Consumer Affairs in Rural New Zealand
Transcript of Consumer Affairs in Rural New Zealand
Consumer Affairs in Rural New Zealand
Gretchen Larsen
Robert Lawson
Wolfgang Chr Fischer
Abstract
Recent changes in many areas of Government policy in New
Zealand, as well as changes in the private sector have
had major impacts on the provision of services in rural
areas of New Zealand. This report describes the results
of a New Zealand survey of 795 rural consumers. The
results emphasise how the problems perceived as most
important to people in rural areas are essentially linked
to fundamental services such as housing, water,
communications and transport. Though this element of
basic needs is covered in the consumer policy literature
it is not a feature that tends to be emphasised. The
survey also gauges some aspects of rural consumers’
knowledge of their entitlements under New Zealand
consumer law and their familiarity with, and use of,
consumer advisory and support services.
Introduction
Consumer policy is generally developed and implemented on
the basis of the circumstances of the majority of the
population and those most closely involved in the
business sector (Fischer, 1999; Tiemstra, 1992).
1
Consequently the needs of minority groups are often not
reflected by consumer policy, but it is these minority
groups who, for various reasons, require the most support
in maintaining their rights as consumers (Benge, 1988).
In most western countries, the majority of the population
resides in urban areas. Therefore consumers who reside in
rural areas comprise a minority groups whose needs may
not be addressed in the development and implementation of
consumer policy. This research examines consumer issues
as perceived by rural New Zealanders and their
perceptions of the support services available for
consumer advice and information.
In New Zealand recently, consumer problems associated
with residence in rural areas have become topical. The
Government has been actively pursuing a policy of
deregulation and ‘user pays’. As a result many rural
areas have found that some public services have been
removed, as it is no longer regarded as economic to
operate them in these areas. Many private businesses have
also faced this situation. This has left a large
proportion of rural consumers with no easy access to
retail outlets, hospitals, post offices, banks and
consumer information services (e.g. Fairweather, 1989).
It has also led to differential pricing for rural
consumers who pay more for some services such as postal
deliveries or telephone installations on the basis that
they are more expensive to supply and maintain in rural
2
areas. Paying more for privately traded articles, such
as grocery items, has long been established as a feature
of rural life due to lack of local competition and higher
distribution costs, but until recently “public” services
were all supplied at a uniform price across the country
irrespective of location. Recent exploratory research has
supported the notion that New Zealand’s rural consumers
remain disadvantaged, as they are less able to assert
their consumer rights of information, choice, redress,
education and the right to be heard (Larsen 1996). This
indicates that any efforts that may have been made to
cater to the needs of rural consumer in New Zealand have
not been successful. This is in contrast to some
reported views by consumer policy experts and officials
who have suggested that because of independent and self
employed nature of many rural occupations, rural
consumers are knowledgeable and well equipped to protect
their own self interests (Larsen 1996). The research
documented in this paper aims to contribute to our
knowledge of consumer affairs in rural areas and consider
the implications for consumer policy. The paper reports
on the results of a survey of rural consumers in New
Zealand that aimed to fulfil three objectives:
1. to scope the relative importance of consumer issues as
perceived by rural consumers;
2. to assess the levels of knowledge held by rural people
of their rights as consumers;
3
3. to document the use and access to consumer advice and
support services by rural consumers.
Consumer Policy in New Zealand
The principle basis for the development of consumer
policy measures and of the independent organisations that
support consumers is that the customer is in an unequal
bargaining position with suppliers of goods and services.
The central focus of consumer policy has therefore been
to equalise the bargaining positions of consumers and
suppliers in the marketplace (Benge, 1988). In attempting
to achieve this policy, the New Zealand Government is
moving away from regulation and protection, with the aim
of creating a more competitive market. As identified in
the literature however, competition does not ensure
consumer sovereignty nor overcome the “caveat emptor”
principle (e.g. Collinge, 1971). Consequently policy
makers are aware that some level of regulation may be
required in order to ensure that competition exists in
the free market and that consumers are able to make
informed purchase decisions.
In general, the New Zealand Government prefers policies
that enlarge consumer choice and those that preserve the
freedom of sellers to market their most profitable goods
and services. Consumer policy provisions are mostly in
4
the area of consumer law and consumer information.
Consumer legislation is quite varied, however the two
main complementary pieces of legislation, the Fair
Trading Act 1986 and the Consumer Guarantees Act 1993
cover all types of products and services. Essentially
the Fair Trading Act deals with supply and pre-purchase
issues such as advertising and pricing, while the
Consumer Guarantees Act deals with post-purchase issues
such as performance, servicing and redress (Commerce
Commission, 1994, Skinnon and Sligo, 1993).
Additionally, there are specific pieces of legislation
that deal with certain industries such as food, credit or
motor vehicles. Consumer information is provided through
a variety of public, semi-public and private
organisations including the Ministry of Consumer Affairs,
the Consumers Institute and Citizens Advice Bureaux (see
Larsen and Lawson pp 87-103 in Fischer and Lawson, 1999).
The Government of New Zealand has not historically
focused on consumer education as a specific consumer
policy strategy, however some initiatives have been taken
to provide consumer education through both the formal
school system and adult education (Ministry of Education,
1995). Most provisions are administered on a national
basis and little attempt is made to distinguish and cater
to the specific concerns of minority groups, including
rural consumers.
Rural Consumers in New Zealand
5
Rural areas are usually sparsely populated and are often
located on or near mountains or islands, or even in
places subject to climatic extremes. Typically,
transportation between rural areas and major population
centres is time-consuming and inconvenient, which limits
commuting or even relatively casual business travel.
Populations are scattered and the topography frequently
difficult, the per-unit or per-capita costs of providing
many public services and infrastructure are often high.
Such rural areas are the finals to be added to electrical
supply grids and modernised telephone systems. The
operating and maintenance costs of conventional water and
sewerage treatment systems for communities in rural areas
in New Zealand are often prohibitively high as well. Per
student costs of education in rural areas are high
because schools are very small, and require extensive
transportation systems, in some cases boarding
arrangements, or distance education through radio and in
nowadays starting with Internet.
The smaller and more rural settlements generally have the
narrowest economic bases; poor income-earning
opportunities, especially for women and young people; and
comparatively low average incomes, largely because the
barriers that make them remote also make it difficult for
them to integrate economically with the rest of their
countries. In addition many have ageing and declining
6
populations. Overall, private companies and even the
Government regard some rural areas as not any more
profitable locations. New Zealand’s rural towns and
communities are vulnerable to economic and political
changes. The pastoral and broad-acre farming regions
depend for their survival almost exclusively on foreign
markets. Downturns in the commodity markets, or
unfavourable changes in exchange rates, quickly impact on
local economies and effects soon become obvious on
service centres. Altogether, trends of exploitation of
rural resources and insufficient understanding of the
rural context underlie the demand for change in rural
development practices. There is a need for stronger
governmental programs to revitalise small country towns
and rural areas, in particular for young families to make
their life attractive in remote areas.
In New Zealand one element that may have contributed to
policy-makers’ interest in rural areas is the increasing
degree of powerlessness of many rural people.
Powerlessness in rural areas may come from isolation,
poor communications and invisibility. This feeling may
have been encouraged by recent trends of rural
depopulation and the resulting effects that this has had
on rural communities' size and infrastructure. Another
reason why policy-makers need to be concerned with rural
communities pertains to the economic policy of ‘user
pays’. Rural services are no longer supplied as right to
7
rural areas, and the policy of equal costs regardless of
location no longer applies. The majority of government
services are now organised on the basis of user pays.
Consequently, rural inhabitants are likely to be
disadvantaged in their access to some social services.
Rural consumers are restricted by cost, distance and the
lack of appropriate services to obtain redress for the
problems they face, and are not always in a position to
protect themselves, as the appropriate education and
information services may not be available. Therefore the
principle is that consumer policy should attempt to cater
for all consumer's needs, including those of minority
groups, and should not assume that the needs of consumers
in certain groups are homogenous. Consumer affairs as a
part of governmental policy are based on the constitution
in most OECD countries. Basically, this is related to the
aim of a sustained economic and social development of the
society, and therefore aimed at increasing the standard
of living.
According to official statistics, rural consumers
represent a sizeable portion of New Zealand’s population
- 23.3% (Census 1996). Despite this there has been very
little research conducted on the nature of being a rural
consumer in New Zealand. At a more general level, there
is also a distinct lack of sociological literature with
regard to rural New Zealand, which is surprising for a
country that “proverbially lives off the sheep’s back”
8
(Carter, 1990). Like many definitions of rural, the
official definition on which the rural population is
defined can be described as a rather “negative”
definition. Cities and towns are defined by population
size and by definition anything that is left after these
areas have been removed is classified as rural. Such an
approach does little to apply meaning to the nature of
rural places and has been heavily criticised as a method
by Carter (1990). For any person with a small knowledge
of the geography of New Zealand, it also emphasises how
it is dangerous to make assumptions or
oversimplifications concerning the nature of communities
covered in this type of definition. Rural areas can
include anything from the fairly intensive and prosperous
agricultural areas surrounding Christchurch or Hamilton,
through to the remote and rugged forested areas of the
South Island West Coast or East Cape on the North Island.
In those places isolated communities are often supported
by single industries such as forestry, fishing, hunting
or perhaps tourism. However, partially because of a lack
of detailed research on rural areas in the country, there
seem to be a number of traditionally held assumptions
about the nature of rural life and of being a consumer in
rural areas. Larsen’s exploratory research in 1996
indicated that, at a consumer policy level, most
knowledge about rural consumers is limited to simplistic
views that most rural consumers can cater for their own
needs quite adequately and without special consideration.
9
The opinions of consumer policy experts that she
interviewed were founded on traditional views that most
of the rural community was engaged in primary production,
often running their own business i.e. a family farm. It
was argued that this experience would make them astute as
consumers. Furthermore, the close knit nature of rural
communities would mean that they were able to get good
local support from family and friends, and probably had
excellent relationships with rural traders who would be
keen to help solve any problems that did arise.
Furthermore, where rural consumers did have problems, it
was argued that effective advice and information systems
could be provided by distance methods such as telephone
or the Internet. These sentiments clearly did not match
those expressed by the rural consumers that Larsen spoke
to in the focus group interviews who articulated a series
of problems they faced as consumers and demonstrated
demand for services such as those offered by the
Citizens’ Advice Bureaux (MAFF &, CAB 1993).
Consequently it was perceived that there was a need for
survey information which would (a) clarify what rural
consumers saw as the most important issues they faced;
(b) investigate the levels of knowledge they held about
their rights as consumers and the services available to
help them if needed; and (c) explore current demand for
and access to consumer support services.
10
Methodology
Information to answer these questions was gathered using
a nation-wide mail survey. The surveys were sent to a
geographically stratified sample of 3,000 rural dwellers
identified from New Zealand telephone directories.
Incomplete addresses are the only major drawback of
telephone directories as a sampling frame in New Zealand
since there are very few unlisted numbers. Consequently
242 questionnaires were returned as wrong or incomplete
addresses. A total of 795 fully completed and usable
responses were returned, which equates to an effective
response rate of 28.8%. The accompanying cover letter
requested that the person who is responsible for the
household shopping complete the questionnaire, and no
follow up or reminders were issued. Exact comparisons of
the sample to the relevant population are not easy
because there is no comparable publication of aggregate
rural demographic statistics in the census. However, the
sample profile is very varied and matches the “expected”
characteristics in all except two regards. Firstly,
there is an under-representation of those aged below 25.
This is possibly the result of using telephone
directories and therefore missing consumers yet to reach
householder status. It may also be a feature of shopping
responsibilities within the household. Secondly, there
is an under-representation of people identifying
themselves as Maori in the survey. This is a usual
11
feature for surveys in New Zealand that is not fully
understood. It is believed to have a complex set of
cultural and social causes relating to values structures,
education and language. There are no corresponding
simple over-representations that counter these
deficiencies in the sample.
Data has been analysed by a variety of appropriate and
conventional statistical methods including cluster
analysis, anovas, crosstabulations and basic descriptives
and frequencies using SPSS10 for Windows.
Results
a) Important issues Faced by Rural Consumers
The questionnaire included a set of 45 items designed to
measure the importance of different consumer issues as
problems for the respondents. These questions were
devised as a set of questions as to measure consumers’
perceptions of their rights (Larsen, Lawson and Fischer
2001) and covered the eight established entitlements
adopted by the United Nations resolution as well as
perceived entitlements relating to product quality and
levels of service. Each entitlement was measured by a
minimum of three rating statements and reliabilities for
12
all 10 sets of issues were over .77. Table one
summarises the mean scores for each issue.
Table 1: Perceived Importance of Consumer Issues
Consumer
Issues
Mean Importance score
(5 = most important)Basic Needs 4.22Safety 3.87Environment 3.83Heard 3.79Redress 3.74Information 3.72Choice 3.70Education 3.61Quality 3.61Service 3.58
Obviously, rural consumers see all issues as important
but the really significant result is the emphasis that is
placed on the provision of basic needs. In this case
basic needs are defined as services such as education,
telecommunications, transport and power. It is difficult
to escape the conclusion that the emphasis on basic needs
is the direct result of the “user pays” philosophy
described above which has been applied by New Zealand
governments since the mid 1980s. Although definitions of
basic needs (like those of poverty) may vary between
countries of different standards of living, the emphasis
13
and concern on basic needs in rural New Zealand is an
important issue for a developed economy to face.
In order to look for variation between individuals or
groups in the importance ratings in an efficient way, the
respondents were grouped on the importance ratings using
k-means clustering methods. Since all the issues were
rated with fairly high levels of importance the data was
adjusted to reflect the relative importance of each issue
for the respondents. This was done by calculating the
mean importance score across all 45 items for each
respondent and subtracting the mean from each of the
original ratings. The clusters were then formed on these
differences which emphasise the most and least important
issues for each respondent. This process is an accepted
way of transforming data with limited distributions such
as values or satisfaction (e.g. Schwartz 1992) and
prevents cluster solutions based simply on patterns of
responses where some individuals might tend to rate all
items more highly than other respondents. Although groups
were derived from the relative ipsatized scores the
profiles and discussion below are based upon the absolute
scores from the original data in order to provide
accurate contrasts between the groups. A range of
solutions were considered from three to five groups and
eventually a three group solution was chosen on the basis
of its face validity and the strength of associations
with the socio-economic and demographic data in the
14
survey. 25 cases were omitted from the cluster solution
because of missing data.
Cluster one (n=351): Overall this group identify more
issues as problematic but are particularly concerned with
issues relating to access to basic services (e.g.
electricity, telephone, transport), and product quality.
Guarantees and satisfactory redress are also an issue for
this group in comparison to the other two clusters.
Demographically, this group are biased towards the 30-39
age group, are married or separated and have dependent
children. Geographically this group is more concentrated
in the North Island of New Zealand and they are biased
towards the bottom three levels of the Elley-Irving
index.
Cluster two (n=203): This group are less concerned about
consumer issues in rural with the exception of problems
relating to choice and lack of competition where they are
the most critical group. Issues relating to information,
advertising, product quality and standards, the
environment and consumer voice are relatively unimportant
for this group. Demographically this group contains
more under 25s than would normally be expected, but is
still spread over all age ranges. They are also more
likely to be married than the other groups but not
necessarily have dependent children and they are
concentrated in the three highest Elley-Irving socio-
15
economic groups. Geographically they are well dispersed
throughout New Zealand.
Cluster three (n=206): The primary concerns of this group
relate to information on legal rights, consumer voice and
the environment. They are especially unconcerned with
issues relating to retail service standards. This group
represents a slightly older part of the population with
more people over 65 than would be expected, and
consequently more people who are divorced and widowed.
Consistent with this, they are more concentrated in the
Nelson/Marlborough area at the top of the South Island.
This area is recognised as having one of the best
climates in the country and is favoured by some people
for retirement. This group is spread well through all
socio-economic groups but contains the highest percentage
in the top two strata.
It should also be noted that income itself was not
directly related to these groups but if the likely
discretionary income is considered, then the first group
is likely to be less well off than the other two. Hence
the concern with product quality and more basic issues is
easier to understand. The second group has higher socio-
economic status and fewer dependents. Consequently,
consumer issues may be less of a problem as long as they
have a suitable spread of choices. This attitude amongst
the younger element of this group is also consistent with
16
what has been written about Generation X and their
attitudes to consumption and other work on consumer
lifestyles in New Zealand (Todd, Lawson and Jamieson,
2001). This study identified younger consumers who are
slightly cynical in their attitudes to the market place
but at the same time they are independent and unconcerned
about consumer policy issues. They normally emphasise
individual as opposed to collectively orientated values
and consume explicitly out of self-interest. We presume
that the concern with choice reflects the limited nature
of supply in rural areas, while this group do not
perceive any deficiencies in information or quality
standards regarding products that are available. The
results of the questions on knowledge of consumer rights
given later suggest that younger respondents who form a
major part of this group do have better knowledge and our
interpretation is that, given adequate choice, they feel
capable of looking after their own interests and that
they do not wish to become involved in more socially
concerned issues. This is contrast to the third group who
are older and more socially orientated. The consumer
issues that they regard as most important are the
“societal” ones concerned with representation and the
environment. There is a likely cohort effect here since
these older consumers will have been influenced by
experiences prior to 1984 in New Zealand when there was
heavy state involvement in almost every aspect of life
and many more controls on competition, distribution and
17
delivery of services. Inputs into policy for these
people would have been a more normal part of life at one
time.
b) Consumers’ Knowledge of their Rights
Knowledge was assessed in two ways. Firstly, respondents
were provided with lists consumer protection legislation
and consumer service organisations in the survey and
asked to indicate which Acts and organisations they had
heard of and which they understood the purpose of. The
results of these questions are summarised in tables 2 and
3. In this simple self –report form with a list for
aided recall it is possible that there will be some
upward bias in these figures but overall they appear to
carry some face validity. The major pieces of
legislation such as the Fair Trading Act and Consumer
Guarantees Act both appear well known and both the
Privacy Act and the Motor Vehicle Dealers act have had
prominent publicity in the 1990s. The privacy
legislation was regarded as internationally very
innovative and caused much comment including adverse
criticism from some areas of business. In contrast, the
Motor Vehicle Dealers Act has been the subject of some
recent ridicule as it has been shown to be outdated in a
number of ways as it has failed to accommodate new
trading patterns and methods, such as internet or direct
advertising. As expected, the proportion of respondents
18
claiming to understand the purpose of each piece of
legislation is lower than awareness in each case.
Examination of the reported knowledge of legislation
against the clusters and demographic variables revealed a
few understandable statistically significant
relationships. In most cases knowledge declined with
age, especially amongst those over the age of 60. The
exceptions to this were the Sales of Goods Act (1908) and
the Door to Door Sales Act (1967). These are the oldest
of the pieces of legislation and more likely to be known
by the older generations. Increased knowledge of both
the Fair trading Act and the Privacy Act was associated
with higher levels of education and there were several
significant relationships between reported knowledge and
work status. Full-time homemakers claimed a higher level
of knowledge regarding the Sale of Goods Act but lower
levels of knowledge regarding the Credit Contracts Act
and the Motor Vehicle Dealers Act while self-employed
respondents claimed much higher levels of awareness
regarding the Credit Contracts Act than other
respondents. Both these are understandable since many
small businessmen will come into contact with credit
legislation as part of their work, while full-time
homemakers without a personal income are less likely to
be signatories on a credit agreement, or to be involved
in actual payment for a motor vehicle.
TABLE 2: Awareness and Understanding of Consumer Legislation
19
Legislation
Heard Of Understand Purpose
Yes No Yes No
n % n % n % n %
Consumer Guarantees
Act
570 78.0 161 22.0 426 62.4 257 37.6
Fair Trading Act 750 96.8 25 3.2 552 74.4 190 25.6Sale of Goods Act 578 78.4 159 21.6 319 46.1 373 53.9Privacy Act 745 96.5 27 3.5 582 78.1 163 21.9Door to Door Sales
Act
335 46.2 390 53.8 216 32.7 444 67.3
Motor Vehicle Dealers
Act
652 85.8 108 14.2 419 58.5 297 41.5
Credit Contracts Act 322 40.5 406 55.8 190 23.9 470 59.1
As well as legislation, respondents were similarly asked
about their knowledge of consumer service organisations.
Claimed awareness of these is generally very high and the
lower proportion for Community Law Centres makes sense as
they offer limited geographic coverage and are more
concentrated in urban centres. There are some
interesting differences in this table between the
proportions who have heard of and those who claim to
understand the purpose of different consumer service
organisations. Apart from “Fair Go” which appears as a
nationally broadcast TV programme, the organisations that
are most understood relative to awareness are those run
by voluntary agencies such as the Citizens Advice Bureau.
The two government services, the Ministry of Consumer
Affairs and the Commerce Commission, both have lower
20
levels of understanding, as does the Retailers and
Manufacturers’ Association. As for the legislation,
there are generally higher levels of claimed knowledge by
younger respondents. Also, understandably, knowledge of
the Commerce Commission and the Retailers and
Manufacturers’ Association is higher amongst those who
are self-employed. Again, these are not surprising
results considering the nature of both organisations will
involve businesses as well as consumers.
TABLE 3: Respondents Awareness and Understanding of Consumer
Services
Service
Heard Of Understand
Purpose
Yes No Yes Non % n % n % N %
Citizens Advice
Bureau
759 99.2 6 0.8 680 90.3 73 9.7
Ministry of Consumer
Affairs
715 95.2 36 4.8 431 60.1 286 39.9
Commerce Commission 665 89.9 75 10.1 296 41.9 410 58.1Fair Go 756 99.2 6 0.8 742 96.9 24 3.1Consumers Institute 720 94.9 39 5.1 551 74.4 190 25.6Community Law Centre 434 59.4 297 40.6 277 40.6 405 59.4Safety Standards
Association
634 85.6 107 14.4 527 73.6 189 26.4
Retailers/
Manufacturers Assn
586 79.4 152 20.6 330 46.7 377 53.3
Disputes Tribunal 740 97.1 22 2.9 625 84.1 118 15.9
21
As well as the awareness and understanding questions,
respondents were also presented with a series of 5 short
scenarios of consumer problems and asked to select the
appropriate options that would be available to them as
consumers to remedy the problem. We regard this as a
potentially more accurate way of acquiring a more
detailed understanding of their knowledge of their rights
as consumers. The overall results are presented in table
4 where the shaded areas depict the correct legal
opinions for each scenario. The ideas for all five
scenarios came from earlier qualitative work for the
study. In all the scenarios except number two, the
majority of the respondents successfully identified at
least one of the correct options, though identification
of all the remedies available by any individual was low. 1
Responses to these questions have also been
crosstabulated with the clusters and the demographic
characteristics with some interesting results that
generally support the trends outlined in the associations
on the previous questions. Firstly, identification of
the correct answers for all the scenarios is associated
with age. Younger respondents show more knowledge and in
particular those over 60 are less accurate. There are no
such differences in relation to the incorrect options.
Following from this association with age, those people in
cluster three are also generally less knowledgeable.1 Note that all possible solutions were presented as separate questions requiring a ‘yes’ or ‘no’ response and respondents were told that any, all or none of the answers to each scenario may be theconsumers’ correct legal entitlement.
22
Respondents with dependent children were much more likely
to be accurate with scenario three, indicating that the
relevance of the scenario to their situation is probably
important. The employment status of the respondent is
also associated with many of the correct responses, with
those people who describe themselves full-time homemakers
showing much more knowledge on the scenarios related to
the heater, the shoes and the toy. In all those cases
both retired and self-employed were much less aware. For
example:
79% of homemakers knew money could be refunded for the
heater compared to 75% of self-employed and 64% of
retired people;
39% of homemakers knew that the shoes must be kept as
opposed to 21% of self-employed and 20% of retired
people;
93% of homemakers knew the toy required a warning label
compared to 65% self-employed and 64% of retired
respondents.
TABLE 4: AWARENESS and Understanding of Legal Rights
Scenario 1: A person buys a new heater. When they get it home it does not
work.Option Money Heater Heater Credit None of
23
Refunded Replaced Repaired Note the AboveFrequency 580 548 321 76 13 Percent 74.0 69.9 40.9 9.7 1.7Scenario 2: A person buys some new shoes. They are sure that they are theright colour, so they do not ask if they can return them if they are not.The person gets the shoes home and decides they are not the right colour.Option Keeps shoes Exchanges
shoes
Receives
Refund
None of the
AboveFrequency 183 449 188 140Percent 23.4 57.4 24.0 17.9Scenario 3: A child’s toy has a part that is small enough for a childunder 3 years to swallow. However, if the part is removed, the toy willno longer work.Option Nothing Is
Done
Warning Label Part Altered None of the
AboveFrequency 33 566 304 67Percent 4.2 72.6 39.0 8.6Scenario 4: A hire purchase deal for a television is advertised as a nointerest deal. A person purchases a television and signs the hirepurchase agreement. When they get home they check the calculations anddiscover that interest has been added to their monthly payments. Theconsumer returns to the retailer.Option Nothing Is
Done
New Agreement New Agreement
and Discount
None of the
AboveFrequency 77 585 139 72Percent 10.0 75.7 18.0 9.3Scenario 5: A new vitamin tablet is being sold. It is found that overuseof the vitamin causes extreme tiredness. However, this is not indicatedon the bottle.Option Nothing Is
Done
Product
Recalled
Compensation
Given
Warning Label None of the
Above
Frequency 11 321 630 37Percent 1.4 41.2 80.9 4.7
(Note: the correct legal options for each scenario are shaded)
24
Since no comparisons on consumer knowledge exist for the
general population is difficult to be absolute in
summarising the findings regarding this assumption
regarding consumer knowledge. Clearly many consumers
have a good knowledge of many of their rights and the
legislation and services available to them but there is
no evidence that suggests that this is due to the rural
nature of their lifestyle. Even those people who are
self-employed do not reveal any extra knowledge except in
areas that might be related to some aspect of business.
Overall, it can be said that knowledge seems to vary by
individual circumstance and relevance and that in the
generalised areas covered in the scenarios, the
experience of the full-time homemaker showed through. It
is interesting to speculate that this may be the same
kind of result as that found in the old studies on price
knowledge by Gabor and Granger (1964) who identified
higher levels of knowledge amongst full-time homemakers
and attributed it to experience and social role. Being a
consumer and acting on behalf of the rest of the family
group is an important part of the full-time homemaker’s
daily set of duties but it is not a phenomenon restricted
to people in rural areas.
c) Accessibility and Use of Consumer Services in Rural Areas
The third objective of the survey was to document the
access and use of consumer affairs services by rural
consumers. In order to address this objective respondents
25
were asked about the availability of services to them and
about any past history of usage of these services. They
were also asked about their preferred methods of access
in order to see if remote services (e.g. Internet or
telephone) provided adequate alternative services.
Respondents were provided with a list of ten consumer services that
may be available for their use in their community. The respondents
were required to indicate whether the service was available to them
and in which of the seven forms provided it was available.
Respondents were able to indicate as many forms of contact as applied
to each service. The results are detailed in Table 5.
26
TABLE 5: Availability of Consumer Services in the Respondents Community
Service
Availability Forms Through Which Services Are Available
Yes No Don’t
Know
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
n % n % n % FrequencyCitizens Advice Bureau 479 64.
0
177 23.
7
92 12.
3
148 75 235 178 6 2 16 38
Ministry of Consumer
Affairs
115 16.
0
370 51.
3
236 32.
7
180 48 3 48 1 1 14 1
Commerce Commission 104 14.
6
354 49.
8
253 31.
8
189 19 3 47 1 10
Fair Go 242 33.
4
348 48.
1
134 18.
5
293 33 23 2 24 21 2
Consumers Institute 163 22.
9
346 48.
6
203 28.
5
215 28 3 36 1 63 3
Community Law Centre 151 21. 296 41. 267 37. 122 18 33 104 11 4 2
27
1 5 4Link Centre 75 10.
5
267 37.
5
370 52.
0
103 14 13 44 8 5 1
Safety Standards
Association
94 13.
1
330 46.
2
291 40.
7
169 15 3 41 2 10 1
Retail/Manufacturers
Association
148 20.
8
270 37.
9
295 41.
4
140 18 33 64 2 5 1
Disputes Tribunal 232 32.
1
255 35.
3
236 32.
6
172 19 40 123 9 8 8
Key: 1= Phone – Toll 5= Periodic Visits
2= Phone – Freephone 6= Internet
3= Local Office 7= Publications
4= Nearby Town 8= Combinations
28
The results indicate that in all cases, except for the Citizens
Advice Bureau and Fair Go, there were a higher percentage of
respondents who did not know if the service was available in
their community than those who did. It is difficult to know how
many of these respondents who answered either yes or no are
correct as it is not known where each respondent resides and
exactly what services are available in their community.
However, the Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Commerce Commission,
Fair Go and the Consumers Institute all provide nation-wide
coverage through the phone, Internet or distribution of
publications. Nation-wide coverage is also attempted by the
Citizens Advice Bureau, Safety Standards Association, and
Disputes Tribunals, but these services will not be locally
available to all rural dwellers. Community Law Centres, Link
Centres and Retailers/Manufacturers Associations are more
intermittently dispersed, but will still be available by
telephone. Generally, the frequency of ‘yes’ responses should
be higher than what has been shown, as most of the services
will be available in some form to rural dwellers.
The differentiation between telephone access via toll calls and
free telephone lines was included to measure if respondents
were aware of free/0800 telephone lines provided by some
services. However a disproportionate amount of respondents
indicated the option of access via a toll call. In fact all
services will be able to be contacted through a toll call and
it seems evident that there is a low awareness of the free
phone options available to consumers. It is a particular
29
concern that a large proportion of respondents (51.3%) believed
that the services of the Ministry of Consumer Affairs were not
available to them when the Ministry provides a free telephone
line, dedicated solely to consumer issues that is available to
all New Zealanders
The Citizens Advice Bureau obtained very high levels of
awareness of both its residency in the respondents community
and the forms through which it is available. Many respondents
identified access to the Citizens Advice Bureau as either
through a local office or in a nearby town. The Citizens Advice
Bureau obviously maintains a strong presence in rural New
Zealand areas and has promoted both its role and availability
successfully.
Another striking result detailed in the table is the very low
awareness of the Consumers Institute publications such as
‘Consumer’ magazine. A total of only 63 respondents identified
that the Consumers Institute services were available through
publications, although 74.4% of respondents had indicated that
they understood the purpose of this service. The main function
of the Consumers Institute is to provide information to its
members through the Consumer publication. It has been suggested
that rural dwellers place more emphasis on themselves to be
better consumers through the use of product and service
information (Liefeld, 1981). If this is found to be true, then
these results present an area of concern. The Consumers
Institute is one of the few independent consumer services in
30
New Zealand that is able to provide the information regarding
product test results, the quality of services and other
consumption related issues that consumers require to make
better consumption decisions.
The final point of interest is the relatively low level of
awareness of the availability of services through the Internet.
Many services such as the Consumers Institute, the Ministry of
Consumer Affairs and the Commerce Commission now run websites
where consumer related information and consumer advice can be
obtained. These low levels of awareness could be due either to
lower usage rates of Internet services in rural areas, or that
rural consumers do not use the Internet as a source of consumer
related information.
In order to determine the forms of contact that rural dwellers
prefer to use when accessing consumer services, respondents
were given a list of eight different forms from which they were
asked to select as many forms as they would prefer to use. The
results are presented in the following table.
TABLE 6: Preferred Forms of Contact with Consumer Organisations
Form of Contact Yes NoFrequency Percent Frequency Percent
Personal Visit to
Local Office
326 42.2 447 57.8
0800/Toll Free
Telephone Line
570 73.7 20.3 26.3
Personal Response Advice Telephone Line
221 28.6 552 71.4
31
Automated Response Advice Telephone Line
13 1.7 760 98.3
Visit When they Make a Community Visit
105 13.6 668 86.4
Write to Them 179 23.2 594 76.8Website on the
Internet
31 4.0 741 96.0
Pamphlets/Leaflets/
Brochures
116 15.0 657 85.0
The most popular form of contact amongst the respondents was
via 0800 or toll free lines. These can obviously be accessed
immediately without any travel or direct cost. The second most
preferred form of contact was a ‘personal visit to a local
office’. This is understandable but what is more significant is
the dislike by respondents for automated response telephone
services and website contacts. The reasons for this dislike
were not collected in the survey and they may be related to
issues such as the impersonal nature of the service, or even to
cost since they both involve potentially expensive options for
rural dwellers in New Zealand. For example, the “User Pays”
cost based policies described above have meant that urban
dwellers in New Zealand have had far quicker and cheaper
internet access than have the rural population. These dislikes
are particularly important for the service providers to
understand since Larsen (1996) reported many organisations to
be keen on developing these options as cost effective ways of
distributing their services.
In order to gauge the extent of consumer problems faced by
rural consumers and demand for consumer support services
32
respondents were asked a series of questions about their
previous use of services. 285 respondents (37.5%) said that
they had used one of the services listed above and a further 84
respondents (11.1%) admitted that they should or would have
liked to have used a consumer service on at least one occasion.
59 of the cases had been within the six months prior to the
survey, a further 66 cases between six months and one year and
all except for 40 cases were within the last five years. If
memory recall is accurate and these figures can be relied upon
to accurately reflect the use of services over time they
indicate that the use of services had increased more recently
with almost 44% of contacts being within the last 12 months.
Crosstabulations with the personal characteristics of the
respondents showed that people who had used consumer services
were more likely to be female and educated with professional or
university qualifications. Those less likely to use the
services were unemployed males and female homemakers with few
educational qualifications. These are not surprising
associations but they emphasise the difficulties that face many
social policy organisations in ensuring that those who may have
most need for some of their services do actually take up the
opportunities available to them. The distribution of the
actual services used by respondents is given in table 7.
33
TABLE 7: Consumer Service Used by Respondents
Service Frequency Valid PercentCitizens Advice Bureau 179 61.7Ministry of Consumer
Affairs
22 7.6
Commerce Commission 15 5.2Fair Go 14 4.8Consumers Institute 60 20.7Community Law Centre 34 11.7Link Centre 27 9.3Safety Standards
Association
9 3.1
Retailers/Manufacturers
Assn
7 2.4
Disputes Tribunal 98 33.8
Of the respondents who have previously used a consumer service,
a large proportion of them has turned to the Citizens Advice
Bureau for assistance. This is consistent with the high levels
of awareness and understanding associated with this consumer
service as identified previously.
An attempt was made to discover why the particular used was
chosen and if the selection of the consumer service agency had
been constrained in any way by lack of availability and choice.
In effect most respondents simply identified that the agency
used was the chosen because it was the appropriate one for the
problem they faced and there was little evidence to suggest
that they were chosen to use any service because of access or
availability. Perhaps the most interesting point in the reasons
34
for choosing a particular agency was that almost a quarter of
the respondents used a particular consumer service because it
was personally recommended to them. This emphasises the
potential importance of word-of-mouth in the take up and use of
consumer services and the potential difficulties facing an
organisation like the Ministry of Consumer Affairs without a
high public profile or widespread understanding of their role.
Over 80% of the people who had used a consumer service
expressed satisfaction with the outcome of action taken. Those
who were dissatisfied explained that this was because the
preferred course of action would have been to settle the issue
directly with the business or supplier concerned. These
responses indicate that consumer service agencies are seen as
effective when called upon.
Conclusions
This study has attempted to provide information and insights in
a topical but little researched area. It is argued that the
specific problems of rural consumers are often overlooked when
consumer policy is developed and support services for consumers
are provided. Though primarily an urban society, New Zealand
still retains a sizeable rural population, which provides a key
role in the economy. For example, all the most important
export industries, including tourism, are essentially based in
the rural sector. Therefore understanding and meeting the
needs of rural communities is not only a question of equity in
35
social policy but also potentially an important investment in
terms of the general economy.
The issues that consumers might perceive as important problems
were approached by looking at the established set of consumer
entitlements supplemented by issues relating to quality and
service. The outstanding issue in the minds of most rural
dwellers was the provision of services supporting basic needs
such education, health, transport, telecommunications and
power. A cluster analysis did show some variation with some
one group also emphasising lack of choice and another issues
relating to consumer voice and the environment. A feature to
note about all these services is that they have traditionally
been supplied from the public sector and even after
deregulation and privatisation of many public services in New
Zealand, the provision of these services still has a strong
Government influence.
Amongst the services traditionally supplied or supported by the
Government are also the consumer affairs services that provide
information and advice to people relating to consumer problems.
Though we have no benchmarks for comparison, the respondents of
this survey showed that they had made extensive use of some of
these services, especially the Citizens Advice Bureaux. Over
one eighth of the sample claimed to have used one of the
services in the twelve months preceding the survey – allowing
for the non-response element to the mail survey this suggests
that the real rate of contact lies somewhere between 4% and 14%
36
of the population. Even the lowest figure would represent a
sizeable proportion of the total rural community. Regarding
the consumer support services available to consumers in New
Zealand, it seems quite clear that the public do not have good
levels of awareness regarding those directly supplied by the
central government and that there should be an opportunity for
the Ministry of Consumer Affairs in particular to improve
understanding of the services it offers and the usage levels.
It is also clear that usage of the services is biased towards
the younger and better-educated people in the sample.
In contrast to the actual support services run by the
government, there does seem to be widespread knowledge of
consumer legislation and an understanding of many courses of
action available under that legislation. Both the Commerce
Commission and the Ministry of Consumer Affairs, as well as the
independent Consumers Institute have given substantial
publicity to consumer entitlements in the 1990s around and
following the introduction of the Consumer Guarantees Act in
1993. Knowledge of entitlements as a consumer is linked to age
and falls especially amongst the over 60s. This is an
important finding in a local context. Like other developed
countries, New Zealand has an ageing population and there are
substantial concentrations of older and retired people in some
areas – including rural parts of Northland, Nelson, Marlborough
and Central Otago where good climates and cheap housing make
attractive retirement communities. Amongst the support needed
for these communities, the provision of adequate consumer
37
education and advice should not be ignored. Among other
factors influencing knowledge of consumer entitlements the most
important would seem to be employment status. Knowledge of
particular legislation such as credit contracts was linked to
self-employed status while full-time homemakers were more
knowledgeable concerning some of the relevant scenarios that
respondents were asked to judge. Neither of these is
indicative of any particular characteristic of a rural life
that would support the assumptions made by consumer
policymakers that Larsen reported in 1996. Those assumptions
were based on a stereotype of rural consumers as a self-
employed farmer and family who were astute and knowledgeable at
managing their affairs. This is an obvious oversimplification
of the rural community and in any case it is disconnected from
the pressures on essential services that nearly all respondents
in our survey rated as the most critical issue for them.
References
Benge, P (1988). Social Perspectives.In Report of the Royal
Commission on Social Policy, v.4, April, Crown Publishers.
Carter, I. (1990). Rural. In., New Zealand Society: A Sociological
Introduction Spoonley, P., Pearson, D and Shirley, I (eds),
Dunmore Press, Palmerston North, .56-66.
38
Collinge, J (1971). The Law of Marketing in Australia and New Zealand.
Australia Thesaurus Press.
Commerce Commission (1994). The Fair Trading Act: A Compliance Guide for
Advertisers and Traders, Wellington.
Elley, W.B. & Irving, J.C. (1985) The Elley-Irving Socio-Economic Index 1981 Census Revision. New Zealand Journal of EducationalStudies, vol 20, No 2, 115-128.
Fairweather, J.R. (1989) Some Recent Changes in Rural Society in New
Zealand, Canterbury, Agribusiness and Economics Research Unit,
Lincoln College, Discussion Paper No. 124.
Fischer, W (1999). Principle Characteristics of Consumer
Affairs, in Consumer Affairs in Remote Areas W. Chr.Fischer and R.W.
Lawson (eds), Research Monograph from the Department of
Marketing, University of Otago, 3-14.
Gabor, A. & Granger, S. W. J. (1964) "Price Sensitivity of the
Consumer," Journal of Advertising Research, 4 (December),40-44.
Larsen, G (1996). Consumer Affairs in Rural New Zealand Areas,
BCom(Hons) Dissertation, University of Otago, (Unpublished).
Larsen, G. & Lawson, R.W. (1999). Consumer Affairs in New
Zealand, in Consumer Affairs in Remote Areas, (Research Monograph) W.
Chr. Fischer and R.W. Lawson (eds), Dunedin, Department of
Marketing, University of Otago, 87-127.
39
Larsen, G. Lawson, R.W. & Fischer, W. (2001). Assessing
Consumer Perceptions of Consumer Rights, Rethinking European
Marketing, European Marketing Academy and Norwegian School of
Economics, Bergen (cdrom).
Liefeld, J (1980). An Exploratory Study of Urban/Rural Consumer
Expectations and Evaluations of Their Consumer Realities. In)
Refining Concepts and Measures of Consumer Satisfaction and Complaining
Behaviour, Hunt, H.K and Day, R.L (eds), Bloomington, Indiana
University, School of Business, Division of Research,.95-101.
Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries and the Citizens Advice
Bureau (1993) Towards Self Help: Urban/Rural Differences in Access to Services.
Wellington, MAF Policy Technical Paper, 93/9.
Ministry of Education (1995). Technology in the New Zealand Curriculum.
Learning Media, Wellington, Crown Publishing.
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in Twenty Countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1-61.
Skinnon, J.C and Sligo, L (1993). Companion to the Consumer
Guarantees Act, 1993. Auckland, The Butterworth Group.
40
Tiemstra, J.P (1992). Theories of Regulation and the History of
Consumerism. International Journal of Social Economics, v.19, n.6, pp.3-
27.
Todd, S.J., Lawson, R.W. & Jamieson T. (2001) New Zealand
Beyond 2000. Dunedin, Report from Consumer Research Group,
Department of Marketing, University of Otago.
41