WBSETCL should be extended to al l the

employees who were in the payrolls of the

erstwhile WBSEB”. This was pointed out on the

rationale that option limited to few employees as

has been announced portrays unequal

opportunity. Further, there is every possibility to

get insufficient response, if option is restricted to

only deputed personnel of WBSETCL which may

in turn result to a situation where WBSETCL will

only not have less than the required personnel

but also shortage of experienced personnel. This

again will pave way for induction by way of lateral

entry. Hence, it was pointed out to review this

aspect in a thorough manner.

l The contents of the clause 5(3) of the Gazette

Notification No. 12PO/0/111/3R-29/2006 dt.

25.01.2007 was requested by us for reference

wherein it stood stipulated “on such transfer and

subject to the provisions of the said Act and

provisions of this Scheme, the personnel shall

for a part of the services of WBSEDCL and their

rank, scale of pay and inter-seniority as existing

in WBSEB on the effective date of transfer shall

be maintained”. The said clause was requested

for reference as the clause has been deviated

subsequently by both WBSEDCL and WBSETCL

while inducting employees at higher positions by

way of lateral entry. The induction of employees

by way of lateral entry has entirely disrupted the

essence and the spirit of the clause 5(3]. Now,

we feel that it is the onus of the authority of the

WBSEDCL to uphold the stipulation as contained

in the said clause by inducting restoration

measures to all concerned who were employees

of erstwhile WBSEB.

l The contents of the clause 5(5)(a) of the Gazette

Notification No. 12PO/0/111/3R-29/2006 dt.

25.01.2007 was requested by us for reference

wherein it stood stipulated “that the terms and

conditions of service applicable to the personnel

on the effective date of transfer shall not, in any

way, be less favorable than those applicable to

them immediately before the said effective date

of transfer”.

We have requested to refer this clause on the

rationale that WBSEDCL inducted a Deputy

Company Secretary which is equivalent position

of Superintending Engineer and three AGMs

(F&A) which are equivalent position of Addl Chief

Engineer at a subsequent date and extended

REPATRIATION OF WBSEDCL & WBSETCL

Power News v 30

privilege and out of turn exemptions from the

stipulated rules and regulations in force in

WBSEDCL. The recruitment of AGMs (F&A) and

Head IT are in out and out violation to the clause

20(d) of the ROPA, 2009. The clause 20(d) only

permits to induct in the rank of ACE/AGM in absence

of sufficient no adequately qualified and

experienced personnel. It can not be easily verified

that those personnel have any exceptional

qualification nor have higher level of experience.

a) WBSEDCL has inducted three AGMs (F&A)

relaxing the experience criteria. The number of

years experience as has been set out for those

AGMs (F&A) where 15 years without the mention

of post qualification experience and the relevant

industry experience. WBSEDCL for its own

employees have set out to have 19 years of

experience in this company for eligibility for

consideration for the post of AGM (F&A) and that

too with the restriction that the number of eligible

candidates for the post of AGM (F&A) cannot be

more than 3 times the number of vacancy.

b) Simi lar ly, the Deputy Company Secretary

appointed in the rank of Senior Manager/

Superintending Engineer had worked less than

16 years prior to joining this company. Moreover,

her experience has been in a different discipline.

Further, she has been awarded with higher basic

pay of Rs.35000 which any inductee class-I officer

in WBSEDCL never reaches to that basic pay

after having worked for continuously 16 years.

Besides she has been privileged with facilities

beyond entitlements of an officer in the rank

equivalent to Superintending Engineer/Senior

Manager. Her extra facilities are exclusive mobile

phone usage reimbursement, residential landline

phone reimbursement and company’s vehicle for

commuting from residence to office and back. The

clause 20(a) of ROPA, 2009 may be referred which

will reveal that recruitment of Deputy Company

Secretary is in contravention to the set out

guidelines. (Appointment order copy enclosed)

c) Another glaring example of such contravention

is appointment of Head of IT by WBSETCL

authority. The head of IT neither possesses

extraordinary qualification nor has extraordinary

exposure/experience. Surprisingly, her initial

basic pay at the t ime of jo ining was Rs.

47,000.00.The pay band in which she has joined

starts with Rs. 37,400.00. It is diff icult to

corroborate as to under which rationale her pay

was fixed in such a manner, in this context, it is

very easy to arrive at a conclusion that she has

been privileged in a very exceptional manner.

Hence, it would be imperative for the WBSEDCL

authority to have a relook upon the irregularities

and take steps to set right by extending similar

privileges to all concerned.

l We had also pointed out the stipulation as set

out in clause 5(5) (d) on the unresolved demands

of the unions and associations. Those demands

stand as follows:-

a) Full pension on completion of 20 years of service

in line with the regulations as prevailing in Central

Government/State Government

b) Extension of similar benefits to all the employees

joining WBSEDCL on or after 16.02.2009 as

granted to Director (R&T). Those benefits which

we referred were extension of benef i t as

contained in DCRB Regulations of WBSEDCL.

The Director (R&T) was appointed in WBSEDCL

vide o/o No. WBSEDCL/MR/2010/181 dt .

18.08.10 but surprisingly his date of joining in the

said office order stood mentioned as 30.01.2009.

It is very difficult to understand that whether

WBSEDCL authority barring this appointment has

issued any appointment letter to any employee after

joining and working in WBSEDCL for more than one

and half years. The move resulted to grant of

privilege by bringing him under the coverage of

DCRB Regulations. Hence to restore parity it would

not be very unjustified if we demand to extend the

same benefits to others also. (Appointment order

copy enclosed)

c) Similarly, we are also not clear about the sentence

as recorded in the MOM against sl. no. 4 (b) that

“Individual employees will apply accordingly for

further action by the authorities of both the

companies.” i.r.o. transfer of CP fund and its

withdrawal by the employees. For more clarity and

to avoid any complicacy it is suggested that the

employees of WBSEDCL who are in CP Fund (no.

is negligible compared to the total strength) should

be given an opportunity to opt for GP Fund as

WBSETCL provident fund is un-exempt.

d) Reviewing the promotion policy.

e) Deleting the intense coverage in the promotion

policy 2010 and ROPA 2009 on the subject

covering Fast Tract Promotion and Lateral Entry.

l The contents of the clause 5(5)(6) was also

brought to the notice which stipulates “The

arrangements with regard to Staff Terminal

Benefits including provident fund, gratuity fund,

pension fund .......”. Our concern in this context

was whether both WBSEDCL and WBSETCL has

conformed to the stipulation as set out in the

clause 5(5)(6).The concern expressed was

Power News v 31

backed by the fact that 8.50 percent BOND

amounting to Rs. 1800 crore (Rs. 1530 crore for

WBSEDCL employees and Rs. 270 crore for

employees of WBSETCL) was issued to meet up

the pension liability of employees and that the

said Gazette Notification stipulates towards

redemption of such BONDS in 5 equal installments

commencing from the year 2016, but till date we

are not aware as to whether both the authorities

have initiated any measures towards such

redemption. Our concern was also’ guided upon the

requisite provisioning in stepped manner towards

ensuring the stipulated redemption.

l Our concern was also expressed as we had

discovered that there is a serious asset -liability

mismatch of the pension fund. Total liability under

the pension fund account is Rs. 5637 crore [Rs.

5346 crore- WBSEDCL and Rs.291 crore-

WBSETCL) as per latest available records

whereas the total asset in the said fund is Rs.

4008 crore. Hence, it is clearly evitable that the

assets fall short by Rs. 1629 crore which has to

be make good by the authority of WBSEDCL. If

we consider the other payables by WBSEDCL to

the said fund the same tantamount to Rs. 2863

crore. You should surely appreciate that our

concern is backed by genuine reasons.

l The total liability under Gratuity Fund Account is

Rs. 605 crore whereas the total asset is only

221.00 crore which clearly reveals that the assets

are insufficient by Rs. 384 crore to match the

l iabi l i ty. We ser iously at tempted to have

knowledge on the contemplation of the authority

of WBSEDCL towards liquidating the mismatch.

l It was also felt to point out an issue in context to

terminal benefit cost which stood accepted by

WBERC. An amount of Rs. 455 crore has been

allowed in tariff by WBERC accepting the terminal

benefit cost of employees’ of WBSEDCL, but

even after elapse of substantial period of time

the same is yet to be transferred to the trustee

boards of the respective trust funds.

l We thereafter raised some issues on the areas

pertaining to WBSETCL. We had brought to the

notice that any amount or sum can be transferred

from an approved trust fund to only another

approved trust fund. This was pointed out on the

perspective that the amount that stood transferred

to WBSETCL’s trust fund is an unapproved trust

fund as the WBSETCL authority is yet to obtain

the approval from RPF authority in respect of CPF

trust fund as an exempted trust fund under EPF

and MP Act, 1952.

l From the MOM it is seen that the CMD,

WBSEDCL has expressed his views & clarified

his position for transfer of funds i.r.o. terminal

benefit to the employees on absorption in

WBSETCL, Inter-se-seniority issue, transfer of

GP fund & CP fund etc., but there is no line in

the said MOM regarding any views given by the

WBSETCL authorities how they will guarantee all

such benefits to their future employees to be

absorbed in WBSETCL from WBSEDCL. So, we

think that before going to further, s igned

Agreement/MOU between two companies, duly

approved/authenticated by Govt. of West Bengal

regarding phase wise transfer of Funds pertaining

to the different components of terminal benefits

liabilities as per the Gazette notification and other

aspect of the service condit ion is utmost

important.

l Optee employees should know their service

condition in their future company along with some

other aspects like recruitment policy, welfare

policy, fund management, medical insurance

benefit of retired employees of WBSEDCL to be

absorbed in WBSETCL etc. But till date no ESR

[Employees Service Regulation) of WBSETCL

has been published. This should be published

before the last date of exercising option.

We reiterate that the issues as pointed out which

did not Find a place in the said MOM are extremely

important, relevant, pertinent and vital issues. In the

event, those issues are not addressed then it would

be an act of inequity and disparity towards reliable

and committed workforce.

We feel that both the employers WBSEDCL and

WBSETCL may have to act rationally placing the

interest of the employees’ at priority and without

compromising to the futures of the workforce and

displaying natural justice, restoring equal opportunity

to all concerned. Lastly it may not be out of place to

mention that a strict adherence to the Gazette

Notification is always expected from responsible

organizations like WBSEDCL and WBSETCL. So,

we on behalf of WBSEB Engineers' Association

would like to request you to have a relook upon the

issues pointed out and unless resolved, proceeding

towards repatriation appears not to be a sensible

approach.

Yours Sincerely,

Sd/-

(Sanjoy Kr. Bhunia)

Hony. Secretary

WBSEBEA

Power News v 32

WEST BENGAL STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD.Vidyut Bhaban, Bidhannagar, Kolkata - 700 091

Memo No. : WBSEDCL/MR/2011/Appointment/Dy. Co. Secy./01 Dt. : 10.01.11

To

Mrs. Aparna Biswas

48/3G, B. T. Road

Kolkata - 700 050

Sub : Appointment to the post of Deputy Company Secretary.

She is hereby appointed provisionally to the post of Deputy Company Secretary under the regular

establishment of the West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd.(WBSEDCL), in the Pay Band

of Rs 15.600-39.100/- with initial Band Pay of Rs. 5,000/- and Grade Pay of Rs. 7,600/- plus other allowances

and benefits as admissible as per rules, with effect from the date of acceptance of joining report subject to

(i) her medical fitness (ii) Police verification (iii) verification of Caste Certificate [in case of SC/ST/OBC] and

(iv) other terms and conditions as noted below :

1. She shall be allowed to join if found medically fit for services under WBSEDCL. A detailed guideline

regarding medical examination is enclosed.

2. If she is now serving in any other Government/Semi Government organization, she has to produce

Release Order from the present employer at the time of joining.

3. She shall be on probation for a period of one year on such appointment which may be extended

depending on her performance and conduct.

4. The above appointment is temporary and is likely to continue subject to the Company being satisfied

on enquiry as to her suitability pertaining to performance, character and antecedents.

5. During the period of probation, the appointment may be liable to termination or one month’s notice

from either side or on payment of one month’s pay (including DA) in Iieu thereof.

6. She, will have to serve the Company for a minimum period of 3 years after completion of the Probation

period. If she fails to serve the Company for such period or leaves the Company during the Probation

period or during the aforesaid period of 3 years after completion of probation period, she will be required

to pay a sum of Rs.50,000/- [Rupees, fifty thousand] only, to the Company, apart from serving one

month’s or three month’s notice, as will be applicable on the date of resignation, or on payment of pay

[including DA] equivalent to the shortfall of notice period. On the date of joining, she is required to

execute a Bond and Agreement in favour of WBSEDCL for an amount of Rs. 50,000/- in prescribed

proforma (enclosed), in non judicial stamp paper of Rs. 100/- each for the purpose so stated.

7a) She shall be required to furnish necessary declaration of Nationality in the prescribed form (as enclosed)

at the time of joining.

7b) She shall also be required to furnish a family declaration with details of relations in the prescribed form

[as enclosed] at the time of joining.

7c) She shall; be required to furnish necessary declaration regarding age in the prescribed form (as

enclosed) duly supported by certificate issued by the appropriate authority at the level of Secondary

Examination, at the time of joining. Declaration of age once made and accepted shall be binding and

shall not be revoked subsequently for any reason whatsoever.

8. Confirmation in service under the regular establishment of the WBSEDCL in the above post shall be

considered on fulfillment of the requisite formalities i.e. receipt of satisfactory Police Verification Report

of Certificate and Antecedents, Medical fitness Certificate and satisfactory completion of Probation

Period. Verification Rolls in duplicate (as enclosed) need be produced duly filled In and signed before

or at the time of joining. If the report of the Police Authority is found adverse, the appointment shall be

cancelled/terminated forthwith, at any stage, without any correspondence.

9. She shall be liable to be transferred in the interest of work of the Company to any of the Offices,

Establishments, Departments, Projects of the Company.

10. She should note that the appointment shall be cancelled or the service shall be terminated at any

stage, if it is detected that the information furnished and/or document(s) submitted is/are false/

incomplete/invalid.

Power News v 33

11. Seniority in the above post shall be determined as per relative position in the merit list drawn after

selection or as per modified rules made or to be made hereinafter.

12. The age of superannuation is 60 years as per present rules.

13. She shall be covered under Employees Contributory Provident Fund Scheme.

14. The appointment under the Company will be subject to the provisions of the VVBSEBESR and other

Rules and Regulations, as adopted by WBSEDCL, as may be amended from time to time.

15. She shall also be subjected to orders/directives of the Company issued from time to time.

She is advised to submit the joining report upon acceptance of this offer of appointment with terms and

conditions as above, along with duly filled in Forms & Documents as mentioned at clause no: 6 & 7a, 7b

and 7c to the undersigned at Bidyut Bhawan on 21.01.11 at 10.00 a.m. At the time of joining she shall have

to submit a set of self attested photo copies of Admit Card of Secondary Level Examination, all Mark

Sheets and Certificates and shall have to produce the originals of the same for verification.

This offer shall remain valid upto 21.01.11 and the offer shall stand automatically cancelled if she falls to

report on the said date.

Yours faithfully,

Sd/-

(D. Goswami)

Director (HR)

WEST BENGAL STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD.Vidyut Bhaban, Bidhannagar, Kolkata - 700 091

Office Order No. : WBSEDCL/MR/2010/181 Dt. : 18.08.10

Shri Anirban Guha, son of Shri Manoranjan Guha of 2Y, Batakrishna Paul Lane, P.O. Ghughudanga

Kolkata, West Bengal, Pin -700 030, presently working as whole-time Director of WBSEDCL (on deputation

from WBPDCL) is hereby appointed to the post of Executive Director in the regular establishment of West

Bengal State Electricity Distribution Company Limited with effect from 30.01.2009 (afternoon):on the following

terms and conditions:

1. He will be paid remuneration in the Pay Band of Rs. 37,400/- to Rs. 67,000/- with Grade Pay of Rs.

10,000/- plus all other allowances as admissible to the post as a regular employee of the Company.

2. He will have to resign from WBPDCL and the WBPDCL authority will have to accept his resignation

mentioning categorically that the resignation is for the purpose of enabling him to join in the regular

establishment of WBSEDCL,

3. His past services as rendered in WBPDCL/erstwhile WBSEB before creation of WBPDCL be treated as

continuous together with the service he would render under WBSEDCL after 30.01.2009 (afternoon) for

the purpose of determination of superannuation benefits including Pension/Gratuity. ‘

4. In the event of reversion of Shri Guha from the Board of the Company to the post of Executive Director

on expiry of the present term including the period of re-appointment, if any, to his lien post of Executive

Director, the Pay, which he would be in receipt of as a Member of the Board as on the date of his

reversion to the post of Executive Director, will be protected.

5. His service will be guided by the rules and regulations of WBSEB Employees’ Service Regulations

(since adopted by the Company) or such modifications in the said regulations or any new regulation, if

prescribed by the Company for its employees from time to time.

6. He will be entitled to Leave Travel Concession and Medical expenditure reimbursement facility as

admissible to the regular employees of the Company.

7. He will also be entitled to admissible travelling and daily allowances for undertaking tour on official

purposes.

Power News v 34

8. He will be provided with a chauffeur driven car at the Company’s cost for his Official work. However, there are

certain provisions of personal use of the Car at concessional rates, ‘which will also be applicable for him.

9. He will be provided with Mobile Phone connection at the Company’s cost with reimbursement of call

Charges thereof. He will also be entitled to get reimbursement of telephone charges of one land line

connection at his residence.

This appointment for the purpose of absorption of Shri Anirban Guha in the regular establishment of

WBSEDCL is issued in prior consultation with WBPDCL followed by approval accorded by Govt. of West

Bengal in the Power & NES Deptt., in terms of Memorandum No: 275-PO/O/C-IV//2E-05/09 dated 21.06.2010

and also as per the resolution adopted in the 22nd meeting of the Board of Directors of the Company held

on 19.07.2010 and will be effective from 30.01.2009 (afternoon) only after acceptance of his resignation

from WBPDCL with effect from the said date.

Shri Guha is to confirm the acceptance of the assignment on the terms contained in this Order.

Yours faithfully,

Sd/-

(D. Goswami)

Director (HR)

FAST TRACK PROMOTION


To

The Director (HR)

WBSEDCL, Bidyut Bhavan, 7th Floor

A-Block, Salt Lake, Kolkata - 700 091

Sub : Fast Track Promotion

Sir,

With reference to the above subject and draft Circular on Fast Track Promotion as issued to us vide

memo no.: MR/ESTB/1494 dated 24.06.2013, we request you kindly refer our earlier communications

submitted on different occasion where lot of points have been recorded regarding above issue.

During the last few years, we have been observing that authorities of both WBSEDCL & WBSETCL has

intended into activities which are either flouting to its own laid out rules and regulations or in violation to the

Gazette Notification No. 12PO/0/111/3R-29/2006 dated- 25.01.2007 and our association have already

communicated the same vide Memo No.: WBSEBEA/Admin/2013-14/14 dated 26/06/2013.

But it is a matter of great concern that the authorities of both WBSEDCL & WBSETCL have, perhaps, become

directionless into their activities which are not in the best interest of workforces of both the company at large.

Whereas, we had requested earlier to the authorities of WBSEDCL & WBSETCL vide Memo no.-

WBSEBEA/Admin/2013-14/9 dated-04.06.13 and WBSEBEA/Policy/2012-13/29 dated-17.08.12 for creating

better promotional avenues for the employees of Class I Officers and optimum utilization of man power

through review of restructuring process (as portrayed by M/s PWC earlier) so as to improve the overall

performances and motivation of the workforce but the above draft Circular has enough potential to have

detrimental effect on the employees of Class 1 level. We, as a responsible association and an important

stakeholder had submitted our proposal vide memo no mentioned above for creating better promotional

avenues to all the levels of Class I Officers. It appears that the proposal has been misinterpreted as the

said draft circular instead of contemplating the career avenues at all levels of class I officers, envisages

restricted promotional avenues.

While creating promotional path or avenues for the employees, it is quite expected that the career

avenues of the peers be consulted or the best be followed. But the contents of the draft Circular depicts

that there is an intended approach to create an impasse and divert the attention of all from the arena of

work. This pattern of fast track promotion system at the lower level of executive positions is no where followed in

the top performing CPSUs. It is not understood, with any context or rationale, as to how such restricted pattern

of promotion can ever be envisaged by the authorities of WBSEDCL. Till date both WBSEDCL and WBSETCL

have not come up with a mechanism as to what constitutes an expected performance.

Power News v 35

This is stated on the ground that the major component of the performance for selection at higher positionis evaluated on the basis of interview. Again, the major components of the questionnaire in all the interviews

are mostly theoretical in natures which are not in general applicable in day to day affairs. The intended fasttrack promotion scheme envisages more theory learning as one has to attain 75% marks in suitability test.Hence, the envisaged fast track promotion policy, as such, will motivate the employees to keep themselvesaway from day to day work and concentrate their efforts on reading theoretical books. As a responsibleassociation an important stakeholder, we cannot involve ourselves in propagating theory learning and todiscourage the employees to make them detached from performing the goods in the arena of work.

It is an unconcealed reality that any special privilege or out of turn promotion scheme only restricted to

specific level of employees is not free from biasness. Consequently, the outcome of the selection from fasttrack process has the likelihood to be based on other factors and not on performance. The subsequenteffect will be mass discrimination without any sound rationale.

The said draft, if implemented, will invite a culture where the processes will be non transparent, disparityand misdeed. Moreover, it will be again a one step ahead towards the act of unequal opportunity andunfairness towards the Class I Officers.

The Class I Officers, as pointed out by us in an earlier communication, is in dearth of motivation as the

result of present gloomy avenues of career growth. We had requested the authorities of both WBSEDCL tocontemplate for a better career path for the Class 1 officers so as to sustain and achieve the journeytowards the vision of WBSEDCL. But it appears that the authority is not desire to contemplate the future ofWBSEDCL and the harness the potential of the workforce.

Hence, we do not feel interested in forwarding any further suggestion on the said draft copy of thecircular and strongly demand not to proceed further with the draft circular.

Thanking you.

Yours faithfully,

Sd/-

(Sanjoy Kr. Bhunia)


INTERVIEW CALL OF ACE


To

The Chiarman and Managing Director



Sub : Grievance i.r.o. interview called for the post of Addl CE from SE level.

Sir,

Information came to this end that some junior engineers at SE level have got interview letters for the

post of Addl CE which will be held on 13.08.13 & 14.08.13, where senior engineers are being deprived /

bypassed from such interview process, which further leads the concern engineers to frustration &

demotivation and thereby creating unhealthy industrial atmosphere. We Engineers’ Association repeatedly

invited the concern authority to set right the issue before going to such interview process, so that the above

business can run smoothly. In this regard Engineers’ Association has also submitted one proposal for

process of selection of eligible candidate to appear before the above interview and we strongly believe that

such proposal was the best proposal to avoid any unrest among the engineers. We also mentioned that lot

of mistakes are still there in the gradation list which are to be set right first. But we observed that the

authority concern simply ignored the concern matter by keeping us in dark and such attitude may also

become detrimental i.r.o. maintaining industrial relationship. You are requested to take necessary steps

towards solving above unwanted issues.

Yours truly,

Sd/-

(Sanjoy Kr. Bhunia)


Power News v 36

WBSETCL PROJECT MONITORING & OPERATION


To

The Managing Director

WBSETCL

Bidyut Bhavan, 8th Floor, Block-A

Salt Lake City, Kolkata - 700 091

Sub : Creation of (i) a new cell named “Project

Monitoring & Operation Services" and

(ii) a post of Chief Engineer, (O&M

Construction) in WBSETCL.

Ref : Office Order nos.: 352/2013, dated:

29.07.2013 and 372/2013, dated:

12.08.2013 of the Managing Director,

WBSETCL.

Sir,

I take this opportunity to convey our thanks to

the BoD, WBSETCL, through you, for creation of the

subject cell and post in WBSETCL as per the above

referred Office orders. This action will surely increase

the career prospects of our members.

Please recall that WBSEBEA has been vigorously

pursuing with you, during different discussions, to

take some constructive steps so as to enhance the

career prospects of our members. Your action, as

above, is considered as the fruit of our consistent

effort, on the score.

In this connection, we would like to draw your

attention to the penultimate paragraph of the Office

Order no: 372/2013, dated : 12.08.2013 regarding

‘Man power set up under Chief Engineer (O&M

Construction )'. It is our considered opinion that man

power set up is required to be created in such a way

so as to avoid the possibility of dual Administrative

and or Technical control of the field engineers of the

existing (O&M) wing.

We hope that the matter of creation of man power

set up will be finalized in line with our proposal

submitted to you.

Further, we would request for an audience with

you within seven days for discussions on our various

unsettled matters.

Yours faithfully,

Sd/-

(Sanjoy Kr. Bhunia)

Hony. Secretary

WBSEBEA

VIGILANCE ACTIVITIES

Ref. : WBSEBEA/Admin/2013-14/26(A) Dt. : 24.08.13

To

The Director-HR

WBSEDCL

Bidyut Bhavan,


Sub : Unprecedented activities of Vigilance

Department.

Dear Sir,

We are enclosing a copy of letter issued by the

Advisor (S&V) dt. 5/3/2010 addressed to the AE,

Kolaghat Gr. E/S and a copy of the reply against the

said letter dt. 15/03/2010 by AE, Kolaghat Gr. E/S

and another copy of letter issued on 18/3/2010 by

the then AGM (HR&A) Corporate Vigilance Cell for

your perusal.

From the first two letters, it is appeared that there

was case of power theft in the premises of one

commercial consumer for which necessary pilfer bill

was raised. As far as we know that the Advisor(S&V)

is the competent authority in the matter of power

theft. However, in case of pilfer bill, competent

authority is the Station Manager of the respective

CCC and other than he only appellate authority or

appropriate court can intervene into the matter of

pilfer bill. So, it is not clear to us why by violating all

the norms and regulation as laid down in Electricity

Act and the provision of WBERC, the said letter was

issued by Corporate Vigilance probably keeping

Advisor(S&V) in dark (as these two letters are found

to be contradictory in nature). It has also been come

to our knowledge that at that time AE, Kolaghat Gr.

E/S was called in the chamber of CVO where a

statement was collected from him under stressed

condition. Now, after a long gap of more than three

years, he has been called again recently for further

submission for the reason best known to the authority.

We think that the instruction for withholding the

pilfer bill was served with an ulterior motive and

malafide intention and may be for personal gain just

to make the said pilfer bill (amounting to Rs.

11,82,752) BAD IN LAW. This act on behalf of

Vigilance Department has not only caused financial

loss of the Company but also weaken the criminal

case against the accused person. As gathered the

person is still enjoying electricity without paying a

paisa as pilfer bill. The then AGM (HR&A), Corporate

Vigilance Cell, just cannot avoid his responsibility

by saying ‘I am directed by competent authority.......’

Being a senior officer of his rank, it should have been

known to him who is the competent authority related

to any pilfer bill. In this context it is to mention here

that the said accused person to whom the pilfer bill

Power News v 37

was issued for detected theft of electricity had confined the entire inspection team by using unholy muscle

power and thereby he had compelled them to reconnect his service line with a new cable. This incident was

also noted in the said FIR.

It is true that in some cases authority need enquiry but for that reason withholding of pilfer bill was not

compulsory. So, when the same is done it has become crystal clear what the purpose of such enquiry is.

There may have been a ‘HAND OF GOD ' which can only be revealed through proper enquiry into the

matter. So, we are requesting you to conduct a high level transparent enquiry into the matter of issuance

the said letter from vigilance department. And for the sake of clarity, at least one nominated member from

WBSEBEA is to be inducted in the said committee. Moreover, immediate action towards disconnecting the

service line which was forcefully reconnected by the said consumer to be undertaken instead of demoralizing

action against our honesty engineer member.

Thanking you,

Yours faithfully,

Sd/-

(Sanjoy Kr. Bhunia)


WEST BENGAL STATE ELECTRICITYDISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD.

Vidyut Bhaban, Bidhannagar

Kolkata - 700 091

Memo No. : Adv (S&V)/ Dt. : 05.03.10

To

The Asstt. Engineer

Kolaghat Gr. E/S.,

Kolaghat, Medinipur

Sub : Provisional assessment in connection

with detection of unauthorized use of

electricity at the premises of Sri Mridul

Khan, Vill. Shantipur, P.S. Kolaghat.

In connection with detection of theft of electricity

under Section 135 (i) (b) of Electricity Act 2003 and

its amendment in 2007 at the commercial premises

of Sri Mridul Khan of Village: Shantipur, P.S. Kolaghat

on 22.02.2010 and subsequent lodging of complaint

made by you at Kolaghat P.S., the details of

provisional assessment preferred may please be

made known to this end within 48 hours of receipt of

this letter.

Yours faithfully,

Sd/-

(R. Thyagaraju)

Advisor (S&V)

Office of the A.E. & Stn. Manager

Kolaghat Gr. E/S, WBSEDCL

Memo No. : KGT/PS Case/2306(i-iii) Dt. : 15.03.10

To

The Advisor (S&V)

Bidyut Bhavan, Salt Lake

Sector – II, Kolkata – 700 091

Sub : Unauthorised use of electricity in the premises

of Mridul Khan of vill. Shantipur, P.S. Kolaghat,

Dist. Purba Medinipur.

Ref. : Your No. Adv. (S&V)/LPW/DC/9/144 dated

05.03.2010.

Dear Sir,

Reference to above the undersigned submits

herewith the report about unauthorized use of

electricity into the premises of Mridul Khan, as

preferred by you :

1. Mridul Khan of viilage Santipur under P.S. Kolaghat

is a consumer of Kolaghat Gr. E/S. He pilfered

power by theft directly from W.B.S.E. D.C.L’s line.

2. The higher authority was highlighted about the

matter in black and white (Xerox copy annexed

as ready reference).

3. The under signed lodged FIR with the Kolaghat

Police Station about above (Xerox copy enclosed

as ready reference)

4. The consumer was claimed pilferage of power

bill against said unauthorized conduct (Xerox

copy attached as ready reference).

This is for your information and necessary action

please.

Thanking you,

Yours faithfully,

Sd/- (Indrajit Naskar)

WBSEDCL,

Power News v 38

WEST BENGAL STATE ELECTRICITYDISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD.

Vidyut Bhaban, Bidhannagar, Kolkata - 700 091

Memo No. : AS/V-1867/AGM/2018 Dt. : 18.03.10

To

The Circle Manager

Tamluk (D) Circle

W.B. State Electricity Dist. Co. Ltd.

Tamluk, Purba Midnepore

Sub : Supplementary bilI of Rs. 11,82,762/-

issued in favour of Consumer No.

A073551 (Name of the Consumer:

Mridui Khan) issued by Stat ion

Manager. Koiaghat Gr. E/S vide Order

No. KGT/RAID/3 dated 23.02.10.

Sir,

With reference to the subject mentioned above, I

am directed by the: competent authority to request

you to keep the above referred provisional bill in

abeyance till further clearance from Corporate

Vigilance Cell, even if the hearing for the final

assessment of the provisional assessed bill is over.

Further, Divisional Manager, Tamluk (D) Division

and Station Manager, Kolaghat Gr. Electric Supply

may be instructed accordingly.

Yours faithfully,

Sd/-

(G. K. Bagchi)

Addl. General Manager (HR&A)

Corporate Vigilance Cell

REOPENING OF PENSION SCHEME

Ref. : WBSEBEA/Policy/2013-14/27 Dt. : 24.08.13

To

The Chairman and Managing Director,


Kolkata - 700 091

Sub : Request for reopening of the scope for

exercise of option for Pension Scheme

as per WBSEB Employees’ (Death-cum-

Retirement) Benefit Regulations,1985.

Sir,

You are perhaps aware that some of our members

had opted for ‘Employees’ Provident Fund &

Miscellaneous Provision Act’ in lieu of ‘WBSEB

Pension Scheme’.

Their options for ‘EPF & MP’ scheme, prior to

2002, was largely due to their apprehension

regarding the continuity and the ultimate benefits of

the other option under Employees’ (Death-cum-

Retirement) Benefit Regulations, 1985 (DCRB

Regulations).

In the last decade various Rules and Regulations

were introduced to make the DCRB Regulations

more remunerative. As a result of which these

members, after their dedicated service to WBSEB/

WBSEDCL for more than two and half decade, now

find themselves deprived and neglected because of

their inability to opt for DCRB Regulation,1985. The

quantum of terminal benefits between the optees’ to

DCRB Regulat ion and the non- optees have

increased in the recent past and created huge

monetary difference.

However, since 2002, no scope was extended to

the employees who had earlier opted for EPF&MP

Scheme to change over for DCRB Regulation, 1985.

In view of above, WBSEBEA requests you to

allow one last scope to the employees to exercise

their option for coming within the coverage of

WBSEB Employees’ (Death-cum-Retirement)

Benefit Regulations, 1985.

We hope that you would consider our petition

sympathetically and favourably.

Yours faithfully,

Sd/-

(Sanjoy Kr. Bhunia)

Hony. Secretary

WBSEBEA

REVIEW OF RESTRUCTURE REVIEW COMMITTEE


To

The Chairman and Managing Director,


Kolkata - 700 091

Sub : Submission of Restructure Review

Committee Report prepared by

WBSEBEA.

Sir,

With due respect, this is to inform you that we

have already submitted one proposal for considering

the Restructure Review Committee Report prepared

by our Association vide memo no. WBSEBEA/Policy/

2012-13/29 dated-17.08.12 and the same was

prepared taking into consideration the constraints are

being faced by our filed offices in their day to day

Power News v 39

activities in respect of giving better consumer

services. Already one year has elapsed and lot of

table talks & discussion happened towards revert

back of erstwhile Sub-Division for providing better

consumer services. In this regard it is to mention

here that one report has been submitted before the

authori ty of WBSEDCL by manpower review

committee constituted by WBSEDCL, where the

committee also recommended the same views what

our Association does think. We also do believe that

we the WBSEB Engineers’ Association along with

our efficient field level engineers can only give you

good suggestions in respect of both technical and

administrative issues for betterment of our esteemed

organization right from technical to financial health.

Here we must request you to kindly go through our

submitted proposal vide memo no mentioned above,

where you will be able to understand that the

manpower strength as per our proposal is much less

than that of report submitted by M/s PWC. Which

proves the inefficient approach of M/s PWC and

thereby the erstwhile management also. It is also to

be noted here that no more additional expenditure

will be incurred if the erstwhile Sub-Divisions are

reverted back. At present our field offices are running

in a much unorganized way, where in some places

both technical and non-technical staffs & officers are

not getting any sitting arrangement due to place

constraint mainly and the field staffs are not placed

in their exact working place, as a result of which

working atmosphere is also deteriorating day by day.

Field staffs placed at Division offices are taking more

time to reach the working spot as most of the cases

the distances are the main factor.

For creat ing smooth and healthy working

environment, you are requested to give due

importance into the matter and revert back of

erstwhi le Sub-Division for betterment of the

organization by placing the new empanelled

Assistant Engineers selected through recent

recruitment process or the Assistant Engineer posted

in different areas since long.

Yours faithfully,

Sd/-

(Sanjoy Kr. Bhunia)

Hony. Secretary

WBSEBEA

LONG PENDING DEMANDS


To

The Managing Director,

WBSETCL

Bidyut Bhavan, Salt Lake City

Kolkata - 700 091

Sub : Record note of discussion held on

27.08.2013 i.r.o. various long pending

demands of WBSEBEA.

Dear Sir,

Please recall our discussions had with you on

27.08.2013 in your chamber which started at about

4 P.M. regarding following long pending demands of

WBSEB Engineers’ Association.

1. Out of turn placement of SE & ACE in the post

of CE:

The WBSEB Engineers’ Association has been

representing continuously for placing of Chief

Engineer or senior most ACE (if CE is not available

for posting) in the post of CE and Addl. Chief

Engineer in the post of ACE.

We observed that comparatively junior ACEs

were posted in Procurement Department and SLDC.

In spite of repeated persuasion, you did not show

any positive attitude to set right the problem by

placing senior most engineers in those posts which

is very much required for creating and maintaining

congenial and good working atmosphere. Most

surprisingly we have seen recently that just before

the interview for selection for the post of CE from

ACE, you have again issued order for posting of

comparat ively junior ACE to take charge of

CE:TR(O&M) and also in the newly created post of

CE(TR. O&M - construction) and all the vacant CE’s

post i.e. in SLDC, Procurement, Tr (O&M) and Tr

(O&M-Construction) have been filled up virtually

bypassing the process of selection through interview

exists in the company; rather you felt it comfortable

to adopt pick and choose system without giving

due weight and recognition on experience and

knowledge of senior most engineers and thus

creat ing an unhealthy atmosphere in the

organization. We strongly protested this type of

illogical pick and choose system adopted by you.

Moreover, you have issued an order for assuming

charge of CE, CTD by one junior most engineer in

Power News v 40

the rank of Superintending Engineer. Looking after day to day works for the temporary period could have

been entrusted to any of the existing CEs or the senior most SE posted in that department or senior most

ACE could have been posted there.

It is seen from the above that the autocratic attitude of the TCL management has made the interview

system meaningless and there might have every possibilities to create annoyance in the forthcoming interview

process. It may be assumed from your above actions that, those ACEs are out of turn posted now in

different CE’s post will be selected for regularization through interview which is expected to be held in the

mid September’2013. Then other ACEs (senior level as well as junior level) eligible for appearing interview

for the post of CE will appear with zero expectation in their mind in the coming selection process of interview

system which is very much painful and also very much detrimental for an organization.

We are again strongly placed our logical demand for withdrawal of all the above orders immediately

before the ensuing interview for selection of CE and ACE at the same time we also request you to refrain

from any kind of unscientific action and violation of basic norms of the company. Resentment amongst the

engineers are gearing up and top management of both organizations viz, WBSEDCL and WBSETCL will be

held responsible for any unwanted situation if arises out of it.

2. Review of Restructuring of the Organization and Manpower setup :

Though we welcome for creation of one post in the rank of CE in TR (O&M-Construction) but we requested

you to see the above issue in a broad perspective as there was lacuna in the existing Organization Structure

considering rapid expansion of Transmission system, to meet the future demand growth, to remove cadre

disparity exists in the organization etc. We expect your active consideration regarding our submission of

composite proposal for “Re-Design of Organization Re-Structures and Man Power Set-Up” few months

back. We demand your early response as till date nothing has been received.

3. Assured Career Progression Scheme (ACPS):

We again placed our demand submitted by WBSEBEA few months back for early implementation of

ACPS. Thorough analysis on the career prospect of engineers of other similar Indian power utilities is

done; it is to both the companies to remove cadre disparity which exists in the organization.

4. Inclusion of Activities of Corporate Monitoring in the Corporate Plan :

We have noticed that the name of Corporate Monitoring Cell and their activities have not been included

in the Corporate Plan, published from WBSETCL. The same has been pointed out to you. Though you

admitted it as an unintentional mistake and also assured us that next time due care will be taken.

5. Inclusion of one post of Chief Engineer as Head of HRD Department in WBSETCL :

In view of recent move towards creation of HRD Department in WBSETCL, WBSEBEA demands that

the post should be headed by one Chief Engineer, as in this purely technical organization the issues to be

handled by that position would also be technical in nature.

Hope that you will consider our long pending logical demands and will take positive action for early

redressal of grievances of the Engineers for creation of healthy atmosphere within the organization for its

further improvement and giving better consumer services.

Thanking you.

Yours Truly,

Sd/-

(Sanjoy Kr. Bhunia)

Hony. Secretary

WBSEBEA

Power News v 41

VIGILANCE ACITIVITES


ToThe Director-HRWBSEDCL, Bidyut BhavanSalt Lake, Kolkata - 700 091

Sub : Vigilance Activities in WBSEDCLSir,

Time and again we have lodging our protest against unreasonable vigilance activities in our organisationand now we are enclosing herewith a copy of a part of report submitted by T. K. Ghosh and Co.(CharteredAccountants), the audit firm, which was engaged for verifying the ATC loss calculation of RaghunathganjDivision. Accordingly, they have submitted a report wherein it has been stated........

‘As informed by the DM there is no specific guidelines prescribed by the HQ for the computation of ATCloss and other than the formula provided by the IT&C cell of HQ. It is our suggestion that a guideline, taking

into consideration all the variables like sharing of energy, own premises billing, old outstanding collectionetc. should be prepared and made available all divisions so that the calculation process is standarised andmay also be cross referenced with the data available at the HQ level.’

From the above observation and suggestion of a specialized agency engaged by WBSEDCL, there is enoughreason to believe that our organisation has no standardised process of computation of ATC loss of a particularunit. In such a case there is every possibility of human error or different result for adopting different method forsame calculation and in no way this is unusual. By admitting the shortcomings in the system, recently a changed

method has been adopted by the authority in computation of ATC loss in WBSEDCL.

Now, it has come to our notice that some charge sheets have been issued to some engineers due todifference in calculation of ATC loss. This is most unfortunate. We fail to understand why some individualsare held responsible for the reason that generated out of System Deficiency. So, we, WBSEBEA demandto withdraw the said charge sheets against our engineers which causes to demoralise our engineer members,otherwise we may be forced to take the street.

Yours faithfully,

Sd/-(Sanjoy Kr. Bhunia)

Hony. Secretary WBSEBEA

5. Suggestions and modificatioms needed for computation of loss

Our observations

As informed by the DM there is no specific guidelines prescribed by the H.O. For the computation of AT& C loss other than the formula provided by the IT & C cell of the H.O. It is our suggestion that a guideline,taking into consideration all variables like sharing of energy, own premises billing, old outstanding collectionsetc, should be prepared and made available at all divisions so that the calculation process is standardizedand may also be cross referenced with the data available at the H.O. level.

6. If any further communication or guideline is required for the site

Our Observations

l All substations under the division should be metered so as to make available the accurate incoming power.

l Single phase defective meters are 48365 as on 31.08.2012 in the division. Immediate steps should betaken to replace / repair the defective meters.

l There are 46587 conventional meters in the division which should be immediately replaced by thedigital meters for accurate readings.

l Discussion was made on the number of consumers between 0-25 units and 26-50 units for the monthsof August 2011 and August 2012 as per the following table :

Consumers as % to total consumers

11-Aug 12-Aug

0-25 Units 18.29 28.61

26-50 Units 21.06 20.03

Power News v 42

PROTEST AGAINST IRRATIONAL INTERVIEW PROSESS


To



7th Floor, Kolkata - 700 091

Sub : Protest against the attempt for calling of engineers for interview for promotion to

the 4th and 5th level post in much higher numbers than the established norms of

3 candidates per post.

Sir,

We regret to note that an attempt is being made to call a large number of engineers for interview for the

4th and 5th level posts violating the established norms of three candidates per post. We feel that such an

attempt shall increase resentment amongst the engineers due to large scale supersession.

You are therefore, requested to intervene and stop such an attempt in the greater interest of the Company.

Incidentally it may be mentioned that the matter has already been brought to the notice of the Director

(HR), WBSEDCL, on 09.09.2013 with a request to set right the issue, without any tangible result as yet.

We are constrained to inform you that unless the matter is set right immediately we may be compelled

to go for agitation programme in the near future, starting with a gate meeting on 13.09.2013 to press for our

demand.

Yours faithfully,


Hony. Secretary

WBSEBEA

REVIEW & RESTRUCTURE


To




Sub : Reminder to reinstate the Maintenance Sub-Division for improved power system.

Sir,

Recently it has been observed that four Transfer Orders have been issued vide Office Order nos. 90 to

93 dated 13.09.2013 under the signature of Dir. (HR). The R.M, Birbhum R.O, D.M, Rampurhat Division

and associated other five (5) engineers are involved in those transfer orders.

It is gathered that recent power interruption on the festive date 05.09.13 at Tarapith is the primary cause

behind the Transfer orders. The transfer order i.r.o. Er. Kallol Das, R.M, Birbhum R,O is categorically appeared

to be irrational and unjustified in reference to some other crucial factors of the Districts at this juncture. A

reporting in daily news paper, Anandabazar dated 17.09.2013 is being attached herewith as reference

which is not encouraging message for the Organisation, WBSEDCL.

Sir, our network is outdoor type having numerous obstacles on its way. So, interruption is a common

phenomenon. However, the same can be restricted to a limited value if our experimentally proven structure

including the Sub-Division is rolled back.

Power News v 43

INTERVIEW FOR PROMOTION


To




Sub : Unsettled issue on calling of engineers i.r.o. interview for promotion to the 4th

and 5th level post.

Ref. : Our previous letter vide Ref. No. WBSEBEA/Admin./2013-14/32 dated 10.09.13.

Sir,

We are yet to observe any positive response from your end on the captioned matter. Post interview

status for the position of Chief Engineer (5th level) held on 17.09.2013 are still found to be kept at stalemate

condition. Expected interview of engineers for the 4th level is also being got delayed.

It is reiterated that we are against the violation of established norms of calling three (3) candidates

per post for interview of promotion to the 4th and 5th level post. Because, we feel, this will generate

“Loss of motivation” and create “Resentment” amongst the engineers due to large scale supersession

which will become unhealthy for the organization as a whole.

You have also observed, by this time, that other Officer’s Association of our organization also expressed

same view on this issue.

At this juncture, your specific view about this serious issue is requested for early and smooth settlement

of the Promotional guideline for 4th & 5th level post.

We are always ready to discuss with you over the issue, if necessary, for an early settlement in the

interest of our members as well as for the organization.

Prompt response from your end to settle the aforesaid issue in a congenial atmosphere is highly solicited.

Yours faithfully,


Hony. Secretary

WBSEBEA

So, keeping the defective structure intact you can never expect better result towards getting uninterrupted

power by initiating some transfer orders / penal actions against Engineers / employees after occurrence of

any unwanted power interruption. In last year, we had formed a Technical Committee consisting of engineers

having vast practical experience in Distribution System of WBSEDCL and they had suggested for roll back

of Sub-Division which was abolished on the recommendation of an agency having no experience in power

system. We have already mentioned this in our earlier meeting with you.

So, we are requesting you to study our comprehensive proposal which was submitted earlier (a copy is

enclosed for your ready reference) and reinstate the Sub-Division with immediate effect, otherwise there

will be a big mess every now and then.

Yours faithfully,


Hony. Secretary

WBSEBEA

Power News v 44

VIGILANCE ACTIVITIES


To




Sub : Review of the punishment against

vigilance enquiry i.r.o Sri Gobinda

Biswas.

Sir,

This in reference to our discussion with you on

05/09/2013 when we had mentioned that one

vigilance enquiry was constituted against Sri

Gobinda Biswas, AE, presently posted at Barasat

Area Office, WBSETCL. This was related to an

electrical accident at Kolaghat 132KV Sub-Station.

We are not going to details of the fact. We just want

to mention that at the material point of time Sri

Biswas was on leave. Still he was held responsible

for the accident. As far as we have investigated, Sri

Biswas is very responsible and duty bound engineer.

In no way he gave any instruction for work without

Shut Down of the line. Still he has been held

responsible through a complex enquiry process.

During enquiry the basic thing of his sanctioned leave

of absence was ignored. This shocking finding has

demoralised Sri Biswas to a great extent. In this

context, we further to state that you had assured us

to look into the matter sympathetically.

Under the stated circumstances, we are praying

to your goodself to reconsider his punishment for

withholding three increments, so that he gets back

his working spirit which will be ultimately beneficial

both for him as well as for the organisation. Sri

Biswas has already submitted the formal appeal

before you. Hope that you will consider our prayer.

Thanking you,

Yours faithfully,

Sd/-

(Sanjoy Kr. Bhunia)

Hony. Secretary

WBSEBEA

LIST OF MEMBERS OF WBSEBEA(as on 01.11.2013)

Sl. M. Name Dues in Year wise

No. No. (Rs.) dues details



1 700 PARTHA PRATIM SAHA 700 08-14

2 736 DIPESH CHANDRA DUTTA LM

3 743 BARUNADAY SAHA LM

4 746 PRANAB KR. DAS SARMA 500 10-14

5 754 SWAPAN KUMAR DEY(SR) LM

6 778 SRIKUMAR SATHPATHY LM

7 784 BALAI CH. MUKHERJEE LM

8 788 SUMITRA SEKHAR SENGUPTA LM

9 802 SUDHAMOY DE LM

10 845 MADHUSUDAN PAL LM

11 850 TUHIN CHAKRABORTY LM

12 853 SATYABRATA MALLIK LM

13 854 BASUDEV MOITRA LM

14 855 DEBANSHU DAS LM

15 857 NIRANJAN SAHA LM

16 858 SWAPAN KR. CHATTOPADHYAY LM

17 859 TUSHAR KATI CHOWDHURY LM

18 863 PRADIP KUMAR DEY LM

19 872 PULAK KUMAR SENGUPTO LM

20 873 PRABHAT KUMAR PAUL LM

21 874 BINIMOY DUTTA LM

22 877 TAPAN KUMAR GOSWAMI LM

23 878 PRABIR BHATTACHARYA LM

24 881 BADAL KARMAKAR 200 13,14

25 883 RARHINDRANATH SAHA LM

26 884 SUDIP KUMAR BHADURI LM

27 885 TAPAS GHOSH CHOWDHURY LM

28 887 RABINDRA N. CHATTAPADHYAY LM

29 888 SAMIR BASAK 2400 83-14

30 898 BIMAL KUMAR SANTRA 700 08-14

31 901 AMALENDU BRAHMA LM

32 902 UTTAM KUMAR AUDDY LM

33 914 SAMSUL ALAM LM

34 920 SUJIT NATH LM

35 921 ARUNDHUTI SARKAR 200 13,14

36 922 DIPTI BASAK LM

37 923 SACHINDRA N. MUKERJEE LM

38 925 SWAPAN KUMAR DEY LM

39 928 DIPALI MUKERJEE LM

40 936 GOURI SANKAR SARANGI LM

41 937 SUKESH CH. GIRI GOSWAMI LM

42 938 GOUTAM SENGUPTA 0 no dues

43 939 DIPANKAR BASU LM

44 940 SUBHASH GUPTO LM

45 941 SATYABAN ROY LM

46 943 PRIYA RANJAN CHAKRABORTY LM

47 944 BUDDHADEB GHOSH LM

48 948 RANJAN MITRA LM

49 950 SAMAR KR. CHATTAPADHYAY LM

50 951 MADHURINDU DUTTA LM

51 954 MALAY PALIT LM

52 955 DIPAK ROY LM

53 956 ASHOK KUMAR SINHA LM

54 957 BISHWANATH CHAKRABORTY LM

Power News v 45





55 959 PRADYUT KUMAR PAL LM

56 964 AMITAVA BISWAS LM

57 965 DEBASHISH CHOWDHURY LM

58 966 SISIR KUMAR GUHA LM

59 967 AMITAVA ROYCHOWDHURY LM

60 968 DINESH DEY 200 13,14

61 970 PABITRA KUMAR MAITY LM

62 971 SHYAMAL KUMAR DAS LM

63 973 DIPAK KUMAR GHOSH LM

64 976 ACHINTRA KUMAR LAHA LM

65 977 TAPAN KUMAR DEY 100 14

66 978 CHIRANJIB KUMAR DAS LM

67 980 SOMNATH BHATTACHARYA LM

68 981 SUDIP GOSWAMI LM

69 982 BHAIRAB KUMAR SAHA 300 12-14

70 983 PARTHA SARATHI DEY LM

71 985 BIBEKANANDA MAJUMDER LM

72 987 RUPANKAR SOM LM

73 988 PANKAJ KUMAR BHADRA 700 08-14

74 989 PRANAB KUMAR BOSE LM

75 990 TAPAN KUMAR CHAKRABORTY LM

76 993 SUBHASHISH PATTANAYAK LM

77 995 SANJAY KUMAR GHOSH LM

78 997 SWAPAN KR. PALCHOWDHURY LM

79 998 BISWANATH BANERJEE LM

80 1000 SUBHASISH DUTTA CHOWDHURY LM

81 1001 BINAY SEN LM

82 1004 NIHAR KUMAR DUTTA LM

83 1005 PARTA SARATHI MUKERJEE LM

84 1006 MATHUR BHAR LM

85 1007 MANAS GIRI LM

86 1008 SUBHAMAY DASGUPTA LM

87 1011 SISIR KUMAR CHOWDHURY LM

88 1013 PRTADIP DAS LM

89 1017 NANDADUDAL MAJUMDER LM

90 1019 TARUN KUMAR MITRA 0 no dues

91 1022 RANJIT KUMAR MAJUMDER LM

92 1023 SOUMENDRANATH SARKAR LM

93 1024 TAPASH KUMAR DAS LM

94 1026 TANMAY KUMAR BASU LM

95 1028 AMALENDU MAITY 0 adv. for 14-16

96 1030 SUNANDAN GHOSH LM

97 1031 DEBANANDA SAHA LM

98 1033 APURBA GHOSHAL LM

99 1034 MIHIR KUMAR DASGUPTA LM

100 1035 DERBASHISH GUPTA LM

101 1036 JAYANTA KUMAR SAHA 600 08,10-14

102 1037 SANAT KUMAR BISWAS LM

103 1038 SAMIR KUMAR DAS 0 no dues

104 1040 SURAJIT CHAKRABORTY LM

105 1042 SAJAL KUMAR ROY LM

106 1043 SUDIP KUMAR ROY 200 13,14

107 1044 KAMALESH MAITY LM

108 1046 PARTHA PRATIM BISWAS LM

109 1047 PRANAB K. DUTTA MAJUMDER LM

110 1048 PRASUN KR. DUTTA LM

111 1049 SALIL KUMAR SINHA LM

112 1052 SADHAN KUMAR DUTTA 200 13,14

113 1053 KALYAN CHAKRABORTY LM

114 1055 GIRIDHARI GHOSH 0 up to 14-15

115 1059 SASWATI MUKHAPADHYAY LM

116 1060 MOUSUMI BHOWMIK LM

117 1062 GOPAL KRISHNA BASU LM

118 1068 PARTHA SARATHI BISWAS LM

119 1070 BIMAN DUTTA CHOWDHURY 1200 03-14

120 1075 ALOKE CHAKRABORTY 800 07-14

121 1078 KAJAL BHATTACHARJEE LM

122 1079 ARUN KUMAR LAHIRI 1200 03-14

123 1080 MOLOY KARMAKAR 400 11-14

124 1081 SWAPAN MITRA 400 08,09,10,11

125 1084 BIBHASH BHATTACHARYA LM

126 1085 UMA PANDIT 0 no dues

127 1086 PUSPITA BHADRA LM

128 1087 KALYAN S. CHAKRABORTY LM

129 1088 NIDHIR NEOGI LM

130 1089 ARUP KR. CHATTAPADHYAY LM

131 1090 SIDHARTHA KUMAR GHOSH LM

132 1091 GOPAL CHANDRA ROY LM

133 1094 KALYAN KUMAR GHOSHAL LM

134 1095 BIPLAB BISWAS 200 13,14

135 1098 SANAT KUMAR GHOSH LM

136 1099 RAFIQUL ISLAM LM

137 1101 APURBA SAMADDAR LM

138 1102 SWAPAN GHOSH 100 14

139 1103 BITASTA DAS 200 13,14

140 1107 CHINMOY KUMAR HALDAR LM

141 1109 SUBIMAL ROYBARMAN LM

142 1110 ANUP KUMAR HAZRA LM

143 1111 SANJIB KUMAR SARKAR LM

144 1113 SABYASACHI ROY LM

145 1114 BODHISATTWA SARKAR 0 no dues

146 1117 KAMALESH BISWAS LM

147 1118 SATRAJIT GHOSH LM

148 1119 ASHISH KUMAR BISWAS 0 no dues

149 1120 PARTHA B. MUKERJEE LM

150 1124 SOMNATH SARMA LM

151 1125 SUMIT KUMAR BASU LM

152 1126 SUPRIYA SINHA 100 14

153 1127 SOUMENDRANATH BASU LM

154 1128 AJOY KUMAR MITRA LM

155 1129 SOMNATH PARUI LM

156 1135 AMITAVA NAG LM

157 1136 SALIL KR. CHATTAPADHYAY LM

158 1137 SUBRATA MUKERJEE LM

159 1138 PRABIR KUMAR KUNDU 300 12,13,14

160 1139 PIJUSH KANTI GUHATHAKURTA 200 13,14

161 1140 TAPAS KUMAR PAL LM

162 1141 SIBSANKAR ROY LM

163 1142 SIBANANDA DAS LM

164 1147 KAMAL KANTI BHOWMIK 300 12,13,14

165 1149 SUBRATA BASU 200 07,08

166 1152 AMITAVA KAYAL LM

167 1153 KALLOL KANTI DAS LM

168 1154 AMLAN KUMAR DASGUPTA LM

169 1155 CHANDIDAS MANDAL 1300 02-14

170 1157 TAPAN KUMAR GHOSH LM

171 1158 VITIHOTRA KUMAR LM

172 1159 SIDDHARTHA CHATTAPADHYAY LM

Power News v 46





173 1161 DURGA DAS KUNDU LM

174 1163 BASAB KANTI MOITRA 200 13,14

175 1169 PRODYUT KUMAR BASU 900 06-14

176 1172 SUPRATIK MITRA LM

177 1174 ASHOK MAJUMDER 200 13,14

178 1175 MITA SARKAR LM

179 1177 AMIT KUMAR PAL 300 12-14

180 1178 RAJAT BHATTACHARYA 200 13,14

181 1180 DWIPRAHAR MUKERJEE LM

182 1184 KUMARESH MAL LM

183 1185 SUBIR KUMAR GHATAK LM

184 1187 ANIL KUMAR SINGH 300 12-14

185 1188 DIPANKAR NANDY LM

186 1197 ANIL KUMAR PANDEY LM

187 1198 S. DEB SHARMA BISWAS LM

188 1199 AMITAVA BARDHAN ROY LM

189 1200 DEBANJAN DUTTA GUPTA 400 11-14

190 1201 PARTHAJIT GHOSH DASTIDAR 2190 87-14

191 1203 SOMNATH BISWAS LM

192 1204 SHYAMAPRASAD MOITRA LM

193 1205 AMITAVA SEN 200 13,14

194 1210 SIDDHARTHA ROY LM

195 1211 AMITAVA SENGUPTA LM

196 1213 DEBASHISH SINHA LM

197 1214 SUDIPTA MUKHAPADHYAY LM

198 1215 SUBHASHISH GHOSH LM

199 1216 GAUTAM KUMAR ROY 1400 01-14

200 1217 DIPAK KUMAR PAL LM

201 1220 ARDHENDU ROY 1200 03-14

202 1222 HARADHAN CHAKRABORTY LM

203 1223 SUBIR SAHA PODDER 400 11-14

204 1224 ANUPAM BARUA LM

205 1227 DEBAJYATI DASGUPTA 200 13,14

206 1229 JAHIRUL HAQUE LM

207 1230 BINODE KUMAR SARKAR LM

208 1231 GAUTAM KUMAR DE LM

209 1232 ASIT KARMAKAR LM

210 1234 SRISHA BATABYAL LM

211 1235 PARTHA PRATIM ROY 400 10,12,13,14

212 1239 SUBHASHISH ROY LM

213 1247 GOLOKMOY SINHA 600 09-14

214 1248 SIBSANKAR MUKERJEE 1520 99-14

215 1249 GOUTAM KANJILAL LM

216 1250 DEBASHISH DEB LM

217 1252 VINOD KUMAR MISHRA LM

218 1254 ABHIJIT BANERJEE 0 no dues

219 1255 ANIRUDDHA MONDAL LM

220 1257 GOUTAM BANERJEE LM

221 1258 TAPASH KUNDU LM

222 1260 SAMARESH KUMAR ROY LM

223 1261 KUSHAL KUMAR DHAR LM

224 1262 AJOY KUMAR DASMAHAPATRA LM

225 1263 DILIP KUMAR DAS LM

226 1265 MANJUSHRI NAG(MUKERJEE) LM

227 1267 PRANAB KUMAR BANERJEE LM

228 1268 PRABIR KUMAR MUKHERJEE LM

229 1270 MIRA CHAKRABORTY LM

230 1275 SHYAMAL KUMAR DATTA LM

231 1279 SURAJIT DUTTA LM

232 1280 SURAJIT CHAKRABORTY 400 11-14

233 1281 SANTANU SARKAR LM

234 1282 JOYDEEP CHAKRABARTY 400 07,08,10,11

235 1283 ARINDAM SARKAR LM

236 1286 HARSHABARDHAN ROY LM

237 1287 AHISH KUMAR BHOWMIK LM

238 1288 GOPAL CHANDRA PAL LM

239 1289 SUJIT ROY LM

240 1290 APURBA KRISHNA PAL LM

241 1292 DIPANKAR BAKSI LM

242 1294 SUJIT GHOSH LM

243 1295 SUBRATA DAS 0 no dues

244 1296 SANKAR KUMAR MAITY LM

245 1297 MOHIT KUMAR GHOSH 100 14

246 1298 SUMIT MUKERJEE 300 12-14

247 1299 TUSHAR KANTI SARKAR LM

248 1300 MD.NURUL ISLAM LM

249 1302 JAGANNATH MUKERJEE LM

250 1303 PARESH CHANDRA ROUTH LM

251 1304 SWAPAN KUMAR DEY 1000 03,06-14

252 1306 AMIT RANJAN PANJA 0 no dues

253 1308 RANJIT KUMAR SAHA LM

254 1309 LITON CHANDRA BHOWMIK LM

255 1310 SHOBHAN ACHARYA LM

256 1312 KALYAN HALDER 500 10-14

257 1315 SANATAN SARKAR LM

258 1318 ANATH KOLAY 100 14

259 1320 PRANAB KUMAR PAL LM

260 1321 SUKANTA BISWAS 200 13,14

261 1322 JAYANTA KANJILAL LM

262 1329 SK.SIRAJUL HAQUE LM

263 1330 ARUP KUMAR GHOSH 100 14

264 1331 ABANTI MITRA 700 08-14

265 1332 ASHISH R. BHATTCHARYAY LM

266 1333 MANIK CHANDRA PAL LM

267 1334 SHIBESH KUMAR DEB LM

268 1335 SEEMA DAS(ROY) LM

269 1337 RITA CHAKRABORTY LM

270 1338 MOHAN ROY CHAKRABORTY LM

271 1339 PRANAB KUMAR SINHA 300 12-14

272 1340 SAMIR KUMAR SINHA LM

273 1341 SANJAY KUMAR GOSWAMI LM

274 1343 PRADIP KUMAR NAG LM

275 1344 DEBASHISH CHAKI LM

276 1345 SUJAY KUMAR SAHA LM

277 1346 ANIL SINHA LM

278 1347 PROLOY S. MUKHAPADHYAY 100 14

279 1353 DIBYENDU BHATTACHARYYA LM

280 1354 SUBIR KUMAR DAN 100 14

281 1355 ASHISH PAL LM

282 1358 SANDIP KUMAR GUHA LM

283 1359 NILESH MUKHAPADHYAY 0 no dues

284 1360 GOUTAM NAYEK LM

285 1362 SAMPA SAHA(NAYEK) LM

286 1363 PATHIK KUMAR NAYEK LM

287 1364 SANJIB KUMAR MONDAL LM

288 1365 SOUMITRA BISWAS LM

289 1367 SUBHADRA GOPAL DUTTA LM

290 1370 SANDIP BASAK LM

Power News v 47





291 1371 RAKESH KUMAR SINHA LM

292 1372 MRINAL KANTI DAS LM

293 1373 SUBHENDU DEY LM

294 1377 SUDHIR KUMAR AMBASTHA LM

295 1379 DILIP KUMAR BISWAS 200 13,14

296 1380 DIPANKAR CHOWDHURI LM

297 1381 DILIP KUMAR BACHHAR LM

298 1382 SANJAY KUMAR BHUNIA LM

299 1383 SHANKAR BANDOPADHYAY 500 08,11,12,13,14

300 1384 ALOKE KUMAR SARKAR LM

301 1387 SUBHRENDRU SARKAR LM

302 1391 TAPAS HALDAR LM

303 1393 PROBODH KUMAR SINGH LM

304 1394 DEBIKA DEB LM

305 1395 PARTHA PRATIM DUTTA LM

306 1396 UTTAM KUMAR JANA 200 13,14

307 1399 DIPAK KUMAR PAL LM

308 1400 CHANDAN GHOSH LM

309 1401 AJOYENDU GANGOPADHYAY LM

310 1402 DEBASHIS SARKAR LM

311 1405 ASHIM KUMAR HALDER LM

312 1407 HIMANSHU BHUSHAN CHANDA LM

313 1408 TANAY KUMAR ADAK 600 09-14

314 1411 UTTAM BRAMHACHARI LM

315 1412 PRABIN KUMAR SAHA LM

316 1413 SHANTANU BANDOPADHYAY 600 09-14

317 1414 PARTHA SARATHI HALDER LM

318 1415 TAPASH SEN LM

319 1416 TAPAN KUMAR DEY LM

320 1417 PRIYA LAL PANDEY LM

321 1419 TAPASH BISWAS LM

322 1420 ANILCHANDRA BIR 200 13,14

323 1422 AMARTA BANDOPADHYAY 300 12-14

324 1423 PANCHU GOPAL NATH LM

325 1424 KALYAN KUMAR MAITY 500 10-14

326 1426 AMIT SIL LM

327 1427 DIPANKAR SAHA 100 14

328 1428 SOUMEN DAS LM

329 1429 SOUMEN DUTTA LM

330 1430 ARUN KUMAR LM

331 1432 DEBASHISH MONDAL LM

332 1452 KALYAN KUMAR GUHA 900 06-14

333 1475 UMESHLAL KARNA 500 10-14

334 1477 SUBIR ROY 200 13,14

335 1482 FIROJ AKHTAR KHAN LM

336 1483 TAPAN KUMAR BASU LM

337 1487 SAMIR BARAN GHOSH 900 06-14

338 1488 GOBINDA CHANDRA SARKAR LM

339 1489 MAHENDRA TIBRIWALLA LM 100

340 1490 TAPAS DAS LM

341 1491 SOUMEN ADHIKARI 600 09-14

342 1492 PRANAB KUMAR TALUKDAR 1100 04-14

343 1493 MILAN MOHAN MUKHERJEE LM

344 1494 PARTHA SARATHI MONDAL LM

345 1495 MRIGANKA MOULI DE LM

346 1496 SOUMEMDRA N. MUKHERJEE LM

347 1498 ASHOKE RANJAN GIRI 200 13,14

348 1499 SABYASACHI SARKAR 400 11-14

349 1500 TAPASH CHAKRABORTY 700 08-14

350 1501 ASHOK DOLOI LM

351 1502 SWAPAN KUMAR DAS 600 09-14

352 1503 SATYABAN MONDAL LM

353 1504 BIMAL KUMAR DEY LM

354 1506 PARTHA ROY 1060 02-06,09-14

355 1507 ANINDYA BANERJEE 300 12-14

356 1508 SIDHARTHA S. BHATTARJEE LM

357 1509 AMALENDU SAHA LM

358 1511 ABHIJIT NASKAR LM

359 1512 SUHAS KUMAR SEN LM

360 1513 DEWESH KUMAR LM

361 1516 CHITTARANJAN MALLICK LM

362 1517 ANUP KUMAR MALLICK 700 08-14

363 1519 BARNALI SAHA LM

364 1520 SIDDHASWAR DAS LM

365 1523 SHYAMAL KANTI DAS LM

366 1524 RABISANKAR BANERJEE LM

367 1525 RAJARSHI SAHA LM

368 1527 PRAKASH CHANDRA CHARAN LM

369 1528 NITISH RANJAN SAHU LM

370 1529 RANJAN DAS 200 13,14

371 1530 NANDA NANDAN BISWAS 100 100

372 1531 RUM RUM ROY LM

373 1532 KUMKUM MAJUMDER LM

374 1533 BISWAJIT MADHU LM

375 1535 PRANAY KUMAR PAL LM

376 1537 TAPAS MAJUMDER 300 12-14

377 1538 PARTHA PRATIM NASKAR LM

378 1539 PINAKI NATH ROY 800 07-14

379 1540 KAMAL KUMAR MAITY 500 10-14

380 1541 SUSHANTA KUMAR HAZRA LM

381 1542 SULI DEY (GOSWAMI) LM

382 1543 RANJAN KUMAR PRAMANIK 1520 99-14

383 1544 BISWAJIT CHATTERJEE LM

384 1545 PRADIP KUMAR MONDAL LM

385 1546 NIKHIL MAHATO LM

386 1548 SURJESWAR SEN LM

387 1549 SAOUVIK BANERJEE LM

388 1550 RAM PRASAD MONDAL LM

389 1556 KARTIK BETAL LM

390 1557 PREMANANDA SAHU LM

391 1558 CHIRANJIB BANDOPADHYAY LM

392 1561 KARTICK CHANDRA SAMANTA LM

393 1562 SRINIBASA ROUTH LM

394 1564 HIMADRI BOSE LM PPSP

395 1565 NIRMAL MONDAL LM

396 1566 RAMESH CHANDRA MADHU LM

397 1567 SATYABRATA GHOSH LM

398 1568 NIKHIL CHANDRA SARKAR LM

399 1569 SOUVIK BERA 400 11-14

400 1571 SUPARNA SEN LM

401 1572 PRANAB KUMAR BANGAL 200 13,14

402 1573 PRIYABRATA KHAMARU LM

403 1574 SOUMEN MAITY LM

404 1575 KAKALI NASKAR LM

405 1576 KAUSHIK MUKHERJEE LM

406 1577 RAJU CHOWDHURY LM

407 1578 GOUTAM DATTA LM

408 1579 MITESH DASGUPTA LM

Power News v 48





409 1580 ARINDAM NEOGI LM

410 1581 SOUMAVA SARKAR 700 08-14

411 1584 PANKAJ KUMAR SAHOO LM

412 1586 AMIYA KUMAR ADAK LM

413 1587 DWAIPAYAN ACHARYA LM

414 1588 SALIL KANTI DAS LM

415 1589 SREYASI MONDAL LM

416 1590 NANDALAL SARKAR LM

417 1594 ALOKE KR. CHAKRABORTY 200 13,14

418 1597 PARTHA BHATTACHARYA LM

419 1604 ABHIJIT SANYAL LM

420 1605 SARBANI SARKAR LM

421 1606 SANJAY KUMAR DUTTA 300 06,07,14

422 1607 TIRTHANKAR SARKAR 200 13,14

423 1608 NIRMAL KANTI BISWAS 700 08-14

424 1609 SAJAL KRISHNA BAG LM

425 1611 MRINAL KANTI GHOSH LM

426 1612 PRITAM BANERJEE LM

427 1613 BARUN BISWAS LM

428 1614 SOUMYA SAMANTA LM

429 1615 RAJIV LM

430 1616 KAUSHIK BHOWMIK LM

431 1617 MOUPALI MUKHERJEE LM

432 1623 NILOY KUMAR DAS LM

433 1624 SUMAN DAS LM

434 1625 BARUN KUMAR ROY 0 no dues

435 1628 DAYAMOY SHYAM 0 no dues

436 1630 NIRMAL CH. CHAKRABORTY LM

437 1631 JOYDEEP SENGUPTA LM

438 1632 ANJAN KUMAR THAKUR LM

439 1636 ANIRUDDHA PRADHAN LM

440 1637 DIPAK ROY 0 no dues

441 1638 NILADRI GHOSH LM

442 1639 BISHNU DATTA LM

443 1640 SUDIP GHOSH LM

444 1641 BASANTA MALLICK 600 09-14

445 1645 SUBHAJIT SAMANTA LM

446 1646 BISWARUIP SADHUKHAN 300 12-14

447 1647 ABHIJIT PAL LM

448 1648 FARHAN AHMED LM

449 1649 SURYA KANTA KOLEY 1200 03-14

450 1650 UTPAL DHALI LM

451 1654 BIDHAN CHANDRA SARKAR 300 12-14

452 1655 RAJU MONDAL LM

453 1656 SUKUMAR CHAKRABORTY LM

454 1657 DEBABRATA SANTRA 500 05,11-14

455 1658 DEBASHISH PAL LM

456 1659 GOURI MOKHOPADHYAY LM

457 1661 PARIJAT BHATTACHARJEE 100 14

458 1664 BIBHASH CHANDRA TRIPATHI 100 14

459 1665 SOMNATH ROY 1400 01-14

460 1669 ABHAY KUMAR SING LM

461 1671 DIPAK KUMAR MONDAL LM

462 1672 SUMIT CHOWDHURY LM

463 1673 SUJIT KUMAR SAHA 200 13,14

464 1674 ANUBHU DEY LM

465 1676 SADANANDA NASKAR LM

466 1677 CHANCHAL BISWAS 800 07-14

467 1678 SANDIP SAHANA LM

468 1681 DIPAK KUMAR DEY 100 14

469 1686 CHANDRA S. SENGUPTA LM

470 1688 BUDDHADEB DUTTA 300 12-14

471 1690 SHYAMAL KUIMAR HAZRA LM

472 1693 DIPAK KUMAR GHOSH LM

473 1695 SUJOY KUMAR DAS LM

474 1696 AMITAVA CHOWDHURY LM

475 1697 MRIGENDRA KISHOR DUTTA 500 10-14

476 1698 UJJWAL KARMAKAR LM

477 1699 BIPLAB BISWAS LM

478 1701 KARTIK CHANDRA BISWAS LM

479 1703 ANINDYA KISHORE MANNA 100 05-14

480 1706 SHAMBHUNATH MODAK LM

481 1707 D. BHATTACHARYYA LM

482 1712 PRABIR KUMAR BASU 1100 04-14

483 1713 RAJIV NANDAN SINHA LM

484 1715 HARI SANKAR MEDDA 600 09-14

485 1718 SAIBAL MAJUMDER LM

486 1720 SUMANJAN PONDA LM

487 1721 BISEADEV PANDIT LM

488 1722 ABHIJIT BASU LM

489 1723 ABHISHEK KOPARIHA 100 14

490 1724 SURAJIT KUMAR SING LM

491 1725 BIDYUT BISWAS LM

492 1726 NARAYAN CHANDA ROY 500 10-14

493 1727 SUMON DAS LM

494 1728 GOBINDA BISWAS LM

495 1729 MOUSUMI MAHIS(DEY) LM

496 1730 SUBHASHIS DE LM

497 1731 PRASUN BHOUMIK LM

498 1732 DIPANKAR DAS LM

499 1733 SUBRATA ROYCHOUDHURY LM

500 1734 TAPAS CHOWDHURY 100 05-14

501 1735 SHIBU SARKAR LM

502 1736 PARTHA SARATHI DAPHADAR LM

503 1737 KRISHA KUMAR MISRA LM

504 1738 JAYANTI MONDAL LM

505 1739 SNEHASIS SINHA LM

506 1740 TAPASH KUMAR SARKAR LM

507 1741 MANU CHARAN BARMAN LM

508 1742 SUNIL KUMAR LM

509 1743 ADITYA NATH LM

510 1744 SANJIV KUMAR GUPTA LM

511 1745 JIBANLAL MALLICK 300 12-14

512 1747 ARUNAVA GHOSH LM

513 1748 DEBASISH PAL LM

514 1749 GUTAM DUTTA 300 12-14

515 1750 DIBYA KANTI NEOGI LM

516 1751 DIPAK KUMAR BISWAS 300 12-14

517 1752 SUMANTA RAY LM

518 1753 KINKAR SING LM due 100 for 13

519 1754 ASOK KUMAR SAMAL LM

520 1755 DILIP KUMAR SAHA LM

521 1756 SWADHIN GAYAN LM

522 1759 SUSANTA KUMAR ROY LM

523 1760 CHANDAN KUMAR MONDAL LM

524 1761 MANAB DAS LM

525 1762 DEBASHISH CHAKRABORTY 200 13,14

526 1763 AJIT KUMAR LM

Power News v 49





527 1764 SOMNATH DUTTA 700 08-14

528 1765 PRANOY MONDAL LM

529 1766 MARY CHATTERJEE LM

530 1768 AMIYA SANKAR MAHANA 400 11-14

531 1769 SUSHANT GOUTAM LM

532 1770 SHWETA ANAND 700 08-14

533 1771 KAJAL MURMU LM

534 1772 SANTANU ROY LM

535 1773 BIPLAB ROY 400 11-14

536 1774 ARUN KUMAR BISWAS LM

537 1775 AFROJ AHMED LM

538 1776 SUPRATIM PAL LM

539 1777 SHAMPA BISWAS 700 08-14

540 1778 MADHUSUDAN ROY LM

541 1780 RANJIT KUMAR MONDAL LM

542 1781 SOMRAJ ROY LM

543 1782 SAMAPTI MONDAL LM

544 1783 EHHITA MANDI LM

545 1784 RAMKRISHNA PARUI 600 09-14

546 1785 SANTANU MAITY 700 08-14

547 1786 SURYA KANTA BAG 700 08-14

548 1787 RINKI PARUI 700 08-14

549 1788 KAMALIKA BANERJEE 600 09-14

550 1789 JOYDEEP SARKAR LM

551 1790 SUVENDU DALAL LM

552 1791 SAIKAT SEAL 300 12-14

553 1792 ARUP KUMAR MUDI LM

554 1793 MOHAN KISKU LM

555 1794 RATAN CHANDRA BARMAN LM

556 1795 SUBHENDU KUMAR SAHOO 700 08-14

557 1796 GOUTAM ASHISH BISWAS 100 14

558 1797 PANKAJSHREE PRADHAN LM

559 1799 SOUMYAJIT DHARA LM

560 1800 TARA CHANDRA SING LM

561 1801 SAFIQUL ALAM 700 08-14

562 1802 ANIRBAN CHONGDAR LM

563 1803 PARTHA PRATIM MONDAL LM

564 1804 PHURDEN SHERPA 800 07-14

565 1805 DEBABRATA BANIK LM

566 1807 AMIT DAS 100 14

567 1808 DIPTENDU PATRA LM

568 1809 DOLLY DEBNATH LM

569 1810 GOBINDA TALUKDAR 100 14

570 1811 SUBHADEEP BANIK 100 14

571 1812 SANTA ROY 100 14

572 1813 MONOJ KANTI BISWAS 100 14

573 1814 RAJU DAS 800 07-14

574 1815 KISHOR KUMAR 800 07-14

575 1816 BISWAJIT DAS LM

576 1817 SUMIT CHOWDHURY LM

577 1818 SUKHEN HALDER LM

578 1819 SAUVIK SARKAR LM

579 1820 NIHAR BISWAS LM

580 1821 UJJWAL ROY LM

581 1822 SUBHANKAR CHATTERJEE LM

582 1823 AMIT KUMAR PAL 200 13,14

583 1824 ANINDA PATRA 400 11-14

584 1825 AMIT GHOSH 300 12-14

585 1826 SASANKA SARKAR 800 07-14

586 1827 ARABINDA NANDY 800 07-14

587 1828 SHYAMAL KUMAR MONDAL 300 12-14

588 1829 SANJIB ROY LM

589 1830 SUKDEV KUMAR BASRA 200 13,14

590 1831 HARENDRA KUMAR RAM LM

591 1832 BANESWAR DAS 800 07-14

592 1833 BISWAJIT BAGDI 700 08-14

593 1834 CHANDI CHARAN MONDAL LM

594 1835 SOMNATH CHAKRABORTY LM

595 1836 ARUN KUMAR DEV 800 07-14

596 1837 HASIBUR RAHAMAN LM

597 1838 SK. FIROZDUDIN 500 10-14

598 1839 SOMNATH MONDAL 800 07-14

599 1840 RAJESH KUMAR SING 800 07-14

600 1841 SUKRITI RANJAN BAUL 400 07,12,13,14

601 1842 SEKH MILAN 500 07,08,12,13,14

602 1844 PRANIT SUBBA 100 14

603 1845 MASHIUR RAHAMAN 300 12-14

604 1846 HARANATH GHOSH LM

605 1847 ASHISH NATH 0 no dues

606 1848 SUDIP DASMODAK 700 08-14

607 1849 SUDARSHAN SAHA LM

608 1850 PRANAB KUMAR MONDAL LM

609 1851 PRADIP SAMANTA 500 10-14

610 1852 AYAN BASAK 400 07,08,13,14

611 1853 INDRAJIT NASKAR LM

612 1854 DEBABRATA BAIRAGI LM

613 1855 BIMAN SEN LM

614 1856 BISWARUP PAL 700 08-14

615 1857 ASIT KUMAR DE LM

616 1858 ARNAB GIRI 700 08-14

617 1859 SUBRATA KARMAKAR LM

618 1860 SWAPAN KUMAR MONDAL LM

619 1861 RAJAT KUMAR TIKADAR LM

620 1862 SURAJIT SARKAR LM

621 1863 SANJAY KUMAR SIKARI LM

622 1864 ANUP KUMAR DUTTA 800 07-14

623 1865 SARMISTHA PODDAR LM

624 1866 CHANDAN SARKAR LM

625 1867 ANUP KUMAR MANNA 800 07-14

626 1868 GUOUTM MAJI 800 07-14

627 1869 SIDDHESWAR DAS LM

628 1870 RIK PRASAD BISWAS LM

629 1871 SOMNATH TARAFDAR 200 13,14

630 1872 TUHIN MONDAL LM

631 1873 HIMADRI SHEKHAR SARKAR 800 07-14

632 1874 SIBASHISH GHOSH LM

633 1875 NAYAN KUMAR GARAI 800 07-14

634 1876 ARIJIT BHATTACHARYA LM

635 1877 SHUBHAMOY PAL 700 08-14

636 1878 PRANAB ROY 700 08-14

637 1879 PRASANTA KUMAR LAYEK LM

638 1880 USHA CHOWDHURY LM

639 1881 BANIBRATA ROY LM

640 1882 SOUMENDRA KUNDU LM

641 1883 DEBASHISH MONDAL LM

642 1884 UTTAM ADHIKARI 700 08-14

643 1885 SUSANTA PAL LM

644 1886 PRITAM KUMAR BANERJEE 700 08-14

Power News v 50





645 1887 BIDIP RANJAN BARMAN 300 12-14

646 1888 HARANATH GHOSH 800 07-14

647 1889 UTTAM ROY LM

648 1890 SUKANTA CHAKRABORTY LM

649 1891 SRIMAN SAHOO 600 09-14

650 1892 SOURAV CHATTERJEE 600 09-14

651 1893 GOPAL CHANDRA JANA LM

652 1894 TANMAY MAHAPATRA LM

653 1895 ANUP KUMAR NANDI 600 09-14

654 1896 SANTOSH KUMAR 600 09-14

655 1897 SUSHANT KUMAR SWARIES LM

656 1898 BIDYUT BERA LM

657 1899 SANJAY KUMAR 600 08-11,13,14

658 1900 SANDIP KRISHNA SAHA 700 08-14

659 1901 RATHIN SARKAR 700 08-14

660 1902 BALAI SAU 700 08-14

661 1903 SOMPRAKASH MAITY LM

662 1904 ARNAB SAHA 300 12-14

663 1905 RAJESH DAS LM

664 1906 SANJAY MONDAL 100 14

665 1907 SUBHENDU BIKASH MAITY LM

666 1908 TARUN KUMAR GHOSH LM

667 1909 SOURISH SENGUPTA 200 13,14

668 1910 SUKANTA MONDAL LM

669 1911 SAMARES KUNDU 100 14

670 1912 JAYANTA KUMAR BHOWMIK 500 10-14

671 1913 KOUSHIK KUMAR SAHOO LM

672 1914 MARK CHANDRA RAI 700 08-14

673 1915 SUJAY KUMAR DUTTA 700 08-14

674 1916 MANAJ KUMAR 700 08-14

675 1917 SHIB SANKAR SARKAR 700 08-14

676 1918 SAMIR KUMAR PAL LM

677 1919 ANIRBAN MONDAL 700 08-14

678 1920 SANJAY PRASAD LM

679 1921 MONAJIT DUTTA LM

680 1922 PRADIP MAJI 0 no dues

681 1923 NILLOHIT GUPTA LM

682 1924 BARUN CHANDRA SARKAR 600 09-14

683 1925 DIPANKAR NATH GHOSH 300 12-14

684 1926 SANDIP BANERJEE 600 09-14

685 1927 MALAY SIKDAR LM

686 1928 PETER BHOWMICK LM

687 1929 SWARUP KUMAR MAITY LM

688 1930 BIJITESH KIRTANIA LM

689 1931 RANJAN SING LM

690 1932 RAJARSHI CHAKRABORTY LM

691 1933 PRASENJIT GHOSH LM

692 1934 SUMITAVA HAZRA 400 11-14

693 1935 JAYANTA DUTTA 200 13,14

694 1936 DEEPEN KHAWAS 100 14

695 1937 GOLOK MONDAL 400 11-14

696 1938 JAYDEB BHATTACHARJEE 200 13,14

697 1939 SANJAY DEBSHARMA 400 11-14

698 1940 SHUBHAMAY SARKAR 100 14

699 1941 ABHIJIT MUKHERJEE 600 09-14

700 1942 MAINAK GHOSH 400 11-14

701 1943 AJIT KUMAR 400 11-14

702 1944 ANSHUMAN SARKAR 600 09-14

703 1945 HARAN PAL LM

704 1946 SUKUMAR SINGA 200 13,14

705 1947 SANDIP MAJI 300 12-14

706 1948 DUKHABANDHU MURMU 0 no dues

707 1949 MANORANJAN BISWAL 0 no dues

708 1950 SAIKAT KUMAR MONDAL 100 14

709 1951 SUJIT GOLDER LM

710 1952 SUSHANTA KUMAR MAL 0 no dues

711 1953 MRITUNJAY PAL 600 09-14

712 1954 SURAJIT MAITY 400 11-14

713 1955 INGEET MUKERJEE 600 09-14

714 1956 PRAVAS GAYEN LM

715 1957 NARAYAN ROY 600 09-14

716 1958 SIBASHISH GHOSH 600 09-14

717 1959 SABYASACHI MANDAL 500 10-14

718 1960 ASHISH KUMAR MANNA LM

719 1961 SANDIP GHOSH LM

720 1962 PANCHANAN SAHA 500 10-14

721 1963 SADIQUE ISLAM LM

722 1964 MRINAL KANTI BISWAS 600 09-14

723 1965 BISWAJIT DAS LM

724 1967 UTTAM GHORAI 500 10-14

725 1968 BIPLAB DEBNATH 500 10-14

726 1969 AMITABHA DUTTA 400 11-14

727 1970 MALABIKA SARDAR (JANA) 0 no dues

728 1971 ATANU DUTTA LM

729 1972 SAMIR SARDAR LM

730 1973 KUNAL HANSDA 500 10-14

731 1974 DINESH CHANDRA NASKAR LM

732 1975 RAJES DAS 100 14

733 1976 BAPPADITYA CHEL 200 13-14

734 1977 RATHIN KUMAR BISWAS 100 14

735 1978 UTSAB ADITYA LM

736 1979 BISWAJIT MOHANTA LM

737 1980 L.D.SHERPA LM

738 1981 ARIJIT DUTTA 500 10-14

739 1982 DIPANKAR MONDAL LM

740 1983 INDRANIL SEN LM

741 1984 NILKANTHA BISWAS LM

742 1985 PRADIP BISWAS LM

743 1986 SAMIR KANTI GAYEN 500 10-14

744 1987 SANDIP SAHA 500 10-14

745 1988 SUKUMAR SAHANA LM

746 1989 KOUSHIK SAHA 500 10-14

747 1990 SANJAY PURAKOYASTHA 100 14

748 1991 PRANAB DUTTA 100 14

749 1993 PARTHA PRIYA SAHA LM

750 1994 SANDIP MANDAL 500 10-14

751 1995 SONAMONI BAG 100 14

752 1996 ALAMGIR ALAM 300 12-14

753 1997 BIJAY LAKRA 100 14

754 1998 MADAN KUMAR KAMAT 500 10-14

755 1999 UTPAL DAS LM

756 2000 SUBHAJIT SAMAJDER LM

757 2001 SAGARIKA RAY 500 10-14

758 2002 RAJESH KUNDU LM

759 2003 PRASANTA BISWAS 400 11-14

760 2004 ANIMESH HATUI 100 14

761 2005 SANKHADWIP BHATTACHARYYA LM

762 2006 RAMKRISHNA DAS 500 10-14

Power News v 51





763 2007 SUSANTA GHORAI 500 10-14

764 2008 PARTHA SARATHI BARMAN LM

765 2009 ASLAMUDDIN AHAMED 500 10-14

766 2010 KOUSHIK MONDAL LM

767 2011 KARTIK NASKAR 500 10-14

768 2012 MD.MOHIDUL ISLAM HALDER LM

769 2013 DEBJIT PAL LM

770 2014 PREM KUMAR BAKSI 400 07,08,10,11

771 2015 PRADIP CHOWDHURY 500 10-14

772 2016 DIPANKAR LAYEK 500 10-14

773 2017 BIRAJ KISHOR MONDAL LM

774 2018 DEBASIS NAIYA LM

775 2019 SANDIP MAITY LM

776 2020 SUBHENDU KUMAR BARAI LM

777 2021 ILA KOLEY LM

778 2022 DIBYENDU ADHIKARY LM

779 2023 TAPAS KUMAR MONDAL LM

780 2024 SAIKAT POREL 500 10-14

781 2025 DINESH KUMAR KUNDU LM

782 2026 CHANCHAL MONDAL 300 12-14

783 2027 KOUSHIK GHOSH 500 10-14

784 2028 GOBINDA MURMU LM

785 2029 AVIK CHATTOPADHYAY 100 14

786 2030 NARAYAN BHOWMIK 200 13,14

787 2031 SOURAV SIL 500 10-14

788 2032 ASHISH MAJUMDER 500 10-14

789 2033 SUDIP SAMADDER 500 10-14

790 2034 SUMAN SAREN 500 10-14

791 2035 BIDISHNA BHATTACHARYA 500 10-14

792 2036 SUBRATA SAHA 400 11-14

793 2037 ASIT BARAN MALLICK 500 10-14

794 2038 RAJIB KUMAR BASU 400 11-14

795 2039 AMRITA SARKAR LM

796 2040 SUDIPTA HAZRA 500 10-14

797 2041 TANUSREE MUKHERJEE LM

798 2042 TARUN ACHARYA LM

799 2043 SAMBHU NATH HALDER LM

800 2044 KOUSHIK PRAMANIK 100 14

801 2045 SUBHENDU CHAKRABORTY LM

802 2046 KULDIP SAHA LM

803 2047 SABYASACHI BAROI 500 10-14

804 2048 RAJIB KUMAR JANA 300 11,13,14

805 2049 SANJIT CHAKRABORTY 200 13,14

806 2050 AVRADEEP DAS LM

807 2051 CHHOTAN SAHA 300 11,12,13

808 2052 MUKESH KUMAR 300 11,12,13

809 2053 SOUMITRA DEB 100 14

810 2054 DIPANKAR DAS 0 no dues

811 2055 SOUVIK CHAKRABORTY LM

812 2056 AJAY KUMAR SARKAR LM Due Rs. 50/-

813 2057 SOUMEN GHOSH 500 10-14

814 2058 PEMA SHERPA LM

815 2059 AMIT KARMAKAR LM

816 2060 RUPAM MONDAL LM

817 2061 ANUP DAS LM

818 2062 PAYEL MONDAL LM

819 2063 SOURABH DAS LM

820 2064 SANDIP MAJUMDER 500 10-14

821 2065 JAIPUR RAHAMAN MONDAL LM

822 2066 KAUNISH BIJALI LM

823 2067 PANKAJ JANA 500 10-14

824 2068 ANIRBAN SAHA LM

825 2069 KRISHNA GOPAL PANDA LM

826 2070 BIBHAS ROY 300 09,10,14

827 2071 BHASWATI SAHA LM

828 2072 PARIMAL SARKAR 600 09-14

829 2073 SHANKAR HANSDA LM

830 2074 DEBABRATA SAHA 600 09-14

831 2075 SANDIP BURMAN 0 no dues

832 2076 MD. SOHEL HASSAN LM

833 2077 KUMAREDIP SEN 100 14

834 2078 MOUMITA SARKAR LM

835 2079 SUBRATA PRADHAN 500 10-14

836 2080 BRATATI MUKHERJEE LM

837 2081 SHYAMAL KUMAR JOARDAR LM

838 2082 SAURAV KUMAR SAHOO LM

839 2083 SOURAV GHOSH 400 11-14

840 2084 MALAY ROY 100 14

841 2085 SOMNATH BASAK LM

842 2086 ASHIM KRISHNA BISWAS 500 10-14

843 2087 RAKESH ROY LM

844 2088 SANDIP SARKAR LM

845 2089 SUBIR DAS LM

846 2090 TUHIN SOVAN KOLEY LM

847 2091 ARUP KUMAR GHOSHAL LM

848 2092 SANTANU MAITY 400 09,12,13,14

849 2093 SOUMEN MONDAL LM due 150/-

850 2094 HIMACHAL KUNDU LM

851 2095 KRISHNENDU NANDY LM

852 2096 SATYABRATA MURMU 600 09-14

853 2097 SUDHIR KUMAR 600 09-14

854 2098 BAPAN GHOSHAL 600 09-14

855 2099 RADHA NATH PATRA LM

856 2100 AMITAVA MEHETA LM

857 2101 ARINDAM KAR 600 09-14

858 2102 GOPAL KARMAKAR LM

859 2103 MAHUA MONDAL LM

860 2104 PRABIR PAL LM

861 2105 USHA RANJAN CHAKRABORTY 400 11-14

862 2106 BHARATI SING LM

863 2107 SOURAV LAHIRI 100 14

864 2108 MD. SIRAJ HOSSAIN 500 10-14

865 2109 DIBYENDU BISWAS 500 10-14

866 2110 MD. NASIRUDDIN LM

867 2111 NITU KUMARI GUPTA 200 13,14

868 2112 KHOKAN KARMAKAR 600 09-14

869 2113 SUMIT SUBBA 100 14

870 2114 NILADRI BHUSHAN DAS 100 14

871 2115 TENZIN CHOEPLEL LM

872 2116 MUKUNDA NARAYAN SING 200 13,14

873 2117 ANIRUDDHA NATH 100 14

874 2118 SOUMEN KUMAR MONDAL 500 10-14

875 2119 PROSENJIT GHOSH 400 11-14

876 2120 SUBHADEEP BANERJEE 500 10-14

877 2121 BAISHAKHI SAHU LM

878 2122 SUBHENDU BHOR LM

879 2123 PROSENJIT MAITY LM

880 2124 SUSIL KUMAR PANDEY 400 11-14

Power News v 52





881 2125 SUDIPTA DHARA 300 12-14

882 2126 SANTANU SAMANTA LM

883 2127 UTTAM KR. KAR 100 14

884 2128 SOUTIK HALDER 400 11-14

885 2129 SAYANTI SIKDAR (MAJUMDER) LM

886 2130 VIJAY PRASAD LM

887 2131 ANUPAM GHOSH 200 13-14

888 2132 TATHAGATA BARMAN 500 10-14

889 2133 SOURAV BHATTACHARYYA LM BDN

890 2134 MALLIKA DAS NOEGI 400 11-14

891 2135 MAHUA SALIL KANTI BANERJEE 400 11-14

892 2136 SOMNATH GANGULY LM

893 2137 SOUMYA K. CHAKRABORTY LM

894 2138 SANDIP DATTA LM

895 2139 AJAY KR. DAS 300 12-14

896 2140 PRIYA RANJAN DAS LM

897 2141 SUDIPTA CHATTERJEE LM

898 2142 PRODIP MALLICK 200 13,14

899 2143 JOYDEEP SARKAR LM

900 2144 KOUSHIK DAS BISWAS LM

901 2145 BIPLAB KUMAR DAS LM

902 2146 SANTANU NAYEK LM

903 2147 SOURAV PATRA 200 13,14

904 2148 HIMADRI BHOWMIK LM

905 2149 TIRTHA MAL 400 11-14

906 2150 ANINDA ROY LM

907 2151 SANTANU MONDAL LM

908 2152 NILADRI SHEKHAR SIKDAR LM

909 2153 KRISHNA PADA RUHIDAS 400 11-14

910 2154 NABINA NANDA BARIK LM

911 2155 DEBABI DUTTA LM

912 2156 MRINAL KANTI BISWAS LM

913 2157 SUBRATA SAHA LM

914 2158 ABUL KALAM AZAD 100 14

915 2159 SURYA PRAKESH SINGH 300 12-14

916 2160 SOURAV GHOSH 300 12-14

917 2161 SIRIN DUTTA CHOWDHURY 300 12-14

918 2162 SOUMENDU MANDAL LM

919 2163 MD. MINARUL ISLAM LM

920 2164 NIBEDITA GHOSH(CHANDRA) 300 12-14

921 2165 AMIT BARUA LM

922 2166 ASHISH ROY LM

923 2167 PRERNA SRIVASTAVA 300 12-14

924 2168 SURAJIT DASGUPTA 300 12-14

925 2169 DEBASHISH KUMAR 200 13,14

926 2170 PRANAY MUKHAPADHYAY LM

927 2171 BISHWAJIT MONDAL 200 13,14

928 2172 BARUN KUMAR RAJAK 300 12-14

929 2173 PRATAP KANGSA BANIK LM

930 2174 JOYDEEP MANNA 300 12-14

931 2175 SUJIT PATRA 300 12-14

932 2176 KRISHNADHAN CHANDPARI 200 13,14

933 2177 SHIBAJI GHOSH LM

934 2178 SUDIPTA DHARA 100 14

935 2179 JOY ROY 0 no dues

936 2180 ABHISHEKH KUNDU 200 13,14

937 2181 PRADIPTA THAKUR 200 13,14

938 2182 MILAN DAS LM

939 2183 TILAK BAIDYA LM

940 2184 ABHIJIT MIDDER LM

941 2185 NARAYAN DEBNATH 100 14

942 2186 SOMENATH RANA 300 12-14

943 2187 SURYA PRASAD SING 300 12-14

944 2188 DWAIPAYAN CHAKRABORTY LM Due Rs. 100/-

945 2189 ASIT SARKAR 300 12-14

946 2190 AMRITENDU SAMANTA 300 12-14

947 2191 DEBESH CHANDRA SAHOO 300 12-14

948 2192 SAISAB BISWAS LM

949 2193 SAMARENDRA MONDAL 200 13,14

950 2194 GAJADHAR MAHATO 200 13,14

951 2195 ROHIT RANJAN 200 13,14

952 2196 ANGSHUMAN NAG LM

953 2197 SAIBAL SETT 200 13,14

954 2198 NILADRI KUNDU 100 14

955 2199 RONI MITRA 200 13,14

956 2200 ANIKET DAS LM

957 2201 ASADULLAH SHAIKH 200 13,14

958 2202 SUBHANKAR DEB 100 14

959 2203 SANTU DATTA LM

960 2204 RICHA CHATURVEDI 200 13,14

961 2205 RAJIV KUMAR ROY LM

962 2206 BHIMKUMAR GHOSH LM

963 2207 SABIR ALI 100 14

964 2208 ARNAB KUNDU 100 14

965 2209 PRITAM PAUL 200 13,14

966 2210 SUMAN PRASAD 200 13,14

967 2211 AMIT KAR 200 13,14

968 2213 ABHISHEK MALIK 200 13,14

969 2214 DEBOJYOTI GOSWAMI 200 13,14

970 2215 SHIVA PRASAD CHAKRABORTY 200 13,14

971 2216 SUBIR MAJUMDER LM

972 2217 HARANATH GOSWAMI 200 13,14

973 2218 MD. MAJID LM

974 2219 SUMIT SEN LM

975 2220 SOUMITRA MONDAL LM due 50/-

976 2221 SANJIB KR DAS LM 13

977 2222 SUPRAKASH MAITY 100 14

978 2223 BAPPADITYA SAMANTA LM

979 2224 MRINMOY NATH 200 13,14

980 2225 HAFSHA RAHMAN 100 14

981 2226 SAGARIKA MITRA LM

982 2227 KAUSHIK BISWAS LM

983 2228 SAPTARSHI BISWAS 200 13,14

984 2229 KAMAL JANA LM

985 2230 AMLAN SARKAR LM

986 2231 MRINMOY ROY LM

987 2232 AVIJIT CHANDA LM

988 2233 SOURAV SEN 200 13,14

989 2234 IMON CHAKRABORTY 200 13,14

990 2235 ASHOK KUMAR TIWARI 200 13,14

991 2236 SOUMYA DAS 200 13,14

992 2237 ABHIJIT KAR LM due 50/-

993 2238 TUHIN SUBHRA DEY LM due 50/-

994 2239 RAHUL MONDAL LM

995 2240 PARTHA CHAKRABORTY LM

996 2241 SURESH KUMAR SAHA 200 13,14

997 2242 DEBAYAN DE 200 13,14

998 2243 SOUMEN DEBNATH LM

Power News v 53





999 2244 SOURAV CHAKRABORTY 100 14

1000 2245 JAHANGIR SADHUKHAN 100 14

1001 2246 JOYDEEP DAS 200 13,14

1002 2247 SANDIP KUMAR SARKAR 200 13,14

1003 2248 SATYA PRAKASH 100 14

1004 2249 CHANDRASHEKHAR RAPTAN 200 13,14

1005 2250 RAHUL JHA 200 13,14

1006 2251 BHASKAR JYOTI DAS LM

1007 2252 ABHISHEK BOSE LM

1008 2253 SOURAV MUKHERJEE LM

1009 2254 PALASH MAJUMDER 200 13-14

1010 2255 PRATIK GARDI 200 13-14

1011 2256 SATYANANDA PALUI 200 13-14

1012 2257 SHALINI KARMAKAR 200 13-14

1013 2258 RANJENDAR SARKAR 200 13-14

1014 2259 ARKAPRABHA MAJUMDER 200 13-14

1015 2260 RUPAK KABASI 100 14

1016 2261 SHYAMAL JHA LM

1017 2262 KOUSHIK KHAN 200 13,14

1018 2263 DIPAK KUMAR DHIBAR 200 13,14

1019 2264 SOMSHUVRA KAPRI 100 14

1020 2265 SOMDUTTA DAS LM

1021 2266 SOUMMYAJIT BHOWMICK LM

1022 2267 DIPTAM DUTTA LM

1023 2268 KAUSHIK MANDAL LM

1024 2269 BIPUL SINGHA 100 14

1025 2270 SUPRIYA DE 100 14

1026 2271 MINTU MAKHAL 100 14

1027 2272 PALASH DAS LM

1028 2273 DEBAYAN MANDAL LM

1029 2274 MD. ANSAR ALAM LM

1030 2275 AMIT KUMAR SINGH UJJAIN LM

1031 2276 ARNAB SARKAR LM

1032 2277 DEBANJAN BASU LM

1033 2278 BIPLAB PRAMANIK 100 14

1034 2279 TANMOY SAHA 100 14

1035 2280 AHMED RAZA 100 14

1036 2281 NIRMAL KUMAR MONDAL 100 14

1037 2282 SUDIP KUMAR DEY 100 14

1038 2283 SANJOY MONADL LM

1039 2284 JOYETA CHATTERJEE 100 14

1040 2285 VIKASH MALA LM

1041 2286 SAMBUDDHA KARMAKAR 14 14

1042 2287 INDRAJIT BESRA LM

1043 2288 KRISHNENDU MUKHERJEE 100 14

1044 2289 ABHISHEK DEY LM

1045 2290 TANMOY DAS LM

1046 2291 SHAKTI KUMAR SINGH LM

1047 2292 SIDDHARTHA DEY 100 14

1048 2293 SANJIB MONDAL 100 14

1049 2294 SOUMEN DAS LM

1050 2295 JOYDEEP SAHA 100 14

1051 2296 ARINDAM CHAUDHURY LM

1052 2297 SOROOD EQBAL LM

1053 2298 SONAM SAH LM

1054 2299 ANUPAM RAY LM

1055 2300 MUKESH KUMAR 200 13,14

1056 2301 ASHUTOSH KUMAR JHA 100 14

1057 2302 SURAJIT LAHA 100 14

1058 2303 SUDIPTA HALDER 100 14

1059 2304 SUBHABRATA BERA 100 14

1060 2305 AYANANGSHU SAHU LM

1061 2306 ANIRUDHA GUHAROY 200 13-14

1062 2307 JAYASREE PAUL LM

1063 2308 PRADIPTA MONDAL LM

1064 2309 ATANU GHATAK LM

1065 2310 KRISHNA KISKU 100 14

1066 2311 SUSHANTA KUMAR GARAI 100 14

1067 2312 PINAKI DAS LM

1068 2313 PALLAB MONDAL LM

1069 2314 NARYARAN CHANDRA DAS LM

1070 2315 SATADRU PRAMANIK LM

1071 2316 DEBOPRASAD MANDAL LM

1072 2317 PROSENJIT KUNDU 100 14

1073 2318 SUBIR BISWAS 100 14

1074 2319 AVINABA MAJUMDER 100 14

1075 2320 SUBHRA GHOSAL 100 14

1076 2321 JITENDRA PANDEY 0 no dues

1077 2322 POULAMI KARMAKAR 0 no dues

1078 2323 GOUTAM KALA 100 14

1079 2324 SHYAMAL MAZUMDAR 100 14

1080 2325 JITENDRA KR. SAHA LM

1081 2326 BHASKAR MANDAL LM

1082 2327 KAUSTUV DAS LM

1083 2328 SANDIP KR. SARKAR 100 14

1084 2329 RAJIB KR. RAY LM

1085 2330 SONAM JAMTSHO DUKPA LM

1086 2331 SANJIB AGARWAL LM

1087 2332 MD SIJARUZZAMAN LM

1088 2333 SAIDUL ALAM 100 14

1089 2334 ANIMESH PRIYADARSHI 100 14

1090 2335 GOURANGA SUNDAR DE 100 14

1091 2336 SUMAN KR. CHAKRABORTY 0 no dues

1092 2337 DIPTYA SARKAR 0 no dues

1093 2338 SOUVIK DAS 0 no dues

1094 2339 SOMNATH BOSE 0 no dues

1095 2340 DEBASIS NASKAR 0 no dues

1096 2341 SUBHAJIT SAHA 0 no dues

1097 2342 SANDIP MANDAL LM

1098 2343 SUNAN SENGUPTA 100 14

1099 2344 JIGMEE LAMA 100 14

1100 2345 ABHISHEK SAHAI 100 14

1101 2346 KAVITA KUMARI 100 14

1102 2347 AFROZ ALAM 100 14

1103 2348 SUNNY RAJ KISPOTTA LM

1104 2349 MAHABUL HOSSAIN LM

1105 2350 SUBRATA DAS LM

1106 2351 SAYAN MANDAL LM

1107 2352 KALYANBAR SARKAR LM

1108 2353 SANDIP DAS LM

1109 2354 DIPANKAR BISWAS LM

1110 2355 RABISANKAR DAS 100 14

1111 2356 SASWATA KUNDU 100 14

1112 2357 SANTANU MISRA 100 14

1113 2358 UTTAM BARUA LM

1114 2359 ARPITA MANDAL LM

1115 2360 SOUMYADEEP SADHUKHAN LM

1116 2361 ENDADUL MONDAL LM

Power News v 54





1117 2362 LALTU MONDAL LM

1118 2363 KHAGENGRA PR. BANDOPADHAY LM 14

1119 2364 DIPEN CHATTERJEE LM

1120 2365 SOUVANIK CHAKRAVORTY LM

1121 2366 DEBJIT HALDER LM

1122 2367 ALOKE BISWAS LM

1123 2368 SUMAN PAUL LM

1124 2369 PUSPENDU PAL LM

1125 2370 UDDIPAN MAJUMDAR LM

1126 2371 PRANAY KUMAR MAJI LM

1127 2372 ANUPAM PRADHAN LM

1128 2373 SOUMEN PRAMANIK LM

1129 2374 SK NIZAMUL GONI LM

1130 2375 ARGHYA SINHA LM

1131 2376 ARKA MANDAL LM

1132 2377 AVIJIT ROY 100 14

1133 2378 DAWA TAMANG 100 14

1134 2379 HILLOL DAS 100 14

1135 2380 MANAS KUMAR MANDAL 100 14

1136 2381 NIRJHOR ROY 100 14

1137 2382 PEDEN DUKPA LM

1138 2383 PEMA CH LAMA LM

1139 2384 PRANAVESH ROY 100 14

1140 2385 PRATIBHA TSHRING LEPCHA LM

1141 2386 PRATIM KUMAR DATTA 100 14

1142 2387 PROTHIM MANDAL 100 14

1143 2388 ROURAV BASAK 100 14

1144 2389 SANDEEP CHOWDHURY 100 14

1145 2390 SANDEEP TAMANG LM

1146 2391 SHUVAM DAS LM

1147 2392 SOUGATA GHOSH 100 14

1148 2393 SUKLACHARYA BISWAS 100 14

1149 2394 SUMANTA MAJHI LM

1150 2395 SUSAMIR TAMANG 100 14

1151 2396 TAPAN BISWAS LM

1152 2397 ROHIT BANERJEE LM

1153 2398 HEMANT KERKETTE 100 14

1154 2399 SUZU SHERPA LM

1155 2400 SAMIR CHOWDHURI LM

1156 2401 PALASH BISWAS LM

1157 2402 MOUMIT MAJHI LM

1158 2403 BIREN RAY LM

1159 2404 CHANDRIMA SENGUPTA LM

1160 2405 SAIKAT KHAN LM

1161 2406 ARINDAM MONDAL LM

1162 2407 SOUMEN MANDAL LM

1163 2408 AMARESH MALAKAR LM

1164 2409 KOUSHIK SINGHA LM

1165 2410 RAKESH KUNDU LM

1166 2411 PRAKASH JANA LM

1167 2412 ABHISEK SARKAR LM

1168 2413 SHUBHADEEP RAY LM

1169 2414 KRISHNENDU DUTTA LM

1170 2415 SANJIBAN SAHA 100 14

1171 2416 SOURAV PAL 100 14

1172 2417 SAYANTI CHAKRABORTY LM

1173 2418 SOMNATH MONDAL LM

1174 2419 MAHENDRA KUMAR SINGH LM

1175 2420 SAIKAT KUMAR DAS LM

1176 2421 ARIJIT BHATTACHARYA LM

1177 2422 DIPAK DEBNATH LM

1178 2423 MAYANK CHOURASIA LM

1179 2424 NILANJAN KUMAR MONDAL LM

1180 2425 ABHIJIT CHOWDHURY LM

1181 2426 SUMAN ROY LM

1182 2427 ARINDAM SINHA LM

1183 2428 PINTU KUMAR MURMU LM

1184 2429 SOUMYADEEP BISWAS 100 14

1185 2430 SOMENATH DAS 100 14

1186 2431 NAYAN MONDAL LM


1188 2433 SUSHIL SADHUKA LM

1189 2434 GAUTAM BISWAS 100 14

1190 2435 PRITAM LAHIRI 100 14

1191 2436 SANJOY KUMAR DEY 100 14

1192 2437 JAYANTA MAJEE 100 14

1193 2438 BIPLAB MANDI LM

1194 2439 SEKH MD. SUKURALI 100 14

1195 2440 DEBASISH CHATTERJEE 100 14

1196 2441 BISWADEB BISWAS 100 14

1197 2442 SWARNA KAMAL MAITI LM

1198 2443 POOJA MANDAL LM

1199 2444 KRISHNA MONDAL LM

1200 2445 ARNAB BASU LM

1201 2446 SAIKAT DATTA LM

1202 2447 DEBSUNDAR KAR LM

1203 2448 SUMAN MAJUMDER LM

1204 2449 RAJAT BARMAN LM

1205 2450 ABHISHEK BHUIYA LM

1206 2451 SURESH BAGDI LM

1207 2452 ANUPAM DUTTA LM

1208 2453 SK. ABDUL MAHBOOD LM

1209 2454 PARTHA SARATHI LAHA LM

1210 2455 SAPTARSHI DAS LM

1211 2456 SOUMYADIP MUKHERJEE LM

1212 2457 SUBHADIP GHOSH LM

1213 2458 RUPAYAN DAS LM

1214 2459 ABHISHEK DEY 0 no dues

1215 2460 CHANDAN MAITY 0 no dues

1216 2461 SAHEB GHOSH LM

1217 2462 TAPAN SINGHA MAHAPATRA LM

1218 2463 MANIK BYAPARI LM

1219 2464 SUBHANKAR CHOWDHURY LM

1220 2465 SASWATA SEKHAR ROY LM

1221 2466 SK. NAJRUL ISLAM LM

1222 2467 SHAHNAWAZ SHAMIN LM

1223 2468 MITALI CHATTERJEE LM

1224 2469 BIKRAM SARDAR LM

1225 2470 ANKITA SAHA LM

1226 2471 MANAS KUMAR MANDAL LM

1227 2472 TANVIR HASSAN SYED LM

1228 2473 ALIK BANERJEE LM

1229 2474 SOUMANTEE MITRA LM

1230 2475 BISWAJIT BHANJA LM

1231 2476 ABHIJIT KARMAKAR LM

1232 2477 SHUVAYAN GHOSH LM

1233 2478 ABHIJIT PATRA LM

1234 2479 PROMITA ACHARJEE(MALLIK) LM

Power News v 55





1235 2480 KAUSHIK MITRA LM

1236 2481 MADHURIMA MANDAL LM

1237 2482 SANTANU MANDAL LM

1238 2483 MD. JAMIL AKHTAR LM

1239 2484 MD. SHAKIL KHAN LM

1240 2485 AVISEK ROY LM

1241 2486 SANGRAM LAHA LM

1242 2487 TANMOY KUMAR KHAN LM

1243 2488 CHANDAN RAI LM

1244 2489 BIJAN DUARI LM

1245 2490 MITHUN MAJUMDAR LM

1246 2491 SUBHADEEP BANERJEE LM

1247 2492 ARNAB BARUA LM

1248 2493 ANIRUDDHA HAZRA LM

1249 2494 INDRANIL MAJI LM

1250 2495 SUBRATA DAS LM

1251 2496 DEEPAK KUMAR LM

1252 2497 PROSENJIT SARKAR LM

1253 2498 BIBEKANANDA ROY LM

1254 2499 LITAN BISWAS LM

1255 2500 ABHIJIT MONDAL LM

1256 2501 MEHDI HASAN MONDAL LM

1257 2502 MD. SHAHANAWAZ ANSARI LM

1258 2503 PINAKI RANJAN DHALI LM

1259 2504 DEEP BANERJEE 100 14

1260 2505 ANANDA REETO SIL 100 14

1261 2506 SUKANTA DEY 0

1262 2507 SOURAV LAHA 0


1264 2509 TUHIN SADHUKHAN LM

1265 2510 SAIFUDDIN MONDAL LM

1266 2511 USHNISH RANJAN CHATTERJEE LM

1267 2512 AKSHAY BARMAN 0 no dues

1268 2513 DEBASISH MONDAL 0 no dues

1269 2514 SAIKAT DAS LM

1270 2515 RAMIZ RAZA 0 no dues

1271 2516 SUMANA DEY LM

1272 2517 ARNAB DAS LM

1273 2518 SAIKAT DUTTA LM

1274 2519 RAJIB MANDI LM

1275 2520 AYON CHATTERJEE LM

1276 2521 SUBHENDU SARKAR LM

1277 2522 PRASANTA BISWAL LM

1278 2523 ARANYA ROY LM

1279 2524 SNIGDHA MONDAL 0 no dues

1280 2525 SRIPARNA MANDAL LM

1281 2526 AMIT KUMAR BASAK 0 no dues

1282 2527 SANGITA SAHANA 0 no dues

1283 2528 ANKUSH SARKAR 0 no dues

1284 2529 BISWAJIT MITRA 0 no dues

1285 2530 UDDIPTA BHAUMIK 0 no dues

1286 2531 SANTANU CHATTERJEE LM

1287 2532 SANDIP SAHA LM

1288 2533 DALIA PRATIHAR LM

1289 2534 ARPANA SAHA LM

1290 2535 SUBHOJIT MALLICK 0 no dues

1291 2536 SAYAN BHATTACHARYYA LM

1292 2537 ABDUL WAHID MALLICK LM

1293 2538 SAYED PARVEZ ALAM LM

1294 2539 SOURAV DEY LM

1295 2540 DIBENDU NANDI LM

1296 2541 PRASUN BANERJEE LM

1297 2542 SOURADYUTI CHATTERJEE LM

1298 2543 JAYANTA PANDA LM

1299 2544 INATI HANSDA LM

1300 2545 DEBASISH KHAN LM

1301 2546 ABHISHEK SINGH LM

1302 2547 NILADRI SEKHER SAHA LM

1303 2548 DEBRAJ RAKSHIT LM

1304 2549 SUDEB CHANDRA DANA LM

1305 2550 DEBASISH CHAUDHURY LM

Published by Er. Sanjoy Kumar Bhunia, Hony. Secretary, WBSEBEA, Vidyut Bhavan, 2nd Floor, Salt Lake, Kolkata - 700 091.

Publication Sub Committee : Editor - Er. Satyaban Roy, Convenor - Er. Kamalesh Biswas, Members - Er. Rita Chakraborty,

Er. Bibhas Bhattacharya, Er. Biswadeb Pandit, Er. Mousumi Bhowmick, Er. Sujit Nath, Er. Hafsa Rahaman

and Printed by Media SS, Kolkata - 700 029, Phone : 98306 10609

To

Hon'ble Chief Minister

Uttarakhand

Secretariat,

4, Subash Road

Dehradun, Uttarakhand

Sub : Donation by 'WBSEB Engineers' Association' to CM Relief Fund.

Sir,

It is known to all that recent natural disaster has made a lot of damagesto the state of Uttarakhand. We are very much shocked, grieved and thereis no language to console. As a token help we, the 'WBSEB Engineers'Association' would like to donate an amount of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. fiftythousand only) to the 'CM Relief Fund', Uttarakhand. The draft, vide no.464103 dtd. 23.10.13 on UCO Bank, Salt Lake, Sector-II, West Bengal is

attached herewith. Kind acknowledgement of the same is highly solicited.

Thanking you.

Yours faithfully,

(Sanjoy Kr. Bhunia)

Hony. Secretary

WBSEBEA

WEST BENGAL STATE ELECTRICITY

BOARD ENGINEERS’ ASSOCIATIONREGD. NO. S/10987 l VIDYUT BHABAN l 2ND FLOOR l BLOCK : B

SECTOR : II l SALT LAKE CITY l KOLKATA - 700 091

Website : www.wbsebea.in

Ref. WBSEBEA/Admin/2013-14/38 Date : 28.10.13

WEST BENGAL STATE

ELECTRICITY BOARD

ENGINEERS’ ASSOCIATION

Head Quarters - West Bengal State Electricity Board ...

Documents

Transcript of Head Quarters - West Bengal State Electricity Board ...