Benjamin Elijah Mays: His views on how God and Religion serves Humanity and How Humanity should...
Transcript of Benjamin Elijah Mays: His views on how God and Religion serves Humanity and How Humanity should...
Benjamin Elijah Mays
His views on how God and Religion serves Mankind andHow Mankind should serve God
Ronald Barnes, AuthorDecember 12, 2015
Page1
Benjamin Elijah Mays (Born: August 1, 1894 – Died: March 28,
1984) was an American black minister, educator, sociologist,
social activist and the president of Morehouse
College in Atlanta, Georgia from 1940 to 1967. He was also a
mentor and respected advisor to civil rights leader Martin Luther
King Jr. i Mays was highly critical of segregation even prior to
the modern civil rights movement which for all practical purposes
began in 1955 with Rosa Parks’ refusal to go to the back of the
bus in segregated Birmingham, Alabama. I can argue that Benjamin
Mays, the man, cannot be accurately evaluated, understood or
assessed without acknowledgement of his belief in God and
devotion to his Christian faith. To talk about Benjamin Mays is
to talk about a man who was sincerely
concerned about others.
The purpose of this thesis is to present
Page2
the views of Benjamin Mays on how God and Religion serves mankind
and his views on how mankind should serve God. First I will
investigate and identify the schools of thought Mays was exposed
in his early academic life that were instrumental in shaping his
own thinking about the “idea of God” and how that idea influences
or should influence human behavior. Next I will present how
exposure to these “ideologies of God” gave clarity and refined
definition to Mays’ specific views on how God and Religion serves
man and how man should serve God. Finally, I will comment on and
present my own viewpoints on the relevance of Mays’ ideas to our
modern 21st century society. There is more clarity to the issue
“How God and Religion serves mankind”, as the Bible clearly
states the purpose of religion, God and Jesus. There is less
clarity regarding “How mankind should serve God”. Even though the
Bible states specifically “How mankind should serve God” the
ambiguity is in how mankind actually does serve God. One can
argue the paradox in this difference. How God serves man is an
unwavering issue in the viewpoint of a true Christian. How man
serves God is complicated by mankind’s free will which often has
standard deviation form religious intentions of God as identified
Page3
in the Bible, at least according to Benjamin Mays.
Benjamin Elijah Mays was born in Ninety Six, South Carolina, the
youngest of eight children; his parents were tenant farmers and
former slaves. As a child, seeing his father threatened by a
white mob during an election riot made a deep impression.ii After
being enrolled in Virginia Union University for one year, he
transferred to Bates College in Maine, where he obtained
his B.A. in 1920. Mays then attended the University of Chicago as
a graduate student, completing his M.A. in 1925 and his Ph.D. in
the School of Religion in 1935. While in graduate school Mays
worked as a Pullman Porter. He also worked as a student assistant
to Dr. Lacey Kirk Williams, pastor of Olivet Baptist Church in
Chicago and President of the National Baptist Convention, USA,
Inc.
While working on his doctorate, Mays and Joseph Nicholson
published a study entitled The Negro's Church, the first
sociological study of the black church in the United States. His
Doctoral thesis, written in 1935, was on the topic of “The Idea
of God in Contemporary Negro Literature”. Four years later in
Page4
1938, he published a refined commercial version of this thesis
entitled “The Negro's God as Reflected in His Literature.”
His professional experiences include the following:- 1926 -Executive secretary of the Tampa, Florida Urban
League. - 1928 -National Student Secretary of the YMCA.
1934 -Dean of the School of Religion at Howard University in Washington, - 1940 -President of Morehouse College- 1967 -President of Atlanta School Board
As Morehouse President, Dr. Mays steered the financially
suffering Morehouse College into a financially secure
institution.iii One of Dr. Mays’ primary goals as president of
Morehouse was to establish a proud academic and professional
legacy for the College. He introduced the esteemed tradition of
producing Morehouse Men. A Morehouse Man was a highly educated
black professional, dedicated to service. Specifically, Dr. Mays
wanted his Morehouse Men to be physicians, lawyers, and
ministers. In addition to their success, he believed that they
must be Christians who gave back to the black community.iv His
most famous student there was someone who benefitted deeply from
Page5
Dr. Mays' educational and religious philosophies and leadership,
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. They developed a close relationship
that continued until Dr. King's death in 1968. Dr. King referred
to Dr. Mays as his "Spiritual Mentor", and he saw in Dr. Mays
"the ideal of what I (King) wanted a minister to be." Mays
delivered the eulogy for King at his funeral.
Although Mays’ life was abundantly productive there are two major
traits that characterize and preoccupied his professional life;
1) the dignity of all human beings and 2) the gap between
American democratic ideals and American social practices. Those
became key elements of the message of King and the American civil
rights movement. Mays developed these themes at length in his
book “Seeking to Be a Christian in Race Relations”, published in
1957. After his retirement in 1967 from Morehouse, Mays was
elected president of the Atlanta Public Schools Board of
Education, where he supervised the peaceful desegregation of
Atlanta's public schools. He published two autobiographies, “Born
to Rebel” (1971), and “Lord, the People Have Driven Me
On” (1981). In 1982, he was awarded the Spingarn Medal from
the NAACP. Mays died in Atlanta on March 28, 1984. He was
Page6
entombed on the campus of Morehouse College. His wife Sadie is
entombed beside him.
It is against this backdrop in the life of Benjamin Elijah Mays
that I will present my thesis.
According to Mays (Doctoral thesis 1935) there are “ideas of God”
that support a growing consciousness of social adjustment to
reconstruct the social order to be fairer to the Negro. “Ideas of
God” support physical adjustment proving the Negro is not
inferior and entitled to all the rights and privileges as others
in the society.v Mays determined that in the “mass” amount of
Negro literature the “ideas of God” reflect the orthodox views of
Christianity as written in the Bible. Mays discusses the
traditional views of God giving the example of the mother who
prays for her children to be safe and successful in this life. In
prayer the mother is consoled. Her anxiety is satisfied even if
the facts don’t match the reality. The idea of dependence on God
influences her behavior to pray for blessings on her family. In
this effort she is relieved of worry. Her behavior is different
from people who don’t believe in God, according to Mays.vi Belief
Page7
in the rewards of going to heaven and punishment for those who
act against God’s will and incur his wrath are basis for the idea
that God supports social adjustment that gives equal rights to
the Negro.vii Mays further points out, there is a growing
sentiment among post war writers to abandon the idea of God as an
influence in social rehabilitation.viii I would argue that the
idea of God being insignificant in social change developed as a
result of post war discrimination and Negro writers realizing
discrimination is institutionalized in America. The fact that
Negros risked their lives in the War did not change the opinions
of racist America. Negros had equal rights to die in war but not
equal rights to live equally with whites in freedom and times of
peace.
i Jelks, Randall Maurice, Walking Integrity: Benjamin Elijah Mays, Mentor to Martin Luther King Jrii Fordham, Damon L., Voices of Black South Carolina: Legend & Legacy, P 125-126iii Jelks, Randal Maurice. Benjamin Elijah Mays, Schoolmaster of the Movementiv Roper, John Herbert. Magnificent Mays: A Biography of Benjamin Elijah Maysvii Mays Benjamin E, The Development of the Idea of God in contemporary Literature, P15
viii Mays Benjamin E, The Development of the Idea of God in contemporary Literature, P16
Page8
Mays indicates the needs of the Negro group, the minority
disadvantaged group, are different from those of the privileged
group and the behavior of the suppressed group is different from
the behavior of the privileged group. Mays sites a study by H.A.
Miller (Races, Nations and Classes. P. 35) that asserts the
minority groups suffer from a “oppression psychosis”. This
condition according to Miller is symptomatic of the oppressed
group being “abnormally subjective and unable to view their
problems objectively”. The oppressed group is resentful, super
sensitive to insult and has a guarded suspicion of the dominant
group. Miller also states the minority group develops an
inferiority complex which makes them overly aggressive in
attempts to make up for being inferior. In effect this causes the
minority group to create a solidarity which otherwise would not
be created.ix Mays does not deny these assertions but cites them
as main reasons the needs of the Negro are distinctly different
v Mays Benjamin E, The Development of the Idea of God in contemporary Literature, P. ii - iii
vi Mays Benjamin E, The Development of the Idea of God in contemporary Literature, P14
ix Mays Benjamin E, The Development of the Idea of God in contemporary Literature, P16
Page9
from whites which gives credibility to how the “idea of God” has
developed in contemporary Negro literature.x
Mays does note that ideas of God relative to how Negro literature
presents them varies with the times and the conditions under
which they live, their economic, social and political status.
“Ideas of God” are expressed not only in Negro literature but
also in song, spirituals that Mays considers one of the major
contributions to American culture.xi Also much of the idea and
perception Negros had of God is contained in Religious Spiritual
song, created by slaves out of necessity to enable them to better
survive in America. Spirituals with themes such as; “Nobody knows
the trouble I see, Nobody know but Jesus”; “Sometimes I feel like
a motherless child”; “Every time I feel the spirit”; “Oh when I
come to die, give me Jesus”; and “Steal away to Jesus” are
examples of Negro spirituals that express these feelings,
thoughts and conditions of the Negro experience. Negro spirituals
x Mays Benjamin E, The Development of the Idea of God in contemporary Literature, P17
xi Mays Benjamin E, The Development of the Idea of God in contemporary Literature, P120
Page10
expressed a dependence on Jesus in times of distress for comfort.
God is omniscient, omnipresent, and omnipotent and belief that
God answers those who pray is the basic to the Negro spiritual
and religious life, at least during the era Benjamin Mays wrote
his thesis (1935). The “ideas of God” expressed in spirituals are
found in the Bible or inspired by Biblical scripture. The Negro
spirituals imply God will answer the prayers of his children. The
belief that God will make things right in this world or the next
(afterlife) is based on traditional Biblical interpretation. Also
Benjamin Mays presents the argument that the misery suffered by
Negroes is indicative that they are God’s “chosen vessel” and God
is preparing Negroes for victory and triumph at the end, “the
harder the cross, the brighter the crown”. That Negroes have
endured centuries of oppression and for the most part suffered
without revolution, bitterness and maintained a “reserved
resolve” is the basis of Mays argument for Negroes as the chosen
people. xii It is this belief in God according to Mays that has
allowed Negroes to prevail with a relative “emotional poise and
balance” up until the time of this thesis (1935).xiii
Page11
Furthermore Mays raises the argument Negro spirituals were not
only born out of the religious spiritual conviction of Negroes
but also from the social conditions Negroes were forced to
endure, during slavery and until this present time.xiv Mays sites
that “other-worldly” “ideas of God” is not a new concept. The
Jews after centuries of oppression adopted the belief they could
not get relief in this world on earth and believed their
salvation was in the afterlife. An enlightening argument raised
by Mays is that as the social and economic condition in society
improves, the same situations become less advantageous for
Negroes. Whites prosper in times of prosperity yet even in
prosperous times conditions become worse for Negroes. As a
result, the churches have a significant and dominant role in the
lives of Negroes, disadvantaged people and the working class.
Their opportunities are less than those of the business dominant
class which increases their need to find comfort in religion. xii Mays Benjamin E, The Development of the Idea of God in contemporary Literature, P 27
xiii Mays Benjamin E, The Development of the Idea of God in contemporary Literature, P27
xiv Mays Benjamin E, The Development of the Idea of God in contemporary Literature, P30
Page12
Mays indicates this as one significant reason the “idea of God”,
the church and religion has been and still is a dominant force in
the lives of Negroes, working class people and oppressed people.
In Mays’ thesis and his early writings “ideas of God” were
expressed in sermons and speeches delivered by a number of
sermons and speeches which also includes some of his own thinking
and that of others to whom he references, Mays references sermons
that give insight into what he calls the “idea of God”. One such
sermon is as follows:xv
“We have so many folks today to whom God is speaking, trying to get them to repent, to listen but they are stubborn. The Christian world is not in harmony with God and God is pleading for them to come back to him, but the folks won’t hear God, so God causes calamity to come unto them.”
“You are too busy with things of the world to stop and confer with God. You are compassed about with things of theworld and saying that it is impossible for you to find timeto “work for God.” God will lay such persons on the bed of affliction -- too busy to serve him.” (Mays and Nicholson, op. Cit., p.87)xvi
xv Mays Benjamin E, The Development of the Idea of God in contemporary Literature, P38
xvi Mays Benjamin E, The Development of the Idea of God in contemporary Literature, P38
Page13
Mays acknowledge that it is not clear in this quote what “Working
for God” means. He suggests that working for God implies
shouting, singing, praying and spreading the word in order to
escape the “wrath of God” and escape eternity in “burning hell.”
According to Mays it is the “idea of God” that keeps people from
doing wrong. Mays associates the “idea of God” as deterrent from
sin and belief “God will fight ones battles, solve ones problems,
he will hear and answer prayers, he will help those who pray and
punish those who do not pray.”xvii The idea of God “enables the
individual to be at peace and calm when conditions are stifling
and all but unbearable. This condition serves as an opiate for
people.”xviii This idea of God is traditional and based on Biblical
reference.
Mays takes his argument further by saying, “salvation and
security are sought in God. God makes specific and exact demands
xvii Mays Benjamin E, The Development of the Idea of God in contemporary Literature, P39
xviii Mays Benjamin E, The Development of the Idea of God in contemporary Literature, P39
Page14
on mankind because mankind owes everything to God, including
mankind’s very existence. Mays’ argument is that God makes
demands on man to demonstrate appreciation, gratitude and
thankfulness for what God has given mankind. Among the demands
God makes on mankind are serving humanity to make one’s life more
livable as well as the life of others. Serving God includes
serving humanity to bring more opportunity to groups, people and
races that are denied them. Mays clearly states “God makes urgent
social demands upon man for the debt he owes to him.”xix It is
this belief Mays indicates gives responsibility to Mankind to
take responsibility for the betterment of life and equal
opportunity for all of mankind, including minorities, the working
class and especially the Negro. Mays believes the “idea of God
should transcend race and be interpreted considering ethical,
moral and social values. According to Mays God demands clean
hearts, free of envy, hate and malice. The rights of every man
should be respected. He further believes the “idea of God” should
evolve to include not only worship but also forgiveness of others
xix Mays Benjamin E, The Development of the Idea of God in contemporary Literature, P41
Page15
and social justice and equal opportunity for all. Simply to pray
with expect to achieve salvation and God’s grace is useless
without being accompanied with works of responsibility toward
ones fellow mankind.xx According to Mays God loves and is
interested in the welfare and development of everyone regardless
of class, race, creed or color. Every person should enjoy social
and economic security. In other words, Mays express thoughts that
the “idea of God” does not encourage a person to wait until death
to be compensated for his plight in his earthly existence but
rather mankind should enjoy the benefits of prosperity and equal
rights while living in his earthly existence. xxi
Themes presented by Mays delivered in various sermons giving definition to the “idea of God” are as follows:
“it is the spirit of God in the life of an individual that transforms them”xxii
“the Negro is the chosen race and God is on his side”xxiii
“health, life and security from disease come from God”xxiv
“God fights for those who ask and he guides, protects and xx Mays Benjamin E, The Development of the Idea of God in contemporary Literature, P43
xxi Mays Benjamin E, The Development of the Idea of God in contemporary Literature, P45
xxii Mays Benjamin E, The Development of the Idea of God in contemporary Literature, P46
Page16
counsels them”xxv
“God will save us to eternal life”xxvi
“God is the author of all life and all life is precious in God’s sight”xxvii
Mays presents another evolution theory in the “idea of God.” Mays
credits Mordecai Wyatt Johnson, President of Howard University at
the time, and Carter G. Woodson with advancing an “idea of God”
that requires the abandonment of the “White man’s religion”, the
“White man’s Christianity” and realization it is not in the best
interest of Negroes to follow this brand of Christianity.xxviii
According to Mays, Johnson and Woodson shared common opinions in
a positive belief in democracy and religion but not as it is
represented, practiced and manifested in the actions and behavior
xxiii Mays Benjamin E, The Development of the Idea of God in contemporary Literature, P47
xxiv Mays Benjamin E, The Development of the Idea of God in contemporary Literature, P49
xxv Mays Benjamin E, The Development of the Idea of God in contemporary Literature, P49
xxvi Mays Benjamin E, The Development of the Idea of God in contemporary Literature, P52
xxvii Mays Benjamin E, The Development of the Idea of God in contemporary Literature, P61
xxviii Mays Benjamin E, The Development of the Idea of God in contemporary Literature, P147
Page17
of the “white man.” They believed the Negro will never achieve
economic, political, social or spiritual equality and liberty in
America as long as Negroes subscribe to a religious system
developed by the “White man.” Mays, referencing a comment by
Carter G. Woodson stating; Negroes by “following the religious
teachings of their traducers, the Negroes do not show any more
common sense than a people would in permitting criminals to enact
the laws and establish the procedure of the courts by which they
are to be tried.”xxix Personally, it appears to me they do
exercise a sound logic. Woodson and Johnson, according to Mays
have different reasons for criticizing the “White mans” religion.
Woodson because it is a religion “that has been used to justify
slavery; Johnson because economic, political and spiritual
liberty are denied.”xxx Both men confessed beliefs that people who
believe in the one true God, the God of Jesus would not
exterminate, discriminate, oppress or exploit other human
beings.xxxi
According to mays, the viewpoints of Woodson and Johnson
represent a movement away from the “idea of God” based solely on
Page18
prayer, dutiful behavior and hope for salvation at the end of
life. Even the “idea of God” with inclusion of acts directly in
tribute to God along with duty to ones fellow man does not
compromise the views of Woodson and Johnson. They believe it is
in the best interest of the Negro to abandon the White man’s
religion altogether. It is these “ideas of God” that Mays was
exposed in writing his Doctoral thesis in 1835.
In his book, “Christianity on Trial”, Mark Chapman, associate
professor of African American Studies at Fordham University,
cites the contributions of Black Scholars and Theologians
Benjamin Mays and Howard Thurman, two pre-black power
theologians, as examples of Black men who worked against racism
and black men with intelligence and ability comparable or
superior to most whites. According to Chapman both Mays and
Thurman believed the Church should use their resources to solve xxix Mays Benjamin E, The Development of the Idea of God in contemporary Literature, P148
xxx Mays Benjamin E, The Development of the Idea of God in contemporary Literature, P149
xxxi Mays Benjamin E, The Development of the Idea of God in contemporary Literature, P149
Page19
the race problem and end segregation. Mays points out that
nowhere in the Bible is racism supported. Stating, that God does
not judge people based on their race.xxxii According to Chapman,
Mays firmly believed in God and was a defender of the poor,
further adding it was Jesus’ belief in God and man that gave him
courage and willingness to die on the cross.xxxiii While Thurman
and Mays continued to support Christianity and believed
Christianity to be the solution to racism, others of their era
did not agree, Elijah Muhammad being one. Mr. Muhammad, like
Woodson and Johnson believed Christianity was the white man’s
religion and Blacks would never gain freedom from oppression
while they practice Christianity.xxxiv Both Muhammad and Mays
argued the hypocrisy in Christianity however they differed in the
value of Christianity to Black Americans.xxxv
Muhammad arguments against Christianity being a viable religion
for Black people included the following: xxxvi
xxxii Chapman, Mark L. Christianity on Trial, p. 38
xxxiii Chapman, Mark L. Christianity on Trial, p. 38
xxxiv Chapman, Mark L. Christianity on Trial, p. 42
xxxv Chapman, Mark L. Christianity on Trial, p. 46
Page20
1 The races should be separated because Blacks will neverreceive equal treatment from whites under a racist government and racist society
2 God was Black and the first humans in the world were Black. White people were created in scientific experiments by a Black man named Yakub for the purpose of evil.
3 Slavery alone is sufficient to discredit Christianity.4 If Christianity were a good religion, Black people
would not be begging for civil rights.5 Christianity is misleading in teaching Black people to
“love your enemies”. While Muslims are not a violent people they do believe in “an eye for an eye” as a means of self-defense against their enemies.
6 Whites promoted self-hatred among Blacks. Self- hatred must be replaced with self-love and this cannot be accomplished under Christianity.
7 Muhammad, himself could not understand why Black peoplewould want to follow a religion the practices segregation and defiles blackness.
While Mays shared partial beliefs with Mr. Muhammad he still
believed that Christianity, if practiced as God, Jesus and the
Bible scriptures intended or if practiced consistent with the
“idea of God”, contained the remedy for solving the
discrimination problems in America against African Americans,
minorities, working class and other disenfranchised people.
In support of the “idea of God” and Christianity, Mays concludes the following:
xxxvi Chapman, Mark L. Christianity on Trial, p. 45-64
Page21
“the Negros firm faith in God has saved him up to this point, from violent revolutionary methods of achieving his rights. His faith in God has not only served as an opiate for the Negro but it has suggested and indicated pacific and legal methods of achieving them. ... unless liberal or progressive religion moves more progressively to the left in the effort toachieve complete citizenship for the Negro, the more irreligious the Negros become, the more militant and communistic they will become in their efforts to attain full manhood in American life. ... prior to 1914, one finds no “ideas of God” that imply doubt and repudiation. Since the warand particularly since 1920, there is a wave of cynicism, doubts and frustrations in the writings of young Negroes whereGod is discussed.”xxxvii
I take this statement by Mays on the “idea of a Christian God” to
mean that Christianity has saved the Negro from harm up to this
point in history (that the outcome of a Negro revolution would
have been favorable to the Negro is doubtful). It is my
understanding Mays views this as a positive attribute of
Christianity. One that prevented Mays from entertaining the
notion to abandon Christianity as did Johnson, Woodson and
Muhammad. However, I believe Mays recognizes the ambiguity in the
way Christianity is practiced and the way it serves as a remedy
for the condition of disadvantaged people, especially Negroes.
Still he is not accepting of Christianity as it serves Negroes in
xxxvii Mays Benjamin E, The Development of the Idea of God in contemporary Literature, P175
Page22
America. Another well know African American scholar that has
views similar to those of Woodson, Johnson and Muhammad is Dr.
James Cone.
In his autobiography, “Seeking to be a Christian”, Mays begins by
stating “the most baffling problem confronting mankind today
(1957) is the problem of race.” Mays discuss the difficulty and
challenge race relations places on maintaining a Christian
character.xxxviii One interesting argument raised by Mays is that
“man cannot build the world as he pleases”. The Pharaohs, Cyrus
the Great, Nebuchadnezzar, Alexander the Great, the Caesars,
Napoleon, Kaiser Wilhelm, Hitler, Mussolini and others are
mentioned by Mays as people who have tried to enforce their will
on their respective societies yet failed in relatively short time
because it is God, not man, who determines the fate and moral
ethical rotation of the world.xxxix God has created the kind of
justice that enables man to live in harmony with others and only
Gods shaping of mankind’s interrelationships will endure over the
xxxviii Mays, Benjamin E., Seeking to be a Christian in Race Relations, P. ixxxxix Mays, Benjamin E., Seeking to be a Christian in Race Relations, P. 4
Page23
long run, according to Mays. Neither money, military might, most
populated nor any other material advantage has authority over the
Christian faith, according to Mays.xl Even the scientist
according to Mays is dependent on God. Prediction of a scientific
occurrence, such as a comet appearance, or an astronomical
prediction or even a medical phenomenon discovery is dependent on
God because what the scientist calls natural law, order and logic
in the universe that allows predictions and discoveries to take
place, the Christian calls God.xli Attempts to abolish
Christianity during early and ancient Roman history failed in
spite of torture and killings of Christians. In the face of death
Christianity prevailed. The Nazi attempt to abolish Christianity
between 1939 -1945 by exalting Karl Marx and by substituting
Hitler for Christ was a failure. Mays raises these issue pointing
out that Christianity has an endurance and presence in our world
that represents the power and undeniable purpose of an
irrefutable God.xlii However, every belief in God must be belief
in a universal God of justice, mercy and love, non-racist,
xl Mays, Benjamin E., Seeking to be a Christian in Race Relations, P. 5
xli Mays, Benjamin E., Seeking to be a Christian in Race Relations, P. 5
Page24
without class or status consciousness and a God for all people
otherwise the “idea of God” among mankind is inaccurate and does
not represent the true God in the Bible, according to Mays.xliii
Mays makes and interesting argument, stating that God created
man, unique to other animals. God gave man attributes that
distinguish him as a special creature in God’s world and it is a
“foolish notion” of man to create their own “special distinctions
merely because he belongs to a particular race, nation or
family.”xliv As science has determined the commonality and kinship
among all human beings, man has not authority to deny God’s
domain as the author and father of mankind. “Either God is the
father and creator of all or he is the father and creator of
none”, so says Mays.xlv
Another argument advanced by Mays is that Christianity upholds
xlii Mays, Benjamin E., Seeking to be a Christian in Race Relations, P. 6-5
xliii Mays, Benjamin E., Seeking to be a Christian in Race Relations, P. 7
xliv Mays, Benjamin E., Seeking to be a Christian in Race Relations, P. 9
xlv Mays, Benjamin E., Seeking to be a Christian in Race Relations, P. 12
Page25
the free will of man. Man is never wholly a slave to his
prevailing conditions. Man has ability to rise above any
situation that confronts him. This creates the potential (though
unrealized to the extent Mays perceives Gods will for it to be)
for all mankind (Jews, Negroes, Gentiles, Whites, Asians,
Hispanic, young, old, rich, poor) to live harmoniously without
prejudice. It is deep-seated prejudice and man’s free will acting
against God’s preference that causes the diffraction among human
beings. Free will can be a good thing when exercised in
accordance with God’s will.xlvi Free will acting against the will
of God will be evaluated by God on judgment day, according to my
understanding of how Mays views the gift of free-will.
Mays raises another interesting issue in “Seeking to become a
Christian in Race Relations” by raising the point, Jesus’
troubles began and persisted to his death because he believed in
man. That Jesus professed belief in God was a non-threatening
issue because belief in a God or a super-human deity was common
in those times. In his pursuit to combine the integrated belief xlvi Mays, Benjamin E., Seeking to be a Christian in Race Relations, P. 15
Page26
in man with his belief in God along with his failure to deny
being perceived as the messiah attracted the jealous envy of
Pharisees toward Jesus that eventually lead to his death. “… love
God and love your fellow man” (Matthew 22:35-40), Mays references
as basic to the thinking of Jesus. Mays attributes man’s “ultra-
selfish” nature as the “cardinal sin of mankind” especially in “a
nation that wants to be God, in the race that wants special
privileges or in the individual who sees and judges everything
according to his own likes or dislikes.” xlvii
Mays quotes Genesis 3:2-5 to substantiate man’s recognition of
his limitation is the moment sin entered the world. Man’s
dissatisfaction with himself and stupid jealously of God is an
ignorant weakness in man to attain the unattainable. Man’s pride
in wanting to be what he is not creates self-deception that leads
mankind astray from the will of God.xlviii Religion centered on man
becomes estranged from the will of God. Man loses perception of
the center of his ground of being which should be God but the
xlvii Mays, Benjamin E., Seeking to be a Christian in Race Relations, P. 17
xlviii Mays, Benjamin E., Seeking to be a Christian in Race Relations, P. 20
Page27
center of man’s being becomes man, himself, and his own selfish
interest. This condition according to Mays causes mankind to lose
their focus of God as well as loss of the true “idea of God”.xlix
Mays’ position on the “idea of God” is brought into focus in his
autobiography, “Seeking to be a Christian in Race Relations”. It
is the issue of race combined with Mays’ own Christian spiritual
character that leads to his belief that a true Christian cannot
separate devotion to God from his devotion to his fellow man.
Race is the vehicle Mays uses to highlight mankind’s relationship
to his fellow man because of the highly visible and
discriminating nature of race relations. This gives Mays a “birds
eye” insight into the realization that Christianity and Religion
is based on mankind’s relationship with God combined with
mankind’s relationship with mankind.l
Mays express an insightful viewpoint into the Church culture in
America. According to Mays, American churches (of all xlix Mays, Benjamin E., Seeking to be a Christian in Race Relations, P. 24-32
l Mays, Benjamin E., Seeking to be a Christian in Race Relations, P. 33-42
Page28
denominations) deny they are solely an earthly institution,
created by man. The Christian church also denies it has ultimate
purpose to and final obligation to mankind. According to Mays the
church in America has “ultimate allegiance to God” and is not
responsible to the state nor has responsibility to conform to the
ways of the world. The American church holds “there must be a
tension between it and the world.”li Being an institution of
worship, it is improper for any church in America to deny anyone
freedom to worship, especially based on race. Any difference in
language, service procedure, or liturgy may be reason for people
to separate themselves from a church or choose not to worship at
that particular church but that is decision for the individual,
not the church as God’s agent on earth.lii According to Mays, the
Old Testament, the New Testament, the early church, science, the
World Council of Churches, national church bodies (National
Council of the Churches of Christ in the US, The Federal Council
of Churches in Christ in America, The Methodist Church, The
United Presbyterian Church of North America and more), all
denounce segregation in religious choice, worship and
practice.liii Racial discrimination became a practice when western
Page29
imperialism exploited Africa, brought slaves to America and
segregated people along lines of color. According to Mays, this
was the first cause of overt racial discrimination and
segregation in America, as well as denial of religious practice
to become institutionalize in the modern world.liv
According to Mays, Booker T. Washington, another of our country’s
great Americans, believed it was “folly” for the Negro to try to
force whites to accept him, socially or politically. He believed
that the Negro should “strive to make himself proficient and
indispensable” in the industrial and mechanical areas of life
then rights will be achieved.lv Considering my vantage point from
21st century America, I would argue this statement is only half
true. I do agree that it is “folly” for the Negro (and in
reference to our modern times, Black person or African American) li Mays, Benjamin E., Seeking to be a Christian in Race Relations, P. 42
lii Mays, Benjamin E., Seeking to be a Christian in Race Relations, P. 43
liii Mays, Benjamin E., Seeking to be a Christian in Race Relations, P. 42-59
liv Mays, Benjamin E., Seeking to be a Christian in Race Relations, P. 48-49
lv Mays Benjamin E, The Development of the Idea of God in contemporary Literature, P16
Page30
to attempt to force whites to accept them. However, it is also my
opinion that there is a radical separation between whites and
minorities in America which also includes rich and poor. American
culture is simply a discriminating culture and will be as long as
white class conscious people dictate the political, economic and
social policies in American culture.
This is my first in depth exposure to the philosophy of Benjamin
Mays. He is a well-known and respected African American citizen
of prominent status in African American history and culture as
well as in American History.. Having researched in depth into his
life, I have developed a new found appreciation for the man, the
social activist, the scholar, the minister and the Christian,
Benjamin Mays. It is common knowledge the obstacles during his
era made it far more difficult and challenging for Black people
to achieve success in America than today. His efforts paved the
way for future generations of Black people to achieve the
advances in many areas of American life (education, medicine,
sports, entertainment, law, and others). Though discrimination
against Blacks in America still has a strong presence, the verve,
Page31
determination and will of Black people to succeed has become
stronger. I believe Black people today are not encumbered with
the obstacle of insecurity and self-doubt that restricted them
from advancing in prior generations. Black people today are much
better equipped to combat the racist enemy than in prior
generations. That being said, I do think there is a certain
degree of naivety in the sentiment expressed by Booker T.
Washington and redacted by Mays. I think it matters not, how
accomplished Black people become nor the amount of expertise
Black people acquire in their technical, industrial and
mechanical skills to contribute to American progress, there is a
cultural barrier institutionalized in American culture that
prevents white Americans from being fair and to realize their own
quality of humanity. White people are culturally socialized and
instilled with a “negative X” factor gene that prevents them from
being able to accept the concept of equal rights and fully
embrace the “idea of God” as presented by Benjamin Mays and the
Bible. This is my opinion and I am not referring to all white
people. I am referring to the institutions in America that are
controlled by whites that even the majority of decent non-
Page32
discriminating white people are powerless to change. I do need to
make a disclaimer that the majority of whites, in my opinion, do
not fit the “negative X” gene theory. However, that
discrimination exists is cause to believe those that do fit the
“negative X gene” theory are in position to dictate the plight of
others including non-racist decent white people.
Nevertheless, it is my belief that Benjamin Mays is an example of
a man who carved his niche’ into American society with credible
productivity and success while still maintaining an honor and
pride in his African heritage. Both Mays and Muhammad found ways
to exist in America in spite of America’s racism. I do however
believe Mays was slightly naïve to think White America will
change simply because it is the right thing to do. The Bible is
in obvious dispute with the mistreatment and disrespect of one
human being to another. I believe the viewpoints held by Carter
G. Woodson and Mordecai Wyatt Johnson has more in common with the
viewpoint of Elijah Muhammad. If white society has not altogether
ended discrimination and racism in the last 150 years since
slavery was abolished, what proof is there to give hope they will
Page33
follow the bible in terms of how one human should treat another
anytime soon or in this generation. At the risk of sounding
pessimistic, I believe Black people must seek to operate within
the American society with minimum dependence on the areas in
American society that harbor discrimination and racism. Elijah
Muhammad, regardless of what people think about him, is an
example of a Black leader that has led his people away from total
dependence on white society while at the same time operating
within the boundaries of American values and laws. At the least,
I think Mays does realize there are two types of Christianity
being practiced in America. The Christianity that serves white
people and the Christianity that disadvantaged people embrace.
Also there is the Christianity that serves all people which Mays
contends in not being practiced in America. I believe the problem
is not in the “idea of God” or in Christianity itself. The
problem is in the way the “idea of God” and Christianity is
practiced and manifested in American society. If American society
is truly a Christian society, then I believe Mays would agree
that change is required; Changes that demonstrates mankind’s
devotion to God while at the same time change that demonstrates
Page34
mankind’s devotion to all human beings, practiced as one
Christianity.
Mays writes in his autobiography, “Lord, The People Have Driven
Me On”, about his academic experiences at Bates College in Maine.
It was here that Mays came into contact with a different caliber
of white people, a caliber different from southern whites. His
interactions and positive experiences in a predominantly white
environment caused him to realize there are many decent white
people in the world. He was treated decent, “as a person”, “as a
human being”, and “respected” for who he was by faculty,
students, men and women. It was at Bates College that Mays
developed an appreciation for white people as opposed to a benign
tolerance. He got a radically different perspective of whites
than in prior experiences that shaped his thought.lvi Possibly it
could have been this experience with whites had a slight
influence that caused Mays not to abandon his devotion to
Christianity. This is mere speculation however while Mays was
lvi Mays, Benjamin E., Lord The People Have Driven Me On, P. 21
Page35
critical of Christianity and how whites practiced Christianity,
he still maintained his devotion to Christianity in America in
spite of his exposure to criticism by associates and peers that
Christianity is “a white man’s religion”. I have always believed
that past life experience weighs in, one way or another, on how
our life path is directed. This is my opinion.
I have a reinforced pride and respect for The University of
Chicago. Mays recollects how he was denied entrance into many
northern colleges to which he applied. Being rejected by most of
the colleges he applied and upon receiving acceptance from the
University of Chicago, Mays received words of encouragement from
his Bates College professor, Halbert Haine Britan. Britan told
Mays he need not be concerned about his rejections because the
University of Chicago is far superior to all other colleges to
which he applied and was rejected.lvii I would argue that although
Mays was a balanced and extremely intelligent man in his own
right. There is an additional balance that is given to his
lvii Mays, Benjamin E., Seeking to be a Christian in Race Relations, P. 34
Page36
psychology by the positive experience he encountered form whites
that I will assume reinforced his own character to deal with
rejections based on racism in a disappointing, yet positive
manner. Again this is speculation but as mentioned previously,
past life experience is a source that weighs in on how we respond
to other situations we confront in life. This is my opinion.
Another influence Mays encountered while attending the University
of Chicago was the relationship he developed with Professor A.E.
Hayden, a humanist. Hayden believed man did not need to rely on
God, Jesus, traditional Christian religion, angels, heaven or
hell to build a world of peace, goodwill and justice. While the
views of Hayden challenged Mays’ own Christian beliefs he was
drawn to Hayden’s humanity and the value Hayden placed on the
human being. Hearing Hayden make a speech in Rockefeller Chapel
stating the “life of one child is more important than all of the
buildings put up on the University Campus”, created a lifetime
bonding between Hayden and Mays. Mays gives Hayden credit as
being an inspiration to his own life.lviii
Page37
That Mays held more moderate views regarding Christianity than
other of his contemporaries (Johnson, Woodson, Elijah Muhammad),
I believe the real impact of his value can be judged by his
influence on one of the greatest American human beings in history
(in my opinion), Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. (MLK). Few men in
history did as much as Dr. King to change American society. The
advancements made by Black people during his (MLK) lifetime and
caused by his (MLK) efforts of gave realization to the “idea of
God” as expressed by Dr. Benjamin E. Mays. It is clear to me that
the philosophy of Dr. Mays regarding the “idea of God” was
manifested in the Christianity and Civil Rights activity
practiced by Dr. King. More so, one can witness the Christianity
espoused by Mays in the actions, efforts, speeches and life of
Dr. King. I cannot help to consider the thought of the cost to lviii Mays, Benjamin E., Lord The People Have Driven Me On, P. 47
Page38
realize the “idea of God” as Dr. Mays advances and as Dr. King
put into action. The cost to implement the kind of Christianity
supported by Mays is evidenced in the price Dr. Martin L. King
paid, his life. What does this say about American Religion in the
20th Century? (See the attachments that indicate the relationship
between Dr. Mays and Dr. King. One can speculate and argue that
indirectly Dr. Mays was an architect of the Civil Rights
movement.
Following are some of the many letters of correspondence
exchanged between Dr. Mays and Dr. King that gives indication of
the closeness of their relationship, and the mutual value and
respect they shared for each other.
Page39
Page44
Correspondence November 29, 1963 (exhibit Mays to King)Atlanta, GA
Dr. Benjamin E. Mays writes to Dr. King shortly after President Kennedy's assassination to urge him
These are but a few of the letters of correspondence that speak to the relationship between Dr. Benjamin E. Mays and Dr. Martin L. King, Jr. Dr. King often requested the advice of Dr. Mays and keep him in the loop of his Civil Rights activity. Likewise Dr. Mays was reliant on the feedback of Dr. King for input on Morehouse College. Their relationship was personal as well as professional.
Primary Resources
Mays, Benjamin E., The Idea of God in Contemporary Negro Literature, University of Chicago Doctor of Philosophy Thesis Submission, Chicago Illinois, 1935
Mays, Benjamin E., The Negro’s God as Reflected in His Literature, Russell & Russell, New York, 1938, reissued 1968
Mays, Benjamin E., Seeking to be a Christian in Race Relations, Friendship Press, New York, New York, 1957.
Mays, Benjamin E., Born to Rebel: An Autobiography. Athens, GA, USA: University of Georgia Press, 2003.
Mays, Benjamin E. Lord, the People Have Driven Me On, Vantage Press, Chicago Illinois, 1981
Supplemental Secondary Sources
Jelks, Randall Maurice, Walking Integrity: Benjamin Elijah Mays, Mentor to Martin Luther King Jr., Mercer University Press, Macon GA., 1998
Jelks Randall Maurice, Benjamin Mays: Schoolmaster of the Movement, A Biography, University of North Carolina Press, Chapel
Page45
Hill, NC, 2012
Roper, John Herbert, Magnificent Mays: A Biography of Benjamin Elijah Mays, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, SC, USA:, 2012.
Dumas, Carrie M. and Hunter Julie, Benjamin Elijah Mays (A Pictorial life and Times), Mercer University Press, 2006
Chapman, Mark L. Christianity on Trial, Orbis Books, New York 1996
Colson, Freddie C., Dr. Benjamin E. Mays Speaks (Representative Speeches of a Great American Orator), University Press of AmericaInc., New York, 2002
http://www.thekingcenter.org/archive/theme/3088
End Notes
Page46