Basis of Structural Design Course 6 Structural action: -Foundations -General remarks on structural...
-
Upload
independent -
Category
Documents
-
view
1 -
download
0
Transcript of Basis of Structural Design Course 6 Structural action: -Foundations -General remarks on structural...
1
Basis of Structural Design
Course 6
Structural action:
- Foundations
- General remarks on structural action
Course notes are available for download athttp://www.ct.upt.ro/users/AurelStratan/
Foundations
� Most structures invariably rest on the ground
� The best solution would be to place the supports of a
structure on solid rock, but this is seldom possible
� In most cases solid rocks lies deep in the ground, with softer and weaker soil layers above it
� Relatively high stresses in the superstructure have to be safely transferred to the much softer and weaker soil.
This is done through foundations
2
Types of foundations
� Isolated footing
– Top soil layer is removed and a block of
concrete, wider than the one which rests
on it, is placed on the ground
– Plan dimensions of the isolated footing
need to be larger than the ones of the
column, in order to have lower stresses
at the foundation-soil interface
– Foundation dimensions should be large
enough to allow stresses acting on the
soil to be smaller than the soil strength
� Continuous footing: when the
structural member to be supported
by the foundation is a wall, the footing is realised continuously below the wall, following the concept of the isolated footing
Types of foundations
� Raft foundation:
– When the soil is very poor, larger
area is required for the foundation,
which extends over the full plan
dimension of the building
– Raft foundations were developed by
Romans, who built them from
hydraulic concrete several metres
deep
– Modern raft foundations are much
thinner, as they area realised from
reinforced concrete
– Raft foundations can be
constructed as a series of boxes,
with the walls in the basement
contributing to the strength of the
foundation and enabling thinner
slab
3
Types of foundations
� Isolated and continuous footings, and raft foundations
are shallow foundations:
– placed relatively close to the surface of the ground
– loads are transferred from the building to the soil by providing
large enough area of the foundation in order to reduce stresses
below the ones allowed by the strength of the soil
Types of foundations
� Pile foundations:
– Soil properties get better as the depth
increases. When the soil near the surface is
very poor, pile foundations can be used.
– Pile foundations are made of tree trunks (in
old times), steel or reinforced concrete (in
modern times)
– Loads are transferred to the soil through
shear stresses between the pile shaft and
the soil (major contribution) and
compression stresses at the bottom of the
pile (minor contribution)
– Piles are long, enabling them to reach
stronger and stiffer soil layers, or even
solid rock
– First pile foundations date back to Neolithic
period, and were made of tree trunks
4
Types of foundations
� Pile foundations:
– Without pile foundations, cities like Venice
and Amsterdam, located due to strategic
and economic reasons on marshes could
not have been developed at all
– Wooden piles were usually of oak or, in the
sea, of greenheart from Central America,
which is particularly resistant to marine
borers
– Pile foundations can be installed by either
driving them into the ground (wooden, steel
and precast concrete) or drilling a shaft and
filling it with concrete
� Piles are deep foundations, in which
loads are transferred to the soil by reaching deeper and stronger soil layers.
Types of foundations
� Cofferdam foundations
– Cofferdam is an enclosure beneath
the water constructed to allow
water to be displaced by air for the
purpose of creating a dry work
environment
– Were developed by Romans and
remained mainly unchanged until
the early 19th century
– Pneumatic caissons were then
invented, allowing underwater
foundations to be excavated,
keeping the water out by air
pressure. Difficult and expensive
to operate.
5
Failure of foundations
� Complete failures of foundations are rare, though they
may happen
– Example: Transcona grain silo, Winipeg , Canada. In October
1913, this grain silo started to tip over. It was loaded with over a
million bushels of wheat and was newly built. It continued to sink
slowly for over 12 hours until finally it was at an angle of 30
degrees from vertical but still intact. The wheat was emptied from
the bins, and work began to right it. By tunelling underneath it,
they built new foundations down to the bedrock and then pushed
it back into position. It is still in use today
Failure of foundations
� Complete failure of foundations are rare, though they may happen
– Example: Tilting of apartment buildings at Kawagishi-Cho,
Niigata, produced by liquefaction of the soil during the 1964
Niigata Earthquake
6
Foundation soil behaviour
� The biggest problem of foundations is soil settlement,
especially the differential settlement, of various parts of a
structure, leading to cracking and distortion of the superstructure
� Soil can vary greatly in composition from one point to
another, even under the same structure
� Soil properties are greatly affected by ground water
� Soil consists of a mass of solid particles (soil skeleton) of
sand and/or clay, more or less loosely packed, and the
spaces between them filled with water
� In an undisturbed soil the weight of the earth above is carried by solid particles, and the water in pores is at normal pressure of water at that level below the water table
Foundation soil behaviour
� Soil skeleton is much more compressible than water, and when an additional load (e.g. from a building) comes onto the ground,
– At first, the additional compressive stress in the soil is carried
entirely by water because it is stiffer than the soil skeleton
– The pore pressure increases and it is squeezed out sideways
from under the foundation
– Pore water pressure drops gradually back to normal values at that
depth, as the soil skeleton is compressed enough to carry itself
the loads
� In fine clays the water escapes slowly and the process of consolidation under a foundation can take many years
7
Foundation soil behaviour
� Problems due to settlement can arise when:
– Soil property changes at different points under the same structure
– When construction of the building proceeds fast (as is the case in
modern times)
– When an additional heavy load (e.g. a tower in old times) is added
after the bulk of the structure is completed and has settled
– Ground water is pumped out. Notorious instances: Venice and
Mexico-city
� Example: Venice
– Water supply in Venice originally came from mainland
– Starting from 1910, this was increasingly supplemented from
boreholes up to 300 m deep
– General subsidence of buildings (100-200 mm) ⇒⇒⇒⇒ extremely damaging to buildings as walls of most Venetian houses start at
only about 1 m above average sea level
Foundation soil behaviour
� Example: Mexico-city:
– Most of the city is built on a soft bed 30-40 m deep of a dried-up
lake
– Building settlement reached constant levels and was not a
problem
– In the 19th century pumping started from deep wells to
supplement water supply
– Today the ground level in the centre of the city is more than 6 m
lower than it was in 1900
– Old buildings, sewers and water pipes much affected
8
General remarks on structural action
� [1] Structures support loads in
the most direct way open to
them
– bowstring truss: if the top chord
has the right shape for the given
loading, loads pass directly to the
support, ignoring the web
members
– a lateral load at the top of a
triangular tower is transmitted
down the two main members while
the inner bars are unstressed
General remarks on structural action
� [1] Structures support loads in the most direct way open to them
– (a) the load applied at the top of a
column in the frame from the
figure goes directly to the
foundation through the column,
while the rest of structure is
virtually unstressed
– (b) if the direct path is interrupted,
the load path is much more
complicated, and the stresses and
deflections are greatly increased
– Rule: provide paths as simple and
as direct as possible for the loads
to pass to the supports
9
General remarks on structural action
� Characteristics of a well-designed structure:
– elements are few and well-disposed
– their function is obvious, and
– the whole effect inspires confidence
� well conceived structure
� ill-conceived structure
General remarks on structural action
� [2] The larger the structure,
– the more important is the own weight of the structure in
comparison with other loads
– the more important is that structural elements be arranged as
efficiently as possible
� Example: simply supported beam bridge
– moment larger at the midspan
– provide more material at the midspan
to increase the moment resistance
– larger loads at the midspan
– larger moments
– inefficient structural configuration
– Bridges using simply-supported beams are most often of
constant cross-section and are used for small spans only
Mmax
10
General remarks on structural action
� Example: cantilever
bridge
– the moment due to dead
weight is largest at the
support
– the material must be
concentrated at the
supports
– a load near the support
produces only a small
increase in moment
– efficient structure for large
bridges
General remarks on structural action
� [3] Statically indeterminate structures support loads in the stiffest mode open to them
– very often, load paths can take two alternatives: direct
tension/compression or bending
– a thin plate loaded transversally supports loads by bending but
direct (membrane) action develops rapidly as the plate deflects
– thin shells support transverse loads as far as possible by
compressive membrane forces rather than bending
11
General remarks on structural action
� [3] Statically indeterminate structures support loads in
the stiffest mode open to them
– sometimes simple change in a structure allows loads to be
carried in a more efficient way:
• portal frame with a concentrated load at the ridge develops bending stresses
• if a tie is inserted between the two sides of the eaves level. The two rafters and the tie form a triangulated structure. The loads are
transmitted through compression in the rafters, tension in ties,compression in beams, with negligible bending.
General remarks on structural action
� [4] Direct tension is preferable to direct compression
– it is rarely possible to avoid compression
– even in predominantly tension structures as suspension bridges,
tensile forces in cables must be balanced by compressive forces
in towers
– minimize the loss of efficiency due to compression by:
• keeping the compressive members short
• use a material (e.g concrete) with lower strength, and therefore more stocky members less prone to instability
� [5] In statically indeterminate structures, the stiffer elements will attract larger forces
– Example: portal frames are often
haunched near the corners
• further increase of bending moments at the corners though actual stresses reduce due increase of cross-section