Bristol Warren - eride.ri.gov

163
Bristol Warren totals 551,283 square feet and consists of the school type(s) detailed below. School(s) were visited three times during the Statewide Facilities Assessment by teams of specialists from April-July 2016. This report provides LEA summary findings for the statewide assessment program. School Type SqFt Elementary School 223,636 Middle School 149,915 High School 177,732 Total: 551,283 Demographics Enrollment is projected to decrease by 12.6% over the next 10 years in Bristol Warren. The total LEA enrollment at 6 school(s) is 3,288 students with a total capacity of 4,098 as reported by the LEA. Utilization is calculated by dividing enrollment by capacity, resulting in 80.2% utilization at Bristol Warren. Educational Program Space Analysis In Bristol Warren there are 272 instructional spaces; of these spaces 25.7% meet or exceed the space size standards. Of the total current deficiencies identified, $4,742,060 are related to the educational program space assessment. Addressing these identified deficiencies will improve the learning environment and bring the school(s) in the district closer to 21st century learning facilities. Five Year Need Summary The current deficiencies total $49,471,548, with 43.3% categorized as Priority 3 and another 24.4% as Priority 4. The building systems with the highest current deficiency costs are Interior and Technology. The projected life cycle need in Years 1 through 5 is $10,060,814. It is anticipated that the majority of the need will occur in Year 5. School(s) with the greatest need are represented in the adjacent table and make up 77.0% of the combined 5-Year need at Bristol Warren. Five Year Facility Condition Index (FCI) For master planning purposes, the total current deficiencies, less new construction, and the first 5 years of projected life cycle needs were combined. This provides an understanding of the current needs of a facility as well as the projected needs in the near future. A 5-Year FCI was calculated by dividing the 5-Year need by the total replacement cost. The 5-Year need is $59,532,362 with a district replacement value of $192,019,672. The resulting 5-Year FCI is 31.0%. School(s) with Greatest Need Combined 5-Year Need Mt. Hope High School $22,406,303 Kickemuit Middle School $16,193,355 Hugh Cole School $7,256,649 80.2 % Utilization LEA Summary Data Gross SqFt Avg Year Built Current Deficiencies (Less New Construction) Life Cycle Year 1-5 Total Total 5-Year Need (Year 1-5 + Current Defs) 5-Year FCI 551,283 1946 $49,471,548 $10,060,814 $59,532,362 31.0% MAPP LEA Summary Bristol Warren

Transcript of Bristol Warren - eride.ri.gov

Bristol Warren totals 551,283 square feet and consists of the school type(s) detailed below. School(s) were visited three times during the Statewide Facilities Assessment by teams of specialists from April-July 2016. This report provides LEA summary findings for the statewide assessment program.

School Type SqFtElementary School 223,636Middle School 149,915High School 177,732Total: 551,283

DemographicsEnrollment is projected to decrease by 12.6% over the next 10 years in Bristol Warren. The total LEA enrollment at 6 school(s) is 3,288 students with a total capacity of 4,098 as reported by the LEA. Utilization is calculated by dividing enrollment by capacity, resulting in 80.2% utilization at Bristol Warren.

Educational Program Space AnalysisIn Bristol Warren there are 272 instructional spaces; of these spaces 25.7% meet or exceed the space size standards. Of the total current deficiencies identified, $4,742,060 are related to the educational program space assessment. Addressing these identified deficiencies will improve the learning environment and bring the school(s) in the district closer to 21st century learning facilities.

Five Year Need SummaryThe current deficiencies total $49,471,548, with 43.3% categorized as Priority 3 and another 24.4% as Priority 4. The building systems with the highest current deficiency costs are Interior and Technology.

The projected life cycle need in Years 1 through 5 is $10,060,814. It is anticipated that the majority of the need will occur in Year 5. School(s) with the greatest need are represented in the adjacent table and make up 77.0% of the combined 5-Year need at Bristol Warren.

Five Year Facility Condition Index (FCI)For master planning purposes, the total current deficiencies, less new construction, and the first 5 years of projected life cycle needs were combined. This provides an understanding of the current needs of a facility as well as the projected needs in the near future. A 5-Year FCI was calculated by dividing the 5-Year need by the total replacement cost. The 5-Year need is $59,532,362 with a district replacement value of $192,019,672. The resulting 5-Year FCI is 31.0%.

School(s) with Greatest Need Combined 5-Year Need

Mt. Hope High School $22,406,303

Kickemuit Middle School $16,193,355

Hugh Cole School $7,256,649

80.2 % Utilization

LEA Summary Data

Gross SqFt Avg Year BuiltCurrent Deficiencies

(Less New Construction)Life Cycle Year 1-5

TotalTotal 5-Year Need

(Year 1-5 + Current Defs) 5-Year FCI551,283 1946 $49,471,548 $10,060,814 $59,532,362 31.0%

M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

LEA SummaryBristol Warren

M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

LEA SummaryBristol Warren

570-574 Hope Street, Bristol, RI 02809

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Colt Andrews School June 2017

1M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Colt Andrews School, located at 570-574 Hope Street in Bristol, Rhode Island, was built in 1906. It comprises 71,300 gross square feet. Each school across the district was visited three times during the Facility Condition Assessments by three teams of specialists in the spring/summer of 2016.

For master planning purposes a 5-year need was developed to provide an understanding of the current need as well as the projected needs in the near future. For Colt Andrews School the 5-year need is $3,620,454. The findings contained within this report resulted from an assessment of building systems performed by building professionals experienced in disciplines including: architecture, mechanical, plumbing, electrical, acoustics, hazardous materials, and technology infrastructure.

Figure 1: Aerial view of Colt Andrews School

Introduction

Colt Andrews School serves grades KG - 5, has 32 instructional spaces, and has an enrollment of 368. Instructional spaces are defined as rooms in which a student receives education. The LEA reported capacity for Colt Andrews School is 432 with a resulting utilization of 85%.

2M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Colt Andrews School

Approach and MethodologyA facility condition assessment evaluates each building’s overall condition. Two components of the facility condition assessment are combined to total the cost for facility need. The two components of the facility condition assessment are current deficiencies and life cycle forecast.

Current Deficiencies: Deficiencies are items in need of repair or replacement as a result of being broken, obsolete, or beyond useful life. The existing deficiencies that currently require correction are identified and assigned a priority. An example of a current deficiency might include a broken lighting fixture or an inoperable roof top air conditioning unit.

Life Cycle Forecast: Life cycle analysis evaluates ages of a building's systems to forecast system replacement as they reach the end of serviceable life. An example of a life cycle system replacement is a roof with a 20-year life that has been in place for 15 years and may require replacement in five years.

Discipline Specialists

All assessment teams produced current deficiencies associated with each school. The assessment for the school facilities at the Rhode Island Department of Education included several specialties:

Facility Condition Assessment: Architectural, mechanical, and electrical engineering professionals observed conditions via a visual observation that did not include intrusive measures, destructive investigations, or testing. Additionally, the assessment incorporated input provided by district facilities and maintenance staff where applicable. The assessment team recorded existing conditions, identified problems and deficiencies, documented corrective action and quantities, and identified the priority of the repair in accordance with parameters defined during the planning phase. The team took digital photos at each school to better identify significant deficiencies.

Technology: Technology specialists visited RIDE facilities and met with technology directors to observe and assess each facility's technology infrastructure. The assessment included network architecture, major infrastructure components, classroom instructional systems, necessary building space and support for technology. The technology assessment took into account the desired technology outcome and best practices and processes to ensure results can be attained effectively.

Hazardous Materials: Schools constructed prior to 1990 were assessed by specialists to identify the presence of hazardous materials. The team focused on identifying asbestos containing building materials (ACBMs), lead-based painted (LBP) areas, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs). As part of an indoor air and exterior air quality assessment, the team noted evidence of mold, water intrusion, mercury, and oil and hazardous materials (OHMs) exposure. If sampling and analysis was required, these activities were recommended but not included in the scope of work.

Traffic: A traffic specialist performed an in-office review of aerial imagery of the traffic infrastructure around the facilities in accordance with section 1.05-7 in the Rhode Island School Construction Regulations and reviewed data collected on site during the facility condition assessment. Based on this information, deficiencies and corrective actions were identified. High problem areas were identified for consideration of more detailed site-specific study and analysis in the future.

Acoustics: Specialists assessed each school's acoustics, including architectural acoustics, mechanical system noise and vibration, and environmental noise. The assessment team evaluated room acoustics with particular attention to the intelligibility of speech in learning spaces, interior and exterior sound isolation, and mechanical system noise and vibration control.

Educational Program Space Assessment: Teams evaluated schools to ensure that that all spaces adequately support the districts educational program. Standards are established for each classroom type or instructional space. Each space is evaluated to determine if it meets those standards and a listing of alterations that should be made to make the space a better environment for teaching and learning was created.

3M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Colt Andrews School

System Summaries

Building Envelope

The exterior systems for the building(s) at this campus includes:01 - Colt School: Fiber Cement Exterior Wall

Wood Exterior WindowsSteel Exterior Entrance Doors

02 - Andrews School: Brick Exterior Wall Vinyl on Wood Frame Exterior WindowsStorefront Entrance Doors

The roofing for the building(s) at this campus consists of:01 - Colt School: Clay Tile Roofing02 - Andrews School: Composition Shingle Roofing

Site

The site level systems for this campus include:Site Asphalt Parking Lot Pavement

Concrete Pedestrian Pavement

Interior

The interior systems for the building(s) at this campus include:01 - Colt School: Wood Interior Doors

Steel Interior DoorsInterior Door Hardware Suspended Acoustical Grid SystemSuspended Acoustical Ceiling TilePainted CeilingsCeramic Tile WallBrick/Stone Veneer Interior Wall PaintingConcrete FlooringCeramic Tile FlooringWood FlooringVinyl Composition Tile FlooringCarpet

02 - Andrews School: Wood Interior DoorsOverhead Interior Coiling DoorsInterior Door Hardware

The following tables summarize major building systems at the Colt Andrews School campus, identified by discipline and building.

4M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Colt Andrews School

02 - Andrews School: Suspended Acoustical Grid SystemPainted CeilingsCeramic Tile WallAcoustical Wall PanelingBrick/Stone Veneer Interior Wall PaintingConcrete FlooringCeramic Tile FlooringVinyl Composition Tile FlooringEpoxy Coated FlooringCarpetAthletic/Sport Flooring

Mechanical

The mechanical systems for the building(s) at this campus include:

01 - Colt School: 1,275 MBH Cast Iron Water Boiler 3,264 MBH Cast Iron Water Boiler Steam/Hot Water Heating Unit VentDDC Heating System Controls1 Ton Ductless Split System5 HP VFD 5 HP Pump 2-Pipe Hot Water Hydronic Distribution System 15,000 CFM Interior AHU 15,000 CFM Outdoor AHUDuctworkKitchen Exhaust HoodsRoof Exhaust FanFire Sprinkler System

02 - Andrews School: 1,275 MBH Cast Iron Water Boiler Finned Wall Radiator Steam/Hot Water Heating Unit VentElectronic Heating System Controls1 Ton Ductless Split System3 Ton Outside Air Cooled Condenser2-Pipe Hot Water Hydronic Distribution System 5 HP Pump Ductwork15,000 CFM Interior AHU 15,000 CFM Outdoor AHURoof Exhaust FanSupply Fan

5M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Colt Andrews School

02 - Andrews School: Fire Sprinkler System

Electrical

The electrical systems for the building(s) at this campus include:01 - Colt School: 208/120v Switch

1,200 Amp SwitchgearPanelboard - 120/208 125APanelboard - 120/208 225ABuilding Mounted Lighting Fixtures Light Fixtures

02 - Andrews School: 208/120v Switch 1,600 Amp SwitchgearPanelboard - 120/208 125APanelboard - 120/208 225APanelboard - 120/208 400ABuilding Mounted Lighting Fixtures

Plumbing

The plumbing systems for the building(s) at this campus include:01 - Colt School: 2" Backflow Preventers

Gas Piping System100 Gallon Gas Water Heater

02 - Andrews School: 2" Backflow PreventersGas Piping System100 Gallon Gas Water Heater

01 - Colt School: Domestic Water Piping System 02 - Andrews School: Domestic Water Piping System 01 - Colt School: Classroom Lavatories

Mop/Service SinksRefrigerated Drinking FountainRestroom LavatoriesToiletsUrinals

02 - Andrews School: Classroom LavatoriesMop/Service SinksRefrigerated Drinking FountainRestroom LavatoriesToiletsUrinals

01 - Colt School: Sump Pump02 - Andrews School: Sump Pump01 - Colt School: Air Compressor (5 hp)

6M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Colt Andrews School

02 - Andrews School: Light Fixtures

7M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Colt Andrews School

Facility Deficiency Priority Levels

Deficiencies were ranked according to five priority levels, with Priority 1 items being the most critical to address:

Priority 1 – Mission Critical Concerns: Deficiencies or conditions that may directly affect the school’s ability to remain open or deliver the educational curriculum. These deficiencies typically relate to building safety, code compliance, severely damaged or failing building components, and other items that require near-term correction. An example of a Priority 1 deficiency is a fire alarm system replacement.

Priority 2 – Indirect Impact to Educational Mission: Items that may progress to a Priority 1 item if not addressed in the near term. Examples of Priority 2 deficiencies include inadequate roofing that could cause deterioration of integral building systems, and conditions affecting building envelopes, such as roof and window replacements.

Priority 3 – Short-Term Conditions: Deficiencies that are necessary to the school's mission but may not require immediate attention. These items should be considered necessary improvements required to maximize facility efficiency and usefulness. Examples of Priority 3 items include site improvements and plumbing deficiencies.

Priority 4 – Long-Term Requirements: Items or systems that may be considered improvements to the instructional environment. The improvements may be aesthetic or provide greater functionality. Examples include cabinets, finishes, paving, removal of abandoned equipment, and educational accommodations associated with special programs.

Priority 5 – Enhancements: Deficiencies aesthetic in nature or considered enhancements. Typical deficiencies in this priority include repainting, replacing carpet, improved signage, or other improvements to the facility environment.

8M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Colt Andrews School

Table 1: System by Priority

Priority

System 1 2 3 4 5 Total % of Total

Site - - $151,087 $175,819 $69,827 $396,734 12.93 %

Roofing - - - - - $0 0.00 %

Structural - - - - - $0 0.00 %

Exterior - $350 - - - $350 0.01 %

Interior - - $421,535 $146,708 $97,620 $665,864 21.70 %

Mechanical - $259,702 - - - $259,702 8.46 %

Electrical - - - - $57,567 $57,567 1.88 %

Plumbing - - $271,079 - $17,375 $288,454 9.40 %

Fire and Life Safety - - - - - $0 0.00 %

Technology - - $1,390,561 - - $1,390,561 45.32 %

Conveyances - - - - - $0 0.00 %

Specialties - - $9,127 - - $9,127 0.30 %

Total $0 $260,052 $2,243,389 $322,528 $242,389 $3,068,358

*Displayed totals may not sum exactly due to mathematical rounding

The following chart summarizes this site's current deficiencies by building system and priority. The listing details current deficiencies including deferred maintenance, functional deficiencies, code compliance, capital renewal, hazardous materials and technology categories.

The building systems with the most need include:Technology - $1,390,561Interior - $665,864Site - $396,734

The chart below represents the building systems and associated deficiency costs.

Figure 2: System Deficiencies

9M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Colt Andrews School

Current Deficiencies by Category

Deficiencies have been further grouped according to the observed category.

• Acoustics deficiencies relate to room acoustics, sound insolation, and mechanical systems and vibration control modeled after ANSI/ASA Standard S12.60-2010 and ASHRAE Handbook, Chapter 47 on Sound and Vibration Control.

• Barrier to Accessibility deficiencies relate to the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Rhode Island Governors Commission on Disability. Additional items related to accessibility may be included other categories.

• Capital Renewal items have reached or exceeded serviceable life and require replacement. These are current and do not include life cycle capital renewal forecasts. Also included are deficiencies correcting planned work postponed beyond its regular life expectancy.

• Code Compliance deficiencies related to current codes. Many may fall under grandfather clauses, which allow buildings to continue operating under codes effective at the time of construction. However, there are instances where the level of renovation requires full compliance which are reflected in the master plan.

• Educational Adequacy deficiencies identify where facilities do not align with the Basic Education Program and the RIDE School Construction Regulations. • Functional Deficiencies are deficiencies for components or systems that have failed before the end of expected life or are not the right application, size, or design.

• Hazardous Materials include deficiencies for building systems or components containing potentially hazardous material. The team focused on identifying asbestos containing building materials (ACBMs), lead based painted (LBP) areas, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs). As part of an indoor air and exterior air quality assessment, the team noted evidence of mold, water intrusion, mercury, and oil and hazardous materials (OHMs) exposure. With other scopes of work there may be other costs associated with hazardous materials.

• Technology deficiencies relate to network architecture, technology infrastructure, classroom systems, and support. Examples of technology deficiencies include: security cameras, secure electronic access, telephone handsets, and dedicated air conditioning for telecommunication rooms.

• Traffic deficiencies relate to vehicle or pedestrian traffic, such as bus loops, crosswalks, and pavement markings.

10M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Colt Andrews School

Table 2: Deficiency Category by PriorityPriority

Category 1 2 3 4 5 Total

Acoustics - - - $3,708 - $3,708

Barrier to Accessibility - - - - - $0

Capital Renewal - $260,052 $687,619 $238,542 $88,379 $1,274,593

Code Compliance - - - - - $0

Educational Adequacy - - $31,943 $28,329 $154,010 $214,282

Functional Deficiency - - $4,995 - - $4,995

Hazardous Material - - - $51,949 - $51,949

Technology - - $1,367,744 - - $1,367,744

Traffic - - $151,087 - - $151,087

Total $0 $260,052 $2,243,389 $322,528 $242,389 $3,068,358

*Displayed totals may not sum exactly due to mathematical rounding

The following chart and table represent the deficiency category by priority. This listing includes current deficiencies for all building systems.

11M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Colt Andrews School

Life Cycle Capital Renewal Projections

System Current DeficienciesYear 12017

Year 22018

Year 32019

Year 42020

Year 52021 LC Yr. 1-5 Total Total 5-Year Need

Site $396,734 $0 $0 $0 $0 $74,154 $74,154 $470,888

Roofing $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Structural $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Exterior $350 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $350

Interior $665,864 $0 $43,730 $0 $0 $211,978 $255,708 $921,572

Mechanical $259,702 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $259,702

Electrical $57,567 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $57,567

Plumbing $288,454 $0 $0 $5,322 $0 $5,322 $10,644 $299,098

Fire and Life Safety $0 $0 $0 $0 $208,980 $0 $208,980 $208,980

Technology $1,390,561 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,390,561

Conveyances $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Specialties $9,127 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $9,127

Total $3,068,358 $0 $43,730 $5,322 $208,980 $291,454 $549,486 $3,617,844

*Displayed totals may not sum exactly due to mathematical rounding

Life Cycle Capital Renewal ForecastDuring the facility condition assessment, assessors inspected all major building systems. If a need for immediate replacement was identified, a deficiency was created with the estimated repair costs. The identified deficiency contributes to the facility's total current repair costs.

Capital planning scenarios span multiple years, as opposed to being constrained to immediate repairs. Construction projects may begin several years after the initial facility condition assessment. Therefore, in addition to the current year repair costs, it is necessary to forecast the facility's future costs using a 5-year life cycle renewal forecast model.

Life cycle renewal is the projection of future building system costs based upon each individual system’s expected serviceable life. Building systems and components age over time, eventually break down, reach the end of their useful lives, and may require replacement. While an item may be in good condition now, it might reach the end of its life before a planned construction project occurs.

The following chart shows all current deficiencies and the subsequent 5-year life cycle capital renewal projections. The projections outline costs for major building systems in which a component is expected to reach the end of its useful life and require capital funding for replacement.

Table 3: Capital Renewal Forecast

12M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Colt Andrews School

Facility Condition Index (FCI)The Facility Condition Index (FCI) is used throughout the facility condition assessment industry as a general indicator of a building’s health. Since 1991, the facility management industry has used an index called the FCI to benchmark the relative condition of a group of schools. The FCI is derived by dividing the total repair cost, including educational adequacy and site-related repairs, by the total replacement cost. A facility with a higher FCI percentage has more need, or higher priority, than a facility with a lower FCI. It should be noted that costs in the New Construction category are not included in the FCI calculation.

For master planning purposes, the total current deficiencies and the first five years of projected life cycle needs were combined. This provides an understanding of the current needs of a facility as well as the projected needs in the near future. A 5-year FCI was calculated by dividing the 5-year need by the total replacement cost. Costs associated with new construction are not included in the FCI calculation.

Figure 5: 5-Year FCI

Financial modeling has shown that over a 30-year period, it is more cost effective to replace than repair schools with a FCI of 65 percent or greater. This is due to efficiency gains with facilities that are more modern and the value of the building at the end of the analysis period. It is important to note that the FCI at which a facility should be considered for replacement is typically debated and adjusted based on property owners and facility managers approach to facility management. Of course, FCI is not the only factor used to identify buildings that need renovation, replacement, or even closure. Historical significance, enrollment trends, community sentiment, and the availability of capital are additional factors that are analyzed when making school facility decisions.

The replacement value represents the estimated cost of replacing the current building with another building of like size, based on today’s estimated cost of construction in the Providence, Rhode Island area. The estimated replacement cost for this facility is $24,955,000. For planning purposes, the total 5-year need at the Colt Andrews School is $3,620,454 (Life Cycle Years 1-5 plus the FCI deficiency cost). The Colt Andrews School facility has a 5-year FCI of 14.50%.

It is important to reiterate that this FCI replacement threshold is not conclusive, but is intended to initiate planning discussion in which other relevant issues with regard to a facility’s disposition must be incorporated. This merely suggests where conversations regarding replacement might occur.

13M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Colt Andrews School

The capacity of a school reflects how many students the school’s physical facility can effectively serve. There are various methodologies that exist to calculate capacity. It is not uncommon to review an existing building only to find that the capacity that had once been assigned is greater than what can be reasonably accommodated today. This is primarily because of a change in how programs are delivered.

The Rhode Island Aspirational Capacity is based on the Rhode Island School Construction Regulations (SCRs) and is an aspirational goal of space use. The capacity for each individual public school in the state of Rhode Island was designed to conform to Section 1.06-2 Space Allowance Guidelines of the Rhode Island Department of Education (RIDE) SCRs. These regulations outline the allowed gross square feet (GSF) per student at each school type (ES, MS, HS) by utilizing a sliding scale based on projected enrollment. The resulting capacities reflect how school capacities align to the SCRs for new construction. The existing enrollment was multiplied by the GSF per student for the appropriate bracket. For the purposes of this analysis, Pre-K centers were rolled into the elementary totals, and K-8 facilities were counted as middle schools.

The most consistent and equitable way a state can determine school capacities across a variety of districts and educational program offerings is to use square-foot-per-student standards. In contrast, in the 2013 Public Schoolhouse Assessment Report, LEAs self-reported capacities for their elementary, middle and high schools. Districts typically report “functional capacity,” which is defined as the number of students each classroom can accommodate. Functional capacity counts how many students can occupy a space, not how much room students and teachers have within that space. For example, a 650-square-foot classroom and a 950-square-foot classroom can both have a reported capacity of 25 students, but the actual teaching and learning space per student varies greatly.

The variation in square feet per student impacts the kinds of teaching practices possible in each space. The lowest allocation of space per student restricts group and project-based learning strategies and requires teachers to teach in more traditional, lecture-style formats, due to a lack of space. Furthermore, the number of students that can be accommodated in a classroom does not account for access to sufficient common spaces such as libraries, cafeterias, and gymnasiums. When cafeterias are undersized relative to the population, schools must host four or more lunch periods a day, resulting in some students eating lunch mid-morning and some mid-afternoon. Similarly, undersized libraries and gymnasiums create scheduling headaches for schools and restrict student access. Finally, a classroom count-only approach to school capacity does not consider the inherent scheduling challenges schools face.

Rhode Island Aspirational Capacity

Applying the Rhode Island Aspirational Capacity, a facility of this size could ideally support an enrollment of approximately 430 students.

As part of the Educational Program Space Assessment, select core spaces were compared to the RI School Construction Regulations. If it was determined that a facility was in need of square footage related to a cafeteria or library/media center, a cost for additional space was estimated. This cost is not included in the total 5-year need or the 5-year FCI calculation.

Facility New Construction

The New Construction cost to bring the Colt Andrews School cafeteria and/or library/media center to the size prescribed by the SCRs is estimated to be $353,430.

14M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Colt Andrews School

Table 4: Facility Condition by Building

Gross Sq Ft Year BuiltCurrent

Deficiencies LC Yr. 1-5 TotalTotal 5 Yr Need

(Yr 1-5 + Current Defs) 5-Year FCI

Colt Andrews School Totals 71,300 1906 $3,070,968 $549,486 $3,620,454 14.50%

*Displayed totals may not sum exactly due to mathematical rounding

The following pages provide a listing of all current deficiencies and 5-year life cycle need and the associated costs, followed by photos taken during the assessment.

The Colt Andrews School comprises 71,300 square feet and was constructed in 1906. Current deficiencies at this school total $3,070,968. Five year capital renewal costs total $549,486. The total identified need for the Colt Andrews School (current deficiencies and 5-year capital renewal costs) is $3,620,454. The 5-year FCI is 14.50%.

Summary of Findings

Cost estimates are derived from local cost estimating expertise and enhanced by industry best practices, historical cost data, and relevance to the Rhode Island region. Costs have been developed from current market rates as of the 2nd quarter in 2016. All costs are based on a replace-in-kind approach, unless the item was not in compliance with national or state regulations or standards. For planning and budgeting purposes, facility assessments customarily add a soft cost multiplier onto deficiency repair cost estimates. This soft cost multiplier accounts for costs that are typically incurred when contracting for renovation and construction services. Soft costs typically include construction cost factors, such as contractor overhead and profit, as well as labor and material inflation, professional fees, and administrative costs. Based on the Rhode Island School Construction Regulations, a soft cost multiplier of 20% is included on all cost estimates. Other project allowances are included in the cost estimates based on school attributes such as age, location, and historic designation. All stated costs in the assessment report will include soft costs for planning and budgeting purposes. These are estimates, and costs will vary at the time of construction.

Cost Estimating

15M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Colt Andrews School

Site Level DeficienciesSiteDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

Traffic Signage Is Required Traffic 4 Ea. 3 $151,087 9292

Note: Add school zone signs on adjacent roadways (2 on Hope St, 2 on Bradford St)

Asphalt Paving Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 30 CAR 4 $98,587 11431

Backstops Require Replacement Educational Adequacy

1 Ea. 4 $28,329 28405

Note: Backstops Require Replacement

Fencing Requires Replacement (4' Chain Link Fence) Capital Renewal 750 LF 4 $48,159 11430

Exterior Basketball Goals are Required Educational Adequacy

1 Ea. 5 $5,807 28687

Note: Exterior Basketball Goals are Required

PE / Recess Playfield is Missing and is Needed Educational Adequacy

1 Ea. 5 $64,020 54859

Note: PE / Recess Playfield is Missing and is Needed

Sub Total for System 6 items $395,990

Sub Total for School and Site Level 6 items $395,990

Building: 01 - Colt SchoolExteriorDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

The Glass Pane In The Storefront Window Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 10 SF 2 $350 9669

Note: First floor office interior window is cracked and should be replaced.

Sub Total for System 1 items $350

InteriorDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

Interior Doors Require Replacement Functional Deficiency 1 Door 3 $4,995 9663

Note: Lower level boy's restroom door is swelling and delaminating.

The Vinyl Composition Tile Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 4,300 SF 3 $53,439 9664

Note: There are cracks in the VCT floor at the 1st floor lobby, 2nd floor corridor, and north stairwell 2nd landing.

Interior Gypsum Board Walls Require Repair Capital Renewal 2,000 SF Wall

4 $15,835 9666

Location: Girl's restroom, VP office, Room C117

Classroom Door Requires Vision Panel Educational Adequacy

1 Ea. 5 $2,282 Rollup

Room lacks appropriate sound control. Educational Adequacy

200 SF 5 $6,959 Rollup

The Gypsum Board Ceilings Require Repainting Capital Renewal 5,449 SF 5 $24,693 Rollup

Sub Total for System 6 items $108,203

MechanicalDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

The Mechanical / HVAC Piping / System Is Beyond Its Useful Life Capital Renewal 31,100 SF 2 $259,702 9668

Sub Total for System 1 items $259,702

ElectricalDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

Room Has Insufficient Electrical Outlets Educational Adequacy

36 Ea. 5 $17,866 Rollup

Sub Total for System 1 items $17,866

PlumbingDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

The Plumbing / Domestic Water Piping System Is Beyond Its Useful Life Capital Renewal 31,100 SF 3 $271,079 9667

Note: Replace pipes and insulation.

The Class Room Lavatories Plumbing Fixtures Are Missing And Should Be Installed Educational Adequacy

1 Ea. 5 $1,512 Rollup

Sub Total for System 2 items $272,591

16M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Colt Andrews School

TechnologyDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

Room lacks Interactive White Board Educational Adequacy

1 Ea. 3 $5,704 Rollup

Sub Total for System 1 items $5,704

SpecialtiesDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

Room has insufficient writing area. Educational Adequacy

1 Ea. 3 $4,563 Rollup

Sub Total for System 1 items $4,563

Sub Total for Building 01 - Colt School 13 items $668,979

Building: 02 - Andrews SchoolSiteDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

Bleachers Require Repainting Capital Renewal 165 Seat 4 $744 9659

Sub Total for System 1 items $744

InteriorDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

The Vinyl Composition Tile Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 29,217 SF 3 $363,101 9661

Note: VCT is aged and chipped with cracks and stains.

Interior Gypsum Board Walls Require Repair Capital Renewal 9,500 SF Wall

4 $75,216 9658

Note: There are cracks in the gypboard wall in the stairwells, damage to corners, and various chips in walls.

Paint (probable pre-1978 in base layer(s)) - damaged area < 9 sq. ft. OR overall worn AND in children-accessible area (measurement unit - each)

Hazardous Material 12 Ea. 4 $3,708 Rollup

Paint (probable pre-1978 in base layer(s)) - damaged area < 9 sq. ft. OR overall worn AND in children-accessible area (measurement unit - linear feet)

Hazardous Material 460 LF 4 $11,370 Rollup

Paint (probable pre-1978 in base layer(s)) - damaged area < 9 sq. ft. OR overall worn AND in children-accessible area (measurement unit - square feet)

Hazardous Material 3,580 SF 4 $36,871 Rollup

Partitions Provide Insufficient Sound Isolation Acoustics 120 SF 4 $3,708 19686

Note: Principal Office

The Exposed Ceilings Require Repainting Capital Renewal 5,153 SF 5 $63,686 9660

Note: Gym ceiling shows flaking paint.

Sub Total for System 7 items $557,660

ElectricalDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

Room Has Insufficient Electrical Outlets Educational Adequacy

80 Ea. 5 $39,701 Rollup

Sub Total for System 1 items $39,701

PlumbingDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

Room lacks a drinking fountain. Educational Adequacy

7 Ea. 5 $7,720 Rollup

The Class Room Lavatories Plumbing Fixtures Are Missing And Should Be Installed Educational Adequacy

8 Ea. 5 $8,143 Rollup

Sub Total for System 2 items $15,863

TechnologyDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

Room lacks Interactive White Board Educational Adequacy

3 Ea. 3 $17,113 Rollup

Technology: Campus network switching electronics are antiquated and/or do not meet standards.

Technology 288 Ea. 3 $148,309 18346

Technology: Campus wireless infrastructure inadequate. Technology 46 Ea. 3 $66,327 18345

Technology: Classroom AV/Multimedia systems are inadequate and/or near end of useful life.

Technology 1 Ea. 3 $21,628 18352

Technology: Instructional spaces do not have local sound reinforcement. Technology 40 Ea. 3 $205,984 18355

17M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Colt Andrews School

TechnologyDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

Technology: Intermediate Telecommunications Room grounding system is inadequate or non-existent.

Technology 4 Ea. 3 $23,070 18343

Technology: Intermediate Telecommunications Room is not dedicated. Room requires partial walls and/or major improvements.

Technology 1 Ea. 3 $40,785 18340

Technology: Intermediate Telecommunications Room needs M/E improvements. Technology 3 Ea. 3 $79,098 18341

Technology: Intermediate Telecommunications Room UPS does not meet standards, is inadequate, or non-existent.

Technology 4 Ea. 3 $20,598 18342

Technology: Main Telecommunications Room ground system is inadequate or non-existent. Technology 2 Ea. 3 $14,419 18338

Technology: Main Telecommunications Room needs M/E improvements. Technology 1 Ea. 3 $31,722 18336

Technology: Main Telecommunications Room needs minor improvements. Technology 1 Ea. 3 $23,482 18335

Technology: Main Telecommunications Room UPS does not meet standards, is inadequate, or non-existent.

Technology 2 Ea. 3 $19,569 18337

Technology: Network cabling infrastructure is outdated (Cat 5 or less) and/or does not meet standards.

Technology 103 Ea. 3 $47,737 18347

Technology: Network cabling infrastructure is partially outdated and/or needs expansion. Technology 144 Ea. 3 $66,739 18351

Technology: Network system inadequate and/or near end of useful life Technology 48 Ea. 3 $247,181 18354

Technology: PA/Bell/Clock system is inadequate and/or near end of useful life. Technology 71,032 SF 3 $131,683 18353

Technology: Special Space AV/Multimedia system is inadequate. Technology 1 Ea. 3 $58,706 18348

Technology: Telecommunications Room (large size room) needs dedicated cooling system improvements.

Technology 2 Ea. 3 $16,479 18339

Technology: Telecommunications Room (small size room) needs dedicated cooling system improvements.

Technology 4 Ea. 3 $20,598 18344

Technology: Telephone handsets are inadequate and sparsely deployed throughout the campus.

Technology 46 Ea. 3 $75,802 18349

Technology: Telephone system is inadequate and/or non-existent. Technology 1 Ea. 3 $7,827 18350

Sub Total for System 22 items $1,384,856

SpecialtiesDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

Room has insufficient writing area. Educational Adequacy

1 Ea. 3 $4,563 Rollup

Sub Total for System 1 items $4,563

Sub Total for Building 02 - Andrews School 34 items $2,003,389

Total for Campus 53 items $3,068,358

18M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Colt Andrews School

Colt Andrews School - Life Cycle Summary Yrs 1-5Site Level Life Cycle Items

SiteUniformat Description LC Type Description Qty UoM Repair Cost Remaining Life

Fences and Gates Wood 300 LF $74,154 5

Note: Andrews School

Sub Total for System 1 items $74,154

Sub Total for Building - 1 items $74,154

Building: 01 - Colt School

InteriorUniformat Description LC Type Description Qty UoM Repair Cost Remaining Life

Suspended Plaster and Painted ceilings 10,898 SF $45,587 5

Wall Painting and Coating Painting/Staining (Bldg SF) 12,440 SF $82,195 5

Carpeting Carpet 3,870 SF $84,196 5

Sub Total for System 3 items $211,979

PlumbingUniformat Description LC Type Description Qty UoM Repair Cost Remaining Life

Domestic Water Equipment Water Heater - Gas - 100 Gallon 1 Ea. $5,322 5

Note: 120 gallons

Sub Total for System 1 items $5,322

Fire and Life SafetyUniformat Description LC Type Description Qty UoM Repair Cost Remaining Life

Fire Detection and Alarm Fire Alarm 31,100 SF $91,154 4

Sub Total for System 1 items $91,154

Sub Total for Building 01 - Colt School 5 items $308,455

Building: 02 - Andrews School

InteriorUniformat Description LC Type Description Qty UoM Repair Cost Remaining Life

Carpeting Carpet 2,010 SF $43,730 2

Sub Total for System 1 items $43,730

PlumbingUniformat Description LC Type Description Qty UoM Repair Cost Remaining Life

Domestic Water Equipment Water Heater - Gas - 100 Gallon 1 Ea. $5,322 3

Note: 120 gallon

Sub Total for System 1 items $5,322

Fire and Life SafetyUniformat Description LC Type Description Qty UoM Repair Cost Remaining Life

Fire Detection and Alarm Fire Alarm 40,200 SF $117,826 4

Sub Total for System 1 items $117,826

Sub Total for Building 02 - Andrews School 3 items $166,878

Total for: Colt Andrews School 9 items $549,487

19M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Colt Andrews School

Supporting Photos

Typical Damage to Walls

Main Entry

Computer Lab

Gypsum Board Wall Damage

20M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Colt Andrews School

Typical Lockers

Site Aerial

Cracked VCT

Typical Classroom

Stained VCT

Faded Paint At Bleachers

21M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Colt Andrews School

Damage To Wall Corner

Lobby Plaque

Lockers

Kitchen

Restroom Finishes

Entrance

22M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Colt Andrews School

Andrews School Sign

Gym/Cafeteria

Play Area

Corridor Finishes

Theater

Cracked Window

23M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Colt Andrews School

Aged Piping

Ceiling Paint Flaking

Delaminating Door

Chipped Gypsum Board Wall

Cracked VCT

Peeling Ceiling Paint

24M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Colt Andrews School

Library

Colt School Plaque

Colt School Sign

Cracked Gypboard Wall

25M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Colt Andrews School

35 Washington Street, Bristol, RI 02809

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Guiteras School June 2017

1M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Guiteras School, located at 35 Washington Street in Bristol, Rhode Island, was built in 1929. It comprises 38,600 gross square feet. Each school across the district was visited three times during the Facility Condition Assessments by three teams of specialists in the spring/summer of 2016.

For master planning purposes a 5-year need was developed to provide an understanding of the current need as well as the projected needs in the near future. For Guiteras School the 5-year need is $6,012,645. The findings contained within this report resulted from an assessment of building systems performed by building professionals experienced in disciplines including: architecture, mechanical, plumbing, electrical, acoustics, hazardous materials, and technology infrastructure.

Figure 1: Aerial view of Guiteras School

Introduction

Guiteras School serves grades KG - 5, has 23 instructional spaces, and has an enrollment of 303. Instructional spaces are defined as rooms in which a student receives education. The LEA reported capacity for Guiteras School is 288 with a resulting utilization of 105%.

2M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Guiteras School

Approach and MethodologyA facility condition assessment evaluates each building’s overall condition. Two components of the facility condition assessment are combined to total the cost for facility need. The two components of the facility condition assessment are current deficiencies and life cycle forecast.

Current Deficiencies: Deficiencies are items in need of repair or replacement as a result of being broken, obsolete, or beyond useful life. The existing deficiencies that currently require correction are identified and assigned a priority. An example of a current deficiency might include a broken lighting fixture or an inoperable roof top air conditioning unit.

Life Cycle Forecast: Life cycle analysis evaluates ages of a building's systems to forecast system replacement as they reach the end of serviceable life. An example of a life cycle system replacement is a roof with a 20-year life that has been in place for 15 years and may require replacement in five years.

Discipline Specialists

All assessment teams produced current deficiencies associated with each school. The assessment for the school facilities at the Rhode Island Department of Education included several specialties:

Facility Condition Assessment: Architectural, mechanical, and electrical engineering professionals observed conditions via a visual observation that did not include intrusive measures, destructive investigations, or testing. Additionally, the assessment incorporated input provided by district facilities and maintenance staff where applicable. The assessment team recorded existing conditions, identified problems and deficiencies, documented corrective action and quantities, and identified the priority of the repair in accordance with parameters defined during the planning phase. The team took digital photos at each school to better identify significant deficiencies.

Technology: Technology specialists visited RIDE facilities and met with technology directors to observe and assess each facility's technology infrastructure. The assessment included network architecture, major infrastructure components, classroom instructional systems, necessary building space and support for technology. The technology assessment took into account the desired technology outcome and best practices and processes to ensure results can be attained effectively.

Hazardous Materials: Schools constructed prior to 1990 were assessed by specialists to identify the presence of hazardous materials. The team focused on identifying asbestos containing building materials (ACBMs), lead-based painted (LBP) areas, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs). As part of an indoor air and exterior air quality assessment, the team noted evidence of mold, water intrusion, mercury, and oil and hazardous materials (OHMs) exposure. If sampling and analysis was required, these activities were recommended but not included in the scope of work.

Traffic: A traffic specialist performed an in-office review of aerial imagery of the traffic infrastructure around the facilities in accordance with section 1.05-7 in the Rhode Island School Construction Regulations and reviewed data collected on site during the facility condition assessment. Based on this information, deficiencies and corrective actions were identified. High problem areas were identified for consideration of more detailed site-specific study and analysis in the future.

Acoustics: Specialists assessed each school's acoustics, including architectural acoustics, mechanical system noise and vibration, and environmental noise. The assessment team evaluated room acoustics with particular attention to the intelligibility of speech in learning spaces, interior and exterior sound isolation, and mechanical system noise and vibration control.

Educational Program Space Assessment: Teams evaluated schools to ensure that that all spaces adequately support the districts educational program. Standards are established for each classroom type or instructional space. Each space is evaluated to determine if it meets those standards and a listing of alterations that should be made to make the space a better environment for teaching and learning was created.

3M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Guiteras School

System Summaries

Building Envelope

The exterior systems for the building(s) at this campus includes:01 - Main Building: Brick Exterior Wall

CMU Exterior Wall Vinyl on Wood Frame Exterior WindowsSteel Exterior Entrance DoorsStorefront Entrance Doors

The roofing for the building(s) at this campus consists of:01 - Main Building: Single Ply Roofing

Site

The site level systems for this campus include:Site Asphalt Parking Lot Pavement

Asphalt Roadway PavementConcrete Pedestrian Pavement

Interior

The interior systems for the building(s) at this campus include:01 - Main Building: Steel Interior Doors

Wood Interior DoorsInterior Door Hardware Suspended Acoustical Grid SystemSuspended Acoustical Ceiling TilePainted CeilingsCeramic Tile WallInterior Wall PaintingConcrete FlooringCeramic Tile FlooringWood FlooringVinyl Composition Tile FlooringCarpetAthletic/Sport Flooring

Mechanical

The mechanical systems for the building(s) at this campus include:

01 - Main Building: 3,264 MBH Cast Iron Water Boiler

The following tables summarize major building systems at the Guiteras School campus, identified by discipline and building.

4M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Guiteras School

01 - Main Building: Finned Wall Radiator Steam/Hot Water Heating Unit VentDDC Heating System Controls2-Pipe Hot Water Hydronic Distribution System 5 HP Pump 5 Ton DX Gas Roof Top Unit10,000 CFM Outdoor AHUDuctworkKitchen Exhaust HoodsRoof Exhaust FanFire Sprinkler System

Electrical

The electrical systems for the building(s) at this campus include:01 - Main Building: 800 Amp Distribution Panel

Panelboard - 120/208 100APanelboard - 120/208 225ALight Fixtures Building Mounted Lighting Fixtures

Plumbing

The plumbing systems for the building(s) at this campus include:01 - Main Building: 2" Backflow Preventers

Gas Piping System80 Gallon Electric Water HeaterDomestic Water Piping System Classroom LavatoriesMop/Service SinksRefrigerated Drinking FountainRestroom LavatoriesToiletsUrinalsSump Pump275 Gallon Above Ground Fuel Oil Storage Tank

5M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Guiteras School

Facility Deficiency Priority Levels

Deficiencies were ranked according to five priority levels, with Priority 1 items being the most critical to address:

Priority 1 – Mission Critical Concerns: Deficiencies or conditions that may directly affect the school’s ability to remain open or deliver the educational curriculum. These deficiencies typically relate to building safety, code compliance, severely damaged or failing building components, and other items that require near-term correction. An example of a Priority 1 deficiency is a fire alarm system replacement.

Priority 2 – Indirect Impact to Educational Mission: Items that may progress to a Priority 1 item if not addressed in the near term. Examples of Priority 2 deficiencies include inadequate roofing that could cause deterioration of integral building systems, and conditions affecting building envelopes, such as roof and window replacements.

Priority 3 – Short-Term Conditions: Deficiencies that are necessary to the school's mission but may not require immediate attention. These items should be considered necessary improvements required to maximize facility efficiency and usefulness. Examples of Priority 3 items include site improvements and plumbing deficiencies.

Priority 4 – Long-Term Requirements: Items or systems that may be considered improvements to the instructional environment. The improvements may be aesthetic or provide greater functionality. Examples include cabinets, finishes, paving, removal of abandoned equipment, and educational accommodations associated with special programs.

Priority 5 – Enhancements: Deficiencies aesthetic in nature or considered enhancements. Typical deficiencies in this priority include repainting, replacing carpet, improved signage, or other improvements to the facility environment.

6M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Guiteras School

Table 1: System by Priority

Priority

System 1 2 3 4 5 Total % of Total

Site - - $78,825 $28,329 $8,414 $115,568 2.83 %

Roofing - - - - - $0 0.00 %

Structural - - - - - $0 0.00 %

Exterior - - $69,322 - - $69,322 1.70 %

Interior - - $172,139 $972,867 $298,669 $1,443,675 35.32 %

Mechanical - $687,035 - $19,854 $3,260 $710,149 17.38 %

Electrical - - $94,302 - $43,671 $137,973 3.38 %

Plumbing - - $364,577 $46,109 $18,647 $429,333 10.50 %

Fire and Life Safety - - - - - $0 0.00 %

Technology - - $1,171,805 - - $1,171,805 28.67 %

Conveyances - - - - - $0 0.00 %

Specialties - - $9,127 - - $9,127 0.22 %

Total $0 $687,035 $1,960,096 $1,067,159 $372,661 $4,086,951

*Displayed totals may not sum exactly due to mathematical rounding

The following chart summarizes this site's current deficiencies by building system and priority. The listing details current deficiencies including deferred maintenance, functional deficiencies, code compliance, capital renewal, hazardous materials and technology categories.

The building systems with the most need include:Interior - $1,443,675Technology - $1,171,805Mechanical - $710,149

The chart below represents the building systems and associated deficiency costs.

Figure 2: System Deficiencies

7M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Guiteras School

Current Deficiencies by Category

Deficiencies have been further grouped according to the observed category.

• Acoustics deficiencies relate to room acoustics, sound insolation, and mechanical systems and vibration control modeled after ANSI/ASA Standard S12.60-2010 and ASHRAE Handbook, Chapter 47 on Sound and Vibration Control.

• Barrier to Accessibility deficiencies relate to the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Rhode Island Governors Commission on Disability. Additional items related to accessibility may be included other categories.

• Capital Renewal items have reached or exceeded serviceable life and require replacement. These are current and do not include life cycle capital renewal forecasts. Also included are deficiencies correcting planned work postponed beyond its regular life expectancy.

• Code Compliance deficiencies related to current codes. Many may fall under grandfather clauses, which allow buildings to continue operating under codes effective at the time of construction. However, there are instances where the level of renovation requires full compliance which are reflected in the master plan.

• Educational Adequacy deficiencies identify where facilities do not align with the Basic Education Program and the RIDE School Construction Regulations. • Functional Deficiencies are deficiencies for components or systems that have failed before the end of expected life or are not the right application, size, or design.

• Hazardous Materials include deficiencies for building systems or components containing potentially hazardous material. The team focused on identifying asbestos containing building materials (ACBMs), lead based painted (LBP) areas, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs). As part of an indoor air and exterior air quality assessment, the team noted evidence of mold, water intrusion, mercury, and oil and hazardous materials (OHMs) exposure. With other scopes of work there may be other costs associated with hazardous materials.

• Technology deficiencies relate to network architecture, technology infrastructure, classroom systems, and support. Examples of technology deficiencies include: security cameras, secure electronic access, telephone handsets, and dedicated air conditioning for telecommunication rooms.

• Traffic deficiencies relate to vehicle or pedestrian traffic, such as bus loops, crosswalks, and pavement markings.

8M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Guiteras School

Table 2: Deficiency Category by PriorityPriority

Category 1 2 3 4 5 Total

Acoustics - - - $523,626 - $523,626

Barrier to Accessibility - - $41,065 - - $41,065

Capital Renewal - $687,035 $581,535 $66,200 $299,647 $1,634,418

Code Compliance - - - - - $0

Educational Adequacy - - $14,831 $385,972 $70,408 $471,211

Functional Deficiency - - $78,754 - - $78,754

Hazardous Material - - - $91,360 - $91,360

Technology - - $1,166,101 - - $1,166,101

Traffic - - $77,810 - $2,606 $80,416

Total $0 $687,035 $1,960,096 $1,067,159 $372,661 $4,086,951

*Displayed totals may not sum exactly due to mathematical rounding

The following chart and table represent the deficiency category by priority. This listing includes current deficiencies for all building systems.

9M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Guiteras School

Life Cycle Capital Renewal Projections

System Current DeficienciesYear 12017

Year 22018

Year 32019

Year 42020

Year 52021 LC Yr. 1-5 Total Total 5-Year Need

Site $115,568 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $115,568

Roofing $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Structural $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Exterior $69,322 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $69,322

Interior $1,443,675 $0 $0 $213,213 $0 $0 $213,213 $1,656,888

Mechanical $710,149 $0 $0 $500,803 $19,398 $0 $520,201 $1,230,350

Electrical $137,973 $0 $0 $229,356 $0 $0 $229,356 $367,329

Plumbing $429,333 $0 $0 $1,449 $0 $836,217 $837,666 $1,266,999

Fire and Life Safety $0 $0 $0 $113,137 $0 $0 $113,137 $113,137

Technology $1,171,805 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,171,805

Conveyances $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Specialties $9,127 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $9,127

Total $4,086,951 $0 $0 $1,057,958 $19,398 $836,217 $1,913,573 $6,000,524

*Displayed totals may not sum exactly due to mathematical rounding

Life Cycle Capital Renewal ForecastDuring the facility condition assessment, assessors inspected all major building systems. If a need for immediate replacement was identified, a deficiency was created with the estimated repair costs. The identified deficiency contributes to the facility's total current repair costs.

Capital planning scenarios span multiple years, as opposed to being constrained to immediate repairs. Construction projects may begin several years after the initial facility condition assessment. Therefore, in addition to the current year repair costs, it is necessary to forecast the facility's future costs using a 5-year life cycle renewal forecast model.

Life cycle renewal is the projection of future building system costs based upon each individual system’s expected serviceable life. Building systems and components age over time, eventually break down, reach the end of their useful lives, and may require replacement. While an item may be in good condition now, it might reach the end of its life before a planned construction project occurs.

The following chart shows all current deficiencies and the subsequent 5-year life cycle capital renewal projections. The projections outline costs for major building systems in which a component is expected to reach the end of its useful life and require capital funding for replacement.

Table 3: Capital Renewal Forecast

10M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Guiteras School

Facility Condition Index (FCI)The Facility Condition Index (FCI) is used throughout the facility condition assessment industry as a general indicator of a building’s health. Since 1991, the facility management industry has used an index called the FCI to benchmark the relative condition of a group of schools. The FCI is derived by dividing the total repair cost, including educational adequacy and site-related repairs, by the total replacement cost. A facility with a higher FCI percentage has more need, or higher priority, than a facility with a lower FCI. It should be noted that costs in the New Construction category are not included in the FCI calculation.

For master planning purposes, the total current deficiencies and the first five years of projected life cycle needs were combined. This provides an understanding of the current needs of a facility as well as the projected needs in the near future. A 5-year FCI was calculated by dividing the 5-year need by the total replacement cost. Costs associated with new construction are not included in the FCI calculation.

Figure 5: 5-Year FCI

Financial modeling has shown that over a 30-year period, it is more cost effective to replace than repair schools with a FCI of 65 percent or greater. This is due to efficiency gains with facilities that are more modern and the value of the building at the end of the analysis period. It is important to note that the FCI at which a facility should be considered for replacement is typically debated and adjusted based on property owners and facility managers approach to facility management. Of course, FCI is not the only factor used to identify buildings that need renovation, replacement, or even closure. Historical significance, enrollment trends, community sentiment, and the availability of capital are additional factors that are analyzed when making school facility decisions.

The replacement value represents the estimated cost of replacing the current building with another building of like size, based on today’s estimated cost of construction in the Providence, Rhode Island area. The estimated replacement cost for this facility is $13,510,000. For planning purposes, the total 5-year need at the Guiteras School is $6,012,645 (Life Cycle Years 1-5 plus the FCI deficiency cost). The Guiteras School facility has a 5-year FCI of 44.42%.

It is important to reiterate that this FCI replacement threshold is not conclusive, but is intended to initiate planning discussion in which other relevant issues with regard to a facility’s disposition must be incorporated. This merely suggests where conversations regarding replacement might occur.

11M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Guiteras School

The capacity of a school reflects how many students the school’s physical facility can effectively serve. There are various methodologies that exist to calculate capacity. It is not uncommon to review an existing building only to find that the capacity that had once been assigned is greater than what can be reasonably accommodated today. This is primarily because of a change in how programs are delivered.

The Rhode Island Aspirational Capacity is based on the Rhode Island School Construction Regulations (SCRs) and is an aspirational goal of space use. The capacity for each individual public school in the state of Rhode Island was designed to conform to Section 1.06-2 Space Allowance Guidelines of the Rhode Island Department of Education (RIDE) SCRs. These regulations outline the allowed gross square feet (GSF) per student at each school type (ES, MS, HS) by utilizing a sliding scale based on projected enrollment. The resulting capacities reflect how school capacities align to the SCRs for new construction. The existing enrollment was multiplied by the GSF per student for the appropriate bracket. For the purposes of this analysis, Pre-K centers were rolled into the elementary totals, and K-8 facilities were counted as middle schools.

The most consistent and equitable way a state can determine school capacities across a variety of districts and educational program offerings is to use square-foot-per-student standards. In contrast, in the 2013 Public Schoolhouse Assessment Report, LEAs self-reported capacities for their elementary, middle and high schools. Districts typically report “functional capacity,” which is defined as the number of students each classroom can accommodate. Functional capacity counts how many students can occupy a space, not how much room students and teachers have within that space. For example, a 650-square-foot classroom and a 950-square-foot classroom can both have a reported capacity of 25 students, but the actual teaching and learning space per student varies greatly.

The variation in square feet per student impacts the kinds of teaching practices possible in each space. The lowest allocation of space per student restricts group and project-based learning strategies and requires teachers to teach in more traditional, lecture-style formats, due to a lack of space. Furthermore, the number of students that can be accommodated in a classroom does not account for access to sufficient common spaces such as libraries, cafeterias, and gymnasiums. When cafeterias are undersized relative to the population, schools must host four or more lunch periods a day, resulting in some students eating lunch mid-morning and some mid-afternoon. Similarly, undersized libraries and gymnasiums create scheduling headaches for schools and restrict student access. Finally, a classroom count-only approach to school capacity does not consider the inherent scheduling challenges schools face.

Rhode Island Aspirational Capacity

Applying the Rhode Island Aspirational Capacity, a facility of this size could ideally support an enrollment of approximately 214 students.

As part of the Educational Program Space Assessment, select core spaces were compared to the RI School Construction Regulations. If it was determined that a facility was in need of square footage related to a cafeteria or library/media center, a cost for additional space was estimated. This cost is not included in the total 5-year need or the 5-year FCI calculation.

Facility New Construction

The New Construction cost to bring the Guiteras School cafeteria and/or library/media center to the size prescribed by the SCRs is estimated to be $554,904.

12M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Guiteras School

Table 4: Facility Condition by Building

Gross Sq Ft Year BuiltCurrent

Deficiencies LC Yr. 1-5 TotalTotal 5 Yr Need

(Yr 1-5 + Current Defs) 5-Year FCI

Guiteras School Totals 38,600 1929 $4,099,072 $1,913,573 $6,012,645 44.42%

*Displayed totals may not sum exactly due to mathematical rounding

The following pages provide a listing of all current deficiencies and 5-year life cycle need and the associated costs, followed by photos taken during the assessment.

The Guiteras School comprises 38,600 square feet and was constructed in 1929. Current deficiencies at this school total $4,099,072. Five year capital renewal costs total $1,913,573. The total identified need for the Guiteras School (current deficiencies and 5-year capital renewal costs) is $6,012,645. The 5-year FCI is 44.42%.

Summary of Findings

Cost estimates are derived from local cost estimating expertise and enhanced by industry best practices, historical cost data, and relevance to the Rhode Island region. Costs have been developed from current market rates as of the 2nd quarter in 2016. All costs are based on a replace-in-kind approach, unless the item was not in compliance with national or state regulations or standards. For planning and budgeting purposes, facility assessments customarily add a soft cost multiplier onto deficiency repair cost estimates. This soft cost multiplier accounts for costs that are typically incurred when contracting for renovation and construction services. Soft costs typically include construction cost factors, such as contractor overhead and profit, as well as labor and material inflation, professional fees, and administrative costs. Based on the Rhode Island School Construction Regulations, a soft cost multiplier of 20% is included on all cost estimates. Other project allowances are included in the cost estimates based on school attributes such as age, location, and historic designation. All stated costs in the assessment report will include soft costs for planning and budgeting purposes. These are estimates, and costs will vary at the time of construction.

Cost Estimating

13M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Guiteras School

Site Level DeficienciesSiteDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

Concrete Walks Require Replacement Capital Renewal 50 SF 3 $1,015 8766

Note: Concrete is spalling at the west side of the building.

Crosswalk Requires Repainting Traffic 3 Ea. 3 $2,266 9325

Note: Repaint crosswalks at front of school

Traffic Signage Is Required Traffic 2 Ea. 3 $75,544 9327

Note: Add flashing beacon to school zone signs on adjacent roadway

Backstops Require Replacement Educational Adequacy

1 Ea. 4 $28,329 28406

Note: Backstops Require Replacement

Exterior Basketball Goals are Required Educational Adequacy

1 Ea. 5 $5,807 28688

Note: Exterior Basketball Goals are Required

Paving Requires Restriping Traffic 46 CAR 5 $2,606 9326

Note: Paint parking spots in lots around school

Sub Total for System 6 items $115,568

ElectricalDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

The Pole Lighting Is Missing And Needed Functional Deficiency 4 Ea. 3 $78,754 8767

Note: School does not have any pole lighting. School has four building mounted fixtures that partially illuminate the parking lot. Light poles should be installed to provide sufficient illumination.

Sub Total for System 1 items $78,754

Sub Total for School and Site Level 7 items $194,322

Building: 01 - Main BuildingExteriorDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

The Brick Exterior Requires Repair Capital Renewal 1,000 SF Wall

3 $69,322 9281

Sub Total for System 1 items $69,322

InteriorDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

Interior CMU Walls Require Repair Capital Renewal 750 SF 3 $28,372 8787

Note: Cracked walls should be repaired.

Location: Rooms 209, 107, B2 restroom, 3rd boy's restroom, 2nd corridor

The Acoustical Ceiling Tiles Require Replacement Capital Renewal 250 SF 3 $2,352 8768

Note: There are several stained or broken acoustical tiles.

Location: Rooms: 205, 207, 105, 3rd floor resource office, social worker, cafe, 1st floor custodial closet, all 3 floor corridors

The Carpet Flooring Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 2,528 SF 3 $57,291 8769

Location: Stairwell entries and library

The Ceramic Tile Flooring Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 40 SF 3 $1,119 8772

Location: 3rd floor boy's restroom

The Vinyl Composition Tile Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 5,500 SF 3 $65,724 8770

Location: All corridors, Rooms 205, 206, 207, 202, 204, 107, 108, 101, 102, 104, principal, nurse, cafe, custodial closet

The Wood Flooring Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 500 SF 3 $17,281 8771

Location: Stairwell and gym

Paint (probable pre-1978 in base (layers(s)) - large areas (> 10 sq. ft.) of peeling/damage & area in active use - children (measurement unit - each)

Hazardous Material 165 Ea. 4 $49,020 Rollup

Paint (probable pre-1978 in base layer(s)) - large areas (> 10 sq. ft.) of peeling/damage & area in active use - children (measurement unit - linear feet)

Hazardous Material 1,576 LF 4 $37,457 Rollup

Paint (probable pre-1978 in base layer(s)) - large areas (> 10 sq. ft.) of peeling/damage & area in active use - children (measurement unit - square feet)

Hazardous Material 460 SF 4 $4,555 Rollup

Room Is Excessively Reverberant Acoustics 18,000 SF 4 $418,901 27981

Location: Classrooms

Room Is Excessively Reverberant Acoustics 4,500 SF 4 $104,725 27982

Location: Gym

14M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Guiteras School

InteriorDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

Room Lighting Is Inadequate Or In Poor Condition. Educational Adequacy

9,386 SF 4 $357,644 Rollup

The Gypsum Board Ceilings Require Replacement Capital Renewal 20 SF 4 $238 9235

Wall/ceiling materials - area < 9 sq. ft. AND in children-accessible area Hazardous Material 33 SF 4 $327 Rollup

Classroom Door Requires Vision Panel Educational Adequacy

1 Ea. 5 $2,282 Rollup

Interior Walls Require Repainting (Bldg SF) Capital Renewal 36,732 SF 5 $252,814 Rollup

The Gypsum Board Ceilings Require Repainting Capital Renewal 10,000 SF 5 $43,574 Rollup

Sub Total for System 17 items $1,443,675

MechanicalDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

The Cast Iron Water Boiler Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 2 Ea. 2 $377,102 8782

The Mechanical / HVAC Piping / System Is Beyond Its Useful Life Capital Renewal 38,600 SF 2 $309,934 8783

Small HVAC Circulating Pump Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 2 Ea. 4 $19,854 8781

Remove Abandoned Equipment Capital Renewal 1 Ea. 5 $3,260 9236

Note: 100 gallon water heater

Sub Total for System 4 items $710,149

ElectricalDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

The Mounted Building Lighting Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 10 Ea. 3 $15,548 8774

Room Has Insufficient Electrical Outlets Educational Adequacy

88 Ea. 5 $43,671 Rollup

Sub Total for System 2 items $59,219

PlumbingDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

The Existing Lavatory/Sink Pipes Are Not Insulated Correctly Barrier to Accessibility

8 LF 3 $396 8776

Location: Lower level boy's restroom

The Plumbing / Domestic Water Piping System Is Beyond Its Useful Life Capital Renewal 38,600 SF 3 $323,512 8780

The Restroom Is Not ADA Compliant Barrier to Accessibility

140 SF 3 $40,669 8775

Location: 2nd floor office restroom

The Refrigerated Water Cooler Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 6 Ea. 4 $46,109 8779

Room lacks a drinking fountain. Educational Adequacy

10 Ea. 5 $11,028 Rollup

The Class Room Lavatories Plumbing Fixtures Are Missing And Should Be Installed Educational Adequacy

7 Ea. 5 $7,619 Rollup

Sub Total for System 6 items $429,333

TechnologyDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

Room lacks Interactive White Board Educational Adequacy

1 Ea. 3 $5,704 Rollup

Technology: Campus network switching electronics are antiquated and/or do not meet standards.

Technology 234 Ea. 3 $115,866 18404

Technology: Campus wireless infrastructure inadequate. Technology 25 Ea. 3 $34,661 18406

Technology: Classroom AV/Multimedia systems are inadequate and/or near end of useful life.

Technology 20 Ea. 3 $415,930 18410

Technology: Classroom AV/Multimedia systems are inadequate and/or near end of useful life.

Technology 1 Ea. 3 $20,797 18412

Technology: Instructional spaces do not have local sound reinforcement. Technology 21 Ea. 3 $103,982 18415

Technology: Main Telecommunications Room ground system is inadequate or non-existent. Technology 1 Ea. 3 $6,932 18402

Technology: Main Telecommunications Room is not dedicated and/or inadequate. Technology 1 Ea. 3 $52,288 18400

15M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Guiteras School

TechnologyDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

Technology: Main Telecommunications Room UPS does not meet standards, is inadequate, or non-existent.

Technology 1 Ea. 3 $9,408 18401

Technology: Network cabling infrastructure is outdated (Cat 5 or less) and/or does not meet standards.

Technology 164 Ea. 3 $73,085 18405

Technology: Network cabling infrastructure is partially outdated and/or needs expansion. Technology 72 Ea. 3 $32,086 18411

Technology: Network system inadequate and/or near end of useful life Technology 25 Ea. 3 $123,789 18414

Technology: PA/Bell/Clock system is inadequate and/or near end of useful life. Technology 38,673 SF 3 $68,937 18413

Technology: Special Space AV/Multimedia system is inadequate. Technology 1 Ea. 3 $56,448 18407

Technology: Telecommunications Room (large size room) needs dedicated cooling system improvements.

Technology 1 Ea. 3 $7,922 18403

Technology: Telephone handsets are inadequate and sparsely deployed throughout the campus.

Technology 23 Ea. 3 $36,443 18408

Technology: Telephone system is inadequate and/or non-existent. Technology 1 Ea. 3 $7,526 18409

Sub Total for System 17 items $1,171,805

SpecialtiesDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

Room has insufficient writing area. Educational Adequacy

2 Ea. 3 $9,127 Rollup

Sub Total for System 1 items $9,127

Sub Total for Building 01 - Main Building 48 items $3,892,629

Total for Campus 55 items $4,086,951

16M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Guiteras School

Guiteras School - Life Cycle Summary Yrs 1-5Building: 01 - Main Building

InteriorUniformat Description LC Type Description Qty UoM Repair Cost Remaining Life

Acoustical Suspended Ceilings Ceilings - Acoustical Tiles 19,300 SF $174,310 3

Suspended Plaster and Painted ceilings 9,300 SF $38,903 3

Sub Total for System 2 items $213,213

MechanicalUniformat Description LC Type Description Qty UoM Repair Cost Remaining Life

Decentralized Heating Equipment Heating Unit Vent - Steam/Hot water 14 Ea. $236,807 3

Exhaust Air Kitchen Exhaust Hoods 1 Ea. $15,964 3

Exhaust Air Roof Exhaust Fan 3 Ea. $15,612 3

Heating System Supplementary Components

Controls - DDC (Bldg.SF) 38,600 SF $232,420 3

HVAC Air Distribution Roof Top Unit - DX Gas (5 Ton) 1 Ea. $19,398 4

Sub Total for System 5 items $520,202

ElectricalUniformat Description LC Type Description Qty UoM Repair Cost Remaining Life

Lighting Fixtures Light Fixtures (Bldg SF) 38,600 SF $229,356 3

Sub Total for System 1 items $229,356

PlumbingUniformat Description LC Type Description Qty UoM Repair Cost Remaining Life

Building Support Plumbing System Supplementary Components

Sump Pump 1 Ea. $1,449 3

Fuel Storage Tanks Above Ground Fuel Oil StorageTank ( 275 Gal) 1 Ea. $475 5

Note: 80 gallon

Domestic Water Equipment Gas Piping System (BldgSF) 38,600 SF $835,742 5

Sub Total for System 3 items $837,667

Fire and Life SafetyUniformat Description LC Type Description Qty UoM Repair Cost Remaining Life

Fire Detection and Alarm Fire Alarm 38,600 SF $113,137 3

Sub Total for System 1 items $113,137

Sub Total for Building 01 - Main Building 12 items $1,913,573

Total for: Guiteras School 12 items $1,913,573

17M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Guiteras School

Supporting Photos

Site Aerial

Aged Piping

Gymnasium

Library

18M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Guiteras School

Play Area

Art Classroom

Worn Carpet

Stained Ceiling Tile

Circulating Pump

Elevation

19M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Guiteras School

Cracked And Chipped VCT Flooring

Boilers

Restroom Fixtures And Finishes

Cracked And Separating VCT

Cafeteria

Building Mounted Lighting

20M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Guiteras School

Main Entrance

Site Signage

Peeling Wall Paint

Cracked Interior Wall

Classroom

Stage In Gymnasium

21M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Guiteras School

Roof Condition

Asphalt Parking

Non-Compliant Restroom

Computer Lab

Missing Lavatory Pipe Insulation

Concrete Spalling

22M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Guiteras School

Paint Bubbled On Ceiling

Hallway Finishes

Refrigerated Water Fountain

Cracks In Exterior Brick

23M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Guiteras School

50 Asylum Road, Bristol, RI 02809

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Hugh Cole School June 2017

1M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Hugh Cole School, located at 50 Asylum Road in Bristol, Rhode Island, was built in 1968. It comprises 84,536 gross square feet. Each school across the district was visited three times during the Facility Condition Assessments by three teams of specialists in the spring/summer of 2016.

For master planning purposes a 5-year need was developed to provide an understanding of the current need as well as the projected needs in the near future. For Hugh Cole School the 5-year need is $7,256,649. The findings contained within this report resulted from an assessment of building systems performed by building professionals experienced in disciplines including: architecture, mechanical, plumbing, electrical, acoustics, hazardous materials, and technology infrastructure.

Figure 1: Aerial view of Hugh Cole School

Introduction

Hugh Cole School serves grades PK - 5, has 47 instructional spaces, and has an enrollment of 674. Instructional spaces are defined as rooms in which a student receives education. The LEA reported capacity for Hugh Cole School is 780 with a resulting utilization of 86%.

2M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Hugh Cole School

Approach and MethodologyA facility condition assessment evaluates each building’s overall condition. Two components of the facility condition assessment are combined to total the cost for facility need. The two components of the facility condition assessment are current deficiencies and life cycle forecast.

Current Deficiencies: Deficiencies are items in need of repair or replacement as a result of being broken, obsolete, or beyond useful life. The existing deficiencies that currently require correction are identified and assigned a priority. An example of a current deficiency might include a broken lighting fixture or an inoperable roof top air conditioning unit.

Life Cycle Forecast: Life cycle analysis evaluates ages of a building's systems to forecast system replacement as they reach the end of serviceable life. An example of a life cycle system replacement is a roof with a 20-year life that has been in place for 15 years and may require replacement in five years.

Discipline Specialists

All assessment teams produced current deficiencies associated with each school. The assessment for the school facilities at the Rhode Island Department of Education included several specialties:

Facility Condition Assessment: Architectural, mechanical, and electrical engineering professionals observed conditions via a visual observation that did not include intrusive measures, destructive investigations, or testing. Additionally, the assessment incorporated input provided by district facilities and maintenance staff where applicable. The assessment team recorded existing conditions, identified problems and deficiencies, documented corrective action and quantities, and identified the priority of the repair in accordance with parameters defined during the planning phase. The team took digital photos at each school to better identify significant deficiencies.

Technology: Technology specialists visited RIDE facilities and met with technology directors to observe and assess each facility's technology infrastructure. The assessment included network architecture, major infrastructure components, classroom instructional systems, necessary building space and support for technology. The technology assessment took into account the desired technology outcome and best practices and processes to ensure results can be attained effectively.

Hazardous Materials: Schools constructed prior to 1990 were assessed by specialists to identify the presence of hazardous materials. The team focused on identifying asbestos containing building materials (ACBMs), lead-based painted (LBP) areas, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs). As part of an indoor air and exterior air quality assessment, the team noted evidence of mold, water intrusion, mercury, and oil and hazardous materials (OHMs) exposure. If sampling and analysis was required, these activities were recommended but not included in the scope of work.

Traffic: A traffic specialist performed an in-office review of aerial imagery of the traffic infrastructure around the facilities in accordance with section 1.05-7 in the Rhode Island School Construction Regulations and reviewed data collected on site during the facility condition assessment. Based on this information, deficiencies and corrective actions were identified. High problem areas were identified for consideration of more detailed site-specific study and analysis in the future.

Acoustics: Specialists assessed each school's acoustics, including architectural acoustics, mechanical system noise and vibration, and environmental noise. The assessment team evaluated room acoustics with particular attention to the intelligibility of speech in learning spaces, interior and exterior sound isolation, and mechanical system noise and vibration control.

Educational Program Space Assessment: Teams evaluated schools to ensure that that all spaces adequately support the districts educational program. Standards are established for each classroom type or instructional space. Each space is evaluated to determine if it meets those standards and a listing of alterations that should be made to make the space a better environment for teaching and learning was created.

3M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Hugh Cole School

System Summaries

Building Envelope

The exterior systems for the building(s) at this campus includes:01 - Main Building: Brick Exterior Wall

CMU Exterior Wall Metal Panel Exterior Wall Steel Exterior WindowsStorefront / Curtain WallSteel Exterior Entrance DoorsOverhead Exterior Utility Doors

The roofing for the building(s) at this campus consists of:01 - Main Building: Composition Shingle Roofing

EPDM Roofing

Site

The site level systems for this campus include:Site Asphalt Parking Lot Pavement

Asphalt Roadway PavementConcrete Pedestrian Pavement

Interior

The interior systems for the building(s) at this campus include:01 - Main Building: Foldable Interior Partition

Steel Interior DoorsAluminum/Glass Storefront Interior DoorsWood Interior DoorsInterior Door Hardware Suspended Acoustical Grid SystemSuspended Acoustical Ceiling TileCeramic Tile WallCMU WallInterior Wall PaintingConcrete FlooringCeramic Tile FlooringVinyl Composition Tile FlooringTerrazzo FlooringCarpet

The following tables summarize major building systems at the Hugh Cole School campus, identified by discipline and building.

4M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Hugh Cole School

Mechanical

The mechanical systems for the building(s) at this campus include:

01 - Main Building: 1,275 MBH Cast Iron Water Boiler Finned Wall Radiator Steam/Hot Water Heating Unit VentDDC Heating System ControlsPneumatic Heating System Controls20 Ton Outdoor Air Cooled Chiller3 Ton Outside Air Cooled Condenser3 Ton D/X Fan Coil25 HP VFD 2-Pipe Hot Water Hydronic Distribution System 1 HP or Smaller Pump5 HP Pump Roof Exhaust FanKitchen Exhaust HoodsFire Sprinkler System

Electrical

The electrical systems for the building(s) at this campus include:01 - Main Building: 1,600 Amp Switchgear

Panelboard - 120/208 100APanelboard - 120/208 225A600 Amp Distribution PanelLight Fixtures Building Mounted Lighting Fixtures Canopy Mounted Lighting Fixtures

Plumbing

The plumbing systems for the building(s) at this campus include:01 - Main Building: 60 Gallon Gas Water Heater

Domestic Water Piping System Classroom LavatoriesMop/Service SinksRefrigerated Drinking FountainRestroom LavatoriesToiletsUrinalsAir Compressor (5 hp)

5M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Hugh Cole School

Facility Deficiency Priority Levels

Deficiencies were ranked according to five priority levels, with Priority 1 items being the most critical to address:

Priority 1 – Mission Critical Concerns: Deficiencies or conditions that may directly affect the school’s ability to remain open or deliver the educational curriculum. These deficiencies typically relate to building safety, code compliance, severely damaged or failing building components, and other items that require near-term correction. An example of a Priority 1 deficiency is a fire alarm system replacement.

Priority 2 – Indirect Impact to Educational Mission: Items that may progress to a Priority 1 item if not addressed in the near term. Examples of Priority 2 deficiencies include inadequate roofing that could cause deterioration of integral building systems, and conditions affecting building envelopes, such as roof and window replacements.

Priority 3 – Short-Term Conditions: Deficiencies that are necessary to the school's mission but may not require immediate attention. These items should be considered necessary improvements required to maximize facility efficiency and usefulness. Examples of Priority 3 items include site improvements and plumbing deficiencies.

Priority 4 – Long-Term Requirements: Items or systems that may be considered improvements to the instructional environment. The improvements may be aesthetic or provide greater functionality. Examples include cabinets, finishes, paving, removal of abandoned equipment, and educational accommodations associated with special programs.

Priority 5 – Enhancements: Deficiencies aesthetic in nature or considered enhancements. Typical deficiencies in this priority include repainting, replacing carpet, improved signage, or other improvements to the facility environment.

6M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Hugh Cole School

Table 1: System by Priority

Priority

System 1 2 3 4 5 Total % of Total

Site - - $23,872 $609,994 $5,807 $639,673 9.92 %

Roofing - - - - - $0 0.00 %

Structural - - - - - $0 0.00 %

Exterior - $12,748 - - - $12,748 0.20 %

Interior - - $507,853 $1,404,562 $6,738 $1,919,152 29.77 %

Mechanical - $878,045 - $536,737 - $1,414,783 21.94 %

Electrical - $315,881 - - $88,726 $404,607 6.28 %

Plumbing - - $348,498 $106,661 $32,744 $487,903 7.57 %

Fire and Life Safety - - - - - $0 0.00 %

Technology - - $1,466,315 - - $1,466,315 22.74 %

Conveyances - - - - - $0 0.00 %

Specialties - - $4,533 $88,900 $8,499 $101,931 1.58 %

Total $0 $1,206,674 $2,351,071 $2,746,853 $142,514 $6,447,112

*Displayed totals may not sum exactly due to mathematical rounding

The following chart summarizes this site's current deficiencies by building system and priority. The listing details current deficiencies including deferred maintenance, functional deficiencies, code compliance, capital renewal, hazardous materials and technology categories.

The building systems with the most need include:Interior - $1,919,152Technology - $1,466,315Mechanical - $1,414,783

The chart below represents the building systems and associated deficiency costs.

Figure 2: System Deficiencies

7M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Hugh Cole School

Current Deficiencies by Category

Deficiencies have been further grouped according to the observed category.

• Acoustics deficiencies relate to room acoustics, sound insolation, and mechanical systems and vibration control modeled after ANSI/ASA Standard S12.60-2010 and ASHRAE Handbook, Chapter 47 on Sound and Vibration Control.

• Barrier to Accessibility deficiencies relate to the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Rhode Island Governors Commission on Disability. Additional items related to accessibility may be included other categories.

• Capital Renewal items have reached or exceeded serviceable life and require replacement. These are current and do not include life cycle capital renewal forecasts. Also included are deficiencies correcting planned work postponed beyond its regular life expectancy.

• Code Compliance deficiencies related to current codes. Many may fall under grandfather clauses, which allow buildings to continue operating under codes effective at the time of construction. However, there are instances where the level of renovation requires full compliance which are reflected in the master plan.

• Educational Adequacy deficiencies identify where facilities do not align with the Basic Education Program and the RIDE School Construction Regulations. • Functional Deficiencies are deficiencies for components or systems that have failed before the end of expected life or are not the right application, size, or design.

• Hazardous Materials include deficiencies for building systems or components containing potentially hazardous material. The team focused on identifying asbestos containing building materials (ACBMs), lead based painted (LBP) areas, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs). As part of an indoor air and exterior air quality assessment, the team noted evidence of mold, water intrusion, mercury, and oil and hazardous materials (OHMs) exposure. With other scopes of work there may be other costs associated with hazardous materials.

• Technology deficiencies relate to network architecture, technology infrastructure, classroom systems, and support. Examples of technology deficiencies include: security cameras, secure electronic access, telephone handsets, and dedicated air conditioning for telecommunication rooms.

• Traffic deficiencies relate to vehicle or pedestrian traffic, such as bus loops, crosswalks, and pavement markings.

8M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Hugh Cole School

Table 2: Deficiency Category by PriorityPriority

Category 1 2 3 4 5 Total

Acoustics - - - - - $0

Barrier to Accessibility - - - - - $0

Capital Renewal - $1,206,674 $856,351 $1,837,853 $3,281 $3,904,160

Code Compliance - - - - - $0

Educational Adequacy - - $10,198 $846,477 $139,232 $995,908

Functional Deficiency - - - - - $0

Hazardous Material - - - $62,524 - $62,524

Technology - - $1,460,650 - - $1,460,650

Traffic - - $23,872 - - $23,872

Total $0 $1,206,674 $2,351,071 $2,746,853 $142,514 $6,447,112

*Displayed totals may not sum exactly due to mathematical rounding

The following chart and table represent the deficiency category by priority. This listing includes current deficiencies for all building systems.

9M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Hugh Cole School

Life Cycle Capital Renewal Projections

System Current DeficienciesYear 12017

Year 22018

Year 32019

Year 42020

Year 52021 LC Yr. 1-5 Total Total 5-Year Need

Site $639,673 $0 $0 $0 $59,553 $0 $59,553 $699,226

Roofing $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Structural $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Exterior $12,748 $0 $0 $0 $0 $121,974 $121,974 $134,722

Interior $1,919,152 $0 $84,639 $10,878 $0 $272,584 $368,101 $2,287,253

Mechanical $1,414,783 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,414,783

Electrical $404,607 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $404,607

Plumbing $487,903 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $487,904

Fire and Life Safety $0 $0 $0 $247,775 $0 $0 $247,775 $247,775

Technology $1,466,315 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,466,315

Conveyances $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Specialties $101,931 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $101,931

Total $6,447,112 $0 $84,639 $258,653 $59,553 $394,558 $797,403 $7,244,515

*Displayed totals may not sum exactly due to mathematical rounding

Life Cycle Capital Renewal ForecastDuring the facility condition assessment, assessors inspected all major building systems. If a need for immediate replacement was identified, a deficiency was created with the estimated repair costs. The identified deficiency contributes to the facility's total current repair costs.

Capital planning scenarios span multiple years, as opposed to being constrained to immediate repairs. Construction projects may begin several years after the initial facility condition assessment. Therefore, in addition to the current year repair costs, it is necessary to forecast the facility's future costs using a 5-year life cycle renewal forecast model.

Life cycle renewal is the projection of future building system costs based upon each individual system’s expected serviceable life. Building systems and components age over time, eventually break down, reach the end of their useful lives, and may require replacement. While an item may be in good condition now, it might reach the end of its life before a planned construction project occurs.

The following chart shows all current deficiencies and the subsequent 5-year life cycle capital renewal projections. The projections outline costs for major building systems in which a component is expected to reach the end of its useful life and require capital funding for replacement.

Table 3: Capital Renewal Forecast

10M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Hugh Cole School

Facility Condition Index (FCI)The Facility Condition Index (FCI) is used throughout the facility condition assessment industry as a general indicator of a building’s health. Since 1991, the facility management industry has used an index called the FCI to benchmark the relative condition of a group of schools. The FCI is derived by dividing the total repair cost, including educational adequacy and site-related repairs, by the total replacement cost. A facility with a higher FCI percentage has more need, or higher priority, than a facility with a lower FCI. It should be noted that costs in the New Construction category are not included in the FCI calculation.

For master planning purposes, the total current deficiencies and the first five years of projected life cycle needs were combined. This provides an understanding of the current needs of a facility as well as the projected needs in the near future. A 5-year FCI was calculated by dividing the 5-year need by the total replacement cost. Costs associated with new construction are not included in the FCI calculation.

Figure 5: 5-Year FCI

Financial modeling has shown that over a 30-year period, it is more cost effective to replace than repair schools with a FCI of 65 percent or greater. This is due to efficiency gains with facilities that are more modern and the value of the building at the end of the analysis period. It is important to note that the FCI at which a facility should be considered for replacement is typically debated and adjusted based on property owners and facility managers approach to facility management. Of course, FCI is not the only factor used to identify buildings that need renovation, replacement, or even closure. Historical significance, enrollment trends, community sentiment, and the availability of capital are additional factors that are analyzed when making school facility decisions.

The replacement value represents the estimated cost of replacing the current building with another building of like size, based on today’s estimated cost of construction in the Providence, Rhode Island area. The estimated replacement cost for this facility is $29,587,600. For planning purposes, the total 5-year need at the Hugh Cole School is $7,256,649 (Life Cycle Years 1-5 plus the FCI deficiency cost). The Hugh Cole School facility has a 5-year FCI of 24.48%.

It is important to reiterate that this FCI replacement threshold is not conclusive, but is intended to initiate planning discussion in which other relevant issues with regard to a facility’s disposition must be incorporated. This merely suggests where conversations regarding replacement might occur.

11M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Hugh Cole School

The capacity of a school reflects how many students the school’s physical facility can effectively serve. There are various methodologies that exist to calculate capacity. It is not uncommon to review an existing building only to find that the capacity that had once been assigned is greater than what can be reasonably accommodated today. This is primarily because of a change in how programs are delivered.

The Rhode Island Aspirational Capacity is based on the Rhode Island School Construction Regulations (SCRs) and is an aspirational goal of space use. The capacity for each individual public school in the state of Rhode Island was designed to conform to Section 1.06-2 Space Allowance Guidelines of the Rhode Island Department of Education (RIDE) SCRs. These regulations outline the allowed gross square feet (GSF) per student at each school type (ES, MS, HS) by utilizing a sliding scale based on projected enrollment. The resulting capacities reflect how school capacities align to the SCRs for new construction. The existing enrollment was multiplied by the GSF per student for the appropriate bracket. For the purposes of this analysis, Pre-K centers were rolled into the elementary totals, and K-8 facilities were counted as middle schools.

The most consistent and equitable way a state can determine school capacities across a variety of districts and educational program offerings is to use square-foot-per-student standards. In contrast, in the 2013 Public Schoolhouse Assessment Report, LEAs self-reported capacities for their elementary, middle and high schools. Districts typically report “functional capacity,” which is defined as the number of students each classroom can accommodate. Functional capacity counts how many students can occupy a space, not how much room students and teachers have within that space. For example, a 650-square-foot classroom and a 950-square-foot classroom can both have a reported capacity of 25 students, but the actual teaching and learning space per student varies greatly.

The variation in square feet per student impacts the kinds of teaching practices possible in each space. The lowest allocation of space per student restricts group and project-based learning strategies and requires teachers to teach in more traditional, lecture-style formats, due to a lack of space. Furthermore, the number of students that can be accommodated in a classroom does not account for access to sufficient common spaces such as libraries, cafeterias, and gymnasiums. When cafeterias are undersized relative to the population, schools must host four or more lunch periods a day, resulting in some students eating lunch mid-morning and some mid-afternoon. Similarly, undersized libraries and gymnasiums create scheduling headaches for schools and restrict student access. Finally, a classroom count-only approach to school capacity does not consider the inherent scheduling challenges schools face.

Rhode Island Aspirational Capacity

Applying the Rhode Island Aspirational Capacity, a facility of this size could ideally support an enrollment of approximately 567 students.

As part of the Educational Program Space Assessment, select core spaces were compared to the RI School Construction Regulations. If it was determined that a facility was in need of square footage related to a cafeteria or library/media center, a cost for additional space was estimated. This cost is not included in the total 5-year need or the 5-year FCI calculation.

Facility New Construction

The New Construction cost to bring the Hugh Cole School cafeteria and/or library/media center to the size prescribed by the SCRs is estimated to be $424,116.

12M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Hugh Cole School

Table 4: Facility Condition by Building

Gross Sq Ft Year BuiltCurrent

Deficiencies LC Yr. 1-5 TotalTotal 5 Yr Need

(Yr 1-5 + Current Defs) 5-Year FCI

Hugh Cole School Totals 84,536 1968 $6,459,246 $797,403 $7,256,649 24.48%

*Displayed totals may not sum exactly due to mathematical rounding

The following pages provide a listing of all current deficiencies and 5-year life cycle need and the associated costs, followed by photos taken during the assessment.

The Hugh Cole School comprises 84,536 square feet and was constructed in 1968. Current deficiencies at this school total $6,459,246. Five year capital renewal costs total $797,403. The total identified need for the Hugh Cole School (current deficiencies and 5-year capital renewal costs) is $7,256,649. The 5-year FCI is 24.48%.

Summary of Findings

Cost estimates are derived from local cost estimating expertise and enhanced by industry best practices, historical cost data, and relevance to the Rhode Island region. Costs have been developed from current market rates as of the 2nd quarter in 2016. All costs are based on a replace-in-kind approach, unless the item was not in compliance with national or state regulations or standards. For planning and budgeting purposes, facility assessments customarily add a soft cost multiplier onto deficiency repair cost estimates. This soft cost multiplier accounts for costs that are typically incurred when contracting for renovation and construction services. Soft costs typically include construction cost factors, such as contractor overhead and profit, as well as labor and material inflation, professional fees, and administrative costs. Based on the Rhode Island School Construction Regulations, a soft cost multiplier of 20% is included on all cost estimates. Other project allowances are included in the cost estimates based on school attributes such as age, location, and historic designation. All stated costs in the assessment report will include soft costs for planning and budgeting purposes. These are estimates, and costs will vary at the time of construction.

Cost Estimating

13M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Hugh Cole School

Site Level DeficienciesSiteDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

Crosswalk: Needs to be added Traffic 1 Ea. 3 $755 9302

Note: Install crosswalk across parking lot to proposed sidewalk location

New Sidewalk Is Required Traffic 1,020 SF 3 $23,116 9301

Note: Install sidewalk from north edge of parking lot to existing neighborhood sidewalk (6' wide)

Asphalt Paving Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 177 CAR 4 $581,665 8421

Note: North East rear lot by paly area has large damaged area. West lot has several cracks, and alligatoring.

Backstops Require Replacement Educational Adequacy

1 Ea. 4 $28,329 28410

Note: Backstops Require Replacement

Exterior Basketball Goals are Required Educational Adequacy

1 Ea. 5 $5,807 28691

Note: Exterior Basketball Goals are Required

Sub Total for System 5 items $639,673

Sub Total for School and Site Level 5 items $639,673

Building: 01 - Main BuildingExteriorDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

The Metal Exterior Door Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 2 Door 2 $12,748 8423

Note: Door by room 01 and door by room 02

Sub Total for System 1 items $12,748

InteriorDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

The Acoustical Ceiling Tiles Require Replacement Capital Renewal 42,268 SF 3 $379,178 8424

Note: Replace in older portion of building.

The Acoustical Ceiling Tiles Require Replacement Capital Renewal 900 SF 3 $8,074 8425

Note: New wing of school, several stained tiles: cafeteria, room 71, 75, 61, 57, 54, 52, 53, 51, 48, west corridor, 47, and nurse room.

The Ceramic Tile Flooring Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 2,500 SF 3 $66,682 8428

Note: Mary wing restroom floors are in need of repair.

The Terrazzo Flooring Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 500 SF 3 $36,828 8432

Note: Cracks in terrazzo flooring by gym.

The Vinyl Composition Tile Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 500 SF 3 $5,697 8426

Note: Cracked tiles in south corridor.

The Vinyl Composition Tile Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 1,000 SF 3 $11,394 8427

Note: Damaged VCT in north and east entry vestibule, cracked VCT north corridor, room 67

Ceiling Grid Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 42,268 SF 4 $497,944 8716

Interior Ceramic Walls Require Repair Or Replacement Capital Renewal 1,200 SF 4 $26,516 8444

Note: Damaged in both boys and girls restrooms.

Paint (probable pre-1978 in base (layers(s)) - large areas (> 10 sq. ft.) of peeling/damage & area in active use - children (measurement unit - each)

Hazardous Material 173 Ea. 4 $49,009 Rollup

Paint (probable pre-1978 in base layer(s)) - large areas (> 10 sq. ft.) of peeling/damage & area in active use - children (measurement unit - linear feet)

Hazardous Material 102 LF 4 $2,312 Rollup

Paint (probable pre-1978 in base layer(s)) - large areas (> 10 sq. ft.) of peeling/damage & area in active use - children (measurement unit - square feet)

Hazardous Material 121 SF 4 $1,143 Rollup

Paint (probable pre-1978 in base layer(s)) - damaged area < 9 sq. ft. AND NOT in children-accessible area (measurement unit - each)

Hazardous Material 1 Ea. 4 $283 Rollup

Paint (probable pre-1978 in base layer(s)) - damaged area < 9 sq. ft. AND NOT in children-accessible area (measurement unit - linear feet)

Hazardous Material 36 LF 4 $816 Rollup

Paint (probable pre-1978 in base layer(s)) - damaged area < 9 sq. ft. AND NOT in children-accessible area (measurement unit - square feet)

Hazardous Material 875 SF 4 $8,263 Rollup

Room Lighting Is Inadequate Or In Poor Condition. Educational Adequacy

21,602 SF 4 $817,578 Rollup

Wall/ceiling materials - area < 9 sq. ft. AND in children-accessible area Hazardous Material 74 SF 4 $699 Rollup

Interior Walls Require Repainting (Bldg SF) Capital Renewal 500 SF 5 $3,281 Rollup

14M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Hugh Cole School

InteriorDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

Room lacks appropriate sound control. Educational Adequacy

100 SF 5 $3,456 Rollup

Sub Total for System 18 items $1,919,152

MechanicalDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

Replace Unit Vent Capital Renewal 33 Ea. 2 $554,430 8443

Note: Original.

The Mechanical / HVAC Piping / System Is Beyond Its Useful Life Capital Renewal 42,268 SF 2 $323,616 8438

Note: Half of the piping in the school needs to be replaced.

Existing Controls Are Inadequate And Should Be Replaced With DDC Controls Capital Renewal 80,000 SF 4 $536,737 8441

Note: Part of the original 1968 section. Needs to be upgraded.

Sub Total for System 3 items $1,414,783

ElectricalDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

The Distribution Panel Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 1 Ea. 2 $28,933 8439

Note: FPE panel, Past life expectancy, needs replacement.

The Lighting Fixtures Require Replacement Capital Renewal 42,268 SF 2 $249,459 8440

Note: Replace lighting in the older half of school.

The Panelboard Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 3 Ea. 2 $14,448 8436

Note: In the old part of building

The Panelboard Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 4 Ea. 2 $23,041 8437

Note: In the old part of building, replace.

Room Has Insufficient Electrical Outlets Educational Adequacy

180 Ea. 5 $88,726 Rollup

Sub Total for System 5 items $404,607

PlumbingDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

The Plumbing / Domestic Water Piping System Is Beyond Its Useful Life Capital Renewal 42,286 SF 3 $337,937 8435

Note: Half of the school has not been renovated. Replace piping in old half.

The Urinal Plumbing Fixtures Require Replacement Capital Renewal 8 Ea. 3 $10,561 8433

Note: Replace in original part of school.

Floor Drains Are Required Educational Adequacy

1 Ea. 4 $570 Rollup

The Custodial Mop Or Service Sink Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 2 Ea. 4 $5,118 8431

Note: Replace in original part of the building

The Refrigerated Water Cooler Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 3 Ea. 4 $21,983 8434

Note: Replace in older portion of building.

The Restroom Lavatories Plumbing Fixtures Require Replacement Capital Renewal 25 Ea. 4 $78,990 8429

Note: Replace in older portion of the building.

Room lacks a drinking fountain. Educational Adequacy

16 Ea. 5 $17,526 Rollup

The Class Room Lavatories Plumbing Fixtures Are Missing And Should Be Installed Educational Adequacy

14 Ea. 5 $15,218 Rollup

Sub Total for System 8 items $487,903

TechnologyDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

Room lacks Interactive White Board Educational Adequacy

1 Ea. 3 $5,666 Rollup

Technology: Auditorium AV/Multimedia system is in need of minor improvements. Technology 1 Room 3 $94,430 18364

Technology: Campus network switching electronics are antiquated and/or do not meet standards.

Technology 336 Ea. 3 $158,642 18361

Technology: Campus wireless infrastructure inadequate. Technology 25 Ea. 3 $33,050 18362

15M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Hugh Cole School

TechnologyDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

Technology: Classroom AV/Multimedia systems are inadequate and/or near end of useful life.

Technology 22 Ea. 3 $436,264 18367

Technology: Classroom AV/Multimedia systems are inadequate and/or near end of useful life.

Technology 1 Ea. 3 $19,830 18369

Technology: Instructional spaces do not have local sound reinforcement. Technology 23 Ea. 3 $108,594 18373

Technology: Intermediate Telecommunications Room needs M/E improvements. Technology 1 Ea. 3 $24,174 18360

Technology: Main Telecommunications Room ground system is inadequate or non-existent. Technology 1 Ea. 3 $6,610 18358

Technology: Main Telecommunications Room needs M/E improvements. Technology 1 Ea. 3 $29,084 18356

Technology: Main Telecommunications Room UPS does not meet standards, is inadequate, or non-existent.

Technology 1 Ea. 3 $8,971 18357

Technology: Network cabling infrastructure is outdated (Cat 5 or less) and/or does not meet standards.

Technology 431 Ea. 3 $183,146 18363

Technology: Network cabling infrastructure is partially outdated and/or needs expansion. Technology 96 Ea. 3 $40,794 18368

Technology: Network system inadequate and/or near end of useful life Technology 24 Ea. 3 $113,315 18371

Technology: Network system inadequate and/or near end of useful life Technology 1 Ea. 3 $7,554 18372

Technology: PA/Bell/Clock system is inadequate and/or near end of useful life. Technology 84,536 SF 3 $143,688 18370

Technology: Telecommunications Room (large size room) needs dedicated cooling system improvements.

Technology 1 Ea. 3 $7,554 18359

Technology: Telephone handsets are inadequate and sparsely deployed throughout the campus.

Technology 25 Ea. 3 $37,772 18365

Technology: Telephone system is inadequate and/or non-existent. Technology 1 Ea. 3 $7,177 18366

Sub Total for System 19 items $1,466,315

SpecialtiesDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

Room has insufficient writing area. Educational Adequacy

1 Ea. 3 $4,533 Rollup

Replace Cabinetry In Classes/Labs Capital Renewal 8 Room 4 $88,900 9263

Room lacks an appropriate refrigerator. Educational Adequacy

1 Ea. 5 $8,499 Rollup

Sub Total for System 3 items $101,931

Sub Total for Building 01 - Main Building 57 items $5,807,440

Total for Campus 62 items $6,447,112

16M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Hugh Cole School

Hugh Cole School - Life Cycle Summary Yrs 1-5Site Level Life Cycle Items

SiteUniformat Description LC Type Description Qty UoM Repair Cost Remaining Life

Roadway Pavement Asphalt 18 CAR $59,553 4

Sub Total for System 1 items $59,553

Sub Total for Building - 1 items $59,553

Building: 01 - Main Building

ExteriorUniformat Description LC Type Description Qty UoM Repair Cost Remaining Life

Exterior Wall Veneer Metal Panel - Bldg SF basis 1,283 SF $121,974 5

Note: Original school

Sub Total for System 1 items $121,974

InteriorUniformat Description LC Type Description Qty UoM Repair Cost Remaining Life

Wall Painting and Coating Painting/Staining (Bldg SF) 4,270 SF $28,213 2

Note: New wing of school

Wall Painting and Coating Painting/Staining (Bldg SF) 4,270 SF $28,213 2

Note: Original wing of school

Wall Painting and Coating Painting/Staining (Bldg SF) 4,270 SF $28,213 2

Note: Original wing of school

Carpeting Carpet 500 SF $10,878 3

Interior Operable Partitions Foldable partition (Bldg SF) 2,280 SF Wall $263,362 5

Interior Swinging Doors Wood 2 Door $9,222 5

Note: Library has 2 6'x8' sliding glass door, wood frame.

Sub Total for System 6 items $368,102

Fire and Life SafetyUniformat Description LC Type Description Qty UoM Repair Cost Remaining Life

Fire Detection and Alarm Fire Alarm 84,536 SF $247,775 3

Sub Total for System 1 items $247,775

Sub Total for Building 01 - Main Building 8 items $737,851

Total for: Hugh Cole School 9 items $797,405

17M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Hugh Cole School

Supporting Photos

North Parking Alligator Cracking

Corridor

Stained Ceiling Tile

225 Amp Panel

18M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Hugh Cole School

100 Amp Panel

Piping

Lighting

Electric Panel

Cabinet Unit Ventilator

Damaged VCT

19M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Hugh Cole School

Stained Tile

Cracked VCT

Door Damage

VCT

Lobby

East Parking Cracking

20M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Hugh Cole School

Ceramic Tile Damage

VCT

Restroom Floor

East Parking Cracking

Classroom

Piping

21M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Hugh Cole School

Service Sink

Water Fountain

Lockers

Damage Tile Wall

VCT

Restroom Sink

22M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Hugh Cole School

Play Area

Computer Lab

Site Aerial

Urinals

Corridor

Music

23M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Hugh Cole School

Cafeteria

Gym

Plaque

Entry

Restroom

Library

24M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Hugh Cole School

525 Child Street, Warren, RI 02885

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Kickemuit Middle School June 2017

1M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Kickemuit Middle School, located at 525 Child Street in Warren, Rhode Island, was built in 1958. It comprises 149,915 gross square feet. Each school across the district was visited three times during the Facility Condition Assessments by three teams of specialists in the spring/summer of 2016.

For master planning purposes a 5-year need was developed to provide an understanding of the current need as well as the projected needs in the near future. For Kickemuit Middle School the 5-year need is $16,193,355. The findings contained within this report resulted from an assessment of building systems performed by building professionals experienced in disciplines including: architecture, mechanical, plumbing, electrical, acoustics, hazardous materials, and technology infrastructure.

Figure 1: Aerial view of Kickemuit Middle School

Introduction

Kickemuit Middle School serves grades 6 - 8, has 74 instructional spaces, and has an enrollment of 753. Instructional spaces are defined as rooms in which a student receives education. The LEA reported capacity for Kickemuit Middle School is 879 with a resulting utilization of 86%.

2M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Kickemuit Middle School

Approach and MethodologyA facility condition assessment evaluates each building’s overall condition. Two components of the facility condition assessment are combined to total the cost for facility need. The two components of the facility condition assessment are current deficiencies and life cycle forecast.

Current Deficiencies: Deficiencies are items in need of repair or replacement as a result of being broken, obsolete, or beyond useful life. The existing deficiencies that currently require correction are identified and assigned a priority. An example of a current deficiency might include a broken lighting fixture or an inoperable roof top air conditioning unit.

Life Cycle Forecast: Life cycle analysis evaluates ages of a building's systems to forecast system replacement as they reach the end of serviceable life. An example of a life cycle system replacement is a roof with a 20-year life that has been in place for 15 years and may require replacement in five years.

Discipline Specialists

All assessment teams produced current deficiencies associated with each school. The assessment for the school facilities at the Rhode Island Department of Education included several specialties:

Facility Condition Assessment: Architectural, mechanical, and electrical engineering professionals observed conditions via a visual observation that did not include intrusive measures, destructive investigations, or testing. Additionally, the assessment incorporated input provided by district facilities and maintenance staff where applicable. The assessment team recorded existing conditions, identified problems and deficiencies, documented corrective action and quantities, and identified the priority of the repair in accordance with parameters defined during the planning phase. The team took digital photos at each school to better identify significant deficiencies.

Technology: Technology specialists visited RIDE facilities and met with technology directors to observe and assess each facility's technology infrastructure. The assessment included network architecture, major infrastructure components, classroom instructional systems, necessary building space and support for technology. The technology assessment took into account the desired technology outcome and best practices and processes to ensure results can be attained effectively.

Hazardous Materials: Schools constructed prior to 1990 were assessed by specialists to identify the presence of hazardous materials. The team focused on identifying asbestos containing building materials (ACBMs), lead-based painted (LBP) areas, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs). As part of an indoor air and exterior air quality assessment, the team noted evidence of mold, water intrusion, mercury, and oil and hazardous materials (OHMs) exposure. If sampling and analysis was required, these activities were recommended but not included in the scope of work.

Traffic: A traffic specialist performed an in-office review of aerial imagery of the traffic infrastructure around the facilities in accordance with section 1.05-7 in the Rhode Island School Construction Regulations and reviewed data collected on site during the facility condition assessment. Based on this information, deficiencies and corrective actions were identified. High problem areas were identified for consideration of more detailed site-specific study and analysis in the future.

Acoustics: Specialists assessed each school's acoustics, including architectural acoustics, mechanical system noise and vibration, and environmental noise. The assessment team evaluated room acoustics with particular attention to the intelligibility of speech in learning spaces, interior and exterior sound isolation, and mechanical system noise and vibration control.

Educational Program Space Assessment: Teams evaluated schools to ensure that that all spaces adequately support the districts educational program. Standards are established for each classroom type or instructional space. Each space is evaluated to determine if it meets those standards and a listing of alterations that should be made to make the space a better environment for teaching and learning was created.

3M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Kickemuit Middle School

System Summaries

Building Envelope

The exterior systems for the building(s) at this campus includes:01 - Main Building: Brick Exterior Wall

CMU Exterior Wall Glass Block Exterior Wall Steel Exterior WindowsStorefront / Curtain WallSteel Exterior Entrance Doors

02 - Maintenance Shop: Metal Panel Exterior Wall Steel Exterior Entrance DoorsOverhead Exterior Utility Doors

03 - Shed: Wood Siding Exterior Wall Wood Exterior Doors

The roofing for the building(s) at this campus consists of:01 - Main Building: Composition Shingle Roofing

EPDM RoofingBuilt-Up Roofing With Ballast

02 - Maintenance Shop: Metal Low-Slope Roofing03 - Shed: Composition Shingle Roofing

Site

The site level systems for this campus include:Site Asphalt Parking Lot Pavement

Asphalt Roadway PavementAsphalt Pedestrian PavementConcrete Pedestrian Pavement

Interior

The interior systems for the building(s) at this campus include:01 - Main Building: Steel Interior Doors

Wood Interior DoorsInterior Door Hardware Suspended Acoustical Grid SystemSuspended Acoustical Ceiling TilePainted CeilingsWood Ceilings

The following tables summarize major building systems at the Kickemuit Middle School campus, identified by discipline and building.

4M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Kickemuit Middle School

01 - Main Building: Ceramic Tile WallInterior Wall PaintingConcrete FlooringCeramic Tile FlooringWood FlooringRubber Tile FlooringVinyl Composition Tile FlooringTerrazzo FlooringCarpetAthletic/Sport Flooring

02 - Maintenance Shop: Steel Interior DoorsWood Interior DoorsInterior Door Hardware Exposed Metal Structure CeilingInterior Wall PaintingConcrete Flooring

03 - Shed: Wood CeilingsInterior Wall PaintingWood Flooring

Mechanical

The mechanical systems for the building(s) at this campus include:

01 - Main Building: 4,200 MBH Cast Iron Steam Boiler Finned Wall Radiator Steam/Hot Water Heating Unit Vent3 kW Electric Unit HeaterDDC Heating System Controls1 Ton Ductless Split System2-Pipe Steam Hydronic Distribution System 5,000 CFM Outdoor AHU10,000 CFM Outdoor AHU8,000 CFM Energy Recovery Unit Roof Exhaust FanFire Sprinkler System

02 - Maintenance Shop: 5 kW Electric Unit Heater

Plumbing

The plumbing systems for the building(s) at this campus include:01 - Main Building: 2" Backflow Preventers

Gas Piping System80 Gallon Electric Water Heater

5M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Kickemuit Middle School

Electrical

The electrical systems for the building(s) at this campus include:01 - Main Building: 1200 kW Emergency Generator

1,200 Amp Switchgear1,600 Amp SwitchgearPanelboard - 120/208 100APanelboard - 120/208 225APanelboard - 120/208 400A600 Amp Distribution PanelLight Fixtures Building Mounted Lighting Fixtures Canopy Mounted Lighting Fixtures

02 - Maintenance Shop: Panelboard - 120/208 225ABuilding Mounted Lighting Fixtures Light Fixtures

01 - Main Building: Domestic Water Piping System Classroom LavatoriesMop/Service SinksRefrigerated Drinking FountainRestroom LavatoriesShowersToiletsUrinalsSump Pump

6M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Kickemuit Middle School

Facility Deficiency Priority Levels

Deficiencies were ranked according to five priority levels, with Priority 1 items being the most critical to address:

Priority 1 – Mission Critical Concerns: Deficiencies or conditions that may directly affect the school’s ability to remain open or deliver the educational curriculum. These deficiencies typically relate to building safety, code compliance, severely damaged or failing building components, and other items that require near-term correction. An example of a Priority 1 deficiency is a fire alarm system replacement.

Priority 2 – Indirect Impact to Educational Mission: Items that may progress to a Priority 1 item if not addressed in the near term. Examples of Priority 2 deficiencies include inadequate roofing that could cause deterioration of integral building systems, and conditions affecting building envelopes, such as roof and window replacements.

Priority 3 – Short-Term Conditions: Deficiencies that are necessary to the school's mission but may not require immediate attention. These items should be considered necessary improvements required to maximize facility efficiency and usefulness. Examples of Priority 3 items include site improvements and plumbing deficiencies.

Priority 4 – Long-Term Requirements: Items or systems that may be considered improvements to the instructional environment. The improvements may be aesthetic or provide greater functionality. Examples include cabinets, finishes, paving, removal of abandoned equipment, and educational accommodations associated with special programs.

Priority 5 – Enhancements: Deficiencies aesthetic in nature or considered enhancements. Typical deficiencies in this priority include repainting, replacing carpet, improved signage, or other improvements to the facility environment.

7M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Kickemuit Middle School

Table 1: System by Priority

Priority

System 1 2 3 4 5 Total % of Total

Site - - $44,815 $598,057 $5,807 $648,680 4.40 %

Roofing - $543,914 $198 - - $544,112 3.69 %

Structural - - - - - $0 0.00 %

Exterior - $82,841 $62,746 - - $145,587 0.99 %

Interior - - $2,344,945 $2,751,171 $940,813 $6,036,930 40.91 %

Mechanical - $1,575,847 $488,561 - - $2,064,409 13.99 %

Electrical - $69,059 $59,066 - $132,999 $261,123 1.77 %

Plumbing - - $1,165,358 $88,529 $18,710 $1,272,597 8.62 %

Fire and Life Safety $470,156 - - - - $470,156 3.19 %

Technology - - $2,473,391 - - $2,473,391 16.76 %

Conveyances - - - - - $0 0.00 %

Specialties - - $9,127 $821,402 $8,556 $839,085 5.69 %

Total $470,156 $2,271,661 $6,648,207 $4,259,160 $1,106,886 $14,756,069

*Displayed totals may not sum exactly due to mathematical rounding

The following chart summarizes this site's current deficiencies by building system and priority. The listing details current deficiencies including deferred maintenance, functional deficiencies, code compliance, capital renewal, hazardous materials and technology categories.

The building systems with the most need include:Interior - $6,036,930Technology - $2,473,391Mechanical - $2,064,409

The chart below represents the building systems and associated deficiency costs.

Figure 2: System Deficiencies

8M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Kickemuit Middle School

Current Deficiencies by Category

Deficiencies have been further grouped according to the observed category.

• Acoustics deficiencies relate to room acoustics, sound insolation, and mechanical systems and vibration control modeled after ANSI/ASA Standard S12.60-2010 and ASHRAE Handbook, Chapter 47 on Sound and Vibration Control.

• Barrier to Accessibility deficiencies relate to the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Rhode Island Governors Commission on Disability. Additional items related to accessibility may be included other categories.

• Capital Renewal items have reached or exceeded serviceable life and require replacement. These are current and do not include life cycle capital renewal forecasts. Also included are deficiencies correcting planned work postponed beyond its regular life expectancy.

• Code Compliance deficiencies related to current codes. Many may fall under grandfather clauses, which allow buildings to continue operating under codes effective at the time of construction. However, there are instances where the level of renovation requires full compliance which are reflected in the master plan.

• Educational Adequacy deficiencies identify where facilities do not align with the Basic Education Program and the RIDE School Construction Regulations. • Functional Deficiencies are deficiencies for components or systems that have failed before the end of expected life or are not the right application, size, or design.

• Hazardous Materials include deficiencies for building systems or components containing potentially hazardous material. The team focused on identifying asbestos containing building materials (ACBMs), lead based painted (LBP) areas, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs). As part of an indoor air and exterior air quality assessment, the team noted evidence of mold, water intrusion, mercury, and oil and hazardous materials (OHMs) exposure. With other scopes of work there may be other costs associated with hazardous materials.

• Technology deficiencies relate to network architecture, technology infrastructure, classroom systems, and support. Examples of technology deficiencies include: security cameras, secure electronic access, telephone handsets, and dedicated air conditioning for telecommunication rooms.

• Traffic deficiencies relate to vehicle or pedestrian traffic, such as bus loops, crosswalks, and pavement markings.

9M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Kickemuit Middle School

Table 2: Deficiency Category by PriorityPriority

Category 1 2 3 4 5 Total

Acoustics - - $488,561 $191,019 - $679,580

Barrier to Accessibility - - - - - $0

Capital Renewal - $2,271,661 $3,618,062 $3,916,359 $940,813 $10,746,895

Code Compliance $424,523 - - - - $424,523

Educational Adequacy $45,633 - $14,831 $119,626 $166,072 $346,163

Functional Deficiency - - $59,066 - - $59,066

Hazardous Material - - - $32,156 - $32,156

Technology - - $2,467,686 - - $2,467,686

Traffic - - - - - $0

Total $470,156 $2,271,661 $6,648,207 $4,259,160 $1,106,886 $14,756,069

*Displayed totals may not sum exactly due to mathematical rounding

The following chart and table represent the deficiency category by priority. This listing includes current deficiencies for all building systems.

10M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Kickemuit Middle School

Life Cycle Capital Renewal Projections

System Current DeficienciesYear 12017

Year 22018

Year 32019

Year 42020

Year 52021 LC Yr. 1-5 Total Total 5-Year Need

Site $648,680 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $648,680

Roofing $544,112 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $544,112

Structural $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Exterior $145,587 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $145,587

Interior $6,036,930 $34,000 $0 $0 $0 $37,372 $71,372 $6,108,302

Mechanical $2,064,409 $0 $0 $1,228,517 $0 $0 $1,228,517 $3,292,926

Electrical $261,123 $0 $0 $117,796 $0 $0 $117,796 $378,919

Plumbing $1,272,597 $0 $0 $5,655 $0 $1,449 $7,104 $1,279,701

Fire and Life Safety $470,156 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $470,156

Technology $2,473,391 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,473,391

Conveyances $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Specialties $839,085 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $839,085

Total $14,756,069 $34,000 $0 $1,351,968 $0 $38,821 $1,424,789 $16,180,858

*Displayed totals may not sum exactly due to mathematical rounding

Life Cycle Capital Renewal ForecastDuring the facility condition assessment, assessors inspected all major building systems. If a need for immediate replacement was identified, a deficiency was created with the estimated repair costs. The identified deficiency contributes to the facility's total current repair costs.

Capital planning scenarios span multiple years, as opposed to being constrained to immediate repairs. Construction projects may begin several years after the initial facility condition assessment. Therefore, in addition to the current year repair costs, it is necessary to forecast the facility's future costs using a 5-year life cycle renewal forecast model.

Life cycle renewal is the projection of future building system costs based upon each individual system’s expected serviceable life. Building systems and components age over time, eventually break down, reach the end of their useful lives, and may require replacement. While an item may be in good condition now, it might reach the end of its life before a planned construction project occurs.

The following chart shows all current deficiencies and the subsequent 5-year life cycle capital renewal projections. The projections outline costs for major building systems in which a component is expected to reach the end of its useful life and require capital funding for replacement.

Table 3: Capital Renewal Forecast

11M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Kickemuit Middle School

Facility Condition Index (FCI)The Facility Condition Index (FCI) is used throughout the facility condition assessment industry as a general indicator of a building’s health. Since 1991, the facility management industry has used an index called the FCI to benchmark the relative condition of a group of schools. The FCI is derived by dividing the total repair cost, including educational adequacy and site-related repairs, by the total replacement cost. A facility with a higher FCI percentage has more need, or higher priority, than a facility with a lower FCI. It should be noted that costs in the New Construction category are not included in the FCI calculation.

For master planning purposes, the total current deficiencies and the first five years of projected life cycle needs were combined. This provides an understanding of the current needs of a facility as well as the projected needs in the near future. A 5-year FCI was calculated by dividing the 5-year need by the total replacement cost. Costs associated with new construction are not included in the FCI calculation.

Figure 5: 5-Year FCI

Financial modeling has shown that over a 30-year period, it is more cost effective to replace than repair schools with a FCI of 65 percent or greater. This is due to efficiency gains with facilities that are more modern and the value of the building at the end of the analysis period. It is important to note that the FCI at which a facility should be considered for replacement is typically debated and adjusted based on property owners and facility managers approach to facility management. Of course, FCI is not the only factor used to identify buildings that need renovation, replacement, or even closure. Historical significance, enrollment trends, community sentiment, and the availability of capital are additional factors that are analyzed when making school facility decisions.

The replacement value represents the estimated cost of replacing the current building with another building of like size, based on today’s estimated cost of construction in the Providence, Rhode Island area. The estimated replacement cost for this facility is $49,471,952. For planning purposes, the total 5-year need at the Kickemuit Middle School is $16,193,355 (Life Cycle Years 1-5 plus the FCI deficiency cost). The Kickemuit Middle School facility has a 5-year FCI of 32.71%.

It is important to reiterate that this FCI replacement threshold is not conclusive, but is intended to initiate planning discussion in which other relevant issues with regard to a facility’s disposition must be incorporated. This merely suggests where conversations regarding replacement might occur.

12M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Kickemuit Middle School

The capacity of a school reflects how many students the school’s physical facility can effectively serve. There are various methodologies that exist to calculate capacity. It is not uncommon to review an existing building only to find that the capacity that had once been assigned is greater than what can be reasonably accommodated today. This is primarily because of a change in how programs are delivered.

The Rhode Island Aspirational Capacity is based on the Rhode Island School Construction Regulations (SCRs) and is an aspirational goal of space use. The capacity for each individual public school in the state of Rhode Island was designed to conform to Section 1.06-2 Space Allowance Guidelines of the Rhode Island Department of Education (RIDE) SCRs. These regulations outline the allowed gross square feet (GSF) per student at each school type (ES, MS, HS) by utilizing a sliding scale based on projected enrollment. The resulting capacities reflect how school capacities align to the SCRs for new construction. The existing enrollment was multiplied by the GSF per student for the appropriate bracket. For the purposes of this analysis, Pre-K centers were rolled into the elementary totals, and K-8 facilities were counted as middle schools.

The most consistent and equitable way a state can determine school capacities across a variety of districts and educational program offerings is to use square-foot-per-student standards. In contrast, in the 2013 Public Schoolhouse Assessment Report, LEAs self-reported capacities for their elementary, middle and high schools. Districts typically report “functional capacity,” which is defined as the number of students each classroom can accommodate. Functional capacity counts how many students can occupy a space, not how much room students and teachers have within that space. For example, a 650-square-foot classroom and a 950-square-foot classroom can both have a reported capacity of 25 students, but the actual teaching and learning space per student varies greatly.

The variation in square feet per student impacts the kinds of teaching practices possible in each space. The lowest allocation of space per student restricts group and project-based learning strategies and requires teachers to teach in more traditional, lecture-style formats, due to a lack of space. Furthermore, the number of students that can be accommodated in a classroom does not account for access to sufficient common spaces such as libraries, cafeterias, and gymnasiums. When cafeterias are undersized relative to the population, schools must host four or more lunch periods a day, resulting in some students eating lunch mid-morning and some mid-afternoon. Similarly, undersized libraries and gymnasiums create scheduling headaches for schools and restrict student access. Finally, a classroom count-only approach to school capacity does not consider the inherent scheduling challenges schools face.

Rhode Island Aspirational Capacity

Applying the Rhode Island Aspirational Capacity, a facility of this size could ideally support an enrollment of approximately 824 students.

As part of the Educational Program Space Assessment, select core spaces were compared to the RI School Construction Regulations. If it was determined that a facility was in need of square footage related to a cafeteria or library/media center, a cost for additional space was estimated. This cost is not included in the total 5-year need or the 5-year FCI calculation.

Facility New Construction

The New Construction cost to bring the Kickemuit Middle School cafeteria and/or library/media center to the size prescribed by the SCRs is estimated to be $761,627.

13M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Kickemuit Middle School

Table 4: Facility Condition by Building

Gross Sq Ft Year BuiltCurrent

Deficiencies LC Yr. 1-5 TotalTotal 5 Yr Need

(Yr 1-5 + Current Defs) 5-Year FCI

Kickemuit Middle School Totals 149,915 1958 $14,768,566 $1,424,789 $16,193,355 32.71%

*Displayed totals may not sum exactly due to mathematical rounding

The following pages provide a listing of all current deficiencies and 5-year life cycle need and the associated costs, followed by photos taken during the assessment.

The Kickemuit Middle School comprises 149,915 square feet and was constructed in 1958. Current deficiencies at this school total $14,768,566. Five year capital renewal costs total $1,424,789. The total identified need for the Kickemuit Middle School (current deficiencies and 5-year capital renewal costs) is $16,193,355. The 5-year FCI is 32.71%.

Summary of Findings

As part of the assessment process, LEAs were given several opportunities to provide feedback on the data. Jacobs performed a thorough review of the comments provided relating to the Facilities Condition Assessment. Based on information provided, some adjustments were made to improve or refine the dataset. In other situations, enough information was not provided, item was out of scope, or evidence provided by assessment team did not align with the feedback and no adjustment was made. Finally, deficiency priorities, costs, and educational space/technology standards are consistent throughout the state.

Cost estimates are derived from local cost estimating expertise and enhanced by industry best practices, historical cost data, and relevance to the Rhode Island region. Costs have been developed from current market rates as of the 2nd quarter in 2016. All costs are based on a replace-in-kind approach, unless the item was not in compliance with national or state regulations or standards. For planning and budgeting purposes, facility assessments customarily add a soft cost multiplier onto deficiency repair cost estimates. This soft cost multiplier accounts for costs that are typically incurred when contracting for renovation and construction services. Soft costs typically include construction cost factors, such as contractor overhead and profit, as well as labor and material inflation, professional fees, and administrative costs. Based on the Rhode Island School Construction Regulations, a soft cost multiplier of 20% is included on all cost estimates. Other project allowances are included in the cost estimates based on school attributes such as age, location, and historic designation. All stated costs in the assessment report will include soft costs for planning and budgeting purposes. These are estimates, and costs will vary at the time of construction.

Cost Estimating

LEA Feedback

14M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Kickemuit Middle School

Site Level DeficienciesSiteDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

Asphalt Walks Require Replacement Capital Renewal 5,280 SF 3 $44,815 8901

Note: Beyond useful life. Several large cracks, these cracks are a trip hazard.

Asphalt Paving Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 147 CAR 4 $483,077 8899

Note: Beyond useful life. Several large cracks, several areas of alligatoring, potholes. Several trip hazards. Asphalt also requires sealcoating.

Asphalt Paving Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 25 CAR 4 $82,156 8900

Note: Beyond useful life.

Backstops Require Replacement Educational Adequacy

1 Ea. 4 $28,329 28408

Note: Backstops Require Replacement

Fencing Requires Replacement (4' Chain Link Fence) Capital Renewal 70 LF 4 $4,495 8898

Note: Over life cycle

Exterior Basketball Goals are Required Educational Adequacy

1 Ea. 5 $5,807 28690

Note: Exterior Basketball Goals are Required

Sub Total for System 6 items $648,680

RoofingDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

The Asphalt Shingle Roof Covering Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 24,000 SF 2 $543,914 8902

Note: Several leaks in rooms under low sloping asphalt. Rooms with leaks: 111, 111C, 113, 115, 119, 141, 144, 146, 148, 149, 151,155, Book storage. 1st floor corridor outside room 114

Sub Total for System 1 items $543,914

ElectricalDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

The Pole Lighting Is Missing And Needed Functional Deficiency 3 Ea. 3 $59,066 8903

Note: Need more lights in parking lot.

Sub Total for System 1 items $59,066

Sub Total for School and Site Level 8 items $1,251,660

Building: 01 - Main BuildingRoofingDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

The Roof Drains Require Cleaning Capital Renewal 5 Ea. 3 $198 8907

Sub Total for System 1 items $198

ExteriorDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

Glass Wall Requires Replacement (Bldg SF) Capital Renewal 250 SF 2 $42,781 8928

Note: Glass wall in gym has broken glass blocks

The Glass Pane In The Steel Exterior Window Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 48 SF 2 $22,794 8906

Note: 2 4'x6' glass panes are damaged. 1 in assistant principals office, 1 in main office

The Brick Exterior Requires Repointing Capital Renewal 1,500 SF Wall

3 $62,746 8914

Note: Several areas require Repointing, possibly could be the cause of leaks.

Sub Total for System 3 items $128,321

InteriorDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

Interior CMU Walls Require Repair Capital Renewal 3,000 SF 3 $108,950 8922

Note: Cracks in CMU located in rooms: 114, 212, work room, 246, in corridor walls by rooms, 124, 221, 224, 255. Holes in mechanical room.

The Acoustical Ceiling Tiles Require Replacement Capital Renewal 128,839 SF 3 $1,163,625 8908

Note: Several damaged and stained ceiling tiles throughout school. Whole system should be replaced.

The Carpet Flooring Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 3,357 SF 3 $73,036 8909

Note: Carpet installed in 1997

The Ceramic Tile Flooring Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 250 SF 3 $6,713 8911

Note: Restroom floors.

15M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Kickemuit Middle School

InteriorDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

The Interior Door Hardware Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 1 Door 3 $3,137 8916

Note: Missing hardware in main office

The Vinyl Composition Tile Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 86,254 SF 3 $989,484 8910

Note: Several areas of damage, replace whole system.

Interior Ceramic Walls Require Repair Or Replacement Capital Renewal 800 SF Wall

4 $21,296 8913

Note: Most Restrooms have damage to ceramic tile walls.

Interior Gypsum Board Walls Require Repair Capital Renewal 500 SF Wall

4 $3,654 8904

Note: Cracks in gypboard above lockers 327, 173, 123, 111, 97, 81, 767, 705, 651, 639, 621, 607.

Moveable Partitions Require Replacement Capital Renewal 3,840 SF Wall

4 $443,557 8905

Note: Partition has a tear in fabric, room 117. Additional partitions old and obsolete.

Paint (probable pre-1978 in base layer(s)) - damaged area < 9 sq. ft. OR overall worn AND in children-accessible area (measurement unit - each)

Hazardous Material 4 Ea. 4 $1,141 Rollup

Paint (probable pre-1978 in base layer(s)) - damaged area < 9 sq. ft. OR overall worn AND in children-accessible area (measurement unit - linear feet)

Hazardous Material 276 LF 4 $6,297 Rollup

Paint (probable pre-1978 in base layer(s)) - damaged area < 9 sq. ft. OR overall worn AND in children-accessible area (measurement unit - square feet)

Hazardous Material 2,600 SF 4 $24,718 Rollup

Room Is Excessively Reverberant Acoustics 8,550 SF 4 $191,019 27950

Location: Gym

Room Lighting Is Inadequate Or In Poor Condition. Educational Adequacy

2,396 SF 4 $91,297 Rollup

The Terrazzo Flooring Requires Repair Capital Renewal 36,966 SF 4 $1,968,192 8915

Note: Several large cracks in terrazzo floor. All corridors have cracks, cracks in rooms.

Interior Walls Require Repainting (Bldg SF) Capital Renewal 142,389 SF 5 $940,813 Rollup

Sub Total for System 16 items $6,036,930

MechanicalDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

The Boiler HVAC Component Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 2 Ea. 2 $455,325 8912

Note: Replace

The Mechanical / HVAC Piping / System Is Beyond Its Useful Life Capital Renewal 144,839 SF 2 $1,116,447 8923

Unit Ventilators Are Excessively Noisy Acoustics 77 Ea. 3 $488,561 27949

Location: Classrooms

Sub Total for System 3 items $2,060,333

ElectricalDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

Switchgear Is Needed Or Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 1 Ea. 2 $69,059 8924

Room Has Insufficient Electrical Outlets Educational Adequacy

268 Ea. 5 $132,999 Rollup

Sub Total for System 2 items $202,058

PlumbingDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

The Plumbing / Domestic Water Piping System Is Beyond Its Useful Life Capital Renewal 144,839 SF 3 $1,165,358 8921

The Refrigerated Water Cooler Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 12 Ea. 4 $88,529 8920

Room lacks a drinking fountain. Educational Adequacy

6 Ea. 5 $6,617 Rollup

The Class Room Lavatories Plumbing Fixtures Are Missing And Should Be Installed Educational Adequacy

8 Ea. 5 $12,093 Rollup

Sub Total for System 4 items $1,272,597

Fire and Life SafetyDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

Fire Alarm Is Missing Or Inadequate (NFPA 72 and NFPA 101, Section 9.6) Code Compliance 144,839 SF 1 $424,523 8918

Room lacks shut-off valves for utilities. (International Fuel Gas Code, Section 409.6) Educational Adequacy

4 Ea. 1 $45,633 Rollup

Sub Total for System 2 items $470,156

16M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Kickemuit Middle School

TechnologyDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

Room lacks Interactive White Board Educational Adequacy

1 Ea. 3 $5,704 Rollup

Technology: Campus network switching electronics are antiquated and/or do not meet standards.

Technology 24 Ea. 3 $11,408 18441

Technology: Campus wireless infrastructure inadequate. Technology 55 Ea. 3 $73,204 18439

Technology: Classroom AV/Multimedia systems are inadequate and/or near end of useful life.

Technology 50 Ea. 3 $998,232 18446

Technology: Classroom AV/Multimedia systems are inadequate and/or near end of useful life.

Technology 1 Ea. 3 $19,965 18447

Technology: Gymnasium sound system is nonexistent, inadequate, or near end of useful life.

Technology 1 Ea. 3 $9,127 18443

Technology: Instructional spaces do not have local sound reinforcement. Technology 51 Ea. 3 $242,428 18451

Technology: Intermediate Telecommunications Room grounding system is inadequate or non-existent.

Technology 5 Ea. 3 $26,620 18437

Technology: Intermediate Telecommunications Room is not dedicated. Room requires partial walls and/or major improvements.

Technology 1 Ea. 3 $37,648 18435

Technology: Intermediate Telecommunications Room needs minor improvements. Technology 4 Ea. 3 $66,929 18434

Technology: Intermediate Telecommunications Room UPS does not meet standards, is inadequate, or non-existent.

Technology 5 Ea. 3 $23,767 18436

Technology: Main Telecommunications Room ground system is inadequate or non-existent. Technology 1 Ea. 3 $6,655 18433

Technology: Main Telecommunications Room needs M/E improvements. Technology 1 Ea. 3 $29,281 18432

Technology: Network cabling infrastructure is outdated (Cat 5 or less) and/or does not meet standards.

Technology 615 Ea. 3 $263,105 18442

Technology: Network system inadequate and/or near end of useful life Technology 55 Ea. 3 $261,442 18449

Technology: Network system inadequate and/or near end of useful life Technology 3 Ea. 3 $22,817 18450

Technology: PA/Bell/Clock system is inadequate and/or near end of useful life. Technology 144,839 SF 3 $247,856 18448

Technology: Telecommunications Room (small size room) needs dedicated cooling system improvements.

Technology 5 Ea. 3 $23,767 18438

Technology: Telecommunications Room fiber connectivity infrastructure is outdated and/or inadequate.

Technology 2 Ea. 3 $12,549 18440

Technology: Telephone handsets are inadequate and sparsely deployed throughout the campus.

Technology 55 Ea. 3 $83,661 18444

Technology: Telephone system is inadequate and/or non-existent. Technology 1 Ea. 3 $7,225 18445

Sub Total for System 21 items $2,473,391

SpecialtiesDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

Room has insufficient writing area. Educational Adequacy

2 Ea. 3 $9,127 Rollup

The Retractable Bleachers Require Replacement Capital Renewal 720 Seat 4 $821,402 8917

Room lacks an appropriate refrigerator. Educational Adequacy

1 Ea. 5 $8,556 Rollup

Sub Total for System 3 items $839,085

Sub Total for Building 01 - Main Building 55 items $13,483,068

17M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Kickemuit Middle School

Building: 02 - Maintenance ShopMechanicalDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

Electric Unit Heater Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 3 Ea. 2 $4,076 8929

Note: Past life expectancy, needs replacement.

Sub Total for System 1 items $4,076

Sub Total for Building 02 - Maintenance Shop 1 items $4,076

Building: 03 - ShedExteriorDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

The Exterior Wood Requires Replacement (Bldg SF) Capital Renewal 576 SF 2 $17,266 8930

Note: over life

Sub Total for System 1 items $17,266

Sub Total for Building 03 - Shed 1 items $17,266

Total for Campus 65 items $14,756,069

18M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Kickemuit Middle School

Kickemuit Middle School - Life Cycle Summary Yrs 1-5Building: 01 - Main Building

InteriorUniformat Description LC Type Description Qty UoM Repair Cost Remaining Life

Resilient Flooring Rubber Tile Flooring 1,820 SF $34,000 1

Sub Total for System 1 items $34,000

MechanicalUniformat Description LC Type Description Qty UoM Repair Cost Remaining Life

Exhaust Air Roof Exhaust Fan 68 Ea. $353,880 3

Heating System Supplementary Components

Controls - DDC (Bldg.SF) 144,839 SF $872,110 3

Decentralized Heating Equipment Unit Heater Electric (3 KW) 2 Ea. $2,527 3

Sub Total for System 3 items $1,228,517

ElectricalUniformat Description LC Type Description Qty UoM Repair Cost Remaining Life

Electrical Service Switchgear - Main Dist Panel (1600 Amps) 1 Ea. $82,102 3

Sub Total for System 1 items $82,102

PlumbingUniformat Description LC Type Description Qty UoM Repair Cost Remaining Life

Domestic Water Equipment Water Heater - Electric - 80 gallon 1 Ea. $5,655 3

Note: 75 Gallon

Building Support Plumbing System Supplementary Components

Sump Pump 1 Ea. $1,449 5

Sub Total for System 2 items $7,104

Sub Total for Building 01 - Main Building 7 items $1,351,723

Building: 02 - Maintenance Shop

InteriorUniformat Description LC Type Description Qty UoM Repair Cost Remaining Life

Wall Painting and Coating Painting/Staining (Bldg SF) 4,500 SF $29,733 5

Sub Total for System 1 items $29,733

ElectricalUniformat Description LC Type Description Qty UoM Repair Cost Remaining Life

Lighting Fixtures Building Mounted Fixtures (Ea.) 6 Ea. $8,956 3

Lighting Fixtures Light Fixtures (Bldg SF) 4,500 SF $26,738 3

Sub Total for System 2 items $35,694

Sub Total for Building 02 - Maintenance Shop 3 items $65,427

Building: 03 - Shed

InteriorUniformat Description LC Type Description Qty UoM Repair Cost Remaining Life

Wall Painting and Coating Painting/Staining (Bldg SF) 576 SF $3,806 5

Specialty Suspended Ceilings Ceiling - Wood 576 SF $3,833 5

Note: Exposed Wood

Sub Total for System 2 items $7,639

Sub Total for Building 03 - Shed 2 items $7,639

Total for: Kickemuit Middle School 12 items $1,424,789

19M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Kickemuit Middle School

Supporting Photos

Piping

Elevation

CMU Crack

Crack in CMU

20M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Kickemuit Middle School

CMU Holes

Piping

Unit Ventilator

Switchboard

Alligatoring In Parking Lot Asphalt

Trip Hazard

21M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Kickemuit Middle School

Large Trip Hazard

Parking Lot Cracks

Asphalt Sidewalk Trip Hazard

Cracks In Asphalt Sidewalk

Roof

Damaged Roof Covering

22M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Kickemuit Middle School

Active Leak Outside Room 232

Damaged Roof Covering

Tear In Partition #1

Broken Glass (Gym)

Corridor

Classroom

23M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Kickemuit Middle School

Site Aerial

Science lab

Auditorium

Kitchen

Gymnasium

Roof

24M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Kickemuit Middle School

Gymnasium

Cafe

Fintess Center

Restroom

Restroom 2

Marquee

25M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Kickemuit Middle School

Music

Boys locker room

Art

Auditorium

Library

Cracks In Gypsum Board

26M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Kickemuit Middle School

Computer lab

Roof

Damaged Glass Pane

Glass Pane

Stained Tiles

Damaged VCT

27M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Kickemuit Middle School

Roof Drain

Stained Tiles

Cracked VCT

Restroom Flooring

Boilers

Damaged Wall

28M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Kickemuit Middle School

Restroom Flooring

Damaged Wall

Repoint Brick

Repoint

Cracked Terrazo

Water Fountain

29M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Kickemuit Middle School

Terrazzo Floor Damage

Missing Hardware

Shop Interior

Maintenance Shop

Shed

30M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Kickemuit Middle School

199 Chestnut Street, Bristol, RI 02809

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Mt. Hope High School June 2017

1M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Mt. Hope High School, located at 199 Chestnut Street in Bristol, Rhode Island, was built in 1965. It comprises 177,732 gross square feet. Each school across the district was visited three times during the Facility Condition Assessments by three teams of specialists in the spring/summer of 2016.

For master planning purposes a 5-year need was developed to provide an understanding of the current need as well as the projected needs in the near future. For Mt. Hope High School the 5-year need is $22,406,303. The findings contained within this report resulted from an assessment of building systems performed by building professionals experienced in disciplines including: architecture, mechanical, plumbing, electrical, acoustics, hazardous materials, and technology infrastructure.

Figure 1: Aerial view of Mt. Hope High School

Introduction

Mt. Hope High School serves grades 9 - 12, has 78 instructional spaces, and has an enrollment of 912. Instructional spaces are defined as rooms in which a student receives education. The LEA reported capacity for Mt. Hope High School is 1,407 with a resulting utilization of 65%.

2M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Mt. Hope High School

Approach and MethodologyA facility condition assessment evaluates each building’s overall condition. Two components of the facility condition assessment are combined to total the cost for facility need. The two components of the facility condition assessment are current deficiencies and life cycle forecast.

Current Deficiencies: Deficiencies are items in need of repair or replacement as a result of being broken, obsolete, or beyond useful life. The existing deficiencies that currently require correction are identified and assigned a priority. An example of a current deficiency might include a broken lighting fixture or an inoperable roof top air conditioning unit.

Life Cycle Forecast: Life cycle analysis evaluates ages of a building's systems to forecast system replacement as they reach the end of serviceable life. An example of a life cycle system replacement is a roof with a 20-year life that has been in place for 15 years and may require replacement in five years.

Discipline Specialists

All assessment teams produced current deficiencies associated with each school. The assessment for the school facilities at the Rhode Island Department of Education included several specialties:

Facility Condition Assessment: Architectural, mechanical, and electrical engineering professionals observed conditions via a visual observation that did not include intrusive measures, destructive investigations, or testing. Additionally, the assessment incorporated input provided by district facilities and maintenance staff where applicable. The assessment team recorded existing conditions, identified problems and deficiencies, documented corrective action and quantities, and identified the priority of the repair in accordance with parameters defined during the planning phase. The team took digital photos at each school to better identify significant deficiencies.

Technology: Technology specialists visited RIDE facilities and met with technology directors to observe and assess each facility's technology infrastructure. The assessment included network architecture, major infrastructure components, classroom instructional systems, necessary building space and support for technology. The technology assessment took into account the desired technology outcome and best practices and processes to ensure results can be attained effectively.

Hazardous Materials: Schools constructed prior to 1990 were assessed by specialists to identify the presence of hazardous materials. The team focused on identifying asbestos containing building materials (ACBMs), lead-based painted (LBP) areas, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs). As part of an indoor air and exterior air quality assessment, the team noted evidence of mold, water intrusion, mercury, and oil and hazardous materials (OHMs) exposure. If sampling and analysis was required, these activities were recommended but not included in the scope of work.

Traffic: A traffic specialist performed an in-office review of aerial imagery of the traffic infrastructure around the facilities in accordance with section 1.05-7 in the Rhode Island School Construction Regulations and reviewed data collected on site during the facility condition assessment. Based on this information, deficiencies and corrective actions were identified. High problem areas were identified for consideration of more detailed site-specific study and analysis in the future.

Acoustics: Specialists assessed each school's acoustics, including architectural acoustics, mechanical system noise and vibration, and environmental noise. The assessment team evaluated room acoustics with particular attention to the intelligibility of speech in learning spaces, interior and exterior sound isolation, and mechanical system noise and vibration control.

Educational Program Space Assessment: Teams evaluated schools to ensure that that all spaces adequately support the districts educational program. Standards are established for each classroom type or instructional space. Each space is evaluated to determine if it meets those standards and a listing of alterations that should be made to make the space a better environment for teaching and learning was created.

3M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Mt. Hope High School

System Summaries

Building Envelope

The exterior systems for the building(s) at this campus includes:01 - Main Building: CMU Exterior Wall

Metal Panel Exterior Wall Aluminum Exterior WindowsStorefront / Curtain WallStorefront Entrance DoorsSteel Exterior Entrance Doors

02 - Storage: Wood Siding Exterior Wall Steel Exterior Entrance Doors

03 - Maintenance: CMU Exterior Wall Steel Exterior Entrance DoorsOverhead Exterior Utility Doors

04 - Storage: Wood Siding Exterior Wall Steel Exterior Entrance Doors

05 - Storage: Wood Siding Exterior Wall Overhead Exterior Utility Doors

06 - Concessions: Wood Siding Exterior Wall Steel Exterior WindowsSteel Exterior Entrance Doors

07 - Ticket Building: Wood Siding Exterior Wall Vinyl on Wood Frame Exterior WindowsSteel Exterior Entrance DoorsOverhead Exterior Utility Doors

08 - Field Electrical Room: Wood Siding Exterior Wall Steel Exterior Entrance Doors

09 - Portable A: Wood Siding Exterior Wall Vinyl on Wood Frame Exterior WindowsSteel Exterior Entrance Doors

10 - Building 10: Wood Siding Exterior Wall Vinyl on Wood Frame Exterior Windows

Site

The site level systems for this campus include:Site Asphalt Parking Lot Pavement

Asphalt Roadway PavementAsphalt Pedestrian PavementConcrete Pedestrian Pavement

The following tables summarize major building systems at the Mt. Hope High School campus, identified by discipline and building.

4M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Mt. Hope High School

10 - Building 10: Storefront Entrance Doors11 - Pump House: CMU Exterior Wall

Steel Exterior Entrance Doors

The roofing for the building(s) at this campus consists of:01 - Main Building: Composition Shingle Roofing

EPDM RoofingSteel Canopy Roofing

02 - Storage: Composition Shingle Roofing03 - Maintenance: Metal Steep Slope Roofing04 - Storage: Composition Shingle Roofing05 - Storage: Composition Shingle Roofing06 - Concessions: Composition Shingle Roofing07 - Ticket Building: Composition Shingle Roofing08 - Field Electrical Room: Composition Shingle Roofing09 - Portable A: Composition Shingle Roofing10 - Building 10: Clear Polycarbonate Roofing11 - Pump House: Composition Shingle Roofing

Interior

The interior systems for the building(s) at this campus include:01 - Main Building: Moveable Interior Partition

Steel Interior DoorsWood Interior DoorsInterior Door Hardware Suspended Acoustical Grid SystemSuspended Acoustical Ceiling TilePainted CeilingsCeramic Tile WallCMU WallInterior Wall PaintingConcrete FlooringCeramic Tile FlooringWood FlooringVinyl Composition Tile FlooringTerrazzo FlooringCarpetAthletic/Sport Flooring

02 - Storage: Wood CeilingsInterior Wall PaintingWood Flooring

03 - Maintenance: Wood Interior Doors

5M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Mt. Hope High School

03 - Maintenance: Overhead Interior Coiling DoorsInterior Door Hardware Exposed Metal Structure CeilingWood Wall PanelingConcrete Flooring

04 - Storage: Wood CeilingsInterior Wall PaintingWood Flooring

05 - Storage: Wood CeilingsInterior Wall PaintingWood Flooring

06 - Concessions: Wood Interior DoorsInterior Door Hardware Wood CeilingsInterior Wall PaintingConcrete Flooring

07 - Ticket Building: Wood CeilingsWood Wall PanelingWood Flooring

08 - Field Electrical Room: Wood CeilingsWood Wall PanelingWood Flooring

09 - Portable A: Wood Interior DoorsInterior Door Hardware Suspended Acoustical Grid SystemSuspended Acoustical Ceiling TileWood Wall PanelingCarpet

10 - Building 10: Wood Flooring11 - Pump House: Wood Ceilings

Concrete Flooring

Mechanical

The mechanical systems for the building(s) at this campus include:

01 - Main Building: 1,275 MBH Cast Iron Steam Boiler 4,200 MBH Cast Iron Steam Boiler Finned Wall Radiator Steam/Hot Water Heating Unit Vent5 kW Electric Unit HeaterDDC Heating System ControlsPneumatic Heating System Controls1 Ton Ductless Split System

6M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Mt. Hope High School

01 - Main Building: 3 Ton D/X Fan Coil2-Pipe Hot Water Hydronic Distribution System 1 HP or Smaller Pump5 HP Pump 10 HP Pump 5,000 CFM Outdoor AHUDuctworkDehumidifierRoof Exhaust FanKitchen Exhaust HoodsFire Sprinkler System

03 - Maintenance: 3 kW Electric Unit Heater

Electrical

The electrical systems for the building(s) at this campus include:01 - Main Building: 1200 kW Emergency Generator

Plumbing

The plumbing systems for the building(s) at this campus include:01 - Main Building: 2" Backflow Preventers

Gas Piping System40 Gallon Gas Water Heater50 Gallon Gas Water Heater75 Gallon Gas Water HeaterDomestic Water Piping System

03 - Maintenance: Domestic Water Piping System 09 - Portable A: Domestic Water Piping System 01 - Main Building: Classroom Lavatories

Mop/Service SinksNon-Refrigerated Drinking FountainRefrigerated Drinking FountainRestroom LavatoriesShowersToiletsUrinals

03 - Maintenance: Restroom LavatoriesToilets

09 - Portable A: Restroom LavatoriesToilets

01 - Main Building: Sump PumpAir Compressor (2 hp)1,000 Gallon Underground Fuel Oil Storage Tank

7M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Mt. Hope High School

01 - Main Building: 1,600 Amp SwitchgearPanelboard - 120/208 100APanelboard - 120/208 225APanelboard - 120/208 400AElectrical DisconnectLight Fixtures Building Mounted Lighting Fixtures Canopy Mounted Lighting Fixtures

03 - Maintenance: Panelboard - 120/208 100ALight Fixtures

07 - Ticket Building: Panelboard - 120/208 100ALight Fixtures

08 - Field Electrical Room: 45 KVA TransformerPanelboard - 120/208 100APanelboard - 120/208 225A

09 - Portable A: Panelboard - 120/208 100ALight Fixtures

8M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Mt. Hope High School

Facility Deficiency Priority Levels

Deficiencies were ranked according to five priority levels, with Priority 1 items being the most critical to address:

Priority 1 – Mission Critical Concerns: Deficiencies or conditions that may directly affect the school’s ability to remain open or deliver the educational curriculum. These deficiencies typically relate to building safety, code compliance, severely damaged or failing building components, and other items that require near-term correction. An example of a Priority 1 deficiency is a fire alarm system replacement.

Priority 2 – Indirect Impact to Educational Mission: Items that may progress to a Priority 1 item if not addressed in the near term. Examples of Priority 2 deficiencies include inadequate roofing that could cause deterioration of integral building systems, and conditions affecting building envelopes, such as roof and window replacements.

Priority 3 – Short-Term Conditions: Deficiencies that are necessary to the school's mission but may not require immediate attention. These items should be considered necessary improvements required to maximize facility efficiency and usefulness. Examples of Priority 3 items include site improvements and plumbing deficiencies.

Priority 4 – Long-Term Requirements: Items or systems that may be considered improvements to the instructional environment. The improvements may be aesthetic or provide greater functionality. Examples include cabinets, finishes, paving, removal of abandoned equipment, and educational accommodations associated with special programs.

Priority 5 – Enhancements: Deficiencies aesthetic in nature or considered enhancements. Typical deficiencies in this priority include repainting, replacing carpet, improved signage, or other improvements to the facility environment.

9M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Mt. Hope High School

Table 1: System by Priority

Priority

System 1 2 3 4 5 Total % of Total

Site - - $12,452 $521,265 $453,262 $986,978 5.45 %

Roofing - $102,675 - - - $102,675 0.57 %

Structural - - - - - $0 0.00 %

Exterior - $2,403,767 - - - $2,403,767 13.27 %

Interior - - $2,245,366 $1,594,643 $731,371 $4,571,380 25.23 %

Mechanical - $3,571,287 $42,991 $482,926 - $4,097,204 22.61 %

Electrical - $319,206 $88,918 $5,514 $113,148 $526,786 2.91 %

Plumbing - - $1,414,290 $226,224 $85,840 $1,726,355 9.53 %

Fire and Life Safety $503,830 - - - - $503,830 2.78 %

Technology - - $2,988,024 - - $2,988,024 16.49 %

Conveyances - - - - - $0 0.00 %

Specialties - - $13,690 $139,879 $59,894 $213,463 1.18 %

Total $503,830 $6,396,936 $6,805,730 $2,970,451 $1,443,515 $18,120,462

*Displayed totals may not sum exactly due to mathematical rounding

The following chart summarizes this site's current deficiencies by building system and priority. The listing details current deficiencies including deferred maintenance, functional deficiencies, code compliance, capital renewal, hazardous materials and technology categories.

The building systems with the most need include:Interior - $4,571,380Mechanical - $4,097,204Technology - $2,988,024

The chart below represents the building systems and associated deficiency costs.

Figure 2: System Deficiencies

10M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Mt. Hope High School

Current Deficiencies by Category

Deficiencies have been further grouped according to the observed category.

• Acoustics deficiencies relate to room acoustics, sound insolation, and mechanical systems and vibration control modeled after ANSI/ASA Standard S12.60-2010 and ASHRAE Handbook, Chapter 47 on Sound and Vibration Control.

• Barrier to Accessibility deficiencies relate to the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Rhode Island Governors Commission on Disability. Additional items related to accessibility may be included other categories.

• Capital Renewal items have reached or exceeded serviceable life and require replacement. These are current and do not include life cycle capital renewal forecasts. Also included are deficiencies correcting planned work postponed beyond its regular life expectancy.

• Code Compliance deficiencies related to current codes. Many may fall under grandfather clauses, which allow buildings to continue operating under codes effective at the time of construction. However, there are instances where the level of renovation requires full compliance which are reflected in the master plan.

• Educational Adequacy deficiencies identify where facilities do not align with the Basic Education Program and the RIDE School Construction Regulations. • Functional Deficiencies are deficiencies for components or systems that have failed before the end of expected life or are not the right application, size, or design.

• Hazardous Materials include deficiencies for building systems or components containing potentially hazardous material. The team focused on identifying asbestos containing building materials (ACBMs), lead based painted (LBP) areas, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs). As part of an indoor air and exterior air quality assessment, the team noted evidence of mold, water intrusion, mercury, and oil and hazardous materials (OHMs) exposure. With other scopes of work there may be other costs associated with hazardous materials.

• Technology deficiencies relate to network architecture, technology infrastructure, classroom systems, and support. Examples of technology deficiencies include: security cameras, secure electronic access, telephone handsets, and dedicated air conditioning for telecommunication rooms.

• Traffic deficiencies relate to vehicle or pedestrian traffic, such as bus loops, crosswalks, and pavement markings.

11M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Mt. Hope High School

Table 2: Deficiency Category by PriorityPriority

Category 1 2 3 4 5 Total

Acoustics - - - $178,731 - $178,731

Barrier to Accessibility - - $160,097 - - $160,097

Capital Renewal - $6,396,936 $3,582,587 $1,270,107 $750,651 $12,000,281

Code Compliance $503,830 - - - - $503,830

Educational Adequacy - - $65,028 $1,469,477 $692,864 $2,227,369

Functional Deficiency - - $59,066 - - $59,066

Hazardous Material - - - $52,136 - $52,136

Technology - - $2,936,686 - - $2,936,686

Traffic - - $2,266 - - $2,266

Total $503,830 $6,396,936 $6,805,730 $2,970,451 $1,443,515 $18,120,462

*Displayed totals may not sum exactly due to mathematical rounding

The following chart and table represent the deficiency category by priority. This listing includes current deficiencies for all building systems.

12M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Mt. Hope High School

Life Cycle Capital Renewal Projections

System Current DeficienciesYear 12017

Year 22018

Year 32019

Year 42020

Year 52021 LC Yr. 1-5 Total Total 5-Year Need

Site $986,978 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $986,978

Roofing $102,675 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $102,675

Structural $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Exterior $2,403,767 $0 $0 $0 $466,440 $250,271 $716,711 $3,120,478

Interior $4,571,380 $0 $0 $917,509 $154,150 $5,947 $1,077,606 $5,648,986

Mechanical $4,097,204 $0 $0 $70,869 $0 $871,591 $942,460 $5,039,664

Electrical $526,786 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $526,786

Plumbing $1,726,355 $0 $0 $235,035 $0 $0 $235,035 $1,961,390

Fire and Life Safety $503,830 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $503,830

Technology $2,988,024 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,988,024

Conveyances $0 $0 $0 $285,209 $0 $0 $285,209 $285,209

Specialties $213,463 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,001,683 $1,001,683 $1,215,146

Total $18,120,462 $0 $0 $1,508,622 $620,590 $2,129,492 $4,258,704 $22,379,166

*Displayed totals may not sum exactly due to mathematical rounding

Life Cycle Capital Renewal ForecastDuring the facility condition assessment, assessors inspected all major building systems. If a need for immediate replacement was identified, a deficiency was created with the estimated repair costs. The identified deficiency contributes to the facility's total current repair costs.

Capital planning scenarios span multiple years, as opposed to being constrained to immediate repairs. Construction projects may begin several years after the initial facility condition assessment. Therefore, in addition to the current year repair costs, it is necessary to forecast the facility's future costs using a 5-year life cycle renewal forecast model.

Life cycle renewal is the projection of future building system costs based upon each individual system’s expected serviceable life. Building systems and components age over time, eventually break down, reach the end of their useful lives, and may require replacement. While an item may be in good condition now, it might reach the end of its life before a planned construction project occurs.

The following chart shows all current deficiencies and the subsequent 5-year life cycle capital renewal projections. The projections outline costs for major building systems in which a component is expected to reach the end of its useful life and require capital funding for replacement.

Table 3: Capital Renewal Forecast

13M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Mt. Hope High School

Facility Condition Index (FCI)The Facility Condition Index (FCI) is used throughout the facility condition assessment industry as a general indicator of a building’s health. Since 1991, the facility management industry has used an index called the FCI to benchmark the relative condition of a group of schools. The FCI is derived by dividing the total repair cost, including educational adequacy and site-related repairs, by the total replacement cost. A facility with a higher FCI percentage has more need, or higher priority, than a facility with a lower FCI. It should be noted that costs in the New Construction category are not included in the FCI calculation.

For master planning purposes, the total current deficiencies and the first five years of projected life cycle needs were combined. This provides an understanding of the current needs of a facility as well as the projected needs in the near future. A 5-year FCI was calculated by dividing the 5-year need by the total replacement cost. Costs associated with new construction are not included in the FCI calculation.

Figure 5: 5-Year FCI

Financial modeling has shown that over a 30-year period, it is more cost effective to replace than repair schools with a FCI of 65 percent or greater. This is due to efficiency gains with facilities that are more modern and the value of the building at the end of the analysis period. It is important to note that the FCI at which a facility should be considered for replacement is typically debated and adjusted based on property owners and facility managers approach to facility management. Of course, FCI is not the only factor used to identify buildings that need renovation, replacement, or even closure. Historical significance, enrollment trends, community sentiment, and the availability of capital are additional factors that are analyzed when making school facility decisions.

The replacement value represents the estimated cost of replacing the current building with another building of like size, based on today’s estimated cost of construction in the Providence, Rhode Island area. The estimated replacement cost for this facility is $64,275,120. For planning purposes, the total 5-year need at the Mt. Hope High School is $22,406,303 (Life Cycle Years 1-5 plus the FCI deficiency cost). The Mt. Hope High School facility has a 5-year FCI of 34.82%.

It is important to reiterate that this FCI replacement threshold is not conclusive, but is intended to initiate planning discussion in which other relevant issues with regard to a facility’s disposition must be incorporated. This merely suggests where conversations regarding replacement might occur.

14M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Mt. Hope High School

The capacity of a school reflects how many students the school’s physical facility can effectively serve. There are various methodologies that exist to calculate capacity. It is not uncommon to review an existing building only to find that the capacity that had once been assigned is greater than what can be reasonably accommodated today. This is primarily because of a change in how programs are delivered.

The Rhode Island Aspirational Capacity is based on the Rhode Island School Construction Regulations (SCRs) and is an aspirational goal of space use. The capacity for each individual public school in the state of Rhode Island was designed to conform to Section 1.06-2 Space Allowance Guidelines of the Rhode Island Department of Education (RIDE) SCRs. These regulations outline the allowed gross square feet (GSF) per student at each school type (ES, MS, HS) by utilizing a sliding scale based on projected enrollment. The resulting capacities reflect how school capacities align to the SCRs for new construction. The existing enrollment was multiplied by the GSF per student for the appropriate bracket. For the purposes of this analysis, Pre-K centers were rolled into the elementary totals, and K-8 facilities were counted as middle schools.

The most consistent and equitable way a state can determine school capacities across a variety of districts and educational program offerings is to use square-foot-per-student standards. In contrast, in the 2013 Public Schoolhouse Assessment Report, LEAs self-reported capacities for their elementary, middle and high schools. Districts typically report “functional capacity,” which is defined as the number of students each classroom can accommodate. Functional capacity counts how many students can occupy a space, not how much room students and teachers have within that space. For example, a 650-square-foot classroom and a 950-square-foot classroom can both have a reported capacity of 25 students, but the actual teaching and learning space per student varies greatly.

The variation in square feet per student impacts the kinds of teaching practices possible in each space. The lowest allocation of space per student restricts group and project-based learning strategies and requires teachers to teach in more traditional, lecture-style formats, due to a lack of space. Furthermore, the number of students that can be accommodated in a classroom does not account for access to sufficient common spaces such as libraries, cafeterias, and gymnasiums. When cafeterias are undersized relative to the population, schools must host four or more lunch periods a day, resulting in some students eating lunch mid-morning and some mid-afternoon. Similarly, undersized libraries and gymnasiums create scheduling headaches for schools and restrict student access. Finally, a classroom count-only approach to school capacity does not consider the inherent scheduling challenges schools face.

Rhode Island Aspirational Capacity

Applying the Rhode Island Aspirational Capacity, a facility of this size could ideally support an enrollment of approximately 950 students.

As part of the Educational Program Space Assessment, select core spaces were compared to the RI School Construction Regulations. If it was determined that a facility was in need of square footage related to a cafeteria or library/media center, a cost for additional space was estimated. This cost is not included in the total 5-year need or the 5-year FCI calculation.

Facility New Construction

The New Construction cost to bring the Mt. Hope High School cafeteria and/or library/media center to the size prescribed by the SCRs is estimated to be $0.

15M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Mt. Hope High School

Table 4: Facility Condition by Building

Gross Sq Ft Year BuiltCurrent

Deficiencies LC Yr. 1-5 TotalTotal 5 Yr Need

(Yr 1-5 + Current Defs) 5-Year FCI

Mt. Hope High School Totals 177,732 1965 $18,147,599 $4,258,704 $22,406,303 34.82%

*Displayed totals may not sum exactly due to mathematical rounding

The following pages provide a listing of all current deficiencies and 5-year life cycle need and the associated costs, followed by photos taken during the assessment.

The Mt. Hope High School comprises 177,732 square feet and was constructed in 1965. Current deficiencies at this school total $18,147,599. Five year capital renewal costs total $4,258,704. The total identified need for the Mt. Hope High School (current deficiencies and 5-year capital renewal costs) is $22,406,303. The 5-year FCI is 34.82%.

Summary of Findings

As part of the assessment process, LEAs were given several opportunities to provide feedback on the data. Jacobs performed a thorough review of the comments provided relating to the Facilities Condition Assessment. Based on information provided, some adjustments were made to improve or refine the dataset. In other situations, enough information was not provided, item was out of scope, or evidence provided by assessment team did not align with the feedback and no adjustment was made. Finally, deficiency priorities, costs, and educational space/technology standards are consistent throughout the state.

Cost estimates are derived from local cost estimating expertise and enhanced by industry best practices, historical cost data, and relevance to the Rhode Island region. Costs have been developed from current market rates as of the 2nd quarter in 2016. All costs are based on a replace-in-kind approach, unless the item was not in compliance with national or state regulations or standards. For planning and budgeting purposes, facility assessments customarily add a soft cost multiplier onto deficiency repair cost estimates. This soft cost multiplier accounts for costs that are typically incurred when contracting for renovation and construction services. Soft costs typically include construction cost factors, such as contractor overhead and profit, as well as labor and material inflation, professional fees, and administrative costs. Based on the Rhode Island School Construction Regulations, a soft cost multiplier of 20% is included on all cost estimates. Other project allowances are included in the cost estimates based on school attributes such as age, location, and historic designation. All stated costs in the assessment report will include soft costs for planning and budgeting purposes. These are estimates, and costs will vary at the time of construction.

Cost Estimating

LEA Feedback

16M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Mt. Hope High School

Site Level DeficienciesSiteDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

Asphalt Walks Require Replacement Capital Renewal 1,200 SF 3 $10,185 8583

Note: Asphalt walks have several large pot holes and cracks.

Location: Courtyard and front sidewalk

Pavement Markings: Words/Symbols Are Required Traffic 6 Ea. 3 $2,266 9314

Note: Add arrow pavement markings on campus to control parent drop off/pick up flow

Asphalt Paving Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 150 CAR 4 $492,936 8582

Note: Asphalt pavement has several large pot holes and cracks.

Backstops Require Replacement Educational Adequacy

1 Ea. 4 $28,329 28409

Note: Backstops Require Replacement

School has insufficient baseball fields. Educational Adequacy

1 Ea. 5 $207,745 28313

Note: School has insufficient baseball fields.

School has insufficient football/soccer fields. Educational Adequacy

1 Ea. 5 $94,430 28184

Note: School has insufficient football/soccer fields.

School has insufficient softball fields. Educational Adequacy

1 Ea. 5 $151,087 28356

Note: School has insufficient softball fields.

Sub Total for System 7 items $986,978

ElectricalDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

The Pole Lighting Is Missing And Needed Functional Deficiency 3 Ea. 3 $59,066 8585

Note: Additional pole lighting is needed.

Sub Total for System 1 items $59,066

Sub Total for School and Site Level 8 items $1,046,044

Building: 01 - Main BuildingExteriorDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

Metal Edge Termination At Wall Requires Repair Capital Renewal 1 Ea. 2 $61 8602

The Aluminum Window Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 10,061 SF 2 $1,702,563 8587

The Metal Exterior Door Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 2 Door 2 $12,834 8586

Note: Doors rusted at bottom.

The Metal Panel Exterior Requires Replacement (Bldg SF) Capital Renewal 3,290 SF 2 $500,447 8624

Note: Original to the building.

Sub Total for System 4 items $2,215,906

InteriorDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

Interior CMU Walls Require Repair Capital Renewal 1,800 SF 3 $65,370 8626

Location: Corridor M, D205, D201, E101, A138, B101, B102, B106, B207

Interior Doors Require Replacement Capital Renewal 262 Door 3 $1,208,051 8590

Note: Interior wood doors are original, scratched, worn and need to be replaced.

The Acoustical Ceiling Tiles Require Replacement Capital Renewal 1,800 SF 3 $16,257 8588

Note: There are various stained, broken, and cracked acoustical ceiling tiles throughout the building in classrooms and corridors.

The Carpet Flooring Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 5,800 SF 3 $126,186 8591

Note: Carpet is frayed and worn.

The Ceramic Tile Flooring Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 15,000 SF 3 $402,806 8593

Note: Several areas have broken ceramic flooring and base.

The Existing Toilet Stall Does Not Meet Minimum ADA Requirements Barrier to Accessibility

10 Ea. 3 $29,472 8584

The Existing Toilet Stall Does Not Meet Minimum ADA Requirements Barrier to Accessibility

6 Ea. 3 $17,683 8599

Location: 2nd floor D wing, 1st floor D110, G wing, E101, 2nd floor B wing

17M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Mt. Hope High School

InteriorDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

The Interior Door Hardware Requires Replacement Barrier to Accessibility

36 Door 3 $112,943 9223

Note: Original to the building.

The Vinyl Composition Tile Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 20,000 SF 3 $229,435 8592

Location: Corridors D, M, C; 1st floor faculty room, mechanical room, E105, Dean's office, B208, C205, C210, C203, C201, C206

Light Deterioration or Damage of 9x9 Asbestos Floor Tile is Present Hazardous Material 6 SF 4 $171 Rollup

Paint (probable pre-1978 in base layer(s)) - damaged area < 9 sq. ft. OR overall worn AND in children-accessible area (measurement unit - each)

Hazardous Material 6 Ea. 4 $1,711 Rollup

Paint (probable pre-1978 in base layer(s)) - damaged area < 9 sq. ft. OR overall worn AND in children-accessible area (measurement unit - linear feet)

Hazardous Material 1,340 LF 4 $30,574 Rollup

Paint (probable pre-1978 in base layer(s)) - damaged area < 9 sq. ft. OR overall worn AND in children-accessible area (measurement unit - square feet)

Hazardous Material 2,070 SF 4 $19,679 Rollup

Room Is Excessively Reverberant Acoustics 8,000 SF 4 $178,731 19713

Note: Gym

Room Lighting Is Inadequate Or In Poor Condition. Educational Adequacy

35,135 SF 4 $1,338,782 Rollup

Vinyl Wall Covering Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 70 SF 4 $1,464 8612

Note: Wall laminate in elevator cab is chipped.

Classroom Door Requires Vision Panel Educational Adequacy

1 Ea. 5 $2,282 Rollup

Interior Ceramic Walls Require Repainting Capital Renewal 1,200 SF Wall

5 $9,127 8633

Note: Tile wall has paint peeling.

Interior Doors Require Repainting Capital Renewal 255 Door 5 $17,212 8589

Interior Walls Require Repainting (Bldg SF) Capital Renewal 23,974 SF 5 $158,404 Rollup

Room lacks appropriate sound control. Educational Adequacy

200 SF 5 $6,959 Rollup

The Concrete Flooring Requires Repair Or Repainting Capital Renewal 8,500 SF 5 $64,647 8594

Note: Floor in auditorium is chipped and worn and should be repainted.

The Gypsum Board Ceilings Require Repainting Capital Renewal 111,591 SF 5 $466,793 Rollup

Sub Total for System 23 items $4,504,739

MechanicalDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

Ductwork Requires Replacement (SF Basis) Capital Renewal 30,000 SF 2 $441,035 10952

Note: Original to the building.

Electric Unit Heater Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 9 Ea. 2 $12,227 8618

Replace Unit Vent Capital Renewal 70 Ea. 2 $1,184,036 8630

The Boiler HVAC Component Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 2 Ea. 2 $455,325 8595

Note: Original installation.

The Fan Coil HVAC Component Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 3 Ea. 2 $17,113 8627

The Fin Tube Water Radiant Heater Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 80 Ea. 2 $134,010 8619

The Mechanical / HVAC Piping / System Is Beyond Its Useful Life Capital Renewal 171,897 SF 2 $1,325,015 8620

Air Compressor Is Inoperable And Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 2 Ea. 3 $12,766 8613

Large HVAC Circulating Pump Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 2 Ea. 3 $30,225 8614

Existing Controls Are Inadequate And Should Be Replaced With DDC Controls Capital Renewal 42,974 SF 4 $290,277 8623

Note: Approximately 25% of the school has pneumatic controls that should be updated to DDC.

Lab lacks an appropriate fume hood. Educational Adequacy

4 Ea. 4 $87,943 Rollup

Small HVAC Circulating Pump Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 4 Ea. 4 $38,119 8608

Small HVAC Circulating Pump Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 6 Ea. 4 $45,770 8632

The Exhaust Hood Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 4 Ea. 4 $20,816 10953

Sub Total for System 14 items $4,094,677

ElectricalDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

Switchgear Is Needed Or Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 1 Ea. 2 $82,102 8609

The Panelboard Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 20 Ea. 2 $96,971 8615

The Panelboard Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 19 Ea. 2 $110,186 8616

The Panelboard Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 4 Ea. 2 $25,098 8617

18M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Mt. Hope High School

ElectricalDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

The Mounted Building Lighting Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 20 Ea. 3 $29,852 10954

The Canopy Lighting Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 4 Ea. 4 $5,514 10955

Room Has Insufficient Electrical Outlets Educational Adequacy

228 Ea. 5 $113,148 Rollup

Sub Total for System 7 items $462,872

PlumbingDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

The Gas Water Heater Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 2 Ea. 3 $6,320 8610

The Gas Water Heater Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 1 Ea. 3 $3,113 8611

The Gas Water Heater Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 1 Ea. 3 $5,845 8629

The Plumbing / Domestic Water Piping System Is Beyond Its Useful Life Capital Renewal 171,897 SF 3 $1,383,064 8607

Note: Water piping is old and deteriorating.

The Urinal Plumbing Fixtures Require Replacement Capital Renewal 12 Ea. 3 $15,949 8605

Non-Refrigerated Drinking Fountain Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 1 Ea. 4 $10,220 8598

The Custodial Mop Or Service Sink Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 7 Ea. 4 $18,035 8601

The Refrigerated Water Cooler Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 7 Ea. 4 $51,642 8606

The Restroom Lavatories Plumbing Fixtures Require Replacement Capital Renewal 45 Ea. 4 $143,146 8596

Room lacks a drinking fountain. Educational Adequacy

6 Ea. 5 $6,617 Rollup

Room lacks a private shower area. Educational Adequacy

2 Ea. 5 $20,470 Rollup

The Class Room Lavatories Plumbing Fixtures Are Missing And Should Be Installed Educational Adequacy

20 Ea. 5 $30,232 Rollup

Underground Fuel/Oil Storage Tank Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 1 Ea. 5 $28,521 8622

Sub Total for System 13 items $1,723,174

Fire and Life SafetyDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

Fire Alarm Is Missing Or Inadequate (NFPA 72 and NFPA 101, Section 9.6) Code Compliance 171,897 SF 1 $503,830 8603

Sub Total for System 1 items $503,830

TechnologyDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

Room lacks Interactive White Board Educational Adequacy

9 Ea. 3 $51,338 Rollup

Technology: Auditorium AV/Multimedia system is in need of minor improvements. Technology 1 Room 3 $95,070 18391

Technology: Campus network switching electronics are antiquated and/or do not meet standards.

Technology 196 Ea. 3 $93,168 18389

Technology: Campus wireless infrastructure inadequate. Technology 65 Ea. 3 $86,513 18388

Technology: Classroom AV/Multimedia systems are inadequate and/or near end of useful life.

Technology 55 Ea. 3 $1,098,055 18394

Technology: Instructional spaces do not have local sound reinforcement. Technology 56 Ea. 3 $266,195 18399

Technology: Intermediate Telecommunications Room grounding system is inadequate or non-existent.

Technology 5 Ea. 3 $26,620 18385

Technology: Intermediate Telecommunications Room is not dedicated. Room requires partial walls and/or major improvements.

Technology 1 Ea. 3 $37,648 18377

Technology: Intermediate Telecommunications Room is not dedicated. Room requires partial walls and/or major improvements.

Technology 1 Ea. 3 $37,648 18378

Technology: Intermediate Telecommunications Room is not dedicated. Room requires partial walls and/or major improvements.

Technology 1 Ea. 3 $37,648 18379

Technology: Intermediate Telecommunications Room is not dedicated. Room requires partial walls and/or major improvements.

Technology 1 Ea. 3 $37,648 18380

Technology: Intermediate Telecommunications Room is not dedicated. Room requires partial walls and/or major improvements.

Technology 1 Ea. 3 $37,648 18381

19M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Mt. Hope High School

TechnologyDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

Technology: Intermediate Telecommunications Room is not dedicated. Room requires partial walls and/or major improvements.

Technology 1 Ea. 3 $37,648 18383

Technology: Intermediate Telecommunications Room needs minor improvements. Technology 1 Ea. 3 $16,732 18382

Technology: Intermediate Telecommunications Room UPS does not meet standards, is inadequate, or non-existent.

Technology 5 Ea. 3 $23,767 18384

Technology: Main Telecommunications Room ground system is inadequate or non-existent. Technology 1 Ea. 3 $6,655 18376

Technology: Main Telecommunications Room is not dedicated and/or inadequate. Technology 1 Ea. 3 $50,197 18374

Technology: Main Telecommunications Room UPS does not meet standards, is inadequate, or non-existent.

Technology 1 Ea. 3 $9,032 18375

Technology: Network cabling infrastructure is outdated (Cat 5 or less) and/or does not meet standards.

Technology 598 Ea. 3 $255,833 18390

Technology: Network cabling infrastructure is partially outdated and/or needs expansion. Technology 196 Ea. 3 $83,851 18395

Technology: Network system inadequate and/or near end of useful life Technology 32 Ea. 3 $152,112 18397

Technology: Network system inadequate and/or near end of useful life Technology 3 Ea. 3 $22,817 18398

Technology: PA/Bell/Clock system is inadequate and/or near end of useful life. Technology 171,879 SF 3 $294,129 18396

Technology: Telecommunications Room (small size room) needs dedicated cooling system improvements.

Technology 4 Ea. 3 $19,014 18387

Technology: Telecommunications Room fiber connectivity infrastructure is outdated and/or inadequate.

Technology 2 Ea. 3 $12,549 18386

Technology: Telephone handsets are inadequate and sparsely deployed throughout the campus.

Technology 60 Ea. 3 $91,267 18392

Technology: Telephone system is inadequate and/or non-existent. Technology 1 Ea. 3 $7,225 18393

Sub Total for System 27 items $2,988,024

SpecialtiesDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

Room has insufficient writing area. Educational Adequacy

3 Ea. 3 $13,690 Rollup

The Metal Student Lockers Require Replacement Capital Renewal 255 Ea. 4 $125,456 8625

Location: Boy's locker room

Welding Bays Are Required Educational Adequacy

2 Ea. 4 $10,838 Rollup

Work Tables Are Required Educational Adequacy

1 Ea. 4 $3,585 Rollup

Room lacks an appropriate refrigerator. Educational Adequacy

7 Ea. 5 $59,894 Rollup

Sub Total for System 5 items $213,463

Sub Total for Building 01 - Main Building 94 items $16,706,684

Building: 02 - StorageExteriorDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

The Exterior Wood Requires Replacement (Bldg SF) Capital Renewal 900 SF 2 $26,978 8635

The Metal Exterior Door Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 1 Door 2 $6,417 8634

Sub Total for System 2 items $33,395

Sub Total for Building 02 - Storage 2 items $33,395

20M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Mt. Hope High School

Building: 03 - MaintenanceRoofingDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

The Metal Roof Architectural Roof Covering Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 2,250 SF 2 $77,006 8639

Sub Total for System 1 items $77,006

ExteriorDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

The Metal Exterior Door Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 1 Door 2 $6,417 8636

The Overhead Door Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 1 Door 2 $36,792 8637

The Overhead Door Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 1 Door 2 $36,792 8638

Sub Total for System 3 items $80,001

InteriorDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

Interior Doors Require Replacement Capital Renewal 1 Door 3 $4,611 8640

Interior Wood Walls Require Replacement Capital Renewal 2,250 SF 4 $20,535 8646

Sub Total for System 2 items $25,146

MechanicalDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

Electric Unit Heater Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 2 Ea. 2 $2,527 8645

Sub Total for System 1 items $2,527

ElectricalDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

The Panelboard Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 1 Ea. 2 $4,849 8644

Sub Total for System 1 items $4,849

PlumbingDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

The Restroom Lavatories Plumbing Fixtures Require Replacement Capital Renewal 1 Ea. 4 $3,181 8641

Sub Total for System 1 items $3,181

Sub Total for Building 03 - Maintenance 9 items $192,710

Building: 04 - StorageRoofingDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

Shingle Roof Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 450 SF 2 $12,834 8647

Sub Total for System 1 items $12,834

ExteriorDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

The Exterior Wood Requires Replacement (Bldg SF) Capital Renewal 450 SF 2 $13,489 8649

The Metal Exterior Door Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 1 Door 2 $6,417 8648

Sub Total for System 2 items $19,906

InteriorDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

The Wood Flooring Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 450 SF 3 $14,931 9225

The Wood Ceiling Tiles Require Replacement Capital Renewal 450 SF 4 $2,995 9224

Interior Walls Require Repainting (Bldg SF) Capital Renewal 450 SF 5 $2,973 Rollup

Sub Total for System 3 items $20,899

Sub Total for Building 04 - Storage 6 items $53,639

Building: 05 - StorageRoofingDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

Shingle Roof Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 450 SF 2 $12,834 8650

Sub Total for System 1 items $12,834

21M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Mt. Hope High School

Buildings with no reported deficiencies07 - Ticket Building

08 - Field Electrical Room

10 - Building 10

11 - Pump House

ExteriorDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

The Exterior Wood Requires Replacement (Bldg SF) Capital Renewal 450 SF 2 $13,489 8652

The Overhead Door Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 1 Door 2 $36,792 8651

Sub Total for System 2 items $50,281

InteriorDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

Interior Walls Require Repainting (Bldg SF) Capital Renewal 450 SF 5 $2,973 Rollup

Sub Total for System 1 items $2,973

Sub Total for Building 05 - Storage 4 items $66,089

Building: 06 - ConcessionsExteriorDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

The Steel Window Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 20 SF 2 $4,278 8653

Note: Window is cracked.

Sub Total for System 1 items $4,278

Sub Total for Building 06 - Concessions 1 items $4,278

Building: 09 - Portable AInteriorDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

The Carpet Flooring Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 810 SF 3 $17,623 8712

Sub Total for System 1 items $17,623

Sub Total for Building 09 - Portable A 1 items $17,623

Total for Campus 125 items $18,120,462

22M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Mt. Hope High School

Mt. Hope High School - Life Cycle Summary Yrs 1-5Building: 01 - Main Building

ExteriorUniformat Description LC Type Description Qty UoM Repair Cost Remaining Life

Exterior Window Wall Storefront / Curtain Wall (Bldg SF) 3,240 SF $261,206 4

Exterior Entrance Doors Storefront Doors - Glass/Aluminum 25 Door $178,256 4

Exterior Entrance Doors Steel - Insulated and Painted 38 Door $243,854 5

Sub Total for System 3 items $683,315

InteriorUniformat Description LC Type Description Qty UoM Repair Cost Remaining Life

Interior Operable Partitions Moveable Partitions (Major) 3,060 SF Wall $353,460 3

Wood Flooring Wood Flooring - All Types 17,000 SF $564,049 3

Note: Gym

Interior Swinging Doors Steel 36 Door $154,150 4

Sub Total for System 3 items $1,071,658

MechanicalUniformat Description LC Type Description Qty UoM Repair Cost Remaining Life

Decentralized Cooling Ductless Split System (1 Ton) 3 Ea. $42,348 3

Facility Distribution Systems Supplementary Components

Dehumidifier 1 Ea. $28,521 3

Exhaust Air Kitchen Exhaust Hoods 1 Ea. $15,964 5

HVAC Air Distribution AHU 5,000 CFM Outdoor 6 Ea. $855,627 5

Sub Total for System 4 items $942,460

PlumbingUniformat Description LC Type Description Qty UoM Repair Cost Remaining Life

Plumbing Fixtures Classroom Lavatories 85 Ea. $231,114 3

Domestic Water Equipment Backflow Preventers - 2 in. (Ea.) 1 Ea. $3,921 3

Sub Total for System 2 items $235,035

ConveyancesUniformat Description LC Type Description Qty UoM Repair Cost Remaining Life

Elevators Hydraulic (Passenger Elev) 1 Ea. $285,209 3

Sub Total for System 1 items $285,209

SpecialtiesUniformat Description LC Type Description Qty UoM Repair Cost Remaining Life

Casework Lockers 2,036 Ea. $1,001,683 5

Sub Total for System 1 items $1,001,683

Sub Total for Building 01 - Main Building 14 items $4,219,361

Building: 02 - Storage

InteriorUniformat Description LC Type Description Qty UoM Repair Cost Remaining Life

Wall Painting and Coating Painting/Staining (Bldg SF) 900 SF $5,947 5

Sub Total for System 1 items $5,947

Sub Total for Building 02 - Storage 1 items $5,947

Building: 10 - Building 10

ExteriorUniformat Description LC Type Description Qty UoM Repair Cost Remaining Life

Exterior Wall Veneer Wood Siding - Bldg SF basis 900 SF $26,978 4

Sub Total for System 1 items $26,978

Sub Total for Building 10 - Building 10 1 items $26,978

23M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Mt. Hope High School

Building: 11 - Pump House

ExteriorUniformat Description LC Type Description Qty UoM Repair Cost Remaining Life

Exterior Entrance Doors Steel - Insulated and Painted 1 Door $6,417 5

Sub Total for System 1 items $6,417

Sub Total for Building 11 - Pump House 1 items $6,417

Total for: Mt. Hope High School 17 items $4,258,702

24M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Mt. Hope High School

Supporting Photos

Site Aerial

Gymnasium

Lockers

Auditorium

25M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Mt. Hope High School

Hallway Finishes

Wood Shop

Library

Press Box

Robotics Classroom

Art Room

26M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Mt. Hope High School

Pump House

Retractable Bleachers

Kitchen

Weight Room

Science Lab

Music Classroom

27M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Mt. Hope High School

Home Economics Classroom

Classroom

Computer Lab

Main Entrance

Site Signage

Greenhouse

28M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Mt. Hope High School

Exterior Door Rusted At Bottom

Poor Seals At Window

Stained Ceiling Tiles

Broken Window

Broken Ceiling Tile

Worn Wood Door

29M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Mt. Hope High School

Vandalized Interior Door

Worn Carpet

Cracked Parking Lot Pavement

Frayed Carpet In Office

Alligatoring Parking Lot Pavement

Pot Hole In Parking Lot

30M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Mt. Hope High School

Pot Hole In Asphalt Walkway

Cafeteria

Kitchen

Unlevel Walkway

Science Lab

Peeling Wall Paint

31M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Mt. Hope High School

Aged Pump

Weathered Wood Siding

Aged Panelboard

Rusted Exterior Door

Unit Heater

Weathered And Vandalized Wood Siding

32M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Mt. Hope High School

Maintenance Building Exterior

Storage Building 5 Exterior

Cabinet Unit Ventilator

Cracked Window At Concessions Building

Damaged Cabinet Unit Ventilator

Damaged Wall

33M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Mt. Hope High School

Chipped Paint

Worn CMU Wall

Damaged Locker Room Lockers

Aged Fan Coil Unit

Cracked CMU Wall

Finned Tube Radiator

34M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Mt. Hope High School

Aged Unit Heater

Aged Panelboard

Aged Air Compressors

Aged Panelboard

10 HP Circulating Pump

Switchboard

35M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Mt. Hope High School

Aged Pump

Damaged Drinking Fountain

Corroded Metal At Termination Wall

Aged Piping

Typical Urinal Fixtures

Aged Service Sink

36M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Mt. Hope High School

Non-Compliant Toilet Stalls

Worn Bathroom Sink

Chipped Paint On Auditorium Floor

Non-Refrigerated Drinking Fountain

Original Boilers

Cracked And Missing Ceramic Tile

37M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Mt. Hope High School

Cracked VCT Flooring Stained And Broken VCT

38M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Mt. Hope High School

1225 Hope Street, Bristol, RI 02809

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Rockwell School June 2017

1M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Rockwell School, located at 1225 Hope Street in Bristol, Rhode Island, was built in 1951. It comprises 29,200 gross square feet. Each school across the district was visited three times during the Facility Condition Assessments by three teams of specialists in the spring/summer of 2016.

For master planning purposes a 5-year need was developed to provide an understanding of the current need as well as the projected needs in the near future. For Rockwell School the 5-year need is $4,042,956. The findings contained within this report resulted from an assessment of building systems performed by building professionals experienced in disciplines including: architecture, mechanical, plumbing, electrical, acoustics, hazardous materials, and technology infrastructure.

Figure 1: Aerial view of Rockwell School

Introduction

Rockwell School serves grades KG - 5, has 18 instructional spaces, and has an enrollment of 278. Instructional spaces are defined as rooms in which a student receives education. The LEA reported capacity for Rockwell School is 312 with a resulting utilization of 89%.

2M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Rockwell School

Approach and MethodologyA facility condition assessment evaluates each building’s overall condition. Two components of the facility condition assessment are combined to total the cost for facility need. The two components of the facility condition assessment are current deficiencies and life cycle forecast.

Current Deficiencies: Deficiencies are items in need of repair or replacement as a result of being broken, obsolete, or beyond useful life. The existing deficiencies that currently require correction are identified and assigned a priority. An example of a current deficiency might include a broken lighting fixture or an inoperable roof top air conditioning unit.

Life Cycle Forecast: Life cycle analysis evaluates ages of a building's systems to forecast system replacement as they reach the end of serviceable life. An example of a life cycle system replacement is a roof with a 20-year life that has been in place for 15 years and may require replacement in five years.

Discipline Specialists

All assessment teams produced current deficiencies associated with each school. The assessment for the school facilities at the Rhode Island Department of Education included several specialties:

Facility Condition Assessment: Architectural, mechanical, and electrical engineering professionals observed conditions via a visual observation that did not include intrusive measures, destructive investigations, or testing. Additionally, the assessment incorporated input provided by district facilities and maintenance staff where applicable. The assessment team recorded existing conditions, identified problems and deficiencies, documented corrective action and quantities, and identified the priority of the repair in accordance with parameters defined during the planning phase. The team took digital photos at each school to better identify significant deficiencies.

Technology: Technology specialists visited RIDE facilities and met with technology directors to observe and assess each facility's technology infrastructure. The assessment included network architecture, major infrastructure components, classroom instructional systems, necessary building space and support for technology. The technology assessment took into account the desired technology outcome and best practices and processes to ensure results can be attained effectively.

Hazardous Materials: Schools constructed prior to 1990 were assessed by specialists to identify the presence of hazardous materials. The team focused on identifying asbestos containing building materials (ACBMs), lead-based painted (LBP) areas, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs). As part of an indoor air and exterior air quality assessment, the team noted evidence of mold, water intrusion, mercury, and oil and hazardous materials (OHMs) exposure. If sampling and analysis was required, these activities were recommended but not included in the scope of work.

Traffic: A traffic specialist performed an in-office review of aerial imagery of the traffic infrastructure around the facilities in accordance with section 1.05-7 in the Rhode Island School Construction Regulations and reviewed data collected on site during the facility condition assessment. Based on this information, deficiencies and corrective actions were identified. High problem areas were identified for consideration of more detailed site-specific study and analysis in the future.

Acoustics: Specialists assessed each school's acoustics, including architectural acoustics, mechanical system noise and vibration, and environmental noise. The assessment team evaluated room acoustics with particular attention to the intelligibility of speech in learning spaces, interior and exterior sound isolation, and mechanical system noise and vibration control.

Educational Program Space Assessment: Teams evaluated schools to ensure that that all spaces adequately support the districts educational program. Standards are established for each classroom type or instructional space. Each space is evaluated to determine if it meets those standards and a listing of alterations that should be made to make the space a better environment for teaching and learning was created.

3M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Rockwell School

System Summaries

Building Envelope

The exterior systems for the building(s) at this campus includes:01 - Main Building: Brick Exterior Wall

Vinyl on Wood Frame Exterior WindowsSteel Exterior Entrance DoorsStorefront Entrance Doors

The roofing for the building(s) at this campus consists of:01 - Main Building: Composition Shingle Roofing

EPDM RoofingCanopy Roofing

Site

The site level systems for this campus include:Site Asphalt Parking Lot Pavement

Asphalt Roadway PavementAsphalt Pedestrian Pavement

Interior

The interior systems for the building(s) at this campus include:01 - Main Building: Wood Interior Doors

Overhead Interior Coiling DoorsInterior Door Hardware Suspended Acoustical Grid SystemSuspended Acoustical Ceiling TileCeramic Tile WallAcoustical Wall PanelingInterior Wall PaintingConcrete FlooringCeramic Tile FlooringVinyl Composition Tile FlooringCarpet

Mechanical

The mechanical systems for the building(s) at this campus include:

01 - Main Building: 1,275 MBH Cast Iron Water Boiler Steam/Hot Water Heating Unit Vent

The following tables summarize major building systems at the Rockwell School campus, identified by discipline and building.

4M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Rockwell School

01 - Main Building: Pneumatic Heating System ControlsWindow Units5 HP VFD 2-Pipe Hot Water Hydronic Distribution System 5 HP Pump Fire Sprinkler System

Electrical

The electrical systems for the building(s) at this campus include:01 - Main Building: 800 Amp Distribution Panel

Panelboard - 120/208 125APanelboard - 120/208 225ALight Fixtures Building Mounted Lighting Fixtures Canopy Mounted Lighting Fixtures

Plumbing

The plumbing systems for the building(s) at this campus include:01 - Main Building: 400 Gallon Electric Water Heater

Domestic Water Piping System Classroom LavatoriesMop/Service SinksRefrigerated Drinking FountainRestroom LavatoriesToiletsUrinalsAir Compressor (1 hp)

5M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Rockwell School

Facility Deficiency Priority Levels

Deficiencies were ranked according to five priority levels, with Priority 1 items being the most critical to address:

Priority 1 – Mission Critical Concerns: Deficiencies or conditions that may directly affect the school’s ability to remain open or deliver the educational curriculum. These deficiencies typically relate to building safety, code compliance, severely damaged or failing building components, and other items that require near-term correction. An example of a Priority 1 deficiency is a fire alarm system replacement.

Priority 2 – Indirect Impact to Educational Mission: Items that may progress to a Priority 1 item if not addressed in the near term. Examples of Priority 2 deficiencies include inadequate roofing that could cause deterioration of integral building systems, and conditions affecting building envelopes, such as roof and window replacements.

Priority 3 – Short-Term Conditions: Deficiencies that are necessary to the school's mission but may not require immediate attention. These items should be considered necessary improvements required to maximize facility efficiency and usefulness. Examples of Priority 3 items include site improvements and plumbing deficiencies.

Priority 4 – Long-Term Requirements: Items or systems that may be considered improvements to the instructional environment. The improvements may be aesthetic or provide greater functionality. Examples include cabinets, finishes, paving, removal of abandoned equipment, and educational accommodations associated with special programs.

Priority 5 – Enhancements: Deficiencies aesthetic in nature or considered enhancements. Typical deficiencies in this priority include repainting, replacing carpet, improved signage, or other improvements to the facility environment.

6M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Rockwell School

Table 1: System by Priority

Priority

System 1 2 3 4 5 Total % of Total

Site - - - $136,775 $69,827 $206,602 7.08 %

Roofing - $184,594 - - - $184,594 6.32 %

Structural - - - - - $0 0.00 %

Exterior - - - - - $0 0.00 %

Interior - - $26,156 $300,374 $172,894 $499,424 17.11 %

Mechanical - $225,079 $101,519 $197,237 - $523,836 17.94 %

Electrical - - - - $35,731 $35,731 1.22 %

Plumbing - $61,118 $234,940 $44,264 $16,527 $356,849 12.22 %

Fire and Life Safety $85,585 - - - - $85,585 2.93 %

Technology - - $1,022,437 - - $1,022,437 35.02 %

Conveyances - - - - - $0 0.00 %

Specialties - - $4,563 - - $4,563 0.16 %

Total $85,585 $470,791 $1,389,615 $678,650 $294,979 $2,919,621

*Displayed totals may not sum exactly due to mathematical rounding

The following chart summarizes this site's current deficiencies by building system and priority. The listing details current deficiencies including deferred maintenance, functional deficiencies, code compliance, capital renewal, hazardous materials and technology categories.

The building systems with the most need include:Technology - $1,022,437Mechanical - $523,836Interior - $499,424

The chart below represents the building systems and associated deficiency costs.

Figure 2: System Deficiencies

7M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Rockwell School

Current Deficiencies by Category

Deficiencies have been further grouped according to the observed category.

• Acoustics deficiencies relate to room acoustics, sound insolation, and mechanical systems and vibration control modeled after ANSI/ASA Standard S12.60-2010 and ASHRAE Handbook, Chapter 47 on Sound and Vibration Control.

• Barrier to Accessibility deficiencies relate to the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Rhode Island Governors Commission on Disability. Additional items related to accessibility may be included other categories.

• Capital Renewal items have reached or exceeded serviceable life and require replacement. These are current and do not include life cycle capital renewal forecasts. Also included are deficiencies correcting planned work postponed beyond its regular life expectancy.

• Code Compliance deficiencies related to current codes. Many may fall under grandfather clauses, which allow buildings to continue operating under codes effective at the time of construction. However, there are instances where the level of renovation requires full compliance which are reflected in the master plan.

• Educational Adequacy deficiencies identify where facilities do not align with the Basic Education Program and the RIDE School Construction Regulations. • Functional Deficiencies are deficiencies for components or systems that have failed before the end of expected life or are not the right application, size, or design.

• Hazardous Materials include deficiencies for building systems or components containing potentially hazardous material. The team focused on identifying asbestos containing building materials (ACBMs), lead based painted (LBP) areas, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs). As part of an indoor air and exterior air quality assessment, the team noted evidence of mold, water intrusion, mercury, and oil and hazardous materials (OHMs) exposure. With other scopes of work there may be other costs associated with hazardous materials.

• Technology deficiencies relate to network architecture, technology infrastructure, classroom systems, and support. Examples of technology deficiencies include: security cameras, secure electronic access, telephone handsets, and dedicated air conditioning for telecommunication rooms.

• Traffic deficiencies relate to vehicle or pedestrian traffic, such as bus loops, crosswalks, and pavement markings.

8M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Rockwell School

Table 2: Deficiency Category by PriorityPriority

Category 1 2 3 4 5 Total

Acoustics - - $101,519 - - $101,519

Barrier to Accessibility - - - - - $0

Capital Renewal - $470,791 $261,095 $355,878 $172,894 $1,260,659

Code Compliance $85,585 - - - - $85,585

Educational Adequacy - - $4,563 $303,401 $122,085 $430,050

Functional Deficiency - - - $11,861 - $11,861

Hazardous Material - - - $7,511 - $7,511

Technology - - $1,022,437 - - $1,022,437

Traffic - - - - - $0

Total $85,585 $470,791 $1,389,615 $678,650 $294,979 $2,919,621

*Displayed totals may not sum exactly due to mathematical rounding

The following chart and table represent the deficiency category by priority. This listing includes current deficiencies for all building systems.

9M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Rockwell School

Life Cycle Capital Renewal Projections

System Current DeficienciesYear 12017

Year 22018

Year 32019

Year 42020

Year 52021 LC Yr. 1-5 Total Total 5-Year Need

Site $206,602 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $206,602

Roofing $184,594 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $184,594

Structural $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Exterior $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Interior $499,424 $0 $0 $0 $219,087 $637,884 $856,971 $1,356,395

Mechanical $523,836 $0 $0 $0 $19,060 $12,024 $31,084 $554,920

Electrical $35,731 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $35,731

Plumbing $356,849 $0 $162,645 $5,153 $0 $0 $167,798 $524,647

Fire and Life Safety $85,585 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $85,585

Technology $1,022,437 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,022,437

Conveyances $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Specialties $4,563 $0 $0 $0 $0 $61,006 $61,006 $65,569

Total $2,919,621 $0 $162,645 $5,153 $238,147 $710,914 $1,116,859 $4,036,480

*Displayed totals may not sum exactly due to mathematical rounding

Life Cycle Capital Renewal ForecastDuring the facility condition assessment, assessors inspected all major building systems. If a need for immediate replacement was identified, a deficiency was created with the estimated repair costs. The identified deficiency contributes to the facility's total current repair costs.

Capital planning scenarios span multiple years, as opposed to being constrained to immediate repairs. Construction projects may begin several years after the initial facility condition assessment. Therefore, in addition to the current year repair costs, it is necessary to forecast the facility's future costs using a 5-year life cycle renewal forecast model.

Life cycle renewal is the projection of future building system costs based upon each individual system’s expected serviceable life. Building systems and components age over time, eventually break down, reach the end of their useful lives, and may require replacement. While an item may be in good condition now, it might reach the end of its life before a planned construction project occurs.

The following chart shows all current deficiencies and the subsequent 5-year life cycle capital renewal projections. The projections outline costs for major building systems in which a component is expected to reach the end of its useful life and require capital funding for replacement.

Table 3: Capital Renewal Forecast

10M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Rockwell School

Facility Condition Index (FCI)The Facility Condition Index (FCI) is used throughout the facility condition assessment industry as a general indicator of a building’s health. Since 1991, the facility management industry has used an index called the FCI to benchmark the relative condition of a group of schools. The FCI is derived by dividing the total repair cost, including educational adequacy and site-related repairs, by the total replacement cost. A facility with a higher FCI percentage has more need, or higher priority, than a facility with a lower FCI. It should be noted that costs in the New Construction category are not included in the FCI calculation.

For master planning purposes, the total current deficiencies and the first five years of projected life cycle needs were combined. This provides an understanding of the current needs of a facility as well as the projected needs in the near future. A 5-year FCI was calculated by dividing the 5-year need by the total replacement cost. Costs associated with new construction are not included in the FCI calculation.

Figure 5: 5-Year FCI

Financial modeling has shown that over a 30-year period, it is more cost effective to replace than repair schools with a FCI of 65 percent or greater. This is due to efficiency gains with facilities that are more modern and the value of the building at the end of the analysis period. It is important to note that the FCI at which a facility should be considered for replacement is typically debated and adjusted based on property owners and facility managers approach to facility management. Of course, FCI is not the only factor used to identify buildings that need renovation, replacement, or even closure. Historical significance, enrollment trends, community sentiment, and the availability of capital are additional factors that are analyzed when making school facility decisions.

The replacement value represents the estimated cost of replacing the current building with another building of like size, based on today’s estimated cost of construction in the Providence, Rhode Island area. The estimated replacement cost for this facility is $10,220,000. For planning purposes, the total 5-year need at the Rockwell School is $4,042,956 (Life Cycle Years 1-5 plus the FCI deficiency cost). The Rockwell School facility has a 5-year FCI of 39.50%.

It is important to reiterate that this FCI replacement threshold is not conclusive, but is intended to initiate planning discussion in which other relevant issues with regard to a facility’s disposition must be incorporated. This merely suggests where conversations regarding replacement might occur.

11M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Rockwell School

The capacity of a school reflects how many students the school’s physical facility can effectively serve. There are various methodologies that exist to calculate capacity. It is not uncommon to review an existing building only to find that the capacity that had once been assigned is greater than what can be reasonably accommodated today. This is primarily because of a change in how programs are delivered.

The Rhode Island Aspirational Capacity is based on the Rhode Island School Construction Regulations (SCRs) and is an aspirational goal of space use. The capacity for each individual public school in the state of Rhode Island was designed to conform to Section 1.06-2 Space Allowance Guidelines of the Rhode Island Department of Education (RIDE) SCRs. These regulations outline the allowed gross square feet (GSF) per student at each school type (ES, MS, HS) by utilizing a sliding scale based on projected enrollment. The resulting capacities reflect how school capacities align to the SCRs for new construction. The existing enrollment was multiplied by the GSF per student for the appropriate bracket. For the purposes of this analysis, Pre-K centers were rolled into the elementary totals, and K-8 facilities were counted as middle schools.

The most consistent and equitable way a state can determine school capacities across a variety of districts and educational program offerings is to use square-foot-per-student standards. In contrast, in the 2013 Public Schoolhouse Assessment Report, LEAs self-reported capacities for their elementary, middle and high schools. Districts typically report “functional capacity,” which is defined as the number of students each classroom can accommodate. Functional capacity counts how many students can occupy a space, not how much room students and teachers have within that space. For example, a 650-square-foot classroom and a 950-square-foot classroom can both have a reported capacity of 25 students, but the actual teaching and learning space per student varies greatly.

The variation in square feet per student impacts the kinds of teaching practices possible in each space. The lowest allocation of space per student restricts group and project-based learning strategies and requires teachers to teach in more traditional, lecture-style formats, due to a lack of space. Furthermore, the number of students that can be accommodated in a classroom does not account for access to sufficient common spaces such as libraries, cafeterias, and gymnasiums. When cafeterias are undersized relative to the population, schools must host four or more lunch periods a day, resulting in some students eating lunch mid-morning and some mid-afternoon. Similarly, undersized libraries and gymnasiums create scheduling headaches for schools and restrict student access. Finally, a classroom count-only approach to school capacity does not consider the inherent scheduling challenges schools face.

Rhode Island Aspirational Capacity

Applying the Rhode Island Aspirational Capacity, a facility of this size could ideally support an enrollment of approximately 162 students.

As part of the Educational Program Space Assessment, select core spaces were compared to the RI School Construction Regulations. If it was determined that a facility was in need of square footage related to a cafeteria or library/media center, a cost for additional space was estimated. This cost is not included in the total 5-year need or the 5-year FCI calculation.

Facility New Construction

The New Construction cost to bring the Rockwell School cafeteria and/or library/media center to the size prescribed by the SCRs is estimated to be $0.

12M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Rockwell School

Table 4: Facility Condition by Building

Gross Sq Ft Year BuiltCurrent

Deficiencies LC Yr. 1-5 TotalTotal 5 Yr Need

(Yr 1-5 + Current Defs) 5-Year FCI

Rockwell School Totals 29,200 1951 $2,926,097 $1,116,859 $4,042,956 39.50%

*Displayed totals may not sum exactly due to mathematical rounding

The following pages provide a listing of all current deficiencies and 5-year life cycle need and the associated costs, followed by photos taken during the assessment.

The Rockwell School comprises 29,200 square feet and was constructed in 1951. Current deficiencies at this school total $2,926,097. Five year capital renewal costs total $1,116,859. The total identified need for the Rockwell School (current deficiencies and 5-year capital renewal costs) is $4,042,956. The 5-year FCI is 39.50%.

Summary of Findings

Cost estimates are derived from local cost estimating expertise and enhanced by industry best practices, historical cost data, and relevance to the Rhode Island region. Costs have been developed from current market rates as of the 2nd quarter in 2016. All costs are based on a replace-in-kind approach, unless the item was not in compliance with national or state regulations or standards. For planning and budgeting purposes, facility assessments customarily add a soft cost multiplier onto deficiency repair cost estimates. This soft cost multiplier accounts for costs that are typically incurred when contracting for renovation and construction services. Soft costs typically include construction cost factors, such as contractor overhead and profit, as well as labor and material inflation, professional fees, and administrative costs. Based on the Rhode Island School Construction Regulations, a soft cost multiplier of 20% is included on all cost estimates. Other project allowances are included in the cost estimates based on school attributes such as age, location, and historic designation. All stated costs in the assessment report will include soft costs for planning and budgeting purposes. These are estimates, and costs will vary at the time of construction.

Cost Estimating

13M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Rockwell School

Site Level DeficienciesSiteDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

Asphalt Paving Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 33 CAR 4 $108,446 8789

Note: cracks and alligatoring

Backstops Require Replacement Educational Adequacy

1 Ea. 4 $28,329 28407

Note: Backstops Require Replacement

Exterior Basketball Goals are Required Educational Adequacy

1 Ea. 5 $5,807 28689

Note: Exterior Basketball Goals are Required

PE / Recess Playfield is Missing and is Needed Educational Adequacy

1 Ea. 5 $64,020 54860

Note: PE / Recess Playfield is Missing and is Needed

Sub Total for System 4 items $206,602

Sub Total for School and Site Level 4 items $206,602

Building: 01 - Main BuildingRoofingDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

EPDM Roofing Requires Replacement (Bldg SF) Capital Renewal 14,599 SF 2 $184,594 9226

Note: Inaccessible due to snow. Evidence of leaks present inside the building.

Sub Total for System 1 items $184,594

InteriorDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

The Vinyl Composition Tile Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 2,280 SF 3 $26,156 8790

Note: Lounge has chipped VCT, north corridor has curled and loose tiles, cracked VCT outside room 4

Ceiling Grid Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 500 SF 4 $5,930 8800

Note: Stained tiles in library, room 5, room 8, office, several corridors.

Ceiling Grid Requires Replacement Functional Deficiency 1,000 SF 4 $11,861 8801

Note: Water leak in girls restroom next to room 17 damaging tile.

Paint (probable pre-1978 in base layer(s)) - damaged area < 9 sq. ft. OR overall worn AND in children-accessible area (measurement unit - each)

Hazardous Material 8 Ea. 4 $2,282 Rollup

Paint (probable pre-1978 in base layer(s)) - damaged area < 9 sq. ft. OR overall worn AND in children-accessible area (measurement unit - square feet)

Hazardous Material 550 SF 4 $5,229 Rollup

Room Lighting Is Inadequate Or In Poor Condition. Educational Adequacy

7,219 SF 4 $275,072 Rollup

Interior Walls Require Repainting (Bldg SF) Capital Renewal 26,167 SF 5 $172,894 Rollup

Sub Total for System 7 items $499,424

MechanicalDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

The Mechanical / HVAC Piping / System Is Beyond Its Useful Life Capital Renewal 29,200 SF 2 $225,079 8795

Unit Ventilators Are Excessively Noisy Acoustics 16 Ea. 3 $101,519 27968

Location: Classrooms

Existing Controls Are Inadequate And Should Be Replaced With DDC Controls Capital Renewal 29,200 SF 4 $197,237 8798

Note: Need to be upgraded to digital, past life expectancy

Sub Total for System 3 items $523,836

ElectricalDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

Room Has Insufficient Electrical Outlets Educational Adequacy

72 Ea. 5 $35,731 Rollup

Sub Total for System 1 items $35,731

PlumbingDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

The Electric Water Heater Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 1 Ea. 2 $61,118 8803

Note: Replace 530 gallon storage water heater

The Plumbing / Domestic Water Piping System Is Beyond Its Useful Life Capital Renewal 29,200 SF 3 $234,940 8794

14M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Rockwell School

PlumbingDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

The Refrigerated Water Cooler Requires Replacement Capital Renewal 6 Ea. 4 $44,264 8793

Room lacks a drinking fountain. Educational Adequacy

9 Ea. 5 $9,925 Rollup

The Class Room Lavatories Plumbing Fixtures Are Missing And Should Be Installed Educational Adequacy

6 Ea. 5 $6,601 Rollup

Sub Total for System 5 items $356,849

Fire and Life SafetyDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

Fire Alarm Is Missing Or Inadequate (NFPA 72 and NFPA 101, Section 9.6) Code Compliance 29,200 SF 1 $85,585 8791

Sub Total for System 1 items $85,585

TechnologyDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

Technology: Campus network switching electronics are antiquated and/or do not meet standards.

Technology 120 Ea. 3 $57,042 18420

Technology: Campus wireless infrastructure inadequate. Technology 26 Ea. 3 $34,605 18421

Technology: Classroom AV/Multimedia systems are inadequate and/or near end of useful life.

Technology 21 Ea. 3 $419,257 18426

Technology: Classroom AV/Multimedia systems are inadequate and/or near end of useful life.

Technology 1 Ea. 3 $19,965 18428

Technology: Instructional spaces do not have local sound reinforcement. Technology 22 Ea. 3 $104,577 18431

Technology: Main Telecommunications Room ground system is inadequate or non-existent. Technology 1 Ea. 3 $6,655 18418

Technology: Main Telecommunications Room is not dedicated. Room requires partial walls and/or major improvements.

Technology 1 Ea. 3 $42,591 18416

Technology: Main Telecommunications Room UPS does not meet standards, is inadequate, or non-existent.

Technology 1 Ea. 3 $9,032 18417

Technology: Network cabling infrastructure is outdated (Cat 5 or less) and/or does not meet standards.

Technology 48 Ea. 3 $20,535 18422

Technology: Network cabling infrastructure is partially outdated and/or needs expansion. Technology 72 Ea. 3 $30,803 18427

Technology: Network system inadequate and/or near end of useful life Technology 25 Ea. 3 $118,837 18430

Technology: PA/Bell/Clock system is inadequate and/or near end of useful life. Technology 29,200 SF 3 $49,969 18429

Technology: Special Space AV/Multimedia system is inadequate. Technology 1 Ea. 3 $54,190 18423

Technology: Telecommunications Room (large size room) needs dedicated cooling system improvements.

Technology 1 Ea. 3 $7,606 18419

Technology: Telephone handsets are inadequate and sparsely deployed throughout the campus.

Technology 26 Ea. 3 $39,549 18424

Technology: Telephone system is inadequate and/or non-existent. Technology 1 Ea. 3 $7,225 18425

Sub Total for System 16 items $1,022,437

SpecialtiesDeficiency Category Qty UoM Priority Repair Cost ID

Room has insufficient writing area. Educational Adequacy

1 Ea. 3 $4,563 Rollup

Sub Total for System 1 items $4,563

Sub Total for Building 01 - Main Building 35 items $2,713,018

Total for Campus 39 items $2,919,621

15M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Rockwell School

Rockwell School - Life Cycle Summary Yrs 1-5Building: 01 - Main Building

InteriorUniformat Description LC Type Description Qty UoM Repair Cost Remaining Life

Resilient Flooring Vinyl Composition Tile Flooring 19,098 SF $219,087 4

Resilient Flooring Vinyl Composition Tile Flooring 2,335 SF $26,787 5

Note: Sheet

Acoustical Suspended Ceilings Ceilings - Acoustical Grid System 29,200 SF $346,327 5

Acoustical Suspended Ceilings Ceilings - Acoustical Tiles 29,200 SF $263,723 5

Wall Paneling Acoustical Panel Wall 114 SF $1,047 5

Sub Total for System 5 items $856,971

MechanicalUniformat Description LC Type Description Qty UoM Repair Cost Remaining Life

Facility Hydronic Distribution Pump - 5HP 2 Ea. $19,060 4

Other HVAC Distribution Systems VFD (5 HP) 2 Ea. $12,024 5

Sub Total for System 2 items $31,084

PlumbingUniformat Description LC Type Description Qty UoM Repair Cost Remaining Life

Plumbing Fixtures Classroom Lavatories 17 Ea. $46,223 2

Plumbing Fixtures Restroom Lavatories 21 Ea. $66,802 2

Plumbing Fixtures Toilets 16 Ea. $45,633 2

Plumbing Fixtures Urinals 3 Ea. $3,987 2

Plumbing Fixtures Mop/Service Sinks 2 Ea. $5,153 3

Sub Total for System 5 items $167,798

SpecialtiesUniformat Description LC Type Description Qty UoM Repair Cost Remaining Life

Casework Lockers 124 Ea. $61,006 5

Sub Total for System 1 items $61,006

Sub Total for Building 01 - Main Building 13 items $1,116,859

Total for: Rockwell School 13 items $1,116,859

16M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Rockwell School

Supporting Photos

Site Aerial

Restroom Paint

530 Gallon Water Heater

Playground

17M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Rockwell School

Gym

Typical Classroom

Lockers

Front Elevation

Library

Sidewalk

18M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Rockwell School

Main Entry

VCT North Corridor

VCT Outside Room 4

Kitchen

Cracks

Typical Restroom

19M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Rockwell School

Piping

Stained Tile

Cracks

VCT In Lounge

Piping

Typical Corridor Paint

20M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Rockwell School

Typical Corridor

Cabinet Unit Ventilator

Stained Tile

Water Leak In Girls Restroom

21M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Jacobs 2017

Facility Condition AssessmentBristol Warren - Rockwell School