Full Board Packet 05_21_2019.pdf - Brown County

BOARD OF BROWN COUNTY COMMISSIONERS REGULAR MEETING –May 21, 2019

AGENDA:

9:00 AM 1. Approve County Board Official Proceedings and Synopsis of 05-07-19

9:01 AM Sheriff Jason Seidl Chief Deputy Steve Depew 2. Monthly Report of Activity 9:03 AM Auditor/Treasurer Jean Prochniak 3. General Government Claims 4. Cash Management/Investment Report 5. Resolution−Delegate Authority for EFT Transfers to the Auditor/Treasurer 9:08 AM Auditor/Treasurer Jean Prochniak Assistant Highway Engineer Andrew Lang 6. Drainage Ditch Repair Requests 9:10 AM Highway Engineer Wayne Stevens Assistant Highway Engineer Andrew Lang 7. SAP 008-607-014 Shoulder Widen & Regrade Project on CSAH 7 8. Storm Sewer Repair Project on CSAH 29 9:15 AM Assistant Zoning Administrator Robert Santaella Feedlot Technician Amanda Lang 9. 2018 Annual County Feedlot Report 9:20 AM Public Health Director Karen Moritz 10. Public Health Update 9:30 AM HR Director Ruth Schaefer 11. Public Health RN Resignation 12. Appoint 2019 Summer Highway Engineering/Maintenance Student 13. Salary Administration Plan 9:55 AM BREAK 10:00 AM Zoning Administrator Laine Sletta 14. Planning Commission Recommendations

B r o w n C o u n t y , M i n n e s o t a B o a r d o f C o m m i s s i o n e r s

P.O. Box 248 Center & State Streets New Ulm, MN 56073 Telephone (507) 233-6600

District 1: David Borchert

405 South Broadway St. New Ulm, MN 56073

District 2: Anton Berg

20218 195th Ave New Ulm, MN 56073

District 3: Scott Windschitl 10 Doris Drive

New Ulm, MN 56073

District 4: Dean Simonsen 28711 310th Ave.

Sleepy Eye, MN 56085

District 5: Jeff Veerkamp

205 East George St. Comfrey, MN 56019

10:30 AM Auditor/Treasurer Jean Prochniak 15. Selection of Audit Firm 11:00 AM Auditor/Treasurer Jean Prochniak Highway Engineer Wayne Stevens 16. PUBLIC HEARING – Consolidation of Lateral 11A to CD 5 and

Redetermination of Benefits CD 5 11:15 AM Auditor/Treasurer Jean Prochniak 17. PUBLIC HEARING – Redetermination of Benefits CD 72 11:40 AM Human Services Director Tom Henderson 18. Payment of Human Services Claims 11:45 AM 19. CLOSED SESSION – Social Service Payments 11:50 AM County Administrator Charles Enter 20. April 2019 Budget Report 21. Other Business

22. Correspondence C-1 thru C-4 23. Coordinate Calendar Events

24. Adjournment Additional items may be added as Addenda and approved with Agenda or with a Suspension of Rules

NEXT COUNTY BOARD MEETING DATES

05-28-19 06-04-19 06-18-19 06-25-19

County Administrator’s E-Mail Address: [email protected] Home Page Address: www.co.brown.mn.us

mailto:[email protected]

http://www.co.brown.mn.us/

May 7, 2019

75

At 9:00 AM, on Tuesday, May 7, 2019, the Board of Brown County Commissioners met in Regular Session in Room #204 of the Brown County Courthouse located in New Ulm, Minnesota 56073. Commissioners present were David Borchert, Anton Berg, Scott Windschitl, Dean Simonsen, and Jeff Veerkamp along with County Administrator Charles Enter and County Attorney Charles Hanson. Also present was County Administrator-Designee Sam Hansen. NUCAT staff was present, and Media Representatives Abby Berg of KNUJ Radio and Fritz Busch of the Journal (at 9:08 AM) were also present.

______________________________ Chairman Borchert convened the Regular Meeting at 9:00 AM, at which time the printed agenda was accepted along with the following addenda: 25a) Appraiser Resignation; 25b) PAC Pointing of License Bureau Technician Position Description; 25c) License Bureau Technician Appointment; C-9) South Country Health Alliance Capital Call Final Payment; C-10) Commissioner Berg report with Commissioner Windschitl on the Ad Hoc Audit Committee, with Commissioner Simonsen on CD#5 meetings, and with all Commissioners on the Hazard Mitigation work session; C-11) Commissioner Windschitl reports on Drug Court, Enterprise North, and South Country Health Alliance; C-12) Commissioner Simonsen report on the Underage Substance Abuse Coalition; C-13) Commissioner Veerkamp report on the Redwood-Cottonwood Rivers Control Area, Area II, and the Community Health Board meeting.

______________________________ A motion was offered by Commissioner Berg, and was seconded by Commissioner Simonsen, to accept the Minutes of 04-23-2019 and authorize publication of the Synopsis of same. This motion carried unanimously.

______________________________ At 9:02 AM, a motion was offered by Commissioner Windschitl, and was seconded by Commissioner Berg, to schedule a closed session for labor negotiation strategy planning to be held in the Commissioners Room 204 of the Brown County Courthouse, New Ulm, MN at approximately 10:40 AM this date 5-7-2019 for the AFSCME Courthouse and Highway Collective Bargaining Units, and for the LELS Locals #94 and #98 Collective Bargaining Units, pursuant to M.S. 13D.03. The motion passed unanimously.

______________________________ At 9:04 AM, Auditor/Treasurer Jean Prochniak met with the County Board. A motion was offered by Commissioner Windschitl, and was seconded by Commissioner Simonsen, to authorize payment of General Government claims in the amount of $341,581.50 as follows: Revenue $275,631.72 Public Health $1,803.59 Road and Bridge $27,477.70 Human Services $770.23 Park Fund $1,334.12 Ditch $7,650.05 Capital Improvement Fund $3,679.00 Landfill $22,492.57 Score $232.52 Forfeited Tax Fund $510.00 In accordance with MS 375.12, the following claims exceeding $2,000 are included in the Fund totals above: Area II MN River Basin Projects $12,971.00; Bode Collision & Glass $2,923.00; Bridging Brown County $3,250.00; Brown Co Agricultural Society $14,250.00; Brown Co Editorial Assn $5,679.66; Brown Co Historical Society $45,713.50; Brown Co Humane Society $4,037.50; Brown Co Library Board $40,757.50; Brown Co Soil & Water Cons Dist $48,700.00; Erickson Engineering Co, LLC $7,172.00; GEI Consultants Inc $8,769.25; Gemini Research $3,321.24; Hildi Inc $3,600.00; I & S Group Inc $6,438.00; Liberty Tire Recycling LLC $3,572.53; Miesen's Color Center $7,997.00; Mn Valley Action Council $3,317.00; Mn Valley Testing Laboratories $5,742.10; Optics Planet Inc $3,592.4; Ranger Chevrolet - Cadillac $36,448.16; Red Rock Quarry $9,414.32; River Bend Business Products $8,648.78; Ron'S Recycling $2,680.00; Trane U.S. Inc $3,346.25 101 Payments Less Than $2000.00 49,240.31; Final Total: $341,581.50. This motion carried unanimously.

______________________________ At 9:08 AM, Highway Engineer Wayne Stevens and Assistant Engineer Andrew Lang met with the County Board. A motion was offered by Commissioner Berg, and was seconded by Commissioner Borchert, to authorize the Highway Department to request quotes for the replacement of 2500 feet of tile in CD#58. This motion carried unanimously.

______________________________

gbode

Typewritten Text

# 1a

gbode

Oval

gbode

Draft

May 7, 2019

76

A motion was offered by Commissioner Simonsen, and was seconded by Commissioner Berg, to approve the following Drainage Repair request and the payment of said repair as follows: System Repair # Order Branch Twp Section Repair Type Percentage Cost CD68 18-172 1 957 Sigel 33 Blowout 100 $1,223.46

This motion carried unanimously.

______________________________ A motion was offered by Commissioner Windschitl, and was seconded by Commissioner Berg, to accept the quote received from Sondag Services for buffer strip seeding in the total amount of $20,738.82 for approximately 191 total acres to include buffer areas of CD#4, CD#5, CD#10, CD#12, CD#13, CD#45, CD#57, CD#60, and CD#69. This motion carried unanimously. Three other bids were received from Erosion Control Plus in the amount of $29,240.01; Evergreen Companies in the amount of $35,399.83; and Ibberson Lawn Care in the amount of $56,752.58.

______________________________ A motion was offered by Commissioner Berg, and was seconded by Commissioner Veerkamp, to award the SAP 008-624-036 Surface Rehabilitation Projects on CSAH 24 to M.R. Paving & Excavating, Inc. in the amount of $140,748.74. This motion carried unanimously. Other bids were also received from OMG Midwest Inc. d/b/a Southern MN Construction Co., Inc. in the amount of $164,340.75; Central Specialties Inc. in the amount of $168,357.00 and Duininck, Inc. in the amount of $170,759.50.

______________________________ A motion was offered by Commissioner Simonsen, and was seconded by Commissioner Veerkamp, to accept the quote received for maintenance striping of 164 road miles in Brown County from AAA Striping Service in the amount of $92,735. This motion carried unanimously. One other bid was received from Traffic Marking Services in the amount of $98,132.

______________________________ A motion was offered by Commissioner Berg, and was seconded by Commissioner Borchert, to approve the request from the City of New Ulm to close a portion of CSAH 13 (Center Street) between Garden Street and Highland Avenue on 9-7-2019 from approximately 8:15 PM to 9:00 PM for a fireworks show during the Hermannfest celebration, noting that the City of New Ulm approved said request on 4-16-2019. This motion carried unanimously.

______________________________ A motion was offered by Commissioner Windschitl, and was seconded by Commissioner Simonsen, to accept and file the Highway Department Monthly Update for Construction Projects and Maintenance Projects. This motion carried unanimously.

______________________________ At 9:29 AM, Water Planner Andrew Meyer met with the County Board. A motion was offered by Commissioner Simonsen, and was seconded by Commissioner Berg, to approve the Amendment to Attachment A between the MN Department of Agriculture and Brown County AgBMP Loan Program – Multiple Lender System – Agreement #M6892 in the revised 2019 award amount of $700,000. This motion carried unanimously.

______________________________ At 9:33 AM, Assistant Probation Director Evonne Westcott met with the County Board. A motion was offered by Commissioner Simonsen, and seconded by Commissioner Winschitl, to approve the FY2020 and FY2021 Remote Electronic Alcohol Monitoring (REAM) Grant Agreement (Contract #155460/3-110810) in the amount of $13,000 each year between Brown County Probation and the Minnesota Department of Corrections, and authorize the County Board Chair and Assistant Probation Director to sign same on behalf of Brown County. This motion carried unanimously.

______________________________

May 7, 2019

77

At 9:37 AM, Probation Director Les Schultz met with the County Board. A motion was offered by Commissioner Windschitl, and seconded by Commissioner Berg, to approve the State of MN Grant Agreement #155714/3-110982 for Caseload/Workload programming for FY 2020 in the amount of $62,750 and for FY 2021 in the amount of $62,750; and authorize the County Board Chair and Probation Director to sign same on behalf of Brown County. This motion carried unanimously.

______________________________ At 9:47 AM, Public Health Director Karen Moritz and Public Health Administrative Supervisor Ann Gieseke met with the County Board. A motion was offered by Commissioner Windschitl, and was seconded by Commissioner Berg, to authorize the discontinuation of the Brown County Public Health Home Care Program with a sunset date of 7-15-2019, with the understanding that the Adult Health Program areas will include Jail Health, Public Health Nurse Clinic, SCHA Care Coordination, SCHA Connector, Community Health Education, MN Choice Assessments, Coalition and Community Engagement, Community Health Assessment, Community Health Improvement Planning, Quality Improvement, Performance Measurement, Disease Prevention & Control, Emergency Preparedness, and Case Management for Human Services Clients. This motion passed on a roll-call vote of 5-0.

______________________________ At 10:08 AM, HR Director Ruth Schaefer met with the County Board. A motion was offered by Commissioner Berg, and was seconded by Commissioner Borchert, to authorize to post the vacancy for one FT Public Health Supervisor according to policy. This motion passed unanimously.

______________________________ A motion was offered by Commissioner Simonsen, and was seconded by Commissioner Veerkamp, to appoint Joan Wieneke as Full Time License Bureau Technician, at the hourly rate of $17.4124, Grade VIII, Step 4, with a start date of 5-13-2019. This motion carried unanimously.

______________________________ A motion was offered by Commissioner Simonsen, and was seconded by Commissioner Berg, to appoint Steve Kissner as FT Information Technology Network & Systems Administrator at the hourly wage of $25.6421, Grade XV, Step 2, effective 5-21-2019. This motion carried unanimously.

______________________________ A motion was offered by Commissioner Berg, and was seconded by Commissioner Veerkamp, to appoint Luke Zellmer and Collin Ludewig for the 2019 Summer Highway Engineering/Maintenance Student positions with an anticipated start date of 5-13-2019 and 5-20-2019 respectively, at the first year hourly wage of $11.00 pending results of pre-employment drug screen and physical exam. This motion passed unanimously.

______________________________ A motion was offered by Commissioner Simonsen, and was seconded by Commissioner Windschitl, to appoint Jeffrey Spessard as an Intermittent Part-Time Heartland Express Bus Driver at $16.3562/hour (Grade VIII, Step 2) with a start date contingent on the passage of the pre-employment background checks, and a DOT physical and drug screen. This motion passed unanimously.

______________________________ A motion was offered by Commissioner Windschitl, and was seconded by Commissioner Berg, to approve with respect to the Employment Agreement, Section 5. Outside Employment and Activities, Sam Hansen’s request to intermittently act as a Sports Official – Umpire with time off in accordance with the Employment Agreement dated 4-23-2019 and the Brown County Personnel Policy. This motion carried unanimously.

______________________________ A motion was offered by Commissioner Berg, and was seconded by Commissioner Simonsen, to approve and refer to PAC the following Planning and Zoning Department Position Descriptions, with adjustment to Section 8 in each position description to equal 40 hours : 1) Zoning Administrator/Emergency Management Director, 2) Assistant Zoning Administrator/Emergency Management Director, 3) Environmental Specialist, 4) County Feedlot Officer, 5) Emergency Manager, 6) Office Support Specialist, 7) Resident Park Caretaker, and 8) Park Maintenance Worker. This motion passed unanimously.

______________________________

May 7, 2019

78

A motion was offered by Commissioner Berg, and was seconded by Commissioner Windschitl, to table consideration of the resignation of Sean Gremmels, FT Appraiser, until later this date. This motion passed unanimously.

______________________________ A motion was offered by Commissioner Simonsen, and was seconded by Commissioner Berg, to approve the PAC assigned 237 points, to be effective 5-7-2019, for the License Bureau Technician position presented through the 2018 Rotational Review process. This motion passed unanimously.

______________________________ At 10:20 AM, County Attorney Chuck Hanson presented a request. A motion was offered by Commissioner Veerkamp, and was seconded by Commissioner Windschitl, to ratify Assistant Attorney Daniel Kalk’s lodging cost in the amount of $345.86 for the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives Arson for Prosecutors Training which was held on 4-23-19 through 4-25-19. This motion carried unanimously.

______________________________ At 10:21 AM, County Administrator Charles Enter presented the quarterly county budget report. A motion was made by Commissioner Berg, and seconded by Commissioner Simonsen, to accept and file the 2019 1st Quarter (Cash Basis and Unaudited) Budget Report which reflects activity at 25% of the budget year as follows: Expenditures of $8,355,697.85 or 22.4%, and revenues of $5,260,650.34 or 16.0%; and the 2019 1 st Quarter Supplemental Budgets Report noting expenditures of $492,912.87 or 23.8%, and revenues of $316,052.28 or 16.2% of budgeted activity. This motion carried unanimously.

______________________________ A motion was offered by Commissioner Simonsen, and was seconded by Commissioner Borchert, to accept the resignation of Sean Gremmels, FT Appraiser, effective 5-17-2019, and approve posting of this position according to policy and contract. This motion passed unanimously.

______________________________ A motion was made by Commissioner Berg, and seconded by Commissioner Borchert, to approve the Memorandum of Agreement between the County of Brown and AFSCME Council 65, Local 1204 Courthouse Unit through which, pursuant to M.S. 352.98, Brown County agrees to sponsor a Post Retirement Health Care Savings Program that allows aforementioned employees to save money to pay medical expenses and/or health insurance premiums after termination of public service, with payroll deductions not beginning until the full two-week pay period following HCSP Contract completion with the Minnesota State Retirement System (MSRS). This motion carried unanimously.

______________________________ At 10:32 AM, Chairman Borchert convened a Closed Session pursuant to M.S. 13D.03 for labor negotiation strategy planning in the Commissioners Room 204 of the Brown County Courthouse, New Ulm, MN for the AFSCME Courthouse and Highway Collective Bargaining Units, and for the LELS Locals #94 and #98 Collective Bargaining Units. This session was attended by Commissioners Borchert, Berg, Windschitl, Simonsen, and Veerkamp, along with County Administrator Enter, County Attorney Hanson, HR Director Schaefer, and County Administrator-Designee Sam Hansen. A motion was made by Commissioner Berg, and was seconded by Commissioner Simonsen, to end the closed session at 11:28 AM. The motion passed unanimously and Chairman Borchert declared the closed session ended at 11:28 AM.

______________________________ At 11:28 AM, Correspondence C-1 thru C-13 were accepted and filed. C-10) Commissioner Berg reported on the Community Health Board, with Commissioner Windschitl on the Ad Hoc Audit Committee, with Commissioner Simonsen on CD#5 meetings, and with all Commissioners on the Hazard Mitigation work session; C-11) Commissioner Windschitl reported on Brown/Nicollet/Watonwan Drug Court, Enterprise North, and South Country Health Alliance; C-12) Commissioner Simonsen reported on the Underage Substance Abuse Coalition meeting on 4-27-2019; C-13) Commissioner Veerkamp reported on the Redwood-Cottonwood Rivers Control Area, Area II, and the Community Health Board meeting.

______________________________ At 11:56 AM, Calendars were coordinated for the next two week period.

______________________________

May 7, 2019

79

There being no further business, a motion was made by Commissioner Simonsen, and was seconded by Commissioner Veerkamp, to adjourn the meeting. The motion passed unanimously and Chairman Borchert declared the Meeting adjourned at 12:03 PM.

______________________________

___________________________ David Borchert , Chair

Board of Brown County Commissioners Brown County, Minnesota

ATTEST: Charles Enter Brown County Administrator Brown County, Minnesota

36

SYNOPSIS OF COUNTY BOARD MEETING May 7, 2019

Members present: Borchert, Berg, Windschitl, Simonsen, and Veerkamp, along with County Administrator Enter, County Attorney Hanson and County Administrator-Designee Sam Hansen. M/Berg, S/Simonsen, to accept the Minutes of 04-23-2019 and authorize publication of the Synopsis of same; carried. M/Windschitl, S/Berg, to schedule a closed session for labor negotiation strategy planning to be held in the Commissioners Room 204 of the Brown County Courthouse, New Ulm, MN at approximately 10:40 AM this date 5-7-2019 for the AFSCME Courthouse and Highway Collective Bargaining Units, and for the LELS Locals #94 and #98 Collective Bargaining Units, pursuant to M.S. 13D.03; passed. M/Windschitl, S/Simonsen, to authorize payment of General Government claims in the amount of $341,581.50 as follows: Revenue $275,631.72; Public Health $1,803.59; Road and Bridge $27,477.70; Human Services $770.23; Park Fund $1,334.12; Ditch $7,650.05; Capital Improvement Fund $3,679.00; Landfill $22,492.57; Score $232.52; Forfeited Tax Fund $510.00. In accordance with MS 375.12, the following claims exceeding $2,000 are included in the Fund totals above: Area II MN River Basin Projects $12,971.00; Bode Collision & Glass $2,923.00; Bridging Brown County $3,250.00; Brown Co Ag Society $14,250.00; Brown Co Editorial Assn $5,679.66; Brown Co Historical Society $45,713.50; Brown Co Humane Society $4,037.50; Brown Co Library Board $40,757.50; Brown Co Soil & Water Cons Dist $48,700.00; Erickson Engineering Co, LLC $7,172.00; GEI Consultants Inc $8,769.25; Gemini Research $3,321.24; Hildi Inc $3,600.00; I & S Group Inc $6,438.00; Liberty Tire Recycling LLC $3,572.53; Miesen's Color Center $7,997.00; Mn Valley Action Council $3,317.00; Mn Valley Testing Laboratories $5,742.10; Optics Planet Inc $3,592.4; Ranger Chevrolet - Cadillac $36,448.16; Red Rock Quarry $9,414.32; River Bend Business Products $8,648.78; Ron'S Recycling $2,680.00; Trane U.S. Inc $3,346.25 101 Payments Less Than $2000.00 49,240.31; Final Total: $341,581.50; carried. M/Berg, S/Borchert, to authorize the Highway Dept. to request quotes for the replacement of 2500 feet of tile in CD#58; carried. M/Simonsen, S/Berg, to approve one (1) Drainage Repair request and the payment of said repair; carried. M/Windschitl, S/Berg, to accept the quote received from Sondag Services for buffer strip seeding in the total amount of $20,738.82 for approximately 191 total acres to include buffer areas of CD#4, CD#5, CD#10, CD#12, CD#13, CD#45, CD#57, CD#60, and CD#69; carried. Three other bids were received from Erosion Control Plus; Evergreen Companies; and Ibberson Lawn Care. M/Berg, S/Veerkamp, to award the SAP 008-624-036 Surface Rehabilitation Projects on CSAH 24 to M.R. Paving & Excavating, Inc. in the amount of $140,748.74; carried. Other bids were also received from OMG Midwest Inc. d/b/a Southern MN Construction Co., Inc.; Central Specialties Inc.; and Duininck, Inc. M/Simonsen, S/Veerkamp, to accept the quote received for maintenance striping of 164 road miles in Brown County from AAA Striping Service in the amount of $92,735; carried. One other bid was received from Traffic Marking Services. M/Berg, S/Borchert, to approve the request from the City of New Ulm to close a portion of CSAH 13 (Center Street) between Garden St. and Highland Ave. on 9-7-2019 from approximately 8:15 PM to 9:00 PM for a fireworks show during the Hermannfest celebration, noting that the City of New Ulm approved said request on 4-16-2019; carried. M/Windschitl, S/Simonsen, to accept and file the Highway Dept. Monthly Update for Construction Projects and Maintenance Projects; carried. M/Simonsen, S/Berg, to approve the Amendment to Attachment A between the MN Dept. of Agriculture and Brown County AgBMP Loan Program – Multiple Lender System – Agreement #M6892 in the revised 2019 award amount of $700,000; carried. M/Simonsen, S/Winschitl, to approve the FY2020 and FY2021 Remote Electronic Alcohol Monitoring (REAM) Grant Agreement (Contract #155460/3-110810) in the amount of $13,000 each year between Brown County Probation and the MN Dept. of Corrections, and authorize the County Board Chair and Assistant Probation Director to sign same on behalf of Brown County; carried. M/Windschitl, S/Berg, to approve the State of MN Grant Agreement #155714/3-110982 for Caseload/Workload programming for FY 2020 in the amount of $62,750 and for FY 2021 in the amount of $62,750; and authorize the County Board Chair and Probation Director to sign same on behalf of Brown County; carried. M/Windschitl, S/Berg, to authorize the discontinuation of the Brown County Public Health Home Care Program with a sunset date of 7-15-2019, with the understanding that the Adult Health Program areas will include Jail Health, Public Health Nurse Clinic, SCHA Care Coordination, SCHA Connector, Community

gbode

Typewritten Text

# 1b

gbode

Oval

gbode

Draft

37

Health Education, MN Choice Assessments, Coalition and Community Engagement, Community Health Assessment, Community Health Improvement Planning, Quality Improvement, Performance Measurement, Disease Prevention & Control, Emergency Preparedness, and Case Management for Human Services Clients; passed 5-0. M/Berg, S/Borchert, to authorize to post the vacancy for one FT Public Health Supervisor according to policy; passed. M/Simonsen, S/Veerkamp, to appoint Joan Wieneke as FT License Bureau Technician, at the hourly rate of $17.4124, Grade VIII, Step 4, with a start date of 5-13-2019; carried. M/Simonsen, S/Berg, to appoint Steve Kissner as FT Information Technology Network & Systems Administrator at the hourly wage of $25.6421, Grade XV, Step 2, effective 5-21-2019; carried. M/Berg, S/Veerkamp, to appoint Luke Zellmer and Collin Ludewig for the 2019 Summer Highway Engineering/Maintenance Student positions with an anticipated start date of 5-13-2019 and 5-20-2019 respectively, at the first year hourly wage of $11.00 pending results of pre-employment drug screen and physical exam; passed. M/Simonsen, S/Windschitl, to appoint Jeffrey Spessard as an IPT Heartland Express Bus Driver at $16.3562/hour (Grade VIII, Step 2) with a start date contingent on the passage of the pre-employment background checks, and a DOT physical and drug screen; passed. M/Windschitl, S/Berg, to approve with respect to the Employment Agreement, Section 5. Outside Employment and Activities, Sam Hansen’s request to intermittently act as a Sports Official – Umpire with time off in accordance with the Employment Agreement dated 4-23-2019 and the Brown County Personnel Policy; carried. M/Berg, S/Simonsen, to approve and refer to PAC the following Planning and Zoning Dept. Position Descriptions, with adjustment to Section 8 in each position description to equal 40 hours: 1) Zoning Administrator/Emergency Management Director, 2) Assistant Zoning Administrator/Emergency Management Director, 3) Environmental Specialist, 4) County Feedlot Officer, 5) Emergency Manager, 6) Office Support Specialist, 7) Resident Park Caretaker, and 8) Park Maintenance Worker; passed. M/Berg, S/Windschitl, to table consideration of the resignation of Sean Gremmels, FT Appraiser, until later this date; passed. M/Simonsen, S/Berg, to approve the PAC assigned 237 points, to be effective 5-7-2019, for the License Bureau Technician position presented through the 2018 Rotational Review process; passed. M/Veerkamp, S/Windschitl, to ratify Assistant Attorney Daniel Kalk’s lodging cost in the amount of $345.86 for the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives Arson for Prosecutors Training which was held on 4-23-19 through 4-25-19; carried. M/Berg, S/Simonsen, to accept and file the 2019 1st Quarter (Cash Basis and Unaudited) Budget Report which reflects activity at 25% of the budget year as follows: Expenditures of $8,355,697.85 or 22.4%, and revenues of $5,260,650.34 or 16.0%; and the 2019 1st Quarter Supplemental Budgets Report noting expenditures of $492,912.87 or 23.8%, and revenues of $316,052.28 or 16.2% of budgeted activity; carried. M/Simonsen, S/Borchert, to accept the resignation of Sean Gremmels, FT Appraiser, effective 5-17-2019, and approve posting of this position according to policy and contract; passed. M/Berg, S/Borchert, to approve the Memorandum of Agreement between the County of Brown and AFSCME Council 65, Local 1204 Courthouse Unit through which, pursuant to M.S. 352.98, Brown County agrees to sponsor a Post Retirement Health Care Savings Program that allows aforementioned employees to save money to pay medical expenses and/or health insurance premiums after termination of public service, with payroll deductions not beginning until the full two-week pay period following HCSP Contract completion with the MN State Retirement System (MSRS); carried. At 10:32 AM, Chairman Borchert convened a Closed Session pursuant to M.S. 13D.03 for labor negotiation strategy planning in the Commissioners Room 204 of the Brown County Courthouse, New Ulm, MN for the AFSCME Courthouse and Highway Collective Bargaining Units, and for the LELS Locals #94 and #98 Collective Bargaining Units. This session was attended by Commissioners Borchert, Berg, Windschitl, Simonsen, and Veerkamp, along with County Administrator Enter, County Attorney Hanson, HR Director Schaefer, and County Administrator-Designee Hansen. M/Berg, S/Simonsen, to end the closed session at 11:28 AM; passed Chairman Borchert declared the closed session ended at 11:28 AM. At 11:28 AM, Correspondence C-1 thru C-13 were accepted and filed. Berg reported on the Community Health Board, with Windschitl on the Ad Hoc Audit Committee, with Simonsen on CD#5 meetings, and with all Commissioners on the Hazard Mitigation work session; Windschitl reported on Brown/Nicollet/Watonwan Drug Court, Enterprise North, and South Country Health Alliance; Simonsen reported on the Underage Substance Abuse Coalition meeting on 4-27-2019; Veerkamp reported on the Redwood-Cottonwood Rivers Control Area, Area II, and the Community Health Board meeting. At 11:56 AM, Calendars were coordinated for the next two week period.

38

There being no further business, M/Simonsen, S/Veerkamp, to adjourn the meeting; passed and Chairman Borchert declared the Meeting adjourned at 12:03 PM. The Official Minutes of the Regular Meeting of 5-7-2019 are on file in the County Administrator’s Office and may be viewed during normal business hours, M-F, 8AM-4:30PM. Correspondence and requests for additional information may be directed to the County Administrator’s E-Mail Address: [email protected] Home Page Address: www.co.brown.mn.us

mailto:[email protected]

http://www.co.brown.mn.us/

REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION

Requested Board Date: 5-21-2019 Originating Department: Sheriff Flexibility: No

Item: Monthly Report of Activity Presenter: Jason Seidl- County Sheriff Estimated Time: 5 minutes

Board Action Requested: Accept and order filed the April 2019 Monthly Report of Activity for the Brown County Sheriffs Department.

Background:

See attachments.

cc Chief Deputy Depew

Administrator's Comments:

Board Action: Approved as Requested Denied Tabled Other

Notations: RBAsheriffrep 17.docx

Supporting Documents: x Attached None

Motion Offered By Motion Seconded By Vote By Acclamation Roll Call Vote

District I District 2 District 3 District 4 District 5

gbode

Typewritten Text

# 2

gbode

Oval

BROWN COUNTY SHERIFFS REPORT TO THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

2019 JAN FEB MAR APRL MAY JUN JUL AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC YTDTOTALS 9-1-1 CALLS (LAND-LINE) 105 79 61 74 319 9-1 -1 CALLS (CELLULAR) 275 373 386 338 1372 911 HANG UP 64 64 71 81 280 911 NON EMERGENCY 22 23 26 27 98 ABANDONED/STALLED VEHICLE 24 44 19 18 105 ADVERSE WEATHER CONDITIONS 0 0 0 0 0 ADULT PROTECTION INVESTIGATIGt 0 0 0 0 0 ALARM 6 3 7 9 25 AMBULANCE 1 3 2 2 8 ANIMAL COMPLAINTS 9 8 13 16 46 ASSAULT 1 0 0 0 1 ASSIST AMBULANCE 13 11 14 17 55 ASSIST FIRE DEPT 1 2 3 4 10 ASSIST OTHER AGENCY 40 46 50 48 184 ASSIST PUBLIC MISC 7 12 5 17 41 ATTEMPT CIVIL PAPER SERVICE 195 147 161 204 707 ATTEMPT TO LOCATE 0 1 0 0 1 ATTEMPT WARRANT/A & D SERVICE 3 6 8 11 28 ATVACCIDENT 0 0 0 0 0 ATV COMPLAINT 1 0 0 0 1 ATVPROJECT 0 0 0 0 0 BOAT ACCIDENT 0 0 0 0 0 BOAT COMPLAINT 0 0 0 1 1 BOAT PROJECT 0 0 0 0 0 BOMBITHREAT 0 0 0 0 0 BURGLARY 0 0 0 0 0 CHILD PROTECTION 3 2 7 1 13 CITATION 0 0 0 0 0 CITIZENS ACADEMY 0 0 0 0 0 CIVIL DEFENSE TEST 0 0 0 1 1 CIVIL DISPUTE 4 0 1 4 9 CIVIL PROCESSIPAPERWORK 0 0 0 0 0 COMMITMENT ORDER 0 0 0 0 0 COMPLAINT AGAINST OFFICER 0 0 0 0 0 COMPLIANCE CHECK-TOBACCO 0 0 0 0 0 COMPLIANCE CHECL-ALCOHOL 0 0 0 0 0 CONCEAUCARRY GUN PERMIT 19 9 33 34 95 COURT ORDERS RECEIVED 14 5 8 8 35 CRIM DAMAGE TO PROPERTY 1 0 1 0 2 DEAD PERSON 1 0 0 2 3 DISTURBANCE 1 0 1 1 3 DOMESTIC 2 0 3 1 6 DOOR CHECK 1 8 6 2 17 DRIVERS LICENSE CHECK 17 5 7 4 33 DRIVING COMPLAINT 11 7 14 11 43 DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED 0 1 1 0 2 DRUNK/INTOXICATED PERSON 0 0 0 0 0 DRUG TAKE BACK 1 3 7 7 18 EMERGENCY RESP TEAM 0 0 1 0 1 ESCORT 1 2 0 1 4

EVICTION 0 0 0 0 0 FIGHT 0 0 0 0 0

FINGERPRINT 1 0 0 0 1 FIRE CALL 0 0 1 0 1 FIREARMS VIOLATION 0 0 0 0 0 FIREWORKS VIOLATION 0 0 0 0 0 FORECLOSURE 0 0 0 0 0


GAMEIFISH VIOLATIONS 0 0 0 0 0 GUNSHOTS 0 0 0 0 0 HARASSMENT 2 1 2 0 5 IN COURT 0 1 0 0 1 INFORMATION 42 50 64 57 213 INVESTIGATION 2 1 4 3 10 JAIL BOOKING 62 47 45 55 209 JAIL INCIDENTS 35 25 40 30 130 JVTROUBLE 1 1 1 1 4 LICENSE PLATE CHECK 0 0 0 0 0 LlaUOR LAW VIOLATION 0 0 0 0 0 LOST/FOUND PROPERTY 1 1 1 3 6 MEDICAL CALUNO AMBULANCE 2 1 0 3 6 MEETING 8 1 4 6 19 MISCELLANEOUS 4 5 5 2 16 MOTOR VEHICLE FATALITY 0 0 0 0 0 NARCOTIC/DRUG ACTIVITY 0 0 0 0 0 OPEN DOOR 0 1 3 3 7 PARKING COMPLAINT 0 1 1 1 3 PERMIT TO PURCHASE 7 11 14 7 39 PERSONAL INJURY ACCIDENT 1 5 3 1 10 PREDATORY OFFENDER REGIS 0 1 0 6 7 PRISONER IN CUSTODY/ARREST 1 0 1 0 2 PROBATION A& D RECEIVED 9 7 8 13 37 PROBATION AOD CHECK 2 1 5 5 13 PROBATION NIGHTHAWK CHECK 11 8 8 0 27 PROPERTY DAMAGE ACCIDENT 28 74 16 26 144 PROWLER 0 0 0 0 0 PURSUITIFLEEING 0 0 0 0 0 RECORDS CHECK 0 0 0 0 0 REG SEX OFFENDER CHECK 2 4 0 0 6 REMOVAL PROPIWRIT RECOVERY 1 0 1 0 2 RESIDENCE CHECK 21 8 3 17 49 ROBBERY 0 0 0 0 0 RUNAWAY 0 0 0 0 0 SAFE AND SOBER PROJECT 0 0 0 0 0 SCAM 2 6 1 9 18 SCHOOL SAFETY PROJECT 0 0 0 0 0 SEARCH WARRANT 1 0 0 3 4 SEX OFFENSES 0 0 0 0 0 SHERIFF'S SALE 2 2 0 1 5 SHOOTING 0 0 0 0 0 SNOWMOBILE ACCIDENT 0 0 0 0 0 SNOWMOBILE COMPLAINT 0 1 0 0 1 SNOWMOBILE PROJECT 0 0 1 0 1 SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT 0 0 0 0 0 STOLEN VEHICLE 0 0 0 0 0 STOP ARM VIOLATION 0 0 0 0 0 SUICIDEIA TTEMPTED 0 0 0 2 2 SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY 3 6 5 6 20 THEFT 1 2 2 4 9 TRANSPORTATION ORDER 5 3 7 9 24 TRANSPORTS-ADULT 15 10 27 25 77 TRANSPORTS-JV 5 8 5 6 24 TRESPASS COMPLAINT 0 0 0 0 0 TRUCK SCALES PROJECT 0 0 0 0 0 VANDALISM 1 1 1 2 5


VEHIPROP FORFEITURE 0 0 0 0 0 VEHICLE STOP 43 27 44 104 218 WARRANT RECEIVED 26 28 20 27 101 WELFARE CHECK 6 5 6 3 20

0 0

TOTAL BROWN COUNTY CFS 816 766 818 972 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3372 TOTAL CALLS FOR SERVICE-ALL 2060 1816 2154 2342 8372

CIVIL FEES PAID TO COUNTY $2647.35 $2667.79 $1425.00 $1 375.00 $8115.14 HUBER PAYMENTS $1095.00 $650.00 $930.00 $670.00 $3345.00 TOTAL JAIL AD.P. 30.87 26.75 27.58 28.50 37.90 OUT OF COUNTY AD.P. 3.20 3.80 2.87 3.70 4.52 BRN CO INMATE AD.P. 27.67 22.95 24.71 24 .80 33.38 BROWN COUNTY HUBER ADP 2.37 0.70 1.06 1.26 1.80 OIC INMATE BILLINGS $6402.00 $5568.00 $3948.00 $5416.00 $21334.00 TOTAL JAIL BOOKINGS 63 43 44 56 206 OUT OF COUNTY HUBER AD.P. 0 0 0 0 0


2019 JAN FEB MAR APRL MAY JUN JUL AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC YTDTOTALS 330 SHERIFF SEIDL 23567 24468 25297 26151 2017 Ford Explorer 459 901 829 854 3043

331 CHIEF DEPUTY DEPEW 43380 44624 46328 47818 2016 Ford Explorer 700 1244 1704 1490 5138

332 DEPUTY STUEBER 123054 124456 126695 129165 2014 ChevY CCl,Drice PPV 636 1402 2239 2470 6747

333 DEPUTY FAIRBAIRN 128100 128500 129350 129600 2011 Ford Crown Victoria 712011 1472 400 850 250 2972

334 DEPUTY REED 77652 78799 79740 80532 2015 Ford Explorer 1636 1147 941 792 4516

335 SCHWARZROCK 109832 111 440 115174 117278 2015 Ford Explorer 3261 1608 3734 2104 10707 2015 Ford Explorer

336 DEPUTY MURPHY 135700 136200 137930 139800 2013 ChevY Caprice PPV 1565 500 1730 1870 5665

337 SGT BENTZ 163956 164,918 166584 169040 2013 ChevyGaprice Classic 1 31 1 962 1666 2456 6395

338 DEPUTY KITZBERGER 140340 142572 144 805 147885 2014 ChevY Caprice Classic 3202 2232 2233 3080 10747

339 DEPUTY SHAW 134 126 136556 139893 142628 2015 Ford Explorer 2880 2430 3337 2735 11382

TRANSPORT SQUAD 126425 127706 128505 129931 2012 Ford Explorer-June 1 2013 2,014 1 281 799 1426 5520

340 DEPUTY BAUER 78393 80366 82529 85389 2016 FORD EXPLORER 2230 1973 2163 2860 9226

EXPEDITION 64503 65086 65693 67031 4 583 607 1338 2532

SPARE SQUAD 161760 161823 161880 162951 428 63 57 1071 1619

2003 FORD EXCURSION 60690 61375 61474 61884 397 685 99 410 1 591

MONTHLY TOTALS 19965 15438 20825 22346 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 78574

Agenda # _____ _ Date: ______ _


Requested Board Date: 05/21/19 Originating Department: Auditor-Treasurer Flexibility:

Items: General Government Claims Presenter: Jean Prochniak Estimated Time:

Board Action Requested: Consider payment of general government claims in the amount of $465, 153.19

Background:

Supporting Documents [g] attached D none


Gl~5?fG1, 5" -15"-(q

Board Action: Motion Offered By: Approved as Requested -- Motion Seconded By: Denied Vote By Acclamation: --Tabled Roll Call Vote --Other District 1 -- --

District 2 --District 3 - -District 4 --District 5 --

Notations:

IIC RT _SERVERIS YSIAUDTRESIOFFICElMYDOCSIAUDTR ES4IFORMICOMM_RBA.DOC

gbode

Typewritten Text

# 3

gbode

Oval

COMMISSIONER'S VOUCHERS ENTRIES

TRES#CRM 9:01AM5/15/19

N

N

D

2

N

1

Audit List for Board Page 1

Print List in Order By:

Explode Dist. Formulas?:

Paid on Behalf Of Nameon Audit List?:

Type of Audit List:

Save Report Options?:

D - Detailed Audit ListS - Condensed Audit List

1 - Fund (Page Break by Fund)2 - Department (Totals by Dept) 3 - Vendor Number4 - Vendor Name

Page Break By: 1 - Page Break by Fund2 - Page Break by Dept

*** Brown County ***

COMMISSIONER'S VOUCHERS ENTRIES1

9:01AM5/15/19TRES#CRM

General Revenue Fund

Copyright 2010-2018 Integrated Financial Systems

1

BORCHERT, DAVID

BORCHERT, DAVID 157.76 16952

BROWN CO EDITORIAL ASSN

BROWN CO EDITORIAL ASSN 2,061.91 37695

Green Mill-NUCC

Green Mill-NUCC 2,754.00 16664

GUTES ESSEN DELI & CATERING

GUTES ESSEN DELI & CATERING 284.79 15542

1 Commissioners5,258.46

44

Mn State Auditor

Mn State Auditor 5,313.50 1203

44 Public Examiner5,313.50

60

DELL MARKETING LP

DELL MARKETING LP 826.56 16022

Free Press/The

Free Press/The 341.78 1244

MENARDS (CH 33000266)

CommissionersDEPT

6952

01-001-0000-0000-6330 157.76 3/18-3/25 Mileage Mileage N

7695

01-001-0000-0000-6240 163.32 CP 4-10-19 Publication Expense/Comm. Proceedings N

01-001-0000-0000-6240 1,163.65 CP 4-16-19 Publication Expense/Comm. Proceedings N

01-001-0000-0000-6240 734.94 CP 4-2-19 Publication Expense/Comm. Proceedings N

6664

01-001-0000-0000-6180 2,754.00 Emp Banquet Meal 4031 Employee Recognition N

5542

01-001-0000-0000-6180 284.79 Emp Banquet Dessert 4132 Employee Recognition N

Public ExaminerDEPT

203

01-044-0000-0000-6270 5,313.50 2018 Audit Svc-01/23 - 04/16 Public Examiner Expense N

Information TechnologyDEPT

6022

01-060-0000-0000-6405 826.56 Dell monitors for Assr and HR 10310863205 Computer/Printer Parts & Supplies N

244

01-060-0000-0000-6233 341.78 Network position advertising 160749043019 Subscriptions & Publications N

5613

Page 2Audit List for Board

Account/Formula Description Rpt Invoice #Warrant DescriptionVendor Name 1099Paid On Bhf #Accr Amount On Behalf of NameNo. Service Dates

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

4 Vendors 6 TransactionsDEPT Total:

Transactions


Transactions

Transactions

Account/Formula


STATE OF MN - OFFICE OF MN.IT SERVICES

STATE OF MN - OFFICE OF MN.IT SERVICES





MENARDS (CH 33000266) 25.09 15613

South Central Auto Service Llp

South Central Auto Service Llp 251.65 14823

1,700.00 18060

TSG SERVER AND STORAGE

TSG SERVER AND STORAGE 250.00 18607

60 Information Technology3,395.08

61

Kemske Paper Co

Kemske Paper Co 124.27 1427

61 Central Administration124.27

62

Election Systems & Software Inc

Election Systems & Software Inc 7,785.00 14879

MN DEPT OF HUMAN SERVICES

MN DEPT OF HUMAN SERVICES 64.60 15496

62 Elections7,849.60

63

ALLINA HEALTH SYSTEM

01-060-0000-0000-6300 25.09 HVAC repair 15874 Furniture & Equip Maint. N

4823

01-060-0000-0000-6560 251.65 Van oil change and eng diagnos 22045 Gasoline & Oil N

8060

01-060-0000-0000-6200 1,700.00 Apr'19 MNNET DV19040386 Communications/Telephone N

8607

01-060-0000-0000-6300 250.00 IBM Mass360 add 5 more license 2019-0326 Furniture & Equip Maint. N

Central AdministrationDEPT

427

01-061-0000-0000-6400 124.27 3 hole punch, pencil lead, era 303616 Departmental Supplies N

ElectionsDEPT

4879

01-062-0000-0000-6300 7,785.00 Hdwre Maint/Firemware & Electi 1088049 Furniture & Equip Maint. N

5496

01-062-0000-0000-6210 64.60 (221)Voter Cards A300IC08193I Postage Due Account N

Personnel AdministrationDEPT

3304

01-063-0000-0000-6294 550.00 Pre-Emp Phys-DH/KN/AP/BP/LZ/SZ 314919840 Employment Physicals And Testing N



Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions


Transactions


Transactions

Transactions


Account/Formula






ALLINA HEALTH SYSTEM 550.00 13304

FSSOLUTIONS

FSSOLUTIONS 259.10 14394

Innovative Office Solutions

Innovative Office Solutions 18.12 11609

Kemske Paper Co


MnCCC MI 33

MnCCC MI 33 1,643.00 1214

RVS SHREDDING

RVS SHREDDING 15.00 11682

TREBESCH/DONITTA

TREBESCH/DONITTA 34.80 16532

63 Personnel Administration2,812.78

90

BACHMAN PRINTING

BACHMAN PRINTING 192.00 15572

Bock/Theresa M

Bock/Theresa M 56.00 16185

RVS SHREDDING

4394

01-063-0000-0000-6294 259.10 Pre-Emp Drg Srn-DH/AP/JS/BP/KN FL00293469 Employment Physicals And Testing 6

1609

01-063-0000-0000-6400 18.12 Labels 2487899 Departmental Supplies N

427

01-063-0000-0000-6400 198.00 Chair 303680 Departmental Supplies N

01-063-0000-0000-6400 94.76 Chairmat 303687 Departmental Supplies N

214

01-063-0000-0000-6605 1,643.00 Optimum Pyrl Supt 6/30/19-7/1/ 1905017 Software Expense $5,000 or > N

1682

01-063-0000-0000-6400 15.00 Apr'19 Shred Svcs 22187 Departmental Supplies N

6532

01-063-0000-0000-6330 34.80 Mileage Mileage N

County AttorneyDEPT

5572

01-090-0000-0000-6360 192.00 Appellate Brief 71855 Trial & Investigation Exp N

6185

01-090-0000-0000-6360 56.00 Transcript/CR-19-163 2220 Trial & Investigation Exp Y

1682



Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions


Transactions

Transactions

Account/Formula


THOMSON REUTERS - WEST PAYMENT CENTER

THOMSON REUTERS - WEST PAYMENT CENTER






278.44 2262

90 County Attorney531.44

100



Kemske Paper Co


NORTHSTAR

NORTHSTAR 347.12 16546

100 County Recorder1,014.03

101

DUNN/DIANE

DUNN/DIANE 83.49 16816

HEIL/JAMES

HEIL/JAMES 229.68 27672

01-090-0000-0000-6800 5.00 Shredding 22185 Shredding N

262

01-090-0000-0000-6260 249.55 Apr'19 West Law Info 840201691 Legal Research N

01-090-0000-0000-6260 28.89 Apr'19 Library Plan Chrg 840283509 Legal Research N

County RecorderDEPT

1609

01-100-0000-0000-6400 194.25 Toner for HP main IN2470670 Departmental Supplies N

427

01-100-0000-0000-6400 11.13 Staples, fasteners 302868 Departmental Supplies N

01-100-0000-0000-6400 252.19 Catalog envelopes 303146 Departmental Supplies N

01-100-0000-0000-6400 14.94 sort kwik, dryline 303264 Departmental Supplies N

01-100-0000-0000-6400 194.40 Kraft envelopes 303677 Departmental Supplies N

6546

01-100-0000-0000-6400 347.12 Vitals security paper 2445216 Departmental Supplies N

County AssessorDEPT

6816

01-101-0000-0000-6330 83.49 3/25-5/10 NUNC/QT/Region Mtg Mileage N

7672

01-101-0000-0000-6330 2.32 Apr'19 NU Quintile Mileage N

01-101-0000-0000-6330 227.36 Apr'19 Education Wkshp Mileage N



Transactions

Transactions


Transactions

Transactions

Transactions


Transactions

Transactions

Account/Formula








Kemske Paper Co


MnCCC MI 33

MnCCC MI 33 360.00 1214

River Bend Business Products

River Bend Business Products 28.56 17040

101 County Assessor742.23

107

BRAUN/BRIAN H

BRAUN/BRIAN H 63.20 26823

Mohr/Anita

Mohr/Anita 49.28 28206

Potter/Dennis

Potter/Dennis 74.80 24857

ROLLOFF/JOHN

ROLLOFF/JOHN 40.00 16997

Sleepy Eye Herald Dispatch

1609

01-101-0000-0000-6400 26.08 Ink 950 so-2454275 Departmental Supplies N

427

01-101-0000-0000-6400 14.42 Corr Tape 303549 Departmental Supplies N

214

01-101-0000-0000-6355 360.00 Legal Description course 1904258 Training Expense N

7040

01-101-0000-0000-6400 28.56 Envelopes #10 242507-0 Departmental Supplies N

Planning And ZoningDEPT

6823

01-107-0000-0000-6148 40.00 May'19 PZ Per Diem Y

01-107-0000-0000-6330 23.20 May'19 PZ (40 MI) Mileage Y

8206

01-107-0000-0000-6148 40.00 May'19 PZ Per Diem Y


4857

01-107-0000-0000-6148 40.00 May'19 PZ Per Diem Y


6997

01-107-0000-0000-6148 40.00 May'19 PZ Per Diem Y

423



Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions


Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Account/Formula






Sleepy Eye Herald Dispatch 244.40 1423

107 Planning And Zoning471.68

110

CARROLL CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY

CARROLL CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY 19.99 26761

Fastenal Company

Fastenal Company 71.28 12904

Johnstone Supply

Johnstone Supply 186.48 12359


MENARDS (CH 33000266) 157.06 55613

New Ulm Tire

New Ulm Tire 59.57 21999

Runnings-Marshall

01-107-0000-0000-6240 244.40 Apr/May BOA mtgs/P&Z 1005590505 Publication/Advertising Expense N

Government BuildingsDEPT

6761

01-110-0000-0000-6300 21.56 10 oz. caulk gun NU029259 Furniture & Equip Maint. N

01-110-0000-0000-6300 1.57 Exempt/sales tax adj NU029259 Furniture & Equip Maint. N

2904

01-110-0000-0000-6400 71.28 Anchors/bolts MNNEW163071 Departmental Supplies N

2359

01-110-0000-0000-6300 186.48 Crimper/notcher/cutter/snip me S100708817.001 Furniture & Equip Maint. N

5613

01-110-0140-0000-6300 11.34 Painting supplies (PHN) 16589 Furniture & Equip Maint. N

01-110-0000-0000-6400 116.65 3 hook rails/primer/key organi 16673 Departmental Supplies N

01-110-0135-0000-6300 10.73 Fem hose adapter/5 ft. flex ho 16703 Furniture & Equip Maint. N

01-110-0136-0000-6300 3.35 Fem hose adapter/5 ft. flex ho 16703 Furniture & Equip Maint. N

01-110-0041-0000-6300 14.99 60 qt. utility box (for ceilin 16704 Furniture & Equip Maint. N

1999

01-110-0000-0000-6310 30.13 2007 F150 patch front tire (dr 247242 Vehicle Maintenance N

01-110-0000-0000-6310 29.44 Lube/oil/filter 1999 F150 247243 Vehicle Maintenance N

1027

01-110-0000-0000-6400 12.58 Tri-flow lock spray 2ea. 5874866 Departmental Supplies N

01-110-0000-0000-6300 46.91 1/2 HP cast iron transfer pump 5883625 Furniture & Equip Maint. N






Transactions


-

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Account/Formula






Runnings-Marshall 118.59 51027

110 Government Buildings612.97

120



120 Veteran Services635.59

141

COMFREY TIMES/THE

COMFREY TIMES/THE 7.50 16188

JOURNAL INC/THE

JOURNAL INC/THE 578.45 2382

Kemske Paper Co


KNUJ Radio Station

KNUJ Radio Station 57.00 16459


River Bend Business Products 6,180.30 27040

RVS SHREDDING


Veteran ServicesDEPT

1609

01-120-0000-0000-6400 635.59 Toner Cartridiges for Printer SO-2508113 Departmental Supplies N

License BureauDEPT

6188

01-141-0000-0000-6240 7.50 FT LB Tech Ad Publication/Advertising Expense N

382

01-141-0000-0000-6240 287.35 FT LB Tech Ad 008488 Publication/Advertising Expense N

01-141-0000-0000-6240 291.10 PT LB Tech Ad 438808 Publication/Advertising Expense N

427

01-141-0000-0000-6400 6.35 Take a # sign 303574 Departmental Supplies N

6459

01-141-0000-0000-6240 57.00 FT LB Tech Ad 67289-1 Publication/Advertising Expense N

7040

01-141-0000-0000-6400 6,097.00 Office Furniture 220335-0 Departmental Supplies N

01-141-0000-0000-6400 83.30 Envelopes 236748 Departmental Supplies N

1682

01-141-0000-0000-6800 33.50 Shredding Cabinet and boxes 22195 Other Expense N



Transactions


Transactions


Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Account/Formula








Springfield Advance Press

Springfield Advance Press 53.60 2441

VAN HEE MEDIA L.L.C

VAN HEE MEDIA L.L.C 61.50 26470

141 License Bureau7,084.46

149


MENARDS (CH 33000266) 165.38 25613

NOZCO INC

NOZCO INC 246.20 15644


River Bend Business Products 152.78 27040

149 Other General Government564.36

200

ALPHA WIRELESS COMMUMICATIONS

ALPHA WIRELESS COMMUMICATIONS 1,361.40 1187

423

01-141-0000-0000-6240 106.26 FT/PT LB Tech Ad 1005430505 Publication/Advertising Expense N

441



6470



Other General GovernmentDEPT

5613

01-149-0000-0000-6889 59.47 1/2x4x8 Homasote board (PR) 16359 Contingency Fund N

01-149-0000-0000-6889 105.91 (2)4x4x8 birch Nom/(5)clr box 16568 Contingency Fund N

5644

01-149-0000-0000-6889 246.20 Lock Pocket door(PR) 4992 Contingency Fund N

7040

01-149-0000-0000-6320 110.92 MR: Canon Copier Maintenance B 241056-0 Copy Machine Maint. & Supply N

01-149-0000-0000-6320 41.86 HW: Canon Copier Maintenance B 241448-0 Copy Machine Maint. & Supply N

SheriffDEPT

187

01-200-0000-0000-6300 1,361.40 May19 Maint, console, paging, 698264 Maint for Bldg, Furn & Eq/Maint Cntrct N



Transactions

Transactions

Transactions


Transactions

Transactions

Transactions


Transactions

Account/Formula


CLANCY'S FIRE EXTINGUISHERS SALES & SERV






156.00 15532

IDENTISYS INC

IDENTISYS INC 60.77 16836

Kemske Paper Co


New Ulm Body Shop

New Ulm Body Shop 173.00 1314

RVS SHREDDING


Sleepy Eye Electric Co

Sleepy Eye Electric Co 1,243.73 18179





SPRINGFIELD STATION

SPRINGFIELD STATION 65.29 18257

TransUnion LLC

5532

01-200-0000-0000-6300 156.00 15 Annual inspections, recharg 117149 Maint for Bldg, Furn & Eq/Maint Cntrct Y

6836

01-200-0134-0000-6816 60.77 Gun permit cards 436851 Program Expense-Gun permit N

427

01-200-0000-0000-6400 47.00 Notary stamps - Peterson & Bas 303613 Departmental Supplies N

314

01-200-0000-0000-6310 173.00 333 - 2019 tahoe install decal 46617 Vehicle Maintenance N

1682

01-200-0000-0000-6356 20.00 Shredding 22199 Disposal Services N

8179

01-200-0000-0000-6300 1,243.73 Repair radio lines 36185 Maint for Bldg, Furn & Eq/Maint Cntrct N

423

01-200-0000-0000-6240 40.30 IPT dispatcher 1005430505 Publication/Advertising Expense N

441

01-200-0000-0000-6240 13.40 Ad for dispatcher 196581 Publication/Advertising Expense N

8257

01-200-0000-0000-6560 65.29 335 - Fuel for squad 1253 Gasoline & Oil N

7634

01-200-0000-0000-6360 25.11 Background - Penner 4931181 Trial & Investigation Exp N



Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Account/Formula








TransUnion LLC 25.11 17634

WEELBORG CHEVROLET

WEELBORG CHEVROLET 111.98 12813

Winter/Gina

Winter/Gina 240.24 38529

200 Sheriff3,558.22

201

17.00 15532

201 Boat & Water Safety Enforcement17.00

221

Ramsey County (Medical Examiner)

Ramsey County (Medical Examiner) 3,608.25 2469

221 County Coroner3,608.25

250

A H Hermel Company

A H Hermel Company 266.91 22153

Cashwise Pharmacy

2813

01-200-0000-0000-6310 111.98 338 - oil change, filter, pla 83562 Vehicle Maintenance N

8529

01-200-0000-0000-6331 10.50 Parking fees St. Cloud trainin 04/29/19 Travel Expense N

01-200-0000-0000-6330 204.74 Mileage to conference St Cloud 04/30/19 Mileage N

01-200-0000-0000-6450 25.00 Uniform hemming for dispatch 05/02/19 Uniform Supply N

Boat & Water Safety EnforcementDEPT

5532

01-201-0212-0201-6310 17.00 (4) annual inspections 117150 Vehicle Maintenance Y

County CoronerDEPT

469

01-221-0000-0000-6266 1,876.25 Postmortem Exam/Toxicology (C Coroner Expense 6

01-221-0000-0000-6266 1,732.00 Postmortem Exam/Toxicology (C Coroner Expense 6

Corrections-JailDEPT

2153

01-250-0207-0000-6814 163.77 Commissary 768835 Jail Canteen Account N

01-250-0000-0000-6400 103.14 Cleaning supplies 768919 Departmental Supplies N

3261

01-250-0000-0000-6363 82.79 Apr'19 Jail Imate RX Apr Stmt Medical Care Of Prisoners N



Transactions

Transactions

Transactions


Transactions


Transactions


Transactions

Account/Formula






Cashwise Pharmacy 82.79 13261

Johnstone Supply

Johnstone Supply 251.00 22359

Keefe Supply Company

Keefe Supply Company 641.78 25175

Kemske Paper Co


KNUJ Radio Station

KNUJ Radio Station 57.00 16459


MENARDS (CH 33000266) 50.67 15613

NOZCO INC

NOZCO INC 325.00 15644

Premier Biotech Inc

Premier Biotech Inc 373.45 16115

Reliance Telephone Inc

Reliance Telephone Inc 600.00 13183

RVS SHREDDING

2359

01-250-0000-0000-6300 145.86 Tools/parts for Jail tower A/C S100708817.001 Furniture & Equip Maint. N

01-250-0000-0000-6400 105.14 Dryer - repair parts S100710661.001 Departmental Supplies N

5175

01-250-0207-0000-6814 629.84 Jail Commissary 1138747 Jail Canteen Account N

01-250-0000-0000-6400 11.94 Shampoo 1138748 Departmental Supplies N

427

01-250-0000-0000-6400 14.25 Receipt books - jail 303609 Departmental Supplies N

6459

01-250-0000-0000-6240 57.00 FT Correction Officer Ad 67619-1 Publication/Advertising Expense N

5613

01-250-0000-0000-6400 50.67 Casters for jail med cart 16341 Departmental Supplies N

5644

01-250-0000-0000-6300 325.00 Jail sallyport door repair 4969 Furniture & Equip Maint. N

6115

01-250-0000-0000-6363 373.45 April 2019 - Drug Testing L3315354 Medical Care Of Prisoners N

3183

01-250-0207-0000-6814 600.00 Phone cards $10 - 20 ct, $20 - D-22993 Jail Canteen Account Y

1682

01-250-0000-0000-6356 10.00 Shredding 22192 Disposal Services N



Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Account/Formula


COMMUNITY COMPLIANCE MONITORING SERVICES

COMMUNITY COMPLIANCE MONITORING SERVICES










250 Corrections-Jail2,737.25

251

31.00 16537

DESIGN HOME CENTER

DESIGN HOME CENTER 598.69 71090

GROCHOW/MATTHEW ELROY

GROCHOW/MATTHEW ELROY 1,908.08 17254

Homeward Bound Therapeutic Services

Homeward Bound Therapeutic Services 90.00 17692



423

01-250-0000-0000-6240 44.30 FT correction officer 1005430505 Publication/Advertising Expense N

441

01-250-0000-0000-6240 20.10 FT Correction Officer Ad 196568 Publication/Advertising Expense N

ProbationDEPT

6537

01-251-0295-0000-6354 31.00 Ream grant participants Apr19A Electronic Monitoring Y

1090

01-251-0000-0000-6400 95.98 Paint 126961 Departmental Supplies N

01-251-0000-0000-6400 49.08 Paint supplies 126983 Departmental Supplies N






7254

01-251-0298-0000-6816 1,908.08 DC surveillance reimb - April Program Expense Y

7692

01-251-0270-0253-6816 90.00 Group Therapy, CJ 3 Program Expense N

1609

01-251-0000-0000-6320 126.21 Toner IN2498400 Copy Mach. Maint/Supplies N



Transactions

Transactions

Transactions


Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Account/Formula






Intoximeters Inc

Intoximeters Inc 830.00 1394

Kemske Paper Co


Prairie Lakes Juvenile Detention Center

Prairie Lakes Juvenile Detention Center 5,275.34 399460

Premier Biotech Inc

Premier Biotech Inc 1,478.66 36115

RVS SHREDDING


SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP

SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP 106.00 12149

TESTDAY

TESTDAY 190.00 17403

VOYAGER FLEET SYSTEMS INC

VOYAGER FLEET SYSTEMS INC 51.07 13093

WEELBORG CHEVROLET

394

01-251-0263-0000-6610 830.00 PBT's (2) 623286 Co $200 To < $5000 N

427

01-251-0000-0000-6400 15.48 Label holders 303548 Departmental Supplies N

99460

01-251-0270-0253-6816 8.34 Prescription, TK 265-105-1 Program Expense Y

01-251-0280-0000-6844 4,351.00 Detention, TK 265-105-1 Juvenile Hold Expenses Y

01-251-0280-0000-6844 916.00 Detention, CK 270-105-1 Juvenile Hold Expenses Y

6115

01-251-0000-0000-6375 1,013.08 Drug testing supplies 2119934 Drug Testing N

01-251-0000-0000-6375 143.93 Drug testing supplies 2119935 Drug Testing N

01-251-0000-0000-6375 321.65 Drug testing confirmations L3315289 Drug Testing N

1682

01-251-0000-0000-6320 40.00 May '19 Shredding 22197 Copy Mach. Maint/Supplies N

2149

01-251-0000-0000-6374 106.00 Publisher software B09865386 Software Expense < $5,000 N

7403

01-251-0000-0000-6374 190.00 May'19 Testday software TD190501774 Software Expense < $5,000 N

3093

01-251-0000-0000-6560 51.07 Gasoline 869092312917 Gasoline & Oil N

2813

01-251-0000-0000-6310 355.27 Replaced battery, cleaned cabl 83503 Vehicle Maintenance N



Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Account/Formula






WEELBORG CHEVROLET 355.27 12813

251 Probation11,095.80

280


MENARDS (CH 33000266) 5.49 25613

280 Emergency Services5.49

282

ALPHA WIRELESS COMMUMICATIONS

ALPHA WIRELESS COMMUMICATIONS 1,066.25 1187

E-911 Independent Emergency Services

E-911 Independent Emergency Services 32.31 15365

282 911 Emergency Telephone System1,098.56

500

American Legion Post 7

American Legion Post 7 50.00 18100






Emergency ServicesDEPT

5613

01-280-0000-0000-6400 13.48 Adhesive & PVC (Shawn) 16254 Departmental Supplies N

01-280-0000-0000-6400 7.99 Return divider 16337 Departmental Supplies N

911 Emergency Telephone SystemDEPT

187

01-282-0000-0000-6358 1,066.25 May19 Maint, console, paging, 698264 Contract Services N

5365

01-282-0000-0000-6300 32.31 May'19 - 911 Services 400-0168 Furniture & Equip Maint. N

Cultural ActivitiesDEPT

8100

01-500-0000-0000-6802 50.00 Memorial Day Reimbursement Memorial Day Expense N

3227


6256


745




Transactions


-

Transactions


Transactions

Transactions


Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Account/Formula









500 Cultural Activities250.00

601



601 County Extension31.79

611

Mn Pollution Control Agency 20000988700

Mn Pollution Control Agency 20000988700 33,681.91 38170

611 Septic Loan Program33,681.91

615



615 Water Plan66.68

1 General Revenue Fund92,561.40

8113


County ExtensionDEPT

1609

01-601-0000-0000-6400 31.79 Webcam Camera 2476050 Departmental Supplies N

Septic Loan ProgramDEPT

8170

01-611-0000-0000-6847 9,147.20 Cottonwood River Watershed Pho 13th SAP Loan Repayment N

01-611-0000-0000-6847 18,121.24 Middle MN- Implementation of C 17th SAP Loan Repayment N

01-611-0000-0000-6847 6,413.47 Cottonwood River WatershedNon- 17th SAP Loan Repayment N

Water PlanDEPT

1609

01-615-0000-0000-6400 12.91 Ink cartridge (Andy) IN2414967 Departmental Supplies N

01-615-0000-0000-6400 28.89 Ink Cartridge-Andy IN2487881 Departmental Supplies N

01-615-0000-0000-6400 24.88 Ink Cartridge (Andy) IN2503817 Departmental Supplies N



Transactions

Transactions


Transactions


Transactions


Transactions


Fund Total: 159 Transactions

Account/Formula




Public Health Fund


481

Andrews/Danielle

Andrews/Danielle 175.45 17541

Availity LLC

Availity LLC 50.00 17852

COMPTON, LISA

COMPTON, LISA 244.18 26400

DALLENBACH/MELISSA

DALLENBACH/MELISSA 186.18 25662

Fausch/Tara

Fausch/Tara 165.30 26477

Gilb/Stacy

Gilb/Stacy 11.02 22297

Grosklags/Chelsea

Grosklags/Chelsea 21.46 17486

GUTES ESSEN DELI & CATERING

GUTES ESSEN DELI & CATERING 150.11 15542

Hoffmann/Melissa

Public Health NursingDEPT

7541

06-481-0472-0000-6330 175.45 April 2019 HHA Mileage Apr 2019 Mileage N

7852

06-481-0000-0000-6374 50.00 Claim Submission Fee INV00479811 Software Expense < $5,000 Y

6400

06-481-0462-0000-6330 127.60 April 2019 HFA Mileage Apr 2019 Mileage N

06-481-0462-0000-6330 116.58 April 2019 MCH Mileage Apr 2019 Mileage N

5662

06-481-0472-0000-6330 78.30 April 2019 Home Health Apr 2019 Mileage N

06-481-0472-0000-6330 107.88 April 2019 SCHA Mileage Apr 2019 Mileage N

6477



2297

06-481-0000-0000-6330 9.28 April 2019 Agency Mileage Apr 2019 Mileage N

06-481-0474-0000-6330 1.74 April 2019 DPC Mileage Apr 2019 Mileage N

7486


5542

06-481-0000-0000-6355 150.11 Catering - All staff inservice 4123 Training Expense N

1621




Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Account/Formula




Public Health Fund


Hoffmann/Melissa 465.16 41621

JORE/KAYLA

JORE/KAYLA 38.86 35289

KLOSSNER/SUSAN

KLOSSNER/SUSAN 146.45 34998

LESHOVSKY/KRISTINE

LESHOVSKY/KRISTINE 175.04 25176

MACK/VANESSA

MACK/VANESSA 56.84 17431

Mathiowetz/Judy

Mathiowetz/Judy 62.64 1633

Moritz/Karen

Moritz/Karen 377.00 61392

06-481-0000-0000-6330 276.08 April 2019 SHIP Mileage Apr 2019 Mileage N

06-481-0000-0000-6330 4.06 April 2019 Wellness/Agy Mileag Apr 2019 Mileage N

06-481-0463-0000-6330 89.32 April 2019 UC Mileage Apr 2019 Mileage N

5289

06-481-0000-0000-6330 0.58 April 2019 Jail Mileage Apr 2019 Mileage N

06-481-0472-0000-6330 35.38 April 2019 Home Health Mileage Apr 2019 Mileage N


4998




5176


06-481-0472-0000-6331 12.35 Wound Care Training - Meal Apr 2019 Travel Expense N

7431

06-481-0470-0000-6330 56.84 April 2019 WIC Mileage Apr 2019 Mileage N

633

06-481-0473-0000-6330 62.64 April 2019 School Health Milea Apr 2019 Mileage N

1392


06-481-0000-0000-6330 59.16 April 2019 SHIP Mileage Apr 2019 Mileage N

06-481-0000-0000-6330 2.32 April 2019 Brown/Nicollet CHS Apr 2019 Mileage N

06-481-0000-0000-6330 278.40 April 2019 State/Regional PH M Apr 2019 Mileage N


06-481-0472-0000-6330 0.58 April 2019 SCHA Mileage Apr 2019 Mileage N



Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Account/Formula




Public Health Fund


O'NEILL/REBECCA

O'NEILL/REBECCA 95.70 26888

PIPPERT/TAMMY

PIPPERT/TAMMY 47.30 36134

RVS SHREDDING


SEVERSON/TERESA

SEVERSON/TERESA 190.24 46538

SOUKUP/LINDA

SOUKUP/LINDA 128.47 18552

Springfield Area Community Center

Springfield Area Community Center 100.00 14723

Stark/Elen

Stark/Elen 162.40 22255

Steinbeisser/Michelle

6888



6134


06-481-0000-0000-6432 6.41 Ribbon for the Audiometers Apr 2019 Program Supplies N


1682

06-481-0000-0000-6358 5.00 Shredding 22198 Contract Services N

6538




06-481-0468-0000-6330 19.14 April 2019 CTC Mileage Apr 2019 Mileage N

8552


4723

06-481-0470-0000-6342 100.00 JUN'19 WIC Rent June 2019 Office Space Rent N

2255



6894

06-481-0460-0000-6330 274.34 April 2019 Public Hlth Emerg P Apr 2019 Mileage N




Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Account/Formula




Public Health Fund


Steinbeisser/Michelle 277.82 26894

Tauer/Laureen

Tauer/Laureen 93.09 22665

Thordson/Margaret

Thordson/Margaret 631.27 25152

TIMM/BONNIE

TIMM/BONNIE 95.70 36338

481 Public Health Nursing4,152.68

489

BROWN NICOLLET CHB

BROWN NICOLLET CHB 633.00 11235

South Country Health Alliance

South Country Health Alliance 45,076.00 1763

489 Other Public Health45,709.00

6 Public Health Fund49,861.68

2665



5152


06-481-0472-0000-6331 18.79 Wound Care Training - Meal Apr 2019 Travel Expense N

6338


06-481-0000-0000-6330 6.96 April 2019 Jail Mileage Apr 2019 Mileage N

06-481-0472-0000-6330 87.87 April 2019 Home Health Apr 2019 Mileage N

Other Public HealthDEPT

1235

06-489-0000-0000-6999 633.00 Apr'19 Radon Kit Collected April 2019 Radon Kit Remit - BNCH N

763

06-489-0000-0000-6950 45,076.00 SCHA Capital Call-PH Share Special/Extraordinary Items N



Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions


Transactions

Transactions



Account/Formula




Road And Bridge Fund


300

Card Services

Card Services 78.17 1709

Kemske Paper Co


MN CO INTERGOVENMENTAL TRUST

MN CO INTERGOVENMENTAL TRUST 137.00 13748

MRCI

MRCI 987.00 12046

Pitney Bowes Inc (supplies)

Pitney Bowes Inc (supplies) 118.98 13207

300 Administration1,363.94

310

M R Paving & Excavating

M R Paving & Excavating 735.90 2591

M-R SIGN CO INC

M-R SIGN CO INC 371.43 1997

Minnesota Paving & Materials

Minnesota Paving & Materials 3,275.67 27840

AdministrationDEPT

709

10-300-0000-0000-6355 78.17 CRANE TRAINING M91229773 Training Expense N

427

10-300-0000-0000-6400 35.63 ENVELOPES 12-1/2 X 18-1/2 303546 Departmental Supplies N

10-300-0000-0000-6400 7.16 POCKET DIVIDERS FOR BINDERS 303595 Departmental Supplies N

3748

10-300-0000-0000-6368 137.00 UTV-PROPERTY/CASUALTY/LIAB.INS 2718 Gen/Auto/Prof. Liab. Ins. N

2046

10-300-0000-0000-6366 987.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES APRIL '19 645760 Extra Hire (Not Payroll) N

3207

10-300-0000-0000-6400 118.98 2 INK CARTRIDGES FOR MAIL STAT 1012362951 Departmental Supplies N

Road MaintenanceDEPT

591

10-310-0000-0000-6500 371.25 BLACK TOP PATCH CR29 10828 R & B Supplies & Materials N

10-310-0000-0000-6500 364.65 BLACK TOP PATCH CR29 10833 R & B Supplies & Materials N

997

10-310-0000-0000-6500 371.43 ADOPT A HWY SIGNS, KALEB FISCH 203928 R & B Supplies & Materials N

7840

10-310-0000-0000-6500 2,814.59 RIP RAP CLASS I QUARTZITE CR13 1519870 R & B Supplies & Materials N

10-310-0000-0000-6500 461.08 RAILROAD BALLAST - QUARTZITE C 1519870 R & B Supplies & Materials N



Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions


Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Account/Formula






Red Rock Quarry

Red Rock Quarry 42,470.23 102189

310 Road Maintenance46,853.23

320

ERICKSON ENGINEERING CO, LLC

ERICKSON ENGINEERING CO, LLC 1,100.00 18470

MENARDS (HWY 3000276)

MENARDS (HWY 3000276) 11.97 16949



320 Construction1,365.77

340

AUTO VALUE NEW ULM

2189

10-310-0000-0000-6500 456.95 SEAL COAT CHIPS CR27 27433 R & B Supplies & Materials N

10-310-0000-0000-6500 9,453.64 CR5 SEAL COAT CHIPS 27466 R & B Supplies & Materials N

10-310-0000-0000-6500 4,517.92 CR27 SEAL COAT CHIPS 27466 R & B Supplies & Materials N

10-310-0000-0000-6500 4,788.00 SEAL COAT CHIPS CR5 27528 R & B Supplies & Materials N


10-310-0000-0000-6500 577.30 RIP RAP CR2 27544 R & B Supplies & Materials N





ConstructionDEPT

8470

10-320-0000-0000-6267 1,100.00 BRIDGE ANALYSIS 13071 Consultant Fees N

6949

10-320-0000-0000-6500 11.97 SHOVEL 16255 R & B Supplies & Materials N

423

10-320-0000-0000-6240 253.80 OVERLAY SURFACING BID ADVERTIS 1080810505 Publication/Advertising Expense N

Equipment MaintenanceDEPT

4311

10-340-0000-0000-6500 47.56 HD AIR FILTER U110 10288635 R & B Supplies & Materials N

10-340-0000-0000-6500 41.84 OIL FILTER U110 10288635 R & B Supplies & Materials N

10-340-0000-0000-6500 12.04 HD OIL FILTER U18 10288635 R & B Supplies & Materials N


10-340-0000-0000-6500 46.99 BALL BEARING U110 10288734 R & B Supplies & Materials N

10-340-0000-0000-6500 12.29 FITTING, HOSE U121 10288996 R & B Supplies & Materials N



Transactions


Transactions

Transactions

Transactions


Account/Formula






AUTO VALUE NEW ULM 752.86 254311

HARRISON TRUCK CENTERS

HARRISON TRUCK CENTERS 279.38 37063

Macqueen Equip Inc

Macqueen Equip Inc 532.29 31842

NAPA AUTO PARTS

10-340-0000-0000-6500 10.39 BLADE U4 10289334 R & B Supplies & Materials N


10-340-0000-0000-6500 52.02 HD OIL AND AIR FILTERS U107 10289414 R & B Supplies & Materials N

10-340-0000-0000-6500 48.63 HYDRAULIC HOSE AND FITTINGS U1 10289725 R & B Supplies & Materials N

10-340-0000-0000-6500 3.99 BLK SHLD RETAINERS U110 10289738 R & B Supplies & Materials N

10-340-0000-0000-6500 14.39 HOSE, PIPE U121 10290008 R & B Supplies & Materials N

10-340-0000-0000-6500 42.99 SERPENTINE BELT U80 10290083 R & B Supplies & Materials N




10-340-0000-0000-6500 15.63 OIL FILTER U32 10290679 R & B Supplies & Materials N

10-340-0000-0000-6500 32.06 HD HYDRAULIC FILTER U94 10290776 R & B Supplies & Materials N

10-340-0000-0000-6500 86.29 HD AIR & OIL FILTER U108 10290776 R & B Supplies & Materials N

10-340-0000-0000-6500 2.49 CLEARANCE LIGHT U98 10290776 R & B Supplies & Materials N

10-340-0000-0000-6500 42.99 AUTOMOTIVE V-RIBBED U80 10290776 R & B Supplies & Materials N

10-340-0000-0000-6500 98.40 STARTER U45 10291465 R & B Supplies & Materials N

10-340-0000-0000-6500 14.48 WRENCHES 10291525 R & B Supplies & Materials N

10-340-0000-0000-6500 25.33 HD FUEL FILTER U108 10291556 R & B Supplies & Materials N

10-340-0000-0000-6500 16.04 FUEL FILTER U108 10291669 R & B Supplies & Materials N

7063

10-340-0000-0000-6500 117.07 AIR ELEMENT U80 X2010600274:01 R & B Supplies & Materials N

10-340-0000-0000-6500 117.07 AIR ELEMENT U107 X201060274:01 R & B Supplies & Materials N

10-340-0000-0000-6500 45.24 SENSOR-FUEL WATER-INAMP CONNEC X201060948:01 R & B Supplies & Materials N

1842

10-340-0000-0000-6500 40.20 BUSHINGS U115 P18934 R & B Supplies & Materials N

10-340-0000-0000-6500 40.19 BUSHING U18 P18934 R & B Supplies & Materials N

10-340-0000-0000-6500 451.90 CUTTING EDGE U18 P19211 R & B Supplies & Materials N

269

10-340-0000-0000-6500 9.00 MOUNT U32 598823 R & B Supplies & Materials N

10-340-0000-0000-6500 11.99 PIN CLIP U4 599286 R & B Supplies & Materials N

10-340-0000-0000-6500 13.82 LED MARKER LAMP U4 599286 R & B Supplies & Materials N

10-340-0000-0000-6500 5.69 ACCESSORY U110 599863 R & B Supplies & Materials N



Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Account/Formula






NAPA AUTO PARTS 40.50 4269

New Ulm Tire

New Ulm Tire 1,222.56 21999

North Central International

North Central International 3,282.35 6124

Powerplan Oib

Powerplan Oib 826.78 36360

Stepp MFG

Stepp MFG 224.00 28461

340 Equipment Maintenance7,160.72

350

Franks Shoe Repair

Franks Shoe Repair 300.00 25985

Locators & Supplies Inc

1999

10-340-0000-0000-6328 99.00 DISMOUNT, MOUNT 2 TIRES U108 246883 Repair & Maint Services N

10-340-0000-0000-6328 1,123.56 TIRE RETREAD U108 247061 Repair & Maint Services N

124

10-340-0000-0000-6500 25.65 PRESS PR U114 105457 R & B Supplies & Materials N

10-340-0000-0000-6500 50.32 BRAKE U60 105639 R & B Supplies & Materials N

10-340-0000-0000-6500 38.71 GLASS U111 105685 R & B Supplies & Materials N

10-340-0000-0000-6500 42.48 NUT U108 105700 R & B Supplies & Materials N

10-340-0000-0000-6500 762.58 KIT, GOLDTO 43J U108 166625 R & B Supplies & Materials N

10-340-0000-0000-6328 2,362.61 CLAMPS,GASKET ENGINE BRAKE, BO 21975 Repair & Maint Services N

6360

10-340-0000-0000-6500 509.03 ACCELERATOR U94 P79194 R & B Supplies & Materials N

10-340-0000-0000-6500 72.75 SEALS, O-RING U93 P79267 R & B Supplies & Materials N

10-340-0000-0000-6500 245.00 FITTINGS, HOSE, O-RINGS U92 P79268 R & B Supplies & Materials N

8461

10-340-0000-0000-6500 158.52 VALVE 1" 3-WAY BALL U44 55547 R & B Supplies & Materials N

10-340-0000-0000-6500 65.48 SWITCH WAND TRIGGER U44 55613 R & B Supplies & Materials N

Maint & Constr. UnallocatedDEPT

5985

10-350-0000-0000-6500 150.00 SAFETY SHOES J.LUDEWIG 231570 R & B Supplies & Materials N

10-350-0000-0000-6500 150.00 SAFETY SHOES C.GROEBNER 231570 R & B Supplies & Materials N

628

10-350-0000-0000-6500 134.89 SAFETY SHIRTS & VESTS 275243-IN R & B Supplies & Materials N

10-350-0000-0000-6500 501.83 SAFETY SHIRTS,GLASSES, HATS, E 275280-IN R & B Supplies & Materials N

10-350-0000-0000-6500 55.95 SAFETY SUNHATS W/NECK SHADE 275491-IN R & B Supplies & Materials N



Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions


Transactions

Account/Formula






Locators & Supplies Inc 692.67 3628

350 Maint & Constr. Unallocated992.67

360

AUTO VALUE NEW ULM

AUTO VALUE NEW ULM 225.34 74311

Ccp Industries

Ccp Industries 107.67 13172

CINTAS CORP

CINTAS CORP 20.64 15249

MATHESON TRI GAS INC

MATHESON TRI GAS INC 28.70 1684

Terminal Supply Co

Terminal Supply Co 180.15 28710

Zahl Equip Service Inc

Zahl Equip Service Inc 5,336.00 18410

360 Shop Maintenance5,898.50

Shop MaintenanceDEPT

4311

10-360-0000-0000-6500 80.92 SPOOL CABLE 10288563 R & B Supplies & Materials N

10-360-0000-0000-6500 20.96 SOCKETS, TIRE PLUG GLUE, WRENC 10289370 R & B Supplies & Materials N

10-360-0000-0000-6500 5.99 1/2" WRENCH 10289486 R & B Supplies & Materials N

10-360-0000-0000-6500 19.99 WHIP HOSE FOR 3/4" AIR WRENCH 10290254 R & B Supplies & Materials N

10-360-0000-0000-6500 20.99 PERMATEX MEDIUM STRETCH 10290776 R & B Supplies & Materials N

10-360-0000-0000-6500 7.99 TAPE COMBO PACK 10290889 R & B Supplies & Materials N

10-360-0000-0000-6500 68.50 1/2 CR FLEX HANDLE 10290978 R & B Supplies & Materials N

3172

10-360-0000-0000-6500 107.67 SHOP CLOTHS IN02309105 R & B Supplies & Materials N

5249

10-360-0000-0000-6328 20.64 RUG SERVICE 4/30 4020992661 Repair & Maint Services N

684

10-360-0000-0000-6500 28.70 CYLINDER RENTAL MAY '19 19618778 R & B Supplies & Materials N

8710

10-360-0000-0000-6500 114.15 NYLON RING TERMINALS,CLEARANCE 31323-00 R & B Supplies & Materials N

10-360-0000-0000-6500 66.00 GRINDING WHEELS 33006-00 R & B Supplies & Materials N

8410

10-360-0000-0000-6600 5,336.00 U372 FUEL TANK & FILL-RITE PUM 42219 Co $5000 Or > N



Transactions


Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions


Account/Formula






10 Road And Bridge Fund63,634.83




Account/Formula




Human Services


454


MENARDS (CH 33000266) 11.61 15613

Runnings-Marshall


454 Income Maint24.10

455


MENARDS (CH 33000266) 20.64 15613

Runnings-Marshall


South Country Health Alliance

South Country Health Alliance 228,112.00 1763

455 Social Services228,154.85

11 Human Services228,178.95

Income MaintDEPT

5613

11-454-0140-0000-6300 11.61 Painting supplies (PHN) 16589 Furniture/Equip/License Maint. N

1027

11-454-0140-0000-6300 12.49 1/2 HP cast iron transfer pump 5883625 Furniture/Equip/License Maint. N

Social ServicesDEPT

5613

11-455-0140-0000-6300 20.64 Painting supplies (PHN) 16589 Furniture/Equip/License Maint. N

1027

11-455-0140-0000-6300 22.21 1/2 HP cast iron transfer pump 5883625 Furniture/Equip/License Maint. N

763

11-455-0700-0000-6950 228,112.00 SCHA Capital Call-HS Share Special/Extraordinary Items N



Transactions

Transactions


Transactions

Transactions

Transactions



Account/Formula




Park Fund


550

AMERICAN WELDING & MACHINING INC

AMERICAN WELDING & MACHINING INC 120.13 1488

HOFFMANN/JEFF

HOFFMANN/JEFF 23.20 14883


MENARDS (CH 33000266) 18.93 15613

River View Sanitation

River View Sanitation 18.72 13757

Searles Well Drilling Inc

Searles Well Drilling Inc 656.75 18167

VICTORY CORPS

VICTORY CORPS 87.94 16168

550 Parks And Recreation925.67

18 Park Fund925.67

Parks And RecreationDEPT

488

18-550-0905-0000-6564 120.13 Repair gate/Lost Dog & Fox 0026638 Park Maint & Supplies N

4883

18-550-0905-0000-6330 23.20 (4)RT to LF 4/20;4/29 April/2019 Mileage Y

5613

18-550-0905-0000-6564 18.93 Garbage bags & TT 16347 Park Maint & Supplies N

3757

18-550-0903-0000-6564 18.72 2 yd dumpster/MC 22835 Park Maint & Supplies N

8167

18-550-0905-0000-6564 656.75 Pump holding tank Lost Dog & 22015 Park Maint & Supplies N

6168

18-550-0000-0000-6400 87.94 Flag/LH 1621050 Departmental Supplies N



Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions



Account/Formula




Ditch Fund


856

BEHRENDS/MARK

BEHRENDS/MARK 300.00 16413

JONES, HAUGH & SMITH INC

JONES, HAUGH & SMITH INC 2,000.00 16408

856 Judicial Ditch 5 B&R2,300.00

868

BEHRENDS/MARK




868 Judicial Ditch 18 B&R4,420.00

872

BEHRENDS/MARK




872 Judicial Ditch 25 R&B2,150.00

876

BEHRENDS/MARK


Judicial Ditch 5 B&RDEPT

6413

20-856-0000-0000-6304 300.00 Apr'19 JD#5 View (5 hrs) Ditch Maintenance Y

6408

20-856-0000-0000-6304 2,000.00 JD#5 Benefit Redetermination 39664 Ditch Maintenance N

Judicial Ditch 18 B&RDEPT

6413

20-868-0000-0000-6304 420.00 Apr'19 JD#18 View (7 hrs) Ditch Maintenance Y

6408


Judicial Ditch 25 R&BDEPT

6413

20-872-0000-0000-6304 150.00 Apr'19 JD#25 View (2.5 hrs) Ditch Maintenance Y

6408



6413

20-876-0000-0000-6304 330.00 Apr'19 JD#35 View (5.5 hrs) Ditch Maintenance Y



Transactions

Transactions


Transactions

Transactions


Transactions

Transactions


Transactions

Account/Formula




Ditch Fund





879




905

BEHRENDS/MARK

BEHRENDS/MARK 4,280.00 26413

CHRISTIANSON/CHRIS

CHRISTIANSON/CHRIS 746.40 26415

LANGSETH/KENDALL

LANGSETH/KENDALL 892.40 27101



905 County Ditch 55,984.60

912

BEHRENDS/MARK

6408



6408


County Ditch 5DEPT

6413

20-905-0000-0000-6304 3,990.00 Apr'19 CD#5 View (66.5 hrs) Ditch Maintenance Y

20-905-0000-0000-6330 290.00 Apr'19 CD#5 (500 mi) Mileage Y

6415

20-905-0000-0000-6304 700.00 Apr'19 CD#5 View (14 hrs) Ditch Maintenance Y


7101

20-905-0000-0000-6304 875.00 Apr'19 CD#5 View (17.5 hrs) Ditch Maintenance Y


423

20-905-0000-0000-6240 65.80 CD#5 Ditch/Legals Publication Exp-Ads/Marketing N

County Ditch 12DEPT

6413




Transactions


Transactions


Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions


Account/Formula




Ditch Fund



CHRISTIANSON/CHRIS


912 County Ditch 12701.70

913

BEHRENDS/MARK


CHRISTIANSON/CHRIS


913 County Ditch 13731.70

961

BEHRENDS/MARK


CHRISTIANSON/CHRIS


LANGSETH/KENDALL

LANGSETH/KENDALL 313.92 27101


6415



County Ditch 13DEPT

6413


6415


20-913-0000-0000-6330 66.70 Apr'19 CD#13 )115 mi) Mileage Y

County Ditch 72DEPT

6413



6415



7101



423



Transactions

Transactions


Transactions

Transactions


Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

Account/Formula




Ditch Fund



961 County Ditch 721,154.12

20 Ditch Fund25,372.12

20-961-0000-0000-6304 56.40 CD#72 Ditch/Legals Ditch Maintenance N



Transactions



Account/Formula




Landfill Fund


390

A H Hermel Company

A H Hermel Company 211.64 12153

Mathiowetz Enterprises Inc

Mathiowetz Enterprises Inc 4,033.12 3303

New Ulm/City Of

New Ulm/City Of 350.00 18311

390 Sanitation4,594.76

60 Landfill Fund4,594.76

SanitationDEPT

2153

60-390-0000-0000-6400 211.64 Garbage Bags-LF 764528 Departmental Supplies N

303

60-390-0000-0000-6307 656.20 Gen Maint BCL-18.1 Landfill Maintenance N

60-390-0000-0000-6311 2,177.50 daily cover BCL-18.1 Landfill Daily Cover N

60-390-0000-0000-6400 1,199.42 New Cell Access Roads BCL-18.1 Departmental Supplies N

8311

60-390-0000-0000-6327 350.00 (4)Leachate Dump 4/3;4/25 INV02027 Leachate Management N



Transactions

Transactions

Transactions



Account/Formula




Forfeited Tax Fund


151

HOTOVEC/KELLY

HOTOVEC/KELLY 23.78 16337

151 Non-Departmental (Non-Budgeted)23.78

77 Forfeited Tax Fund23.78

465,153.19

Non-Departmental (Non-Budgeted)DEPT

6337

77-151-0000-0000-6330 23.78 Cobden STS work task 5/14/19 Mileage N



Transactions



Final Total: 203 Vendors 352 Transactions

Account/Formula


COMMISSIONER'S VOUCHERS ENTRIES 9:01AM5/15/19

TRES#CRM




Amount

92,561.40 General Revenue Fund 1

49,861.68 Public Health Fund 6

63,634.83 Road And Bridge Fund 10

228,178.95 Human Services 11

925.67 Park Fund 18

25,372.12 Ditch Fund 20

4,594.76 Landfill Fund 60

23.78 Forfeited Tax Fund 77

465,153.19

NameFundRecap by Fund

All Funds Total Approved by, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

REQUEST FOR ACTION Requested Board Dale: Originaling Department:

May 21, 2019 Auditor-Treasurer Item: Presenter: Jean Prochniak I Cash Mgmtllnvst Report Estimated Time: 2 Minutes Board Action Requested:

Receive and order tiled the Cash Management/Investment Report thru April 30, 2019 that reflects a portfolio balance of $25,654,752.04.

--

Background

See attached reports to review the breakdown of the invested funds. Currently we have receipted $183 ,838.45 in interest income for 2019.

I have updated my spreadsheet on the buffer loans to illustrate the potential interest revenue on these loans as well.

I

Supporting Documents [8Jattached 0 none Notes:

~Jv-&J€/v ~- -rs"'i9 Board Action: Motion Offered By: __

Motion Seconded By: ___ Approved as Requested D Vote by Acclamation:

Roll Call Vote: Yes No Denied D District I D D Tabled D

District 2 D D District 3 D D

Other D I

District 4 D D District 5 D 0

gbode

Typewritten Text

# 4

gbode

Oval

C:\Users\jprochniak\Desktop\lnvestment Report current.xls

Dated

Code-

May 2,2019

Maturity lnterest lnterest at

lnvestment Portfolio Weighted Average Yield

prepared by Jean P@hniak

Date TermYield

1C:\Users~prochniak\Desktop\lnvestment Report current.xls

Dated May 2, 2019

ID Code-Number Bank Institution

99 Magic-Liauid Assets 12 CBNU 12 CBNU 12 CBNU- Credit Card Acet 12 CBNU-LB 12 CBNU-eRecordina 8 Bank Midwest

50110014610 5 United Prarie Bank 149159-MM-4 6 Cathay Bank 17284AW53 6 CIT Bank 36157PFR5 6 GE Capital-Draper UT 38143AVC6 6 Goldman Sachs 06740KHF7 6 Barclays BK -Delaware 20451P-UU-8 6 Compass Bank 23204HFB9 6 Customers Bk 78658Q-3S-O 6 Safra Bank 05580AAU8 6 BMW Bank 319141CV7 6 Highland Park IL 02587DXY9 6 American Exp Ent Bk 140420SH4 6 Capital One 99000N-VH-1 6 Comenity Bank 14042E-4Z-O 6 Capital One Natl 88241TBU3 6 Texas Exchange 512108-KV8 6 Lakeside 687377-DS-7 6 Orrstown Bank 795450WV3 6 Sallie Mae Bank 90348JFW5 6 UBS Bank 33646CHU1 6 First Source Bank 48125Y5K6 6 JP Morgan Chase 3134AG9N52 6 FHLB 3136G3V77 6 FNMA 17312QR84 6 Citibank Sioux Falls 949763-UC-8 6 Wells Fargo Bank 3134GASR6 6 FHLB 32082BEC9 6 First Merchants Bank 3134GBTZ5 6 FHLB 3134GBVF6 6 FHLB 45906ABP1 6 International Bank-Munci I 3130AC2L7 6 FHLB 3130ABWY8 6 FHLB 20350ACX7 6 Cmnty Bk Chesapeake 99000FGR3 6 World's Foremost 3133EGEH4 6 Fed Farm Credit 40434YKY2 6 HSBC 712303AA4 6 Peoples Security 3134GAUG7 6 FHLB 05581WK53 6 BMO Harris

Investment Portfolio Weighted Average Yield

prepared by Jean Prochniak Auditor-Treasurer

Date Amount Yield Invested

2,337,836.47 2.000% 1-Apr-19 5,875,285.87 2.020% 1-Apr-19

722120.26 2.020% 1-Apr-19 13,802.62 2.020% 1-Apr-19

203,706.82 2.020% 1-Aor-19 0.00 0.020% 1-Aor-19

200,000.00 2.000% 21-May-18 245,000.00 3.000% 24-Sep-18 245,000.00 2.250% 5-Jun-18 245,000.00 2.100% 13-Jun-12 245,000.00 2.150% 15-Jun-12 245,000.00 2.150% 20-Jun-12 245,000.00 2.050% 16-Jul-14 245,000.00 2.450% 9-Jul-18 245,000.00 2.100% 21-Feb-18 245,000.00 2.450% 16-Jul-18 245,000.00 2.100% 9-Sep-14 247,000.00 2.050% 29-0ct-14 245,000.00 2.000% 14-May-15 225,000.00 2.150% 17-Jun-15 200,000.00 2.250% 24-Jun-15 245,000.00 2.300% 29-Jul-15 245,000.00 1.900% ll-Aug-17 245,000.00 2.000% 28-Aug-15 245,000.00 2.000% 28-Aug-15 245,000.00 2.200% 4-Nov-15 245,000.00 3.100% 21-Nov-18 245,000.00 2.000% 28-Jul-17 245,000.00 1.200% 15-Jul-16

1,500,000.00 1.500% ll-Jul-16 1,500,000.00 2.000% 24-Aug-16

245,000.00 3.000% 24-Aug-18 245,000.00 3.100% 28-Sep-18

1,000,000.00 2.000% 28-0ct-16 245,000.00 2.050% 30-0ct-15 755,000.00 2.000% 12-Jun-17

1,000,000.00 2.000% 19-Jul-17 245,000.00 2.100% 31-Jul-17 300,000.00 2.150% 30-Aug-17 625,000.00 2.050% 24-Aug-17 245,000.00 2.050% 22-Sep-17 200,000.00 2.450% 8-May-13

1,100,000.00 2.020% 13-Jun-16 245,000.00 2.000% 23-Jun-17 245,000.00 3.000% 31-Aug-18

1,035,000.00 2.000% 27-0ct-16 245,000.00 3.000% 28-Jan-19

25,654,752.04

2.06%

Term Maturity Interest Interest at (Days) Date 1 day yield Maturity

30 30-Aor-19 128.10 3843.02 30 30-Aor-19 325.15 9,754.58 30 30-Aor-19 39.96 1,198.92 30 30-Aor-19 0.76 22.92 30 30-Aor-19 11.27 338.21 30 30-AOr-19 0.00 0.00

365 21-May-19 10.96 4,000.00 1,095 4-Sep-21 20.14 22,050.00

365 3-Jun-19 15.10 5,512.50 2,555 13-Jun-19 14.10 36,015.00 2,555 17-Jun-19 14.43 36,872.50 2,555 20-Jun-19 14.43 36,872.50 1,825 16-Jul-19 13.76 25,112.50

395 9-Aua-19 16.45 6,495.86 730 21-Aug-19 14.10 10,290.00 425 16-Sep-19 16.45 6,989.21

1,825 19-5ep-19 14.10 25,725.00 1,825 29-0ct-19 13.87 25,317.50 1,825 14-May-20 13.42 24,500.00 1,825 17-Jun-20 13.25 24,187.50 1,825 24-Jun-20 12.33 22,500.00 1,825 29-Jul-20 15.44 28,175.00 1,095 ll-Aug-20 12.75 13,965.00 1,825 28-Aug-20 13.42 24,500.00 1,825 28-Aug-20 13.42 24,500.00 1,825 4-Nov-20 14.77 26,950.00

731 23-Nov-20 20.81 15,210.81 1,460 28-Jun-21 13.42 19,600.00 1,825 15-Jul-21 8.05 14,700.00 1,825 19-Jul-21 61 .64 112,500.00 1,825 24-Aug-21 82.19 150,000.00 1,095 24-Aug-21 20.14 22,050.00 1,095 28-Sep-21 20.81 22,785.00 2,190 28-0ct-21 54.79 120,000.00 2,190 l -Nov-21 13.76 30,135.00 1,825 29-Jun-22 41 .37 75,500.00 1,825 19-Jul-22 54.79 100,000.00 1,825 29-Jul-22 14.10 25,725.00 1,825 24-Aug-22 17.67 32,250.00 1,825 24-Aug-22 35.10 64,062.50 1,825 22-Sep-22 13.76 25,112.50 3,650 8-May-23 13.42 49,000.00 3,650 13-Jun-23 60.88 222,200.00 1,095 23-Jun-23 13.42 14,700.00 1,095 31-Aug-21 20.14 22,050.00 2,555 27-0ct-23 56.71 144,900.00 1,095 28-Jan-22 20.14 22,050.00

68,891 1449.04 1,750,218.53

5/212019

gbode

Oval

DATE 05/1sl2019

1 REVENUE

6 PUBIJIC HEALTH

7 M]SSING HEIRS

10 ROAD & BRIDGE

11 HUMAN SERV]CES

14 BUILDING

18 PARK

2O DITCH

32 DEBT SERVICE

35 HRA

37 CAPITAL IMP

60 I,ANDFILL

61 SCORE

70 TAX & PENALTY

71 MTG REGISTRAT]ON

73 REGION 9

74 SCHOOLS

75 TCV

77 FORFEITED TAX

78 PREPAID TAX

79 ASSI'RANCE

80 STATE DEED TAX

81 I,ANDFIIJIJ TRUST

83 COLLABORATIVE

BROWN COUNTY AUDITOR_TREASURERIS OFFICE

COLLECTIONS, PAYMENTS & CASH BALANCE

FOR 0!/0L/20L9 THRV 04/30/20L9

CURRENT

TOTALS 26284454.84 11555933 .30

BEG BAL

4024620 .27

1009506.69

31983.77

944023L.74

sr.r.1388.96

].83233 .64

145280.03

877812.21nn

.00

2]57 45 . L2

L76584't .69

129411 .9't

.001q4 nn

502.83

49896.77

230153.87

].69720.78

171809.17

t6302 . l7300.91

2930922 .68

345229.57

COLLECTlONS

1116395.70

421-553.13

.00

2838347 .90

2!272!6.0453278.52

40.00

3).9].9.82

.00

.00

1560.00

163713.28

2840 .69

4989409 . t2.00

.00

.00

.00

L8779.20

L6258'7.L3-

s25.00

57.'75

6175.66

5670'7.62

PAYMENTS

4005563 .59

668627 .05

.00

2047 404 .00

369090s.38

.00

25973.97

806493 .72

.00

.00

71090.25

397255 .92

29497 .94

.00

70139.72

502.83

49896.77

230153.87

3875.84

.00

120.00

73193.15

.00

t23348 . L0

L2295636 . LO

TRANSFERS

604643.70-

772r.'7L

.00

530t2.7238812.3s-

7353.00-

74 .72 -

446779.46

.00

.00

.00

.00

160.93-

119.00-

69985.'72

.00

.00

.00

.00

t-l-9.00

78.00

7 3434 . 49

.00

27.80-

CREDlTS

72933L'7 . 06

434037.44

.00

2892547 .62

2].28465.30

5327 I . 52

40.00

516010.55

.00

.00

1560.00

7637].3.2A

2440 .69

4949409.72

72308.99

.00

.00

.00

Lg779.20

1,62468.L3-

603.00

75133.15

6L75.66

567 07 .62

DEBITS

478A127.65

573390.05

.00

2048591.00

3'130966.99

7353.00

25988 .69

843804.59

.00

.00

7!O90.25

39'7255 .92

29652 . g7

119.00

72462.99

502.83

49896.77

230153.87

3875.84

.00

120.00

7 6434 . 07

.00

1,23375.90

END BAL

529809.68

770),54.48

31983.77

10284188.36

3508887.27

229L59.16

119331.34

544018 . L7

.00

.00

L4621,4 .8't

93230s.05

].02999.79

4989290 . 12

.00

.00

.00

.00

ra4624 . 14

934t .04

167 85 . r7

.00

2937098.34

379561.29

.00 L2543459.48 131'13).62.28 25654'752.04

PRD

2

DATE 05/15/2019 BROWN COUNTY AUDITOR-TREASURER'S OFFICE


FOR 01/01/2019 THRU 04 / 30/2019

CURRENT PRD

BEG BAL COLLECTIONS PAYMENTS TRANSFERS CREDITS DEBITS END BAL

1 REVENUE 4024620.27 1116396.70 4006563.59 604643.70- 1293317.06 4788127.65 529809.68

6 PUBLIC HEALTH 1009506.69 421553.13 668627.05 7721.71 434037.84 673390.05 770154.48

7 MISSING HE I RS 31983.77 .00 .00 . 00 .00 .00 31983.77

10 ROAD & BRIDGE 9440231.74 2838347 . 90 2047404.00 53012 . 72 2892547.62 2048591.00 10284188 . 36

11 HUMAN SERVICES 5111388.96 2127216.04 3690905.38 38812.35- 2128465.30 3730966.99 3508887 . 27

14 BUILDING 183233.64 53278.52 .00 7353.00- 53278.52 7353 . 00 229159.16

18 PARK 145280.03 40.00 25973.97 14.72- 40.00 25988.69 119331. 34

20 DITCH 871812.21 31919 . 82 806493.72 446779.86 516010.55 843804.59 544018.17

32 DEBT SERVICE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00

35 HRA .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00

37 CAPITAL IMP 215745.12 1560.00 71090.25 .00 1560.00 71090.25 146214.87

60 LANDFILL 1165847.69 163713.28 397255 . 92 .00 163713.28 397255.92 932305.05

61 SCORE 129811.97 2840.69 29491.94 160.93- 2840.69 29652.87 102999.79

70 TAX & PENALTY .00 4989409 . 12 .00 119.00- 4989409.12 119.00 4989290.12

71 MTG REGISTRATION 154.00 .00 70139.72 69985.72 72308.99 72462 . 99 .00

73 REGION 9 502.83 .00 502.83 .00 .00 502.83 .00

74 SCHOOLS 49896.77 . 00 49896 . 77 . 00 .00 49896 . 77 .00

75 TCV 230153.87 .00 230153.87 . 00 .00 230153.87 .00

77 FORFEITED TAX 169720.78 18779 . 20 3875.84 .00 18779.20 3875.84 184624.14

78 PREPAID TAX 171809.17 162587.13- .00 119.00 162468.13 - .00 9341.04

79 ASSURANCE 16302.17 525.00 120.00 78.00 603.00 120.00 16785.17

80 STATE DEED TAX 300 . 91 57.75 73793.15 73434 . 49 76133.16 76434.07 .00

81 LANDFILL TRUST 2930922 . 68 6175.66 .00 .00 6175.66 .00 2937098.34

83 COLLABORATIVE 385229 . 57 56707 . 62 123348 . 10 27.80- 56707.62 123375.90 318561.29

TOTALS 26284454.84 11665933.30 12295636.10 .00 12543459.48 13173162.28 25654752.04

gbode

Oval

DATE 05/15/2079 BROWN COUNTY AUDITOR-TREASURERI S OFFICE


FOR oL/ 0t/ 20l.9'[HRV 04 / 30 /20:.9

DEPOSITS WlTHDRAWALS

CURRENT

INTEREST

.00

.00

.00

.00

CREDITS

BEG BAI,

END BA],

.00

.00

245000.00

245000.00

DEBITS

15057000.00

245000.00 16057000.00

3 AMERICANA BANK

5 UNITED PRAIRIE

6 WELI,S FARGO

8 BANK MIDWEST

.00

.00

.00

.00

33.00-

.00

.00

245000.00

.00.00.00

.00

.00

.00.00

200000.00

200000.00

C]TIZENS BANK-NU

11 CBNU-TERM INVESTM

12 CITIZENS-NEW UI,M

13 TRANSFER ACCT

14 CREDIT CARD ACCT

]-5 LICENSE BUREAU

].6 E RECORDING

MAGIC F['ND

98 MAGIC CDIS

99 CADRE F]NANCIAL

SOUTHPOINT

10 SOUTI.IPOINT FED CU

21 SP MEMBER ACCT

5398413.59 ],2295669.10

.00.00

.00

9001s0.00- 815605.93

9842 .23 - L5373.53

25000.00- r11059.14

Lt4945 .87 - 96116.05

805563.33

900150.00 722120 .26

8427.22

9992.23 13802.62

111614.68

24957 .00 203'706.82

18829.81

Lt4945.A7 .00

.00

.00.00

4699465 . 09

23L38.19 ?049938.10 137L6489.88 12540669 .r0 5875285.87

8131?2.06

15L92 .55

rL62r0 .45

95L1 5.05

.00

4r7].].90.47

3434 .87

30.98

848.69

.00

.00

55538.02

.00

.00.00 .00

2AL85.29 6000000.00- 4199375.76

4L38460.71

5000000.00 2337936.47

.00

.00

.00 .00.00.00

.00

.00

.00

26244454 .84

1-9835724.20 25654152.04

.00

.00

TOTALS

LL6a0295.28 t2295636.a0 .00 ).920602L.40

.00

.00

WIRES

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

3

DATE 05/15/2019 BROWN COUNTY AUDITOR-TREASURER'S OFFICE


FOR 01/01 / 2019 THRU 04 / 30/2019

CURRENT PRD BEG BAL

DEPOSITS WITHDRAWALS INTEREST WIRES CREDITS DEBITS END BAL

3 AMERICANA BANK .00

.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00

5 UNITED PRAIRIE 245000.00

.00 .00 .00 .00 . 00 .00 245000.00

6 WELLS FARGO 16057000.00

.00 .00 . 00 .00 245000.00 245000.00 16057000.00

8 BANK MIDWEST 200000.00

.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 200000.00

CITIZENS BANK-NU

11 CBNU-TERM INVESTM .00

.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00

12 CITIZENS-NEW ULM 4699465.09

6398413.59 12295669.10 23138.19 7049938.10 13716489.88 12540669.10 5875285.87

13 TRANSFER ACCT 805663.33

813172.06 .00 3434 . 87 900150 . 00- 816606.93 900150.00 722120.26

14 CREDIT CARD ACCT 8421. 22

15192.65 .00 30.98 9842.23- 15373.63 9992.23 13802.62

15 LICENSE BUREAU 111614.68

116210.45 33.00- 848.69 25000.00- 117059 .1 4 24967.00 203706.82

16 E RECORDING 18829.81

96116.06 . 00 .00 114945.87- 96116.06 114945.87 .00

MAGIC FUND

98 MAGIC CD'S .00

.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00

99 CADRE FINANCIAL 4138460.71

4171190.47 .00 28185.29 6000000.00- 4199375.76 6000000.00 2337836.47

SOUTH POINT

10 SOUTH POINT FED CU .00

. 00 .00 . 00 .00 .00 .00 .00

21 SP MEMBER ACCT .00

.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00

TOTALS 26284454.84

11610295.28 12295636.10 55638.02 .00 19206021.40 19835724.20 25654752.04

gbode

Oval

oursrANDrNG BUFFER rOANS AS OF 4l30lt9

01-149-0560{903-6941 lhter-tundLoancDf3 UE BUFFER03PRINCIPAI- sl37l2otaofio 75,000.00 2018BUFFERSTR|PLoAN-cDo3 55,686.2201-149{560-@03-6941 lnter-tund Loan CDf3 ilE 7l31,l2o7ao:@

772.53

01-149-0s60-0909-6941 lnter-tundLoancD*ll lE U28l2O780tO0 350,000.00 2O18BUFF€RSTRIPLOAN-CD11 236,002.4301-149-0560-0909-6941 lhter-tund Loah cD#l1 lE BUFFER 11 PRINCIPAL 5l31.l2O7aO.O0

113,997.57 67^/ 4.559.90

01-149{560{9486941 lnter-tund Loan CDf58 UC BUFFER 58 PRINCIPAL Sl3ll2OI8OtOO 109,259.84c1-149{560-0948-6941 lnter-tundloancofs8 UE Tl3tl2o8otoo 17s,000.00 2ol8BUFFERsTRrproAN-cDs8

65,740.L6 63* 2,629.61

C1-149-0560-0953-5941 lnter-fundLoanCDl,63 UE 2l2A/201a OIOO 341,000.00 2018 BUFFER sTRrp |-OAN-CD63

262,532.6a 7a,467.32 777. 3,138.59

149{550-0955-6941 lnterfund Loan CDrl57 llE BUFFER 57 PRINCIPAL 5/3L/2OLaO$O 111,000.00 2018 EUFFER STRIP LOAN-CD57 705,572.82

4,327.L8 t73.O9

lntetrfund Loan CD[58 lE 404,000.00 2018 BUFFER STRtp tOAN-CD68

3L4,592.47

3,416.29'1494560-0959-6941 lnter-fund Loan CDf70 tlE BUFFER 70 PRINCIPAI" 5/31/2018 0:00 59,000.00 2018 BUFFER STRIP toAN-cO7o s0,972.52

321.10

D1-1if9-0560{960-5941 lnter-tundl,o.ncDl71 tlE U2tl2OI8OtOO 110,000.00 2oI8BUFFERSTR|PLOAN{D71,1-149{55q}96O6941 lnter-tund l-@n CDfil llE EUFFER 71 PRltilClPAL sl3y2olsotoo 76,773.54 697.

1.329.05149-0560-0947-6941 lnter-fund Loah CD 57 BUFFERSTPRINCIPAI- gllol2ola |42,OOO.O0 2018Sufferstriptoan-CD57 109,995.58 32,OO4.42

1,280.18

1 lnter-fund l"oan CD 45 BUFFER45PRINCIPAL 3h0l20r9 17,000.00 2019BufferStriptoancD45 4,747.77

12,858.23

165.67

,1-149-560-0951-5941 lnter-tundLoanCD50 UE BUFFER60PRINCIPAI 3/l0l2ol8 317,000.00 2Ol9Buffe.StriptoanCD60238,593.48 7a,406.52 7s% 3,136.26

11-149-550{904{941 lnter-fundLoanCD4 YE BUFFER04PRINCIPAL 4h9l2OL9 97,000.00 2019BufferStripLoanCD0410,553.85 86,446.L5 119 3,457.85

)1-149-560-0908-6941 lnter-FundLoanCDl0 JIE BUFFERl0PRlNClPAL 4h9l2OT9 365,000.00 2019BufferStriptoancDlO75,158.73 2a9,a37.27 219 71,593.25

)1-149-560{9135941 lnter-tundt6anCD12 ilE BufrerCD12Principal 511612019 147,00O.q) 2019BufierStiipL@nCD12147,000.00 5.880.00

)1-149-560-0942-6941 lnterotundl@nCD49 YE CD49Repair&Resre 4l3Ol20L9 22,000.00 Repair&Re*rc22,OOO.OO 880.00

$ 47,8s3.47

TheE are authorized tempoEry loans from Revenue fund to the lndividual dEinate accounts forthe implementation ofbuffer strips.

AccountNumber AaaountDescription TranType VendorName AuditDate Amount TiansDeicription Pd to Date Balanae Due i: Pd E5t tnterest year 1

4

OUTSTANDING BUFFER LOANS AS OF 4/30/19

01·149-0560-0903-6941 tnter·fund loan CO#3 lIE BUFFER 03 PRINCIPAL 5/31/20180:00 75,000.00 2018 BUFFER STRIP LOAN-CD03 55,686.22

01·149-0560-0903-6941 Inter-fund Loan CDII3 l/E 7/31/20180:00

19,313.28 74% 772.53

01·149-0560-0909-6941 Inter-fund loan (0#11 l/E 2/28/2018 0:00 350,000.00 2018 8UFFER STRIP lOAN·C011 236,002.43

01·149·0560-0909·6941 Inter-fund loan CD#l1 l/E BUFFER 11 PRINCIPAL 5/31/20180:00

113,997.57 67% 4,559.90

01·149-0560-0948-6941 Inter-fund loan CD#S8 l/E BUFFER 58 PRINCIPAL 5/31/20180:00 109,259.84 01·149-0560-0948-6941 Inter-fund loan (0#58 lIE 7/31/20180:00 175,000.00 2018 8UFFER STRIP lOAN-C058

65,740.16 63% 2,629.61

01·149-0560-0953·6941 Inter-fund loan (0#63 l/E 2/28/20180:00 341,000.00 2018 8UFFER STRIP LOAN-CD63 262,532.68 78,467.32 77% 3,138.69

01·149-0560-0956-6941 Inter-fund loan CD#67 lIE BUFFER 67 PRINCIPAL 5/31/20180:00 111,000.00 2018 8UFFER STRIP lOAN -CD67 106,672.82

4,327.18 96% 173.09

01·149-0560-0957-6941 Inter-fund Loan (0#68 lIE 2/28/20180:00 404,000.00 2018 8UFFER STRIP lOAN·CD68

318,592.87 79%

85407.13 3,416.29 01-149·0560-0959-6941 Inter-fund loan ( 0100 l/E 8UFFER 70 PRINCIPAL 5/31/20180:00 59,000.00 2018 BUFFER STRIP LOAN-C070 50,972.52

86% 8,027.48 321.10

01·149-0560-0960-6941 Inter-fund loan CD#71 l/E 2/28/20180:00 110,000.00 2018 BUFFER 5TRIP LOAN-C071

01·149-0560-0960-6941 Inter-fund loan CD#71 lIE BUFFER 71 PRINCIPAL 5/31/20180:00 76,773.58 69% 33226.42 1,329.06

01·149-0560-0947-6941 Inter-fund loan CD 57 lIE BUFFER 57 PRINCIPAL 9/10/2018 142,000.00 2018 Buffer Strip loan - CD 57 109,995.58 32,004.42 77% 1,280.18

01·149·560·0938-6941 Inter-fund loan CD 45 l/E BUFFER 45 PRINCIPAL 3/10/2018 11,000.00 2019 Buffer Strip loan CD 45 4,141.77 76% 165.67

12,858.23

01·149·560-0951-6941 Inter-fund loan CD 60 l/E BUFFER 60 PRINCIPAL 3/10/2018 317,000.00 2019 Buffer Strip loan CD 60

238,593.48 78,406.52 75% 3,136.26

01·149·560-0904-6941 Inter-fund loan CD 4 lIE BUFFER 04 PRINCIPAL 4/19/2019 97,000.00 2019 Buffer Strip loan CD 04

10,553.85 86,446.15 11% 3,457.85

01·149·560·0908-6941 Inter-Fund Loan CD 10 l/E BUFFER 10 PRINCIPAL 4/19/2019 365,000.00 2019 Buffer Strip loan CD 10

75,168.73 289,831.27 21% 11,593.25

01·149·560-0913-6941 Inter-fund loean CD 12 lIE Buffer CD 12 Principal 5/16/2019 147,000.00 2019 Buffer Strip loan CD 12

147,000.00 5,880.00

01·149·560-0942-6941 InterOfund loan CD 49 l/E CD 49 Repa ir & Reserve 4/30/2019 22,000.00 Repair & Reserve

22,000.00 880.00

41,853.47

These are authorized temporary loans from Revenue fund to the Individual drainage accounts for the implementation of buffer strips.

gbode

Oval

C:\Users\jprochniak\Desktop\lnvestment Report current.xls

COUNTY OF BROWNSummary of lnvestment PoolAs of 2-May-19

preparcd by Jean Pr@hniakAuditor-Treasurcr

TERM OF INVESTMENT

AmountPercentof Total

Averagelnterest

RateAverage

Size

AverageDays toMaturity

Less than 6 months 9,152,752.O4 35.68% 2.015o/o 1.525,459 -27 to 12 months 445,000.00 1 .73o/o 2.138o/o 222,500 251 to 2 Years 735,000.00 2.860/o 2.334% 245,000 1152 to 3 Years 1,7't5,000.00 6.68% 2.729o/o 245,000 8543 to 4 Years 245,000.00 0.95% 1.999% 245,000 7884 to 5 Years 5,247,000.00 20.45% 1.881Yo 349,800 5885 to 6 Years 6,325,000.00 24.65% 2.052Yo 702,778 987Over 6 Years 1,790,000.00 6.98% 2.104o/o 447,500 766

lnvestments 25,654,752.04 99.98% 2.062o/o

AMOUNT !NVESTED BY INSTITUTION:

AmountPercentOf Total

Average!nterest

RateNumber of

lnvestmentsAverage

Term (days)Alliance Bank 0.00% #N/A 0 #N/AAmericana Bank 0.00 0.00% #N/A 0 #N/AUnited Prairie 245,000.00 0.95% 0.000% 0 #Dtv/o!Southpoint 0.00 0.00% #N/A 1 #N/AWells Farqo 16,057,000.00 62.59o/o 2.075o/o 39 1,724CBNU Cash Manaqement 6,814,915.57 26.56% 2.020o/o 5 30Bank Midwest 200,000.00 0.7$Yo 2.000o/o 1 365Maqic CD's 0.00 0.00% #N/A 0 #N/AMaqic Liquid Assets 2,337,836.47 9.11% 2.00Oo/o 1 30

lnvestments 25,654,752.04 100.00% 47

5/2/2019

5C:\Users~prochniak\Desktop\lnvestment Report current.xls

Less than 6 months 7 to 12 months 1 to 2 Years 2 to 3 Years 3 to 4 Years 4 to 5 Years 5 to 6 Years Over 6 Years Total Investments

Alliance Bank Americana Bank United Prairie Southpoint Wells Fargo CBNU Cash Management Bank Midwest Magic CD's Magic Liquid Assets Total Investments

fa ared b Jean Prochniak p p y Auditor-Treasurer

COUNTY OF BROWN Summary of Investment Pool

As of

TERM OF INVESTMENT

Percent Amount of Total

9,152,752.04 35.68% 445,000.00 1.73% 735,000.00 2.86%

1,715,000.00 6.68% 245,000.00 0.95%

5,247,000.00 20.45% 6,325,000.00 24.65% 1,790,000.00 6.98%

25,654,752.04 99.98%

2-May-19

Average Interest

Rate 2.015% 2.138% 2.334% 2.729% 1.999% 1.881 % 2.052% 2.104% 2.062%

AMOUNT INVESTED BY INSTITUTION: Average

Percent Interest Amount OfTotal Rate

0.00% #N/A 0.00 0.00% #N/A

245,000.00 0.95% 0.000% 0.00 0.00% #N/A

16,057,000.00 62.59% 2.075% 6,814,915.57 26.56% 2.020%

200,000.00 0.78% 2.000% 0.00 0.00% #N/A

2,337,836.47 9.11% 2.000% 25,654,752.04 100.00%

Average Average Days to

Size Maturity 1,525,459 -2

222,500 25 245,000 115 245,000 854 245,000 788 349,800 588 702,778 987 447,500 766

Number of Average Investments Term (days)

0 #N/A 0 #N/A 0 #DIV/O! 1 #N/A

39 1,724 5 30 1 365 0 #N/A 1 30

47

512/2019

gbode

Oval

REQUEST FOR ACTION Requested Board Date: Originating Department:

May 21, 2019 Auditor-Treasurer Item: Presenter: Jean Prochniak

Estimated Time: 5 Minutes Resolution to Delegate Authority for EFT transfers to the A-T ~~~~~~~~------------------~---------------------------------

Board Action Requested :

Designate by Resolution authority to do electronic funds transfer to the Auditor-Treasurer in accordance with M.S. 471.38

Background

Statute is attached for reference.

The OSA discovered in the legal compliance review that this authority needs to be delegated by resolution on an annual basis. Our investment policy includes this provision but it is not formally done by resolution.

This resolution will be submitted to our bank to have on file as well.

We are now required to provide a list of all transactions made by electronic funds transfer to the governing body at its next regular scheduled meeting. It will be our goal to include this information on the RBA for claims approval.

A breakdown will be provided as to the amount of vendors being paid by check and by ACH and then a listing of EFT's.

Supporting Documents ~attached D none Notes:

Board Action: Motion Offered By:

0 Motion Seconded By: -----Approved as Requested Vote by Acclamation: _

0 Roll Call Vote: Yes No

Denied District I 0 0 Tabled 0 District 2 0 0

District 3 0 0 Other 0 District 4 0 0

District 5 0 0

gbode

Typewritten Text

# 5

gbode

Oval

Resolution No. 2019-07 Brown County Resolution

Authorizing the Auditorrrreasurer to Make Electronic Funds Transfers

The following Resolution was offered by Commissioner and moved for adoption at a Regular Meeting held on at the Brown County Courthouse, New Ulm, MN:

WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 471.38 allows for the use of electronic funds transfers as a means of making various payments; and

WHEREAS, a local government may make an electronic funds transfer for the following: • For a claim for a payment from an imprest payroll bank account or investment of excess

money; • For a payment of tax or aid anticipation certificates; • For a payment of contributions to pension or retirement fund; • For vendor payments; and • For payment of bond principal, bond interest and fiscal agent service charge from the debt

redemption fund;

WHEREAS, the County Board shall annually delegate the authority to make electronic funds transfers; and

WHEREAS, the County Board acknowledges: adequate security procedures and internal controls must be maintained for approval processes; a monthly reconciliation shall be conducted on electronic transfer; settlement arrangement for vendors desiring to use electronic payment methodology shall be authorized by and coordinated within the Auditor-Treasurer's office; and funds may not be released without the appropriately approved documentation prior to settlement;

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the County Board delegates the authority to make electronic funds transfers to the Auditor-Treasurer.

Seconded by Commissioner and the same being put to a vote was duly carried. This Resolution shall become effective immediately and without publication.

Adopted by the following vote: Ayes __ Nayes __ . Dated this 21 st day of May, 2019.

ATTEST:

Administrator, Brown County

State of Minnesota County of Brown

CERTIFICA TION

Chairman, Brown County

I, Charles Enter, duly appointed, qualified and acting County Administrator for the County of Brown, State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that 1 have compared the foregoing copy of a Resolution with the original minutes of the proceedings of the Board of County Commissioners, Brown County, Minnesota, at their session held on the 21" day of May, 2019, now on file in my office, and have found the same to be a true and correct copy thereof.

Witness my hand and official seal at New Ulm, Minnesota, this 21~ day of May, 2019.

County Administrator

M:\OFFICE\MYDOCS\PCADMN20 1 9\Resolutions\Res_20 19-07 AT Delegate Authority for EIT TRansfers.docx

Office of the Revisor of Statutes

2018 Minnesota Statutes

471.38 CLAIMS.

Page 1 of 1

Authenticate III PDf

Subdivision I. Itemization; declaration. Except as provided in subdivision 2, if an account, claim, or demand against a local government for any property or services can be itemized in the ordinary course of business, the board or officer authorized by law to audit and allow claims shall not audit or allow the claim until the person cliliming payment, or the person's agent, provides to the board or officer an itemized list in writing or in an electronic transaction record. By making the claim for payment, the person maki.ng the claim is declaring tbat the aC.count, claim, or demand is just and correct and that no part of it has been paid. The board or ofiicer may in its discretion allow a claim prepared by the c'Ierk or secretary of the board or officer prior to the declaration by the claimant if the declaration is made on the check or order-check by which tbe claim is paid, as provided in section .11J.)9 1. 5ubejivis ion 2. For the purposes of this section, "local government" means any county, local social services agency , school district, tOWl) , or home rule charter city of the second, third, or fourth class, or any park district.

Subd . 2. Application. The provisions of this section do not apply to any claim or demand for an annual salary or fees of jurors or witnesses, fixed by law, nor to the salary or wages of any employee whose salary or wages have been fixed on an hourly, daily, weekly or monthly basis, by the goveming board of the municipality . and which is now authorized by law to

be paid on a payroU basis.

Subd. 3. Electronic funds transfer. Electronic funds transfer is the process of value exchange via mechanical means without the use of c,hecks, drafts , or similar negotiable instruments. A local govemment may make an electronic funds transfer for the following:

(I) for a claim for a payment fTom an imprest payroll bank account or investment of excess money;

(2) for a payment of tax or aid anticipation certificates;

(3) for a payment of contributions to pension or retirement fund;

(4) for vendor payments; and

(5) for payment of bond principal , bond interest and a fiscal agent service cbarge from the debt redemption fund.

Subd . 3a, Eligibility. The authorization in subdivision 3 extends only to a local government that has enacted all oftbe following policy controls:

(a) the governing body shall annually delegate the authority to make electronic funds transfers to a designated business administrator or chief financial officer or the officer's designee;

(b) the disbursing bank shall keep on file a certified copy of the delegation of authority;

( c) the initiator of the electronic transfer shall be identified;

(d) the initiator shall document the request and obtain an approval from the designated business administrator, or chief financial officer or the officer's designee, before initiating the transfer as required by internal control policies ;

(e) a written confirmation of the transaction shall be made no later than one business day after the transaction and shall be used in lieu of a check, order check or warrant required to support tbe transaction;

(f) a list of all transactions made by electronic funds transfer shaJl be submitted to the governing body at its next regular meeting after the transaction.

History: (ZfiQj RL s 438; / 9'!2 c 4/6 .L!. ; 195J c350li; 1953 dO s L 1955 cJ / 2 .\' 1; J2,J.2.£lkL: ] 961 c.5 s 1, 1976 c1..-I s 68; 1979 c334 arJ 6 s 25;l2.J6 c 444; 1989 c119 art 9s 29; 1994 c (iJ.j s 3/; lOOf c J 3 s_L :;.017 c 52 s 1

.Co Ryrj(Jht It? 2018 by the Revisor of Statutes, State of Minnesota, All rights reserved,

https:llwww.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/471.38 5/1412019


Requested Board Date: May 21, 2019

Flexibility: Yes

Item: Drainage Ditch Repair Request

Originating Department: Auditor-Treasurer

Presenter: Jean ProchniaklAndrew Lang

Estimated Time: #5 minutes

Board Action Requested: Approve the following drainage repair requests and the payment of the repairs: System Repair # Order Twp Section Repair Type Percentage Cost

(003 19-019 1 Stark 13 Tile Outlet 100 $2,739.00

(060 18-185 1 Prairieville 33 Surface Intake 100 $3,032.00

(060 18-189 1 Prairieville 34 Slough, Tile Outlet, 100 $1,068.00

.1018 B R 19-003 1 Eden 19 Slough, Tile Outlet, 100 $733.00

(002 19-012 1 Albin 26 Tile Outlet 100 $596.00

(020 19-018 1 Albin 22 Blowout 100 $300.00

(020 19-018 2 Albin 22 Blowout 100 $853.00

.1005 B W 19-011 1 Albin 35 Blowout 100 $381.00

Background: The county drainage systems were repaired as described on the attached sheets. These were normal maintenance repairs.

Note: This RBA requests the approval of the repairs and the payment as a Friday payable. This new procedure was recommended by the Ditch Committee.

Supporting Documents: X attached none Administrator's Comments:

Board Action:

Approved as Requested __

Denied

Tabled

Other

Notations:

{)(wJlu..&wI~ S-I }"-/ f Motion offered by __ ~ ___ _

Motion seconded by ______ _

Vote by acclamation ______ _

Roll call vote

District 1

District 2

District 3

District 4

District 5

gbode

Typewritten Text

# 6

gbode

Oval

BROWN COUNTY

DRAINAGE DEPARTMENT

REPAIR REPORT For Staff Documentation & Contractor Information

CD03 Repair #19-019

Brown Drainage Department Repair Report (CD03 - 19-019) Page 1 of 5

... Muni<ip.l~ie.

... Township.

... Sections

N

... County Boundor}' ..

... Poree l.

N

... Public Drain'ge System s

IV Open Ditch ." Sh. ll o", Ditch N Til e

... streom s

IV Protected Natura l Protected Altered

J, OtherPerenn ialn ntermittent

... Privole Dr.in.ge

IV Drainage Outl et Open Ditch

... Dr.in.ge System Watersheds

N

... Roods

N Inlerstate ,., U.S. and St.te Hwy

N CSAH IV Co unty Road

Tow n. hip Road City Street

BROWN COUNTY

DRAINAGE DEPARTMENT


OVERVIEW

Date Repair Was Created: 2018-06-19 Branch: 903 Problem/Proposed Work: Ditch bank washout from tile outlet and dirt in ditch Ditch Repair: Tile Repair: Tile Outlet FEMA Event: False FEMA Date:

REPAIR LOCATION DETAILS

Commissioner District: 4 Township: Stark Twp: 109N Range: 32W Section: 13 Qtr-Qtr Section: Latitude: 44.249318 Longitude: -94.596705

PERSON REQUESTING REPAIR

Name Address Phone PATRICK D and JUDY F SCHROEPFER

LANDOWNER

Name Address Phone PATRICK D and JUDY F SCHROEPFER

STATUS LOG

Action Date Initials Notes For Review 06/19/2018 andrewl In Progress 04/26/2019 andrewl Heiderscheidt

Closed 05/06/2019 andrewl

DRAINAGE AUTHORITY ACTIONS

Action Date Board Date Initials Notes For Approval 05/15/2019 2019-05-21 andrewl For Payment 05/15/2019 2019-05-21 andrewl

REPAIR INVOICES

Order Date Contractor %Complete Total Cost Notes 1 2019-05-15 Heiderscheidt Digging Inc 100 2739.00 Partial Payment

INSPECTION LOG

Date Initials Notes 04/26/2019 andrewl 36" side drain washed out. 3 other tile outlets were broken and washing

into bank (marked on south side for north repairs.)


BROWN COUNTY

DRAINAGE DEPARTMENT


INSPECTION PHOTOS

Date(2019-04-26) - Inspector(andrewl)

05/15/2019 - IMG_20190426_122314410_HDR.jpg

05/15/2019 - IMG_20190426_122527869.jpg


BROWN COUNTY

DRAINAGE DEPARTMENT


05/15/2019 - IMG_20190426_123030570.jpg

05/15/2019 - IMG_20190426_123212906_HDR.jpg

05/15/2019 - IMG_20190426_123507720.jpg


BROWN COUNTY

DRAINAGE DEPARTMENT


05/15/2019 - IMG_20190426_123628841_HDR.jpg


BROWN COUNTY

DRAINAGE DEPARTMENT


CD60 Repair #18-185


... Muni<ip.l~ie.

... Township.

... Sections

N


... Poree l.

N



... streom s






N

... Roods




BROWN COUNTY

DRAINAGE DEPARTMENT


OVERVIEW

Date Repair Was Created: 2018-11-05 Branch: 951 Problem/Proposed Work: Brian wants to remove an intake near the open ditch. Ditch Repair: Tile Repair: Surface Intake


Commissioner District: 4 Township: Prairieville Twp: 110N Range: 33W Section: 33 Qtr-Qtr Section: Latitude: 44.296870 Longitude: -94.815863


Name Address Phone BRIAN H and CHRISTINE L BRAUN

LANDOWNER

Name Address Phone BRIAN H and CHRISTINE L BRAUN

STATUS LOG

Action Date Initials Notes For Review 11/05/2018 jacobh In Progress 04/17/2019 andrewl Heiderscheidt




REPAIR INVOICES


INSPECTION LOG

Date Initials Notes 11/05/2018 jacobh If intake is removed water will pond up and possibly run over ditch bank. 03/29/2019 andrewl Landowner saw how intake performed over spring melt, and wants to

leave intake. Do need to repair intake as it washed out. Also 2 other side drains are in need of repair.


BROWN COUNTY

DRAINAGE DEPARTMENT


INSPECTION PHOTOS

Date(2018-11-05) - Inspector(jacobh)

11/05/2018 - 20181102_094050.jpg


BROWN COUNTY

DRAINAGE DEPARTMENT


Date(2019-03-29) - Inspector(andrewl)

05/15/2019 - 6745.jpeg

05/15/2019 - 6749.jpeg


BROWN COUNTY

DRAINAGE DEPARTMENT


CD60 Repair #18-189


... Muni<ip.l~ie.

... Township.

... Sections

N


... Poree l.

N



... streom s






N

... Roods




BROWN COUNTY

DRAINAGE DEPARTMENT


OVERVIEW

Date Repair Was Created: 2018-11-06 Branch: 951 Problem/Proposed Work: Bank washout - SE of RR crossing culvert. Ditch Repair: Slough Tile Repair: Tile Outlet, FEMA Event: True FEMA Date: 2018-06-15


Commissioner District: 4 Township: Prairieville Twp: 110N Range: 33W Section: 34 Qtr-Qtr Section: Latitude: 44.293693 Longitude: -94.791318


Name Address Phone ROBERT J NELSON LIV TRUST ETAL

LANDOWNER

Name Address Phone ROBERT J NELSON LIV TRUST ETAL

STATUS LOG





REPAIR INVOICES

Order Date Contractor %Complete Total Cost Notes 1 2019-05-14 Heiderscheidt Digging

Inc 100 1068.00 Partial Payment

INSPECTION LOG

Date Initials Notes 11/06/2018 jacobh Bank washout around tile outlet. Tile outlet broke off.


BROWN COUNTY

DRAINAGE DEPARTMENT


INSPECTION PHOTOS


11/06/2018 - 20181105_104158.jpg

11/06/2018 - 20181105_104219.jpg


BROWN COUNTY

DRAINAGE DEPARTMENT


JD18 B_R Repair #19-003

Brown Drainage Department Repair Report (JD18 B_R - 19-003) Page 1 of 4

... Muni<ip.l~ie.

... Township.

... Sections

N


... Poree l.

N



... streom s






N

... Roods




BROWN COUNTY

DRAINAGE DEPARTMENT


OVERVIEW

Date Repair Was Created: 2019-04-25 Branch: 868 Problem/Proposed Work: Side drain not working Ditch Repair: Slough Tile Repair: Tile Outlet, FEMA Event: False FEMA Date:


Commissioner District: 4 Township: Eden Twp: 111N Range: 33W Section: 19 Qtr-Qtr Section: Latitude: 44.408110 Longitude: -94.844831


Name Address Phone JOEL and MONICA R CHRISTENSEN

LANDOWNER

Name Address Phone JOEL and MONICA R CHRISTENSEN

STATUS LOG





REPAIR INVOICES

Order Date Contractor %Complete Total Cost Notes 1 2019-05-14 Heiderscheidt Digging

Inc 100 733.00 Partial Payment

INSPECTION LOG

Date Initials Notes 04/24/2019 jacobh Outlet pipe was broken and not draining. Noticed a bank wash out just

north of outlet pipe. Joel was not worried about the washout.


BROWN COUNTY

DRAINAGE DEPARTMENT


INSPECTION PHOTOS


04/25/2019 - 20190424_120438_HDR.jpg

04/25/2019 - 20190424_120442_HDR.jpg


BROWN COUNTY

DRAINAGE DEPARTMENT


04/25/2019 - 20190424_120457_HDR.jpg

04/25/2019 - 20190424_120640_HDR.jpg


BROWN COUNTY

DRAINAGE DEPARTMENT


CD02 Repair #19-012


... Muni<ip.l~ie.

... Township.

... Sections

N


... Poree l.

N



... streom s






N

... Roods




BROWN COUNTY

DRAINAGE DEPARTMENT


OVERVIEW

Date Repair Was Created: 2019-05-03 Branch: 901 Problem/Proposed Work: Tile outlet washed out Ditch Repair: Tile Repair: Tile Outlet FEMA Event: False FEMA Date:


Commissioner District: 5 Township: Albin Twp: 108N Range: 32W Section: 26 Qtr-Qtr Section: Latitude: 44.134482 Longitude: -94.636477


Name Address Phone ALLAN M LEE

LANDOWNER

Name Address Phone ALLAN M LEE

STATUS LOG





REPAIR INVOICES


INSPECTION LOG

Date Initials Notes 05/03/2019 andrewl Landowner met Heiderscheidt on another repair. Tile outlet on north bank.

Called when onsite to verify County repair.


BROWN COUNTY

DRAINAGE DEPARTMENT


CD20 Repair #19-018


... Muni<ip.l~ie.

... Township.

... Sections

N


... Poree l.

N



... streom s






N

... Roods




BROWN COUNTY

DRAINAGE DEPARTMENT


OVERVIEW

Date Repair Was Created: 2019-04-12 Branch: 916 Problem/Proposed Work: Tile washout where it has before Ditch Repair: Tile Repair: Blowout




Name Address Phone HOWARD J and SHARON L FINSTAD

LANDOWNER

Name Address Phone HOWARD J and SHARON L FINSTAD

STATUS LOG





REPAIR INVOICES

Order Date Contractor %Complete Total Cost Notes 1 2019-05-15 Heiderscheidt Digging Inc 100 300.00 Partial Payment 2 2019-05-15 Heiderscheidt Digging Inc 100 853.00 Partial Payment

INSPECTION LOG

Date Initials Notes 05/03/2019 andrewl Three washouts that joints opened and repaired with fabric. Another line was

plugged and opened up. Will need to come back to close.


BROWN COUNTY

DRAINAGE DEPARTMENT


JD05 B_W Repair #19-011

Brown Drainage Department Repair Report (JD05 B_W - 19-011) Page 1 of 2

... Muni<ip.l~ie.

... Township.

... Sections

N


... Poree l.

N



... streom s






N

... Roods




BROWN COUNTY

DRAINAGE DEPARTMENT


OVERVIEW

Date Repair Was Created: 2019-04-08 Branch: 855 Problem/Proposed Work: Tile washout near where they have been before Ditch Repair: Tile Repair: Blowout FEMA Event: False FEMA Date:




Name Address Phone DUANE E and RUTH R HELGET

LANDOWNER

Name Address Phone DUANE E and RUTH R HELGET

STATUS LOG





REPAIR INVOICES


INSPECTION LOG

Date Initials Notes 05/03/2019 andrewl 5" tile line

Brown Drainage Department Repair Report (JD05 B_W - 19-011) Page 2 of 2


Requested Board Date: May 21,2019

Flexibility: Yes

Originating Department: Highway

Presenter: Wayne Stevens


Item: SAP 008-607-014 Shoulder Widen & Regrade Project on CSAH 7

Board Action Requested: Set a letting date for this project.

Background: CSAH 7 from the railroad tracks in Cobden to CSAH 31 in Evan is planned for a shoulder widen and regrade project. This road segment has narrow shoulders, steep inslopes and two horizontal curves that do not meet standards. This road will be graded to 6 foot shoulders and 4: 1 inslopes. The horizontal curves will be brought up to current standards. Numerous hills along the road will be backsloped to reduce snow drifting on the road. In 2020 a surface rehabilitation project will be performed on this road segment under a different contract.

The plan for this roadway has been approved for construction. This project will be funded with state aid funds, local funds and wheelage tax funds as shown in the current five year program.

The Highway Department recommends the Board set the letting date for June 26, 2019 at 10:00 a.m. at the Courthouse. The results will be brought to the Board for approval on July 9,2019. The project is anticipated to be constructed within the August to November time frame.


Board Action:

Approved as Requested Denied Tabled Other

Notations:

Supporting Documents: attached X none

~~i-6,tt!i ~=i) -- i1 Motion offered by Motion seconded by Vote by acclamation Roll call vote District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4 District 5

gbode

Typewritten Text

# 7

gbode

Oval


Requested Board Date: May 21, 2019

Flexibility: Yes

Originating Department: Highway

Presenter: Wayne Stevens/Andrew Lang


Item: Storm Sewer Repair Project on CSAH 29 in Home Township

Board Action Requested: Award the contract to the appropriate bidder.

Background: The south ditch on CSAH 29 just west of225 th Avenue has a ditch block with a culvert draining into a ravine ending at Kuelb's Creek. The culvert has rusted out on the bottom. Over the past two years, the excessive rainfall has caused the slope to severely erode under the culvert. This project will include two manhole structures to drop the storm water over a height of 30 feet to dissipate the energy of outletting water into the ravine.

Quotes were sent out to five contractors. Two bids were received and were opened on May 15, 2019. The project is scheduled to start on or before June 10 and be completed within 10 working days.

The resulting summary abstract of bids is attached.

The Highway Department recommends the low bid.


Board Action:

Approved as Requested __ Denied Tabled Other

Notations:

Supporting Documents: X attached none

Motion offered by Motion seconded by Vote by acclamation Roll call vote District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4 District 5

gbode

Typewritten Text

# 8

gbode

Oval

5/15/2019

BCHDProject Bid Summary

CSAH 29 Kuelb's Creek Storm Sewer Project Name: Contract No.: 29M-2019

Project No.: Client: Brown County Highway Bid Opening: 05/15/2019 10:00 AM Owner: Brown County Highway Dept.

Business Name Total Bid Amount Percent Over/Under Estimate Engineers Estimate $79,760.50

Ground Zero Services $85,510.50 7.21% OVER ESTIMATE MR Paving & Excavating $88,818.16 11.36% OVER ESTIMATE


Requested Board Date: May 21 S\ 2019 Originating Department: Feedlot (P/Z) Flexibility: Yes

Item: 20t8 Annual County Feedlot Presenter: Robert Santa ella, Assistant Report Zoning Administrator

Amana Lang, Feedlot Technician

Estimated time: 5 Min

Board Achon Requested: Approve MPCA feedl ot Program 20 18 Annual County Feedlot Officer & Performance Credit report (Data for period 111 /2018 - 12/3112018), authorize Board Chai r to sign same on behalf of Brown County .

Background: As part of the reporting process, the County needs to submit the feedlot annual report to MPCA in order to receive funding for 2019. The report must be signed by the Chainnan of the Brown County Board of Commissioners in order to be considered complete by the state. Attachment 1-3 is the Annual Report. Attachment 4-9 is the year-end review from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.


Board Action: Approved as Requested _ _ Denied Tabled Other

Notations: RBAFormat.DOC

Supporting Documents: X Attached None



gbode

Typewritten Text

# 9

gbode

Oval

2018 County Feedlot Officer (CFO) Annual Report(Data for the Period: January 1, 2018 - December 31, 2018) Revised May 2018

County: Brown Contact Person:

Phone: 507-233-6642 E-Mail Address:

Signature:

All data must be entered in accordance with the Annual CFO Report Guidance Document.

Except where identified, this report only addresses non-CAFO/NPDES/SDS sites required by 7020 to be registered.

STAFFING LEVEL

1 0.7

2 1

3 0

4 1.7

REGISTRATION (Report your current numbers - base grant numbers are displayed for reference) Base Current

5 25 22

6 221 201

7 90 85

8 --- 12

9 50 40

10 386 360

11 Total - Feedlots Eligible for Funding (FROM AGENCY BASE GRANT AWARD NUMBER) 386

Feedlot Sites Inspected Minimum number of FEEDLOT SITES required to register that must be inspected (7%): 27.5

(count in-field land app inspections as 1/2 of an inspection) you did NOT meet the 7% inspection minimum

INSPECTION REPORTING

13 Compliance inspections

13.1) How many included the optional P review

14 Construction inspections

14.1) How many received a 2nd construction inspection

150

100+ AU &

in DWSMA

16 In-field land application inspection

17 Complaint initiated inspections (any non-CAFO/NPDES/SDS)

18 Routine or follow-up stockpile only inspection

Other Inspection Related Info

19 CAFO/NPDES/SDS sites inspected at the MPCA's request 0

20 Number of feedlots inspected within shoreland, a DWSMA, or a TMDL area. 1

21 Number of sites inspected found to be non-compliant with water quality discharge standards. 1

22 Number of sites inspected with 100+ AU found to be non-compliant with N and/or P requirements. 6

INSPECTION Performance Credits (Summarized from entries above)

NOTE: Inspections assumed to satisfy the 7% minimum are not PC eligible

23 Compliance inspections min. # of compliance inspections: 14 34 27.5 6.5 1.5 9.75

24 Construction inspections 1 0 1 1 1

25 Desktop N&P records inspections 6 0 6 1.5 9

26 In-field land application inspections 11 0 11 0.5 5.5

27 Compliance inspections that include optional P review 0 0.5 0

28 Number of facilities that received 2 or more construction inspections. 0 0.5 0

29 CAFO/NPDES/SDS sites inspected at the MPCA's request 0 0.5 0

30 Complaint initiated inspections (any non-CAFO/NPDES/SDS) (only count 1 per feedlot): 1 0.5 0.5

31 Routine or follow-up stockpile only inspection. (only count 1 per feedlot) 0 0.25 0

PC Total

0 1

0 0

0 0

0

Desktop N&P records inspection(P review as part of a compliance inspection should be reported in 13.1)

Total

Not PC

eligible

PC

eligible PC

2

0

7

6

4

Feedlots with NPDES or SDS permits:

Total - Feedlots required to be registered:

Types of Inspections (at sites required to be registered)

Only count first instance of each type of inspection per feedlot

50 - 299 AU(except where noted)

300 or more AU(Non-CAFO/NPDES/SDS)

26 8

10 - 49 AU(in shoreland)

0

Number of FEEDLOT SITES that received a compliance, construction, desktop N&P, or in-field land app inspection1247.5

0

0

0

1 0

FTEs supplied through contract with other local government units:

Total Number of FTE positions that supported county program:

Feedlots in shoreland with 10 - 49 AU:

Feedlots with 50 - 299 AU:

Non-CAFO/NPDES/SDS ≥ 300 AU:

CAFOs without NPDES or SDS permits 300-999 AU ("Gap Sites")

Robert Santaella

[email protected]

(Signature of County Board Commissioner) (Date)

FTEs - (Full Time Equivalents) supplied by the CFO(s):

FTEs supplied by other county staff, including administrative and support staff assigned to the feedlot program:

rsantaella

Text Box

Attachment 1

PERMITTING Number PC PC Total32 0 --- ---33 0 2 0

34 1 1 1

35 0 --- ---

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (EAW) Number PC PC Total

36 0 --- ---37 0 4 0

EMERGENCY RESPONSE Number PC PC Total38 1 2 2

ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS Number PC PC Total39 Letters of Warning (LOW) issued: 2 --- ---40 Notices of Violation (NOV) issued: 0 --- ---41 Court actions commenced: 0 --- ---

FEEDLOT SITE SCHEDULED COMPLIANCE (Achieved in current reporting year) Number PC PC Total42 0 --- ---43 0 6 0

LAND APPLICATION SCHEDULED COMPLIANCE (Achieved in current reporting year) Number PC PC Total44 1 --- ---45 0 --- ---46 0 --- ---

Feedlots where a complete environmental upgrade was achieved:

Feedlots 100+ AU where N records requirements were returned to compliance:

Feedlots 300+ AU (or 100+ DWSMA) where N&P requirements were returned to compliance:

Feedlots 100+ AU where in-field inspection non-compliance was resolved:

Construction Short-Form Permits Issued or Modified at Sites ≥ 300 AU:

Public meetings held for construction or expansion to ≥ 500 AU:

EAW petitions received:

EAWs prepared by county:

Events where emergency response was conducted: (on-site visit)

Feedlots where a partial environmental upgrade was achieved:

Additional Performance Credit Calculations and Supplemental Information

Describe below the progress made in meeting your program year work plan inspection goals. You must provide quantitative

results for each compliance inspection and land application goal listed in your work plan.The goals set for Brown County feedlot inspections were mostly met in 2018. One category was not completed due to lack of producer

response. Below I have listed the goals set, along with the number we were able to reach.

Sites with an Interim or Construction Short Form permit 300 or more AU: Goal=3 Conducted=4

Sites required to be registered that have never been inspected: Goal=28 Conducted=27

Failure to maintain records: Goal=1 Conducted=1

Conduct Land Application Inspections in 4 assigned townships: Goal=12 Conducted=13

Conduct Inspection at Site within shoreland: Goal:1 Conducted:1

Conduct Phosphorus Inspection at 4 assigned townships: Goal=5 Conducted=6

30-day construction or expansion notifications received:

Interim Permits Issued or Modified:

rsantaella

Text Box

Attachment 2

OWNER ASSISTANCE AND OUTREACH Number PC PC Total47 0 --- ---48 0 2 0

0 --- ---49 0 1 0

50 1 --- ---51 1 --- ---

CFO TRAINING AND MENTORING Number PC PC Total

52 CFO - training hours: (Enter total training hours earned - list events below) 41.15 --- ---53 0 0.25 0

List the training events attended.

Description Hours

OTHER PROGRAM ACTIVITIES Number PC PC Total54 0 1 0

55 41 --- ---56 4 --- ---57 If Yes describe below

Site Name

TOTAL PERFORMANCE CREDITS You did not meet the minimum inspection requirements 28.75

Feedlots where a MinnFARM was conducted (list sites below):

Notifications received claiming air quality exemptions:

Meetings with other local government and producer groups:

9/10/2018 Article in the New Ulm Journal, Mentioned informtion about manure hauling and setbacks during winter app

12/27/2018 Newsletter to all Brown County feedlot owners

48.1) Total number of feedlot owners attending these events

CFO presentations at informational or producer group events: (per event)

Number of mailings to feedlot owners:

Feedlot articles placed in newspapers:

Describe your workshops, trainings, newsletters, mailings, articles, or other assistance and outreach activities.

Date Description

Sites visited to provide assistance

Workshops/trainings hosted/sponsored by the CFO:

MinnFARM completed by CFO

registration no.

Describe other county program activities not identified elsewhere.

Hours mentoring New CFOs (describe on a separate sheet):

Date

Feedlot ordinance revisions likely, in progress, or completed? Yes No

rsantaella

Text Box

Attachment 3

Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCAj Feedlot Program

2018 Year-End Review Worksheet

Sites reviewed by MPCA staff will be chosen from work done by the County in 2018. The County can pull their 2018 information from the Tempo warehouse data dump and Tableau. The information the County prepares should include:

1. Sites that registered 2. Compliance inspections conducted 3. Sites returned to compliance 4. Sites receiving a permit

A total of 20 Non-Inspection Minimum Program Requirement (MPR) points are possible for the 2018 Year-End Review. A County cannot receive a partial point two years In a row for the same MPR. Either the County earns a full point the second year or no point. The MPCA reviewer should have the County's MPCA County Feedlot Program Delegation Agreement Work Plan available for reference during the review.

County; DrWV\-Date of Review:

3 ' J-d--! 1 Cou nty Feedlot Officer: (prim name)

-AxY'C~ ~O {sign atureU.mc1~db. ~ /

MPCA Reviewer: (pm cl ~'Jfx)s).:.·-l iSlgJlEj )t't&;.£!-- 0 Agency-approve<t1iumber of feedlotsr equired to be registered

.:3 ~lo (Attachment A) : -

INSPECTlON MPRs Number of inspections conducted that count towards the 7% inspection

~7.~ rate:

Inspection rate achieved by the county (%): 1~.3Cio ,

Number of applicable non-inspection MPRs: d{) NON-INSPECTION MPRs Total non-inspection MPR points: )'0

Non-Inspection MPR rate (%): ID(J1,

Registration (DNA) - Review two registration files. If there Is only one file, review one file. If there are no registration files, mark "NAIJ for this section.

MPR No.

1. a. Did the County use either the MPCA standard registration form or an alternative agency- ONO I2J ~ pt approved registratiqn form? o 1/4pt One holf point - both files contain a standard/approved form One quarter point - one of the two files contain a standard/approved form No point - neither file contains Q standard/approved f orm

~

1. b. Did the County update registration data in Tempo? ONO !ZJ ~ pt One half point - 90% or more of 2018 registrations are updated/in Tempo. D 1/4 pt One quarter point - 50% to 89% of 2018 registrations are updated/in Tempo. No point - 0% - 49% of 2018 registrations are updated/in Tempo.

December 201 8 Page 1 of6

rsantaella

Text Box

Attachment 4

2. Did the County meet the 304 day registration receipt requirement? One point - both tiles contain on acceptable 3D-day letter or meet other agency acceptable notification requirements. One half point - one of the two files contain agency acceptable documentation or both files contain a 30-day registration receipt but documentation is inadequate. No point - neither file reviewed contaim a 30-day registration receip t nor agency acceptable documentation .

1----' Files reviewed for this section: 1.

2.

Comments:

'- 'f ~( 1;411 M.$S'~

- erd dJ·o - ~Icl 11h1 jf1'p':a--

ONO ~1 pt D~pt

Inspections and Compliance - Review four inspection files. If there are less than four files, review those that are available.

• For 3 and 6, review two compliance inspection files. • For 8, review two inspection files. If there is only one file, review that file. If no files, mark "NA". 3 Were all inspections documented on the Non-NPDES checklist? ONO bJ 1 pt

One point - both files reviewed contain the correct checklist. D~pt One half pOlnt- one of the two files reviewed contain the correct checklist. No point - both files reviewed do not contain the correct checklist.

4. Were all conducted inspections entered into Tempo (see Tableau and discrepancy list)? ONO -W'lpt One point - 90% or more oj inspections are in Tempo. D 1/21:1t

One halj point - 50% to 89% oj inspections are in Tempo . No pain t - 0% - 49% of ins pections are in Tempo . /'

5 Did the County follow their Delegation Agreement Work Plan Inspection Strategy? ONO IjLri pt One point - County followed inspection strategy. No point - Coun ty did not follow inspection strategy.

6 Was the producer notified in writing of the results of the compliance inspection? ONO I@ pt One point - both fi les reviewed contain a letter that was sent when required. D~pt One half point - one of the two files reviewed contain a notification letter. No point - neither of the two files reviewed contain a notifica tion letter.

7 Did the County follow their Delegation Agreement Work Plan Complia nce Strategy for ONO c:n. pt inspections that resulted in non-compliance? (DNA) One point - County fallowed compliance strategy.

r------ . No point - County did not follow compliance strategy. /'

8 Did the County maintain documentation of corrective action for any site that was returned to ONO ~lPt compliance in the program year? (DNA) " DXpt One point - documentation was maintained jar each file reviewed. One half point - documentation was observed in, at least, one of the files reviewed. No point - no documentation wos observed.

December 2018 Page 20[6

rsantaella

Text Box

Attachment 5

Files reviewed for this section:

l.Jbs"cf1 fVlo Ide"'? Vz;n. ~eCDCo

2. 'I oJj TbJ:Rl~cYt Fw~ 5L{f37

Comments:

-

3. fe+v Ho+-f fkvt F:r~ f~\'L ~~u\ev ~5 OIl ~r-}~ ~t {O-1,

4.

Permitting (DNA) - Review two permit files. If there is only one file, review one file. If there are no permit files, mark "NA" for this section.

9 Did the County issue permits within the 60/120 day time period? ONO gl Pt • Did the County clearly document a received date on all paperwork (permit applications, . X pt

MMPs. and plans & spec documents)? DYES DMOST DNO

• If applicable, did the County send incomplete letters within 15 business days? DYES DNO DNA

One point - oil paperwork (applications, MMPs, and plans and specs) clearly document a rece ived dote ond County met 15 business day requirement for opplicable incomplete letters. One half point - most paperwork (applica tions, MMPs and pions and specs) clearly document a received date and County met 15 business day requirement. No point - a received date is not documented on popelWork or County did not meet 15 business day requirement. /"

10 Did the County complete an agency-approved checklist for each application? DNO ~lPt One paint - both files contain a campleted checklist. Ox pt One half point - only one of two files contain a completed checklist. No paine - neither file contains a completed checklist. /

11 Were notification requirements met (public notice ~500 AU DNA and government notice DNO ~lPt DNA)? [J}'2 pt One point - all notification requirements were met. One half paint - half or more required notifications were met. No point - notification requirement was not met.

12 Were permits issued no sooner than 20 business days after public notice (>500 AU)? (DNA) DNO ~j::rl pt One point- applicoble permits were issued 20+ business days after public notice. No point - one or both applicable permit(s) were issued SOONER than 20 business days.

13 Did the County complete an agency-approved checklist to ensure that submitted MMP DNO ~Pt requirements were met? (DNA) X pt One point - all applicable files contoin 0 completed checklist. One half point - one of the two files contain a completed checklist. (Does not apply if only one file requires a checklist.) No point - a/l applicable files do not contain a completed checklist.

December 2018 Page 3 of6

rsantaella

Text Box

Attachment 6

14 Did the County complete an agency-approved checklist to ensure that submitted LMSA requirements were met? (ONA) One point - all applicable tiles contain 0 completed checklist. One half point - one of the two files contain a completed checklist. (Does not apply if only one file requires a checklist.) No point - al/ applicable files do not cO[ltain a completed checklist.

DNO ~1pt OYl pt

15 Did the County conduct an inspection at all sites to ensure that the proper permit was issued (CSF vs. tNT)?

DNO ~lPt DY1pt

One point - both sites were inspected prior to permit issuance and correct permits were issued. One holf point - one of the two sites was inspected prior to permit issuance and correct permit was issued. No point - neither site was inspected and correct permits were not issued at al/ or incorrect permits were issued.

Files reviewed for this section: Comments:

. __ p1/YJ f n evtC""/ C/1t'(;t f/JA~ MlrIf A (fMc! -"

-- ( ( /

Complaint Response (DNA) If the County received no complaints mark "NA" for this section I . L 16 Did the County maintain a complaint log? DNO ~lPt

One point - complete complaint iog IS maintained. 31. pt One half point - some complaint log information is maintained. No point - Q complaint log is not maintained.

Comments :

Owner Assistance L 17 Did the County follow their Delegation Agreement Work Plan Owner Assistance Strategy? DNO ~1 pt

One point - County followed owner assistance strategy. '" No point - County did not follow owner assistance strategy. Comments;

Staffing Level/ Air Quality Exemption/Web Site Posting Requirement /' 18 Did the County earn the required 18 continuing education units (CEUs) oftraining? DNO ~ lPt

One point - 18 or more CEUs earned. D}I,.pt One holf point - 9-17 CEUs earned. No point - 0-8 CEUs earned.


rsantaella

Text Box

Attachment 7

19 Did the County maintain an air quality exemption log? (DNA for no notifications received) One point - complete oir quality exemption log is maintained. One half point - some air quality exemption log information is maintained. No {Joint - air quo/itv exemption log is not maintained.

20 Did the County post their 2017 Annual CFO Report and MPCA Financial Report on their website by July 1, 20187 One point - information is posted. No point - information is not posted.

Comments:

Financial Report (No points awarded for this section.) Does the financial report show how much grant money the county received and spent? DNO J2jYES Does the financial report show that the county spent the total match amount? DNO ~s

Summary Review Notes/Comments/Tempo Issues

/ DNO _~lPt

D~pt

/ DNO J:}f pt


rsantaella

Text Box

Attachment 8

ATIACHMENTA

County Big Stone Blue Earth Brown CaNer Clay Cottonwood Oooglas Faribault Fillmore Freeborn Goodhue Houston Jackson Kandiyohi Klttson Lac Qui Pal1e Lake of the Woods La Sueur Uncoln Lyon McLeod Marshall Martin Meeker Morrison Mower Murray Nicollet Nobles Norman Pennington Pipestone Polk Pope Red Lake Renville Rice Rock Steams Steele Stevens Swift Todd Traverse Wadena Waseca Watonwan Winona Wright Yellow Medicine

Feedlots EJlgitHe for Funding

40 363 ~

'~77:2~ 238 105 257 420 362 737 285 685 414 330 445 18 194 25 172 414 282 329 41 474 253 618 381 425 316 432 45 38 451 77 194 38 288 287 512 1,491 251 130 157 682 34 99 234 184 555 263 271


rsantaella

Text Box

Attachment 9


Requested Board Date: May 21, 2019 Originating Department: Public Health Flexibility:

Item: Public Health Update Presenter: Karen Moritz

Estimated time:10 minutes

Board Action Requested: Public Health Report to Board and Public Health Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes from February 27,2019 Background:



Notations: RBAFormat.DOC



District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4 District 5

gbode

Typewritten Text

# 10

gbode

Oval

1

TO: BROWN COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS FROM: KAREN MORITZ, DIRECTOR DATE: MAY 21, 2019

1. MEASLES - In the United States from January 1 to May 10, 2019, 839 (data is updated every Monday) individual cases of measles have been confirmed in 23 states. This is an increase of 75 cases from the previous week. This is the greatest number of cases reported in the U.S. since 1994 and since measles was declared eliminated in 2000

There are no cases in Minnesota right now however in 2017 Minnesota had a 75-case outbreak mainly in the Somali-American community with poor vaccination coverage.

Measles is a very contagious disease caused by a virus. It spreads to others through coughing and sneezing. It is so contagious that if one person has it, up to 90% of the people around him or her will also become infected if they are not protected.

Measles starts with a high fever. Soon after, it causes a cough, runny nose, and red eyes. Then a rash of tiny, red spots breaks out. It starts at the head and spreads to the rest of the body. Measles can be serious. It can lead to pneumonia, encephalitis (swelling of the brain), and death.

Historically in the last several decades in the United States it has not been very common for people to get measles. That’s because most people in this country are protected against measles through vaccination. However, measles is still common in other parts of the world. Every year, unvaccinated people get measles while they are abroad, bring the disease into the United States, and spread it to others.

Measles can spread quickly in communities where people are not vaccinated. Anyone who is not protected against measles, including children too young to be vaccinated, are at risk of getting infected. That’s why it is so important to be up to date on vaccinations, including before traveling abroad.

We protect children against measles with a combination vaccine that provides protection against three diseases: measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR). The MMR vaccine is proven to be very safe and effective. CDC recommends that children get one dose at each of the following ages: 12 through 15 months and again 4 through 6 years

MMR vaccine is about 93 percent effective at preventing measles after 1 dose and about 97 percent effective after 2 doses.

In Brown County 94% of children have received their 1st does of MMR by age 24 months and over 98% of children attending school have received both recommended doses of MMR at Kindergarten. We have a higher rate of vaccination than the state with all vaccines including the MMR.

2

2. HOME CARE TRANSITION UPDATE- In response to the board decision to discontinue home care we have started the process of transitioning out of that program. All the federal and state governmental bodies have been notified per the guidelines. Our healthcare and community partners have also been notified. Clients and associated family members have been notified by letter and communicated with directly by the nursing staff. There is already work in progress to find another agency for our clients either by their Brown County Human Services case manager, family members, or the Home and Community Care division at the Veterans Administration in collaboration with public health staff.

Staff have been notified of their position changes going forward after July 5th and will continue to be provided guidance and leadership during this transition. We anticipate some difficult times over the next 2 months as we adjust to the new structure especially without a current supervisor. We know that we will create the new normal soon.

3. WIC (Women, Infant, and Children Nutrition Program) eWIC CARD – The transition from the WIC paper voucher system that was used for participants to shop with, to the eWIC card system started April 9th. The transition is going very well. We have distributed the eWIC card to 29% of our eligible participants as of May 15, 2019, and 98% of those distributed have been used. Our grocery store partners have implemented the system with few problems. 4. SOUTH COUNTRY HEALTH ALLIANCE CARE COORDINATION PRELIMINARY 2018 AUDIT RESULTS – Brown County is a delegated entity that completes care coordination activities for SCHA. Each year SCHA is required to audit our care coordination work that we do with SCHA members. Care coordination in Brown County is done by staff in Public Health and Human Services. We had our exit audit meeting the beginning of this month and received our preliminary report. We did very well on the audit and have only a couple areas that we fell slightly short of the expected 95% threshold. We will work with Human Services and put a plan in place to improve in those areas.

5. SOUTHERN MINNESOTA INTIATIVE FOUNDATION GRANT – Our Family Health section applied for a Literacy Grant and was selected to receive 500 books to support children and families by promoting literacy. We will be distributing the books to the WIC participants when they are in our WIC clinic. We have the opportunity to interact with young families prior to them starting school so it is great opportunity to promote literacy along with health. We pick up the books June 20th. 6. SHIP (Statewide Health Improvement Partnership) – Brown County along with every county in the state has worked through a statewide program we call SHIP to create healthier communities, reduce healthcare costs, and prevent chronic disease by expanding opportunities for physical activity, healthy eating, and tobacco-free living. This program has worked alongside local initiatives like Heart of New Ulm, Safe Routes to School initiatives, and Springfield Well-being Team in Brown County. Over the last 10 years there has been a lot of work done and has contributed to lower rates of obesity

3

and commercial tobacco use and saving Minnesota health care costs. See attached fact sheet pg. 1-2

7. CONJUNCTIVITIS – There has been a good deal of research around conjunctivitis, commonly called “pink eye” in the last few years. It was once thought to be always bacterial and was frequently treated with antibiotic eye drops. It was also considered an illness that children were considered exempt from school or daycare until they were treated by antibiotics. That practice has now changed and not widely supported.

The decision to treat with antibiotics is the healthcare provider’s decision based on the symptoms and the severity. Sometimes an antibiotic will be prescribed but no longer is that practice routine.

The Minnesota Department of Health recommendations and many health care providers have now changed practice and are not recommending school exemption in most cases.

Conjunctivitis, commonly known as pink eye, is an inflammation of the thin transparent layer of tissue that lines the inner surface of the eyelid and covers the white part of the eye. This leads to redness and soreness of the eye, often caused by viruses or allergies. Other causes of conjunctivitis include bacterial infections and irritation from chemicals.

Viral conjunctivitis is most commonly caused by contagious viruses associated with the common cold, but typical cold symptoms are not always present. Most viruses that cause conjunctivitis spread through hand-to-eye contact by hands or objects that are contaminated with the virus.

Antibiotics will not cure or help viral conjunctivitis. Like a common cold, the virus has to run its course, which can take up to two or three weeks. Symptoms can often be relieved with warm or cool compresses and artificial tear solutions. Frequent hand washing will help prevent any spread of the illness similar to a cold.

No exclusions are recommended, unless the child has a fever or is not healthy enough to participate in routine activities. Antibiotics or a note from a health care provider are not required. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends considering conjunctivitis like the common cold – both diseases are easily spread among children and both resolve without treatment.

Brown County Public Health provides school health and daycare consultation and also is frequently called about this topic.

This is a change for schools and daycares as well as parents and health care providers. In collaboration with our Brown County Health Medical Director and the Minnesota Department of Health we will be supporting the new recommendations going forward.

4

8. ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINUTES - Please see attached pg. 3-6 approved meeting minutes from the February 27, 2019 Advisory Committee meeting. 9. PUBLIC HEALTH PREPAREDNESS EXERCISE JUNE 19th – Public Health will be conducting a workshop and a table top exercise for our staff and community partners in the morning June 19th around the topic of medical countermeasures distribution. We will then be conducting a functional exercise the afternoon of June 19th to test setting up our open point of dispensing. See attached invitation to the functional exercise pg. 7

Statewide Health

Improvement Partnership Since 2009, SHIP has worked to create healthier communities, reduce health care costs, and prevent chronic

disease by expanding opportunities for physical activity, healthy eating and tobacco-free living. SHIP also

funds communities to serve the elderly by helping delay the onset or slow the progression of dementia.

SHIP supports local projects in all 87 counties and 10 tribal nations. More than 5,200 partner sites are engaged in helping people make healthy choices across the state.

Between 2016 and 2018, SHIP:

Helped to establish fall prevention programs in 76

communities , reaching more than 270,000 elderly

Minnesotans. '

Helped to expand or establish new farmers' markets,

increasing access to healthy, local foods for nearly 680,000

Minnesotans. '

• • ••• Supported smoke-free policies in

1,000 mUlti-unit properties ,

reducing exposure to secondhand smoke for nearly 84,000

Minnesotans.'

Influenced community planning

efforts to create safer, more accessible places and spaces for

more than 4.4 million Minnesotans to walk and bike.'

SHIP is contributing to lower rates of obesity and commercial tobacco use and

saving Minnesota health care costs.

Minnesota's adult smoking Minnesota's adult obesity rate rate is at a record low.' is firmly below our neighbors. '

$365 million in spending was averted since 2011 by putting

the brakes on rising adult obesity rates.'

1. R: •• ch Data: MIOflfiOIa Dep4Jtme1t 01 Heo1IIlft, Ol:!:<:e 01 STatewide Health Impr~menl Imllillives (0$1'111), 20 19

2. Map source' COCo eRFSS. 20 17 3. Spending averted: NaliorHd COSt studies aDKpteO tor M,"ne..'101a by The M,nneSOla

OePllrtmenl 01 He,llth >lnd wele u!led 10 generale .~mate ,; ;::or .,rkl'liooal infOrmation visit """""".heall.h,m n.QO'Ifship

For more information, contact: Kari Oldfield, LPHA Director [email protected] or (651) 789-4354

$260 million in spending was averted since 2011 by

accelerating the drop in adult smoking rates.'

l ===p ===H AL...--.l Local Public Health Association

of Minronofo

~hjp improvement pa~ip

State and local partners support maintaining SHIP

funding at $35 million per biennium.

A He.lll hH! ' SOo. tlw" ~1

A.C t GI 'SW M~MWC'

Art turl lOt ~.~""1'0II'

.... Iq l/)!o.Ivsmoulo..l!1Ict

"'''011;) l'1.u.th ClIft!! Crnl~ r

A!! ~ ,~ County H~a \l h & ~I!UII SC!r\I~" 1

AI~rl ~ Comm urllty Edualic;ln

.t.tIert i.eOJ' F~rNIy 't'MCA

AI Soi,nb !.entJr LMnt:

Amerton Oi.t",:'d A!.1OC\;;J llon

AmerlOin Heart A~wtl_ I It'"

AmeflQrll~ CI,I""", I~ It'f ~Ott.mla~IOtl

~QfI~~ll11"

A.nnai'dW ~.IftII,," MIfIIe'l A" tH.OI IIpmwpl" ~fCommunny Edut~t lon

Arcad ll O\Mte, SchaDI

A'r l' .... -M~ ~oonomiIC:ClltPQrtU"'ly AIi""cv Au~lln Alu ~,.m~,tIrU

"''''''IIb let) , . County 1t'M!'11111

klie PL&lne Plubht Schoal1 iem d,ll.l l w,nf. ~ A,u M I!IT'III I",' lIHl Nt' l · ... ~

~.nwn Puohc $dtook

B:t:Y(11' Alliance of Mmne~Ola

IIit ~OI\<' C\)unly r",,"ly Servl c~.

Bo k~ TlIoe'I A....."hils

BhIllltCII;K;; ,.nd"ue~oIMIII~

Bi lJ<! lQllft P'Ujef.'t ~ft l e. Gorder StaLe a.tnk

arntalI'C Bro .... n COU'Ily

ar"",01'1 Trudul'll& ""~ lIrtd,~ CeM@!' COtnn-.tntly Xhoob 8\11i'~o r.ml l"1. 1Io' .i/: ~ e:

CAPIUSA

CIIIJiI '" HQlO\lVI1I ON.tQ,-M __

I:.I,~ A& HOfotOl' [to!"'". I(III -M I\"t;lnt

Cil"'~'!;1 l 'flH \ CtlII

c...gn COuntv Publk: """il lll'I ."<1 tk.Im.MI ~""lCeJ

Call\~ .... ,~h-Rl!'ItWood

Carwor C:1Io.II1V (:(lI"\lI!Un~ Oe~~lI:Ipt'I'It ... t Ajte.,cy

Cior.'fI CQvtIly PvbIo( HottlLh

CflI tur..." He ;a.ilh - ~Oft. II'I'a ,' 11!

( to ntr IDr" He.nn· MonlctHo

(en~llcilef

~UII MN Caundl an AalI'C c:tIllltkrWoDd Public Hullh.

0MIcI ~r~ & Nulri! OOI"t , Inc.

Chlopewt Ctul tv O'I" j)ew;a Counl'l MOllte~ i1 D1oplbl OtlPP{\'IIA OO[R!>ItrS£S I~

0I0'0t The~PI'

OmIIIOftFao-.... \l.C

(ill'ells Stlte a."k 01 Aonau CIty o f Ad~

Otyol -'ll kln

( Jlv of BlUIe U le

ttl'¥ of 8ioom1llf'on Public: Hu lUl ~

<I,y ol 8l ~e E~rt-'"

Cltv 0 1"'00II"'''' CeMIlf CARS OtptrIf'MI\l

( liv oi .,.ftlLo . ..... -' l)eP4rtlNft '

( IIV of DliII sl..~

City 0 ' D"· ... so,, Cllv of Deer Rtwrr

C-otv 01 DetrU' Uo\e\ tit ... Oi I)ol .. ort /l CilV 011 EIoI , n ';:'tv 01 ~Uton

City of F' ~lR

City 01 GI\'fIdan.

e,y 01 GfI(""U1!

Citv oHj '~ i te F",h. Cityol lrwer GrOIl~ "e1: hl~

tityof lab uti." City illl~le

City d ""' 1I'sh~1

~'1 of foIlen""Ut4e \c hls Cltv of MOf'l\lo:ella

CiIV of MurdO(II

CJcy cI Nonhflel ~

Ci\ y d ' .Uu", IIIQDX

City QI Prro< I aile

Cotv 01 '5I ;ryton

Citv or n>l.f Riller Falls

., , CI tY 01 W:lboKh;a

tny ooII W ,lfun

City n! W,llertow"

'""' o:Y Wcm .... ke

o.¥'o'-' .:I'~ Courlrr ...... n'"t: s,,'VKr (le~rWn ¥ M l<lnCi OU

", Aru FI re Dutna (JoQuei "'Ilk Schaah

'-bd (1III1111UnAlft

CHW SoIubon~ Commu ... ,ty Em~rSfn(v !'I_n I.H~ncc Prosr~ms

C_".It'1 M .)r k @\ ol l itch f1eld

COJIIIIMIarl HO\l5lnS PI\",,,M., IfIf

C'omeutllne Nun.lni .1Id ~,N.b C~I f '

C'cunt lYlloor hlb'oc; ... "ltil Dakota Coullt'1

04kol~ Coont'1 PlA)io!. "ult~ Ol!fI~f1~ t

O,lW\OfIIltid M.ldK .. f .w~,,",M.wIII'U

D.w'lOft loyd $aiGiZ

~,lhl>l!r tSO.31'

O@$ Mo"''''' Vah'ey Hi(-.aJlh ,lnd Hu'-S4l'\roCu

DotIae CotIi ty Publ ;c. Hulin

Dulul h ArPii Fi nly YMCA

Dululnu5C

E.I&le "-Ie tlemenUrv

( I}~I Gof l nd Fo rks publ, ( Schoo!

~ J"ot< 'l rver COU ... ty Sdtool~

n ; HO Q'lart.er Scllool El N,IJO Bonn & r......., Mml~moes

[ I¥ C""'lI'I<Ift it'1 Clot . Tu m ( l$tnll. H~~ l lh

l U:Mlua H~,' 1 1 h A~

h Wll rl1 IitWlt h {j ra~lJe

( ytnllil.

{VO~\It AckIpoo ... & r Hrniy S4"lVites

fa~ ' Hu",~ r C~III "'" ' (100 sn" lf Family ~\!'S ~ .. rwut"

loWIblult 'IIIht ... n 'JoLt'I«It h"b_llt " af's and A.t<"".':ion f .,BIoIIt ubK !i(hooI

Fe~li ... s GIXloI1 MN - Powerr.rl by CMtr ~"",(" Hul,h {elY) P .. P!bJ.oc: Sthooh

;otUJ DellBn.InC. illlmor ~ Cauntv Putdk.",,~ fri end , 01 HIe Jacluon COunly Tr,tll,

~,"I(IrI, Ilea lth (':, 'e InlUAtlles

Good s.nanlln SoOI!1 ... Waoronw & WeIA'I~"'" .Le te l

GoodhIJlr Gounty f,"III1.1ld ttu.-n~" G' K .PI,t(e ~.,~

Gnm,'. r~ 11 [cOIlOmoC Develupme ... ' Aut ho rit y

Grow,", Up tinllhv

Hlllh>Cl. CQtnlnu"'lv Owtt HlII~ h e . n ll Rnt:\NI

liarmony ~""'" U ..... c.m., HII II I"\I\ Publk ScllOOls lIo11J'!o1i rod er\ COII.bQQoI ,lIf!

H~"lIeJ"'l

Hul:t~l!i !l

HU 'I 01 New Uim

He ... ",j)it'I r oof'lly Menial He.I,,, Cen' e '

He ... ep(n Coun ty VOYI II)(1 al Se N O(t l P'OC~!ll

Hff'll'lep/n Hn~ HC Me

HEI'C COioMIOII, WIC~ SI:/IooI ISCH 10

Hin artcMolmes Thor.atre

Hop~1IU Ptlbli( $(hOOls

H". ... ' . ,. lll~ e F.:m nen MIr'I~

HO¥ri ~rd U'e·Wi\'erh'-""lro. ted IlWIk khooll HUI'fWI S4"""KQt h r; & Ma"111 CountieS

~IPI'lt1! 5oII.t1 1Ofl'l,

Inpl t \llilf (or Acritu lt u, e lind r. .de (\I(Jlk~

Inte. COVH t'1 NUflo inC SeNoce kll er.c-.,u'V CDI'l'Irr",mlty COUII(,I

-.tRIn;l11oru1 1' . lIs "'-'bite l lbl'il ry ~OII It~"Jt P<lrtnersh l(r '1) r s...~uin~bH'lv

0 11\ ·/\ill"" P",blOc Sl..h~s

"" ... ISO .... ..,tv Chlldl>ood rV" l~ Ed . 1'd khoot ~dlne ..

ISD . 1; 7 · 5dloot As. till t' lSAC]

1$0 ~J19

ISO _361 IW ;0r5 IS P r~lt1'e [lementilrv

~&r63D

1:,,;0 COU""" ~\J bh; 14 ~ ~ !th

.loriUn 'ublic Sci1ool. 1St) 711

O.,dl\'Ohl County

K~IIYOII W~l'I...,.oS\hOOI~

~11iI;' CIIIJ\t:: I 'fUr"

IlUi 'fiTI6Iy &n1Xl1

LKq .. tt;wIe \/.11ey kIod 5n*-

13ke c.~ PI.IiI ... Sch l)Clo!:

l 3ke UIIOIn C" C L ... ~e U/l;all C'OIP'IlTI\Inlty (i~nI"f\ ( ommll lt o::

i.l ~e Lallin Spoort.rnt'I! ' i a,.,p ! l ke h t \ AuOuliQl'l Hlch \rf\O(ll

l I ke P~ rle AudubQn ISO l HIt9

l J ~e ~0l'I Alb (Qun,,' h~e ~ Hulthare

LA~B"'\II1" "~C.

U~ l!wOOd ttf! ~1ttI SYlot~

U n(a.! l er P\lbloc Schooar

lIInd 01 ! .... D.irlcm s: Sky Aru Atentor CIl'IAiIoI'lI le SouelJf Co_ty Pttbllc Hultn

UncrIln '" ,"II t:N.d1 ~n Md r..",lIes CoIllbota -;r

ltlch'ltld A(e~ CNmbfor of CQI"UM!Jf;e

LroY Me .. llhy iII~1f W""1t livt' Well Good h"'e Coonly

L 'f\\'d'~pn.f"" LNIo'ft."'~

lcc 11111' 1'''11't'r.\ Suppoo1 ~lIII"OItlOl'1 Ool,.,h

Ions ".'tle·Grey h\i:\tr [lemml~ry 5(hoQo'

lU lhdR n 5oeltJ ~ .... k" Q' M N

L~t~ 1'\..11101: $I;tIooI

lYDf1~tV

",MCCRAV P IJb I,~ SCMd

Madierolnun, r:ne 100d ~

M~efol n","",nt.uy MlilAOmrIfI ,..tI1oc. 'ialOXIk 114U M~lull CII'JRt'1 c."tr.lII SOlid!. M~:)"llI , ,,,bllt Schoo\:l.

MayO O ldie " " allh Syn"m McGc""OflS0 1I4 M.clls.-~

M~ R Wr'II I': Spe.:ul LdL$C.lltion (Dr,1CIoI!fal ive

MOf'f!'l:~ ' A,c. Food Sohell Me1C'Iliusp ~.aI

M f'tfJ' CQIIol,.fI,,,-Inc.

M.ct....'t~l CO"""U..tV De'o 'dOpO'l'l'!'r,t M,ltUtItIt" M ln"'.lI'Oh li,,~rl i n~litu!1.' f w ... dal;oll

MJ"'''~>Ol il AQCI" nv 01 F~, .,i ly pl'ty1lc J"', M''''''''O'Ia AOO,rrr~o t Nut ,hl",. ."'0 Dot1 ... ,u Minne\QI\.l Br.Jlr rt«Jlnl COioIif:()ll Minroaou P.,bllc Hu lin A11o)(U11bn

Mill!lelllll ~ R~. Aru AI"ne\' on Aci ... g MM N hcmer'll¥V

Mob'" ttooe -~yton M l)ll'lucejlo CDmmW1!t\' Cml!er

MOft\JteIIo HI.., Sdlool

MM1~kll,n l~ Mou nlilin ( Iemenif ry

McnU(:rJ lo Mltfdle 5<;;1I00I

MOON Llk' ~II' S<tIooi UIIU"l Oli""l'lllolU"" "'0" Mo...., COIol" ~ 5httfrr~ Oro"e Ne t, hbc/hood HeallhSoIl1" "

Nertjtr~nd (Jeoo.1e'IU' Y SthtIoI

hItI/""uMt~ ~ Pfatue Area Schoob Nc: .... i'f)l\lC' Sd\ocIh . (;.pUlPI» le,lI nUt l ( efl(eor

New Ufm Mrd iul ("nl",

Nil .... u tll\ Po ll(" ~" ... ,t'I>l

~1Jhn~1J

/'Pi:[lIfet Cou~rv PuOllc Hu!11'1

Nallln Counly ~u bl '( W()rIo..

Nortner ... OPl'on5 for W Olll,l"

Nor1h rotld Ar. " F.m~v VM I;of,

tion ",1tlId ",,-~llhv CDrIUIIUIVV 1n.!IIIM

KOf1h! leld l'ubtlc s.c: h.ooI~ Corn:TlV:lI!V ~ 0\vI11~ Northfield UniOf1 of Vaut~

Qlu', HO!'I", Inc..

On~ Arn Hu:'h:SC ... ,t(!.': Onon>'Att¥Sc:hooI Our (Of"lm!.ll'''V~:lOd ;>r~, U (

P~ uI Buny. " (oml"'lun'~IbM

P,,(fa l ~. 'I\/t ~ aIh

" eliel " V .... y s....:w llvN'c ?eOlPll l RWllOl'"dl~d

? erk. .Qel'll\ Pub l" Sl.1NJO~

i',II~burv Uniled CO!l'lmu " lt .~

Pla inv,ew Etonomic Ofv~oprnfn' Aurhor ,:y (EOA)

. . .. , Roll", C I, .,I~

It ..... ..., iln'.JI'IT1 ~fTl !.., t"lY

., f ,.,

bel lloQ CG1.fIIIty ~tl"Al tJoon",,"I,Jorv

R.-cI l,.J~ . C-clo,II'Ity Ofnlr". 'icNlOl

~t<l l:l"'" F.lh II\tblol Schools

Re<.!I"lIIld.e t:""me"! ~ ry

Pf1.Iv ·,Ielhc.tl

R.ei" b/oe MedlUl ~OP/Y

Rt!"'Ie .... ,l'tI t"eCou~ Rl llCl les,d ,... fLtmrtl.ry Sd'tOQ/ /I.I'I~rVlo""' '(Mo.

JIJ ~(' r1I"" CtIftI""II4'1 COIFfie ~rVl@w _a"'"

~1Yt!I"WDQII Holll1CJrto Cornt" :II obb'nsd,tl ~ .... r~ . ~hoe" N UII .\.()I' Se""~ e.'

';.I' .., K'ds G ' ~ l1 d ~Ol\i

~"rtyd HUlt h

...., ... f .. d l~ M~dlQl Cert'le

~ .. tOO'h MCVllr.tfllJll'IOII:

$(.01\ Clo~. O.I;ol) Commur;,:V Act;OI'> Pann" rVt ,,,,

SCOII ( llW nty AnOt'\"ll)1 ' ~ Oif, r ,!, - Choose NOI 10 UK

~\1 COo"nty Go¥e~ Certl e-t

sum l:_rrlW,.", ..."d\Ho.t."".., Sel'fO(es

5t.c.1n t"""" y ri~I Of.ul SoeIet .. 'io ~unrd H~""'Ht Ht_nUnd

Sl:MMCH RA Slu kgpee Pu.bllc ~ food MId N ITfllW)fl 5otIVOCQ SoIHP'f eye M-.JoooI c-I ....

Sleepy Eve P'ah:B Oer-1l!lf"l SMSoU SIt.p r " "as ~lkoPH ~V fDt ttulillc: He.an ( duutCIII Mi~ ... ~~

'Soul'" SL P".ul khool, Soulhwest Bte,"tJe~djI'lS (1IOI1ot lDn.

:s.ouc h~1 14e.lul 110 HumJn 3oeN " "

louthwf!:';1 RetIQl" ... J Oe\'Mpmem C oml'f'U ~1on

~~td lor II'-e A.!'Il

Sonncl..rd " ubk khod.l ~ Cl:iudl SUo!4I U ..... ffio "V ~ f.a n<;,~ R o!t oon~1 M4I6oc.t CotfIle,

~. ~d hlt\h ~mmtonl..,~dl!O'l ~

St. iDhn'1 Orr. !;If c..re 51 . .Iolvt~ Un .. ", C: h", rch 01 OIr;u Sf. \.J)ui~ (.QUnIV '-:Iblft HtaltJ, aN HU""-" St' .... ,te'l Ooe:JlIr1 m e.."

Sl.lctUIS hflt "'blk Schtnk SL MIrv \ [~l"" Sc.tuiol

S lt'e~ CounlV jtyblK ttuh., SIh ens EIof!'TI~ - o.wson-h.,. tf Schoolt.

5tll'lf'I. [. dJ:.o of Meho)

5 ... 111 ( 01' '''' '' 8t'1lOfO " e 3/ Se-rvIc~$

Swill ~rtly HwtnlItSerotite.

S",!h; COUNV ItCA

l crwedo law Ofrolt

T~ FOQd Gl'clu.,

Theltenycn 'IA"drr The l ei.none F",hwle lnree LlII~1

Three R./v"rs ( ollm u ... "V AC11on , Int

rllc!d Co ... ~

I_ Cil et Mr.IiUI IV

Unlr" COIIWftI,Ift'ly Ac:100ll0 P*"I'Oefl/t ip Un! tett W~v of C,uUolI ~v

Ulliled Way of thc Brown (ou"i'I Ar ea, Inc

Unlver l lty 01 "":-.\01 <1 - r.o'ltftS\oofl

I.M to.1enllort · ~ I!,r..onal SutUInlt:le o... .lOomotni

Part~~

\JIll,.,. s", r'It M.nM~ol.

WiIb<J~h~ Ar"" ~ood Sh,, 11

W~sN AIC'tdR CJub

w10blw '.moen M •• ~e t

y.,,, butol M""" S.fee'!

WiWtN-" e!Iaa Area Chlmbttr IIf Coml:l$ /ce & (VB

W • .)lII"" ,," lI! •• r.tg, Cl!nle ISO,gg

W3!e'lown·M;wer Poblit ~ooh

Wl'ltS l-4r.ln, .",at~

WiI~ 1n CO u""" Publl~ 1"Ie.t.kh WI .... E·Mac Public School

Wlnon~ Cou,,'y ( ",,,,",,,,,,,,II V SerYl{et

WO"~t_ ,",clille I "" ,,", COm ,,,,"H

WriJhs County CommI/t'l4'r AnIM, Inc

Wr-"t eoullf~ Pi' -S ~ nd ReC .. ~

Yellow MeCltCIr\f County f ~ rnD, SelViLe (enter

I"tl!o .... Melhclrof hit Sch QlJol D' ~I! iCI

3

BROWN COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING Wednesday February 27, 2019

Present: Tony Berg, Karen Moritz, Lois Schieffert, Sandy Sellner, Sarah Van Meveren, Nathanael Mayhew, Sheila Wurtzberger, Ethan Mixdorf, Kaley Hernandez (intern), Jennifer Taylor, Sharon Pieschel, Daryn Collins, Jim Lilleodden, Barb Dietz Call to order 12:35pm by Tony Berg Introductions were given. Approval of Agenda – Sharon Pieschel made a motion to approve, second by Dr Collins. Motion carried. Approval of Minutes from December 12, 2018 – No changes. All approved. Old Business: New Business: Elect Officers: Chair – Sharon Pieschel nominated Tony Berg. All approved Vice chair – Lois Berg nominated Sharon Pieschel. All approved Secretary – Sharon Pieschel nominated Barb Dietz. All approved Infrastructure Membership: Approve - Pastor Nathaneal Mayhew - Faith Community Advisory representative Sheila Wurtzerger – School Board Representative Barb made a motion to approve, second by Sharon Pieschel. Motion carried. We do not have a candidate for New Ulm Representative at this time. Public Health Partnership Award Nominations – Karen asked the group if they wanted to continue giving out this award. The group all agreed to continue this award. Karen went over the application briefly and asked for a small committee to assist with the nominations. Ethan Mixdorf, Barb Dietz, and Sharon Pieschel volunteered to be on the committee. They will review the applications, score them and select the awardee by the end of March. It will then be awarded on April 2nd at the Brown County Board meeting and celebrated on April 10th at the Advisory Committee meeting.

4

Commissioner of Health Named – Governor Walz named Jan Malcolm as the Public Health Commissioner. She was the commissioner under Jesse Ventura and then also in 2018 after Commissioner Ehlinger resigned due some issues with long term care. Karen also talked about the Commissioner of Human Services Tony Laurey (previously Senator Laurey) who we expect to be very good at making changes in the division. Community Health Assessment and Improvement Process Progress – Karen updated the group on where the process is. CHA is done. The 10 top issues were identified. The MAPP core group used the Hanlon and PEARL method to identify the top 3 to create the CHIP around. The CHIP event is March 27th at 1:30 PM at the Country Club. Karen invited anyone that was interested and to let her know if they can come. The invitation flyers were passed out to the group. Nicollet County – Public Health Leadership – Second interviews were this week. Karen has not been involved in the process. They did have the waiver supervisor involved and she was within PH before the department reorganized to Health and Human Services. We should know by next week sometime. Student Program – MSU Nursing and Community Health Education – We have had 8 MSU students here just for 3 Wednesdays. They were offsite for one, have spring break next week and missed one for snow so it limited their experience. Kaley Hernandez (intern for Community Health Education) has been here since January and very instrumental in helping prepare for today and doing many projects within the department. Karen stressed that this type of position is critical in a PH department and she will be bringing it up with CHB to possibly share a position. However, there is no funding so it would come out of the general fund or tax dollars. Local Public Health Legislative Priorities – Karen handed out the legislative priorities to the group and briefly went over them touching the most on the Public Health Care Access fund. Communicable Disease Influenza update – Karen provided the latest influenza report – It is widespread right now and school outbreaks have increased. There have been 769 hospitalizations compared to over 6000 last season and 23 deaths compared to 435 last season. Hospitalizations and deaths are much less than last year but it might not be over. Influenza vaccination rates – Karen shared the Brown County influenza vaccination rates. They remain pretty stable but at a much lower rate than we would like to see. We are at about 36 % vaccinated and at 62% vaccinated for ages 65 and up. Karen reminded everyone it is not ALL ABOUT YOU – it is about protecting others that are more vulnerable as well. Tuberculosis – We have completed our DOT (directly observed therapy) on 2 infants that were exposed to active TB. The case was related to the outbreak associated with MSU – total of 8 active cases now. The index case had it and was spreading it for 2 years prior to diagnosis so with that and the fact that we are dealing with college students has made this very difficult to investigate and get stopped. Karen stressed that TB is not near as communicable as other diseases but can be spread.

5

Access to Quality Healthcare South Country Health Alliance – South Country Health Alliance had another bad year in 2018. The newspaper has covered the story and the board action. The loss was 14 million due to a number of factors in 2018. SCHA has made many adjustments to make the 2019 budget doable. The reimbursement from DHS is not sustainable for any Managed Care Organization at this point. There is an ear at the Capitol from Governor Walz and our local legislators and also the new Commissioner of Human Services has met with the SCHA. Community Worker in the Jail – Human Services has successfully implemented a social worker in the jail that works with inmates and helps law enforcement with community response and with assistance at the time of an incident involving someone with mental health so they can prevent incarceration if they really need assistance with their mental health instead. It is just starting and developing. It is only M-F business hours so somewhat limiting but I think it will be beneficial and become something that meets the needs. Blessed Bottoms – FB page - https://www.facebook.com/blessedbottomsnewulm/ This program is being hosted by the First United Methodist Church in New Ulm. It is a free diaper distribution program for those in immediate need of diapers. They have the diaper distribution monthly at the First United Methodist Church. In order to participate they need to live, work, or worship in the New Ulm school district. Participants need to register monthly to be eligible to pick up diapers that day. Karen mentioned this could be replicated in other communities. Laundry Love – https://laundrylove.org/about/ - The United Church of Christ is sponsoring this program. It is for low or no income individuals or families. This program started January 22ndand is held at the Mega Wash Maytag Laundry near Wal- Mart in New Ulm. It occurs from 12PM – 5PM the 4th Tuesday of the month. They are allowed a $15.00 maximum for an individual and a $25.00 maximum for a family. Karen mentioned that the faith community has been doing amazing things in New Ulm for those that need assistance. Blue Earth County Mutual Aid – Brown County PH and other SC PH departments are assisting Blue Earth with family home visiting, waiver case management and perinatal Hep B cases. We have done at least one FHV family for them. Most of their staff have been pulled to work on the TB outbreak. We will be billing for the service to the clients insurance and if that does not work because we do not have a reimbursement source Blue Earth will reimburse us directly at 140.00 per HV. Promote Healthy Behaviors Change to Chill - This is a resilience program designed for teens but can be used by adults as well. It is a website and a curriculum that is being offered to schools in our county. The New Ulm Public Schools has started the program and we are working to get it out to the other districts. Allina just offered training on it with several participants. Sleepy Eye and Springfield are planning to implement it. It is web based at ChangetoChill.org

https://www.facebook.com/blessedbottomsnewulm/

https://laundrylove.org/about/

6

ACES Training – Karen reminded the group what ACES is and about the research involved. Adverse Childhood Events awareness training is now being promoted by the Department of Human Services through Minnesota Communities Caring for Children. They provide the training and are working through the Mental Health Collaborative which locally is 3 Counties for Kids and then in Brown County Families First. The first training will be in Springfield at the school. We plan to participate in hosting a “train the trainer” program this summer so we have local trainers. Healthy Families of America Evidence Based Family Home Visiting Program Update – Staff have admitted 3 families to the HFA program with a goal of 9 families the first year. The staff training is just about complete. This is a model that requires a large amount of time spent with clients and additional paperwork. Underage Substance Abuse Coalition - As the current SAMSHA grant comes to an end in the fall of 2019. Decisions will need to be made to continue with USAC in the same capacity or in some other capacity. Right now the county has provided funding to complete the year of 2019 at a base funding level. The USAC coordinator or director Abby Schwab has resigned and took a position with extension. She is currently contracting with the fiscal agent United Way to work about 8-10 hours a week and keep the program going and finalize all the reporting at least through September. There are a couple additional grants that can be written and the group plans to do that soon. Otherwise without a current full time director the board is considering discontinuing this coalition. Respond to Emergencies Communication Exercise – In January we did a functional communication exercise with the South Central region and some Long Term Care and healthcare partners. We opened the Emergency Operations Center and did the exercise with Emergency Management. It went well and we identified one gap. The gap was our new faxing software was not on portable computers and will need to get that done. Preparedness Summit Karen and Michelle attended the metro Preparedness Summit on February 20th. The speakers were from the California fires and the Las Vegas shooting. It was very informative. Environmental Health Other Business Annual Meeting Next Meeting – April 10, 2019 12:30 PM Meeting Adjourned 12:35pm

u Public Health Emergency Preparedness

Point of Dispensing Exercise

Join uS at v'o.gel fie t/hcH.lSe J une 1~ th from 2:30-4-00

To Test E mer.genc ""eJ' cat; on Dispensin.9

Arri'Ve and wa ~throu.9h our simulated c ink

t uS i.9ure out wh'ch Anti-Anthrax IREAr ment

! ri.9ht for ~ou

RSVP BY JUNE 1, 2019 Stacv.g [email protected] Or call 507-233-6820

REQUEST FOR BOARD ACnON

Requested Board Date: May 21,2019 Originating Department: Human Resources/Public Health

Flexibility:

Item: Public Health RN Resignation Presenter: Ruth Schaefer

Estimated Time: 1 minute

Board Action Requested: Accept the resignation of Kristine Leshovsky from her fUll-time Public Health Adult Health Nurse position, effective June 9,2019.

Background : Kristine Leshovsky began employment with Brown County on 3/18/13 as a FT Public Health Registered Nurse. She gave her resignation on 5/9/19.

Due to the 7/15/2019 discontinuation of the Brown County Public Health Home Care Program, this position will not be filled .

cc: Karen Moritz

Admin istrator's Comments:

Board Action: Approved as Requested ______ _

Denied

Tabled

Other

I Notations:

Supportinq Documents attached X none

Motion Offered By Motion Seconded By ________ _ Vote By Acclamation ________ _ Roll Call Vote


gbode

Typewritten Text

# 11

gbode

Oval


Requested Board Date: May 21,2019 Originating Department: Human ResourceslHighway Department

Flexibility: Item: Appointment of 20 19 Summer Highway Presenter: Ruth Schaefer

Engineering/Maintenance Student Estimated Time: 1 minute

Board Action Requested: Approve the appointment of Dylan Hillesheim for the 2019 Summer Highway EngineeringlMaintenance Student position with a start date of 6/3/20 19 at the first year hourly wage of $11.00.

Background: The interview committee (Highway Engineer, Assistant Highway Engineer, Highway Foreman and HR Director) recommends appointing Dylan Hillesheim to the 2019 Summer Highway EngineeringlMaintenance Student position.

cc: Wayne Stevens Andrew Lang Fred Gareis


Board Action: Approved as Requested ______ _

Denied

Tabled

Other

Notations:

Supporting Documents attached X none

Motion Offered By Motion Seconded By ________ _ Vote By Acclamation Roll Call Vote


---------

gbode

Typewritten Text

# 12

gbode

Oval


Requested Board Date: 5-19-2019 Originating Department: Flexibility: Administration; HR

Item: Salary Administration Plan Presenter: Administrator; HR Director Estimated Time: 10 minutes

Board Action Requested: Consider the 9-4-2018 Board agenda item that was tabled: Recommendation of the Salary Administration Task Force to implement a 13-Step Salary Range Schedule for paying non-union salaried and hourly employees

Background: On September 4, 2018, the County Board took the following action:

At 9: 15 AM, the County Board considered the recommendation of the Salary Administration Task Force that was tabled at the 8-21-2018 County Board meeting. A motion was offered by Commissioner Potter, and was seconded by Commissioner Berg, to table consideration of the recommendation of the Salary Administration Task Force to implement a 13-Step Salary Range Schedule for paying non-union salaried and hourly employees to be considered further in June 2019. After considerable discussion, this motion to table carried on a roll-call vote of 4-1, with Commissioner Borchert dissenting.

Recommendation of the Salary Administration Task Force: A. Approve steps consolidation to thirteen (13) steps with a 38-39% range from entry level to

maximum effective 1-3-2020 for paying non-union salaried and hourly employees. Note: Attachment 1 is a cost comparison updated from the 9-4-2018 RBA. The steps consolidation is based on the current 38-39% range from entry level to the maximum step. Attachment 2 is the 2019 Salary Range Schedule for non-union employees. Attachment 3 is the 13 Step Consolidation chart from September 4,2018.

In the alternative to the recommendation of the Salary Administration Task Force, the County Board may want to consider:

B. Approve steps consolidation to thirteen (13) steps with a 32% range from entry level to maximum effective 1-3-2020 for paying non-union salaried and hourly employees.

Note: A 32% range from entry level to the maximum step is in line with the 15 county survey which reports the average range from entry level to the maximum step to be approximately 32%. Attachment 4 is a cost estimate with the steps consolidation based on the 32% range from entry level to the maximum step.

C. Revise single health insurance benefit for eligible non-union full-time employees and part-time 0.75 FTE or greater employees to 100% premium paid by the employer for the base plan (currently Medica 2700HSA 100%) effective 1-1-2020.

D. Revise single health insurance benefit for eligible non-union full-time employees and part-time 0.75 FTE or greater employees to 90% premium paid by the employer for the base plan (currently Medica 2700HSA 100%) effective 1-1-2020.

Regarding alternatives C & D, please refer to background information in Attachments 5 & 6.

cc Department Heads (by email)



Notations: RBA052 1 19 Consolidation.docx

Supporting Documents:



x Attached None

gbode

Typewritten Text

# 13

gbode

Oval

Cost Comparison - DRAFT - Estimated 5-21-2019 1 Current 26-Step Plan (2018 estimates increased by 2i119 salary plan adjustment of 2.5%

2020 2021

2 Annual cost of steps (est. increase of 2% each yr) $ 130,277 $ 132,883

3 Est. 30% Human Services revenue ~e-capture: $ 39,083 $' 39,865 -.--4 Est. levy funded cost: $ 91,194 $ 93,018

************************************************************************************* ~.-.

5 Consolidated Steps Plan to 13 Steps 2020

6 Implementation cost 1/3/2020

7-~:' 30% Human Services revenue re-capture:

$ 137,650

8 -.

9

10 -U

-12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21 f- -

22

23

24

25

26

_. $ 41,295

Est. levy funded cost: $ 96,355 1----

2020' 2021

Annual cost of steps w/consolidated plan $ 162,850 $ 348,500 .. - --- ---

E~9% Human Services revenue re-capture: $ 48,855 $ 104,550

Est. levy funded cost: 1---. $ 113,995 $ 243,950

1) For budget discussion purposes only, a 2.0% cola is applied each year 2021-2023

2) The consolidated steps plan cost will reduce somewhat as long-term employees reach the top step.

3) Approximately 30% of Brown County employees would be above Step 13 on-going in the consolidated system.

'After initial placement of all staff on January 3 (Implementation), anniversary steps will apply during the year .-- -

**************************************************************************************************

2020

Est. additional levy need if consolidated plan adopted: $ 119,156 $ Est. per cent additional levy needed based on 2019 levy: 0.9%

Total Payroll in 2019 budget: $ 13,983,182

1 % levy increase = $132,597

Note:

1. STEPS: 15 county survey average /I of steps is 11; Proposal above moves to 13 steps from 26 steps

2. RANGE: 15 county survey average range from entry level to highest step is 32%

NOTE: The proposal above keeps the rangeat the current 38-39%from entry level to maximum step

.. -

Conselidation 2018-19 5-21-2019 worksheet.xlsx

C: of step!) Percentage Increase 0: s~ County Step or Merit Pay. Increase different

Union vs Non-Union Blue Earth Step No 12 3 36 Cass Step No 10 30 Freeborn Step No Varies 35 LQ5ueur Step No 3.5 33.7 Lyon Periormance Based NlA N/A N/A Meeker Step No 11 34% Mille Lacs Step Yes 11-12 Varies 28% 133.5%

Nicollet Performance Based No N/A N/A N/A Nobles Step No 27 Pine Performance Based No N/A 0-6% N/A

Redwood Step No 14 2.8 39.2

Renville Perlormance 8ased No N/A N/A N/A

Todd Step No 27 Wabasha Step No 11 2.75 30.25

es - Ighway (AFSCME) Union

Watonwan Step· Different 15 2.53 37.9

36 30 35

i I

-~l==~=. -=::=:---·:~-=:~!-;,~;-;;"'::::-sbr:::-r:::;h::----+---:C!~;;---+-------+---;;;:---1 f--+---.--.- . 'LeSueur 8 33.7

34 1-1----- --·--·----·----I,I,M7e=".7k'='er::'-----+---711;---+--.. -- ... --.--- Mille Lacs 11 28

27 29.2

.~~. =_~:::.._-=- -=_-~~ __________ EN"'o:.:b:::le:.:s'---, ____ +_--,=:9,___--+------- --+---;~,---1 -f----- __ .. _____ . ___ ._. __ I'c;~~~.c;~'i;.:::O.:::Od"-----+----':::'94'---,--t-.----.-----I---=:~--1

27 30.25 37.9

-- ·-··----··------+W"'a"'b.=.a-s,...ha-----+---711:----+---W.tonw.n .4,5 ------+-..::,;:,;::::.--1

1-4-------------------f~~T~o~ta~IA~v-e-rn-g-.-~-~(~1~O~.7~3-~~~-~T~o7ta7IA7v-e~rn~g~e--tt-~~~ 1-1------- -----------+-.:..:::::::..:..:.=:!!.::..-+-~_====:,.,L+-...:..::::::..:..==-+'~='=''_I

\ 31.64 -

2021

150,932

1.1%

-

2022 2023

$ 135,540 $ 138,251

$ 40,662 $ 41,475

$ 94,878 $ 96,776

2022 2023

$ 355,470 $ 362,579

$ 106,641 $ 108,774

$ 248,829 $ 253,806

-

2022 2023

$ 153,951 $ 157,030

1.2% 1.2% -

.. _ - --

----

~, RANGe Minimum • StartinQ

'" 146- 160· 21,510 10.3413

V 161- 115 . 24,142 11.6068

VI ' 176·190 26,779 12.8745

VII ,gl -Z05! 29, 192 ~ 14.0346

YIU 206 - 220' 31,829 , 15.3023

IX 221 -235 34,240 lSAS16

X 236.·= 36,8n 17.7271

XI 25 - 265 39,509 18.9948

~n 266 - 28:0 41,922 20.1549

XIII 261-295 44,554 21.4203

XIV" 200 - ]\1) 41,190 22.6873

'IN ' 311 -.25 49,826 23.9550

~VI 376 - 340 52,241 25. 1158

lXVII 3.11 · '356 54,873 26.3813

)<VIII 3S6 ·370 . 57,507 27,6475

XIX p 71-365 60,1 42 28.9145

1<1: 386-0100 62,554 30,073"

~ .:101- 41 5 65,187 31 .3401

1001 416 - 430 67,931 32.6593

2.50% Percentage Over 2018 Schedule

1 22,260

10.7020 24 ,974

12.0068 27,701

13.3176 30,246

14.54 15 32.925

15.8292 35.467

17.0517 36,191

16,3609 .:10.912

19,6695 43,418

20.8741 AS,137

22. 1811 48,857

23.4889 51 ,580

2.:1.7982 54,084

26.0020 56,604

27.3098 59,523

28.6169 62,246

29.9261 64,754

31.1315 67,471

32.4378 70,312

33.8039

2019 SALARY RANGE SCHEDULE Non-Union EMPLOYEES

~ 2 3 • 5

23,003 23,751 24,496 25,241 11.0590 11,41 90 11.77671 12.1352 25,814 26,643 27,4771 28,313

12.4106 12.8092 13.2100 ' 3,6122 28,624 29,544 30,464 31,38"

13.7614 14.2038 14.6461 15.0901 31,299 32,354 33.406 34,459

15.0417 15.5546 16.06 15 . 16.5670 34,021 35,120 36,216 37.31~

16.3562 16.8847 17.4124 17.9394 36,699 37.930 39,157 40,386

17.6440 18.2355 18.8256 19.4.164 39,509 40,826 42,144 43,457

18.9948 19.6279 20.26 17 20.6926 42.319 43.724 45,126 " 46 ,532

20.3456 21 .0210 21.69SO 22.3711 44,905 46,401 47,894 .49.385

21.5688 22 .3060 23.0258 2U.27 47,718 49,297 SO,873 , 52,457

22.9411 23.7004 24.4582 25.2197 50,529 2~~~1, 53,662 55,532

24.2927 25.8952 26.6982 53,336 55,094 56,843 . 56,603

2.5 .6421 26.4875 27.3284 28.1745 55,928 57,772 59,611 61 ,457

26.8883 27.7152 28.6592 29,5469 58,737 60,667 62,598 64,531,

28.2391 29.1669 30.0954 31.0246 61,544 63,566 65,584 3~75~ 29.5884 30.5607 31 .53Oa 64 .357 66,461 68,570 70,679

30.9407 31.9524 32.9663 33,9601 66.947 69,141 71,336 73;530

32.1862 33.2409 34,2963 35,3510 69,751 72,036 74,317 76.602

33.$341 34.6325 35.7295 . 36.8280 72,687 75,069 77,447 79,628

34.9456 36.0907 37.2341 38.3786

One percent fO f 6thru 8 and 3/4 percent from 9 10 26

MAXIMU Percent 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 I. 15 16 n 18 19 20 21 22 23 2' 25 26 Chao""

25,494 25,749 26,006 26,201 26,398 26,596 26,795 26,996 27,199 27,403 27,608 27,815 28.024 28,234 28,446 28.659 28.874 29,091 29,309 29,528 29.750 38% 12.2566 12.3791 12.S029 12.5967 12.6912 12.7864 12.8823 12.9789 13.0762 13.1743 13.2731 13.3721 13.4729 13.5740 13.8758 U.7784 13.8817 13.9858 14 .0907 14 .1964 14,3029 28,597 28 .663 29,171 29,390 29,611 29,833 30,056 30,282 30.509 30,738 30.968 31,201 31,435 31 .670 3 1,908 32.147 32.388 32.631 32.876 33.122 33,371 38%

13.7484 13.8858 14.0247 14.1299 14,2359 14.3426 14.4502 14 .5586 14.6678 14.7778 14.8886 15.0003 15.1128 15.2261 15.3403 15.4554 15.57 13 15.6881 15.8057 15.9243 16.0437 31 ,703 32 ,020 32.340 32,562 32,827 33,073 33,321 33,571 33,823 34,076 34,332 34,569 34,649 35,110 35,374 35,639 35,906 36, 175 36,447 36,720 36,995 38%

15.2416 15.394 1 15.5480 15.6646 15.7621 15.9005 16.0197 16.' 399 16.2609 16.3829 16.S051 16.6295 16.7542 16.8799 17.0065 17.1341 17.2626 17.3920 17.5225 17.6539 17.7863 34,804 35,152 35,5()4 35,770 36,038 36,308 36,581 36,655 37,13 1 37,410 37,690 37,973 38,258 36,545 38.834 39,125 39,419 39,714 40.012 40,312 40,615 39%

16.7327 16.9000 17.0690 17.1970 17.3260 17.4559 17.5869 17.7188 17.8516 17.9S55 18.1204 18.2563 16.3933 18,53 12 16.6702 18.8102 16.9513 19.0934 19.2366 19.3809 19.5263 31,667 38,064 38,445 16,733 39,023 39,316 39,611 39,908 40,207 40,509 40.81 3 41,119 41 ,427 41,738 42,051 42,366 42,684 43,004 43,327 43,652 43,979 38%

18.1187 18.2999 18.4829 18.62 16 18.7612 18.9019 19.0437 19.1865 19.3304 19.4754 19.6215 19.7686 19.9169 20 .0663 20.2168 20.3684 20.5212 20.6751 20.8301 20.9663 21.1437 40,790 41,198 41 ,610 41 .922 42,236 42,553 42.872 43,194 43,518 43,844 44,173 44,504 44,838 45,174 45,513 45,854 46,198 46.545 46,894 47.246 47,600 39%

19.5105 19.8066 20.0047 20. 1547 20 .3059 20.4582 20.6 116 20. 7662 20.9220 21.0789 21.2370 21.3962 21.5567 21 .7184 21.8813 22.0454 22.2107 22.3773 22.5451 22 .7142 22.6846 43,891 44,330 44,773 45,109 45,448 45,788 46,132 46.478 46,826 47.178 47,531 47,888 48,247 48,609 48,974 49,341 49,711 50,064 50.459 50,638 51.219 39%

21. 1016 21.2126 21.5257 21.6a71 21 ,6496 22.0137 22.1768 22.3451 22 .5127 22.6815 22 .8511 23.0230 23.1957 23.3697 23.5450 23. 7215 23.8995 24.0787 24.2593 24.4412 24.6245 46,997 47,467 47,94 2 48,301 48.664 49.029 49,396 49 ,767 50,140 50,516 SO,695 51,277 51.661 52,049 52,439 52,832 53.229 53,628 54,030 54,435 54,844 39'4

22.5948 22.8209 23.0490 23.2219 23.3960 23.5715 23.7483 23.9264 24.1058 24 .2866 24 .468B 24.6523 24 .6372 25.0235 25.2111 25.4002 25 .5907 25.7827 25.9760 26.1 709 26.3671 49,879 50,378 SO,881 51.263 51,647 52.035 52,425 52,818 53.214 53,613 54,016 54.421 54 ,829 55,240 55,654 56.072 56,492 56,916 57.343 57,773 58,206 39%

23.9802 24 .2200 24.4622 24.6456 24.6305 25.0161 25.2043 25.3934 25.5838 25.7157 25.9690 26 .1638 26,3600 26.5577 26.7569 26.9576 27.1597 27.3634 27.5687 27.7754 27.9838 52.982 53,511 54,047 54,.452 54,860 55,272 55,686 56,104 56,525 56,949 51,376 57,806 58.240 58,676 59,117 59,560 60,007 60,457 60,910 6 1.367 61.827 39%

25.4719 25.7267 25.9839 26.1788 26.3752 26.5730 26.7723 26.9731 27.1754 27.3792 27.5845 27.7914 27.9998 28.2098 28.4214 28 .6346 28.8493 29.0657 29 .2837 29.5033 29 .7246 56,066 56,649 57,215 57.644 58.076 56,512 58,951 59,393 59,838 60,267 60,739 61. 195 61,654 62,116 62,562 63,052 63,524 64,001 64,481 64,964 65,452 39%

26.9652 27.2349 27.SOn 27.7135 27.9214 28 .1308 28.341 8 28,5543 28.7685 28 .9843 29.2016 29.4207 29.6413 29 .8636 30.0876 30.3133 30.5406 30.7697 31.0004 31 .2329 31:4672 59,169 59.181 60,379 60,832 61,288 61,74 7 62,21 1 62.677 63,147 63,621 64,096 64,519 65,063 65,551 66.043 66,536 67,037 67.540 68,046 68,557 69,07 1 39%

28.4563 28.7408 29.0282 29.2459 29 .4653 29.6863 29.9089 30.1332 30.3592 30.5869 30.81 63 31.0475 31.2803 31.5149 31.7513 31.9894 32.2293 32 . .:1710 32.7146 32.9599 33.2071 62,072 62,693 63,320 63,795 64,273 64.755 65,241 65,730 66,223 66,720 67,220 67,724 68,232 68,744 69,260 69 ,779 70,302 70,830 71.361 71.896 72,435 39%

29.8423 30.1408 30.4422 30.6705 30.9005 31.1323 31 .3658 31.6010 31 .8380 32.0768 32.3174 32.5597 32.6039 33.0500 33.2979 33.5476 33.7992 34.0527 34.3081 34.5654 34.8246 65,177 65,826 66,487 66,965 67,488 67,994 66,5()4 69,017 69.535 70.057 70,582 71,111 71 ,645 72,182 72,723 73,269 73,818 74,372 74,930 75,492 76,058 39%

31.3349 31.6482 31.9647 32.2044 32.4460 32.6893 32.9345 33.1815 33,4303 33.6811 33.9337 34.1882 34.4446 34.7029 34.9632 35.2254 35.4696 35.7558 36.0240 36.294 1 36.5863 68,279 68,962 69,652 70,174 70,701 71,231 71 ,765 72,303 72,846 73,392 73,942 74,497 15,056 15,619 76.186 76,757 77,333 77,913 78,497 79,086 79,679 39%

32.8266 33.1549 33.4865 33,7376 33.9906 34.2456 34.5024 34.7612 35.02 19 35.2846 35,5492 35.8158 36,0644 36.3551 36,62n 36.9024 37.1792 37.4580 37.7390 38.0220 38.3072 71,385 72.099 72,820 73,366 73,917 74,471 75,030 75,592 76,159 76,730 77,306 77,886 78,470 79,058 79,65 1 80,249 60,651 81 .457 62,068 82,683 63,304 39%

34.31 99 34,6631 35.0098 35,2723 35.5369 35.8034 36.0719 36,3425 36.6150 36.8896 37.1863 37.4451 37.7259 38.0088 38,2939 38.5811 38,8705 39.1620 39.4557 39.7516 40 .0498 74,265 75,OOB 15,758 76.326 76,899 77 ,475 78,057 78,642 79.232 79,826 80,425 81 ,028 81 .636 82,248 82,865 83 ,486 84,112 84,743 85.379 86,019 86,664 39%

35.7045 36.0615 36.0:1222 36.6953 36.9705 37.2418 37.5272 37,6086 38.0922 38,3n9 38.6657 36.9557 39.2479 39.5422 39.8388 40.1376 40.4366 40.741 9 41 .0415 41.3553 4 1.6555 77,368 78,142 78,923 79,515 80,11 2 80,712 61 .318 8 1,928 82,542 83,161 83,785 84,4 13 85.046 85.684 86,327 86.974 87,627 88,284 88,946 89.613 90,285 39%

37.1963 37.5682 37.9439 38.22&5 38.5152 38.8041 39.0951 39.3883 39.6637 39.9814 40 .2812 40.5833 40.8877 41.1944 41.5033 41.8146 42.1282 42.4442 42.7625 43.0832 43.4064 60,625 81,431 82,246 82.862 83.0:184 84,110 64.741 85,377 86,017 66,66 1 87.313 67,967 88,627 69,292 89,962 90,635 91 ,316 92,000 92,690 93,365 94,086 39~.

38.7622 39.1491 39.5412 39.8375 40.1366 40.4373 40 .7409 41 .0468 41 .3543 41.6641 41 .9773 42.2916 42.6093 42 .9286 43.2508 43 .5747 43.9019 44 .2309 44.5626 44.8967 45.2335

1.00% 1.oo-k 1.00n/. 0.750/0 0,75% 0.75% 0.750/0 0.75% 0.75% 0.75% 0.75% 0 .75% 0.75% 0.750/a 0.75% 0.75% 0.75% 0.75% 0.75% 0.75% 0.75% 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 16 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

gbode

Typewritten Text

". 2019 Brown County Proposed Grade Structure (2 5% COLA over 2018 Structure) ChHk 1M 201' ".n8'~ A1i')unm8ntJ .. l .S"

,. .. ,,,,---', SteP-l! . .

Rance Range ~ Mu ..,in

"' .... RanpMI!) ~tep-l _~~p:~ S~P:"J .-~te~. u Step-S: . ~p-8 " $\Op-) Step-8, .. . St ... } " St~p:-10 S",p-11 St.JI:o;- 1 , MI!_ G,..,.'llfl $prud f Grado l:OlB~iN 2DJ8MAX Ch.", .. Chance .

• $10.34 $10.60 510.87 511.14 $11,43 511 .71 512 .01 $12.31 512.62 $12.94 $13.27 513.61 $13.95 $14.30 38% , $10.09 $13.95 102.50% 102.50%

5 $11.60 $11.90 $12.20 $12.50 $12.82 $13.14 513 .48 $ 13.82 $14.16 514 .52 5111.89 51$.27 5 15.65 516.04 12.17% 3S% 5 $11.32 $15.65 102.$0% 102.50%

• $12.87 513.20 $13.$3 513.87 514 .22 $1458 514.95 515.33 $15.72 516.11 516.52 516. 94 $17.36 511 .78 10.86% 38% 6 $12.56 517.35 lOl.5m6 102.50%

7 $111.03 $14.39 514 .75 $1$.12 515.50 $15.90 $16.30 516.71 $17.13 517.56 518 .01 518.46 518.93 $19.53 9.78% 39"0 7 $13.69 519.05 102.50"10 lO2.SD"~

8 $15 .30 $15.69 $16.09 $16.49 $16.91 517.34 $17.77 518.22 $18.68 519.15 519.64 520.13 520.64 521.15 8.28% 38% 8 $14.93 520.63 102.50% 102.5O"Ai

• 516A6 $16 .88 517.30 $17.74 $18.19 518.65 519.12 519.60 $20.10 $20.60 $21.12 521.66 522.20 $22.8' 8.23% 39% 9 $16.06 $22.33 101.50% 102.50%

10 517.72 518.17 $18.63 519.10 5 19.58 520. 08 $20.58 $2 1.10 $21.&4 522.18 522.74 523.32 523.90 524.62 7.60% 3.% 10 $17 .29 524.02 102.50"A. 102.50""

11 518.99 519.47 $19.96 520.47 520.99 $21 .52 $21.06 $22.62 523.19 $23.77 524.37 524 .99 $25.62 526.36 7.08% 3.% 11 $18.53 $25.72 102.50% 102.50%

12 $20.15 520.66 $21.18 $21.72 $22 .27 $22.8] 523.40 $23 .99 524.60 5B.21 $25.86 $26.51 527 .18 $27.98 6.11"D 3.% 12 519.66 $27.30 102.50% 102.50%

13 $21.42 $21.96 $22.52 523.09 $13 .67 $24.27 524.88 525.51 $26.15 526.81 $27.49 528. 18 $2B.90 529.73 6.22% 39% 13 520.90 $29.00 102.50"'<' 102.50%

14 $22.68 52].26 $23 .84 $24.45 $25.06 525.70 526.34 $27.01 $27.69 $28.]9 52!Ul $29.84 $30.60 5]1.47 5.86% 3.%

" $22.13 $30.70 102.50% 102.50%

15 $23.95 $24.56 $25.18 525.81 526.47 527. 14 $27.82 $28.52 $29.24 529.98 530.74 531.51 532.31 $33.21 553% 3'" 15 523.37 $32.40 102.50% 102.50%

16 525.11 525.75 526.40 $27 .06 $27.75 528.45 $29.17 529.90 $30.66 $31.43 532.22 $33.04 533.87 $34.83 4.87% "" 16 524.50 $33.98 102.50% 102.50"..(,

17 $26.38 527.()$ $27.73 $28.43 $29.15 $29.89 530.&4 531.42 532 .21 533.02 533.86 534 .71 $3559 $36.56 5.00% 3.% 17 $25.74 $]5.67 102,50% 102.50%

18 527.64 $28 .3' $29.06 $29. 79 530.54 531.32 $32.11 532.92 533.75 $34.60 535A7 536.37 537.29 $38.30 4.76% 3.% 18 526.97 $3 7.17 102.$0",,(, 102.50%

" 528.92 $29.65 $30.39 531.16 531 .95 $32.75 $33.58 534.43 535.30 536.19 $37.10 $38.04 539.00 $40.05 4.55% 38" ,. S28.21 $39.07 102.50% ]02.50%

20 $30.07 $30.83 $31.61 $32.41 $33 .23 $34.07 $34.93 535.81 536.71 537.64 538.59 $39.57 $40.56 $41.67 4 .03% 3.% 20 529.34 $40.65 102.50"" 102.50%

21 $31.34 $32. 14 532.95 $33.78 $34.63 $35 .51 $36.40 537.32 538.26 $39.23 540.22 $41.24 $42.28 $43.41 4.18% 38% 21 $30.58 $42.3$ 102.50""£ 102.50%

22 $32.66 $33.49 $34.34 $35.21 536. 10 $37.02 $37.96 $38.'2 $39.91 $40.93 541.97 543.03 $44.13 $45.24 4.21% 39" 22 $31.86 544.14 102.49'',.{, 102.$0",,(,

Step Incr Grilde 4 2.53% 2.53% 2.53% 2.53% 2.53% 252""(' 2.53% 2.53% 2.53% 2.52% 2.53% 253% 2.51%

Step Incr Grade 22 2.54% 2.54% 254% 2.54% 2.54% 254% 2.54% 2.54% 2.54% 2.54% 2.54·" 254% 2.53%

Cost Comparison - DRAFT - Estimated 5-14-2019 I 1 Current 26-Step Plan (2018 estimates increased by 2019 salary plan adjustment of 2.5%

--2020 2021 2022 2023

2 Annual cost of steps (est. increase of 2% each yr) S 130,277 S 132,883 S 135,540 S 138,251 1---'-3 Est. 30% Human Services revenuere-capture: S 39,083 S 39,865 S 40,662 S 41,475 4 Est. levy funded cost: S 91,194 S 93,018 S 94,878 S 96,776

_ .. - 1*************************************************************************************

5 I Consolidated Steps Plan to 13 Steps w/32% Range 2020

6 Implementation cost 1/3/2020 $ 115,626 7 .Est 30% Human Services revenue re-capture: S 34,688 Lg

Est. levy funded cost: $ 80,938 . - - ---202O' 2021 2022 2023

9 Annual cost of steps w/consolidated plan $ 136,794 $ 292,740 $ 298,595 $ 304,567 10 Est. 30% Human Services revenue re-capture: S 41,038 S 87,822 S 89,578 S 91,370 11 Est. levy funded cost: S 95,756 S 204,918 S 209,016 S 213,197

12 1) For budget discussion purposes only, a 2.0% cola is applied each year 2021-2023

13 2) The consolidated steps plan cost will reduce somewhat as long-term employees reach the top step ..

14 ~~pproximately 30% of Brown County employees would be above Step 13 on-goi.ng in the consolidated system.

15" 'After initial placement of all staff on January 3 (Implementation), anniversary steps will apply during the year **************************************************************************************************

2020 2021 2022 2023

16 Est. additional levy need if consolidated plan adopted: $ 85,500 $ 111,900 $ 114,138 $ 116,421

17 Est. per cent additional levy needed based on 2019 levy: 0.6% 0.8% 0.9% 0.9%

18 Total Payroll in 2019 budget: S 13,983,182

19 1% levy increase = $132,597

20 Note:

21 1. STEPS: 15 county survey average # of steps is 11; Proposal above moves to 13 steps from 26 steps

22 2. RANGE

23 a. 15 county survey average range from entry level to highest step is 32%

24 b. Applying the 15 county surveyforrange would reduce employee earning maximum by 7%

25 c. Current Step 19 pay scale would be the new top of the consolidated range

26 d. There are twe~-ty-(20) employees on Step 19 or above, and would see no further step increase

Consolidation 2018-19 32% ra nge worksheet.xlsx

'VEBA

81ue Earth Countv Cass County Freeborn Countv LeSueur County LeSueur County Mille Lacs County Nicollet County· Nobles County· Pine County Redwood County Renville County Todd County Wabasha County Watonwan County

,.

Brown County

LYon CoUnly Meel<.r County

' VEBA

Single Coverage Deductible

$0 S6350 $6.350 53.250 $5,000 $3 ,550 56350 $2500

$2 600/$5 200 $2600 $3,125 55.000 $1625

5250/S1 000 S3,000

$2,600

$3250 $2600

Total Single Monthly Premium

$693.97 $505.00 $505.00 $722.00 $597 .00 $955 .53 $549.00 $545.00 $694 .00 5577.00 5638.00 $515.50 $797.00 $766.00 5810.93 . tuM'

$768.73

S616.00 $147.00

Employer Contribution· Employer Premium Single Contrlbutlo Covera e nOlo

$893.97 100% 5366.00 72% $505.00 100% $722.00 100% 5597.00 100% $721 .21 75% $549.00 100% 5545.00 . 100% 5515.00 $577.00 $638.00 $515.50 5797.00 S726.26

.$810.93 $631.93

56.40.58

$1 040.10 169% SO.OO 0%

15 County Health Insurance Comparison 2011~Ver<lge ~ Employer

Family Coverage Total Family Monthly Employer Contribution. Contrlbutlo Deductible Premium Premium FamilY CoveraQe no;.

$0 $1 913.58 51913.58 100% $6.500 $1 593.00 $1,040.10 65%

$12.700 52083.50 S1 ,484.50 71% $3,250/56 500 52092.50 51,400.00 67% 55000/$10,000 $1729.50 SI,400.00 81 %

$12700 51 374.00 5620,82 45% $2500 $1 630.00 $1,503.00 92%

$2 ,600/$5 200 $1 581 .00 $399.50 25% $5,200.00 $1 441.00 $1 328.15 . 92%

$6250 $1,574 .00 $1242.00 79% SlO 000 $1 375.00 $1 321.35 96% $3250 $2470.50 $1,069.00 43%

$250/$1 000 $2,049 .00 $1 639.20 80% $6,000 $2,185,27 $1,498.10 ,~

" : .. ( \

$5200 52075.37 $1 452.76 \I 70% J '---'"

$5200 $630.00 $0.00 0% $9626 $1 ,237.63· 52 929,83 $1,035.67. $1 563.27 83% · 53%

Employer Contribution H.S.A.NEBA

Employee Premium Single Cost Covera e $0.00 $0

$139.00 $3.175 $0.00' $0 $0.00 $2250 $0.00 $3750

$234.32 $1350 SO.OO $2328 $0.00 $0

5179.00 $200 SO.OO $1284 SO.OO SO 50.00 $2072 $0.00 $125

$41.72 $1500 SO.OO $1,500

, ,I • II

$128.15

.$424.10 $147.00

:m!2018

@)

Employer Contribution

Employee Premium H.S.A. Family Cost Cover.ao SO.OO $0

$552.90 SO $599.00 56350 S692.50 SO $329.50 $0 $753.18 $2750 $127.00 $0

$1 ;181 .50 $316 $112 .85 $0 $332.00 $0 $53.65 SO

$1 401.50 $125 $409.80 $3000 $687.17 $3,000

. , 'I II

$622.61 $1650

$630.00 SO J $201 .96· $1366.56 53300

217/2018·

Health Insurance Cost Estimate - SINGLE Benefit

2019 Single Health Insurance Cost Estimate - County Share Only (including $1,700 HSA) Base plan: Medica 2700HSA 100% (currently)

OPTION OPTION Currently 84% 100% 90%

FT 89 $ 821 ,609 $ 949,246 $ 869,455 PT 5 $ 34,618 $ 53,328 $ 48,846

$ 856,227 $ 1,002,574 $ 918,301

Difference from current formula: $ 146,347 $ 62,074 Estimated 30% Human Services related revenue: $ 43,904 $ 18,622

Estimated additional levy cost: $ 102,443 $ 43,452

Est. per cent additional levy needed based on 2019 levy: 0.77% 0.33%

I

Healthins.xls 2020 Draft comparison sheet 5-13-2019 I


Requested Board Date: May 21 st, 2019 Flexibility: No

10:00 AM Item: Planning Commission Recommendations May14th,2019

Board Action Requested: 1 Approve Re- Zoning Application (Item 1)

Originating Department: Planning & Zoning

Presenter: Laine Sletta, Zoning Administrator

Estimated Time: 5 minutes

2 Approve Conditional Use Permit Application ( Item 2-3) 3 Approve Preliminary Plat Applications (Item 4)

Background

Item 1: Re-Zoning Application APP-RZ-OOOS Application filed by Bradley Berkner on the property owned by Bryan & Belinda Berkner described as Part of the balance of Lot F described as being at the Southeast corner balance of Lot F, also being the Southwest corner of Lot H of Section 31, TWP 1'1 ON, Range 32W, Home Township, Brown County, Minnesota for the purpose of rezoning approximately Fifteen( 15) acres of land from the 1-1 IIndustrial Zoning District to A-1 I Agriculture to allow an existing farm site to be considered a conforming use.( See attachments). Recommendation: Approve

Item 2: Conditional Use Permit Application APP-C-0077 Application filed by David Tauer on the property owned by David Tauer located in the West ~ of the Northwest lit of Section 12, Township 108N, Range 32W, Albin Township, Brown County, Minnesota application is to renew and amend an existing CUP to allow an expansion from the current 375 Animal Unit to 429 Animal Unit, All located in the A-1 Protection Zoning District. (See attachments Tauer)

Recommendation: Approve with the Following Conditions 1. Approve The feedlot operator must comply with all Minnesota state rules and regulations

including MPCA standards and regulations regarding feedlot facility construction and operation, including application of manure generated at the facility to cropland at rates which do not exceed the recommended crop nutrient requirements.

2. A perimeter tile line access port must be maintained within 20 feet down-gradient of the barnes) in order to allow drawing a tile line water sample for analysis as may be desired in the future.

3. Liquid manure applied to farm fields must be injected into soil, or may be spread on fields with incorporation into the soil within 12 hours of spreading.

4. Field application of liquid manure shall not exceed two (2) times per year. The County Planning and Zoning Office shall be informed prior to any field application of liquid manure III an emergency.

5. Manure application records, soil analysis and manure analysis shall be retained on file for a period of at least three (3) years and shall be available to the County Planning & Zoning Office upon request.

gbode

Typewritten Text

# 14

gbode

Oval

6. Manure Management Plan must be updated annually, be retained on file for a period of at least three (3) years & shall be available to the County Planning & Zoning Office upon request.

7. County Staff shall be provided access to the property to perform onsite inspections as needed to ensure compliance with all rules & regulations set f011h for this operation.

8. If there is a change of ownership of this site, at any time, the new owner must contact the County Planning & Zoning Office and provide all necessary information to update CUP file. County contact must be made within 30 days of official property transfer. (See attachments)

Item 3: Conditional Use Permit Application APP-C-0079 Application filed by Brooke Knisley on the property owned by John & Brooke Knisley described as Lot 1, Block 1 , of Harmony Acres Second Subdivision located in Section 23, Township I08N, Range 30W, Linden Township, Brown County, Minnesota application is to allow an On Farm Store for Produce and Farm Products, all located in the A-I Agriculture Protection Zoning District.

Recommendation: Approve with the following conditions 1. Owner/Operator must follow rules & regulations of all regulating agencies. 2. County Staff shall be provided access to the property to perform onsite inspections as needed

to ensure compliance with all rules and regulations set forth for this operation. 3. If there is a change of ownership of this site, at any time, the new owner must contact the

County Planning and Zoning Office and provide all necessary information to update the CUP file. County contact must be made within 30 days of official property transfer(See attachments)

Item 4: Preliminary Plat Application APP-P-0046 Application filed by Bradley Carlson on the property owned by Allan Lee and Wendy Butler know as Willow Haven Second Subdivision (8.94 Acres) on property described as Lot I, Block I of the Willow Haven First Subdivision and the Southeast 1/4 of the Southwest Y4 of Section 27. Township I 08N, Range 32W, Albin Township, Brown County, Minnesota application is to re-subdivide to add land to building site, all located in the A-I Agriculture Protection Zoning District.(See attachments)

Recommendation: Approve

Supporting Documents: __ X __ Attached _____ None


Proposed Rezoning

9th

Water

±

Bradley BerknerRe-Zoning Applicaiton

Sec 31, TWP 110N, R 32WHome TWP

APP-RZ-0005

0 210 420 630 840105 Feet

pzupfer

Text Box

Berkner 1

9th

7th

US

Hw

y 14

Co Rd 27

8th

Main

Water

280t

h

Maple

Walnut

Prescott

37th

Unn

amed

School

7th

Unnamed

I-1

M

A-1

A-1

F-P

F-P

A-1

F-P

B-1

A-1

±

Bradley BerknerRe-Zoning Applicaiton

Sec 31, TWP 110N, R 32WHome TWP

APP-RZ-0005

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.40.05 Miles

pzupfer

Text Box

Berkner 2

PARCEL_NUM V1OWNAME V1OWHOUSEV1OWSTREET V1OWADDR2 V1OWCITY V1OWSTV1OWZIP

150.031.002.04.125 RIVER REGION COOPERATIVE PO BOX 429 SLEEPY EYE MN 560850429

150.031.002.04.122 SPRINGFIELD COOP CREAMERY ASSN PO BOX 7 SPRINGFIELD MN 560870007

150.031.002.01.010 BRADLEY & LEANN BERKNER 1007 MAPLE ST SE SLEEPY EYE MN 560852500

150.031.002.04.075 BRYAN & MELINDA BERKNER 22673 9TH AVE SW SLEEPY EYE MN 560854367

150.031.003.11.150 DEL MONTE FOODS INC 3003 OAK ROAD STE 600 WALNUT CREEK CA 945974541

150.031.003.11.130 CAROLE J BERKNER 1007 MAPLE ST SE SLEEPY EYE MN 560852500

150.031.003.12.180 CITY OF SLEEPY EYE 200 MAIN ST E SLEEPY EYE MN 560851638

150.031.003.11.160 BROWN COUNTY PO BOX 248 NEW ULM MN 560730248

150.031.003.11.140 JEFFS WELL DRILLING INC 27943 US HIGHWAY 14 SLEEPY EYE MN 560854326

150.031.002.03.050 DANIEL W BRAUN 27777 COUNTY ROAD 27 SLEEPY EYE MN 56085

150.031.004.09.210 GARY NEIDECKER ETAL 22207 STATE HIGHWAY 4 SLEEPY EYE MN 560855119

150.031.004.09.215 HAALA INDUSTRIES INC 1201 STATE HIGHWAY 4 S SLEEPY EYE MN 560855120

150.031.003.11.170 JACOB J KOTTEN 21798 280TH AVE SLEEPY EYE MN 560855046

240.006.001.01.010 DOUGLAS & KELLAN FRITON 21233 STATE HWY 4 SLEEPY EYE MN 560855064

150.031.004.15.010 HAALA PROPERTIES LLLP PO BOX 389 SLEEPY EYE MN 560850389

150.031.004.16.230 SCHROEPFER LLC 22071 ST HWY 4 PO BOX 556 SLEEPY EYE MN 560850556

150.031.003.12.190 NORTHERN NATURAL GAS PO BOX 3330 OMAHA NE 681030333

150.031.003.17.200 CENTERPOINT ENERGY RESOURCE PO BOX 59038 MINNEAPOLIS MN 554590038

220.036.001.08.070 SLEEPY EYE GOLF CLUB PO BOX 528 SLEEPY EYE MN 560850528

220.036.004.16.090 STATE OF MINNESOTA (DOT) 395 JOHN IRELAND BLVD MS ST PAUL MN 551551899

220.036.001.08.060 DALE J & DOROTHY A KRZMARZICK 27920 US HWY 14 SLEEPY EYE MN 560854326

220.215.000.00.010 DAKOTA MINN & EASTERN RAILROAD 120 6TH ST S MINNEAPOLIS MN 554021916

170.001.001.02.010 RANDALL & PAMELA KRZMARZICK 28443 US HIGHWAY 14 SLEEPY EYE MN 560854336

170.001.004.09.080 JOHN R MERTZ 21461 280TH AVE SLEEPY EYE MN 560855045

220.025.004.12.100 CAREY B SEIFERT 504 PRESCOTT ST NW SLEEPY EYE MN 560851165

DEAN SELLNER 25950 190TH ST SLEEPY EYE MN 560854287

ROSEMARY ZEIG 17360 255TH AVE SLEEPY EYE MN 560854220

SYLVAN SCHUMACHER 19062 295TH AVE SLEEPY EYE MN 560854350

DAVID SCHUMACHER 17898 340TH AVE SPRINGFIELD MN 560871688

JOE MANGEN 27738 320TH ST SLEEPY EYE MN 560854082

MYRA SIMON 26540 260TH AVE SLEEPY EYE MN 560854197

FRANCIS FROMM 23907 CO RD 7 SLEEPY EYE MN 560854538

THOMAS HIRSCH 23354 300TH AVE SLEEPY EYE MN 560854564

pzupfer

Text Box

Berkner 3

This Page intentionally left blank

230t

h

±

David TauerConditional Use Permit Applicaiton

Sec 12, TWP 108N, R 32WAlbin TWP

APP-C-0077

0 130 260 390 52065 Feet

pzupfer

Text Box

Tauer 1

Seidl, Mark

Fischer, Robert

3/4 Mile1/2 Mile

Kral, Scott & KristineTauer Ronald

Kral, Douglas & Victoria

Kral, Darrell

Kral, Dean

Fischer, Cody & Shari

Fischer, Larry & MarleneRossbach, Douglas

Bauer, James & Karla

Fischer, Lyle & Laurel

Sellner, BrianSeidl, Steven & Nola

Gedrose, Donald

220t

h

150th

140th

230t

h

Co Rd 20

Unnamed

±

David TauerConditional Use Permit Applicaiton


APP-C-0077

0 0.25 0.5 0.75 10.125 Miles

pzupfer

Text Box

Tauer 2

Brown County CUP Application Checklist & Summary FOR STAFF USE ONLY

Name of applicant: _David D Tauer Type of operation being proposed:_ Feedlot Over 300 AU_____

Is this a renewal application? YES NO

If yes, have there been any changes or modifications made to this operation since the last CUP was approved? YES NO

If yes: what has been changed or modified? _Increase in Animal Units ________

Was a site plan submitted as part of the application? YES NO

Are any state or federal permits and/or licenses required for this site? YES NO If yes, which permits are needed? (Note: Copies of said permits shall be included in the application.) _ ______

Is construction being proposed as part of this application? YES NO

If yes: has it been included in the site plan (dimensions, type and purpose of structure, design, etc.)? YES NO

If a design or professionally engineered plans are required have they been included with the application? YES NO

Date(s) of review _________ Date of approval __ ___

Is an Environmental Assessment Worksheet required? YES NO

If yes, when was it completed and by whom? __________________________

Date of Inspection/Site Visit: _5-3-2019__ Inspection/Site Visit performed by: _RS__

Was site found to be compliant with all related state and local rules & regulations for the proposed operation? YES NO

If no, what is proposed course of action? _____________________________________________

pzupfer

Text Box

Tauer 3

N/A For Feedlot Applications: Is a current Manure Management Plan required? YES NO

If yes, does it meet all requirements under MN Rule 7020? YES NO

If no, why not? _____________

Date of review: ___4/29/2019__________

A copy of the inspection follow up letter sent by our staff to the applicant is included and was mailed on_5/6/2019_.

N/A For Mining Applications: Are Maps A-C included with the application AND updated to reflect any and all additional phases for the proposed operation. YES NO

Is a stormwater management plan included with the application? (Note: This shall include soil erosion and sediment controls.) YES NO

Is a dust control plan included with the application? N/A – on tar road YES NO

Is a reclamation plan included with the application? (Note: This is to reflect the lifespan of the project - duration of mining, the time frame for completion of the reclamation process, seed mix(es) that may be used, etc.) YES NO

N/A For all WECS and Tower Applications: Does the project description include: number and type of turbines, generating capacity, total height, rotor diameter and certification by a professional engineer?

YES NO

Was a signed copy of a power purchase agreement or documentation that all power generated will be used onsite included? YES NO

Do the site plans clearly depict any communications towers, wetlands, airports or other sensitive features? YES NO

Has a detailed decommissioning plan been included that describes how costs will be covered if the WECS is to be decommissioned? YES NO

All components of this application have been submitted and reviewed for compliance with Minnesota Rules, Statutes, and the Brown County Zoning Ordinance as of _05/06/2019___

(date) by (staff) _Robert Santaella___.

PZ Staff Signature: _______________________

rsantaella

Text Box

Tauer 4

PARCEL_NUM V1OWNAME V1OWHOUSEV1OWSTREET V1OWCITY V1OWSTV1OWZIP

100.002.004.09.070 DAVID J GUTTUM 1610 SUMMIT AVE APT 201 NEW ULM MN 56073

100.011.004.10.100 WAYNE & GWEN ROSSBACH 25201 COUNTY ROAD 20 HANSKA MN 560414169

100.011.004.09.090 EUGENE L WELLMANN REV LIV TR 21798 150TH ST HANSKA MN 560414191

100.011.001.01.010 RONALD R TAUER 23399 150TH ST SLEEPY EYE MN 560855096

100.012.003.12.040 DOUGLAS J & VICTORIA L KRAL 14346 230TH AVE HANSKA MN 560414182

100.012.004.09.055 DEAN L KRAL 14411 220TH AVE HANSKA MN 560414186

100.012.001.01.010 SCOTT A & KRISTINE KRAL 22185 150TH ST HANSKA MN 560414185

100.012.002.02.020 DAVID D & ANGELA M TAUER 14684 230TH AVE HANSKA MN 560414154

100.001.004.09.090 ROBERT W FISCHER 22458 150TH ST HANSKA MN 560414184

100.001.003.13.070 MARK E SEIDL 22808 150TH ST HANSKA MN 560414183

DALE WINDSCHITL 25038 150TH ST SLEEPY EYE MN 56085

KARLA BAUER 14924 Co Rd 10 SLEEPY EYE MN 56085

pzupfer

Text Box

Tauer 5

pzupfer

Text Box

Tauer 4

Proposed Store

130th±

Brooke KnisleyConditional Use Permit Applicaiton


APP-C-0077

0 60 120 180 24030 Feet

pzupfer

Text Box

Knisley 1

1/2 Mile 3/4 Mile

Nelson, Scott & Betty Lou

Olson, Ronald & Carolyn

Sellner, RoseHalvorson, Janet

Odegard, Steven & Darlene

Koons, Mark & RobbiCarda, William

Guth, Jeffrey & Lori

Christensen Farms & Feedlots

Byro, Thomas & Ellen

Kolbe, Duane

Anderl, Nancy

Byro, David

Hoffmann, Justin

Lammers, Janice

Schmidt, John & EileenDarrell Pace Trust

Tierney, Natasha

110t

h

102n

d

130th

112t

h

132nd

Co Rd 19

117t

h±

Brooke KnisleyConditional Use Permit Applicaiton


APP-C-0077

0 0.25 0.5 0.75 10.125 Miles

pzupfer

Text Box

Knisley 2

I I

•

I

. ,",,--, 1 I f~ . ! ,'7 I I 1-"\. ! I b{""" /

/'

()

o o o J {) v ()

D o o

. 0 o (;>

I ib 8 J C> 0 I C)

I I 0 I I 0 () I Lo Q

I j.;,;-~, '''''~ ,t &, ......... 1 I

___ I

I ---

o o <:J o o /;)

~

v o o 'b

D ()

o 6 Q

Cl ()

CI

o 6 ()

()

o D J !) [J

o t)

G o o [J

•

I O\.U'

• '--~ , • ,,'

•

,i ,,'

pzupfer

Text Box

Knisley 4

Brown County CUP Application Checklist & Summary FOR STAFF USE ONLY

Name of applicant: _Brooke Knisley Type of operation being proposed:_ On Farm Store_____

Is this a renewal application? YES NO

If yes, have there been any changes or modifications made to this operation since the last CUP was approved? YES NO

If yes: what has been changed or modified? _ ________

Was a site plan submitted as part of the application? YES NO

Are any state or federal permits and/or licenses required for this site? YES NO If yes, which permits are needed? (Note: Copies of said permits shall be included in the application.) _ Product sold will be produce and products made onsite, therefore the proposal falls under the MN Department of Ag “Product of the Farm Rules, exempting the operation from MDA licensing.

Is construction being proposed as part of this application? YES NO

If yes: has it been included in the site plan (dimensions, type and purpose of structure, design, etc.)? YES NO

If a design or professionally engineered plans are required have they been included with the application? YES NO

Date(s) of review __N/A_______ Date of approval __N/A ___

Is an Environmental Assessment Worksheet required? YES NO

If yes, when was it completed and by whom? __________________________

Date of Inspection/Site Visit: _TBD__ Inspection/Site Visit performed by: _TBD__

Was site found to be compliant with all related state and local rules & regulations for the proposed operation? YES NO

If no, what is proposed course of action? _____________________________________________

pzupfer

Text Box

Knisley 5

N/A For Feedlot Applications: Is a current Manure Management Plan required? YES NO

If yes, does it meet all requirements under MN Rule 7020? YES NO

If no, why not? _____________

Date of review: _____________

A copy of the inspection follow up letter sent by our staff to the applicant is included and was mailed on__.

N/A For Mining Applications: Are Maps A-C included with the application AND updated to reflect any and all additional phases for the proposed operation. YES NO

Is a stormwater management plan included with the application? (Note: This shall include soil erosion and sediment controls.) YES NO

Is a dust control plan included with the application? N/A – on tar road YES NO

Is a reclamation plan included with the application? (Note: This is to reflect the lifespan of the project - duration of mining, the time frame for completion of the reclamation process, seed mix(es) that may be used, etc.) YES NO

N/A For all WECS and Tower Applications: Does the project description include: number and type of turbines, generating capacity, total height, rotor diameter and certification by a professional engineer?

YES NO

Was a signed copy of a power purchase agreement or documentation that all power generated will be used onsite included? YES NO

Do the site plans clearly depict any communications towers, wetlands, airports or other sensitive features? YES NO

Has a detailed decommissioning plan been included that describes how costs will be covered if the WECS is to be decommissioned? YES NO

All components of this application have been submitted and reviewed for compliance with Minnesota Rules, Statutes, and the Brown County Zoning Ordinance as of _04/29/2019___

(date) by (staff) _Robert Santaella___. PZ Staff Signature: _______________________

pzupfer

Text Box

Knisley 6

PARCEL_NUM V1OWNAME V1OWHOUSEV1OWSTREET V1OWCITY V1OWSTV1OWZIP

180.023.001.08.020 JOHN & BROOKE KNISLEY 11197 130TH ST MADELIA MN 560626212

180.023.001.01.080 DENNIS HYLEN ETAL 920 BARNES LAKE DR YOUNG AMERICA MN 553974507

180.023.001.02.010 THOMAS L ULMEN 34561 850TH AVE MADELIA MN 560625487

180.023.002.06.060 FLORINE ASPELUND 225 6TH ST SW APT 3 MADELIA MN 560621654

DOUG KOEHLER 12508 150TH ST HANKSA MN 560414370

pzupfer

Text Box

Knisley 7

Current Parcel

110th

±

Bradley CarlsonPreliminary Plat Applicaiton Sec 27, TWP 108N, R 32W

Albin TWPAPP-P-0046

0 210 420 630 840105 Feet

pzupfer

Text Box

Carlson 1

D.

&

::NT).

ENTS:

A CENTERLINE ROAD

JM

1M FROM PRINCIPAL

1M FOR ACCESSORY

:S

10'

10'

I . Iw co~ 010 ....:~ 100 ~.

IZ I

.W. COR. WILLOW HA VEN SUBDIVISION.

N.E. COR. WILLOW HA VEN SUBDIVISION.

I I I I I I I I I

--858.32-- I N.89°52' 12"E. I 176.00

~ • ~-----------S8 W --------==--::7.1). GRASS EDGE. ~ \

10'

: ffi HAVEN SUBD. I ~ : I : I I ~: I : GRASS EDGE I - GRASS EDGE ~ 'e)' <C(J: I : 6 I EXISTING ~! z· I 1~ ~ L.-----WILLOW HAVEN SUBDVISION !BUILDINGI I >~r;?\ S I :~ iSl 0 1 V. I :~ ~ I LOT 1 WKL BUILDING I i ~: u.i I I ;~ z I~I~~ BLOCK 1 ~~~I ~ Q ~6 I :(!) ~ J,;x,lg ~ (8.94 ACRES TOTAL) D ~gl;x,J, ~ ..... 0 I :~ ~ VV1t;.... ~ ~~lvV <t: :..c-i I :::l ..ir.... :<!!.... Vi r......i :c ---10 .:::> "'" val I-.. BUILDING I-.. IOv ~ ~ I .tIl ;;> VO I-.. "I: "1:1-.. ° v 3.: ° : g I ql~~ HOUSE ~~q I 0 ~ I 1 ~ I (f)1~ IZ

I ~ I 1 ~ I I ~. I =-- . I I::J . 10' I ~ .. r· ...................... ~ ..... t······················· ~~~" .. "W~9~. lM .................................... j ..... " ............ : [~ I

:ri 0 I --:;7 I &o:ri I ,-----------,-0+-::+------ -\~THS~A~-R-ES-PPR~~L;~;I~£~~TOWNSHIP R-O-~-D-r,- -- -::'r I - ----rll

___ ~==L---~-~-~2~2~4~.O~1-=-~---=~~~------~I~N~R~OA~D~R/~W~)~~-~-~4~9g0.#00~-~-~----~~--------~~~~,-~-~1~5~0~.0~0-~-~~~ n V

--------- l' S.89°52' 12"W. J -/1 --S.89°52' 12"W.--:;::::'T' --864.0 1-- ~ - --176.00-- J

SH'AWV'ECNOSRU' BWDIILVLISOWON S. LINE SEC. 27- S.E. COR. WILLO PT. OF BEG. I . HA VEN SUBDIVISION.

S. 1/4 COR. SEC. 27, FOUND A CONCRETE MON. WITH U-POST ON N. SIDE (6" DEEP).

pzupfer

Text Box

Carlson 2

INSTRUMENT OF DEDICATION

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That Allan M. Lee and Sharon L. Lee, husband and wife, and Bradley D. Carlson and Wendy L. Carlson, husband and wife, owners and proprietors, and Frandsen Bank & Trust. mortgagee of the following described property situated in Brown County, Minnesota, to wit:

Willow Haven Subdivision in the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 27, Township 108 North, Range 32 West, Brown County, Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof. TOGETHER WITH That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 27, Township 108 North, Range 32 West, Brown County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the South Quarter corner of said Section 27; thence on an assumed bearing of South 89 degrees 52 minutes 12 seconds West, along the south line of said section, a distance of 176.00 feet to the point of beginning of the tract to be described; thence continuing South 89 degrees 52 minutes 12 seconds West, along said south line, a distance of 150.00 feet to the Southeast corner of Willow Haven Subdivision, according to the recorded plat thereof; thence North 0 degrees 07 minutes 48 seconds West, along the east line of said plat, a distance of 444.49 feet to the Northeast corner of said plat; thence South 89 degrees 52 minutes 12 seconds West, along the north line of said plat, a distance of 490.00 feet to the Northwest corner of said plat; thence South 0 degrees 07 minutes 48 seconds East, along the west line of said plat, a distance of 444.49 feet to the Southwest corner of said plat located on the south line of said section; thence South 89 degrees 52 minutes 12 seconds West, along the south line of said section, a distance of 224.01 feet; thence North 0 degrees 00 minutes East a distance of 451.98 feet; thence North 89 degrees 52 minutes 12 seconds East a distance of 858.32 feet; thence South 0 degrees 43 minutes 17 seconds East a distance of 452.00 feet to the point of beginning, containing 8.94 acres, subject to easements naw of record in said county and state.

Said tract contains 8.94 acres, subject to easements now of record in said county and state.

Have caused the same to be surveyed and platted as WILLOW HAVEN SECOND SUBDIVISION in the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 27, Township 108 North, Range 32 West, Albin Township, Brown County, Minnesota.

In witness whereof said Allan M. Lee and Sharon L. Lee, husband and wife, have set their hands this day 2019.

Allan M. Lee Sharon L. Lee

ST ATE OF MINNESOTA)

COUNTY OF ~ The faregoing Instrument of Dedication was acknowledged before me this :--:----c day of ______ ~, 2019, by Allan M. Lee and Sharon L. Lee, a husband and wife.


COUNTY OF \

Notary Public, -=:-:-___ County, Minn. My Commission Expires _______ _

My commission expires _______ _

In witness whereof said Bradley D. Carlson and Wendy L. Carlson, husband and wife, have set out hands this day of 2019.

Bradley D. Carlson Wendy L. Carlson

The foregoing Instrument of Dedication was acknowledged before me this -;0--;--- day of 2019, by Bradley D. Carlson and Wendy L. Carlson, husband and wife.

ST ATE OF MINNESOTA) )

COUNTY OF )

Notary Public, -:::---, ___ County, Minn. My Commission Expires _______ _

In witness whereof Frandsen Bank & Trust, Chartered by the State of Minnesota, has caused these presents to be signed by Its proper officers this _______ day of 2019.

Michael P. Schwartz, President - New Ulm

Allison L. Burmeister, Assistant Vice President

STATE OF MINNESOTA)

COUNTY OF \

The foregoing instrument of dedication was acknowledged before me this """_,-:;- day of 2019, by Michael P. Schwartz, President New Ulm and Allison L. Burmeister, Assistant Vice President on behalf of Frandsen Bank & Trust, Chartered by the State of Minnesota.

Notary Public, _---,:-__ County, My commission expires _______ ~

PRELIMINARY PLA T

WILLOW HAVEN SECOND SUBDIVISION N. 1/4 COR. SEC. 270 ___ ------

0

-i \

CONCRETE MON. (8" DEEP)

IN T.

THE s.£. 1/4, S.W 1/4, SEC. 27, 108 N, R. 32 W (ALBIN TOWNSHIP),

BROWN COUNTY, MINNESOTA

SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE

I hereby certify that I have surveyed and platted the property described on this plat as WILLOW HAVEN SECOND SUBDIVISION; that this plat is a correct representation of said survey; that all distances are correctly shown on the plat in feet and hundredths of a foot; that all monuments have been correctly placed in the ground as shown; that the outside boundary lines are correctly designated on the plat; and that there are no wet lands as defined In MS 505.02, Sub. 3, or public highways to be designated other than as shown.


COUNTY OF MARTIN ?

Ben Madsen, Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 50875

The foregoing Surveyor's Certificate was acknowledged before me this ____ day of , 2019, by Ben Madsen, Land Surveyor.

Notary Public, Martin County, Minnesota My Commission Expires ______ ~

COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION

Approved by the Planning Commission of Brown County, Minnesota, at a =..,.,, ____ meeting thereof held this day of _______ _ 2019.

Signed: __________ _ Attested: Chairman Secretary

COUNTY AUDITOR

I hereby certify that this plat was presented to the Board Of Commissioners of Brown County, Minnesota, and that the same was by motion approved, adopted and ordered filed this day of 2019.

I further certify that the taxes are paid for all years prior to 20 __ on the lands described.

Brown County Auditor

COUNTY TREASURER

I hereby certify that the taxes for the real estate described hereon have been paid for the current year of 20 __

Brown County Treasurer

COUNTY RECORDER

Document Number

I hereby certify that this instrument was filed in the Office of the County Recorder for record this __ .,..,..._ day of 2019, at _______ o' clock _M.

Brown County Recorder L L

o 50 100 200

SCALE 1" 100'

DENOTES IRON MONUMENTS FOUND.

DENOTES IRON MONUMENTS SET & MARKED WITH REG. NO. 50875 UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN.

BEARINGS ARE ORIENTED TO THE BROWN COUNTY COORDINATE SYSTEM (NAD83 '996 ADJUSTMENT).

CURRENT BUILDING SETBACK REQUIREMENTS:

FRONT YARD - "0 FEET FROM CENTERLINE OF TOWNSHIP ROAD

SIDE YARD - 10 FEET MINIMUM

REAR YARD - 40 FEET MINIMUM FROM PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES

20 FEET MINIMUM FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURES

MINIMUM LOT AREA 2 1/2 ACRES

10'

10'

I 0

Iw "'. mo '0

-0

"'0 .... , Z I

S.w. VICINITY MAP

1/4, SEC. 27, T. 108 N, R, 32 w., (ALBIN TOWNSHIP)

BROWN COUNTY, MINNESOTA (NOT TO SCALE)

~-----------T-----------I

Ii I I

I' I I

II i i I I I

I,N. w. 1/4, S. W. 1/4 I NE 1/4, S. W. 1/4 I c:, I I ~ I I

I~ i i ~ I I ~-----------I-----------l ~ I

II i I: I is. W. 1/4, S. W. 1/4 SE 1/4, S. W. 1/4 i I. i

Ita-AI" ROAD~~JJJ1 i

.W. COR. WILLOW HAVEN SUBDIVISION.

--858.32-N.89°52' 12"E.

N.E. COR. WILLOW HAVEN SUBDIVISION.

WITH T -POST ON N. SIDE OF MON. (8" DEEP).

~ - A-,.-------- --5.89052' 12"W.---".---------~ GRASS EDGE - ~ :"1)' .~ •••••••••• 0 0 0 0 •••• 000 ••••• '/ ·1·'- 'IiOlio'ING' SETSACK'UNE ~ •••• ::":4lm.uo::~:··· .1' ... 0000 ••• " 0 0 ••••••••••• -:-: j;i····" Q'" ff b": \

t··~············· 0 0 0 0 •••• 000 •••••••• : ••••• 'IiOWNG' SETBAcK'UNE 'Ii" ;;~;:!j:{~ 1'" 0 0 0 o. ~~'~~I~~""" ·t·· .11""" ·s .... ~ ~ "\ 10'

: I ~. I@: : GRASS EDGE I GRASS EDGE ~ Q: : Z I EXISTING ~! Z

i~ ~ L .. __ --------WILLOW HA VEN SUBDVISION IBUILDINGI I ~e e i~ ~ I LOT 1 W~LL BugNG i ~ ~: wi 1~ ~ I ~I~o;- BL OCK 1 O;-~~ I ~ 0 ~6 i§1,,_ ;;c ~~II~; (8.94 ACRES TOTAL) ~ D i~II~~ ~ :-;: ',:::::! I vi'~.;J: .... ~r--.v:r: 1"")1.0

'<t" .... BUILDING 10 v t ...q. :ffi ;: vPI ..... "" '« ..... 0 v ;: I ~ I~I~~ HOUSE ~~~ I j ~ I

3 I I 3'

, ~ I II ~ , . I -1 I 10'

~r···· ................ L .. T ......... ..... ..:~"'~~'~ ..... ··V ..... : h -"'------- --------;-o-;--;:-t-- - --- - ---'\~; ~;;~~PPB;1;~;;~~£~ JdtL TO-WNSHIP ROAD 1,----- ~ (

176.00

I . I lUI 1"-" _0

I. ci

"'''' I ... " , '" Iq I "'I

I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

'" --224.D1-- _ _ IN ROAD R/W) --490.00-- _ _. -- 1 50.00--

'= ---------------------------------- S_._89,'55825'.8'22_"W_--:--------------------------------------------- . S.89°52' 12"W. J J --5.89'52' 12"W. l --864.01-- ~ --176.00-- ---

S.W. COR. WILLOW S. LINE SEC. 2 S.E. COR. WILLO PT. OF BEG. HAVEN SUBDIVISION. HAVEN SUBDIVISION.

S.W. COR. SEC. 27, FOUND A U-POST WITH

COPYRIGHT BY MADSEN LAND SURVEYING, INC.

This drawing and format ore protected by Copyright and 011 rights ore reserved. The use of this drowinq aid format is strictly prohibited without the written consent and permission of t.lodsen Land Surveying. Inc:.

A , /2" IRON ROD IN CENTER (6" DEEP).

318 EAST BLUE EARTH AVENUE FAIRMONT, MINNESOTA 56031

S. 1/4 COR. SEC. 27, FOUND A CONCRETE MON. WITH U-POST ON N. SIDE (6" DEEP).

r-

" cj w

'" w z ::J

vi I

:Z:

pzupfer

Text Box

Carlson 3

Parcels Tax Payer Name Permit Type Completion Date Estimated Value

120.017.004.16.270 PHILLIP J GILL Construction/Zoning Permit Application 8/1/2019 $15,000.00

220.004.004.10.065 CHRISTENSEN FARMS & FEEDLOTS Construction/Zoning Permit Application 12/31/2019 $45,000.00

140.012.003.13.230 PHILIP P SELLNER ETAL Construction/Zoning Permit Application 7/31/2019 $57,000.00

110.025.001.01.010 BRUCE L TOLL Construction/Zoning Permit Application 9/1/2019 $90,000.00

240.021.002.06.080 MICHAEL A LAX Construction/Zoning Permit Application 7/31/2019 $140,000.00

130.021.004.09.430 CAROL M SCHMIDT Construction/Zoning Permit Application 7/31/2019 $200,000.00

230.027.004.10.100, 230.027.004.15.060EUGENE C & CHERYL S TAUER Exterior Maintenance Permit Application 8/1/2019 $3,000.00

230.033.002.05.050 DEAN & LORI SCHNEIDER Construction/Zoning Permit Application 10/31/2019 $600,000.00

130.009.001.02.214, 130.009.001.02.215TERRY A & JOANN D PETERSEN Construction/Zoning Permit Application 10/1/2019 $80,000.00

150.015.001.02.020 LARRY M HELGET Construction/Zoning Permit Application 10/31/2019 $200,000.00

1,430,000.00$

rsantaella

Text Box

April Zoning Report

REQUEST FOR ACTION Request.ed Board Date:

May21 , 2019 Item :

Selection of Audit Firm Board Action Requested:

Originating Department:

Auditor-Treasurer Presenter: Jean Prochniak Estimated Time: 30 Minutes

Accept the proposal dated March 15,2019 for audit service from Clifton Larson Allen (CLA) in the amount of $47,500 for 2019 and $48,700 for 2020. (These are a not to exceed bid proposal). Background Doug Host, Assurance Principal with CLA, will be making a 15 minute presentation to the full board prior to the tinal decision. An additional 15 minutes will be allowed for follow up questions. The board was provided a full copy of the proposal previously.

On April 29th a committee including Financial Manager Steven Rutscher, Administrator Charles Enter, A-T Jean Prochniak and Commissioners Berg and Windschitl interviewed the audit firm finalists. Each fim1 was given 30 minutes to make a presentation followed by a 30 minute question/answer session.

After considerable discussion the committee is recommending entering into an agreement with CLA. There were several reasons identitied to support the decision:

1. CLA currently completes the audit for 33 Minnesota Counties and is the national leader in providing single audit services

2. CLA has the expertise to establish a smooth transition 3. There is a level of confidence that the financial statement would be accepted by

the OSA with minimal review. 4. CLA has programs and training opportunities that will create efficiencies within

the A-T audit preparation. 5. CLA has an office located in New Ulm 6. Cost. Over $20,000 in savings is estimated over what has been paid to the OSA. 7. CLA reference checks were completed and counties describe the team as

knowledgeable, courteous, organized and thorough.

Supporting Documents ~attached D none

Board Action:

Approved as Requested 0

Denied 0

Tabled 0

Oilier 0

Motion Offered By: ______ _ Motion Seconded By: _____ _ Vote by Acclamation: _____ _ Roll Call Vote: Yes

District I District 2 District 3 District 4 Dislrict 5

o o o o o

No o o o o o

gbode

Typewritten Text

# 15

gbode

Oval

Due Date: March 15, 2019

Proposal to provide professional auditing services to:

B own County, Min

Prepared by: Douglas P. Host, CPA, Principal [email protected] direct 218-825-2948 I mobile 218-831-0662

esota

CLAconnect.com

WEALTH ADVISORY

OUTSOURCING

AUDIT, TAX, AND

CONSULTING

March 5, 2019

Ms. Jean Prochniak, Auditor-Treasurer Brown County 14 State Street South, PO Box 115 New Ulm, MN 56073-0115

RE: Request for Proposal for Financial Statement Auditing Services

Dear Ms. Prochniak:

CLA (CliftonLarsonAlien LLP) 14275 Golf Course Drive, Suite 300 Baxter, MN 56425 218-B2~100 I fax 218-B28-95063 CLAconnect.com

Thank you for taking the time to meet with me to discuss your RFP for audit service and for inviting us to propose our services to you. We gladly welcome the opportunity to share our approach to helping Brown County (the County) meet its need for professional services. The enclosed proposal responds to your request for financial statement auditing services for two (2) fiscal years ending December 31, 2019 and 2020.

We are confident that our extensive experience serving other Minnesota counties, bolstered by our clientoriented philosophy and depth of resources, will make CLA a top qualified candidate to fulfill the scope of your engagement. The following differentiators are offered for the County's consideration:

• Industry-specialized insight and resources. As one of the nation's leading professional services firms, and one of the largest firms who specialize in the public sector, CLA has the experience and resources to assist the County with their audit needs. In addition to your experienced engagement team, the County will have access to one ofthe country's largest and most knowledgeable pools of public sector resources.

• OMB Uniform Guidance (UG) experience. CLA performs more than 1,000 single audits of organizations

annually, ranking top in the nation for the number of single audits performed by any CPA firm. The

single audit requires a specific set of skills in order to properly perform the procedures. As such, we have

developed a group of professionals who specialize in providing single audit services.

• Strong methodology and responsive timeline. In forming our overall audit approach, we have carefully reviewed the RFP and other information made available and considered our past experience performing similar work for other Minnesota counties. In addition to our local government clients, we currently serve more than 2,700 governmental organizations nationally which includes nearly 60 county and county-related entities in Minnesota. The services we provide to Minnesota county and county related entities include: audit, tax, consulting, IT system evaluations, accounting assistance and outsourcing services. Our staff understands your complexities not just from a compliance standpoint, but also from an operational point of view. We have developed a work plan that takes into consideration your unique needs as a county in Minnesota. The work plan also minimizes the disruption of your staff and operations (as discussed when we met on February 28 th

) and provides a blueprint for timely delivery of your required reports. We understand the requirements of the Minnesota Statutes and how they apply to Minnesota counties, and the unique reporting and auditing requirements for Minnesota municipalities.

• Communication and proactive leadership. The County will benefit from a high level of hands-on service from our team's senior professionals. We can provide this level of service because, unlike other national firms, our principal-to-staff ratio is similar to smaller firms - allowing our senior level professionals to be involved and immediately available throughout the entire engagement process. Our approach helps

§)Ne;;i~ ~ International

members of the engagement team stay abreast of key issues at the County, and take an active role in addressing them.

• A focus on providing consistent, dependable service. We differ from other national firms in that our corporate practice focuses on the needs of non-SEC clients, thus allowing us to avoid the workload compression typically experienced by firms that must meet public companies' SEC filing deadlines. CLA is organized into industry teams, affording our clients with specialized industry-specific knowledge supplemented by valuable local service and insight. Therefore, the County will enjoy the service of members of our state and local government services team who understand the issues and environment critical to governmental entities.

• Fresh perspective. By engaging CLA, the County will benefit from a "fresh look" at its business operations, information systems, and financial and risk management policies and procedures. You will be served by an engagement team with enthusiasm and a desire to meet and exceed expectations. We are confident that our extensive Minnesota county experience will bring to the County new ideas, creative approaches, and fresh opportunities to meet the financial management and accountability challenges before the County.

• National Reach with Local Presence. At CLA, we have the benefit of having the resources of a national

firm while being able to serve you from our local Minnesota offices.

• Efficiency. Our goal is to provide exceptional client service. A well-planned and well-executed

engagement, by an experienced service team that knows Minnesota Counties, minimizes disruption to

you and your staff and enables timely completion of all deliverables.

Verification Statements

I, Doug Host, your engagement principal-in-charge, will serve as the County's primary contact person for this engagement. Furthermore, as a principal of CLA, I am authorized to sign, bind, and commit the firm to the obligations contained in this proposal and the County's RFP. My contact information is as follows:

Douglas P. Host 14275 Golf Course Drive, Suite 300, Baxter MN 56425 Office : 218-825-2948/ Mobile: 218-831-0662 Email : [email protected]

We are eager to work with you and welcome the chance to present our proposal to the selection committee or board, if desired. If you have any questions about our offerings, please do not hesitate to contact me via phone at 218-825-2948 or email [email protected].

Sincerely,

CliftonLarsonAlien LLP

Douglas P. Host, CPA Principal

~Ne;i~ ~ International

Table of Contents 1 Relevant experience in performing governmental audits. _______________ _

Single audit experience

Clients served

Sample of our governmental client list

Single audit experience in Minnesota counties

Single audit resource center (SARC) award

1

1

2

3

7

8

2 Availability of staff with professional qualifications, technical ability & requisite experience. __ 9

3 Results of external quality control reviews _____________________ 21

Quality control procedures and peer review report 21

4 References from other Minnesota counties 23

5 Costs - Bid/hourly charges 24

Fee considerations 24

Billing for phone calls and questions 25

6 What is your staff turnover rate? ________________________ 25

7 Is there an individual assigned that will be assigned to work with Brown County's audit? How long have they been with the firm? 25

8 Inevitably there will be some turnover, how does your firm handle staffing changes so there isn't an impact on the client? 26

9 Can you tell us about your audit software package? _________________ 26

Use of computer assisted audit techniques 26

10 Is Your firm a member of the Governmental Audit Quality Center (GAQC)? 28

Participation in quality improvement programs 28

11 How many years has your firm attended the various Minnesota conferences? (i.e., AMC< MACO, MACATFO) 28

12 Why Should We Choose Your Firm? 29

Create opportunities 29

Innovation 30

13 How many printed copies of the financial statements and your opinion are included in your quote? 30

14 Will you provide the County an electronic copy of the entire report? 30

15 Will you provide an unbound copy of the report to the county so that we can provide copies to individuals upon request? 30

16 What is not part of your proposal that is part of other county audits you perform? (For examplecompleting the County Financial Reporting form for the Office of the State Auditor (hereafter OSA), providing the report to the OSA, etc.) 31

17 How do you relay accounting standard updates to clients-email messages, webinars, and phone calls? Are there a combination of one-on-one and live/recorded events available? 31

Thought leadership and industry information 31

Industry participation 32

18 What is the firm's plan or practice for department audits (Sheriff, Recorder, etc.)? Will those be audited every year or on a rotational basis? Are department audits included in the proposed fee for the final statement audit? 33

19 Does the firm retain working papers for a minimum of six years? Will the working papers be made available, upon request, to the county? Will the work papers be available to the Office of the State Auditor? 33

20 Does the county prepare and publish their own financial statement? __________ 33

21 What are the firm's materiality levels for planning materiality and individually significant items? ______________________________________________________________________ 33

22 Has your audit software system successfully integrated with IFS (Brown County's general ledger)? Would any proposed journal entries use the County IFS account codes or use general accounts?_ 34

23 Have you audited counties that use Tyler software and if so, what are your thoughts on that accounting system? 34

24 How many combined years of experience do your staff members have working with IFS? 34

25 How many MN county audits from your firm have gone through the OSA's desk review process? Are you familiar with the OSA's County Audit Guide (see http://www.auditor.state.mn.us/other/educationalmaterials/ county_audit_guide.pdf)? 34

26 What steps will be taken to ensure an orderly transition from the prior auditor? ______ 35

First Year Transition 35

27 The proposal should set forth a work plan, including an explanation of the audit methodology to be followed. Firms will be required to provide the following information on their audit approach: 36

a - Proposed timing of the engagement

b - Level of staff and number of hours to be assigned to each proposed segment of

the engagement

c - Sample sizes and the extent to which statistical sampling is to be used in the engagement

d - Type and extent of analytical procedures to be used in the engagement

e - Approach to be taken to gain and document an understanding of the County's

internal controls

f - Approach to be taken in determining laws and regulations that will be subject to audit test work

g - Approach to be taken to cause the least amount of disruption to normal operations

h - Ability to use secure file-sharing software

36

50

51

52

52

53

54

54

A " . '.. ©2019 CliftonlarsonAllen LlP I ii ~, . , .

28. Does your firm have a 2nd review for quality control on county audits? _________ 54

29 Does your firm provide sample schedules/narratives that the county is required to complete? _ 54

30 Will there be periodic feedback and communication throughout the audit or does your firm generally wait to provide all information at the end? 54

31 Could you provide a couple examples of issues that may arise that fall outside the scope of the engagement as quoted? Would questions about or request for technical guidance (GASB standards, GAAP, etc.) typically incur additional fees? 55

Ongoing consultation 56

32 If the law changes and the OSA regains the discretion for auditing counties and notifies Brown County they plan to audit us during the engagement period, do you agree to rescind any agreement or engagement letter so the County doesn't pay for mUltiple audits of the same year? What cost would there be to the County to terminate the agreement/ engagement for that reason? 56

33 Does your firm offer governmental trainings or conferences in Minnesota? Are any such trainings or conferences CPE eligible? 56

Other Information 57 -------------------------------------------------------------Firm Overview - Create opportunities

Certificate of achievement assistance

Federal or state desk or field reviews

Firm independence

Joint venture

License to practice

Litigation

Insurance

57

57

59

60

60

60

60

61

Continuing education program 61

GASB insight potentially affecting current and future audits 62

Identification of anticipated potential audit problems 66

Telecom cost savings assessments 66

Appendix____________________________________________________________ 67

Sample - county exit presentation 68

_: l .·· , _ , , '

\ '", A -" .:.' " ' - ©2019 ~liftonlarSOnAllerlllP I iii " ~" , , ' ~ . (-'.' -

1 Relevant experience in performing governmental audits.

CLA offers the credibility, reputation, and resources of a leading professional services firm - without sacrificing the small-firm touch. We bring unsurpassed levels of technical excellence, commitment, and dedication to our clients, which have made us one of the most successful professional service firms serving governmental entities. Our strong reputation for serving state and local government units provides the County the confidence in their decision to select CLA as their professional service provider.

CLA has one of the largest governmental audit and consulting practices in the country, serving more than 2,700 governmental clients nationwide. Public sector clients represent approximately one-quarter of all firm-wide revenue, and each of the government services team members are thoroughly versed in the issues critical to complex governmental entities.

Our professionals have deep, technical experience in serving governmental entities. As a professional service firm experienced in serving state and local units of government, we are very aware of the financial and legal compliance requirements that government officials are faced with daily. This creates complexities and service issues within a unique operational and regulatory environment. Because of our experience, we have become adept at providing our clients with insights in this environment not typical of other professional service firms.

Single audit experience CLA has become the national leader in providing audit, tax and many other financial servic~s to government entities similar to the County. Our client portfolio of nonprofit, government, and health care institutions represents nearly half of the firm's total revenues. The chart below illustrates CLA's experience in serving organizations that receive federal funds and demonstrates our firm's dedication to serving the government and nonprofit industry. CLA performs the largest number of single audits in the United States! We audited nearly $53 billion dollars in federal funds in 2017.

Number of Single Audits Performed*

ClJl. 1094

PI ante Moran 551

B<:i(er Tilly 524

RSM 457

BKD 442

Eide Bailly 371

CohnRemick 353

WIPFLI 342

o 200 400 600 800 1000

*The information for the firms above was pulled from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse for audits with fiscal year ends between January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2017.

1200

In the current environment of increased oversight, it is more important than ever to find qualified auditors who have significant experience with federal grants specific to the County and can enhance the quality of the County's single audit. Therefore, the single audit will be performed by a team of individuals who are managed by personnel who specialize in single audits in accordance with OIVlB's UG and who will offer both knowledge and quality for the County. As part of our quality control process, the single audit will be reviewed by a firm Designated Single Audit Reviewer.

The AICPA clarified auditing standard, AU-C 801 "Compliance Audits" requires risk-based concepts to be used in all compliance audits including those performed in accordance with OMB UG. Our risk-based approach incorporates this guidance.

The County needs an audit firm experienced in performing single audits and a familiarity with the specific programs in which you are involved. You will benefit from

CLA1s experience in this area!

Clients served The table below provides a listing of Minnesota county and county related entities that CLA served in the last year. The services provided include audit, agreed upon procedures, tax, consulting and outsourcing.

County

Aitkin County

Becker County

Beltrami County

Benton County

Blue Earth County - 2019

Bois De Sioux Watershed District

Carver County

Cottonwood County

Countryside Public Health Services

Crow Wing County

Dakota County

Des Moines Valley Health and Human Services

Dodge County

Douglas County

East Central Regional Development Commission

Freeborn County

Hennepin County Environmental Services

Horizon Public Health

Human Services Of Faribault & Martin Counties

Itasca County

Jackson County

Kanabec County

Lac qui Parle County

Lincoln County

Lyon County

Mower County

Nobles County

Pine County

Pope-Douglas Solid Waste

Ramsey County

Ramsey/Washington Suburban Cable Commission

Region 4 South Adult Mental Health

Rock County

Rock County Rural Water

Rock Soil & Water Conservation District

Rock-Nobles Community Corrections

Sherburne County

Southwestern MN Adult Mental Health

Consortium

St Louis County

Swift County

Stearns County

Todd County

Todd Soil & Water Conservation District

Todd-Wadena Community Corrections

Wadena County

Gateway Corridor Commission

Goodhue County

*:.. .. ~ '.. . .J.. '. ,~ ... '" •. r;;o , , " ~ '. . , , . "

Rice-Steele Consolidate Dispatch

Sample of our governmental client list We audit over 200 local governments in Minnesota. A listing of our Minnesota city, other municipalities, special districts, and school district clients for the fiscal year ending December 31,2017, follows:

Buffalo Township

City of Adams

City of Alden

City of Avon

City of Barnesville

City of Bigfork

City of Blue Earth

City of Brandon

City of Breezy Point

City of Browns Valley

City of Buffalo

City of Carlos

City of Clarks Grove

City of Conger

City of Courtland

City of Crosby

City of Crosslake

City of Deerwood

City of Delano

City of Dexter

Bennington Township

City of Fifty Lakes

City of Garfield

City of Garrison

City of Gem Lake

City of Glencoe

City of Grant

City of Greenwood

City of Hayfield

City of Independence

City of Ironton

City of Kenyon

City of Kimball

City of Lake Elmo

City of Lakeville

City of Littlefork

City of Minnetrista

City of Moose Lake

City of North Branch

City of Onamia

City of Ranier

City of Redwood Falls

City of Rice Lake

City of Royalton

City Of Sauk Centre

' . ~~ ;f ... ~~ k,.~~ ,T ~ • • '" -;. 't _ ••

City of Trimont

City of Warren

City of Windom

Foster Township

Franklin Township

Grafton Township

Laketown Township

Marysville Township

Mission Township

Ravenna Township

Sylvan Township

Town of May

Vadnais Lake Area Water Management Organization

Housing Authorities I Other Governmental Entities Other Governmental

Austin Housing & Redevelopment Authority

Bluff Country HRA

Brainerd Housing & Redevopment Authority

Brainerd South Housing Group, Inc.

Crosby Housing & Redevelopment Authority

Crow Wing County HRA

Housing & Redevelopment Authority Of Moose Lake

Mower County Housing & Redevelopment Authority

Owatonna Housing & Redevelopment

Public Utilities

Aitkin Public Utilities

BENCO Electric Cooperative

Brainerd Public Utilities

Delano Water Light and Power Commission

Glencoe Light and Power Commission

Nobles Cooperative Electric

Northland Connect Broadband LLC

Renville-Sibley Cooperative Power Association

Runestone Electric Association

Stearns Electric Association

Steele-Waseca Cooperative Electric

Alexandria Firemen's Volunteer Relief Association

Becker County EDA

Buffalo Firemen's Relief Association

Cedar River Watershed District

Courtland Firemen's Relief Association

City of Hastings Fire Relief Association

Delano Fire Department Relief Association

Destination Medical Center Corporation

Eden Prairie Firefighters Relief Association

Elk River Fire Relief Association

Hayward Fire Department Relief Association

Lafayette Community Fire Protection Association

Lake Johanna Firefighter Relief Association

Lakeville Fire Relief Association

Little Canada Firefighter's Relief Association

Minnesota Armory Building Commission

Minnesota Municipal Money Market Fund

Onamia Firemen's Relief Association

Pequot Lakes Firemen's Relief Association

Sauk Centre Fire Department Relief Association

SE Minnesota Emergency Communications Board

Sourcewell

Southeast Minnesota Violent Crime Enforcement Team

Stillwater Board of Water Commissioners

Turtle Creek Watershed

Special Districts

Minnesota Sports Facilities Authority

Sherburne Wright County Cable Communications Commission

Viking Library System







Airport and Transit Authority

Albert Lea Port Authority

Port Authority of the City of St. Paul

Traverse Electric Coop Inc.

Water and Light Commission of, the City of Moose Lake

School Districts

Agamim Classical Academy

Athlos Leadership Academy

Burnsville Eagan Savage Schools

Cannon Valley Special Education Cooperative

Eastern Carver County Public Schools

Hiawatha Valley Education

Hopkins Public Schools

ISD #213 Osakis Ind. School District

ISD #110 Waconia Public Schools

ISD #138 North Branch Area Public Schools

ISD #181 Brainerd School District

ISD #204 Kasson-Mantorville

ISD #2125 Triton

ISD #2137 Kingsland Public Schools

ISD #2170 Staples Motley School District

ISD #2174 Pine River Backus School District

ISD #2342 West Central Area School

ISD #2365 GFW

ISD #2534 BOLD Public School

ISD #261 Ashby

ISD #2805 ZumbrotaMazeppa

ISD #2905 Tri-City United

ISD #2908 Brandon-Evansville School District

ISD #294 Houston

ISD #297 Spring Grove

ISD #299 Caledonia

ISD #309 Park Rapids

ISD #361 International Falls Public School

ISD #4106 TrekNorth Junior & Senior High School

ISD #4168 Glacial Hills Elementary

ISD #492 Austin

ISD #507 Nicollet

ISD #533 Dover-Eyota

ISD #535 Rochester

ISD #542 Battle Lake

ISD #550 Underwood

ISD #656 Faribault

ISD #659 Northfield

ISD #719 Prior Lake-Savage Area Schools

ISD #740 Melrose Public School

ISD #756 Blooming Prairie

ISD #761 Owatonna

. ISD #829 Waseca

ISD #836 Butterfield

ISD #857 Lewiston-Altura

ISD #858 St Charles

ISD #861 Winona Area Public Schools

ISD #88 New Ulm

ISD #882 Monticello Public Schools

ISD #883 Rockford Area Public Schools

ISD#196 Rosemount-Apple Valley-Eagan Public School

Lakeville Area Public Schools

Marine Area Community School

Minnesota Valley Education District #6027

Minnetonka Public Schools

Nasha Shkola

Osakis Ind. School District #213-SA Fund

Roseville Area Schools

Shakopee Public Schools

Southern Plains Education Coop #915

Spartan Innovation Building Corporation

Spectrum Building Company

Spectrum High School

I

ISO #2859 Glencoe-Silver Lake

ISO #2860 Blue Earth

ISO #2899 Plainview-ElginMillville

Charter Schools

Academia Cesar Chavez School

ACC Building Company

AFSA Building Company

AFSA High School

Art and Science Academy

Art and Science Academy Building Company

Aurora Charter School

Beacon Academy

Big Picture Twin Cities

Bluffview Montessori School

Bright Water Elementary

Bright Water Elementary Building Company

Cannon River Stem School

College Prep Elementary

Cologne Academy

Cologne Academy Building Company

Cologne Academy PAVE Committee

Community of Peace Academy

Community of Peace Building Company

Community School of Excellence

Cornerstone Montessori Elementary School

CSE Building

, . .

ISO #763 Medford

ISO #77 Mankato

ISO #813 Lake City

Excell Academy for Higher Learning

Friends of Beacon Building Company

Friends of Excell Academy

Friends of Nova Classical Academy

Friends of Spero Building Company

Friends of St. Croix Preparatory Academy

Friendship Academy of the Arts

HCA Building Company

Hmong Academy

Hmong Education Reform Company

Hope Community Academy

Jennings Community School

Kaleidoscope Charter School

KCS Building Company

KIPP - Minnesota

Lafayette Charter School

Lakes International Language Academy

Level Up Academy

LILA Building Company

Loveworks Academy

Math and Science Academy

Minnesota Internship Center

Tesfa International School

Zumbro Education Oistrict

Nerstrand Charter School

New Century Academy

North Lakes Academy Charter

Northwest Passage High School

Nova Classical Academy

Paideia Academy

Paideia Building Company

Prairie Creek Community School

Prodeo Academy

Rochester Beacon Academy

Rosa Parks Charter High School

Saint Paul Conservatory Building Company

Saint Paul Conservatory for Performing Arts

Sojourner Truth Academy

Spero Academy

SRCS Building Company

St. Croix Prep Academy

Stonebridge Building Company

Stonebridge World School

Swan River Montessori Charter School

T.R.U.T.H. Preparatory Academy

Team Academy #4127

".,. . • " ' ' ,:: " ,: . ' ©2019 CliftonLarsonAlien lLP I 6

"' ~' " " ,,'

Eagle Ridge Academy

Eagle Ridge Affiliated Building Company

MSA Building Company .

Natural Science Academy

. Single audit experience in Minnesota counties

The World Learner School of Chaska

. WLS Building Company

Over the past 13 years in which CLA has been auditing Minnesota counties, it has allowed us to build our depth of knowledge and experience with all of the federal award programs you have within your County. We have extensive experience with the following federal grant programs:

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Cluster Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) Community Development Block Grants Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Workforce Investment Act Cluster Highway Planning and Construction Cluster Capitalization Grants for Clean Water Capitalization Grants for Drinking Water Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Child Support Enforcement Low-Income Energy Assistance Program Foster Care Title IV-E Social Service Block Grant Medical Assistance Program (Medicaid Cluster)

CFDA Nos.l0.551 & 10.561 CFDA No. 10.557 CFDA No. 14.218 CFDA No. 14.871

CFDA Nos. 17.258, 17.259, & 17.278 CFDA Nos. 20.205, 20.219, & 23.003

CFDA No. 66.458 CFDA No. 66.468 CFDA No. 93.283 CFDA No. 93.558 CFDA No. 93.563 CFDA No. 93.568 CFDA No. 93.658 CFDA No. 93.667 CFDA No. 93.778

Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse CFDA No. 93.959 CFDA No. 97.036 CFDA No. 97.067

Disaster Grants - Public Assistance Homeland Security Grant Program

Our continuous growth in working with the government sector has come about because we continually provide assistance to our clients in meeting their objectives.

We have been constructive and supportive with as little interruption to their activities as is possible. We have pointed out inefficiencies, poor accounting practices, and in some instances, suspected fraud.

Single audit resource center (SARC) award CLA received the Single Audit Resource Center (SARC) Award for Excellence in Knowledge, Value, and Overall Client Satisfaction. SARC's award recognizes audit firms that provide an outstanding service to their clients based on feedback received from an independent survey in June 2018.

m Single Audit · DDI Resource Center

The survey queried 10,762 nonprofit and government entities about the knowledge of their auditors, the value of their service, and overall satisfaction with their 2017 fiscal year-end audit. The SARC award demonstrates CLA's dedication to serving the government and nonprofit industry and maintaining the most stringent regulatory requirements in those sectors.

2 Availability of staff with professional qualifications, technical ability & requisite experience.

Douglas P. Host, CPA CLA (CliftonLarsonAllen LLP)

Principal, State and Local Government Baxter, Minnesota

Profile

218-825-2948

QQ.l~JZhQ?J@CLA~onnect.conl

Doug is an Assurance Principal in the CLA (CliftonLarsonAllen LLP) public sector group and has over 27 years of state and local government audit and accounting experiences (including the first 12 years of his career with the Minnesota Office of the State Auditor). Doug works exclusively with local governments including many counties, cities, and other governmental entities. During his career, he has frequently presented at the Office of the State Auditor annual training sessions, Minnesota Office of the State Auditor's Regional Training Seminars, Minnesota Society of CPA's state and local government annual conference, Association of Minnesota Counties Annual Conference, and Minnesota Association of County Auditors, Treasurers and Finance Officers annual conferences. Doug has presented on various accounting, auditing, and compliance issues since joining CLA including its annual Nonprofit and Government Accounting and Auditing Update and the CLA Annual Local Government Training Academy. Additionally, Doug has presented at the SW Florida Chapter of the GFOA, the South Florida Chapter of the GFOA, the Annual Cutwater Asset Management Investment Seminar, and the Florida GFOA's School of Government Finance. Other organizations he has presented to include the St. Cloud State University Accounting Club, the Wildan Financial Services Public Funds Management Seminar in Seattle, Washington, and San Diego County, California.

Education and professional involvement • Bachelor of Science, Accounting, St. Cloud State University, Minnesota

• Minnesota Government Finance Officers Association • National Government Finance Officers Association • American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, member

• Minnesota Society of Certified Public Accountants, member

• MN government agencies internal training • CLA Local Government Training Academy (client seminar, instruct, and attend)

• Annual A&A updates • Advanced Single Audit internal training

Continuing professional education Doug is in full compliance with continuing education requirements established by Government Auditing Standards. Relevant CPE areas include:

• Annual audit and accounting updates • Annual risk management and internal control internal training • Yellow book internal training • CLA annual government training academy

Craig Popenhagen, CPA CLA (CliftonLarsonAllen LLP)

Engagement Principal Rochester, Minnesota

Profile

507-280-2327 craig':'p'[email protected]

Craig is a principal with CliftonLarsonAllen focusing on utilities and governmental

audits involving significant infrastructure assets and compliance audits under Uniform

Grant Guidance.

Education and professional involvement Craig is a Certified Public Accountant licensed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Iowa. He is a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the Government Finance Officers Association.

Craig graduated from the University of Northern Iowa with a B.A. in Accounting.

Experience serving clients Craig has more than 24 years of experience in working with utilities, state and local government, and other municipal organizations, including extensive experience in audits of federal grant programs under Uniform Grant Guidance.

A sampling of his current and past clients include:

• City of Ankeny, IA (GFOA Certificate Program - CAFR)

• City of Buffalo, MN

• City of Windom, MN • City of Brooklyn Park, MN (GFOA Certificate Program - CAFR) • City of Mahtomedi, MN (GFOA Certificate Program - CAFR)

• City of Delano, MN • Midwest Consortium of Municipal Utilities • Southeast Minnesota Violent Crime Enforcement Team

• Several rural electrical cooperatives.

Continuing professional education Craig is in full compliance with continuing education requirements established by Government Auditing Standards.

Miranda S.Wendlandt, CPA, CFE CLA (CliftonLarsonAllen LLP)

Principal Alexandria, Minnesota

320-759-5124 miranda.wendlandt @CLAconnect. com

Profile Miranda works exclusively with governmental clients (including: counties, cities, towns, school districts, and special districts) and has extensive experience with single audits of federal grant programs. A sampling of her governmental clients include:

• City of Redwood Falls, MN • Nobles County, MN

• City of North Branch, MN • Rock County, MN

• City of Garfield, MN • Lac qui Parle County, MN

• City of Sauk Centre, MN • Becker County, MN

• City of Barnesville, MN • Becker County Economic Development Authority

• City of Ca rlos, M N • Rock Nobles Community Corrections

• Independent School District 740 - Melrose • Hamilton County, IA • Independent School District 309 - Park Rapids • Black Hawk County, IA

• Jackson County, MN • Bois de Sioux Watershed District

• Douglas County, MN

Miranda participates in the GFOA special review committee for the GFOA Certificate of Excellence in Financial Reporting Program. Though participation in this committee she is exposed to governmental financial reports from various states and has a strong understanding of the GFOA requirements for the certificate.

Education and professional involvement

• Bachelor of Science in Accounting, Bemidji State University, Minnesota

• Certified Public Accountant - Licensed in Minnesota and Arizona • American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, member

• Minnesota Society of Certified Public Accountants, member

• Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, member • Minnesota Government Finance Officers Association • Special Review Committee for GFOA Certificate of Excellence Program, GFOA

• Lakes Area Professional Women, member

Continuing profess ional education Miranda is in full compliance with continuing education requirements established by Government Auditing Standards. Relevant CPE areas include:

• Single audit training

• CLA annual government training academy • Annual audit and accounting updates • Minnesota school district internal training

Anita M. Supinski, CPA CLA (CliftonLarsonAllen LLP)

Principal Brainerd, Minnesota

Profile

218-825-2919 a nita .su pin kski@CLAconnect. com

Anita is a CLA national assurance technical group principal who started with the firm in 1989 and works primarily with state and local government engagements. Anita serves as the CLA state and local government industry assurance leader, and manages the efforts of the CLA GASB GMP implementation task force. Additionally, her responsibilities include being a firm wide technical resource for the governmental agencies audit and assurance practice and quality review of assurance engagements of government agencies. Anita also develops and conducts training sessions for audit and accounting staff within the firm. Anita is an experienced member of peer review teams and is involved with the firm's peer review and internal inspection process.

Technical experience Anita assists governmental audit engagement teams and clients with technical audit and accounting issues, and works with the CLA state and local governments group to formulate audit and financial statement report planning. She has experience working with more than 300 audits including states, schools, counties, local municipalities, as well as numerous special-purpose governments across the nation. Additionally, she consults with engagement teams on technical issues related to audits of federal and state awards and Government Auditing Standards.

Education and professional involvement • Participates as a reviewer in the AICPA's enhanced peer review oversight program

• Past member of the AICPA State and Local Government Expert Panel

• Bachelor of science, accounting - St. Cloud State University, St. Cloud, Minnesota

• American Institute of Certified Public Accountants

• Minnesota Society of Certified Public Accountants

• Certified Public Accountant, Minnesota

Speaking engagements • AICPA National Governmental Accounting and Auditing Update and other AICPA learning webcasts

• Presenter for internal annual CLA audit and accounting updates

• CLA external Local Government Training Academy Presenter • Instructor for firm's annual Minnesota School District update as well as other internal learning sessions

Continuing professional education Anita is in full compliance with continuing education requirements established by Government Auditing Standards. Relevant CPE areas include:

• Single audit training • CLA annual government training academy • Annual audit and accounting updates

• Minnesota school district internal training

KristenA. Houle, CPA CLA(CliftonLarsonAlien LLP)

Director Waite Park, Minnesota

320-203-5539 kristen. hOl;J.?:..@ CL.Ai;Oilr:ect. com

Profile Kristen started with CLA in 2011 (and had 2 years with the Office of the State Auditor) and works exclusively with governmental clients (including: counties, cities, towns, school districts, and special districts) and has extensive experience with single audits of federal grant programs. A sampling of her governmental clients include:

• Aitkin County

• Beltrami County

• Benton County

• City of Avon • City of Crosby

• City of Kimball

• Countryside Public Health

• Crow Wing County (GFOA Certificate Program -

CAFR)

• Horizon Public Health

• Human Services of Faribault and Martin Counties


• Monticello School District (GFOA Certificate

Program - CAFR)

• North Branch School District

• Region 4 South Adult Mental Health Initiative

• Rockford School District

• St. Louis County (GFOA Certificate Program - CAFR)

• Todd County

• Waconia School District (GFOA Certificate Program

- CAFR)

• Wright County (GFOA Certificate Program - CAFR)

• Bachelor of Arts in Accountancy from College of St. Benedict, St. Joseph, Minnesota

• Certified Public Accountant • American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, member • Minnesota Society of Certified Public Accountants, member

Continuing professional education Kristen is in full compliance with continuing education requirements established by Government Auditing Standards. Relevant CPE areas include:

• Single audit training • CLA annual government training academy • Annual audit and accounting updates • Minnesota school district internal training

Elizabeth Winkels, CPA CLA (CliftonLarsonAllen LLP)

Senior Asso.ciate

Alexandria, Minnesota

320-759-5133

eliza beth [email protected]

Profile Elizabeth (Liz) started with CLA in January of 2016 and works exclusively with governmental clients (including: counties, cities, towns, school districts, and special districts) and has extensive experience with single audits of federal grant programs. A sampling of her governmental clients include:

• Todd County • Underwood Independent School District

• Rock County • Marysville Township • Rock County Community Corrections • Laketown Township • Swift County • City of Brandon • Lac Qui Parle County • City of Ca rlos • Lac Qui Parle Yellow Bank Watershed • City of Browns Valley • Douglas County • City of Barnesville • Pope-Douglas Solid Waste • City of Sauk Centre • Battle Lake Independent School District • City of Minnetonka • Ashby Independent School District • City of Redwood Falls • West Central Area Independent School District • Viking Library System • Melrose Independent School District • Marshall University • Park Rapids Independent School District

Education and professional involvement • Masters of Accountancy from North Dakota State University

• Bachelors of Science in Economics from South Dakota State University • Certified Public Accountant • American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, member • Minnesota Society of Certified Public Accountants, member

Continuing professional education Liz is in full compliance with continuing education requirements established by Government Auditing Standards. Relevant CPE areas include:

• Single audit training • Annual audit and accounting updates • Annual risk management and internal control internal training

• Yellow book internal training • CLA annual government training academy

OannyS. Loch, CPA CLA (CliftonLarsonAllen LLP)

Senior Associate

Baxter, Minnesota

218-825-2934

dan ie! .loch@CLAco nnect .com

Profile Danny started with CLA in 2013 and works with governmental clients (including: counties, cities, towns, school districts, and special districts). Danny has extensive experience w ith single audits of federal grant programs in compliance with Uniform Guidance. A sampling of his governmental clients is listed below. Additionally, Danny has experience working constructions and real estate clients of privately held contractors and owners and experience with federal and state tax filings for businesses and individuals.

• Aitkin County • Garrison, Kathio W Mille Lakes Lake Sewer District

• Aitkin Public Utilities • Itasca County Kanabec County

• Beltrami County • Sylvan Township

• City of Bigfork • Washington County (GFOA Certificate Program -

• City of Garrison CAFR)

• City of Ironton

• City of Littlefork

• City of Moose Lake

• City of Ranier

• City of Warren

• Western Lake Superior Sanitary Sewer District

• Freeborn County (GFOA Certificate Program - CAFR)

• Kanabec County

• Beltrami County

• Aitkin County

Education and professional involvement • Bachelor of Science in accounting from North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota

• Certified Public Accountant • American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, member (AICPA) • Minnesota Society of Certified Public Accountants, member

Continuing professional education Danny is in full compliance with continuing education requirements established by Government Auditing Standards. Relevant CPE areas include :

• Single audit training • CLA annual government t raining academy

• Annual audit and accounting updates • Minnesota school district internal training

Mallory Carlson CLA (CliftonLarsonAllen LLP)

Senior st. Cloud, MN

Phone 320-203-5562 [email protected]

Profile Mallory is a senior in the Public Sector Group of CLA. She has three years of professional experiences and she works exclusively with governmental clients (including: cities, schools, counties, housing authorities, townships and municipal utilities) and has extensive experience with single audits of federal grant programs. A sampling of her governmental clients include:

• Benton County

• Brainerd Housing and Redevelopment Authority

• Buffalo Township

• City of Barnesville

• City of Brainerd

• City of Buffalo

• City of Kimball

• City of Onamia

• City of Ortonville


• City of Rice Lake

• Crow Wing County

• Glencoe Light & Power

• Lincoln County

• Marysville Township

• Ravenna Township

• Swift County • Western Lake Superior Sanitary District • School Districts: Monticello, North Branch,

Rockford, Waconia

• Bachelor of Arts, Accounting and Psychology, Concordia College, Minnesota

• Actively pursuing certification

Continuing professional education Mallory is in full compliance with continuing education requirements established by Government Auditing Standards. Detailed CPE listing is available upon request. Relevant CPE areas include:

• Single audit training • CLA annual government training academy

• Annual audit and accounting updates • Minnesota school district internal training

Ryan L. Vadnais, MSA CLA (CliftonLarsonAlien LLP)

Senior Associate

Waite Park, Minnesota

507-280-2323

rv n . vadJlai s®~.LAconnect. com

Profile Ryan a senior in our Waite Park office (who newly moved back to Minnesota from our Massachusetts office) started with CLA in 2015 and works extensively with governmental clients (including: counties, cities, towns, school districts, and special districts). He has experience with single audits of federal grant programs. A sampling of his governmental clients include:

• City of Buffa 10 • City of Newton, MA

• Des Moines Valley Health and Human Services • Martha's Vineyard Regional High School District

• Freeborn County • Massachusetts Convention Center Authority

• Minnesota State College and Universities • MassMutual Center

• Ravenna Township • Town of Eastham, MA

• Rock County • Town of Hamilton, MA

• Wright County • Town of Natick, MA

• Brockton Area Transit Authority • Town of Provincetown, MA

• Buzzards Bay Water District • Worcester Regional Retirement System

• City of Fall River, MA

Education and professional involvement Master of Accountancy from Minnesota State University, Mankato

Continuing professional education

Ryan is in full compliance with continuing education requirements established by Government Auditing Standards (attends a minimum of 20 hours annually of continuing professional education classes, including a minimum of 8 hours of audit and accounting classes, resulting in 120 hours over the three-year period).

Relevant ePE areas include:

• Single audit training • CLA annual government training academy • Annual audit and accounting updates

Nick J. Simon, CPA CLA (cliftonLarsonAllen LLP)

Senior Associate New Ulm, Minnesota

Profile

507-233-5206 [email protected]

Nick started with CLA in 2017 and now works with governmental audit clients (including: counties, cities, towns, school districts, and special districts). Additionally, Nick has experience working with nonprofits and manufacturing / distribution audits, and federal and state tax filings for businesses and individuals. A sample of his nonprofit and governmental audit clients is listed below.

• Committee Against Domestic Abuse • SMILES

• ECHO Food Shelf, Mankato • The Grand Centre of Arts and Culture

• Glencoe Silver Lake school • Twin Valley Council

• Habitat for Humanity, Freeborn/Mower Counties

• Mankato Symphony

Education and professional involvement • Bachelor of Science in accounting from St. John's University, Minnesota

• Certified Public Accountant • American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, member (AICPA) • Minnesota Society of Certified Public Accountants, member

Continuing professional education Nick is in full compliance with continuing education requirements established by Government Auditing Standards.

Elizabeth D. Kisch CLA (CliftonLarsonA!len LLP)

Associate Baxter., Minnesota

Profile

218-825-2963 elizabeth. [email protected]

Elizabeth was an intern with CLA in 2017 and 2018. She was hired as an associate in State and Local Government January 2019. She works exclusively with governmental clients (including: counties, cities, towns, school districts, and special districts). Elizabeth has experience with single audits of federal grant programs in compliance with Uniform Guidance. A sampling of her governmental clients is listed below.

• Aitkin Public Utilities Commission • Garrison Kathio W Mille Lacs

• Becker County • ISO #181 Brainerd School District

• Becker County EDA • ISO #2170 Staples Motley School District

• Brainerd Block Scheduling • ISO #2174 Pine River Backus School District

• City of Brainerd - 079-014170 • ISO #309 Park Rapids

• City of Crosby - 079-027110 • ISO #740 Melrose Public School

• City of Crosslake - 079-020453 • Itasca County

• City of Garrison - 079-019592 • Rice County

• City of Ironton - 079-080200 • St Louis County

• City of Littlefork - 079-198478 • Sylvan Township

• City of Ranier - 079-198479 • Todd County

• Countryside Public Health Services • Todd Soil & Water Conservation District

• Cuyuna Range Housing, Inc • Western Lake Superior Sanitary Sewer District


• Bachelors of Science in accounting and business administration with an emphasis in finance and a minor in fraud examination from Bemidji State University, Minnesota

Continuing professional education Elizabeth is in full compliance with continuing education requirements established by Government Auditing Standards.

Mitchell P. Hagenson CLA (CliftonLarsonAllen LLP)

Associate Baxter, Minnesota

218-828-0100 m itchei l.hage [email protected]

Profile Mitchell started with CLA in January 2018 as an intern and is now an associate with CLA's state and local government group. He has experience in public accounting and works extensively with governmental clients including counties, cities, municipalities, and schools. A sampling of his governmental clients include:

• Aitkin County • Crow Wing County • Aitkin Public Utilities Commission • Franklin Township

• Becker County • Glencoe Light and Power Commission

• Beltrami County • Waconia Public Schools

• Benton County • International Falls Public School

• Brainerd Housing & Redevelopment Authority • Itasca County

• Buchanan County • Kanabec County • City of Bigfork • Lyon County

• City of Crosby • Mower County • City of Deerwood • Pine County

• City of Garrison • Region 4 South Adult Mental Health

• City of Littlefork • Sylvan Township

• City of Ranier • Water & Light Commission Moose Lake • City of Warren

Education and professional involvement • Bachelors of Science of accounting and business administration and concentration in financial planning

from University Jamestown, l\Jorth Dakota

Continuing professional education Mitchell is in full compliance with continuing education requirements established by Government Auditing Standards.

3 Results of external quality control reviews

Quality control procedures and peer review report In the most recent peer review report we received a rating of pass, which is the most positive report a firm can receive. We are proud of this accomplishment and its strong evidence of our commitment to technical excellence and quality service. The full report is provided on the following page.

In addition to an external peer review, we have implemented an intensive internal quality control system to provide reasonable assurance that the firm and our personnel comply with professional standards and applicable legal and regulatory requirements. Our quality control system includes the following:

• A quality control document that dictates the quality control poliCies of our firm. In many cases, these

policies exceed the requirements of standard setters and regulatory bodies. Firm leadership promotes

and demonstrates a culture of quality that is pervasive throughout the firm's operations. To monitor our

adherence to our policies and procedures, and to foster quality and accuracy in our services, internal

inspections are performed annually.

• Quality control standards as prescribed by the AICPA. The engagement principal is involved in the

planning, fieldwork, and post-fieldwork review. In addition, an appropriately experienced professional

performs a risk-based second review of the engagement prior to issuance of the reports.

• Hiring decisions and professional development programs designed so personnel possess the

competence, capabilities, and commitment to ethical principles, including independence, integrity, and

objectivity, to perform our services with due professional care.

• An annual internal inspection program to monitor compliance with CLA's quality control policies.

Workpapers from a representative sample of engagements are reviewed and improvements to our

practices and processes are made, if necessary, based on the results of the internal inspection.

• Strict adherence to the AICPA's rules of professional conduct, which specifically require maintaining the

confidentiality of client records and information. Privacy and trust are implicit in the accounting

profession, and CLA strives to act in a way that will honor the public trust.

• A requirement that all single audit engagements be reviewed by a deSignated single audit reviewer,

thereby confirming we are in compliance with the standards set forth in Uniform Guidance.

,. _: CherryBekaert LlP

CPA.I 6. Advisors

System Review Report

To the Principals of CliftonLarsonAlien LLP and the AICPA National Peer Review Committee

We have reviewed the system of quality control for the accounting and auditing practice of CliftonLarsonAllen LLP (the "firm") applicable to engagements not subject to PCAOB permanent inspection in effect for the year ended July 31, 2016. Our peer review was conducted in accordance with the Standards for Performing and Reporting on Peer Reviews established by the Peer Review Board of the American Institute of Certilied Public Accountants . As a part of our peer review, we considered reviews by regulatory entities, if applicable, in determining the nature and extent of our procedures. The firm is responsible for designing a system of quality control and complying with it to provide the lirm with reasonable assurance of performing and reporting in conformity with applicable professional standards in all material respects. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the design of the system of quality control and the firm's compliance therewith based on our review. The nature, objectives, scope, limitations of, and the procedures performed in a System Review are described in the standards at www.aicpa.org/prsummary.

As required by the standards, engagements selected for review induded engagements performed under Government Audi1ing Standards, audits of employee benefit plans, audits performed under FDICIA, and examinations of service organizations [Service Organizations Control (SOC) 1 and SOC 2 engagements].

In our opinion , the system of quality control for the accounting and auditing practice of CIifl:onLarsonAlien LLP applicable to engagements not subject to PCAOB permanent inspection in effect for the year ended July 31 , 2016, has been suitably designed and complied with to provide the firm with reasonable assurance of performing and reporting in conformity with applicable professional standards in all material respects. Firms can receive a rating of pass, pass with deficiency(ies) or fail. ClifionLarsonAilen LLP has received a peer review rating of pass.

Cherry Bekaert LLP November 21 , 2016

.". ~ . • ©2019 ClrftonLarsonAlien LLP I 22 . ~, ."

4 References from other Minnesota counties

CLA offers its clients the best oftwo worlds - a firm with national public sector experience, complemented by a local team dedicated to accessibility and responsiveness. We are pleased to provide you with the following references, who can describe their experience in greater detail.

Client Contact

Phone Number

Years Serving Client

Services Provided

Client Contact

Phone Number


Services Provided

Client Contact

Phone Number


Services Provided

Itasca County

Jeff Walker, Auditor-Treasurer

218-327-2860

2011--present

Audit of financial statements in accordance with Government Auditing Standards, A-133 and Uniform Guidance Compliance, audit of Minnesota legal compliance, financial statement preparation services when not the County auditor

Benton County

Monty Headley, Administrator

320-968-5000

2003 -- Present

Audit of financial statements in accordance with Government Auditing Standards, A-133 and Uniform Guidance Compliance, audit of Minnesota legal compliance, financial statement preparation services when not the County auditor

Todd County

Denise Gaida, Auditor-Treasurer

320-732-4472

2003 -- Present

Audit of financial statements in accordance with Government Auditing Standards, A-133 and Uniform Guidance Compliance, audit of Minnesota legal compliance

" Kanabec County

Client Contact

Phone Number


Services Provided

Denise Snyder, Auditor-Treasurer

320-679-6430

2003 -- Present

Audit of financial statements in accordance with Government Auditing Standards, A-133 and Uniform Guidance Compliance, audit of Minnesota legal compliance

5 Costs - Bid/hourly charges

Our fees are based on the timely delivery of services provided, the experience of personnel assigned to the engagement, and our commitment to meeting your deadlines.

CLA understands the importance of providing our clients with value-added strategies. We propose to provide routine, proactive yearly meetings/calls - as part of our fee - that will allow us to review and discuss with you the impact of new accounting issues, as well as any other business issues you are facing and how they should be handled. This level and frequency of interaction will no doubt enable CLA to help you tackle challenges as they come up, and take full advantage of every opportunity that presents itself.

Professional Services 2019 2020

Financial Audit $39,500 $40,500

Single Audit (Assumes Two (2) Major Programs Per Year $8,000 $8,200

Reimbursable Expenses (Included In Fees Above) N/A N/A

Total $47,500 $48,700

We have found over the years that our clients don't like fee surprises - neither do we. We commit to you, as we do all of our clients, that:

• We will be available for brief routine questions at no additional charge, a welcome investment in an on

going relationship.

• Any additional charges not discussed in this proposal will be mutually agreed upon up front.

• We will always be candid and fair in our fee discussions, and we will avoid surprises.

Fee considerations The fee proposal is based on the following:

• The County personnel will provide assistance periodically throughout the year and during the assurance

fieldwork with regard to account analysis and provision of year-end account reconciliation work papers

and schedules.

• The assurance reports will be delivered in accordance with the County's deadlines.

• Satisfactory completion of our firm's normal client acceptance procedures.

• Professional standards and regulations currently in effect. We reserve the right to modify the proposed

fee if professional standards or regulations change for any engagement period.

• No significant changes in the operations of the County subsequent to the date of this proposal.

. ,

, _ , " ' , ©2019q;.ooL,,~AI."'LP I 24 : '

Billing for phone calls and questions It is not our policy or practice to bill our clients every time we receive a phone call. In the course of providing our services to you, we will regularly consult with you regarding accounting, financial reporting, and significant business issues. If a specific project is complex or requires significant time or resources, we will discuss the scope of the project and its fee with you first to make sure there are no surprises. While it is difficult to establish an exact policy for billing in these situations, we commit to discussing the request with you in advance of performing our services if we believe the time requirement to provide you the desired assistance is other than routine. We will discuss the scope of the project and our estimate to complete it prior to commencing work.

Our last word on fees - we are committed to serving you. Therefore, if fees are a deciding factor in your selection of an accounting firm, we would appreciate the opportunity to discuss our audit plan.

At CLA, it's more than just getting the job done.

6 What is your staff turnover rate?

We are committed to providing continuity throughout this engagement. It is our policy to maintain the same staff throughout an engagement, providing maximum efficiency and keeping the learning curve low. We are also flexible in exploring alternative strategies to non-mandatory rotation policies.

In any business, however, turnover is inevitable. When it happens, we will provide summaries of suggested replacements and will discuss re-assignments prior to finalizing. We have an adequate number of qualified staff members to provide the County with top service over the term of the engagement.

7 Is there an individual assigned that will be assigned to work with Brown County's audit? How long have they been with the firm?

Engagement Principal- Doug Host (27 years of county audit experience of which 15 is with CLA and 12 with the Minnesota Office of the State Auditor) will have overall engagement responsibility including planning the engagement, developing the audit approach, supervising staff, and maintaining client contact throughout the engagement and throughout the year. Doug is responsible for total client satisfaction through the deployment of all required resources and continuous communication with management and the engagement team.

Engagement Director - Kristen Houle (10 years government audit experience, nearly 8 years with CLA and 2 with the Minnesota Office of the State Auditor) will act as the lead manager on the engagement. I n this role, Kristen will assist the engagement principal with planning the engagement and performing complex audit areas. She will perform a technical review of all work performed and is responsible for the review of comprehensive annual financial report and all related reports.

Senior Associates - Danny Loch (6 years government audit experience with CLA); and Mallory Carlson (3 years of government audit experience with CLA) will be responsible for the day to day activities for this engagement, including the supervision of all staff assigned.

8 Inevitably there will be some turnover, how does your firm handle staffing changes so there isn't an impact on the client?

2015 2016 2017

CLA is committed to maintaining high staff retention rates, which we believe are a strong indicator of service quality. Continuity results in increased efficiency and quality because staff assigned to the engagement will not have to go through a "Iearning curve" with annual engagements or each new project. Client staff spends less time orienting the engagement team, and more time working toward goals. With a solid, steady engagement team, each year brings the additional benefits of trust and familiarity. High retention rates also indicate that our staff members have the resources they need to perform their tasks and maintain a positive work/life balance.

. CLA • 'ndustry, o~eroge'

9 Can you tell us about your audit software package?

Use of computer assisted audit techniques One of CLA's advantages is access to advanced audit tools and technology. Throughout the audit we may employ the use of Computer Assisted Audit Techniques (CAATs) to increase efficiency and effectiveness. The key CAATs that we will use include:

• Interactive Data Extraction and Analysis (IDEA) -IDEA is a statistical data analysis tool that has the ability to import data from virtually any data source or file type, with no limitations on the size of the data files that can be examined. IDEA utilizes powerful, built-in tools designed for the performance of audits and fraud investigations, providing the ability to :

,r-~IDEA ' ., .~ Oa1;a Analysis Software

•

o Statistically sample, summarize, stratify and/or perform an aging of large data sets o Compare, join, append or otherwise manipulate multiple, related populations of data o Identify gaps or duplicates in record sequences o Extract subsets of data using a variety of criteria or filters o Build reports and graphs to summarize testing results

FX Engagement - FX Engagement is our "paperless" audit product. This product allows us to file and save all of our audit workpapers in an electronic storage capacity; allowing our firm to save time and resources associated with maintaining and storing paper files. FX Engagement also boasts a trial balance software program, which is utilized to produce financial statements, lead schedules, and allows us to perform trend analysis utilizing our clients' trial balances. As discussed when we met on February 28 th

, the client version of ProFx Engagement would be a fantastic option for you to use in preparing your trial balances and financial statements. As we have done for other clients who adopted this approach, we are available to assist with the implementation of this approach.

, ... . . . . ., , ~ ~ ,

,,: _ ... . . ©>019CIi,,,",,,,"A'''" lLP I 26 :

., . \., . " .

• A Program Generator (APG) -In order to provide a uniform approach to all engagements, the firm requires the use of APG, a software program custom-written for CLA. This software package allows the tailoring of procedures, based on the requirements of your engagement. We have developed a customized CLA audit program, which effectively makes our audit processes paperless and will enhance our present electronic practices.

In an audit engagement, the primary use of APG is to take a standard audit program and modify, add, and delete procedures to create a program that has been specifically tailored to meet the needs of your engagement. Once tailored, the document can be completed electronically. Specific reports in addition to the basic program are generated to accommodate planning and review of your engagement. APG is an example of a technology tool that is designed to promote audit efficiencies. This software produces an industry-specific base program that is intended to encourage more thoughtful and specific tailoring. For an engagement to be effective in dealing with the risk of errors and efficient in avoiding riskless work, the engagement team will create a plan - the program - that contains the steps necessary to accomplish the goals of your engagement. Using APG is viewed as a thinking process, not just a documentation process.

• Client Portal-In addition to secure file transfer, clients can take advantage of a secure document portal to easily share documents and store files. This tool provides anytime, anywhere access to uploaded tax returns, financial statements and more from anywhere you have an Internet connection. Clients and CLA professionals can share and store confidential files in a secure environment. The portal has capacity for both long-term and transient file storage and provides access to all your documents in one place.

• leapFllE and Secure File Transfer Protocol- CLA is committed to keeping client and member data secure. We utilize LeapFILE, a secure file transfer protocol (SFTP) software program, to receive and send encrypted files. LeapFILE allows us to transfer files to and receive files from our clients in a secure manner and keeps files with sensitive data out of our email boxes and hard drives.

10 Is Your firm a member of the Governmental Audit Quality Center (GAQC)?

Participation in quality improvement programs Yes - CLA has been a member of the GAQC since its inception . In addition, we work with governmental entities across the country, and our exposure to the circumstances and issues that surround your industry will allow us to serve you with exceptional knowledge and insight. We understand the specific needs and challenges of the public sector and have been serving clients similar to the County for decades.

We are also actively involved in and/or are members of the following professional organizations:

• American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA)

• AICPA's State and Local Government Expert Panel

• AICPA's Government Audit Quality Center (GAQC) • Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA)

• Special Review Committee for the GFOA's

• Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting (Certificate) Program

AICPA Single Audit Quality Task Force

@AICPA

• • Association of Government Accountants

Our participation/membership in the aforementioned professional organizations, combined with various other technical services we subscribe to, allows use to be at the forefront of change in the government environment. We take seriously our responsibility for staying current with new accounting pronouncements, auditing standards, other professional standards and laws and regulations.

11 How many years has your firm attended the various Minnesota conferences? (Le., AMC< MACO, MACATFO)

G

Minnesota Conferences I Years Attending

Association of Minnesota Counties 16 Years

Minnesota Association of Counties Officers 16 Years

Minnesota Association of County Auditors, Treasurers, & Finance Officers 15 Years

Note: Over the years, CLA has also been a frequent presenter at these conferences and we are the only CPA firm that has attended each of these conferences for the past 15-16 years. We have been committed to serving counties since the first year CPA firms were able to audit counties in 2003.

-

'.- .. ' ~. -' . .' ..' ©>Ol9C""oo""W"Ai"" UJ> I 28 "

,

12 Why Should We Choose Your Firm?

With CLA by your side, you can find everything you need in one firm. We know you"r industry, and we want to know you. We have strong leadership and talent, commitment, and enthusiasm to provide our governmental clients excellent service in a cost-effective manner. We commit to providing you a high level of personalized, responsive service. Communication is as important to us as it is to you.

Create opportunities We understand your most important needs are:

A proposed team of professionals carefullyselected for compatibility with the County's needs and circumstances. Your service team understands the strategic, operational, and regulatory issues impacting your organization. These professionals dedicate a substantial percentage of their time assisting the County with financial, regulatory, and information security matters.

• Efficiency. Our goal is to provide exceptional client service at the lowest possible cost. A well-planned and well-executed engagement by an experienced service team will minimize disruption to your staff and enable timely completion of all deliverables.

• We are local! All of the personnel assigned to your engagement team are located in Minnesota, so we are available to meet with you at your request without additional constraints for travel and additional costs. In addition, since we have audit staff available right in New Ulm, we will utilize the local staffto the extent possible.

• Experience and continuity. Each engagement team member has in-depth experience in state and local government accounting, auditing, or tax matters. We will commit the necessary resources to provide quality client service and timely report delivery. We have an extensive local and national state and local government practice from which to draw resources.

• Fresh perspective. The County will benefit from a fresh look at your business, systems, and processes. You will be served by an engagement team with enthusiasm and a desire to develop a strong relationship that will help us exceed your expectations. We are confident that our industry experience will reveal new ideas, approaches, and opportunities.

Innovation

Our clients are hungry for more than standard seNices; they are seeking out professionals who know them well · and can help them with a wide variety of business issues. To meet your unique needs, CLA consistently innovates to keep our resources and approach fresh and relevant. Our culture sees change as an opportunity to enhance efficiency, embrace new technologies, and fully employ data analytics.

13 How many printed copies of the financial statements and your opinion are included in your quote?

Fourteen (14) printed and bound copies of the County's final financial statement report will be provided to the County.

14 Will you provide the County an electronic copy of the entire report?

Yes, CLA will provide an electronic copy of the entire financial report, governance letter, and exit presentation to the County.

15 Will you provide an unbound copy of the report to the county so that we can provide copies to individuals upon request?

Yes, CLA provides an unbound copy of the final financial statement report, governance letter, and exit presentation to the County.

16 What is not part of your proposal that is part of other county audits you perform? (For example-completing the County Financial Reporting form for the Office of the State Auditor (hereafter OSA), providing the report to the

OSA, etc.) The OSA financial reporting form is not included in the audit fees. CLA can assist the County in completing this form for an additional fee of $600 since it is outside the scope of the audit.

17 How do you relay accounting standard updates to clients-email messages, webinars, and phone calls? Are there a combination of one-on

one and live/recorded events available?

CLA actively supports industry education as a thought leader and industry speaker. Our firm focuses on supporting the educational needs of the industry through nationally sponsored trade events. Our team of governmental professionals is sought after, both as educators and as experienced speakers who are invited to speak and teach at major professional events by leading trade associations.

Thought leadership and industry information CLA goes beyond the numbers and offers value-added strategies. You will hear from us throughout the year. We send periodic email publications and host webcasts to keep clients and friends of the firm informed of relevant industry updates. Below are just a few of the resources we offer:

• State and Local Government Perspectives - A periodic e-newsletter providing news, tips, strategies, insights, and updates on regulatory and industry issues as well as subjects relevant to government entities.

• National industry webcasts - Web-based seminars designed to provide information on upcoming industry trends, accounting, tax, risk, and other issues in either the accounting or public sector industry. Many of webcasts are complimentary and some provide attendees with an opportunity to obtain CPE credit.

• Speaking engagements and workshops - We share our industry knowledge and experience by presenting at national, regional, and local events, as well as hosting our own industry events in various markets. We provide quality insight and education in the areas of improving profitability, reducing risk, building business value, and planning for succession.

• Recent industry articles - In addition to our direct participation with national organizations, CLA has had numerous articles published by our public sector industry professionals.

• In-person events - Annual economic, capital markets, and tax outlook seminars are presented by local professionals and CliftonLarsonAlien Wealth Advisors, LLC investment committee members.

• Minnesota Local Government Training Academy- For the past 10 years, CLA has hosted the Local Government Training Academy. It is held the first Friday in March of each year. This conference has approximately 150-180 attendees from throughout the state with many of the attendees representing Minnesota counties. It is via this conference where updates on standards, laws, compliance and other items are presented.

You can register for our webcasts and find our extensive resource library on our website, CLAconnect.com.

Industry pa rticipation CLA actively supports industry education as a thought leader and industry speaker. Our firm focuses on supporting the educational needs of the industry through nationally sponsored trade events. Our team of state and local government professionals is sought after, both as educators and as experienced speakers who are invited to speak and teach at major professional events by leading trade associations.

Educational events and workshops - We share our industry knowledge and experience at national, regional, and local events. We also host our oWn events on topics such asimprovihg profitability, reducing risk,building value, and succession.

Perspectives - Our periodic e-newsletter provides news, tips, strat~gies, insights, and updates on regulatory and industry issues. We also write on topics like personal finances; estate planning, and investment planning for private clients.

,Industry articles ~ CLA prof~ssionals publish widely. VisitCLAconnect .com;

In-person eventsLoecH professionals collaborate on seminars addressing the economy, capital markets, and tax changes.

Industry web casts -Seminars on industry trehds, accounting, tax, risk; and otherihdustryspecific 'issues. Webcasts are free to clients

. and ofter attendees CPE credit.

18 What is the firm's plan or practice for department audits (Sheriff, Recorder) etc.)? Will those be audited every year or on a rotational basis? Are department audits included in the proposed fee for the final statement audit?

Yes, CLA's group of county auditors is very familiar with this audit requirement prescribed by the OSA. Our practice is to audit the significant departments on a rotating basis (every 3 years) as per the OSA's requirements which I believe is the same approach the OSA has taken with regards to departmental audits. We do not perform departmental audits on those that do not collect or disburse county funds. In addition, we do not audit departments that only have minimal collections or activity (i.e., Veterans Services, Attorney, Administration, etc ... ). Lastly, our proposed fees due include the time needed to perform the departmental audits. The most common department audits we perform relate to the Sheriff, Recorder, Social Welfare Fund, Public Health, Road and Bridge, Parks and Libraries, as applicable.

19 Does the firm retain working papers for a minimum of six years? Will the working papers be made available, upon request, to the county? Will the work papers be available to the Office of the State Auditor?

Yes, CLA's record retention policy conforms to federal and state guidelines. Our retention policy is seven years for workpapers. We do share our workpapers with our clients to share information and make the audit preparation as easy/smooth as possible. In addition, if requested, we will make our audit workpapers available to the Office of the State Auditor.

20 Does the county prepare and publish their own financial statement?

CLA's approach to preparation of the financial statements varies from client to client. As discussed in our February 28 th meeting, we have the skills and capacity to continue with the exact same process for preparing the County's financial statements that the county has used in the past. However, as we discussed, we are also able to accommodate the other options for financial statement preparation (i.e., ProFX).

21 What are the firm's materiality levels for planning materiality and individually significant items?

The materiality levels we use as part of our audit are dependent on a few factors (i.e., total assets, liabilities, revenues and expenditures) based on opinion unit. Assuming for example, an opinion unit with $10M of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenditures, our planning materiality level would be $107,000 and the individually significant item threshold would be $27,000.

22 Has your audit software system successfully integrated with IFS (Brown County's general ledger)? Would any proposed journal entries use the County IFS account codes or use general accounts?

The software system that CLA works with most often in auditing counties is the IFS system. It is completely compatible with COFARS, has outstanding download capabilities, allows for efficient tracking of federal and state grants, has modules that allows for cash basis, modified accrual and full accrual reporting. Its features work very well in facilitating internal reporting and budgeting as well as external financial reporting. The audit software we use, ProFx Engagement communicates/reads IFS reports and downloads with ease. Any journal entries that we propose utilize the exact county IFS codes - the process that CLA uses for this allows the county to enter the audit adjustments into the IFS if it so chooses.

23 Have you audited counties that use Tyler software and if so, what are your thoughts on that accounting system?

Yes, CLA audits a county that utilizes Tyler software. In addition, we audit some cities that utilize this software. As it relates to counties, it does not seem to mesh as well with COFARS and Minnesota county reporting and related requirements. We are able to utilize our paperless audit software similar to how we use for the IFS system. The largest drawback we have seen is that Tyler information in the general ledger is incorporated at a summary level, it is extremely difficult and inefficient to ever drill down to the supporting documentation. This same concern has been expressed by our audit client. If you would like, we could put you in contact with that county so you could get the direct perspective from an existing county that utilizes Tyler software.

24 How many combined years of experience do your staff members have working with IFS?

Since we have been audited counties since 2003, and the majority of the counties first released by the OSA used the IFS System, our staff have each been working with the IFS general ledger system their whole careers. In addition, Doug and Kristen worked with the IFS system when they worked at the Office of the State Auditor. Grand total, the combined number of years of experience CLA staff have with the IFS System is approximately 120.

25 How many MN county audits from your firm have gone through the OSA's desk review process? Are you familiar with the OSA's County Audit Guide (see http://www.auditor.state.mn.us/other/educationalmaterials/ county_audit_guide.pdf)?

CLA is very familiar with the OSA's County Audit Guide. Doug Host, while working for the OSA prior to joining CLA, actually participated in the development of the original county audit guide. In addition, CLA county audit staff are also very familiar with the guide and its requirements. Each county audit that CLA has performed since 2003 has gone through the OSA's desk review process. The total number of county audits that CLA has had go through the desk review process is approximately 180 over the past 15 years.

26 What steps will be taken to ensure an orderly transition from the prior auditor?

At this time, we do not envision any audit problems. If issues arise as we are working with your staff, we will contact County management to discuss the appropriate resolution to any issues that we encounter.

First Year Transition An area of concern that is commonly encountered during transition to new engagements is the start-up time required to familiarize ourselves with your operations. As shown in figure 4, we mitigate transition issues.

Upon appointment as auditors, we will initiate a planning meeting with the appropriate management of the County. This meeting will take place shortly after we are notified about your selection. The purpose of the meeting will be to:

• Review our approach and roles, and solicit comments and concerns

• Schedule work • Establish key meeting and reporting dates

• Review the audit requirements

Management may be concerned about the potential disruption of its personnel during the transition period while

the new firm becomes familiar with your operations. We have addressed this concern by structuring our transition

process to gain a thorough understanding of your operations. That process has been successfully applied for

numerous organizations in the past.

Figure 4. We Mitigate Transition Issues. Transition issues are minimized through our use of thoughtful information requests

and our staff's experience. This experience allows a thorough understanding of your field, so transitional time is focused on

getting to know the unique culture, personnel, and control environment specific to the County.

Our approach to transition includes:

• A well-structured, experienced engagement team

• More intensive involvement by principal and manager in the transition year • Careful and complete communications at all levels of the team to resolve issues and concerns

• User-friendly audit tools • Use of review of prior auditors workpapers as a way to gather pertinent historical accounting

information and documents to limit your team's time in producing them for us

All transition activities will involve the on-site participation of the audit service team in order to:

• Focus our efforts only upon relevant matters • Avoid unnecessary efforts by your personnel • Make the audit process more responsive

We recognize changing accounting firms presents an opportunity as well as a challenge. Our service approach effectively minimizes the impact of client transition issues

27 The proposal should set forth a work plan, including an explanation of the audit methodology to be followed. Firms will be required to provide the following information on their audit approach:

a - Proposed timing of the engagement Communication with the entire management team and allows us to be responsive to your needs. The schedule allows for input from your personnel to make certain that the services are completed based on your requirements. The plan may also be amended during the year based on input from the finance committee.

Please see the below chart for the estimated time frame for the December 31 audit relating to each segment of

this engagement:

Interim Audit Work

Audit Fieldwork Begins

Draft Reports

Presentation to finance/audit committee

Presentation to board/management

Our audit approach for each year will have certain consistent elements. Our audit objective extends beyond the issuing of an opinion on financial statements. We believe that a good audit will yield substantial information for management, and will ' be a valuable tool in recognizing . opportunities and identifying areas that can be strengthened. An effective audit performed by our team will also provide:

• An objective look at your policies and procedures

• Valuable suggestions for improvements in your financial operations and other areas

• An analysis of trends and unusual variations from year-to-year

• Protection for current and future resources through improved internal controls

• A deterrent to embezzlement and other fraudulent activities

Our audit services are designed-to protect theinierests of mari;:tgemehtby concentratihg on high-risk areas. Risk identification i~the . fitst st~p of the audit 'process, providing the basis upon which the overall pla~ is developed.Qur ri~k asses.sment process involves consideration ofthe following types. of d$k:

• • •

Inherent risk - that an error In the acc'ountingand reportingpr~cess may occur Control risk - thatihternal'control systems designed to prevent/d'etect errors may fajl Audit detection risk - the riSK thafau'dit procedures may fan to detecterrQrs

Through careful consideratidnofthe aboverisks andtheit interrel~tiQhships; ,we WIl) dt!velopan auditplan and related programs that cohcentrate our·efforts on those elements of your financial statements thatinvolvethe greatest risk. At the same tim.e, we will avoid th~ unnecessary application of 'commonplace andtraditi~~al procedures to low-risk areas . .

We expect thatthe majority of our audit hours will be concentrated in the h:igh-riskaudit areas. Our approach is not to review everyaccQunt,with extensive substantive testing. While s.ub~tantive testing remains part of the

· process, we first identifyrelationshipsandtruiyleamaboutyour operations. .

Commitment to Communication with Management

Continual communication starts when an engagement letter is issued and continues until the completion or closeout of an engagement. We believe effective communication is critical to a successful engagement. This communication includes the exchange of ideas and advice as changes are considered or implemented by the entity or the accounting profession.

Upon notice of the issuance of an engagement letter, team members will meet with you to plan the start of the work and to further discuss the audit process.

Specific Audit Approach - Work Plan An economy of effort: focusing on operational efficiency . Your resources are precious, andwe help you conserve and maximize them. Weemploy what we call "enterprise excellence" in conducting your audit, which means we look for efficiencies, as well as the best ways to leverage our own resources in serving you. We believe our services will contribute to better business and administrative practices.

Two heads are better than one: bringing your team into the process Our audit engagement team is exceptional at mitigating risk, because we work closely with your people to understand your circumstances. We talk directly with your internal accounting staff, as well as personnel in other departments, to see your operations firsthand. This helps us understand what internal controls are in place or what controls will need to be improved in the future.

We take a business advisory approach in our audit services, which looks beyond accounting entries to underlying transactions and business systems. To best understand those, we talk with your key decision makers.

Results in recommendations regarding your systems and

procedures to make them more comprehensive, better understood, and more frequently implemented

Helps develop a comfort level for your people and emphasizes our

accessibility throughout the year

Can help with immediate problems and share insights and best practices to assist in planning for your future

success

Assessing risk: the gold standard in audit planning

Most value: talking with key decision makers asking clarifying questions, discussing organizational strategies, and dealing with sensitive reporting

issues of your leadership

Effective and cost-efficient, produces high quality audit and tax

deliverables, provides you with substantive dialogue with our team

leaders

Values time spent discussing significant business issues with management over time spent reviewing detailed workpapers

Our firm follows the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission's (COSO) risk -based framework to build our audit plan. CliftonLarsonAllen, management, and your stakeholders identify and assess risks concerning the organization, material accounts, transactions impacting the year-end financial statements, and federal and state tax regulations.

The following diagram illustrates the relationship between the COSO framework and our audit plan.

During the planning stages and throughout the audit, we identify the external and internal pressures and risks influencing the County's financial statements, operations, and future goals. Inputs to our risk identification process include the following (but are not all-inclusive) :

• Analysis of preliminary financial statements prior to beginning audit fieldwork

• Planning meetings with management

• Planning meeting with the body governing the audit process

• Reading of governance meeting minutes

• Analysis of control activities

The ultimate goal is to reach an understanding of the critical processes and develop an audit plan which addresses the risks identified through this process.

Based upon this risk analysis, CliftonLarsonAlien tailors and designs each audit area's approach. We use checklists and other tools crafted specifically to focus on control issues applicable to the County.

No surprises: ongoing communication is key Our emphasis on planning and communication allows for an efficient audit process in which everyone involved knows their roles and expectations. Issues are dealt with immediately, not accumulated until the end of the audit. We provide a nosurprises approach to our services, based on frequent and timely communication.

Electronic resources: paperless audit: efficiency and convenience We utilize a paperless audit process, using electronic resources to communicate and increase the efficiency of our engagement. In our experience working with similar organizations, we believe that virtually all the workpapers we require can be provided electronically. Our templates will help you organize the necessary audit support.

Our paperless model takes advantage of mobile technology and the Internet, meets compliance standards, and maintains our commitment to quality.

Standing up to scrutiny: auditor independence ensures credibility While our primary purpose is to serve as your independent auditor, CliftonLarsonAllen offers many other services that you may find useful. Requests by the County for such services will be considered on a project by project basis to ensure compliance with the following requirements of our independence standards and Government Auditing Standards Amendment No.3, Independence:

• auditors should not perform management functions or make management decisions; and

• auditors should not audit their own work or provide non-audit services in situations where the amounts or services involved are significant/material to the subject matter of the audit.

We will conduct our audit in four primary phases:

• Phase 1- Planning & Strategy • Phase 2 - Systems Evaluation • Phase 3 - Testing & Analysis • Phase 4 - Reporting & Follow-Up

Phase 1 - Planning & Strategy The main objective of the planning phase is to identify significant areas and design efficient audit procedures. We will accomplish our planning by following the methodology below:

• Conduct an entrance meeting with the County. Doug Host and Kristen Houle will meet with County personnel to mutually agree on an outline of responsibilities and timeframes. The agenda will include but not be limited to the following:

Establish audit approach and timing schedule Assistance to be provided by the County personnel Application of generally accepted accounting principles Initial audit concerns Concerns of the County's management Establishment of report parameters and timetables Progress reporting process and Establish principal contacts

Continuous Communication

Throughout

• Gain an understanding of the operations of the County including its organization, management style and internal and external factors influencing the operating environment and changes from the prior year. We will utilize reference materials such as the budget and related materials, organizational charts, manuals and programs, and financial and other management information systems.

• Identify significant accounts and accounting applications, critical audit areas, significant provisions of laws and regulations, and relevant controls over operations.

• Determine the likelihood of effective Information Systems (IS) - related controls.

• Perform a preliminary overall risk assessment.

• Confirm protocol for requesting information from and meeting with County staff.

• Establish a timetable for the fieldwork phase of the audit.

• Determine a protocol for using Interactive Data Extraction and Analysis (IDEA), our data extraction and analysis software, to facilitate timely receipt and analysis of reports from management.

• Prepare initial comprehensive list of items to be prepared by the County, establish clear deadlines and review with County management.

We will document our planning through preparation of the following:

• Entity Profile. This profile will help us gain an understanding of the County activities, organizational structure, services, management, key employees and regulatory requirements.

• Preliminary Analytical Procedures. These procedures will assist in planning the nature, timing and extent of auditing procedures that will be used to obtain evidential matter. They will focus on enhancing our understanding of the financial results, and will be used to identify any significant transactions and events that have occurred since the last audit date, as well as to identify any areas that may represent specific risks relevant to the audit.

• General Risk Analysis. This will contain our overall audit plan, including materiality calculations, fraud risk assessments, overall audit risk assessments, effects of our IS assessment, timing, staffing, client assistance, a listing of significant provisions of laws and regulations and other key planning considerations.

• Account Risk Analysis. This document will contain the audit plan for the financial statements, including risk assessment and the extent and nature of testing by assertion.

• Prepared by Client listing. This document will contain a listing of schedules and reports to be prepared by the County personnel with due dates for each item.

One of the key elements in the planning of this audit engagement will be the heavy involvement of the

Principal and Manager/Director. We will clearly communicate any issues in a timely manner, and will be in

constant contact with the County as to what we are finding and where we expect it will lead.

We will develop our audit programs during this phase. Utilizing the information we have gathered and the risks identified we will produce an audit program specifically tailored to the County. This program will detail

by major section the nature and types of tests to be performed. We view our programs as living documents

subject to change as conditions warrant. We will hold an entrance conference with the County to discuss

the audit timeframes, and will meet the appropriate County personnel at least one month prior to the start

of each audit.

Phase 2 - Systems Evaluation During the systems evaluation phase, we will gain an understanding of the internal control structure ofthe County for financial accounting and relevant operations. Next, we will identify control objectives for each type of control that is material to the financial statements, and then identify and gain an understanding of the relevant control policies and procedures that effectively achieve the control objectives. Finally, we will determine the nature, timing and extent of our control testing and perform tests of controls.

This phase of the audit will include extensive testing of controls over transactions, financial reporting and compliance with laws and regulations. Whenever possible, we will use dual-purpose tests to reduce the need to select multiple samples for internal control and compliance testing. We will be as efficient as possible, thereby reducing the disruption to your operations while achieving our audit objectives.

We will test controls over each critical audit area. One of our audit efficiency initiatives is to rely heavily on

internal controls when appropriate and to creatively look at internal control testing to make it as efficient

as possible. This means not routinely performing detailed tests of transactions using large samples. We first

seek to identify key controls, and then identify possible testing through alternative methods, such as observation, interviews and re-performance. These tests serve not only to gather evidence about the

existence and effectiveness of internal control for purposes of assessing control risk, but also to gather

evidence about the reasonableness of an account balance.

We will also develop our internal control tests to assess the compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants for which noncompliance could have a direct and material effect on the determination of financial statement amounts. Our use of multi-purpose tests allows us to provide a more efficient audit without sacrificing quality.

Our assessment of internal controls will determine whether the County has established and maintained internal controls to provide reasonable assurance that the following objectives are met:

• Transactions are properly recorded, processed and summarized to permit the preparation of reliable financial statements and to maintain accountability over assets

• Assets are safeguarded against loss from unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition

• Transactions are executed in accordance with laws and regulations that could have a direct and material effect on the financial statements

We will finalize our audit programs during this phase. We will also provide an updated Prepared by Client Listing based on our test results and our anticipated substantive testing.

During the internal control phase, we will also perform a review of general and application Information Systems (IS) controls for the applications that are significant to financial statements to conclude whether IS general controls are properly designed and operating effectively, and consider application controls as part of the internal control assessment in the financial statement audit. Our strategy for the IS review of the applications will involve reviewing all of the general control activities, including the computerized and manual processes. We will determine the scope of work by applying the concepts of materiality and risk

assessment to effectively reduce examination inefficiencies. When planning this examination, we will gain an understanding of the County's operations by reviewing its current controls and control objectives as documented, and will also review prior years audit work and the status of corrective actions.

Based on our preliminary review, we will perform an initial risk assessment of each critical element in each general control category, as well as an overall assessment of each control category. We will then proceed to assess the significant computer-related controls.

For IS-related controls that we deem to be ineffectively designed or not operating as intended, we will gather

sufficient evidence to support appropriate findings and will provide recommendations to improve internal controls. For those IS controls that we deem to be effectively designed, we will perform testing to determine if · they are operating as intended through a combination of procedures, including observation, inquiry, inspection and re-performance.

Phase 3 - Testing & Analysis

The extent of our substantive testing will be based on results of our internal control tests. It has been our experience that governmental entities, like the County, often have a system of internal control that, with appropriately designed tests and correlation to account balances, can be used to limit the extent of account balance substantiation testing.

Audit sampling will be used only in those situations where it is the most effective method of testing. Before deciding to sample, we will consider all possible approaches and audit techniques. Items where, in our

judgment, acceptance of some sampling risk is not justified will be examined 100 percent. These may include unusual items or items for which potential misstatements could individually equal or exceed tolerable error.

After identifying individually significant or unusual items, we will decide on the audit approach for the remaining balance of items by considering tolerable error and audit risk. This may include (1) testing a sample of the remaining balance, (2) lowering the previously determined threshold for individually significant items to increase the percent of coverage of the account balance or (3) applying analytical procedures to the remaining balance. When we elect to sample balances we will use IDEA to efficiently control and select our samples.

Our work papers during this phase will clearly document our work as outlined in our audit programs. These audit work papers will be retained for a minimum of three (3) years, unless notified in writing by the County of the need to extend the retention period. We will also provide the County with status reports during the course of the audit fieldwork. As in all phases of the audit, we will be in communication with the County to ensure that all identified issues are resolved in a timely manner. We will also hold a final exit conference with the County to summarize the results of our fieldwork and review significant findings.

Phase 4 - Reporting & Follow-Up

Reports to management will include oral and/or written reports regarding:

• Independent Auditors' Report • Independent Auditors' Report on Internal Control over financial reporting and on compliance and

other matters based on an audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards

• Independent Auditors' Report on Compliance for Each Major Federal Program and Report on Internal Control over Compliance Required by the Uniform Guidance, as applicable

• Management Letter • Written Communication to Those Charged with Governance, which includes the following areas:

Our responsibility under auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America Changes in significant accounting policies or their application

Unusual transactions Management judgments and accounting estimates Significant audit adjustments Planning timing and scope of the audit Management representations Other information in documents containing the audited financial statements Disagreements with the County The County's consultations with other accountants Major issues discussed with management prior to retention Difficulties encountered in performing the audit Fraud or illegal acts

Once the final reviews of working papers and financial statements are completed, which is a process that actually starts while the fieldwork is in process, our opinion, the financial statements and management letter will be issued.

The County will be provided a draft of any comments that we propose to include in the management letter, enabling you to review the comments for accuracy prior to final release. Any items that come to our attention that are not what we consider major items may be discussed verbally with management and not induded in the management letter. Our management letter will include items noted during our analysis of your operations. We will also make a formal presentation of the results of the audit to those charged with governance of the County, if requested.

Single audit approach In the current environment of increased oversight, it is more important than ever to find qualified auditors who have

significant experience with federal grants specific to the County and can enhance the quality of the County's single

audit. Therefore, the single audit will be performed by a team of individuals who specialize in single audits in

accordance with OMB's Uniform Guidance and who will offer both knowledge and quality for the County. As part of

our quality control process, the single audit will be reviewed by a firm Designated Single Audit Reviewer.

The OMB's Uniform Guidance (2 CFR Part 200) is effective for federal grants made on or after December 26,2014. This

affects how federal grants are managed and audited and impacts every organization that receives federal assistance.

Grant compliance can be a confusing topic and many of our clients rely on their federal funding as a major revenue

source, so it is important that they understand what these changes mean to their organization. As a leader in the

industry, CLA was out in front of these changes and informed our clients of how to be proactive about these changes

could impact their entity. CLA professionals are available to provide guidance and tools tailored to the County's needs,

and to assist in compliance with the new rules.

The AICPA clarified auditing standard, AU-C 801 "Compliance Audits" requires risk-based concepts to be used in all

compliance audits including those performed in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200. Our risk-based approach incorporates

this guidance.

We will conduct our single audit in three primary phases, as shown, below:

The risk assessment and planning phase will encompass the overall

planning stage of the single audit engagement. During this phase, we

will work closely with the County's management to determine that

programs and all clusters of programs are properly identified and risk

rated for determination ofthe major programs for testing. We will also review the forms and programs utilized in the

prior year to determine the extent of any changes which are required.

We will accomplish this by following the methodology below:

• Determine the threshold to distinguish between Type A and B programs, including the effect of any loans and

loan programs

• Utilizing the preliminary Schedule of Expenditure of Federal Awards, we will identify the Type A and significant

Type B programs (25% of Type A threshold) in accordance with the Uniform Guidance (UG)

• Identify the programs tested and the findings reported for the past two fiscal years. Determine and document

the program risk based on the past two single audits

• Prepare and distribute Type B program questionnaires to determine risk associated with Type B programs

• Determine the major programs to be tested for the current fiscal year based on the previous steps

• Based on our determination of the major programs, we will obtain the current year compliance supplement

to aid in the determination of Direct and Material Compliance requirements, and customize the audit program

accordingly

• Determine the preferred methods of communication during the audit

We will determine the programs to be audited based on the risk

assessment performed in the planning phase. We will perform the

audit of the programs in accordance with UG.

To accomplish this, we will perform the following:

• Schedule an introductory meeting and notify the County's management of the major programs for the current

fiscal year

• Plan and execute the testing of the expenditures reported on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards

• Perform tests of compliance and internal controls over compliance for each major program identified

• Schedule periodic progress meetings to determine that schedules are adhered to and identify issues as they

arise

• Conduct entrance and exit conference meetings with each grant manager

identified.

We will re-perform the steps noted in the preliminary assessment and

planning stage once the final Schedule of Expenditures of Federal

Awards is received to determine if additional major programs were

Based on the final determination of the programs we will perform the following:

• Identify Type A and significant Type B programs which were not previously identified.

• Re-assess the risk and determine if we are required to audit additional programs.

• Perform compliance testing at the entity wide level related to procurement and cash management

requirements.

• Perform testing to validate the status of prior year findings for those programs not selected for audit.

• Prepare the Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs.

• Conduct exit conference with the County's management to review drafts of required reports:

o Independent Auditors' Report on Internal Control over financial reportihg and on compliance and

other matters based on an audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance with Government

Auditing Standards

o Independent Auditor's Report on Compliance for Each Major Federal Program, Report on Internal

Control Over Compliance, and Report on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Required by

the Uniform Guidance

Throughout the single audit, we will maintain communication through periodic progress meetings with those

designated by the County. These meetings will be on a set schedule, but as frequently as the County determines.

During these meetings, we will discuss progress impediments and findings as they arise.

Data analytics In addition to standard auditing methodology, a distinguishing aspect of CLA's audit services incorporates the power

of data analytics to mUltiply the value of the analyses and the results we produce for clients. CLA's data methodology

is a six-phase, systematic approach to examining an organization's known risks and identifying unknown risks.

Successful data analysis is a dynamic process that continuously evolves throughout the duration of an engagement

and requires collaboration of the engagement team.

Data analytics are utilized throughout our audit process, our Risk Assessment, Data Analytics and Review ("RADAR")

is a specific application of general ledger data analytics that has been implemented on all audit engagements. RADAR

is an innovative approach created and used only by CLA that aims to improve and replace traditional preliminary

analytics that were being performed.

The phases in our data analytics process are as follows :

1. Planning

In the planning stage of the engagement, the use of data analysis is considered and discussed to determine that

analytics are directed and focused on accomplishing objectives within the risk assessment. Areas of focus, such as

journal entries, cash disbursements, inventory, and accounts receivable are common.

2. Expectations

We consider the risks facing our client and design analytics to address these risks. Through preliminary discussions

with management and governance, we develop and document expectations of financial transactions and results for

the year. These expectations will assist in identifying anomalies and significant audit areas in order to appropriately

assess risk.

3. Data Acquisition

Sufficient planning, a strong initial risk assessment, and an adequate understanding of your systems will serve as the

foundation necessary to prepare our draft data request list. We will initially request information in written format and

conduct follow-up conversations helping CLA practitioners our staff share a mutual understanding of the type of data

requested and the format required . If there are going to be any challenges/obstacles related to obtaining data, or

obtaining data in the preferred format, they will generally be discovered at this point.

4. Technical Data Analysis

Technical analysis of the data requires the skillful blend of knowledge and

technical capability; Meaningful technical analysis provides the engagement team

with a better understanding of the organization. The additional clarity assists the

engagement team to better assess what is "normal" and, in turn, be better suited

to spot anomalies, red-flags and other indications of risk. Analytics generally fall

into five categories, each looking into the data set in a different way and deployed

with a different purpose.

5. Interpret Results and Subsequent Risk Assessment

Trends and anomalies will be identified through the performance of the above referenced analytics. Comments

regarding the interpretation of those trends and anomalies will be captured. When trends are identified they are

reconciled against expectations. For anomalies identified, the approach to further audit procedures will be considered.

6. Response and Document

The last process is to capture responses and determine that our procedures are properly documented . Abstracts, charts or summaries of both trends and anomalies are retained in the audit documentation to support our identification of risks .Our analysis can be tailored and customized to help analyze an array of information, including client specific and proprietary data. Key benefits of data analytics include:

• Built-in audit functionality including powerful, audit specific commands and a self-documenting audit trail • 100 percent data coverage, which means that certain audit procedures can be performed on entire

populations, and not just samples

• Unlimited data access allows us to access and analyze data from virtually any computing environment

• Eliminates the need to extrapolate information from errors (a common effort when manually auditing data) and allows for more precise conclusions

The below figure illustrates typical data analytics scenarios.

Data Ana/yties. At the end of a series of pre-determined analytics (often retrieved from multiple proprietary accounting systems) that are customized to the project at hand, we identify anomalies and potential errors in transactions. In every case, we review what appears to be inappropriate activity, including supporting documentation evidencing the transactions.

Assistance from client We request that the County provide access to all records required for the audits and other requirements of the contract. In addition, we request that you assign a "project coordinator" through whom we will communicate and coordinate activities. We do not foresee needing the County's staff other than during normal business hours.

To assist in this process, we will provide a detailed Prepared by Client list early in the engagement. We will ask that your accounting staff provide us with standard schedules, as well as additional requested supporting items. We anticipate that your accounting personnel will need to locate and submit to us certain invoices, vouchers, cancelled checks, and other documents and records.

We will depend on your staff to provide us with as much information as possible, in an effort to limit everyone's time on the engagement and, ultimately, to save your organization money.

Relationships between the Department of Audits, the Department of Finance, and the project team

In addition to the specific tasks and responsibilities outlined in this proposal, we will utilize the County's Department of Audits in all aspects of the audit. In addition, the Department of Finance will be asked to prepare schedules to our staff to provide us with as much information as possible, in an effort to limit everyone's time on the engagement and, ultimately, to meet the revised deadlines and save your organization money. We will depend on the County's support account balances, prepare confirmations, provide copies of invoices and other documentation as required, and provide explanations for questions as they arise. Additionally, we will require time from department staff to discuss key planning issues, to meet with staff involved with operations to develop our understanding of the County's systems and processes, and to conduct other key meetings throughout the audit. We anticipate utilizing the County's Department of Audits to the extent outlined in the RFP.

b - Level of staff and number of hours to be assigned to each proposed segment of the engagement

Engagement Schedule We are committed to performing the engagement adhering to the deadlines required by the County. Below we have provided the tentative schedule for the engagement:

Description Start End

Meeting with appropriate As soon as feasible upon notification of award No later than the middle of November

personnel

Atime line wiil be I!st;lblishe.d during the audit '

PreliminarY ~eldwork planhing conferenc~. When possiQI~, 'we peiform our

No later than January, 31st , 'preliminary work priorto .year-end to avoid '

overburdening dient staff

Fieldwork No later than May 1". No later than June 15th

~ ~

Delivery of Preliminary Drafts Preliminary drafts no later than " Final reports no later than

and Final Reports July 31st August 15th

t

Presentation to Management Preliminary meeting/conference call prior to year-end If requested, at Board's convenience

and Board fieldwork

BROWN COlJNTY .

Principals' Manager Senior Associate Clerical

Planning & strategy 20 . 30 4 0

Systems Evall:lation

Testing & Analytics 200'

Reporting' & Follow up 92

Total Hours 60 92 140 ,

134 4 430

c - Sample sizes and the extent to which statistical sampling is to be used in the

engagement

. Statistical Sampling We extensively use statistical and non-statistical sampling during our audits of governmental and not-for-profit

entities. The sampling techniques vary depending upon the nature of the test, such as internal control reliance,

substantive testing and transactional testing. Our sampling methods and resulting sample sizes are in accordance

with and result from guidance provided by the AICPA for both audits and single audits. Our sample sizes are

directly related to the various risks (inherent and control) associated with the item being tested, confidence level

to be obtained and overall materiality. Our sample sizes generally include up to 30 items for control and

transactional testing or up to 60 items for single audit testing. The samples for substantive testing are highly

dependent upon the balance of the account being tested and the materiality of the engagement.

We plan to determine the scope of work by applying the concepts of materiality and risk assessment to effectively

reduce examination inefficiencies. Our strategy for the IT review of the applications will involve reviewing all of

the general control activities, including the computerized and manual processes.

During the planning phase of the engagement, we plan to gain an understanding of the County's operations by

reviewing current controls and control objectives as documented. We will also review prior years' audit work and

the status of any findings that may have been reported in prior years. Based on our preliminary review, we will

perform an initial risk assessment of each critical element in each general control category, as well as an overall

assessment of each control category. We will also develop preliminary estimates of materiality to assist in

developing our audit plan. We will then proceed to assess the significant computer-related controls.

For those controls that we deem to be ineffectively designed or not operating as intended, we will gather sufficient

evidence to support appropriate findings and to provide recommendations to improve internal controls. For those

controls we deem to be effectively designed, we will perform testing to determine that they are operating as

intended through a combination of procedures, including observation, inquiry, inspection, and re-performance.

Electronic Resources: Paperless Audit: Efficiency and Convenience We utilize a paperless audit process, using electronic resources to communicate and increase the efficiency of our engagement. In our experience working with similar organizations, we believe that virtually all the workpapers we require can be provided electronically. Our templates will help you organize the necessary audit support.

Our paperless model takes advantage of mobile technology and the Internet, meets compliance standards, and maintains our commitment to quality.

d - Type and extent of analytical procedures to be used in the engagement

Preliminary analytical procedures will assist in planning the nature, timing and extent of auditing procedures that

will be used to obtain evidential matter. These procedures will focus on enhancing our understanding of the

financial results. These procedures are also used to identify any significant transactions and events that have

occurred since the last audit date, as well as to identify any areas that may represent specific risks relevant to the

audit.

In performing our substantive testing, our audit efficiency initiative provides that we first think analytically. By

doing this, we can better understand the specific account balance being tested and determine if the current

balance or relationship with other account balances appears reasonable . We will also employ analytical testing on

smaller and/or lower risk accounts and cycles to maintain efficiency and to meet milestones.

Approach to be Taken in Drawing Audit Samples for Purposes of Tests of Compliance

The samples for purposes of compliance testing for populations greater than 100 are drawn randomly or haphazardly from the population of transactions utilizing applicable numerical sample techniques. These techniques consider confidence level, tolerable error and attribute risk in determining sample sizes. We will use dual-purpose testing whenever possible to increase audit efficiency.

The samples for purposes of compliance testing for populations less than 250 generally range from 10-15 percent of the population or the identification and testing of individually significant transactions to obtain adequate population coverage. Samples for populations in excess of 250 range up to 60 items.

e - Approach to be taken to gain and document an understanding of the County's internal controls

The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) has established a framework

for internal control systems. Under the coso framework, internal control is a process to provide reasonable

assurance that those internal objectives, including effectiveness and efficiency of business operations, reliability

of financial reporting, and compliance with applicable laws and regulations, will be met.

Our audit approach is designed to evaluate and test the departmental internal controls in accordance with COSO

concepts. Our procedures include a review of the overall control environment, determination of the internal

controls which are determined to be direct and material to the federal program under review, determination of

the adequacy of those procedures, and testing of the procedures to determine if they are functioning as designed.

During the planning and internal control phases of our audit, we will develop our understanding of the County's

business operations and internal control structure for financial accounting and relevant operations through

observation, discussion and inquiries with management and appropriate personnel. During this phase of the audit,

we will review budgets and related materials, organization charts, accounting and purchase manuals, and other

systems documentation that may be available.

Once we understand your operations, we will then identify control objectives for each type of control that is

material to the financial statements. The next step will be to identify and gain an understanding of the relevant

control policies and procedures that effectively achieve the control objectives. Wewill then determine the nature,

timing and extent of our control testing and perform tests of controls.

This phase of the audit will include extensive testing of controls over transactions, financial reporting and

compliance with laws and regulations. Whenever possible, we will use dual-purpose tests to reduce the need to

select multiple samples for internal control and compliance testing. We will be as efficient as possible, thereby

reducing the disruption to your operations while achieving our audit objectives.

Our assessment of internal controls will determine whether the County has established and maintained internal

controls to provide reasonable assurance that the following objectives are met:

• Transactions are properly recorded, processed and summarized to permit the preparation of reliable

financial statements and to maintain accountability over assets

• Assets are safeguarded against loss from unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition

• Transactions are executed in accordance with laws and regulations that could have a direct and material

effect on the financial statements

Our work papers during this phase will clearly document our work through the preparation of the following for

each significant transaction cycle or accounting application:

• Audit program

• Cycle memo and supporting documentation

• Account risk analysis (ARA)

• Specific control evaluation (SCE)

f - Approach to be taken in determining laws and regulations that will be subject to audit test work

Our determination of the laws and regulations that will be subject to audit tests will be based on the following:

• Our extensive knowledge gained during previous audits of other Minnesota counties and other Minnesota

local governments

• Review of compliance requirements listed in Uniform Grant Guidance compliance supplement

• Inquiries of management, legal counsel and appropriate personnel

• Review of applicable state laws and regulations

g - Approach to be taken to cause the least amount of disruption to normal operations We are aware that the County staff's primary responsibility is to serve its constituents. We attempt to minimize our demands on the staff's time. However, in order to minimize our time and the resulting cost of performing the audit, we provide a list of information that we need to have available for efficient use of our time. Generally, these items are comprised of information previously prepared by the County, such as minutes, financial statements and reports, account reconciliations, and operating policies and procedures.

h - Ability to use secure file-sharing software Assurance Information Exchange (AlE) - CLA utilizes a secure web-based application to request and obtain documents necessary to complete client engagements. The application allows you to view detailed information including due dates for all the audit items CLA is requesting. Additionally, you will have the availability to attach electronic files and add commentary related to the document requests directly on the application. This system uses multifactor authorization to further protect the security of your files.

28. Does your firm have a 2nd review for quality control on county audits?

CLA requires each audit to go through an independent second review thereby ensuring a high quality audit. Not all firms require an independent second review of all audits each year and others only require an independent 2nd review the first year a new client is audited. CLA's process helps to ensure that audits are complying with OSA guidelines.

29 Does your firm provide sample schedules/narratives that the county is required to complete?

CLA does not require its templates/schedules/narratives to be completed. Instead, CLA chooses to utilize what the county is most familiar/comfortable with. This allows for a smooth transition. CLA does however, share templates and other tools that the county can choose to use. These items are shared with the county when we feel we can help the county prepare more efficiently and effectively. This has been viewed as a significant value added service that CLA prepares (i.e., our cash flow statement template saved a client a significant amount of time in preparing its cash flow statements.

30 Will there be periodic feedback and communication throughout the audit or does your firm generally wait to provide all information at the end?

CLA proposes to have quarterly meetings to discuss audit progress, preparedness, approach and timing. These quarterly meetings can also address any questions or concerns the county may have. In addition, upon completion of the audit, we will have an audit "wrap up" meeting to put a plan in place to try and make each year's audit cycle better than the previous year (continuous improvement concept).

31 Could you provide a couple examples of issues that may arise that fall

outside the scope of the engagen1ent as quoted? Would questions about or request for technical guidance (GASB standards, GAAP} etc.) typically incur

additional fees?

In addition to the services outlined in this proposal, CLA collectively offers a wide breadth of highly-customized services and capabilities to meet our clients' wants and needs, including a sampling of the following:

• Financial statement and forensic audits • Fraud risk assessment and investigations

• Internal audit, risk assessments, and evaluations • Strategic, financial, and operational consulting • Implementation assistance for complex accounting standards • Outsourced accounting and public administration

• ACA Reporting • Strategic, business, and capital planning • Operational and financial systems consulting

• Organizational and financial health assessment • Operations and performance improvement • Training and educational seminars • Self-insured medical and PBM claim audits • Telecom cost savings assessments • IT security and network vulnerability assessments

We pride ourselves on taking the initiative to meet each and every need of our clients, and therefore are always prepared to take on additional projects. However, independence is our first concern when providing additional services. Independence can easily become impaired when providing consulting services; therefore, we do not provide any services to our audit clients beyond those allowed.

If additional work is requested by Coynty outside of the scope of the audit, we will discuss with you our proposed fee for additional services prior to beginning the new services.

Our fees are based on the timely delivery of services provided, the experience of personnel assigned to the engagement, and our commitment to meeting your deadlines.

CLA understands the importance of providing our clients with value-added approaches. We propose to provide routine, proactive quarterly meetings - as part of our fee - that will allow us to review and discuss with you the impact of new accounting issues, as well as any other business issues you are facing and how they should be handled. This level and frequency of interaction will no doubt enable CLA to help you tackle challenges as they come up, and take full advantage of every opportunity that presents itself.

Ongoing consultation We do not anticipate County will receive additional billings related to the annual audit procedures, as we anticipate cooperation from staff and receipt of information for timely completion of your audit. It is also our policy not to bill you for routine telephone calls. Our quoted fee includes routine general consultation throughout the year, however, if you seek a written opinion, or if the issue requires us to perform research, we will bill you at our standard rates for these services, less a 15% discount. We will provide detailed information on additional fees to the County, as applicable

For your convenience, we have a toll-free number for this purpose: (enter toll-free number). Additionally, in order to provide the most direct access to your team, we will provide the cell phone numbers of your engagement principal and audit manager upon acceptance of our proposal.

Our last word on fees - we are committed to serving you. Therefore, if fees are a deciding factor in your selection of an accounting firm, we would appreciate the opportunity to discuss with you the scope of our services.

At CLA, it's more than just getting the job done

32 If the law changes and the OSA regains the discretion for auditing counties and notifies Brown County they plan to audit us during the engagement period, do you agree to rescind any agreement or engagement letter so the County doesn't pay for mUltiple audits of the same year? What

cost would there be to the County to terminate the agreement/ engagement for that reason?

Yes, CLA will include an escape clause in the arrangement/engagement letter as follows :

This agreement is voidable by either CliftonLarsonAlien LLP or the County at any time upon 30-day written notice and the County will be responsible for any time and expenses relate<>to the engagement up to the written notification date. A sample engagement letters for the audit can be provided, if requested. A formal engagement letter will be forwarded later upon your decision to hire CliftonLarsonAlien.

33 Does your firm offer governmental trainings or conferences in Minnesota? Are any such trainings or conferences CPE eligible?

Minnesota Local Government Training Academy - For the past 10 years, CLA has hosted the Local Government Training Academy. It is held the first Friday in March of each year. This conference has approximately 150-180 attendees from throughout the state with many of the attendees representing Minnesota counties. It is via this conference where updates on standards, laws, compliance and other items are presented.

Other Information

Firm Overview - Create opportunities CLA exists to create opportunities for our clients, our people, and our communities through industry-focused wealth advisory, outsourcing, audit, tax, and consulting services. Our broad professional services allow us to serve clients more completely - from startup to succession and beyond.

Our professionals are immersed in the industries they serve and have specialized knowledge of their operating and regulatory environments. With more than 6,100 people, more than 120 U.S. locations, and a global affiliation, we bring a wide array of approaches to help clients in all markets, foreign and domestic.

HI STORY i : ,~ LOCATION 6,100+ • • • RESOUR CES

60+ gmiiHii · ~~t · .. "." M ore than 120 "~I /(,cJudir,g: 600+

I \ 0. "' . ,.

employees ~ . . locations state and local

years gmgmgm nationwide INDUSTRY DRIVEN gave rn ment prafe ssional$

in business ~ 1 NATI ONAL • We se rve

FI SCALLY STRONG I ;r Among the nations'

II II 2,700+ rID $1 .1 billion leading professional

1 servir.es firm Governmental enti ties

in revenue

With eLA by your side, you can find everything you need in one firm.

Certificate of achievement assistance The Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting is awarded to state and local governments that go beyond the minimum requirements of generally accepted accounting principles. It is awarded to state and local governments who produce a comprehensive annual financial report that evidences the spirit of transparency and full disclosure. Members of the GFOA staff and the GFOA Special Review Committee (SRC) review reports submitted to the CAFR program.

CLA provides audit services to many entities that received the GFOA Certificate of Excellence in Financial Report. All of the procedures noted in our audit approach and our technical review of the CAFR are done to help the County prepare and publish the top product possible. Our managers and principals who review the CAFR have a strong understanding of the GFOA requirement for the certificate. We understand that this is a prestigious award for the County and a great accomplishment for the Finance and Accounting departments.

We will review the GFOA comment letter for each CAFR and provide the County advice regarding the response to the GFOA reviewer's comments. Our procedures with respect to the CAFR will be the review ofthe comments from GFOA on the prior year submission to determine they were adequately addressed, completion of the CAFR checklist, and review of the transmittal letter and statistical data to determine that information presented is reasonable and agrees with the information in the financial statements and management's discussion and analysis (MD&A), where applicable.

We understand the interrelationships of the many and varied components of a governmental entity's financial statements, allowing us to quickly determine errors or problems with the financial statements. Our depth of knowledge and experience also allows us to assist the County with the preparation of the CAFR and improvement of the County's financial statements.

Our involvement with clients in the GFOA Certificate program helps to determine that we are on the leading edge of reporting trends and techniques. We have been engaged by various entities to review their statements for compliance with program requirements. We have aided clients in the early implementation of professional pronouncements and regularly provide our clients with updates on new pronouncements which will affect them and will do the same for the County.

The table below identifies the professionals who are currently members of the GFOA Special Review Committee together with their length of service with the Committee:

Name Title Location Years Served

Julie S. Fowler, CPA Signing Director Sebring, FL 10+

Rich Gonzalez, CPA Principal Roseville, CA 5+

Michelle Hoffman, CPA Principal Minneapolis, MN 4+

Christopher Kessler, CPA Principal Fort Myers, FL <1

Christopher G. Knopik, CPA, CFE Principal Minneapolis, MN 5+

Jacob S. Lenell, CPA Principal Milwaukee, WI 10+

Remi Omisore, CPA Principal Baltimore, MD 6+

Jeffrey Peek, CPA Manager Roseville, CA 2+

Miranda Wendlandt, CPA, CFE Principal Alexandria, MN 3+

Elba Zuniga, CPA Principal Sacramento, CA 1+

Participation in quality improvement programs ·

We work with governmental entities across the country, and our exposure to the circumstances and issues that surround your industry will allow us to serve you with exceptional knowledge and insight. We understand the specific needs and challenges of the public sector and have been serving clients similar to the County for · decades.

We are actively involved in and/or are members of the following professional organizations:

• American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA)

• AICPA's State and Local Government Expert Panel

• AICPA's Government Audit Quality Center (GAQC)

• Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA)

• Special Review Committee for the GFOA's • Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting

(Certificate) Program

• AICPA Single Audit Quality Task Force • Association of Government Accountants

•• AICPft:

Our participation/membership in the aforementioned professional organizations, with various other technical services we subscribe to, allows use to be at the of change in the government environment. We take seriously our responsibility for current with new accounting pronouncements, auditing standards, other professional standards and laws and regulations.

Federal or state desk or field reviews

combined forefront staying

CLA has been subject to several federal and state desk reviews by state overSight agencies during the past three years, and we have resolved all findings. In addition, our government audits are subject to review by each agency's Office of Inspector General, as well as the u.s. Government Accountability Office, and we have also resolved all findings identified in those reviews.

Firm independence CLA is independent of the County as required by auditing standards generally accepted in the United States and the u.S. Government Accountability Office's Government Auditing Standards. Our firm-wide quality control policies and procedures foster strict compliance with these professional standards. In addition, the individuals assigned to your audit are independent ofthe County.

Joint ventu re We are not a joint venture or alliance offirms. We have the capabilities of providing all services outlined in the proposal, including Information Technology services

License to practice CLA is duly licensed to practice public accountancy in the state of (State) and other states. A copy of our state license is provided below:

Mi1ll1esota Board of Accountancy (index.html)

REGULATION • LlCEI'JSURE • ENFORCEMENT· PUBLIC SERVICE

Office Location Assigned to Manage the Engagement

The County will be served by our specialized government engagement team located in the following Minnesota offices:

(LA, 14275 Golf Course Drive Suite 300, Baxter MN 56425 ClA, 1920 Turning Leaf Lane SW, Suite 2, Alexandria, MN 56308 (LA, 108 North Minnesota Street, New Ulm, MN 56073 (LA, 818 Second Street South, Suite 320, Waite Park, MN 56387

Litigation From time to time, the firm is a defendant in lawsuits involving alleged professional malpractice. In all cases, the firm believes that it has a strong position and intends to defend itself vigorously. Should the ultimate outcome be unfavorable, however, net ofthe deductible provisions ofthe firm's malpractice insurance, all cases are expected to be fully covered by insurance and will not have a material impact on the firm or its ability to perform these services.

Moreover, in those cases where claims have been resolved by settlement (the vast majority of our cases), the firm is typically subject to confidentiality agreements that prohibit the disclosure of information regarding those matters. Disclosure by the firm of any details about those matters could invalidate the settlement agreements.

Insurance CLA carries commercially reasonable amounts of malpractice insurance. If requested, the firm will provide a certificate of coverage for an amount specified by the County upon being engaged.

Continuing education program In order to maintain and expand our assurance knowledge, we consistently provide continuing education for our professionals. Each member of our professional team, including principals, attends at least 40 hours of technical training annually.

Updated information on recent changes in technical standards and regulations, as well as the firm's professional policies and procedures, is distributed to our team members on a regular basis. Individuals are required to

familiarize themselves with all current changes in standards and procedures.

CLA invests in our government practice by hiring high caliber professionals and providing additional training to develop and enhance our knowledge. With seasoned professionals, we provide valuable insight into your day-today operations and your accounting systems and controls.

As described below, CLA professionals are specifically trained in the industry at a level beyond our competitors.

Effective Continuing Professional Education. Our greatest strength is the talent of our stoff Our professionals provide more efficient and effective services due to the new ideas they implement from our in-depth training and continuing professional education.

CLA's firm-wide training programs, include:

• Learn. Designed for new CLA associates, this five-day conference is typically attended in the first year of employment. This internally developed and presented training focuses on preparing new hires and interns to understand and perform their role in the audit process. Providing a combination of an introduction to CLA Strategy, business risk and independence with audit theory. Using hands on exercises and simulations to introduce our audit methodology, tools and software. Specific audit areas covered include audit planning, cash, fixed assets, accounts payable and financial statement preparation.

• Experience. Designed for the CLA associate with about one year of experience. This four-day conference is typically attended in the second year of employment. This training is similar to the "Learn" training outlined above, but at a deeper level.

• Achieve. Designed for the CLA associate with about two years of experience. This four-day conference is typically attended in the third year of employment. This internally developed and presented training focuses on leadership and performance management of audit engagements utilizing CLA audit methodology from the perspective of the experienced in-charge. This is a highly interactive session covering the experienced in-charge's role and challenges in the audit process, and prepares participants to manage and perform efficient and effective audits.

• Propel. Designed for the CLA associate with about three years of experience. This four-day conference is typically attended in the fourth year of employment. This training focuses on project management of audit engagements from start to finish and includes exercises and case studies on improving the audit, supervision, analytical procedures and tests of controls and identifying and responding to fraud risks. This session is taught by an external instructor from 20/20 Services.

GASB insight potentially affecting current and future audits Our significant knowledge of technical issues and GASB pronouncements will be especially beneficial to the County. The below are recent issues and pronouncements which may have a future impact on the audits and financial statement of the County. We will proactively work with the County to address the reporting and auditing impact of each pronouncement or issue in advance of the implementation date.

GASB pronouncements

GASB - Recent and Pending - ---- -- ---- ~- -- - --- ---

Description of Statement Potential Impact on the County

. GASB Statement No. 75, Accounting and Financial Reporting for

Postemployment Benefits Other Than Pensions - This statement

. establishes new accounting and financial reporting requirements

for -governments whose employees are provided with OPES, as well

as for certain non-employer governments that have a legal

obligation to provide financial support for OPES provided to the

employees of other entities.

GASB Statement No. 82, Pension Issues - an amendment of GASB

Statements No. 67, No. 68, and No. 73 - The objective of this

statement is to address certain issues that have been raised with respect to Statements No. 67, Financial Reporting for Pension Plans,

and No. 68, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions.

Specifically, this Statement addresses issues regarding (1) the

presentation of payroll-related measures in required

supplementary information, (2) the selection of assumptions and

the treatment of deviations from the guidance in an Actuarial

Standard of Practice for financial reporting purposes, and (3) the classification of payments made by employers to satisfy employee

(plan member) contribution requirements.

This statement is effective for fiscal years ·

beginning after June 15, 2017 and will lh.avean

impact on the County similar to that of GASB

68, requiring recording of the amount of the

net unfunded actuarially computed OPEB

liability.

The Requirements of this statement are

effective for reporting periods beginning after

June 15, 2017. There should be minimal impact

on the County's f inancial statements or

disclosures, therein.

GASB - Recent and Pending . ------------------ - ---- ----- - --~

Description of Statement . Potential Impact on the County

GASB Statement No. 83, Certain Asset Retirement Obligations

The objective of this statement is to provide guidance in recording

and disclosing liabilities related to retirement obligations for certain

tangible capital assets which have been permanently removed from

service.

GASB Statement No. 84, Fiduciary Activities - The objective of this Statement is to improve guidance regarding the identification of fiduciary activities for accounting and financial reporting purposes and how those activities should be reported. It provides criteria for identifying fiduciary activities, identifies four types of fiduciary funds and provides reporting guidance. The four fiduciary fund types are pension (and other employee benefit) trusts, investment trust funds, private-purpose trust funds and custodial funds.

GASB Statement No. 85, Omnibus- The objective of this statement

is to provide guidance on certain practice issues which have arisen

in the past year. Specifically, it addresses certain issues related to

investment classification, component unit issues, classification of

real estate held by insurance entities, and certain OPEB issues.

GASB Statement No. 86, Certain Debt Extinguishment Issues - The primary objective of this Statement is to improve consistency in accounting and financial reporting for in-substance defeasance of debt by providing guidance for transactions in which cash and other monetary assets acquired with only existing resources-resources other than the proceeds of refunding debt-are placed in an irrevocable trust for the sole purpose of extinguishing debt. This Statement also improves accounting and financial reporting for prepaid insurance on debt that is extinguished and notes to financial statements for debt that is defeased in substance.

GASB Statement No. 87, Leases - The objective of this Statement is to better meet the information needs of financial statement users by improving accounting and financial reporting for leases by governments . This Statement increases the usefulness of governments' financial statements by requiring recognition of certain lease assets and liabilities for leases that previously were classified as operating leases and recognized as inflows of resources or outflows of resources based on the payment provisions of the contract. It establishes a single model for lease accounting based on the foundational principle that leases are financings of the right to use an underlying asset. Under this Statement, a lessee is required to recognize a lease liability and an intangible right-to-use lease asset, and a lessor is required to recognize a lease receivable and a deferred inflow of resources, thereby enhancing the relevance and consistency of information about governments' leasing activities.



June 15, 2018. This statement will impact

disclosures in the County's financiar statements

to the extent of the occurrence of these types

of capital asset retirement obligations.



December 15,2018. Implementation of this

statement will require a change in terminology

from agency funds to custodial funds



June 15, 2017. Based on our preliminary

review of this Statement, we do not believe it

will impact your financial statements and

related disclosures.



June 15,2017. Based on our preliminary

review of this Statement, we do not believe it

will impact your financial statements and

related disclosures.



December 15,2019. Based on our preliminary

review of this Statement, the standard would

require the County to record a liability and an

intangible right-to-use lease asset for all non

current (greater than 12 months) leases. There

would be little or no change in existing capital

leases. The impact of recording the new liabilities on the County's legal debt margins and coverage calculations would require

review and discussion with the County legal,

accounting and financial advisors.

GASB - Recent and Pending ----------------------~-f---- - -- -------

Description of Statement Potential Impact on the County

GASB Stat'ement 88, Certain Disclosures Related to Debt, including Direct Borrowings and Direct Placements - The primary objective of this Statement is to improve the information that is disclosed in notes to government financial statements related to debt, including direct borrowings and direct placements. It also clarifies which liabilities governments should include when disclosing information related to debt, This Statement defines debt for purposes of disclosure in notes to financial statements as a liability that arises from a contractual obligation to pay cash (or other assets that may be used in lieu of cash) in one or more payments to settle an amount that is fixed at thedate the contractual obligation is established. This Statement requires that additional essential information related to debt be disclosed in notes to financial statements, including unused lines of credit; assets pledged as collateral for the debt; and terms specified in debt agreements related to significant events of default with finance-related consequences, significant termination events with finance-related consequences, and significant subjective acceleration clauses.

GASB Statement No. 89, Accounting For Interest Cost Incurred before the End of a Construction Period - The primary objective of this Statement are to enhance the relevance and comparability of information about capital assets and the cost of borrowing for a reporting period and to simplify accounting for interest cost incurred before the end of a construction period. This Statement also reiterates that in financial statements prepared using the current financial resources measurement focus, interest cost incurred before the end of a construction period should be recognized as an expenditure on a basis consistent with governmental fund accounting principles,

GASB Statement 90 - Equity Interest Ownership Issues - The primary objectives of this Statement are to improve the consistency and comparability of reporting a government's majority equity interest in a legally separate organization and to improve the relevance of financial statement information for certain component units, It defines a majority equity interest and specifies that a majority equity interest in a legally separate organization should be reported as an investment if a government's holding of the equity interest meets the definition of an investment. A majority equity interest that meets the definition of an investment should be measured using the equity method, unless it is held by a specialpurpose government engaged only in fiduciary activities, a fiduciary fund, or an endowment (including permanent and term endowments) or permanent fund. Those governments and funds should measure the majority equity interest at fair value.



June 15, 2018.



December 15, 2019.

The requirements of this Statement are


December 15, 2018. Earlier application is

encouraged. As this standard was only recently

issued, the County should prepare an inventory

of its equity holdings to determine if further

evaluation is required,

As of the date of this proposal, the GASB is in the midst of due process on the following projects that may affect the financial reports of the County in the future:

Future Pronouncements and Projects - -------------------------- ------------------ ------ _._-

Description of Statement : Potential Impact on the County

Revenue and Expense Recognition - The objective of this project is to develop a comprehensive application model for the recognition of revenues and expenses that arise from nonexchange, exchange, and exchange-like transactions, including guidance for exchange transactions that has not been specifically addressed in the current literature.

Conceptual Framework - Recognition and Measurement

Approaches - This project may affect financial statements in the

future. The concepts being discussed include when to recognize

transactions and on what basis to measure them (historical cost, fair

value, etc.) It is speculated this these two phases of an eventual

concepts statement will lead to an updated financial reporting

model.

Financial Reporting Model - The objective of the project is to make improvements to the financial reporting model including GASB Nos. 34,35,37,41,46 and Interpretation No.6. The improvements would be to enhance the effectiveness of the model in providing information essential for decision-making, enhance the ability to assess a government's accounting and address certain application issues.

Conduit Debt - Reexamination of Interpretation 2 - The objective of this project is to address certain issues related to accounting and financial reporting for conduit debt obligations. The project will consider improvements to the existing guidance in Interpretation No.2, Disclosure of Conduit Debt Obligations, related to: (1) diversity in current reporting that adversely affects comparability between governments, (2) whether conduit debt obligations are liabilities as defined in the GASB's conceptual framework and, therefore, should be reported in government-issuers' financial statements, and (3) the usefulness of required notes to government-issuers' financial statements decision-making and assessing accountability.

Equity Interest Ownership Issues - This project will address certain issues related to the reporting of majority equity ownership in legally separate entities. The project will consider improvements to the existing guidance in Statement No. 14, The Financial Reporting Entity, on the presentation of ownership interest in a legally separate entity. The project also will consider improvements to the recognition and measurement guidance for wholly-owned legally separate entities that are presented as component units.

Public-Private Partnerships, including Reexamination of Statement 60 - The objective of this project is to address accounting and

Currently in the invitation to comment stage.

Currently in the preliminary views

redeliberation stage.

Currently in the invitation to comment

redeliberation stage.

Currently in the initial deliberations stage.

Currently in the exposure draft comment

period. Estimated completion was January 19,

2018.


Future Pronouncements and Projects ---------------~ --.-~- ---.----- --~---------- -. -_.-

Description of Statement : Potential Impact on the County I

financial reporting for public-private partnerships (P3s). The project will consider (1) potential amendments to Statement No. 60, Accounting and F~nancial Reporting for Service Concession Arrangements, and potential amended or new implementation guidance to better address account1ing and financial reporting for service concession arrangements (SCAs) within its scope, and (2) potential additional accounting and financial reporting guidance for other types of public-private partnerships not within the scope of Statement 60 or subject to the provisions of Statement No. 87, Leases.

Information Technology Arrangements, including Cloud Computing- The objective of this project is to address accounting and financial reporting for cloud computing arrangements (CCAs). The project will consider (1) potential accounting and financial reporting guidance for CCAs that are not addressed in current guidance and (2) potential amendments to Statement No. 51, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Intangible Assets, arid related questions and answers in the Comprehensive Implementation Guide.


·Identification of anticipated potential audit problems In situations where authoritative guidance on a particular transaction or accounting issue is unclear or subject to interpretation, our approach is to proactively meet with management to discuss the issue and reach a conclusion that is hopefully agreed upon by both parties. We do not have specific "firm policies" that dictate our conclusions to be reached on all complex accounting issues. Rather, each issue must be evaluated independently by our engagement team. As discussed above, we will not only meet internally, but also facilitate discussion with the County's management team in order to obtain a mutual understanding ofthe particular accounting issue, determine the applicable authoritative guidance that most closely relates to the issue, and strive to reach an approach agreed upon by both parties. If there still remains any ambiguity or disagreement, we can explore other resources that could possibly assist, such as subject matter professionals within the Government Accounting Standards Board staff or the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) or perhaps other municipalities who may have dealt with similar issues.

Telecom cost savings assessments In an effort to help our clients eliminate waste by evaluating recurring operating expenses, CLA offers cost saving services such as telecommunications assessments. CLA can provide a detailed assessment of the County telecommunications-related expenses and offer recommendations to reduce the costs

determine whether a deeper investigation makes sense for the County. Our professionals can dissect the County phone and internet bills to identify discrepancies and optimization strategies, preparing a comprehensive report outlining precisely how cost savings and refunds might be achieved.

, '.- .

,:: , ~ , , , , ', :,', , @2019CIi"",l"oo"""llP I 66

, . "

Appendix

Sample- county exit presentation

WEALTH ADVISORY I OUTSOURCING I .AUDIT , TAX , AND CONSULTING

Agenda

• Introduction

• Required Communications

• Internal Control

• Minnesota Legal Compliance

• Financial Results

• Key Issues/Summary

~ WEALTH ADVISORY I OUTSOURCING I AUDIT, TAX, AND ~, CONSULTING

~ c

.~ <i' c g -~ c

'. ~ u u; rl a N (9

Required Communications

• Separate Communication with Governance letter issued to. all County Commissioners with required communications in detail

• Key points - Audit provides reasonable, but not absolute assurance - Audit includes some accounting estimates - We received full cooperation from management

• Results of the Audit - We issued an unmodified {(clean" opinion on the financial statemehts - Single audit performed as County had federal expenditures in excess

of $750,000

.~ WEALTH ADVISORY I OUTSOURCING I AUDiT. TAX, AND , CONSULTING

~ c ~ <: c:

~ ~ c ()

U . U"l

M o ," . g

Internal Control Material Weaknesses - deficiencies in internal control such that there is a

reasonable possibility that a material misstatement would not be prevented or detected and corrected on a timely basis

• Segregation of Duties

• Audit Adjustments

• Annual Financial Reporting

• Timely Deposits

• Timely Adjustments to Inventory

• Review Adjustments to Inventory

Significant Deficiencies - deficiencies in internal control that are less sever than material weaknesses, year important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance

• None Noted

m WEALTH ADVISORY I OUTSOURCING I AUDIT , Tt\ X , AND , CONSULTiNG

Single Audit - Internal Control

Material Weakness

- Health and Human Services - no formal contracts with vendors (new requirement)

Significant Deficiency

- Documentation of review of LeTS reports

~ c ~ <t c

~ .:'l c

~ o

" U'\ ,-;

, 0 , N

' (Qj

~ WEALTH ADVISORY I OUTSOURCING I AUD IT, TAX , AND , CONSULTING

, .:-) () ,~ '" 8

Minnesota Legal Compliance Auditors performed testing and completed a 25 page

check list to verify that the County complied with applicable Minnesota Statutes

2017 Findings:

• Unclaimed Property

• Timely Payment of Claims

• Electronic Funds Transfer Process

~ WEALTH ADVISORY I OUTSOURCING I AUDIT, T,I\X, AND '111.;... CONSU LTING

ro -' c o ~ U U)

rl o N

19

Financial Results Governmental Activities Net Position

• Net Position increased $1.9M

• Unrestricted Net Position had approximately a $9.3M deficit

$80,000,000

$75,000,000

$70,000,000

I: $65,000,000 0

:E III 0 ~ ... $60,000,000 OJ Z iii ... 0 I-

$55,000,000

$50,000,000

2010 2011

'J{ WEALTH ADVISORY I OUTSOURCING I AUDIT , TAX , AND , CONSULTING

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Year

Financial Results Months of Expenditures in Fund Balance - All Governmental Funds

• Total Fund Balance - 2016 = $21,362,465 2017 = $13,447,392

• Unassigned, Assigned, and Committed Fund Balance - 2016 = $8,622,621 2017 = $9,234,538

• Approximately 3 months of expenditures in Fund Balance (Assigned, Unassigned, and Committed)

• Minnesota Office of the State Auditor recommends no less than 5 months expenditures in Fund Balance (Assigned, Unassigned, and Committed)

I I MONTHS OF EXPENDITURES IN FUND BALANCE I 6

'" 5 ~ QI

.~ /~ "0 C QI Co .!j 4

J ~ '0 '" .. .s:: C /"

I~ 3

~ 'II

2

I

I 1

I 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Year I __ Months I

!b WEALTH ADVISORY I OUTSOURCING I AUDIT TAX . .l..NCl ,. CON SLJL T iNG

Financial Results Revenue Comparison - Governmental Funds

• Revenue breakdown by type is consistent from year.;.to-year

• Taxes and Intergovernmental Revenues account for 78% and 80% of Total Revenues, respectively

2016 2017

Gifts and Contributio

Fines a Forfeits

0%

Cha rges for Services

11%

36%

Interest on

Permits 1%

9%

Taxes 42%

~ WEALTH ADVISORY I OUTSOURCING I AU DIT . TAX, AN D ,..;,... CONSULTING

Interest on Investments

Gifts and 0% Contributions

~--~~ 0%

Services 13%

Intergovem al

41% Permits 1%

Specia I sessments

0%

Financial Results Expenditure Comparison - Governmental Funds

• Debt principal increased approximately $8.7M

• Health expenditures increased approximately $2.6M

Conservation of Natural Resources

0%

0%

2016 Principal

3 Interest

Streets 10%

Genera I Government 25%

Public Safety 21%

WEALTH ADVISORY I OUTSOURCING I AUDIT. TAX. AND CONSU LTING

Capital Out 12%

2017

Interest 1%

15%

16%

Public Safety 16%

Highways a nd Streets

7%

15

"----' ---'

Financial Results c .9! 4' c

§ ro

Long-Term Liabilities - Governmental Activities ---' c 0

~ G U) d 0 N (Q>

$20,000,000 • Total Long-Term .... $19,000,000 F ., Liabilities $18,000,000 I \ $17,000,000 I \ 2017 = $11,171,042 $16,000,000 -

A.. I \ $15,000,000 /' "- I \ 2016 = $20,720,250 $14,000,000 -- ./ "- ---/- \: $13,000,000 --

~ .,

$12,000,000 • General Obligation · $11,000,000 -. \

~ $10,000,000 \ Bonds ~ $9,000,000 ~

o $8,000,000 - 2017 = $9,275,000 $7,000,000 $6,000,000 - 2016 = $18,615,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000

,r, ;.l'"""-$1,000,000 -:

$0

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Year

I ..... G.O. Bonds _,-Compo Abs . I

• WEALTH ADVISORY I OUTSOURCING I AUDIT , TAX, AND ~" !J 16 , CONSULTING

Key Issues / Summary

• Financial Stability - Decreasing Fund Balance levels in General Fund

- Financial statements and the required OSA reporting form submitted to the required state agencies by the statutory deadline

- 2007 and 2008 G.O. Bonds paid off in 2017

- Community Health Fund now part of the County

- Decrease in Net Pension Liability from $17,206,519 in 2016 to $11,624,764 in 2017

.!b WEALTH ADVISORY I OUTSOURCING I AUDIT, TAX, AND , CONSULTING

Thank you to all for allowing us to serve you!

Contact Information: Doug Host, CPA

218-825-2948

[email protected]

\-.. ~ WEALTH ADVISORY I OUTSOURCING I AU DIT, TAX, AND ,.;, CONSUL TIN""

REQUEST FOR ACTION Requested Board Date: Ori ginating Department:

May21,2019 Auditor-Treasurer Item:

PUBLIC HEARING - Consolidation of Lateral IIA to CD 5 followed by the ROB on County Ditch 5 11 a.m. 130nrd Action Requested:

Public Hearing on the consolidation of Lateral 11A to CD 5 with County Ditch 5 followed by the ROB for the parcels in the CD 5 watershed. Background The viewers conducted two informational meetings with all the landowners on these drainage systems. The first was held January 24, 2019 and the final landowner meeting was April 17[h. TIle viewers, two Commissioners, the A-T and Water Planner met on May 13th with an individual landowner to discuss the benefits assigned to the City of Sleepy Eye. The final reports presented today are representative of these discussions.

The Engineer has prepared his final report and the viewers will provide the final documents on the ROB at the public hearing.

The public hearing will proceed as follows: (Landowners arc requested [ 0 sign in for the public hearing)

1. The Auditor-Treasurer will present affidavits of mailing, posting and publication for these hearings.

CONSOLIDA nON OF THE TWO DRAINAGE SYSTEMS I

2. The Drainage Authority in a separate motion will consider the consolidation of i Lateral I1A to CD 5 and County Ditch 5 based on the recommendation of the Engineer. The resolution to consider this action was passed by the Drainage Authority on April 2, 2019. i

3. The funds in these two drainage funds will be combined into a singular account upon approval. The balance of the combined accounts as of March 31 51 would be (6,251.03).

4. Accept public testimony regarding the consolidation of these two systems and creating one fund within the financial system.

5. The Drainage Authority will decide whether the consolidation 1S fair and equitable and direct the County Attorney to include this action in the Findings of Fact and Order.

Ifthe consolidation is approved; the next step would be:

CONSIDER THE REDETERMINATION OF BENEFITS FOR CD 5 1. Viewers present the final copy of the property owners report and viewers report

along with the spreadsheet of new benefits and damages for this combined system.

-7 2. A motion is required to adopt the Engineer's report and maps as presented. 3. The Drainage Authority needs to consider an assessment in the amount of

$434,000 for the payment of damages for the buffer acquisition and obtaining the construction easement. The Auditor will share the terms of repayment; L-_ _ __ _

gbode

Typewritten Text

# 16

gbode

Oval

a. Checks for damages and bills for the assessments are anticipated to be mailed in early July.

b. Landowners have 60 days from the date of the billing to pay with no interest. c. An option is provided to make the payment with the 2020 tax bill; or d. Pay the assessment over a 3 year period with interest of 4%. e. Lando'V.'11crs can prepay the a.<;sessment without penalty.

CD 05 Asmt Calc::ulation

Balance in CD 05

Average Expenditures on these systems - Year 1

. Average Expenditures - Year 2

Cushion

Buffer Seeding @ $225 per acre ( Estimate)

I Buffer Easement

Estimated Balance in CD 05

·1 (6,251.03)

(19,602.89) _ ~ A .... ,

(19,602.89)

(2,000.00)

(9,704.25) I (377,085.00)

(434,246.06) I

Assessment approved (rounded to nearest $1,000) $ 434,000.00 . ~ _H¥"' _

4. The board will accept public testimony from the landowners. 5. The Drainage Authority will make a motion to approve the assessment in the

amount of $434,000 with an interest rate of 4%. 6. The Drainage Authority will vote to accept/reject/table the redetennined benefits

and direct the county attorney to prepare the Findings of Fact and Order to be approved at a future board meeting.

Note: The Drainage Authority authorized the planting of the buffer as a repair at a previous board meeting.

It should be noted that once the Findings of Fact and Order are signed at a future board meeting, a landowner has 30 days to appeal. Sup ortin DocumentsC8Jattached 0 none Notes : Atta 'hed art tile £n~tnter R~'JXtrt :I.ml the Resolullofl lur lh¢ CO!l50iiJsuOI1 oftht:>e two S} fem.'. A m~p of L!!lel'll \1 til "'0 5 i also /!vail!lb l~ f1)1" rclertl1CC. TIle 'dC'~ers repl1Jl and property owner,; rqx>n: ,-,ere Pf<wli!cd t(l the CommiSSioners pnor 10 lhe April 1?1>· Llilldo"!n1!r info)1llntionill mtcLmg.

Board Action: Motion OtTered By: Approved as Requested 0 M()ti{)ll Seconded By:

Denied 0 Vote by Acclamation : Roll Call Vote: Yes No

Tabled 0 Dislrici I D D District 2 D D District 3 D D

Other 0 District 4 D D Distric.t 5 D D


The fol1lowing Resolution was offered by Commissioner Berg and moved for adoption at a Regular Meeting held on April 2, 2019 at the Brown County Courthouse, New Ulm, MN:

WHEREAS, M.S . 103E.801 provides for the consolidation or division of Drainage Systems; and

WHEREAS, CD 5 and Lateral 11 A to County Ditch 5 are in the process of having benefits redetermined; and

WHEREAS, both of these systems are in the same watershed boundaries; and

WHEREAS, there has been no activity on Lateral II A to CD 5 for several years; and

WHEREAS, the consolidation will provide for the efficient administration of the drainage system; and

WHEREAS, the consol idation of CD 5 and & Lateral II A to County Ditch 5 will be fair and equitable.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, as follows:

1. CD 5 and Lateral 11 A to County Ditch 5 will be considered one drainage system. 2. The Ditch Viewers will be asked to assign benefits based on this consolidated

system. a. AI,I future expenditures will be charged against the consolidated system known in the tax

system as CD 5. b. The fund balances of the rwo systems will be combined into one singular account in the

accounting systems of Brown County. c. The county will conduct a public hearing for this consolidation at the same meeting as the

landowners consider the redetermination of benefits. d. The county attorney will be directed to prepare the Findings ·of Fact and Order for this

consolidation in conjunction with the benefit redetermination.

Seconded by Commissioner Simonsen and the same being put to a vote was duly carried. This Resolution shall become effective immediately and without publication.

Adopted by the following vote: Ayes ~5,--_Nayes ---,O,--~ ~~ted'lIlis 200 day of April, 2019.

~ : _ATT¥EJ-~ Adm inis tor, Brown County

CERTIFICATION

~SJa...;:~~~~!!L!,;L.<>~"t.~_ Chairman, Brown ~ty

St . of MilineSo18 €~ty o( Biown

l. Charles Enter. duly appointed, qualified and acting County Administrator for the County of Brown. Slate of Minnesota, do hereby cenify that I Mve compared the (<>recoins copy of a Resolulion with the original minutes of the proceedings of the Board of County Commissioners, -Brown County, Minnesota, at their session held on the 2..:1 day of April, 20 19, now on file in my office. and have found the same to be eo true and correct copy Ihereof.

Witne .. my hard and offlCiol seal at New Ulm. MinnesotB, this 2'" day of April, 2019. &de ~ c..,<

CoWlt)' Administrator

M :IOFFICE\M YDOCSIPCADMN20 19IResoluboru\Res_20 19-OS AT Consolido'o" of Latentl I I A of CDS and CDS

Location of Lateral 11 A on County Ditch 05

Map created by Brown County Data from Brown County Date 5-8-2019

o 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6

Brown County Ditches

Open Ditch

Tile N

•'

. . W E

, .

s 0.8 1

Miles -- -- --

BROWN COUNTY COUNTY DITCH NO.5

Engineer's Advisory Report Redetermination of Benefits and Damages

April 26, 2019

• JONES eA HAUGH ~~ SMITH

Engineers' Surveyors

515 South Washington Ave

Albert Lea, MN 56007

507-373-4876

I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota.

STEVEN J. PENKAVA Date: April 26, 2019 Lie. No. 43895

STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF BROWN

IN THE MADER OF REDETERMINATION OF BENEFITS AND DAMAGES OF COUNTY DITCH 1\10.5 BROWN COUNTY, MINNESOTA

ENGINEER'S ADVISORY REPORT

TO THE HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS:

The undersigned Licensed Professional Engineer, Steven J. Penkava, representing Jones, Haugh & Smith Inc., Consulting Engineers, duly appointed by Order of said Board of County Commissioners, dated November 21, 2017, having qualified as provided by law and assumed the duties of the office of Engineer, would now respectfully report on the investigation and examination of said drainage system as follows:

ORDER The Brown County Board of Commissioners has determined that the original benefits or damages determined in the above drainage systems do not reflect reasonable present day land values; or that the benefited or damaged areas have changed.

HISTORY

County Ditch NO.5 (CD 5) was established in 1905. A petition to improve the ditch was filed in 1953 and later established in 1959. The project deepened the open ditch and added numerous tile laterals. The total cost of construction was $224,509.89. As part of the improvement project a lift pump and tile were constructed in the NE ~ Section 30, Home Township . The pumping station was used to pump water into Sleepy Eye Lake thus maintaining lake levels. A July 3, 1974 letter from Brown County to the City of Sleepy Eye states the City pays for normal operating and maintenance of the pumps.

The established outlet of CD 5 is into Judicial Ditch No. 30 in the NW ~ NE ~ Section 36, Prairieville Township, Brown County.

Since the original construction of CD 5, there has been substantial development of private surface and subsurface drainage systems within the watershed. There have also been numerous repairs of CD 5 over the years.

Engineer's Advisory Report Brown County Ditch No, 5

1

FINDINGS Maps of previous proceedings for CD 5 were reviewed and used to determine watershed divides and current drainage use of the system. Aerial photography, U.S. Geological Survey contour maps and other technological advances provide more accurate location of watershed divides than methods used years ago. The watershed was shown as approximately 7,143 acres on original construction maps. The current watershed is approximately 7,851 acres with 571 acres within the City of Sleepy Eye.

RIGHT-OF-WAY REQUIRED It appears right-of-way was acquired for the construction of the open ditch at the time of construction. We recommend right-of-way be purchased for the one-rod permanent grass strip.

A list of tracts for which the right-of-way is needed is listed in Exhibit B under the "RIGHT-OFWAY REQUIRED". The list contains the description of each tract, the name of the recorded owner, and the approximate area required for the one-rod permanent grass strip on either side of the ditch. The one-rod grass strip acres listed in Exhibit B are approximate. Refer to the Viewers Report for the final one-rod grass strip acres.

Damages for acquisition of the one-rod grass strip should be shown separately in the Viewer's Report.

No damages were awarded for tile construction right-of-way.

RECOMMENDATIONS Landowners should realize that no construction is proposed and that benefits determined will be the basis for future repair and maintenance of all legally established systems in the County Ditch NO.5 watershed.

Hearings should be held to consider the Viewer's Report and watershed modifications shown on Exhibit A to this report. Subject to discussions during the hearings, the Ditch Authority should adopt the Engineer's Report and the Viewer's Report as accepted or amended during these proceedings.

Exhibit A:

Exhibit B:

ATIACHMENTS Title Sheet & Watershed Map.

Right-of-way required.

Engineer's Advisory Report Brown County Ditch No.5

2

REDETERMINATION OF BENEFITS AND DAMAGES

COUNTY DITCH NO. 5

BROWN COUNTY, MN

RIGHT-OF-WAY REQUIRED

One-Rod Grass

Owner Location Pin Strip (ac)

Countll Ditch No.5 - Main O~en Ditch

Carey Seiffert NWNE 36-110-33 220.036.001.01.020 0.3 1

River Region Coop NWNE 36-110-33 220.036.001.01.010 0.31

Carey Seiffert NE NE 36-110-33 220.036.001.01.020 0.18

River Region Coop NE NE 36-110-33 220.036.001.01.010 0.18

Carey Seiffert SE SE 25-110-33 220.Q25.004.12.100 1.16

Carey Seiffert NE SE 25-110-33 220.Q25.004.12.100 1.07

Carey Seiffert SE NE 25-110-33 220.025.004.12.100 1.02

Dennis Krzmarzick NE NE 25-110-33 220.025.001.01.020 0.50

Dennis Krzmarzick NE NE 25-110-33 220.025.001.01.010 0.51

Dennis Krzmarzick SE SE 24-110-33 220.024.004.16.100 1.36

Samuel Hofman SWSE 24-110-33 220.024.004.15.090 0.29

Dennis Krzmarzick NE SE 24-110-33 220.024.004.09.110 0.98

Carey Seiffert NW SE 24-110-33 220.024.004.10.080 0.48


Ala n Krenz Tru st NWSW 19-111-33 150.019.003.12.165 1.01

Alan Krenz Trust NESW 19-111-33 150.019.003.12.165 0.43

Beverly Bartz SWSW 19-111-33 150.019.003.13.150 0.30

Beverly Bartz SWSW 19-111-34 150.019.003.13.160 0.09

Beverly Bartz SE SW 19-111-33 150.019.003.13 .160 0.27

Beverly Bartz SESW 19-111-33 150.019.003.14.170 0.59

Alan Krenz Trust SESW 19-111-33 150.019.004.10.2 10 0.03

Mark Sommerfeld NESW 19-111-33 150.019.004.10.280 0.50

Greg Bartz SE 5W 19-111-33 150.019.004.02.050 0.09

Greg Bartz SW SE 19-111-33 150.019.004.02.050 0.49

Mark Sommerfeld SW SE 19-111-33 150.019.004.10.280 0.49

Mark Sommerfeld SE SE 19-111-33 150.019.004.10.280 0.53

Mark Sommerfeld SE SE 19-111-33 150.019.004.09.200 0.39

Mark Sommerfeld NE SE 19-111-33 150.019.004.09.200 0.37

Alan Krenz Trust NE SE 19-111-33 150.019.004.10.210 0.47

Greg Bartz SE SE 19-111-33 150.019.004.02.050 0.14

Beverly Bartz sE NE 19-111-33 150.019.003.13.160 0.22

Dennis Krzmarzick SW NE 19-111-33 150.019.001.07.040 1.41

Dennis Krzmarzick SW NE 19-111-33 150.019.001.07.030 0.23

Beverly Bartz NWNE 19-111-33 150.019.001.02.020 0.23

Dennis Krzmarzick SE NW 19-111-33 150.019.002.05.130 0.11

Sharon Black NE NW 19-111-33 150.019.002.03.120 1.12

James Sommerfeld sESW 18-111-33 150.018.003.13 .050 1.00

James Sommerfeld NEsW 18-111-33 150.018.003.13 .050 1.10

Exh ibit B (1 of 2)

REDETERMINATION OF BENEFITS AND DAMAGES

COUNTY DITCH NO. S

BROWN COUNTY, MN

RIGHT-Of-WAY REQUIRED

One-Rod Grass

Owner Location Pin Strip (ac)

Coun~ Ditch No.5 - Main O~en Ditch

James Sommerfeld NWSW 18-111-33 150.018.003.13.050 0.96

Paul Nuytten NE SE 13-110-33 220.013.001.07.020 0.44

Charles Nelson NE SE 13-110-33 220.013.004.09.080 0.44

Paul Nuytten SE NE 13-110-33 220.013.001.07.020 0.08

Charles Nelson SE NE 13-110-33 220.013.004.09.080 1.23

Greg 8artz NE NE 13-110-33 220.013.001.01.010 0.08

Greg Bartz NWNE 13-110-33 220.013 .001.01.010 1.48

Ivan Kotten NE NW 13-110-33 220.013.002 .04.030 0.20

Elise Camara SWSE 12-110-33 220.012.004.07.050 0.50

Marian Johnson SE SW 12-110-33 220.012.003.11.030 0.50

Ricky Krenz NWSE 12-110-33 220.Q12.004.05.040 0.49

Marian Johnson NESW 12-110-33 220.012.003.11.030 0.72

Lynn Krenz SENW 12-110-33 220.012.002.04.040 0.74

Lynn Krenz SENW 12-110-33 220.012.002.05.020 0.75

Lynn Krenz NWNW 12-110-33 220.012.002.06.060 0.73

PDD Farms LLC NWNW 12-110-33 220.012.002.04.050 0.70

Lynn Krenz SWNW 12-110-33 220.012.002.05.020 0.25

PDD Farms LLC SWSW 1-110-34 220.001.003.13.060 0.22

Crystal Tierney Family NE NE 11-110-33 220.011.001.01.010 0.50

Crystal Tierney Family SE SE 2-110-34 220.002.004.16.100 0.73

Judith Sandman SWSE 2-110-34 220.002.004.15.090 0.77

Doug Lux NWSE 2-110-34 220.002 .004.09.080 0.32

Doug Lux SE SE 2-110-34 220.002.004.09.080 0.24

Countll Ditch No.5 - Branch 1 O~en Ditch

Carey Seiffert NWSE 24-110-33 220.024.004.10.079 0.04


Ivan Kotten SWNE 24-110-33 220.024.001.07.030 1.06

Sharon Black NWNE 24-110-33 220.024.001.01.010 1.13

Ivan Kotten NE NW 24-110-33 220.024.001.07.030 0.S9

Waldemar Harmening SE5W 13-110-33 220.013.003.11.050 0.72

SWSW 13-110-33 220.013.003.12.070 1.19

Waldemar Harmening SE SE 14-110-33 220.014.004.16.080 0.50

Jacob Kotten SE SE 14-110-33 220.014.004.15.070 0.50

Jacob Kotten SWSE 14-110-33 220.014.004.15.070 1.70

Harold Portner NW5W 14-110-33 220.014.003.13.050 1.37

Countv Ditch No.5 - Branch 7 O~en Ditch

Ivan Kotten 13-110-33 NE NW 220.013.002 .04.030 0.99

Ivan Kotten 13-110-33 NWNW 220.013.002.04.030 0.99

Exhibit B (2 of 2)

COUNTY DITCH NO.5 REDETERMINATION OF BENEFITS & DAMAGES


N

+ 2000 0 P"'I--.-

INDEX TO SHEETS

SHEET ~

rmE$HEET

2-5 WA TERSHEO MAP

"""'O_TEElI10UOill ....... ruSHED ..u"f"IOJUM4fEMf.1UOItWAretIMED ~:ou.TEOfIIIO_LW"lEItIl'OED

~DI1'C"ll'fojeetl UOAL 0f'&II orrell (_ Pro)OC'll MNI.,'IEOPeiOITctI nL..!cnCl1{PfOi'tC!)

:;~;~'nIE;'CH (HOI Pf~

""' ........ ST'IIEo\ ... QASLM CJV6HEAD ute,1IaC u~OUtO'(UPHOHE

OVBI.H£.Aorn_e nea.-OPT1CS U~ROUND ELECTRIC

"""''''''

= --_0><-... _-~

• -.-- ",-- .. -

.&.

ABBREVIAnON$

2000 .

..ICD • .10M COUNTY on at MOO·.t.u.INOfI"I9IOITCM

"OO-I"ftIY.UEOP£NOI'TOI VW-L.()III¥.WA'SiI XO-Qt03.SINO

NO R£::SP<:JISiBlUTY IS ACC[P1'[l) roR THE LOCAl1OHS OF UTlU11ES SHOWN HEREON. \I£RIflCA'1'I<»f OF ACT\IH.. LOCATIONS SHCM.D BE REQUESTED PRIOR TO T1£ Ca.tWENCENENT OF CCWSlRUC1'I(JIt OR THE TAKING CF ~y OTHm AcnOH REI.. YlNC ON T1i[ AC'NAL. LOCA nONS. THE COfClRACTOR SHAlL 1 .... EDlA m.. Y HOTFY THE ENGINEER OF ANY [lS(R[PAHOES CR YARIATION fR(JIIII PLAN.

LOCA T1aotS OF AlL Ul1.Jll[S SHDYIN ARE APPROUIA'IE. CXPHER STATE ONE-CALL: 1-800-2.52-1166

n£ SUBSURFACE U11UTY WQWATION IH THIS ~ IS uruTY OUAUTY lE\n O. TWlS UTIUTY QUAUTY l.E\fl. WAS 0ElUIrI1HED ACCOONG TO 1H[ QJIOEIJNES (F C/ASC£. 38-02. Dmnm '"STAHOARD QJIIJElJHES '01 THE CQ...1.£cnON AND ClEPtCncJ.I (F ElaSTING SUBSURFACE uruTY DATA.·

ca>"'(Jff THIS ORA_G AHD f'ORWAT ARE PR01£ClED BY COP'I'RIQH AHD ALL RIGHTS ARE RE5ER\€D. T1iE USE (F THIS DRAMoIG AHD n:RIIAT tS ST'RICllY PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE WRlT'1'DI (XWson AHO PERMlSSlCIII (F JaoIES, ttAUQi • SMITH INC.

I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THS Pl.Nf. SPECACATION. CR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY WE at I.IfOER NY DIRECT S1JP£R\49C::W AHa THAT I N4 A OOL. Y uctHSED PROFESSKJr4N.. ENGINEER lH:IER THE LAWS

;;Y;:;;.t OP):J:tl4L stewn J. Priovo

EXHIBIT A 1=-:"iO~;:t:~~r=~r=~:::-"":-~~~~::::::l!~~~l!~!I~IIIIII!!!I~r:~~~-1!r;;~:;;::;!;~;;;;;;~::~ ~. Ha~ ~~ ~~19 ~~ r-~~--+---------~~--~==~~-'--------B--R-O-VV-N--C-O-U--N-TY--,-M-N--------'-~--~

- COUNTY DITCH NO.5 ~:.= REDETERMINAT+~;L~ :~~E~TS & DAMAGES 5

o

(

CHARLES NElSON

Z20.~0(I4./~(J90

CHARLES KOTTEH

ZMO».OOI.tJI.OIO

OlIO ,

DONAlD HIRSCH

22O.DZ:10r0./ZotIO

DIOCESE OF NEW ULM

220.OJlJ.oro./~070

(I ' , I

/ , I

J r~ .J

I L __ -,

IhouId be ~ prior to the oonwn~t of ocn.t:nJotlon or the lok.,O or orry oth .. octJon "''''0 «I the oatuaI IocotIonL

GCPHElI STAlE <»IE-CAU.; 1-800-2:52-1186

L

--, ---

~ I

! I. ! rI

I'--+---+--I-'-+-~ ""I ==,_ i,j..--i--='!'II- __ J ~ ~ r

-

LEON H()f'AjAN

IMJoQ21.002.O«.MO

LEON H()f'AjAN

'~Ozr.()().J./.lOtJO

BRIAN NELSON l$O.aMotU,as.uQ

FLOYD MARl! l.5lUJM.()().J.1Z/MJ

NEONA PElIERSON

150.02rS00.l1:J.J$O

) u

BROWN COUNTY MN COUNTY DITCH NO.5 _W~A~T~ThE~R.~SHED MAP '::; OF"""""' • """"'" ..... RIEWlL. "OWE AND ED£> 1llON5I!1'S

2 OF

5

S'IL'<£SlER SPA[lH

VC1.oto.004.1t1.0tJ()

S'IL'IESlER SPAElH

2M.OTs'007.01.010

HELEN GREENBERG

~~~'~~.

CHARLENE WAU<ER

DtlOt6.otu..ID.f»O .-\

CHARlENE WAU<ER

220.OtS,otU.OII.DtIO

\ i HI~~AN ' =t=t::~ ·

SHANE HINDERMAN

_~_'AI10

..., a &-.-HORIl_ SCH.f

..... ........ .

ARNOlD HINDERMAN

2M.OII,DtJZ.04011O

S'IL 'lESlER SPAElH

na.{JfI.otJ.1'~07()

S'IL'IESlER SPA[lH

naOl4.DtJZ.O«.o.JO

- --

AIlC£ JOHNSON

VtJOtI.lJOJ. If.(JlIIJ

-r~PPROXI"'A T£ _ 1 _ _ ~~OR WA TERSHED

POD FARWS LLC .!1IIlDtl.DDI.DIIlOlO

MARIAN JOHNSON

ZZD.OfI,oo«""'OO

DEAN HOfTFloIAN

Z20.Of4.(J()t. oz.tOO

ARNOlD HINDERMAN

DaOl4.()(U.OII.06O

~APPROXl"'A T£ -. ....... ~ ORIGINAL WA TERSHED

~

\ \

' . '-. '" ...... . -

MOLL U\ilNG TR .ua.~.lOO'. a2(lJD

----4- -./

\ \ .

- \ \ -

\ \ -OEAN

HOfTFloIAN 22Q(J2,J,OOI.0l.OtO

WAlOOIAR HARWENING

t2C.Of.l0lU1ZOlO

RtO<Y KRtENZ

naMz.OO«.OJ,OJO

EUSE CAAotARA

.!1IIlOIZotU.07,OtJ()

RIO<Y KRENZ

3N1.MZOO4.OAOIID

~EBBIE

_CHRISTENSEN .t2O.Ot.lotJ.1l1.OfJ

---WAlOOIAR HARMENING

2XJ.DI,JOOJ.N.4()(J

WALDDIAR HARMENING

HQ.01.J.(J().J.II.030

IVAN KOllEN

2M 024. (){)f.07.D.JD

CHARl£S NELSON

Z2Q.Of.1004.DIIlDtJO

SHARON BLAO<

Z1(1Of.J.otH.l4.OIIO

BROI'IN CO-RURAl EL£C

22O.OH.OOI.()', fUO

SHARON BLAO<

DO.t»4.001.0l.(1fO

'\ CAREY

}-:~

~APPRO)(J"'A T£ -J. : -£X1ERIQ!!. _ WA TERSHED

- '- --_.;;::. '.,--

DEAN HDITIIAN

DENNIS KRZIIARZIO<

150.01ADOl.M. IXI

r ~ il

DE~ H2f1lI.AN

150.001.Yr 'S.ruo

/ . I I , \

\

" \ DEAN l-IOITIIAN

l$O.''<.,I!OOl,01.mo

18

BEVERLY BARTL

150.01IJ.otH.I .. DIO

\

DANIEL SEIDL

1$4"'''DDf.OI.OIO

EUCDE'

BERTRAND " 15D.0I:W.DtJZ.0Il()I(J

MARGARET BERTRAND

1$t10Q100J:IZfJ!M)

EUGENE BERTRAND

15D.OOLlOCU

----f,jA TT LUX 't$401l.00z{)f..()I(J I5Q.OI7.00205.120

" \

DENNIS MOLL

--,-~~ \ I$O.Oll.()().l/Z,I60

DIANE COfl1ELD

I5Q.OI1.otJ.lIJ.DtIO

"-I

/

JOHN BERTRAND

I~Ot7.DO.lf.J.07O

- .... - .... -

5

LARRY CHRISlENSEN

22'O.oo.IOO2.D.l0lS0

JAMES PAULSON

22O.fXUOOJ.lJ. 100

JAN HARTLEBEN

Z2Q O1QOOZo:s...", . / '

. I ( \

PAUL \ \

zm~=OJO J I I ..... '

l J

/l

ARDIE

/ \

CLARK naOl!J..OOZOMH() \ , \

JAMES PAULSON

DQ.DO.1O/H./dllO

"\

,\~ f\, ~DQ1_0'·f'O

. \

TIM SCHIEFFERT

22t1txUOI:H.DIIt"O

TIM SCHIEFFERT

22'O.00J.Q:U.1(111O

ROBERT IBBERSON

.t2I1(J1Q..OOI.OJ.{no

10 SYL\,£STER SPAETH

Z20.0IaotU.l&060

SYL\,£STER SPAETH

Z20.015.()()1. tJf.OIO

\ . ~ERG . ~ , __ .-oc...:. ~ ____ UlUffS.M:{)tJ~

CHARLES SPAETH

22O.O/4.OM.osO!!O

._'- '_ .. ". \

l j / .,.. .

HOffljAN FAMILY PRT

22'O.0l'.ooz.05.()(J()

JUDITH SANOMANN

DO.OOZotH.l!1(J11()

ARNOlD HINDERMAN

zm011.00zotJ.OII()

SYL\,£STER SPAETH

22'O.011.00J./J.Ol'D

SYL\,£STER SPAETH

zmQt"'OO2.04. DJO

AUCE JOHNSON

220.011.00::1.14.0lI0

AUCE JOHNSON

Z20.OI1.00zOJ.Q20

DOUG LUX 22'O.0I2ZfXH.0I.{J(J(J

JUDITH SANDWANN

Z2aOQZ.D04I!1/JH

DARWIN JOHNSON

Z2O. 011.00% D.t OJO

POD FARMS LLC DO,O" ./JDI.04D20

MARIAN JOHNSON

Z2Q.OII.D04'4'OO

OEAN HOfFFloIAN

22a014.001.()2. IDO

OEAN HOFFFMAN

22f).OI4.00I.U()II()

\ LYNN

KRENZ Z20.()()t.DO.l./Z,Ot1D l

LYNN KRENZ

ZM01ZIXJZIl:5.OM

LARRY KRENZ

22O.()()1.00J.11.{}40

/ /

I I

A (

I \ ....

ELISE CAMARA

22'O.OIZfX)4.01.06IJ

~-;-""'-::"':;""':;--~

15 / .--_. ----y---.......Ijii----"'I!w!!I~--------__' ,... ...... ......... -:]:,=~'OO NORBERT

KRZMARZICK 13

.00 0 I'''''l00*.-

\ DANia LENDT

22aOI$.(J(UII.{)6()

/

'-

CHARLENE WALKER

22O.01!1()()4./401J()

\

:I CHARLENE WALKER

zm015.OI:H.DlltOllO

~=:=~V~·ofoctual ~. IIhcUd b, l1IquMtld prtor to ttl, OMWn __ M' of oonlllrucUon CIT ttl, takhIJ gf _,. ~ oc:tIon nil"", _ the ~allooatI __

QOPH[R STATE ONE-CAU...: 1~2S2-lIM

ARNOlD HINDERMAN

zmO'4.(J(H..OIU}tJ()

WAlDENAR HARMENING

ZZO,OU.oo.Il2.DIO

\ I I SCHI~T

i ntlOOI.t;I(H,O$l{J(J(J

LYNN KRENZ

\. zm 012.001.01,020

\ \

"'"t ' -

RICKY KRENZ

ZIO.DIZotH,fU().)t)

R1CKY KRENZ

Z20.0IZfXH,.OI.otIO

AlBERT SCHEWE

150.()(}7.()()2.04.0IIJ0

CURTIS MOlDAN

I$O..OOAOCUIJ.lOO

_ rAPPROXlMA TE: 4. : :::lCR/@ . ~ TFRSHED ,_._.- 7- -' ,

DALE BERKNER

I I

OE~ H~AN

154007.:'r '!1DJO

I I . I

I I ~~! \ I I'!:;/~ \

\ ",;all

~

/" \

\

"' \

IlE\o£RI. Y BARTZ

I5lJ.OIf1otH,II.OISO

4 or

5

..., 0

1"'Iw.*--

34 OAR\\IN

JOHNSON t44(lH.oru;" .O«J

DONAlD J ... COB

no.OWOOl.£UO",

LARRY CHRISTENSEN

HO.QUoaztuDlJO

JAIIES P ... ULSON

Z20.DO..lDQl 1.1 100

/

--LUTHERAN CHURCH ZMOC1lOOl.a!.OJO

WOlL U\1NG TR

Z:1O.00J.DtJt.Ol,OID

0 ... \10 SCHIEFFERT

Daoo.JtJOI,07.iHO

-----1..ENUS HEJIlERSCHElOT .uo.oo.1 001.07. 06D

J ..... ES P ... ULSON

ZM.DO.lotH.lalZO

~ABRIEL • R ... SWUSSEN J' Z2I1 __ IJr.IJrO

\

TIW SCHIEFFERT

Z2Q()()J.()()4.(J«.ltD

GREG HELGET

14(lQ,BDQ2.Q!MO

0'" 'YIO SCHIEFFERT I.fO.O.BQQlGlifDtlD

0 ... \10 SCHIEFFERT lfaGt.lSDI:tl.OtI.otIO

JACOB KOTlEN

Z20.0I2Z.001tH.04O

DEAN P ... ULSON

naoaz.()().J.l.J.OIIO

JOEL -IB8ERSON Z20.D02.OCUI.J.OlO

BRlAN-ENGHOLt.I

Z2O.OQZOQl.o.ttlJO

-'JDlTH SANDIotANN

zzafJOZ.otH.l$.1JiIIO

LARRY FlSCHtR-ntlml.OOZtJ.I.tiIJO

""" !

\ I

1/ .Ii

I frO

ROBERT IBBERSON

namaOOl.Ol.(!tO

SYLVESTER SPAETH

HOfl'\IAN F ..... ILy PRT

Z20.DI1.(J02.05.otIO

I«J.tu5.DtJt.DI,DID ... ~-;;==±::::--

DENNIS OITlllENHER

lofQt.U!DtJt.QlQ1O

scon IBBERSON-=' uo.oaz.OO1.oz.MD

ANNE IBBERSONDO.ODZ.OOI. I1t.IOO

DOUG WX no.OQZ.otH.fJ«.0110

-'JDlTH SANDIotANN

Z2tJ.OM,()()4.I5.OIIO

OAR\\IN JOHNSON

Z20.0" . DI22CUOJO

T ..... AR ... DOROW KIEPER 1:MDQ200l.07.itID

POD F ARWS LLC DO.011.00I,ot/.lJI()

LYNN KRENZ

Z2Q(J()I.otlll2.MIJ

LYNN KRENZ

DQ011.DOZ.alO2O

LARRY KRENZ

ntJ,DtJt.()()J.n.04O

'- ,

\\IWAII TRESBESCH

f«J. (J.JtfJ.OOt.Ol.OI$

/

I

/

" ( , \

DON HAl£ l«l(l.Jll()()4.O«OIIO

WARY WOLDAN

1«14J1l004OQOJO

JEROIoIE WOLDAN

U4(J.JtfJ.()()4.16. IIXJ

WEL\1N WOLDAN

D4001.001.0l,010

DONAlD N ... ZARENlJS

Z2QDOI.OO1.OIltUO

\ ,

LYNN KRENZ

, Z20.0IZ.tX».OI.tuO

\

-'JOITH REIIUS

1S1.DJ'I.IXJZ.MOJO

LYNN

REliUS 1 tSl.CUI.OQZ.(¥.O«1

M ' 0 ... \10 ~ REWUS

I!JI.O.JIDO.J.II.0!J0 I

LEON SCHERER

ISI.o.n.oo.J.'4..DIID

~1.utul.

J, ~ CURTIS WOLDAN

/S1.o.:n.OO4.Is'OlO

ALBERT SCHEWE

154007.001.D4.0II0

_ rAPPROXlAlA TE :z. . -CX1CR/Q!!. ,WA TETfSH£O ........ . _.- :::::. ..... ~

BROWN COUNTY MN COUNTY DITCH NO.5

WATERSHED MAP ,!!,!:!!!.'~~,!!,Of~~

." SIt[[T

5 Of

5

REQUEST FOR ACTION Requested Board Date: Originating Department:

May 21,2019 Auditor-Treasurer Item:

PUBLIC HEARING on the ROB for CD 72 - 11:15 a.m.

Prmnter: Jean Prochniak Estimated Time: 10 Minutes

Board Action Requested:

1. Approve by Board action the Engineer's Report 2. Accept/Reject/Table the redetennined benefits and direct the county attorney to

prepare the Findings of Fact and Order Background

The viewers conducted two infOlmational meetings on this drainage system. The first was in January with the final landowner meeting held on April 17,2019. The Engineer has prepared his final report and the viewers will provide the final documents on the ROB at the public hearing.

The public hearing will proceed as follows: (Attendees are requested to sign in)

1. The Auditor-Treasurer will present affidavits of mailing, posting and publication for these hearings.

2. The board will consider by motion to accept the Engineer's report. 3. The viewers will present the final copy of the property owners and viewers

reports along with the spreadsheet that illustrates the benefits assigned to each of the parcels in the watershed.

4. CD 72 is an all tile system therefore no damages to be paid. 5. CD 72 has sufficient funds to cover the costs incurred with a ROB. Current

balance is $18,502.79. No assessment required at this time. 6. The board will accept public testimony from the landowners. 7. The Drainage Authority will vote to accept/reject/table the redetermined

benefits and direct he county attorney to prepare the Findings of Fact and Order to be approved at a future board meeting. It should be noted that landowners have 30 days to appeal from the date that the findings are recorded.

Supporting Documents [gJattached 0 none Notes:

Board Action: Motion Offered By: ____ ... _ _ ...... ___

0 Motion Seconded By:

Approved as Requested Vote by Acclamation:

0 Roll Call Vote: Yes No

Denied District 1 0 0 Tabled 0 District 2 0 0

District 3 0 0 Other 0 District 4 0 0

District 5 0 0

gbode

Typewritten Text

# 17

gbode

Oval

BROWN COUNTY COUNTY DITCH NO. 72

Engineer's Advisory Report Redetermination of Benefits and Damages

April 22, 2019

.. JONES '-HAUGH ~~ SMITH

Engineers' Surveyors

515 South Washington Ave

Albert Lea, MN 56007

507-373-4876

I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota.

STEVEN J. PEN KAVA Date: April 22, 2019 Lie. No. 43895

STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF BROWN

IN THE MAnER OF REDETERMINATION OF BENEFITS AND DAMAGES OF COUNTY DITCH NO. 72 BROWN COUNTY, MINNESOTA

ENGINEER'S ADVISORY REPORT

TO THE HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS:

The undersigned Licensed Professional Engineer, Steven J. Pen kava, representing Jones, Haugh & Smith Inc., Consulting Engineers, duly appointed by Order of said Board of County Commissioners, dated November 21,2017, having qualified as provided by law and assumed the duties of the office of Engineer, would now respectfully report on the investigation and examination of said drainage system as follows:

ORDER The Brown County Board of Commissioners has determined that the original benefits or damages determined in the above drainage systems do not reflect reasonable present day land values; or that the benefited or damaged areas have changed .

HISTORY County Ditch No. 72 (CD 72) was established in 1969 and consists entirely of subsurface tile ranging in size from 12 inches to 48 inches. The system provides drainage for the southeast Side of the City of Sleepy Eye.

The established outlet of CD 72 is into a tributary of the Cottonwood River in the SW Y. NW Y. Section 5, Stark Township, Brown County.

Since the original construction of CD 72, there has been substantial development of private surface and subsurface drainage systems within the watershed. There have also been numerous repairs of CD 72 over the years.

FINDINGS Maps of previous proceedings for CD 72 were reviewed and used to determine watershed divides and current drainage use of the system. Aerial photography, U.S. Geological Survey contour maps and other technological advances provide more accurate location of watershed divides than methods used years ago . The watershed was shown as approximately 700 acres on original construction maps. The current watershed is approximately 797 acres with 305 acres within the City of Sleepy Eye.

Engineer'$ Advisory Report Brown County Ditch No. 72

1

RIGHT-OF-WAY REQUIRED No damages were awarded for tile construction right-of-way.

RECOMMENDATIONS Landowners should realize that no construction is proposed and that benefits determined will be the basis for future repair and maintenance of all legally established systems in the County Ditch No. 72 watershed.

Hearings should be held to consider the Viewer's Report and watershed modifications shown on Exhibit A to this report. Subject to discussions during the hearings, the Ditch Authority should adopt the Engineer's Report and the Viewer's Report as accepted or amended during these proceedings.

Exhibit A: ATIACHMENTS

Title Sheet & Watershed Map.

Engineer 's Advisory Report Brown County Ditch No. 72

2

.tl'S

I

1 6 -

I

COUNTY DITCH NO. 72 REDETERMINATION OF BENEFITS & DAMAGES


~ . -

; ~

\ . I .; . ) .... - .-

J

lP " (

33

l

N

+

INDEX TO 5HEET5

.§!!Ell ~

1 TffLESHEET

2 WATERSHED MAP

AI'PIII().QlMTI!DlBltlOJlw ... tr.A~ _ . _ _

"'-O~n:"TI!ItlOAW"'EJltHlO - .. - - _ .. -Al'f'lllQAIo¥T1iClflIO_LWAfUStoa) - . - . -_OfI'CH~ ~ lEG&I,.OPfJIOffCMI_PtoJiIcfI _ ~"'fl!~onOl ___ _

ru."DlICHI~ _ ~nu: onc"r-"",""",,"fl - __ ~"'I"" ___ W""fWWAV _ •• _ _ lVIUtITIllA,M __ OASLIe _

~IUIiC,q: ----cwa..-.-.. UlCX!II0ltOlMD I~ ______ ___

aT'YlJIIIIlS - - - - -~I'MC. UNa: ---+------II-

=DTD.~ _ e _ ftKIt.()f>ncs - 00---

=:~EH~~ ~r

ABBREVlA nONS ~o · .,IUDlQAl DIITCIt eo -COO"" DflC>t .oco _,oQWI'COUNrYOJfCH 1IOO·""","~OfICH LAf-l.ArUAL u· .... _

PVJ·"",,,n

VW"\OW""'''''OI J.Ooao,o.$S&I'tQ

OII..°OUIL£T

1000 0 1000 I''''l00*- !

NO ~Sl8IUTY IS ACCEPTID FOR niE lOCA Tl~ CF UTlUlIES SHa.. HERECN, ~l1Ort Of ACTUAL l..OCAn~ SHOJlD BE REQUESTED PRWR TO 1ltE cow.WENCDlEHT r:E ~5lRIJC1I(J\I OR TI€ THONG Of AHY OTHm ACTlctl REL"I1HG ON M ACTUAL LOCATIONS. T)f[ CONTRACTOR SHH.l IMWEDlAm,.V HQWY THE DKiINEIR Of ANY OISCREPAHQES OR VARlATlCN rRa.t PlN4.

lDCAnc..S r:E AU uruncs SHO~ M.£ APPROXIU,1[. C<PHEJI STAT[ CJr£-CAU.: 1-1KJO-2$2-1166

1ltE SUBS..RFAC[ uruTY WORMAn<JIt ~ THtS P'I..Nt 1$ UlUfY OUAUTY l£\n. O. llfS UTlJTY QUAUTY l.E'tn WAS DETrRt.lMlJ ACCORDING TO 1}f[ WlOEUHES CF a/ASC£. 38-02. ENTITLED ·STAHOARO CJAOEl.NS FOR TI€ ca.u:C11ON AI«) OEPtCncJj CF ElOSTHG ~AC[ unuTY DATA:

"""""CHT lltS (JRA_G AND f'tIRIrIIAT M£ PR01'ECTED SY COP'l'RlQiT Nm AU. RIQ-ITS M£ RE5EJI'tU>, n£ USE (E THIS ORAWIG AND FORIIAT IS STRlC'n.Y PROHIBIltD WlniOUT lliE 1IIRITlDI C()NS[NT AND PERIIISSKJr4 (E JCIoIES. HAUQi a: SYni INC.

St.Mwt J. Pri.ow Uc. Ho. 43M~ Dote: -4-22-Ig

EXHIBIT A

BROWN COUNTY, MN COUNTY DITCH NO. 72

REDETERMINATION OF BENEFITS & DAMAGES TITLE SHEET

or

2

eoo !

14

IJ

DIOC[S£ OF NEW UUI

Zft1GUaoo.Jl4.0Jf')

6

' . -. '-. HAAlA ' -

~~~,~ i HAH.A Il£Wl..CIPW(J(rs l$O.D.I2tJ04. (401).

t44o.JZ.«H. /ADIO \

r o

, _ . _ . _ . "

JAMES MARn

~0!25.ODI.OI.OI5

if -- EU~..sw.,g .- "/

/ .

/ I . ---

CHARl£S ROMBERG

1!KJ.().lJ.(J(JI.01. D.1O

33 CHARl£S ROMBERG

l54dllOO.J. fl. DPa .

'-AP'PROX.WA TE ORIGINAL WA TERSHED

WALTER ROMBERG

15adllOO.J.1J,.I()()

CHARl£S ROMBERG

154OJJ.OOI,OII.()fI)

KRiENKE I£GACY LLC

150.(JZ7.00.J.1J.l.JO

CHARI£S ROMBERG

1${J.D.U.002.04.04()

I 27

JONAlHAN PElERMANN

1~DJ4.DOZ(U.(J.J()

I

3

BROWN COUNTY, MN COUNTY DITCH NO. 72

WATERSHED MAP

SI£ET

~TIOH OF BDID'TI'S • twU«S HOM( • STNiK TOWNSHIPS

2

2


Requested Board Date: 5/2112019 Originating Department: Flexibility: Brown County Human Services

Item: Presenter: Tom Henderson Claim payments Estimated time: 5 minutes

Board Action Requested: Consider payment of claims in the amount of $118,036.31. In accordance with MS 375 .12 the following claims exceed $2,000: American Engineering $2,200.00 ; Brown Co Public Health Nursing $6,000.00; CDW Government Inc. $2,043.46 ; Confidential Client $2,558.88; Confidential Client $3,007.60; Confidential Client $3,185.00; Elan Financial Services $2,208.88; Greater MN Family Services $8,490.55; MN Human Services $4,490.11 ; MN State Auditor $4,722.50; PRO Kinship For Kids $2,500.00; Sturm Funeral Home $8 ,456.00; Superior Mobility $2,956.39; Verizon Wireless $2,874.74; Two hundred twenty payments less than $2,000.00 total $62,342.20. Final total is $118,036.31 . Background:


Board Action: Approved as Requested _ _ _ Denied Tabled Other

Notations: RBAF ormat. DOC




gbode

Typewritten Text

# 18

gbode

Oval

BCHS ADMIN Board List 5/21/2019

EstlmateCl County

Vendor Name Description Cost Amount

ABClEGAL SERVICES 4/16 SERVICE FEE 18% 125.00

ABCLEGAL SERVICES 4/24 SERVICE FEE 18% 125.00





ALBACHTEN/ST ACIE 4/1 CUENT MEAL 36% 10.98

ALBACHTEN/ST ACIE 3/1-28 MILES 36% 113.68

ALBACHTEN/ST ACIE 4/2-29 MILES 36% 57.42

ALLINA HEALTH PHARMACY OVRPMT OF MA EST RECOV 0% 6.00

ALLINA HEALTH PHARMACY OVRPMT OF MA EST RECOV 0% 18.00

ALPHA WIRELESS COMMUMICA110NS APR DISPATCH FEES 0% 88.55

ALPHA WIRELESS COMMUMICA110NS MAY DISPATCH FEES 0% 88.55

AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING SHOP ADDmON SERVICES 0% 2,200.00

AMERICAN SOLUTIONS FOR BUSINESS CHECKS/SOC WELF FUND 43% 114.69

AMERICAN SOLUTIONS FOR BUSINESS CHECKS/SOC WELF FUND 36% 203.90

AM FCCl SPRING WORKSHOP/SLATER 43% 90.00

AMFCCL SPRING WORKSHOP/FILZEN 36% 90.00

ANOKA CO SHERIFF DEPT 4/10 SERVICE FEE 18% 70.00

AUTO VALUE NEW ULM #402 TAILPIPE/MUFFLER HANGER 0% 39.45

BERANEK/KEN N ETH APRIL MILES/TRANSrr 0% 99.87

BERG/HOLLY 4/3-29 MILES 36% 61.48

BJERKE/STEVE 4/1-30 MILES 36% 529.88

BLUE EARTH CO SHERIFF 5/7 SERVICE FEE 18% 65.00

BRAAM/NANCY 4/16 MILES 43% 34.80

BROWN CO HEARTLAND EXPRESS BUS TOKENS/NON SED FLEX 0% 13.00

BROWN CO RECORDER CERT BIRTH CERTIFCATES/NON SED 0% 78.00

BROWN CO RECORDER CERT BIRTH CERl1FCATE/NON SED 0% 25.00

BROWN CO RECORDER CERT BIRTH CERTIFICATES/NON SED 0% 52.00

BROWN COUNlY SHERIFF 5/10 SERVICE FEE 18% 50.00

BRUNS/ ANGELA 4/3-18 MILES 36% 65.12

CASTLEMAN/KAMI 4/1-30 MILES 36% 396.72

COW GOVERNMENT INC MS SURFACE PRO PEN 36% 78.49

1

CDW GOVERNMENT INC SURFACE PRO/SERBUS 36% 969.08

COW GOVERNMENT INC SURFACE PRO/CP POSITrON 36% 995.89

CLARK/TRACY 4/2-24 MILES 36% 130.50

COMFREY TIMES/THE 4/25 PHYS & MH SOC WRKER A 36% 15.00

COMFREY TlMES/THE 4/3 INTERMITIENT PT BUS DRVR 0% 7.50

COMPLETE COMPUTER SOLUTIONS INC RPM ANNUAL UCENSE FEE 36% 359.00

COWING/PRESTON 4/15-22 MILES 43% 148.48

DARTS DEFENSIVE DRVG/PASSENGER TRAIN 0% 160.00

DELL MARKETING LP MONITORjCP posmON 36% 324 .98

DEWANZ/CHRISTIE 3/19 MILES 43% 34.80

DIETZ/BARBARA 3/29-4/26 MILES 36% 138.04

DOMEIER/SAMANTHA 3/1-4/30 MILES 36% 46.40

DOMEIER/SAMANTHA 3/1-4/30 MILES/TRANSIT 0% 48 .72

ELAN FINANOAL SERVICES POmNG SOIL 43% 4.30

ELAN FINANOAL SERVICES CLOCK/LEAVENWORTH RM 43% 1.40

ELAN FINANOAL SERVICES AMSSA CONF LODGING/RFISCHER 43% 103.66

ELAN FINANCIAL SERVICES ELDER ABUSE TRG/COWING 43% 80.00

ELAN FINANCIAL SERVICES 4/29-5/1 LODGING SJOHNSON 43% 302.10

ELAN FINANCIAL SERVICES 5/1 LODGING/SLATER 43% 105.87

ELAN FINANOAL SERVICES 5/1 LODGING/HOLZ 43% 105.87

ELAN FINANOAL SERVICES 5/7 MONEY ORDER FEE 18% 2.50

ELAN FINANCIAL SERVICES 4/16 MONEY ORDER FEE 18% 1.25

ELAN FINANOAL SERVICES 4/23 MONEY ORDERS FEE 18% 4.20

ELAN FINANOAL SERVICES 4/15 MONEY ORDER FEE 18% 1.25




ELAN FINANCIAL SERVICES POmNG SOIL 36% 7.64

ELAN FINANOAL SERVICES CLOCK/LEAVENWORTH RM 36% 2.48

ELAN FINANCIAL SERVICES AMSSA CONF LODGING/RFISCHER 36% 184.29

ELAN FINANCIAL SERVICES ELDER ABUSE TRG/DlETZ 36% 80 .00

ELAN FINANCIAL SERVICES HOSPITAL PARKING/NON SED FLEX 0% 6.00

ELAN FINANCIAL SERVICES MEAL/MEDICAL APPMT/NON SED FLE 0% 4.50

ELAN FINANCIAL SERVICES 4/17 LAUNDRY/LICE/NON SED FLEX 0% 73.75

ELAN FINANCIAL SERVICES CLEANING SUPPLIES/LICE/NON SED 0% 77.03

ELAN FINANOAL SERVICES FUEL CARD/NON SED FLEX 0% 45 .00

ELAN FINANOAL SERVICES 5/1 LODGING/FILZEN 36% 105.87

ELAN FINANCIAL SERVICES ELDER ABUSE TRG/8RAUN 36% 80.00

2

ELAN FINANCIAL SERVICES ELDER ABUSE TRG/CFISCHER 36% 80.00

ELAN FINANCIAL SERVICES ELDER ABUSE TRG/LANGER 36% 80.00

ELAN FINANUAL SERVICES BOOK CASE/KOOP 36% 27.44

ELAN FINANUAL SERVICES BOOK SHELF/TREBESCH 36% 27.44

ELAN FINANOAL SERVICES 4/28-29 CONF LODG/TREBESCH 36% 275.58

ELAN FINANOAL SERVICES MOONDOG TICKETS/FAM FAC ACT 0% 187.50

ELAN FINANOAL SERVICES fAM FAC ACT SUPPliES 0% 6.97

ELAN FINANCIAL SERVICES TREATS/SUPPliES FAM FAC ACT 0% 8.96

ELAN FINANCIAL SERVICES 5/7 LODGING/LACOURSE 0% 129.33

ENTERPRISE NORTH MAR CAR & VAN CLEANING 36% 45.00

FISCHER/CATHY 4/1-29 MILES 36% 107.88

fISCHER/ROSELYN 3/18-4/25 MILES 43% 56.38

FISCHER/ROSELYN 4/25 PARKING 43% 1.80

FISCHER/ROSELYN 3/18-4/25 MI LES 36% 100 .22

FISCHER/ROSELYN 4/25 PARKING 36% 3.20

FORST/ROSE 5/7 MILES 43% 33.64

FORSTNER/KRISTEN 4/1-30 MILES 36% 273 .76

FORSTNER/KRISTEN 3/11-29 MA MILES 36% 245.34

FSSOLUTIONS 4/4 DRUG SCREEN 0% 52.20

GROSSMANN/STEVE APRIL MILES/TRANSIT 0% 46.98

GROSSMANN/THOMAS APRIL MILES/TRANSIT 0% 52.78

HELGET/STACY 4/5-30 MILES 36% 281 .88

HELGET/STACY 4/10 PARKING 36% 4.00

HEMPHILL-SCHMm/KIM 4/1-30 MILES 36% 200.39

HENDERSON/TOM 4/2-26 MILES 43% 89.78

HENDERSON/TOM 4/24-25 MEALS/PARKING 43% 10.33

HENDERSON/TOM 4/2-26 MILES 36% 159.62

HENDERSON/TOM 4/24-25 MEALS/PARKING 36% 18.36

HILLESHEIM/DEBRA 3/4-4/30 MILES 43% 5.22

HILLESHEIM/DEBRA 3/4-4/30 MILES 36% 9.28

HOGEN/JUUE 4/2-30 MILES 36% 140.36

HOLZ/PAUUNE 4/5-5/2 MILES 43% 104.98

HOLZ/PAULINE 5/1-2 MEALS 43% 13.09

HUHN/DEBRA 4/9 CPR/1ST AID TRAINING 0% 80.00

INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS INDEX DIV/CC 43% 12.40

INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS RUBBER FINGER PAD 43% 0.63

INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS ENVELOPES/NOTES/STAMPS 43% 20.44

INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS ENVELOPES/STNO BOOKS/T APE/CORR 43% 24 .99

3

INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS ENVELOPES/NOTES/STAMPS 43% 36 .35

INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS ENVELOPES/STNO BOOKS/TAPE/CORR 43% 44.'13

INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS RUBBER FINGER PAD 36% 1.12

INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS WIRE SORTERS/HOGEN 36% 4.54

INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS BINDERS/CC ORIENTATION 36% 12.00

INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS DRY WIPE&CORK BOARD/SCHWARZ 36% 46 .96

JOHNSON/DENNIS APRIL MILES/TRANSIT 0% 74 .82

JONES/MEREDITH 4/22 CL MEAL 36% 12.65

JONES/M EREDITH 4/1-29 MILES 36% 252.30

JONES/MEREDITH 4/2&-29 CONF MEALS 36% 29.49

JOURNALINC/THE 3/5 AD HEALTH/SHOPPER 0% 260.25

JOURNAL INC/THE 4/4 INTERMmENT PT SUS DRVR 0% 304 .05

KAMM/DENISE 3/12-4/12 MILES 36% 104.40

KEMSKE PAPER CO 8 CS WHITE COpy PAPER 36% 100.77

KEMSKE PAPER CO CLAIM FORMS 36% 41.53

KEMSKE PAPER CO BLACK MESH CHAIR/VOGEL 36% 120.60

KEMSKE PAPER CO BLACK MESH CHAIR/SHROPSHIRE 18% 335.00

KEMSKE PAPER CO CLAIM FORMS 43% 73.82

KEMSKE PAPER CO 8 CS WHITE COPY PAPER 43% 179.15

KEMSKE PAPER CO BLACK MESH CHAIRjVOGEL 43% 214.40

KEMSKE PAPER CO HEALTH & WELFARE FORMS 43% 69.70

KEMSKE PAPER CO PENS/POST IT NOTES/CORRECT/TRAN 0% 88.82



KNUJ RADIO STATION 5/1 FT SOC WRKR AD 36% 57.00

KNUJ RADIO STATION 4/18 MH/DISABTLITY SOC WRKER A 36% 57.00

KNUJ RADIO STATION APR TWINS SPONSORSHIP AD 0% 670.00

KNUJ RADIO STATION 4/4 PT BUS DRIVER AD 0% 57 .00

KNUJ RADIO STATION APR l'WINS SPONSORSHIP AD 0% 140.00

KOOP/SANDI 4/1-30 MILES 36% 43.50

KRU5E/UNUS 4/3-17 MILES 36% 41.18

KUEHN/DENISE 4/16 MILES 18% 15.08

KUSTER/JUDITH 4/23 BOARD MEETING 43% 14.40

KUSTER/JUDITH 4/23 BOARD MEETING 36% 25.60

LAB CORP OF AMERICA HOLDINGS 4/1 PATERNITY TESTING 18% 65.80

LAB CORP OF AMERICA HOLDINGS 4/16-18 PATERNITY TESTING 18% 98.70

LACOURSE/PATRICK REIMBURSE FOR KEYS 0% 6.42

LACOURSE/PATRICK 5/7 MEAL 0% 16.84

4

LANGER/LISA 4/2-30 MILES 36% 90.48

UTILE RASCALS LEARNING CENTER 4/2 DA YCARE FEES/NON SED FLEX 0% 62.50

LYON CO SHERIFF 5/13 SERVICE FEE 18% 70.00

CLIENT 5/1 LAC MECTlNG 36% 15.00

MANGEN/ROSE 4/8 MILES 0% 15.08

MESSERLI/STEVEN 4/9 MILES 0% 35.96

METRO SALES INC COPIER MAINT/INCL MAl NT 43% 466.92

MIDWEST MONITORING & SURVEILLANCE SWEAT PATCH/DRUG TESTING KITS 36% 826.59

MIDWEST MONITORING & SURVEILLANCE UA TESTING KITS 36% 132.36

MIKES COLLISION & TIRE #401 INSPECf/OIL CHG 0% 71.09

MIKES COLLISION & TIRE #301 INSPECf/OIL CHG 0% 64.49

MIKES COLLISION & TIRE !t303 TIRE REPAIR 0% 19.50

MIKES COLLISION & TIRE lt401REPL TIRES/ OIL DRAIN PLUG 0% 30.87

MIKES COLLISION & TIRE II 104 HEADLIGHT BULB 0% 20.85

MIKES COLLISION & TIRE #301 WIRE CONNECfORS/MARKER 0% 48.50

MIKES COLLISION & TIRE #301 BATIERY 0% 370.70

MILLER SELLNER IMPLEMENT INC APR BUS STORAGE 0% 135.00

MN CO INTERGOVENMENTAL TRUST DATA PRACfICES TRNG/HOGEN 36% 65.00

MN DEPT OF HEALTH REPLMT PATERNITY ADJUDICATION 18% 40.00

MN DEPT OF HEALTH CERTIFIED BIRTH CERT/NON SED F 0% 26.00

MN FRAUD INVESTIGATORS ASSN SPRING CONfERENCE/COWING 43% 175.00

MN HUMAN SERVICES FEB MF RECOVERIES 0% 152.25

MN HUMAN SERVICES FEB FS RECOVERIES 0% 738.40

MN HUMAN SERVICES JAN FS RECOVERIES 0% 1,293.10

MN HUMAN SERVICES MAR FED OFFSET FEES 18% 1,064.72

MN HUMAN SERVICES 2018 SSIS MENTOR FEES 36% 100.00

MN HUMAN SERVICES JAN GRH RECOVERIES 0% 839.64

MN HUMAN SERVICES MAR19 CCAP RECOVERIES 0% 282.00

MN HUMAN SERVICES JAN MSA RECOVERIES 0% 10.00

MN HUMAN SERVICES FEB MSA RECOVERIES 0% 10.00

MN STATE AUDITOR 1/23-4/16/19 SERVICES 43% 1,245.06

MN STATE AUDITOR 1/23-4/16/19 SERVICES 36% 2,213.44

MOH R/ELIZABETH 4/23 BOARD MTG/MILES 43% 12.53

MOHR/ELIZABETH 4/23 BOARD MEETING 43% 14.40

MOHR/ELIZABETH 4/23 BOARD MTG/MILES 36% 22.27

MOHR/ELIZABETH 4/23 BOARD MEETING 36% 25.60

MRCI #401 BUS WASHES 0% 14.08


5


MRCI # 104 BUS WASHES 0% 14.08



NAPA AUTO PARTS #402 MINITURE BULBS 0% 5.38



NAPA AUTO PARTS #305 MINlTURE BULBS 0% 5.38


NELSON/LORI 4/1-25 MILES 36% 146.16

NELSON/LORI 4/28-30 CONF MILES 36% 301.60

NELSON/LORI 4/28-30 CONF MEALS 36% 38.36

NEOPOST USA INC 6/1-8/31 POSTAGE MTR RENT/MAIN 43% 58.32

NEOPOST USA INC 6/1-8/31 POSTAGE MTR RENT/MAIN 36% 103.68

NESVOLD/JACL YN 4/11-5/10 MILES 36% 220.98

NEW ULM BODY SHOP #305 REAR BUMPER REPAIR 0% 198.13

NORTH CENTRAL BUS SALES #402 LED AMBER BULBS 0% 7.47





NUVERA TELEPHONE SERV/SE OFFICE 43% 26.49

NUVERA TELEPHONE SERV /SE OFFICE 36% 47.10

NUVERA PHONE/CABLE/INTERNET BOC 0% 206.13

NUVERA TELEPHONE SERVjTRANSrr 0% B.88

NUVERA TELEPHONE SERVjTRANSrr EXP 0% 27.50

OAK HILLS LIVING CTR MA EST RECOV OVRPMT 0% 397.79

OAK HILLS LIVING CTR MA EST RECOV OVRPMT 0% 1,193.35

OLD LOG THEATRE 7/1B PLAY llCKETS/fAM FAC ACT 0% 120.00

PENKERT/KAl1E 3/26 CL MEAL 36% 5.90

PENKERT/KATIE 4/9-29 MILES 36% 48.14

PENKERT/KATIE 3/5-27 MILES 36% 208.22

CLIENT MA EST RECOV OVRPMT 0% 382.70

CUENT MA EST RECOV OVRPMT 0% 1,148.10

PINNACLE MARKmNG GROUP DIRECTORY ADVERTISING/TRANSIT 0% 125.40

POULSON/RICHARD APRIL MILES/TRANSIT 0% 254.62

PREMIER BIOTECH INC UA TESTING KITS 36% 237.50

PRINTWEAR GRAPHICS SHIRT EMBROIDERY 0% 54 .00

6

QUICK MART 4/23 FUEL PURCH/NON SED FLEX 0% 30 .00

QUICK MART 4/24 FUEL PURCH/NON SED FLEX 0% 30 .00

CLIENT 5/1 LAC MEETING 36% 15.00

RIVER BEND BUSINESS PRODUcrS APR COPIER MAlNT/FRONT DESK 43% 11.02

RIVER BEND BUSINESS PRODUcrS MAY COPIER MAINT/FRONT DESK 43% 11 .02

RIVER BEND BUSINESS PRODUerS COPIER MAINT/MAIL RM 43% 40 .29

RIVER BEND BUSINESS PRODUerS COPIER MAINT/N-D 18% 98 .98

RIVER BEND BUSINESS PRODUcrS MAY COPIER MAINT/FRONT DESK 36% 19.60

RIVER BEND BUSINESS PRODUcrS APR COPIER MAlNT/FRONT DESK 36% 19.60

RIVER BEND BUSINESS PRODUcrS COPIER MAlNT/MAIL RM 36% 71.62

RIVER BEND BUSINESS PRODUcrS COPIER MAINT/TRANSlT 0% 66.26

ROYAL TIRE INC REPLMT WHEEL/ALIGNMENT/BLUE FU 36% 419.01

ROYAL TIRE INC OIL CHG/FILTER/BLUE FUSION 36% 27.01

ROYAL TIRE INC 4 TIRES/OIL CHANGE WH FUSION 36% 430.08

ROYAL TIRE INC 4 TIRES/BALANCE BLUE FUSION 36% 402.20

RU NNINGS-MARSHALL OFFICE KEYS/TRANSrr 0% 11.25

RVS SHREDDING 65 GALLON CAN/SHREDDING CA8INE 43% 19.80

RVS SHREDDING 65 GALLON CAN/SHREDDING CA8INE 36% 35.20

SCHROEDER/THERESA 4/10-12 MILES 43% 30.16

SCHROEDER/THERESA 4/25 MILES 43% 104.40

SCHROEDER/THERESA 5/8 MILES 43% 15.08

SCHUELKE/ ANNE PET CARRIER/NON SED FLEX 0% 28.52

SCHUELKE/ANNE CAT LmER/NON SED FLEX 0% 4.07

SCHUELKE/ANNE 3/26 CLIENT MEAL/NON SED FLEX 0% 7.40

SCHUELKE/ANNE 2/25-27 MILES 36% 69.60

SCHUELKE/ANNE 3/1-29 MILES 36% 114.26

SCH UGEL/KALLIE 4/3-30 MILES 36% 316.68

SCHWAB/STEPHANI E 4/1-30 MILES 36% 238.96

SENECA CENTER 2 FAM FINDING SEARCHES/NON SED 0% 50.00

SERBUS/MARY LOU 4/1-30 MILES 36% 351.48

SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP ACROBAT LICENSE/RADEL 36% 375.00

SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP 2019 WINDOWS/CP PosmON 36% 268.00

SIBLEY CO SHERIFF 4/4 SERVICE FEE 18% 50.00

SIOUX TRAILS MENTAL HEALTH erR 4/9 CLINICAL SPRVSN 36% 160.00

SLA TER/ ALESIA 4/9-5/2 MILES 43% 129.17

SLA TER/ ALESIA 5/1 MEAL 43% 22.54

SLEEPY EYE HERALD DISPATCH 4/22 FT PHYS/MH SOC WRKR AD 36% 78.30

SLEEPY EYE HERALD DISPATCH 5/2 FT CP SOC WRKR AD 36% 63 .90

7

SLEEPY EYE HERALD DISPATCH 6/11/18 PHY/MH SOC WRKR AD 36% 87.90

SLEEPY EYE HERALD DISPATCH 6/25/18 FT AMH SOC WRKR AD 36% 71.50

SLEEPY EYE HERALD DISPATCH 4/1 INTERMmENT PT BUS DRVR 0% 55.50

SMITH/BRIAN 4/1-25 MILES 36% 59.74

SPRINGFIELD ADVANCE PRESS 4/26 FT CP SOC WRKR AD 36% 26.80

SPRINGFIELD ADVANCE PRESS 4/24 FT PHYS/MH SOC WRKR AD 36% 40.20

SPRINGFIELD ADVANCE PRESS 4/3 INTERMmENT PT BUS DRVR 0% 26.80

STURM FUNERAL HOME 5/9 BURIAL SERVICES 100% 4,000.00



CLIENT 5/1 LAC MEmNG 36% 15.00

TREBESCH/DANNA 4/1-29 MILES 36% 193.14

TREBESCH/DANNA 4/28-29 CONF MEALS 36% 43.26

VAN HEE MEDIA L.L.C 4/25 PHYS/MH SOC WRKR AD 36% 51.00

VAN HEE MEDIA LL.C 4/4 INTERMmENT PT BUS DRVR 0% 33.30

VERIZON WIRELESS SMART PHONES ADMIN 7265 PHN 51.55

VERIZON WIRELESS HOT SPOTS 4033403941896804 PHN 140.04

VERIZON WIRELESS HOT SPOTS 4890 4034 4036 PHN 105.03

VERIZON WIRELESS SMART PHONE 1660 6596 1180 PHN 154.65

VERIZON WIRELESS SMART PHONE 6596 PHN 51.55

VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONE 6174 PHN 51.55

VERIZON WIRELESS HOT SPOTS 4813 4038 PHN 70.02

VERIZON WIRELESS SMART PHONE 9621 6173 3933 038 PHN 309.30

VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONE SERV ISS SPVRS 36% 104.43

VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONE SERV ISS 36% 1,504.68

VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONE SERV/AMHI 36% 155.98

VERIZON W1RELESS TABLET & CELL PHONE SERV 0% 175.96

CLIENT 5/1 LAC MEmNG 36% 15.00

CLIENT REV RECAPTURE OVRPMT 0% 64.28

WINTERS/JENNIFER 4/1-30 MILES 36% 144.42

WOLF/DAVID A 4/6-9 MILES 0% 160.08

WOLF/DAVID A 3 UNIFORM PANTS 0% 104.97

TOTAL 50,678.41

8

BCHS Collaborative Board List

ALL 0% COUNTY COST

Vendor Name

BROWN CO HUMAN SERVICES

BROWN CO HUMAN SERVICES

BROWN CO PUBLIC HEALTH NURSING

BROWN CO PUBLIC HEALTH NURSING

GREATER MN FAMILY SERVICES







MN STATE AUDITOR

MN STATE AUDITOR

PRO KINSHIP FOR KIDS

Description

COlLAB ACeT 3/1-4/25/19

COLlAS ACCT 3/1-4/25/19

MAR UC GRANT

APR UC GRANT

APR COlLAS COORDINATOR SERV

MAY COlLAS COORDINATOR SERV

MAY COLLAS COORDINATOR SERV

APR COlLAB COORDINATOR SERV

APR CONTRACTED SERV/FGDM

MAR CONTRACTED SERV/RIESER

APR CONTRACTED SERV/RIESER

1/23-4/16/19 SERVICES/lCTS

1/23-4/16/19 SERVICES/leTS

MAY MENTOR PROGRAM

5/21/2019

Amount

313.92

313.91

3,000.00

3,000.00

687.50

687.50

687.50

687.50

2,000.00

1,836.27

1,904.28

632.00

632.00

2,500.00

TOTAL 18,882.38

BCHS MA Board list 5/21/2019

ALL 0 0/0 COUNTY COST

Vendor Name Description Amount CUENT APR MED INS PREM 123.74

CLlENT 4/1 MA MEALS 13.00

CUENT 4/1 MA MILES 20.24

CLIENT MAY MED PART B PREM 135.50

CLlENT MAY MED PART B PREM 135.50

CLIENT MAR MED PART B PREM 135.50

CLIENT APR MED PART B PREM 135.50


CLIENT APR MED INS PREM 212.58

CLlENT APR MED INS PREM 599.24



CLlENT JAN MED INS PREM 163.59

CLIENT fEB MED INS PREM 163.59

CLlENT MAR MED INS PREM 163.59

CUENT APR MED INS PREM 163.59

CLlENT JAN MED INS PREM 13.86

CLIENT FEB MED INS PREM 13.86

CLIENT MAR MED INS PREM 13.86


CLIENT 4/3 MA MILES 47.08

CLIENT 4/24 MA MILES 16.50 CLIENT 4/18 MA MILES 16.50

CLIENT MAR MED PART B PREM 135.50

CUENT APR MED PART B PREM 135.50

CllENT MAY MED PART B PREM 135.50

BROWN CO HEARTLAND EXPRESS 4/16 MA MILES 9.00


BROWN CO hlEARTLAND EXPRESS 4/2 MA MILES 9.00


BROWN CO hlEAIR"JLAND EXPRESS 4/4 MA MILES 9.00 BROWN CO hlEARTLAND EXPRESS 4/25 MA MILES 9.00 BROWN CO HEARTLAND EXPRESS 4/24 MA MILES 4.50

BROWN CO HEARTlLAND EXPRESS 4/17 MA MILES 9.00





1

BROWN CO HEARTLAND EXPRESS 4/11 MA MILES 4.50 BROWN CO HEARTLAND EXPRESS 4/9 MA MILES 4.50 BROWN CO HEARTLAND EXPRESS 4/4 MA MILES 9.00 BROWN CO HEARTLAND EXPRESS 4/15 MA MILES 9.00 BROWN CO HEARTLAND EXPRESS 4/18 MA MILES 9.00 BROWN CO HEARTLAND EXPRESS 4/24 MA MILES 9.00 BROWN CO HEARTLAND EXPRESS 4/2 MA MILES 4.50 BROWN CO HEARTLAND EXPRESS 4/23 MA MILES 4.50 BROWN CO HEARTLAND EXPRESS 4/29 MA MILES 9.00 BROWN CO HEARTLAND EXPRESS 4/19 MA MILES 4.50 BROWN CO HEARTLAND EXPRESS 4/15 MA MILES 9.00 BROWN CO HEARTLAND EXPRESS 4/26 MA MILES 4.50 BROWN CO HEARTLAND EXPRESS 4/23 MA MILES 9.00 BROWN CO HEARTLAND EXPRESS 4/24 MA MILES 26.10 BROWN CO HEARTLAND EXPRESS 4/23 MA MILES 38.86 BROWN CO HEARTLAND EXPRESS 4/16 MA MILES 38.86 CLlENT 4/9 MA MILES 12.76 CUENT 4/23 MA MILES 12.76 CLIENT MAR MED INS PREM 385.00 CLIENT APR MED INS PREM 385.00 CLIENT MAY MED PART B PREM 135.50 CLlENT MAR MED INS PREM 310 .72 CUENT APR MED INS PREM 310.72 CUENT APR MED INS PREM 669.36 CLIENT 4/3 MA MILES 6.93 CLIENT 4/10 MA MILES 6.93 CLIENT 4/29 MA MILES 6.93 CLIENT 4/15 MA MILES 6.93 CUENT 4/17 MA MILES 6.93 CUENT 4/24 MA MILES 6.93 CUENT 4/12 MA MILES 6.93 CLlENT 4/5 MA MILES 6.93 CLIENT 4/19 MA MILES 6.93 CLIENT 4/26 MA MILES 6.93 CLlENT 4/1 MA MILES 6.93 CLlENT 4/8 MA MILES 6.93 CUENT 4/22 MA MILES 6.93 CLIENT 3/9 MA PARKING 11.00 CLIENT 3/22 MA PARKING 23 .00 CLIENT APR MED INS PREM 134.92 CUENT MAY MED PART B PREM 135.50 CUENT APR MED INS PREM 193.96 CUENT 4/15 MA MILES 13 .20 CUENT 4/30 MA MILES 13.20 CLIENT 4/29 MA MILES 13.20

2

CLIENT MAY MEO PART B PREM 135.50



CLIENT APR MEO INS PREM 446.52

CLIENT APR MEO INS PREM 539.42.

CLIENT MAR MEO INS PREM 269.71







CLIENT MAY MEO PART 8 PREM 135.50






CLIENT APR MED PART B PREM 135.50 CLIENT APR MED PART B PREM 135.50




HABILITATIVE SERVICES INC 3/19 MA MILES 31.24

HABILITATIVE SERVICES INC 4/25 MA MILES 26.18




CLIENT MAY MED PART B PREM 135.50 CLIENT APR MEO PART B PREM 135.50



CLIENT 3/22 MA MILES 14.52 CLIENT 3/7 MA MILES 13.86 CLIENT 3/26 MA MILES 15.18


CLIENT 2/18 MA MILES 13.86 CLIENT APR MED INS PREM 588.64 CLIENT APR MED INS PREM 80.00 CLIENT APR MED INS PREM 670.76 CLIENT 4/5 MA MILES 13.20




3


CLIENT 4/12 MA MILES 13 .20

CLIENT APR M ED INS PREM 531.94


CLIENT MAY MED INS PREM 179.15



KATO CAB LLC 4/1 MA MILES/2 BASE 22.00

KATO CAB LLC 4/1 MA MILES 75.40

KATO CAB l LC 4/4 MA MILES/2 BASE 22.00

KATO CAB LLC 4/4 MA MI LES 75.40

KATO CAB LLC 4/8 MA MILES/2 BASE 22 .00





KATO CAB lLC 4/15 MA MILES 75.40

KATO CAB LlC 4/19 MA MILES/2 BASE 22 .00


KATO CAB lLC 4/23 MA MILES/2 BASE 22.00




KATO CAB LLC 4/25 MA MILES/3 BASE 33 .00






CUENT APR MED INS PREM 275.00














CLIENT 3/26 MA MILES 1.10 CLIENT 11/9 MA MI LES 1.37

4








CLIENT 4/22. MA MILES 14.74






































5



CLIENT 1/8 MA MI LES 13 .86





















CUENl 1/31 MA MILES 0.27

ClIEN! 4/18 MA MILES 1.37




CL[ENT 3/11 MA MILES 0.27

CL1ENT 10/19 MA MILES 37.40

CL1ENT 4/19 MA MILES 1.10

Cl.[ENT 4/29 MA MILES 14.74

Cl.[ENli 3/28 MA MILES 0.27








CLliENf 4/9 MA MIlIES 1.10

ClJ.ENr 1/3 MA MILES 0.27




6


CLIENT DEC MED INS PREM 71.18

CLIENT JAN MED INS PREM 71.18 CLIENT FEB MED INS PREM 71.18

CLIENT 12/8 MA LODGING 50.00

CLIENT 12/5-12 MA MEALS 19.00

CLIENT 12/5-12 MA MILES 52.80


CLIENT 12/5-12 MA PARKING 5.00

CLIENT APR MED INS PREM 421.94 CLIENT 4/17 MA MILES 6.43



CLIENT APR MED PART B PREM 135.50



CLIENT APR MED INS PREM 355.60 CLIENT APR MED INS PREM 576.60




CLIENT 4/25 MA MEALS 6.50 CLIENT 4/25 MA MILES 45.76

CLIENT DEC MED INS PREM 271.44

CLIENT JAN MED INS PREM 271.44

CLIENT FEB MED INS PREM 271.44


CLIENT APR MED INS PREM 271.44 CLIENT MAY MED PART B PREM 135.50



CLIENT MAY MED INS PREM 124.63 CLIENT NOV MED INS PREM 390.00 CLIENT DEC MED INS PREM 390.00

CLIENT JAN MED INS PREM 390.00

CLIENT FEB MED INS PREM 390.00 CLIENT MAR MED INS PREM 585.00

CLIENT APR MED INS PREM 325.00 CLIENT 2/11 MA MILES 44.44


CLIENT APR MED INS PREM 534.74 CLIENT 4/22 MA MILES 12.76 CLIENT 2/19 MA MI LES 5.94



7











CLIENT 1/22 MA MILES 12.76 CLIENT MAY MED PART B PREM 135.50

CLIENT MAY M ED PART B PREM 135.50

CLIENT MAY MED PART 8 PREM 135.50

CLIENT APR MED INS PREM 410 .82

CLIENT MAY MED PART B PREM 135.50 CLIENT APR MED INS PREM 425.20


READY TO RIDE TRANSPORTATION LLC 2/13 MA MILES/2 BASE 22.00

READY TO RIDE TRANSPORTATION LLC 2/13 MA MILES 39.00

READY TO RIDE TRANSPORTATION LLC 2/18 MA MILES/2 BASE 22.00 READY TO RIDE TRANSPORTATION LLC 2/18 MA MILES 83.20







CLIENT MAY MED PART B PREM 135.50 CLIENT APR MED PART B PREM 135.50



CLIENT MAY MED PART B PREM 135.50 CLIENT APR MED INS PREM 1,106.14 CLIENT MAY MED PART B PREM 135.50










8






































SUPERIOR MOBILI1Y 4/2 MA MILES 29.25

SUPERIOR MOBILI1Y 4/12 MA MILES/2 BASE 26.00



SUPERIOR MOBILITY 4/2 MA MILES 152.10




9

SUPERIOR MOBIUTY 4/16 MA MILES 152 ,10 SUPERIOR MOBILITY 4/23 MA MILES/2 BASE 26.00 SUPERIOR MOBILITY 4/23 MA MILES 153.40 SUPERIOR MOBILITY 4/30 MA MILES/2 BASE 26.00 SUPERIOR MOBILITY 4/30 MA MILES 152.10 SUPERIOR MOBILITY 4/17 MA MILES/2 BASE 26.00 SUPERIOR MOBILITY 4/17 MA MILES 260 .00 SUPERIOR MOBILITY 4/24 MA MILES/2 BASE 26.00 SUPERIOR MOBIUTY 4/24 MA MILES 43.88 SUPERIOR MOBILITY 4/24 MA MILES 43.88 SUPERIOR MOBILITY 4/1 MA MILES/2 BASE 26.00 SUPERIOR MOBILITY 4/1 MA MILES 65.81 SUPERIOR MOBILITY 4/1 MA MILES 65.81 SUPERIOR MOBILITY 4/1 MA MILES/BASE 13 .00 SUPERIOR MOBIUTY 4/1 MA MILES 1.30 SUPERIOR MOBIUTY 4/9 MA MILES/2 BASE 26.00 SUPERIOR MOBILITY 4/9 MA MILES/2 BASE 314.60 SUPERIOR MOBILITY 4/23 MA MILES/2 BASE 26.00 SUPERIOR MOBIliTY 4/23 MA MILES 64.35 SUPERIOR MOBIUTY 4/23 MA MILES 64.35 SUPERIOR MOBILITY 4/23 MA MILES/BASE 13.00 SUPERIOR MOBILITY 4/23 MA MILES 1.30 SUPERIOR MOBILITY 4/30 MA MILES/2 BASE 26.00 SUPERIOR MOBIUTY 4/30 MA MILES 323.70 SUPERIOR MOBILITY 4/3 MA MILES/BASE 13.00 SUPERIOR MOBILITY 4/3 MA MILES 21.94 SUPERIOR MOBILITY 4/8 MA MILES/2 BASE 26.00 SUPERIOR MOBILITY 4/8 MA MILES 19.01 SUPERIOR MOBILITY 4/8 MA MILES 20.48 SUPERIOR MOBILITY 4/15 MA MILES/2 BASE 26.00 SUPERIOR MOBIUTY 4/15 MA MILES 20.48 SUPERIOR MOBILITY 4/15 MA MILES 20.48 SUPERIOR MOBILITY 4/19 MA MILES/2 BASE 26.00 SUPERIOR MOBILITY 4/19 MA MILES 20.48 SUPERIOR MOBILITY 4/19 MA MILES 21.94 SUPERIOR MOBILITY 4/2 MA MILES/2 BASE 26.00 SUPERIOR MOBILITY 4/2 MA MILES 29.25 CLIENT MAR MED INS PREM 189.36 CLIENT APR MED INS PREM 189.36 CUENT APR MED INS PREM 134.92 CLIENT MAY MED INS PREM 134.92 CLIENT MAR MED INS PREM 134.52 CLIENT APR MED INS PREM 269.04 CLIENT APR MED I NS PREM 217.26 CLIENT MAR MED INS PREM 108.63

10

CLIENT 2/6 MA MILES 150.80 CUENT APR MED INS PREM 417.82 CUENT 4/17 MA MILES 6.93 CUENT 5/1 MA MILES 6.93 CUENT 4/24 MA MILES 6.93 CUENT 4/12 MA MILES 6.93

CUENT APR MED INS PREM 255.00 CUENT OCT MED INS PREM 876.67 CUENT JAN MED INS PREM 353.60 CUENT MAR MED INS PREM 24.00

CUENT AUG MED INS PREM 876.66 CUENT SEPT MED INS PREM 876.67

CUENT JUN MED INS PREM 455.00 CLIENT JUL MED INS PREM 455.00 CUENT AUG MED INS PREM 455.00 CUENT SEPT MED INS PREM 455.00

CUENT ocr MED INS PREM 455.00

CUENT NOV MED INS PREM 455.00 CLIENT DEC MED INS PREM 455.00 CUENT 2/19 MA MILES 45.76

TOTAL 48,475.52

11


Requested Board Date: 5-21-2019 Originating Department: Flexibility: No Human Services

Item: Closed Session for Social Services Presenter: Human Services Director Payments Tom Henderson

Estimated Time: 5 minutes

Board Action Requested:

Convene Closed Session to consider payment of Social Services payments to vendors. Amount will be provided at meeting.

Background:

Listing will be distributed at meeting; session will be aUdiotaped.



Notations: RBAssclaims.docx

Supporting Documents:



Attached x None

gbode

Typewritten Text

# 19

gbode

Oval


Requested Board Date: 5-21-2019 Originating Department: Flexibility: Yes Administration

Item: April 2019 Budget Report Presenter: Charles Enter, Co. Admin. Estimated Time: 5 minutes

Board Action Requested: Accept and file the April 2019 Budget Report (Cash Basis and Unaudited) which reflects activity at 33.3% of the budget year as follows: expenditures of $10,410,888.45 or 27.9%, and revenues of $6,043,110.07 or 18.3%; and the April 2019 Supplemental Budgets Report noting expenditures of $980,226.76 or 47.4%, and revenues of $400,851.92 or 20.5% of annual budgeted activity.

Background: Pages 1-3 include the 2019 Budget Funds, with the first 212 pages being the individual departments that are included in the Revenue Fund. Page 3 lists totals by fund for all 2019 Budget Funds.

Page 4 lists the April 2019 activity summary for the Supplemental Budgets.

Page 5 is a comparison of the monthly budget activity relative to recent budget years.

Page 6 is a summary of the outstanding buffer loans as of 4-30-2019 as provided by the AuditorTreasurer 's Office for the County Board ' s information.

cc: Department Heads (by email)



Notations: RBAApnnobudrep.docx

Supporting Documents: x Attached None

~.&J~y 14,2019 Motion Offered By Motion Seconded By Vote By Acclamation Roll Call Vote


gbode

Typewritten Text

# 20

gbode

Oval

BROWN COUNTY 2019 BUDGET REPORT (Cash Basis & Unaudited) Page 1 Per Cent of Yr: 33.3

Selected Months: April 2~19 Current 1 month's Selected 2019 %of Month's %ofYr Months Budget Budget .. 1----

Department Total 8.3% Total 01-00 I Commissioners Rev.: $ - $ - $ -

Exp.: $ 16,876.03 6.1% $ 89,409.59 $ 275,420.00 32.5% Net: $ 16,876.03 6.1% $ 89,409.59 $ 275,420.00 32.5%

01-0 II Court Administration Rev.: $ - $ - $ -Exp.: $ 6,109.99 4.8% $ 40,913 .34 $ 126,139.00 32.4% Net: $ 6,1 09.99 4.8% $ 40,913 .34 $ 126,139.00 32.4%

01-044 Public Examiner Rev. : $ · $ · $ 550.00 Exp.: $ 3,355.75 5.6% $ 3,355.75 $ 60,000.00 5.6% Net: $ 3,355.75 5.6% $ 3,355.75 $ 59,450.00 5.6%

01·045 A ud i tor-Treasurer Rev.: $ 1,125.80 0.9% $ 29,354 .52 $ 120,547.00 24.4% Exp.: $ 53,065 .78 7.7% $ 221 ,494.81 $ 691 905.00 32.0% Net: $ 51,939.98 9.1% $ 192,140.29 $ 571 ,358.00 33.6%

~--,

01 ·060 Information Services Rev.: $ 901.50 12.9% $ 2,574.00 $ 7,000.00 36.8% Exp.: $ 49, 163.65 8.5% $ 202,303.62 $ 580,569.00 34.8% Net: $ 48262.15 8.4% $ 199,729.62 $ 573 ,569.00 34.8%

01-061 Administration Rev. : $ - $ · $ · --Exp. : $ 16,945 .93 8.0% $ 68,991.91 $ 211,654.00 32.6% Net: $ 16,945.93 8.0% $ 68,991.91 $ 211,654.00 32.6%

01·062 Elections Rev.: $ · $ · $ · Exp. : $ 3 15.13 1.7% $ 9,738.01 $ 18,850.00 51.7%

Net: $ 315.13 1.7% $ 9,738.01 $ 18,850.00 51.7%

01-063 Personnel Rev. : $ · $ · $ · - .. .. -

Exp.: $ 25,053.45 8.9% $ 96,642 .82 $ 281,441.00 34.3%

Net: $ 25,053.45 8.9% $ 96,642.82 $ 281,441.00 34.3%

--- Rev.: 01·090 County Attorney $ 4,52?.:!>6 $ 14,430.30 $ 44,200.00

Exp. : $ 48,033.32 7.7% $ 194,670.23 $ 622,824.00 31.3%

Net : $ 43,503.66 7.5% $ 180,239.93 $ 578,624.00 31.1%

.. _-_._ -01·100 County Recorder Rev.: $ 89,858.09 24.9% $ 121 ,686.83 $ 360,400.00 33.8%

Exp.: $ 30,784.36 6.3% $ 155,922.42 $ 491 ,754.00 31.7% (Note: CREDIT NET) Net: $ (59,073.73) ·45.0% $ 34,235.59 $ 131,354.00 26.1%

01-101 County Assessor Rev.: $ 30,287.75 16.6% $ 55,Q'!!}.25 $ 181,968.00 30.3%

Exp. : $ 50,514.28 8.7% $ 183,135.92 $ 577,460.00 31.7%

Net: $ 20,226.53 5.1% $ 128,052.67 $ 395,492.00 32.4%

01·107 Planning & ~oning Rev.: $ 2,180.44 1.5% $ 59,458.21 $ 142,840.00 41.6%

Exp.: $ 12,275.61 7.3% $ 43,~99. 3 8 $ 167,502.00 26.2%

(Note: CREDIT NET' Net: $ 10,095.17 40.9% $ (15,558.83) $ 24,662.00 -63.1%

01-110 Government Buildings Rev.: $ 12,030.68 8.3% $ 48,493.69 $ 145,197.00 33.4% Exp.: $ 43,917.57 6.8% $ 215,519.94 $ 643,117.00 33.5%

Net: $ 31,886.89 6.4% $ 167,026.25 $ 497,920.00 33.5%

Per Cent ofYr: 33.3

Current I month's Selected 2019 %of Month's % ofYr Months Budget Budget

Department Total 8.3% Total 01- 120 Veterans Services Rev.: $ - 0.0% $ - $ 10,000.00 0.0%

f-. Exp.: $ 10,364.80 7.4% $ 42,401.23 $ 139,199.00 30.5% Net: $ 10,364.80 8.0% $ 42,40!.23 $ 129,199.00 32.8%

01-123 Veterans Hospital Shuttle Rev.: $ 660.00 4.6% $ 1,913.91 $ 14,212.00 13.5% Exp.: $ 1,038.26 7.3% $ 3,879.46 $ 14,212.00 27.3% Net: $ 378.26 $ 1,965.55 $ -

01-141 License Bureau Rev.: $ 29,367.81 8.8% $ 116,215.42 $ 332,240.00 35.0% Ex_p.: $ 19,053.74 6.9% $ 81,976.70 $ 278,124.00 29.5%

(Note: CREDIT NET) Net: $ (10,314.07) 19.1% $ (34,238.72) $ (54,116.00) 63.3%

01-149 Intergov'tal Budgeted Rev.: $ 46,346.69 0.5% $ 213,062.76 $ 9,653,169.00 2.2% Exp.: $ 890.10 0.3% $ 65,918.77 $ 302,672.00 21.8%

(Note: CREDIT NET) Net: $ ( 45,456.59) 0.5% $ (147,143.99) $ _(9,350,497.00) 1.6%

01-200 Sheriff Rev.: $ 9,206.75 5.5% $ 22,922.61 $ 168,162.00 13.6% Exp.: $ 181 709.28 7.5% $ 836,784.21 $ 2,429,305.00 34.4% Net: $ 172,502.53 7.6% $ 813,861.60 $ 2,261,143.00 36.0% --

01-201 Boat & Water Safety Rev.: $ - 0.0% $ - $ 7,516.00 0.0% Exp.: $ - 0.0% $ 535.00 $ 7,516.00 7.1% Net: $ - $ 535.00 $ -

01-206 Emergency Medical Services Rev.: $ - $ - $ -Exp.: $ - 0.0% $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 100.0% Net: $ - $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00

01-221 County Coroner Rev.: $ - $ - $ -Exp.: $ 5,015.75 41.8% $ 11,575.50 $ 1~,000.00 96.5% Net: $ 5,015.75 41.8% $ 11,575.50 $ 12,000.00 96.5%

01-250 Jail Rev.: $ 17,175.68 20.0% $ 50,758.64 $ 85,700.00 59.2% Exp.: $ 141,894.61 8.9% $ 597,128.81 $ 1,585,759.00 37.7% Net: $ 124,718.93 8.3% $ 546,370.17 $ 1,500,059.00 36.4% _.

01-251 Probation Rev.: $ 16,110.86 2.7% $ 143,244.62 $ 593,203.00 24.1% Exp.: $ 114,777.92 6.3% $ 573,592.10 $ 1,825,580.00 31.4% Net: $ 98,667.06 8.0% $ 430,347.48 $ 1,232,377.00 34.9%

01-280 Emergency Services Rev.: $ - 0.0% $ 22,370.18 $ 21,546.00 103.8% Exp.: $ 10,401.73 16.7% $ 24,172.32 $ 62,128.00 38.9% Net: $ 10,401.73 25.6% $ 1,802.14 $ 40,58?00 4.4%

01-500 Cultural Rev.: $ - $ - $ -Exp.: $ - 0.0% $ - $ 196, 166.00 0.0% Net: $ - 0.0% $ - $ 196166.00 0.0%

01-600 Ag Society Rev.: $ - $ - $ -Exp.: $ - 0.0% $ - $ 28,500.00 0.0% Net: $ - 0.0% $ - $ 28,500.00 0.0%

01-601 County Extension Rev.: $ 40.00 10.0% $ 150.00 $ 400.00 37.5% Exp.: $ 16,351.77 .1~~ $ 18,041.92 $ 84,956.00 21.2% Net: $ 16,311.77 19.3% $ 17,891.92 $ 84,556.00 21.2%

01-602 Soil & Water Conservation Rev.: $ - $ - $ -Exp.: $ - 0.0% $ 12,550.00 $ 122,~21.00 10.2% Net: $ - 0.0% $ 12,550.00 $ 122,921.00 10.2%

Per Cent ofYr: 33.3 Current 1 month's Selected 2019 %of Month's % ofYr Months Budget Budget

Department Total 8.3% Total 01-604 Wetlands Rev. : $ - 0.0% $ 9, 396:~ ~. 8,778.00 107.0%

Exp.: $ 1,175.76 6.4% $ 6) 175.64 $ 18,332.00 33.7% (Note: CREDIT NET) Net: $ 1, 175.76 12.3% $ (3,220.85) $ 9554.00 -33.7%

01-615 Water Plan Rev.: $ - 0.0% $ 14,033.00 $ 68,435.00 20.5%

- Exp. : $ 1,570:23 2.0% $ 7,182.24 $ 78,813.00 9.1% (Note: CREDIT NET) Net: $ 1,570.23 15.1% $ (6,850.76 $ 10,378.00 -66.0%

o 1-700Economic DeveloJll11ent Rev.: $ - $ - $ -Exp.: $ - 0.0% $ 24,578.67 $ 26,245.00 93 .7% Net: $ - 0.0% $ 24,578.67 $ 26,245.00 93.7%

~lJt ALS BY FUND

01 - Revenue Fund Rev.: $ 259,821.71 2.2% $ 925,148.43 $ 11 ,966,063.00 7.7% Exp.: $ 860,-654,.80 7.2% $ 3,837,490.31 $ 11 ,966,063 .00 32.1% Net: $ 600,833.09 $ 2,912,341.88 $ -

06 - Public Health Fund Rev.: $ 46,409.55 2.6% $ 431 ,575 .17 $ 1,805,435 .00 23 .9% Includes SCHA Capital Call $90, I 52 Exp.: $ 134,654.37 7.5% $ 670,927 .38 $ 1,805,435.00 37.2%

Net: $ 88244.82 $ 239,352.21 $ -10 - Road & Bridge Fund Rev.: $ 316,079.53 2.4% $ 2,864 608.88 $ 13,117,534.00 21.8%

Exp.: $ 230,680.23 1.8% $ 2,020,652 .26 $ 13,117,534.00 15.4% (Note: CREDIT NET) Net: $ (85,399.30) $ (843,956.62) $ -

11 - Human Services Fund Rev.: $ 375,573.36 3.8% $ 1,763,648.47 $ 9,781,168.00 18.0% Includes SCHA Capital Call $456,223 Exp. : $ 751,139.39 7.7% $ 3,661 ,542.16 $ 9,781 ,168.00 37.4%

Net: $ 375,566.03 $ 1,897,893 .69 $ -83 - Collaboratives Fund Rev.: $ 4,397.40 2.0% $ 56,530.40 $ 222,270.00 25.4% 1----------- --....

Exp.: $ 8342.76 3.8% $ 123,198.68 $ 222,270.00 55.4% Net: $ 3,945 .36 $ 66,668 .28 $ -

18 - Park Fund Rev. : $ 20.00 0.0% $ 38.72 $ 122,215 .00 0.0% Exp.: $ 5,039.17 4.1% $ 25,987.41 $ 122,215 .00 21 .3% Net:

r--$ 5,019.17 $ 25,948.69 $ -

37 - Capital Improvement Fund Rev.: $ - 0.0% $ 1,560.00 $ 335272.00 0.5% Exp.: $ 64,679.88 19.3% $ 71 ,090.25 $ 335,272.00 21.2% Net: $ 64,679.88 $ 69,530.25 $ -

2019 Budget Funds Total: Rev.: $ 1,002,301.55 2.7% $ 6,043,110.07 $ 37,349,957.00 18.3% . EX!l.: $ 2,055,190.60 5.5% $ 10,410,888.45 $ 37,349,957.00 27.9% Net: $ 1,052,889.05 $ 4,367,778.38 $ -

ADMNPSNL 2019Budget BudMoReportl9 .xlsx - - - _. __ ._ . 'revenues divisor for % calculation has been decreased by $4,377 ,957 (Reserves revenue in 20 I 9, including $4 . I 85 million in Highway Flmd 10)

Apr-19 .. April April Per Cent of Yr: 33.3 Supple~eotal Budgets 2019 Current 1 month's Selected 2019 % of

(Cash Basis & Unaudited) Month's % ofYr Months Budget Budget Department Total 8.3% Total

01-013 Law Library Rev.: $ 1,715 .00 8.9% $ 5,885 .00 $ 19,250.00 30.6% 12-31-2016 balance: $3 ,255 Exp.: $ 3,896.45 20.2% $ 17,384.14 $ 19,250.00 90.3% \2-31-2017 balance: $9,717 Net: $ (2 ,181.45) $ (11,499.14) $ -12-31-2018 balance: $8,509 Note: Law Library has negative balance as 00-31-201 9 01-091 Co Attorney - Forfeitures Rev.: $ (3 ,133.53) $ (3,133.53) $ 5,500.00 12-31-2016 balance: $13,949 Exp.: $ - $ 5,141.00 $ 5,500.00 12-31-2017 balance: $14,066 Net: $ (3,133 .53) $ (8,274.53) $ -12-31-2018 balance: $12,963 01-202 Sheriff Contingent Rev.: $ 212.50 7.1% $ 549.17 $ 3,000.00 18.3% 12-31-2016 balance: $7,40 I Exp.: 0.0% $ 1,412.08 $ 3,000.00 47.1% 12-3\-2017 balance: $4,684 Net: $ 212.50 $ (862.91) $ -12-31-2018 balance: $3 ,182 01-204 Snowmobile Safety Rev.: $ - 0.0% $ - $ 3,399.00 0.0%

Exp.: $ 49.99 1.5% $ 532.99 $ 3,399.00 15.7% Net: $ (49.99) $ (532.99) $ -

01-252 Jail Commissions Rev.: $ 1,864.19 20 .7% $ 6,979.02 $ 9,000.00 77.5% 12-31-2016 balance: $71,677 Exp.: $ 166.08 1.8% $ 1,037.21 $ 9,000.00 11.5% 12-31-2017 balance: $40,847 Net: $ 1,698.11 $ 5,941.81 $ -\2-31-2018 balance: $34,977 01-282911 Emergency Telephone Rev.: $ 8,472.74 7.9% $ 33,890.96 $ 107,406.00 31.6% 12-31-2016 balance: $404,134 Exp.: $ 26,473 .61 24.6% $ 56,128.71 $ 107,406.00 52.3% 12-31-2017 balance: $457,610 Net: $ (18,000.87) $ (22,237.75) $ -12-31-2018 balance: $501 ,870 01-611 Septic Loan (county funds) Rev.: $ - 0.0% $ - $ 182,693.~0 0.0%

-12-31-2016 balance: $156,077 Exp.: $ - 0.0% $ 2,665.00 $ 182,693.00 1.5%

12-31-2017 balance: $134,096 1---12-31-2018 balance: $206,329

Net: $ - $ (2,665.00) $ -

] 4 Building Fund Rev.: $ 721.88 $ 45,925.52 $ 213,857.00

12-31-2016 balance: $374,704 Exp.: $ - $ - $ 210,136.00

12-3\-2017 balance: $135,648 Net: $ 721.88 $ 45,925 .52 $ 3,721.00

12-31-2018 balance: $183,233 20 Ditch Fund Rev.: $ - 0.0% $ 32,921.71 $ 63,950.00 51.5%

Exp.: $ 377,244.43 589.9% $ 360,715.75 $ 63,950.00 564.1% Net: $ (377,244.43) $ (327,794.04 ) $ -

60 Landfill Fund Rev.: $ 74,922.86 6.1% $ 272,222.43 $ 1,227,829.00 22.2% 12-31-2016 balance: $1_c.823,411 Exp.: $ 72,535.12 5.6% $ 505,765.07 $ 1,305,675.00 38.7% 12-31-2017 balance: $1 ,949,329 Net: $ 2,387.74 -3 .1% $ (233,542.64) $ (77 ,846.00) 300.0% 12-31-2018 balance: $1 ,165,847 I r----- -

$ $ 119,447.00 61 SCORE Fund Rev.: 24.00 0.0% $ 5,611.64 4.7% 12-31-2016 balance: $13 5,068 Exp.: $ 6,948.21 4.4% $ 29,444.81 $ 157,415.00 18.7% 12-31-2017 balance: $145,437 Net: $ (6,924.21) $ (23 ,833.17) $ (37,968.00) 12-31-2018 balance: $129,811 SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGETS TOTAL:

"-----,- ... -Rev.: $ 84,799.64 4.3% $ 400,851.92 $ 1,955,331.00 20.5% Exp.: $ 487,313.89 23.6% $ 980,226.76 $ 2,067,424.00 47.4% Net: $ (402,514.25) $ (579,374.84) $ (112,093.00)

ADMNPSNL 2019Budget BudMoSuppiementall9

Month Jan. Feb. % of year 8.3% 16.7% REVENUES 2014 5.9% 8.3% 2015 3.2% 11.3% 2016 4.3% 20.1% 2017 2.4% 9.7% 2018 6.6% 10.6% 2019 1.8% 9.8%

EXPENSES 2014 8.6% 15.8% 2015 9.7% 18.3% 2016 7.9% 15 .1% 2017 7.2% 13.6% 2018 6.5% 14.3% 2019 7.1% 13.7%

Brown County Monthly Budget Activity Comparison For the Period of 2014 thru 2019

March April May June July Aug. 25% 33.3% 41.7% 50% 58.3% 66.7%

13 .0% 23.4% 27.1% 49.8% 62.3% 69.7% 14.7% 25.1% 28.5% 52.8% 61.1% 67.0% 22.3% 26.6% 30.8% 53.9% 65.6% 71.6% 12.7% 15.2% 31.7% 56.6% 63.6% 70.4% 23.4% 24.2% 29.1% 52.8% 61.3% No report

16.0% 18.3%

21.5% 28.3% 35.0% 42.8% 52.5% 65.8% 24.4% 31.2% 38.5% 54.2% 63.9% 71.6% 21.0% 28.3% 35.0% 43.5% 63.3% 69.8% 18.9% 24.4% 30.0% 38.6% 45.5% 52.6% 22.3% 28.6% 35.8% 45.3% 53.1% No report

22.4% 27.9% I

M :\OFFICE\MYDOCS\PCADMN20 I 9\RBA \Budget Related\MonthlyBudComparisonI9.docx

Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. 75% 83.3% 91.7% 100%

71.2% 73.8% 93.6% 97.5% 72.1% 73.4% 96.9% 101.7% 73.0% 78.1% 101.8% 102.6% 75.8% 76.7% 95.8% 100.7% 71.2% 72.4% 92.5% 97.7%

70.7% 84.8% 90.8% 99.2% 78.4% 85.8% 92.3% 101.6% 77.0% 85.1% 91.6% 100.7% 66.6% 79.9% 86.9% 96.2% 75.3% 82.0% 91.2% 98.5%

JI . t

OUTSTANDING BUFFER LOANS AS OF 4/30/19

01-149·0560-0903-6941 Int@r-fund loan (0#3 Ol-149.{)560-0903-6941 Inter-fund loan (01:3

lIE

lIE

BUFFER 03 PR INCIPAL 5/31/20180:00

7/31/20180:00

These are authorized temporary loans from Revenue fund to the individual drainage accounts fOf the implementation of buffer strips .

c.riphon Pd to Data Balance Due ,:.

BUFFE R STRIP l OAN-C003 55.686.22

April 23, 2019 72

At 9:00 AM, on Tuesday, April 23, 2019, the Board of Brown County Commissioners met in Regular Session in Room #204 of the Brown County Courthouse located in New Ulm, Minnesota 56073. Commissioners present were David Borchert, Anton Berg, Scott Windschitl, Dean Simonsen, and Jeff Veerkamp, along with Lay Board Members Elizabeth Mohr and Judy Kuster, County Administrator Charles Enter, Human Services Director Tom Henderson, and County Attorney Charles Hanson (at 9:25 AM). NUCAT staff was present, and Media Representative Fritz Busch of the Journal was also present (at 9:03 AM).

Chairman Borchert convened the Regular Meeting at 9:00 AM, at which time the printed agenda was accepted along with the following addenda: 13 . Supplement - Contract with new County Administrator; 14a. 1PT Dispatcher Withdrawal; 14b. State of Emergency Declaration; C-6. Commissioner Berg report with Commissioner Simonsen on the Personnel Advisory Committee; C-7. Commissioner Simonsen report on two county ditch meetings; C-8. Commissioner Veerkamp report on the JD#24 meeting.

A motion was offered by Commissioner Berg, and was seconded by Commissioner Simonsen, to accept the Minutes of4-16-2019 and authorize publication of the Synopsis of same. This motion carried unanimously.

At 9:01 AM, South Central Community Based Initiative Director Jamie Grohman met with the County Board. A motion was offered by Commissioner Berg, and was seconded by Commissioner Windschitl, to accept and file the regional South Central Community Based Initiative (SCCBI) aruma I report. This motion carried unanimously.

At 9:30 AM, Family Facilitator Clinical Supervisor Jamie Rieser met with the County Board. A motion was offered by Commissioner Simonsen, and was seconded by Commissioner Berg, to accept and file the annual Family Facilitator Program Report which noted that 82 families and 125 children received voluntary Family Facilitator services in 2018. This motion carried unanimously.

At 9:48 AM, Human Services Director Tom Henderson presented Family Facilitator contracts. A motion was offered by Commissioner Berg, and was seconded by Commissioner Simonsen, to approve the Contract for Family Facilitator Services for the period of 7-1-20 19 thru 6-30-2020 with the following school districts: New Ulm School District No. 88 ; Springfield School District No. 85; and Sleepy Eye School District No. 84 . This motion carried unanimously.

At 9:50 AM, Probation Director Les Schultz and Human Services Director Tom Henderson met with the County Board. A motion was offered by Commissioner Windschitl, and was seconded by Commissioner Simonsen, to authorize Brown County Human Services and Brown County Probation to apply for grant funding from Families First Collaborative and other possible grants, noting that grant funding would allow for the transfer of non-mental health truancy cases from Human Services to Probation. This motion carried unanimously.

At 10:05 AM, Social Services Supervisor Denise Kamm met with the County Board. A motion was offered by Commissioner Windschitl, and was seconded by Commissioner Simonsen, to approve the posting for a 5th child protection worker for the child protection unit. This motion carried unanimously .

At 10:12 AM, Human Services Director Tom Henderson presented additional items. A motion was offered by Commissioner Berg, and was seconded by Commissioner Borchert, to approve payment of Human Services administrative claims in the amount of $14,859.55. In accordance with MS 375.12 the following claims exceed $2,000: ELAN Financial Services $8,009.46; Verizon Wireless $2,872.51; Ten payments less than $2,000.00 total $3,977.58. Final total is $14,859.55 . This motion carried unanimously.

April 23, 2019 73

A motion was offered by Commissioner Simonsen, and was seconded by Commissioner Borchert, to accept and file the following Correspondence: Email from MACSSA Executive Director Eric Ratzmann and Consent Agenda Items: Connections Homes Close; South Country Health Alliance Update; Resumption of Pursuit of Improved Child Support and Income Maintenance Electronic Filing and Beginning the Pursuit of Social Service Electronic Filing; Social Services Monthly Report; Income Maintenance Monthly Report; Out of Home Placement Monthly Report; and Heartland Express Monthly Report. This motion carried unanimously.

At 10:36 AM, Lay Board Members Elizabeth Mohr and Judy Kuster were excused.

At 10:43 AM, Highway Engineer Wayne Stevens and Assistant Highway Engineer Andrew Lang met with the County Board. A motion was offered by Commissioner Simonsen, and was seconded by Commissioner Berg, to approve the following Drainage Repair request and the payment of said repair as follows:

System Repair # Order Twp Section Repair Type Percentage Cost

CD60 19-002 I Prairieville 33 Blowout, Tile Outlet, 100 $1,064.00

This motion carried unanimously.

A motion was offered by Commissioner Berg, and was seconded by Commissioner Borchert, to approve the Brown County Highway Department Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan dated April 2019. This motion passed unanimously.

At 10:47 AM, Emergency Manager Shawn Stoermann met with the County Board. The County Board considered Brown County Resolution 2019-6 in regards to a State of Emergency Declaration as follows:


Declaring a State of Emergency

The following Resolution was offered by Commissioner Windschitl and moved for adoption at a Regular Meeting held on April 23, 2019 at the Brown County Courthouse, New Ulm, MN:

WHEREAS, the flooding/Winter Storm Wesley is expected to impact the population of Brown County and its cities; and WHEREAS, the event is expected to cause a significant amount of public property damage; and WHEREAS, the Brown County Department of Emergency Management request the Brown County Board of Commissioners to declare Brown County in a STATE OF EMERGENCY for the floodinglWinter Storm Wesley event of Spring 2019; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Brown County Board of Commissioners declares Brown County in a State of Emergency in order to prepare and do advance measures to protect the County from this spring flooding event.

Seconded by Commissioner Veerkamp and the same being put to a vote was duly carried. This Resolution shall become effective immediately and without publication.

Adopted by the following vote: Ayes __ 5_ Nayes _0 __ . Dated this 23 Td day of April, 2019.

ATTEST: /s/ Charles Enter

Administrator, Brown County

/s/ David Borchert Chairman, Brown County

April 23, 2019 74

At 10:52 AM, Human Resources Director Ruth Schaefer met with the County Board. A motion was offered by Commissioner Berg, and was seconded by Commissioner Simonsen, to approve the appointment of Brianna Portner as FT Social Worker - Children's Mental Health at the Bachelor's level social worker position hourly rate of $23.4889, Grade XIV, Step I, with an anticipated start date of 5-7-2019 pending successful completion of pre-employment screening. This motion passed unanimously.

A motion was offered by Commissioner Simonsen, and was seconded by Commissioner Borchert, to accept the ·resignation of Valerie Hauser, FT Correctional Officer, effective 4-29-2019, and ratify the internal posting of the vacancy for one FT Correctional Officer; and if there is no internal interest, approve an external posting of this position according to policy and contract. This motion passed unanimously.

A motion was offered by Commissioner Berg, and was seconded by Commissioner Veerkamp, to accept Kyle Reynolds' withdrawal from consideration for the IPT Dispatcher position, rescind the appointment and authorize rep osting this position according to policy. This motion passed unanimously.

At 10:55 AM, HR Director Ruth Schaefer and DDA Human Resources, Inc. Management Consultant Liza Donabauer met with the County Board. Also present was Sam Hansen. Ms. Donabauer reported that Sam Hansen accepted the offer of the position of county administrator that was presented to him on 4-16-2019 and that terms of employment have been finalized between Brown County and Mr. Hansen in accordance with the work of the Ad Hoc Committee that included Commissioners Borchert and Windschitl. A motion was made by Commissioner Windschitl, and was seconded by Commissioner Berg, to approve the Employment Agreement with Sam Hansen thereby employing Sam Hansen as Brown County Administrator effective 5-20-2019. This motion passed on a roll call vote of 5-0. It should be noted that a transition period will be in effect from 5-20-2019 through 5-31-2019, which is the resignation date for County Administrator Charles Enter.

At II :00 AM, Correspondence C-I thru C-8 were accepted and filed. C-6. Commissioner Berg reported with Commissioner Simonsen on the Personnel Advisory Committee; C-7. Commissioner Simonsen reported on two county ditch meetings; C-8. Commissioner Veerkamp reported on the JD#24 meeting.

At II :05 AM, Calendars were coordinated for the next two week period .

There being no further business, a motion was made by Commissioner Berg, and was seconded by Commissioner Veerkamp, to adjourn the meeting. The motion passed unanimously and Chairman Borchert declared the Meeting adjourned at 11: lOAM.

ATTEST:

ctuuult.. Efl.jVI..--Charles Enter Brown County Administrator Brown County, Minnesota

21-JJ~ David Borchert, Chair

BoardofBrown County Commissioners Brown County, Minnesota

This page intentionally left blank

Corresyondence

DATE: May 21,2019

TO: Brown County Board of Commissioners

?n ~~~ '1o p":c",f

~ <J:co~ 01

'5 ~"1-I-1.-tll"

FROM: HR Director Ruth Schaefer

RE: 2018 Distinguished Service - Support Staff Award

Each year, the Distinguished Service Award is given to select employees who have exhibited exemplary performance in their job, above and beyond the usual expectations for the position for several years. This award is presented to one (1) department head/supervisor and to one (1) support staff person.

Paul Wesselmann is the recipient of the 2018 Distinguished Service Support Staff award. Paul was unable to attend the Employee Recognition Banquet on May 2, 2019; therefore, it is with great pleasure to acknowledge Paul by way of this correspondence to the Board.

The following is background for choosing Paul for this award. 'With Sue Jensen's vision for a new and improved working space at the License Bureau, this employee made it come to life without hesitation. He overcame challenges and deadlines using his knowledge, resources and contacts, along with his supervisor Jesse Kral, to pull everything together to minimize costs and ensure business could continue with little to no interference for the License Bureau staff and customers. With this employee's hard work, the remodel project exceeded the License Bureau Staffs expectations in every way, and was completed in an efficient and impressive manner.'

CSAH Regular Maintenance Revenue and Expense Breakdown (Does not include Municipal and Local County Highways)

Revenue Cost Breakdown Hwy Dept. Snow/Ice Routine Repair/ Depreciation Annual

Year State Aid Local Control Maintenance Replace Betterment Unallocated Adjustment Levy 2018 $2,138,453 $708,214 $466,009 $1,132,867 $189,213 $531,842 $280,577 $246,159 $1,792,936 2017 $1,757,351 $764,682 $283,396 $1,210,383 $285,606 $432,145 $154,803 $155,700 $1,868,701 2016 $1,726,263 $764,939 $282,690 $1,158,082 $229,294 $470,604 $205,394 $145,138 $1,947,906 2015 $1,617,509 $951,561 $295,186 $1,110,097 $262,409 $417,488 $206,469 $277,421 $1,931,260 2014 $1,546,432 $745,943 $518,135 $822,790 $174,892 $429,577 $194,645 $152,336 $1,854,398 2013 $1,491,060 $815,056 $699,899 $714,013 $269,803 $323,230 $214,328 $84,843 $1,841,055 2012 $1,471,984 $782,046 $372,689 $814,852 $291,485 $422,981 $197,961 $154,062 ' $1,889,024 2011 $1,389,180 $843,596 $478,733 $765,049 $332,281 $385,470 $322,159 ($50,916) $1,639,569 2010 $1,300,466 $884,601 $752,990 $622,776 $129,528 $379,492 $268,035 $32,246 $1,727,881 2009 $1,188,346 $964,549 $460,332 $541,037 $189,709 $481,214 $239,307 $241,296 $1,866,587 2008 $1,125,387 $943,581 $401,317 $539,006 $222,918 $309,517 $228,701 $367,509 $1,761,134 2007 $1,101,496 $810,731 $395,466 $482,285 $196,759 $340,085 $236,864 $260,768 $1,172,380 2006 $1,080,019 $714,559 $183,506 $541,834 $234,559 $336,526 $234,701 $263,452 $1,106,572

Average $1,456,457 $822,620 $430,027 $804,236 $231,420 $404,629 $229,534 $179,232 $1,723,031

Notes: 1. Routine Maintenance includes gravel blading, minor patching, culvert & di'tch repair, weed control, snow & ice control and traffic services. 2. Repair/replace includes reshaping, major patching, graveling and major culvert & bridge repair. 3. Betterment includes new culverts, new bridge rails, seeding and seal coating. 4. Unallocated includes shop and other costs that can not be charged to a specific road or equipment 5. Depreciation adjustment is the difference between equipment rental charges collected versus initial cost depreciation, repair costs and operational costs. 6. Does not include special funding. (FEMA flood repairs etc.) 7. Maintenance paid $172,075 in bond interest and Construction paid $440,000 in principal in 2018.

j

1..0'

tI -..c

(to ~.

3-!!: s:.

-

~ <':

'"\

" rt;.

-

~© ..... N V'I

) f'J -. I

~

~ (~~:~~;~~:Cf~~ H~~~~nio~:~~~~~~~TION E "(;

~: Brown County Highway Department

Year Ended 12/31/2018

Regular Municipal County

Total Mileage 316.770 11.440 17.800 :(

.. ~ ::~:

C~nstruction :

Allotment $3,207,680.00 $242,923,00

Total Cost $4,407,884.99 $267,635,32 $2,013,26

Maintenance:

Allotment $2,138,453.00 $161,948,00

. State Aid Bond Interest $172,074.84

.' :+ Maintenance Cost (. Includes costs below) $2,870,769,50 $167,556,07 $166,492.07 ' ..

t '. T()tal Maintenance Plus Bond Int. $3,042,844.34 $167,556,07

'" Unallocated Costs: $280,576,53 $11,988.07 $16,406,36

'" Adj. to Equalize Depreciation: $246,158.67 $10,517.52 $14,393,82

CERTIFICATION STATEMENT

I certify that the above information is true and correct. I also certify that the Brown County Highway ".: : D_epartment has followed the accounting procedures as established in the State Aid Accounting

':.:,.'''.", •. ::' '>brvfankua'dor an alternativde metho~ as approdved by the ,M.n/DOTh, , I~ iS

f unde,rstood that all records,

... . 00 s, oyuments, an accounting proce ures pertaining to t IS In ormation are subject to audit and ~ "examination by the Mn/DOT and the State Auditor's Office. It is also understood that the Mn/DOT t~r:'

.21 reserves the right to withhold future State Aid payments if the county has not complied with the ", procedures and practices as approved and established.

Ceritified:

County Engineer Date

D.S.A.E. Date

Friday, April 19. 2019 7:25:03 AM Version: 11 .1

Consumer Price Index April 2019 United States City Average

Percent change to Group Index Apr. 2019 from

Apr. Apr.

I Mar.

2019 2018 2019 (1982-84=100 unless otherwide noted)

All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) AJlltems ........................................... ............................... . 255.548 2.0 0.5 All items (other base)(1 ) ....... ...... .. .. .. .... .................... .. .... .. . 765.507 Food and beverages ................................. ....... ........... ... .. 257.393 1.7 .0

Food .......... ..... ........ ........ ..... .... .. ...... .... ...... .. ... .. ..... .. ... .. . 257.708 1.8 .0 Food at home ........... .... .. .. .. .. ... .. ..... ... .... .. .. ... .. .. ... ...... . 241.878 .7 -.3

Cereals and bakery products ........ .. .. .... .... ....... ..... .. 276.640 1.8 -.2 Meats. poultry, fish , and eggs .... .. .. .. ...... .. ... ....... .. .. . 249.203 -1 .1 .1 Dairy and related products .......... ...... ........ .. .. .. ...... .. 217.510 .3 .0 Fruits and vegetables ..... .. ......... ........ ................ .. .. . 303.503 2.2 -.6 Nonalcoholic beverages and beverage materials .. .. 170.727 2.2 -.8 Other food at home .............. ...... .. ........ ...... .......... .. . 211 .078 .2 -.2

Food away from home .... .... .. ..... .... .. ....... .... ..... ......... .. 282.798 3.1 .3 Alcoholic beverages .... .... .. ... .. ..... ..... .. .. ......... .... ...... ...... . 251 .758 1.2 -.1

Housing .......................................................................... .. 264.452 2.9 .2 Shelter .............. ...... .. ...... ... .... ......... .......... .. ... .... ... .... .... . 316.263 3.4 .4

Rent of primary residence .. .... .. .............. .. ...... ..... ..... .. 328.678 3.8 .4 Owners' equiv. rent of residences(2) ................ .... .... .. 323.426 3.4 .3

Owners' equiv. rent of primary residence(2) .... .... .. .. 323.456 3.4 .3 Fuels and util ities .. ... ....... ... ... .. ...... .. .. ..... .... ................ ... . 240.773 .8 -.3

Household energy ..... .... .. .. .. .... .. ...... .. .... ....... .... ... .... .. . 198.366 .0 -.5 Energy services .... .. .. .. ... ...... .. .. ..... .. ... ........ .. ......... .. 201 .341 .0 -.6

Electricity ..... .. .... .. .... .... ..... .... ........ ... ..... ... ..... ... .. . 210.525 .6 -.2 Utility (piped) gas service .. .. .. .. ...... ...... ........ .. ... . .. 171 .004 -1 .9 -1 .8

Furnishings and operations ... .. ..... ..... .... .. .. ... ... ..... .. ...... . . 123.345 1.1 -.3 Apparel .... .... ........................................... ...................... ... . 125.542 -3.0 -.2 Transportation ......................... .................. ..................... . 214.142 1.6 2.5

Private transportation ........ .. .. .......... ...... ... .... ... .. .... .. ... ... . 209.918 1.8 2.6 New and used motor vehicles(3) ..... .. ... .. ....... ...... .. .... . 99.984 .9 .0

New vehicles ........... .... .. ..... ..... .. ............. ..... .. ...... . .. 147.840 1.2 .0 Used cars and trucks ...... ........ .............. .. .... .. ........ .. 140.458 .8 .0

Motor fuel.. ...... ........ .. ............. .. ... .. ....... .. ... .. ... .. .. ... .. .. . 249.550 3.1 10.1 Gasoline (all types) .... ... ...... ......... ..... ...... .. ..... .. ..... .. 248.499 3. 1 10.3

Unleaded regular(4) ...... ....... ..... .. .... ... ...... ..... .. ... . 243.787 3.0 10.4 Unleaded midgrade(4)(5) ... .. .. ... .. ....... ... .. ...... ..... . 265.450 3.6 9.8 Unleaded premium(4 ) .... .. ....... .. ...... .... ... .. .... ...... . 260.494 3.6 9.7

Motor vehicle insurance(6) ............ .. ..... : ...... ...... ....... . . 570.492 1.4 -.5 Medical Care .......... ... ........ .............................................. . 493.331 1.9 .2 Recreation(3) .............................................. .. ................. .. . 120.821 1.6 .1 Education and communication(3) .............. ................... . 137.182 .9 .1

Tuition, other school fees, and child care(6) .............. .. .. . 756.908 3.4 .0 Other goods and services .......................................... ... .. 448.658 1.4 .0 Special indexes ..... ... ............... ........ .. .... ... .... ........... ....... . Commodities ................ ... ........ .. ....... .... .. ...... .... .... .... ........ . 186.884 .9 1.0

Durables... .. ... ............. .. ........ ..... .. ..... ... ..... .. ............. .. .. .. 105.178 .3 -.2 Nondurables.... .. ...... ....... .. .... .. .. .. .... ........ .. ...... ......... .... .. 229.028 1.1 1.5

Services.... .. .... .. .. .. ........ ... .... ....... .... .... ... .. ....... .. .... ... ..... .... 323.228 2.7 .2 All items less medical care...... .. .......... ...... ..... ... .. ... ..... ...... 244.134 2.0 .6 All items less shelter.... ...... .. ....................... ... .. .... ...... .... .... 234.723 1.3 .6 Energy...... .. .. .. ... ................ .... .... .... .. . ..... .. ... ... .. .. ........ ...... .. 222.499 1.7 5.1 All items less energy.... .. ...... .. .. ............ .. .............. ............ . 260.925 2.0 .2 All items less food and energy.... .... ...... .. .... .. .. ........ ... .. .. ..... 262.332 2.1 .2

Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W) All Items........... ..... .... .. ..... .. ........................ ...................... 249.332 1.9 0.6 All items (other base)(1 )............ .. .. .... .... .... .... .. ................. . 742.683 (1) Other base: United States City Average, 1967-100; Midwest Region , December 1977-100. (2) Index on a December 1982=100 base. (3) Index on a December 1997=100 base. (4) Special index based on a substantially smaller sample. (5) Index on a December 1993=100 base. (6) For the Midwest, index on a December 1977=100 base. - Data not available. NOTE: Index applies to a month as a whole. not to any speCific date. Data not seasonally adjusted.

cc ~v 5 - ""2..1 - "2.1>'4

Midwest Percent change to

Index Apr. 2019 from Apr. Apr.

I Mar.

2019 2018 2019

237.510 1.5 0.3 386.441 246.391 .8 -.1 245.689 .8 -.1 226.719 -.5 -.3 257.264 -.9 -.7 246.965 -1 .6 .1 194.063 -1 .8 -.5 269.574 .6 -1 .1 162.936 .9 -1 .5 198.321 -.3 .7 277.182 2.5 .2 253.893 1.1 -.1 231 .999 2.8 .1 278.535 3.5 .2 277.399 3.3 .2 282.449 3.4 .1 282.416 3.4 .1 217.617 -.3 -.3 174.666 -1.4 -.4 180.802 -1.4 -.3 197.879 -.4 .6 141 .802 -3.7 -2.4 116.256 1.4 .3 115.838 -3 .3 -1 .5 207.665 2.1 2.2 202.644 2.3 2.2

98.142 1.5 -.1 138.861 1.3 .0 139.697 .5 .1 250.913 4.5 9.3 249.602 4.5 9.4 243.301 4.5 9.6 286.308 5.0 8.8 271.531 4.2 8.2 737.005 .5 -1.0 487.594 1.1 -.7 120.985 -1 .1 -.2 137.404 .0 .0

1200.610 1.8 .0 432.934 1.6 .3

181 .219 .7 .9 102.266 .2 .0 222.893 .9 1.3 295.548 2.1 -.1 225.673 1.6 .4 225.158 .7 .4 209.577 1.8 4.8 243.197 r~ -.1 243.471 1.6 -.1

~~

231 .726 r1 1.~ ) 0.4 374.753

'----'"

Full Board Packet 05_21_2019.pdf - Brown County

Documents

Transcript of Full Board Packet 05_21_2019.pdf - Brown County