Bacteria enclosure between silica-coated membranes for the degradation of organic compounds in...
-
Upload
brescia-it -
Category
Documents
-
view
0 -
download
0
Transcript of Bacteria enclosure between silica-coated membranes for the degradation of organic compounds in...
ARTICLE IN PRESS
0043-1354/$ - se
doi:10.1016/j.w
�Correspondfax: +39030 37
E-mail addr
Water Research 39 (2005) 2056–2064
www.elsevier.com/locate/watres
Bacteria enclosure between silica-coated membranes for thedegradation of organic compounds in contaminated water
Roberta Pedrazzania, Giorgio Bertanzab,�, Carlo Maffezzonia, Marina Gelmic,Nino Mancac, Laura E. Deperoa
aDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, INSTM, University of Brescia, Via Branze, 38, 25123 Brescia, ItalybDepartment of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering University of Brescia, Via Branze, 38, 25123 Brescia, Italy
cInstitute of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Brescia, P. le Spedali Civili, 1, 25100 Brescia, Italy
Received 22 April 2004; received in revised form 8 September 2004
Available online 10 May 2005
Abstract
A non-conventional technique is proposed for the enclosure of either pure bacterial cultures or entire biocoenoses, for
a possible utilization in the treatment of contaminated water. Biological components have been enclosed between
polyester membranes coated by silica films consisting of: (a) SiO2 and nitrocellulose, (b) SiO2, ZnS crystals and
nitrocellulose, (c) SiO2, TiO2 crystals and nitrocellulose, (d) SiO2, ZnS and TiO2 crystals and nitrocellulose.
Morphological, structural and mechanical features of membranes were investigated by means of optical and electron
microscopy, mercury porosimetry and wear resistance tests. Degradation kinetics have been finally studied by dipping
the entrapped biomass into aqueous solutions of three different model organic compounds (a-D-glucose, ethyl alcoholand peptone). Results are very promising: in fact, no metabolic inhibition mechanisms of microorganisms have been
evidenced. The porosity of the system allows mass transfer through the membranes, hence bacteria can grow and
degrade pollutants. Besides, by this system, cells are constrained, avoiding they to spread across the retainment scaffold.
r 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Biodegradation kinetics; Entrapped biomass; Membranes; Silica coating; Water treatment
1. Introduction
The removal of organic pollutants from surface and
groundwater is a demanding task (CLARINET, 2000;
US EPA, 2004) since human activities have caused wide
environment contamination phenomena which compro-
mise the water use for human consumption. Pollution
problems are correlated with the presence of both
inorganic (e.g., ammonia, nitrates, heavy metals, etc.)
and organic (e.g., chlorinated solvents, pesticides, PAHs,
e front matter r 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserve
atres.2005.03.013
ing author. Tel.: +39030 3715522;
15503.
ess: [email protected] (G. Bertanza).
etc.) substances. Common methods for water treatment,
and especially for contaminated groundwater remedia-
tion (like pump-and-treat, air sparging/bio-sparging,
chemical oxidation, etc.), are generally expensive and
often lead to the formation of harmful by-products.
The technique proposed in this paper is based on
biological degradation of pollutants by physically
encapsulated microorganisms. Due to physical features
of the tested system (see description below) its potential
application should concern the treatment of water
characterized by contaminants which are mainly
present in the dissolved form, such as, for instance,
groundwater and chemically physically pre-treated
surface water.
d.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
Fig. 1. Schematic representation of the experimental scaffold
fabricated for biomass enclosure.
R. Pedrazzani et al. / Water Research 39 (2005) 2056–2064 2057
Over the last three decades, the technology of
immobilized biologicals has greatly expanded in several
fields, ranging from synthetic and analytical chemistry,
to environmental monitoring and technology, medical
diagnostics and proteomics (Wijffels and Tramper, 1995;
Leenen et al., 1996; Tartakovsky et al., 1996; Gill and
Ballesteros, 2000a). Bioimmobilizates often require
stringent constrains in order to allow their application.
The major issues are the physico-chemical stability of
retaining matrix and immobilized biologicals, especially
in relation to performances in gaseous and liquid media
under biologically, chemically, and physically aggressive
conditions. Encapsulation is the most widely used
technique for immobilizing biological components
(O’Reilly and Scott, 1995; Nassif et al., 2002): synthetic
polymers can be obtained via sol–gel or non-sol–gel
processes (Gill and Ballesteros, 2000b; Viitala et al.,
2002). Sol–gel processes are generally based on hydro-
lysis, condensation, and polymerization of metal-alk-
oxides and yield matrices of defined porosity and
thickness, optically transparent, which are chemically,
thermally and dimensionally stable (Hench and West,
1990; Dunn et al., 1998; Chia et al., 2002). Sol–gel synthesis
of inorganic glasses is performed at room temperature,
thus enabling metabolic functioning of incorporated
biologicals (Avnir et al., 1994; Dunn et al., 1998). Proteins,
bacterial, algal, fungal and yeast whole cells are not
inhibited by the entrapment in the silica matrix, since its
porosity allows small molecules to diffuse into the matrix
itself (or to be spread out of the glass coating) (Dunn et al.,
1998; Carturan et al., 2000a; Carturan et al., 2000b).
Finally, as stated in literature (Tartakovsky et al., 1996;
Gill and Ballesteros, 2000a; Cohen, 2001; Viitala et al.,
2002), sol–gel-derived silica biomaterials are characterized
by mechanical stiffness and long-term stability.
The aim of the present study was to enclose biomass
between polyester membranes whose physical character-
istics were implemented by SiO2, SiO2/ZnS, SiO2/TiO2,
and SiO2/ZnS/TiO2 coatings (subsequently: S, SZ, ST,
SZT). A colloidal silica precursor was simply evaporated
to form an amorphous unstructured silica film. The
utilized method, indeed, differs substantially from
sol–gel chemistry (which is restricted to polymers
derived from the controlled reaction of silicon alkoxide
precursors) and was proposed because of silica biocom-
patibility and chemical stability, simplicity of the
manufacturing procedure, easy availability of employed
materials on the market and low costs (preliminary
investigations have shown that there should be an
appreciable saving, with respect to the use of conven-
tional synthetic membranes or other conventional
groundwater treatment systems commonly employed in
environmental applications) (US EPA, 2001; Van der
Roest et al., 2002).
A further nitrocellulose coating was also used in order
to prevent the crumbling of silica structure (this is very
important in view of the supposed applications), despite
the possible increase of the diffusion limitations.
Experimental tests focussed on the evaluation of
bioactivity and viability maintenance of entrapped
biomass.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Experimental scaffolds for bacteria retention
Biomass (in the form of slurry: see below) was
retained between two polyester membranes (mesh:
71.55, expressed in cm, thread: 55 mm), which were
tightened by a stainless steel frame (30 cm in length,
15 cm in width) and completed with four different
coatings: S, SZ, ST or SZT, respectively (see Fig. 1).
Polyester membranes provide a robust physical
support for the silica-based layer; the latter controls
the porosity of the inert barrier in order to avoid the
biomass to spread across.
Silica medium consisted of a colloidal suspension of
SiO2 (Du Pont) in which TiO2 and/or ZnS crystals
(average particle diameter: 27.7mm for ZnS and 0.25mmfor TiO2) were dispersed. SiO2 and ZnS crystals were
mixed in a 6–4 w/w ratio; colloidal SiO2 and TiO2
crystals were mixed in a 9–1 w/w ratio. The four
different dispersions (S, ST, SZ, SZT) were deposed on
the polyester membrane obtaining a homogeneous layer.
Samples were then heated at 80 1C for 10min for drying.
Since the silica layer is fragile and easily crumbles, as
stated above, an additional nitrocellulose coating was
deposed so as to improve the physical features of the
membranes. Cellulose nitrate (Aldrich) was dissolved in
amyl acetate (Aldrich) in a 12.5–87.5 w/w ratio. The
nitrocellulose amyl acetate solution was then sprayed
onto both sides of the membrane. Then, the amyl acetate
was evaporated by heating at 80 1C for 5min.
Biomass was taken from the oxidation tank of a
municipal wastewater activated sludge treatment plant,
since biodegradation kinetics, biotic structures,
ARTICLE IN PRESSR. Pedrazzani et al. / Water Research 39 (2005) 2056–20642058
physiological and metabolic patterns are well known
(Henze et al., 1997). Activated sludge was centrifuged
(5000 rpm, 5min) so as to obtain slurry with high
biomass concentration (about 7 g/L of volatile dry
matter). The slurry (50mL) was finally placed between
two membranes, sealed with silicone (see Fig. 1).
2.2. Characterization of preformed membranes
Microscopy investigations: Membrane structure was
investigated by means of optical and electron micro-
scopy techniques: a Reichart-Jung MeF3 optical micro-
scope (for metallography) and a Cambridge Stereoscan
260 SEM microscope were, respectively, used.
Porosity: Coatings porosity and pore size distribution
were monitored by a PASCAL 240 mercury porosi-
meter, which allows to determine pore size and volume,
in the range of 3.7 and 7500 nm radius and with a
volume resolution of 0.1mm3, by means of mercury
intrusion at high pressure (up to 200MPa). Porosity
analyses were performed on membrane samples of about
700 cm2 (5 g weight).
Membrane retention efficiency and biomass viability: A
preliminary experiment was aimed at verifying both the
biocompatibility of scaffolds (biomass viability) and
their biomass retention effectiveness. This test was
performed preparing a scaffold in which only Escher-
ichia coli was introduced. This apparatus was dipped
into 3L of sterile buffered peptone water (Biolife) and
maintained at a temperature of 37 1C with sterile air
blowing for 2 weeks. Samples of the contact solutions
(10mL, 4 replicates) were taken after 1, 2, 7, 14, 28 days
and submitted to E. coli determination after incubation
(at 44.570.2 1C, for 24 h) in agar plates with Tryptone
Bile X-Glucuronide Medium (Oxoid). After 28 days,
surface sampling was also carried out (4 cm2 surface, 4
replicates), in order to exclude the presence of E. coli
attached onto the external side of membranes.
Dehydrogenase activity was monitored at the begin-
ning and at the end of the test, taking bacteria samples
(1mL sample, 2 replicates) from the apparatus, in order
to assess biomass viability (Andreottola et al., 2002).
Wear resistance: Mechanical tests were carried out to
verify coatings wear resistance under turbulent water
conditions. Membranes were maintained in water for 1
month. This period of time was defined considering that,
in a supposed practical application, membranes should
be substituted every month, due to biomass metabolism
constrains. Turbulence was obtained by rotational
movement of the scaffolds or air blowing. Water
samples were taken at fixed time intervals and Si, Zn
and Ti concentrations were measured in order to check
possible coating failures and consequent metal
release.
The apparatus was fixed to a rotating shaft and
dipped into 3L of distilled water. It was continuously
rotated (40 rpm) for a week. After 64 and 167 h contact
water was replaced and 500mL samples were taken and
submitted to Si, Zn and Ti analyses.
Afterwards, the same apparatus was dipped into 2.7L
of distilled water and air diffusers were placed under the
scaffold. After 64 h, contact water was replaced and a
500mL sample was taken. The same operations were
repeated after 232 and 569 h.
In all cases, contact water samples were filtered using
polycarbonate membranes (Nuclepores Track Etch
membranes, Whatman); both filtered water and mem-
branes were digested with fluoridric acid and then
submitted to ICP analyses which were performed by
means of ICP-AES Jobin Yvon Sequential Spectrometer
JY24.
Besides, coatings surface was periodically monitored
with optical microscope.
2.3. Pollutants degradation efficiency
The evaluation of the organic pollutants degradation
capability was assessed by means of laboratory tests
carried out in batch conditions by comparing metabolic
activity of free and encapsulated cells.
Five parallel experimental runs were performed, for
testing free biomass (as a reference) and biomass
enclosed between S, SZ, ST, SZT preformed coated
membranes, respectively. Microorganisms were dipped
into 6L distilled water tanks; at different time intervals,
nutrients (K2HPO4, KH2PO4 � 3H2O, NH4NO3, NaCl,
Carlo Erba Reagenti) and different carbon sources
(respectively, (a) a-D-glucose, Carlo Erba Reagenti; (b)
ethyl alcohol—anhydrous, denatured with 5% isopropyl
alcohol and 5% methyl alcohol-, Aldrich and (c)
buffered peptone water, Biolife) were dosed. Carbon
compounds were dosed so as to reach a COD
concentration of about 150–200mg/L, while nitrogen
and phosphorous were added in such amounts to avoid
nutrients to be a limiting factor for bacterial activity.
Table 1 shows the composition of ethyl alcohol and
glucose stock solutions and peptone powder employed
for substrates dosage.
The test baths were agitated by means of magnetic
stirrers and dissolved oxygen was supplied by an air
blower throughout the test. Microorganisms degrada-
tion activity was evaluated by measuring the COD and
TOC residual concentration, at fixed time intervals.
Inorganic nitrogen compounds concentration was also
determined. Temperature, pH (WTW Inolab pH meter)
and dissolved oxygen concentration (WTW oxymeter)
were on-line monitored. pH and dissolved oxygen were
adjusted respectively at 8.0 and 6.0mg/L. COD, TOC
and nitrogen concentration measurements were per-
formed accordingly with IRSA-CNR methods (IRSA-
CNR, 1994).
ARTICLE IN PRESS
Table 1
Composition of stock solutions and peptone powder employed during degradation bench tests
Ethyl alcohol stock solution (g/L) Ethyl alcohol NH4NO3 KH2PO4 K2HPO4 � 3H2O
5 3 0.086 2
Glucose stock solution (g/L) Glucose NH4NO3 KH2PO4 K2HPO4 � 3H2O
10 3 0.086 2.56
Biolife peptone powder (%w/w) Peptone NaCl Na2HPO4 NaH2PO4
50 25 17.5 7.5
R. Pedrazzani et al. / Water Research 39 (2005) 2056–2064 2059
2.4. Mass balances
For a more accurate analysis of degradation processes
during bench tests, and for an approximate mass balance
determination, the following phenomena were considered:
�
organic substrate degradation (both under aerobicand anoxic conditions);
�
cellular lysis and consequent nitrogen release;�
nitrification and denitrification.Process simplified modelling was developed through
the following steps:
(1)
(Removed N)/(removed COD) ratio determinationNitrogen, in the form of ammonia, is assimilated
during organic substrate degradation both under
aerobic and anoxic conditions (biomass growth).
Besides, nitrogen in the form of nitrate is denitrified
under anoxic conditions.
The amount of ammonia required for biomass
production depends on the organic substrate being
degraded and can be calculated if the yield constant
Yobs is known. This can be approximately estimated
for every batch test from experimental data calcu-
lating the actual biomass growth as the difference
between maximum growth [ ¼ Ymax� (degraded
organic substrate)] and decay [ ¼ (decay rate) �
(amount of biomass) � (duration of the test)],
assuming that maximum yield constant (Ymax) and
decay rate are the same for aerobic and anoxic
conditions. Based on this simplified approach,
calculated Yobs values range from 0.26 to 0.45 and
from 0.39 to 0.65 (g biomass COD/g substrate
COD), respectively, for ethyl alcohol and glucose
(depending on several factors such as duration of
the test, F/M ratio, temperature, etc.), where
assumed values for Ymax are 0.55 (g biomass
COD/g substrate COD) for ethyl alcohol and 0.75
(g biomass COD/g substrate COD) for glucose
(Dircks et al., 1999) and assumed decay rate is
0.08–0.10 d�1 as a function of temperature (Henze
et al., 1997). For instance, assuming for Yobs the
values 0.454 (for ethyl alcohol) and 0.647 (for
glucose), obtained during one of the experiments
carried out, the biomass growth equations are the
following:
C2H5OHþ 0:272NH3 þ 1:640O2
! 0:272C5H7NO2 þ 0:640CO2 þ 2:456H2O; ð1Þ
C6H12O6 þ 0:777NH3 þ 2:115O2 ! 0:777C5H7NO2
þ 2:115CO2 þ 4:446H2O; ð2Þ
where C5H7NO2 is the generic composition of
biomass (Henze et al., 1997).
From the above equations, the mass ratio nAER
between assimilated N and COD degraded under
aerobic conditions can be easily calculated, respec-
tively, for ethyl alcohol and glucose:
nAER; C2H5OH ¼ 0:0396g N
g COD,
nAER; C6H12O6¼ 0:0565
g N
g COD.
Similarly, ethyl alcohol and glucose degradation
under anoxic conditions can be described as follows
(provided that the organism assimilates ammonium):
C2H5OHþ 1:312 NO�
3 þ 0:272 NHþ
4 þ 1:040 Hþ
! 0:272 C5H7NO2 þ 0:656 N2
þ 0:640 CO2 þ 3:112 H2O; ð3Þ
C6H12O6 þ 1:692 NO�
3 þ 0:777 NHþ
4 þ 0:915 Hþ
! 0:777 C5H7NO2 þ 0:846 N2
þ 2:115 CO2 þ 5:292 H2O; ð4Þ
leading to the same mass ratios nANOX (assimilated
nitrogen/degraded COD) as calculated for aerobic
conditions:
nANOX; C2H5OH ¼ nAER; C2H5OH ¼ nC2H5OH ¼ 0:0396g N
g COD,
nANOX; C6H12O6¼ nAER;C6H12O6
¼ nC6H12O6¼ 0:0565
g N
g COD.
From Eqs (3) and (4) the mass ratio n0 between
denitrified nitric nitrogen and degraded COD can
ARTICLE IN PRESSR. Pedrazzani et al. / Water Research 39 (2005) 2056–20642060
also be calculated by observing that denitrification
of 1mole of NO3� requires 1mole of C2H5OH or
1mole of C6H12O6. Resulting n0 coefficients are the
following:
n0
C2H5OH ¼ 0:1911g N2NO�
3
g COD,
n0
C6H12O6¼ 0:1230
g N2NO�
3
g COD.
(2)
Determination of N–NH4+ deriving from cellularlysis
Biomass decay and consequent cellular lysis increase
the ammonia nitrogen content in the bulk liquid
(10%, being the typical nitrogen content in the
biomass expressed as volatile solids) (Metcalf and
Eddy Inc., 1991).
Biomass concentration was known; thus considering
a decay rate of 0.08–0.10 g VSS/g VSSd (as a
function of temperature) it was possible to obtain
the amount of nitrogen release due to biomass decay
and cellular lysis.
(3)
Evaluation of actually removed N–NH4+Ammonia nitrogen amount was calculated (based
on the measured concentrations and the water
volume) at the beginning ([N–NH4+]0) and at the
end of the test ([N–NH4+]END); by calculating
N–NH4+ produced from cellular lysis ([N–NH4
+]L)
as described in step (2), the actually removed
nitrogen ([N–NH4+]REM) could be evaluated as
follows:
½N2NHþ
4 �REM ¼
½N2NHþ
4 �0 � ½N2NHþ
4 �END þ ½N2NHþ
4 �L.
(4)
Evaluation of assimilated nitrogenCOD concentration was measured at the beginning
and at the end of the test, allowing the calculation of
the amount of degraded COD ([COD]DEG). Assimi-
lated nitrogen ([N]ASS) was calculated by the
following equation:
½N�ASS ¼ n½COD�DEG,
n being calculated in step (1).
(5)
Evaluation of nitrified nitrogen:On the basis of the amount of removed ammonia
nitrogen ([N–NH4+]REM) and assimilated nitrogen
([N]ASS), nitrified nitrogen ([N–NH4+]NIT) was
calculated:
½N2NHþ
4 �NIT ¼ ½N2NHþ
4 �REM � ½N�ASS.
(6)
Evaluation of denitrified nitrogenThe denitrified nitrogen ([N]DEN) was obtained based
on the amount of oxidized nitrogen forms at the
beginning and at the end of the test ([N–NOx�]0 ,
[N–NOx�]END) and of nitrified nitrogen
([N–NH4+]NIT), as follows:
½N�DEN ¼ ½N�NO�
X �0 � ½N�NO�
X �END þ ½N�NHþ
4 �NIT,
where
½N�NO�
X � ¼ ½N�NO�
2 � þ ½N�NO�
3 �.
(7)
Determination of COD degraded under anoxicconditions
COD degraded under anoxic conditions ([COD]ANOX)
was calculated, depending on the specific organic
substrate, based on the amount of denitrified
nitrogen, as follows:
½COD�ANOX ¼½N�DEN
n0.
(8)
Determination of COD degraded under aerobicconditions
Finally, COD degraded under aerobic conditions
([COD]AER) was calculated as a difference be-
tween COD degraded during the overall process
([COD]DEG) and the amount of COD degraded
under anoxic conditions ([COD]ANOX):
½COD�AER ¼ ½COD�DEG � ½COD�ANOX.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Characterization of preformed membranes
Microscopy investigations: Micrographs (Fig. 2) show
that: SiO2 homogeneously covers the polyester structure
(A) presenting irregular fissures; ZnS crystals (B) seems
to reduce the fissure size while TiO2 (C) tends to
decrease the overall cracking.
Porosity: As a result of porosity tests, the cumulative
distribution of pore volume with respect to pore
diameter was obtained. Experimental data were pro-
cessed by means of a Savitzky–Golay algorithm. Fig. 3
shows a significant difference in coatings pore size
distribution, depending on ZnS and TiO2 crystals
presence. S and ST coatings are characterized by two
main pore diameter domains: 3–5 and 7–9 mm range,
respectively. On the other hand, SZ and SZT coatings
are monodispersed with a pore diameter of 4–5 mm.
Whichever is the cause of two distribution functions of
membrane S (we have to consider that dead volumes are
also measured with the employed technique, so surface
defects can be revealed), the presence of TiO2 (average
particle diameter: 0.25 mm) does not modify significantly
the distribution of pore diameters, although the amount
of larger pores is decreased. In membranes containing
ARTICLE IN PRESS
Fig. 2. Micrographs (SEM) of S (A), SZ (B), ST (C) membranes.
0
0.0005
0.001
0.0015
0.002
0.0025
100 1000 10000 100000
dV
/dD
[m
m3/
nm
]
SSTSZSZT
Pore Diameter [nm]
Fig. 3. Plot of (dV/dr) vs. log (D) for S, SZ, ST, SZT coatings.
R. Pedrazzani et al. / Water Research 39 (2005) 2056–2064 2061
ZnS, these crystals (average particle diameter: 27.7 mm)
reduce the porosity (large cavities and defects are
avoided due to ‘‘filling’’ effect of ZnS) hence a
monodispersed pore distribution resulted. In this case,
the further addition of TiO2 leads only to a broader pore
size distribution.
Membrane retention efficiency and biomass viability:
All E.coli determinations (water and surface samples)
led to absence of bacterial growth on agar plates, thus
showing that no biomass leakage occurred under the
tested conditions.
Dehydrogenase activity tests after 28 days showed the
maintenance of respiratory activity, the average mea-
sured concentration of monoformazans being equal to
11.5mg TPF/mg VSS (free biomass, at the beginning of
the test) and 10.8mg TPF/mg VSS (entrapped biomass,
at the end of the test).
Wear resistance: Optical microscope observations (not
shown) performed during the test did not highlight any
significant structural change on membrane’s coatings.
Besides, Zn, Si and Ti were never detected in contact
water (concentration o5mg/L for Zn and concentration
o9mg/L for Si and Ti). These data suggest a good wear
resistance of all types of silica coatings.
3.2. Pollutants degradation efficiency and mass balances
As far as bioactivity is concerned, Fig. 4 displays, as
an example, only COD concentration time profile
measured in case of S and SZ membranes. As a first
point, it can be seen that different behaviours occurred
with the same substrate (see dosage 1 and dosage 3 for
ethyl alcohol). This was probably due to the lack of
bacteria acclimation in the case of dosage 1 (for ethyl
alcohol) and dosage 2 (for glucose). As a second point,
the degradation rate was higher for glucose and ethanol
and lower for peptone (see dosages 3, 4 and 5); this was
likely caused by molecular complexity of peptone in
comparison with glucose and ethanol.
Considering the nitric nitrogen time profile (Fig. 5), it
appears as the difference between free and enclosed
biomass. Enclosed bacteria were able to remove nitrates
through denitrification. It can be supposed that deni-
trification occurred within the inner layer of biomass,
where anoxic conditions could be established.
Fig. 6 displays the results of mass balance calcula-
tions; the example of glucose as organic substrate is
shown. Fig. 6 summarizes all results obtained with
different types of membrane coatings. Only data
referring to acclimated biomass are reported (for
instance, in the case of S and SZ membranes, only data
concerning dosage 5 are plotted, while dosage 2 is not
considered). It can be observed that no appreciable
differences in COD removal were obtained with
different apparatuses but S and SZ membranes showed
higher removal rates (COD was degraded in 28 h) even if
temperature was relatively low (14 1C). It can be
supposed that in TiO2-coated structures mass transfer
through the membranes was delayed, for instance, due
to a lower global porosity.
In general, there was a high N removal, also thanks to
denitrification, which, actually, did not always occur at
the same extent. In fact, if tests carried out with ST and
SZT membranes (in which glucose was added twice at
different times) are considered, it can be seen that in one
case denitrification was less efficient and a lower COD
degradation under anoxic conditions was obtained. It is
worth noting that aerobic COD degradation was faster
ARTICLE IN PRESS
0
50
100
150
200
250
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360 380 400
time [h]
SiO2 (S) SiO2+ZnS (SZ)
Dosage 5Glucose +nutrients
Dosage 2Glucose +nutrients
Dosage 3Ethyl alcohol +nutrients
Dosage 4Peptone
413.25
Dosage 1Ethyl alcohol +nutrients
CO
D [
mg
/L]
Fig. 4. COD time profiles obtained during substrate degradation tests (S and SZ membranes).
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360 380 400
N-N
O3-
[mg
/L]
SiO2 (S) SiO2+ZnS (SZ) free biomass
Dosage 1Ethyl alcohol +nutrients
Dosage 3Ethyl alcohol +nutrients
Dosage 2Glucose +nutrients
Dosage 4Peptone
413.25
Dosage 5Glucose +nutrients
time [h]
Fig. 5. N–NO3� time profiles obtained during substrate degradation tests (S and SZ membranes in comparison with free biomass).
R. Pedrazzani et al. / Water Research 39 (2005) 2056–20642062
than aerobic/anoxic removal. This phenomenon (which
was observed also in the case of ethyl alcohol) can be
explained by considering that denitrification can be
affected by the COD concentration gradient through the
membranes. When the diffusional velocity of organic
substrate allows organic matter to reach the anoxic
zone, denitrification can occur. But, if the diffusional
resistance is increased (for example, due to the
accumulation of degradation by-products on the inner
surface of the membrane which, as a consequence, are
clogged), COD is mainly degraded in the aerobic zone
and partial denitrification occurs. Then, the membranes
porosity and consequently their behaviour are also
influenced by the working time.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
Fig. 6. Results of mass balance calculations (glucose): substrates (expressed in mg substrate/L contact solution) removed during
degradation tests. Dt ¼ time required for substrate degradation.
R. Pedrazzani et al. / Water Research 39 (2005) 2056–2064 2063
4. Conclusions
A novel approach for the realization of a simple and
cheap system for biodegradation of dissolved organics in
contaminated water was proposed: biomass was en-
closed between polyester membranes coated with silica
films consisting of: (a) SiO2 and nitrocellulose; (b) SiO2,
ZnS crystals and nitrocellulose; (c) SiO2, TiO2 crystals
and nitrocellulose; (d) SiO2, ZnS and TiO2 crystals and
nitrocellulose. The system was submitted to several tests;
the following considerations can be drawn:
�
Membrane physical features are affected by the typeof coating: in particular, ZnS crystals reduce the pore
size (a pore diameter domain of 4–5mm was
measured) and leads to a monodispersed pore
distribution curve, while a further TiO2 addition
slightly increases the dispersion around the mean
value. The final nitrocellulose coating avoids that
silica-based layers crumble under turbulent condi-
tions.
�
Obtained features allow the diffusion of substrates(organics, nutrients, oxygen) from the bulk liquid
through the membranes and the enclosed biomass
avoiding its metabolic inhibition; on the contrary, the
biomass cannot spread across the retainment scaf-
fold, so uncontrolled bacteria diffusion into the
surrounding environment is prevented. Indeed, since
bacteria size (E. coli was used in this test) is of the
same order of magnitude of the measured pore
diameters, it can also be supposed that the nitrocel-
lulose layer plays an important role in this issue.
�
Substrate degradation tests (carried out by entrap-ping activated sludge from a municipal wastewater
treatment plant) showed that TiO2 coating delays the
mass transfer of substrates through the membranes,
since with ST and SZT membranes COD removal
ARTICLE IN PRESSR. Pedrazzani et al. / Water Research 39 (2005) 2056–20642064
rate was lower with respect to the rate obtained with
S and SZ membranes. Global porosity was supposed
to be reduced by TiO2 presence.
�
Both aerobic and anoxic processes (with N–NO3-denitrification) could take place at a different extent
within the membranes depending on the substrate
diffusional velocities with respect to the degradation
rates.
In conclusion, even if further investigations are
required for the optimization of material synthesis and
for its testing under different environment conditions
(characteristics of ‘‘target’’ compounds and conse-
quently selected bacteria, flow regime, temperature,
pH, dissolved oxygen concentration, working time,
etc.), the first series of tests has shown the feasibility of
this approach. ZnS crystals are important in homo-
genizing the porosity, while TiO2 seems to decrease the
system performance. Finally, nitrocellulose plays an
important role for both material stability and bacterial
escape prevention.
There is a patent pending on this technique.
References
Andreottola, G., Baldassarre, L., Collivignarelli, C., Pedrazza-
ni, R., Principi, P., Sorlini, C., Ziglio, G., 2002. A
comparison among different methods for evaluating the
biomass activity in activated sludge systems: preliminary
results. Water Sci. Technol. 46 (1–2), 413–417.
Avnir, D., Braun, S., Lev, O., Ottolenghi, M., 1994. Enzymes
and other proteins entrapped in sol–gel materials. Chem.
Mater. 6, 1605–1614.
Carturan, G., Campostrini, R., Dal Monte, R., 2000b.
Secondary metabolites from cells immobilized by a SiO2
sol–gel layer. In: Tundo, P., Anastas, P. (Eds.), Green
Chemistry. Challenging Perspectives. Oxford University
Press, New York, pp. 61–78.
Carturan, G., Dal Monte, R., Muraca, M., 2000a. SiO2
entrapment cells for hybrid bioartificial organs. Mater.
Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 628 CC10.1-15.
Chia, S.M., Wan, A.C.A., Quek, C.H., Mao, H.Q., Xu, X.,
Shen, Lu., Ng, M.L., Leong, K.W., Yu, H., 2002. Multi-
layered microcapsules for cell encapsulation. Biomaterials
23, 849–856.
CLARINET, 2000. Remediation of contaminated land tech-
nology implementation in Europe: a state of the art of
CLARINET WG 7. Eighth Draft Document 2000
December.
Cohen, Y., 2001. Biofiltration—the treatment of fluids by
microorganisms immobilized into the filter bedding materi-
al: a review. Bioresourc. Technol. 77, 257–274.
Dircks, K., Pind, P.F., Mosbaek, H., Henze, M., 1999. Yield
determination by respirometry—the possible influence of
storage under aerobic conditions in activated sludge. Water
SA 25 (1), 69–74.
Dunn, B., Miller, J.M., Dave, B.C., Valentine, J.S., Zink, J.I.,
1998. Strategies for encapsulating biomolecules in sol–gel
matrices. Acta Mater. 3, 737–741.
Gill, I., Ballesteros, A., 2000a. Bioencapsulation within
synthetic polymers (Part 1): sol–gel encapsulated biologi-
cals. Trends Biotechnol. July, 282–296.
Gill, I., Ballesteros, A., 2000b. Bioencapsulation within
synthetic polymers (Part 2): non-sol–gel protein polymer
biocomposites. Trends Biotechnol. November, 469–479.
Hench, L.L., West, J.K., 1990. The sol–gel process. Chem. Rev.
90, 33–79.
Henze, M., Harremoes, P., Jansen, J.l., Arvin, E., 1997.
Wastewater Treatment, Biological and Chemical Processes.
Springer, Berlin.
IRSA-CNR, 1994. Standard Methods for Water Analysis
(Metodi analitici per le acque). Quaderno n. 100. Istituto
Poligrafico e Zecca dello Stato, Roma (Italy).
Leenen, E.J.T.M., Dos Santos, V.A.P., Grolle, K.C., Tramper,
J., Wijffels, R.H., 1996. Characteristics of and selection
criteria for support materials for cell immobilization in
wastewater treatment. Water Res. 12, 2985–2996.
Metcalf and Eddy Inc., 1991. Wastewater Engineering: Treat-
ment, Disposal and Reuse, third ed, revised by G.
Ichobanoglous and F.L. Burton McGraw-Hill, New York
Nassif, N., Bouvet, O., Rager, M.N., Roux, C., Coradin, T.,
Livage, J., 2002. Living bacteria in silica gel. Nat. Mater. 1,
42–44.
O’Reilly, A.M., Scott, J.A., 1995. Defined coimmobilization of
mixed microorganism cultures. Enzyme Microb. Technol.
17, 636–646.
Tartakovsky, B., Kotlar, E., Sheintuch, M., 1996. Coupled
nitrification–denitrification processes in a mixed culture of
coimmobilized cells: analysis and experiment. Chem. Eng.
Sci. 51 (10), 2327–2336.
US EPA, 2001. Cost analyses for selected groundwater cleanup
projects: pump and treat systems and permeable reactive
barriers. EPA Report 542-R-00-013.
US EPA, 2004. Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable.
Remediation Technologies: Screening Matrix and Reference
Guide. Version 3.0. http://www.frtr.gov/matrix2/top_pa-
ge.html.
Van der Roest, H.F., Lawrence, D.P., Van Bentem, A.G.N.,
2002. Membrane Bioreactors for Municipal Wastewater
Treatment. IWA Publishing, Colchester, UK.
Viitala, R., Jokinen, M., Peltola, T., Gunnelius, K., Rosen-
holm, J.B., 2002. Surface properties of in vitro bioactive and
non-bioactive sol–gel derived materials. Biomaterials 23,
3073–3086.
Wijffels, R.H., Tramper, J., 1995. Nitrification by immobilized
cells. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 17, 482–492.