BaryCenter Update IAndre Willers

6 Nov 2014

Synopsis :

BaryCenters are essential in understanding the identity of anything . You , and the particles that compose you . A way of looking at fractals .

Discussion :

1.Pulling together some threads .

See the Appendices below . After SupSup Appendix there is a separate numbering system , but don’t pay too much attention to it .

2. I have not included the structure of the AI(x) minds (like humans ). It is self-evident , and can be found elsewhere in the Blog “Andre’sWhy”

3. I have not included genetic structures or barycenters of virtual genome constructs . Too much .

4. The dear reader must fill in themselves the latest work on MOND . They’re still dancing on the heads of pins there .

5. No attempt has been made to correlate crumpled space-time with quantum effects or rogue swan effects

See http://andreswhy.blogspot.com/2014/09/rogue-swan-tech.html . Although one can intuit that crumpled space-time will translate as strange probabilistic effects .

Just swim through it and have fun !

See http://rt.com/usa/202255-many-interacting-worlds-quantum-mechanics/

Adding a finite number of tangential universes actually makes many problems in barycenters solve themselves .

It also makes a workable momentum tap theoretically possible .

Spindizzily Yours

Andre

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Appendix I

Barycenters , Stellar- and Proton StabilityAndre Willers

7 May 2011

Synopsis :A Barycenter inside an object's defined delineation radius destabilizes it .

Discussion :See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Center_of_mass for definitions of barycenters .

See http://andreswhy.blogspot.com/2011/04/slingshots-dark-matter-and-dark-energy.html

Suns :Our sun has a barycenter just outside it's surface , mainly due to Jupiter .

What does this mean ?

It means that Sol is not prone to massive eruptions that will sterilize the planets .

The same will be true for other Solar systems .

A barycenter inside the Sun will impart massive momentum surges to thenormal stellar processes , resulting in large EMP and particulate fluxes due to fusion in extra-solar environments (loops) . This would sterilize any life processes on planets .

Earth-Moon has a barycenter inside the earth . This means very large tides as well as active tectonics .Basically , the generation of life. Just enough destabilization .

Protons :Proton size has to be smaller than the barycenter distance from the proton's center .

If it is greater , it will decay .

If it doesn't , it's boundary is forever teasing the edges of instability . The half-life of protons can be calculated from this .

Substituting muons for electrons (see "NewScientist" 26 Mar 2011 p50 "Nuclear bad boys" ) led to a factor of about 4% reduction in the sizeof the proton .As expected . They did not mention decay products from proton breakdown .

This is actually a planar explosive (energy release along general proton spin axes) .

About 4% conversion of mass into energy .

It also means that a chain reaction is possible .

A really large bomb .

But , also , a space drive .

Spindizzy . Dirac equations apply .

What will Humans choose ?

Andre

Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Appendix II

Barycenters II :Spindizzy Matter-conversionPulse-rocket .Andre Willers

12 May 2011

Synopsis:Energy release from decrease in proton size is channeled partly into chain reaction , and partly into intensification of magnetic field . Once this grows over 10^16 Tesla , charged particles start forming outof the vacuum (starting with rho-mesons) . These short-lived particlesare usually more massive than electrons . So we have a short , intensepositive-feedback pulse where energy comes from proton and neutron decay , as well as vacuum energy as created particles are separated bythe really intense magnetic forces .

Discussion :References :

1. http://andreswhy.blogspot.com "Barycenters" 12 May 2011 Above

2. "NewScientist" 9 Apr 2011 "Magnets pluck current from void"

The Plan :1.Wrap a number of small packets of hydrogen(protons) in fine copper wire .

2.Pack them in-line in a tube with a heavy duty conductor wrapped around them for the proton-axis alignment .

3.In between them , put a doped layer of matter that decays into muons.

4.Pulse one end of the tube heavily with muons , while pulsing a heavycurrent through the big outer winding to align the protons .

Mass will be expelled at the other end (your jet)

5.Repeat . (Pulse)

6.Stand back far away . (Do not try this at home)

Negative EMP:A theoretical possibility .

All EMP pulses are flattened ("sucked up") into the formation of vacuum-particles .

Think matter rectifiers and matter transistors .

This will lead to ultra-collapsed matter . (Not neutronium , black hole or any squashed matter . Pure matter without any charge in stableconfigurations.)

Even a catalysis under certain conditions .

The radiation signature might be much smaller than supposed .

Properly balanced , it will be zero .

But when is the universe ever properly balanced ?

It is much more likely that Negative-EMP dominates .Which means a leaching effect on EM waves . It would seem as if wavelengths are growing longer as time goes on .

Sounds familiar ? (Hubble effect , universe expansion)

A neat twist on the Hoyle-Chandrasekhar Steady-State Universe . Instead of matter being continuously created , EM is being continouslydestroyed and transformed .

Conservation Principles :This set of Universes are characterized by Delineation : Delineation ,by definition , creates a Paired Principle: any delineated change is associated with another delineated change . Also known as Laws of Conservation of Energy , Mass , Information ,etc .

Trans-luminal effects :What happens to the information encoded in EM which is zeroized by Negative EMP?

The new home (a small particle-pair) has insufficient capacity to store much (order of 256 bits) , whereas the EM has potentially very large information content .

So , the information pops up somewhere else in this universe . And it is not limited by EM speed , by definition .

Hyperdrive :So , we only need to keep the information packets together . Which is an engineering problem .

Enclosing the spaceship in a shell of magnetic fields exceeding 10^16 Tesla will isolate it from the local space-time , enabling it to pop up at some other space-time coordinate . Sounds simple , but remember conservation of information .

The KISS principle applies with a vengeance .

Hyperdrive pilots will have to have a simplicity . Everybody will get lost in multiplicity .

Quantum Laundering :The problem is isolating the observer from quantum observer effects before and after the experiment .

Remember , it is time-independent , but complexity dependant .

We know the complexity of this set of universes is of the order of

1/dx * 1/dmv <= 2pi/h ….from Heisenberg uncertainty principle

<= 9.482514 * 10^33

This is the measure of Complexity of the Beth(0) Universe we find ourselves in .

See http://andreswhy.blogspot.com "Slingshots" 17 Apr 2011 above

Our problem is to find a sufficiently complex procedure that is simpleto execute in a repetitive fashion . Luckily this has already been done .

This is the Laundering Procedure :

It usually follows entropy , but this can be reversed (time travel)

An ordinary bridge card game (52 cards) where every card comes into play , has a maximum complexity of the order of 10^14 .

But add a joker or two , and the complexity rises to the order of 10^41 , bigger than the complexity of the underlying substrate Beth(0)universe .

Tarot cards are even higher .

Delicious !

If the experimenters played any poker with jokers , before or after the quantum experiment , it would affect the result .

Especially after the experiment .

Cold fusion is a case in point .

CERN should do this . But they only pay lip-service to the idea that the observer is an integral part of the process , never mind that the effect of the observer can be isolated by complexity protocols .

Hyperdrive Captains will have to be players of jokers or tarot .if they want to arrive at their advertised destinations .

Las Vegas Starport , anyone ?

Andre

Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Appendix III

Barycenters III : Spindizzy Theory Andre Willers

14 May 2011

Synopsis :Asymmetric orbitals around barycenters leads to lags between magnetic momentum and angular momentum of mass . This generates fluctuations in

G . The effect gets very pronounced if the barycenter is inside the definition horizon one of the particles involved .

Macro-asymmetric effects can be engineered (ie a space-drive)

Discussion :The relevant equation is the Locke derivation of the Dirac-Brackett equation :

G = (2*c/b) ^2 * (P/U)^2

Where

G=Gravitational Interaction between particles

C is lightspeed , b~0.25 , P is magnetic moment , U is Angular Momentum .

The Trick :1.P and U are divorced (lagged) in Barycenter descriptions .

The centers do not coincide .

2.G then varies . This averages out unless some rectifying element is applied .

Usually , this is simply dipping the barycenter below the definition horizon of a particle .

3.But you can apply precise EM lasers at beat frequencies to increase the lag .

This will biase G in the direction of the lasers .

In other words , a reactionless mass space drive .

Testing :This can be tested on university desk-top systems .

Tribute to James Blish .We don't need a Bridge on Jupiter .

But he was the Bridge .

May we see Cities in Flight .

Andre

Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Appendix IV

Barycenter IVAndre Willers

21 May 2011

Synopsis:Measurements of Big G (Newton's Gravitational Constant) have been warped by the hidden assumption that small g (Earth's gravitational attraction at the surface) remains constant . But it fluctuates depending on the barycenter .

Discussion :Measurement techniques :

Torsion Balance or Free-hanging pendulums .

See NewScientist 23 Apr 2011 p45

Both require the hidden assumption that the rate of change of g in two horizontal dimensions is zero .

But it is not .

The experimental apparatus is orbiting around the barycenter , changing the g vectors

And they did not compensate for this . After two centuries .

GRRR !

We expected better .

The order of G error (10^-4 ) fits the barycenter discrepancy .

Humans will have to do better than this if they expect to survive .

You get a big fat D minus .

Andre

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Appendix V

Dark Matter Update .

Andre Willers

28 Jun 2012

Synopsis :

Dark matter and energy are fictitious , but crumpled branes seem to bereal . This adds significantly to complexity . This reallity might notbe a simulated locale .

Discussion :

Briefly , slingshot-effects are sufficient to explain supposed gravitational anomalies . They simply exchange energy between rotatingmasses and linear kinetic energy . The momentum transfer is called the

slingshot effect . It also means that a significant percentage of the energy in the system is “in transit” , as it were . We are talking interstellar distances . It is a dynamical system . The observed effect is either an overmass or an undermass , depending on the dynamics of the in-transit momentum transferring masses .

The Crumpling of space-time from brane collisions actually increases the complexity of possible paths . Luckily , we can compute this from general theory (See Appendix I) . This is because of one of the few Hyperdimensional Theorems we know to be true : We can always find a set of dimensions , so that the distance R from the center of random Beth(0) movements is R=d*Square root of(n) , where d is a step and n is the number of steps .

This seems contradictory . But remember , these are deterministic systems . They only become random because of random constraints . Thus, constraints increase randomness by the same order that the constraints are random . If the space-time crumpling is beyond our understanding , it is ,by definition , random . Then we can use the Crumpled Paper Algorithm . See Appendix I .

See Appendix III for some Randomness .

Are we in a simulation ?

In Appendix I we derive mu=2.1773242 * 10^ (-4) , meaning ratio of volume-of-mass to volume in a Planck Universe that is crumpled.

This is another way of saying that the possible number of crumplings (N) is N=2^ (1/mu) (from Binomial distribution .)The degrees of randomness in the crumpling .Also a measure of the degree of complexity .N = 2^4592.7933 . A large number .

In Appendix II we derive a measure of complexity from observed Planck quantities and found it wanting in the complexity

stakes .

1/dx * 1/dmv <= 2pi/h ….from Heisenberg uncertainty principle <= 9.482514 * 10^33

But , the complexity of the crumpling completely overshadows the planck complexity .

Thus , if we are in a simulation , N will have to be drastically lower . In other words few and major folds in the space-time crumpling. These should be detectable . One thinks of black-holes . In an artificial locale , the number of black-holes per cubic parsec should give an indication . A nice little problem for the Dear Reader .

More likely , the number of singularities simply balance the values ofthe Planck values . Not cause , but in a dynamic balance .

What use is this argument , one might ask .

Well , you can make a super-battery . Spin a particle in a capacitor field . Very high energy densities can be achieved . Store energy in spin .

The Karma of Constraints .

Andre

Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

SupSup Appendix .

Appendix I

Crumpling Paper and Space-TimeAndre Willers23 Feb 2012

“The moving finger writes , and having writ , crumples it in random ruins.”With apologies to Omar Khayyam .

Synopsis:Crumpled paper gives a good approximation of spacetime as a membrane with clumpy masses .“Empty” spaces not occupied by the membrane gives an impression of dark matter .We derive an expression to give this ratio using Infinite Descentand Beth(0) Random Walk .

Discussion :1.The Crumpled paper :Consider a paper disk of radius r and thickness d .It's volume is then Vp=pi * r^2 * dDraw a line from the center to the edge , in steps of length d , over the edge , then back to the center Let nu=r/d , a measure ofthe thickness of the paper . Note that it is a pure number .

The number of steps in the line is then n0=(2r/d)+1But the number of steps to the edge of the original paper disk isn1=r/d=(n0-1)/2r=d*(n0-1)/2n0=2*nu+1

Vp=(pi*d^3*(n0-1)^2 )/4

Crumple it up in a way that is as random as flipping a coin (ie Beth(0) )

The Trick : The line we have drawn up above breaks up into randomvectors by rotating through a third dimension = crumpling into a ball .

We thus have a continuous line of random steps of known number ofsteps .In 3 dimensions , the mean square distance from the center then is known

R = d * (n0)^0.5 …. See true for all dimensions as long as all are of Beth(0) order of randomness.

Volume of crumpled ball Vb=4/3*pi*R^3The Ratio Vb/Vp = mu then gives the ratio of crumpled ball space to volume of paper mass .

Mu={4/3*pi*d^3 *n0^(3/2)} / (pi*d^3*(n0-1)^2 )/4Notice the d^3 term and pi cancels out . This has profound physical implications .This simplifies to

Mu=4*4/3*(n0^3/2/(n0-1)^2)Expressed as thickness of paper , nu , which is a pure number independent of metric chosen .mu=4*4/3(2*nu+1)^3/2 / (2*nu)^2mu=4/3*(2nu+1)^3/2 / nu^2This gives a quartic equation in nu , which can be solved exactlyalgebraically .(mu)^2*(nu)*4 – 2^7/3^2 *(nu)^3 – 2^6/3^2 (nu)^2 – 2^5/3^2 * (nu)^1 - 2^4/3^2 =0

Test it on A4 paper:A4 paper has thickness d~0,1 mm and r~150 mmnu=150/0,1nu=1500mu=4/3*(3001^3/2)/(1500^2)mu=0.097421589mu= 1- 0.90257841This means that the crumpled A4 paper ball encloses about 90% empty space .This agrees with experimental results . See NewScientist.

Note that the force applied does not matter . As long as the paper is untorn , mu will be the same .

How many times can it be folded ?

Solving the above (see below) gives mu=1 for about nu=14.7 to 14.8 .This means there are no empty spaces left to fold into .

This can get complicated , so I will keep it simple .Take a piece of paper and fold it . You then have a new piece of paper .The test-circle of same r will have double the thickness .Ie , nu will double .Between 7 and 8 folds , nu will hit the ceiling of mu=1 , regardless of the starting value of nu .This is the maximum number of paper folds , as confirmed from other sources .

Physical interpretations :Take an m-dimensional space . Randomness of order Beth(0) appliesequally to all . The underlying equalizer . Collapse it to three dimensions and let the third one approach single Planck lengths .Then we can use the above paper approximation . Notice how d cancels out except for an addition of 1 in final ratio .

What does it mean ?See the physical universe as a brane (ie sheet of paper) in a multiverse . Crumpling it means it has mass and singularities . Both are aspects of the same thing .An estimate of the number of singularities can be made from edgesand points in crumpled paper .

Can we crumple the paper to a ball that is just paper ?That is a particle .The answer is “Yes” .

Such crumpling means that mu=1 (no empty space in any dimension )This gives an quartic equation in nu that solves to four values ,other dimensions than three denoted by i=(-1)^0.5

See http://www.1728.org/quartic.htm for a calculatornu1= 14.722181 (this makes the physical particle universe possible . Mass .Nu2= - 0.004167 + i*0.49558 (Rotation :Spin :charge and

magnetism)nu3 = - 0.004167 - i*0.49558 (Rotation :Spin :charge and magnetism) notice the minus sign .Nu4= - 0.49164542 (quantum effects as the particles dither. Inertia?)

What does a negative nu mean ?nu=r/d . A negative nu means one of r or d must be negative .1.If r is negative , it can be interpreted as curled up dimensions , inside the “outside” dimensions as defined by i . See http:andreswhy.blogspot.com “ The inside of zero” Aug 20092.If d is negative , it can be interpreted as quantum effects . Aparticle does not “occupy” all the space . Likes hopscotch .3.But notice the the two are interrelated .The notorious observereffect . Where we place the minus sign between r or d .

There should be relationships between nu2 , nu3 and nu4 . Variousrotations between macro- and micro dimensions .This means the contraption is not symmetrical But we already know that ,

Physical constants :Things like charge , mass , etc should be derivable from these basics . Hint:use lots of crumpled paper .

There is hope . The fact that it is quartic equation , which is always solvable , means that the Universe can be understood . Complicated and perverse , but as long as you stick to Beth(0) randomness , it can be understood . For higher orders of randomness , good luck .

Dark Matter :I nearly forgot . Using Planck units , we can define the ratio ofthickness of the brane asnu=c*PlanckTime/(1*Planck Time)nu=c = 3*10^8This gives aMu=4/3*(2c+1)^3/2 / c^2Simplifying (c is very large) . This gives the approximation

mu=4/3* 2^1.5 / c^0.5mu=2.1773242 * 10^ (-4)mu = 1-0.999783357This means that 99.9783357 % of the universe can be interpreted as being “Dark Matter”.Ie with attractive and repulsive qualities . Basically empty space .May you have joy of that .

An interesting aside :Creative artists .How many pieces of paper does an artist need to crumple up and throw away before he finds something acceptable ?Something acceptable would translate to mu=1 . Thus , we can say 7-8 truly random foldings should give a result .The same holds for cryptanalysis or any attempt to find an unknown .Algorithm :Try 8 times , crumple , then put it aside and try again later .There is a quantum connection , strange as it might seem .

And what about a nice little Crumpling App for smartphones ?But the randomness should be from truly random tables , not pseudo-random generators .

Randomly yours.AndreXxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Appendix IISlingshots , Dark Matter and Dark Energy.Andre Willers17 Apr 2011

Synopsis :Dark matter and Dark energy are misinterpretations of slingshot effects where the probe-mass is not infinitesimal .In other words , they are observational artifacts .

Discussion .See http://andreswhy.blogspot.com "The Problem with Fields" Dec 2008Reproduced in Appendix A for ease of reference .

Field Theory assumes that Probe Masses can be infinitesimal . Yet, if we combine finite probe masses with SlingShot theory , a better fit to explain astrophysical anomalies is obtained . Alsomeson interactions .

Why Slingshot ?1. Because we do not have a theory of three interacting masses . But we can do it for two masses . But everything rotates and orbits . So , we can describe all moving delineated masses as interactions of two masses slingshotting .2. It is a valid mechanism for converting angular momentum into linear momentum .See Penrose Process (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penrose_process)And vice-versa .

The alert reader will notice reactionless drives and high-energy storage devices lurking in these seeming innocuous statements .

An Example :From http://www.mathpages.com/home/kmath114/kmath114.htmA simple slingshot , though the principles hold for more complex cases .

V2={(1-m/M)v1+2U1} / {1+m/M}

We choose not to let m be small relative to M . But we are also too lazy , ignorant and old to count every particle in a universe .

So we cheat and say : let x = m/M , then integrate v2 for 0 <= x =<1 .

This means that the probe mass m takes on finite values from zeroto our major mass M . This then includes subatomic and atomic andany other particles .

This gives valuesIntegral (v2) dx (from x= 0 to 1) = 2*ln(2)*(v1+u1) ………(1)Integral {(v2)^2} dx (from x= 0 to 1) = 2*(v1+u1)^2 – 4*ln(2)*v1*u1 + 1 ……(2)

Equation (1) tells you how to make an inertialess drive . The Spindizzy strikes again !

Equation (2) is an Energy equation and is responsible for all those horrible contortions of Mond (especially the last term of +1) .

It also tells you how to make stable , high , density energy storage devices .

Remember , magnetism is spin . If there is spin , there are Slingshots .

Galaxies seeming to orbit too close and fast/slow are simply exchanging slingshot masses (cf mesons)

Bits and pieces of the universe keep on flying around , creating space-time as they go.It depends on their entanglements . The present universe looks more like an amoeba , with tentacles shooting out . The extent ofspace and time depends on where you look.

Vacuoles ?Mini-universes created by tendrils of slingshot masses enclosing . Interesting spin effects as different tendrils have different velocities .These should be able to be created in the laboratory .

Complexity :

Invert the Heisenberg Principle to define the Complexity of a Beth(0) Universe .dx*dmv >= h/2pi ….Heisenberg uncertainty principle

Let 1/dx be all the possible values of x (ie the complexity of space)Let 1/dmv be all the possible values of momentum . (ie complexityof time)

1/dx * 1/dmv <= 2pi/h ….from Heisenberg uncertainty principle <= 9.482514 * 10^33This is the measure of Complexity of the Beth(0) Universe we findourselves in .

This almost certainly means that we are in a simulation .The Complexity of Beth(0) is too small .

But is it sufficient for open-ended complexity of Beth(>0) ?

I can intuit that there is a threshold .

Bah .

I can also intuit that we are probably on a chaotic boundary threshold . Go one way , and you recycle (Karma concept)Go another way , advance .

And it was designed this way .

Storming Heaven .Shooting tendrils of space-time into the multiverse will decreasethe Heisenberg constant , thereby increasing the complexity past the threshold of recycling .The Poor Civilization's Singularity .

The mass of the soul .

This can now be calculated from first principles from the complexity of momentum .It is about 4! gm = 24 gm relative to the surrounding universe simulation .And may you have joy of that .

May God have Mercy .

Andre

Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Appendix A

The Problem with Fields .Andre Willers21 Dec 2008

A sad tale of Hidden Assumptions and Fictitious Forces .

Our story begins with Isaac Newton about 400 years ago . He proved that radially symmetric bodies (like balls) can be treatedas a point-mass from a gravitational viewpoint as long as f=G*m(1)*m(2)/ (R^2) holds . This is his famous Law of Gravitation .

Fast forward to the Twentieth Century . Space probes were measured to have accelerations not predicted by expected theory .(See New Scientist 20 Sept 2008 p38 "Fly-by Fright." )

Fright indeed . Physical laws were under threat .It was first noticed with the Pioneer probes and stimulated the MOND (Google it) modification to Newton's Law . But the effect was small and controversial .

But then even a bigger shock came . Probes doing slingshots around the Earth (like Gallileo in 1992 , Near Shoemaker in 1998 ) showed such large divergences from expected velocities

after the slingshot that the matter could not be swept under the carpet anymore . (The favourite human response.)

Is our understanding of physics wrong ?

No .

What is going on ?

They treated planets as point sources in their programs .(Remember , these are the guys that mixed up newtons and poundalson the Mars probe) .

The Earth-Moon illustration .The system orbits around a common center of gravity which lies inside the Earth . Even school atlases' state this .

You can treat the Earth as a gravity point-source , but then you must include the Moon as well (and other bodies , but their effect is very small) .

The velocity change during the slingshot maneuver is dependant onthe Earth's rotation around the common center of gravity . The Earth-Moon rotational plane coincides roughly with the Earths equator . Hence the observational datum that the velocity change is proportional the difference in the angles incoming and outgoing with reference to the equatorial plane .

What is happening ? Are conservation laws being violated ?No .

Internal Slingshot .

It is simply a slingshot maneuver around a virtual mass .

The Earth-Moon rotating system is not radially symmetric . It is lumpy . The velocity change is dependant on a large number of factors , but can be calculated .

The energy comes from the weak coupling between angular momentum and linear momentum . From a really basic viewpoint , this can be easiest seen as the difference between a straight line touching a circle and the continuation of the circle . (Newton's laws measure forces by disturbances from a straight line .)

Another way of looking at it :The gravitational attractions on an outside probe of masses rotating around each other and about a common center of gravity do not cancel out . A small vector-residue is left . This is a dynamical effect . Movements only need apply .

This can be calculated ,But will vary in every instance .(A software-computer (General Theory) is not possible .) This is because there are three bodies involved :Earth , Moon and Probe .

The Three-body Problem has no general solution . This is well known in mathematics Now are you happy ?

Calculating this gravitational difference gives rise to a disturbing effect : the mathematical terms for the field probe does not vanish . In hindsight , a necessary effect because of the general insolubility of the Three-Body problem . But not obvious beforehand .

This is simply restating there is no general solution of the Three-body Problem .Two bodies plus a probe makes a three-body problem . Every case will be different . Use Chaos theory .

This will be true for any body in the solar System (ie Pioneer probes) , as well as any rotating set of bodies in this Universe .

The Field Assumption .Beloved of theoretical physicists , mainly because they are too lazy to do it properly .

The Classical definition is a probe mass , charge or whatever examined near the identifiable object . The forces the probe experience are defined as the Field . The Probe is then ignored .

This has the hidden assumption that the effect of the probe can be cancelled out .(Ie that it is really a Two-body Problem).

In most radially symmetric objects like balls or charges this canbe done .But , alas , it breaks down if the objects are lumpy . Then the pesky mathematical terms denoting the probe just won't go away .

Without the hidden assumptions about symmetry , error margins have to be specified .We cannot use our software computer (ie theory) to cancel out theinterference of our test-probe .

This is analogous to Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle , but notsimilar .

You have to understand levels of Randomness (See http://andreswhy.blogspot.com "NewTools " )Error-margins at Beth(x+1) level for Beth(x) levels can be made arbitrarily small (although maybe not zero) .

General Relativity and Tensors .This effect can be clearly seen if you use Ricci's Tensors to denote gravitational fields. This is the really general granddaddy of fields .

Tensor theory very clearly requires that tensors are only definedin continuous and differentiable spaces . (Rather amusing , sincethis takes place before any metric is assigned . Sub-Space !) Hence the problems with quantum gravity . A quantal system is by definition discontinuous . Trying to describe it by continuous methods is futile .

Or Bio-fields . Things are just too idiosyncratic for meaningful abstractions using fields .

Fictitious Forces .The major culprit is centripetal force (also known as centrifugalforce ) . This is a fictitional force to balance the theory's bookkeeping .

From the above you can see that a large composite body like a galaxy composed of many objects rotating around each other and all around a center will have a nett attraction either larger or smaller than by gravity alone .

If larger , objects that we observe to fall around it in orbit will have a higher speed than required by the fictitious centripetal force of purely gravitational attraction .Dark matter , anyone ?

If smaller , things fly apart .Negative Dark matter , anyone ?

If you look at the maths , being exactly the same will smack of design (The probability of this is very small for Beth(0) randomness ) .Stellar engineering on Beth(2) or Beth(3) scale .

Does this sound familiar ?

Dark Matter .Phlogiston , ahoy! Your buddy Dark Matter is coming .You can then dance the Ptolemaic Gavotte .

Can Fields be salvaged ?Maybe . But then horrible contortions are necessary . Dimensions writhe in semi-being . As a last resort , a marriage counselor might have to be called in .

But why bother ? There are better ways .

If you have to , assign error margins to every field-point and interact the error-margins . This will automatically result in spiky discontinuities . Gauss would have loved them , but unless you are as expert as he was, try the simpler route .

Once again , why bother ? Use Beth(x) systems .

And if you are feeling adventurous , try numbers that only exist at different Beth(x>1) levels .

Guaranteed to lose weight .

Andre .

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Appendix III

Orders of Randomness 2Andre Willers15 Aug 2008

See http://andreswhy.blogspot.com : “Orders of Randomness”

I have been requested to expand a little on orders of Randomness and what it means . Please note that human endeavours at this date use only randomness of the order of flipping a coin ( Beth(0) )

Aleph is the first letter of the Hebrew Alphabet . It was used byCantor to denote Classes of Infinity (ie Aleph(0) for Rational numbers , Aleph(1) for Irrational Numbers , etc

Beth is the second letter of the Hebrew Alfabet . It means “House”

I will first repeat the derivation of Orders of Randomness from http://andreswhy.blogspot.com : “Orders of Randomness” because itis so important .

----------------xxxxxxStart Quote:First , simple Randomness .Flip of a coin . Heads or Tails . 0 or 1Flip an unbiased coin an infinite number of times ,write it down below each other and do it again .All possible 0 and 1’s

An example : Beth(0)xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxFlips(1) 0,1,1,1,1,… etcFlips(2) 0,1,1,1,0,… etc.Flips(infinity) 0,0,0,0,0,0,…etcXxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

This describes all possible states in a delineated binary universe .“delineated binary” means a two sided coin which cannot land on it’s side .

Now draw a diagonal line from the top left of Flips(1) to Flips(infinity) . At every intersection of this diagonal line with a horizontal line , change the value .

The Diagonal Line of (0,1)’s is then not in the collection of allpossible random Horizontal coin-Flips(x) .

This means the Diagonal Line is of a stronger order of randomness.This is also the standard proof of an Irrational Number .

This is the standard proof of aleph numbers .Irrational numbers ,etcSince any number can be written in binary (0,1) , we can infer that the order of randomness is the same as aleph numbers .

This means we can use number theory in Randomness systems .Very important .

Google Cantor (or Kantor)

Define coin-flip Randomness as Beth(0) , analogous toAleph(0)Then we have at least Beth(1) , randomness an order stronger thanflipping a coin .Then we can theorize Beth(Omega) <->Aleph(Omega) .

End Quote----------------xxxxxx

Cardinal Numbers .

The cardinal number is the index x of Aleph(x) .Cantor proved thatAleph(n+1) = 2 ^ Aleph( n )

Where n is the cardinal number of the infinity .

Tying them together :He also proved that P(A) = 2^ n

Where A is any set , P(A) is the PowerSet of A and n is the cardinal number of set A Thus , Cardinal Number of P(A) =(n+1)

The PowerSet of A = the Set of all subsets of A . This sounds fancy , but it is simply all the different ways you can combine the elements of set A . All the ways you can chop up A . You can see it easily in a finite binomial expansion (1+1)^n = P(A) = 2^n

See http://andreswhy.blogspot.com : “Infinite Probes”There we also chop and dice , using infinite series .

Can you see how it all ties together ?

Why 2 ?This derives from the Delineation Axiom . Remember , we can only talk about something if it is distinct and identifiable from something else . This gives a minimum of 2 states : part or non-part .

That is why the Zeta-function below is described on a 2-dimensional plane , or pesky problems like Primes always boil down to 2 dimensions of some sort .

This is why the irrational numbers play such an important part inphysics .Z=a+ib describes a 2-dimensional plane useful for delineated systems without feedback systems

Its in the axiom of Delineation , dummy .

But we know that Russell proved that A+~A<Universum .The difference can be described as the Beth sequences . Since they are derivatives of summation-sequences(see below) , they define arrows usually seen as the time-arrows .

These need not to be described a-la-dunne’s serial time , as different Beth levels address the problem adequately without multiplying hypotheses .

Self-referencing systems and Beth sequences .

A Proper Self-referencing system is of one cardinal Beth number higherthan the system it derives from .Self-referencing systems (feedback systems) can always be described assequences of Beth systems . Ie as Beth(x) <-> Beth(y) . The formal proof is a bit long for inclusion here .

The easiest way to see it is in Bayesian systems . If Beth(x) systems are included , Bayesian systems become orders of magnitude more effective .

Life , civilization and markets are such . See below .

Conservation Laws :By definition , these can always be written in a form ofSomeExpression = 0

Random (Beth(0) Walk in Euclidean 2-dimensions This is a powerful unifying principle derived from the Delineation Axiom .

In Random Walk the Distance from the Center is = d * (n)^0.5 . This isa property of Euclidean systems .(Where d = step , n=number of random beth(0) steps)

Immediately we can say that the only hope of the Walker returning to the center after an infinity of Beth(0) steps is if d ~ 1/(n)^0.5 . This is the Riemann Hypothesis .

Now , see a Universum of 2-dimensional descriptors z=a+ib

Sum all of them . Add together all the possible things that can be thus described .

This can be done as follows :From z=a+ib Raise both sides to the ee^(z) = e^(a) . e^i(b)Raise both sides to the ln(j) power where j is real integers.j^(z) = j^(a) . e^(b/ln(j))

Now , sum them :Zeta=Sum of j^(z) for j=1 to infinity

Now we extract all possible statements that embody some Conservation Law . Beth(1)

This means that Zeta is zero for the set of extracted statements if and only if (b/ln(j)) is of the order of Beth(0) and a=(-1/2)

Tensors .The above is a definition of a tensor for a discontinous function .

Riemann’s Zeta function.This can describe any delineated system .If Zeta = 0 , conservation laws apply .

Zeta = Sigma(1/j )^z for j=1,2,3,…,infinity and z=a+ib , where z is complex and i =(-1)^0.5The z bit is in two dimensions as discussed above .

This function has a deep underlying meaning for infinite systems .If you unpack the Right-Hand side on a x-yi plane you get a graph thatlooks like a random walk .

If every point is visited that a random walk would visit over infinity(ie all) , without clumping , then Zeta can only be non-trivially zeroif a=(-1/2) .

Why (x – yi) plane ? See “Why 2 “ above . The system is fractal . Two dimensions are necessary in any delineated system .

Remember , randomwalk distance from origin = step*sqrt(number of steps) .

So if the steps = 1/ ( sqrt(number of steps) ) , then the Origin mightbe reached if and only if a= -1/2This is easily proven .

If a= - 1/2 , then b can be any real function . This would include Beth(0) and Beth(1) , but not higher orders of beth .

If a= -1/2 and b is an unreal number , then a cannot be equal to -1/2anymore . Conservation cannot hold at any level .

Consequences:Conservation Laws can only hold for Beth(0) and Beth(1) systems .

This is forced by the two dimensions of delineation .

Mathematically , this means that Beth(2+) systems of feedbacks can only be described in terms of attractors or/and fractal systems (ie not in isolation)

Physically , conservation of energy and momentum need not hold for Beth(2+) systems .

This has an interesting corollary in decryption (unpacking) . A Beth(2) mind unpacking Beth(0) or Beth(1) encryption is functionally equivalent to Non-Conservation of Energy .

Some other consequences :If a< -½ , then Riemannian Orbitals are described . Beth(any)Also described as nuclei , atoms .

If a> -½ , then a diffuse cloud is described . Beth(any)Also described as magnetic effects .

What does this mean?Present technology uses Beth(x) technology in a rather haphazard way .(Quantum physics) .

A better understanding will bring about a sudden change in capability.

Andrexxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx