Bheemdatta Municipality Resettlement Plan

Resettlement Plan

Project Number: 47252-002

December 2020

NEPAL: Regional Urban Development Project

Upgrading and Rehabilitation of Urban Road and Drainage in Bheemdatta

Municipality

Prepared by the Government of Nepal for the Asian Development Bank.

This resettlement plan is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature.

Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section of this website.

In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.

http://www.adb.org/terms-use

http://www.adb.org/terms-use

i

Table of Contents ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................... iii

WEIGHTS AND MEASURES ................................................................................. iv

GLOSSARY OF NEPALI TERMS............................................................................ iv

Glossary of Terms .................................................................................................... v

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.......................................................................................... 1

I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ........................................................................... 6 A. Introduction ..................... ....................................................... ........ 6 B. Sub-project Description and Proposed Components .............................. 7 C. Measures to Avoid or Minimize Impact ................................................... 13 D. Scope and Objectives of RP.............................................................. 17

II. SCOPE OF LAND ACQUISTION AND RESETTLEMENT IMPACTS ................ 21

A. Beneficial Impact of the Sub-project ........................................................ 21

B. Scope of Land Acquisition....................................................................... 21 C. Summary of Impact .................................................................................. 30 D. Indigenous Peoples ......................................................................... 32 E. Impact Category of the Subproject ................................................... 33

III. SOCIO-ECONOMIC INFORMATION AND PROFILE ....................................... 34

IV. INFORMATION DISCLOSURE, CONSULTATION AND PARTICIPATION ..... 40

A. Community & Stakeholder Consultations ............................................. 40 B. Information Disclosure and Dissemination ........................................... 42 C. Future Consultations and Participation ................................................ 43

V. GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISMS ........................................................ 45

VI. LEGAL FRAMEWORK .................................................................................... 47

A. The Constitution ................................................................................... 47 B. Land Acquisition Act, 2034 (1977) ....................................................... 47 C. Land Reform Act 2021 (1964) .............................................................. 48

D. Local Government Operation Act, 2074................................................. 48 E. Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Policy (LARRP) .. 49 F. Policies and Act related to Indigenous Peoples ..................................... 51 G. ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement 2009 ............................................ 52 H. ADB’s Policy on Indigenous Peoples (SPS 2009) ............................ 53 I. Measures for Bridging Gaps between ADB and GON Policies ............ 53

VII. ENTITLEMENT, ASSISTANCE AND BENEFITS.................................... 55 A. Entitlement Policy................................................................................. 55 B. Entitlement Matrix ................................................................................ 56

ii

VIII. RESETTLEMENT BUDGET AND FINANCING PLAN ...................... 62

A. Dismantling, Rehabilitation / Maintenance Cost....................................... 62 B. Reinstatement / Protection for Public / Community Properties .................. 62 C. Rehabilitation Allowances.................................................................. 62 D. RP Implementation and Management Cost ......................................... 62 E. Contingencies ....................................................................................... 63 F. Total Cost Estimate ............................................................................. 63 G. Financing Plan ......................................................................................... 63

IX. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS......................................................... 64 X. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE................................................................. 66 XI. MONITORING AND REPORTING............................................................. 67

Annexes ..................................................................................................... 70 Annex-1: List of Consulted Persons and Inventory of Loss Annex-2: Demographic and Economic Information of Affected Households Annex-3 (A): Land Ownership and Impact on Land Annex-3 (B): Minimum Land Rate and Current Market Price of Land Annex 4: Minutes of Meeting Annex-5(A): Third Party Verification Letter Annex-5(B): Individual Consent of Affected Owners

iii

ABBREVIATIONS

ADB Asian Development Bank AH Affected Household AP Affected Person BPL Below Poverty Level CBO Community Based Organizations CDC Compensation Determination Committee CDO Chief District Officer CFC Compensation Fixation Committee CPR Community Property Resource CRIPP Combined Resettlement and Indigenous Peoples Plan DDC / DCC District Development Committee / District Coordination Committee DoR Department of Roads DSC Design and Supervision Consultants DUDBC Department of Urban Development and Building Construction EA Executing Agency GoN Government of Nepal GRC Grievance Redress Committee HA Hectares HH s Households IA Implementing Agency IP Indigenous People IR Involuntary Resettlement LA Land Acquisition LA Act Land Acquisition Act NGO Non-Government Organization NRs Nepalese Rupees PCO Project Coordination Office PD Project Director PISU Project Implementation Support Unit PIU Project Implementation Unit PMC Project Management Consultant PM Project Manager PPTA Project Preparatory Technical Assistance RoW Right of Way RP/IPP Resettlement Plan / Indigenous Peoples Plan R-PIU Regional Project Implementation Unit R&R Resettlement and Rehabilitation TA Technical Assistance ToR Terms of Reference WHH Women Headed Households

iv

WEIGHTS AND MEASURES

Sq.m Square meter cum Cubic meter Km Kilometer mm Millimeter

GLOSSARY OF NEPALI TERMS

Ropani Size of land parcel; 1 ropani= 16 anna (0.509ha)-508.72 sq.m Anna Size of land parcel; 1 anna= 4 paisa (0.0509ha) Paisa Size of land parcel; 1 paisa= 4 dam = 31.80 sq.m Dam Size of land parcel; 1 dam= 1.99 sq.m Bigha Size of land parcel; 1 bigha= 20 katha (0.678ha) Crore 10 million (= 100lakh) Dhur Size of land parcel; 1dhur= 0.0017ha Katha Size of land parcel; 1 katha= 20 paisa (0.0339ha) Kucchi Temporary structure e.g a rural hut made of wood, bamboo or

stone with Mud mortar and a thatched roof Lakh, lac 100,000 Pukka Structure (house/ building) with permanent roofing made of RCC/

RBC Semi- Pukka

House or building made of stone with mud mortar and clay, timber, slate or corrugated iron roofing

v

Glossary of Terms

Affected Person: In the context of involuntary resettlement, displaced persons are those who displaced physically (relocation, loss of residential land, or loss of shelter) and/or economically (loss of land, assets, access to assets, income sources, or means of livelihood) as a result of (i) involuntary acquisition of land, or (ii) involuntary restrictions on land use or on access to legally designated parks and protected areas; (iii).or any other moveable or fixed assets acquired, possessed, restricted, or otherwise adversely affected, in full or in part, permanently or temporarily

Census: Census is 100% enumeration of affected persons and to document the socio-economic status of potentially affected persons within the project footprint. The census will provide a demographic overview of the population, households' assets, source of incomes, and means of livelihood.

Compensation Determination Committee (CDC): The committee established as per Land Acquisition Act 2034 (1977) for the determination of compensation rate.

Compensation: Payment in cash or in kind in lieu of acquisition of an asset or a resource that is acquired or affected by a project.

Cut-off date: The completion date of the census that establishes the eligibility for receiving compensation and resettlement assistance by the project affected persons. For land, the cut-of date will be the date of notice published by the CDC.

Dalits: The group of people defined and recognized by National Dalit Commission. The word is usually designated for a group of people belonging to the so-called lower castes, many of whom are traditionally regarded as 'untouchable'.

Grievance Redress Committee (GRC):The committee established under the projects to document, hear, and resolve the project related grievances/concerns.

Indigenous peoples: The ethnic groups and communities having distinct social and cultural characteristics such as distinct language/mother tongue, traditional customs, cultural identity, social structure from those of dominant populations and culture. The National Foundation for Upliftment of Aadibasi/Janjati Act, 2058 (2002) has identified 59 groups as Adivasi/Janajati (or indigenous peoples or nationalities) in Nepal.

Land acquisition: The approaches (voluntary offer, negotiation, inter-agencies transfer, and expropriation) adopted to acquire land for the project components.

Rehabilitation: The allowances/assistance provided as described in the resettlement plan other than compensation of the acquired property.

Relocation: Physical relocation of APs permanently from their shelter.

Replacement cost: The sum of market value of the affected assets plus any transaction costs such as administrative charges, taxes, registration, and titling costs to replace the affected assets.

vi

Restoration: All the measures taken to mitigate all or any adverse impacts of the project on the APs' property and/or livelihoods including enhancement measures.

Severely affected households: The affected households (i) losing 10% or more of their total productive assets and/or income sources; (ii) requiring relocation due to the Project.

Socio-economic survey: The survey conducted to establish monitoring and evaluation parameters and establish a benchmark of socio-economic status of APs.

Vulnerable group: The vulnerable a r e individuals or groups who may experience differential adverse impacts from the proposed project more severely than dominant population because of their unique and inherit socio-economic characteristics. Typically, those households falling below poverty line 1 , the landless, household head with disability, single women headed households, Dalits, and endangered indigenous peoples.

1 NPR 31,134 person / year in 2019 (socio-economic survey year) and NPR 33,223 person / year in 2020.

This figure has been derived from per capita income NPR 19,262 person / year estimated by Nepal Living Standards Survey (CBS, 2010/2011) adjusting Nepal Rastra Bank’s annual inflation rate from 2012 to 2020

1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1. Regional Urban Development Project (RUDP) has been implemented to develop urban infrastructure as well as to strengthen urban sector institutions. The broader goal of the project is to uplift the standard of living of the people; and the objective is to achieve socio-economic transformation in the project municipalities through managed urbanization. The 8 Project Municipalities are Dhangadhi, Bheemdutta, Godawari & Suklaphanta of P7 (now Sudurpaschim) and Biratnagar, Birgunj, Siddarthanagar & Nepalgunj of non P7. The project will improve infrastructure and service delivery in urban roads, drainage and integrated waste management in project municipalities; as well as construction of municipal office building in Suklaphnata and Godawari municipalities. For implementation of the project Government of Nepal (GoN) has received financial assistance from the Asian Development Bank (ADB). Loan No. 3566 for US$ 150 million was approved on 22 September 2017, signed on 27 November 2017 and became effective on 8 December 2017. 2. This document is a Resettlement Plan (RP) for Urban Roads and Drainage component in Bheemdatta municipality under RUDP. This sub-project includes rehabilitation and upgrading of existing road and drainage. The main objective of the RP is to identify impacts and to propose suitable mitigation measures to address the various losses due to the subproject activities. The RP has been prepared based on the detailed engineering design. The major components of the sub-project are urban road, drainage, foot path and road furniture. The RP follows Combined Resettlement and Indigenous People Planning Framework (CRIPPF) prepared by ADB for RUDP and guided by the ADB Safeguard Policy Statement 2009 and other relevant policies and guidelines of Nepal. 3. Considering the budget constraint and magnitude of impacts on public and private structures, the municipality has prioritized the road and drainage improvement works. Meeting held among Bheemdatt Municipality official, R-PIU, PMC and DSC on 30th April, 2019 has selected the most prioritized road that will go under construction. Accordingly out of total 36.6 km road recommended by PPTA, 14.014 km will go under construction in phase-I under the project scope. Therefore, this RP has been prepared for improvement of Phase-I road and drainage in Bhamdatta under RUDP. 4. The loss inventory prepared during project screening stage reveals that there would be severe impacts on the public and private properties, if road and drainage are designed based on the RoW recommended by municipal transportation master plan (MTMP). Therefore, magnitude of the impact was tested out with different road width options and appropriate design width was chosen with proper consultation with municipality in order to avoid or minimize the losses. Different alternatives were discussed and agreed to adopt design width based on the actual available width of existing roads so that the major construction activities could be carried out without impacting the structural element of the houses. Accordingly the detailed design of the road finalized based on alternative agreed to avoid loss and with minimum impact. 5. This Resettlement Plan (RP) aims to explore the measures to avoid or minimize the losses of private and public properties as far as possible. The likely affected local people/ families and communities residing along the proposed road alignment were consulted during socio-economic household survey so that they can have informed choice of the

2

project design. The affected person have chosen the design option resulting partial impact on their structures without affecting structural element of their house and they agreed for offering donation voluntary in case of unavoidable minor loss of land and structures. This RP therefore, focuses on the assessment of eligibility criteria for voluntary donation and ensure willingness of affected owners. 6. Altogether 628 structures will be affected, which include the projected temporary shed in front part of the house locally known as Chhaja, house peti (apron) or boundary wall of 619 private houses, 1 school, 4 Government offices and 4 public/community properties (temple, chautara). As such total 3740 individuals living in 619 households are identified as affected persons due to the sub-project. Out of them 1965 (52.54 %) are male and 1777 (47.46 %) are female with sex ratio 1.11. The average household size of the affected owners is 6.25. The findings of field survey and loss inventory signify that there would not be physical displacement and the affected persons would loss less than 10 % of their productive asset. Hence, none of them are severely affected persons. 7. Based on eligibility criteria for voluntary donation as specified in CRIPPF, the project will accept self-declaration of voluntary donation of partial structures and clearance of municipal right of way. The offer has been considered in condition of; i) the voluntary offer is of small strips of land, ii) it will not result in permanent and significant loss/impact on income and livelihood of the owner, iii) road improvement and other project activities will directly benefit the owners, iv) meaningful consultation was carried out to finalize the design, v) land owners agree and their voluntary offer without coercion is documented, and vi) the donor is not categorized as poor or vulnerable. Based on these criteria, the affected owners are eligible for voluntary offer and also are willing for voluntary donation of affected minor structures or lands located within the adopted design width. The Individual consent of the affected owners has been collected and attached in Annex-5. 8. Since there will be partial dismantling of the projected structures located within the adopted design width and main structures remain unaffected, there would not be relocation impacts (displacement of residential houses). There would be nominal economic displacement as the affected parts primarily include apron (peti), temporary shed ( chhaja), boundary wall which are not contributing to the household's income. The affected owners are operating their business in main building and the land being used by affected projected structures viz. chhajja or peti is not used for business purpose. Most of the proposed roads are in city core area, which is town planning area. The Nagar Vikas Samiti has prepared Mahendranagar Town Development Master Plan in B.S 2029 (1973) and also fixed the road RoW. After fixing the road width (50 ft for North-South gully roads and 30 ft for East-West gully roads) residential plots were sold beyond this road width on both sides. The local residents have built peti (apron) and temporary shed (Chhaja) on the free space between edge of black topped (mostly drain) and their houses. Since the lands covered by the affected structures are located within the width of public road, the affected owners will loss no land. The inventory of loss indicates that the loss of land outside the town planning areas is less than 10 percent of total land owned by the affected individual household (Annex-3). The implementation of the sub-project will have more positive impacts rather than adverse impacts to the owners because the upgraded road will increase their income by expanding market as well as increase in their rental value and land price. Therefore, the

3

voluntary donation of affected minor structures and small strips of land was accepted following the provision of CRIPPF. 9. The cost for dismantling and minor maintenance works of affected structures within the design width (formation width) has been provisioned and included in BoQ. This cost primarily covers the dismantling, repair and maintenance of public and community structures. The useable material will be used for reinstatement of demolished structures. Transportation cost for disposal of unusable materials of demolished structures has also been included in BoQ. The inventory of loss prepared during design stage includes the information on type of house and current status of building along the road alignment. This information will be verified and updated during the construction, if required in order to avoid grievance particularly effect to the building due to use of heavy equipment and vibration. Some temporary impacts may arise during the construction period, and shall be addressed by the contractor complying with the combined resettlement and indigenous people planning framework (CRIPPF) prepared for the RUDP. As the proposed roads pass mostly through built up area, some temporary disturbances to businesses are anticipated for a few hours per 100-200 m section during construction of roads (preparation of base course, premix and pavement) and drainages. However, full road closure is not anticipated and these temporary disturbances will not result in physical or restriction to access to business and resources. In order to avoid and limit the disturbance to the extent possible, consultations with stakeholders will be undertaken at different locations. 10. Field consultations were undertaken especially during household survey at different locations, in particular with affected persons, and municipality representatives. Consultations with community people along the alignment of proposed road sections were carried out to get feedback on people’s perceptions of the project and suggestions. More than 600 persons were consulted during census survey of affected households and the list of them is given in Annex-1. In addition formal meetings / interactions with stakeholders including affected persons were conducted in different locations and dates. Summary such consultations is given in Table- 14 and minutes are attached in Annex-4. 11. A summary of RP including sub-project's design alternative, impacts, entitlement, budget, grievance redress mechanism and contact information will be made accessible to the affected people and stakeholders through the respective Ward Offices, Bheemdatta Municipality Office and office of R-PIU. Different design options (viz road width recommended by PPTA or municipality / MTMP, within the existing width, including no project choice) were shared with the affected local people and communities so that they can have informed choice of the project design. The detailed design of the road sections have been finalized based on the alternative agreed to avoid loss and with minimum impact. As the affected persons have chosen design option resulting partial loss of structures, the project accepts self-declaration of voluntary donation of structures and clearance of municipal right of way. Such offer has been considered only after assessment of eligibility criteria as stated in CRIPPF and willingness of affected owners for donation voluntarily. As stated in entitlement matrix there is no compensation for the donated land and self-demolition of affected structures. However, there are some provisions to mitigate the impacts such as provision of exemption of registration fees or other municipal charges, repair allowances to structure owner based on per unit rate (sq.m) as decided by municipal

4

board, exemption of 3 years’ housing tax (only for demolished building), waiver of building permission fees and taxes to rebuild affected house. 12. To keep more transparency and for further active involvement of APs and other stakeholders, the subproject information will be disseminated through disclosure of safeguard planning documents. The EA will provide relevant information (final RP endorsed by the EA and other relevant information, if required) in a timely manner. 13. The grievance redress mechanism (GRM) as proposed in CRIPPF has been established for this project. The project has established two tiers of GRM at the local (project municipality) & central (PCO) levels respectively. A municipal level GRC has been formed in Bheemdatta Municipality on 2074/10/14 BS (2018 Jan 28). The composition of the GRC is in line with PAM and CRIPPF; headed by Mayor of the municipality. The committee consists of following members:

I. Chairperson : Mr. Surendra Bista , Mayor II. Member : Project Manager, RPIU/DUDBC Dhangadhi, Kailali III. Member : to be nominated , representing Affected Person IV. Member : to be nominated , representing Affected Person V. Member Secretary: Mr. Hari Singh Dhami, Social Development Unit, Bheemdatta

Municipality.

14. The GRC will meet as needed to determine the merit of each grievance, and resolve grievances within 7 working days of receiving the complaint. Similarly, at the central level a GRC has been formed under the chairmanship of Project Director (PD) comprising of Deputy Project Director and chief of social development unit of MoUD as members. The unresolved or major issues forwarded by the Municipality level GRC will be reviewed at PCO level GRC for final solution. Decision must be made within 15 days of receipt of complaint at this level. The PCO level GRC shall refer the complaints registered at the PCO to the concerned municipality level GRC for initial hearing within 7 days of registration.

15. An aggrieved person shall have access to the country's legal system at any stage, and accessing the country's legal system can run parallel to accessing the project GRM and is not dependent on the negative outcome of the GRM. People who are, or may in the future be, adversely affected by the project and not satisfied with the established GRM may submit complaints to ADB’s Accountability Mechanism.

16. An entitlement matrix has been prepared in line with the requirements of GON and ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement (2009) on involuntary resettlement. The entitlement matrix (EM) has provisions of self-declaration of voluntary demolition of building and clearance of municipal Right of Way (ROW). The CRIPPF explains that voluntary donation is a choice of affected person who meets all eligibility criteria. As stated earlier the affected persons have chosen design option resulting partial impact on their temporary structures and they also meets all eligibility criteria. Thus the subproject will adopt voluntary donation approach for dismantling of projected structures that fall within the municipal Right of Way (ROW) as well as adopted design width without affecting the main buildings. EM has also provisions to ensure that the owners are the direct beneficiaries of the project and are willing for voluntary donation.

5

17. The total estimated resettlement budget for the implementation of this RP is NRs. 55,411,492. This cost includes all costs related to dismantling, rehabilitation and minor maintenance of affected structures within RoW, reinstatement / maintenance / protection of the affected public / community properties, RP implementation, monitoring and contingencies. The major cost related to the dismantling, reinstatement and protection of affected structures including public / community properties is included in BoQ. All the budget for implementation of the RP will be borne by the government. The MOUD, the executing agency, will ensure that adequate funds are delivered on time for timely implementation of the RP.

18. The MOUD working through its Department of Urban Development and Building Construction (DUDBC), has established a project coordination office (PCO) for the RUDP headed by a project director. The PCO is staffed with a social development/ safeguard expert under the Project Management Consultant (PMC) to ensure smooth implementation of the RP and take corrective actions if necessary. The R-PIU established in DUDBC divisional office Kailali, along with the DSC is the Implementing Agencies (IAs) for the sub-projects. The municipality has also established a project implementation support unit (PISU) for smooth implementation of the projects. The R-PIU headed by Project Manager and staffed with a social development officer is responsible for further updating and implementation of this RP. 19. A design and supervision consultant (DSC) is engaged to support the R-PIU in all its activities; and will make sure that the relevant conditions formulated in the CRIPPF and RP will be included in the tender documents, to allow the bidders to include these measures and conditions in their bids. The DSC has qualified personnel to carry out this task. The DSC will assist with any rehabilitation and resettlement to ensure that affected persons are aware of their entitlements and to ensure conformity with the project RP.

20. The project will be implemented over six years (2017-2023). Construction activities are expected to start from the first quarter of 2020. The voluntary dismantling of structures will be completed prior to handing over of subproject site and the start of civil works. This RP includes individual consent of affected owners offering voluntary donation of affected structures and land. The voluntary donation process and eligibility criteria as specified in CRIPPF have been review and verified by Municipality, RPIU and Nagarik Samaj viz Citizen Forum nominated by municipality as an independent third party. So, individual consents in this regard have been collected prior to contract award to ensure there is no outstanding issue.

21. The RP implementation will be monitored through internal monitoring systems. Internal monitoring will be the regular activity of the R-PIU and DSC, which is also in charge of implementing the RP. The R-PIU will maintain a record of all transactions in the resettlement database. The project office will be responsible to keep the record of the baseline, socio-economic and census data for field level monitoring. The PCO/DUDBC will submit semiannual internal monitoring reports of the RP implementation to ADB.

6

I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. Introduction

22. Regional Urban Development Project (RUDP) aims to develop urban infrastructure and to strengthen urban sector institutions. The broader goals are to uplift the standard of living of the people, reduce poverty and capitalize on the benefits of urbanization to support economic growth based on a sustainable development track. The services are proposed to deliver in four Municipalities of Province 7 (now Far-western Province) namely i) Dhangadhi, ii) Godavari, iii) Shuklaphanta and iv) Bheemdatta; as well as in the non-provience-7 municipalities of Biratnagar, Birgunj, Nepalgunj and Siddharthanagar. The project will improve infrastructure and service delivery in urban roads, drainage and integrated waste management in project municipalities; as well as construction of municipal office building in Suklaphnata and Godawari municipalities. For implementation of the project Government of Nepal (GoN) has received financial assistance from the Asian Development Bank (ADB). Loan No. 3566 for US$ 150 million was approved on 22 September 2017, signed on 27 November 2017 and became effective on 8 December 2017. 23. This document is a Resettlement Plan (RP) for Urban Roads and Drainage component in Bheemdatta municipality under RUDP. This sub-project includes rehabilitation and upgrading of existing road and drainage. The main objective of the RP is to identify impacts and to propose suitable mitigation measures to address the various losses due to the subproject activities. The RP has been prepared based on the detailed engineering design. The technical, financial and social feasibility of road alignment of proposed urban road and drain were assessed and it was agreed with the municipality.

7

Figure- 1: Location of Project Area

B Sub-project Description and Proposed Components

24. Bheemdatta Municipality is one of major urban centers of the Kanchanpur District of the Far-Western region as a part of Mahakali region in Terai-Madhesh plain. It lies in southern-west part of Nepal and covers an area of 171.24 square kilometer within 28015’ to 29008’ North Latitude; and 80006’ to 80015.5’ East Longitude. This municipality stands at the elevation of approximately 229 m from sea level. 25. The Project will implement urban environmental improvement, on an integrated basis, in the areas of municipal road, drainage, waste water management and solid waste management. The following table summarizes the components of urban infrastructures in Bheemdatta municipality.

8

Table 1 : Priority Urban Infrastructure Components in Bheemdatta Municipality Municipality Sector Description

Bheemdatta

Waste Water Management

Improvements of existing on-site waste water management New small bore sewerage and decentralized WWTP sites. Serving households approximately 2,000 (as per PPTA).

Solid Waste Management

Strategic waste prevention plus reduce, reuse and recycle (3R). Integrated solid waste management (ISWM) system with landfill site. Serving households approximately 10,700 (as per PPTA).

Urban Roads and Drainage

Roads and Drainage works length approximately 36.19 km (as per PPTA)

26. Among the four sub-project components under RUDP, this report covers only road and drainage sub-project in Bheemdatta municipality. The Road and Drainage improvement works initially proposed by the municipality based on PPTA recommendation is given in Table below. Table 2: Roads proposed under the project

SN Name of the Roads Length of road (Km) as per PPTA

Municipal RoW (m)

1 M1 Bhasi-Rautela Road 5 15

2 M2 Bhanuchowk-Bishnudham Road 5 15

3 M3 Shukla Phanta Marg 4 20 4 M4 Airport-Airighat Road 2.8 20 5 M5 Gaddachauki(H14)- Airighat Road 4 20

6 M6 Tintara(H14)-Ring Road-Ghadighach Road 5.5 15

7 M8 Municipal Ring Road(North-West Section) 1.5 15

8 Hospital Chowk-Traffic, SP Office

8.8 15

9 Gully No. 1, 2, 3, 4, & 5

10 Parba to 1 No. Galli-eye hospital road

11 Katan Chhetra road

12 Janaki tole Katan Chhetra road

13 Ban Karyala to Uttar Sadak

14 Campus road to Melpot road Total 36.6

9

27. Prioritized Road and Storm Water Drains: Even though the PPTA has proposed nearly 36.6 km road ( Table-2), considering the budget constraint and magnitude of impacts on private and public structures, the municipality has prioritized the road and drainage improvement works in two phases as described below. 28. The total estimated cost for road and drain as presented in Draft Detailed Design Report is about NRs. 4203.7 million but the allocated budget for Bheemdatt Municipality as per PAM is about NRs. 1770 million. Meeting held among Bheemdatta Municipality official, R-PIU, PMC and DSC to find the way out on 30th April, 2019. The meeting decided to select the most prioritized road that will go under construction. The minute of meeting is attached in Annex-4 for reference. Based on that decision, the total road and drain has been divided into two phase, Phase I and Phase II (Table-3). Road and drain under Phase I will go under construction, while the Phase II roads and drains will be constructed in future only after the management of budget. Table - 3: Phasing of Road and Drain

S.N Road Name Road Length (m) Drain Length (m)

Phase I Phase II Total Phase I Phase II Total

1 M1:Bhasi - Rautela Road 560.00 3,081.00 3,641.00

- 3,910.00 3,910.00

2 M2: Bhanuchowk - Bishnudham Road 210.00

4,675.00 4,885.00 451.00 8,247.36

8,698.36

3 M3: Shukla Phata Marga (Bhanuchowk-Madan chowk-Airport Road)

3,756.48 - 3,756.48 7,264.50 -

7,264.50

4 M4: Airport - Airighat Road 652.56

1,659.44 2,312.00 851.50 3,054.00

3,905.50 5 M5: Gaddachauki (H14) -

Airighat Road - 4,004.00 4,004.00

- 7,719.00 7,719.00

6 Tintara (H14) - Ring Road - Ghadighach Road (M6)

- 5,587.00 5,587.00

- 10,085.00 10,085.00

7 Municipal Ring Road (North-West Section) (M8)

- 1,137.00 1,137.00

- 2,229.23 2,229.23

8 Madan Chowk- Dasrat Chowk- Napi karalaya- Bhagatpur Chowk Road

1,149.70 - 1,149.70 2,165.00 -

2,165.00

9 Traffic Chowk- Dasrat Chowk- BP Chowk Road (Hospital Link Road)

596.84 - 596.84 1,170.00 -

1,170.00

10 Hotel Opera Road 190.00 90.00 280.00

380.00 154.00 534.00

11 V1: Gully No. 1 Road - Shalgadhi Road 1,102.04 - 1,102.04

1,331.00 - 1,331.00

12 V2: Gully No. 2 Road 407.92 - 407.92 392.00 -

392.00 13 V3: Gully No. 3 Road 407.37 - 407.37

389.00 - 389.00

14 V4: Gully No. 4 Road 404.75 - 404.75 387.00 -

387.00 15 V5: Gully No. 5 Road -

Campus Road 674.77 - 674.77 1,109.00 -

1,109.00 16 H1: Gully Road -1(East

West section) 298.26 - 298.26 - - -

10

S.N Road Name Road Length (m) Drain Length (m)

Phase I Phase II Total Phase I Phase II Total

17 H2: Gully Road-2 (East West section ) 297.88 - 297.88

- - -

18 H3: Hospital Road (Gully 6 to Gully 1) 290.08 - 290.08

580.00 - 580.00

19 H4: Campus Road (Janki tole) to Gully 1 284.40

195.60 480.00 580.00 380.00

960.00

20 Sarswati Tole Road 1 (East West section, Katan Area), (H5)

300.99 - 300.99 593.00 -

593.00

21 H6: Sarswati Tole Road 2 (East West section, Katan Area)

149.85 200.15 350.00

- 688.00 688.00


392.41 - 392.41 774.00 -

774.00


372.22 - 372.22 719.00 -

719.00

24 H9: Eye Hospital Road 429.83 - 429.83 838.00 -

838.00

25 H10: Hospital Road (Gully 1 to Bhagatpur Marg)

738.03 - 738.03 1,444.00 -

1,444.00

26 V6: Krishi Vikash Road (Malpot/Napi karalaya-E/W highway)

347.58 - 347.58 665.00 -

665.00

Total 14,013.96 20,629.19 34,643.15

22,083.0 36,466.59

58,549.59

29. Minor rehabilitation and improvement of first priority (Phase I) roads of total 14.014 km length (23 road sections) includes construction of urban standard road with both side drain, footpath, road furniture and street lamp. The pavement is proposed for all 14.014 km roads.

11

Figure 2: Overall Road and Drainage Plan, Bheemdatta

12

Figure 3: Overall Road and Drainage Plan of Core Area, Bheemdatta

13

(C) Measures to Avoid or Minimize Impact 30. Attentions had been given during the project preparatory and detailed design phases of the subproject to minimize the adverse impacts due to land acquisition and resettlement. Initially preliminary design was guided by municipal RoW (based on MTMP) and other design parameters recommended by PPTA team. However, considering the magnitude of impacts on private and public structures different options were discussed in consultation with municipality and R-PIU. During the design phase technical and engineering constraints were one of the major concerns during exploration of various alternative design options. Before finalizing the design different design options (within the existing width, including no project choice) were shared with the stakeholders. The affected local individuals/ families and communities were also consulted during socio-economic household survey so that they can have informed choice of the project design. Following are the general criteria adopted for the selection of the design to avoid IR impacts : Initially attempt was made in designing the urban road within municipal RoW and length

recommended by PPTA as far as possible. Where the resettlement impacts are severe then attempts have been made designing project within existing RoW and accommodate all proposed facilities within it as far as possible with proper consultation with the municipality.

The loss inventory prepared during project screening stage reveals that there would be severe impacts on the public and private properties, if road and drainage are designed based on the RoW recommended by municipal transportation master plan (MTMP). Therefore, magnitude of the impact was tested out with different road width options and appropriate design width was chosen with proper consultation with municipality in order to avoid or minimize the losses. Different alternatives were discussed and agreed to adopt design width based on the available width so that the major construction activities could be confined within the designed width without impacting the major part of the structures. Accordingly the detailed design of the road finalized based on alternative agreed to avoid loss and with minimum impact. The road section wise details of road width options and impacts are presented in Annex-4 of this report. The comparison between the impacts between municipal RoW and adopted design width as well as the measures taken to mitigate the impacts are given in Table-4 below.

Table-4: Comparison of Impacts between Municipal RoW and Adopted Design Width

S. No. Road Name

Municipal RoW and Likely Impacts

Adopted Design Width to avoid or minimize the losses

Measures taken to avoid or minimize Impacts Width

(m) Impacts Design

Width (m)Impacts

1

M1: (Bhasi Rautela Road), Total Length=3641 m, Phase I Construction Length=560 m (Chainage 0 +00 - 0+560 m)

24 Major part of 37 houses will be affected.

12 Total 5 minor structures (peti and boundary wall) of houses including one temple will be affected, but structural element of

Considering the magnitude of impact and budget constraint 12 m wide road of length 560 m road out of total 3641 m proposed length will be constructed

14

S. No. Road Name




(m) Impacts Design

Width (m)Impacts

houses will remain unaffected.

in phase I to avoid / minimize losses.

2

M2: (Bhanuchowk -Bishnudham Road), Total Length=4885 m, Phase I Construction Length= 210 m (Chainage 0+00 - 0+210)

10 Major part of 5 houses including 9 minor structures will be affected.

10 Total 9 minor structures will be affected and major part of houses will remain unaffected.

Considering the magnitude of impact and budget constraint 210 m out of total 4885 m road will be constructed.

3

M3 :Shukla Phata Marga (Bhanuchowk-Madan chowk-Airport Road), Total length=3,756.5 m, Phase I construction length=3,756.5 m

20 Total 60 houses (major part) will be affected.

34.5 m from ch. 0+00 to 0+540.39 & 12 m from ch. 0+540.39 to 0+3,756.5

19 minor structures will be affected.

Design width of the road has been reduced to 12 m to avoid or minimize the impact.

4

M4: (Airport-Airighat Road), Total Length = 2312 m, Phase I Construction Length = 652.56 m (Chainage 1+660 - 2+312)

20 Total 41 structures will be affected including major part of houses.

12 Only 4 minor structures will be affected and structural element of houses will remain unaffected.

Considering the magnitude of impact and budget constraint o652.56 m out of 2312 m road will be constructed reducing design width to 12 m.

5

V5: Gully No-5 Road(Campus Road, North-South section), Total Length = 674.77 m, Phase I Construction Length = 674.77 m

15 Total 46 houses (major part) including 103 minor structures will be affected.

12 Total 103 minor structures (Chhaja & Peti) will be affected and major element of houses will remain unaffected.

Design width has been reduced to 12 in order to minimize possible loses of private / public properties.

6

V-4: Gully No-4 Road (North-South section), Total Length = 404.75 m, Phase I Construction Length = 404.75 m


12 Total 74 minor structures (Chhaja & Peti) will be affected and major part of houses will remain unaffected.

Considering the magnitude of impact 12 m design width of the road has been adopted.

7 V-3: Gully No-3 Road (North-South section),

15 Major part of 36 houses including 64

12 Total 64 minor part (Chhaja & peti) will be

Considering the magnitude of impact 12 m

15

S. No. Road Name




(m) Impacts Design

Width (m)Impacts

Total Length=407.37m, Phase I Construction Length=407.37 m

minor structures will be affected.

affected and major part of houses will remain unaffected.

design width of the road has been adopted.

8

V-2 :Gully No-2 Road(North-south section), Total Length = 407.92 m, Phase I Construction Length = 407.92 m


12 Total 89 minor part (Chhaja & peti) will be affected and major part of houses will remain unaffected.


9

V-1: Gully No-1 Road (North-South section), Total Length = 1,102.04 m, Phase I (Construction Length =1,102.04 m

15 Total 31 houses including 98 minor structures will be affected.

12 Total 98 minor part (Chhaja & peti) will be affected and major part of houses will remain unaffected.


10

V6: Krishi Vikash Road (Malpot/Napi-Highway), Length=347.58 m

15 Minor part of 4 houses will be affected

12 Minor part of 4 houses will be affected

Considering the magnitude of impact 12 m design width of the road section has been adopted.

11

H1:(East-West Gully-1), Total Length = 298.26 m, Phase I Construction Length=298.26 m

10 21 houses (major part) including 23 minor parts will be affected.

9 Minor part of 23 houses (Chhaja & Peti) will be affected.

In order to avoid or minimize the loss 9 m design width has been adopted.

12

H2: (East-West Gully-2), Total Length = 297.88 m, Phase I Construction Length=297.88 m

10 27 houses (major part) will be affected

9 16 houses (minor part) will be affected


13

H-3: Hospital road ( East-West Gully-3), Total Length = 290 m, Phase I Construction Length =290 m

15 16 houses (major part) will be affected.

10 None In order to avoid the loss 10 m design width has been adopted.

14

H-4: East –West Gully-4 (Campus Road/Janiki Tole – Gully No-1) Total Length = 480 m, Phase I Construction

15 11 houses (major part) will be affected.

10 None In order to avoid the loss 10 m design width has been adopted.

16

S. No. Road Name




(m) Impacts Design

Width (m)Impacts

length = 284.4 m

15

H-5: Saraswoti Tole Road-1 (East- West Section, Katan Area), Total Length = 300.99 m, Phase I Construction Length=300.99 m

15 Major part of 7 houses along with 28 minor structures will be affected.

10 28 minor structures (boundary wall) will be affected.

In order to avoid or minimize the impact 10 m design width has been adopted.

16

H-6: Sarswoti Tole Road 2 (East-West section, Katan Area) , Total Length = 350 m, Phase I construction Length=150 m (ch 200-350)

15 4 houses (major part) will along with 11 minor structures be affected.


In order to avoid or minimize the impact 150 m out of 350 m length and 10 m design width has been adopted.

17

H-7: Sarswati Tole Road 3 (East West section, Katan Area), Total Length = 392.41m, Phase I Construction length=392.41 m

15 13 houses along with 29 minor structures will be affected.



18

H-8: Sarswati Tole Road 4 (East West section, Katan Area), Total length= 372.22m, Phase I Construction Length= 372.22m

15 3 houses along with 26 minor structures will be affected.



19

H-9: Eye Hospital Road, East-west Section), Total Length= 429.83 m, Phase I Construction length=429.83 m

15 3 houses including 1 boundary wall will be affected.

10 1 boundary wall will be affected.


20

H-10: (Galli 1- BP Chowk - Bhagatpur Marga), Total Length= 738.03m, Phase I Construction Width=738.03 m

15 10 houses with 13 minor structures will be affected.

10 13 minor structures (boundary wall & peti) will be affected.


21 Hotel Opera 15 18 houses 15 6 structures In order to avoid or

17

S. No. Road Name




(m) Impacts Design

Width (m)Impacts

road, Total length=280 m, Phase I construction length= 190 m (ch. 0+00 - 0+190)

and 6 other structures will be affected.

(peti & shed/shutter) will be affected.

minimize the impact 190 m out of total length 280 m road will be constructed.

22

Madan Chowk-Dashrath Chowk – Napi Kralaya - Bhagatpur Chowk Road, Total Length 1150m

15

25 houses and 6 other structures will be affected.

15 m from Dashrath Chowk to Nani Karalaya (ch: 0+00-0+750) & 12 m from Napi Karalaya to Bhagatpur (ch:0+751- 1+150)

6 structures (peti and boundary wall) will be affected.

Considering the severity of impact the design width has been reduced to 12 m for 400 m long section (Napi karalaya – Bhagatpur).

23

Traffic Chowk- Dashrat - BP Chowk Road (Hospital link Road), Length = 596.84 m

15 None 15 None

Source: Field survey, 2019

During the household census survey for socio-economic information field consultations

were made at various places along the alignment of the proposed road sections and based on people’s concerns and suggestions the design was adjusted to minimize the resettlement impacts.

(D) Scope and Objectives of RP 31. This sub-project includes rehabilitation and upgrading of existing road and drainage. The main objective of the RP is to identify impacts and to propose suitable mitigation measures to address the various losses due to the subproject activities. The RP has been prepared based on the detailed engineering design. The major components of the sub-project are urban road, drainage, foot path and road furniture. The process and methodology followed for this RP preparation include topographic field survey for obtaining screening level data i.e affected structures, field measurement and observation as well as socio-economic household survey of the affected households in order to obtain detailed information on resettlement impacts and to prepare loss inventory. Field verification and consultations with affected persons / communities residing along the alignment of proposed roads and with government line agencies were carried out and different design options were discussed. The RP follows Combined Resettlement and Indigenous People

18

Planning Framework (CRIPPF) prepared by ADB for RUDP and guided by the ADB Safeguard Policy Statement 2009, and other relevant policies and guidelines of Nepal. 32. This Resettlement Plan (RP) aims to explore the measures to avoid or minimize the losses of private and public properties as far as possible. The likely affected local people/ families and communities residing along the proposed road alignment were consulted during socio-economic household survey so that they can have informed choice of the project design. The affected persons have chosen the design option resulting partial impact on their structures without affecting structural element of their houses, and they agreed for offering donation voluntary in case of unavoidable minor loss of land and structures. This RP therefore, focuses on the assessment of eligibility criteria for voluntary donation and ensure willingness of affected owners. In this regard individual consent of affected owners has been collected and attached in Annex-5. 33. The census survey of households residing within the design width of proposed road section was carried out. Altogether 619 households were surveyed, who have built permanent or temporary structures within design width. However, only extended structures such as chhaja (shed in front part of the house), peti (apron) or boundary wall etc need to be dismantled for site clearance during construction. Road section wise details of affected structures within adopted design width to avoid or minimize the impacts are given in table below. Table -5: Summary of Impact within Design Width Adopted to Avoid or Minimize the Impact.

S. No. Road Name Number of Affected structures as per design width

Remarks

1

M1: (Bhasi Rautela Road), design width=12 m, Length=560 m (Chainage 0 +00 - 0+560 m)

Total 5 minor structures (peti and boundary wall) of houses including one temple will be affected, but structural element of houses will remain unaffected.

Considering the magnitude of impact and budget constraint 12 m wide road of length 560 m road (out of total 3641 m proposed length) will be constructed.

2

M2: (Bhanuchowk -Bishnudham Road), Design width=10m, Length= 210 m (Chainage 0+00 - 0+210)

Total 9 minor structures will be affected and major part (structural element) of houses will remain unaffected.

Considering the magnitude of impact and budget constraint 210 m out of total 4885 m road will be constructed.

3

M3 :Shukla Phata Marga (Bhanuchowk-Madan chowk-Airport Road), Design width=34.5 m from ch. 0+00 to 0+540.39 & 12 m from ch. 0+540.39 to 0+3,756.5, Length=3,756.5 m

20 minor structures will be affected.

Design width of the road has been reduced to 12 m to avoid or minimize the impact.

4 M4 (Airport-Airighat), Design width=12 m, Length = 652.56 m (Chainage 1+660 - 2+312)

Only 4 minor structures will be affected and major part of houses will remain unaffected.

Considering the magnitude of impact and budget constraint 652.56 m out of 2312 m road will be constructed reducing design width to 12 m.

5 V5: Gully No-5 (Campus Total 103 minor Design width has been

19


Remarks

Road, North-South section), Design width=12m, Length = 674.77 m

structures (Chhaja & peti) will be affected and major part of houses will remain unaffected.

reduced to 12 in order to minimize possible losses of private / public properties.

6 V-4: Gully No-4 (North-South), Design width=12m, Length = 404.75 m

Total 76 minor structures (Chhaja & Peti) will be affected and major part of houses will remain unaffected.


7 V-3: Gully No-3, Design width=12m, Length=407.37 m

Total 64 minor part (Chhaja & peti) will be affected and major part of houses will remain unaffected.


8 V-2 :Gully No-2, Design width=12m, Length = 407.92 m



9 V-1: Gully No-1, design width=12m, Length =1,102.04 m



10

V6: Krishi Vikash Road (Malpot/Napi-Highway), Design width=12m, Length = 347.58 m

Minor part of 4 houses will be affected

Considering the magnitude of impact 12 m design width of the road section has been adopted.

11 H1:(East-West Gully-1), Design width=9m, Length=298.26 m

4 houses (minor part) will be affected.


12 H2: (East-West Gully-2), Design width=9m, Length = 297.88 m

4 houses (minor part) will be affected


13 H-3: Hospital road ( East-West Gully-3), Design width=10m, Length =290 m

None In order to avoid the loss 10 m design width has been adopted.

14

H-4: East –West Gully-4 (Campus Road/Janiki Tole to Gully No-1), Design width=10m, Length = 284.4 m

None In order to avoid the loss 10 m design width has been adopted.

15

H-5: Saraswoti Tole Road-1 (East- West Section, Katan Area), Design width=10m, Length = 300.99 m

28 minor structures (boundary wall) will be affected.


16

H-6: Sarswoti Tole Road 2 (East-West section, Katan Area) , Design width=10m, Length=150 m (ch 200-350)


In order to avoid or minimize the impact 150 m out of 350 m length and 10 m design width has been adopted.

17

H-7: Sarswati Tole Road 3 (East West section, Katan Area), Design width=10m, Length=392.41 m



18 H-8: Sarswati Tole Road (East West section, Katan

26 minor structures (boundary wall) will be

To avoid or minimize the impact 10 m design width has

20


Remarks

Area), Design width=10m, Length= 372.22m

affected. been adopted.

19 H-9: Eye Hospital Road, East-west Section), Design width=10m, Length=429.83 m

1 boundary wall will be affected.


20 H-10: (Gully 1- BP Chowk - Bhagatpur Marga), Design width=10m, Length=738.03 m

13 minor structures (boundary wall & peti) will be affected.


21 Hotel Opera road, Length= 190 m (ch. 0+00 - 0+190)

6 minor structures (peti & shed/shutter) will be affected.

In order to avoid or minimize the impact 190 m out of total length 280 m road will be constructed.

22

Madan Chowk-Dashrath Chowk – Napi Kralaya - Bhagatpur Chowk road, Design Width=15 m from Dashrath Chowk to Nani Karalaya (ch: 0+00-0+750) & 12 m from Napi Karalaya to Bhagatpur (ch:0+751- 1+150),Total Length 1150m

6 minor structures (peti and boundary wall) will be affected.

Considering the severity of impact the design width has been reduced to 12 m for 400 m long section (Napi karalaya – Bhagatpur).

23

Traffic Chowk- Dashrat - BP Chowk Road (Hospital link Road), Design width =15m,Length= 596.84 m

None


34. The objective of this RP is to assess the resettlement impacts as well as develop mitigation measures exploring possible alternatives. The loss inventory prepared during project screening stage reveals that there would be severe impacts on the public and private properties, if road and drainage are designed based on the RoW recommended by municipal transportation master plan (MTMP). Therefore, magnitude of the impact was tested out with different road width options and appropriate design width was chosen with proper consultation with municipality in order to avoid or minimize the losses. Different alternatives were discussed and agreed to adopt design width based on the actual available width of existing roads so that the major construction activities could be confined within the designed width without impacting the structural element of the houses. Accordingly the detailed design of the road finalized based on alternative agreed to avoid loss and with minimum impact.

21

II. SCOPE OF LAND ACQUISTION AND RESETTLEMENT IMPACTS

A. Beneficial Impact of the Sub-project

35. The urban road and drainage improvement will have overall positive impacts for all residents of the Bheemdatta municipality irrespective of caste/ethnicity, economic status and socio-political backgrounds. The proposed subproject can be viewed as a means to enhance quality of living in Bheemdatta municipality. It is expected that it will boost economic growth and contribute in poverty reduction bringing substantial economic opportunities in the city. The social benefits arising due to the subproject will be triggered off due to improved accessibility to various services such as easy access to markets, health facilities, schools, workplace etc. which in turn increases the income of the locals, and ultimately uplifting their standard of living. Besides, improved road and drain network will encourage entrepreneurs to invest more in commercial enterprises and industrial activities which ultimately generate employment opportunities for city dwellers. Improved road will also enhance essential and emergency services like schools, health services, public distribution system etc. making them available faster.

B. Scope of Land Acquisition and Likely IR and IP Impacts:

36. The assessment of likely impacts of involuntary resettlement with respect to physical displacement (relocation, loss of residential land, or loss of shelter) and economic displacement (loss of land, assets, access to assets, income sources, or means of livelihoods) as a result of (i) involuntary acquisition of land, or (ii) involuntary restrictions on land use or on access to legally designated parks and protected areas for the proposed components are given below. 37. Bheemdatta has prepared its Municipal Transport Master Plan (MTMP), which indicates road right-of-ways (RoW). Based on the MTMP, Bheemdatta municipality has declared RoWs for all roads within its jurisdiction. The PPTA has initially proposed total 36.6 km length under the project scope. During design phase however, the municipality has prioritized through phasing of the recommended road sections considering budget constraint and magnitude of impact on private and public properties. Now it has been decided to construct 23 roads sections including city core area road (16 road sections) with total length of 14.014 km in phase-I under scope of RUDP. In addition considering the severity of impacts within the municipal RoW, the magnitude of impacts was tested out with different road width options of the roads, and appropriate width was chosen in order to avoid or minimize the impacts. 38. Different alternatives were discussed and agreed to adopt design width based on the actual available width of existing roads so that the major construction activities could be carried out without impacting the major part of the structures. Accordingly the detailed design of the road finalized based on alternative agreed to avoid loss and with minimum impact. Hence, there would not have involuntary resettlement impact resulting physical displacement. There will be nominal economic impact due to loss of minor structures and less than 10 percent of productive assets. Since the minor structures are not contributing to the household’s income, loss of such minor structures will not result adverse impact to

22

the owners; rather the upgraded road will increase their income by expanding the market as well as increasing their rental value and land price. Annex-3 (B) shows the land rate fixed by District Revenue Office and current market price of land to compare results of expanded market and increased land price after the improvement of the roads. Some temporary impacts may arise during the construction period, and shall be addressed by the contractor complying with the CRIPPF prepared for the RUDP. 39. Most of the proposed roads are in city core area, which is town planning area. The Nagar Vikas Samiti has prepared Mahendranagar Town Development Master Plan in B.S 2029 (1973) and also fixed the road RoW. After fixing the road width (50 ft for North-South gully roads and 30 ft for East-West gully roads) residential plots were sold beyond this road width on both sides. The local residents have built peti (apron) and temporary shed (Chhaja) on the free space between edge of carriage way / black topped (mostly drain) and their houses. Since the lands occupied by the affected structures are located within the width of public road, the affected owners will loss no land. The inventory of loss indicates that the loss of land outside the town planning areas is less than 10 percent of total land owned by the affected individual household as shown in Annex-3. 40. The typical cross-sections of proposed roads of different width ranging from 10 m to 34.5 m are shown in Figures 4 to 7 below. The typical cross section for 10 m width road (Figure-4, left) represents the typical design of four city core area road sections namely gully roads (4 East-West sections H1 to H4). The roads consist of 5.5 m carriageway (black topped), 0.85 m side drain and 0.40 m footpath on both side of the road. Hence, 10 m site clearance is required to carry out construction activities and any structures located beyond 5 m from the centre of the road will not be affected under this project. 41. Figure 4 (right-hand) represents the typical cross section of city core area road viz. H-5: Saraswoti Tole Road-1 (East- West Section, Katan Area), H-6: Sarswoti Tole Road 2 (East-West section, Katan Area), H-7: Sarswati Tole Road 3 (East West section, Katan Area), H-8: Sarswati Tole Road 4 (East West section, Katan Area), H-9: Eye Hospital Road, East-west Section), H-10: (Galli 1- BP Chowk - Bhagatpur Marga) and V6: Krishi Vikash Road. The roads consist of 5.5 m carriageway (black topped), 0.50 m side drain and 1.75m storm water drain on both side of the road. Closed drain has been designed and the foot path and street light will be accommodated within the same space (1.75 m) in either side. Hence, 10 m site clearance is required to carry out construction activities and any structures located beyond 5 m from the centre of the road will not be impacted.

23

Figure 4: Typical Cross Section of Road for 10 m width (10 City Core Area Roads, East West Sections)

42. The city core area North South road sections (Gully No.1 - 5) and Airport - Airighat Road (M4) have been designed as urban road standard road of 12 m width as shown in Figure-5 below. The road consists of 7 m carriageway (black topped), 0.85 m side drain, 1.65 m foot path on both side of the road and street light. Hence, 12 m site clearance is required to carry out construction activities and any structures located beyond 6 m from the centre of the road will not be dismantled under this project, even though they fall within the municipal RoW (15m).

Figure 5: Typical Cross Section of Road for 12 m width (5 City core Area Road, North

South Sections, Gully No.1-5)

43. As Figure-6 shows, an urban road standard (double lane) 15 m wide road is designed for Madan Chowk- Dasrat Chowk- Napi Karalaya- Bhagatpur Chowk Road, Traffic Chowk- Dasrat Chowk- BP Chowk Road (Hospital Link Road and Hotel Opera Road. The road consists of 7 m carriageway (black topped), 0.5 m side drain, 1.5 m cycle

24

track and 2 m storm water drain on both sides. Closed drain has been designed and the foot path and street lamp will be accommodated within the 15 m width. Hence, 15 m site clearance is required to carry out construction activities and any structures located beyond 7.5 m from the centre of the road will not be affected under this project. Figure 6: Typical Cross Section of Road for 15 m width (Madan Chowk- Dasrat Chowk-

Napi karalaya- Bhagatpur Chowk Road, Traffic Chowk- Dasrat Chowk- BP Chowk Road (Hospital Link Road and Hotel Opera Road)

44. An urban road standard (four lane) road of 34.5 m width has been designed for 450 m segment of M-3 (Suklaphanta Marga) as shown in Figure-7, which consists of 7 m carriageway (black topped) on either side with provision of deriver at the centre, side drain, storm water drain, cycle track and greenery area. Closed drain has been designed and the foot path, street light and road furniture will be accommodated within the 34.5 m width. Hence, 34.5 m site clearance is required to carry out construction activities and any structures located beyond 17.75 m from the centre of the road will not be impacted under this project.

Figure 7: Typical Cross Section of Road for 34.5 m width (450 m segment of

M3:Suklaphanta Marga)

25

45. The proposed road and drainage construction works will be carried out within the adopted design width which has been fixed based on the actual available width of the existing roads in order to avoid losses as far as possible. The road section wise details of existing situation are given below in Table-6. Table-6: The road section wise details of existing situation S.N. Name of Road Existing Situation Remarks

M1: (Bhasi Rautela Road), design width=12 m, Length=560 m (Chainage 0 +00 - 0+560 m)

The road M1 under this project starts from East West Highway at Bhasi towards North direction and ends at Mahakali canal crossing site. It is also known as Bhasi-Rautela Road. The road alignment lies in open area with scattered settlement on both sides of the road. Within the adopted design width total 5 minor structures of the houses (2 Chhaja + Peti) and 3 boundary wall) will be affected, which require to dismantle for site clearance during construction. Of the total affected structures 4 are private house and 1 temple. Regarding land loss the affected owners will loss than 10 percent of total land (Annex-3).

The affected households agree for offering donation voluntary and dismantling the affected structures. Individual consent of affected households has been taken and included in Annex-5. The site is clear and no any other issue regarding land acquisition.

M2: (Bhanuchowk -Bishnudham Road), Total Length=4885 m, Phase I Construction Length= 210 m (Chainage 0+00 - 0+210)

The road M2 under this project starts from Bhanuchowk towards North direction to Bishnudham. Out of total 4.8 km only 0.21 km road will be constructed under phase -I. This section of road passes through built up area. Total 9 minor structures i.e Peti and Chhaja of the houses will be affected; but major part of the houses will remain unaffected. The affected owners will loss less than 10 % of total land. Additional vacant land acquisition i.e the land not occupied by the structure is not required as this section of road is in built up area.

There will be minor impact on 9 private structures. They are ready for voluntary dismantle the structures. Individual consent has been taken from them (Annex-5). Except this the site is clear and no any issue regarding land acquisition.

M3 :Shukla Phata Marga (Bhanuchowk-Madan chowk-Airport Road), Total length=3,756.5 m, Phase I construction length=3,756.5 m

The proposed road M3 starts from Bhanuchowk (E/W highway) passing through Madan Chowk ends at airport. The road is the main gateway to Mahendranager town. 34.5 m wide road has been designed from Bhabu Chowk to Madan Chowk (540m) and from Madan Chowk to Airport 12 m road width has been adopted. Storm water drain are proposed on the both sides of the road. A total of 19 minor structures (3 hut/shed, 4 Peti & Chhaja, 11 boundary wall and 1 kitchen shed) will be affected due to sub project; of them 18 are private house and 1 is temple. From Bhanu Chowk to Madan Chowk there is compact settlement, whereas from Madan Chowk towards airport the settlement is scattered. Land loss due to the project is less than 10 % of total land of affected owners.

They are willing to donate voluntary the affected structures or lands. Individual consent in this regard is taken from them before dismantling the structures. Besides this the site is clear and no any issue regarding land acquisition.

26

S.N. Name of Road Existing Situation Remarks

M4: (Airport-Airighat Road), Total Length = 2312 m, Phase I Construction Length = 652.56 m

The proposed road M4 starts from Airport (Majgaun) towards South direction ends at Banskeda. The road is known as Airport-Arighat road has 2.3 km total length, of that only 0.65 km road will be constructed under this project. The road passes through open land. Total 4 structures (3 boundary wall and 1 shed) will be affected due to construction of 12 m wide road. Only small strip of land covered by these structures will be lost by affected owner (less than 10% of total land). Additional land in open area is not required as the available width of existing road is sufficient.

They are willing to donate voluntarily structure and land. Individual consent in this regard is taken them and are attached in Annex-5. The site is clear and no any other issue regarding land acquisition.

V5: Gully No-5 Road(Campus Road, North-South section), Length = 674.77 m

Gully No-5 road starts from Madan Chowk towards South direction. Since the road is in city core area, passes through built up area with dense settlement. Total 103 Peti (apron) and Chhaja (temporary shed) of the houses will be affected due to construction of the road. However, major part (structural element) of the houses will remain unaffected. This area is town planning area, where the Nagar Vikas Samiti after fixing 50 ft road width sold residential plots beyond this road width on both sides. The local residents have built peti (apron) and temporary shed (Chhaja) on the free space available between edge of black topped or drain and their houses. The affected land i.e covered by structures is public road (within RoW); hence the affected owners will loss no land due to the sub project.

The affected owners are ready for voluntary dismantling the structures. Individual consent from them has been taken and attached in Annex-5. The site is clear and no any issue regarding land acquisition.

V-4: Gully No-4 Road (North-South section), Length = 404.75 m

Gully No-4 road passes through built up area with dense settlement. A total of 74 Peti (apron) and Chhaja (temporary shed) of the houses will be affected due to construction of the road. However, major part (structural element) of the houses will remain unaffected. This area is town planning area, where the Nagar Vikas Samiti after fixing 50 ft road width sold residential plots beyond this road width on both sides. The local residents have built peti (apron) and temporary shed (Chhaja) on the free space available between edge of black topped or drain and their houses. Hence, the affected owners will loss no land due to the sub project.


V-3: Gully No-3 Road (North-South section), Length=407.37m

Gully No-3 road is in city core area. It passes through built up area with dense settlement. Total 64 Peti (apron) and Chhaja (temporary shed) of the houses will be affected due to construction of the road. However, major part (structural element) of the houses will remain unaffected. This area is town planning area, where the

The affected owners are ready for voluntary donation. Individual consent from them has been taken and attached in Annex-5. The site is clear and no any issue regarding land

27


Nagar Vikas Samiti after fixing 50 ft road width sold residential plots beyond this road width on both sides. The local residents have built peti (apron) and temporary shed (Chhaja) on the free space available between edge of black topped or drain and their houses. Hence, the affected owners will loss no land due to the sub project.

acquisition.

V-2 :Gully No-2 Road(North-south section), Length = 407.92 m

Gully No-2 road is in city core area. It passes through built up area with dense settlement. Total 89 Peti (apron) and Chhaja (temporary shed) of the houses will be affected due to construction of the road. However, major part (structural element) of the houses will remain unaffected. This area is town planning area, where the Nagar Vikas Samiti after fixing 50 ft road width sold residential plots beyond this road width on both sides. The local residents have built peti (apron) and temporary shed (Chhaja) on the free space available between edge of black topped (or drain) and their houses. Hence, the affected owners will loss no land due to the sub project.


V-1: Gully No-1 Road (North-South section), Length = 1,102.04 m

Gully No-2 road passes through built up area with dense settlement. Total 98 Peti (apron) and Chhaja (temporary shed) of the houses will be affected due to construction of the road. However, major part (structural element) of the houses will remain unaffected. This area is town planning area, where the Nagar Vikas Samiti after fixing 50 ft road width sold residential plots beyond this road width on both sides. The local residents have built peti (apron) and temporary shed (Chhaja) on the free space available between edge of black topped (or drain) and their houses. Hence, the affected owners will loss no land due to the sub project.


V6: Krishi Vikash Road (Malpot/Napi-Highway), Length = 347.58 m

V6: Krishi Vikas Road starts from East-West Highway and end at Napi Karalaya. It passes through open area with some structures along the alignment. Total 4 (3 Peti (apron) & Chhaja (temporary shed) and 1 boundary wall) , but major part (structural element) of the houses will remain unaffected. Small strip of land (less than 10 %) of the affected owner will be impacted.

The affected owners are ready for voluntary donation. Individual consent from them has been taken and attached in Annex-5. The site is clear and no any issue regarding land acquisition.

H1:(East-West Gully-1), Length = 298.26 m

H1 (East-West Gully 1) is in city core (town planning area), which intersects the North-South Gully Roads. It passes through built up area with dense settlement. Total 23 Peti (apron) and Chhaja (temporary shed) of the houses will be affected due to

The affected owners are ready for voluntary dismantling the structures. Individual consent from them has been taken and

28


construction of the road. However, major part (structural element) of the houses will remain unaffected. This area is town planning area, where the Nagar Vikas Samiti after fixing 30 ft road width sold residential plots beyond this road width on both sides. The local residents have built peti (apron) and temporary shed (Chhaja) within the space of public road (30 ft) on both sides. Hence, the affected owners will loss no land due to the sub project.

attached in Annex-5. The site is clear and no any issue regarding land acquisition.

H2: (East-West Gully-2), Total Length = 297.88 m.

H2 (East-West Gully 2) is in city core (town planning area), which intersects the North-South Gully Roads. It passes through built up area with dense settlement. Total 16 Peti (apron) and Chhaja (temporary shed) of the houses will be affected due to construction of the road. However, major part (structural element) of the houses will remain unaffected. This area is town planning area, where the Nagar Vikas Samiti after fixing 30 ft road width sold residential plots beyond this road width on both sides. The local residents have built peti (apron) and temporary shed (Chhaja) within the space of public road (30 ft) on both sides. Hence, the affected owners will loss no land due to the sub project.

The affected owners are ready for voluntary donation. Individual consent from them has been taken and attached in Annex-5. The site is clear and no any issue regarding land acquisition.

H-3: Hospital road ( East-West Gully-3), Total Length = 290 m

H3 (East-West Gully 3) is in city core (town planning area), which intersects the North-South Gully Roads. It passes through built up area with dense settlement. The available width of the existing road (10 m) is sufficient for road improvement; hence no structure and land will be affected due to the sub-project.

The site is clear and no any issue regarding land acquisition.

H-4: East –West Gully-4 (Campus Road/Janiki Tole – Gully No-1) Length = 480 m

H4 (East-West Gully 4) is in city core (town planning area), which intersects the North-South Gully Roads. It passes through built up area with dense settlement. The available width of the existing road (10 m) is sufficient for road improvement; hence no structure and land will be affected due to the sub-project.


H-5: Saraswoti Tole Road-1 (East- West Section, Katan Area), Length = 300.99 m

H5 (East-West section) is in Saraswoti Tole, Katan area. Total 28 structures (23 boundary wall, 2 Peti (apron) / Chhaja and 3 shed/shutter) will be affected due to construction of the road. However, major part (structural element) of the houses will remain unaffected. The local residents have built peti (apron) and temporary shed (Chhaja) within the space of public road (30 ft) on both sides. Hence, the affected owners will loss no land due to the sub project.

The affected owners are ready for voluntary donation of affected structure. Individual consent from them has been taken and attached in Annex-5. The site is clear and no any issue regarding land acquisition.

H-6: Sarswoti Tole Road 2 (East-West

H6 (East-West section) is in Saraswoti Tole, Katan area. Total 11 boundary wall

The affected owners are ready for voluntary

29


section, Katan Area) , Total Length = 350 m

will be affected due to construction of the road. However, major part (structural element) of the houses will remain unaffected.

donation of affected structure. Individual consent from them has been taken and attached in Annex-5. The site is clear and no any issue regarding land acquisition.

H-7: Sarswati Tole Road 3 (East West section, Katan Area), Length = 392.41m

H7 (East-West section) is in Saraswoti Tole, Katan area. Total 29 structures ( 22 boundary wall and 7 hut/shed) will be affected due to construction of the road. However, major part (structural element) of the houses will remain unaffected.

The affected owners are ready for voluntary donation of affected structure. Individual consent in this regard has been taken and attached in Annex-5. The site is clear and no any issue regarding land acquisition.

H-8: Sarswati Tole Road 4 (East West section, Katan Area), Length= 372.22m

H8 (East-West section) is in Saraswoti Tole, Katan area. Total 26 structures ( 24 boundary wall and 2 hut/shed) will be affected due to construction of the road. However, major part (structural element) of the houses will remain unaffected.

The affected owners are ready for voluntary donation of affected structure/land. Individual consent in this regard has been taken and attached in Annex-5. The site is clear and no any issue regarding land acquisition.

H-9: Eye Hospital Road, East-west Section), Length=429.83 m

The road H9 known as Eye Hospital Road. The road passes through open area. Only one boundary will be affected due to construction of the road. The available width of the existing road is sufficient for improvement of the road; hence land acquisition is not required.

The affected owner is ready for voluntary donation of affected structure. Individual consent in this regard has been taken and attached in Annex-5. The site is clear and no any issue regarding land acquisition.

H-10: (Gully 1- BP Chowk - Bhagatpur Marga), Length =738.03 m

The road H 10 starts from Gully No-1 and ends at Bhagalpur Chowk. The road passes through the open area with scattered settlement. Total 13 structures (12 boundary wall and 1 peti) will be affected due to construction of the road. Major part (structural element) of the houses will remain unaffected.

The affected owners are ready for voluntary donation of affected structure/land. Individual consent in this regard has been taken and attached in Annex-5. The site is clear and no any issue regarding land acquisition.

Hotel Opera road, Length= 190 m

The Hotel Opera road under this project is in city core area. It passes through built up area. Considering the severity impact 190 m road of 15 m width will be constructed out of total 280 m length. Total 6 structures ( peti and shed/shutter) will be affected. However, major part of the house will remain unaffected.

The affected owners are ready for voluntary donation of affected structure. Individual consent in this regard has been taken and attached in Annex-5. The site is clear and no any issue regarding land acquisition.

30


Madan Chowk-Dashrath Chowk – Napi Kralaya - Bhagatpur Chowk Road, Total Length 1150m

This road under this project starts from Madan Chowk passing through Dashrath Chowk and Napi Karalaya ends at Bhagatpur Chowk. Total 6 structures will be affected due to the construction of road.

The affected owners are ready for voluntary donation of affected structure/land. Individual consent in this regard has been taken (Annex-5). The site is clear and no any issue regarding land acquisition.

Traffic Chowk- Dashrat - BP Chowk Road (Hospital link Road), Length = 596.84 m

This section of road under the project also known as hospital link road. It starts from Traffic Chowk passing through Dashrath Chowk ends at BP Chowk. The available width of the existing road (10 m) is sufficient for road improvement; hence no structure and land will be affected due to the sub-project.


Source: Field measurement and observation, 2019

C. Summary of Impact

46. Impact on Private and Public Structures: Overall 628 minor structures i.e Chhaja, Peti, boundary wall etc. of 619 private houses, 1 schools, 4 Government offices, 4 public/community structures (temple/chautara) will be affected. The road section wise number of affected structure is given in Table-7 below, and further details of loss inventory along with list of affected persons / owners are presented in Annexes-, 2 and 3 of this report. Table-7: The road section wise details of affected structures

S.N Name of the Road

Number of structures affecting Chhaja, Peti, Boundary Wall etc.

Private house School Gov.

Office

Public structure (Temple /Chautara)

Total

1 M1: (Bhasi Rautela Road) 4 1 5

2 M2: (Bhanuchowk -Bishnudham Road) 9 9

3 M3 :Shukla Phata Marga (Bhanuchowk-Madan chowk-Airport Road)

18 1 19

4 M4: (Airport-Airighat Road) 4 4

5 V5: Gully No-5 Road (Campus Road, North-South section), 103 103

6 V-4: Gully No-4 Road (North-South section) 74 74

7 V-3: Gully No-3 Road (North-South section) 64 64

8 V-2 :Gully No-2 Road(North-south section) 89 89

9 V-1: Gully No-1 Road (North-South section), 97 1 98

31

S.N Name of the Road

Number of structures affecting Chhaja, Peti, Boundary Wall etc.

Private house School Gov.

Office

Public structure (Temple /Chautara)

Total

10 V6: Krishi Vikash Road (Malpot/Napi-Highway) 3 1 4

11 H1:(East-West Gully-1) 23 23 12 H2: (East-West Gully-2) 16 16

13 H-3: Hospital road ( East-West Gully-3)

0

14 H-4: East –West Gully-4 (Campus Road/Janiki Tole – Gully No-1)

0

15 H-5: Saraswoti Tole Road-1 (East- West Section, Katan Area)

28 28

16 H-6: Sarswoti Tole Road 2 (East-West section, Katan Area) 11 11

17 H-7: Sarswati Tole Road 3 (East West section, Katan Area), 29 29

18 H-8: Sarswati Tole Road 4 (East West section, Katan Area) 26 26

19 H-9: Eye Hospital Road, East-west Section) 1 1

20 H-10: (Gully 1- BP Chowk - Bhagatpur Marga) 10 2 1 13

21 Hotel Opera road 4 2 6

22 Madan Chowk-Dashrath Chowk – Napi Kralaya - Bhagatpur Chowk Road

6 6

23 Traffic Chowk- Dashrat - BP Chowk Road (Hospital link Road),

0

Total 619 1 4 4 628Source: Field survey, 2019

47. Affected Persons: Total 3740 individuals living in 619 households were identified as affected persons due to the sub-project. Out of them 1965 (52.54 %) are male and 1777 (47.46 %) are female with sex ratio 1.11. The average household size of the affected owners is 6.25. The findings of field survey and loss inventory signify that there will be nominal economic impact without physical displacement and the affected persons would loss less than 10 % of their productive asset; hence none of them are severely affected persons. The social assessment signifies that the affected households do not fall under the below poverty line and other venerability criteria. All of them are direct beneficiaries of the sub-project and they have chosen the design option resulting partial impact on their temporary/projected structures. Based on eligibility criteria for voluntary donation as specified in CRIPPF, the affected owners are eligible for offering donation voluntarily and also are willing for voluntary donation of affected minor structures or lands located within the adopted design width. Individual consent of the affected owners in this regard has been taken and attached in Annex-5 of this report and the further detail information of affected households are given in Annexes 1,2 and 3.

32

48. During construction of roads (preparation of base course, premix and pavement) and drainages some temporary disturbances to businesses are anticipated for a few hours per 100-200 m section. However, full road closure is not anticipated and these temporary disturbances will not result in physical or restriction to access to business and resources. In order to avoid and limit the disturbance to the extent possible, consultations with stakeholders will be undertaken at different locations. Different options of avoidance /or minimization of disturbance will be discussed. Different measures will be adopted such as alternative traffic management in coordination with city traffic authority, provision of night works in high-traffic and commercial areas, avoidance of drainage construction during evening hours (5:00- 7:00 pm) when moving venders are coming to the streets and provision of walkways and metal sheets where required to maintain access to shops will ensure continued access to businesses and limited disruption to business activity. To avoid such disruptions all the construction activities will comply with a work schedule that ensures completion of particular activity on the same day. Such action shortens disruption timings of the business and vending. The construction workforce will take maximum care of the private and public structures and utility services while doing excavation works. The disturbance related to environment like, noise, dust etc. will be covered by the project specific EMP. 49. The project will also establish close coordination with the residents and business owners of the area to minimize construction related disturbances. For efficient work progress and people’s support in project activities, RPIU along with Municipality, Construction Supervision Consultant (CSC) and the contractor will disseminate information on commencement of works through public announcements, billboards/signage and other form of notice to the residents, businesses owners and tenants, and other sensitive receptors (schools, places of worship, hospitals/clinics, etc.) along construction alignment 7 days, and again 2 days, prior to commencement of works. D. Indigenous Peoples

50. According to the ADB’s safeguard policy the indigenous people safeguards are triggered if a project directly or indirectly affects the dignity, human rights, livelihood systems, or culture of indigenous peoples or affects the territories or natural or cultural resources that indigenous peoples own, use, occupy, or claim as an ancestral domain or asset. The term indigenous peoples is used in a generic sense to refer to a distinct, vulnerable, social and cultural group possessing the characteristics such as self-identification as members of distinct indigenous cultural group, geographically distinct habitats or ancestral territories; distinct customary cultural, economic, social, or political institutions and a distinct language. 51. The subproject activities are confined within a linear distance with defined width along the alignment of proposed road and drainage. The construction will be undertaken following the existing road and drainage alignment. It has been observed that the indigenous people in the subproject area share a similar economic and political system with the mainstream society. The indigenous people are not significantly different from the non-indigenous households and other local families living in the project areas in terms of livelihood patterns, and access to economic, health and educational opportunities. The indigenous people in general do not display any significant social or economic traits that

33

would distinguish them from non-indigenous people communities, except in their cultural identity and national identification as indigenous people or Janajati/Adhibasi (in Nepali language). The field observation reveals that all the settlements/clusters in Bheemdatta are heterogeneous in terms of caste/ethnicity and no specific territory of indigenous people has been observed. The lands owned or occupied by indigenous people in sub-project site are not considered as ancestral/tribal value. Individual ownership of lands has been in practice among indigenous people for many generations. Hence, it is expected that the project will have no impact on their cultural identity, survival and cultural resources. 52. The improved road services and drainage system will have overall beneficial effects. However, the improved road conditions may increase vehicle speed and requires awareness among the indigenous people about the road safety and traffic rules. With municipal facility improvements, subprojects are expected to result in improved health and quality of lives of both indigenous people and non-indigenous people. Considering the facilities proposed under this subproject, the adverse impact of the project on indigenous peoples along the road alignment is not expected. No physical displacement of indigenous people is anticipated as a result of implementation of the subprojects. On the other hands, the project will create short-term employment opportunities in infrastructure construction and maintenance where indigenous groups will be given first priority for employment. The project design has included activities, which will address requirements in behavioral changes to be habitual with improved road and traffic management system. The gender equality and social inclusion (GESI) action plan and performance-based socio-economic development program (PBSEDP) includes specific actions favorable to indigenous people to enhance beneficial impacts. Therefore, indigenous people plan is not required for this subproject.

E. Impact Category of the Subproject

53. In Bheemdatta the resettlement impacts of the proposed components are found to be minor as land acquisition and resettlement has been avoided and/or minimized to the extent possible by exploring alternative design of the subproject. Improvement of roads and drainages will be carried out avoiding realignment and widening wherever feasible. For example, project will try to limit formation width of the road within the available width of existing road in order to minimize losses of structures and land acquisition. In unavoidable circumstances, voluntary donation of affected structures for road widening works will be accepted only by following the approach of community-driven development and process as defined in the CRIPPF prepared for RUDP. Thus, the resettlement impacts will be of small scale, consistent with Category B as per SPS -2009.

34

III. SOCIO-ECONOMIC INFORMATION AND PROFILE 54. This section provides an overview of brief socio-economic information and profile of the affected households residing along the alignment of proposed road sections and the findings are based on the census survey. The census survey of the households who have permanent or temporary structures within the adopted design width was conducted in order to access the socio-economic status and magnitude of likely impacts on them. The household survey was conducted from January to February 2019 and covers the demographic and economic status of affected households. As stated in earlier section out of total 628 affected structures 619 are private houses and other 9 belong to government office/institution or public/community structures. Hence the profile provides the socio-economic information of 619 affected households.

55. Both field physical survey and household survey were carried out in order to acquire the information regarding location of house and type of loss and socio-economic status of the households. The households were interviewed using the structured questionnaire, which includes questions about family composition, age, gender, education, employment, livelihood activities, income and expenditure of household and possession of the land etc. The census for collection of socio-economic and demography data were conducted by visiting each household. The list and further detail information of the surveyed households are given in Annexes- 1and 2. 56. Demography: During the household census survey socio-economic information of 598 out of total 619 affected households was collected because 21 house owners are living in other area and could not be met during the survey. The total population of the surveyed households is 3740 with 52.54 percent male and 47.46 percent female. The average household size is 6.25 and sex ratio 1.11. The road section wise distribution of affected households and population are given in table below.

Table 8: Household and Population of Affected Households

S.N Name of Road Surveyed HH Population Average

HH Size Sex

Ratio Male Female Total 1 M1 : Bhasi- Rautela Road 4 14 9 23 5.75 1.56

2 M2 : Bhanuchowk -Bishnudham Road 9 25 26 51 5.67 0.96

3 M3: Suklaphanta Marga(Bhanuchowk-Madan chowk-Airport Road)

18 66 52 115 6.39 1.27

4 M4: Airport-Airighat Road 4 19 14 33 8.25 1.36

5 V5: Gully No-5 Road (Campus Road, North-South section) 99 314 297 611 6.17 1.06

6 V-4: Gully No-4 Road (North-South section) 72 203 200 403 5.60 1.02

7 V-3 : Gully No-3 Road (North-South Section) 62 216 193 408 6.58 1.12

8 V-2: Gully No-2 Road (North-South section) 89 285 282 568 6.38 1.01

35

S.N Name of Road Surveyed HH Population Average

HH Size Sex

Ratio Male Female Total

9 V-1: Gully No-1(Shalgadhi Road, North-South Section) 89 329 291 622 6.99 1.13

10 V6: Malpot/Napi Karalaya-E/W Highway) 3 8 8 16 5.33 1.00

11 H1: East-West Gully-1 23 76 75 150 6.52 1.01 12 H2: East-West Gully-2 16 54 50 104 6.50 1.08

13 H-3: Hospital Road (Gully 6 to Gully 1/ East-West Gully-3) 0

14 H-4: Campus Road (Janki tole) to Gully 1( East-West Gully-4) 0

15 H-5: Sarswati Tole Road 1 (East West Gully-5, Katan Area)

28 88 78 166 5.93 1.13

16 H-6:Sarswati Tole Road 2 (East West Gully-6, Katan Area)

11 34 33 67 6.09 1.03

17 H-7: Sarswati Tole Road 3 (East West Gully-7, Katan Area)

28 96 69 165 5.89 1.39

18 H-8: Sarswati Tole Road 4 (East West section, Katan Area)

24 78 55 133 5.54 1.42

19 H-9: Eye Hospital Road (East-West) 1 6 5 11 11.00 1.20

20 H-10 : Hospital Road (Gully 1 to Bhagatpur Marg) 9 23 17 40 4.44 1.35

21 Hotel Opera road, E-W) 3 10 7 17 5.67 1.43

22 Madan chowk-Dashrath Chowk - Napi - Bhagatpur Chowk Road 6 21 16 37 6.17 1.31

23 Traffic Chowk- Dashrat - BP Chowk Road 0

Total 598 1965 1777 3740 6.25 1.11 Source: Census Survey, 2019

57. Caste / Ethnicity: The project service area comprises multi caste / ethnic groups. Each caste and ethnicity is characterized by its own customs, traditions, culture and nature of occupation with which they are associated. Among the affected households, Hill Brahmin and Chhettri, comprising 95.8 percent of total families, are the most prevailing group in the service area. Janagati are the next major indigenous group with 1.94 percent , followed by Dalit group constituting 1.62 percent of total affected households. It was learnt that Brahmin and Chhettri were migrated from different hill districts of western region and settled in the project area especially after development of east-west highway and town planning in Mahendranager. The Janjati refers to the indigenous group and here basically represents Tharu community. The western Terai region including the project service area is considered as original homeland of Tharu people. Tharu are the indigenous people with

36

their own culture, social and political institutions and distinct language. Table 9: Distribution of surveyed households by Caste and Ethnicity S.N. Ethnicity / Caste No. of HH Percent

1 Brahmin /Chhettri 593 95.802 Janajati 12 1.943 Dalit 10 1.624 Muslim 1 0.165 Others (Yogi) 3 0.48

Total 619 100.00Source: Field survey, 2019

58. Family Structure: Two types of family structures were reported among the surveyed households; nuclear and joint family. A nuclear family is a family that consists only of parents and their unmarried children sharing a common kitchen. Whereas, joint family consists of grandparents, parents and their children who share a common kitchen. The finding of the household survey reveals that 54.35 percent have a nuclear family structure and 45.65 percent households have a joint family structure (Table 10). The joint family structure was reported particularly in Tharu community which has traditionally been in practice. Table 10: Surveyed households by types of family structure Family Type Number of Households Percent (%)

Nuclear family 325 54.35 Joint family 273 45.65 Total 598 100.00


59. Literacy and Education: Out of total household surveyed, 34.95 percent of household head reported that they have completed intermediate level education, 20.57 percent have secondary school level education and 32.11 percent are literate with or without formal education. Nearly 11.20 percent of them have attended higher education; whereas only 1.17 percent are illiterate who could not read and write. Table 11: Educational Status of the Head of Household Educational Status No. of HH Head Percent Illiterate 7 1.17 Literate / Elementary 192 32.11

Secondary school level 123 20.57

Intermediate level 209 34.95 Higher Education 67 11.20 Total 598 100.00


37

60. Household economy and modes of livelihood: With urbanization the economy of the area has gradually been shifted from rural agricultural economy to business and service based; hence the major sources of income for majority of the households are nonfarm activities. However, the overall livelihood strategy of the surveyed households is characterized by a mixture of farm and nonfarm activities. Farm activities are carried out for food supply, whereas other requirements of the household are fulfilled through nonfarm activities. The surveyed households are largely relying on more than one source of income for the fulfillment of their livelihood needs. Non-agriculture activities like business & jobs are the main contributors for household economy. The main source of income for a large majority of surveyed households (80.27 %) is business. Service which includes both government and private sector jobs is the primary source of income for 17.89 percent of the households, whereas agriculture is the major source of income for only 1.51 percent households. As in other part of the country remittance / foreign employment has also been playing important role in household economy of the area, which is contributing as secondary source of income for many households. Table 12: Main sources of income of the surveyed households

S.N. Occupation No. of HH Percent 1 Agriculture 9 1.51 2 Business 480 80.273 Service 107 17.894 Wage Labor 1 0.17 5 Remittance 1 0.17 6 Other 0.00

Total 598 100.00Source: Field survey, 2019

61. Income Level: It is indeed a difficult task to calculate the income and expenditure patterns of the surveyed households because generally income and expenditure data might not be very reliable as most of the respondents either grossly underestimate their income or overestimate their expenditure patterns. Besides, the surveyed households do not keep records of their family’s income and expenditures. Even though the surveyed households own lands and are involved in farm activities, agriculture is not a significant contributor to the household economy. The major part of the household income is derived from nonfarm activities. The surveyed household’s monthly average income is estimated as NRs 53123 with an average per capita income of NRs 114606 per person per year. This is significantly higher income as compared with per capita NRs 19,262 person/year estimated by the Nepal Living Standards Survey 2010/2011 and Nepal Rastra Bank’s annual inflation rate adjusted per capita income NRs 31,134 per person per annum in survey year 2019. Further details of occupation, monthly income and per capita income of individual affected household are presented in Annex-2, which signifies that none of the affected households fall under below poverty line.

38

Table 13: Average household income and per capita income

S.N Name of Road No. of

HH

Average Monthly

Income (Rs)

Average Per Capita

Income (Rs)1 M1 : Bhasi- Rautela Road 4 26250 547832 M2 : Bhanuchowk -Bishnudham Road 9 43889 92941

3 M3: Suklaphanta Marga(Bhanuchowk-Madan Chowk-Airport Road) 18 48944 91930

4 M4: Airport-Airighat Road 4 345250 502182

5 V5: Gully No-5 Road (Campus Road, North-South section) 99 51515 100164

6 V-4: Gully No-4 Road (North-South section) 72 55556 1191077 V-3 : Gully No-3 Road (North-South Section) 62 56855 1036768 V-2: Gully No-2 Road (North-South section) 89 57618 108338

9 V-1: Gully No-1(Shalgadhi Road, North-South Section) 89 57674 99029

10 V6: Malpot/Napi Karalaya-E/W Highway) 3 23333 5250011 H1: East-West Gully-1 23 60217 11080012 H2: East-West Gully-2 16 58313 107654

13 H-3: Hospital Road (Gully 6 to Gully 1/ East-West Gully-3)

14 H-4: Campus Road (Janki tole) to Gully 1( East-West Gully-4)

15 H-5: Sarswati Tole Road 1 (East West Gully-5, Katan Area) 28 47036 95205

16 H-6:Sarswati Tole Road 2 (East West Gully-6, Katan Area) 11 39091 77015

17 H-7: Sarswati Tole Road 3 (East West Gully-7, Katan Area) 28 40357 82182

18 H-8: Sarswati Tole Road 4 (East West section, Katan Area) 24 52708 114135

19 H-9: Eye Hospital Road (East-West) 1 80000 87273

20 H-10 : Hospital Road (Gully 1 to Bhagatpur Marg) 9 34444 93000

21 Hotel Opera road, E-W) 3 38333 81176

22 Madan chowk-Dashrath Chowk - Napi - Bhagatpur Chowk Road 6 35000 68108

23 Traffic Chowk- Dashrat - BP Chowk Road Total 598 55005 105539


39

62. Vulnerability and Differential Impacts Assessment: The vulnerable are individuals or groups who may experience differential adverse impacts from the proposed project more severely than dominant population because of their unique and inherit socio-economic characteristics. Those households falling below poverty line, the landless, household head with disability, single women headed households, marginalized Dalits, and endangered indigenous peoples (Mukta Kamaiya) are considered here as vulnerable groups. Per capita income NRs 31,134 in 2019 (socio economic survey year) is considered here as poverty threshold, which is derived from per capita income NRs 19,262 person/year estimated by the Nepal Living Standards Survey 2010/2011 adjusting Nepal Rastra Bank’s annual inflation rate from 2012 to 2019. The socio-economic census survey of affected households signifies that per capita income of affected individual household is higher than NRs 31,134 per person per year which details are shown in Annex-2 of this report; hence none of the affected household falls under below poverty line. 63. The Janjati refers to the indigenous group and here basically represents the Tharu community. The western Terai region is considered as original homeland of Tharu people. Tharu are the indigenous people with their own culture, social and political institutions and distinct language. Among the Tharu people Mukta Kamaiya (freed labor) could be considered as vulnerable group. The census survey of affected households signifies that among the total affected households there are 12 of indigenous people including Tharu. However, none of them were reported as Mukta Kamaiya. Out of total affected households 10 are reported as Dalit. All of them are involving in business and their income level is satisfactory with per capita income above NRs. 31,134. Either Peti (apron), temporary chhaja (shed) or boundary wall will be affected without impacting the major part (i.e structural element) of the house. Such affected minor structures are not contributing for household's income; thus there would not be economic and physical displacement due to dismantling the affected part. Regarding land loss the affected area i.e area covered by affected structure is public land (within RoW of existing road); hence the affected owners would loss no land. 64. It has been observed that the Indigenous and Dalit people in the subproject area share a similar economic and political system with the mainstream society. The indigenous and Dalit people are not significantly different from the non-indigenous households and other local families living in the project areas in terms of livelihood patterns, and access to economic, health and educational opportunities. The indigenous people in general do not display any significant social or economic traits that would distinguish them from non-indigenous people communities. Therefore, considering the economic status and nature or scale of impacts on Indigenous and Delit groups differential impact on their livelihood may not applicable for this sub-project.

40

IV. INFORMATION DISCLOSURE, CONSULTATION AND PARTICIPATION

A. Community & Stakeholder Consultations

65. Field consultations were undertaken especially during household survey at different locations, in particular with affected persons, and municipality representatives. More than 600 persons were consulted during census survey of affected households and the list of them is given in Annex-1. In addition meetings / interactions with stakeholders including affected persons were conducted in different locations and dates. Summary such consultations is given in Table- 14 below and minutes are attached in Annex-4. 66. The general objective of the consultations was to share project related information with project affected local communities and stakeholders as well as to assess the project’s likely impacts (both positive and negative) on them. These consultations organized during household survey also fulfilled dual objectives to assess and acquire socio-economic information required for this RP as well as to disseminate information on the likely impacts of the project. The consultations were also instrumental to understand the perceptions of affected persons, local residents, expectations and feedback of affected people. Most of such consultations were carried out along the alignment of the proposed section of road during socio-economic survey. Different design options viz. road width recommended by PPTA and municipality / MTPM, within the existing width, including no project choice were shared with the affected local people and communities so that they can have informed choice of the project design. Among the different alternatives discussed they agreed to adopt design width based on the actual available width so that the major construction activities could be carried out without impacting the major part of the structures. The detailed design of the road sections have been finalized based on the alternative agreed to avoid loss and with minimum impact. 67. The major concerns and perceptions of the participants about the subproject during the consultations are as follows:

• Most of the consulted persons particularly affected persons were positive towards the project and they even willing for voluntary demolish the minor structures and donate land if required for the road and drainage improvement.

• Some likely affected people who have houses within the municipal RoW worried about the possibilities of demolishing of their houses and also raised queries regarding the provision of compensation .

• Few of them worried about losing their small strip of lands along the alignment of the proposed road.

• Some participants expressed positive opinions about the proposed subproject and encouraged municipality to start the proposed subproject as soon as possible.

• In general the landowners along the road alignment were willing to give their land if required for road extension for the benefit of the community welfare.

41

Table-14: Summary of Consultation

S.N Date Location No. of Participants

Participants Topics Discussed Issues Raised Action Taken

1

2077-3-12 (26 Jun 2020)

Ward Nos-17,16 &12

14 (m-12, F-2)

Ward Chairperson, Ward members and affected persons

Ward /Tole level discussion regarding road width and impact on structures; consent and commitment of beneficiaries/affected owners for construction of road; formation of committee.

Queries on compensation and benefit for affected persons. Issues of land loss and structures

Width of road has been reduced and finalized based on actual available RoW of existing roads to avoid or mitigate impacts

2

2077-3-11 (25 Jun 2020)

Ward No-1

12 (m-10, F-2)


Ward/Tole level discussion regarding road width and impact on structures; consent and commitment of beneficiaries/affected owners for construction of road; formation of committee.

. concern of land loss and structures Queries on compensation and benefit for affected persons.


3

2077-3-12 (26 Jun 2020)

Ward No-18

13 (m-10, F-2)


Ward level discussion regarding road width and impact on structures; consent and commitment of beneficiaries/affected owners for construction of road

. concern of land loss and structures


4

2077-3-12 (26 Jun 2020)

Ward Nos-15 & 4

12 (m-11, F-1)


Ward level discussion regarding road width and impact on structures; consent and commitment of beneficiaries/affected owners for construction of road

. concern of land loss and structures Queries on compensation and benefit for affected persons.

Width of road has been reduced and finalized based on actual available RoW of existing roads to avoid or mitigate impacts,

5

2076-1-17 BS (30 April 2019)

Bheemdatta Municipality

14 (M-13, F-1)

Municipality (Mayor, Chief Admin Officer, Engineer), RPIU (Deputy Project Manager), PMC expert, DSC experts

Road prioritization and selection of road to be constructed under phase-1, request for implementation of surveyed roads not included in phase-I, regarding individual consent of affected households for dismantling of affected structures and nomination of third party.

Budget constraint and delay in design works Maintenance /protection of public/ cultural property to be done during construction

Road prioritization based on available budget For protection / maintenance of public/cultural property budget has been included in BoQ.

42

S.N Date Location No. of Participants

Participants Topics Discussed Issues Raised Action Taken

6

2075-9-18 (2 Jan 2019)


21 (M-18, F-3)

Municipality (Mayor, Deputy Mayor, Chief Admin Officer, Engineer, Ward Chairpersons), RPIU (Deputy Project Manager), DSC experts and beneficiaries

Road prioritization based on budget and severity of impact and recommendation for design and estimate of prioritized roads, request for phase II roads design and estimate.

7

2075-8-8 (24 Nov 2018)

Ward No-3

44 (m-39, F-5)

Ward Chairperson, Ward members, secretary and affected persons

Ward level discussion regarding road width and impact on structures; consent and commitment of beneficiaries/affected owners for construction of road; formation of road width demarcation committee.

Queries on compensation and benefit for affected persons. Issues of land loss and structures

Width of road has been reduced and finalized based on actual available RoW of existing roads to avoid or mitigate impacts,

8

2075-4-30 ( 15 Aug 2018)

Ward No-6

78 (m-68, F-10)

Ward Chairperson, Ward members, Municipality officials and affected persons

Ward level discussion regarding road width, impact on structures and commitment of beneficiaries/affected owners for construction of road; formation of road width demarcation committee.

Issues of land loss and structures. Queries on compensation and benefit for affected persons.

Width of road has been reduced and finalized based on actual available RoW of existing roads

9

2075-5-6 (22 Aug 2018)

Ward No-6

11 (M-9, F-2)

Ward Chairperson, Ward members, member of road measurement/ demarcation committee.

Discussion regarding road width, affected structures and formation of road measurement/width demarcation committee.

10

2075-1-3 (6 Apr 2018)


5 (M-3, F-2)

Mayor, Deputy Mayor, Member, Engineer

Topographical survey of recommended roads

11

2075-3-24 (8 July 2018)


5 (M-3, F-2)

Mayor, Deputy Mayor, Member, Engineer

Road selection and topographical survey of recommended roads

B. Information Disclosure and Dissemination

68. Information disclosure and public consultation are important and necessary during project preparation as well as implementation. A summary of RP will be made accessible to the affected people and stakeholders through the respective Ward Offices, Bheemdatta Municipality Office, R-PIU Office.

43

69. Similarly, during project implementation, meaningful consultation, including with project affected persons as described in the CRIPPF will be continued. These enable project affected people, IPs, vulnerable groups, and other stakeholders to participate in and contribute to the project planning and implementation, and thereby help minimize adverse impacts and maximize the benefits. The information to be disclosed will include, information related to works progress, potential temporary disruptions to access during construction, grievance redress process, employment and other benefits available under the project and procedures for access etc. The mode of disclosure could vary, but may include booklets, newspapers, the internet, and community meetings related to the project and subprojects. Potential disclosure places could include: Ward Office, Municipality Office, DUDBC Divisional Office/RPIU, NGO, club etc. C. Future Consultations and Participation

70. In order to keep more transparency in planning and for further active involvement of APs and other stakeholders, the subproject information will be disseminated through disclosure of safeguard planning documents. The EA will provide relevant information (final RP endorsed by the EA, an updated RP, if required) in a timely manner, in an accessible place.

71. For effective implementation of the RP, additional consultative meetings with the affected persons will be carried out during project implementation. Such consultations will be carried out by the social development officer at R-PIU & social safeguards focal person at the municipality with the support of Social Expert under the PMC and DSC. Based on stakeholder analysis and consultation, following consultation and communication plan has been proposed for this sub-project.

Table-15 : Consultation and Communication Plan Activity Target

Stakeholders Type of Participation

Objective Responsible Time Frame

1. Project orientation focusing on construction modality for local community groups targeting affected persons (one time in each affected ward)

At least 650 community members focusing affected persons (619HHs) in each project ward of the municipality. The members to include head of the affected families, FHHs, TLO representatives and community leaders and at least 33% women.

Information sharing Consultation Shared responsibilities and expectations

Through presentations and discussion introduce the project construction modality, impact and benefits

Gather concerns and views related to project design and implementation

Explain grievance mechanism Explain ADB’s and the government’s

safeguards measures; grievance redress mechanism to the affected persons

Explain initiatives to promote GESI under the project; increased representation in decision-making and employment opportunities

Build awareness on the need to protect and keep clean public spaces and entities

PMC, DSC, IDC

Just before start of civil work

44

Activity Target Stakeholders

Type of Participation

Objective Responsible Time Frame

2. Project orientation workshop for contractors

Management staff, field supervisors and laborers.

Information sharing

Orient on safeguard provisions Sensitize on avoiding public

nuisances, minimizing public inconveniences, and avoiding disruption to the public activities/mobility

Awareness creation on health and hygiene, HIV/AIDS, other communicable diseases and core labor standards and gender issues

Best construction practices for safety during construction activities and EMP compliance

PMC, IDC, DSC

Upon contractor mobiliza-tion

3. Consultation on project‘s resettlement plan and framework (minimum 3 meetings) with identified APs

Affected persons Information sharing Consultation Negotiation

Introduce the project’s safeguard provision

Mitigate potential conflict Solicit the views of affected persons on

resettlement and compensation Agree on resettlement processes,

location, timing and compensation Disseminate/share about the likely

impacts of the subproject, summary of the RP including entitlements, grievance redress mechanism and contact information

R-PIU/PISU,PMC DSC, IDC

Years 1-3

45

V. GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISMS 72. A project municipality specific grievance redress mechanism (GRM) has been established to hear grievances and concern raised from affected persons and project beneficiaries. According to PAM and CRIPPF each project municipality has to establish two tiers of grievance redress mechanism (GRM) at the local (project municipality) & central (PCO) level respectively.

73. Municipality level Grievance Redress Committee (GRC): As mentioned in CRIPPF the GRC has been formed comprising five members headed by mayor of Municipality. Members of the GRC include RPIU chief, representatives of affected persons with one male and one female (a representative of Indigenous people, in case of indigenous people related issues), social safeguard focal person. The social safeguard focal person representing project municipality is the member secretary of the GRC. The GRC will meet as needed to determine the merit of each grievance, and resolve it within 7 days of receiving the complaint. The committee thus appointed should be sanctioned by the municipal board. The responsibilities of the GRC at municipality will be:

to conduct subproject level public awareness campaign regarding grievance redress mechanism of the project. The social safeguards experts of the PMC will support the GRC by preparing and providing information/awareness material etc. to conduct the awareness campaign. The campaign will ensure participation of poor and vulnerable groups in the awareness campaign. The campaigns also cover information on entitlements policy provisions and their application.

to hear complaints and grievances at local level. The local people can approach the committee with their grievances related to the project which will be registered, categorized and discussed in the committee with the aim of amicable settlement. It is expected that the committee will provide an accessible forum for receiving and facilitating resolution grievances related to the project and grievances will be redressed within one week from the date of lodging the complaints. The social safeguard focal person representing project municipality in each municipality assisted by the DSC social expert will be responsible for processing and placing all papers before the GRC, recording decisions, issuing minutes of the meetings and taking follow up action to see that formal orders are issued and the decisions carried out. Any unresolved or major issues at municipality level will be referred to the PCO level GRC for resolution.

74. A municipal level GRC has been formed in Bheemdatta Municipality on 2074/10/14 BS (2018 Jan 28). The composition of the GRC is in line with PAM and CRIPPF; headed by Mayor of the municipality. The committee consists of following members: I. Chairperson : Mr. Surendra Bista , Mayor II. Member : Project Manager, RPIU/DUDBC Dhangadhi, Kailali III. Member : to be nominated , representing Affected Person IV. Member : to be nominated , representing Affected Person V. Member Secretary: Mr. Hari Singh Dhami, Social Development Unit, Bheemdatta Municipality.

75. The PCO Level GRC: A GRC has been formed at PCO under the chair of Project Director (PD) comprising of Deputy Project Director and chief of social development unit of MoUD as members. The Social Development Expert of Project

46

Management Consultant (PMC) under PCO is acting as member secretary of the GRC and responsible for processing and placing all papers before the GRC, recording decisions, issuing minutes of the meetings and taking follow up action to see that formal orders are issued and the decisions carried out. 76. The unresolved or major issues forwarded by the Municipality level GRC will be reviewed at PCO level GRC for final solution. Decision must be made within 15 days of receipt of complaint at this level. The PCO level GRC shall refer the complaints registered at the PCO to the concerned municipality level GRC for initial hearing within 7 days of registration. 77. Despite the project GRM, an aggrieved person shall have access to the country's legal system at any stage, and accessing the country's legal system can run parallel to accessing the GRM and is not dependent on the negative outcome of the GRM. 78. People who are, or may in the future be, adversely affected by the project and not satisfied with the established GRM may submit complaints to ADB’s Accountability Mechanism3. The Accountability Mechanism provides an independent forum and process whereby people adversely affected by ADB-assisted projects can voice, and seek a resolution of their problems, as well as report alleged violations of ADB’s operational policies and procedures. Before submitting a complaint to the Accountability Mechanism, affected people should make a good faith effort to solve their problems by working with the concerned ADB operations department. Only after doing that, and if they are still dissatisfied, should they approach the Accountability Mechanism. 3For further information see: http://www.adb.org/Accountability-Mechanism/default.asp

47

VI. LEGAL FRAMEWORK

79. In principle, Nepal has an established policy framework to implement social safeguard measures in development activities. The safeguard policies and regulation related to infrastructure development mainly reflected in the constitution, policies and regulations related to land acquisition and compensation; Indigenous Peoples (IPs); good governance, social accountability and public consultation.

A. The Constitution 80. The Constitution of Republic of Nepal (2015), Article 25 (1) guarantees the fundamental right of a citizen, i.e. right to acquire, own, sell and dispose of the property. Article 25 (2) describe that the state cannot acquire the property of any person except in case of public interest. Article 25 (3) also state that compensation shall be provided for any loss of individual property for public interest.

B. Land Acquisition Act, 2034 (1977) 81. The Land Acquisition Act (1977) specifies the procedures for land acquisition and compensation. The Act empowers the government to acquire any land for public interest or for the execution of any development works. There is a provision of Compensation Determination Committee (CDC) under the leadership of Chief District Officer (CDO), which will fix the rate of compensation for the affected property. The other members in the committee are the Chief of Land Revenue Officer, representative from District Development Committee (now District Coordination Committee), concerned Project Director/Manager. The committee can also invite representatives from among the affected persons, representative from affected Rural/Municipality. 82. The basic function of the CDC is to review the verification of lands to be acquired, review and determine the compensation rate, identify the proper owners, distribution of compensation and address the issues related to land acquisition and compensation distribution. District Administrative Office (DAO) under CDO is also responsible to notify the public regarding the details of the land area, structure affected and other assets affected in the concerned Rural/Municipality for project purposes. The typical process of land acquisition under this act is indicated in Table 16. Table 16: Process for land Acquisition as per Land Acquisition Act

S.N. Steps outlined in the Land Acquisition Act 1 Sectorial agency decides to execute a development project at a certain location 2 Sectorial agency requests the Government to acquire land specifying objectives and

committing payments of compensation and other expenses 3 GON approves and orders the initiation process and CDC is formed 4 Public notification is made at public places in the project area, Rural / Municipality

offices and to the affected households 5 Necessary preliminary survey including boundary demarcation, agricultural

production valuation and social census of affected families takes place 6 Land Revenue Office report on the area and location of land to be acquired

including likely compensation and amount of loss

48

7 The local officer (CDO) issues notices including purpose of acquisition and detail of land to be acquired

8 Land transactions are banned within the notified area 9 Owner can file complaints within 7 days through the local officer 10 Resolution of grievance within 15 days of complaint 11 Acquisition of land and payment of compensation Source: Land Acquisition Act, 2034(1977)

C. Land Reform Act 2021 (1964)

83. Another key legislation in Nepal related to land acquisition is the Land Reform Act 2021 (1964). The Land Reform Act (1964) is relevant in the compensation distribution modality. It specifies the compensation entitlements for the registered tenant. Where the tenancy right is legally established, the owner and tenant each will be entitled to 50% of the total compensation amount. Section 42 of the Land Reform Act states that Guthi (religious/trust) land acquired for development work must be replaced with another land.

D. Local Government Operation Act 2074

84. The new Local Government Operation Act enacted in 2017 has superseded all provisions of Local Self Governance Act 1999 in line with state restructuring of Nepal. The local government as Municipalities and Rural Municipalities has definite roles and rights in public land conservation and ownership as depicted in Clause 11 (g). Clause 11 (n-4) articulates the roles of local government in facilitation of land acquisition, compensation determination and distribution for public purpose. Similarly, the sub clause (n-5 and 6) articulates the roles of local government in facilitation and coordination for determination of land ownership and cadastral mapping. Other role in land ownership certificate distribution is also defined in these sub clauses.

85. The Local Government Operation Act 2074 Chapter -7 has building construction and road related provision. The clause 45 (1) states that Municipality or Rural Municipality may declare (fix) RoW of road within its area. According to clause (2) the municipality or Rural Municipality should obey the norms / standard of RoW of national or provincial level road. The clause 45(3) has given the power to local government over RoW and states that Municipality or Rural Municipality can order anytime to demolish or remove structures erected within RoW as mentioned in clause 45 (1 & 2). Further the clause 45(4) states that in case any person, organization or institution do not demolish or remove structures as ordered clause 45 (3), Municipality or Rural Municipality can demolish or remove such structures itself and the demolition or removal cost will be charged from concerned person, organization or institution.

86. Moreover, the clause 45 (5) states that after the enactment of this Act, once the RoW has been declared as per sub-section 1; if the RoW is changed again - then in such case if any land or structure falls under the new RoW (extended portion), then compensation shall be provided for acquisition of such land, or for demolition or/and removal of such structures. The Clause 27 in the Chapter 7 has provision of prohibition on construction of building without obtaining approval from concerned Municipality or Rural Municipality. House map registration and approval is mandatory for house construction. Clause 27 (3) mentions that fragmentation or plotting of land for housing purpose should not be done without prior approval from Municipality or Rural Municipality.

49

E. Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Policy (LARRP), 2015

87. The Government of Nepal has formulated Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Policy 2071 (2015) to facilitate the land acquisition process for infrastructure project. The policy outlines the need to conduct an economic and social impact assessment (SIA) of the development project, which was not a requirement under the Land Acquisition Act 1977. Based on this assessment, projects will be categorized as high, medium and low-risk5. The policy also provisioned for the project affected families to be entitled to compensation if works like installation of transmission, telephone and underground drinking water pipe lines affect livelihood. And in case the projects affect yields of registered commercial crop, fruit or flower producers, compensation equivalent to five years of revenue must be given in cash. 88. The policy adds that all expenses related to land acquisition, compensation and the implementation of resettlement and rehabilitation plans should be considered as project cost and interest should be paid on compensation amount depending on the days it took to release funds to those affected by the project. The interest calculation begins from the day a formal decision was taken to operate the project, says the policy. 89. The compensation amount for those affected by the project will be fixed by a five- member compensation committee formed under the chief district officer. The committee can form a technical team to determine the compensation amount. This team should derive the compensation amount as close as possible to the minimum market rate by working closely with members of families that are likely to be displaced. 90. Those not satisfied with land acquisition, resettlement and rehabilitation processes can lodge complaints at a body formed at the project office and complaint hearing offices at district and regional levels. If verdict issued by the regional level complaint hearing office is also deemed unsatisfactory, the person can knock on the doors of court.

5 High-risk projects refer to those which displace 50 or more households in the mountainous region, 75 or more households in the hilly region and 100 or more households in the Tarai. Medium-risk projects, on the other hand, are those that force relocation of less than 50 households in the mountainous region, less than 75 households in the hilly region and less than 100 households in the Tarai. Likewise, low-risk projects refer to those which cause productive property to shrink by up to 10 per cent.

50

91. The Land Acquisition, Resettlement and Rehabilitation Policy for the Infrastructure Development Projects has following key provisions regarding land acquisition:

Recognizes the need of resettlement and rehabilitation plan to ensure the livelihood of the project affected persons or households at least above the pre- project conditions;

Emphasize that the project development agency conduct meaningful consultation with the project affected persons including all vulnerable groups viz women, children, indigenous/Janajati groups, disabled, helpless and persons having no legal rights on the operated land;

Requires to accomplish compensation payment, resettlement and rehabilitation efforts to the project affected person/households including nontitle holders;

Emphasize land acquisition through negotiation with the project affected person/households through transparent, free, fair and justifiable process;

Requires land based compensation and resettlement to persons/households who lose all the property or whose livelihood is agriculture based;

Requires relocation and resettlement of the affected persons/households close to the current place of residence until and otherwise he/she willingly prefer to relocate him/herself;

Requires inclusive programs for the enhancement of their socio- economic development of disadvantageous groups such as facility less groups (Dalit, Indigenous or Janajati groups and single women etc.);

Requires compensation of the built properties including resettlement and rehabilitation benefits for persons/households who do not have land or legal right for the currently operated land;

Requires access on project benefit (share allocations) to the affected persons/households for projects where return on investment is potential;

Requires provisioning of subsidized rates to the project affected persons/households for projects providing services;

Requires following additional project assistance on the top of the compensation and resettlement to the physically displaced groups.

1. Residential facilities 2. Goods transportation assistance 3. Relocation assistance 4. Relocation for business assistance 5. House Rental assistance

Additional assistance as recommended by plan to seriously project affected households and vulnerable groups (Dalit, Janajati or marginalized Indigenous, single women, helpless, disabled, senior citizen etc.)

Employment opportunity and livelihood restoration to the seriously project affected households and Vulnerable groups (Dalit, Janajati or marginalized Indigenous, single women, helpless, disabled, senior citizen etc.) based on their skills and capabilities.

Requires project development agency to ensure the allocation of resources required for resettlement /rehabilitation and livelihood restoration of the project affected persons/households.

51

F. Policies and Act Related to Indigenous Peoples 92. Nepal does not have a standalone policy on Indigenous Peoples to safeguard them from specific policy, planning initiatives and development projects. The Constitution of Nepal 2072 (2015), NFDIN Act 2002, Local Government Operation guideline, 2074, Forest Act (1993) and Forest Regulation (1995) and periodic Five Year Plans have been placed significant emphasis on delivering basic services to the indigenous people. Besides, there are some provisions for the protection and promotion of Janajatis' traditional knowledge and cultural heritage. 93. The Constitution of Nepal 2072 (2015), Article 18, Right to Equality, states that all citizens shall be equal before law. No person shall be denied the equal protection of law. However, the article also mentioned that nothing shall be deemed to bar the making of special provisions by law for the protection, empowerment or advancement of the women lagging behind socially and culturally, Dalits, Adibasi, Madhesi, Tharus, Muslims, oppressed class, backward communities, minorities, marginalized groups, peasants, laborers, youths, children, senior citizens, sexual minorities, persons with disability, pregnant, incapacitated and the helpless persons, and of the citizens who belong to backward regions and financially deprived citizens including the Khas Arya. 94. Specific policy initiatives for the welfare and advancement of IPs (Adivasi/Janajati) were initiated in 1997, when a National Committee for Development of Nationalities (NCDN) was set up. In 2002, the Nepal Parliament passed a bill for the establishment of an autonomous foundation named “National Foundation for Upliftment / Development of Indigenous Nationalities (NFDIN),” which came into existence in 2003 replacing the NCDN. The NFDIN Act 2002 established the first comprehensive policy and institutional framework pertaining to Adivasis/Janajatis. The act defines indigenous groups or Adivasi / Janajati in Nepali as "a group or community having its own territory, own mother tongue, traditional rites and customs, distinct cultural identity, distinct social structure and written or unwritten history". The government, through NFDIN, has identified and officially recognized 59 such indigenous communities. This list was updated in 2009 to include 81 groups for official recognition but yet to be approved by the GON. 95. The Local Government Operation Act, 2074 commits municipalities for the promotion, preservation, and protection of language, religion, culture of indigenous people and their welfare in the municipal area. The Act empowers municipalities to formulate policy / regulation, by-laws and guideline regarding project implementation, monitoring and evaluation within their own jurisdiction. The act also emphasis on the formulation, implementation and monitoring of the plan required for economic, social, environmental, cultural, technology and infrastructure development. Under the jurisdiction of provincial and state law, the act has given the authority to municipality formulate urban development plan and policy, law and standard related to building construction as well as planning, study, project identification, implementation and monitoring. The Act provides municipalities to follow planned development programs and prioritized programs that can increase productivity, contribute to upgrading living standards, and generate income and employment opportunities for indigenous people and other vulnerable groups. The Act also provisions on social security and poverty alleviation and focuses on formulation and execution of target group plan and policy benefiting to women and disadvantaged groups.

52

96. These constitutional, legal and policy provisions are supplemented with the provisions under the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007) and International Labor Organization (ILO) Convention (169), 1989 in 2007 since Nepal is a signatory to these international legal instruments. The ILO Convention no. 169 of 1989 is the most comprehensive legally binding treaty on the rights of indigenous peoples. The Convention includes provisions on cultural integrity, land and resource rights and non-discrimination, and instructs states to consult indigenous peoples in all decisions affecting them. Articles 1-4 of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007) ensures the individual and collective rights of indigenous peoples, as well as their rights to culture, identity, language, employment, health, education and other issues while implementing any development activities in the traditional territory of the IP. G. ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement 2009

97. According to the ADB Safeguard Policy Statement (2009), the basic objectives of the safeguards requirements are to avoid involuntary resettlement wherever possible; to minimize involuntary resettlement by exploring project and design alternatives; to enhance, or at least restore, the livelihoods of all affected persons in real terms relative to pre-project levels; and to improve the standards of living of the affected poor and other vulnerable groups. ADB’s main safeguard policy guidelines are:

Involuntary Resettlement (IR) should be avoided wherever possible; Where IR is unavoidable, minimize involuntary resettlement by exploring project

and design alternatives; Enhance or at least restore the livelihoods of all affected persons in real terms

relative to pre-project levels; Improve the standards of living of the affected poor and other vulnerable groups; Gender analysis is required to identify related resettlement impacts and risks; Resettlement Plans (RP) should be prepared in full consultation with affected

persons (APs), host communities, and concerned nongovernment organizations (NGOs) including disclosure of the RP and project related information;

Preference will be given to land-based resettlement for affected persons whose livelihoods are land-based. However, if the land is not the preferred option or the land is not available at reasonable price, the Displaced Person (DPs) will be provided opportunities for employment, or self-employment, in addition to the reasonable cash compensation for land and other assets lost;

Cash compensations for the loss of structures, other assets and incomes should be based on full replacement cost;

Absence of formal legal title to land or non-recognized or recognizable claims to such land by the affected persons should not be a bar to compensation;

The rate of compensation for land, structures and other assets should be calculated at full replacement cost based on fair market value; transaction cost; interest accrued; transitional and restoration cost, and other applicable payments, if any.

All compensation payments and related activities must be completed prior to the commencement of the civil work;

Special attention to be paid to the needs of vulnerable groups especially those below the poverty line, the landless, the elderly, women and children and indigenous people and those without legal title to land.

53

H. ADB’s Policy on Indigenous Peoples (SPS 2009)

98. It states that the borrower/client will ensure (i) that affected Indigenous Peoples receive culturally appropriate social and economic benefits; and (ii) that when potential adverse impacts on Indigenous Peoples are identified, these will be avoided to the maximum extent possible. Where this avoidance is proven to be impossible, based on meaningful consultation with indigenous communities, the Indigenous Peoples Plan6 will outline measures to minimize, mitigate, and compensate for the adverse impacts.

I. Measures for Bridging Gaps between ADB and GON Policies

99. The Table 17 summarizes the main differences between ADB and Government of Nepal’s legislation in terms of involuntary resettlement and the measures included in this resettlement plan to bridge the gaps.

Table 17: Differences between ADB Policy and GON Legal Framework and measures recommended for bridging gaps Key issues GON Regulation ADB SPS Measures

recommended in the RIPPF

Loss of more than 10% of the total landholdings and income

Do not consider thepercentage loss of income or total land holdings The LARRP (2015) has provision of social impact assessment ( 7.2.1)

Income restoration programs such as training and other measures to restore and improve the standard of living of the affected households

Provision has been madeto provide skill training and income generating measures in theEntitlement Matrix

Squatters/illegal occupants/nontitle land users

Do not consider squatters/ encroachers/ nontitle land users for compensation The LARRP (2015) has provision of compensation for affected non-land assets and assistance for rehabilitation ( 7.3.8)

Non-title holders are not entitled for the compensation of land but for replacement cost of assets on land and resettlement assistance business and other assistance

Provision has been made to provide compensation for the affected structures /houses/ business in the EM

Valuation of affected land, houses & other structures and trees

Compensation rate is determined by CDC, consisting of (i) CDO (ii) representative from DDC (iii) Chief of Land Revenue Office (iv)

All compensation is based on the principle of replacement cost

Provision has been made for the replacement value for the loss of land, houses/structures. APs can take salvagedmaterials. CDC will make final

6 If the impact on indigenous people is significant an Indigenous People’s Plan would be prepared for this project with a set out actions to addressing how IPs will benefit from this project and negative impacts will be avoided/mitigated. However, the impact on IP is very limited and no separate IPP is not justified at the stage of the project preparation and detained design.

54

Project Manager

The LARRP (2015) has provision of following scientific procedures while determining the compensation for the lands acquired and lossesincurred by individuals/families so that minimum market-value of the property must be maintained and the compensation should be given to the affected families within the given time (7.3.2).

decision on the rates in the presence of representativesfrom DPs, Municipality, civilsociety, who will attend themeeting as an observer(details are provided inSection VIII)

Other assistance For relocation of the houses

No provisions in LAA(1977) The LARRP (2015) hasprovision that projectproponent will ensure the resources required torehabilitate the livelihoodof the affected individuals/families (7.1.3)

All the eligible DPsincluding tenants, employees are entitled to receive financial assistance to cover physical andeconomical displacement

Provision has been madefor the transitionalallowances, transportallowances and one timefinancial assistance to thetenants, employees

Vulnerable groups No Provisions in LAA (1977) The LARRP (2015) hasprovision of additionalassistance and inclusive programs targeting these groups to uplift their socio-economic status (7.2.7).

Focused on the poor and vulnerable group to avoid future impoverishment and create new opportunities

Provision has been made for income restoration programs and other financial assistance

Voluntary land donation

No provision in LAA (1977) The LARRP (2015) hasprovision of Third-partyvalidation of consultationrelated to land donationsis required

The borrower is required to engage an independentthird-party to document thenegotiation and settlementprocesses to openlyaddress the risks ofasymmetry of informationand bargaining power ofthe parties involved insuch transactions.

A mechanism will be established ensuring transparent process is followed, and there is no coercion for donation of land and building demolition. The verification will be done by an independent third party.

55

VII. ENTITLEMENT, ASSISTANCE AND BENEFITS

A. Entitlement Policy

100. An entitlement matrix has been given in Table 17, which summarizes the main types of losses and corresponding entitlements proposed under this subproject. The entitlements listed in the entitlement matrix are based on standards and practices adopted by GON for similar projects funded by ADB. Principally the key entitlements include voluntary donation of partial loss of land and structures at minor repair cost and provisional exemption of tax and fees. 101. Voluntary Donation of Land & Structures: As provisioned in CRIPPF for RUDP the project accepts self-declaration of voluntary demolition of building and clearance of municipal right of way. Such offer would be considered only if (i) the voluntary offer is for small strips of land7, (ii) it will not result in permanent and significant loss/impact on income and livelihood of the land donor or causing any third party displacement8, (iii) road improvements and other project activities will directly benefit the owners, (iv) meaningful consultation was carried out to finalize the design, (v) land owners agree and their voluntary offer without coercion is documented, and (vi) the donor is not categorized as poor or vulnerable. 102. The affected person have chosen the design option resulting partial loss of structures and lands without affecting main part (i.e structural element) of their house and they agreed for offering donation voluntary. As stated in entitlement matrix there is no compensation for the donated land and self-demolition of affected structures. However, there are some provisions to mitigate the impacts such as provision of exemption of registration fees or other municipal charges, repair allowances to structure owner based on per unit rate (sq.m) as decided by municipal board, exemption of 3 years’ housing tax (only for demolished building), waiver of building permission fees and taxes to rebuild affected house. 103. The house owners who have built the projected structures within the municipal RoW as well as design width are mostly involving in business operating in their main building and the likely impacts due to demolition of the extended structures without disturbing the main buildings/structures are very marginal (based on percentage of loss and minimum size of remaining assets). The dismantling of extended structures such as chhaja (temporary shed in front part of the house), house peti (apron), boundary wall etc. do not result in displacement of households or cause loss of household’s incomes and livelihood. On the other hands, the households making voluntary donations are the direct beneficiaries of the project and they have chosen the proposed project design based on their informed choice among the various design options prepared by the project.

7 For example, less than 10% of the total area and not affecting the main structure 8 The donated land/assets should be free of third party impacts (current user of the land/ assets, either by

formal or informal arrangement). If there will be third party impacts, some assistance need to be provided to them.

56

104. While preparing individual voluntary donation consent paper, a mechanism has been established to ensure transparent process was followed and coercion was not used during accepting the voluntary demolition of building and clearance of municipal right of way. The whole process of offering voluntary donation of structures or lands has been verified and validated by R-PIU/PISU, Municipality with the help of Citizen Forum Bheemdatta as an independent third party prior to contract award. The individual consent papers in this regard are attached in Annex-5 for reference.

B. Entitlement Matrix

105. An entitlement matrix has been given in Table 18, which summarizes the main types of losses and corresponding entitlements proposed under this subproject. The entitlements listed in the entitlement matrix are based on standards and practices adopted by GON for similar projects funded by ADB. Principally the key entitlements include voluntary donation of partial loss of land and structures at minor repair cost and provisional exemption of tax and fees.

Table 18: Entitlement Matrix

Type of Loss Scope Who is entitled Entitlements

Responsible for the Delivery of the

Entitlement

Comments

A1. Loss of Lands/Impact on Lands 1. Self-declaration

of Voluntary demolition of building and clearance of municipal Right of Way (ROW)

Loss of land and structures on the donated land

Land and structure owner.

No compensation for the donated land and self-demolition of affected structures.

Exemption of any transfer costs, registration fees or other municipal charges.

Repair allowances to structure owner based on per unit rate (sft) as decided by municipal board.

Exemption of 3 years’ housing tax (only for demolished building).

Waiver of building permission fees and taxes to rebuild affected house.

The EA (concerned municipality & PIU)

1.1 Voluntary donor households. Donation is accepted only if the donor: Is project beneficiary and fully consulted and

informed about their rights and design options; Doesn’t fall below poverty line after land

donation; Donating up to 10% land holding without or no

impact on structural element of the building; Is unforced or freely willing to donate, Has chosen the design option for road widening. 1.2 Donation should be verified by PCO/RPIU to ensure integrity and impartiality. 1.3 The entitlement may not be applicable if the building owner has built the structure violating approved design of the building and building construction certificate issued by the municipality. 1.4 The municipality will provide all entitlement for any building constructed prior to declaration of RoW of particular road sections.

A2. Temporary Impacts on Land 2. Temporary

impacts during construction

2.1 Damage to adjacent parcel of land due to movement of machinery and spoil generated during construction 2.2 Land used by the contractor for labor

Land and business owner

15 days prior notice will be given to protect crops or business Reinstatement of the damaged property to the original form. Cash or kind compensation at replacement value by contractor, if the loss is non-revocable (that cannot be restored or reestablished). Lease fee at

Contractor Design supervision consultant will verify the loss and facilitate to negotiate the rates. Contractor to negotiate a contract agreement on a rental rate with the owner or user of the land that will be temporarily used for construction activities. Project and the contractor to ensure that persons other than the owner affected as a result of temporary acquisition are also compensated for loss of at least 3 months income.

58



Entitlement

Comments

camp, construction yard and stores.

replacement value will be provided to the land or building owner or user of the land or building if rented out. Land should be returned to the owner/user at the end of temporary acquisition period after fully restoring it to its original condition or improved as agreed with the AP.

B. Loss of Residential and Commercial Structures 3. Loss of

residential and commercial structures

Marginal impact (i.e., unaffected portion of the house is still viable for use and no relocation required)

3.1 Owners of the structures with or without acceptable proof of ownership over the land; with or without building permit

Cash compensation at replacement cost for the affected portion. Repair allowance equivalent to not less than 20% of replacement cost of the affected portion, or equivalent to the actual cost of repair. The affected households have right to take salvaged materials without deduction to compensation.

EA, Concerned municipality, PIU, and CDC

This entitlement only applies if someone denied for voluntary donation and impact on major structure due to construction activities with genuine causes verified by a technical team of DSC/PIU. Payment will be made, in full, to the AP before taking possession of the structure. Technical team of (IA or municipality or DSC consultant) will assess and confirm viability of use of the building and concurred with by the affected household.

59



Entitlement

Comments

Severe impact (i.e., house is no longer viable for continued use and the entire structure is to be acquired

3.2 Owners of the structures with or without acceptable proof of ownership over the land; with or without building permit

Cash compensation at replacement cost for the entire structure.

Materials transport allowance equivalent to 1.5 month minimum wage for the household if relocating in the same ward/village; 2 month minimum wage for the household if relocating elsewhere in the municipality/district.

One time assistance allowance of 1 month minimum wage for the household for those who will move to another plot of land and 1/2 month minimum wage for the household for those who will move within the same plot of land.

The affected household have right to take salvaged materials without deduction to compensation

EA, Concerned municipality, PIU, and CDC

This entitlement only applies when loss of residential/ commercial structures happened while demolishing extended slab/structure and compound wall with genuine causes verified by a technical team of DSC/PIU Payment will be made, in full, to the AP before taking possession of the structure. Technical team of (IA or municipality or DSC consultant) will assess and confirm viability of use of the building and concurred with by the affected household.

60



Entitlement

Comments

C. Loss of Income Generating Sources and Assets 4. Loss of income

of small vendors

Business affected temporarily during project construction

4.1 Non-mobile business operators on footpaths of road extension/upgrade projects

Affected Venders will be notified at least 1 month in advance of the construction date by the Project. One time assistance allowance of 15 days minimum wage for the vender. A lump sum shifting allowance (transport plus load un loading charges) of NRs 2500.00 will be paid to affected vender/shop/business owner

Supervision consultant/contractor to deliver short term compensation for loss of income.

The EA and project supervision consultant will ensure payment is made prior to physical displacement.

D. Loss of common property resources 5. Loss of cultural

and community structures/ public facilities/community forests

Common property resources such as community forests, monasteries, temples, irrigation cannel, water supply pipes, electricity poles etc. affected by the Project.

5.1 Affected community/ Institution/user group responsible for the administration of the property.

Replacement or restoration of the affected community facilities (including temples, shrines, public water stand posts etc.) in consultation with the affected community. Or cash compensation for restoring the affected cultural/community structures to the recognized institution/ patron/ custodian of the affected structure.

Design supervision consultant/contractor to deliver replacement/ restoration of structure/facility

The EA, and design supervision consultant

61



Entitlement

Comments

Project Assistance to move the structure to a new location

F. Other unanticipated impacts 6. Unanticipated

adverse impacts due to project intervention or associated activity.

Unanticipated involuntary and other impacts of the subprojects will be documented during the implementation phase and mitigated based on provision made in the CRIPPF. The EA and project implementation authorities will finalize the entitlements in line with GoN legal provisions and ADB’s SPS, 2009.

DSC= Design Supervision Consultants, CDC= Compensation Determination Committee, PIU= Project Implementation Unit.

62

VIII. RESETTLEMENT BUDGET AND FINANCING PLAN 106. This chapter provides the details of cost estimates regarding the resettlement activities described in preceding chapters under the following headings:

A. Dismantling, Rehabilitation and Minor Maintenance Cost for Affected Structures Within Design Width: 107. Cost for dismantling, rehabilitation and minor maintenance of private structures within the adopted design width has been provisioned and included in BoQ. The projected structures of private houses such as Chhaja (temporary shed in front part of the house), house peti (apron) and other minor structures including compound wall, temporary shed ect. need to be dismantled for site clearance during construction. Transportation cost for disposal of unusable materials of demolished structures has also been included. Total NRs 36,072,854 has been proposed for dismantling and minor maintenance of affected private structures and included in BoQ. B. Reinstatement / Maintenance / Protection of the Affected Public / Community Properties (Chautara, Temple etc.):

108. During socio-economic survey some public / community properties were identified located within RoW that will be affected during site clearance for construction. The cost has been provisioned for reinstatement / maintenance / protection of affected public / community properties such as temple, compound wall of public school, Government office etc. The Entitlement Matrix (EM:5.1) states the replacement or restoration of the affected community facilities (including temples, shrines, public water stand posts etc.) in consultation with the affected community. Total cost of NRs 2,481,521 has been proposed for this and included in BoQ.

C. Rehabilitation Allowance for Affected Venders 109. A rehabilitation allowance has been provisioned to cover loss of income or livelihood strategy due to temporary disturbance to income generating activities of mobile hawkers/vendors during Drainage and Road Improvement works. The entitlement Matrix (EM: 4.1) proposes one time assistance allowance of 15 days minimum wage(as per established rate of Kanchanpur district) plus a lump sum shifting allowance (transport plus load un loading charges) of NRs 2500.00 for the affected venders. The contractors will enumerate and Municipality / PISU will verify the exact numbers of the affected venders during construction period. The verified affected venders will be compensated using budget allocated either under provisional sum of the subproject or using contingency budget heading of the RP. D. RP Implementation and Management Cost: 110. A number of RP implementation activities need to be carried out at the subproject level by R-PIU in collaboration with PISU. Some of such activities include: (i) public consultation, and information dissemination, (ii) organizing stakeholder meetings, and implementing the decision, field verification, and updating RP, (iii) organizing and mobilizing local grievance redress committee meetings so on. In order to ensure such expenses, RP implementation cost also been calculated and incorporated in the resettlement budget as given in Table-18

63

E. Contingencies: 111. A contingency amount including price contingency, material, work change and other as per GoN rule (25%) of the total cost estimated for implementation of the resettlement activities is proposed to cover cost of likelihood expenses including cost of some private structures that might be affected during the implementation of road and drainage improvement works. F. Total Cost Estimate

112. The tentative total cost estimate for implementation of resettlement activities is as follows: Table 19: Budgetary Cost Estimate for Implementation of Resettlement Activities

S.N Description of the Task Quantity Rate (NRs) Estimated Cost (NRs)

1

Dismantling, Rehabilitation and Minor Maintenance of Affected Structures Within RoW/adopted design width.

As per BoQ As per BoQ 36,072,854

2

Reinstatement / Maintenance / Protection of the Affected Public / Community Properties (Chautara, Temple etc.)

As per BoQ As per BoQ 2,481,521

3

Information dissemination about the project, organizing stakeholder meeting and follow up activities.

6 25,000 150,000

4 Organizing GRC meetings and follow-up activities. 15 5,000 75,000

5

Mobilization of Surveyor/Amin / Malpot for Field Verification plus social safeguard related orientation/training

LS 300,000 300,000

6 Monitoring LS 150,000 150,000 Total(1-6) - 39,229,375

13% VAT 5,099,819 Sub-total including VAT 44,329,194 25% contingency 11,082,298 Total 55,411,492

G. Financing Plan

113. All costs related to RP implementation would be borne by the Government. The EA will ensure that adequate funds are delivered on time to the R-PIU for timely implementation of resettlement activities.

64

IX. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS

114. The Ministry of Urban Development (MoUD) through its Department of Urban Development and Building Construction (DUDBC) is the Executing Agency (EA) of the project. EA has established a Project Coordination Office (PCO) headed by a Project Director (PD). The PCO is staffed with a social development expert under project management consultant to confirm smooth implementation of the RP and take corrective actions if necessary. The R-PIU established in DUDBC divisional office Kailali, along with the project municipalities (Dhangadhi, Godawari, Suklaphanta and Bheemdatta) will be the Implementing Agencies (IAs) for the subprojects. The project municipalities have also established a project implementation support unit (PISU) in each municipality. The R-PIU headed by project manager and staffed with a social development officer / sociologist is responsible for the preparation of the SIA and the subsequent Resettlement and IPP Planning documents. Besides preparation of RAPs and related documents, R-PIU will also be responsible for the public participation process as outlined above, and for the grievance redress mechanism

115. A Design Supervision Consultant (DSC) is engaged to support the R-PIU in all its activities; and will make sure that the relevant conditions formulated in the CRIPPF and RP will be included in the scheme construction Tender Documents, in order to allow the bidders to include these measures and conditions in their bids. The DSC has qualified personnel to carry out this task. The DSC will assist with any rehabilitation and resettlement to ensure that affected persons are aware of their entitlements and to ensure conformity with the project Resettlement Plan.

116. The R-PIU and PISU in the municipality will implement resettlement activities. The Project Management Consultant (PMC) under PCO will also monitor the smooth implementation of RP. The R-PIU and PISU will work closely with the DSC- Resettlement Specialist /consultant during detailed design and construction phase to verify APs and corresponding mitigation measures and assistance proposed in this RP. The R-PIU and PISU will continue further consultation with APs during project implementation and solicit views regarding compensation, and relocation options. The PCO will verify the implementation of resettlement requirements and confirm whether APs received entitlements as per the RP prior to the award of civil work contracts. The municipal project implementation support unit (PISU) will facilitate linking APs to relevant government programs related to social and economic rehabilitation. 117. The R-PIU will submit quarterly progress reports on RP implementation to the PCO, who will then review and take corrective actions if necessary. The PCO with assistance from the PMC consultants will consolidate their reports into semiannual monitoring reports and submit to ADB. These reports are to describe the progress of the implementation of resettlement activities and any compliance issues and corrective actions. In cases where the municipality and plot owner negotiate directly, the DSC-consultant and R-PIU will verify the satisfaction of the plot owner with the agreed compensation amount, if applicable. The R- PIU and PISU with support of social development expert of DSC are to ensure all the activities specified in RP are implemented and ensure all entitlements are paid accordingly before commencement of civil works.

65

118. Civil works contracts and contractors: RP and EMP are to be included in bidding and contract documents and verified by the R-PIU and PCO. The contractor will be required to designate an Environment, Health and Safety (EHS) supervisor to ensure implementation of social safeguard provisions in this RP during civil works, who will also have the responsibility for communication with the public under the guidance of R- PIU/PSIU and grievance registration. Contractors are to carry out all mitigation and monitoring measures outlined in their contract.

119. The PCO and R-PIU will ensure that bidding and contract documents include specific provisions requiring contractors to comply with: (i) all applicable labor laws and core labor standards on (a) prohibition of child labor as defined in national legislation for construction and maintenance activities; (b) equal pay for equal work of equal value regardless of gender, ethnicity, or caste; and (c) elimination of forced labor; and with (ii) the requirement to disseminate information on sexually transmitted diseases, including HIV/AIDS, to employees and local communities surrounding the project sites.

66

X IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE

120. The project will be implemented over five years (2016-2021). Construction activities are expected to start from the first quarter of 2020 and be completed at the end of 2021. RUDP-CRIPPF (2016) and ADB SPS (2009) require that consent of affected persons for voluntary donation of affected land and structures within the municipal RoW to be provided before the loss is incurred. Accordingly the consents of affected owners in this regard have been collected before construction and attached in this RP, and other entitlements will commence as soon as the RP has been approved by ADB. All land required will be provided free of encumbrances to the contractor prior to handing over of subproject site and the start of civil works. APs will be given sufficient notice to vacate their property before civil works begins.

Table-20: Time Bound Schedule for RP Implementation S.N RP Implementation

Activities 2018 2019 2020 2021

1Q

2Q

3Q

4Q

1Q

2Q

3Q

4Q

1Q

2Q

3Q

4Q

1Q

2Q

3Q

4Q

1 Topographic Survey of proposed road section

2 Loss Inventory preparation based on topographic survey

3 Project Screening and Categorization

4 Field measurement and Socio-economic survey of Affected Households

5 Inventory of Affected Households

6 Draft RP preparation

7 Final RP preparation

8 Approval of RP by ADB 9 Disclosure of RP and

Distribution of RP summary

10 Consent / Agreement with Affected households for voluntary donation of affected land and structure

11 Establish Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM) and form Grievance Redress Committee (GRC)

12 Contract Bidding 13 Award for civil works

contracts

14 RP implementation, monitoring and Reporting

15 Internal monitoring by RPIU/PCO

67

XI. MONITORING AND REPORTING

121. Need for Monitoring: Monitoring is a major part of the resettlement management system to ensure its goals are met. The RP implementation activities will be closely monitored internally by the R-PIU, PISU and PCO. This will involve: (i) administrative monitoring to ensure that implementation is on schedule and problems are dealt with on a timely basis; (ii) socio-economic monitoring during and after any resettlement impact utilizing baseline information from sub-project preparation; (iii) overall monitoring to assess AP status; and (iv) preparation of quarterly progress reports to be submitted to PCO by the R-PIU, reporting actual achievements against the targets fixed and reasons for shortfalls, if any.

122. Internal Monitoring: The DUDBC through its PCO will be responsible for internal monitoring. The R-PIU will provide necessary oversight and monitor the RP implementation at the ground level and submit quarterly progress reports to PCO. Internal monitoring will ensure all land acquisition and resettlements activities are implemented according to the approved Resettlement Plans are in accordance with this Resettlement Framework.

123. The R-PIU in coordination with the PISU and technical support of social development expert of DSC will maintain a record of all transactions in their resettlement database, followed by entitlement records signed by AP and survey based monitoring of resettlement / land acquisition progress on a monthly basis. Monitoring will ensure that:

All internal training of relevant safeguards staff occurred; Verification that there are no outstanding or unresolved land acquisition

issues with respect to the project and that property valuation and economic rehabilitation has been carried out in accordance with the provisions of the plan;

Information campaign and consultation has been carried out with APs; Status of land acquisition and payments on land compensation; Value of entitlement received is equal to that of original structure or land

acquired; Effective utilization of entitlements received; Compensation for affected structures and other assets; Relocation of APs; if applicable; Payments for loss of income; That all economic rehabilitation measures are implemented, as approved; Effective operation of both the Grievance Committees; Funds for implementing land acquisition and economic rehabilitation

activities are available in a timely manner, are sufficient for the purposes, and are spent in accordance with the plan.

124. PCO through R-PIU and PISU will also be responsible for carrying out field level monitoring through:

Review of census information for all APs; Consultation and informal interviews with APs; In-depth case studies; Informal sample survey of APs; Key informant interviews; and Community public meetings.

68

125. Monitoring Indicators: The most crucial components/indicators to be monitored are specific contents of the activities and entitlement matrix. Some of the indicative monitoring indicators are as following:

1. Delivery of entitlement

Entitlements disbursed, compared with number and category of losses set out in the entitlement matrix.

Disbursements against timelines. Timely disbursements of the agreed transport costs, relocation costs, income

restoration support, and any resettlement allowances, according to schedule.

2. Consultation and Grievances

Consultations organized as scheduled including meetings, groups, and community discussions.

Knowledge of entitlements by the displaced persons. Use of the grievance redresses mechanism by the displaced persons. Information on the resolution of the grievances. Implementation of special measures for Indigenous Peoples.

3. Communications and Participation

Number of general meetings (for both men and women). Percentage of women out of total participants. Number of meetings exclusively with women. Number of meetings exclusively with vulnerable groups. Number of meetings exclusively with IPs.

4. Budget and Time Frame

Land acquisition and resettlement staff appointed and mobilized on schedule for

the field and office work. Capacity building and training activities completed on schedule. Achieving resettlement implementation activities against the agreed

implementation plan. Funds allocation for resettlement to resettlement agencies on time. Receipt of scheduled funds by resettlement offices. Funds disbursement according to the resettlement plan.

69

5. Livelihood and Income Restoration

Progress on income and livelihood restoration activities being implemented as set out in the income restoration plan

Number of affected persons who received vocational training (women, men, and vulnerable groups).

Types of training and number of participants in each. Number and percentage of affected persons covered under livelihood

programs (women, men, and vulnerable groups). Number of affected persons who have restored their income and livelihood

patterns (women, men, and vulnerable groups). Number of new employment activities created by the project.

6. Benefit Monitoring

Noticeable changes in patterns of occupation, production, and

resource use compared to the pre-project situation. Noticeable changes in income and expenditure patterns compared to the

pre-project situation. Changes in cost of living compared to the pre-project situation. Changes in key social and cultural parameters relating to living standards. Changes occurred for IPs and vulnerable groups. Benefiting from the project by the affected persons

126. Reporting Requirement: The R-PIU will submit quarterly9 progress reports on resettlement activities and submit to PCO to the PCO, who will then review and take corrective actions if necessary. The R-PIU will prepare quarterly progress reports. The PCO with assistance from the PMC consultants will consolidate their reports into semiannual monitoring and submit to ADB. These reports are to describe the progress of the implementation of resettlement activities and any compliance issues and corrective actions. Reports to ADB should clarify whether or not resettlement goals have been achieved, more importantly analysis of whether livelihoods and living standards have been restored/enhanced (especially for vulnerable APs) along with appropriate recommendations for improvement need to include in monitoring reports. Any problems or issues identified are followed-up (including recommendation of mitigation measures and supplementary budget); and learning from such issues must be recorded which would help to deal with issues such as these more effectively.

9DSC to submit monthly reports to R-PIU; R-PIU submits quarterly reports to PCO; PCO submits semi-annual reports to ADB.

70

ANNEXES

Annex ‐ Page 1

ANNEX-1 List of Consulted Persons and Inventory of Loss

S.N Name of HH Head Side Available ROW

Required Width

Chainage

Type of Structure Affected Part Individual

Consent

M1 (Bhasi- Rautela Road), Design Width=12 m, Total Length=3641 m, Phase I Construction Length=560 m (Chainage 0 +00 - 0+560 m)

1 Chanak Lal Chaudhary R 5 1 0+010 BM House 1.0m peti+ T.Chhaja Yes

2 Asha Chaudhary R 4.5 1.5 0+060 BM House 1.50m peti+T.Chhaja Yes

3 Shiva Mandir R 2.5 3.5 0+250 BM House 2.5mBW+1m T.Store

4 Hira Devi Thagunna R 4.6 1.4 0+362 BM House 1.40m BW Yes

5 Ghungra Khatri R 4.7 1.3 0+420 BM House 1.30m BW Yes M2 (Bhanuchowk -Bishnudham Road), Design Width= 10m, Total Length=4885 m, Phase I Construction Length= 210 m (Chainage 0+00 - 0+210)

1 Binod Rawal L 4.6 0.4 0+015 RCC House 0.4m Chhaja Yes

2 Bhupendra Rawal R 4.3 0.7 0+015 BM House 0.7mT-Chhja Yes

3 Debu Devi Bista L 4.6 0.4 0+031 BM House 0.4m peti Yes

4 Kalyan Singh Thakuriya R 4.6 0.4 0+031 BM House 0.4m peti

5 Madhavi Bhatta L 4.4 0.6 0+077 RCC House 0.6m Chhaja+Peti Yes

6 Deependra Rawal R 4.5 0.5 0+145 RCC House 0.5m peti Yes

7 Prem Thalal R 4.4 0.6 0+145 RCC House 0.6m Chhaja+Peti

8 Navaraj Khadka R 4.5 0.5 0+166 RCC House 0.5m Peti Yes9 Kishor Pandey L 4.6 0.4 0+189 RCC House 0.4m Peti

M3: Suklaphanta Marga(Bhanuchowk-Madan chowk-Airport Road) , Design Width=34.5m for 540.39 m and 12 m for 3216.09 m, Total Length=3756.48 m, Phase I construction Length=3756.48m

1 D.D Pandey R 5 1 1+515 BM House 1m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

2 Sabitri Rawat L 5.4 0.6 1+530 RCC House 0.60m Chhaja Yes

3 Kalawati Chand R 5.4 0.6 1+555 BM House 0.60nm Peti Yes

4 Kamala Devi Dhami R 4 2 1+572 BM House 2mPeti Yes

5 Gopal Chand L 4.75 1.25 1+572 RCC House 1.25m Wall+2.6m BW Yes

6 Dabala Dhami R 5.1 0.9 1+600 BM House 1.9BW+0.9m Shed

7 Kalu Chand L 4.6 1.4 1+635 RCC House 1.4m BW Yes

8 Rami Chand L 5.3 0.7 1+655 BM House 0.70mBW Yes

9 Gangadatt Joshi L 4.5 1.5 1+710 BM House 1.5mBW Yes

10 Ran Bdr. Chand L 5.1 0.9 1+669 BM House 0.9m BW

11 Arjun Chand L 4.3 1.7 1+935 BM House 1.7m BW

12 Nglasaini Mandir L 5.3 0.7 2+020 BM House 0.7m Kitchen hut

13 Puskar Bdr. Chand L 5.5 0.5 2+520 BM House 0.50m BW Yes

14 Lal Singh Bista R 5.6 0.4 2+602 BM House 0.40m BW Yes

15 Bahadur Nath L 5.2 0.8 2+668 BM House 0.80m Shed

16 Dhan Bdr. Bista R 5.4 0.6 3+470 BM House 0.60m BW Yes

17 Bhim Bdr. Chand R 5.2 0.8 3+550 BM House 0.80m BW Yes

Annex ‐ Page 2


Required Width

Chainage


Consent

18 Kausilla Khatri R 5.3 0.7 3+560 BM House 0.70m BW Yes

19 Mohan Dev Bhatta R 5 1 3+600 RCC House 1m Septic Tank YesM4: Airport-Airighat Road, Design Width= 12 m, Total Length = 2313 m, Phase I Construction Length = 652 m (Chainage 0+00 - 0+652 as per social survey)

1 Mohan Singh Bhjandari L 5.5 0.95 0+005 BM 0.95 m Shed Yes

2 Haridatt Joshi L 3.8 2.2 0+090 BM 2.2m BW Yes

3 Man Bdr. Chand R 3.7 2.3 0+418 BM House 2.3m BW Yes

4 Bishna Devi Dhami L 3.3 2.7 0+418 BM House 2.7m BW Yes V5: Gully No-5 Road (Campus Road, North-South section), Design Width = 12 m, Total Length = 674.77 m, Phase I Construction Length = 674.77m

1 Deepak Rawat R 4.5 1.5 0+000 RCC House 1.50m Peti+T-Chhaja

2 Tej Singh K.C R 4.5 1.5 0+013 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

3 Hiikmat Thaurathi R 4.5 1.5 0+023 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

4 Padam Bharati R 4.5 1.5 0+029 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

5 Tek Raj Bharati R 4.5 1.5 0+032 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

6 Ghanashyam Joshi R 4.5 1.5 0+035 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

7 Raju Chand R 4.5 1.5 0+046 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

8 Lal Bdr. Chand R 4.5 1.5 0+050 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja

9 Bharat Chand R 4.5 1.5 0+055 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja

10 Megh Raj Bohora R 4.5 1.5 0+077 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

11 Ganesh Chand R 4.5 1.5 0+085 RCC House 1.50m Peti

12 Chhetrapal Mehera R 4.5 1.5 0+088 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

13 Madhav Parshad Bhatta R 4.5 1.5 0+089 RCC House 1.50m Peti Yes

14 Uddhav Dev Joshi R 4.5 1.5 0+100 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

15 Chandra Dev Joshi R 4.5 1.5 0+104 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

16 Mahadev Bohora R 4.5 1.5 0+108 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

17 Laxmi Devi Joshi R 4.5 1.5 0+115 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

18 Prem parkash Pathak R 4.5 1.5 0+122 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja

19 Bijaya Nanda Joshi R 4.5 1.5 0+125 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

20 Hansa Devi Chand R 4.5 1.5 0+128 RCC House 1.50m Peti

21 Lok Raj Bharati R 4.5 1.5 0+163 RCC House 1.50m Peti Yes

22 Devraj Mishra R 4.5 1.5 0+150 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

23 Keshav Raj Joshi R 4.5 1.5 0+162 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

24 Dilananda Giri R 4.5 1.5 0+175 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

25 Bisna Devi Palpali R 4.5 1.5 0+183 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

26 Khem palpali R 4.5 1.5 0+185 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

27 Raghubir Bhatta R 4.5 1.5 0+188 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja

28 Chandra Devi Rawal R 4.5 1.5 0+193 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

Annex ‐ Page 3


Required Width

Chainage


Consent

29 Sushila Vevi Rawal R 4.5 1.5 0+200 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

30 santos Aitwal R 4.5 1.5 0+206 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

31 Parbesh Partap Aitwal R 4.5 1.5 0+216 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

32 Bhupendra Aitwal R 4.5 1.5 0+226 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

33 Gyanendra Pd. Joshi R 4.5 1.5 0+250 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

34 Mahesh Parshad Joshi R 4.5 1.5 0+256 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

35 Ganesh Joshi R 4.5 1.5 0+260 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

36 Tribhuwan Kumar Bhatta R 4.5 1.5 0+263 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

37 Gunakar Bhatta R 4.5 1.5 0+267 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

38 Hari Parshad pandey R 4.5 1.5 0+274 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

39 Uma Chand R 4.5 1.5 0+278 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

40 Kedar Nath Pandey R 4.5 1.5 0+286 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

41 Krishna Parshad Aryal R 4.6 1.4 0+304 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

42 Laxmi Devi Aryal R 4.5 1.4 0+308 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

43 Gopal Sing Bohora R 4.5 1.4 0+317 RCC House 1.40m Peti Yes

44 Suraj Kharel R 4.5 1.4 0+323 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

45 Gyan Parshad Dumre R 4.5 1.4 0+329 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

46 Parbatman Khanal R 4.5 1.4 0+339 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

47 Tika Devi Kadel R 4.5 1.4 0+349 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

48 Duhurba Parshad Aryal R 4.5 1.4 0+357 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

49 Khagimaya Bhandari R 4.5 1.4 0+360 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

50 Chandra Bdr. Malla R 5 1 0+364 RCC House 1.00m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

51 Harka Bdr. Malla R 5 1 0+370 RCC House 1.00m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

52 Gopal Datt Joshi R 5 1 0+390 RCC House 1.00m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

53 Saraswati Rawal L 4.5 1.5 0+000 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja

54 Upendr Bdr. Khadka L 4.5 1.5 0+004 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

55 Jayaraj Saran Bhatta L 4.5 1.5 0+008 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

56 Dinesh Chandra Bhatta L 4.5 1.5 0+011 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

57 Devraj Saran Bhatta L 4.5 1.5 0+022 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

58 Manoj Gupta L 4.5 1.5 0+028 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

59 Dev Raj Panta L 4.5 1.5 0+034 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

60 Sivraj saran Bhatta L 4.5 1.5 0+040 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja

61 Gyanendra Bdr. Shah L 4.5 1.5 0+055 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja

62 Sambhu Bharati L 4.5 1.5 0+070 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

63 Kalawati Joshi L 4.5 1.5 0+075 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

64 Dan Bdr. Kunuwar L 4.5 1.5 0+080 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja

65 Bhakta Joshi L 4.5 1.5 0+084 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja

Annex ‐ Page 4


Required Width

Chainage


Consent

66 Hari Shngh Bista L 4.5 1.5 0+091 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

67 Janki Raiswal L 4.5 1.5 0+095 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja

68 Parbati Chataut L 4.5 1.5 0+098 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

69 Tarani Datt Chataut L 4.5 1.5 0+107 RCC House 1.50m Peti Yes

70 Bijayanand Joshi L 4.5 1.5 0+122 RCC House 1.50m Peti Yes

71 Nanda Dhami L 4.5 1.5 0+136 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

72 Mohan Singh Dhami L 4.5 1.5 0+140 RCC House 1.50m Peti Yes

73 Jayakisan Bhatta L 4.5 1.5 0+145 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

74 Dilliraj Joshi L 4.5 1.5 0+152 RCC House 1.50m Peti Yes

75 Dharma Devi Rana L 4.5 1.5 0+158 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

76 Gopal Datt Joshi L 4.5 1.5 0+163 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

77 Tej Bdr. Bam L 4.5 1.5 0+170 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

78 Kisan Singh Thapa L 4.5 1.5 0+176 RCC House 1.50m Peti Yes

79 Laxmi Datt Pandey L 4.5 1.5 0+187 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

80 Lov Dev Pandey L 4.5 1.5 0+198 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

81 Basudev Bohora L 4.5 1.5 0+209 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

82 Karna Bdr. Chand L 4.5 1.5 0+215 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

83 Deelip Singh Bhandari L 4.5 1.5 0+221 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

84 Manoj Parshad Joshi L 4.5 1.5 0+228 RCC House 1.50m Peti Yes

85 lov Dev Pandey L 4.5 1.5 0+238 RCC House 1.50m Peti Yes

86 Chandra Maya karki L 4.5 1.5 0+248 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

87 Tara Devi Bhatta L 4.5 1.5 0+256 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

88 Gangaram Giri L 4.5 1.5 0+264 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

89 Netra Chataut L 4.5 1.5 0+286 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

90 Balaram Ghimire L 4.5 1.5 0+290 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

91 Jayadatt Paudyal L 4.5 1.5 0+300 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

92 Bidhya Devi Kharel L 4.5 1.5 0+309 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

93 Tikaram Aryal L 4.5 1.5 0+315 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

94 Chintamani Kharel L 4.5 1.5 0+323 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

95 Ranbir Saran Bhatta L 4.5 1.5 0+330 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

96 Narain Datt Bhatta L 4.5 1.5 0+337 RCC House 1.50m Peti Yes

97 Raju Sharma L 4.5 1.5 0+345 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

98 Gokarna Bdr. Chand L 4.5 1.5 0+352 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

99 Amita Aryal L 4.5 1.5 0+360 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes100 Pabi Kafle L 4.5 1.5 0+364 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

101 Hema Devi Gurung L 4.5 1.5 0+367 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

10 Hom Bdr. Kunuwar L 4.5 1.5 0+387 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ Metal Ladder Yes

Annex ‐ Page 5


Required Width

Chainage


Consent

2

103 Khadak Bdr. Kunuwar L 4.5 1.5 0+388 RCC House 1.50m Peti+ T-Chhaja Yes

V-4: Gully No-4 Road (North-South section) , Design Width = 12 m, Total Langth = 404.75 m, Phase I Construction Length = 404.75 m

1 L.B Bista R 4.6 1.4 0+000 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja

2 Tara Singh Bohora R 4.6 1.4 0+013 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

3 Mohan Khatri R 4.6 1.4 0+020 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

4 Hariram Chaudhari R 4.6 1.4 0+026 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

5 Chet Raj Joshi R 4.6 1.4 0+031 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

6 Dhan Bdr.Ayer R 4.6 1.4 0+037 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

7 Khadak Singh Saud R 4.6 1.4 0+044 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja

8 Hira Devi Thagunna R 4.6 1.4 0+050 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

9 Shankardatt Joshi R 4.6 1.4 0+075 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

10 Chitramani Joshi R 4.6 1.4 0+078 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

11 Manju Bhatta R 4.8 1.2 0+083 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja

12 Haridatt Bhatta R 4.8 1.2 0+087 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja

13 Mamta Awasti R 4.6 1.4 0+092 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

14 Dhan Bdr. Bom R 4.6 1.4 0+100 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

15 Kiran Khadka R 4.6 1.4 0+108 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

16 Gajadhar Joshi R 4.6 1.4 0+112 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

17 Manorath Bhatta R 4.6 1.4 0+116 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

18 Girija Shankar Parsad R 4.6 1.4 0+120 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja

19 Harish Chandra Bhatta R 4.6 1.4 0+150 RCC House 1.40m Peti Yes

20 Naina Ojha R 4.6 1.4 0+175 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja

21 Deependra Bista R 4.6 1.4 0+180 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

22 Ganga Kharel R 4.6 1.4 0+186 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja

23 Devidatt Bhatta R 4.6 1.4 0+192 RCC House 1.40m Peti

24 Devaki Joshi R 4.6 1.4 0+196 RCC House 1.40m Peti

25 Chandrakala Panta R 4.6 1.4 0+204 RCC House 1.40m Peti

26 Jaya Bdr. Pal R 4.6 1.4 0+210 RCC House 1.40m Peti Yes

27 Dambar Bdr. Pal R 4.6 1.4 0+219 RCC House 1.40m Peti Yes

28 Hari Parsad Bhatta R 4.6 1.4 0+228 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

29 Laxman Singh Bista R 4.6 1.4 0+234 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja

30 Narendra Khatri R 4.6 1.4 0+250 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja

31 Dhirendra Bdr. Chand R 4.6 1.4 0+255 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja

32 Saligram Kharel R 4.6 1.4 0+258 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

33 Narayan Baral R 4.8 1.2 0+265 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

Annex ‐ Page 6


Required Width

Chainage


Consent

34 Dhan Bdr. Chand R 4.6 1.4 0+273 RCC House 1.40m Peti Yes

35 Bamayanti Joshi R 4.6 1.4 0+280 RCC House 1.40m Peti Yes

36 Durga Bhandari R 5 1 0+310 RCC House1.40m RCC House Chhaja Yes

37 Parbati Devi Damai R 5 1 0+318 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

38 Tila Devi Damai R 5 1 0+322 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

39 P.K Shrestha R 5 1 0+325 RCC House 1.0mPeti Yes

40 Dammari Bhatta R 5 1 0+332 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja

41 Rama Shrestha R 5 1 0+340 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja

42 Deepa Devi Shrestha R 5 1 0+352 RCC House 1.40m Peti Yes

43 Hripriya Pant L 4.6 1.4 0+000 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja

44 Premdatt Joshi L 4.6 1.4 0+012 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja

45 Prajapati Bista L 4.6 1.4 0+019 RCC House 1.40m Peti Yes

46 Dal Bdr.Bista L 4.6 1.4 0+032 RCC House 1.60m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

47 Harka Bdr. Bista L 4.6 1.4 0+036 RCC House 1.60m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

48 Jahar Singh Pwali L 4.6 1.4 0+040 RCC House 1.60m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

49 Madhav Joshi L 4.6 1.4 0+045 RCC House 1.60m Peti+T-Chhaja

50 Shreeram Chataut L 4.6 1.4 0+055 RCC House 1.60m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

51 Hajari Singh Pujara L 4.6 1.6 0+065 RCC House 1.60m Peti Yes

52 Dharma Singh Rawal L 4.6 1.4 0+072 RCC House 1.60m Peti+T-Chhaja

53 Dhana Devi Bhatta L 4.6 1.4 0+080 RCC House 1.60m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

54 Niraj Saud L 4.6 1.4 0+093 RCC House 1.60m Peti Yes

55 Padam Thakurathi L 4.6 1.4 0+100 RCC House 1.60m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

56 Godawari Bhatta L 4.6 1.4 0+108 RCC House 1.60m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

57 Sunil Panta L 4.6 1.4 0+150 RCC House 1.60m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

58 Tek Bdr. Kunuwar L 4.6 1.4 0+156 RCC House 1.60m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

59 Madan Singh Thagunna L 4.6 1.4 0+162 RCC House 1.60m Peti+T-Chhaja

60 Sova Karki L 4.6 1.4 0+168 RCC House 1.60m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

61 Kalu Bohora L 4.6 1.4 0+173 RCC House 1.60m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

62 Gorakh Bdr. Bista L 4.6 1.4 0+180 RCC House 1.60m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

63 Lalit Bdr. Bohora L 4.6 1.4 0+205 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

64 Lalit Parsad Bhatta L 4.6 1.4 0+215 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

65 Laxman Chand L 4.6 1.4 0+260 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

66 Kashi Singh Karki L 4.6 1.4 0+267 RCC House 1.20m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

67 Gyanu Bohara L 4.6 1.4 0+278 RCC House 1.30m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

68 Parkash Chand L 4.6 1.4 0+282 RCC House 1.30m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

69 Padama devi Bhatta L 4 2 0+331 RCC House 2m Peti+0.20m H/Chhaja Yes

70 Rudra Parsad Bhatrai L 4 2 0+335 RCC House 2m Peti+0.20m H/Chhaja Yes

Annex ‐ Page 7


Required Width

Chainage


Consent

71 Mina Baral L 4.9 1.1 0+350 RCC House 1.10m Peti Yes

72 Padam Raj Pandey L 5.4 0.6 0+372 RCC House 0.60m Peti Yes

73 Mahesh Pandey L 5.4 0.6 0+375 RCC House 0.60m Peti Yes

74 Dhan Bdr. Chand L 4.9 1.1 0+390 RCC House 1.10m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes V-3 : Gully No-3 Road (North-South Section), Design Width= 12m, Total Length=407.37m, Phase I Construction Langth=407.37 m

1 Basanti Devi Pandey R 5.5 0.5 0+000 RCC House 0.50m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

2 Ambika devi Bhandari R 5.5 0.5 0+015 RCC House 0.50m House Peti Yes

3 Parmananda Bhandari R 5.5 0.5 0+026 RCC House 0.50m House Peti Yes

4 Top Bdr. K.C R 4.5 1.5 0+037 RCC House 1.50m Peti+T-Chhaja

5 Bhim Pandey R 4.5 1.5 0+048 RCC House 1.50m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

6 Bhuwan Pandey R 4.5 1.5 0+052 RCC House 1.50m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

7 Devraj Mishra R 4.6 1.4 0+065 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

8 Prem Singh Bhatta R 4.5 1.5 0+074 RCC House 1.50m Peti+T-Chhaja

9 Hikmat Saud R 4.5 1.5 0+079 RCC House 1.50m Peti Yes

10 Ganesh Saud R 4.5 1.5 0+085 RCC House 1.50m Peti Yes

11 Tej Bdr. Bhandari R 4.5 1.5 0+090 RCC House 1.50m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

12 Sundara Dev Bhandari R 4.5 1.5 0+094 RCC House 1.50m Peti Yes

13 Chandra Bdr. Chand R 4.5 1.5 0+100 RCC House 1.50m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

14 Bhan Bdr. Chand R 4.5 1.5 0+108 RCC House 1.50m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

15 Bashu Dev Deuba R 4.5 1.5 0+115 RCC House 1.50m Peti+T-Chhaja

16 Nara Bdr. Bista R 4.5 1.5 0+119 RCC House 1.50m Peti+T-Chhaja

17 Kamala Devi Kathayat R 4.5 1.5 0+124 RCC House 1.50m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

18 Dal Bdr. Shah R 4.5 1.5 0+128 RCC House 1.50m Peti+T-Chhaja

19 Gorakh Bdr. Khati R 4.5 1.5 0+132 RCC House 1.50m Peti+T-Chhaja

20 Bhim Datta Bhatta R 4.5 1.5 0+139 RCC House 1.50m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

21 Yagyaraj Paudyal/Madan R 4.5 1.5 0+141 RCC House 1.50m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

22 Rupkiswor Gupta R 4.5 1.5 0+165 RCC House 1.50m Peti

23 Bharat Nepal R 4.5 1.5 0+175 RCC House 1.50m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

24 Nar Bdr. Pal R 4.5 1.5 0+180 RCC House 1.50m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

25 Kailap Bhatta R 4.5 1.5 0+185 RCC House 1.50m Peti

26 Ghanashyam Kalauni R 4.5 1.5 0+195 RCC House 1.50m Peti Yes

27 Dhan Bdr. Bom R 4.5 1.5 0+200 RCC House 1.50m Peti+T-Chhaja

28 Anil Dhungana/Joshi R 4.5 1.5 0+260 RCC House 1.50m Peti Yes

29 Yasoda Pathak/ Tiwari R 4.5 1.5 0+267 RCC House 1.50m Peti Yes

30 Jeetendra Parsad Bhatta R 4.5 1.5 0+300 RCC House 1.50m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

31 Mahendra Bdr Kunwor L 4.7 1.3 0+000 RCC House 1.30m Peti+T-Chhaja

Annex ‐ Page 8


Required Width

Chainage


Consent

32 Ram Singh Ter L 4.7 1.3 0+012 RCC House 1.30m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

33 Ram Pd Sapkota L 4.7 1.3 0+023 RCC House 1.30m Peti Yes

34 Arjun Prakash Upreti L 4.7 1.3 0+033 RCC House 1.30m Peti+T-Chhaja

35 Min Raj Bhatta L 4.7 1.3 0+044 RCC House 1.30m Peti+T-Chhaja

36 Karan Shah L 4.7 1.3 0+065 RCC House 1.30m Peti+T-Chhaja

37 Narendra Raj Bohora L 4.7 1.3 0+070 RCC House 1.30m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

38 Jagdish Upreti L 4.7 1.3 0+074 RCC House 1.30m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

39 Ratan Saud L 4.7 1.3 0+084 RCC House 1.30m Peti Yes

40 Karan Bdr Singh L 4.7 1.3 0+088 RCC House 1.30m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

41 Ashok Kumar Dewal L 4.7 1.3 0+104 RCC House 1.30m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

42 Dhawal Bdr Chand L 4.7 1.3 0+112 RCC House 1.30m Peti

43 Kalpana KC L 4.7 1.3 0+121 RCC House 1.30m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

44 Jayamati Devi Bhatta L 4.7 1.3 0+129 RCC House 1.30m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

45 Madan Panta L 4.6 1.4 0+164 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja

46 Dhan Singh Rawal L 4.6 1.4 0+170 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

47 Belu Devi Bhata L 4.6 1.4 0+186 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

48 Kunti Bohora L 4.6 1.4 0+192 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

49 Harish Chand L 4.6 1.4 0+199 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

50 Jamunaganga Devi Joshi L 4.6 1.4 0+205 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja

51 Tanka Pd. Bhatta L 4.6 1.4 0+220 RCC House 1.40m Peti

52 Radhika Devi Bhatta L 4.6 1.4 0+228 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

53 D.r Rajendra Bhatta L 4.6 1.4 0+234 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

54 Deepak Kharel L 4.6 1.4 0+241 RCC House 1.40m Peti Yes

55 Rishi Kharel L 4.6 1.4 0+250 RCC House 1.40m Peti Yes

56 Yadu Raj Joshi L 4.6 1.4 0+310 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

57 Nar Singh Dhami L 4.6 1.4 0+317 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

58 Tarun Lakhera L 4.6 1.4 0+324 RCC House 1.40m Peti Yes

59 Padama Saud Bhandari L 4.6 1.4 0+330 RCC House 1.40m Peti Yes

60 Furua Kalauni L 5.1 0.9 0+350 RCC House 0.90mPeti+Metal ladder Yes

61 Megh Raj Bhatta L 5 1 0+357 RCC House 1m Peti Yes

62 Kashidatt Bhatta L 5 1 0+365 RCC House 1m Peti Yes

63 Panchadev Multipurpose Office L 5 1 0+373 RCC House 1m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

64 Kalpana Karki L 5.1 0.9 0+380 RCC House 0.90mPeti+Greel ladder Yes V-2: Gully No-2 Road (North-South section) , Design Width = 12 m, Total Length = 407.92 m, Phase I Construction Length = 407.92 m

1 Ramesh Pandey R 4.4 1.6 0+000 RCC House 1.60m Peti Yes

2 Laxi Pandey R 4.4 1.6 0+007 RCC House 1.60m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

Annex ‐ Page 9


Required Width

Chainage


Consent

3 Arjundatt Pandey R 4.4 1.6 0+016 RCC House 1.60m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

4 Gopaldatt Bhatta R 4.4 1.6 0+023 RCC House 1.60m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

5 Jamuna Devi Bhatta R 4.4 1.6 0+027 RCC House 1.60m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

6 Bhojraj Bhatta R 4.4 1.6 0+030 RCC House 1.60m Peti+T-Chhaja

7 Rameswor Upreti R 4.4 1.6 0+040 RCC House 1.60m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

8 Neha Singh Pal R 4.4 1.6 0+047 RCC House 1.60m Peti

9 Tikadatt Paneru R 4.4 1.6 0+053 RCC House 1.60m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

10 Rajesh Gupta R 4.4 1.6 0+060 RCC House 1.60m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

11 Parmananda Paneru R 4.4 1.6 0+064 RCC House 1.60m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

12 Karunakar Paneru R 4.4 1.6 0+070 RCC House 1.60m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

13 Laxmi Devi Bhatta R 4.4 1.6 0+075 RCC House 1.60m Peti Yes

14 Tek Khadka R 4.4 1.6 0+082 RCC House 1.60m Peti+T-Chhaja

15 Ram Parshad Pandey R 4.4 1.6 0+087 RCC House 1.60m Peti+T-Chhaja

16 Sher Singh Ter R 4.4 1.6 0+091 RCC House 1.60m Peti+T-Chhaja

17 Shankar Bdr. Bista R 4.4 1.6 0+095 RCC House 1.60m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

18 Madan Singh Aiyar R 4.4 1.6 0+100 RCC House 1.60m Peti+T-Chhaja

19 Dharma Raj Bhatta R 4.4 1.6 0+103 RCC House 1.60m Peti Yes

20 Dev Raj Bhatta R 4.4 1.6 0+107 RCC House 1.60m Peti Yes

21 Jayalal Bhatta R 4.4 1.6 0+110 RCC House 1.60m Peti Yes

22 Bhoj Raj Bhatta R 4.4 1.6 0+114 RCC House 1.60m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

23 Uddhav Singh Bista R 4.4 1.6 0+120 RCC House 1.60m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

24 Nar Bdr. Bista R 4.4 1.6 0+123 RCC House 1.60m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

25 Kiswar Jairu R 4.4 1.6 0+126 RCC House 1.60m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

26 Nandalal Bohora R 4.4 1.6 0+130 RCC House 1.60m Peti Yes

27 Motilal Bohora R 4.4 1.6 0+134 RCC House 1.60m Peti Yes

28 Madana Devi Bohora R 4.4 1.6 0+138 RCC House 1.60m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

29 Hari Parshad Bohora R 4.4 1.6 0+142 RCC House 1.60m Peti Yes

30 Siddharaj Bohora R 4.4 1.6 0+146 RCC House 1.60m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

31 Sita K.C R 4.4 1.6 0+158 RCC House 1.60m Peti Yes

32 Iswori Devi Bohora R 4.4 1.6 0+163 RCC House 1.60m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

33 Urmila Kharel R 4.4 1.6 0+168 RCC House 1.60m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

34 Tika Devi Kharel R 4.4 1.6 0+174 RCC House 1.60m Peti Yes

35 Ram Parshad Kharel R 4.4 1.6 0+180 RCC House 1.60m Peti

36 Navraj Kharel R 4.4 1.6 0+186 RCC House 1.60m Peti

37 Manmati Giri R 4.4 1.6 0+191 RCC House 1.60m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

38 Nisha Shah R 4.4 1.6 0+195 RCC House 1.60m Peti

39 Rasmi Gupta R 4.4 1.6 0+201 RCC House 1.60m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

Annex ‐ Page 10


Required Width

Chainage


Consent

40 Pawan Kumar Sarwagi R 4.4 1.6 0+206 RCC House 1.60m Peti Yes

41 Birendra Kumar Sangai R 4.4 1.6 0+217 RCC House 1.60m Peti

42 Dhan Bdr. Chand R 4.4 1.6 0+230 RCC House 1.60m Peti

43 Hajari Chand R 4.4 1.6 0+280 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja

44 Ram Bdr. Kunuwar R 4.4 1.6 0+320 RCC House 1.40m Peti+BW Yes

45 Laxmi Bhatta R 4.4 1.6 0+342 RCC House 1.40m Peti Yes

46 Pratap Chand R 4.4 1.6 0+350 RCC House 1.40m Peti Yes

47 Ram Bdr. Kunuwar R 4.4 1.6 0+360 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

48 Narendra Paneru L 4.6 1.4 0+000 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

49 Damodar Athola Joshi L 4.6 1.4 0+013 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

50 Laxi Devi Paneru L 4.6 1.4 0+020 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja

51 Dwarika devi Bista L 4.6 1.4 0+025 RCC House 1.40m Peti Yes

52 Ramdular jaiswal L 4.6 1.4 0+031 RCC House 1.40m Peti Yes

53 Deep Raj Chataut L 4.6 1.4 0+037 RCC House 1.40m Peti Yes

54 Padam Bdr. Thakurathi L 4.6 1.4 0+047 RCC House 1.40m Peti Yes

55 Kalpana Thapa L 4.6 1.4 0+060 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja

56 Motimaya Sharma L 4.6 1.4 0+070 RCC House 1.40m Peti Yes

57 Ganga Kafle L 4.6 1.4 0+075 RCC House 1.40m Peti Yes

58 Narendra Khatri L 4.6 1.4 0+080 RCC House 1.40m Peti

59 Binod Joshi L 4.6 1.4 0+087 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

60 Srijana Rawal L 4.6 1.4 0+090 RCC House 1.40m Peti

61 Bir Bdr.Kunwor L 4.6 1.4 0+095 RCC House 1.40m Peti Yes

62 Nirmal Lamichhane L 4.6 1.4 0+100 RCC House 1.40m Peti Yes

63 Madan Sunar L 4.6 1.4 0+105 RCC House 1.40m Peti Yes

64 Shivlal Nyeupane L 4.6 1.4 0+109 RCC House 1.40m Peti

65 Naresh Agrawal L 4.6 1.4 0+113 RCC House 1.40m Peti Yes

66 Radhika Sunar L 4.6 1.4 0+118 RCC House 1.40m Peti Yes

67 Rameswor Bhatta L 4.6 1.4 0+122 RCC House 1.40m Peti Yes

68 Sushil Dewal L 4.6 1.4 0+132 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja

69 Megh Raj Bohora L 4.6 1.4 0+140 RCC House 1.40m Peti Yes

70 Ramchandra Bohora L 4.6 1.4 0+160 RCC House 1.40m Peti Yes

71 Kamala Devi Bohora L 4.6 1.4 0+166 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

72 Govinda Raj Joshi L 4.6 1.4 0+173 RCC House 1.40m Peti Yes

73 Mukesh Agrawal L 4.6 1.4 0+179 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

74 Kaviraj Bhatta L 4.6 1.4 0+185 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

75 Bhojraj Joshi L 4.6 1.4 0+191 RCC House 1.40m Peti Yes

76 Chitra Nepal L 4.6 1.4 0+202 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

Annex ‐ Page 11


Required Width

Chainage


Consent

77 Iswori Devi Chilwal L 4.6 1.4 0+207 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

78 Laxmi devi Tiwari L 4.6 1.4 0+212 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

79 Ganesh Raj Bohora L 4.6 1.4 0+223 RCC House 1.40m Peti

80 Sunita Budha L 4.6 1.4 0+234 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

81 Chandra Datt Joshi L 4.6 1.4 0+249 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja

82 Madhusudan Aryal L 4.6 1.4 0+245 RCC House 1.40m Peti Yes

83 Gangaram Rawal L 4.6 1.4 0+252 RCC House 1.40m Peti

84 Somraj Aryal L 4.6 1.4 0+260 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja

85 Gopal Bhusal L 4.5 1.5 0+268 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja

86 Homlal Bhusal L 5.4 0.6 0+340 RCC House 0.60m P. Chhaja

87 Ishwori Devi Bhatta L 5.75 0.25 0+344 RCC House0.25m RCC House Chhaja

88 Tek Bdr. Sunar L 4.4 1.6 0+347 RCC House1.60m RCC House Chhaja

89 Min Bdr. Kathayat L 4.5 1.5 0+352 RCC House 1.50m Peti+T-Chhaja V-1: Gully No-1(Shalgadhi Road, North-South Section), Design Width = 12 m, Total Length = 1102 m, Phase I Construction Length =1102 m

1 Bhairav Bdr. Aiyar R 4.6 1.4 0+003 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

2 Suman Dewal R 4.5 1.5 0+011 RCC House 1.50m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

3 Ashok Kumar Dewal R 4.6 1.4 0+013 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

4 Bhupendra Rawal R 4.5 1.5 0+016 RCC House 1.50m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

5 Rajendra Rawal R 4.4 1.6 0+021 RCC House 1.60m Peti+T-Chhaja

6 Bhoj Raj bohora R 5 1 0+026 RCC House 1.00m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

7 Padam Bdr. Aiyar R 5 1 0+032 RCC House 1.00m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

8 Hariom Dewal R 5 1 0+037 RCC House 1.00m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

9 Harinanda Pd.NirajKumar R 5 1 0+058 RCC House 1.00m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

10 Nannelal Hariom R 5 1 0+054 RCC House 1.00m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

11 Kailash Gupta R 4.6 1.4 0+061 RCC House 1.40m Peti Yes

12 Bijaya Dewal R 5 1 0+065 RCC House 1.00m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

13 Padam Bdr. Thakurathi R 5 1 0+071 RCC House 1.00m Peti+T-Chhaja

14 Harilal Thakurathi R 5 1 0+076 RCC House 1.00m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

15 Maheswor Chataut R 5 1 0+081 RCC House 1.00m Peti+T-Chhaja

16 Dansingh Thakurathi R 5 1 0+085 RCC House 1.00m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

17 Omprakash Gupta R 4.5 1.5 0+091 RCC House 1.50m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

18 Rajiv Dewal R 5 1 0+095 RCC House 1.00m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

19 Rajeswori Devi Dewal R 5 1 0+100 RCC House 1.00m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

20 Dharmendra Gupta R 5 1 0+106 RCC House 1.00m Peti+T-Chhaja

21 Parsuram Gautam R 5 1 0+111 RCC House 1.00m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

22 Hira Devi Bohora R 5 1 0+115 RCC House 1.00m Peti+T-Chhaja

Annex ‐ Page 12


Required Width

Chainage


Consent

23 Kanhyalal Dewal R 5 1 0+120 RCC House 1.00m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

24 Gopal Dewal R 5 1 0+125 RCC House 1.00m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

25 Dambar Datt Bhatta R 5 1 0+130 RCC House 1.00m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

26 Balaram Chataut R 5 1 0+136 RCC House 1.00m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

27 Kirta Bdr. Johra R 5 1 0+145 RCC House 1.00m Peti Yes

28 Dharma Raj Joshi R 5 1 0+149 RCC House 1.00m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

29 Durga Devi Johra R 5 1 0+160 RCC House 1.00m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

30 Dharma Singh Rawal R 5 1 0+168 RCC House 1.00m Peti Yes

31 Abdul Samim R 5 1 0+179 RCC House 1.00m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

32 Maina Devi Bhandari R 5 1 0+185 RCC House 1.00m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

33 Parbati Devi Khadayat R 5 1 0+190 RCC House 1.00m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

34 Abdul Samim R 5 1 0+196 RCC House 1.00m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

35 Masjeed R 5 1 0+200 RCC House 1.00m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

36 Indra Singh Rawal R 5 1 0+204 RCC House 1.00m Peti+T-Chhaja

37 Lal Singh Thakurathi R 5 1 0+212 RCC House 1.00m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

38 Padam Raj Bohora R 5 1 0+216 RCC House 1.00m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

39 Bhubaneswori Kunwar R 5 1 0+220 RCC House 1.00m Peti Yes

40 Geeta Kharel R 4.7 1.3 0+232 RCC House 1.30m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

41 Pabitra Aryal R 4.7 1.3 0+237 RCC House 1.30m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

42 Harka Singh Aiyar R 5 1 0+248 RCC House 1.00m Peti+T-Chhaja

43 Bimal Khadayat R 5 1 0+255 RCC House 1.00m Peti

44 Bhubaneswori Bogati R 5 1 0+263 RCC House 1.00m Peti

45 Hem Raj Bohora R 5 1 0+270 RCC House 1.00m Peti

46 Dinesh Shrestha R 5 1 0+315 RCC House 1.00m Peti

47 Dev Singh Ter R 4.5 1.5 0+330 RCC House 1.50m Peti+T-Chhaja

48 Gagan Bdr Singh L 4.6 1.4 0+000 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

49 Khagesh Pd. Bhatta L 4.6 1.4 0+006 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

50 Siddha Raj Bhatta L 4.6 1.4 0+010 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

51 Deepu Budhayar L 4.6 1.4 0+013 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

52 Ammar Budharar L 4.6 1.4 0+019 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

53 Keshav Raj Panta L 4.6 1.4 0+025 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

54 Bimal Raj Panta L 4.6 1.4 0+030 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

55 Pawan Khadayat L 4.6 1.4 0+036 RCC House1.40m RCC House Chhaja

56 Lal Bdr. Khadayat L 4.6 1.4 0+041 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

57 Mukesh Rawal L 4.6 1.4 0+048 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

58 Megh Raj Bohora L 4.6 1.4 0+060 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

59 Dan Singh Thakurathi L 4.6 1.4 0+066 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

Annex ‐ Page 13


Required Width

Chainage


Consent

60 Nawal Singh Saud L 4.6 1.4 0+070 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja

61 Krishna Datt Chataut L 4.6 1.4 0+075 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

62 Shiv Raj Bhatta L 4.6 1.4 0+080 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

63 Niraj Gupta L 4.6 1.4 0+085 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

64 Yagya Raj Bhatta L 4.6 1.4 0+090 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

65 Yagya Raj Bhatta L 4.6 1.4 0+094 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

66 Parkash Rawal L 4.6 1.4 0+097 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

67 Samser Rawal L 4.6 1.4 0+100 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

68 Lal Bdr. Rawal L 4.6 1.4 0+107 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

69 Amar Shingh Khadayat L 4.6 1.4 0+114 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

70 Tek Bdr. Saud L 4.6 1.4 0+117 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

71 Uday Saud L 4.6 1.4 0+120 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

72 Bam Dev Chataut L 4.6 1.4 0+124 RCC House1.40m RCC House Chhaja Yes

73 Chhotelal Batuwa L 4.6 1.4 0+127 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

74 Raj Kumar Dewal L 4.6 1.4 0+135 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

75 Umashankar Dewal L 4.6 1.4 0+138 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

76 Bhuwan Chataut L 4.6 1.4 0+150 RCC House 1.40m Peti

77 Ganesh Chataut L 4.6 1.4 0+155 RCC House 1.40m Peti Yes

78 Bal Devi Kharel L 4.9 1.1 0+158 RCC House 1.10m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

79 Bashu Dev Bohora L 4.9 1.1 0+163 RCC House 1.10m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

80 Mohan Singh Bista L 4.9 1.1 0+169 RCC House 1.10m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

81 Kalpana Devi Bhusal L 4.9 1.1 0+175 RCC House 1.10m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

82 Narayan Bhatta L 4.9 1.1 0+181 RCC House 1.10m Peti+T-Chhaja

83 Anita Joshi L 4.9 1.1 0+200 RCC House 1.10m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

84 Bhuwan Kharel L 4.9 1.1 0+205 RCC House 1.10m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

85 Poonam Bhatta L 4.9 1.1 0+210 RCC House 1.10m Peti Yes

86 Basanti Thagunna L 4.9 1.1 0+215 RCC House 1.10m Peti

87 Sova Dewal L 4.9 1.1 0+219 RCC House 1.40m Peti Yes

88 Mandhari Devi Giri L 5 1 0+226 RCC House 1.00m Peti+T-Chhaja

89 Laxman Singh Bista L 5 1 0+232 RCC House 1.00m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

90 Hema Pandey L 4.2 1.8 0+260 RCC House 1.80m Peti+T-Chhaja

91 Rupa Aryal L 4.4 1.6 0+269 RCC House 1.60m Peti+T-Chhaja

92 Cholanath Bhandari L 4.4 1.6 0+275 RCC House 1.60m Peti+T-Chhaja

93 Man Singh Mahara L 4.4 1.6 0+280 RCC House 1.60m Peti+T-Chhaja

94 Sher Shingh Bhandari L 4.4 1.6 0+285 RCC House 1.60m Peti+T-Chhaja

95 Bir Bdr. Sunar L 4.4 1.6 0+290 RCC House 1.60m Peti+T-Chhaja

96 Omkar Panta L 4.4 1.6 0+305 RCC House 1.60m Peti+T-Chhaja

Annex ‐ Page 14


Required Width

Chainage


Consent

97 Prakash Shah L 4.4 1.6 0+310 RCC House 1.60m Peti+T-Chhaja

98 Hari Datt Bhatta L 4.6 1.4 0+315 RCC House 1.40m Peti+T-Chhaja

V6: Malpot/Napi Karalaya-E/W Highway), Design Width=10 m, Length = 347.58 m

1 Little Buddha Academi R 4.4 0.6 0+228 BM House 0.60m BW Yes

2 Harilal Joshi R 4.9 0.1 0+240 RCC House 0.10m BW+ Chhaja

3 Patiram Chunara R 3.2 1.8 0+260 BM House 1.80m Peti+T-Chhaja Yes

4 Tek Raj Bhatta R 3.2 1.8 0+275 BM House 1.80m Peti+T-Chhaja H1: East-West Gully-1, Design Width=9 m, Rec. Width=9m, Total Length = 298.26 m, Phase I Construction Length=298.26 m

1 Gajendra Bdr. Shah L 2.6 1.9 0+005 RCC House 1.9m Peti Yes

2 Shambhu Bharati R 2.6 1.9 0+005 RCC House 1.9m Peti Yes

3 Chintamani Joshi L 2.6 1.9 0+030 RCC House 1.9m BW Yes

4 Manju Bhatta R 2.6 1.9 0+030 RCC House 1.9m Peti Yes

5 Shreeram Chataut L 2.6 1.9 0+063 RCC House 1.9m Peti Yes

6 Hajari Singh Pujara R 2.6 1.9 0+063 RCC House 1.9m Peti Yes

7 Gopal Singh Budha R 2.6 1.9 0+073 RCC House 1.9m Peti Yes

8 Bhuban Pandey L 2.6 1.9 0+082 RCC House 1.9m Peti Yes

9 Devraj Mishra R 2.6 1.9 0+082 RCC House 1.9m Peti+T.Chhaja Yes

10 Min Raj Bhatta L 2.6 1.9 0+115 RCC House 1.9m Peti + Chhaja Yes

11 Prem Shah R 2.6 1.9 0+115 RCC House 1.9m Peti + Chhaja Yes

12 Narendra Bohora R 2.6 1.9 0+119 RCC House 1.9m Peti + Chhaja Yes

13 Deepak Gupta R 2.6 1.9 0+123 RCC House 1.9m Peti + Chhaja Yes

14 Padam Bdr. Bhandari L 2.6 1.9 0+142 RCC House 1.9m Peti + Chhaja Yes

15 Laxmi Datt Bhatta R 2.6 1.9 0+150 RCC House 1.9m Peti + Chhaja Yes

16 Rudra Singh Bhandari L 2.6 1.9 0+159 RCC House 1.9m Peti + Chhaja

17 Karunakar Paneru L 2.6 1.9 0+162 RCC House 1.9m Peti + Chhaja Yes

18 Harilal Bhatta R 2.6 1.9 0+170 RCC House 1.9m Peti + Chhaja Yes

19 Kalpana Thapa R 2.6 1.9 0+195 RCC House 1.9m Peti + Chhaja

20 Padam Bdr. Thakurathi L 2.6 1.9 0+215 RCC House 1.9m Peti + Chhaja Yes

21 Shanti Damai L 2.6 1.9 0+225 RCC House 1.9m Peti + Chhaja Yes

22 kalu Singh+jagat Bhandari L 2.6 1.9 0+237 RCC House 1.9m Peti + Chhaja

23 Padam Bdr. Thakurathi R 2.6 1.9 0+245 RCC House 1.9m Peti + Chhaja Yes H2: East-West Gully-2, Design Width = 9 m, Rec Width = 9 m, Total Length = 297.88 m, Phase I Construction Length = 297.88m

1 Mohan Singh Dhami L 2.63 0.7 0+005 RCC House 1.77 m Peti Yes

2 Jaya Kisan Bhatta R 2.63 0.7 0+005 RCC House 1.77 m Peti+T.Chhaja Yes

3 Haris Chandra Bhatta R 2.63 0.5 0+024 RCC House 1.77 m Peti Yes

4 Laba Raj Bhatta L 2.63 0.5 0+024 RCC House 1.77 m Peti Yes

Annex ‐ Page 15


Required Width

Chainage


Consent

5 Sunil Panta R 2.63 0.1 0+057 RCC House 1.77 m Peti Yes

6 Madan Paudyal L 2.61 0.45 0+084 RCC House 1.79 m Peti Yes

7 Tikaram Bohora R 2.61 0.45 0+091 RCC House 1.79 m Peti+T.Chhaja

8 Khem Raj Bohora R 2.61 0.45 0+103 RCC House 1.79 m Peti

9 Govinda Ballav Joshi R 2.61 0.6 0+137 RCC House 1.79 m Peti+Chhaja

10 Jaimati Devi Bhatta L 2.61 0.6 0+137 RCC House 1.79 m Peti+Chhaja Yes

11 Bashudev Bohora L 2.61 0.45 0+166 RCC House 1.79 m Peti Yes

12 Sita Devi K.C R 2.61 0.45 0+166 RCC House 1.79 m Peti Yes

13 Ganesh Bohora L 2.61 0.5 0+200 RCC House 1.79 m Peti

14 Kamala Devi Bohora R 2.61 0.5 0+200 RCC House 1.79 m Peti Yes

15 Durga Devi Bohara R 2.61 0.35 0+237 RCC House 1.79 m Peti

16 Dharma Raj joshi L 2.61 0.35 0+237 RCC House 1.79 m Peti Yes H-3: Hospital Road (Gully 6 to Gully 1/ East-West Gully-3), Design Width = 10 m, Total Length = 290 m, Phase I Construction Length =290 m

None H-4: Campus Road (Janki tole) to Gully 1( East-West Gully-4), Design Width = 10 m, Total Length = 480 m, Phase I Construction length = 284.40 m

None H-5: Sarswati Tole Road 1 (East West Gully-5, Katan Area) , Design Width = 10 m, Total Length = 300.99m, Phase I Construction Length = 300.99 m

1 Bisnudatt Bhatta R 4.45 0.55 0+000 BM House 0.55m BW Yes

2 Bajir Singh Aiyar L 4 1 0+038 BM House 1m BW Yes

3 Khagendra Chand R 4.7 0.3 0+038 BM House 0.30m BW

4 Ganga Datt Joshi L 4.15 0.85 0+054RCC House +BM House

0.85m BW+0.55m Shutter

5 Rajendra Chand R 4.8 0.2 0+054 BM House 0.20m BW Yes

6 Anandi Panta L 4.8 0.2 0+076 BM House 0.20m BW Yes

7 Parmeswori Pandey R 4.7 0.3 0+076RCC House+ BW 0.30m BW+0.20m Shutter Yes

8 Hom Bdr. Panthi L 4.7 0.3 0+100RCC House +BMM 0.30m BW+0.20m Shutter

9 Dharma Nanda Bhatta R 4.7 0.3 0+100 BM House 0.30m BW Yes

10 Sashi Ojha L 4.5 0.5 0+113 BM House 0.50m BW Yes

11 Laxman Singh Bhandari R 4.7 0.3 0+113 BM House 0.30m BW

12 Ganesh Bohora L 4.5 0.5 0+132 BM House 0.50m BW Yes

13 Narayan Singh Saud R 4.1 0.9 0+145 BM House 0.90m BW

14 Kamala Bohora L 4.1 0.9 0+145 BM House 0.90m BW Yes

15 Man Bdr. Sunar L 4.2 0.8 0+160 BM House 0.80m BW Yes

16 Tikaram Bhatta R 4.2 0.8 0+160 BM House 0.80m BW Yes

17 Tekendra Bhatta L 4.2 0.8 0+180 BM House 0.80m BW

18 Damodar Pandey R 4.1 0.9 0+200 BM House 0.90m BW Yes

19 Dr. Bhojraj Panta L 4.1 0.9 0+202 BM House 0.90m BW Yes

20 Bishnu Awasti R 4.1 0.9 0+220 BM House 0.90m BW Yes

Annex ‐ Page 16


Required Width

Chainage


Consent

21 Puspamani Bhatta L 4.3 0.7 0+220 BM House 0.70m BW Yes

22 Keshav Nayak R 4.3 0.7 0+239 BM House 0.70m BW

23 Kamal Shrestha L 4.3 0.7 0+250 BM House 0.70m BW Yes

24 Gauri Datt Joshi R 4.3 0.7 0+250 BM House 0.70m BW

25 Lalitananda Joshi L 4.3 0.7 0+257 BM House 0.70m BW

26 Somraj Aryal L 4.3 0.7 0+270 BM House 0.70m BW Yes

27 Man Singh Rawat L 3.7 1.3 0+283RCC House +BM House

0.40m H Chhaja+1.30m BW

28 Purna Raj Bhatta R 3.7 1.3 0+300 BM House 1.30 Kucchi House H-6:Sarswati Tole Road 2 (East West Gully-6, Katan Area), Design Width= 10 m, Total Length = 350 m, Total Length =350 m, Phase I construction length=150m (ch 0+200- 0+350) Yes

1 Devaki Bam L 3.85 1.15 0+200 BM House 1.15m BW

2 Kapil Joshi R 3.85 1.15 0+200 BM House 1.15m BW

3 Shyam Chand L 3.85 1.15 0+225 BM House 1.15m BW Yes

4 Basant Bdr. Singh R 3.85 1.15 0+245 BM House 1.15m BW

5 Parwati Devi Chand L 3.85 1.15 0+265 BM House 1.15m BW Yes

6 Tara Joshi R 3.85 1.15 0+280 BM House 1.15m BW Yes

7 Siddharaj Bhatta L 3.85 1.15 0+295 BM House 1.15m BW

8 Mohandev Joshi R 3.85 1.15 0+315 BM House 1.15m BW

9 Dattaram Dasrath Bhatta L 3.85 1.15 0+325 BM House 1.15m BW

10 Manmati Chand R 3.85 1.15 0+325 BM House 1.15m BW Yes

11 Dal Bdr. Chand L 3.85 1.15 0+330 BM House 1.15M BW H-7: Sarswati Tole Road 3 (East West Gully-7, Katan Area), Design Width= 10 m, Total Length = 392.41m, Phase I Construction length=392.41 m

1 Pushkar Giri R 4.1 0.9 0+000RCC House +BM House

0.70m HW+0.90m BW/Shutter

2 Gagan Giri L 4.1 0.9 0+050 BM House 0.90m BW

3 Dilmaya Bhatta R 4.1 0.9 0+050RCC House +BM House

0.70m HW+0.90m BW/Shutter

4 Tek Raj Panta L 4.1 0.9 0+060 BM House 0.90m BW Yes

5 Sova Devi Joshi R 4.1 0.9 0+060 BM House 0.90m BW Yes

6 Kapil Panta L 4.1 0.9 0+080 BM House 0.90m BW+BM Shed

7 Karan Nath R 4.1 0.9 0+080 BM House 0.90m BW

8 Komala Devi Chand L 4.1 0.9 0+095 BM House 0.90m BW

9 Umadatt Bhatta R 4.1 0.9 0+095 BM House 0.90m BW

10 Ambika Joshi R 4.1 0.9 0+114 BM House 0.90m BW

11 Krishna P.d Bohora L 4.1 0.9 0+138 BM House 0.90m BW

12 Dhani Datt Panta R 3.75 1.25 0+158 BM House 1.25m BW Yes

13 Pramananda Joshi L 3.75 1.25 0+158 BM House 1.25m BW Yes

14 Kalpana K.C R 3.8 1.2 0+185 BM House 1.20m BW

15 Sitaram Joshi L 3.8 1.2 0+185 BM House 1.20m BW

Annex ‐ Page 17


Required Width

Chainage


Consent

16 Prakash Bdr. Singh R 3.8 1.2 0+205 BM House 1.20m BW Yes

17 Rana singh Bhandari L 3.8 1.2 0+205 BM House 1.20m BW Yes

18 Gajendra Thapa R 3.8 1.2 0+225 BM House 1.20m BW Yes

19 Purnananda Bhatta L 3.8 1.2 0+225 BM House 1.20m BW Yes

20 Bhojraj Pandey L 3.8 1.2 0+240 BM House 1.20m BW

21 Jayanti Chand R 4 1 0+260 BM House 1m BW Yes

22 Bhanubhakta Joshi L 4 1 0+260 BM House 1m BW Yes

23 Shusila Pandey L 4 1 0+280 BM House 1m BW+BM Shed Yes

24 Mahadev Bhatta R 3.8 1.2 0+300 BM House 1.20m BW Yes

25 Tara Devi Bhatta L 3.8 1.2 0+300 BM House 1.20m BW+ BM Shed

26 Chandra Dev Upadhyay L 4 1 0+315 BM House 1m BW

27 G.K Bhat L 4 1 0+315 BM House 1m BW Yes

28 Narad Pandey R 4 1 0+335RCC House +BM House 1m HW+ BW Yes

29 Ran Bdr. Pal L 4 1 0+360RCC House +BM House 1m HW+BW

H-8: Sarswati Tole Road 4 (East West section, Katan Area) , Design Width=10m, total length= 372.22m, Phase I Construction Length= 372.22m Yes

1 Tara Devi Joshi R 4.35 0.65 0+000 BM House 0.65m BW Yes

2 Shanti Devi Bhandari L 4.35 0.65 0+030 BM House 0.65m BW Yes

3 Rajaya Swar R 4.15 0.85 0+030 BM House 0.85m BW

4 Laba Dev Pandey L 4.15 0.85 0+050 BM House 0.85m BW Yes

5 Bishnu Aryal R 3.85 1.15 0+086 BM House 1.15m BW Yes

6 Basanta Singh R 3.85 1.15 0+086 BM House 1.15m BW

7 Paradise Hotel L 3.85 1.15 0+100 BM House 1.15m BW Yes

8 Nepal Manav Dharma Sewa R 3.85 1.15 0+100 BM House 1.15m BW Yes

9 Kamala Nanda Joshi L 3.85 1.15 0+136 BM House 1.15m BW Yes

10 Hemlal Sapkota R 3.85 1.15 0+136 BM House 1.15m BW Yes11 Sita Devi Joshi L 3.85 1.15 0+154 BM House 1.15m BW

12 Ganesh Chand R 3.85 1.15 0+154 BM House 1.15m BW Yes13 Tika singh Dhami L 3.85 1.15 0+175 BM House 1.15m HW+ BW

14 Dr. Madan Singh Karki R 3.85 1.15 0+175 BM House 1.15m BW

15 Dharmanand Bhatta L 3.85 1.15 0+209 BM House 1.15m BW 16 Dashrath Joshi R 3.75 1.25 0+209 BM House 1.25m BW Yes

17 Uttara Chand L 3.75 1.25 0+227 BM House 1.25m BW Yes18 Maya Devi Joshi R 3.75 1.25 0+245 BM House 1.25m BW

19 Harsa Narain Upadhyay L 3.75 1.25 0+262 BM House 1.25m BW Yes

20 Bishnu Datt Awasti L 3.75 1.25 0+280 BM House 1.25m BW Yes21 Nirajan Gautam L 3.75 1.25 0+292 BM House 1.25m BW 22 Shavitri Devi Panta R 3.75 1.25 0+300 BM House 1.25m BW Yes23 Krishna Bdr. Chand L 3.75 1.25 0+318 BM House 1.25m BW Yes

Annex ‐ Page 18


Required Width

Chainage


Consent

24 Janaki Devi Bam L 3.75 1.25 0+336 BM House 1.25m BW Yes25 Dammar Datt Bogati R 3.75 1.25 0+350 BM House 1.25m BW+ BM Shed Yes26 Hari Chand R 3.75 1.25 0+360 BM House 1.25m BW Yes

H-9: Eye Hospital Road (East-West), Design Width= 10m, Total Length= 430 m, Phase I Construction length=430m

1 Omprakash Dedwal R 3.5 1.5 0+015 BM House 4m BW+BM House Yes H-10 : Hospital Road (Gully 1 to Bhagatpur Marg), Design Width=10m, Total Length= 738 m, Phase I Construction Width=738 m

1 Siddhanath Tample L 4.4 0.6 0+650 BM House 0.60m BW

2 Krishna Prasad Bhandari R 4.4 0.6 0+694 BM House 0.60m Peti

3 Kedar Prasad Bhandari R 3.8 1.2 0+705 BM House 1.20m BW 4 Nandalal Joshi R 3.8 1.2 0+714 BM House 1.20m BW 5 Kamala Devi Bhatta R 4 1 0+720 BM House 1m BW

6 Ravi Joshi R 4 1 0+730 BM House 1m BW

7 Mina Panta R 4.2 0.8 0+750 BM House 0.80m BW Yes8 Lokraj Panta R 4.3 0.7 0+755 BM House 0.70m BW

9 District Election Office R 4.5 0.5 0+770 BM House 0.50m BW

10 Okil Karalaya/Mahesh Datta Joshi L 4.8 0.2 0+850 RCC House 0.20m HW

11 Lal Bdr.Thapa R 4.3 0.7 0+870 BM House 0.70m BW 12 Raji Chand L 3.4 1.6 0+888 BM House 1.60m BW

13 Dhir Samser Kunuwar R 4.4 0.6 0+922 BM House 0.60m BW Hotel Opera road, E-W), Design Width 15 m, Total length=280 m, Phase I construction length= 190m (ch. 0+00 - 0+190)

1 Binod Kumar Agrawal R 5.5 2 0+020 BM House 2m Peti+T.Chhaja Yes

2 Nagar Vikas House L 5.8 0.7 0+020 RCC House 0.70m Peti

3 Nagar Vikas Shutter-5nos L 7.35 0.15 0+037 RCC House 0.15m Peti+T.Chhaja 4 Krishna Prasad Bogati R 6.8 0.7 0+100 RCC House 0.70m Peti Yes

5 Harilal Paneru R 6.8 0.7 0+175 RCC House 0.70 m Peti Yes

6 Hotel Opera L 7.25 0.25 0+175 BW+Peti 0.25mBW+Peti Madan chowk-Dashrath Chowk - Napi - Bhagatpur Chowk Road, Design Width=15 m from Dashrath Chowk to Nani Karalaya (ch: 0+00-0+750) & 12 m from Napi Karalaya to Bhagatpur (ch:0+751- 1+150),Total Length 1150m

1 Duraga Datt Bohora L 5.8 0.2 0+880 RCC House 0.20m BW+Chhaja Yes

2 Ratna Singh Thakurathi L 5.7 0.3 0+935 RCC House 0.3m Peti+veranda Yes

3 Gorakh Bdr. Chand L 5.7 0.3 0+945 RCC House 0.3m BW Yes4 Omparkash Bhandari R 5.75 0.25 0+965 BM House 0.25m T.Chhaja Yes5 Krishna Datt Bhatta L 5.6 0.4 1+004 BM House 0.4m BW Yes

6 Damar Devi Kuwar R 5.1 0.9 1+060 BM House 0.9m T.shutter+Chhaja YesTraffic Chowk- Dashrat - BP Chowk Road, Design width =15m, Length = 600 m

None Note: BM House= Brick Masonry House, RCC House= Reinforced Concrete House, BW=Boundary Wall, T. Chhaja=Temporary Chhaja (shed)

Annex ‐ Page 19

ANNEX-2

Demographic and Economic Information of Affected Households

S.N Name of HH Head / Owner Ethnicity

Education

Population Economic Status

Male Female Total Occupation Monthly Income (Rs)

Per Capita Income (Rs)

M1 : Bhasi- Rautela Road 1 Chanak Lal Chaudhary Janjati S.L.C 5 2 7 Business 50000 85714

2 Asha Chaudhary Janjati Elementary 1 3 4 Business 25000 75000

3 Hira Devi Thagunna Chhettri Elementary 4 2 6 Agriculture 20000 40000

4 Ghungra Khatri Chhettri Elementary 4 2 6 Wage 16000 32000

M2 : Bhanuchowk -Bishnudham Road

1 Binod Rawal Chhettri Elementary 2 2 4 Business 50000 150000

2 Bhupendra Rawal Chhettri 3 3 6 Business 50000 100000

3 Debu Devi Bista Chhettri Elementary 2 4 6 Business 75000 150000

4 Kalyan Singh Thakuriya Chhettri Elementary 4 4 8 Business 40000 60000

5 Madhavi Bhatta Brahmin Elementary 2 3 5 Business 35000 84000

6 Deependra Rawal Chhettri B.A 4 3 7 Business 30000 51429

7 Prem Thalal Chhettri S.L.C 3 3 6 Business 45000 90000

8 Navaraj Khadka Chhettri Elementary 2 3 5 Business 40000 96000

9 Kishor Pandey Brahmin B.A 3 1 4 Service 30000 90000

M3: Suklaphanta Marga(Bhanuchowk-Madan chowk-Airport Road) 1 D.D Pandey Brahmin Elementary 4 3 7 Business 55000 94286

2 Sabitri Rawat Chhettri Elementary 2 2 4 Business 40000 120000

3 Kalawati Chand Chhettri Elementary 4 3 7 Business 50000 85714

4 Kamala Devi Dhami Chhettri S.L.C 6 3 4 Business 30000 90000

5 Gopal Chand Chhettri Inter 6 5 7 Service 45000 77143

6 Dalla Dhami Chhettri Elementary 4 3 9 Business 50000 66667

Annex ‐ Page 20


Education




7 Kalu Chand Chhettri Elementary 4 3 11 Service 150000 163636

8 Rami Chand Chhettri Elementary 4 3 7 Business 50000 85714

9 Gangadatt Joshi Brahmin * 6 6 12 Business+Service 40000 40000

10 Ran Bdr. Chand Chhettri 4 2 6 Business 39000 78000

11 Arjun Chand Chhettri Inter 2 2 4 Agriculture 30000 90000

12 Piuskar Bdr. Chand Chhettri B.A 1 2 3 Agriculture 25000 100000

13 Lal Singh Bista Chhettri Inter 3 3 6 Service 45000 90000

14 Bahadur Nath Chhettri Inter 3 3 6 Agriculture 52000 104000

15 Dhan Bdr. Bista Chhettri S.L.C 6 3 9 Service 65000 86667

16 Bhim Bdr. Chand Chhettri S.L.C 3 1 4 Service 40000 120000

17 Kausilla Khatri Chhettri Elementary 1 1 2 Business 35000 210000

18 Mohan Dev Bhatta Brahmin S.L.C 3 4 7 Business 40000 68571

M4: Airport-Airighat Road 1 Mohan Singh Bhjandari Chhettri Inter 6 3 9 Service 50000 66667

2 Haridatt Joshi Brahmin S.L.C 6 4 10 Service 70000 84000

3 Man Bdr. Chand Chhettri Inter 5 5 10 Remittance 60000 72000

4 Bishna Devi Dhami Chhettri Elementary 2 2 4 Business 35000 105000

V5: Gully No-5 Road (Campus Road, North-South section)1 Deepak Rawat Chhettri Inter 2 3 5 Business 50000 120000

2 Tej Singh K.C Chhettri S.L.C 2 4 6 Business 35000 70000

3 Hiikmat Thaurathi Chhettri Inter 5 5 10 Business 45000 54000

4 Padam Bharati Chhettri Elementary 3 4 7 Business 30000 51429

5 Tek Raj Bharati Chhettri Elementary 4 4 8 Business 25000 37500

6 Ghanashyam Joshi Brahmin Elementary 6 6 12 Business 32000 32000

7 Raju Chand Chhettri Elementary 1 4 5 Business 35000 84000

8 Lal Bdr. Chand Chhettri Elementary 1 2 3 Business 25000 100000

Annex ‐ Page 21


Education




9 Bharat Chand Chhettri Elementary 3 4 7 Business 45000 77143

10 Megh Raj Bohora Brahmin S.L.C 4 3 7 Business 50000 85714

11 Ganesh Chand Chhettri M.A 1 3 4 Service 50000 150000

12 Chhetrapal Mehera Chhettri Elementary 2 2 4 Business 50000 150000

13 Madhav Parshad Bhatta Brahmin Inter 4 3 7 Business 50000 85714

14 Uddhav Dev Joshi Brahmin Inter 3 2 5 Business 50000 120000

15 Chandra Dev Joshi Brahmin Elementary 2 3 5 Business 50000 120000

16 Mahadev Bohora Chhettri Inter 3 2 5 Business 50000 120000

17 Laxmi Devi Joshi Brahmin Elementary 4 4 8 Business 50000 75000

18 Prem parkash Pathak Brahmin Inter 10 8 18 Business 100000 66667

19 Bijaya Nanda Joshi Brahmin Inter 3 2 5 Business 25000 60000

20 Hansa Devi Chand Chhettri Inter 2 3 5 Business 50000 120000

21 Lok Raj Bharati Chhettri S.L.C 3 1 4 Business 50000 150000

22 Devraj Mishra Brahmin Inter 2 3 5 Business 30000 72000

23 Keshav Raj Joshi Brahmin Inter 2 3 5 Business 50000 120000

24 Dilananda Giri Chhettri Inter 4 1 5 Business 100000 240000

25 Bisna Devi Palpali Dalit Inter 5 6 11 Business 100000 109091

26 Khem Palpali Dalit S.L.C 6 3 9 Business 100000 133333

27 Raghubir Bhatta Brahmin Elementary 4 4 8 Business 50000 75000

28 Chandra Devi Rawal Chhettri Elementary 2 2 4 Business 50000 150000

29 Sushila Vevi Rawal Chhettri Inter 2 3 5 Business 100000 240000

30 santos Aitwal Chhettri Inter 3 2 5 Business 100000 240000

31 Parbesh Partap Aitwal Chhettri Inter 3 3 6 Business 50000 100000

32 Bhupendra Aitwal Chhettri Inter 2 2 4 Business 50000 150000

33 Gyanendra Parshad Joshi Brahmin Inter 2 3 5 Business 50000 120000

34 Mahesh Parshad Joshi Brahmin Inter 3 4 7 Business 50000 85714

Annex ‐ Page 22


Education




35 Ganesh Joshi Brahmin Inter 3 4 7 Business 50000 85714

36 Tribhuwan Kumar Bhatta Brahmin M.A 2 2 4 Business 50000 150000

37 Gunakar Bhatta Brahmin S.L.C 3 3 6 Business 50000 100000

38 Hari Parshad Pandey Brahmin B.A 2 2 4 Business 50000 150000

39 Uma Chand Chhettri B.A 3 1 4 Business 50000 150000

40 Kedar Nath Pandey Brahmin B.A 2 2 4 Business 50000 150000

41 Krishna Parshad Aryal Brahmin BBM 2 2 4 Business 50000 150000

42 Laxmi Devi Aryal Brahmin Inter 3 2 5 Business 50000 120000

43 Gopal Sing Bohora Chhettri Inter 2 2 4 Business 50000 150000

44 Suraj Kharel Brahmin Inter 3 3 6 Business 30000 60000

45 Gyan Parshad Dumre Chhettri Inter 4 5 9 Business 25000 33333

46 Parbatman Khanal Brahmin S.L.C 2 6 8 Business 23000 34500

47 Tika Devi Kadel Chhettri Inter 2 3 5 Business 20000 48000

48 Duhurba Parshad Aryal Brahmin S.L.C 2 3 5 Business 20000 48000

49 Khagimaya Bhandari Chhettri Elementary 1 4 5 Business 20000 48000

50 Chandra Bdr. Malla Chhettri Elementary 6 4 10 Business 70000 84000

51 Harka Bdr. Malla Chhettri S.L.C 4 3 7 Business 100000 171429

52 Gopal Datt Joshi Brahmin B.A 7 5 12 Service 35000 3500053 Saraswati Rawal Chhettri Elementary 2 3 5 Business 50000 120000

54 Upendr Bdr. Khadka Chhettri S.L.C 5 5 10 Business 50000 60000

55 Jayaraj Saran Bhatta Brahmin S.L.C 4 3 7 Business 50000 85714

56 Dinesh Chandra Bhatta Brahmin B.A 2 3 5 Business 50000 120000

57 Devraj Saran Bhatta Brahmin Inter 2 2 4 Business 50000 15000058 Manoj Gupta Brahmin B.A 2 2 4 Business 50000 150000

59 Dev Raj Panta Chhettri Elementary 3 3 6 Business 50000 100000

60 Sivraj saran Bhatta Brahmin B.A 3 3 6 Business 50000 100000

Annex ‐ Page 23


Education




61 Gyanendra Bdr. Shah Chhettri S.L.C 3 4 7 Business 50000 85714

62 Sambhu Bharati Chhettri Inter 1 3 4 Business 100000 300000

63 Kalawati Joshi Brahmin Elementary 5 4 9 Business 50000 66667

64 Dan Bdr. Kunuwar Chhettri Elementary 3 2 5 Service 50000 120000

65 Bhakta Joshi Brahmin Inter 4 4 8 Business 40000 60000

66 Hari Shngh Bista Chhettri Elementary * * * * *

67 Janki Raiswal Chhettri Inter * * * * *

68 Parbati Chataut Chhettri Elementary 6 3 9 Service 100000 133333

69 Tarani Datt Chataut Chhettri Inter 3 3 6 Service 100000 200000

70 Bijayanand Joshi Brahmin Inter 3 2 5 Business 60000 144000

71 Nanda Dhami Chhettri Inter 4 1 5 Service 20000 48000

72 Mohan Singh Dhami Chhettri S.L.C 4 3 7 Business 50000 85714

73 Jayakisan Bhatta Brahmin Elementary 3 2 5 Business 20000 48000

74 Dilliraj Joshi Brahmin Inter 4 3 7 Business 50000 85714

75 Dharma Devi Rana Janjati Elementary 1 1 2 Business 25000 150000

76 Gopal Datt Joshi Brahmin S.L.C 3 2 5 Business 20000 48000

77 Tej Bdr. Bam * * * * * * *

78 Kisan Singh Thapa Chhettri Inter 2 1 3 Business 50000 200000

79 Laxmi Datt Pandey Brahmin Inter 6 5 11 Service 150000 163636

80 Laba Dev Pandey Brahmin Inter 6 6 12 Service 200000 200000

81 Basudev Bohora Chhettri Inter 3 1 4 Business 55000 165000

82 Karna Bdr. Chand Chhettri Inter 2 2 4 Business 40000 120000

83 Deelip Singh Bhandari Chhettri Inter 3 2 5 Service 50000 120000

84 Manoj Parshad Joshi Brahmin Inter 3 4 7 Business 100000 171429

85 Chandra Maya karki Chhettri Elementary 4 6 10 Service 30000 36000

86 Tara Devi Bhatta Brahmin S.L.C 1 3 4 Business 50000 150000

Annex ‐ Page 24


Education




87 Gangaram Giri Yogi Elementary 3 3 6 Business 70000 140000

88 Netra Chataut Brahmin PHd 3 1 4 Business 60000 180000

89 Balaram Ghimire Brahmin S.L.C 2 2 4 Business 50000 150000

90 Jayadatt Paudyal Brahmin Inter 4 1 5 Business 50000 120000

91 Bidhya Devi Kharel Brahmin Inter 2 1 3 Business 40000 160000

92 Tikaram Aryal Brahmin Inter 4 3 7 Business 50000 85714

93 Chintamani Kharel Brahmin Inter 2 1 3 Business 50000 200000

94 Ranbir Saran Bhatta Brahmin S.L.C 3 3 6 Business 25000 50000

95 Narain Datt Bhatta Brahmin S.L.C 4 4 8 Business 25000 37500

96 Raju Sharma Brahmin S.L.C 7 6 13 Business 50000 46154

97 Gokarna Bdr. Chand Chhettri Inter 7 3 10 Service 40000 48000

98 Amita Aryal Brahmin S.L.C 2 3 5 Business 20000 48000

99 Pabi Kafle Brahmin Inter 2 2 4 Business 20000 60000

100 Hema Devi Gurung Janjati Elementary 2 2 4 Service 30000 90000

101 Hom Bdr. Kunuwar Chhettri S.L.C 3 3 6 Business 30000 60000

102 Khadak Bdr. Kunuwar Chhettri S.L.C 3 1 4 Business 35000 105000

V-4: Gully No-4 Road (North-South section)

1 L.B Bista Chhettri S.L.C 3 4 7 Business 100000 171429

2 Tara singh Bohora Chhettri S.L.C 2 3 5 Business 50000 120000

3 Mohan Khatri Chhettri S.L.C 3 3 6 Business 50000 100000

4 Hariram Chaudhari Janjati S.L.C 3 3 6 Business 50000 100000

5 Chet raj Joshi Brahmin B.A 8 5 13 Service 50000 46154

6 Dhan Bdr.Ayer Chhettri S.L.C 3 3 6 Business 50000 100000

7 Khadak Singh Saud

8 Hira Devi Thagunna Chhettri Elementary 3 3 6 Business 50000 100000

9 Shankardatt Joshi Brahmin Inter 2 3 5 Business 50000 120000

Annex ‐ Page 25


Education




10 Chitramani Joshi Brahmin Elementary 3 4 7 Business 50000 85714

11 Manju Bhatta Brahmin Inter 2 2 4 Business 50000 150000

12 Haridatt Bhatta Brahmin Elementary 3 4 7 Business 50000 85714

13 Mamta Awasti Brahmin Inter 4 7 11 Business 50000 54545

14 Dhan Bdr. Bom Chhettri Inter 4 3 7 Business 50000 85714

15 Kiran Khadka Chhettri Elementary 3 3 6 Business 50000 100000

16 Gajadhar Joshi Brahmin Elementary 7 7 14 Business 50000 42857

17 Manorath Bhatta Brahmin Elementary 4 2 6 Business 50000 100000

18 Girija Shankar Parsad Brahmin Elementary 3 3 6 Business 50000 100000

19 Harish Chandra Bhatta Brahmin S.L.C 6 6 12 Business 100000 100000

20 Naina Ojha Brahmin Inter 2 3 7 Business 50000 85714

21 Deependra Bista Chhettri Inter 2 3 5 Business 150000 360000

22 Ganga Kharel Brahmin Inter 3 5 8 Service 50000 75000

23 Devidatt Bhatta Brahmin Inter 2 * 2 Business 100000 600000

24 Devaki Joshi Brahmin Elementary 2 3 5 Business 50000 120000

25 Chandrakala Panta Brahmin Inter 2 2 4 Business 50000 150000

26 Jaya Bdr. Pal Chhettri S.L.C 3 3 6 Business 100000 200000

27 Dambar Bdr. Pal Chhettri S.L.C 3 3 6 Business 100000 200000

28 Hari parsad Bhatta Brahmin Inter 2 1 3 Business 100000 400000

29 Laxman Singh Bista Chhettri Inter 3 3 6 Business 50000 100000

30 Narendra Khatri Chhettri Inter 3 3 6 Service 20000 40000

31 Dhirendra Bdr. Chand Chhettri Inter 1 2 3 Business 10000 40000

32 Saligram Kharel Brahmin S.L.C 2 3 5 Business 50000 120000

33 Narayan Baral Brahmin Inter 1 1 2 Business 50000 300000

34 Dhan Bdr. Chand Chhettri Inter 4 1 5 Business 50000 120000

35 Bamayanti Joshi Brahmin Elementary 4 2 4 Business 100000 300000

Annex ‐ Page 26


Education




36 Durga Bhandari Chhettri Elementary 1 1 2 Business 50000 300000

37 Parbati Devi Damai Dalit Elementary 2 1 3 Business 50000 200000

38 Tila Devi Damai Dalit Elementary 3 3 6 Service 35000 70000

39 P.K Shrestha Janjati S.L.C 5 4 9 Business 100000 133333

40 Dammari Bhatta Brahmin S.L.C 2 2 4 Business 40000 120000

41 Rama Shrestha Janjati S.L.C 1 3 4 Business 40000 120000

42 Deepa Devi Shrestha Janjati S.L.C 2 2 4 Business 30000 90000

43 Hripriya Pant Brahmin S.L.C 2 2 4 Business 15000 45000

44 Premdatt Joshi Brahmin B.A 2 2 4 Business 50000 150000

45 Prajapati Bista Chhettri Inter 3 2 5 Business 15000 36000

46 Dal Bdr.Bista Chhettri S.L.C 3 3 6 Service 25000 50000

47 Harka Bdr. Bista Chhettri S.L.C 3 3 6 Service 25000 50000

48 Jahar Singh Pwali Chhettri Elementary 4 5 9 Business 25000 33333

49 Madhav Joshi Brahmin B.A 2 2 4 Business 70000 210000

50 Shreeram Chataut Chhettri Elementary 3 6 9 Business 100000 133333

51 Hajari Singh Pujara Brahmin Elementary 2 2 4 Business 50000 150000

52 Dharma Singh Rawal Chhettri Inter 2 2 4 Business 100000 300000

53 Dhana Devi Bhatta Brahmin Elementary 4 3 7 Business 50000 85714

54 Niraj Saud Chhettri Inter 1 3 4 Business 75000 225000

55 Padam Thakurathi Chhettri Elementary 3 1 4 Business 75000 225000

56 Godawari Bhatta Brahmin Elementary 5 3 8 Business 75000 112500

57 Sunil Panta Brahmin B.A 2 2 4 Business 75000 225000

58 Tek Bdr. Kunuwar Chhettri B.A 3 3 6 Business 75000 150000

59 Madan Singh Thagunna Chhettri S.L.C 3 1 4 Business 75000 225000

60 Sova Karki Chhettri MBBS 1 2 3 Business 75000 300000

61 Kalu Bohora Chhettri S.L.C 3 3 6 Business 30000 60000

Annex ‐ Page 27


Education




62 Gorakh Bdr. Bista Chhettri Elementary 4 4 8 Business 30000 45000

63 Lalit Bdr. Bohora Chhettri S.L.C 3 4 7 Business 75000 128571

64 Lalit Parsad Bhatta Brahmin Inter 2 3 5 Business 75000 180000

65 Laxman Chand Chhettri Inter 2 2 4 Business 40000 120000

66 Kashi Singh Karki Chhettri

67 Gyanu Bohara Chhettri Inter 2 2 4 Business 40000 120000

68 Parkash Chand Chhettri Inter 3 1 4 Business 50000 150000

69 Padama devi Bhatta Brahmin Inter 2 2 4 Business 50000 150000

70 Rudra Parsad Bhatrai Brahmin Inter 3 1 4 Business 50000 150000

71 Mina Baral Chhettri Elementary 2 2 4 Business 20000 60000

72 Padam Raj Pandey Brahmin Inter 2 2 4 Business 15000 45000

73 Mahesh Pandey Brahmin Inter 2 2 4 Service 30000 90000

74 Dhan Bdr. Chand Chhettri S.L.C 4 3 7 Business 20000 34286

V-3 : Gully No-3 Road (North-South Section)

1 Basanti Devi Pandey Brahmin Elementary 5 4 9 Business 100000 133333

2 Ambika devi Bhandari Chhettri S.L.C 6 3 9 Business 100000 133333

3 Parmananda Bhandari Chhettri B.A 6 3 9 Business 100000 133333

4 Top Bdr. K.C Chhettri Elementary 2 2 4 Business 80000 240000

5 Bhim Pandey Brahmin Elementary 3 4 7 Business 50000 85714

6 Bhuwan Pandey Brahmin B.A 3 4 7 Business 50000 85714

7 Devraj Mishra Brahmin 4 1 5 Service 20000 48000

8 Prem Singh Bhatta Brahmin 4 3 7 Business 50000 85714

9 Hikmat Saud Chhettri 3 2 5 Business 20000 48000

10 Ganesh Saud Chhettri 4 3 7 Business 50000 85714

11 Tej Bdr. Bhandari Chhettri Inter 3 2 5 Business 30000 72000

12 Sundara Dev Bhandari Chhettri Elementary 3 2 5 Business 30000 72000

Annex ‐ Page 28


Education




13 Chandra Bdr. Chand Chhettri Inter 5 3 8 Business 30000 45000

14 Bhan Bdr. Chand Chhettri Inter 6 6 12 Business 40000 40000

15 Bashu Dev Deuba Chhettri Elementary 2 2 4 Business 50000 150000

16 Nara Bdr. Bista Chhettri Elementary 4 2 6 Business 20000 40000

17 Kamala Devi Kathayat Chhettri Elementary 4 4 8 Business 22000 33000

18 Dal Bdr. Shah Chhettri S.L.C 4 3 7 Business 30000 51429

19 Gorakh Bdr. Khati Chhettri Elementary 3 4 7 Business 25000 42857

20 Bhim Datta Bhatta Brahmin S.L.C 3 3 6 Business 25000 50000

21 Yagyaraj Paudyal/Madan Brahmin Inter 3 3 6 Business 50000 100000

22 Rupkiswor Gupta Chhettri S.L.C 3 2 5 Business 100000 240000

23 Bharat Nepal Brahmin S.L.C 9 9 18 Business 100000 66667

24 Nar Bdr. Pal Chhettri Elementary 1 1 2 Business 50000 300000

25 Kailap Bhatta Brahmin Inter 2 2 4 Business 50000 150000

26 Ghanashyam Kalauni Brahmin B.A 3 2 5 Business 50000 120000

27 Dhan Bdr. Bom Chhettri Elementary 4 6 10 Business 50000 60000

28 Anil Dhungana/Joshi Brahmin Inter 3 4 7 Service 35000 60000

29 Yasoda Pathak/ Tiwari Brahmin M.A 3 2 5 Business 50000 120000

30 Jeetendra Parsad Bhatta Brahmin S.L.C 2 2 4 Business 50000 150000

31 Mahendra Bdr Kunwor Chhettri Inter 3 2 5 Business 30000 72000

32 Ram Singh Ter Chhettri Elementary 7 10 17 Business 100000 70588

33 Ram Pd Sapkota Brahmin S.L.C 5 4 9 Business 100000 133333

34 Arjun Prakash Upreti Brahmin S.L.C 4 3 7 Business 50000 85714

35 Min Raj Bhatta Brahmin S.L.C 4 6 10 Business 50000 60000 36 Karan Shah Chhettri Elementary 4 3 7 Business 50000 85714

37 Narendra Raj Bohora Brahmin S.L.C 3 3 6 Business 50000 100000

38 Jagdish Upreti Brahmin Elementary 3 3 6 Business 100000 200000

Annex ‐ Page 29


Education




39 Ratan Saud

40 Karan Bdr Singh Chhettri Elementary 2 3 5 Business 100000 240000

41 Ashok Kumar Dewal Chhettri S.L.C 4 3 7 Business 50000 85714

42 Dhawal Bdr Chand Chhettri Elementary 2 3 4 Business 100000 300000

43 Kalpana KC Chhettri Elementary 3 3 6 Business 50000 100000

44 Jayamati Devi Bhatta Brahmin Inter 2 2 4 Business 100000 300000

45 Madan Panta Brahmin Elementary 6 5 11 Business 50000 54545

46 Dhan Singh Rawal Chhettri Elementary 3 3 6 Business 50000 100000

47 Belu Devi Bhata Brahmin Elementary 3 3 6 Business 50000 100000

48 Kunti Bohora Chhettri Elementary 2 2 4 Business 50000 150000

49 Harish Chand Brahmin Elementary 5 4 9 Business 50000 66667

50 Jamunaganga Devi Joshi Brahmin Elementary 4 3 7 Business 50000 85714

51 Tanka Pd. Bhatta Brahmin Elementary 3 2 5 Business 50000 120000

52 Radhika Devi bhatta Brahmin Elementary 4 4 8 Business 50000 75000

53 D.r Rajendra Bhatta Brahmin PHD 3 2 5 Service 100000 240000

54 Deepak Kharel Brahmin 3 2 5 Business 40000 96000

55 Rishi Kharel Brahmin Inter 4 4 8 Business 50000 75000

56 Yadu Raj Joshi Brahmin Inter 3 3 6 Service 50000 100000

57 Nar Singh Dhami Chhettri S.L.C 2 3 5 Business 150000 360000

58 Tarun Lakhera Brahmin Inter 3 3 6 Business 50000 100000

59 Padama Saud Bhandari Chhettri PhD 2 2 4 Service 50000 150000

60 Furua Kalauni Chhettri Elementary 1 2 3 Business 15000 60000

61 Megh Raj Bhatta Brahmin S.L.C 3 2 5 Business 25000 60000

62 Kashidatt Bhatta Brahmin Elementary 3 1 4 Business 15000 45000

63 Kalpana Karki Chhettri Inter 3 2 5 Business 150000 360000


Annex ‐ Page 30


Education




1 Ramesh Pandey Brahmin M.A 2 2 4 Service 100000 300000

2 Laxi Pandey Brahmin Elementary 2 2 4 Business 50000 150000

3 Arjundatt Pandey Brahmin B.A 4 5 9 Business 50000 66667

4 Gopaldatt Bhatta Brahmin Elementary 7 8 15 Business 50000 40000

5 Jamuna Devi Bhatta Brahmin Elementary 6 6 12 Business 50000 50000

6 Bhojraj Bhatta Brahmin Elementary 4 2 6 Business 50000 100000

7 Rameswor Upreti Brahmin Elementary 3 4 7 Business 50000 85714

8 Neha Singh Pal Chhettri S.L.C 4 4 8 Business 50000 75000

9 Tikadatt Paneru Brahmin S.L.C 3 3 6 Business 50000 100000

10 Rajesh Gupta Chhettri S.L.C 2 2 4 Business 50000 150000

11 Parmananda Paneru Brahmin Elementary 4 3 7 Business 30000 51429

12 Karunakar Paneru Brahmin Elementary 4 3 7 Business 30000 51429

13 Laxmi Devi Bhatta Brahmin Elementary 3 3 6 Business 30000 60000

14 Tek Khadka Chhettri Inter 2 4 6 Business 30000 60000

15 Ram Parshad Pandey Brahmin S.L.C 4 4 8 Business 30000 45000

16 Sher Singh Ter Chhettri S.L.C 3 3 6 Business 30000 60000

17 Shankar Bdr. Bista Chhettri S.L.C 3 1 4 Business 30000 90000

18 Madan Singh Aiyar Chhettri Elementary 3 3 6 Business 30000 60000

19 Dharma Raj Bhatta Brahmin S.L.C 4 5 9 Business 30000 40000

20 Dev Raj Bhatta Brahmin Inter 4 5 9 Business 30000 40000

21 Jayalal Bhatta Brahmin Elementary 3 3 6 Business 50000 100000

22 Bhoj Raj Bhatta Brahmin Elementary 4 2 6 Business 50000 100000

23 Uddhav Singh Bista Chhettri Elementary 3 2 5 Business 50000 120000

24 Nar Bdr. Bista Chhettri Elementary 3 3 6 Business 50000 100000

25 Kiswar Jairu Chhettri Inter 2 3 5 Business 50000 120000

26 Nandalal Bohora Brahmin S.L.C 3 3 6 Business 50000 100000

Annex ‐ Page 31


Education




27 Motilal Bohora Brahmin S.L.C 5 3 8 Business 50000 75000

28 Madana Devi Bohora Brahmin Elementary 5 2 7 Business 50000 85714

29 Hari Parshad Bohora Brahmin B.A 2 3 5 Business 50000 120000

30 Siddharaj Bohora Brahmin Inter 3 2 5 Business 50000 120000

31 Sita K.C Chhettri Inter 5 5 10 Service 100000 120000

32 Iswori Devi Bohora Brahmin Elementary 5 5 10 Business 30000 36000

33 Urmila Kharel Brahmin Inter 2 2 4 Business 30000 90000

34 Tika Devi Kharel Brahmin Elementary 3 3 6 Business 60000 120000

35 Ram Parshad Kharel Brahmin Inter 3 3 6 Business 30000 60000

36 Navraj Kharel Brahmin Inter 2 2 4 Business 30000 90000

37 Manmati Giri Chhettri Elementary 3 1 4 Business 50000 150000

38 Nisha Shah Muslim Inter 2 3 5 Business 200000 480000

39 Rasmi Gupta Chhettri Inter 2 2 5 Business 15000 36000

40 Pawan Kumar Sarwagi Chhettri Inter 4 2 6 Business 100000 200000

41 Birendra Kumar Sangai Chhettri Inter 3 2 5 Business 150000 360000

42 Dhan Bdr. Chand Chhettri Inter 5 4 9 Business 25000 33333

43 Hajari Chand Chhettri Inter 2 3 5 Business 50000 120000

44 Ram Bdr. Kunuwar Chhettri Elementary 6 5 11 Business 200000 218182

45 Laxmi Bhatta Brahmin B.A 1 2 3 Service 50000 200000

46 Pratap Chand Chhettri Elementary 6 4 10 Service 50000 60000

47 Ram Bdr. Kunuwar Chhettri Inter 2 2 4 Service 50000 150000

48 Narendra Paneru Brahmin BBS 2 3 5 Business 50000 120000

49 Damodar Athola Joshi Brahmin Elementary 6 8 14 Business 100000 85714

50 Laxi Devi Paneru Brahmin Elementary 5 4 9 Business 100000 133333

51 Dwarika Devi Bista Chhettri Elementary 3 1 4 Business 100000 300000

52 Ramdular Jaiswal Chhettri Elementary 2 5 7 Business 50000 85714

Annex ‐ Page 32


Education




53 Deep Raj Chataut Chhettri 3 2 5 Business 75000 180000

54 Padam Bdr. Thakurathi Chhettri Inter 5 5 10 Business 28000 33600

55 Kalpana Thapa Chhettri BA 2 2 4 Business 20000 60000

56 Motimaya Sharma Brahmin Elementary 1 2 3 Service 50000 200000

57 Ganga Kafle Brahmin Elementary 2 2 4 Business 25000 75000

58 Narendra Khatri Chhettri Elementary 2 2 4 Business 50000 150000

59 Binod Joshi Brahmin S.L.C 2 3 5 Business 50000 120000

60 Srijana Rawal Chhettri Elementary 4 5 9 Business 50000 66667

61 Bir Bdr.Kunwor Chhettri Elementary 4 5 8 Business 30000 45000

62 Nirmal Lamichhane Dalit Elementary 4 4 9 Business 30000 40000

63 Madan Sunar Dalit Elementary 5 5 10 Business 30000 36000

64 Shivlal Nyeupane Brahmin Inter 3 3 6 Business 50000 100000

65 Naresh Agrawal Chhettri Inter 2 1 3 Business 100000 400000

66 Radhika Sunar Dalit Elementary 1 3 4 Business 40000 120000

67 Rameswor Bhatta Brahmin M.A 6 7 13 Service 100000 92308

68 Sushil Dewal Chhettri Inter 3 3 6 Business 200000 400000

69 Megh Raj Bohora Chhettri Elementary 3 2 5 Business 40000 96000

70 Ramchandra Bohora Chhettri Elementary 3 3 6 Business 40000 80000

71 Kamala Devi Bohora Chhettri Elementary 3 3 6 Business 50000 100000

72 Govinda Raj Joshi Brahmin Inter 2 1 3 Business 50000 200000

73 Mukesh Agrawal Chhettri Inter 1 4 5 Business 30000 72000

74 Kaviraj Bhatta Brahmin Inter 2 1 3 Business 40000 160000

75 Bhojraj Joshi Brahmin L.L.B 4 8 12 Business 200000 200000

76 Chitra Nepal Brahmin Inter 2 3 5 Service 100000 240000

77 Iswori Devi Chilwal Brahmin Inter 5 2 7 Business 40000 68571

78 Laxmi Devi Tiwari Brahmin S.L.C 3 3 6 Business 30000 60000

Annex ‐ Page 33


Education




79 Ganesh Raj Bohora Chhettri 2 3 5 Business 75000 180000

80 Sunita Budha Chhettri S.L.C 3 1 4 Business 50000 150000

81 Chandra Datt Joshi Brahmin Inter 3 2 5 Business 50000 120000

82 Madhusudan Aryal Brahmin Inter 2 2 4 Business 40000 120000

83 Gangaram Rawal Chhettri Elementary 3 4 7 Business 50000 85714

84 Somraj Aryal Brahmin Inter 4 2 6 Business 50000 100000

85 Gopal Bhusal Brahmin Inter 2 3 5 Business 50000 120000

86 Homlal Bhusal Brahmin Inter 3 3 6 Business 50000 100000

87 Ishwori Devi Bhatta Brahmin Inter * 2 2 Business 50000 300000

88 Tek Bdr. Sunar Dalit Inter 4 3 7 Business 100000 171429

89 Min Bdr. Kathayat Chhettri S.L.C 4 4 8 Business 50000 75000

V-1: Gully No-1(Shalgadhi Road, North-South Section)1 Bhairav Bdr. Aiyar Chhettri Elementary 6 9 15 Business 50000 40000

2 Suman Dewal Chhettri Elementary 1 1 2 Business 10000 60000

3 Ashok Kumar Dewal Chhettri Elementary 4 3 7 Business 19000 32571

4 Bhupendra Rawal Chhettri B.A 3 2 5 Business 35000 84000

5 Rajendra Rawal Chhettri B.A 2 2 4 Business 30000 90000

6 Bhoj Raj Bohora Chhettri Inter 3 1 4 Business 30000 90000

7 Padam Bdr. Aiyar Chhettri Inter 5 5 10 Service 30000 36000

8 Hariom Dewal Chhettri B.A 1 1 2 Business 40000 240000

9 Harinanda Pd.NirajKumar Chhettri Elementary 2 2 4 Business 40000 120000

10 Nannelal Hariom Chhettri Elementary 5 5 10 Service 50000 60000

11 Kailash Gupta Chhettri S.L.C 4 1 5 Business 19000 45600

12 Bijaya Dewal Chhettri S.L.C 3 3 6 Business 30000 60000

13 Padam Bdr. Thakurathi Chhettri S.L.C 4 2 6 Business 20000 40000

14 Harilal Thakurathi Chhettri S.L.C 4 5 9 Business 100000 133333

Annex ‐ Page 34


Education




15 Maheswor Chataut Brahmin S.L.C 3 2 5 Business 40000 96000

16 Dansingh Thakurathi Chhettri Inter 2 3 5 Business 20000 48000

17 Omprakash Gupta Chhettri Elementary 5 3 8 Business 40000 60000

18 Rajiv Dewal Chhettri Elementary 2 2 4 Business 40000 120000

19 Rajeswori Devi Dewal Chhettri Elementary 6 8 14 Business 40000 34286

20 Dharmendra Gupta Chhettri Inter 2 2 4 Business 100000 300000

21 Parsuram Gautam Chhettri Elementary 2 2 4 Business 30000 90000

22 Hira Devi Bohora Chhettri C.A 3 2 5 Business 25000 60000

23 Kanhyalal Dewal Chhettri Elementary 6 4 10 Business 27000 32400

24 Gopal Dewal Chhettri Elementary 2 3 5 Business 25000 60000

25 Dambar Datt Bhatta Chhettri S.L.C 4 1 5 Business 20000 48000

26 Balaram Chataut Brahmin S.L.C 5 3 8 Business 50000 75000

27 Kirta Bdr. Johra Chhettri Elementary 5 7 12 Service 100000 100000

28 Dharma Raj Joshi Brahmin Inter 4 4 8 Business 100000 150000

29 Durga Devi Johra Chhettri Elementary 4 7 12 Business 100000 100000

30 Dharma singh Rawal Chhettri Elementary 2 2 4 Business 30000 90000

31 Abdul Samim Janjati Elementary 2 5 7 Service 100000 171429

32 Maina Devi Bhandari Chhettri Elementary 5 6 11 Business 100000 109091

33 Parbati Devi Khadayat Chhettri Elementary 13 6 19 Business 100000 63158

34 Abdul Samim Janjati Elementary 2 5 7 Business 100000 171429

35 Indra Singh Rawal Chhettri S.L.C 2 4 6 Business 50000 100000

36 Lal Singh Thakurathi Chhettri S.L.C 3 3 6 Business 50000 100000

37 Padam Raj Bohora Brahmin S.L.C 2 4 6 Business 50000 100000

38 Bhubaneswori Kunwar Chhettri

39 Geeta Kharel Brahmin Elementary 9 6 15 Business 100000 80000

40 Pabitra Aryal Brahmin Elementary 4 4 8 Business 100000 150000

Annex ‐ Page 35


Education




41 Harka Singh Aiyar Chhettri S.L.C 9 6 15 Business 40000 32000

42 Bimal Khadayat Chhettri

43 Bhubaneswori Bogati Chhettri

44 Hem Raj Bohora Chhettri

45 Dinesh Shrestha Janjati Inter 2 3 5 Business 30000 72000

46 Dev Singh Ter Chhettri Inter 5 4 9 Business 30000 40000

47 Gagan Bdr Singh Chhettri

48 Khagesh Pd. Bhatta Brahmin Inter 5 2 7 Business 50000 85714

49 Siddha Raj Bhatta Brahmin Inter 7 6 13 Business 100000 92308

50 Deepu Budhayar Chhettri Inter 2 2 4 Business 30000 90000

51 Ammar Budharar Chhettri Inter 2 2 4 Business 30000 90000

52 Keshav Raj Panta Brahmin B.A 3 1 4 Business 100000 300000

53 Bimal Raj Panta Brahmin Inter 2 2 4 Business 50000 150000

54 Pawan Khadayat Chhettri B.A 4 6 10 Business 50000 60000

55 Lal Bdr. Khadayat Chhettri ISC 4 4 8 Business 50000 75000

56 Mukesh Rawal Chhettri BSC 2 2 4 Business 50000 150000

57 Megh Raj Bohora Chhettri S.L.C 4 4 8 Business 100000 150000

58 Dan Singh Thakurathi Chhettri Inter 3 3 6 Business 50000 100000

59 Nawal Singh Saud

60 Krishnadatt Chataut Brahmin S.L.C 4 5 9 Business 25000 33333

61 Shiv Raj Bhatta Brahmin B.A 2 3 5 Service 40000 96000

62 Niraj Gupta Brahmin B.A 2 2 4 Business 60000 180000

63 Yagya Raj Bhatta Brahmin B.A 3 1 4 Business 40000 120000

64 Yagya Raj Bhatta Chhettri Inter 2 2 4 Business 50000 150000

65 Parkash Rawal Chhettri Inter 3 2 5 Business 30000 72000

66 Samser rawal Chhettri B.A 4 1 5 Service 38000 91200

Annex ‐ Page 36


Education




67 Lal Bdr. Rawal Chhettri Inter 3 6 9 Business 100000 133333

68 Amar Shingh Khadayat Chhettri Elementary 2 2 4 Business 50000 150000

69 Tek Bdr. Saud Chhettri Elementary 3 4 7 Business 30000 51429

70 Uday Saud Chhettri Inter 3 2 5 Service 40000 96000

71 Bam Dev Chataut Brahmin Inter 4 2 6 Business 100000 200000

72 Chhotelal Batuwa Chhettri Elementary 9 4 13 Business 100000 92308

73 Raj Kumar Dewal Chhettri Inter 6 4 10 Business 50000 60000

74 Umashankar Dewal Chhettri Elementary 7 4 11 Business 50000 54545

75 Bhuwan Chataut Chhettri Elementary 10 4 14 Business 50000 42857

76 Ganesh Chataut Chhettri Inter 4 3 7 Business 50000 85714

77 Bal Devi Kharel Brahmin Elementary 1 2 3 Business 100000 400000

78 Bashu Dev Bohora Chhettri Inter 2 2 4 Bsiness 50000 150000

79 Mohan Singh Bista Chhettri Inter 3 3 6 Bsiness 50000 100000

80 Kalpana devi Bhusal Brahmin S.L.C 2 3 5 Bsiness 100000 240000

81 Narai Bhatta Brahmin Elementary 3 3 6 Bsiness 100000 200000

82 Anita Joshi Brahmin Elementary 2 4 6 Service 100000 200000

83 Bhuwan Kharel Brahmin Inter 2 3 5 Bsiness 100000 240000

84 Poonam Bhatta Brahmin S.L.C 3 3 6 Business 20000 40000

85 Basanti Thagunna Chhettri Elementary 2 3 5 Business 100000 240000

86 Sova Dewal Chhettri Elementary 1 2 Business 100000 600000

87 Mandhari Devi Giri Yogi Elementary 10 4 14 Business 50000 42857

88 Laxman Singh Bista Chhettri Inter 4 3 7 Business 50000 85714

89 Hema Pandey Brahmin S.L.C 2 2 4 Business 50000 150000

90 Rupa Aryal Brahmin S.L.C 4 1 5 Business 50000 120000

91 Cholanath Bhandari Chhettri S.L.C 2 3 5 Business 50000 120000

92 Man Singh Mahara Chhettri Inter 2 2 4 Business 50000 150000

Annex ‐ Page 37


Education




93 Sher Shingh Bhandari Brahmin

94 Bir Bdr. Sunar Chhettri Inter 3 3 6 Business 100000 200000

95 Omkar Panta Brahmin Inter 2 2 4 Business 100000 300000

96 Prakash Shah Chhettri B.Com 3 3 6 service 100000 200000

97 Hari Datt Bhatta Brahmin S.L.C 5 4 9 Business 50000 66667

V6: Malpot/Napi Karalaya-E/W Highway) 1 Harilal Joshi Brahmin M.A 3 2 5 Service 25000 60000

2 Patiram Chunara Dalit S.L.C 3 5 8 Business 20000 30000

3 Tek Raj Bhatta Brahmin Inter 2 1 3 Business 25000 100000

H1: East-West Gully-1 1 Gajendra Bdr. Shah Chhettri S.L.C 3 4 7 Business 50000 85714

2 Shambhu Bharati Yogi Inter 1 3 4 Business 100000 300000

3 Chintamani Joshi Brahmin Elementary 3 4 7 Business 50000 85714

4 Manju Bhatta Brahmin Inter 2 2 4 Business 50000 150000

5 Shreeram Chataut Brahmin Elementary 3 6 9 Business 100000 133333

6 Hajari Singh Pujara Chhettri Elementary 2 2 4 Business 50000 150000

7 Gopal Singh Budha Chhettri Elementary 3 4 7 Business 30000 51429

8 Bhuban Pandey Brahmin Inter 2 1 3 Business 50000 200000

9 Devraj Mishra Brahmin Inter 3 4 7 Business 50000 85714

10 Min Raj Bhatta Brahmin S.L.C 4 6 10 Business 50000 60000

11 Prem Shah Chhettri Elementary 4 3 7 Business 50000 85714

12 Narendra Bohora Brahmin Inter 3 3 6 Business 50000 100000

13 Deepak Gupta Chhettri Inter 4 5 9 Business 25000 33333

14 Padam Bdr. Bhandari Chhettri Elementary 2 3 5 Service 40000 96000

15 Laxmi Datt Bhatta Brahmin Elementary 2 2 4 Business 60000 180000

16 Rudra Singh Bhandari Chhettri Elementary 3 1 4 Business 40000 120000

Annex ‐ Page 38


Education




17 Karunakar Paneru Brahmin Elementary 3 1 4 Business 20000 60000

18 Harilal Bhatta Brahmin S.L.C 3 3 6 Business 20000 40000

19 Kalpana Thapa 3 2 5 Service 100000 240000


21 Shanti Damai Dalit Elementary 4 5 9 Business 50000 66667

22 kalu Singh+jagat Bhandari Chhettri Inter 9 5 13 Business 100000 92308


H2: East-West Gully-2

1 Mohan Singh Dhami Chhettri Inter 4 3 7 Business 50000 85714

2 Jaya Kisan Bhatta Brahmin Elementary 4 3 7 Business 100000 171429

3 Haris Chandra Bhatta Brahmin S.L.C 4 6 10 Business 100000 120000

4 Laba Raj Bhatta Brahmin Inter 3 1 4 Business 20000 60000

5 Sunil Panta Brahmin B.A 2 2 4 Business 75000 225000

6 Madan Paudyal Brahmin Elementary 5 5 10 Business 21000 25200

7 Tikaram Bohora Brahmin S.L.C 2 2 4 Business 20000 60000

8 Khem Raj Bohora Brahmin S.L.C 4 2 6 Business 20000 40000

9 Govinda Ballav Joshi Brahmin 3 4 7 Business 50000 85714

10 Jaimati Devi Bhatta Brahmin Inter 2 2 4 Business 100000 300000

11 Bashudev Bohora Chhettri Inter 2 2 4 Bsiness 50000 150000

12 Sita Devi K.C Chhettri Inter 5 5 10 Service 100000 120000

13 Ganesh Bohora Chhettri B.A 4 4 8 Service 50000 75000

14 Kamala Devi Bohora Chhettri Elementary 3 3 6 Business 40000 80000

15 Durga Devi Jora Chhettri Elementary 3 2 5 Business 40000 96000

16 Dharma Raj joshi Brahmin Inter 4 4 8 Business 100000 150000

H-3: Hospital Road (Gully 6 to Gully 1/ East-West Gully-3) None

Annex ‐ Page 39


Education




H-4: Campus Road (Janki tole) to Gully 1( East-West Gully-4) None

H-5: Sarswati Tole Road 1 (East West Gully-5, Katan Area)1 Bisnudatt Bhatta Brahmin B.A 3 2 5 Service 100000 240000

2 Bajir Singh Aiyar Chhettri Elementary 2 2 4 Business 45000 135000

3 Khagendra Chand Chhettri Inter 3 4 7 Service 35000 60000

4 Ganga Datt Joshi Brahmin B.A 3 2 5 Service 35000 84000

5 Rajendra Chand Chhettri Inter 3 3 6 Service 35000 70000

6 Anandi Panta Brahmin B.A 2 1 3 Service 30000 120000

7 Parmeswori Pandey Brahmin Elementary 5 7 12 Business 100000 100000

8 Hom Bdr. Panthi Chhettri S.L.C 4 1 5 Business 18000 43200

9 Dharma Nanda Bhatta Chhettri S.L.C 3 3 6 Business 30000 60000

10 Sashi Ojha Chhettri S.L.C 4 2 6 Business 20000 40000

11 Laxman Singh Bhandari Chhettri S.L.C 4 5 9 Business 100000 133333

12 Ganesh Bohora Brahmin S.L.C 3 2 5 Business 40000 96000

13 Narayan Singh Saud Chhettri Inter 5 3 8 Service 50000 75000

14 Kamala Bohora Chhettri Elementary 4 5 9 Business 25000 33333

15 Man Bdr. Sunar Dalit Elementary 2 3 5 Service 40000 96000

16 Tikaram Bhatta Brahmin Elementary 2 2 4 Business 60000 180000

17 Tekendra Bhatta Brahmin B.A 3 3 6 Business 40000 80000

18 Damodar Pandey Brahmin BSC 5 4 9 Service 50000 66667

19 Dr. Bhojraj Panta Chhettri 2 2 4 Business 50000 150000

20 Bishnu Awasti Chhettri Elementary 3 4 7 Business 30000 51429

21 Puspamani Bhatta Brahmin Inter 2 1 3 Business 50000 200000

22 Keshav Nayak Chhettri Elementary 2 1 3 Business 50000 200000

23 Kamal Shrestha Janjati S.L.C 3 4 7 Business 50000 85714

Annex ‐ Page 40


Education




24 Gauri Datt Joshi Brahmin Inter 2 2 4 Service 35000 105000

25 Lalitananda Joshi Brahmin S.L.C 4 2 6 Business 27000 54000

26 Somraj Aryal Brahmin 3 3 6 Service 40000 80000

27 Man Singh Rawat Chhettri S.L.C 3 4 7 Business 100000 171429

28 Purna Raj Bhatta Brahmin S.L.C 4 1 5 Business 40000 96000

H-6:Sarswati Tole Road 2 (East West Gully-6, Katan Area)1 Devaki Bam Chhettri Elementary 4 2 6 Business 50000 100000

2 Kapil Joshi Brahmin Inter 3 1 4 Business 100000 300000

3 Shyam Chand Chhettri Inter 3 3 6 Service 25000 50000

4 Basant Bdr. Singh Chhettri Inter 3 3 6 Service 25000 50000

5 Parwati Devi Chand Chhettri B.A 2 1 3 Service 30000 120000

6 Tara Joshi Brahmin B.A 3 2 5 Service 30000 72000

7 Siddharaj Bhatta Brahmin B.A 2 3 5 Service 30000 72000

8 Mohandev Joshi Brahmin B.A 3 6 9 Service 30000 40000

9 Dattaram Dasrath Bhatta Brahmin Elementary 3 3 6 Business 30000 60000

10 Manmati Chand Chhettri Elementary 2 4 6 Business 30000 60000

11 Dal Bdr. Chand Chhettri S.L.C 6 5 11 Business 50000 54545

H-7: Sarswati Tole Road 3 (East West Gully-7, Katan Area)1 Pushkar Giri Chhettri Inter 3 1 4 Service 25000 75000

2 Gagan Giri Chhettri Inter 3 1 4 Service 30000 90000

3 Dilmaya Bhatta Brahmin S.L.C 4 3 7 Service 50000 85714

4 Tek Raj Panta Brahmin PhD 3 2 5 Service 25000 60000

5 Sova Devi Joshi Brahmin S.L.C 2 1 3 Service 35000 140000

6 Kapil Panta Brahmin Inter 3 1 4 Service 40000 120000

7 Karan Nath Chhettri Inter 4 2 6 Service 25000 50000

8 Komala Devi Chand Chhettri Inter 2 2 4 Business 30000 90000

Annex ‐ Page 41


Education




9 Umadatt Bhatta Brahmin Inter 5 4 9 Service 40000 53333

10 Ambika Joshi Brahmin Elementary 6 3 9 Service 50000 66667

11 Krishna P.d Bohora Brahmin Inter 2 1 3 Business 30000 120000

12 Dhani Datt Panta Brahmin Elementary 3 4 7 Business 50000 85714

13 Pramananda Joshi Brahmin Inter 3 3 6 Business 45000 90000

14 Kalpana K.C Chhettri Elementary 5 4 9 Business 65000 86667

15 Sitaram Joshi Brahmin Elementary 2 3 5 Business 35000 84000

16 Prakash Bdr. Singh Chhettri Inter 4 3 7 Business 40000 68571

17 Rana singh Bhandari Chhettri Inter 5 5 10 Service 50000 60000

18 Gajendra Thapa Chhettri Inter 3 1 4 Business 50000 150000

19 Purnananda Bhatta Brahmin B.A 4 3 7 Service 50000 85714

20 Bhojraj Pandey Brahmin B.A 4 3 7 Service 50000 85714

21 Jayanti Chand

22 Bhanubhakta Joshi Brahmin B.A 5 2 7 Service 40000 68571

23 Shusila Pandey Brahmin B.A 1 1 2 Service 25000 150000

24 Mahadev Bhatta Brahmin Inter 3 3 6 Business 40000 80000

25 Tara Devi Bhatta Brahmin Inter 3 2 5 Service 35000 84000

26 Chandra Dev Upadhyay Brahmin Inter 2 2 4 Service 35000 105000

27 G.K Bhat Chhettri Inter 2 3 5 Service 40000 96000

28 Narad Pandey Brahmin Inter 6 3 9 Business 50000 66667

29 Ran Bdr. Pal Chhettri Inter 4 3 7 Service 50000 85714

H-8: Sarswati Tole Road 4 (East West section, Katan Area) 1 Tara Devi Joshi Brahmin Inter 3 2 5 Service 50000 120000

2 Shanti Devi Bhandari Chhettri Inter 6 3 9 service 60000 80000

3 Rajaya Swar Chhettri Inter 3 1 4 service 50000 150000

4 Laba Dev Pandey Brahmin Inter 6 6 12 Service 200000 200000

Annex ‐ Page 42


Education




5 Bishnu Aryal Brahmin S.L.C 4 2 6 Business 50000 100000

6 Basanta Singh Chhettri Inter 3 1 4 Service 50000 150000

7 Kamala Nanda Joshi Brahmin Elementary 3 2 5 Business 30000 72000

8 Hemlal Sapkota Brahmin Inter 2 2 4 Business 50000 150000

9 Sita Devi Joshi Brahmin Inter 3 1 4 Service 50000 150000

10 Ganesh Chand Chhettri Inter 4 1 5 Service 50000 120000

11 Tika singh Dhami Chhettri Inter 4 4 8 Service 50000 75000

12 Dr. Madan Singh Karki Chhettri M.A 5 3 8 Service 50000 75000

13 Dharmanand Bhatta Brahmin Elementary 3 3 6 Service 50000 100000

14 Dashrath Joshi Brahmin MBBS 2 2 4 Business 50000 150000

15 Uttara Chand Chhettri S.L.C 1 3 4 Agriculture 50000 150000

16 Maya Devi Joshi Brahmin Elementary 4 2 6 Service 50000 100000

17 Harsa Narain Upadhyay Brahmin Elementary 4 4 8 Agriculture 50000 75000

18 Bishnu datt Awasti Brahmin Elementary 3 2 5 Business 50000 120000

19 Nirajan Gautam Brahmin S.L.C 2 2 4 Service 50000 150000

20 Shavitri Devi Panta Brahmin M.A 2 3 5 Business 40000 96000

21 Krishna Bdr. Chand Chhettri B.A 3 2 5 Service 40000 96000

22 Janaki Devi Bam Chhettri S.L.C 3 1 4 Business 35000 105000

23 Dammar Datt Bogati Chhettri S.L.C 3 1 4 Service 35000 105000

24 Hari Chand Chhettri Inter 2 2 4 Business 25000 75000

H-9: Eye Hospital Road (East-West) 1 Omprakash Dedwal Chhettri Elementary 6 5 11 Business 80000 87273

H-10 : Hospital Road (Gully 1 to Bhagatpur Marg)

1 Krishna Prasad Bhandari Brahmin Inter 2 1 3 Agriculture 25000 100000

2 Kedar Prasad Bhandari Brahmin S.L.C 2 1 3 Business 25000 100000

3 Nandalal Joshi Brahmin Inter 4 4 8 Business 50000 75000

Annex ‐ Page 43


Education




4 Kamala devi Bhatta Brahmin Elementary 4 2 6 Business 45000 90000

5 Ravi Joshi Brahmin S.L.C 2 1 3 Agriculture 25000 100000

6 Mina Panta Brahmin Inter 2 2 4 Service 25000 75000

7 Lokraj Panta Brahmin Inter 2 3 5 Agriculture 25000 60000

8 Lal Bdr.Thapa chhettri S.L.C 2 2 4 Service 50000 150000

9 Raji Chand chhettri

10 Dhir Samser Kunuwar chhettri Inter 3 1 4 Service 40000 120000

Hotel Opera road, E-W)

1 Binod Kumar Agrawal Brahmin Inter 3 2 5 Business 35000 84000

2 Krishna P.D Bogati Chhettri Inter 3 2 5 Business 40000 96000

3 Harilal Paneru Brahmin Inter 4 3 7 Business 40000 68571

Madan chowk-Dashrath Chowk - Napi - Bhagatpur Chowk Road1 Duraga Datt Bohora Brahmin Inter 4 1 5 Business 40000 96000

2 Ratna Singh Thakurathi Chhettri Elementary 3 3 6 Business 35000 70000

3 Gorakh Bdr. Chand Chhettri Inter 4 3 7 Service 25000 42857

4 Omparkash Bhandari Chhettri S.L.c 3 2 5 Business 25000 60000

5 Krishna Datt Bhatta Brahmin Inter 2 3 5 Service 35000 84000

6 Damar Devi Kuwar Chhettri Elementary 5 4 9 Business 50000 66667

Traffic Chowk- Dashrat - BP Chowk Road None

Annex ‐ Page 44

ANNEX-3 (A)

Land Ownership and Impact on Land

S.N Name of Owner Length of Affected Part /Area(m)

Width of Affected part/Area (m)

Approx. Area of Affected Part (sqm)

Area of Affected Kitta (Kattha)

Land in Other Area (Kattha)

Total Land Owned (kattha)

Total Land (sq.m)

% of Land Loss

Remaining Land after Donation (sq.m)

% of Remaining Land After Donation

Remarks

M1 : Bhasi- Rautela Road

1 Chanak Lal Chaudhary 8.5 1 8.5 0.7 10 10.7 3616.6 0.24 3608.1 99.76

2 Asha Chaudhary 5 1.5 7.5 4 10 14 4732 0.16 4724.5 99.84

3 Hira Devi Thagunna 8 1.4 11.2 4 0 4 1352 0.83 1340.8 99.17

4 Ghungra Khatri 7 1.3 9.1 0.5 0 0.5 169 5.38 159.9 94.62

M2 : Bhanuchowk -Bishnudham Road

1 Binod Rawal 15.8 0.4 6.32 0.75 15 15.75 5323.5 0.12 5317.2 99.88

2 Bhupendra Rawal 16.8 0.7 11.76 2 60 62 20956 0.06 20944.2 99.94

3 Debu Devi Bista 8.7 0.4 3.48 0.75 15 15.75 5323.5 0.07 5320.0 99.93

4 Kalyan Singh Thakuriya 8 0.4 3.2 0.75 40 40.75 13773.5 0.02 13770.3 99.98

5 Madhavi Bhatta 5.4 0.6 3.24 0.3 5 5.3 1791.4 0.18 1788.2 99.82

6 Deependra Rawal 11.5 0.5 5.75 0.9 60 60.9 20584.2 0.03 20578.5 99.97

7 Prem Thalal 5.5 0.6 3.3 0.75 0 0.75 253.5 1.3 250.2 98.7

8 Navaraj Khadka 5.3 0.5 2.65 0.275 20 20.275 6852.95 0.04 6850.3 99.96

9 Kishor Pandey 9.8 0.4 3.92 2 20 22 7436 0.05 7432.1 99.95

M3: Suklaphanta Marga(Bhanuchowk-Madan chowk-Airport Road)

1 D.D Pandey 20.8 1 20.8 2 0 2 676 3.08 655.2 96.92

2 Sabitri Rawat 3.8 0.6 2.28 2 0 2 676 0.34 673.7 99.66

3 Kalawati Chand 7.8 0.6 4.68 1 20 21 7098 0.07 7093.3 99.93

4 Kamala Devi Dhami 7.6 2 15.2 1 15 16 5408 0.28 5392.8 99.72

5 Gopal Chand 5 1.25 6.25 3 40 43 14534 0.04 14527.8 99.96 6 Dalla Dhami 6.35 0.9 5.715 2 20 22 7436 0.08 7430.3 99.92

Annex ‐ Page 45







Total Land (sq.m)

% of Land Loss



Remarks

7 Kalu Chand 7 1.4 9.8 2 35 37 12506 0.08 12496.2 99.92

8 Rami Chand 18.4 0.7 12.88 2 20 22 7436 0.17 7423.1 99.83

9 Gangadatt Joshi 35 1.5 52.5 10 20 30 10140 0.52 10087.5 99.48

10 Ran Bdr. Chand 18.3 0.9 16.47 3 12 15 5070 0.32 5053.5 99.68

11 Arjun Chand 6.5 1.7 11.05 0.7 10 10.7 3616.6 0.31 3605.6 99.69

12 Piuskar Bdr. Chand 4 0.7 2.8 1 0 1 338 0.31 335.2 99.69

13 Lal Singh Bista 11 0.5 5.5 1 0 1 338 1.63 332.5 98.37

14 Bahadur Nath 10.2 0.4 4.08 3 4 7 2366 0.17 2361.9 99.83

15 Dhan Bdr. Bista 28.3 0.8 22.64 3.5 40 43.5 14703 0.15 14680.4 99.85

16 Bhim Bdr. Chand 10.3 0.6 6.18 1.1 0 1.1 371.8 1.66 365.6 98.34

17 Kausilla Khatri 14 0.8 11.2 1.25 22 23.25 7858.5 0.14 7847.3 99.86

18 Mohan Dev Bhatta 5 0.7 3.5 5 4 9 3042 0.12 3038.5 99.88 M4: Airport-Airighat Road

1 Mohan Singh Bhjandari 10.7 0.95 10.165 1 18 19 6422 0.16 6411.8 99.84

2 Haridatt Joshi 3.2 2.2 7.04 1 25 26 8788 0.08 8781.0 99.92

3 Man Bdr. Chand 8.4 2.3 19.32 0.5 6 6.5 2197 0.88 2177.7 99.12

4 Bishna Devi Dhami 29.5 2.7 79.65 1 4 5 1690 4.71 1610.4 95.29

V5: Gully No-5 Road (Campus Road, North-South section)

1 Deepak Rawat 12.5 1.5 18.75 0.2 40 40.2 13587.6 0 13587.6 100

The

affe

cted

are

a i.e

are

a oc

cupi

ed b

y af

fect

ed s

truct

ure

is

publ

ic la

nd (w

ithin

RoW

of e

xist

ing

road

); he

nce

the

owne

r will

loss

no

land

2 Tej Singh K.C 10.6 1.5 15.9 0.2 50 50.2 16967.6 0 16967.6 100

3 Hiikmat Thaurathi 5.6 1.5 8.4 0.2 3 3.2 1081.6 0 1081.6 100

4 Padam Bharati 2.6 1.5 3.9 0.2 20 20.2 6827.6 0 6827.6 100

5 Tek Raj Bharati 2.6 1.5 3.9 0.2 30 30.2 10207.6 0 10207.6 100

6 Ghanashyam Joshi 10.3 1.5 15.45 0.2 40 40.2 13587.6 0 13587.6 100

7 Raju Chand 3.2 1.5 4.8 0.2 20 20.2 6827.6 0 6827.6 100

8 Lal Bdr. Chand 5.1 1.5 7.65 0.2 30 30.2 10207.6 0 10207.6 100

Annex ‐ Page 46







Total Land (sq.m)

% of Land Loss



Remarks

9 Bharat Chand 2.5 1.5 3.75 0.2 10 10.2 3447.6 0 3447.6 100

10 Megh Raj Bohora 7.1 1.5 10.65 0.2 30 30.2 10207.6 0 10207.6 100

11 Ganesh Chand 3.5 1.5 5.25 0.2 4 4.2 1419.6 0 1419.6 100

12 Chhetrapal Mehera 3.7 1.5 5.55 0.2 0 0.2 67.6 0 67.6 100

13 Madhav Parshad Bhatta 7.5 1.5 11.25 0.4 40 40.4 13655.2 0 13655.2 100

14 Uddhav Dev Joshi 3.7 1.5 5.55 0.2 40 40.2 13587.6 0 13587.6 100

15 Chandra Dev Joshi 3.7 1.5 5.55 0.2 20 20.2 6827.6 0 6827.6 100

16 Mahadev Bohora 6.8 1.5 10.2 0.4 10 10.4 3515.2 0 3515.2 100

17 Laxmi Devi Joshi 7.2 1.5 10.8 0.4 60 60.4 20415.2 0 20415.2 100

18 Prem parkash Pathak 3.8 1.5 5.7 0.2 20 20.2 6827.6 0 6827.6 100

19 Bijaya Nanda Joshi 3.2 1.5 4.8 0.2 10 10.2 3447.6 0 3447.6 100

20 Hansa Devi Chand 7.3 1.5 10.95 0.2 0 0.2 67.6 0 67.6 100

21 Lok Raj Bharati 7.5 1.5 11.25 0.4 10 10.4 3515.2 0 3515.2 100

22 Devraj Mishra 10.9 1.5 16.35 0.4 13 13.4 4529.2 0 4529.2 100

23 Keshav Raj Joshi 7.5 1.5 11.25 0.4 15 15.4 5205.2 0 5205.2 100

24 Dilananda Giri 7.5 1.5 11.25 0.2 20 20.2 6827.6 0 6827.6 100

25 Bisna Devi Palpali 2.7 1.5 4.05 0.2 10 10.2 3447.6 0 3447.6 100

26 Khem Palpali 2.7 1.5 4.05 0.2 10 10.2 3447.6 0 3447.6 100

27 Raghubir Bhatta 5.5 1.5 8.25 0.3 20 20.3 6861.4 0 6861.4 100

28 Chandra Devi Rawal 6.8 1.5 10.2 0.3 0 0.3 101.4 0 101.4 100

29 Sushila Vevi Rawal 5.5 1.5 8.25 0.3 0 0.3 101.4 0 101.4 100

30 santos Aitwal 9.1 1.5 13.65 0.6 44 44.6 15074.8 0 15074.8 100

31 Parbesh Partap Aitwal 10.8 1.5 16.2 0.6 35 35.6 12032.8 0 12032.8 100

32 Bhupendra Aitwal 1.3 1.5 1.95 0.4 35 35.4 11965.2 0 11965.2 100

33 Gyanendra Parshad Joshi 6 1.5 9 0.2 20 20.2 6827.6 0 6827.6 100

34 Mahesh Parshad Joshi 3.6 1.5 5.4 0.2 20 20.2 6827.6 0 6827.6 100

Annex ‐ Page 47







Total Land (sq.m)

% of Land Loss



Remarks

35 Ganesh Joshi 3.5 1.5 5.25 0.2 10 10.2 3447.6 0 3447.6 100

36 Tribhuwan Kumar Bhatta 3.9 1.5 5.85 0.2 1 1.2 405.6 0 405.6 100

37 Gunakar Bhatta 7.5 1.5 11.25 0.4 20 20.4 6895.2 0 6895.2 100

38 Hari Parshad Pandey 3.7 1.5 5.55 0.2 45 45.2 15277.6 0 15277.6 100

39 Uma Chand 3.7 1.5 5.55 0.3 5 5.3 1791.4 0 1791.4 100

40 Kedar Nath Pandey 4.2 1.5 6.3 0.4 10 10.4 3515.2 0 3515.2 100

41 Krishna Parshad Aryal 3.5 1.4 4.9 0.2 0.25 0.45 152.1 0 152.1 100

42 Laxmi Devi Aryal 5.5 1.4 7.7 0.3 20 20.3 6861.4 0 6861.4 100

43 Gopal Sing Bohora 5.5 1.4 7.7 0.3 0 0.3 101.4 0 101.4 100

44 Suraj Kharel 5.5 1.4 7.7 0.3 0 0.3 101.4 0 101.4 100

45 Gyan Parshad Dumre 9.6 1.4 13.44 0.53 0 0.53 179.14 0 179.14 100

46 Parbatman Khanal 9.2 1.4 12.88 0.5 0 0.5 169 0 169 100 47 Tika Devi Kadel 7.4 1.4 10.36 0.4 0.82 1.22 412.36 0 412.36 100 48 Duhurba Parshad Aryal 3.9 1.4 5.46 0.2 0.4 0.6 202.8 0 202.8 100 49 Khagimaya Bhandari 3.9 1.4 5.46 0.2 0 0.2 67.6 0 67.6 100

50 Chandra Bdr. Malla 4.5 1 4.5 0.49 20 20.49 6925.62 0 6925.62 100

51 Harka Bdr. Malla 4.5 1 4.5 0.49 20 20.49 6925.62 0 6925.62 100

52 Gopal Datt Joshi 10.5 1 10.5 0.56 0 0.56 189.28 0 189.28 100

53 Saraswati Rawal 3.5 1.5 5.25 0.2 0 0.2 67.6 0 67.6 100

54 Upendr Bdr. Khadka 3.5 1.5 5.25 0.2 40 40.2 13587.6 0 13587.6 100

55 Jayaraj Saran Bhatta 3.5 1.5 5.25 0.04 40 40.04 13533.52 0 13533.52 100

56 Dinesh Chandra Bhatta 5.5 1.5 8.25 0.58 20 20.58 6956.04 0 6956.04 100

57 Devraj Saran Bhatta 5.5 1.5 8.25 0.58 5 5.58 1886.04 0 1886.04 100

58 Manoj Gupta 5.2 1.5 7.8 0.3 20 20.3 6861.4 0 6861.4 100

59 Dev Raj Panta 2.7 1.5 4.05 0.15 20 20.15 6810.7 0 6810.7 100

60 Sivraj saran Bhatta 5.5 1.5 8.25 0.3 20 20.3 6861.4 0 6861.4 100

Annex ‐ Page 48







Total Land (sq.m)

% of Land Loss



Remarks

61 Gyanendra Bdr. Shah 6.7 1.5 10.05 0.3 30 30.3 10241.4 0 10241.4 100

62 Sambhu Bharati 7.5 1.5 11.25 0.4 30 30.4 10275.2 0 10275.2 100

63 Kalawati Joshi 4 1.5 6 0.2 20 20.2 6827.6 0 6827.6 100

64 Dan Bdr. Kunuwar 4 1.5 6 0.4 15 15.4 5205.2 0 5205.2 100

65 Bhakta Joshi 7.2 1.5 10.8 0.2 20 20.2 6827.6 0 6827.6 100

66 Hari Shngh Bista 3.5 1.5 5.25 0.2 12 12.2 4123.6 0 4123.6 100

67 Janki Raiswal 3.5 1.5 5.25 4 7 11 3718 0 3718 100

68 Parbati Chataut 7.2 1.5 10.8 0.4 10 10.4 3515.2 0 3515.2 100

69 Tarani Datt Chataut 14.6 1.5 21.9 0.79 20 20.79 7027.02 0 7027.02 100

70 Bijayanand Joshi 14.6 1.5 21.9 0.79 15 15.79 5337.02 0 5337.02 100

71 Nanda Dhami 3.7 1.5 5.55 0.2 0.2 67.6 0 67.6 100

72 Mohan Singh Dhami 4.9 1.5 7.35 0.4 80 80.4 27175.2 0 27175.2 100

73 Jayakisan Bhatta 6.5 1.5 9.75 0.3 0 0.3 101.4 0 101.4 100

74 Dilliraj Joshi 5.7 1.5 8.55 0.3 10 10.3 3481.4 0 3481.4 100

75 Dharma Devi Rana 5.5 1.5 8.25 0.3 0 0.3 101.4 0 101.4 100

76 Gopal Datt Joshi 6.9 1.5 10.35 0.4 20 20.4 6895.2 0 6895.2 100

77 Tej Bdr. Bam 5.5 1.5 8.25 0 0 0 0 100

78 Kisan Singh Thapa 10.5 1.5 15.75 1.65 0 1.65 557.7 0 557.7 100

79 Laxmi Datt Pandey 10.9 1.5 16.35 0.59 20 20.59 6959.42 0 6959.42 100

80 Laba Dev Pandey 10.9 1.5 16.35 0.5 50 50.5 17069 0 17069 100

81 Basudev Bohora 4.7 1.5 7.05 0.3 40 40.3 13621.4 0 13621.4 100

82 Karna Bdr. Chand 6.7 1.5 10.05 0.35 80 80.35 27158.3 0 27158.3 100

83 Deelip Singh Bhandari 5.6 1.5 8.4 0.3 10 10.3 3481.4 0 3481.4 100

84 Manoj Parshad Joshi 7 1.5 10.5 0.3 20 20.3 6861.4 0 6861.4 100

85 Chandra Maya karki 9.4 1.5 14.1 0.53 0 0.53 179.14 0 179.14 100

86 Tara Devi Bhatta 7.5 1.5 11.25 0.25 80 80.25 27124.5 0 27124.5 100

Annex ‐ Page 49







Total Land (sq.m)

% of Land Loss



Remarks

87 Gangaram Giri 7.5 1.5 11.25 0.25 30 30.25 10224.5 0 10224.5 100

88 Netra Chataut 18.2 1.5 27.3 0.4 20 20.4 6895.2 0 6895.2 100

89 Balaram Ghimire 3.5 1.5 5.25 0.2 10 10.2 3447.6 0 3447.6 100

90 Jayadatt Paudyal 8.5 1.5 12.75 0.59 20 20.59 6959.42 0 6959.42 100

91 Bidhya Devi Kharel 6.3 1.5 9.45 0.18 1 1.18 398.84 0 398.84 100

92 Tikaram Aryal 7.2 1.5 10.8 0.4 1 1.4 473.2 0 473.2 100

93 Chintamani Kharel 7.2 1.5 10.8 0.4 20 20.4 6895.2 0 6895.2 100

94 Ranbir Saran Bhatta 7.2 1.5 10.8 0.4 20 20.4 6895.2 0 6895.2 100

95 Narain Datt Bhatta 7.2 1.5 10.8 0.4 20 20.4 6895.2 0 6895.2 100

96 Raju Sharma 7.2 1.5 10.8 0.4 1 1.4 473.2 0 473.2 100

97 Gokarna Bdr. Chand 7.2 1.5 10.8 0.4 0 0.4 135.2 0 135.2 100

98 Amita Aryal 3.7 1.5 5.55 0.4 0 0.4 135.2 0 135.2 100

99 Pabi Kafle 3.7 1.5 5.55 0.4 0 0.4 135.2 0 135.2 100

100 Hema Devi Gurung 8.5 1.5 12.75 0.4 0 0.4 135.2 0 135.2 100

101 Hom Bdr. Kunuwar 9.6 1.5 14.4 0.495 40 40.495 13687.31 0 13687.31 100

102 Khadak Bdr. Kunuwar 4.5 1.5 6.75 0.17 10 10.17 3437.46 0 3437.46 100 V-4: Gully No-4 Road (North-South section)

1 L.B Bista 13 1.4 18.2 0.49 40 40.49 13685.62 0 13685.62 100

The

affe

cted

are

a i.e

are

a oc

cupi

ed b

y af

fect

ed s

truct

ure

is

publ

ic la

nd (w

ithin

RoW

of e

xist

ing

road

); he

nce

the

owne

r will

loss

no

land

2 Tara singh Bohora 6 1.4 8.4 0.49 1 1.49 503.62 0 503.62 100

3 Mohan Khatri 6 1.4 8.4 0.49 30 30.49 10305.62 0 10305.62 100

4 Hariram Chaudhari 5.5 1.4 7.7 0.49 60 60.49 20445.62 0 20445.62 100

5 Chet raj Joshi 5.3 1.4 7.42 0.49 15 15.49 5235.62 0 5235.62 100

6 Dhan Bdr.Ayer 5.3 1.4 7.42 0.49 20 20.49 6925.62 0 6925.62 100

7 Khadak Singh Saud 5.7 1.4 7.98 0.3 0.3 101.4 0 101.4 100

8 Hira Devi Thagunna 3.8 1.4 5.32 0.2 10 10.2 3447.6 0 3447.6 100

Annex ‐ Page 50







Total Land (sq.m)

% of Land Loss



Remarks

9 Shankardatt Joshi 3.5 1.4 4.9 0.2 15 15.2 5137.6 0 5137.6 100

10 Chitramani Joshi 5 1.4 7 0.2 6 6.2 2095.6 0 2095.6 100

11 Manju Bhatta 3.5 1.2 4.2 0.2 0.2 67.6 0 67.6 100

12 Haridatt Bhatta 3.5 1.2 4.2 0.2 6 6.2 2095.6 0 2095.6 100

13 Mamta Awasti 7.2 1.4 10.08 0.4 30 30.4 10275.2 0 10275.2 100

14 Dhan Bdr. Bom 7.2 1.4 10.08 0.4 20 20.4 6895.2 0 6895.2 100

15 Kiran Khadka 3.9 1.4 5.46 0.2 20 20.2 6827.6 0 6827.6 100

16 Gajadhar Joshi 3.9 1.4 5.46 0.2 40 40.2 13587.6 0 13587.6 100

17 Manorath Bhatta 3.2 1.4 4.48 0.2 20 20.2 6827.6 0 6827.6 100

18 Girija Shankar Parsad 3.2 1.4 4.48 0.4 0.4 135.2 0 135.2 100

19 Harish Chandra Bhatta 24 1.4 33.6 1.9 30 31.9 10782.2 0 10782.2 100

20 Naina Ojha 5.5 1.4 7.7 0.3 20 20.3 6861.4 0 6861.4 100

21 Deependra Bista 5.5 1.4 7.7 0.3 41 41.3 13959.4 0 13959.4 100

22 Ganga Kharel 5.5 1.4 7.7 0.3 20 20.3 6861.4 0 6861.4 100

23 Devidatt Bhatta 3.5 1.4 4.9 0.2 1 1.2 405.6 0 405.6 100

24 Devaki Joshi 7.4 1.4 10.36 0.3 0 0.3 101.4 0 101.4 100

25 Chandrakala Panta 4.5 1.4 6.3 0.3 0 0.3 101.4 0 101.4 100

26 Jaya Bdr. Pal 8.2 1.4 11.48 0.45 30 30.45 10292.1 0 10292.1 100

27 Dambar Bdr. Pal 8.2 1.4 11.48 0.45 10 10.45 3532.1 0 3532.1 100

28 Hari parsad Bhatta 5.5 1.4 7.7 0.3 0 0.3 101.4 0 101.4 100

29 Laxman Singh Bista 5.5 1.4 7.7 0.3 20 20.3 6861.4 0 6861.4 100

30 Narendra Khatri 3.7 1.4 5.18 0.2 10 10.2 3447.6 0 3447.6 100

31 Dhirendra Bdr. Chand 3.6 1.4 5.04 0.2 0 0.2 67.6 0 67.6 100

32 Saligram Kharel 7.8 1.4 10.92 0.4 1 1.4 473.2 0 473.2 100

33 Narayan Baral 7.4 1.2 8.88 0.4 0 0.4 135.2 0 135.2 100

34 Dhan Bdr. Chand 7.2 1.4 10.08 0.4 1 1.4 473.2 0 473.2 100

Annex ‐ Page 51







Total Land (sq.m)

% of Land Loss



Remarks

35 Bamayanti Joshi 7.5 1.4 10.5 0.4 25 25.4 8585.2 0 8585.2 100

36 Durga Bhandari 7.2 1 7.2 0.4 6 6.4 2163.2 0 2163.2 100

37 Parbati Devi Damai 3.6 1 3.6 0.2 1 1.2 405.6 0 405.6 100

38 Tila Devi Damai 3.6 1 3.6 0.2 1 1.2 405.6 0 405.6 100

39 P.K Shrestha 7.2 1 7.2 0.2 10 10.2 3447.6 0 3447.6 100

40 Dammari Bhatta 3.7 1 3.7 0.2 80 80.2 27107.6 0 27107.6 100

41 Rama Shrestha 3.7 1 3.7 0.2 0 0.2 67.6 0 67.6 100

42 Deepa Devi Shrestha 8 1 8 0.4 12 12.4 4191.2 0 4191.2 100

43 Hripriya Pant 12.1 1.4 16.94 0.49 10 10.49 3545.62 0 3545.62 100

44 Premdatt Joshi 5 1.4 7 0.3 14 14.3 4833.4 0 4833.4 100

45 Prajapati Bista 5 1.4 7 0.3 10 10.3 3481.4 0 3481.4 100

46 Dal Bdr.Bista 3.6 1.4 5.04 0.2 25 25.2 8517.6 0 8517.6 100

47 Harka Bdr. Bista 3.6 1.4 5.04 0.2 25 25.2 8517.6 0 8517.6 100

48 Jahar Singh Pwali 5.2 1.4 7.28 0.3 0 0.3 101.4 0 101.4 100

49 Madhav Joshi 4.8 1.4 6.72 0.2 10 10.2 3447.6 0 3447.6 100

50 Shreeram Chataut 12.7 1.4 17.78 0.49 30 30.49 10305.62 0 10305.62 100

51 Hajari Singh Pujara 8.7 1.6 13.92 0.165 10 10.165 3435.77 0 3435.77 100

52 Dharma Singh Rawal 3.6 1.4 5.04 0.2 60 60.2 20347.6 0 20347.6 100

53 Dhana Devi Bhatta 3.7 1.4 5.18 0.2 20 20.2 6827.6 0 6827.6 100

54 Niraj Saud 7 1.4 9.8 0.4 30 30.4 10275.2 0 10275.2 100

55 Padam Thakurathi 7 1.4 9.8 0.4 20 20.4 6895.2 0 6895.2 100

56 Godawari Bhatta 7 1.4 9.8 0.79 40 40.79 13787.02 0 13787.02 100

57 Sunil Panta 6.2 1.4 8.68 0.3 100 100.3 33901.4 0 33901.4 100

58 Tek Bdr. Kunuwar 5.4 1.4 7.56 0.49 10 10.49 3545.62 0 3545.62 100

59 Madan Singh Thagunna 5.3 1.4 7.42 0.3 0 0.3 101.4 0 101.4 100

60 Sova Karki 5.5 1.4 7.7 0.3 20 20.3 6861.4 0 6861.4 100

Annex ‐ Page 52







Total Land (sq.m)

% of Land Loss



Remarks

61 Kalu Bohora 5.5 1.4 7.7 0.3 0 0.3 101.4 0 101.4 100

62 Gorakh Bdr. Bista 5.5 1.4 7.7 0.3 30 30.3 10241.4 0 10241.4 100

63 Lalit Bdr. Bohora 10 1.4 14 0.49 20 20.49 6925.62 0 6925.62 100

64 Lalit Parsad Bhatta 5.5 1.4 7.7 0.49 10 10.49 3545.62 0 3545.62 100

65 Laxman Chand 7.2 1.4 10.08 0.49 0 0.49 165.62 0 165.62 100

66 Kashi Singh Karki 7.2 1.4 10.08 0.3 0 0.3 101.4 0 101.4 100

67 Gyanu Bohara 3.7 1.4 5.18 0.2 20 20.2 6827.6 0 6827.6 100

68 Parkash Chand 7.2 1.4 10.08 0.4 15 15.4 5205.2 0 5205.2 100

69 Padama devi Bhatta 3.5 2 7 0.2 4 4.2 1419.6 0 1419.6 100

70 Rudra Parsad Bhatrai 15 2 30 0.79 30 30.79 10407.02 0 10407.02 100

71 Mina Baral 7.2 1.1 7.92 0.4 0 0.4 135.2 0 135.2 100

72 Padam Raj Pandey 3.5 0.6 2.1 0.2 13.5 13.7 4630.6 0 4630.6 100

73 Mahesh Pandey 3.5 0.6 2.1 0.2 12 12.2 4123.6 0 4123.6 100

74 Dhan Bdr. Chand 5.2 1.1 5.72 0 0 0 0 0 100

V-3 : Gully No-3 Road (North-South Section)

1 Basanti Devi Pandey 11 0.5 5.5 0.58 40 40.58 13716.04 0 13716.04 100

The

affe

cted

are

a i.e

are

a oc

cupi

ed b

y af

fect

ed s

truct

ure

is p

ublic

land

(with

in

RoW

of e

xist

ing

road

); he

nce

the

owne

r w

ill lo

ss n

o la

nd

2 Ambika devi Bhandari 10.6 0.5 5.3 0.58 20 20.58 6956.04 0 6956.04 100

3 Parmananda Bhandari 10.6 0.5 5.3 0.58 20 20.58 6956.04 0 6956.04 100

4 Top Bdr. K.C 9.8 1.5 14.7 0.58 10 10.58 3576.04 0 3576.04 100

5 Bhim Pandey 3.25 1.5 4.875 0.29 20 20.29 6858.02 0 6858.02 100

6 Bhuwan Pandey 3.25 1.5 4.875 0.29 20 20.29 6858.02 0 6858.02 100

7 Devraj Mishra 8.5 1.4 11.9 0.29 0 0.29 98.02 0 98.02 100

8 Prem Singh Bhatta 4.2 1.5 6.3 0.29 0 0.29 98.02 0 98.02 100

9 Hikmat Saud 5.3 1.5 7.95 0.29 0 0.29 98.02 0 98.02 100

10 Ganesh Saud 5.3 1.5 7.95 0.58 0 0.58 196.04 0 196.04 100

11 Tej Bdr. Bhandari 3.5 1.5 5.25 0.4 7 7.4 2501.2 0 2501.2 100

Annex ‐ Page 53







Total Land (sq.m)

% of Land Loss



Remarks

12 Sundara Dev Bhandari 3.5 1.5 5.25 0.4 7 7.4 2501.2 0 2501.2 100

13 Chandra Bdr. Chand 7.5 1.5 11.25 0.4 20 20.4 6895.2 0 6895.2 100

14 Bhan Bdr. Chand 7.5 1.5 11.25 0.4 0 0.4 135.2 0 135.2 100

15 Bashu Dev Deuba 3.6 1.5 5.4 0.2 80 80.2 27107.6 0 27107.6 100

16 Nara Bdr. Bista 3.6 1.5 5.4 0.2 20 20.2 6827.6 0 6827.6 100

17 Kamala Devi Kathayat 3.6 1.5 5.4 0.2 0 0.2 67.6 0 67.6 100

18 Dal Bdr. Shah 3.6 1.5 5.4 0.2 0 0.2 67.6 0 67.6 100

19 Gorakh Bdr. Khati 7.5 1.5 11.25 0.4 30 30.4 10275.2 0 10275.2 100

20 Bhim Datta Bhatta 3.7 1.5 5.55 0.2 14 14.2 4799.6 0 4799.6 100

21 Yagyaraj Paudyal/Madan 4.2 1.5 6.3 0.2 0.2 67.6 0 67.6 100

22 Rupkiswor Gupta 106 1.5 159 0.49 0.49 165.62 0 165.62 100

23 Bharat Nepal 5.4 1.5 8.1 0.3 10 10.3 3481.4 0 3481.4 100

24 Nar Bdr. Pal 5.4 1.5 8.1 0.3 20 20.3 6861.4 0 6861.4 100

25 Kailap Bhatta 11 1.5 16.5 0.3 30 30.3 10241.4 0 10241.4 100

26 Ghanashyam Kalauni 5.5 1.5 8.25 0.3 25 25.3 8551.4 0 8551.4 100

27 Dhan Bdr. Bom 5.2 1.5 7.8 0.3 20 20.3 6861.4 0 6861.4 100

28 Anil Dhungana/Joshi 7.2 1.5 10.8 0.3 20 20.3 6861.4 0 6861.4 100

29 Yasoda Pathak/ Tiwari 11 1.5 16.5 0.4 0 0.4 135.2 0 135.2 100

30 Jeetendra Parsad Bhatta 6 1.5 9 0.4 0 0.4 135.2 0 135.2 100

31 Mahendra Bdr Kunwor 11.5 1.3 14.95 0.49 40 40.49 13685.62 0 13685.62 100

32 Ram Singh Ter 10.5 1.3 13.65 0.49 110 110.49 37345.62 0 37345.62 100

33 Ram Pd Sapkota 10.5 1.3 13.65 0.49 0 0.49 165.62 0 165.62 100

34 Arjun Prakash Upreti 11 1.3 14.3 0.59 0 0.59 199.42 0 199.42 100

35 Min Raj Bhatta 11.8 1.3 15.34 0.59 120 120.59 40759.42 0 40759.42 100

36 Karan Shah 4.6 1.3 5.98 0.04 10 10.04 3393.52 0 3393.52 100

37 Narendra Raj Bohora 3.6 1.3 4.68 0.15 34 34.15 11542.7 0 11542.7 100

Annex ‐ Page 54







Total Land (sq.m)

% of Land Loss



Remarks

38 Jagdish Upreti 11 1.3 14.3 0.49 20 20.49 6925.62 0 6925.62 100

39 Ratan Saud 3.7 1.3 4.81 0.2 0 0.2 67.6 0 67.6 100

40 Karan Bdr Singh 11 1.3 14.3 0.49 30 30.49 10305.62 0 10305.62 100

41 Ashok Kumar Dewal 7.2 1.3 9.36 0.4 0.25 0.65 219.7 0 219.7 100

42 Dhawal Bdr Chand 7.2 1.3 9.36 0.4 20 20.4 6895.2 0 6895.2 100

43 Kalpana KC 7.1 1.3 9.23 0.79 20 20.79 7027.02 0 7027.02 100

44 Jayamati Devi Bhatta 16.5 1.3 21.45 0.4 2 2.4 811.2 0 811.2 100

45 Madan Panta 7.7 1.4 10.78 0.4 30 30.4 10275.2 0 10275.2 100

46 Dhan Singh Rawal 5.5 1.4 7.7 0.4 40 40.4 13655.2 0 13655.2 100

47 Belu Devi Bhata 5.7 1.4 7.98 0.3 0 0.3 101.4 0 101.4 100

48 Kunti Bohora 5.7 1.4 7.98 0.3 2 2.3 777.4 0 777.4 100

49 Harish Chand 5.4 1.4 7.56 0.3 0 0.3 101.4 0 101.4 100

50 Jamunaganga Devi Joshi 5.7 1.4 7.98 0.3 20 20.3 6861.4 0 6861.4 100

51 Tanka Pd. Bhatta 7.2 1.4 10.08 0.3 20 20.3 6861.4 0 6861.4 100

52 Radhika Devi bhatta 7.5 1.4 10.5 0.3 30 30.3 10241.4 0 10241.4 100

53 D.r Rajendra Bhatta 7.5 1.4 10.5 0.3 30 30.3 10241.4 0 10241.4 100

54 Deepak Kharel 9 1.4 12.6 0.3 20 20.3 6861.4 0 6861.4 100

55 Rishi Kharel 6 1.4 8.4 0.3 20 20.3 6861.4 0 6861.4 100

56 Yadu Raj Joshi 7.2 1.4 10.08 0.3 2 2.3 777.4 0 777.4 100

57 Nar Singh Dhami 7 1.4 9.8 0.3 7 7.3 2467.4 0 2467.4 100

58 Tarun Lakhera 7.2 1.4 10.08 0.3 1 1.3 439.4 0 439.4 100

59 Padama Saud Bhandari 7.2 1.4 10.08 0.3 10 10.3 3481.4 0 3481.4 100

60 Furua Kalauni 7.2 0.9 6.48 0.3 0 0.3 101.4 0 101.4 100

61 Megh Raj Bhatta 7.2 1 7.2 0.4 1 1.4 473.2 0 473.2 100

62 Kashidatt Bhatta 7.2 1 7.2 0.22 10 10.22 3454.36 0 3454.36 100

63 Kalpana Karki 3.5 0.9 3.15 0.4 0.4 135.2 0 135.2 100

Annex ‐ Page 55







Total Land (sq.m)

% of Land Loss



Remarks


1 Ramesh Pandey 6.4 1.6 10.24 0.04 1 1.04 351.52 0 351.52 100

The

affe

cted

are

a i.e

are

a oc

cupi

ed b

y af

fect

ed s

truct

ure

is p

ublic

la

nd (w

ithin

RoW

of e

xist

ing

road

); he

nce

the

owne

r will

loss

no

land

2 Laxi Pandey 3.5 1.6 5.6 0.04 20 20.04 6773.52 0 6773.52 100

3 Arjundatt Pandey 3.5 1.6 5.6 0.04 20 20.04 6773.52 0 6773.52 100

4 Gopaldatt Bhatta 3.5 1.6 5.6 0.04 20 20.04 6773.52 0 6773.52 100

5 Jamuna Devi Bhatta 3.5 1.6 5.6 0.04 20 20.04 6773.52 0 6773.52 100

6 Bhojraj Bhatta 3.7 1.6 5.92 0.49 60 60.49 20445.62 0 20445.62 100

7 Rameswor Upreti 10.5 1.6 16.8 0.29 100 100.29 33898.02 0 33898.02 100

8 Neha Singh Pal 5.2 1.6 8.32 0.29 30 30.29 10238.02 0 10238.02 100

9 Tikadatt Paneru 3.6 1.6 5.76 5 5 1690 0 1690 100

10 Rajesh Gupta 3.2 1.6 5.12 0.2 30 30.2 10207.6 0 10207.6 100

11 Parmananda Paneru 3.2 1.6 5.12 0.2 10 10.2 3447.6 0 3447.6 100

12 Karunakar Paneru 5 1.6 8 0.2 20 20.2 6827.6 0 6827.6 100

13 Laxmi Devi Bhatta 6.2 1.6 9.92 0.3 30 30.3 10241.4 0 10241.4 100

14 Tek Khadka 5.5 1.6 8.8 0.3 20 20.3 6861.4 0 6861.4 100

15 Ram Parshad Pandey 3.8 1.6 6.08 0.2 10 10.2 3447.6 0 3447.6 100

16 Sher Singh Ter 3.7 1.6 5.92 0.2 30 30.2 10207.6 0 10207.6 100

17 Shankar Bdr. Bista 3.8 1.6 6.08 0.2 20 20.2 6827.6 0 6827.6 100

18 Madan Singh Aiyar 3.7 1.6 5.92 0.2 10 10.2 3447.6 0 3447.6 100

19 Dharma Raj Bhatta 3.4 1.6 5.44 0.2 20 20.2 6827.6 0 6827.6 100

20 Dev Raj Bhatta 3.8 1.6 6.08 0.2 20 20.2 6827.6 0 6827.6 100

21 Jayalal Bhatta 3.6 1.6 5.76 0.2 50 50.2 16967.6 0 16967.6 100

22 Bhoj Raj Bhatta 3.6 1.6 5.76 0.2 30 30.2 10207.6 0 10207.6 100

23 Uddhav Singh Bista 3.8 1.6 6.08 0.2 100 100.2 33867.6 0 33867.6 100

24 Nar Bdr. Bista 3.2 1.6 5.12 0.2 20 20.2 6827.6 0 6827.6 100

25 Kiswar Jairu 3.8 1.6 6.08 0.2 1 1.2 405.6 0 405.6 100

Annex ‐ Page 56







Total Land (sq.m)

% of Land Loss



Remarks

26 Nandalal Bohora 3.8 1.6 6.08 0.2 20 20.2 6827.6 0 6827.6 100

27 Motilal Bohora 3.8 1.6 6.08 0.2 50 50.2 16967.6 0 16967.6 100

28 Madana Devi Bohora 7.3 1.6 11.68 0.2 50 50.2 16967.6 0 16967.6 100

29 Hari Parshad Bohora 3.5 1.6 5.6 0.2 30 30.2 10207.6 0 10207.6 100

30 Siddharaj Bohora 8 1.6 12.8 0.2 30 30.2 10207.6 0 10207.6 100

31 Sita K.C 5.8 1.6 9.28 0.25 10 10.25 3464.5 0 3464.5 100

32 Iswori Devi Bohora 5.5 1.6 8.8 0.3 10 10.3 3481.4 0 3481.4 100

33 Urmila Kharel 5.7 1.6 9.12 0.3 20 20.3 6861.4 0 6861.4 100

34 Tika Devi Kharel 5.7 1.6 9.12 0.3 1.5 1.8 608.4 0 608.4 100

35 Ram Parshad Kharel 5.3 1.6 8.48 0.3 21 21.3 7199.4 0 7199.4 100

36 Navraj Kharel 5.5 1.6 8.8 0.3 20 20.3 6861.4 0 6861.4 100

37 Manmati Giri 4.7 1.6 7.52 0.25 1 1.25 422.5 0 422.5 100

38 Nisha Shah 6.2 1.6 9.92 0.3 0 0.3 101.4 0 101.4 100

39 Rasmi Gupta 5 1.6 8 0.3 0 0.3 101.4 0 101.4 100

40 Pawan Kumar Sarwagi 10.7 1.6 17.12 0.5 1 1.5 507 0 507 100

41 Birendra Kumar Sangai 10.7 1.6 17.12 0.5 5 5.5 1859 0 1859 100

42 Dhan Bdr. Chand 12.3 1.6 19.68 0.59 70 70.59 23859.42 0 23859.42 100

43 Hajari Chand 6.7 1.6 10.72 0.4 5 5.4 1825.2 0 1825.2 100

44 Ram Bdr. Kunuwar 18 1.6 28.8 0.49 50 50.49 17065.62 0 17065.62 100

45 Laxmi Bhatta 7.2 1.6 11.52 0.4 0 0.4 135.2 0 135.2 100

46 Pratap Chand 7.05 1.6 11.28 0.4 30 30.4 10275.2 0 10275.2 100

47 Ram Bdr. Kunuwar 5.5 1.6 8.8 0.4 20 20.4 6895.2 0 6895.2 100

48 Narendra Paneru 12.7 1.4 17.78 0.58 34 34.58 11688.04 0 11688.04 100

49 Damodar Athola Joshi 5.5 1.4 7.7 0.29 40 40.29 13618.02 0 13618.02 100

50 Laxi Devi Paneru 5.5 1.4 7.7 0.29 34 34.29 11590.02 0 11590.02 100

51 Dwarika Devi Bista 5.5 1.4 7.7 0.29 0 0.29 98.02 0 98.02 100

Annex ‐ Page 57







Total Land (sq.m)

% of Land Loss



Remarks

52 Ramdular Jaiswal 5.3 1.4 7.42 0.29 0 0.29 98.02 0 98.02 100

53 Deep Raj Chataut 10.3 1.4 14.42 0.58 40 40.58 13716.04 0 13716.04 100

54 Padam Bdr. Thakurathi 10.6 1.4 14.84 0.4 20 20.4 6895.2 0 6895.2 100

55 Kalpana Thapa 8.8 1.4 12.32 0.4 50 50.4 17035.2 0 17035.2 100

56 Motimaya Sharma 4 1.4 5.6 0.2 8 8.2 2771.6 0 2771.6 100

57 Ganga Kafle 4 1.4 5.6 0.2 3 3.2 1081.6 0 1081.6 100

58 Narendra Khatri 7 1.4 9.8 0.2 20 20.2 6827.6 0 6827.6 100

59 Binod Joshi 3.7 1.4 5.18 0.2 9 9.2 3109.6 0 3109.6 100

60 Srijana Rawal 4.2 1.4 5.88 0.2 40 40.2 13587.6 0 13587.6 100

61 Bir Bdr.Kunwor 4.2 1.4 5.88 0.2 20 20.2 6827.6 0 6827.6 100

62 Nirmal Lamichhane 4.2 1.4 5.88 0.2 20 20.2 6827.6 0 6827.6 100

63 Madan Sunar 4 1.4 5.6 0.2 5 5.2 1757.6 0 1757.6 100

64 Shivlal Nyeupane 4.2 1.4 5.88 0.2 20 20.2 6827.6 0 6827.6 100

65 Naresh Agrawal 4.2 1.4 5.88 0.2 12 12.2 4123.6 0 4123.6 100

66 Radhika Sunar 4 1.4 5.6 0.2 1 1.2 405.6 0 405.6 100

67 Rameswor Bhatta 7.2 1.4 10.08 0.4 60 60.4 20415.2 0 20415.2 100

68 Sushil Dewal 7.2 1.4 10.08 0.4 21 21.4 7233.2 0 7233.2 100

69 Megh Raj Bohora 7.2 1.4 10.08 0.2 40 40.2 13587.6 0 13587.6 100

70 Ramchandra Bohora 6.2 1.4 8.68 0.2 1 1.2 405.6 0 405.6 100

71 Kamala Devi Bohora 6.2 1.4 8.68 0.3 1 1.3 439.4 0 439.4 100

72 Govinda Raj Joshi 5.5 1.4 7.7 0.3 10 10.3 3481.4 0 3481.4 100

73 Mukesh Agrawal 6 1.4 8.4 0.3 0 0.3 101.4 0 101.4 100

74 Kaviraj Bhatta 6 1.4 8.4 0.3 0 0.3 101.4 0 101.4 100

75 Bhojraj Joshi 11 1.4 15.4 0.3 60 60.3 20381.4 0 20381.4 100

76 Chitra Nepal 4.3 1.4 6.02 0.3 100 100.3 33901.4 0 33901.4 100

77 Iswori Devi Chilwal 4.2 1.4 5.88 0.3 4 4.3 1453.4 0 1453.4 100

Annex ‐ Page 58







Total Land (sq.m)

% of Land Loss



Remarks

78 Laxmi Devi Tiwari 5.2 1.4 7.28 0.3 0 0.3 101.4 0 101.4 100

79 Ganesh Raj Bohora 11.2 1.4 15.68 0.3 10 10.3 3481.4 0 3481.4 100

80 Sunita Budha 5.5 1.4 7.7 0.3 1 1.3 439.4 0 439.4 100

81 Chandra Datt Joshi 5.5 1.4 7.7 0.3 1 1.3 439.4 0 439.4 100

82 Madhusudan Aryal 5.6 1.4 7.84 0.3 0 0.3 101.4 0 101.4 100

83 Gangaram Rawal 7.5 1.4 10.5 0.3 21 21.3 7199.4 0 7199.4 100

84 Somraj Aryal 8.8 1.4 12.32 0.4 50 50.4 17035.2 0 17035.2 100

85 Gopal Bhusal 3.6 1.5 5.4 0.2 20 20.2 6827.6 0 6827.6 100

86 Homlal Bhusal 3.6 0.6 2.16 0.2 20 20.2 6827.6 0 6827.6 100

87 Ishwori Devi Bhatta 3.5 0.25 0.875 0.2 0 0.2 67.6 0 67.6 100

88 Tek Bdr. Sunar 4.6 1.6 7.36 0.2 40 40.2 13587.6 0 13587.6 100

89 Min Bdr. Kathayat 3.5 1.5 5.25 0.2 10 10.2 3447.6 0 3447.6 100 V-1: Gully No-1(Shalgadhi Road, North-South Section)

1 Bhairav Bdr. Aiyar 8.6 1.4 12.04 0.3 60 60.3 20381.4 0 20381.4 100

2 Suman Dewal 2.25 1.5 3.375 0.3 0 0.3 101.4 0 101.4 100

3 Ashok Kumar Dewal 2.25 1.4 3.15 0.3 0 0.3 101.4 0 101.4 100

4 Bhupendra Rawal 5.2 1.5 7.8 0.3 60 60.3 20381.4 0 20381.4 100

5 Rajendra Rawal 5.2 1.6 8.32 0.3 60 60.3 20381.4 0 20381.4 100

6 Bhoj Raj Bohora 5.6 1 5.6 0.3 12 12.3 4157.4 0 4157.4 100

The

affe

cted

land

i.e.

the

land

oc

cupi

ed b

y st

ruct

ure

is p

ublic

la

nd; h

ence

the

owne

r will

loss

no

land

7 Padam Bdr. Aiyar 5.5 1 5.5 0.3 26 26.3 8889.4 0 8889.4 100

8 Hariom Dewal 2.75 1 2.75 0.3 0 0.3 101.4 0 101.4 100

9 Harinanda Pd.NirajKumar 2.75 1 2.75 0.3 0 0.3 101.4 0 101.4 100

10 Nannelal Hariom 5.5 1 5.5 0.3 0 0.3 101.4 0 101.4 100

11 Kailash Gupta 5.3 1.4 7.42 0.2 20 20.2 6827.6 0 6827.6 100

12 Bijaya Dewal 3.6 1 3.6 0.2 0 0.2 67.6 0 67.6 100

Annex ‐ Page 59







Total Land (sq.m)

% of Land Loss



Remarks

13 Padam Bdr. Thakurathi 3.8 1 3.8 0.2 0 0.2 67.6 0 67.6 100

14 Harilal Thakurathi 3.5 1 3.5 0.2 40 40.2 13587.6 0 13587.6 100

15 Maheswor Chataut 3.5 1 3.5 0.2 0 0.2 67.6 0 67.6 100

16 Dansingh Thakurathi 3.55 1 3.55 0.79 0.79 267.02 0 267.02 100

17 Omprakash Gupta 3.6 1.5 5.4 0.2 0 0.2 67.6 0 67.6 100

18 Rajiv Dewal 3.5 1 3.5 0.2 0 0.2 67.6 0 67.6 100

19 Rajeswori Devi Dewal 3.6 1 3.6 0.2 0 0.2 67.6 0 67.6 100

20 Dharmendra Gupta 3.85 1 3.85 0.3 20 20.3 6861.4 0 6861.4 100

21 Parsuram Gautam 3.6 1 3.6 0.1 0 0.1 33.8 0 33.8 100

22 Hira Devi Bohora 3.8 1 3.8 0.2 10 10.2 3447.6 0 3447.6 100

23 Kanhyalal Dewal 3.5 1 3.5 0.2 18 18.2 6151.6 0 6151.6 100

24 Gopal Dewal 3.5 1 3.5 0.2 0 0.2 67.6 0 67.6 100

25 Dambar Datt Bhatta 3.55 1 3.55 0.2 20 20.2 6827.6 0 6827.6 100

26 Balaram Chataut 7.4 1 7.4 0.2 15 15.2 5137.6 0 5137.6 100

27 Kirta Bdr. Johra 4 1 4 0.2 80 80.2 27107.6 0 27107.6 100

28 Dharma Raj Joshi 7.6 1 7.6 0.4 20 20.4 6895.2 0 6895.2 100

29 Durga Devi Johra 5.6 1 5.6 0.3 60 60.3 20381.4 0 20381.4 100

30 Dharma singh Rawal 7.4 1 7.4 0.1 0 0.1 33.8 0 33.8 100

31 Abdul Samim 10.9 1 10.9 0.79 21 21.79 7365.02 0 7365.02 100

32 Maina Devi Bhandari 5.3 1 5.3 0.3 21 21.3 7199.4 0 7199.4 100

33 Parbati Devi Khadayat 5.5 1 5.5 0.3 80 80.3 27141.4 0 27141.4 100

34 Abdul Samim 5.5 1 5.5 0.3 0.3 101.4 0 101.4 100

35 Indra Singh Rawal 7.7 1 7.7 0.15 0 0.15 50.7 0 50.7 100

36 Lal Singh Thakurathi 3 1 3 0.15 10 10.15 3430.7 0 3430.7 100

37 Padam Raj Bohora 3.6 1 3.6 0.2 0 0.2 67.6 0 67.6 100

38 Bhubaneswori Kunwar 5.5 1 5.5 0 0 0 0 100

Annex ‐ Page 60







Total Land (sq.m)

% of Land Loss



Remarks

39 Geeta Kharel 11 1.3 14.3 0.3 40 40.3 13621.4 0 13621.4 100

40 Pabitra Aryal 5.5 1.3 7.15 0.3 1 1.3 439.4 0 439.4 100

41 Harka Singh Aiyar 7.4 1 7.4 0.3 30 30.3 10241.4 0 10241.4 100

42 Bimal Khadayat 7.4 1 7.4 0 100

43 Bhubaneswori Bogati 6.6 1 6.6 0 100

44 Hem Raj Bohora 7.4 1 7.4 0 100

45 Dinesh Shrestha 7 1 7 0.3 0.5 0.8 270.4 0 270.4 100

46 Dev Singh Ter 7.5 1.5 11.25 0.3 30 30.3 10241.4 0 10241.4 100

47 Gagan Bdr Singh 5.2 1.4 7.28 0.07 0 0.07 23.66 0 23.66 100

48 Khagesh Pd. Bhatta 3.5 1.4 4.9 0.07 1 1.07 361.66 0 361.66 100

49 Siddha Raj Bhatta 3.7 1.4 5.18 0.07 30 30.07 10163.66 0 10163.66 100

50 Deepu Budhayar 5.3 1.4 7.42 0.3 0 0.3 101.4 0 101.4 100

51 Ammar Budharar 5 1.4 7 0.3 0 0.3 101.4 0 101.4 100

52 Keshav Raj Panta 5 1.4 7 0.3 30 30.3 10241.4 0 10241.4 100

53 Bimal Raj Panta 5.8 1.4 8.12 0.3 20 20.3 6861.4 0 6861.4 100

54 Pawan Khadayat 4.4 1.4 6.16 0.3 20 20.3 6861.4 0 6861.4 100

55 Lal Bdr. Khadayat 6.3 1.4 8.82 0.3 20 20.3 6861.4 0 6861.4 100

56 Mukesh Rawal 6.6 1.4 9.24 0.35 20 20.35 6878.3 0 6878.3 100

57 Megh Raj Bohora 4.5 1.4 6.3 0.2 40 40.2 13587.6 0 13587.6 100

58 Dan Singh Thakurathi 4.5 1.4 6.3 0.2 20 20.2 6827.6 0 6827.6 100

59 Nawal Singh Saud 4.5 1.4 6.3 0

60 Krishnadatt Chataut 4.5 1.4 6.3 0.2 0 0.2 67.6 0 67.6 100

61 Shiv Raj Bhatta 3.6 1.4 5.04 0.2 0 0.2 67.6 0 67.6 100

62 Niraj Gupta 3.7 1.4 5.18 0.2 5 5.2 1757.6 0 1757.6 100

63 Yagya Raj Bhatta 3.5 1.4 4.9 0.2 5 5.2 1757.6 0 1757.6 100

64 Yagya Raj Bhatta 3.5 1.4 4.9 0.36 30 30.36 10261.68 0 10261.68 100

Annex ‐ Page 61







Total Land (sq.m)

% of Land Loss



Remarks

65 Parkash Rawal 3.5 1.4 4.9 0.2 20 20.2 6827.6 0 6827.6 100

66 Samser rawal 7 1.4 9.8 0.4 0 0.4 135.2 0 135.2 100

67 Lal Bdr. Rawal 7 1.4 9.8 0.4 30 30.4 10275.2 0 10275.2 100

68 Amar Shingh Khadayat 3.7 1.4 5.18 0.3 10 10.3 3481.4 0 3481.4 100

Area

occ

upie

d by

affe

cted

stru

ctur

e is

pub

lic la

nd (w

ithin

RoW

of e

xist

ing

road

); he

nce

the

owne

r will

loss

no

land

69 Tek Bdr. Saud 3.7 1.4 5.18 0.4 30 30.4 10275.2 0 10275.2 100

70 Uday Saud 3.7 1.4 5.18 0.2 2 2.2 743.6 0 743.6 100

71 Bam Dev Chataut 3.7 1.4 5.18 0.2 5 5.2 1757.6 0 1757.6 100

72 Chhotelal Batuwa 7 1.4 9.8 0.2 0.15 0.35 118.3 0 118.3 100

73 Raj Kumar Dewal 3 1.4 4.2 0.2 4 4.2 1419.6 0 1419.6 100

74 Umashankar Dewal 7 1.4 9.8 0.2 0.05 0.25 84.5 0 84.5 100

75 Bhuwan Chataut 2.8 1.4 3.92 0.3 40 40.3 13621.4 0 13621.4 100

76 Ganesh Chataut 3.1 1.4 4.34 0.3 30 30.3 10241.4 0 10241.4 100

77 Bal Devi Kharel 5.4 1.1 5.94 0.3 20 20.3 6861.4 0 6861.4 100

78 Bashu Dev Bohora 5.5 1.1 6.05 0.3 20 20.3 6861.4 0 6861.4 100

79 Mohan Singh Bista 6.2 1.1 6.82 0.3 20 20.3 6861.4 0 6861.4 100

80 Kalpana devi Bhusal 5.8 1.1 6.38 0.3 0 0.3 101.4 0 101.4 100

81 Narai Bhatta 4.4 1.1 4.84 0.3 40 40.3 13621.4 0 13621.4 100

82 Anita Joshi 6 1.1 6.6 0.3 20 20.3 6861.4 0 6861.4 100

83 Bhuwan Kharel 5.6 1.1 6.16 0.3 20 20.3 6861.4 0 6861.4 100

84 Poonam Bhatta 5.4 1.1 5.94 0.3 30 30.3 10241.4 0 10241.4 100

85 Basanti Thagunna 5.4 1.1 5.94 0.3 4 4.3 1453.4 0 1453.4 100

86 Sova Dewal 3 1.1 3.3 0.15 0.15 50.7 0 50.7 100

87 Mandhari Devi Giri 5.5 1 5.5 0.3 40 40.3 13621.4 0 13621.4 100

88 Laxman Singh Bista 7.8 1 7.8 0.3 30 30.3 10241.4 0 10241.4 100

89 Hema Pandey 4.2 1.8 7.56 0.12 40 40.12 13560.56 0 13560.56 100

90 Rupa Aryal 4 1.6 6.4 0.12 40 40.12 13560.56 0 13560.56 100

Annex ‐ Page 62







Total Land (sq.m)

% of Land Loss



Remarks

91 Cholanath Bhandari 4.1 1.6 6.56 0.12 0.5 0.62 209.56 0 209.56 100

92 Man Singh Mahara 4.1 1.6 6.56 0.12 14 14.12 4772.56 0 4772.56 100

93 Sher Shingh Bhandari 4.5 1.6 7.2 0 0 100

94 Bir Bdr. Sunar 4.5 1.6 7.2 0.12 30 30.12 10180.56 0 10180.56 100

95 Omkar Panta 4.4 1.6 7.04 0.12 5 5.12 1730.56 0 1730.56 100

96 Prakash Shah 4.4 1.6 7.04 0.12 6 6.12 2068.56 0 2068.56 100

97 Hari Datt Bhatta 4.6 1.4 6.44 23.78 23.78 8037.64 8037.64 100 V6: Malpot/Napi Karalaya-E/W Highway)

1 Harilal Joshi 9.9 0.1 0.99 0.49 20 20.49 6925.62 0.01 6925.62 99.992 Patiram Chunara 14.8 1.8 26.64 0.49 10 10.49 3545.62 0.75 3545.62 99.25

3 Tek Raj Bhatta 6.4 1.8 11.52 1 15 16 5408 0.21 5408 99.79

H1: East-West Gully-1 100

1 Gajendra Bdr. Shah 18.3 1.9 34.77 0.3 30 30.3 10241.4 0 10241.4 100

The

affe

cted

are

a i.e

are

a oc

cupi

ed b

y af

fect

ed

stru

ctur

e is

pub

lic la

nd (w

ithin

RoW

of e

xist

ing

road

); he

nce

the

owne

r will

loss

no

land

2 Shambhu Bharati 18.3 1.9 34.77 0.4 30 30.4 10275.2 0 10275.2 100

3 Chintamani Joshi 18.4 1.9 34.96 0.2 6 6.2 2095.6 0 2095.6 100

4 Manju Bhatta 18.3 1.9 34.77 0.2 0 0.2 67.6 0 67.6 100

5 Shreeram Chataut 18.3 1.9 34.77 0.59 30 30.59 10339.42 0 10339.42 100

6 Hajari Singh Pujara 10 1.9 19 0.3 10 10.3 3481.4 0 3481.4 100

7 Gopal Singh Budha 8.5 1.9 16.15 0.4 30 30.4 10275.2 0 10275.2 100

8 Bhuban Pandey 18.3 1.9 34.77 0.2 15 15.2 5137.6 0 5137.6 100

9 Devraj Mishra 18.3 1.9 34.77 0.29 20 20.29 6858.02 0 6858.02 100

10 Min Raj Bhatta 18.3 1.9 34.77 0.49 120 120.49 40725.62 0 40725.62 100

11 Prem Shah 4 1.9 7.6 0.2 10 10.2 3447.6 0 3447.6 100

12 Narendra Bohora 3.8 1.9 7.22 0.2 34 34.2 11559.6 0 11559.6 100

13 Deepak Gupta 10.7 1.9 20.33 0.2 0 0.2 67.6 0 67.6 100

14 Padam Bdr. Bhandari 7.6 1.9 14.44 0.2 2 2.2 743.6 0 743.6 100

Annex ‐ Page 63







Total Land (sq.m)

% of Land Loss



Remarks

15 Laxmi Datt Bhatta 9 1.9 17.1 0.2 5 5.2 1757.6 0 1757.6 100

16 Rudra Singh Bhandari 3.4 1.9 6.46 0.2 20 20.2 6827.6 0 6827.6 100

17 Karunakar Paneru 7.3 1.9 13.87 0.2 20 20.2 6827.6 0 6827.6 100

18 Harilal Bhatta 10 1.9 19 0.3 30 30.3 10241.4 0 10241.4 100

19 Kalpana Thapa 18.3 1.9 34.77 0.4 10 10.4 3515.2 0 3515.2 100


21 Shanti Damai 12.5 1.9 23.75 0.46 10 10.46 3535.48 0 3535.48 100

22 kalu Singh+jagat Bhandari 6.6 1.9 12.54 0.2 0.15 0.35 118.3 0 118.3 100


H2: East-West Gully-2 100

1 Mohan Singh Dhami 18.5 0.7 12.95 0.2 8 8.2 2771.6 0 2771.6 100

The

affe

cted

are

a i.e

are

a oc

cupi

ed b

y af

fect

ed s

truct

ure

is

publ

ic la

nd (w

ithin

RoW

of e

xist

ing

road

); he

nce

the

owne

r will

loss

no

land

2 Jaya Kisan Bhatta 18.5 0.7 12.95 0.3 0 0.3 101.4 0 101.4 100

3 Haris Chandra Bhatta 18.5 0.5 9.25 0.9 50 50.9 17204.2 0 17204.2 100

4 Laba Raj Bhatta 18.5 0.5 9.25 0.4 0 0.4 135.2 0 135.2 100

5 Sunil Panta 18.5 0.1 1.85 0.2 100 100.2 33867.6 0 33867.6 100

6 Madan Paudyal 19 0.45 8.55 0.4 0 0.4 135.2 0 135.2 100

7 Tikaram Bohora 12 0.45 5.4 0.3 50 50.3 17001.4 0 17001.4 100

8 Khem Raj Bohora 6.8 0.45 3.06 0.3 30 30.3 10241.4 0 10241.4 100

9 Govinda Ballav Joshi 20 0.6 12 0.3 40 40.3 13621.4 0 13621.4 100

10 Jaimati Devi Bhatta 18.5 0.6 11.1 0.4 2 2.4 811.2 0 811.2 100

11 Bashudev Bohora 18.5 0.45 8.325 0.3 20 20.3 6861.4 0 6861.4 100

12 Sita Devi K.C 18.5 0.45 8.325 0.25 10 10.25 3464.5 0 3464.5 100

13 Ganesh Bohora 18.5 0.5 9.25 0.4 10 10.4 3515.2 0 3515.2 100

14 Kamala Devi Bohora 18.5 0.5 9.25 0.2 1 1.2 405.6 0 405.6 100

15 Durga Devi Jora 18.5 0.35 6.475 0.2 40 40.2 13587.6 0 13587.6 100

16 Dharma Raj joshi 18.5 0.35 6.475 0.4 20 20.4 6895.2 0 6895.2 100

Annex ‐ Page 64







Total Land (sq.m)

% of Land Loss



Remarks

H-3: Hospital Road (Gully 6 to Gully 1/ East-West Gully-3)

None

H-4: Campus Road (Janki tole) to Gully 1( East-West Gully-4)

None

H-5: Sarswati Tole Road 1 (East West Gully-5, Katan Area)

1 Bisnudatt Bhatta 35 0.55 19.25 1.65 1.65 557.7 0 557.7 100

The

affe

cted

are

a i.e

are

a oc

cupi

ed b

y af

fect

ed s

truct

ure

is

publ

ic la

nd (w

ithin

RoW

of e

xist

ing

road

); he

nce

the

owne

r will

loss

no

land

2 Bajir Singh Aiyar 18.3 1 18.3 1.65 1.65 557.7 0 557.7 100

3 Khagendra Chand 18.3 0.3 5.49 1.65 30 31.65 10697.7 0 10697.7 100

4 Ganga Datt Joshi 21.7 0.85 18.445 1.65 10 11.65 3937.7 0 3937.7 100

5 Rajendra Chand 17.7 0.2 3.54 1.65 35 36.65 12387.7 0 12387.7 100

6 Anandi Panta 18.7 0.2 3.74 1.65 20 21.65 7317.7 0 7317.7 100

7 Parmeswori Pandey 18.3 0.3 5.49 1.65 20 21.65 7317.7 0 7317.7 100

8 Hom Bdr. Panthi 18.3 0.3 5.49 1.65 20 21.65 7317.7 0 7317.7 100

9 Dharma Nanda Bhatta 18.3 0.3 5.49 1.65 1.65 557.7 0 557.7 100

10 Sashi Ojha 18.3 0.5 9.15 1.65 10 11.65 3937.7 0 3937.7 100

11 Laxman Singh Bhandari 18.3 0.3 5.49 1.65 40 41.65 14077.7 0 14077.7 100

12 Ganesh Bohora 18.3 0.5 9.15 1.65 5 6.65 2247.7 0 2247.7 100

13 Narayan Singh Saud 19 0.9 17.1 1.65 0 1.65 557.7 0 557.7 100

14 Kamala Bohora 20 0.9 18 1.65 1.65 557.7 0 557.7 100

15 Man Bdr. Sunar 18.8 0.8 15.04 1.65 1.65 557.7 0 557.7 100

16 Tikaram Bhatta 18.3 0.8 14.64 1.65 5 6.65 2247.7 0 2247.7 100

17 Tekendra Bhatta 18.3 0.8 14.64 1.65 1.65 557.7 0 557.7 100

18 Damodar Pandey 18.3 0.9 16.47 1.65 18 19.65 6641.7 0 6641.7 100

19 Dr. Bhojraj Panta 18.3 0.9 16.47 1.65 10 11.65 3937.7 0 3937.7 100

20 Bishnu Awasti 18.3 0.9 16.47 1.65 30 31.65 10697.7 0 10697.7 100

21 Puspamani Bhatta 19 0.7 13.3 1.65 15 16.65 5627.7 0 5627.7 100

Annex ‐ Page 65







Total Land (sq.m)

% of Land Loss



Remarks

22 Keshav Nayak 9.6 0.7 6.72 1.65 6 7.65 2585.7 0 2585.7 100

23 Kamal Shrestha 18.3 0.7 12.81 1.65 20 21.65 7317.7 0 7317.7 100

24 Gauri Datt Joshi 27 0.7 18.9 1.65 10 11.65 3937.7 0 3937.7 100

25 Lalitananda Joshi 18.5 0.7 12.95 1.65 12 13.65 4613.7 0 4613.7 100

26 Somraj Aryal 12.3 0.7 8.61 1.65 15 16.65 5627.7 0 5627.7 100

27 Man Singh Rawat 20 1.3 26 1.65 25 26.65 9007.7 0 9007.7 100

28 Purna Raj Bhatta 7 1.3 9.1 1.65 17 18.65 6303.7 0 6303.7 100

H-6:Sarswati Tole Road 2 (East West Gully-6, Katan Area)

1 Devaki Bam 18.5 1.15 21.275 1.65 30 31.65 10697.7 0 10697.7 100

The

owne

r will

loss

no

land

2 Kapil Joshi 18.5 1.15 21.275 1.65 30 31.65 10697.7 0 10697.7 100

3 Shyam Chand 18.8 1.15 21.62 1.65 0 1.65 557.7 0 557.7 100

4 Basant Bdr. Singh 18.2 1.15 20.93 1.65 30 31.65 10697.7 0 10697.7 100

5 Parwati Devi Chand 18.3 1.15 21.045 1.65 30 31.65 10697.7 0 10697.7 100

6 Tara Joshi 18.5 1.15 21.275 1.65 27 28.65 9683.7 0 9683.7 100

7 Siddharaj Bhatta 18.3 1.15 21.045 1.65 20 21.65 7317.7 0 7317.7 100

8 Mohandev Joshi 18.3 1.15 21.045 1.65 12 13.65 4613.7 0 4613.7 100

9 Dattaram Dasrath Bhatta 18.5 1.15 21.275 1.65 20 21.65 7317.7 0 7317.7 100

10 Manmati Chand 18.3 1.15 21.045 1.65 0 1.65 557.7 0 557.7 100

11 Dal Bdr. Chand 23 1.15 26.45 1.65 20 21.65 7317.7 0 7317.7 100

H-7: Sarswati Tole Road 3 (East West Gully-7, Katan Area)

1 Pushkar Giri 38 0.9 34.2 1.65 2 3.65 1233.7 0 1233.7 100

Area

occ

upie

d by

af

fect

ed s

truct

ure

is

publ

ic la

nd; h

ence

the

owne

r will

loss

no

land

2 Gagan Giri 18.6 0.9 16.74 1.65 5 6.65 2247.7 0 2247.7 100

3 Dilmaya Bhatta 21.3 0.9 19.17 1.65 12 13.65 4613.7 0 4613.7 100

4 Tek Raj Panta 18.3 0.9 16.47 1.65 40 41.65 14077.7 0 14077.7 100

5 Sova Devi Joshi 18.3 0.9 16.47 1.65 15 16.65 5627.7 0 5627.7 100

6 Kapil Panta 18.3 0.9 16.47 1.65 0 1.65 557.7 0 557.7 100

Annex ‐ Page 66







Total Land (sq.m)

% of Land Loss



Remarks

7 Karan Nath 18.3 0.9 16.47 1.65 0 1.65 557.7 0 557.7 100

8 Komala Devi Chand 18.3 0.9 16.47 1.65 2 3.65 1233.7 0 1233.7 100

9 Umadatt Bhatta 11.9 0.9 10.71 1.65 0 1.65 557.7 0 557.7 100

10 Ambika Joshi 24.8 0.9 22.32 1.65 8 9.65 3261.7 0 3261.7 100

11 Krishna P.d Bohora 19.8 0.9 17.82 1.65 12 13.65 4613.7 0 4613.7 100

12 Dhani Datt Panta 22.3 1.25 27.875 1.65 30 31.65 10697.7 0 10697.7 100

13 Pramananda Joshi 24.1 1.25 30.125 1.65 13 14.65 4951.7 0 4951.7 100

14 Kalpana K.C 18.3 1.2 21.96 1.65 30 31.65 10697.7 0 10697.7 100

15 Sitaram Joshi 19.2 1.2 23.04 1.65 31 32.65 11035.7 0 11035.7 100

16 Prakash Bdr. Singh 18.5 1.2 22.2 1.65 30 31.65 10697.7 0 10697.7 100

17 Rana singh Bhandari 18.5 1.2 22.2 1.65 15 16.65 5627.7 0 5627.7 100

18 Gajendra Thapa 18.2 1.2 21.84 1.65 25 26.65 9007.7 0 9007.7 100

19 Purnananda Bhatta 18.2 1.2 21.84 1.65 25 26.65 9007.7 0 9007.7 100

20 Bhojraj Pandey 18.8 1.2 22.56 1.65 15 16.65 5627.7 0 5627.7 100

21 Jayanti Chand 36.8 1 36.8 30 30 10140 0 10140 100

22 Bhanubhakta Joshi 18.4 1 18.4 1.65 7 8.65 2923.7 0 2923.7 100

23 Shusila Pandey 18.4 1 18.4 1.65 5 6.65 2247.7 0 2247.7 100

24 Mahadev Bhatta 18.8 1.2 22.56 1.65 10 11.65 3937.7 0 3937.7 100

25 Tara Devi Bhatta 18.3 1.2 21.96 1.65 10 11.65 3937.7 0 3937.7 100

26 Chandra Dev Upadhyay 18.3 1 18.3 1.65 1 2.65 895.7 0 895.7 100

27 G.K Bhat 18.3 1 18.3 3.3 20 23.3 7875.4 0 7875.4 100

28 Narad Pandey 70 1 70 4.12 30 34.12 11532.56 0 11532.56 100

29 Ran Bdr. Pal 40 1 40 1.65 10 11.65 3937.7 0 3937.7 100

H-8: Sarswati Tole Road 4 (East West section, Katan Area) 1 Tara Devi Joshi 29.7 0.65 19.305 2.75 20 22.75 7689.5 0 7689.5 100

owne

r w

ill lo

ss

no

land

2 Shanti Devi Bhandari 18.3 0.65 11.895 1.65 0 1.65 557.7 0 557.7 100

Annex ‐ Page 67







Total Land (sq.m)

% of Land Loss



Remarks

3 Rajaya Swar 28.8 0.85 24.48 1.65 20 21.65 7317.7 0 7317.7 100

4 Laba Dev Pandey 36.6 0.85 31.11 1.98 20 21.98 7429.24 0 7429.24 100

5 Bishnu Aryal 18.3 1.15 21.045 1.65 0 1.65 557.7 0 557.7 100

6 Basanta Singh 18.3 1.15 21.045 1.65 5 6.65 2247.7 0 2247.7 100

7 Kamala Nanda Joshi 18.4 1.15 21.16 1.65 1.65 557.7 0 557.7 100

8 Hemlal Sapkota 36.6 1.15 42.09 3.3 3.3 1115.4 0 1115.4 100

9 Sita Devi Joshi 18.3 1.15 21.045 1.65 9 10.65 3599.7 0 3599.7 100

10 Ganesh Chand 18.6 1.15 21.39 1.65 0 1.65 557.7 0 557.7 100

11 Tika singh Dhami 18.3 1.15 21.045 1.65 5 6.65 2247.7 0 2247.7 100

12 Dr. Madan Singh Karki 18.4 1.15 21.16 1.65 5 6.65 2247.7 0 2247.7 100

13 Dharmanand Bhatta 26 1.15 29.9 2.34 30 32.34 10930.92 0 10930.92 100

14 Dashrath Joshi 26 1.25 32.5 2.34 18 20.34 6874.92 0 6874.92 100

15 Uttara Chand 18.3 1.25 22.875 1.65 15 16.65 5627.7 0 5627.7 100

16 Maya Devi Joshi 18.3 1.25 22.875 1.65 120 121.65 41117.7 0 41117.7 100

17 Harsa Narain Upadhyay 18.5 1.25 23.125 1.65 40 41.65 14077.7 0 14077.7 100

18 Bishnu datt Awasti 18 1.25 22.5 1.65 7 8.65 2923.7 0 2923.7 100

19 Nirajan Gautam 18.3 1.25 22.875 1.65 20 21.65 7317.7 0 7317.7 100

20 Shavitri Devi Panta 18.3 1.25 22.875 1.65 0 1.65 557.7 0 557.7 100

21 Krishna Bdr. Chand 18.6 1.25 23.25 1.65 0 1.65 557.7 0 557.7 100

22 Janaki Devi Bam 18.3 1.25 22.875 1.65 0 1.65 557.7 0 557.7 100

23 Dammar Datt Bogati 18.3 1.25 22.875 1.65 30 31.65 10697.7 0 10697.7 100

24 Hari Chand 19.3 1.25 24.125 1.65 20 21.65 7317.7 0 7317.7 100

H-9: Eye Hospital Road (East-West)

1 Omprakash Dedwal 14 1.5 21 1.65 0 100

H-10 : Hospital Road (Gully 1 to Bhagatpur Marg) 100

1 Krishna Prasad Bhandari 5.6 0.6 3.36 0.3 13 13.3 4495.4 0 4495.4 100

Annex ‐ Page 68







Total Land (sq.m)

% of Land Loss



Remarks

2 Kedar Prasad Bhandari 6.7 1.2 8.04 0.3 13 13.3 4495.4 0 4495.4 100

3 Nandalal Joshi 6.4 1.2 7.68 0.3 10 10.3 3481.4 0 3481.4 100

4 Kamala devi Bhatta 9.1 1 9.1 0.3 50 50.3 17001.4 0 17001.4 100

5 Ravi Joshi 16.3 1 16.3 0.43 0 0.43 145.34 0 145.34 100

6 Mina Panta 5 0.8 4 0.3 20 20.3 6861.4 0 6861.4 100

7 Lokraj Panta 16 0.7 11.2 1.43 20 21.43 7243.34 0 7243.34 100

8 Lal Bdr.Thapa 18.7 0.7 13.09 1.65 30 31.65 10697.7 0 10697.7 100

9 Raji Chand 24.7 1.6 39.52 1.65 1.65 557.7 0 557.7 100

10 Dhir Samser Kunuwar 8.65 0.6 5.19 1.65 5 6.65 2247.7 0 2247.7 100

Hotel Opera road, E-W)

1 Binod Kumar Agrawal 8.45 2 16.9 3.09 6 9.09 3072.42 0 3072.42 100

2 Krishna P.D Bogati 16.7 0.7 11.69 0.3 0 0.3 101.4 0 101.4 100

3 Harilal Paneru 15.3 0.7 10.71 0.34 20 20.34 6874.92 0 6874.92 100

Madan chowk-Dashrath Chowk - Napi - Bhagatpur Chowk Road

1 Duraga Datt Bohora 10.6 0.2 2.12 2 40 42 14196 0 14196 100

2 Ratna Singh Thakurathi 5.25 0.3 1.575 1.65 0.18 1.83 618.54 0 618.54 100

3 Gorakh Bdr. Chand 5.25 0.3 1.575 0.4 12 12.4 4191.2 0 4191.2 100

4 Omparkash Bhandari 10 0.25 2.5 1.65 10 11.65 3937.7 0 3937.7 100

5 Krishna Datt Bhatta 17.2 0.4 6.88 1.98 14 15.98 5401.24 0 5401.24 100

6 Damar Devi Kuwar 10 0.9 9 1.65 20 21.65 7317.7 0 7317.7 100

Traffic Chowk- Dashrat - BP Chowk Road

None Source: Field Measurement 2019

Annex ‐ Page 69

ANNEX- 3 (B): Minimum Land Rate and Current Market Price of Land

S.N

Name of Road

Ward No.

Minimum rate of land of FY 2077 / 078

fixed by Land Revenue Office

(NRs/Kattha)

Annual increment trend of minimum rate of

land

Current Market Rate (NRs / Kattha)

1 M1 : Bhasi- Rautela Road 1 2709040 10 % 4000000

2 M2 : Bhanuchowk -Bishnudham Road 3,6 8127120 10 % 5000000

3 M3: Suklaphanta Marga(Bhanuchowk-Madan Chowk-Airport Road)

Bhanu Chowk – Madan Chowk 4 8804380 10 % 29000000

Madan Chowk - Airport 4 6433970 10 % 10000000

4 M4: Airport-Airighat Road 17,12,16 2709040 10 % 5500000

5 V5: Gully No-5 Road (Campus Road, North-South section) 4,18 8973695 10 % 17600000

6 V-4: Gully No-4 Road (North-South section) 4,18 8973695 10 % 17600000

7 V-3 : Gully No-3 Road (North-South Section) 4,18 8973695 10 % 17600000

8 V-2: Gully No-2 Road (North-South section) 4,18 8973695 10 % 17600000

9 V-1: Gully No-1(Shalgadhi Road, North-South Section) 4 8973695 10 % 20000000

10 V6: Malpot/Napi Karalaya-E/W Highway) 4 8973695 10 % 9500000

11 H1: East-West Gully-1 4,18 8973695 10 % 12000000

12 H2: East-West Gully-2 4 8973695 10 % 12000000

13 H-3: Hospital Road (Gully 6 to Gully 1/ East-West Gully-3) 4,18 8973695 10 % 12000000

14 H-4: Campus Road (Janki tole) to Gully 1( East-West Gully-4) 18 2539725 10 % 7500000

15 H-5: Sarswati Tole Road 1 (East West Gully-5, Katan Area) 18 1523835 10 % 6000000

16 H-6:Sarswati Tole Road 2 (East West Gully-6, Katan Area) 18 1523835 10 % 6000000

17 H-7: Sarswati Tole Road 3 (East West Gully-7, 18 1523835 10 % 5500000

Annex ‐ Page 70

S.N

Name of Road

Ward No.

Minimum rate of land of FY 2077 / 078

fixed by Land Revenue Office

(NRs/Kattha)

Annual increment trend of minimum rate of

land

Current Market Rate (NRs / Kattha)

Katan Area)

18 H-8: Sarswati Tole Road 4 (East West section, Katan Area) 18 1523835 10 % 5500000

19 H-9: Eye Hospital Road (East-West) 18 2607451 10 % 10000000

20 H-10 : Hospital Road (Gully 1 to Bhagatpur Marg) 18 5587395 10 % 20000000

21 Hotel Opera road, E-W) 4 10158900 10 % 15000000

22 Madan chowk-Dashrath Chowk - Napi - Bhagatpur Chowk Road 4 5587395 10 % 29000000

23 Traffic Chowk- Dashrat - BP Chowk Road 4 4910135 10 % 11700000

Source: Land Reform and Land Revenue Office, Mahendranagar, Kanchanpur, 2020

Annex – page 71

ANNEX- 4 Minutes of Meetings / Consultations

Annex – page 72

Annex – page 73

Annex – page 74

Annex – page 75

Annex – page 76

Annex – page 77

Annex – page 78

Annex – page 79

Annex – page 80

Annex – page 81

Annex – page 82

Annex – page 83

Annex – page 84

Annex – page 85

Annex – page 86

Annex – page 87

Minutes of Ward Level Consultations with Affected Persons (M- 2)

Annex – page 88

Annex – page 89

Annex – page 90

Annex – page 91

Annex – page 92

Annex – page 93

Annex – page 94

Annex – page 95

Annex – page 96

Annex – page 97

Annex – page 98

ANNEX- 5 (A)

Third Party Verification Latter

Annex – page 99

ANNEX-5 (B) Individual Consent of Affected

Owners

Annex – page 100

Annex – page 101

Annex – page 102

Annex – page 103

Annex – page 104

Annex – page 105

Annex – page 106

Annex – page 107

Annex – page 108

Annex – page 109

Annex – page 110

Annex – page 111

Annex – page 112

Annex – page 113

Annex – page 114

Annex – page 115

Annex – page 116

Annex – page 117

Annex – page 118

Annex – page 119

Annex – page 120

Annex – page 121

Annex – page 122

Annex – page 123

Annex – page 124

Annex – page 125

Annex – page 126

Annex – page 127

Annex – page 128

Annex – page 129

Annex – page 130

Annex – page 131

Annex – page 132

Annex – page 133

Annex – page 134

Annex – page 135

Annex – page 136

Annex – page 137

Annex – page 138

Annex – page 139

Annex – page 140

Annex – page 141

Annex – page 142

Annex – page 143

Annex – page 144

Annex – page 145

Annex – page 146

Annex – page 147

Annex – page 148

Annex – page 149

Annex – page 150

Annex – page 151

Annex – page 152

Annex – page 153

Annex – page 154

Annex – page 155

Annex – page 156

Annex – page 157

Annex – page 158

Annex – page 159

Annex – page 160

Annex – page 161

Annex – page 162

Annex – page 163

Annex – page 164

Annex – page 165

Annex – page 166

Annex – page 167

Annex – page 168

Bheemdatta Municipality Resettlement Plan

Documents

Transcript of Bheemdatta Municipality Resettlement Plan