Genetic analysis of greenbug populations from Argentina and Chile based on enzyme variability
-
Upload
independent -
Category
Documents
-
view
1 -
download
0
Transcript of Genetic analysis of greenbug populations from Argentina and Chile based on enzyme variability
SALDÚA, L. et al. Greenbug genetic variability
Genetic analysis of greenbug populations from Argentina and Chile
based on enzyme variability.
SALDÚA Luciana**, María S. TACALITI*, Erica TOCHO**, Anthony F. G.
DIXON *** and Ana M. CASTRO*
* Faculty of Agronomy Sciences, CC31, (1900) La Plata, Argentina;
e-mail: [email protected]
** INFIVE-CONICET, CC 327, (1900) La Plata, Argentina
*** School of Biological Sci. University of East Anglia, Norwich,
U.K., NR4, 7TY, U.K.
ABSTRACT
Twenty-nine Schizaphis graminum (Rondani) populations and sixty clones
collected from very contrasting regions of Argentina and Chile
were investigated electrophoretically. A high degree of enzymatic
polymorphism was found. The enzymatic structure was descript for
the estearase system, founding nine different loci. Latitudinal
stratification was determined and populations were associated into
three groups, according to the latitude there were collected from.
The 90% of loci resulted polymorphic in the first group and 100%
of loci were polymorphic in the rest. Observed heterozygosity was
lower than the expected. None group had fixed alleles according to
Fsr values; group one had a slight heterozygous excess, while the
other groups showed slight positive Fsr values, because there was
a homozygous excess. According to Frt third group showed the
highest value that was in concordance with the highest gene flow
value. There were three populations that could not been joint to
any of the groups. The -carboxyl-estearase was always present,
1
SALDÚA, L. et al. Greenbug genetic variability
also in clones and populations which were located in non
agriculture zones, implicating that the insecticide resistance is
well spread throughout the Argentinean and Chile territory. Non
relationship was found between the enzymatic patterns and the
biotype nor the host species where the aphids were collected from.
KEY WORDS. Schizaphis graminum. Enzyme. Genetic flow. Genetic-
structure. Geographical association.
Análisis genético de poblaciones de pulgón verde colectadas en
Argentina y Chile basado en su variabilidad enzimática.
RESUMEN
Veintitrés poblaciones de Schizaphis graminum (Rondani) y sesenta
clones colectados en regiones muy contrastantes de la Argentina y
Chile fueron investigadas electroforéticamente. Se encontró un
alto grado de polimorfismo enzimático. La estructura enzimática
fue descripta para el sistema estearasa, encontrando nueve loci
diferentes. Se determinó que existe estratificación latitudinal y
las poblaciones fueron asociadas en tres grupos, de acuerdo a la
latitud donde fueron colectadas. El 90% de los loci resultaron
polimórficos en el primer grupo y el 100% de los loci fueron
polimórficos en el resto. La heterocigosidad observada fue menor
que la esperada. Ningún alelo fue fijado, de acuerdo con el valor
del Fsr.. El primer grupo tuvo un ligero exceso de heterocigosis,
2
SALDÚA, L. et al. Greenbug genetic variability
mientras que los demás grupos mostraron valores ligeramente
positivos de Fsr, debido al exceso de homocigosis. Con respecto a
Frt, el tercer grupo mostró un valor alto que estuvo en
concordancia con el alto valor de flujo génico. Tres poblaciones
no pudieron ser incluidas en ningún grupo. Las -carboxil-
estearasas siempre estuvieron presentes, incluso en clones y
poblaciones colectadas en zonas no agrícolas, lo que implica que
la resistencia a insecticidas está ampliamente extendida a lo
largo del territorio argentino y chileno. No se encontró relación
entre el patrón enzimático y el biotipo, así como tampoco con la
especie hospedera de donde fueron colectados los áfidos.
PALABRAS CLAVE. Schizaphis graminum. Enzima. Flujo génico. Estructura
genética. Asociación geográfica
INTRODUCTION
Schizaphis graminum (Rondani) is the most wide spread aphid pest in
Argentina, and has received much attention because of its history
of overcoming host plant resistance and for its wide range of host
species. Greenbug was first detected in 1914 in La Pampa province
in Argentina, currently the aphid is spread throughout the cereal
region. Important outbreaks were recorded in the center of Santa
Fe, Córdoba, La Pampa and south-west of Buenos Aires provinces
(Noriega et al., 2000).
Greenbug damages their hosts producing chlorosis, reduction of
root volume in wheat (Burton, 1986), barley (Arriaga, 1969;
Castro, 1988; Gerloff & Orttman, 1971) oat and sorghum (Castro,
3
SALDÚA, L. et al. Greenbug genetic variability
1987; 1990). It also reduces the aerial biomass of wheat (Burton,
1986), barley and rye (Arriaga, 1956). When early attacks occur in
oats and barley a decrease in the protein of reserve movement from
seed to aerial part of the plant has been recorded (Castro et al.,
1987 and Castro and Rumi, 1987).
Biotypes have been defined as populations within an arthropod
species that differ in their ability to utilize a particular plant
genotype (Smith, 2005). Since 1961, eleven different greenbug
biotypes had been identified in USA by means of injury levels
determined in differential cultivars and species (Puterka &
Peters, 1988; Wood el at., 1961; Teetes et al., 1975; Porter et
al., 1982; Harvey & Hackerrot, 1969). These biotypes had given the
letter designations A-K (Shufran et al. 2000), and the origin and
evolution are still controversial subjects (Porter et al., 1997).
Greenbug biotype C and E were detected in 1988 in Argentina (Ves
Losada, 1987). Noriega et al (2000) identified B and C biotypes in
Buenos Aires and Córdoba provinces, they also reported consistent
evidence that biotype E is present in Buenos Aires. Finally,
biotype F and A were found infesting wheats (Almaraz et al.,
2001).
Genetic variation of aphid aggressiveness has been studied among
clones within ecotypes by means of the coleoptile tests (Giménez
et al., 1991a and b, 1992; Castro et al., 1991, 1994). Greenbug
populations collected from very contrasting ecological regions of
Argentina showed significant differences in reproductive behavior,
lifespan, aggressiveness and host preference (Ramos et al., 1998,
Giménez et al., 1991a,b; Clúa et al 2004).
The relationship between aphid resistance to insecticides and
estearases has been thoroughly confirmed. A major cause of
4
SALDÚA, L. et al. Greenbug genetic variability
insecticide resistance in Myzus persicae is the amplification of
one or two closely related genes encoding the
carboxilesterases E4 and FE4, which hydrolyse and sequester
insecticides (Field & Devonshire, 1998). A wide range of copy
numbers can exist for both genes, which give a proportionate
increase in esterase level and consequent resistance (Field
et al, 1999; Devonshire et al., 1998).In order to obtain indirect information about the existence and
intensity of genetic exchange between different regions and about
the presence of insecticide resistance, the purpose of the current
research is to determine the variability in estearase activity in
greenbug populations collected from very contrasting regions of
Argentina and Chile in autumns and springs since 1987.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Aphid material.
Aphids were collected from contrasting regions of Argentina and
Chile (Clúa et al., 2004) “Table 1”. They were reared on
susceptible barley (‘Malteria Eda’) and maintained at 16:8 LD
photophase, 20ºC of temperature and 50% HR in growth cabinets.
Clones were initiated by allowing a single, isolated female to
reproduce by parthenogenesis. Populations and the derived clones
were kept separately by covering pots with transparent plastic
glass with voile on the top and ladder. These aphids were
5
SALDÚA, L. et al. Greenbug genetic variability
collected on different hosts in the field and maintained during
several months isolated in the insectary.
Approximately 200 individuals from every clone was separated and
collected into an eppendorf tube where they were smashed with a
capillary tube sealed with heat on its tip. The samples were
diluted 1:1 with trisglicina buffer (pH 8,3) and centrifuged at
13.500 rpm for 3 minutes. The supernatant was collected and
diluted 1:1/4 with glycerol and frozen at -20ºC.
Procedures.
In order to determinate the genetic base of different isozyme and
to separate these from allozymes, several specific substrates were
used simultaneously. Activity of estearase was performed in
poliacrylamide gel using 10% acrylamide with both tris-chlorhydric
(pH 8,65) and tris-borate (pH 7,9) buffers in a vertical
electrophoresis system, running at 16 volts for 15 minutes and
subsequently at 8 volts for 2 hours.
The gels were developed for alfa and beta estearase activity,
several subtracts were used to differentiated isozymes from
allozymes (20 ug alfa-naftil acetato, 20 ug beta-naftil acetato,
20 ug alfa-naftil-mirstate, 20 ug beta-naftil-miristate, 20 ug
alfa-naftil-butirate, 20 ug beta-naftil-butirate , 20 ug alfa-
naftil-laurate and 20 ug beta-naftil-laurate dissolved in acetone)
added to 50 mg of fast blue RR salt and diluted in 100 ml 0.1M
sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7,2). The gels were scanned for
analytical studies.
Esterase patterns were determined and identified the allelic
forms. These models were determined by means of high significant
correlation coefficients between electrophorms (PROCOR, SAS, 1998)
6
SALDÚA, L. et al. Greenbug genetic variability
and the genotypes. Data was analyzed with POPGENE 3.2 (Yeh et al.,
1997) and obtained Shanon’s index, observed and calculated
heterozygosities, Fsr, Frt, Fst and gene flow were obtained. The
average Hardy-Weinberg expected and observed heterozygosities were
calculated among clones within populations, populations within
regions and populations within total area.
Preliminary analysis showed that there was a regional structure
(Castro, 1994), consequently the inbreeding effect of population
substructure was assessed with the fixation index (F). The F index
is a useful index of genetic differentiation because it allows an
objective comparison of the overall effects of population
substructures among different clones. This index explains the
reduction in the expected heterozygosity with random mating at any
level of a population hierarchy, related to another, more
inclusive level of the hierarchy. Fsr is the fixation index of the
populations relative to the regional aggregates. Frt is the
proportional reduction in heterozygosity of the regional
aggregates relative to the total combined population. Finally, Fst
compares the least inclusive to the most inclusive levels of the
population hierarchy measuring all effects of population
substructure combined. F values varies from 0 to 1, the last value
indicates fixation for alternative alleles in different
populations (Hartl-Clark, 1997).
Table 1
RESULTS
Bands in the gels were distributed in seven regions (A-G) every
representing different loci “Fig. 1” and a total of ten different
7
SALDÚA, L. et al. Greenbug genetic variability
electrophenotypes were revealed. All studied populations and
clones showed esterase activity.
The first region (A), comprised by A1, A2, A3, revealed a brownish
coloration that did not show enzymatic variability. Three bands
appeared in all the studied genotypes “Fig. 1”. This enzyme
represented a dimorphic protein, being every individual
heterozygous.
The second region (B) is represented by presence or absence of
bands. Two alleles were detected, being one of them null. The B1
band represented the null allele. The B2 bands stained brownish.
The model that matches this pattern was a monomorphic protein.
The third region (C) comprised C1 to C4 bands, stained reddish and
presented seven different patterns composed by none, one or two
electrophorms each. A monomorphic protein with four alleles (C1,
C2, C3 and C4) could explain the activity of this enzyme. The
homozygous individuals presented one or none band, while
heterozygous individuals revealed two bands. All possible
combinations between alleles were presented in the current survey.
(Fig. 1, genotype 5 has C2- C3, genotype 6 has C3- C4, genotype 7
showed C2- C4).
The fourth region, D, (D1 to D5) revealed the activity of alfa
esterase bands by a brownish coloration. Every genotype with none,
one or two bands showed five different allelic forms within all
the homozygous individuals. Ten electrophoretic patterns were
found, that indicated the activity of monomorphic proteins with
five alleles (Figure 1, genotypes: 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5). Although,
two band patterns were also registered, only five combinations of
alleles were present in our clones, representing heterozygous
individuals (Fig. 1, genotype 6- 10).
8
SALDÚA, L. et al. Greenbug genetic variability
Similarly, the fifth region (E) ranged from E1 to E4, revealed
none, one or two bands. Seven different patterns were detected.
The activity of a monomorphic protein with four alleles, one of
them considered null, explained this pattern. Those clones with
none activity represented the null homozygous individuals. Other
clones have only one band (Fig. 1, genotypes 2- 4), while
heterozygous individuals presented two bands combining alleles E2,
E3 and E4 (Fig. 1, genotypes 5, 6, 7).
The sixth region, F (F1 to F3), showed also none, one or two
bands, indicating the activity of monomorphic proteins. The zone
stained light reddish. Probably, homozygous individuals were
represented by none or one band and heterozygous by two bands, by
combining allele F2 and F3.
The last region (G), comprised G1 to G7, revealed by dark-brownish
bands characteristic of alfa carboxyl estearase activity. This
region was present in all the studied genotypes with only one
band. Seven different allelic forms were found representing the
activity of a monomorphic protein.
Ten clones not shared the pattern commonly found in regions E and
F. These two new patterns were considered as two new proteins
different from the previously reported above. In region E1 six
clones (Bordenave 8, Gonzales Chaves 2, Gonzales Chaves 1, Villa
María 2, Teka 4 and Bavio 2) showed a three band pattern that
represented the activity of a dimorphic protein. These individuals
were heterozygous (E122- E123- E133). In region F1, four clones
(Gonzales Chaves 2, 4, 1 and Bordenave 9) revealed a three band
pattern (F122- F123- F133), being all individuals heterozygous.
Fig. 1
9
SALDÚA, L. et al. Greenbug genetic variability
The allelic frequencies of all the studied regions were estimated
“Table 2”. Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was only found for region F1.
All studied loci were found polymorphic, nonetheless not all the
possible allelic combinations were found in our study.
Table 2
First analysis of genetic distance showed that populations could
be joint into three groups by means of similitude index values
“Table 3”. First group was conformed by populations: Salta,
Tucumán, Santiago del Estero, Frías, La Cumbre, Rafaela, and
Córdoba Norte (that were collected from 26º 50´ SL to 31 40´ SL)
“Fig. 2A”. Second group joint the following populations: Paraná,
Córdoba Sur, Villa María, Baradero, Bavio, Malargüe and Temuco
(from 31º 52´SL to 35º 30´SL) “Fig. 2B”. The third group was
represented by Ayacucho, Balcarce, Bordenave, Gonzales Chaves,
Osorno, Miramar, Tres Arroyos, La Dulce, Lonquimay, Cabildo, Bahía
Blanca, Los Alerces, Teka, and Castro (from 37º 08´ SL to 43º 28
´SL) “Fig. 2C”. In the first group, La Cumbre showed significant
differences with the rest of the populations. Baradero belongs to
the first group according to its geographical location, however it
joint the third group. Similarly, Lonquimay joint the rest of the
third group at high genetic distance. Temuco fit into the second
group but is geographically located in the strip corresponding to
the third group (38º 20´LS).
Fig. 2A
Fig. 2B
Fig. 2C
The second and third groups revealed 100% of the loci polymorphic
while the first group has a 90% of polymorphic loci “Table 3”.
Consistently with the values of polymorphic loci the lowest
10
SALDÚA, L. et al. Greenbug genetic variability
Shannon’s index was found in the third group, followed by the
first group and the second raised 0.90. In all the studied groups
the observed heterozygosity was lower than the expected
heterozygosity, this could be explained by the effect of the
homozygous individuals that were the most frequent genotype and
consequently, the observed heterozygosity values dropped due to
the lack of heterozygous individuals.
None group had fixed alleles according to Fsr values “Table 3”;
group one had a slight heterozygous excess, while groups two and
three showed slight positive Fsr values, because there were a
homozygous excess.
Comparing Frt values “Table 3” the first and third groups showed
the highest values, instead the second group differed
significantly from the total, showing the lowest values of Frt.
Fst values “Table 3” showed significantly differences related to
the total expected heterozygosity (higher than 0.25) of the total
populations in all the studied populations. These results agreed
with the calculated gene flow values. The second group had the
highest value contrasting with first group which had the lowest
value, and simultaneously showed the highest Fst with very great
differences to the total populations based on the expected
heterozygosity under Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.
Table 3
DISCUSSION
The present study revealed the existence of variability for
esterase enzyme in Schizaphis graminum contrasting with previous
results (Steiner et al., 1985; Beregovoy & Shark, 1986; Abid et
11
SALDÚA, L. et al. Greenbug genetic variability
al., 1989) and in agreement with Giménez et al. (1991a) and Castro
et al. (1996). The enzymatic structure of greenbug populations of
Argentina and Chile was descript for the esterase system. Nine
different loci were found, only one showed none variability. These
loci were found to be reliably resolved and polymorphic in
preliminary surveys of isozyme variation (Castro et al., 1987).
Kephart (1990) provided helpful information for interpreting
isozyme patterns. Infrequent multimeric association or low enzyme
activity may generate faint bands. In plants with null alleles
that lack enzymatic activity, homozygotes and heterozygotes become
visually indistinguishable in monomorphic proteins, heterozygotes
show unexpected two or four banded phenotypes in dimorphic and
tetramorphic proteins. Furthermore, under certain experimental
conditions, extra ghost bands that show primary bands are present
(Kephart, 1990). Their proposal of the existence of a null allele
in the heterozygous individual is based on the intensity of the
bands in the gels. In the current study it is not possible to
confirm the enzymatic patterns from regions B, C, D, E, F and F1,
because it is not possible to differentiate whether the
individuals that showed only one band are homozygous for this gene
or heterozygous carrying the null allele. In region A the model is
not adjusted to the presence of three monomorphic proteins, due to
the lack of discontinuity between the bands.Instead this could be
a dimorphic protein.
Kephart (1990) proposed that the genetic basis of observed
patterns should be verified by isozyme analysis of progeny arrays
from controlled crosses. In fact, crosses in our aphid populations
are extremely difficult because the number of sexual individuals
is not enough to successfully carry out them.
12
SALDÚA, L. et al. Greenbug genetic variability
Populations and clones were associated into three groups
latitudinal structured, similar results has recently found
by:::::::::(….). It would be possible that day-light conditions
(photoperiod), presence of bottlenecks, regimes of temperature,
etc. could be conditioning the genetic similitude of the studied
populations. There were four exceptions, La Cumbre, Baradero,
Lonquimay and Temuco populations. La Cumbre and Lonquimay did not
have significant similitude to the rest of the studied
populations. La Cumbre could be considered as a different group
and a correlation between the absence of eggs (Clúa et al, 2004)
and the isolation from the rest of the studied populations could
be considered. Lonquimay was collected over 2800 msl with a high
rainfull and very cold winter with wide range between day-night
temperature, although non discontinuity of host species was found
between the valley and the agriculture parcels situated high in
the Andes. This population was characterised to reproduce sexually
by Clúa et al (2004). Nonetheless, there were parthenogenetic
individuals together with others that induced sexual individuals.
Temuco population genetically joint with the second group (from
31º 52´SL to 35º 30´SL), but geographically it is located into the
third group (from 37º 08´ SL to 43º 28´SL). Temuco is located into
the typical cereal winter production region of Chile (central
valley) with very dry summers and a rainfull bellow 700 mm. Insect
populations pass through drastic bottlenecks due to the strong
chemical control and the lack of summer cereal crops.
In the other hand populations from Baradero and Parana were highly
similar to each other due to its geographical location, although
they joint different groups. It was not possible to collect any
greenbug sample in those location situated in-between those
13
SALDÚA, L. et al. Greenbug genetic variability
places, probably there would have been a common origin for these
aphids or a high genetic flux.
It is also important to mention that all the populations were
collected from a very great variety of host species including
cultivated and non-cultivated host species. Non relationship was
found between the host specie where the insects were collected
from and the current genetic analysis of sampled populations.
Clones and populations have been maintained in insectary
conditions reared on susceptible barley since their collection
date, this fact could have conditioned the enzymatic patterns and
probably as it was found by Anstead et al. (2002) a relationship
between recent captured population of Schizaphis graminum and its
hosts might be found.
Studying the biotypes of S. graminum by a molecular phylogenetic
analysis based on the cytochrome oxidase I mitochondrial gene,
Shufran et al (2000), combined with earlier studied of mDNA (Power
et al., 1989), rDNA (Black, 1993) and RAPD (Black et al., 1992),
concluded that the biotypes of S. graminum are probably host-adapted
races. The biotype C was the predominant agricultural biotype
infesting sorghum and wheat found in our populations (Noriega et
al., 2000; Clua et al., 2004). By analyzing the relationship
between the isozymes profiles and greenbug biotypes distinctive
patterns were found, agreeing with Abid (1989), Ramos et al.
(1998) and Noriega (2000). On the contrary, Beregovoy and Starks
(1986) established that few isozyme differences exist between
biotypes B, C, or E. Biotype C that gathered Balcarce population,
Bavio 6, La Dulce 9, Bahia Blanca 1 and 2, Bordenave 6 and 9
(Noriega et al., 2000; Clúa et al., 2004), showed different
14
SALDÚA, L. et al. Greenbug genetic variability
electrophenotypes represented in Figure 1 (i.e. genotypes 2, 1, 1,
3, 2, 5, 5 for the C esterase, respectively).
It is also worth to note that -carboxyl-esterase (Field &
Devonshire, 1998; Field et al, 1999; Devonshire et al., 1998)
was present, also in clones and populations which were
located in non agriculture zones, implicating that the
insecticide resistance is well spread throughout the
Argentinean and Chile territories. Current results show there is genetic variability on the greenbug
populations collected in Argentina and Chile. Every population
revealed alfa carboxyl estearase activity pointing out the
existence of insecticide resistance in our local populations. It
was also possible to identify latitudinal stratification of
greenbug populations. Finally, there was association between the
biotype and the ellectrophoretic pattern of estearases.
LITERATURE CITED
ABID, H.S, S.D KINDLER, S.G. JENSEN, M.A THOMAS-COMPTON & S.M.
SPOMER. 1989. Isozymes characterization of Sorghum aphid species
and greenbug biotypes (Homoptera: Aphididae). Annals of the Entomological
Society of America 82: 303-306.
ALMARAZ, L., H.O CHIDICHIMO & A.M. CASTRO. 2001. Biotype
composition of Argentinean populations of Schizaphis graminum. Proc.
XXIII Chilean Congress of Entomolog, Temuco, Chile, p 2.
ANSTEAD J. A, J. D. BUND & K. A. SHUFRAN. 2002. Mitochondrial DNA
sequence divergence among Schizaphis graminum (Hemiptera: Aphididae)
15
SALDÚA, L. et al. Greenbug genetic variability
clones from cultivated and non-cultivated hosts: haplotype and
host associations. Bulletin of Entomological Research 92: 17-24.
ARRIAGA, H.O. 1956. El centeno Insave FA. Híbrido sintético
resistente a la toxemia del pulgón verde de los cereales. Revista de
la Facultad de Agronomía La Plata XXXII: 190-209.
ARRIAGA, H.O. 1969. Resistance to greenbug toxemia. Barley news 13:
58-60.
BEREGOVOY, V.H. & K.J.L. STARKS. 1986. Enzyme patterns in biotypes
of greenbug Schizaphis graminum (Rondani). (Homoptera:Aphididae).
Journal of Kansas Entomological Society 59: 517-523.
BLACK, W., N. DUTEAU, G. PUTERKA, J. NECHOLS & J. PELLORINI. 1992.
Use of random amplified polimerasa chain reaction (RAPD-PCR) to
detect DNA polymorphism in aphids (Homoptera: Aphidiae). Bulletin of
Entomological Research 82: 151-159.
BLACK, W.C. 1993. Variation in the ribosomal RNA cistron among
host-adapted races of an aphid (Schizaphis graminum). Insect Molecular
Biology 2: 59-69.
BURTON, R.L. 1986. Effect of greenbug (Homoptera: Aphididae)
damage on roots and shoots biomass in wheat seedlings. Journal of
Economic Entomology 79: 633-636.
A.M. CASTRO, C.P. RUMI and H.O ARRIAGA, 1987. Host plant isozymes
profiles of greenbug susceptible and tolerant barley, oats and
sorghum cultivars. Ann. Plant Resistance to Insects Newsletter 13: 39-40.
CASTRO, A.M, C.P. RUMI & H.O. ARRIAGA. 1987. Oat production losses
under greenbug (Schizaphis graminum, Rondani) infestation and forward
recovery. Turrialba 39: 97-105.
CASTRO, A.M & C.P. RUMI. 1987. Greenbug damage on the aerial
vegetative growth of two barley cultivars. Environmental and
Experimental Botany 23 (3): 263-271
16
SALDÚA, L. et al. Greenbug genetic variability
CASTRO, A.M., C.P. RUMI & H.O. ARRIAGA. 1988. Influence of
greenbug on root growth of resistance and susceptible barley
genotypes. Environmental and Experimental Botany 28:61-72.
CASTRO, A.M., C.P. RUMI & H. O. ARRIAGA. 1990. Alteraciones en el
crecimiento radical de cultivares de sorgo infestados con pulgón
verde. Turrialba 41: 166-171.
CASTRO, A.M, C.P. RUMI & H. O. ARRIAGA. 1991. Greenbug effect on
grain yield and seed protein content. Annals Plant Resistance to Insect
Newsletters 16: 67-68.
CASTRO, A.M. 1994. Uso de Hordeum chilensis en la mejora de la
resistencia a áfidos en cereales. Tesis doctoral Universidad de
Valencia- Departamento de Biología.
CASTRO A.M., S. RAMOS, P. FRANGI, D. GIMÉNEZ, A. VASICEK & M.
MUÑOZ. 1996. Variability determined by isozymes between and within
Schizaphis graminum (Rondani) populations. Proc. IV Chilean Congress of
Entomology, Temuco, Chile, p 132.
CLÚA, A., A. M. CASTRO, S. RAMOS, D.O. GIMÉNEZ, A. VASICEK, H.
CHIDICHIMO & A.F.G DIXON. 2004. The biological characteristics and
distribution of Schizaphis graminum and Diuraphis noxia (Hemiptera:
Aphididae) in Argentina and Chile. European Journal of Entomology
101(1): 193–198.
DEVONSHIRE, A.L., L.M. FIELD, S.P. FOSTER, G.D. MOORES, M.S.
WILLIAMSON & R.L. BLACKMAN. 1998. The evolution of insecticide
resistance in the peach-potato aphid, Myzus persicae. Philosophical
Transactions of the Royal Society B 353, 1677-1684.
FIELD, L.M. & A. L. DEVONSHIRE. 1998. Evidence that the E4 and FE4
esterase genes responsible for insecticide resistance in the aphid
Myzus persicae (Sulzer) are part of a gene family. Biochemistry Journal
330, 169- 173.
17
SALDÚA, L. et al. Greenbug genetic variability
FIELD, L.M., R.L. BLACKMAN., TYLER-SMITH. C. & A.L. DEVONSHIRE.
1999. Relationship between amount of esterase and gene copy number
in insecticide-resistant Myzus persicae (Sulzer). Biochemistry Journal
339, 737-742.
GERLOFF, E. & E. ORTMAN. 1971. Physiological changes in barley
induced by feeding stress. Crop Science. 11: 174-176.
GIMÉNEZ, D.O., G.N. BROCCHI, A.M. CASTRO, L.B ALMARAZ & H.O
ARRIAGA. 1991a. Greenbug variability evaluated by isozymes
polymorphisms. Annals Plant Resistance to Insects Newsletter 17: 68-691.
GIMÉNEZ, D.O., G.N. BROCCHI, A.M. CASTRO & L.B. ALMARAZ. 1991b.
Biological test: screening greenbug aggressiveness and barley
cultivar resistance by the coleoptile growth. Proc. XIX Plant Physiology
National Meeting, Córdoba, Argentina, pp 33-34.
GIMÉNEZ D.O, G.O BROCCHIO, A.M CASTRO, L.B ALMARAZ & H.O. ARRIAGA.
1992. The development of new biological test. Annals Plant Resistance to
Insect Newsletters 18:53.
HARTL, D.L. & A.J. CLARK. 1997. Principles of Population Genetics.
3rd editon. Sunderland, MA, Sinauer Associates. p 542.
HARVEY, T. K & H.L. HACKEROTT. 1969. Recognition of a greenbug
biotype injurious to sorghum. Journal of Economic Entomology 12: 776-
779.
KEPHART, S.R. 1990. Starch gel electrophoresis of plant isozymes:
a comparative analysis of techniques. American Journal of Botany
77 (5): 693-712.
NEI, M. 1987. Molecular Evolutionary Genetics/ Masatoshi Nei. New
York: Columbia University Press, p 176-187.
NORIEGA, A., H. CHIDICHIMO & A.M. CASTRO. 2000. Determination of
biotypes in three populations of greenbug collected in three
18
SALDÚA, L. et al. Greenbug genetic variability
localities of cereal producing area in Argentina. Revista de La Facultad
de Agronomía, La Plata, 104(2): 85-92.
PORTER, K.G., G. L. PETERSON & O.VISE. 1982. A new greenbug
biotype. Crop Science 22, 847-850.
PORTER, D.R., J.D. BURD, SHUFRAN, K.A, J.A. WEBSTER & G.L. TEETES.
1997. Greenbug (Homoptera: Aphididae) biotypes: select by
resistance cultivars or preadapted opportunists? Journal of Economic
Entomology 90: 1055-1065.
POWER, T.O, S.G. JENSEN, S.D. KINDLER, C.J. STRYKER & L.J. SANDAL.
1989. Motochondrial DNA divergence among greenbug (Homoptera:
Aphididae) biotypes. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 82: 298-
302.
PUTERKA, G.J & D.C. PETERS. 1988. Rapid techniques for determining
greenbug (Homoptera: Aphididae) biotypes B, C, E and F. Journal of
Economic Entomology 81: 396-399.
RAMOS, S., H.O. CHIDICHIMO & A.M CASTRO. 1998: Evaluation of
antibiosis to aisolates of greenbug (Schizaphis graminum, Rond.) in
differential cultivars. Proc. XIX Congress of Entomology, Rio de Janeiro,
Brasil, p 300.
SHUFRAN, K.A, J.D. BURD, J.A. ANSTEAD & G. LUSHAI. 2000.
Mitocondrial DNA sequence divergence among greenbug (Homoptera:
Aphididae) biotypes: evidence for host-adapted races. Insect Molecular
Biology 9 (2): 179-184.
SMITH, C.M. 2005. Plant resistance to arthropods: molecular and
conventional approaches. Springer Science & Business, p 423.
STEINER, W.W.M., D.J. VOEGTLIN & M.E. IRWIN. 1985. Genetic
differentiation and its bearing on migration in North America
population of corn leaf aphid, Rhopalosiphum maidis (Fitch)
19
SALDÚA, L. et al. Greenbug genetic variability
(Homoptera:Aphididae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 78: 518-
525.
TEETES, G. A., C.A. SCHAEFER, J.R. GIPSON, R.C. MCINTYRE & E.E.
LATHAN. 1975. Greenbug resistance to organophsphorus insecticide
on the Texas high plains. Journal of Economic Entomology 68: 214-216.
VES LOSADA, J.C. 1987. Determinación de un nuevo biotipos del
pulgón verde de los cereales en Argentina. Estación Experimental
Agropecuaria Anguil. Anguil, La Pampa. Publicación Técnica 40: 1-11.
ISSN 0325-2132.
WOOD, E.A. 1961. Biologycal studies of a new greenbug biotype.
Journal of Economic Entomology 54: 1171-1173.
YEH, F.C., R-C. YANG, T.B.J. BOYLE, Z-H. YE & J.X. MAO. 1997.
POPGENE, the user-friendly shareware for population genetic
analysis. Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Centre, University
of Alberta, Canada.
Table 1: Region of collection, geographical coordinates (GPS Data)
and host plant of each greenbug (Schizaphis graminum) population
Population CoordinatesS. L. W.L.
Host Plants
1. Salta 24°40´ 65°03´ Sorghum halepense2. Tucumán 26°50´ 65°12´ Sorghum halepense3. Santiago delEstero
27°48´ 61º 35´ Sorghum halepense
4. Frías 28°39´ 65°09´ Sorghum halepense5. La Cumbre 30°59´ 64°29´ Hordeum sp
Bromus sp.6. Rafaela 31°10´ 61°28´ Sorghum sp.7. Paraná 31°52’ 60° 29’ Triticum sp.
Sorghum sp.Bromus sp.
20
SALDÚA, L. et al. Greenbug genetic variability
8. Córdoba Norte
31°40’ 62° 20’ Sorghum sp.Avena sp.
9. Córdoba Sur 32°40’ 60° 53’ Hordeum vulgareAvena sp.
10. Villa María 32°25’ 63° 15’ Avena sp.11. Baradero 33°49´ 59°30´ Sorghum sp.
Avena sp.12. Los Hornos 34°55’ 57° 57’ Avena sp.
Hordeum vulgarePoa sp
13. B. Bavio 35°05’ 57° 44’ Avena sp. Sorghum sp.Hordeum sp.
14. Malargüe 35°30’ 69° 35’ Secale cerealeBromas sp.
Hordeum sp.15. Ayacucho 37°08’ 58° 29’ Hordeum sp.
Poa sp.16. Balcarce 37°50’ 58° 17’ Triticum sp.
Hordeum vulgareTriticosecale
17.Bordenave 37°51’ 63° 01’ Hordeum vulgareAvena sp.
Secale cerealeTriticosecale
Triticum sp.Bromus sp.
18. G. Chaves 38°02’ 60° 05’ Avena sativaHordeum vulgareTriticum aestivumTriticum durum
19. Osorno (CH)1
38°13’ 72° 20’ Secale cerealeTriticum sp.
20. Miramar 38°15’ 57° 50’ Triticum sp.Hordeum vulgare
Bromus sp.21. Tres Arroyos
38°23’ 60° 17’ T.aestivumT. durum
Triticosecale Hordeum vulgare
22. La Dulce 38°25’ 58° 42’ Avena sp.Hordeum vulgare
Triticum sp.23. Lonquimay (CH) 1
38°26’ 71° 21’ Avena sp.
24.Temuco (CH)1 38°20´ 72°20´ Triticum sp.
21
SALDÚA, L. et al. Greenbug genetic variability
Avena sp.25. Cabildo 38°30’ 61° 54’ Triticum sp.
Tritordeum26. Teka 43°28’ 70° 50’ Triticum sp.
Bromus sp.27. Bahía Blanca
42°29’ 61° 55’ Triticum sp.
28. Castro (CH)1
42°29´ 73°45´ Dactylis sp.
29. Los Alerces 42°55’ 71° 20’ Triticum sp.1CH: Chile
Table 2: Allelic frequencies of estearase loci determined for
populations and clones of Schizaphis graminum Regio
n
Null
Allele
Allel
e 1
Allel
e 2
Allel
e 3
Allel
e 4
Allel
e 5
Allel
e 6
Allele
7
A 0 0.5 0.5 0 0 0 0 0
B 0.28 0.71 0 0 0 0 0 0
C 0.24 0.34 0.34 0.08 0 0 0 0
D 0.24 0.16 0.28 0.16 0.16 0 0 0
E 0.23 0.19 0.41 0.16 0 0 0 0
E1 0 0.5 0.5 0 0 0 0 0
F 0.25 0.26 0.40 0 0 0 0 0
F1 0.74 0.233
8
0.024 0 0 0 0 0
G 0 0.015 0.09 0.22 0.22 0.317 0.015 0.11
22
SALDÚA, L. et al. Greenbug genetic variability
Table 3: Percentage of gene polymorphism, observe and expected
heterozygocity, Fsr, Frt, Fst and gene flow for the three groups
of Schizaphis graminum, following Nei (1987).
Group %Gene
Polymorphi
sm
Shannon
Index
Obser.
Hetrozygosity
Expec.Heterozygo
sity
Fsr Frt Fst Gene
Flow
1 90 0.82 0.28 0.47 -
0.1
5
0.4
9
0.4
1
0.2
6
2 100 0.90 0.28 0.50 0.1
8
0.2
3
0.3
8
0.8
0
3 100 0.95 0.28 0.54 0.0
7
0.4
6
0.4
1
0.3
5
Figure 1: Enzymatic patterns for nine loci of Schizaphis graminum with
the description of the found genotypes in sampled populations and
clones.
Electrophenotypes Region 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
A ------A1------A2
23
SALDÚA, L. et al. Greenbug genetic variability
------A3
B B1 B2
C C1
C2
C3
C4
------C2------C3
------C3------C4
------C2
------C4
D D1 D2
D3
D4
D5
------D2------D3
-------D2
-------D4
------D2
------D5
-------D3-------D4
-------D3
-------D5
E E1 E2
E3
E4
-------E2-------E3
-------E2
-------E4
-------E3-------E4
E1 ------E122------E123------E133
F F1 F2
F3--------F2--------F3
F1 F11
------F122------F123------F133
G
G1
G2
G3
G4
G5
G6 G7
In this figure, and ---- indicate different band intensities
24
SALDÚA, L. et al. Greenbug genetic variability
Figure 2: Genotypes grouping of greenbug clones and populations
collected in Argentina and Chile, by means of similitude index
values A: Sampled collected between 26º 50´ SL to 31° 40´ SL. B:
Aphids collected between 31° 52´SL to 35º 30´SL. C: Aphids
collected between 37º 08´ SL to 43º 28´SL.
Figure 2A: Group 1
Pop3 Pop6 Pop8 Pop2 Pop1 Pop11 Pop4 Pop5
25
SALDÚA, L. et al. Greenbug genetic variability
Figure 2B: Group 2
Pop14 Pop9 Pop13 Pop24 Pop10 Pop7 Pop12
Figura 2C: Group 3
Pop22 Pop26 Pop17 Pop18 Pop29 Pop21 Pop27 Pop28 Pop15 Pop19 Pop16
26