, GCB) J 2260(B) (50,000-2-2015) [Bpi.- MAT-F-2

IN THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI

M.A./RA./C.A. No . of 20

IN

Original Application No. of 20

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Ceram,

Appearance, Tribunal's orders or directions and Registrar's orders

Tribunal' s orders

Date : 09.08.2018

M.A.No.352 of 2017 in O.A.No.766 of 2017

B.D. Kadam ....Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors. Respondents.

DATE S\ 18 C OF4e,M Hocble Shri P.N. DIXIT (Oember)A

NCE:

Hin"-n457t-: Si4.44 P031.1.kriA_, 0\e-1 P 'Gs .6;a104e. Adue rate Of the Applicant

... ...... C P.OfF!0. for the Respondentrs ........ Adps.o. .............. .. .

1. Heard Ms. Vrushali Penkar, the learned Advocate

holding for Ms.. P.B. Walimbe, the learned Advocate for the

Applicants and Smt. Archana B.K., the learned P.O. for the

Respondents.

2. Learned Advocate for the Applicant requests for

adjournment on 31.08.2018 along with the similar matters

i.e. 0.A.Nos.762 to 766 of 2017 for hearing.

3. 5.0. to 31.08.2018.

cq A I ICI (P.m DIXIT) Member (A)

G.0 P) .5 2260(3) (50,000-2-2015) ISpl. MAT-F-2 F.

IN THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI

M.A./R.A./C.A. No. of 20

IN

Original Application No. of 20

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

Tribunal' s orders

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Ceram,

Appearance, Tribunal's orders or

directions and ReiriStrar's orders

Date : 09.08.2018

0.A.P.10.653 of 2018

S.P. Male ....Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors. Respondents.

(."`ATP • CI\

1. Heard Shri A.V. Bandiwadekar, the learned

Advocate for the Applicant, Ms. S.P. Manchekar, the

learned C.P.O. for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2 and Shri A.M.

' Misal, the learned Advocate for the Respondent No.3.

2. Learned C.P.O. for the Respondents seeks two

weeks time for filing affidavit-in-reply. CCrRAM

Shd RN. DIXIT (Mernher) A

3. Shri A.M.Misal, the learned Advocate for the AR. NCE:

kl .ictUnclitvaclaibt14_ Respondent No.3 seeks two weeks time to file his reply.

Artivcir:...ite for the Applicant

0. toy ttbe RespoodentAtto.e.2-. .tk Vom- tik141:9

Adi./S.O. to payf 1 ,zeri

4. Learned Advocate for the Applicant requests for

adjournment to hear the matter on the point of interim

relief.

5. 5.0 to 27.08.2018.

(ne, (P.N. DIXIT) Member (A)

sba

DATE q CORAM

Hontle Shri P.N. DIXIT (Member) A

PE 7\ RANCE: S

S I z

5. 5.0. to 27.08.2018.

sba•

GCP■ J 2260(B) (50,000-2-2015) ISpl - MAT F-2

IN THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL IWUNIBAI

M .A No. of 20

N

Original Application No. of 20

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Comm

Appearance, Tribunal's orders or

directions and Registrar's orders Tribunal's orders

Date : 09.08.2018

O.A.No.652 of 2018

Dr. S.S. Malvade ....Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors. Respondents.

•

Advocate for the Applkant

Shrts, 5-p • lkoziAtiddhce_K- ..._c444agaq. fpr t Reeponder0 11/41,10 .12

57~ .SIIVU°ze P. • Urb AdjAS.O. to

2=411 L.

Heard Shri A.V. Bandiwadekar, the learned

Advocate for the Applicant, Ms. S.P. Manchekar, the

learned C.P.O. for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2 and Shri S.D.

Shinde, the learned Advocate for the Respondent No.3.

2. Learned C.P.O. for the Respondents seeks two

weeks time for filing affidavit-in-reply.

3. Shri S.D. Shinde, the learned Advocate for the

Respondent No.3 seeks two weeks time to file his reply.

4. Learned Advocate for the Applicant requests for

adjournment to hear the matter on the point of interim

relief.

5:71(4.1

(PM. WRIT)

Member (A)

n t'.%7F

RAM

Shri P.N. OMIT (Member) A

0.(' P i J 226003) (50,000-2-2015 ISp1.- MAT-F-2

IN THE lVIMLARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MIUMBAI

M A /1-2 A./C.A. No. of 20

IN

Original Application No. of 20

FARM) CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

Office Notes. Office Memoranda of Comma, Appearance, Tribunal's orders or

directions and Registrar's orders Tribunal's orders

Date : 09.08.2018

M.A.No.319 of 2017 in 0.A.No.698 of 2017

Dr. P.S. Gawali & Ors. ....Applicants

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors. Respondents.

1. Heard Shri A.S. Deshpande, the learned Advocate

for the Applicants and Ms. S.P. Manchekar, the learned

C.P.O. for the Respondents.

2. Learned C.P.O. for the Respondents seeks

adjournment by two weeks.

3. S.0 .to 23.08.2018.

y; ..----ayt=c3chpluat, to for the Applicant

G.ciThkeINL sba

14 (P.N. DIXIT) Member (A)

V Ctrs O. for the Resnondenlis

to 2-t-5 \.c3 \

-Fo Shri P N. DIXIT (Member) A

"RANCE: . scsdittiv_

h for I he Applicant

— -D. for the Resoondtn

Pt: g

' 22601E3) (50.000-2-2015)

E.

TN THE MAHA_RASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE I T IBUNAL IUMBAI

R A./C.A. No. if 20

N

flat Ano.ication No of' 20

FARAD CONT7NUATION SHEET NO.

I jeel re Notes. Office Memoranda of Corn, Annearetnee. Tribunal's orders or

Tribunal's orders no-ectioos and Registrar's orders

Date : 09.08.2018

O.A.No.71S of '. )17

R.R. Patil Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors. k so indents.

1. Heard Shri D.V. Sutar, the learned cate for the

Applicant and Shri A.J. Chougule, learned Presenting

I Officer for the Respondents. •

2. Learned P.O. for the Respondents h •i filed reply on

behalf of the Respondent Nos.1 to 4. The same is taken on

record.

3. Learned Advocate or the Applicant seeks

adjournment by two weeks.

4. Adjourned-to 24.08.2018.

411 "eir (P.N. DIXIT)

Member (A)

sba

2260113) ■ 50.000-2-2015 [ Sp1.- 1AT-F 2 E.

TN THE MAHARASHTIRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNA rVIUMBAI

' .‘ JR A./C.A. No. qt. 20

IN

))anal Atudicatien of 20

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO

re Notes. Office Memoranda of Comm.o

onearance. Tribunal's orders or Tribunal' s order

rectums and Registrar's orders

Date : 09.08.2018

O.A.No.865 of it 17

S.C. Rajolia ....Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors. Respon rents.

1. None for the Applicant. Heard Ms. N.0 lohad.

learned Presenting Officer for the Respondents.

o Shri P N. DIXIT (Member) A

"EARANCE:

-,100■,ceNAt-. .:a-Leeete-for-the-Actr4teeet-

,.E.L.:4-41-4 • • ac,LILCS.)

-.-P-nr't)(1 for the Resoonclernis

2. Learned P.O. for the Respondents stat is that she

will file affidavit-in-reply during the course of ' ie day.

3. S.O. to 23.08.2018.

lit (P.N. DIXIT) Member (A)

sba

< 0 to 7_,3\s\Ig• ,,crit, Wet, c.ci Foil' 044.

2260(B) (50.000-2-2015) Spi. ' AT-F-2 E.

TNT THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBU NA' , la IUMBAI

if 20

1\T

• erlai Amaication Nn. fir 20

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

I WI OP Notes Office Memoranda of Corem.

sooearance. Tribunal's orders or

'reetiOliS and Retristrar's orders

Tribunal's orders

Date : 09:08.2018

0.A.No.846 of 2( 17

Shri P.N.DIXIT (Member) A

FLRANCE:

Al. Salunke \ pplicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors. Res ,ondents.

1. Heard Shri A.S. Deshpande, the learne I Advocate

for the Applicant and Ms. N.G. Gohad, learned Presenting

Officer for the Respondents.

2. Learned P.O. for the Respondent has filed affidavit

in reply. The same is taken on record.

3. S.O. to 23.08.2018.

onete for I.he Aor4loant

ccpp ;---,":"e- O. for the Resoondent/s

O.to 231 L

--/)Us 4S I szA, . . l 4-0,3 Y

DIXIT) Member (A)

sba

- hri Po N. DIXIT (Member) A

',RANCE: .k•k• Teak kkLiPstail'abk

ICX thEIS

a :‘;,,tiitt: tkl-R ' Cs" "L 0. for the Resoondeniis

c''' 7--al edE cU

2260!B) (50.000-2-2015) ISpl MAT-F-2 E

TnE MAHARASHTRA. ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL VIUMBAI

5,./C 04. 20

I

n at r, heat' on No of 20

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

Notes, Office Memoranda of Corn ooearance. Tribunal's orders or actions and Reeistrar's orders

Tribunal's orders

ate : 09.08.2018

O.A.No.547 of 2018

.N. Bolde ....Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors. Respondents.

1. Heard Shri A.N. Bolde, Applicant in person and Ms.

N.G. Gohad, learned Presenting Officer for the

Respondents

2. Learned P.O. for the Respondents produces a

communication dated 04.08.2018 granting a subsistence

allowance to the Applicant. The same is taken on record

and marked as 'X' for identification.

3. Copy of the same is provided to the Applicant in

person

4. Learned P.O. for the Respondents seeks two weeks

time to file progress report and to file affidavit-in-reply on

behalf of the Respondents

5. 5.0. to•23.08.2018.

(P.N. DIXIT)

Member (A)

sba

226CM) (50.000-2-2015)

TN THE MAHARASHTRA %DMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL VIUMBAI

Ale. A. No or 20

IN

at Application No. of 20

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

Ot ,sa Notes. Office Memoranda of CoffIITI. nocal once, Tribunal's orders or rections and Revistrar's orders

Tribunal' s orders

Date : 09.08.2018

O.A.No.514 of 2018

N.K. Gaikwad ....Applicant

Versus

I The State of Maharashtra & Ors. Respondents.

1. Heard Shri A.V. Bandiwadekar, the learned

Advocate for the Applicant and Shri A.J. Chougule,

learned Presenting Officer for the Respondents.

2. Learned P.O. for the Respondents states that

necessary affidavit along with exhibits will be filed and will

be provided to learned Advocate for the Applicant

Shri DIXIT (Member) A forthwith.

PRANCE: 14- \3 tE)ozAnckic.4-voito-440-'

3. Learned. Advocate for the Applicant seeks

adjournment by two weeks to file his rejoinder, if any.

•vr•--te for the ADoticant 4. S.O. to 27.08.2018.

•

for the Resoonde

O. to ,_7_152A(2*

,4W sba

(P.N. DIXIT) Member (A)

22608) (50.000-2-2015, IS0I MAT TN THE MAI]IARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL

1'TITIVII3AI

t !' 1./C.A. No. yr' 20

'

—vino{ Ain)Heal-Jon No (x 20

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

110," Notes. Office Memoranda of Contra. 0nearance. Tribunal's orders or

Tribunal's orders -0CtiOnS and Registrar's orders

Date : 09.08.2018

0.A.No.485 of 2018

ks1

Chougule ....Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors. Respondents.

Heard Shri A.V. Bandiwadekar, the learned

Advocate for the Applicant and Ms. N.G. Gohad. learned

Presenting Officer for the Respondents.

2. Learned P.O. for the Respondents seeks

adiournment by four weeks.

Sh! P.N. DIXIT (Member) A 3. 5.0.to 06.09.2018.

IT A:ZANI'P

-at: Inc the AnolIcant

G • C-e) ikch _ _ -41.0 for the Resoondent/s

O. tf [ q fa*

sba

(?)4/111: (P. DIXIT) Member (A)

iiri P N. DIXIT (Member) A

\RANCE 10c2Lbakuri

;:npte.for the AnDtiCent

"1.0. 1F.or the Resoendekitls

e: °A° 53 I I

' 2260 Bt (50.000-2-2015, ISal - MAT-F-2 E

T THE 1VIAHARASHTILA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL

Ne. )r 20

N

!-1 vi mat Annlicatinn No of 20

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

• Notes. Office Memoranda of Coratn.

' onearance. Tribunal's orders or

ref:tons and Registrar's orders Tribunal' s orders

Date : 09.08.2018

O.A.No.453 of 2018

P.S. Walke ....Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors. Respondents.

Heard Shri A.V. Bandiwadekar, the learned

Advocate for the Applicant and Shri A.J. Chougule,

learned Presenting Officer for the Respondents.

2. Learned P.O. for the Respondents produces a

communication from the department addressed to him

stating that the proposal regarding reinstatement of the

Applicant from suspension has been submitted to the

Government. The same is taken on record and marked as

'X' for identification. Therefore, he seeks adjournment by

four weeks.

3. Time as prayed for is granted.

4. Respondent is directed to ensure the progress in

the matter as expeditiously as possible.

S.O. to 21.08.2018.

L Walir DIXIT)

Member (A)

sba

r

Shri 1)N. DIXIT (Member) A

gr-OL05cols

Is to, the Applicant

p4. S stsuivaa. 0 for the Resoondektis

- .9A 153 te.

226(Y131 (50.000-2-2015) [Sp1.- MAT-F-2 E.

N THE MAIIARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL PIUMBAI

!../R.A./C. A. No . 20

N

einal Application Mn of 20

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

iiier Notes. Office Memoranda of Con m. -"clearance. Tribunal's orders or

-actions and liewistrar's orders

Tribunal' s orders

Date : 09.08.2018

O.A.No.246 of 2018

S.V. Wagh ....Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors. Respondents.

Heard Shri U. Bhosle, the learned Advocate for the

Applicant and Ms. S. Suryawanshi, learned Presenting

Officer for the Respondents.

2. Learned P.O. for the Respondents seeks one week's

time for taking instructions and reporting progress in the

matter.

Time as prayed for is granted.

4. 5.0. to 24.08.2018.

0 DIXIT):.a t ( i

Member (A)

sba

!1 T: lik(73

Shri P.N. DIXIT (Member) A

N kkacj\—*Lt

fOliCeStAiCA---

- ate It 'Y the Anoltcant

P.6z for the Respondent's

lig

22bii (A' 50.000-2-20r tSp1.- MAT-F-2 E.

MAMARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI

rr,nal A twuration No

DISTRICT

Applicant/s

T!- e State of D4a harashtra and others

Respondents

'fl000ntinv Office,

-a No tds. Office Memoranda of Co raw.

kneedranee, tribunal's orders of

treetia TM and Reetstrar's order,

Tribunal' s orders

Date : 09.08.2018.

O.A.No.550 of 2017 with O.A.No.551 of .017 with O.A.No.552 of 2017 with 0.A.No.513 or 2017 with O.A.No.554 of 2017 with O.A.No.51 i of 2017 with 0.A.No.556 of 2017 with O.A.No.557 of 2017 with 0.A.No.558 of 2017 with O.A.No.559 of 2017 with

O.A.No.560 of 2017 with 0 A.No.578 of 2017

P.P. Gengale (0.A.550/2017) S.C. Kudale (0.A.551/2017) V.L. Jadhav (o.A.ss2/2o17) D.T. Holkar (0.A.553/2017) V.K. Bhapkar (o.A.ss4/2017) N.B. Jadhav (o.A.ssspoin V.R. Taru (0.A.556/2017) M.P. Patil (0.A.557/2017) B.V. Koli (o.A.ssanon) S.A. Deshpande (0.A.559/2017) P.D. Mulik (o.A.ssopoin B.A. Khadake (0.A.578/2017) ....Applicants. Versus The State of Maharashtra &

Respondents.

Heard Ms. S.P. Ma chekar, the learned Chief

Presenting Officer with Ms. N.G. Gohad, the learned

Presenting Officer for the Respondents. None '.r the

Applicants.

2. Learned C.P.O. for the Respondent Ms. S.P.

Manchekar states that the D.G.P. has issued pr dcy guidelines

in the matter. Learned C.P.O. proposes to f ,e the same along

with the affidavit from the Re spondents along with time

frame within which compliance will be communicated.

Adjourned to 23.08.2018

cal

1f.

(P.N. Elixit) Member(A)

I ork

' 2260(Fil (50.000-2-2015) ISpl - Mika -F-2 B.

TRIBUNAL IN THE MAHAIRASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE

19.A./C.,4 No. .f 20

N

al Application Nn. of 20

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

'Wire Notes. Office Memoranda of Corem. ,onearance. Tribunal's orders or

°I-eel:ors and Reeistrar'ss orders

Tribunal' s orders

Date : 09.08.2018

0.A.No.1167 of 2017

r: gliq

7. 'AN4 2

Learned P.O. for the Respondents produces a

' - le Shri P.N. DIXIT (Member, A

communication dated 31.07.2018 sending a proposal to

the Office of Pay Verification, Mumbai as per the prayer

....1split_._ ta 1) . acvAdicaza made by the Applicant. The same is tak m on recr ird and

IA. :— ARANCE:

marked as 'X' for identification.

3. Learned Advocate for the Applicar seeks vey.7 c,ate, -Of the Aookant

adjournment till the actual payment is completed

2'0 for the Resoondtotrs 4. 5.0. to 20.09.2018.

5)7 (111CI (P.N. DIXIT) Member (Al

N.B. Yadav ....Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors. Respondents.

Heard Shri B.A. Bandiwadekar, the learned

Advocate for the Applicant and Smt. Archana B.K.,

learned Presenting Officer for the Respondents.

• Prc,-4-c-kaAnir€2:.k

sba

‘.° Fihri P N. DIXIT (Member) A

--1' NCE

_;lf.u-sffer: 14.o. L6.4-- 41k-0— .ziptp Certiki-

4er-the-Aoptiocant-

-US I/ 5 nic C

fl-';'-elr-4.0 for the Respondents

13 O. to •

I 2264((A> (50 000-- 2 20151 ISIA MAT-F-2 E

IN THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI

DISTRICT r- [final A polication. NT°

Applicant's

l iR■c:itu•

us

The St ate if Mafia rashtra and others

Respondent's

■ icptinc Officer.

— —

‘I , ire Notes. Office Memoranda of Ceram.

thuearance, 0/ del'S 01

irecti ins and Redistrai's order:

Tribunal' s orders

Date : 09.08.2018.

0.A.No.741 of 2017

V.K. Jagdhane ....Applicant.

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors. Respondents.

1. Heard Smt. K.S. Gaikwad, the learned ,'resenting

Officer for the Respondents.

2. Shri A.A. Gharte, the learned Advoc ete for the

Applicant is absent.

3. Learned P.O. for the Respondents 'nit. K.S. Gaikwad

has produced communication dated 06.08.2018, the same is

marked as "X" for the purpose of identification. According to

learned P.O. the same was sent to the applicant )ut the

acknowledgement is yet to be received.

4. Adjourned to 31.08.2018.

‘1141 (P.N.tDixit) Member(P

ork

(RI?)

2260(131 (50.000-2-2015) LEM - MAT-F-2 E.

N THE IVIAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBL NAL, 7/11.51VIBAI

\ /C 1' 20

N

rinal AmpLication No oc 20

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

' f fi ee Notes. Office Memoranda of Conlin.

‘iinearance. Tribunal's orders or

■,rections and Registrar's orders

Tribunal' s orders

Date : 09.08.2018

0.A.No.823 of 2017

A.N. Pasalkar & Ors. ....Applicants

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors. Respondents.

1. None for the Applicant. Heard Shri A.J. Chougule.

learned Presenting Officer for the Respondents.

2. Learned P.O. for the Respondents seeks

adjournment by three weeks for taking suitable action in

the matter.

sba

!:thri P.N. DIXIT (Member) A

j Fj9ANQE: ...

1\-t4Err-IX+ •

-----ec-ez,s-fer—tbe-Preal.leeetr

. ......... ........... .......

4;4* O. for the Resoombi Als

■ tiO . .....

..

.......

/40;)717/

S.O. to 6.09.2018.

.(lel DIXIT)

Member (A)

Shri P.N. DIXIT (Kitlemberl A

2ANCE- etuAckvea-Pet-

-,;>,c! for the Applicant

L-0 for the Resnondentis

I' .1 22(10 (A) (50.000-2-201,,,

- MAT-F-2

IN THE NLAFIARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI

E

Lc-dial A polication No, 20

a-

DISTRICT

.... Applicant's

(2, te

rierhIIS

The Stair of Maharashtra and others

Respondent's

isentina Officer

— — — Pare Notes. Office Memoranda of Ceram.

Apoeuranee. Tribunal's orders or

directions and Registrar's orders

Tribunal' s orders

Date : 09.08.2018

O.A.NO.541 of 2018

PM. Rathod ...Applicant.

Versus

The State of Maharaihtra & Ors. .,...Respondents.

1. Heard Shri A.V. Bandiwadekar, the learned Advocate

for the Applicant and Ms. S.P. Manchekar, the learned Chief

Presenting Officer for the Respondents.

2. Learned C.P.O. for the Respondents Ms. S.P.

Manchekar seeks adjournment of one week to file sur-

rejoinder.

3. Adjourned to 27.08.2018.

ftl I" (PM. Dixit) Member(A)

prk

PT( )

.rote fee the Anblicant

.m •6- • G-dt1/4-cs-c)-,

O. for the Respondent's

0.t V—‘1 1.11(i.

ark

2761 (A (50 (100-2-201EE [Sp' - MAT-F-2 E

T NT THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE. TRIBUNAL.

MUMBAI

DISTRK7T

■:”}(11 Avolicat Applicant's

I 'e r:ZIL

The State of Maharashtra and others

Respondent's

•nti no Officer.

fl';,•e riot s. Office Memoranda of Coram. I

'womurance. Tribunal's orders or

irectIons and Retristrar's order-

I Date : 09.08.2018.

Tribunal' s orders

O.A.No.505 of 2018

C \

Shri R N. MIT (Member) A

'Yr- A RENCE Sr14,-7"

S.G. Kadam ....Applicant.

I Versus

I The State of Maharashtra & Ors. Respondents.

1. Heard Shri A.V. Bandiwadekar, the learned Advocate

for the Applicant and Ms. N.G. Gohad, the learned Presenting

-Officer for the Respondents.

2. Learned P.O. for the Respondents Ms. N.G.G had

prays for time to receive instructions from the R 2spondents

as to whether they want to file sur-rejoinder in ill( matter.

3. Adjourned to 27.08.2018.

Si WI (P.4 Dixi '

Member(A)

01 t

Shri P.N. MIT (Member) A

A RAIS5_,y Antheth-Coilt

e fo, the Applicant

• g •—Staia.4 pi:V.1)24 hr the Resnoncle*s

... . . . .... .

(I

2261 ■A I (50 000— 2 211 I '. ■

N1AT-F 2 E

fT THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL

IVLT JMBAI

DISTRICT

))):c•nal Application No Applicants

4' tte

US

-rho State )f Maharashtra and others

Respondents

o))optin affic —_—___—......

au/p Notes. Office Memoranda of tan UM,

_ .— __ ...—

Tribunal' s orders

thoesrance• Tribunal's orders at

,recta Ins and Revistrars order: _ _ _

Date : 09.08.2018. '

0.A.No.1073 of 2017

R.S. Prasad ....Applicant.

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors. Respondents.

1. Heard Shri C.T. Chandratre, the learned Advocate for

the Applicant and Ms. S. Suryawanshi, the learned Presenting

Officer for the Respondents.

2. Learned Presenting Officer for the Respondents. Ms.

S. Suryawanshi seeks two weeks time to file affidavit on

behalf of Respondent No.3.

3. Adjourned to 23.08.2018.

p. M. Dixit) Member(A)

prk

(PTO

- a r

, Shri N. DIXIT (MeMbeil A

I 22611 ( A 50 000— 2 201A, ISpl - MAT-F-2 E.

1 4' THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL

MI TMBAI

al At) ilication No n)

DISTRICT ipplicant/s

The St nte of Maharashtra and others

Respondent's

nine- Officer

•I Not-s. Office Memoranda of Coram.

kupearatice. dribunal's orders or ,reclines and Registrar's order-

Tribunal' s orders

Date : 09.08.2018.

0.A.No.532 of 2017

V.V. Gaikwad ....Applicant.

Venus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors. Respondents.

1. Heard Shri R.M. Kolge, the learned Advocate for the

Applicant and Smt. Archana B.K., the learned Presenting

Officer for the Respondents.

2. At the request of learned Advocate for the Applicant

Shri R.M. Kolge adjourned to 23.08.2018.

4.I II (P.N. bixit) Member(A)

prk

2- .. . ......

f Horate fcl the Annlicant

31,,it*Tnt ... .

0 for Pesoondentls

.0 to 5.1J5 ...........

I PT( I

122F1 (A) (50000— 2-'2Wro

LST1- MAT-F-2 E.

'M THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL. NUJMBAI

annul Addication yC

DISTRICT Applicants

ttw

TI7 e State1. Ma harashtra and others

Respondents

tine CRT,

-

t Notre. Office Memoranda of Ceram.

kooeurance. Tribunal's orde FS 01

meenons and Rezistrar's toter _ Date :09.08.2018.

• Tribunal's orders

0.A.No.1063 of 2015

I C.V. Alsatwar ....Applicant.

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors. Respondents.

1. Heard Shri A.S. Deshpande, the learned Advocate for

the Applicant and Ms. S.P. Manchekar, the learned Chief

Presenting Officer for the Respondents.

2. Learned Advocate for the Applicant Shri A.S.

Deshoande refers to the order passed by this Tribunal on

26.07.2017. The order mentions asunder:-

"The Respondents are directed to offer their comments thereupon and thereafter an appropriate

decision will be taken on the same."

3. Copy of the above order and his representation is

made available to the learned C.P.O. one again.

4. Respondent No.1 is directed to file th 2ir reply before

next date.

S.O. to 05.09.2018.

(P.N. Dix; Membe (A)

— r 1110kq

4,M

r.r? Shr RN. DIXIT (Member) A

ziAFIANCE /2-4- .1)cas

ate #1. the Anolk2;nt

ti-$ • 6 • P • \ cLIAt \Ital-M21 O. t Dr the Resnondeet/s

I 5.

ark

I PT(

T 22(Th L 50 Win— 2-20

MAT-F-2 E.

14

':f THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL

- MUMBAI

T STRICT

Anolicatlon N App 'canes

TI Le State of Maharashtra and others

Res )ondent/s

Office

- re Not is. Office Memoranda of Ceram. to ilea ranee. Tribunal's orders in irert ions and Registrar's order.

—._ --

Tribunal' s orders

Date : 09.08.2018.

0.A.No.194 of 201

I.M. Pathan & Ors. ....Applicants.

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors. spondents.

Heard Shri S.D. Chavan, the learned Ad 'orate for the

Applicants and Snit. Archana B.K., the learner P esenting

Officer for the Respondents.

2. Learned Advocate for the Applicant Shri S.D.

Chavan mentions that as per communication, I arked as 'X'

for the purpose of identification, produced b\ the learned

P.O. shows that Applicants have received iifferential amount

which was due to them as per the chart.

3. Learned Advocate further mentions Mat Applicants

are seeking for interest on the delayed payments.

4. Learned Advocate admits that there is i 3 provision

for payment of interest however, he prays or time to

produce relevant judgment, if any, available on tl e subject.

5.0. to 24.08.2018 (Part Heard).

(P.N. ixit) Member(A)

Shri RN. DIXIT (Member? A

NCE: s D • 4-1:0-0(11-411

-•yfermie for the Applicant

171'70. for the Respondent's

to 2N\ 8i1%

air 1/41e_nit_a 1 5.

nrk

pre )

226() (A ■FA) 000-2 901 '. ISpl MAT-F-2 E.

IVIAILkRASFITRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI

•' ill:al Application No 20

DISTRICT Applicants

a

LUF S

The Statl uF Maharashtra and others

Respondent/s

-ei-entine 01 it

re Notes. Office Memoranda of Ceram.

riouritrance. Tribunal's orders o • fired. /ins and linuistrai.'s orders

r 'r

Tribunal's orders

Date : 09.08.2018.

O.A.No.244 of 2018

R.M. Bahule ....Applicant.

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors. Respondents.

Smt. Punam Mahajan, the learned Advocate for the

Anolicant is absent.

2. Adjourned to 23.08.2018.

h I la (P.N. Dixit) Member(A) Shri P.N. DIXIT (Member) A

ork

n7ARANCE: true Vatik-Nrcor

J _4

-cats for the Aohticant 5 43-elf1/41

cute., eta,1/44,,

0. lor the ResoonAntis

SU2 '

PLO.

~tlg~li5 :^

L;hri P N DIXIT IM ember) A

I ; CF • q 15.cualta"5/3/44a '

to ter the Anokant

1TL: . . . ..... For the ReetioOdentiS

„,4:kisTa-ter ..................... .410."

0-dc-14 e-4—

vesi— e_100-12-- -no"\

mLA-IV-CAAA 1'6 CS— 62Pfrtrtal e"

(•-t•r■A■tt, •

' 220 , (A (50 000- 2-2015( MAT-F-2 E.

"7 THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL

MT MBAI

v. r, al Air slit.° DISTRICT

Applicants

S

TI-.9 State of Ma ha rashtra and others

Respondent's

tiny 0(9

o Not Office Memoranda of Gonda

sameorance, ribunal's orders °I irectlons and Honstrur's (moor.,

Tribunal's orders

Date • 09.08.2018.

O.A.No.S08 of 2016 with 0.A.No.527 of 2016 with O.A.No.528 of 2016

M.S. Aitawade (0.A.S08/2016)

S.D. Shelke (0.A.527/2016) S.A.U. Shaikh (0.A.528/2016)

....Applicants.

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors. Respondents.

Heard Shri A.V. Bandiwadekar, the learned Advocate

for the Applicants and Smt. K.S. Gaikwad, the learned

Presenting Officer for the Respondents.

7. Learned Advocate for the Applicants Shri A.V.

Bandiwadekar mentions that competent authority in the

matter is not the Divisional Commissioner for making the

necessary transfer. Learned Advocate states that the related

judgment in this regard will be produced on the next date.

Learned Advocate therefore proposes that the matter may be

kept before the Hon'ble Division Bench.

Learned P.O. for the Respondents Smt. K.S. Gaikwad

states that since the matter is not challenging the

Government Resolution and only challenging the impugned

transfer order, it should not be referred to Division Bench.

4. In view of the foregoing, the matter may therefore be

kept before Hon'ble Chairman for appropriate decision.

(PLixi+-- Member(A)

I ork

[PTO

. 2260)131 (50.000--2-20151 18.01 - MA' 1, 2 E.

FN THE IVIAHAR.ASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI

LA./C A. No. f 20

[N

./ Aoulication No of 20

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

re Notes. Office Memoranda of Cornea, smear Ince. Tribunal's orders or Tribunal's orders sections and Registrar's orders

Date : 09.08.2018

O.A.No.626 of 201/

S.B. Wategaonkar ....Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors. Respondents.

1. Heard Shri A.S. Deshpande, the learned Advocate

for the Applicant and Smt. Archana B.K., the learned

Presenting Officer for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2: Shri K.R.

kri P N. DIXIT (Member) A

Jagdale, the learned Advocate for the Respondent No.3 has

filed leave note.

RANCE e$AP°3-kefig-

rn for the AnNicpnt

2. Learned P.O. for the Respondents mentions that

the reply has been filed on behalf of the Respondent

Nos.1&2.

' ckeiki2.-M.Cli.R).:1'.4, • 3. S.O. to 23.08.2018. 1 for the Resamdentis

liar/ Cb.itiR

(P.N. DIXIT)

sba

Member (1)