Finding passion in work: Media, passion and career guides

17
European Journal of Cultural Studies 2015, Vol. 18(2) 190–206 © The Author(s) 2014 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/1367549414563295 ecs.sagepub.com EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF Finding passion in work: Media, passion and career guides Renyi Hong University of Southern California, USA Abstract Examining career guides, this essay seeks to understand how the notion of passionate work is presently framed as an injunction, a commonsensical good thing we should aspire to find. How does the discourse of passion respond to labor conditions after the crisis, and what are among the possibilities it forecloses? This essay contains three overtures. First, I analyze how career guides change the pain of job loss to a space of empowerment. Directing readers to the optimistic proposal that their work can be better, career guides advise that the negative effect of the present needs only to be endured by the private individual so that a better future can be produced. Second, I consider what meanings passion produced by the instruments of career guides have, thinking about its relationship to neoliberal subjectivity. Last, I examine career guides that provide a counter-discourse of passion, looking into the values it cultivates in readers. Keywords Career guides, labor, mediapassion, neoliberal, work In the years following the financial crisis, a cultural ‘turn to passion’ may be observed in the sphere of work as masses of newly unemployed workers are advised by career guides to take the opportunity to pause and consider their passions and dreams. ‘What do you like’, ‘what makes your heart sing’ are the various therapeutic clichés offered to workers who have to reenter a job scarce marketplace. This fixation on self-discovery is perhaps not unusual given that career guides fall under the genre of self-help which has traditionally Corresponding author: Renyi Hong, Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism, University of Southern California, Watt Way, Los Angeles, CA 90001, USA. Email: [email protected] 563295ECS 0 0 10.1177/1367549414563295European Journal of Cultural StudiesHong research-article 2014 Article at PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV on May 18, 2016 ecs.sagepub.com Downloaded from

Transcript of Finding passion in work: Media, passion and career guides

European Journal of Cultural Studies2015, Vol. 18(2) 190 –206

© The Author(s) 2014Reprints and permissions:

sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.navDOI: 10.1177/1367549414563295

ecs.sagepub.com

e u r o p e a n j o u r n a l o f

Finding passion in work: Media, passion and career guides

Renyi HongUniversity of Southern California, USA

AbstractExamining career guides, this essay seeks to understand how the notion of passionate work is presently framed as an injunction, a commonsensical good thing we should aspire to find. How does the discourse of passion respond to labor conditions after the crisis, and what are among the possibilities it forecloses? This essay contains three overtures. First, I analyze how career guides change the pain of job loss to a space of empowerment. Directing readers to the optimistic proposal that their work can be better, career guides advise that the negative effect of the present needs only to be endured by the private individual so that a better future can be produced. Second, I consider what meanings passion produced by the instruments of career guides have, thinking about its relationship to neoliberal subjectivity. Last, I examine career guides that provide a counter-discourse of passion, looking into the values it cultivates in readers.

KeywordsCareer guides, labor, mediapassion, neoliberal, work

In the years following the financial crisis, a cultural ‘turn to passion’ may be observed in the sphere of work as masses of newly unemployed workers are advised by career guides to take the opportunity to pause and consider their passions and dreams. ‘What do you like’, ‘what makes your heart sing’ are the various therapeutic clichés offered to workers who have to reenter a job scarce marketplace. This fixation on self-discovery is perhaps not unusual given that career guides fall under the genre of self-help which has traditionally

Corresponding author:Renyi Hong, Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism, University of Southern California, Watt Way, Los Angeles, CA 90001, USA. Email: [email protected]

563295 ECS0010.1177/1367549414563295European Journal of Cultural StudiesHongresearch-article2014

Article

at PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV on May 18, 2016ecs.sagepub.comDownloaded from

Hong 191

prized self-knowledge as the route to empowerment. This form of empowerment, however, served a crucial ideological function during the crisis. As Rimke (2000) points out, by espousing an ideology of American individualism, self-help presents social problems as matters of individual responsibility rather than collective politics, which then helps avoid and even naturalizes the social problems that produced the crisis in the first place.

Career guides, however, differ in a number of ways from the general overture of the self-help genre. Often turned to in moments of unemployment, career guides are read not just as inspirational materials, but books offering practical tips that can help readers secure a job. The espousal of ‘passion’ as a necessary affective disposition for the job search frames passion in two ways: it is an object readers are encouraged to find to acquire meaning in work, and it is also something highly pragmatic to the job-hunting process itself. As Steve Dalton (2012), writer of The 2-Hour Job Search, plainly states, ‘In my experience, those who find the job search process least stressful are the ones who combine their aptitudes with their personal passions… When you have both passion and knowledge, people want to hire you immediately’. Passion’s allure arises from this junc-ture of survivalism and optimism. Promising that the job is located precisely at the site of desire: passion soothes, empowers and even offers subjects a feeling of luminosity.

In this essay, I understand ‘passion’ as an affective structure, an optimistic orientation toward work that both produces and makes meaningful various emotional dispositions. The Oxford English Dictionary defines the contemporary use of passion as ‘an aim or goal pursued with zeal’, implying that passion is the active pursuit of something, real or imagined. But the pursuit is animated here, typically not because of the object, but the promise that the object can bring. When career guides ask readers to be passionate about work, the underlying meaning is that finding passion in work can materialize certain desirable outcomes, whether they be competence, success or self-fulfillment. Positioned as a pathway leading to various wishes and fantasies, passion itself becomes an object of desire, something that readers should find, consider and pursue.

In these terms, passion moves beyond the phenomenological, and positions itself as an injunction, a commonsense social good we should aspire to find (Ahmed, 2010). The latter understanding of passion, I argue, represents in the present, an emotional hegem-ony, an affective attitude toward work that is normative. Even when career guides do not expressly discuss passion, they forward a belief that work can produce psychological forms of betterment. The symbolic object of passionate work need not produce feelings of passion to have its effect. As something wanted, its mere desirability is sufficient to intertwine with agency, and influence all kinds of routine decisions in the pursuit of a career.

In this essay, I attempt to critically analyze what it means to find one’s passion. Although passion often takes on a positive valence when associated to work, I argue that it can also lead into what Berlant (2011) calls ‘cruel optimism’. An optimistic attachment to something is cruel when the object which yields a sense of hopeful vision represents the same thing which impairs the expansive transformation that one hopes for. The dis-course of passion can be a kind of cruel optimism when its conveyed fantasies about good work and good feelings become the same objects that delay and foreclose the sub-stantive forms of transformation that the promises of passion itself requires. Such cruelty can also be amplified when passion’s eventual failure to match to its promises becomes

at PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV on May 18, 2016ecs.sagepub.comDownloaded from

192 European Journal of Cultural Studies 18(2)

reason for a person to attach to this fantasy again, hoping that a different outcome will materialize this time around. Therefore, while advice on finding passion may serve ther-apeutic purposes, it also functions as a cultural context for privatizing social problems and, through that, foreclose the extensive politics required to address the issues of the economic crisis, mass unemployment and precarious, unfair labor arrangements.

Market for passion

A year after the financial crisis, the unemployment rates in the United States hit a 26-year high of 10.2 percent (Goodman, 2009). Many nations in Europe were also shaken by the crisis, triggering record high unemployment rates in the region (Eurostat, 2014). While unemployment has declined in the recent years, much of the fall is offset by unemployed populations leaving the labor force (O’Brien, 2013). As such, the financial crisis has left a lasting impact on the labor market: not only have many people given up looking for jobs, situations of underemployment, where people take up temporary, lowly paid jobs for survival, have become more prevalent (Portal Seven, 2013).

The poor condition of the labor market has fuelled a demand for career advice. In 2009, the Association of American Publishers reported strong sales for career guides despite a general fall in publishing figures. As of 2012, the self-improvement industry is estimated to be worth $10.4 billion, and has an annual growth of 6.1% (Marketdata Enterprises, 2012). These optimistic projections apply also to the United Kingdom, which predicts the self-help genre to have the most potential for growth in the publishing sector in 2014 (Groskop, 2014). Although no figures for career guides are readily avail-able, an analysis of 1200 ‘new and popular’ listings under the category of ‘job hunting and careers’ in online retailer Amazon.com reveals that 746 titles (62.2%) were pub-lished after 2007. Of these, 169 titles alone were published in 2013.1 Writers of these books range from career counselors and independent authors, to life coaches, celebrities and motivational speakers. Supplemented with seminars, counseling sessions, boot camps, online writing assignments, these books and materials contribute to a burgeoning market which offers not only career advice, but one which frames it around the discourse of passion and satisfaction in life. Analyzing a range of career guides, I explore the pur-pose passion serves as a response toward the post-recession capitalist environment.

Affect, unemployment and neoliberal capitalism

Neoliberal capitalism, Harvey (2005) notes, arose in the 1970s with the belief that the free market logic, characterized by the absence of government regulation, strong property rights and free trade, holds the basis for the maximization of human well-being. Market values are turned to here as a means of acquiring human freedom, the capacity for people to have entrepreneurial freedoms in how they wish for their lives to proceed. In terms of labor markets, this involves deconstructing its rigidities so that individuals can have and exercise their ability to choose (Rose, 1999). Job security, for instance, was dismantled under the pretext that this provides the individual with the capacity to freely choose jobs rather than stick to only one career as a lifelong prospect. At the same time, the nature of jobs also changed to prize autonomy and self-governance, with the emphasis that work

at PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV on May 18, 2016ecs.sagepub.comDownloaded from

Hong 193

can now offer psychological feelings of success (Lazzarato, 1996). Through these cultural mechanisms, work is increasingly made to be meaningful and cater for the ‘expectation concerning what it is to live a full life’ (Heelas, 2002: 90).

Such expectations from work are historically contingent. In the early Protestant work ethic, Christians were asked to commit to work on the grounds of religious and moral duty rather than love for work itself (Weber, 1905/2001). The external rewards, like wealth and status, were more important than psychological feelings of satisfaction, because it was the former factors that served as the marker for closeness to salvation. The history of managerial ideologies such as welfare capitalism, Taylorism and the human relations movement are too lengthy and rich to describe in this project (Illouz, 2008; Mandell, 2002; Tone, 1997). However, it would be mostly accurate to claim that while experimentations in manipulating the emotions of industrial workers began from the late 19th century, class antagonisms still made work antithetical to personal judgments of satisfaction. The conditions that allowed for passion to take on meaning are complex, but the rise of white collar, middle-class work and the neoliberal restructuring of the labor market, as Liu (2004) suggests, may have a large part to play in the cause. By the 1970s, Hall (2004), a vocational counselor, had noted a different mentality afoot, a ‘strong coun-terculture’ of ‘post-war baby boom cohort’ who wanted ‘freedom, personal choice, and values expression in their work’ (p. 4).

Read in the vein of a creative history of capitalism, this affective configuration of work constitutes a new technology of extraction, a strategized attempt at squeezing more labor power out from workers. When work is molded into a ‘lifestyle’, the temporal and spatial boundaries of the workplace are extended, and work is made into a crucial aspect of an individual’s identity (Gill and Pratt, 2008; Morini, 2007). The dimensions of work-ers’ lives outside work, their personal relationship, life experiences, tastes and knowl-edge – the entire product of human subjectivity – are incorporated into the product of work for the purposes of corporate profit.

These changes relate also to the intensified focus on affect. Hardt and Negri (2004) had described ‘affective labor’ as a labor form that gained prominence after the 1970s. In creative industries, for instance, affects, like enthusiasm and positivity, had become cru-cial not just for the expression of creativity, but also the acceptance of lengthy, high intensity workday demands placed on workers (Harvey, 2000). Outside these industries, many routine corporate practices, like transient teams, corporate presentations, collabo-ration and cooperation, also require good communication and people skills, which are dependent on affective displays (Ross, 2003).

Unemployment and the process of job hunting, in this sense, can be read as a site where the cultural meanings of work are being adjusted, and a time/space feature that cultivates in the would-be worker the subjectivities valued by capital. As Vercellone (2007) notes, with the increased focus placed on the cognitive potential of the worker, free time out of labor has taken on a more productive use. No longer a source of wasted labor-power, free time now serves the purpose of reeducating the worker, allowing new potentials of labor-power to emerge. To extend this proposition, a crisis of unemploy-ment may be presented as an opportunity for the intense reschooling of massive numbers of workers. Anxious and provided with easy access to the socialized forms of knowledge provided by career experts, unemployment offers a powerful opening for voluntary

at PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV on May 18, 2016ecs.sagepub.comDownloaded from

194 European Journal of Cultural Studies 18(2)

readjustment of subjectivities. For instance, Sharone (2014) notes that career centers often instruct job seekers to find their passion, arguing that this would influence their interviews with hiring managers and spark an emotional connection which will land them a job. Advice like this, provided by officially sanctioned institutions which claim to fight unemployment, shows how unemployment can become a setting to reeducate, dis-cipline and transform the affective relationships job seekers have with work.

This essay contains three overtures. First, I look at how career guides change the pain of job loss to a space of empowerment. Directing readers to the optimistic proposal that their work can be better, career guides advise that the negative effect of the present needs only to be endured and transformed in the private individual so that a better future can be produced. How do career guides frame this discourse, and what are the possibilities fore-closed, are the questions I seek to answer in this first portion.

My second section engages with Richard Nelson Bolles’ What Color Is Your Parachute to understand how passion is produced. Writings about passion have often situated them-selves within creative professions (Arvidsson et al., 2010; Hesmondhalgh and Baker, 2011; Ross, 2003). Such a link has unwittingly narrowed passion into an affect solely produced through creative self-expression. In fact, the autonomy which passion relies on can be induced through a different logic and organization of freedoms – which are pos-sibilities the instruments of career guides try to offer. Doing a comparative analysis of the different exercises What Color Is Your Parachute had provided in its many years of publication, I attempt to show the variegated ways passion is produced as an affective category.

Last, I analyze four texts that provide a discourse of counter-passion. Coming against passion during this period of massive unemployment, these career guides resonate with the cynicism some populations may have of work. Having criticized passion, however, these career guides offer advice that circuitously leads readers back to passion itself, rein-forcing the common imagination that work can be a panacea to human suffering. Taking these examples, from the affectively painful to the hopeful to the cynical, I seek to under-stand how passion is reinstated as a common feeling amongst working populations.

Methodology

My analysis is guided by the close textual reading of 20 career guides. Career guides are chosen as materials for analysis for three reasons. First, they are assumed to be one of the most readily accessible, comprehensive materials that people can turn to for advice when anxious about their careers. Second, career guides are understood to articulate an already existing discourse circulating in the larger mediascape of radio programs, newspaper advice columns, YouTube videos and how-to websites. Third, many authors of career guides also directly contribute to public discourse when they brand themselves as gurus which websites can turn to for advice.

The texts were sourced from the Amazon.com categories of ‘job-hunting & careers’ and ‘job-hunting’. I picked those which were ranked high in the ‘new and bestselling’ list, and especially favored those published after 2007. I also looked for some texts through key words, like ‘job loss’. Richard Nelson Bolles’ What Color Is Your Parachute is the only text I did a comparative historical analysis on. Since Bolles’ text is

at PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV on May 18, 2016ecs.sagepub.comDownloaded from

Hong 195

republished with changes every year, I examined different editions of his book starting from 1983 to 2013.

Each of these texts were analyzed for their discourse, with attention paid toward how readers are guided toward finding their next job, the therapeutic advice offered, the instruments used in uncovering skills or passions and the affective dispositions they are told to cultivate. These points were noted and analyzed for the kinds of subjectivities they hope to cultivate, the emotional states they produce in readers and their function in relation to neoliberal capitalism. Lastly, I considered the ways the discourse of passion can mutate, producing different market niches (for example, arguments against passion), while reproducing a central ideological structure.

The labor of endurance

Bolles introduces his 2013 edition of What Color is Your Parachute with a chapter on finding ‘hope’ where he stresses the importance of ‘attitude’. ‘I learned that I can teach the most clever, unorthodox, and effective techniques’, he writes, ‘but a job-hunter can undo it all if they have the wrong attitude’. As examples, he offers archetypes of right and wrong attitudes. The person with a wrong attitude is ‘smoldering with anger’, ‘sullen, gloomy about his future’, and feels that ‘his life as he knew it is over’. In contrast, the person with the right attitude abounds with hope despite being ‘just as depressed about how his life has turned out’. He ‘essentially sees his life as an adventure, and is willing to wait patiently for the next Act to unfold’.

In these examples, Bolles shows that right and wrong attitudes are characterized by the presence of ‘hope’, the affective disposition that allows two equally depressed work-ers to react differently to a job loss. This depiction is interesting, for it suggests that good attitudes rely not upon the erasure of all negativity – in fact, the person with the ‘good attitude’ is ‘just as depressed about how his life has turned out’. What distinguishes a person with the good attitude is the maintenance of hope that allows coping, endurance and patience to proceed. Taking this as a starting point, I wish to analyze how passion can exist in the ‘lowest’ category, the painful period where a disillusioned view of work is most likely to surface. Offering a realist reaction to pain, career guides console sufferers, but advise against these negative emotions simultaneously, unfolding a vision of ‘good work’ where pain can dissipate.

In the discourse of endurance, the precarity of labor markets are depicted as inevita-ble, abstracted economic occurrences that workers need to privately overcome. In 48 Days To The Work You Love, Dan Miller (2010) notes how the terminology of job loss has become less punishing over time. ‘Nobody gets “fired” anymore’, he claims, point-ing out that the language of being ‘fired’ has shifted to that of being ‘laid off’, ‘down-sized’, ‘rightsized’, ‘restructured’ or ‘put in the mobility pool’. Implying that job loss has become more institutional, and therefore, less personal, he, like Jean Baur (2011), the writer of Eliminated! Now What? recommends readers to avoid delving into self-blame, searching for explanations ‘why this happened to me’ (p. 6). Since layoffs are depicted here as generalized occurrences, the precarity of neoliberal capitalism is explained away as something that requires endurance from the individual. As Baur offers, the present economic climate no longer offers any jobs that are ‘recession-proof’. To stay afloat in

at PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV on May 18, 2016ecs.sagepub.comDownloaded from

196 European Journal of Cultural Studies 18(2)

the economy, people need to be ‘resilient’ and learn ‘know how to get up off the floor when they’re knocked down by job loss’.

Resilience is a strategy of endurance. It positions individuals to anticipate the pain and suffering that arises from job loss, with the effect that anticipation itself becomes mobilized as a mode of survival. Since people who suffer a job loss often encounter a host of physical and emotional symptoms, the survival that resilience offers can take on quite a literal meaning. But resilience may also be a means of discipline: it holds each individual accountable for his or her own survival in the precarious job market, and in doing so, naturalizes precarity as something that should already be emotionally antici-pated. Those who become overly emotionally distraught over job loss are then chastised for being unprepared, or pathologized for possessing an emotional defect. In this way, resilience is coercively imposed, for to have any other emotional reaction to job loss is to risk being positioned as outside the norms of an emotionally well-adjusted worker.

In many texts, this hardship of endurance is mitigated by a hopeful proposal of finding better work. For instance, Miller tells readers to have faith in God’s promise of a calling, and to possess the ‘boldness and confidence’ that their next job will be better. Such an optimistic narrative may fulfill an important therapeutic purpose of making resilience less painful and difficult. However, at the same time, this narrative can pressurize work-ers into accepting more exploitative conditions for their next job. Like other texts, Jay C. Levinson and David E. Perry (2011) encourage job seekers in Guerrilla Marketing For Job Hunters 3.0 to find work that they feel strongly about. Passion, however, is used here to reproduce a ‘can-do attitude’, a work ethic which will produce an ‘irrational emotional connection’ with the hiring manager. A diagram shows the nature of this ‘can-do atti-tude’. Job hunters are asked to display ‘high-energy enthusiasm for the job, regardless of the hours worked’, to disregard financial rewards, and to show their capacity to endure to the finish for all projects despite the demands it might have on them.

These criteria show how optimism for a more passionate job can easily translate into a context for exploitation. It is assumed that in order to show one’s earnestness in being passionate for the job, one has to be more open to various work stipulations, regardless of how unfair they may be. Furthermore, this expectation is presented with no alterna-tive. Logic goes that in the job scarce, applicant-plenty environment, attitude will become more important as a basis for hire. Job hunters are therefore required to search out their passion and convey them through the ‘can-do attitude’. This emotional stance is so expected that to refuse it, or to show that you ‘just want a paycheck’, Levinson and Perry warn, is tantamount to a ‘negative attitude’ that could exclude you from the job.

Presented as a commonsensical requirement, endurance is enacted here as a privatized process that burdens individuals with the structural problems of inequality. While mass unemployment is a context for shared public dissent, the discourse of endurance fore-closes this by advising readers to move negative emotions into private settings for ther-apy and transformation. Instead of serving as a source of diagnostics, to reveal the problems of work, these negative public emotions are depicted as backward and stultify-ing, something that hinders readers from getting what they want out of life (Ngai, 2005). For instance, Martha I. Finney (2009) in Rebound repeatedly reminds readers that while grief and anger are normal reactions to job loss, they are also emotions that need to be dealt with privately, in the home or car, away from workplace and co-workers. To sustain

at PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV on May 18, 2016ecs.sagepub.comDownloaded from

Hong 197

these affective performances, techniques of endurance are weaved into the fabric of eve-ryday life as mantras, brainwave therapies, meditation, pills and exercise. One exercise, for example, advice readers to ‘find one short word or a quick phrase that you can focus on, such as ‘my family comes first’ or ‘I’m okay’’ and repeat it as they are escorted out of the workplace. Techniques for conjuring positivity are also central. Readers are asked to visualize a moment where they felt successful and produce an ‘anchor’ for it ‘by mak-ing a physical move… as well as screaming out a word that feels powerful’ (Hill, 2010). These actions, like the fist pump and the shouts of ‘yes!’ which the book suggests, become the compromised solutions to the injuries inflicted by capitalism.

The production of endurance in this situation does not relate to any form of enlight-ened social or political understanding. It purely focuses on a change in affective experi-ence. Baur offers an example of a client who has mastered the art of endurance. The client who ‘cried’, felt ‘lost and hollow’ and ‘pretty worthless’ the first time she was laid off, reacts 2 years later in her second job loss hanging out with friends, having enjoyable conversations and eating freshly baked chocolate chip cookies (Baur, 2011: 56). While I do not wish to trivialize the comfort offered by the familiarization of the job hunting process, the prioritization of these affects rid the opportunity where negative public affects may be galvanized as moments of self-reflection and political dissent. Instead, structural problems are assigned from the institutional level to the individual, and then displaced to simply ‘a state of mind’ (Finney, 2009: 157), just an emotional reaction toward an abstracted, inevitable, economic outcome.

As Woodward (2009) offers, some emotions which are infrequently experienced may feel puzzling and even unwelcome when they are first felt. The confusing nature of these emotions may stem from the fact that they reside outside dominant emotional ideologies, making it difficult for people to immediately understand why they feel the way they do. Yet, this is the reason why these emotions have the most potential to illuminate larger social problems. Time for proper self-reflection, however, is necessary for the political potential of these emotions to surface. The advice to disregard negative emotions as quickly as possible rids it of such a possibility. Furthermore, those who choose to try to make sense of these emotions bump up against an emotional hegemony. Sharone (2014) notes that it is difficult for people to articulate negative feelings about job searching because they risk being dismissed as ‘negative’, ‘lazy’ or ‘unproductive’ for not taking time to develop the right professional personality. In this sense, endurance serves a larger ideological function. By encouraging people to gloss over and to see their hardships as personal trials, endurance also diverts attention and accountability from the deep-seated structural problems made apparent in the crisis.

From endurance to the formation of passion

In this section, I focus on Bolles’ What Color is Your Parachute to understand how pas-sion as an affective state is produced. Described as a ‘job-hunter’s bible’, the book has been revised yearly since its initial publication in 1972, and has since sold over 10 mil-lion copies worldwide. This text is chosen, however, not just for its distribution, but its historical importance in making passion a cultural truism. As the Chicago Tribune noted in 1975, at a time when most career guides had focused on the skills of workers, Bolles’

at PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV on May 18, 2016ecs.sagepub.comDownloaded from

198 European Journal of Cultural Studies 18(2)

method of job hunting had proselytized a more comprehensive approach, incorporating desires and preferences as a guide for careers (Houston, 1975). In the 1983 preface, for example, Bolles lamented about the high rates of unemployment, and then writes,

What we know for a fact is that the enthusiastic job-hunter is infinitely more likely to be the one who finds a job than the matter-of-fact job-hunter. The more you’ve identified a job you’d really love to do, and know what things are your greatest enthusiasms, the more you increase your change of finding a job. (p. viii)

By the 2013 edition, passion is presented clearly as the most powerful job-hunting tech-nique, offering an ‘86% success rate’ of finding a job.

Bolles’ confidence in this method stems from a belief in the affective possibilities that passion can produce. Passion is depicted here as a source where positive emotions clus-ter, of which its possession will allow for an alternate motivational structure to emerge:

After doing the homework on yourself, with a description of a job that would really excite you, you pour much more energy into your job-search. Before your job-hunt may have felt more like a duty than anything else. Now, with your vision, you are dying to find that. So, you redouble your efforts, your dedication, and your determination when otherwise you might tire and give up. Persistence becomes your middle name, for a prize worth fighting for. (Bolles, 2013: 36)

Finding ‘that’, the object of passion, is achieved through an instrument Bolles calls the ‘flower exercise’. Although variants of such exercises are found in many career guides, Bolles’ instrument is the most comprehensive, and probably the most used, of all the career guides I analyzed. Described as a means of self-discovery, it requires readers to consider seven aspects (‘petals’) of their desires and skills. Respectively, the seven sections are as follows: their favorite forms of expertise, workplace relations, personal skills, workplace conditions, salary/responsibility, place(s) to live and their goal, pur-poses and mission in life. By completing these sections, and then mapping them on a single image, the reader receives a thorough and complex picture of what their passion entails. The goal here, Bolles explains, ‘is to find the kind of work that matches all seven sides of you … your dream job, where you would shine’.

Prior to 1987, however, another method, titled the ‘parachute exercise’, was used as the key instrument of the book. While the flower exercise was present then (if in a more rudimentary form), it was slotted into the appendix section. In the 1987 preface, Bolles explained the move of the flower exercise into the main chapters saying that ‘the exer-cises found within it [the flower exercise] are so essential, that in my view no conscien-tious reader, job-hunter, or career-changer should omit doing them. But because readers were not finishing the book, they never discovered [it]’ (p. xiii). With this shift, the flower exercise became the key instrument of self-discovery. The parachute exercise, in turn, was removed, leaving only a few parts scattered through the sections of later edi-tions. The switch of exercises here provides an interesting context to observe how the discourse of passion is produced and transformed through the instruments. Comparing the flower and parachute exercise, I wish to demonstrate how the emergence of passion is progressively entwined with an economic language.

at PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV on May 18, 2016ecs.sagepub.comDownloaded from

Hong 199

While the parachute and flower exercise differ in a number of ways, a comparison of the recall techniques used in both provides the most telling example of their difference. The recall techniques – titled the ‘diary’ in the parachute exercise and the ‘offline blog’ in the flower exercise – guide readers into chronicling their past to discover the skills they possess. In the diary, readers are asked to write from a free flow of memories, focus-ing particularly on happy thoughts – hobbies, things they did that were enjoyable, events that filled them with pride, and the like. After writing everything down (Bolles suggests the diary should number around 30–200 pages), readers are instructed to analyze their diary and pick out ‘things I want to have or use for my future career’ and ‘things I want to avoid’ from those accounts.

This process begins differently in the offline blog. There, readers need only to write seven stories, each containing five components: the goal, the obstacle, how it was over-come, the outcome and possible quantifiable products. After which, an extensive dia-gram called ‘the parachute skills grid’ is used for analysis. This diagram holds a checklist of different skills which readers are supposed to parse through and mark if the story had described its use. 62 skills are divided between categories of ‘people’, ‘data’ and ‘things’. In the section of data, for instance, readers provided with 24 skillsets, including ‘use my intuition’, ‘imagine’ and ‘analyze, break down into its parts’. Each story needs to be analyzed in the same way and readers are tasked to see ‘patterns – the transferable skills that keep reappearing in story after story’.

The differences between these techniques, while seemingly small, are nontrivial if we consider career guides as materials meant to develop subjectivities of ideal workers. The offline blog, more than the diary, serves a pedagogical program where readers are edu-cated in the language of self-economization. This effort parallels the trend in neoliberal-ism to consider increasingly large parts of our lives in terms of market values. While both instruments attempt to capture the positive affective memories so as to align them to the formalisms of the market, it is the newer offline blog instrument that offers a precise set of vocabularies that aid the reader in spinning an affectively charged economic narrative about his or her use of skills. Questions about the obstacle faced, its breakthrough and quantifiable outcomes help readers understand their skills in a way that fits within the norms of the marketplace. The clear, distinctive statements of skills also help convey competence and economic self-awareness. This connection, when understood in the larger framework of the creation of ‘passion’, showcases how Bolles had managed to connect emotional attachments to an economic imaginary.

Such a trend transverses the entire organization of the parachute and flower exer-cise. The parachute exercise moves the reader through three sections: the past, present and future, which correspond approximately to the processes of introspection, self-reflection and futurist projection. Organized around methods, however, the parachute fails to offer an underlying narrative to the reader. The flower exercise, on the other hand, is organized around the petals – each describing desired elements of a career, like the use of particular skills, workplace relations and the location where the job is situ-ated. As the reader moves through each section, the product is transposed in terse sentences onto a single page where an empty flower diagram is located. Filling each petal steadily, the reader ‘blossoms’ and undergoes a teleological process of economic ‘self-discovery’. Since career guides present passion as a naturalized object residing

at PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV on May 18, 2016ecs.sagepub.comDownloaded from

200 European Journal of Cultural Studies 18(2)

within the individual, waiting only to be discovered, this narrative supports the under-lying claim of self-realization.

The production of passion is also supported by a variety of other techniques in the flower exercise. Almost all his sections rely on some form of large data gathering and organization. In the section, where the reader is tasked to find their favorite knowledge, for instance, Bolles immediately breaks the question down into four parts – ‘what you know about your favorite mediums that enable you to work most confidently in that medium’, ‘what you know from your previous jobs’, ‘what you know about, outside of work’, ‘what fields, careers, or industries sound interesting to you’. As these prompts illustrate, what seems at first to be a relatively straightforward question quickly expands, prompting deeper introspection. But even then, these questions are but a guide. ‘Jot down everything’, he instructs, every ‘bright idea’, ‘hunch’, ‘dream’ and ‘intuition’; all aspects of a person’s experience and preference are worth capturing. Once everything is written, then a process of organization begins. Readers are usually asked to map their answers on a grid. In the case of knowledge, these are placed onto a table with the axes of high–low expertise and enthusiasm. In other cases, the answers are broken into items that are quantified in terms of priority and then placed on a chart based on scores. Finally, answers that are the ‘best’ – those that are most attractive to the individual – are trans-ferred to the ‘flower’ diagram in short terse points.

While Bolles’ exercise certainly does not use any form of computerized data analysis, his technique, which prioritizes the gathering of massive information, before narrowing it down, mimics the computerized analysis of big data to some degree. As Louis Amoore (2011) notes, the contemporary forms of big data analysis rely upon an ‘ontology of asso-ciation’, a means by which disaggregated data can be brought together through associa-tional protocols for purposes of prediction. The comparison of forms reveals the associative imaginary this exercise employs. Ideas gathered through prompts and muses now become developed, evaluated and labeled as something central to the unique individual. These various aspects of the individual, which had previously, perhaps, nothing at all to do with passion, now acquire through these associations, a new meaning. Bringing a constellation of these preferences together, Bolles suggests that the object of one’s passion is within everybody’s reach, and that individuals need only to look within themselves to seek it out. Crucially, whether or not readers actually believe that the flower is their ‘dream job’, this image provides a reference to their passion, conveying the optimism that the passion may not have yet materialized but is there. Such an organization respects the autobiographic authenticity of the individual, and translates it into an individualized autonomy, the free-dom to realize what is ‘inside’ and pursue it on the ‘outside’.

The overlap of the economic with the emotional and intimate references a particular configuration of the neoliberal subjectivity. While readers are still tasked to be economi-cally empowered and self-reliant (Ross, 2008), What Color is Your Parachute suggests that control over one’s economic destiny ultimately resides within the intimate sphere. Since what leads to success is the discovery of passion, and that passion is dependent on an analysis of personal history and preferences which is available to everyone, the logical conclusion is that nobody is excluded from the state of economic self-empowerment. Bolles produces this fantasy by glossing over the traditional impediments to employment. The lack of skills or education is now possible to overcome with a convincing personal

at PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV on May 18, 2016ecs.sagepub.comDownloaded from

Hong 201

story woven with an economic vocabulary. Therefore, the transformation of preferences and memories into an economic narrative not only teaches readers to speak the economic lingo required of the neoliberal subject, but it also produces the its attractions, a fantasy that access to the abundance of economic opportunity and freedom requires only the right feelings and mentality.

Distrust of passion

In the last section, I analyze four texts published after the financial crisis which I con-sider to be ‘counter-passion’ texts. Timothy Ferriss’ (2009) The Four-Hour Workweek, Michael Froenls’ (2011) The Gift of Job Loss, Jon Acuff’s (2011) Quitter and Cal Newport’s (2012) So Good They Can’t Ignore You, are all counter-passion texts because they express a mistrust of the narrative of passion. Locating themselves in the economic context after the crisis, they express how passion in work has failed in reacting to the precarity of both financial and labor conditions. Newport, the most ardent speaker against passion, takes aim at Bolles, who he claims had spread this idea of passion, saying, ‘The passion hypothesis is not just wrong, it’s also dangerous’. In his account, passion is depicted as inadequate advice. It is exclusionary since many people are unable to find work they feel passionate about, and it is also ‘dangerous’ since the injunction to seek it may lead individuals to make bad economic decisions.

When the promise that passionate work is able to bring the good life is undeliv-ered or distrusted, individuals may turn against passion, decrying it for its failure to satisfy. But what exists outside it? What are the other forms of optimism individuals can turn to? Work, according to Weeks (2011), takes on such a central role in social life that it has become an ideology, something seen as a social necessity and a requirement rather a social convention. The lack of alternative, substantial visions underscore how counter-passion discourses are able to take on a circulatory reason-ing, criticizing passion but yet lead back to it. Without a different ‘mattering map’, to use Grossberg’s (1992) term, the absence of passion may only produce new forms of individualistic empowerment that may produce more troubling consequences than passion itself.

In the accounts of Ferriss and Froenls, the enemy is ‘Corporate America’ which has soaked up the time of workers, leaving them as empty husks. Using the calamity of the crisis as an opportunity, therefore, both authors advocate readers to rethink the lifestyles they want. Their solution – consumption – ‘mini-retirement plans’ where individuals take flight to foreign countries, enjoying themselves and immersing in new learning opportunities. Directing passion for work to passion for consumption, both authors unpack the different attitudes readers need to have. For Ferriss, this involves becoming more efficient, and most preferably, an entrepreneur. He explains, ‘The vast majority of people will never find a job that can be an unending source of fulfillment, so that is not the goal here; to free time and automate income is’. To do both, however, an individual needs to be trained in the basics of exploitation and entrepreneurship, to find low wage workers to outsource mundane tasks to, to consolidate a group of friends you can take information from and to understand workings of differential global markets. Froenls, on the other hand, situates consumption as a route back to job-hunting, a process that

at PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV on May 18, 2016ecs.sagepub.comDownloaded from

202 European Journal of Cultural Studies 18(2)

produces the mental readiness for a job. As he offers, ‘I came back [from the holiday] energized, full of optimism … I had learned new things about myself, particularly how to handle uncertainty, how to relax in an economic crisis, and how to move forward while others are pessimistic’.

The accusations against passion shift in Newport and Acuff, who argue that the dan-gers of passion lie in the possibility that readers would leave their jobs and end up in dire financial straits. Both authors, however, diverge in their beliefs of passion. Acuff antici-pates that readers already have a passion, but the passion is their hobby, rather than their day job. Warning readers that hobbies often don’t pay well, Acuff advocates that a more fulfilling life may be attained through the development of a deeper affective relationship to the day job via the hobby. He argues,

If you demonize your day job… it becomes a prison you’ll try to escape from… The truth is, we need to learn to fall in like with a job we don’t love because it’s actually the best way to set up your dream for success.

‘Falling in like’ summarizes the entire argument of Acuff’s, where he tries to develop meaning in the work by asking readers to consider the different ways jobs and dreams can benefit one another. In a similar vein, Newport criticizes what he calls ‘courage cul-ture’ which advocates individuals to quit their jobs so as to pursue their passion. Suggesting instead that most people who claim to have passion actually started their jobs without passion, Newport argues that individuals need to be persistent, and build their skills even at something which is not enjoyable. It is only through this process that indi-viduals can earn ‘control’, the capital that underlies feelings of passion itself.

Criticizing passion, but yet leading readers back to work as a site of optimism, these career guides showcase the deep ambivalence that lies at the heart of this discourse. Since passion includes a complex degree of meanings, career guides can afford to dis-trust passion but yet maintain some proximity to it. Advocating individualistic empow-erment, counter-passion discourses attack the rhetoric of passion without changing its status quo.

It is possible to dismiss these counter-passion discourses because they are career guides – objects meant to spread a particular kind of knowledge. Yet, these are the same materials people turn to when laid off, disenchanted with work or suffering, and its con-tent has permeated into culture, sustaining a common imagined affective experience. So when Scott Adams (2013b), the cartoonist of Dilbert recently wrote in Time that passion is overrated, and that only people who are successful can claim to be passionate, we immediately grasp what he is talking about – the ironies of passion. We may then read some Dilbert and both laugh and cry at his satirical depictions of office culture. Finally then, we might pick Adams’ (2013a) newly published self-help book, whose exact chap-ter which disparage passion highlights the importance of energy in a career. The poverty in counter-discourses of passion shows how passion acts as an emotional hegemony. We may believe in passion without physically experiencing it; we may also seek for it while being cynical about it. Passion thus accepts a variety of positions without requiring a fundamental change in the structural inequalities that constitute our everyday lives (Berlant, 2011).

at PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV on May 18, 2016ecs.sagepub.comDownloaded from

Hong 203

Conclusion

One of the goals of this essay has been to challenge the common belief that passion is an unquestionably desirable affect. In critiquing it, however, we might also seek out what Virno (1996) has called the ‘neutral kernel’, a space where passion might be rearticulated for revolutionary potential. In one sense, passion is an unavoidable element in the fight for justice. It is related to what Gramsci had called the ‘optimism of the will’, a kind of affective empowerment that is crucial to social change. Without passion, it is difficult to galvanize the kind of collectives and energy needed for political struggle. At the same time, the clause that precedes it is the ‘pessimism of the intellect’. When placed together, this phrase expresses Gramsci’s belief that clear analysis needs to be conducted before proper social change can proceed.

Conventional articulations of passion hinder a proper understanding of the inequali-ties that structure our lives under capitalism, with the result that passion, while affec-tively important, comes cruel in its failure to address the substantive social changes needed for labor conditions to improve (Berlant, 2011). In this setting, passion becomes an apparatus of capital, something used to offer momentary solace and endurance, while producing the subjectivities that render workers more susceptible to exploitation. Discourses that express a distrust of passion also fail to offer a substantive, alternate vision.

What could a politically enabled form of passion look like? In his early manuscripts, Marx (1844) described good work as work an individual did as ‘free manifestation of life, hence an enjoyment of life’. When work is made into something required for survival it becomes problematic. Work now becomes an ‘alienation of life, for I work in order to live, in order to obtain for myself the means of life’. These early suppositions which equate good work to enjoyment are problematic in many ways, but yet they hold within a possibility. Might passion for work be rearticulated as passion for justice? Can disap-pointment over the unfair labor arrangements and affective requirements, evident after the financial crisis, be used as a source of affective demand?

Career guides foreclose this affective future by making bad feelings wrong. But bad feeling can be right in so many ways, especially as a diagnostics for the injuries of capital (Ngai, 2005). To produce an alternate affective imaginary, the possibilities in bad feel-ings need to be resuscitated, given an opportunity to air as a collective recognition of pain rather than framed as a source of division needing personal transformation. This will also mean reevaluating the things that we invest our affect into, not just the literal enjoyment of work but the fundamental qualities of livelihood, wages, benefits, security and autonomy. This means recognizing the material realities of our lives and the substan-tial change that needs to happen before feelings of passion can really manifest.

In this alternate vision, passion should no longer be something just to be found within the self. Rather, it should be recognized as always relationally intertwined with the broader culture of work. In this way, passion for work can avoid solely being a source of therapeutic transformation, or an individualistic form of empowerment. If work matters for all, then one’s own preference, whatever it might be, needs also to condense and take shape as a collective demand for social justice (Hesmondhalgh, 2010), a wanting for substantive change to produce a society of fairer, better work.

at PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV on May 18, 2016ecs.sagepub.comDownloaded from

204 European Journal of Cultural Studies 18(2)

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Note

1. This was information collated from Amazon.com on November 2013. A total of 38,984 titles were recorded under the ‘job hunting and careers’ category, but Amazon.com allow users to only view 1200 titles at any one time.

References

Acuff J (2011) Quitter: Closing the Gap Between Your Day Job & Your Dream Job. Brentwood, Tennessee: Lamp Press.

Adams S (2013a) How to Fail at Almost Everything and Still Win Big: Kind of the Story of My Life. New York: Penguin.

Adams S (2013b) ‘Passion’ at work is overrated. Time. Available at: http://ideas.time.com/2013/10/21/passion-at-work-is-overrated/

Ahmed S (2010) The Promise of Happiness. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.Amoore L (2011) Data derivatives: On the emergence of a security risk calculus for our times.

Theory, Culture & Society 28(6): 24–43.Arvidsson A, Malossi G and Naro S (2010) Passionate work? Labour conditions in the Milan

Fashion Industry. Journal for Cultural Research 14(3): 295–309.Baur J (2011) Eliminated! Now What? Indianapolis, IN: Jist Works.Berlant L (2011) Cruel Optimism. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.Bolles RN (1983) What Color Is Your Parachute? Berkeley, CA: Ten Speed Press.Bolles RN (2013) What Color Is Your Parachute? Berkeley, CA: Ten Speed Press.Dalton S (2012) The 2-Hour Job Search: Using Technology to Get the Right Job Faster. Berkeley,

CA: Ten Speed Press.Eurostat (2014) Unemployment statistics. Available at: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_

explained/index.php/Unemployment_statisticsFerriss T (2009) The Four-Hour Workweek: Escape 9–5, Live Anywhere, and Join the New Rich.

New York: Crown Publisher.Finney MI (2009) Rebound: A Proven Plan for Starting over after Job Loss. Upper Saddle River,

NJ: FT Press.Froenls M (2011) The Gift of Job Loss: A Practical Guide to Realizing the Most Rewarding Time

of Your Life. Texas: Peitho Publishing. Gill R and Pratt A (2008) In the social factory?: Immaterial labour, precariousness and cultural

work. Theory, Culture & Society 25(7–8): 1–30.Goodman PS (2009) U.S. Unemployment Rate Hits 10.2%, Highest in 26 Years. New York Times.

Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/07/business/economy/07jobs.htmlGrossberg L (1992) We Gotta Get Out of this Place: Popular Conservatism and Postmodern

Culture. New York: Routledge. Groskop V (2014) ‘Shelf-help’ books set to fill publishers’ coffers in 2014. The Guardian.

Available at: http://www.theguardian.com/books/2013/dec/28/self-help-books-literature-publishers-growth

Hall DT (2004) The protean career: A quarter-century journey. Journal of Vocational Behavior 65(1): 1–13.

Hardt M and Negri A (2004) Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire. Penguin Press: New York.

at PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV on May 18, 2016ecs.sagepub.comDownloaded from

Hong 205

Harvey D (2000) Spaces of Hope. Edinburg: Edinburg University Press.Harvey D (2005) A Brief History of Neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.Heelas P (2002) Work ethics, soft capitalism and the ‘turn to life’. In: du Gay P (ed) Cultural

Economy: Cultural Analysis and Commercial Life. London: Sage Publications, pp. 78–96.Hesmondhalgh D and Baker S (2011) Creative Labour: Media Work in Three Cultural Industries.

New York: Routledge.Hesmondhalgh D (2010) Normativity and Social Justice in the Analysis of Creative Labour.

Journal for Cultural Research 14(3): 231–249.Hill P (2010) The Panic Free Job Search: Unleash the Power of the Web and Social Networking

to get Hired. Pompton Plains: The Career Press.Houston J (1975) Job-planning expert shows analytical way to find work. Chicago Tribune, 25

May, N1.Illouz E (2008) Saving the Modern Soul: Therapy, Emotions and the Culture of Self-Help. Los

Angeles, CA: University of California Press.Lazzarato M (1996) Immaterial labor. In: Virno P and Hardt M (eds) Radical Thought in Italy: A

Potential Politics. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp.133–149.Levinson JC and Perry DE (2011) Guerrilla Marketing for Job Hunters 3.0. Hoboken, NJ: John

Wiley & Sons.Liu A (2004) The Laws of Cool: Knowledge Work and the Culture of Information. Chicago, IL and

London: University of Chicago Press.Mandell N (2002) The Corporation as Family: The Gendering of Corporate Welfare 1890–1930.

Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Marketdata Enterprises (2012) The Market for Self-Improvement Products and Services (9th edn).

Available at: http://www.marketdataenterprises.com/studies/#SELFIMPROVEMENTMarx K (1844) Comments on James Mill, Éléments D’économie Politique. Available at: http://

www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1844/james-mill/Miller D (2010) 48 Days to the Work You Love. Nashville, TN: B&H Publishing Group.Morini C (2007) The feminization of labour in cognitive capitalism. Feminist Review 87: 40–59.Newport C (2012) So Good They Can’t Ignore You: Why Skills Trump Passion in the Quest for

Work You Love. New York: Business Plus.Ngai S (2005) Ugly Feelings. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.O’Brien M (2013) The terrifying reality of long-term unemployment. The Atlantic. Available

at: http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2013/04/the-terrifying-realityof-long-term-unemployment/274957/

Portal Seven (2013) Unemployment Rate – U6, 2000–2013. Available at: http://portalseven.com/employment/unemployment_rate_u6.jsp

Rimke HM (2000) Governing citizens through self-help literature. Cultural Studies 14(1): 61–78.Rose N (1999) Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press.Ross A (2003) No-Collar: The Humane Workplace and Its Hidden Costs. New York: Basic Books.Ross A (2008) The new geography of work: Power to the precarious? Theory, Culture & Society

25(7–8): 31–49.Sharone O (2014) Flawed System Flawed Self: Job Searching and Unemployment Experiences.

Chicago, IL and London: University of Chicago Press.Tone A (1997) The Business of Benevolence: Industrial Paternalism in Progressive America. New

York: Cornell University Press.Vercellone C (2007) From formal subsumption to general intellect: Elements for a Marxist reading

of the thesis of cognitive capitalism. Historical Materialism 15: 13–36.

at PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV on May 18, 2016ecs.sagepub.comDownloaded from

206 European Journal of Cultural Studies 18(2)

Virno P (1996) The ambivalence of disenchantment. In: Virno P and Hardt M (eds) Radical Thought in Italy: A Potential Politics. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp.12–33.

Weber M (1905/2001) The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism: The Relationship Between Religion and the Economic and the Social Life in Modern Cultures. London: Routledge.

Weeks K (2011) The Problem with Work: Feminism, Marxism, Antiwork Politics, and Postwork Imaginaries. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.

Woodward K (2009) Statistical Panic: Cultural Politics and the Poetics of the Emotions. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

Biographical note

Renyi Hong is a doctoral student at the Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism, University of Southern California. His ideas draw from the intersections of labor, affect, and cul-tural theory. He is currently interested in the ideological circulation of work-passion across mate-rial culture, software, and architecture.

at PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV on May 18, 2016ecs.sagepub.comDownloaded from