Juan Rodríguez de Pisa, letrado y humanista granadino, traductor de Pico de la Mirandola
Geographical traceability of Italian white truffle ( Tuber magnatum Pico) by the analysis of...
-
Upload
independent -
Category
Documents
-
view
4 -
download
0
Transcript of Geographical traceability of Italian white truffle ( Tuber magnatum Pico) by the analysis of...
RAPID COMMUNICATIONS IN MASS SPECTROMETRY
Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2008; 22: 3147–3153
) DOI: 10.1002/rcm.3714
Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.comGeographical traceability of Italian white truffle
(Tuber magnatum Pico) by the analysis of volatile
organic compounds
Anna Maria Gioacchini1�, Michele Menotta2, Michele Guescini1, Roberta Saltarelli2,
Paola Ceccaroli2, Antonella Amicucci2, Elena Barbieri1, Giovanna Giomaro3
and Vilberto Stocchi1,2
1Istituto di Ricerca sull’Attivita Motoria, Via I. Maggetti 26, Universita degli Studi di Urbino ‘Carlo Bo’, 61029 Urbino, Italy2Istituto di Chimica Biologica ‘Giorgio Fornaini’, Via A. Saffi 2, University of Urbino ‘Carlo Bo’, 61029 Urbino, Italy3Istituto di Botanica e Orto Botanico ‘Pierina Scaramella’, University of Urbino, 61029 Urbino, Italy
Received 21 April 2008; Revised 14 August 2008; Accepted 15 August 2008
*Correspotivita MoUrbino ‘CE-mail: aContract/
Results are presented that were obtained on the geographic traceability of the white truffle Tuber
magnatum Pico. Solid-phase microextraction coupled to gas chromatography/mass spectrometry
(SPME-GC/MS) was employed to characterize the volatile profile of T. magnatum white truffle
produced in seven geographical areas of Italy. The main components of the volatile fraction were
identified using SPME-GC/MS. Significant differences in the proportion of volatile constituents from
truffles of different geographical areas were detected. The results suggest that, besides genetic
factors, environmental conditions influence the formation of volatile organic compounds. The
mass spectra of the volatile fraction of the samples were used as fingerprints to characterize the
geographical origin. Next, stepwise factorial discriminant analysis afforded a limited number
of characteristic fragment ions that allowed a geographical classification of the truffles studied.
Copyright # 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Truffles are the fruit bodies of hypogeous ascomycetous
fungi which live in symbiosis with the roots of trees, such as
oak, poplar, willow, hazel,1 and some shrubs. The truffles are
appreciated for two important features: for environmental
and forestry applications owing to the advantages that
mycorrhizae provide for host plants and for their unique and
characteristic aroma which clearly provides the economic
value of such edible fungi.2 Among the Tuber species, Tuber
magnatum Pico, the ‘white truffle’, and Tuber melanosporum
Vittad., the ‘black truffle’, are the most appreciated truffles
and they are increasingly in demand by the food market in
many countries. However, T. magnatum fruit bodies are one
of the most expensive delicacies together with caviar and
they have so far been collected prevalently in Italy and in
Croatia, rarely in Slovenia and Hungary, resulting in a
limited availability.3
In the present study, a method that couples headspace
solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) to gas chromatog-
raphy/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) was developed and
applied for the simultaneous determination of volatile
organic compounds (VOCs) in the white truffle
T. magnatum Pico belonging to different geographical areas.
SPME has been successfully utilized to rapidly concentrate
a wide variety of polar and non-polar organic compounds.
ndence to: A. M. Gioacchini, Istituto di Ricerca sull’At-toria, Via I. Maggetti 26, Universita degli Studi diarlo Bo’, 61029 Urbino, [email protected] sponsor: CIPE Project 17/03, Marche Region.
This technique, developed by Pawliszyn,4–8 shows evident
advantages compared with traditional techniques such as
liquid/liquid extraction,9 steam distillation10 and purge and
trap11 techniques combined with GC. SPME has proved to be
a highly sensitive and reproducible, low-cost, relatively
simple, solvent-free method for the extraction of organic
chemicals from different matrices, like aqueous, headspace
and ambient air.
The HS-SPME technique combined with ion trap mass
spectrometry (ITMS),12 capable of producing full-scan mass
spectra at very low concentration levels, allowed a detailed
analysis of VOCs.
In the past few decades, VOCs in truffle aromas have been
analyzed using several methods. Some research has been
devoted to the identification of truffle aroma compounds and
to study the effect of food processing on the original aroma
of different Tuber species.13–19 The most used analytical
techniques to concentrate the volatile compounds of food
aroma have been obviously those based on headspace
analysis. For truffle aroma, techniques such as dynamic
sampling headspace coupled to GC/MS20,21 and purge-and-
trap GC/MS22 have been used to detect black Perigord truffle
and Italian white truffle aromas, respectively. HS-SPME
combined with GC/MS17,23,24 has been used to detect the
volatile sulfur compounds in the aroma of white and black
truffles (T. magnatum and T. melanosporum, respectively).
Vapor and headspace analyses of the VOCs emitted by six
species of French truffles have been carried out a study by
March et al.25
Copyright # 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
3148 A. M. Gioacchini et al.
In the literature, there is no complete agreement about the
compounds responsible for the truffle aroma impact.
White truffle aroma was first analyzed in 1967 by
Fiecchi et al.,26 who indicated bis(methylthio)methane as
the most important component of the odor. Several
subsequent studies identified more sulfur compounds such
as dimethyl sulfide (DMS),27 dimethyl disulfide (DMDS),
dimethyl trisulfide (DMTS), tris(methylthio)methane,
methyl(methylthio)methyl disulfide,17,28 and, in some
samples of white truffle, 1,2,4-trithiolane.17 Recently, Piloni
et al.29 have performed a chemical analysis and odor
evaluation of the Tuber magnatum aroma by GC/MS and
GC/olfactometry (O), respectively. Among 20 compounds
identified by GC/MS, only five sulfur compounds were
detected using the GC/O analysis. DMS odour is likened to
broccoli, cauliflower, truffle and sulfur; bis(methylthio)-
methane has a very strong sulfur gas odour; tris(methylthio)-
methane is described as sulfur and garlic; DMTS and
(methylsulfinyl)(methylthio)methane are described as rot-
ten, cooked turnip and sulfur. These data indicate the key
role of sulfur compounds in the perceived aroma of truffles,
thus distinguishing T. magnatum from other truffle species.
Recently, Aprea et al. have suggested an interesting, rapid
and non-destructive way for the analysis of the aroma of
white truffles based on proton transfer reaction mass
spectrometry (PTR-MS),30 involving also a comparison of
white truffles originating from different Italian regions.
In this work we show the use of SPME-GC/MS combined
with factorial discrimination analysis to characterize the
aromatic profile of truffles and to test their authenticity and
traceability.
We analyzed the fruit bodies of T. magnatum Pico from
seven geographical areas and significant differences were
detected in the proportion of VOCs of truffles. The average
mass spectrum for an entire ion chromatogram acquired over
a period of 50min represented a fingerprint for a Tuber
magnatum species. The resulting fingerprints of truffles of
seven Italian geographical areas were subjected to step-wise
factorial discrimination analysis, considering fragment ions
of each spectrum (40<m/z< 110), potential descriptors of the
composition of the VOCs, leading to the successful
identification of samples.
This method provides an effective approach to the rapid
quality control of the truffle T. magnatum Pico by analysis of
the volatile fraction. The present study represents a first step
for the possible development of a stand-alone device able to
utilize the heightened VOC differences in order to test the
origin of Italian T. magnatum species (portable nano-device).
EXPERIMENTAL
Sample description and preparationFruit bodies of Tuber magnatum from seven Italian geo-
graphical areas were collected in the natural truffle grounds
during three harvesting seasons (2005, 2006 and 2007). In
detail, 27 fruit bodies were harvested from Piedmont, 6 from
central Tuscany, 25 from central Emilia-Romagna, 31 from
the northern part of Marche, 18 from Umbria, 4 from Molise
and 4 from the border region area between Emilia Romagna
Copyright # 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
and Marche. All 116 samples were separately analyzed.
Species identification was confirmed for every single fruit
body on the basis of carpophore morphology and spore
shape, as well as multiple polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
amplification of three fruit bodies taken at random for each
region.31 The truffles were kept at 48C and placed in 50mL
vials (Kimble Glass Inc., Vineland, NJ, USA) sealed with
butyl-Teflon septum caps (Kimble Glass Inc.). The samples
were analyzed within 24 h by SPME-GC/MS and the
analyses were conducted in triplicate. The weight of
ascocarps collected was about 1–3 g.
SPME-GC/MS measurementsSPME extraction was performed with Supelco fibers coated
with three different stationary phases: polydimethylsiloxane
(PDMS, thickness 100mm), polydimethylsiloxane/divinyl-
benzene (PDMS/DVB, thickness 65mm), and divinylben-
zene/Carboxen/polydimethylsiloxane (DVB/CAR/PDMS,
thickness 50/30mm). The fibers were supplied by Supelco
(Bellafonte, PA, USA). The 50/30mm DVB/CAR/PDMS
fiber, the most suitable, was chosen for further method
development.
The method included inserting a new 2-cm 50/30mm
DVB/CAR/PDMS fiber in a manual injection holder
followed by preconditioning before the day’s analyses by
performing two blank injections, at a temperature of 2708C.The volatile components were extracted by the static
headspace method. During this step, each of the fibers
was exposed for 10min in the headspace of the truffle with
the vial maintained at 208C (in a thermostatically controlled
analysis room). The adsorbed molecules were desorbed by
introducing the SPME fiber into the injector of a 3800 gas
chromatograph (Varian, Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA).
The injector, in splitless mode for 2min, was set at 2608C.The VOCs were separated on a CP-Sil 8 CB low-bleed/MS
capillary column with a 5% phenyl/95% dimethylpolysilox-
ane stationary phase (30m long, 0.25mm i.d., film thickness
0.25mm; Chrompack Varian, Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA). The
carrier gas was helium and the column flow was constant
(1mL/min).
The GC oven temperature program was 308C, hold 1min,
18C/min to 408C, hold 2min, 18C/min to 608C, 88C/min to
2008C, 208C/min to 2508C, hold 2min (total run time 55min).
The analyses were performed using a Saturn 2200GC/MS
instrument (Varian, Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA) operating
under electron impact ionization (EI, internal ionization
source) conditions (70 eV, 20mA, ion trap temperature 1808C)with the ion trap operating in scan mode (scan range from
m/z 40–650 at a scan rate of 1 scan/s). Mass calibration was
performed using perfluorotributylamine.
Peak identification of sulfur-containing compounds and
terpenes was based on mass spectral interpretation and on
the standard library NIST ‘98 databank (NIST/EPA/NIH
Mass Spectral Library, version 1.6, USA).
The most suitable SPME sampling conditions were
investigated in our previous study.32 Furthermore, for
extractions performed at 208C, better chromatographic
reproducibility was achieved, and therefore extraction at
Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2008; 22: 3147–3153
DOI: 10.1002/rcm
Geographical traceability of Italian white truffle 3149
this temperature was constantly employed. The extraction
time was fixed at 10min.32
Data analysisThe spectrum obtained from each sample under study was
converted into an average spectrum of the entire chromato-
graphic run byW32search software. Only fragment ionswith
intensity above 0.5% of total relative abundance were
considered to be informative. The ion ranging from 40 to
110 amu was considered useful for species characterization.
Stepwise and simultaneous discriminant analyses were
carried out by SPSS (version 10 base) and in stepwise
analysis both Mahlanobis and Wilks’ lambda methods were
performed. A subset of significant fragments was obtained
setting F probability at 0.05 for entry and at 0.1 for removal.
For each analysis, a cross validation leave-one-out test was
performed. Only the best classification result has been
reported in the present paper.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Among the fibers tested, the dual-layer PDMS/CAR/DVB
was chosen for our experiments. The PDMS/CAR/DVBfiber
is a type of coating in which porous materials such as
Carboxen 1006 (a porous carbon with a surface area of
1200m2/g) and DVB are suspended in the PDMS polymer.
The outer DVB coating captures large molecules, while
smaller and more volatile compounds diffuse through the
DVB layer and are trapped by the inner Carboxen/PDMS
layer. Thus, the dual-layer fiber can efficiently extract a
greater range of analytes than other fibers, which is an
important factor when analyzing unknowns such as the
headspace components of truffle Tuber magnatum fruit
bodies.
Blank runs were conducted, between extractions, with the
chosen fiber, to check for the absence of carry-over which
would cause memory effects and misinterpretation of
results. The effects of various physicochemical parameters
on extraction efficiency were studied in the previous work.32
Using the PDMS/CAR/DVB fiber, we observed that an
exposure time of 10min was sufficient to obtain a high signal
evaluating the sum of the peak areas. We investigated the
influence of fiber exposure temperature (20–1008C) on the
peak area.32 The PDMS/CAR/DVB coating has a higher
extraction efficiency compared to the other twomaterials. For
this reason, an extraction time of 10min at a temperature of
208Cwas selected, with no other preparation step, to estimate
the VOCs by SPME-GC/MS. These extraction conditions
proved satisfactory as regards rapidity, simplicity, sensi-
tivity and repeatability.
Volatile organic compounds extracted under the exper-
imental conditions set previously were identified by SPME-
GC/ITMS analysis. Figure 1 shows the average spectra of
Tuber magnatum from the Emilia Romagna (Fig. 1(a)) and
Piedmont (Fig. 1(b)) regions.
We analyzed a large variety of fruit bodies of T. magnatum
species and we evaluated the potential to compare the VOC
profile of each tuber. We also identified some specific VOC
markers allowing the discrimination of the geographical
origin of the truffle.
Copyright # 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
A large variety of VOCs (alkanes, alcohols, esters,
aldheydes, ketones, terpenes, etc.) of widely ranging polarity
and molecular weight were identified for T. magnatum.
Sulfur-containing compounds present in the headspace of
the truffle under study were identified by matching their
mass spectra with the reference mass spectra of the NIST‘98
mass spectra library. These compounds play an important
role in the aroma of truffles and especially in that of
T. magnatum. The VOC profile of T. magnatum was
dominated by these compounds: the sulfur-containing
compounds including bis(methylthio)methane, dimethyl
sulfide, dimethyl disulfide, dimethyl trisulfide, tris-
(methylthio)methane, methyl(methylthio)methyl disulfide,
and 1,2,4-trithiolane. The presence and abundance of these
volatile molecules with low odor threshold clearly indicate
the key role of sulfur compounds for white truffle aroma,
thus distinguishing T. magnatum from other truffle species.
The fragment ions atm/z 47 (methyl sulfides) and 61 (ethyl
sulfides) are characteristic of these sulfur-containing com-
pounds.33 The fragmentation of VOCs for all compounds of
each fruit body was therefore globally very similar. This
observation is an important finding because the recombina-
tion of ionic species from different volatile compounds
was limited in the developed method. It is very difficult
to elaborate a link between structural elements and the
spectra.
The results of the pattern recognition study are shown in
Fig. 2. The greater classification distance between the diverse
geographical samples was obtained by using the stepwise
Wilks’ lambda methods that selected the fragment ions, as
useful variables to estimate canonical discriminant function,
as follows: 47, 73, 60, 77, 102, 108, 74, 103, 107, 65, 75, 106, 61,
46, 63, 62, 48, 100, 90, 91, 40, 44, 45, 56, 52, 101, 64, 59, 97, 78, 41.
As shown in Table 1, 94.8% of the original grouped cases
were correctly classified. In the cross-validation test, 81.7% of
the cross-validated grouped cases were correctly classified.
Difficult though it is to link a mass fragment of a SPME/
MS spectrum unequivocally to any precise volatile com-
ponent, it is interesting to note that the ion at m/z 47 was
abundantly present in the spectra of sulfur-containing
components.
The molecular origin of these fragment ions can be found
in several compounds identified in the headspace by SPME-
GC/MS. Fragment ions at m/z 56, 103, 60 and 74 are
predominant in the spectra of alcohols, esters and acids; the
ion atm/z 100 is characteristic of aldehydes and alcohols. The
fragment ion at m/z 91 characterizes compounds such as
toluene and xylene and the ion at m/z 78 is typical of the
benzene spectrum. A fragment ion at m/z 48 is observed in
the spectra of methanethiol. The fragment ions at m/z 61, 45,
47 and 62 are characteristic of sulfur-containing compounds
such as methanethiol, dimethyl sulfide, dimethyl disulfide
and dimethyl trisulfide. Fragment ionsm/z 41, 77 and 107 are
present in the spectra of terpenoid compounds. A fragment
ion at m/z 75 is observed in the spectra of thiodiglycol and
diethyltrisulfide. Fragment ions at m/z 106 (2–12%), 63 (9–
36%) and 73 (0.7–4%) are present in the spectra of
(methylthio)acetic acid, benzothiazole and tris(methylthio)-
methane, respectively. Finally, the fragment ions atm/z 45, 61
and 108 are present in bis(methylthio)methane, a compound
Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2008; 22: 3147–3153
DOI: 10.1002/rcm
Figure 1. Average mass spectrum and TIC chromatogram of the Tuber magnatum species from Emilia
Romagna (a) and Piedmont (b).
3150 A. M. Gioacchini et al.
more abundant in Tuber magnatum Pico and mainly
responsible for the odor characteristic of this truffle.
Bertault et al.34 have suggested that environmental
variations rather than genetic factors may explain the
organoleptic differences in black truffles (T. melanosporum)
observed over a geographical area. Thus, the country of
truffle origin should be kept in mind in the comparison of
analyses of VOCs emanating from truffles. As shown in
Tables 2a and 2b, qualitative differences were found among
the truffles in the content of sulfur-containing compounds
Copyright # 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
and the fraction of terpenes. The intra-specific variation in
VOC profiles observed can be attributed to influence of the
geographical origin. Recently, Aprea and collegues30 found
that T. magnatum species fromMarche, Umbria and Tuscany
were well separated from the other Italian regions while the
ascomata harvested in Lazio and Molise were partly
overlapping with the Langhe (Piedmomt) samples. Since
in the literature it is reported that there is a very low genetic
variability within the analyzed Italian populations of
T. magnatum,35 we can hypothesize a correlation between
Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2008; 22: 3147–3153
DOI: 10.1002/rcm
Table 1. Analysis results of the discrimination test
Classification resultsb,c
ragg
Predicted group membership
Total1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Original Count 1 21 4 0 0 0 0 0 252 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 5
3 0 0 16 2 0 0 0 18
4 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 30
5 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4
6 0 0 0 0 0 27 0 27
7 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 6
Ungrouped cases 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
% 1 84,0 16,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 100,0
2 ,0 100,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 100,0
3 ,0 ,0 88,9 11,1 ,0 ,0 ,0 100,0
4 ,0 ,0 ,0 100,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 100,0
5 ,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 100,0 ,0 ,0 100,0
6 ,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 100,0 ,0 100,0
7 ,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 100,0 100,0
Ungrouped cases ,0 ,0 ,0 100,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 100,0
Cross-validateda Count 1 17 4 0 4 0 0 0 25
2 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 5
3 0 1 15 2 0 0 0 18
4 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 30
5 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4
6 0 1 1 0 0 24 1 27
7 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 6
% 1 68,0 16,0 ,0 16,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 100,0
2 80,0 ,0 ,0 20,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 100,0
3 ,0 5,6 83,3 11,1 ,0 ,0 ,0 100,0
4 ,0 ,0 ,0 100,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 100,0
5 ,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 100,0 ,0 ,0 100,0
6 ,0 3,7 3,7 ,0 ,0 88,9 3,7 100,0
7 ,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 33,3 66,7 100,0
a Cross validation is done only for those cases in the analysis. In cross validation, each case is classified by the functions derived from all casesother than that case.b, 94.8% of original grouped cases correctly classified.c 81.7% of cross-validated grouped cases correctly classified.ragg: 1-Emilia Romagna; 2-Border region area between Emilia Romagna and Marche; 3-Umbria; 4-Marche; 5-Molise; 6-Piedmont; 7-Tuscany.
Figure 2. Discriminant analysis plot using ion range from 40 to 110 amu. The analysis
was performed by stepwise Wilks’ lambda methods. 1-Emilia Romagna; þ 2-border
region area between Emilia Romagna and Marche; ~ 3-Umbria; * 4-Marche;
& 5-Molise; 6-Piedmont; 7-Tuscany; ungrouped cases from Marche.
Copyright # 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2008; 22: 3147–3153
DOI: 10.1002/rcm
Geographical traceability of Italian white truffle 3151
Table 2a. The sulfur-containing compounds present in Tuber magnatum from seven different geographical areas
Sulfur-containing compounds
Geographical areas
Umbria Piedmont Marche Emilia Romagna
Border region areabetween Emilia Romagna
and Marche Tuscany Molise
Dimethyl sulfide x x x x x x xAllyl methyl sulfide x — — — — — —Sulfurous acid, isobutyl 2-pentyl ester x — — — — x —Bis(methylthio)methane x x x x x x x1-(Methylthio)pentane x — x — — — —1,2,4-Trithiolane x x x x x x xMethyl(methylthio)methyl disulfide x x x x x x x(Methylsulfinyl)(methylthio)methane x x x x x x xBenzothiazole x — — x x — —2-Methylthioacetic acid x x — — — —3-Methylthiopropional x — — x x — —2-Ethyl-1-hexanethiol x — — — — — —Dimethyl trisulfide x x x x x x xDimethyl disulfide x x x x x x xMethyl pentyl disulfide x — — — — x —Methanethiol — x x x x — —2-Mercaptoethanol — x — — — — x2-Hydroxyethyl propyl sulfide — x — — — — —2,20-Dithiodiethanol — x x x x — —Hydroxybenzene-4-sulfonic acid — x — — — — —Carbonodithioic acid, S,S-dimethyl ester — x — x x — —Tris(methylthio)methane — x x x x x xDiethanol sulfide — x x — x — x4-Cyanothiophenol — x — — — — —Diethyl trisulfide — — x — x — —Thiodiglycol — — x x x — —2-Benzoyl-1,3-dithiane — — — — — x —2,4,6-Trimethylbenzenethiol — — — — — x —
Table 2b. The terpenoid compounds present in Tuber magnatum from seven different geographical areas
Terpenoids
Geographical areas
Umbria Piedmont Marche Emilia RomagnaBorder region area betweenEmilia Romagna and Marche Tuscany Molise
Limonene x x x x x x xGuaiene x x x — x xLongifolene x — — — — x xAlloAromadendrene x — x — x — xLedene x — — — — x —a-Gurjunene x — — — — — —Himachalene x — — — — — —Sylvestrene — x — — — — —Pinene — — x — x — —a-Phellandrene — — — x x — —Camphene — — — x x — —Camphor — — — x x — —Carveol — x — x x x xCedrol — x — — — — —3-Carene — — x — x — —Sabinene — — x — x — —p-Cymene — — x x x x xg-Terpinene — — x — x — —Terpinolene — — x — x — —g-Muurolene — — x — x — —g-Selinene — — x — x — —a-Longipinene — — x x x — xGermacrene D — — x — x — —Cumene hydroperoxide x x — x x — x
Copyright # 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2008; 22: 3147–3153
DOI: 10.1002/rcm
3152 A. M. Gioacchini et al.
Geographical traceability of Italian white truffle 3153
VOC patterns and geographical area. More research is
needed to identify the environmental variables that signifi-
cantly affect the perfume and taste of white truffles.
However, our results indicate that SPME-GC/MS together
with pattern recognition procedures is a very interesting
approach for fruit body classification of T. magnatum from
different geographical areas.
CONCLUSIONS
The static headspace solid-phase microextraction gas
chromatography/mass spectrometry method together
with discriminant analysis offers a very effective means
for characterizing truffles through the analysis of their
volatile fraction. The data analysis is simple and needs no
statistical pre-treatment. Also, the method chosen for the
analysis by SPME-GC/MS is meant to help reduce thermal,
mechanical, and chemical modification of the samples,
thereby reducing the risk of analytical devices. The method
developed allows discrimination among T. magnatum fruit
bodies harvested in different Italian geographical areas.
In particular, the ascomata from Marche, Tuscany and
Piedmont, the most important Italian regions where these
fungi are harvested and sold, can be distinguished.
Furthermore, the truffles from borders between Marche
and Emilia Romagna, regions with very similar pedo-
climatic characteristics, can be separated. This evidence
strengthens the idea that also a very small environmental
variation rather than genetic factors can determine the
differences in the aroma of the white truffle Tuber magnatum.
The results and findings of this study could be of extreme
value in the development of a new diagnostic method and to
produce a set of VOCs markers, offering great potential for
developing new tools for authenticity and traceability of
Italian white truffle, the most hunted and prized culinary
food.
AcknowledgementsThe authors are thankful to Prof. Alessandra Zambonelli of
the University of Bologna, Prof. Bruno Granetti of the Uni-
versity of Perugia, Dr. Anna Maria Ferrara of the Istituto per
le Piante da Legno e l’Ambiente I.P.L.A. S.p.A., Torino,
and Dr. Gianluigi Gregori of the Centro Sperimentale di
Tartuficoltura di Sant’Angelo in Vado for providing samples.
Experimental work was supported by the CIPE Project 17/
03, Marche Region.
Copyright # 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
REFERENCES
1. Harley JL, Smith SE. Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. Academic Press:London, 1983.
2. Amicucci A, Guidi C, Zambonelli A, Potenza L, Stocchi V.J. Sci. Food Agric. 2002; 82: 1391.
3. Mello A, Murat C, Bonfante P. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2006;260: 1.
4. Arthur CL, Pawliszyn J. Anal. Chem. 1990; 62: 2145.5. Zhang Z, Yang M, Pawliszyn J. Anal. Chem. 1994; 66: 844A.6. Arthur C, Killam L, Buchholz K, Pawliszyn J. Anal. Chem.
1992; 64: 1960.7. Lord H, Pawliszyn J. J. Chromatogr. A 2000; 885: 153.8. Pawliszyn J. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 2000; 38: 270.9. Hauser KJ, Zabransky RJ. J. Clin. Microb. 1975; 2: 1.
10. Ney K, Freitag WG. Gordian 1980; 80: 214.11. Clark TJ, Bunch JE. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 1997; 35: 206.12. March RE. J. Mass Spectrom. 1997; 32: 351.13. Bellina-Agostinone C, D’Antonio M, Pacioni G. Mycol. Soc.
1987; 88: 568.14. Talou T, Delmas M, Gaset A. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1987; 35: 774.15. Pacioni G, Bellina-Agostinone C, D’Antonio M. Mycol. Res.
1990; 94: 201.16. Talou T, Gaset A, Delmas M, Kulifaj M, Montant C. Mycol.
Res. 1990; 94: 277.17. Pelusio F, Nilsson T, Montanarella L, Tilio R, Larsen B,
Facchetti S, Madsen JO. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1995; 43: 2138.18. Sides S, Robards K, Helliwell S. Trends Anal. Chem. 2000; 19:
322.19. Splivallo R, Bossi S, Maffei M, Bonfante P. Phytochemistry
2007; 68: 2584.20. Bellesia F, Pinetti A, Bianchi A, Tirillini B. Flavour Fragance J.
1996; 11: 239.21. Bellesia F, Pinetti A, Tirillini B, Bianchi A. Flavour Fragance J.
2001; 16: 1.22. Diaz P, Senorans FJ, Reglero G, Ibanez E. J. Agric. Food Chem.
2002; 50: 6468.23. Diaz P, Ibanez E, Senorans FJ, Reglero G. J. Chromatogr. A
2003; 1017: 207.24. Mauriello G, Marino R, D’Auria M, Cerone G, Rana GL.
J. Chromatogr. Sci. 2004; 42: 299.25. March RE, Richards DS, Ryan RW. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 2006;
249/250: 60.26. Fiecchi A, Galli KienleM, Scala A, Cabella P. Tetrahedron Lett.
1967; 18: 1681.27. Bianco L, Marucchi M, Cossa P. Ind. Alimentari 1988; 27: 518.28. Polesello A, Di Cesare LF, Nani R. Ind. Bevande 1989; 18: 93.29. Piloni M, Tat L, Tonizzo A, Battistutta F. Ital. J. Food Sci. 2005;
17: 463.30. Aprea E, Biasioli F, Carlin S, Versini G, Mark TD, Gasperi F.
Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2007; 21: 2564.31. Amicucci A, Zambonelli A, GiomaroG, Potenza L, Stocchi V.
Mol. Ecol. 1998; 7: 273.32. Gioacchini AM, Menotta M, Bertini L, Rossi I, Zeppa S,
Zambonelli A, Piccoli G, Stocchi V. Rapid Commun. MassSpectrom. 2005; 19: 2365.
33. Pretsch E, Buhlmann P, Affolter C. Structure Determination ofOrganic Compounds – Tables of Spectral Data, (3rd edn).Springer: Heidelberg, 2000.
34. Bertault G, RaymondM, Berthomieu A, Callot G, FernandezD. Nature 1998; 394: 734.
35. Frizzi G, Lalli G,MirandaM, Pacioni G.Mycol. Res. 2001; 105:365.
Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2008; 22: 3147–3153
DOI: 10.1002/rcm