village of north riverside, illinois village board meeting agenda ...
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20 Name of the Place/Site village, city
-
Upload
khangminh22 -
Category
Documents
-
view
2 -
download
0
Transcript of FIELD TRIPS 2019-20 Name of the Place/Site village, city
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
Name of the Place/Site village, city: Sobha Garnet, Undri, Pune
Name of the collaborating agency: Sobha Developers, Bangalore
Co-ordinated by: Ar. Sudhir Deshpande, Ar. Sumedh Gite, Ar. Kanchan Shinde
Dates of visit: 3rd and 4th February, 2020
Purpose of the visit: Study of design, construction and services of Multi basements structure
Reason for selection of this site:
The topic was studied to analyse the design, construction and services of multi basement structure. The above
mentioned was suitable to decode the structure in terms of our proposed objectives. This sobha Garnet project
has received various prestigious awards like birla, buildcon etc. Sobha is very well known for their german
engineering audits and their in house design, construction and service team management. Also the project is
located in nearby areas of college. Therefore, it was a great opportunity to us to visit that project.
Summary of the inputs given before site visit (500-600 words)
The topic theory at introductory part was told to students at classrooms only. They were needed to correlate
and find out some alternative mechanisms in the project. The therotical part included topics like, areas, side
margins, heights, ramp designs, column grid, drive ways, parking spaces, circulation elements, fire escapes,
service areas, codings, column treatments, service lines, clearances, water proofing methods, loads, pressures
to be tackled by structure, design optimization and many more.
Summary of the visit: (500-1000 words)
We started with correlative theory and observatory input by the core faculty to initiate the site visit. Then the
field engineer explained us the whole project design by moving around right from entrance to exit. Also they
explained the connection to the building blocks. Then we segregated into two groups to learn and observe
basic services like water supply, firefighting, electrification and mechanical ventilation etc. Each group was
assisted with field engineer and core faculty members. Students actually visited to every area in basement and
asked various queries to the engineer and faculty. Engineers also explained the structural part of the basements
and faculties supported the data with on site sketches to the students to understand the mechanism. The
duration for this site visit was around 2.5 hours. At the last phase the project incharge architect Ar. Kedar
Marathe communicated with students and explained them the economical factors in basement construction. It
was very insightful session for the students.
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
Highlights (major learnings) - (500-600 words)
• Learned to plan the entrance, exits to the basements
• Learned to check the ground profile, number of tenements, applicable norms from corporation before
planning the basement
• Learned to design the ramp profile, slope, expand, movement, fire tender route
• Observed and learned associative features of ramps like channels, ventilators, fire hydrants, speed
breakers, mirrors, coding, surface etc.
• Learned design of drive ways and parking spaces
• Learned the positons of vertical circulation elements like stair and lifts and also connection between
basements and buildings
• Learned to plan the service areas like UGWT, plant room, transformer, generator yard, electrical
room, fire tanks, security rooms, etc.
• Observed the laying service lines, proposed shafts, clearances etc.
• Learned different colour codes to different service lines and overlapping portion of service lines
• Observed the lighting arrangement and ventilation techniques in the basement
• Learned to plan the various escape routes in case of fire, emergency
• Learned to consider different structural loads to be implemented on basement structure.
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
Students Participants – Third year Batches – Red and Yellow batches- Academic Year – 2019-20
Sr. No. Name of the Student Year
Y1
Y2
Y3
Y4
Y5
Y6
Y7
Y8
Y9
Y10
Y11
Y12
Y13
Y14
Y15
Y16
Y17
Y18
Y19
Y20
Y21
Y22
Y23
Y24
Y25
Y26
Y27
Y28
Y29
Y30
Y31
Adwani Lata
Adep Rajeshwari
Ahire Prashant
Alizar Rutika
Bafna Akshay
Barai Simran
Batra Bhavya
Bhandari Jay
Bhonsale Chaitanya
Borawake Ankit
Dhawale Pallavi
Gujalwar Shriya
Ghawalkar Atharva
Ghodke Nishad
Jadhav Pratik
Jadhav Twinkle
Jangam Abhineet
Kangankar Kunal
Karad Kanchan
Kochar Siddhant
Kripalani Harsha
Meshram Mayur
More Darshan
Pareira Raunaq
Patil Mithila
Patil Rajat
Ramani Sanket
Raskar Amay
Rathod Tanish
Suthar Purushottam
Shah Amruta
Third year – Yellow
batch
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
Y32
Y33
Y34
Y35
Singoure Arya
Thakkar Naman
Uttarkar Priyanka
Taori Gopal
Sr. No. Name of the Student Year
R1
R2
R3
R4
R5
R6
R7
R8
R9
R10
R11
R12
R13
R14
R15
R16
R17
R18
R19
R20
R21
R22
R23
R24
R25
R26
Aeram Akansh
Bagad Rutuja
Badjate Aishwarya
Bhadale Akshata
Bhandarkar Gehini
Bhat Vaishnavi
Bhandari Yash
Bhattad Aachal
Bhonsale Divyesh
Bhutkar Rajsheel
Bombale Aishwarya
Chhallani Yash
Chavan Abhishek
Doshi Reva
Dwivedi Pragati
Gupta Riddhi
Gore Yash
Hiray Tanmayee
Jagad Poojal
Jain Niket
Kapuswala Khadija
Khaire Harshda
Khunte Aishwarya
Killedar Rujuta
Kshirsagar Jaidev
Kondhalkar Anand
Third year – Red batch
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
R27
R28
R29
R30
R31
R32
R33
R34
R35
R36
Mannikar Chinmay
Nimbalkar Shivanjali
Rathod Neev
Sethia Roshni
Shah Parth
Shah Piyush
Shewale Nishigandha
Shinde Vedika
Tayade Aniket
Tungar Manas
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
Name of the Place/Site village, city: Aura laser factory, Shirwal MIDC
Name of the collaborating agency: Aura laser management
Co-ordinated by: Ar. Sudhir Deshpande, Ar. Sumedh Gite, Ar. Kanchan Shinde
Dates of visit: 25th January, 2020
Purpose of the visit: Study of design, construction and services of Industrial steel structure
Reason for selection of this site:
The topic was studied to analyse the design, construction and services of Industrial steel structure. The above
mentioned was suitable to decode the structure in terms of our proposed objectives. This Aura laser factory is
well known for production of mechanical parts for automobile industry. Also this project was constructed in
teo phases. The earlier phase was constructed with traditional fin truss and portal arrangement. The extension
and later part of the factory was constructed in PEB construction. Therefore, it was a good opportunity to study
and analyse both systems of construction. Also the layout is simple and well worked out to understand the
segregation between the machine areas and walkways. Also this steel structure was supported with Gantry
arrangement. Therefore, it was a good site to see the crane details and lifting design of materials. Even we
received some good contacts for arranging this visit very systematically.
Summary of the inputs given before site visit (500-600 words)
The topic theory at introductory part was told to students at classrooms only. They were needed to correlate
and find out some alternative mechanisms in the project. The therotical part included topics like, components,
their fixing and design, heights, gateways, provisions of trusses, rafters, wind bracings, purlins, stanchions,
span arrangements, roofing and cladding sheet application, services like cable arrangemnets, fire fighting, rain
water disposals, light and ventilation, surface drainage, clearances, water proofing methods, loads, pressures
to be tackled by structure, design optimization and many more.
Summary of the visit: (500-1000 words)
We started with correlative theory and observatory input by the core faculty to initiate the site visit. Then the
field engineer explained us the whole project design by moving around right from entrance to exit. Also they
explained the connection to the building from old part to new extension. Then we segregated into two groups
to learn and observe structure and services. Each group was assisted with field engineer and core faculty
members. Students actually visited to every area in industrial shed and asked various queries to the engineer
and faculty. Engineers also explained the structural part of the factory and faculties supported the data with on
site sketches to the students to understand the mechanism. The duration for this site visit was around 2 hours.
At the last phase the project incharge engineer Mr. Jadhav communicated with students and explained them
the functioning and suitable space design and economical factors involved in steel construction. It was very
insightful session for the students.
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
Highlights (major learnings) - (500-600 words)
• Learned to plan the entrance, exits to industrial structure
• Learned to check the ground profile, type and function of industry, applicable norms from
corporation before planning the structure
• Learned to design loading unloading platforms, circulation movement patterns, fire tender route,
provision of deck floors
• Observed and learned important connections and fixing details of stanchion, rafter, purlins, bracing
members, ventilators, fire hydrants, speed breakers, mirrors, coding, surface etc.
• Learned design of layout as per the functioning of the structure
• Learned the positons of vertical circulation elements like stair and also connection between old and
new structure
• Learned to plan the service areas like UGWT, plant room, transformer, generator yard, electrical
room, fire tanks, security rooms, etc.
• Observed the laying service lines, proposed shafts, clearances etc.
• Learned different colour codes to different service lines and overlapping portion of service lines
• Observed the lighting arrangement and ventilation techniques in the basement
• Learned to plan the various escape routes in case of fire, emergency
• Learned to consider different structural loads to be implemented on industrial structure.
Students Participants – Third year Batches – Red and Yellow batches- Academic Year – 2019-20
Sr. No. Name of the Student Year
Y1
Y2
Y3
Y4
Y5
Y6
Y7
Y8
Y9
Y10
Y11
Y12
Adwani Lata
Adep Rajeshwari
Ahire Prashant
Alizar Rutika
Bafna Akshay
Barai Simran
Batra Bhavya
Bhandari Jay
Bhonsale Chaitanya
Borawake Ankit
Dhawale Pallavi
Gujalwar Shriya
Third year – Yellow
batch
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
Y13
Y14
Y15
Y16
Y17
Y18
Y19
Y20
Y21
Y22
Y23
Y24
Y25
Y26
Y27
Y28
Y29
Y30
Y31
Y32
Y33
Y34
Y35
Ghawalkar Atharva
Ghodke Nishad
Jadhav Pratik
Jadhav Twinkle
Jangam Abhineet
Kangankar Kunal
Karad Kanchan
Kochar Siddhant
Kripalani Harsha
Meshram Mayur
More Darshan
Pareira Raunaq
Patil Mithila
Patil Rajat
Ramani Sanket
Raskar Amay
Rathod Tanish
Suthar Purushottam
Shah Amruta
Singoure Arya
Thakkar Naman
Uttarkar Priyanka
Taori Gopal
Sr. No. Name of the Student Year
R1
R2
R3
R4
R5
R6
R7
Aeram Akansh
Bagad Rutuja
Badjate Aishwarya
Bhadale Akshata
Bhandarkar Gehini
Bhat Vaishnavi
Bhandari Yash
Third year – Red batch
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
R8
R9
R10
R11
R12
R13
R14
R15
R16
R17
R18
R19
R20
R21
R22
R23
R24
R25
R26
R27
R28
R29
R30
R31
R32
R33
R34
R35
R36
Bhattad Aachal
Bhonsale Divyesh
Bhutkar Rajsheel
Bombale Aishwarya
Chhallani Yash
Chavan Abhishek
Doshi Reva
Dwivedi Pragati
Gupta Riddhi
Gore Yash
Hiray Tanmayee
Jagad Poojal
Jain Niket
Kapuswala Khadija
Khaire Harshda
Khunte Aishwarya
Killedar Rujuta
Kshirsagar Jaidev
Kondhalkar Anand
Mannikar Chinmay
Nimbalkar Shivanjali
Rathod Neev
Sethia Roshni
Shah Parth
Shah Piyush
Shewale Nishigandha
Shinde Vedika
Tayade Aniket
Tungar Manas
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
Name of the Place/Site village, city: Lawkim Limited, Godrej, Shirwal MIDC
Name of the collaborating agency: Aura laser management
Co-ordinated by: Ar. Sudhir Deshpande, Ar. Sumedh Gite, Ar. Kanchan Shinde
Dates of visit: 25th January, 2020
Purpose of the visit: Study of design, construction and services of Industrial steel structure
Reason for selection of this site:
The topic was studied to analyse the design, construction and services of Industrial steel structure. The above
mentioned was suitable to decode the structure in terms of our proposed objectives. The lawkim limited is well
known for production of mechanical parts for automobile industry. It is also allied company of Godrej. This
project was constructed in conventional monitor roof truss. This project also constructed in two phases.The
earlier phase was constructed with traditional monitor roof truss and stanchion arrangement. The extension
and later part of the factory was constructed in PEB construction. Therefore, it was a good opportunity to study
and analyse both systems of construction. Also the layout is simple and well worked out to understand the
segregation between the machine areas and walkways. Also this steel structure was supported with Gantry
arrangement. Therefore, it was a good site to see the crane details and lifting design of materials. Even we
received some good contacts for arranging this visit very systematically.
Summary of the inputs given before site visit (500-600 words)
The topic theory at introductory part was told to students at classrooms only. They were needed to correlate
and find out some alternative mechanisms in the project. The therotical part included topics like, components,
their fixing and design, heights, gateways, provisions of trusses, rafters, wind bracings, purlins, stanchions,
span arrangements, roofing and cladding sheet application, services like cable arrangemnets, fire fighting, rain
water disposals, light and ventilation, surface drainage, clearances, water proofing methods, loads, pressures
to be tackled by structure, design optimization and many more.
Summary of the visit: (500-1000 words)
We started with correlative theory and observatory input by the core faculty to initiate the site visit. Then the
field engineer explained us the whole project design by moving around right from entrance to exit. Also they
explained the connection to the building from old part to new extension. Then we segregated into two groups
to learn and observe structure and services. Each group was assisted with field engineer and core faculty
members. Students actually visited to every area in industrial shed and asked various queries to the engineer
and faculty. Engineers also explained the structural part of the factory and faculties supported the data with on
site sketches to the students to understand the mechanism. The duration for this site visit was around 2 hours.
At the last phase the project incharge engineer Mr. Rahul Jadhav communicated with students and explained
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
them the functioning and suitable space design and economical factors involved in steel construction. It was
very insightful session for the students.
Highlights (major learnings) - (500-600 words)
• Learned to plan the entrance, exits to industrial structure
• Learned to check the ground profile, type and function of industry, applicable norms from
corporation before planning the structure
• Learned to design loading unloading platforms, circulation movement patterns, fire tender route,
provision of deck floors
• Observed and learned important connections and fixing details of stanchion, rafter, purlins, bracing
members, ventilators, fire hydrants, speed breakers, mirrors, coding, surface etc.
• Learned design of layout as per the functioning of the structure
• Learned the positons of vertical circulation elements like stair and also connection between old and
new structure
• Learned to plan the service areas like UGWT, plant room, transformer, generator yard, electrical
room, fire tanks, security rooms, etc.
• Observed the laying service lines, proposed shafts, clearances etc.
• Learned different colour codes to different service lines and overlapping portion of service lines
• Observed the lighting arrangement and ventilation techniques in the basement
• Learned to plan the various escape routes in case of fire, emergency
• Learned to consider different structural loads to be implemented on industrial structure.
Students Participants – Third year Batches – Red and Yellow batches- Academic Year – 2019-20
Sr. No. Name of the Student Year
Y1
Y2
Y3
Y4
Y5
Y6
Y7
Y8
Y9
Y10
Y11
Y12
Adwani Lata
Adep Rajeshwari
Ahire Prashant
Alizar Rutika
Bafna Akshay
Barai Simran
Batra Bhavya
Bhandari Jay
Bhonsale Chaitanya
Borawake Ankit
Dhawale Pallavi
Gujalwar Shriya
Third year – Yellow
batch
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
Y13
Y14
Y15
Y16
Y17
Y18
Y19
Y20
Y21
Y22
Y23
Y24
Y25
Y26
Y27
Y28
Y29
Y30
Y31
Y32
Y33
Y34
Y35
Ghawalkar Atharva
Ghodke Nishad
Jadhav Pratik
Jadhav Twinkle
Jangam Abhineet
Kangankar Kunal
Karad Kanchan
Kochar Siddhant
Kripalani Harsha
Meshram Mayur
More Darshan
Pareira Raunaq
Patil Mithila
Patil Rajat
Ramani Sanket
Raskar Amay
Rathod Tanish
Suthar Purushottam
Shah Amruta
Singoure Arya
Thakkar Naman
Uttarkar Priyanka
Taori Gopal
Sr. No. Name of the Student Year
R1
R2
R3
R4
R5
R6
R7
Aeram Akansh
Bagad Rutuja
Badjate Aishwarya
Bhadale Akshata
Bhandarkar Gehini
Bhat Vaishnavi
Bhandari Yash
Third year – Red batch
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
R8
R9
R10
R11
R12
R13
R14
R15
R16
R17
R18
R19
R20
R21
R22
R23
R24
R25
R26
R27
R28
R29
R30
R31
R32
R33
R34
R35
R36
Bhattad Aachal
Bhonsale Divyesh
Bhutkar Rajsheel
Bombale Aishwarya
Chhallani Yash
Chavan Abhishek
Doshi Reva
Dwivedi Pragati
Gupta Riddhi
Gore Yash
Hiray Tanmayee
Jagad Poojal
Jain Niket
Kapuswala Khadija
Khaire Harshda
Khunte Aishwarya
Killedar Rujuta
Kshirsagar Jaidev
Kondhalkar Anand
Mannikar Chinmay
Nimbalkar Shivanjali
Rathod Neev
Sethia Roshni
Shah Parth
Shah Piyush
Shewale Nishigandha
Shinde Vedika
Tayade Aniket
Tungar Manas
Photographs
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
Name of the Place/Site village, city: FTII, Pune and RBI agricultural banking institute, Shivajinagar,
Pune
Name of the collaborating agency: SMEF’s brick school of architecture
Co-ordinated by: Ar. Sudhir Deshpande, Ar. Rohit Potdar, Ar. Girija Indulkar
Dates of visit: 6th July, 2019
Purpose of the visit: To study existing institutional campus of FTII and RBI for proposed housing
project
Reason for selection of this site:
The topic was studied to analyse and study of existing institutional campus of FTII and RBI for proposed
housing project. The above mentioned project was suitable to understand the idea of institutional housing
and neighbourhood living concepts. Institutional housing, a housing relating to, formulated by, or managed
by an institution. It may be a government or private institute. Any institution will consist of certain rules and
regulations that must be abided by in order to participate in the program. Basically it was a housing project
proposed for the employees of the above mentioned institutes. RBI institute was required a housing facility
for their employees. The institute includes the hierarchy of employees from class F to Class A i.e. from
deputy governor to clerical staff. The institute also needed some amenities for their resident employees and
guests. The project required the privacy and security aspects in planning as it is governed by RBI. FTII
campus of the institute was well separated with interesting un-built and built spaces. The institute was
required housing facility which was proposed at the opposite side of the present institute. The objective was
to redevelop and propose the housing project on the same site. The idea was to create a qualitative built
environment which will display the institutional character by all means. The idea is to explore creative,
innovating content from FTII campus and disciplined, simplistic approach from RBI campus for proposed
institutional housing project.
Summary of the inputs given before site visit (500-600 words)
The topic theory at introductory part was told to students at classrooms only through teacher talks, informal
group discussions, case studies, video presentations etc. The chart of observations to be noted was made
through these discussions. Faculties decided the attributes to be measured on the site. The content part
included topics like site surroundings, site accesses, internal circulation drive ways, walkways, zoning,
existing landscape and civil features, understanding the language of an institute, studying different hierarchies
of user in respective institutes, existing views, landscape elements, capacities, physical environment and many
more.
Summary of the visit: (500-1000 words)
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
We started with correlative theory and observatory input by the core faculty to initiate the site visit. Then the
incharge person explained us the whole project design by moving around right from entrance to exit. Also they
explained the habitat, schedules, user classification, activities in their campus. Then we segregated into two
groups to learn and observe the attributes that we listed in the input sessions. Each group was assisted with
faculty members. Students actually visited to every area of the campus and asked various queries to the
in-charge personnel and faculty. The duration for this site visit was around 2 hours. At the last phase the in
charge personnel communicated with students and explained them the functioning, and housing requirement
and their future plans.. It was very insightful session for the students.
Highlights (major learnings) - (500-600 words)
It was important to understand the designing & planning ideas while proposing neighborhood living. The
behavior of the users, their primary demands, visual & physical connect of buildings are the key components
in planning process. The proposed user was from different contextual background. Therefore, it was a major
challenge & requirement to provide responsive environment through cut off spaces, open spaces, lobbies,
terraces & relaxing spaces. The objective was to create healthy social connect inside the community through
thoughtful designed spaces.
A livable habitat is always a key to connect living and working in a healthier manner. This project was also
contained 5% amenity spaces considering the preferences and psychology of residents of this institute. The
accommodation facility also needed to be designed to cater visiting teachers, guests, artists and other eminent
personalities.
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
Students Participants – Fouth year Batches – Aqua and Purple batches- Academic Year – 2019-2020
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
Name of the Place/Site village, city: Constro-20 Exhibtion at Sinchan Nagar, Pune
Name of the collaborating agency: SMEF’s brick school of architecture
Co-ordinated by: Er. Hemant Joshi
Dates of visit: 16th - 19th January, 2020
Purpose of the visit: Visit to exhibition to understand various developments and practices in RCC and
Steel works.
Pune construction engineering Research Foundation has been organizing constro International fair
every alternate year. It also holds its biggest construction exhibition. Constro 2020 was from 16th January to 19th January at new agriculture college ground Sinchan Nagar, Pune.
Considering the increasing demand in the construction sector that requires to industrial needs and spread awareness about modern building materials, machinery and construction method. This
exhibition was also focus on subjects including building construction codes, green sustainable buildings, effective construction skill development, safety on site etc.
It was an unique platform to visitors to meet other personalities other personalities like architect, engineer, designers, manufacturers, Builders to improve quality, knowledge, technology, research and
development in construction sector by organizing seminar, courses for professionals, graduate, undergraduates in the construction sector.
There was Association of Association of India was conduct their Maharashtra state level meeting in constro 2020, which was focused on skill development in construction sector as part of of exhibition. PCERF also organized its prestigious PCERF Padmashree B. G. Shirke Vidyarthi awards 2020 on
17th of January to boost creativity and talent among the students of civil engineering and architecture
STALLS visited
1. SHIVRAYA PLASTER SAND
EFFECTIVE ALTERNATIVE TO NATURAL SAND, ECO FRIENDLY,
HIGHER CONCRETE STRENGTH, GRADED SAND
2. KALPAK INDUSTRIES
PRE-ENGINEERED STEEL BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES, ROOFING AND CLADDING SHEETS, PURLINS, DECK SHEETS, TURBO VENTILATORS, FRP SHEETS, LOUVERS
3. ECOTECH CHUTES PVT.LTD.
GARBAGE CHUTE, DEBRIS CHUTE, ORGANIC WASTE COMPOSTER
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
4. GUTERMAN DRAIN INDIA PVT.LTD.
LINEAR DRAINAGE SYSTEM MANUFACTURER 5.CREATIOS-THINK AMAZING
GARDEN AND HOME DECOR, LANDSCAPE ELEMENTS
6. KALIKA STEEL
STEEL MANUFACTURING COMPANY
7. ASCOLITE
ESSENTIAL TILE AND STONE FIXING
8. KITEC
MULTILAYER COMPOSITE PIPES USE FOR PLUMBING, CABLE CONDUITS, FUEL LINES
9. SUMEET FIRE ENGINEERS PVT.LTD.
FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS
10. TECHNO ACOUSTIC
MANUFACTURER OF NON-WOVEN POLYESTER FIBRE ACOUSTIC PANELS
11. NEROLAC PERMA
ALL TYPES OF PAINTS, WATER PROOFING SYSTEM, FIXING SOLUTION,
ADMIXTURE, BONDING AGENTS
12. AAHIL PRODUCTS CO.PVT.LTD
FENCE AND SCAFFOLDING SOLUTIONS
13. REACKON
COVERBLOCK MOULDS, DOOR FRAMES MOULD
14. GREENTEK PLAST
PLASTIC FORMWORK BOARDS
15. TPI WOOD
TPI FIBER CEMENT WOOD
16. YASH MARKETING
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
TILE PRTECTION SHEETS, AND ROLL, THERMAL INSULATION, CIVIL CONSTRUCTION PRODUCTS, PRINT AND PACKAGING SOLUTION
17. CON AIR
PARKING LIFTS
18. DRP GROUP
VALVES AND FITTINGS
19. URONEEL ALUMINIUM PANEL SHEET
ALUMINIUM PANEL SHEETS (PVDF)
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
ANALYSIS
• Constro helps to reduces the gap between buyer and seller. So people doesn't want to go
their actual shop and buy something. They can order it right in that stall.
• Seller gave authentic products and materials. Because they observe problems in previous product, so they make the new version to avoiding that problem in new design product.
• When we gone through the all stalls, we got to know about new technology, materials,
machineries and interior design product below one shelter from these kind of event
• we saw their different technics to construct a building. for e.g.- There was one formwork in which u have to put a concrete masonry and a house will ready within a week. So this all technics can be use in our design to ease the construction
• Every seller gave us their brochure. It helps to get more information about their products with their materials and sizes in details.
• While we were visiting each stall we observed that the constro event circulation was well
sorted so that none of the stall can have accommodation problem.
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
Name of the Place/Site village, city: Taljai devi temple, taljai pathar, Sahakarnagar, Pune
Name of the collaborating agency: SMEF’s brick school of architecture, Brick sketch club
Co-ordinated by: Ar. Sudhir Deshpande
Dates of visit: 6th July, 2019
Purpose of the visit: To learn on site sketching of architectural spaces.
Reason for selection of this site:
The topic was studied to learn on site sketching of architectural spaces. The above mentioned site and
location was suitable to understand the idea of sketching and various components and attributes of
sketching. The selected location was well provided with good and shady landscape with traditional temple
architecture. It is a very old temple and trees on the east side create nice shadow patterns on temple façade.
The fresh morning environment and comfortable siting places for sketch invited us for sketching activity.
Summary of the inputs given before site visit
The session was started by Ar. Sudhir Deshpande’s input session. These inputs included different principle
elements of sketching like scale, proportion, balance, light, shade and shadow patterns, human scale, focusing
objects etc. Due to this student got good orientation before the actual sketching session. He also shown some
his previous sketched and explained ideas and narrative behind them. He also suggested some sketching tools
for beginner sketchers.
Summary of the visit:
Student started with correlative theory and observatory input by the core faculty to initiate the activity. In
charge faculty suggested some spots for sketching. Students started their sketching activity and faculty guided
them throughout the session. Students put good , composed and proportionate sketches at the end of the
session. The duration of total session was 2 hours. It was very insightful session for the students.
Highlights (major learnings) - (500-600 words)
It was important to understand the difference between photograph and sketch. The minimum lines should
speak maximum in sketching format. It is an interplay between scale, proportion and light. The perspective
lines considering our eye level are also important. Every individual can pick up his or her own style of
sketching. But the important thing is to learn from the sketching is to express. Architects language is
sketching and expressing through graphics.
Students Participants –Academic Year – 2019-2020
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
Sr. no. Name of the participant Year
1 Gaurav Mali Second year
2 Vivek Chikoti Second year
3 Aditya Savalkar Second year
4 Vedika Shinde Third year
5 Yash Gore Third year
6 Jai Karwande Second year
7 Shreya Gaikwad Second year
8 Sejal Lodha Second year
9 Vaishnavi Rathi Second year
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
Name of the Place/Site village, city: Godrej RMC plant, Dhayari, Pune
Name of the collaborating agency: Godrej RMC
Co-ordinated by: Ar. Jayalaxmi Deshmukh, Ar. Rajdatta Dewang
Dates of visit: 20th & 21st January, 2020
Purpose of the visit: Study of preparation, transportation and quality testing of Ready Mix Concrete
Reason for selection of this site:
The topic was studied to analyse and study of preparation, transportation and quality testing of Ready Mix
Concrete. The above mentioned project was suitable to decode the topic in terms of our proposed objectives.
The Godrej RMC plant is well known for production of Quality ready mix concrete and also it is certified plant
for different typed quality testing and quality products. Godrej RMC plant takes a systematic approach right
from inventory of raw material to transportation of final product. The main plant is situated at Hadapsar. Due
to busy schedule we got an opportunity to visit the allied plant on Sinhgad road. The processes and checking
schedules were systematic therefore, it was a good site to study and understand ready mix concrete topic
comprehensively. Even we received some good contacts for arranging this visit very systematically.
Summary of the inputs given before site visit (500-600 words)
The topic theory at introductory part was told to students at classrooms only. They were needed to correlate
and find out some alternative mechanisms in the project. The therotical part included topics like need of RMC
concrete, proportions, mixing, tranportations through transit trucks, environmental considerations in
manufacturing processes, batching, scheduling, testing, components involved like buckets, vonveyor belts,
mixer, grinders, advantages, limitations, cosing involved, market purchase rating analysis, strength of
concrete loads, and many more.
Summary of the visit: (500-1000 words)
We started with correlative theory and observatory input by the core faculty to initiate the site visit. Then the
field engineer explained us the whole project design by moving around right from entrance to exit. Also they
explained the stages of manufacturing, testing schedules, capacity of the plant, storages of new products and
raw material, site office design and arrangement. Then we segregated into two groups to learn and observe
functions and components. Each group was assisted with field engineer and core faculty members. Students
actually visited to every area of RMC plant and asked various queries to the engineer and faculty. Engineers
also explained the structural attributes of RMC to be achieved as per the norms and faculties supported the
data with on site sketches to the students to understand the mechanism. The duration for this site visit was
around 2 hours. At the last phase the project engineer Mr. Basudeo communicated with students and explained
them the functioning and suitable space and qualitative checks to be done in RMC manufacturing.
It was very insightful session for the students.
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
Highlights (major learnings) - (500-600 words)
• Separate entrances for pedestrian & transit mixer trucks
• Allied departments are separated & coordination was at a good level
• Quality tests gets performed as per IS standards.
• Weighing Bridge is proposed at the exit area.
• Provision of safety helmets & jackets as per standard color codes
• Functioning components like silos, batch mixer, conveyor belt for aggregates, compressor room for
automated cement pumping are planned effectively
• Admixture I.e. ether based & napthalon based tanks are separately planned with pumps and
measuring scale
• Mixing procedure gets initiated with automated system & respective inward, outward invoices gets
printed
• Per day mixer capacity - 300m3, 6m3 - 10 minutes mixing time
• Wastage from mixing gets reused for preparation of cement brick, blocks, bedding concrete
• Waste water also gets reused for washing the aggregates and for mixing
• Seperate area provided for waste storage
• Focus on green concrete by the use of Fly ash, GGBS gets used with ordinary portland cement to
reduce cement quantity
• Produces special concrete such as free flowing concrete, self compaction concrete, coloured concrete,
stamped concrete, pervious concrete
• Tests like Cube compression test, slump cone tests to be taken at manufacturing plant as well as on
proposed site
• Provision of curing tank should be provided with respective date, batch & grade markings on cubes
• Quality checks to be done before application
• Care should be taken at storage areas
• Minimum wastage should be there and it has to be recycled
• Water recycling could be induced
• Processing unit plan should be effective & ready with required database
• Safety norms to be followed strictly
• Travelling time should be less than 3 hours
• Seperate parking & circulation space should be provided for transit trucks
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
List of Participants
NAME OF STUDENTS YEAR 2019-20
G1 Agarwal Nipun 2ND
G2 Bajaj Manokamna 2ND
G3 Balani Diven 2ND
G4 Barde Kaiwalya 2ND
G5 Bhatter Palak 2ND
G6 Bhutada Shrinidhi 2ND
G7 Daule Rutuja 2ND
G8 Dighe Yash 2ND
G9 Georgi Riya 2ND
G10 Hake Pranav 2ND
G11 Jagtap Isha
2ND
G12 Jadhav Hrishikesh 2ND
G13 Kabra Anuj 2ND
G14 Kulkarni Ruchir 2ND
G15 Kumbhare Shashwat 2ND
G16 Lad Atharva 2ND
G17 Laddha Urja 2ND
G18 Lalwani Jatin 2ND
G19 Lalwani Tanay 2ND
G20 Lodha Sejal 2ND
G21 Nanekar Pradyumna 2ND
G22 Navlakha Tanishqa 2ND
G23 Oak Akanksha 2ND
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
G24 Pawar Simran 2ND
G25 Rathi Vaishnavi 2ND
G26 Sakore Atharva 2ND
G27 Shah Rutu 2ND
G28 Shergarwala Zainab 2ND
G29 Shimpi Riya 2ND
G30 Shinde Apoorva 2ND
G31 Shinde Omkar 2ND
G32 Talathi Smeet 2ND
G33 Thakkar Ruchi 2ND
G34 Vanarse Achyut 2ND
G35 Vanave Mahesh 2ND
G36 Rokade Rrushali 2ND
NAME OF STUDENTS YEAR 2019-20
O1 Agarwal Shivangi 2ND
O2 Anvikar Varun 2ND
O3 Babu Dhanyalaxmi 2ND
O4 Bhosale Pranav 2ND
O5 Bhutani Kashish 2ND
O6 Chaure Prasad 2ND
O7 Chavan Rutuja 2ND
O8 Cheekoti Vivek 2ND
O11 Deo Anushka 2ND
O12 Dhankawade Vishwaja 2ND
O13 Gadekar Rohit 2ND
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
O14 Gaikwad Rutik 2ND
O15 Gaikwad Shreya 2ND
O16 Gund Omkar 2ND
O18 Jadhav Shubham 2ND
O19 Jawalkar Tanmay 2ND
O20 Jose Tanya 2ND
O21 Kadam Nirupam 2ND
O22 Kankaria Shreya 2ND
O24 Khot Asmita 2ND
O25 Kulkarni Rucha 2ND
O27 Misal Karan 2ND
O29 Mundada Sakshi 2ND
O30 Mutha Garima 2ND
O31 Patel Rutveek 2ND
O32 Patil Aishwarya 2ND
O33 Rathi Amay 2ND
O34 Salvi Aryan 2ND
O35 Sawalkar Aditya 2ND
O36 Shinde Yash 2ND
O37 Tambi Rounak 2ND
O39 Kale Swagat 2ND
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
Name of the Place/Site village, city: Beside DTDC, Mundhawa Kharadi road, opposite Reliance
Smart,Kharadi, Pune
Name of the collaborating agency: SMEF’s Brick school of Architecture
Co-ordinated by: Ar. Jayalaxmi Deshmukh, Ar. Rajdatta Dewang
Dates of visit: 16th January, 2020
Purpose of the visit: Site Visits arranged to Study latest & basic standards in construction techniques
like frame structure arrangements, reinforcement laying, site formwork, health & safety hazards
Aim: Students to understand Principles of RCC construction & how structures behave in framed construction.
Stress on understanding the structural analysis along with the construction technology and materials. To help
student, gain theoretical as well as practical knowledge.
Objective: To understand how is the reinforcement done in frame structures on sites, how to read structural
drawing, how to communicate on site with the help of structural & architectural drawing, what are the local
names for reinforcement working.
Exploration: Exploration was also aimed to understand the details of structural elements like column, floor
beams and one way/two way, continuous slabs, cantilever beams, canopy and its typical reinforcement details,
staircase reinforcement.
• It was also aimed to understand the terminologies and details of reinforcement cover, bent up bars,
hooks, legs, spacing etc. and how it is shown in drawing.
• For RCC the Drawing meant to understand the arrangement of role of reinforcement.
• Site visits conducted at Kharadi to enable students to be well versed with the practical conditions on
site and understand the detail for all the check points done during execution. To understand how is
the reinforcement done in frame structures on sites, How to read structural drawing, What are the
local names for reinforcement working.
• How to communicate on site with the help of structural & architectural drawing
List of Participants
NAME OF STUDENTS YEAR 2019-20
G1 Agarwal Nipun 2ND
G2 Bajaj Manokamna 2ND
G3 Balani Diven 2ND
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
G4 Barde Kaiwalya 2ND
G5 Bhatter Palak 2ND
G6 Bhutada Shrinidhi 2ND
G7 Daule Rutuja 2ND
G8 Dighe Yash 2ND
G9 Georgi Riya 2ND
G10 Hake Pranav 2ND
G11 Jagtap Isha
2ND
G12 Jadhav Hrishikesh 2ND
G13 Kabra Anuj 2ND
G14 Kulkarni Ruchir 2ND
G15 Kumbhare Shashwat 2ND
G16 Lad Atharva 2ND
G17 Laddha Urja 2ND
G18 Lalwani Jatin 2ND
G19 Lalwani Tanay 2ND
G20 Lodha Sejal 2ND
G21 Nanekar Pradyumna 2ND
G22 Navlakha Tanishqa 2ND
G23 Oak Akanksha 2ND
G24 Pawar Simran 2ND
G25 Rathi Vaishnavi 2ND
G26 Sakore Atharva 2ND
G27 Shah Rutu 2ND
G28 Shergarwala Zainab 2ND
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
G29 Shimpi Riya 2ND
G30 Shinde Apoorva 2ND
G31 Shinde Omkar 2ND
G32 Talathi Smeet 2ND
G33 Thakkar Ruchi 2ND
G34 Vanarse Achyut 2ND
G35 Vanave Mahesh 2ND
G36 Rokade Rrushali 2ND
NAME OF STUDENTS YEAR 2019-20
O1 Agarwal Shivangi 2ND
O2 Anvikar Varun 2ND
O3 Babu Dhanyalaxmi 2ND
O4 Bhosale Pranav 2ND
O5 Bhutani Kashish 2ND
O6 Chaure Prasad 2ND
O7 Chavan Rutuja 2ND
O8 Cheekoti Vivek 2ND
O11 Deo Anushka 2ND
O12 Dhankawade Vishwaja 2ND
O13 Gadekar Rohit 2ND
O14 Gaikwad Rutik 2ND
O15 Gaikwad Shreya 2ND
O16 Gund Omkar 2ND
O18 Jadhav Shubham 2ND
O19 Jawalkar Tanmay 2ND
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
O20 Jose Tanya 2ND
O21 Kadam Nirupam 2ND
O22 Kankaria Shreya 2ND
O24 Khot Asmita 2ND
O25 Kulkarni Rucha 2ND
O27 Misal Karan 2ND
O29 Mundada Sakshi 2ND
O30 Mutha Garima 2ND
O31 Patel Rutveek 2ND
O32 Patil Aishwarya 2ND
O33 Rathi Amay 2ND
O34 Salvi Aryan 2ND
O35 Sawalkar Aditya 2ND
O36 Shinde Yash 2ND
O37 Tambi Rounak 2ND
O39 Kale Swagat 2ND
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
Name of the Place/Site village, city: Jaquar Orientation Center, Shivajinagar, Pune
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
Name of the collaborating agency: Jaquar Group, Shivajinagar, Pune
Co-ordinated by: (name of the faculty):- Ar. Jayalaxmi Deshmukh
Dates of visit: 23rd & 24th July, 2019
Purpose of the visit:
To introduce students the sourcing and distribution of hot and cold water in a building premises
including the study of all components involved.
To show them actual working of Taps, faucets and other fittings- Bib taps (ordinary, Screw down , half
turn , quarter turn using ceramic disks ) variations such as pillar taps , angle valves , shower roses etc. -
Mixing units for wash-hand basins, kitchen sinks, shower units, baths etc. (Both of valve and diverter
type and single lever type) Flushing cisterns and flush valves. Etc.
Reason for selection of this site: (250-300 words):-
Today Jaquar Group is India’s most searched bath brand on Google (Google trends period 13-15), leader by
far. As per super brand across 2000 brands (all top brands across category) in India, Jaquar Group stands in top
5% brand with maximum recognition and awareness Jaquar Group is India’s most trusted bath fittings brand
(AC Neilson 2013). Jaquar Group is the first Indian bathing brand to mark its presence at global bathing fair at
ISH Frankfurt in 2013, 2015, 2017, 2019 and will be participating in the upcoming 2021 fair as well. The
company’s approach to aesthetic design has won several accolades like Red Dot Design (Germany) IF Awards
(Germany), Plus X (Germany) & Good Design (U.S.A), Elle Décor International Award, Indian Design Mark,
among othersThe Group has been globally certified in quality by SON, TUV, CE, TISI, KC, SASO, PZH,
ZNAK-B, WRAS, KIWA, CIDB, PUB, and SABS
Summary of the inputs given before site visit (500-600 words):-
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
We introduced students the basics of plumbing fittings & fixtures. Requirements of toilet design & its
anthropometric. They were also introduced to Sanitary fittings – Water Closets (Indian and European) Wash
down, double syphonic , floor mounted , wall hung etc.
- Bidets
- Wash hand Basins, Bath- Tubs.
- Kitchen and laboratory sinks.
- Urinals.
Traps: their uses and functioning.
- ‘p’ , ‘s’ , and ‘q’ traps for Water Closets.
- Bottle traps, floor traps, gully traps, grease traps and disconnecting traps.
Pipes and piping network.
- Single and double stack systems.
- Materials of pipes – Cast iron , P.V.C. , A.C. Stoneware , R.C.C. etc. and their methods of jointing.
- Specials- Jointing and installations.
- Anti- Siphonage Pipes.
Summary of the visit:
After this visit students were understood Building Services in low, medium and high rise buildings and
inculcate in them the integration of services in architectural design. Systems for hot and cold water supply in a
building premises with storage , sourcing and distribution of hot and cold water in a building premises
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
including the study of all components involved. Systems of hot water supply using conventional and non
conventional energy sources.Direct systems, In-direct systems , components and equipments used for the
same. Insulation of piping and safety devices.
Students Participants
NAME OF STUDENTS YEAR 2019-20
G1 Agarwal Nipun 2ND
G2 Bajaj Manokamna 2ND
G3 Balani Diven 2ND
G4 Barde Kaiwalya 2ND
G5 Bhatter Palak 2ND
G6 Bhutada Shrinidhi 2ND
G7 Daule Rutuja 2ND
G8 Dighe Yash 2ND
G9 Georgi Riya 2ND
G10 Hake Pranav 2ND
G11 Jagtap Isha
2ND
G12 Jadhav Hrishikesh 2ND
G13 Kabra Anuj 2ND
G14 Kulkarni Ruchir 2ND
G15 Kumbhare Shashwat 2ND
G16 Lad Atharva 2ND
G17 Laddha Urja 2ND
G18 Lalwani Jatin 2ND
G19 Lalwani Tanay 2ND
G20 Lodha Sejal 2ND
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
G21 Nanekar Pradyumna 2ND
G22 Navlakha Tanishqa 2ND
G23 Oak Akanksha 2ND
G24 Pawar Simran 2ND
G25 Rathi Vaishnavi 2ND
G26 Sakore Atharva 2ND
G27 Shah Rutu 2ND
G28 Shergarwala Zainab 2ND
G29 Shimpi Riya 2ND
G30 Shinde Apoorva 2ND
G31 Shinde Omkar 2ND
G32 Talathi Smeet 2ND
G33 Thakkar Ruchi 2ND
G34 Vanarse Achyut 2ND
G35 Vanave Mahesh 2ND
G36 Rokade Rrushali 2ND
NAME OF STUDENTS YEAR 2019-20
O1 Agarwal Shivangi 2ND
O2 Anvikar Varun 2ND
O3 Babu Dhanyalaxmi 2ND
O4 Bhosale Pranav 2ND
O5 Bhutani Kashish 2ND
O6 Chaure Prasad 2ND
O7 Chavan Rutuja 2ND
O8 Cheekoti Vivek 2ND
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
O11 Deo Anushka 2ND
O12 Dhankawade Vishwaja 2ND
O13 Gadekar Rohit 2ND
O14 Gaikwad Rutik 2ND
O15 Gaikwad Shreya 2ND
O16 Gund Omkar 2ND
O18 Jadhav Shubham 2ND
O19 Jawalkar Tanmay 2ND
O20 Jose Tanya 2ND
O21 Kadam Nirupam 2ND
O22 Kankaria Shreya 2ND
O24 Khot Asmita 2ND
O25 Kulkarni Rucha 2ND
O27 Misal Karan 2ND
O29 Mundada Sakshi 2ND
O30 Mutha Garima 2ND
O31 Patel Rutveek 2ND
O32 Patil Aishwarya 2ND
O33 Rathi Amay 2ND
O34 Salvi Aryan 2ND
O35 Sawalkar Aditya 2ND
O36 Shinde Yash 2ND
O37 Tambi Rounak 2ND
O39 Kale Swagat 2ND
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
Name of the Place/Site village, city: VKA , Bhaktimarg Rd, Shanti Sheela Society, Deccan Gymkhana, Pune,
Maharashtra 411004
Phone: 020 6626 8888
Name of the collaborating agency: VKA architects
Co-ordinated by: (name of the faculty) Ar. Anurakti Yadav
Dates of visit: 11/02/2020
Purpose of the visit: Study of office infrastructure and talk on the professional ethics.
Reason for selection of this site: Ar. Vishwas Kulkarni has a vast and varied experience of designing and
delivering wide array of architectural projects for the past 39 years. His work has been acclaimed and has
received many awards over the year. So, he would have been the right person students can talk and get all
their doubts clear about the professional ethics and how to develop office infrastructure as your firm
grows. Even today he continues to work towards bringing design perfection in his projects.
Summary of the inputs given before site visit - Students were taught about organization of an architect’s
office in detail, followed by asking them to tell what all essential elements would be required in the given
office. They were given a tender to fill and were asked to form a firm hypothetically and list down no of
years of experience, infrastructure, their skills, type of projects handled.
Summary of the visit - had visit in the office of Ar. Vishwas Kulkarni, to make students understand the scale
and infrastructure of a firm. They had a healthy discussion with the principal architect and the junior architect
and asked all the relative queries to the professional field. Students were exposed to the challenges architect
face as he grows his firm, they got to know various policies an laws mandatory for the approval of the project.
Highlights (major learnings) - Students were exposed to the challenges architect face as he grows his firm,
they got to know various policies and laws mandatory for the approval of the project.
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
Students Participants
Sr. No. Name of the Student Year
1 Chaitanya Ghokhle Fourth year
2 Akshat Ranka Fourth year
3 Kuntal Nage Fourth year
4 Bela Nigulkar Fourth year
5 Rutuj Surana Fourth year
6 Akhil Tanted Fourth year
7 Kanchi Bafna Fourth year
8 Sharvari Rajvaidya Fourth year
9 Anand Jain Fourth year
10 Sejal Phale Fourth year
Photographs
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
Name of the Place/Site village, city: Old Pune city
Name of the collaborating agency: SMEF’s Brick school of Architecture
Co-ordinated by: Ar. Ramiya Gopal, Ar. Vaibhavi Agarwal
Dates of visit: 30th March, 2020
Purpose of the visit: city walk arranged to study the evolution of architecture from the old city to the present
magarpatta township with a focus on contemporary built forms
Aim:
To establish a critical and comprehensive viewpoint about the contemporary trends/approaches in
architectural production in terms of design, practices, its perception, appreciation and critical discourses. To
develop the ability in students to position themselves in today’s time so as to be able to establish an argument
and testify the same.
Lecture Time division:
Total lecture time: 180 min. (once a week for each batch)
Basic Teaching Objectives:
• To position students to look at and read an urban environment, in order to identify clear, visible as well as not
so visible issues, which act on and influence the functioning as well as our experience of an urban
environment.
• The focus will be directed towards understanding relationship between existing built form and the urbanity
around it, and how both influence each other.
• These help students develop an understanding of how built form is not isolated but always in a close
relationship with people and activities around.
• All of this leads towards an understanding of contemporary architecture in the context of present day Pune,
which is not isolated practices and objects but a network of built forms, their functionality in relation to people,
the climate and their use over time.
Teaching Format:
Input: Presentation and discussions
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
The Exercise:
• Started with the most basic question-What architecture meant to them
This exercise is aimed at guiding the studio in the right direction and to enable students to start discovering
answers for themselves
• Book review
This exercise is aimed at the study and understanding of a book which helps students to start generating
opinion
• A Critical Inquiry into Contemporary Built Practices
This exercise is aimed at the study and analysis of three different areas of Pune. It is a walk through three
different timelines to understand how architecture has changed over the years and the factors influencing the
same with a focus on contemporary built forms (buildings and their surroundings). The intent is to identify
issues/problems/concerns which are coming from the site, and which are an outcome of these built forms
acting on their surrounding environment. These issues can be environmental, economic, social, spatial,
experiential or political, but they should arise from the relationship between these built forms and their
surrounding life.
Eg. If a high-rise glass cladded building is causing the micro temperature around it to rise because of reflected
heat, then this is an environmental concern generating from the presence of this built form within its
surroundings.
OR
If street vendors and informal market around a newly developed gated community is removed, so as to
maintain an image of the gated community, then this is a social & economical concern generating from the
presence of this gated community within its surroundings.
OR
If a contemporary high rise in a dense neighborhood has inadequate parking provisions, thereby adding to the
already existing problem of parking around, then this is a traffic and parking issue substantiated by the
presence of the building in that context.
Thus, students have to identify issues of this nature, from their study and analysis. The validity of their inquiry
will be based on their argument, which has to be backed up by evidence. The students cannot just focus on the
relationship between built forms and their surroundings, but they can also base their inquiry on the forces
which have shaped these built forms (economically driven, politically motivated decisions or cultural trends
which have resulted in a particular type of design or construction or choice of location of these built forms).
Thus, the idea behind this exercise is to understand how contemporary built forms are an outcome of a
complex web of decision making, influences, different agencies, different intents and the relationship between
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
the built forms and their surrounding urban life, therefore, they cannot be studied in isolation, merely for their
architectural quality, but they must be viewed within this larger framework.
Method:
- Students will be taken for a city walk starting from Pune city to Magarpatta Township
- They will be divided into group of 10 and asked to conduct a study of given three areas, which will be based
on the following perspectives:
• Visual coherence
• Experience (are the buildings dominating, welcoming, unwelcoming etc.)
• Accessibility (is it easily accessible, difficult to navigate around etc.)
• Form & material (does it suit the context, is it pleasing or hard to look at etc.)
• Effect on public realm around (spaces for interaction, informal spaces, social infrastructure such as bus stop,
public toilets etc.)
• Activities around (informal market, street vendors, street-side shops, walkers/joggers, meeting places etc.)
• Relationship with un-built (open spaces around, green patches, landscape, places of public interaction etc.)
• Pedestrian friendly or automobile friendly surroundings
• Relationship with context (respects the context, dominates the context, disrupts the context etc.)
• Perception (how users see/perceive these built forms, is there a sense of association etc.)
• Use and abuse (are the spaces inside/around used or misused or abused)
• Environment/Microclimate (shade and shadow, vegetation etc.)
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
This is not a checklist, but indicators. You can have your own perspective, but you will have to articulate it in
your study and analysis, although, the above list can serve as a good guide for you to conduct your study.
- After initial group study and analysis, students are expected to figure out their individual focus, on which,
they will be conducting an individual research further, which they will articulate in the form of an academic
paper.
- Individual inquiry can be based on a particular issue or you may interlink multiple issues, to demonstrate
your own critical take on the nature of the built form and its relationship to the surrounding.
- You may even develop a proposal for a design intervention, based on your analysis, which you will articulate
in your paper as a design brief.
Representation:
- Students can make use of photographs, Google earth images, sketches, diagrams, info graphics, text, collage
or any other form of visual representation.
- Presentations will be in the form of a PPT throughout.
- The format for individual papers will be shared at a later stage.
Areas for study :
Kasba Peth Area
Camp Area
Magarpatta City
Stage 01:
Observations: Students presented observations of their study of the three areas. Ideally, they were supposed to
closely follow the brief given to them and orient their study accordingly.
Stage 02:
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
Abstract Submission: After choosing their area of focus, which is based on their group study, students
discussed them time and again at an individual level, and then wrote an abstract, which would give some kind
of orientation towards their area of interest and what their research aims.
Stage 03:
Review of research papers: Students were asked to read and review two research papers, which were related to
their own individual area of inquiry and speak about their understanding or give a short presentation for the
class.
Stage 04:
Submission of Drafts : Students submitted their drafts, which were reviewed and discussed with them for
improvements.
Stage 05:
Final presentation: Students presented their final papers with help of a presentation, which summed up their
paper.
Final Deliverables:
Paper + Presentation (PPT)
We have separately attached two sample student works:
One is the best (Aniket Tayade) for choice of topic, references made and attempt at articulating the argument.
The second is (Roshini Sethia), for the way she has articulated the argument in a simple but comprehensive
way.
Assessment Parameters:
Assessment was based on depth of inquiry, articulation of argument, backing with references and reading,
demonstration of evidence and finesse of language. This was in addition to overall attendance record and a
general regularity throughout the semester.
Observations:
This was a start or an orientation towards academic writing, which is based on on-ground research. It may
have been difficult for many students to understand the brief and the intent of the program, at large, but some
of them sailed through well. Also, since the students have Architectural Research as a subject next year (fourth
year), this program paved the way for them to take it ahead with a bit more understanding and maturity.
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
List of Participants
Sr. No. Name of the Student Year
Y1
Y2
Y3
Y4
Y5
Y6
Y7
Y8
Y9
Y10
Y11
Y12
Y13
Y14
Y15
Y16
Y17
Y18
Y19
Y20
Y21
Y22
Y23
Y24
Y25
Y26
Y27
Y28
Y29
Y30
Adwani Lata
Alizar Rutika
Bafna Akshay
Barai Simran
Batra Bhavya
Bhandari Jay
Bhonsale Chaitanya
Borawake Ankit
Dhawale Pallavi
Gujalwar Shriya
Ghawalkar Atharva
Ghodke Nishad
Jadhav Pratik
Jadhav Twinkle
Jangam Abhineet
Kangankar Kunal
Karad Kanchan
Kochar Siddhant
Kripalani Harsha
Meshram Mayur
More Darshan
Pareira Raunaq
Patil Mithila
Patil Rajat
Ramani Sanket
Raskar Amay
Rathod Tanish
Suthar Purushottam
Shah Amruta
Singoure Arya
Third year – Yellow
batch
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
Y31
Y32
Y33
Thakkar Naman
Uttarkar Priyanka
Taori Gopal
Sr. No. Name of the Student Year
R1
R2
R3
R4
R5
R6
R7
R8
R9
R10
R11
R12
R13
R14
R15
R16
R17
R18
R19
R20
R21
R22
R23
R24
R25
R26
R27
Aeram Akansh
Bagad Rutuja
Badjate Aishwarya
Bhadale Akshata
Bhandarkar Gehini
Bhat Vaishnavi
Bhandari Yash
Bhattad Aachal
Bhonsale Divyesh
Bombale Aishwarya
Chhallani Yash
Chavan Abhishek
Doshi Reva
Dwivedi Pragati
Gupta Riddhi
Gore Yash
Hiray Tanmayee
Jagad Poojal
Jain Niket
Kapuswala Khadija
Khaire Harshda
Khunte Aishwarya
Killedar Rujuta
Kshirsagar Jaidev
Kondhalkar Anand
Mannikar Chinmay
Nimbalkar Shivanjali
Third year – Red batch
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
R28
R29
R30
R31
R32
R33
R34
R35
R36
Rathod Neev
Sethia Roshni
Shah Parth
Shah Piyush
Shewale Nishigandha
Shinde Vedika
Tayade Aniket
Tungar Manas
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
Name of the Place/Site village, city: Bhigwan, Baramati, Maharahtra
Name of the collaborating agency: BRICK
Co-ordinated by: Abhang K, Neha Ghugari, Aditya Mandgaokar, Amrut Deshmukh
Dates of visit: 13th June 2019
Purpose of the visit: Site study
Reason for selection of this site:
The ever increasing human population has put a lot of stress on natural resources. The most affected is land.
We are expanding our footprint on this planet at such an alarming rate, without realising how it affects our
cohabitant flora and fauna. It is no surprise that slowly but surely some species are becoming lesser in numbers
and also becoming extinct. The Short Exploration chosen this semester was a “Migratory Birds Observation
Centre”. Pune is lucky to have Bhigwan in its vicinity. It is renowned for the presence of migratory birds.
Located on the backwaters of the Ujjani dam it offers a good natural environment for these birds.
Summary of the inputs given before site visit
The responsibility of choosing the site was left to the students. Before the visit, guidelines were given on how
to choose the site. An orientation lecture was conducted before departure for the trip. An introduction was
given to the socio-geographic and climatic context of the region. Maps of the region were studied and
important landmarks were identified
Summary of the visit:
The trip was conducted in a single day as the place is about 2 hours drive from Pune. An extensive walkaround
was conducted to first familiarise the students with the area and the village in its vicinity.
Highlights (major learnings)
It was observed that there exists a tourist culture and infrastructure but largely in an unorganised manner.
If this is allowed to take its natural course then there will be a major damage to the environment. To bring
about ecological awareness amongst all, a facility should be proposed which can attract people from all
walks of life, be it a casual tourist, a layman or even an ornithologist. But every intervention has an impact.
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
Nowhere more than at a location which is ecological so sensitive that any careless action can disturb the
nature’s delicate balance and adversely impact the flora and fauna. So it was important to implement the
follwing identified aspects strictly:
• Ecologically sensitive Architectural Design in proximity of a large water body
• Low impact construction
• Lightweight and semi-permanent structure
• Design from a controlled palette of building materials
The material pallette was also carefully proposed as below:
Wood, bamboo, tensile fabric or any other lightweight material.
No RCC , brick, CCU blocks to be allowed for superstructure
PHOTOGRAPHS
Bhigwan site
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
Students Participants
Sr.No Name of the Student Year
1 Adwani Lata 3rd Year
2 Adep Rajeshwari 3rd Year
3 Ahire Prashant 3rd Year
4 Alizar Rutika 3rd Year
5 Bafna Akshay 3rd Year
6 Barai Simran 3rd Year
7 Batra Bhavya 3rd Year
8 Bhandari Jay 3rd Year
9 Bhonsale Chaitanya 3rd Year
10 Borawake Ankit 3rd Year
11 Dhawale Pallavi 3rd Year
12 Gujalwar Shriya 3rd Year
13 Ghawalkar Atharva 3rd Year
14 Ghodke Nishad 3rd Year
15 Nishant Giri 3rd Year
16 Jadhav Pratik 3rd Year
17 Jadhav Twinkle 3rd Year
18 Jangam Abhineet 3rd Year
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
19 Kangankar Kunal 3rd Year
20 Kochar Siddhant 3rd Year
21 Kripalani Harsha 3rd Year
22 Meshram Mayur 3rd Year
23 More Darshan 3rd Year
24 Pareira Raunaq 3rd Year
25 Patil Mithila 3rd Year
26 Ramani Sanket 3rd Year
27 Raskar Amay 3rd Year
28 Rathod Tanish 3rd Year
29 Suthar Purushottam 3rd Year
30 Shah Amruta 3rd Year
31 Singoure Arya 3rd Year
32 Thakkar Naman 3rd Year
33 Uttarkar Priyanka 3rd Year
34 Taori Gopal 3rd Year
35 Aeram Akansh 3rd Year
36 Bagad Rutuja 3rd Year
37 Badjate Aishwarya 3rd Year
38 Bhadale Akshata 3rd Year
39 Bhandarkar Gehini 3rd Year
40 Bhat Vaishnavi 3rd Year
41 Bhandari Yash 3rd Year
42 Bhattad Aachal 3rd Year
43 Bhonsale Divyesh 3rd Year
44 Bombale Aishwarya 3rd Year
45 Chavan Abhishek 3rd Year
46 Doshi Reva 3rd Year
47 Dwivedi Pragati 3rd Year
48 Gupta Riddhi 3rd Year
49 Gore Yash 3rd Year
50 Hiray Tanmayee 3rd Year
51 Jagad Poojal 3rd Year
52 Jain Niket 3rd Year
53 Kapuswala Khadija 3rd Year
54 Khaire Harshda 3rd Year
55 Khunte Aishwarya 3rd Year
56 Killedar Rujuta 3rd Year
57 Kshirsagar Jaidev 3rd Year
58 Kondhalkar Anand 3rd Year
59 Mannikar Chinmay 3rd Year
60 Nimbalkar Shivanjali 3rd Year
61 Rathod Neev 3rd Year
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
62 Sethia Roshni 3rd Year
63 Shah Parth 3rd Year
64 Shah Piyush 3rd Year
65 Shewale Nishigandha 3rd Year
66 Shinde Vedika 3rd Year
67 Tayade Aniket 3rd Year
68 Badjate Aishwarya 3rd Year
69 Bhadale Akshata 3rd Year
70 Bhandarkar Gehini 3rd Year
71 Bhat Vaishnavi 3rd Year
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
Name of the Place/Site village, city: Amboli and Sawantwadi, Maharahtra
Name of the collaborating agency: Settlement Study
Co-ordinated by: Abhang K, Neha Ghugari, Aditya Mandgaokar, Amrut Deshmukh
Dates of visit: 28th Nov – 3rd Dec 2019
Purpose of the visit: Settlement study
Reason for selection of this site:
To understand the typical coastal architecture of semi-rural Maharashtra. The Konkan area of Maharashtra
receives heavy rainfall in the monsoon season. The study this semester would help students understand the
implications of heavy rainfall and humid weather with respect to use of local materials. Like most coastal
areas of India, the Konkan area is also undergoing a change due to dwindling incomes from their traditional
occupations and a move towards domestic tourism. How the inhabitants balance these two diversified ways of
lifestyles and how it has an impact on their culture, traditions and architecture makes an interesting study.
Summary of the inputs given before site visit
An orientation workshop was conducted before departure for the trip.
For each Batch, 7 groups of 5 students each were made, with an assigned group leader and tasks. They were
asked to do a pre-trip study making best use of the library and reliable internet leads to prepare them
beforehand with knowledge about their respective destinations. For Sawantwadi, the area of study chosen was
a street comprising mostly of wooden toy shops, a traditional craft of the region. For Amboli, small hamlets
were chosen due to the absence of large populations in the region. The following aspects were to be covered:
Focus of study –
1. Physical and visual study of the chosen areas in Amboli/Sawantwadi
2. Study of general Architectural typology within the region and the stretch to be
documented.
3. Study of land-use and ownership patterns
4. Study of activity patterns in private and public spaces
5. Study of vehicular and pedestrian movement patterns
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
6. Study of climate, with focus on sunlight/shading in inner courtyards and effect of rainfall on
construction techniques
7. Study of services and infrastructure
8. Socio-cultural impact assessment.
The study will comprise of following topics / sub heads
Photographic documentation
Sketches of the street façade and details
Generating basic measurement drawings – Plan of the entire stretch, individual plans of structures,
sections and elevations. - Landuse, ownership and activity patterns.
Summary of the visit:
It was understood that the Konkan area of India can be divided broadly into 3 regions based on their altitude –
namely areas next to the coast at sea level, areas in the plateau region and areas up on the hills. The intent of
the settlement study was to document, understand and study the chosen street upto one plot depth. The local
inhabitants were interviewed, family profile created and based on that data was collected and analyzed. It
helped students in understanding the constant change that a settlement undergoes and reasons for this change.
They also studied and documented the traditional coastal architecture which has to cater to a hot humid and
heavy rainfall climate.
Highlights (major learnings)
For the Amboli trip students understood why it is important to save and preserve nature. Amboli is one of the
prominent bio-diversity regions in the country. For Sawantwadi the study brought about an interesting
socio-economical aspect to students understanding. The natives are primarily into basic farming – coconuts,
betelnuts, fishing etc. But these sources of income for them was becoming difficult and on the other hand the
young generation preferred to go to the cities for earning. However, with the increase in tourism a new source
of income generation has come up. This has brought about a change to the local architecture which was
studied and documented by the students.
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
List of Participants
Sr.No Name of the Student Year
1 Adwani Lata 3rd Year
2 Adep Rajeshwari 3rd Year
3 Ahire Prashant 3rd Year
4 Alizar Rutika 3rd Year
5 Bafna Akshay 3rd Year
6 Barai Simran 3rd Year
7 Batra Bhavya 3rd Year
8 Bhandari Jay 3rd Year
9 Bhonsale Chaitanya 3rd Year
10 Borawake Ankit 3rd Year
11 Dhawale Pallavi 3rd Year
12 Gujalwar Shriya 3rd Year
13 Ghawalkar Atharva 3rd Year
14 Ghodke Nishad 3rd Year
15 Nishant Giri 3rd Year
16 Jadhav Pratik 3rd Year
17 Jadhav Twinkle 3rd Year
18 Jangam Abhineet 3rd Year
19 Kangankar Kunal 3rd Year
20 Kochar Siddhant 3rd Year
21 Kripalani Harsha 3rd Year
22 Meshram Mayur 3rd Year
23 More Darshan 3rd Year
24 Pareira Raunaq 3rd Year
25 Patil Mithila 3rd Year
26 Ramani Sanket 3rd Year
27 Raskar Amay 3rd Year
28 Rathod Tanish 3rd Year
29 Suthar Purushottam 3rd Year
30 Shah Amruta 3rd Year
31 Singoure Arya 3rd Year
32 Thakkar Naman 3rd Year
33 Uttarkar Priyanka 3rd Year
34 Taori Gopal 3rd Year
35 Aeram Akansh 3rd Year
36 Bagad Rutuja 3rd Year
37 Badjate Aishwarya 3rd Year
38 Bhadale Akshata 3rd Year
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
39 Bhandarkar Gehini 3rd Year
40 Bhat Vaishnavi 3rd Year
41 Bhandari Yash 3rd Year
42 Bhattad Aachal 3rd Year
43 Bhonsale Divyesh 3rd Year
44 Bombale Aishwarya 3rd Year
45 Chavan Abhishek 3rd Year
46 Doshi Reva 3rd Year
47 Dwivedi Pragati 3rd Year
48 Gupta Riddhi 3rd Year
49 Gore Yash 3rd Year
50 Hiray Tanmayee 3rd Year
51 Jagad Poojal 3rd Year
52 Jain Niket 3rd Year
53 Kapuswala Khadija 3rd Year
54 Khaire Harshda 3rd Year
55 Khunte Aishwarya 3rd Year
56 Killedar Rujuta 3rd Year
57 Kshirsagar Jaidev 3rd Year
58 Kondhalkar Anand 3rd Year
59 Mannikar Chinmay 3rd Year
60 Nimbalkar Shivanjali 3rd Year
61 Rathod Neev 3rd Year
62 Sethia Roshni 3rd Year
63 Shah Parth 3rd Year
64 Shah Piyush 3rd Year
65 Shewale Nishigandha 3rd Year
66 Shinde Vedika 3rd Year
67 Tayade Aniket 3rd Year
68 Badjate Aishwarya 3rd Year
69 Bhadale Akshata 3rd Year
70 Bhandarkar Gehini 3rd Year
71 Bhat Vaishnavi 3rd Year
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
Name of the Place/Site village, city: Dhamapur, Maharashtra
Name of the collaborating agency: Settlement Study
Co-ordinated by: Ar. Meghana P, Ar. Prajakta C
Dates of visit: 28th Nov – 3rd Dec 2019
Purpose of the visit: Settlement study Documentation
Reason for selection of this site: (250-300 words)
As a part of the study for the Sindhudurg region, Walaval and Dhamapur were selected for the Second year
students.
Summary of the inputs given before site visit (500-600 words)
A presentation on how to document, division of the study area, student teams were all explained and
announced before the visit. Dos and Don’ts, Protocol for the study was explained and sent to the students via
email. Brief presentation was made to give basic idea about the settlement.
Summary of the visit: (500-1000 words)
Dhamapur is a typical Konkani Wadi kind of a settlement at the banks at 6 km drive from Malvan. A group of
36 students along with 2 faculty studied and documented the settlement. The study was conducted over 4
days. Students were divided under various heads to be documented and each group had a representative to
help keep in touch with the faculty and students. The students documented the settlement with measure
drawings, demographic data, mapping etc in the group of 5-6 students. The documentation was done on the
basis of land use, dwelling unit measurements, materials, year and age of structures, cultural aspects, age
group and no. of family members etc.
The documentation was done in form of maps, drawings, sketches, charts and stories. Students had
interacted with locals to understand their lifestyle, culture, economy and concerns.
Highlights (major learnings) - (500-600 words)
Students studied and understood the current scenario, village lifestyle, their concerns etc during the visit. They
also understood the importance of vernacular architectural character and settlement design. The students
documented entire temple complex, University of Life, 27 dwellings and 5 detailed dwellings. At the end of
the settlement study, students performed a skit in front of the villagers and shared their experience
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
After settlement study, students spent a week on generating drawings and sketches. One of the explorations
was based on settlement study where students proposed a Home-stay & Tourist Facilitation Center. Here the
aim of the studio was to sensitize the students to different Vernacular dwellings, spaces, construction
techniques, materials and their evolution, space efficient design, multifunctional spaces etc.
Students Participants
Sr. No. Name of the Student Year
1 Babu Dhanyalaxmi 2nd year
2 Bhosale Pranav 2nd year
3 Bhutani Kashish 2nd year
4 Chaure Prasad 2nd year
5 Cheekoti Vivek 2nd year
6 Dhankawade Vishwaja 2nd year
7 Gadekar Rohit 2nd year
8 Gaikwad Rutik 2nd year
9 Gund Omkar 2nd year
10 Kankaria Shreya 2nd year
11 Kulkarni Rucha 2nd year
12 Mali Gaurav 2nd year
13 Misal Karan 2nd year
14 Mokal Aditya 2nd year
15 Mundada Sakshi 2nd year
16 Mutha Garima 2nd year
17 Patel Rutveek 2nd year
18 Patil Aishwarya 2nd year
19 Salvi Aryan 2nd year
20 Shinde Yash 2nd year
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
21 Kale Swagat 2nd year
22 Bhatter Palak 2nd year
23 Bhutada Shrinidhi 2nd year
24 Hake Pranav 2nd year
25 Kabra Anuj 2nd year
26 Nanekar Pradyumna 2nd year
27 Oak Akanksha 2nd year
28 Rathi Vaishnavi 2nd year
29 Sakore Atharva 2nd year
30 Shah Rutu 2nd year
31 Shergarwala Zainab 2nd year
32 Kesekar Vaishnavi 2nd year
33 Shimpi Riya 2nd year
34 Rokade Rrushali 2nd year
35 Shinde Omkar 2nd year
36 Vanarse Achyut 2nd year
Photographs,
Samples of the documentation work done by the students.
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
Name of the Place/Site village, city: Walaval, Maharashtra
Name of the collaborating agency: Settlement Study
Co-ordinated by: Divya M, Mayukh G
Dates of visit: 28th Nov – 3rd Dec 2019
Purpose of the visit: Settlement study Documentation
Reason for selection of this site: (250-300 words)
As a part of the study for the Sindhudurg region, Walaval and Dhamapur were selected for the Second year
students.
Summary of the inputs given before site visit (500-600 words)
A presentation on how to document, division of the study area, student teams were all explained and
announced before the visit. Dos and Donts, Protocol for the study was explained and sent to the students via
email.
Summary of the visit: (500-1000 words)
Walaval is a quaint settlement at the banks of the Karli river and at a 11 km drive from Kudal. A group of 37
students studied and documented the settlement. The study was conducted over 4 days. The 37 students were
divided under various heads to be documented and each group had a representative to help keep in touch with
the faculty and students.
The assignment was to document the settlement with roughly 35 dwelling units amongst 37 students in
Walaval, Maharashtra. Along with the temple with is the centre of the activities in the village.
The students documented the settlement with measure drawings, demographic data, mapping etc in 6
groups. The documentation was done on the basis of land use, dwelling unit measurements, materials, year
and age of structures, cultural aspects, age group and no. of family members etc.
The documentation was done in form of maps, drawings, sketches, charts and stories.
Highlights (major learnings) - (500-600 words)
Students were sensitized and learned about challenges faced in older settlements with a strong vernacular
character. The students documented the temple complex along with the dwellings. The aim of the studio was
to sensitize the students to different Vernacular dwellings, spaces, construction techniques, materials and their
evolution, space efficient design, multifunctional spaces etc.
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
At the end of the study, students compiled a report based on the documentation done and submitted it to the
Temple trust.
Students presenting their work to the representative
of the Temple trust.
This exposure and sensitization helped them come
up with thoughtful design interventions in the
coming semester.
Students Participants
Sr. No. Name of the Student Year
1 Aditya sawalkar 2nd year
2 Akash walke 2nd year
3 Amay rathi 2nd year
4 Anushka deo 2nd year
5 Apurva shinde 2nd year
6 Asmita khot 2nd year
7 Atharva lad 2nd year
8 Diven balani 2nd year
9 Esha jagtap 2nd year
10 Hrishikesh jadhav 2nd year
11 Jai karwande 2nd year
12 Jatin lalwani 2nd year
13 Kaiwalya barde 2nd year
14 Mahesh vanavne 2nd year
15 Manokamna bajaj 2nd year
16 Nipun agarwal 2nd year
17 Nirupam kadam 2nd year
18 Riya georgi 2nd year
19 Rounak tambi 2nd year
20 Ruchir kulkarni 2nd year
21 Rutuja chavan 2nd year
22 Rutuja daule 2nd year
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
23 Sejal lodha 2nd year
24 Shashwat kumbhare 2nd year
25 Shivangi agarwal 2nd year
26 Shreya gaikwad 2nd year
27 Shubham jadhav 2nd year
28 Simran pawar 2nd year
29 Smeet talathi 2nd year
30 Tanay lalwani 2nd year
31 Tanishqa navlakha 2nd year
32 Tanmay jawalkar 2nd year
33 Tanya jose 2nd year
34 Urja laddha 2nd year
35 Vaishnavi kolhe 2nd year
36 Varun anvikar 2nd year
37 Yash dighe 2nd year
Photographs
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
Name of the Place/Site village, city: Achara-Masure, SIndhudurg
Name of the collaborating agency:
Co-ordinated by: (name of the faculty) Ketaki Gujar, Vaibhavi Agrawal, Ninada Kashyap, Sunetra
Toshniwal
Dates of visit: January 2020
Purpose of the visit: Settlement Study of Rural set up as part of Syllabus of 1st year 2nd Semester.
Reason for selection of this site: (250-300 words)
The settlement of Achare is located at the sea-shore and the towns main occupation is fishing. The town is
closely weaved, The town is bifurcated with the main axis its approach road that goes straight to the sea shore,
on the other sides of the town is the estuary of the River. The town is full of its flora and fauna. The town also
has history since the era of Ramayan and Mahabharat.
The town of Masure is settled around at the base of Bharatgad fort. The town has history from British era,
where the communication and trade between British and People of Masure happened. Some part of settlement
is along the back waters of river Gad. Fishing is the main occupation of people.
Based on budgetary restrictions, Hours of travel, according to first year syllabus the set up was needed to be
Rural, was chosen in comparison to couple of other options. The aim was to choose a settlement based on its
location, occupation, natural setting of the town.
Summary of the inputs given before site visit (500-600 words)
The character of Achare and Masurewas understood, study regarding locations of temples, the character of
wadas were discussed, Fishing as occupation, Fort in the centre and settlements around and near the sea,
backwaters of River etc, architecture of temple and its origin was taught to students. Input was consisted of
introduction to the settlement with its overall character.
Summary of the visit: (500-1000 words)
The day one was spent in understanding the overall character of the town. Also, students were divided into
various groups one to understand and document the History, local craft, occupation, population and other
statistics of the town, another four groups were made to document and measure draw commercial lanes,
houses, set up colonies, typologies of houses etc in Achare and Masure. The other groups were made to
document local stories and photographic and videographic documentation of the towns.
These groups individually did the designated work for two days and the last day i.e. 4th day was spent in
finding the location of the appropriate site for the design to be done in the upcoming semester. The site was
compared, best one was chosen and then measured, drawn and discussed what could be designed for the town,
which is appropriate, could uplift the status of the town.
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
Highlights (major learnings) - (500-600 words)
Important learning after this settlement study were as following:
1. Communities stay together and work together.
2. Small towns have unity in their activities, celebrations and festivals.
3. Based on the occupation of the people, the houses are designed and renovated.
4. Food of the towns is mainly based on the occupation of the town, i.e. Fishing
5. The rich character of the Rameshwar temple of 11th century has given the character to the town,
though placed on the outskirts of the town.
6. The carvings and the decoration of the temple makes it unique, and has many mythological stories to
tell.
Students Participants: 1st year Batch 2019-2020
ShreyaBhide
SiddhiBirari
DigvijayBeldar
SejalBora
TanviChavan
KunalChougule
BhumikaGaike
ShivaniGautam
TanmayGhadge
TanmayGodha
OmkarGodse
ShailGupta
LalitHinge
ShambhurajeJadhavrao
AnushkaJadhav
Ashiti Jadhav
AashrithaJaladi
RamKale
KomalKondalkar
SmitaLimaye
KhushiLothe
MahekLongani
GaneshMane
JissellaMaria
PratikMour
HarshulOswal
SaiPawar
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
KadambariPatil
KushalPatil
NehaPatil
SandeepPatidar
Saloni Rabara
HeerRaval
KarishmaRawool
ParthSable
AyushiSanghvi
VaishnaviShirsat
AmanShaikh
Ushma Shah
AtharvaShinde
TanmayVaid
AtharvaVanjari
Keshav Agrawal
Shruti Agrawal
Srishti Agarwal
Tanishq Andhale
Stuti Bhagwat
Aditya Bhintade
Samruddhi Bhalerao
Radhey Bhutada
Vishal Dayani
Aditi Dhamankar
Vaishanvi Elekar
Ashutosh Gaware
Vaishnavi Hire
Vaishnawi Hunachagi
Anket Jain
Shrutika Jaju
Siddharth Kadam
Om Kadam
Shruti Khandelwal
Pushkar Khanorkar
Shivani Kotkar
Sanjana Kotecha
Riya Manwatkar
Aanchal Mugdiya
Aashay Mulate
Sireesha Mutnuri
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
Vaishnavi Pawar
Vanshika Parikh
Ruchita Phulkar
Akshita Rathi
Saurabh Sahane
Akshita Sathe
Dhanashri Shinde
Simran Sond
Aakash Sontakke
Tanya Tak
Zareen Tamboli
Atharva Vankade
Vaishnav Vinod
Mayur Wabale
Swapanil Wagh
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
Name of the Place/Site village, city: Loni Bhapkar
Name of the collaborating agency: SMEF’s Brick School of Architecture, Pune
Co-ordinated by: (name of the faculty) Ketaki Gujar, Vaibhavi Agrawal, Ninada Kashyap, Sunetra
Toshniwal
Dates of visit: January 2020
Purpose of the visit: Settlement Study of Rural set up as part of Syllabus of 1st year 2nd Semester.
Assignment: Contextual Design Assignment
Brief:
• Study of a rural, semi urban settlement / community for study, analysis and documentation of its built elements, open spaces and associated architectural character. (as per the syllabus)
• Study of houses, their relationship with common spaces and public buildings of the settlement.
• Study of the impact of culture and traditional values on the built environment.
• Learn through the palette of experiments in Building Technology and Architectural Design that is
displayed throughout the Settlement.
Selection of Achare and Masure for Settlement Study
• A very good study opportunity with primary and secondary occupational activities
• A good opportunity to study the history, biodiversity and socio culture of the place.
• Vernacular lifestyle As a result, it is an appropriate settlement with a peculiar physical and visual character.
Methodology:
1. Preliminary collection of information, for selecting a Settlement of a comprehendible scale and character.
2. Formulation of a structure for study (preamble) & discuss with students.
3. Procuring relevant data required like, location maps etc.
4. Introduction of the study content, overall working pattern on site, and reference data like reports, technique
of
measurement, recording, documentation and presentation, structure of study to the students.
5. Formulation of groups and assigning work schedule. 6. The entire work process was divided in three parts viz,
A. Data collection B. Assimilation of data
C. Analysis of data D. Identification of deficiencies
E. Preparation of Design proposal 7. Conducting on site discussions.
8. Conducting onsite presentation for overall understanding and interaction.
Magenta batch :Achara – Centre for Biodiversity
Biodiversity Centre is a place where one can observe and get to study about diversity in nature found in and
around coastal area of Sindhudurg. Achare being a very scenic place with rich in biodiversity, has potential to
have a research centre . The centre is proposed on site with beach in background and surrounded by lot of palm
trees. Presence of Jackfruit and mango tree adds value and provide opportunities for designer. A built up area
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
of approx. 300 sq. m. giving access to research lab, museum, library, cafeteria, audio-visual, Admin and residential facility etc. Proposing Low rise structure with use of local material and construction techniques.
Built environment should not Have negative impact and should be done with lot of sensitivity which increase
ecological value of site.
Blue batch : Masure – Wellness resort
Wellness resort is a place where people come to relax and enjoy in the clam and beautiful natural environment.
Masure is situated around the foothills of Bharatgad fort on the bank of Kava and Gad river. The specular
settings of Masure in an ideal location for an activity like wellness resort. The site selected for wellness resort
is near the backwater of Gad river with lots of coconut tree planation around.
A built up area of approx. 300 sq. m. giving access to multiactivity hall, meditation room, souvenir , library,
cafeteria, audio-visual, Admin and residential facility etc. Proposing Low rise structure with use of local
material and construction techniques.
Built environment should not Have negative impact and should be done with lot of sensitivity which increase
ecological value of site.
Method: -
• Participatory method for preparing Brief- Students and Teachers together.
• Anthropometry to understand space requirement
• Area Statement
• Site Analysis to understand to potential for design
• Narration for design Idea
• Zoning
• Site Model
• Cognitive mapping for understanding context
• Mind Mapping for generating ideas
• Concept mapping for finalizing ideas
• Shape grammar for space organization
• Physical model making for understanding the volume
• Finalizing design and detailing.
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
Name of the Place/Site village, city: Vishrambagh Wada Pune
Co-ordinated by: (name of the faculty) Anuradha Wanaskar, Priyanka Mangaonkar, Bhavna
Gaikwwad
Dates of visit: 07/03/2020 Saturday 7.30 am to 1.00 pm
Purpose of the visit: Related to the Syllabus of BCM- II to understand the timber construction in olden
days and relate to the current techniques.
Reason for selection of this site: (250-300 words)
1. easily accessible availability of public transport and in the city itself.
2. The most authentic timber structure which depicts the history and culture of the city
3. to study the timber constructions and the use of timber in olden days and understand the current scenario to
understand timber as an element
4. It was made easy for students to relate the timber elements what they have studied and drawn on sheets
5. to observe the timber elements in construction of doors and windows, roof, floor, balcony, pillars, staircase
etc. and study the joineries of elements.
Summary of the inputs given before site visit (500-600 words)
GENERAL NOTES FOR SITE VISI
� A2 size sketch sheet to be made per element.
� Remember to draw proportionate sketch
� Apart from these said junctions you are free to draw any more junction details which you observe
� You may also draw a complete isometric view of the whole element.
ELEMENT: STAIRCASE
1) How tread and riser are fixed?
2) How trade and riser are fixed to diagonal supports?
3) How the whole staircase is fixed to floor above
4) How the whole staircase is fixed to ground level
ELEMENT: ROOF
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
1) Which is the main load taking member and how is it fixed to wall?
2) Which is the secondary member and how is it fixed to the primary member?
3) How is the tertiary member fixed to the member below it
4) How the roofing material (Mangalore tile or country tile) is fixed to the tertiary member?
ELEMENT: DOOR
1) How is door shutter fixed to the frame?
2) What are the different types of hinges used for door and window in Vishrambaug wada?
Sketch all of them.
3) How is the door frame fixed to the wall? Is the horizontal member of the frame going into the wall?
4) What are the different ways in which door shutter is designed?
ELEMENT: WINDOW
1) How the window frame is fixed to wall?
2) What are the different types of windows you see in all the structures?
3) How the louvers in the louvered window are operated?
4) How the window shutter is fixed to the frame around it?
� Apart from all the above elements you will also observe and sketch what kind of construction masonry
is used in Vishrambaug wada and the residential wada behind it?
� How are the column fixed to the ground in each of the structures?
� How the brick sill is made in residential wada?
Highlights (major learnings) - (500-600 words)
The students learned detailed construction of timber elements and how the joineries are made to form the
structure.
Doors, Window, Staircase, balcony, floor, roof, etc.
The students were given an assignment to draw sketches based on the observation.
Students Participants: 1st year Batch 2019-2020
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
ShreyaBhide
SiddhiBirari
DigvijayBeldar
SejalBora
TanviChavan
KunalChougule
BhumikaGaike
ShivaniGautam
TanmayGhadge
TanmayGodha
OmkarGodse
ShailGupta
LalitHinge
ShambhurajeJadhavrao
AnushkaJadhav
Ashiti Jadhav
AashrithaJaladi
RamKale
KomalKondalkar
SmitaLimaye
KhushiLothe
MahekLongani
GaneshMane
JissellaMaria
PratikMour
HarshulOswal
SaiPawar
KadambariPatil
KushalPatil
NehaPatil
SandeepPatidar
Saloni Rabara
HeerRaval
KarishmaRawool
ParthSable
AyushiSanghvi
VaishnaviShirsat
AmanShaikh
Ushma Shah
AtharvaShinde
TanmayVaid
FIELD TRIPS 2019-20
AtharvaVanjari
Keshav Agrawal
Shruti Agrawal
Srishti Agarwal
Tanishq Andhale
Stuti Bhagwat
Aditya Bhintade
Samruddhi Bhalerao
Radhey Bhutada
Vishal Dayani
Aditi Dhamankar
Vaishanvi Elekar
Ashutosh Gaware
Vaishnavi Hire
Vaishnawi Hunachagi
Anket Jain
Shrutika Jaju
Siddharth Kadam
Om Kadam
Shruti Khandelwal
Pushkar Khanorkar
Shivani Kotkar
Sanjana Kotecha
Riya Manwatkar
Aanchal Mugdiya
Aashay Mulate
Sireesha Mutnuri
Vaishnavi Pawar
Vanshika Parikh
Ruchita Phulkar
Akshita Rathi
Saurabh Sahane
Akshita Sathe
Dhanashri Shinde
Simran Sond
Aakash Sontakke
Tanya Tak
Zareen Tamboli
Atharva Vankade
Vaishnav Vinod
Mayur Wabale