2016 ANTALYA

2016ANTALYA

T.C.

2016

01.01.2015-31.12.2015

HAZIRLAYANLAR

TASARIM

1

ÖNSÖZ

ens

lmektedir.

Bu faaliyet raporu, 2015 63

adet (14 adet yeni teklif, 43 adet devam eden ve 6

19

7

2 -7 doktora) 9 98 da bilgi

5

Dr. Abdullah ÜNLÜ Enstitü Müdürü

2

Sayfa No ................................................................................................................................................. 1

..................................................................................................................................... 2 ..................................................................................................... 7

.........................................................................................................8Cucumis sativus

............................................................................................................................ 9......................22

Stevya (Stevia rebaudiana .................................................................................................................................33

...............................................46..............................63

.................................77

Belirlenmesi...................................................................................................................................92Sardunya (Pelargonium ................................................................................................................................................... 107

......................................................................... 120

........................................................................................................... 150Triticum aestivum L.) Uygun Ekim

................................................................................................. 166

............................................................................................................................... 181

Kalite Kriterlerine Etkisinin Belirlenmesi....................................................................................... 202...... 223

1.2.DEVAM EDEN PROJELER .................................................................................................... 243

........................................................................................................... 244- Vicia sativa ............ 246

....................................................................................... 247 .............................................................................................. 248

...................................................................................... 249

3

.................................................. 250Stevia rebaudiana

............................................................................................................................... 251Thymus ve Origanum

Antibakteriyal ve Antifungal Etkilerinin Belirlenmesi..................................................................... 253Orthurus heterocarpus

...................................................................................... 258

.............................................................................................................. 260

................................................................................... 262-

................................................................................................................................. 276

Limon Tiplerinin Belirlenmesi Projesi ........................................................................................... 280 ............................................. 281

.................................................................. 282

..................................................................................................... 283Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck) (TUR020-

............................................................................................................ 284

................................................................................................. 285

..................................................................................................... 287 ........................................ 288

........... 289 ........................................................................................... 290

....... 292

Belirlenmesi................................................................................................................................. 294 ......................... 299

................................................................................................................ 300

Teknolojisi Projesi........................................................................................................................ 301



4

Domates (S. lycopersicum) ve Karpuzda (C. lanatus ....................................... 307


Teknolojisi Projesi........................................................................................................................ 312............................................................................................................ 314

Gypsophila (Gypsophyla sp Gypsophyla sp ...................................................................................................... 315

............................................................................. 317Kesme Verim ve Kaliteye Etkisi ............................................................................................................... 325Antalya K 328

Anabaena sp ................................................................................................................................ 340

Conyza canadensis ................................................................................................................... 347

-Maliyete Etkileri .......................................................................................................................... 348

............................................................................... 350 ............................. 352

.................... 3541.3.SONUÇLANAN PROJELER ................................................................................................... 355

Verim ve Kalite Kriterlerine Etkileri ........................................................................................................................................ 356

......................................................................................................................... 357

Planococcus citri Risso (Hem.,

Parazitoit Leptomastix dactylopii ................................................................................................................................ 358

............................................................................................ 359 ................................................ 360

................................................................................... 361

...................................................................................................... 362

............................................................................................................................... 363

5

............................................... 364

.............................................................. 365- ......................... 366

...................................... 367

...................................................................................................... 368 .................... 369

Contribution of Olive History for the Management of Soil-Borne Parasites in the Mediterranean Basin (PESTOLIVE) ............................................................................................................................. 370Developing A Pool of Novel and Eco-Efficient Applications of Zeolite for The Agriculture Sector (ECO-ZEO) ................................................................................................................................. 371Rethinking The Links Between Farm Modernization, Rural Development and Resilience in A World of Increasing Demands and Finite Resources (RETHINKING)............................................................ 372Mainstreaming Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Use for Improved Human Nutrition and Wellbeing (NUTRITION PROJECT) ............................................................................................ 373

................................. 374 375

Responses of European Forests and Society to Invasive Pathogens (RESIPATH) ............................. 376Botrytis cinerea

................................................................................................................................................... 377itlerinde

............................................ 378Mersin (Myrtus communis

.................................................................................... 379 ......................................................... 380

........................................................................................................... 381

.................................................................................................... 382Domateste Bakteriyel Kanser ve Solgunluk (Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis) Hasta ........ 383

Belirlenmesi................................................................................................................................. 384.............. 385

................................................... 386

............................................................................................................................... 387

6

Phaseolus vulgaris

Belirlenmesi................................................................................................................................. 388

................................................................................................................................................... 389

4.YÜKSEK - ....................................................................... 390 .............................................................................................. 391

- ................................................................................................................................................... 391

................................................................................................................................................... 392......................................................................................................... 393

Medicago sativa .......................................................................................................... 393

Arachis hypogaea .............. 394Salvia fruticosa

........................................................... 395Eriolobus trilobatus

................................................................................................................................................... 396Hibrit Biber (Capsicum annuum

............................................................................................................... 397Fortune Mandarininde Mutasyon Yoluyla Alternaria alternata

............. 398

.................................................................................. 399

PROJELER

9

DESTEK BA URUSUNDA BULUNULAN PROJEN N

BA Cucumis sativus) Genotiplerinin Morfolojik ve

rlendirilmesi ARA TIRMA FIRSAT ALANI (A01) ARA TIRMA PROGRAMI (P-01) PROGRAM ÖNCELI I

ADI ADRESI Demirc PROJE DE ADI SOYADI KURUMU BATEM TELEFONU 0 533 521 83 30 E-POSTA [email protected] PROJE/ALT PROJE YÜRÜTÜCÜLE

ADI SOYADI KURUMU E-POSTA BATEM [email protected]

BATEM [email protected]

TARIHI

30 000 01/01/2016 31/12/2018

L

PROJEDEKI KATKISI

- - - Proje Özeti: -

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Some Local Cucumber (Cucumis sativus) Genotypes

Abstract: In this study, between the years 2016-2019 (BATEM) will be made in the Kocayatak Vegetable and Ornamental Crops Department greenhouse and open field. In research plant material will be used 58 local genotypes in the gene pool of Institute and in 2012

10

year survey work a total 90 genotypes . Morphological and molecular characterization will be made of these genotypes. Identifiable and relationship level with the creation of the local gene pool of certain genotypes of cucumber can be used in breeding programs to obtain pure lines can be achieved. As a result, the gene pool is defined as morphological and molecular gene pool for breeding studies to be made in the future will be created. Keywords: Cucumber, gene pool, morphological characterization, molecular analysis Projenin Ama ve Gerekçesi: -

, morfolojik karekterizasyon ve

Proje ile Elde Edilmek stenilen Ç ar ve Kullan m Alanlar - - -

in

gideme

Balkaya ve Yanmaz, 2003).

1.741.880 ton

11

-ark. 2002).

yapma yetkisi

konulabilmektedir. Morfoloj

lerin

008),

Solmaz ve ark.

erilen kriterler acura uyarlanarak

Yanmaz, 2008).

12

akrabal

BATGEN-1 (73 adet F6) ve BATGEN-2 (68 adet F6

syon

-1 ve BATGEN- veriler NTSYS-

- ektedir ve genellikle radyoaktif

bitki pop

nght

. -

(Vos ve ark., 1995). AFLP, SSR, RFLP, SCAR, STS, ISA ve ALP

13

(Kumar, 1999; Levi ve ark., 2001). AFLP metodu hem restriksiyon enzimlerinin hem

PstI gibi Mse

- -5000 ppm GA3 4+7

tkin

bu gibi durumlarda 50-500 ppm AgNO3 ve ark. 1977, Kalloo 1988). George (1985), ilk gethrelin 250

arayla 1000 ppm GA3 ppm GA4/7 kez 600 3 ve Galun (1988) gynosi ve and

rkek ebeveynleri 4:1 ve

3 ppm ve AgNO3

3 - 3 ve 4 - Zhu ve ark.

- 3

asat edilebilir (Bassett ve ark. 1986).

14

MATERYAL ve METOT Materyal

Yöntem

mlar -

: -

etilen (200- -

1988).

abah 6:00-

Genotiplerin karakterizasyonu: 201

Cucumis sativus ndeki kriterlerden

-anali -

Etiket No Etiket No Topla Btp1 Btp 13 Tokat Btp 25 Gaziantep Btp2 Btp 14 Tokat Btp 26 Btp 3 Kocaeli Btp 15 Rize Btp 27 Btp 4 Kocaeli Btp 16 Rize Btp 28 Kastamonu

15

Btp 5 Hatay Btp 17 Trabzon Btp 29 Btp 6 Hatay Btp 18 Trabzon Btp 30 Sivas Btp 7 Zonguldak Btp 19 Btp 31 Yozgat Btp 8 Zonguldak Btp 20 Btp 32 Btp 9 Zonguldak Btp 21 Artvin Btp 33 Btp 10 Kastamonu Btp 22 Gaziantep Btp 34 Malatya Btp 11 Amasya Btp 23 Malatya Btp 35 Erzincan Btp 12 Tokat Btp 24 Hakkari Btp36 Btp 37 Btp 58 Kayseri Btp 79 Mersin Btp 38 Kastamonu Btp 59 Adana Btp 80 Mersin Btp 39 Btp 60 Adana Btp 81 Mersin Btp 40 Sivas Btp 61 Adana Btp 82 Mersin Btp 41 Yozgat Btp 62 Karaman Btp 83 Mersin/Tarsus Btp 42 Btp 63 Antalya Btp 84 Mersin/Tarsus Btp 43 Btp 64 Antalya Btp 85 Btp 44 Malatya Btp 65 Antalya Btp 86 Mersin Btp 45 Erzincan Btp 66 Burdur Btp 87 Manisa Btp 46 Erzincan Btp 67 Btp 88 Manisa Btp Kayseri Btp 68 Gaziantep Btp 89 Adana Btp 48 Btp 69 Hatay Btp 90 Btp 49 Konya Btp 70 Hatay Btp 50 Afyon Btp 71 Hatay Btp 51 Btp 72 Konya Btp 52 Bilecik Btp 73 Konya Btp 53 rfa Btp 74 Konya Btp 54 Samsun Btp 75 Konya Btp 55 Btp 76 Btp56 Btp 77 Konya Btp 57 Malatya Btp 78 Mersin

Moleküler Yöntem

Puan

3

Orta 5 Kuvvetli 7

) 3

Orta (71-110 cm) 5 Uzun (>111 cm) 7

3

16

Orta (6-9 cm) 5 Uzun (>10 cm) 7

3

Orta 5 7

3

Orta 5 Koyu 7

3

Orta (11-16) 5 Uzun(17cm>) 7

Dar (<15cm) 3 Orta (16-20cm) 5

7

8.Cinsiyet Durumu 3

5 7

9.Bitki 1-3 1 2

10.Bitki: 1

Sadece Dikenli 2 3

11.Meyve: Partenokarpi Yok 1 Var 9

12.Meyve: Uzunluk

1 -15 cm 3

Orta 16-20cm 5 Uzun (21-30 cm) 7

9

3

Orta(3-5cm) 5 7

Boyunlu 1 Hafif Boyunlu 2 Boyunsuz 3

3

Orta 5 Uzun 7

3

Orta 5 Koyu 7

Yok 1 Var 9

Yok veya sert 1 Seyrek 3 Orta 5

7 9

Yok 1 Var 9

Erkenci 3 Orta 5

7 DNA Ekstraksiyonu

17

Ekstraksiyon ifiye CTAB-

-

50-

Forward prime -3' - Me1: TGAGTCCAAACCGGATA: Em3: GACTGCGTACGAATTGAC Me4: TGAGTCCAAACCGGACC Em7: GACTGCGTACGAATTATG Me10: TGAGTCCAAACCGGGAC Em4: GACTGCGTACGAATTTGA Me12: TGAGTCCAAACCGGGGT Em14:GACTGCGTACGAATTCAG Me14: TGAGTCCAAACCGGCTA Em12: GACTGCGTACGAATTGTC Me8: TGAGTCCAAACCGGTGT Em10: GACTGCGTACGAATTTAG

PCR amp

derece 1dakika, 55

o-

1) . 1)

2) 2017 sonbahar 3)

4) ÇALI MA TAKV M

Aylar (I ) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Tohum toplama x x x x x x x x x x x x Yetersiz x x Fide Dikimi x x Kendileme x x x x Tohum eldesi x x x x

18

Aylar (II ) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Tohum ekimi x x Fide dikimi x x

x x x x x x x

Tohum eldesi x x x x Verilerin analizi x x

Aylar (III.Y ) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Tohum ekimi x x Fide dikimi x x

x x x x x x x

Tohum eldesi x x x x x x x

Verilerin analizi ve raporlama x x x YÖNET M DÜZE

Ad Soyad Proje Yürütücülerinin Projeye Kat lar Y cak Faaliyetlerdeki Sorumluluklar Çal Takvimi

Dr. Lev 1-

1-

Mol 28- PROJE SONUÇLARI UYGULAMA AKTARIMI

Cucumis SativusKarekterizasyonu

Yerel g

1 Gen havuzunda yer alan

-Gen havuzundaki genetik varyasyonun tespiti, benzerlik ve

-Yerel genotiplerin kay - -

2

-

19

TALEP E LEN BÜTÇE I.Y Tutar

06 SERMAYE G ERLE YILLARA GÖRE DA ILIM

1.Y l 2.Y l 3 Y l 06.1- Mamul Mal Alml 1750 1750 5000 06.2- Menkul Sermaye Üretim Giderleri 100 100 17000 06.5- Gayrimenkul Sermaye Üretim Giderleri 150 150 3000

1000 Toplam 2000 2000 26000

Genel Toplam 30000

2016

(1. 2017

2018

6 6 1 6 1 2 6 1 2 4 250 250 6 1 2 5 6 1 2 90

6 1 3 5 6 1 3 90 1500 1500 5000 6 2 6 2 6 6 2 6 1 1000 6 2 7 1 100 100 16000 6 5 6 5 2 Malzeme Giderleri 6 5 2 4 6 5 4 Enerji Giderleri 6 5 4 2 150 150 1500 6 5 4 3 1500 6 9 6 9 2 Yolluk Giderleri 6 9 2 1 6 9 2 2 3 3 5 9 3 Kurslara 1000 3 6 2 1

TOPLAM 2000 2000 26000 GENEL TOPLAM 30000

20

KAYNAKÇA

Ankara. -genel.htm

karakterizasys. 212-215, Erzurum

c diversity in Cucumber (Cucumis Sativus) Germplasms A htesis

Phaseolus vulgaris

Fen

–30.

9(2):182–188. BALKAYA, A., YANMAZ, R., KAR, H. and APAYDIN, A., 2005. Morphological characterisation of white head

cabbage (Brassica oleraceae var. capitata subvar. alba) genotypes in Turkey. New Zeland Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science. 33;1–9.

Phaseolus vulgaris) populations from Samsun, Turkey. Vew Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science, Vol.36;189-167.

BASSET, M. J., 1986. Breeding Vegetable Crops. Vegetable Crops Department, University of Florida. Avi Publishing company, Connecticut.

Abelmoschus esculentus) cultivars derived from Turkish land races. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 52; 1019–1030

193-196. FUCHS, E., ATSMON, D. and HALLEY, A.H. 1977. Adventious staminate flower fo rmation in gibberellin treated

gynocious cucumber plants. Plant and Cell Physiology 18(6); 1193-1201. GEORGE, R.A.T. 1985. Vegetable seed production. longman group limited, London and New York, 318.

Cucumis sativus

yarda (Cucumis sativus

- -235. germplasm by srap

and phenotypic marker polymorphism. Biologia, Bratislava, 62/1:41-45 KALLOO, G. 1988. Vegetable Breeding Volume 1. CRC Pres, Inc., Boca Raton, Florida, USA, 105-128.

ENG-MOSS, T.M., BUDAK, H., 2005. Nuclear Genome Diversity and Relationships Among Naturally Occurring Buffalograss Genotypes Determined by Sequence-Related Amplified Polymorphism. HortScience, 40: 537- 541.

JONES, N., OUGHAM, H. ve THOMAS, H., 1997. Markers and mapping: we are all geneticists now, New Phytol. 137: 165–177.

Capsicum annuum var. Conoides

Lisans Tezi), 129 s., Samsun. ACA, S. 2004. Characterization of different pepper genotypes collected

from coastal regions of Turkey. 17th International Pepper Conference November 14–16, 2004 in Naples, Florida, USA

Tolerant Genotiplerin Belirlenmesi.

21

71-77.

Genome mapping, moleculer markers and marker-assisted selection in crop plants, Molecular Breeding 3:87-103.

Eucarpia Meeting Cucurbit Breeding and Genetics, Paris 99-107. ve BOYACI, H.F. 2002. Antalya Narenciye ve

-13

korunma ve -20 Ocak 2000, Ankara 259-

284.

731;103-109 SARI, N.

of cucurbit genetic resources in Turkey. Proceeding of the IXth EUCARPIA meeting on genetics and breeding of Cucurbitaceae May 21-24 2008, Avignon, France, 21-30.

32(1); 103-104. Cucumis melo

var. flexuosus) geno --81.

study of sex determination in cucumber plants. ISHS Acta Horticulturae 588: II. International Symposium on Cucurbits.

ZHU, H.Q., WANG, A.L. and TANG, S. 2004. Study on hybrid seed production technology of spring cucumber. China Vegetables 2: 35-36.

TEKL ONAYI Ad Soya Tarih za Proje Lideri

neren Kurul M d rli i Yap lan Kurulu kili i

rli i Yap lan Kurulu kili i

22


BA : Yeni Pamuk

ARA TIRMA FIRSAT ALANI ARA TIRMA PROGRAMI Lif Bitkileri (P02) PROGRAM ÖNCELI I

ADI ADRESI PROJE DE ADI SOYADI KURUMU BATEM TELEFONU 0242 429 7331 E-POSTA [email protected] PROJE / ALT PROJE YÜRÜTÜCÜLE

ADI SOYADI KURUMU E-POSTA

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

Dr. Volkan SEZENER [email protected]

[email protected]

PROJE TOPLAM

95.000.00 01/01/2016 31/12/2020

L

Teknik

Teknik

em ve

23

Proje Özeti:

melezlemeler

Anahtar Kelimeler: Development of Early Cotton Varieties on Cotton Breeding Studies

Abstract: Efficient and high quality cotton varieties are needed for growing cotton (Gossypium hirsitum L.) consumption supply to offer the variety of products and increase the cotton growing areas to reduce financial losses in our country. With this project that prepared for the West Mediterranean; new lines / varieties will be developing that suitable to the Mediterranean region, as a main / second crop can be grown, have of desired value in terms of fiber quality, high efficiency, disease resistance. And intended to continue that preservation of varieties obtained and certified seed production. In this study domestic / abroad sourced cotton lines / varieties by hybridization to be made. In which drop-down generation after F2 selection will be made by the pedigree breeding method. In addition, lines from breeding programs at different levels of the previous year will be taken into consideration. After trying different lines in advanced stages of having superior properties which observed promising lines will be presented to registration. Keywords: Cotton, Antalya, breeding, crossing, cultivar Projenin Ama ve Gerekçesi:

FAO

36.916.149 450.890

verime sa

a 2.541.832 ton

24

az etkilenmekte,

siyon,

2016-2020 tarihlerini

Proje ile Elde Edilmek stenilen Ç ar ve Kullan m Alanlar - - -

TERATÜR ÖZET tmektir.

2).

n gen aktarmak,

Heterozis ebeveyn de

eterozis istenmektedir. Pamuk, bitki boyu,

25

ancak verim ve adaptasyonda olmaz (Singh vd. 2014)

Karademir vd. 2010).

.

(Meredith vd. 1991; Ulloa ve Meredith, 2000).

(Gossypium hirsutum

-39,66, % 21,07 ve % -

e

Gossypium ssp

kütlü veri101 ve Paum- -

-Paum 101 X Paum-B ve Paum 102 X Bahar- -

-

26

--

- -15 -

-

%66- -

-zik vd. 1993).

-

G. hirsutum L.

1, F2 ve F3 z F1, ve F2

türler ek bitki seleksiyonuna F3 ve daha sonraki generasyonlarda (Karahan, 2013).

468', ', GW--6644.20 kg ve lif verimi hektara

1277.10- -

27


SG125, DP396, St373, 8 adet

ilave edilmesi

Metot 1. Melezleme:

2. Seleksiyon :

4. Verim Denemeleri:

)olarak belirlenecektir.

olarak belirlenecektir.

belirlenecektir.

28

kadar geçen süre gün olarak belirlenecektir. hasat

5.1.

)

belirlenecektir. (%)

Lif (g)

-----------------------------

5.2. Lif Teknolojik Özellikler

6. Verilerin Analizi

ecektir.

ÇALI MA TAKV M

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Tohum ve ekim haz. x x x Tarla haz. ve ekim x x x

x x x x x x x x x x x x x

Melezleme x x Seleksiyon x x x x x x Hasat x x x

x x x x

29

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Tohum ve ekim haz. x x x Tarla haz. ve ekim x x x Seyreltme, çapa, sulama, ilaçlama x x x x x x Morfolojik gözlemler x x x x x x x Melezleme x x Seleksiyon x x x x x x Hasat x x x

x x x x


x x x x


x x x x


x x x x YÖNET M DÜZE Ad Soyad Proje Yürütücülerinin Projeye Kat lar

Y cak Faaliyetlerdeki Sorumluluklar Çal Takvimi

60 ay

30

3-11.aylar

Mehmet lmesinin

5-11.aylar

verilerin temin edil

3-11.aylar

Dr. Volkan SEZENER

36-60. Aylar

M

36-60. Aylar

PROJE SONUÇLARI UYGULAMA AKTARIMI

ilmesi

rilmesi hedeflenmektedir.

girilmesi

1 Toprak, bitki ve iklime

veriler elde edilmesi Yeni pamuk hat ve

Akdeni

kurumlardan biri olarak, ye

i ile lif ve tekstil sanayicisinin

31

TALEP E LEN BÜTÇE

1. YIL 2.YIL 3.YIL 4.YIL 5.YIL

06 1 MAMUL MAL ALIMLARI 6700 6900 7300 7900 8250 06 2 2750 4250 4750 5360 6250 06 6 7000 7500 7700 8250 8250 06 9 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 TOPLAM 15.000 20.000 20.000 20.000 20.000 GENEL TOPLAM 95.000

I II III IV SINIFLANDIRMASI

06 1 3 35600 6500 6650 7000 7550 7900 06 1 3 01 14050 2500 2550 2750 3000 3250 06 1 3 05 12850 2400 2450 2500 2750 2750 06 1 3 90 8700 1600 1650 1750 1800 1900 06 1 6 1450 200 250 300 350 350 06 1 6 01 1450 200 250 300 350 350 06 2 6 10950 1250 2000 2300 2600 2800 06 2 6 01 10950 1250 2000 2300 2600 2800

06 2 7 10400 1250 1900 2050 2300 2900

06 2 7 01 10400 1250 1900 2050 2300 2900

06 2 8 2010 250 350 400 460 550 06 2 8 01 2010 250 350 400 460 550 06 6 1 Malzeme Giderleri 11550 2000 2250 2300 2500 2500 06 6 1 01 Malzeme giderleri 11550 2000 2250 2300 2500 2500 06 6 4 Enerji Giderleri 17150 3000 3250 3400 3750 3750 06 6 4 02 17150 3000 3250 3400 3750 3750 06 6 6 Kiralar 10000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 06 6 6 02 0 0 0 0 0 0 06 6 6 06 Arazi Giderleri 10000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 06 6 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 06 6 7 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 06 9 2 Yolluk Giderleri 7500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 06 9 2 01 7500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 06 9 2 06 0 0 0 0 0 0

GENEL TOPLAM 95.000 15.000 20.000 20.000 20.000 20.000

KAYNAKÇA -

-40. -cesit-gelistirme-ve-islah.php. E.T. 09/10/2014.

32

(Gossypium ssp.) oklu Dizi (Line x Tester)

Derg., Cilt:29-4, 64-76.

-125.

-139.

nde (G.hirsitum L.)

EL-Association With Lint and Fiber Qualitiy. Field Crops Abst. vol:42(2).

FAO. (2014). www.fao.org. . E.T. 03/11/2014

-42. HAGUE, S S., SMITH, C W., BERGER, G., CLEMENT, J., JONES, D C. (2011). Breeding and Genetics. Variation in

An Extra-Long Staple Upland X Medium Staple Upland Cotton F2 Population. The Journal of Cotton Science, 15:265–270.

-72. Gossypium hirsutum

, 16 – 29.

-2014. . (2011). Variability in Yield and Fiber Technological

Properties of Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Not Sci Biol, 3(2):135-139.

-41. (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Erkencilik Kriterleri

Agric. For., 24: 105-111. MEREDITH, W.R.JR., CULP, T.W., RO

(1991). Determining Future Cotton Variety Fiber Quality Objectives. Tex Res J., 61:720-723. SINGH, P., KAIRON, MS., SINGH, S.B. (2014). Breeding Hybrid Cotton. CICR Technical Bulletin No: 14

(www.cicr.org.in). E.T.30/09/2014.

ULLOA, M., MEREDITH, W.R. (2000). Genetic Linkage Map and QTL Analysis of Agronomic and Fiber Quality Traits in An Intraspecific Population. The J Cotton Sci. 4:161-170.

ULLOA, M., PERCY, R., HUTMACHER, R.B., ZHANG, J. (2009). The Future of Cotton Breeding in the Western United States. The J Cotton Sci. 13:246-255.


neren Kurul M d

33

Stevya (Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni)

A 04) ARA P 06)

Orta

ADI

ADI SOYADI Dr. A KURUMU TELEFONU 0 242 3216797 E-POSTA [email protected]


Enstitüsü [email protected] Kadr [email protected]

[email protected] [email protected]

Ahmet Bircan TINMAZ

[email protected]

[email protected]

@tarim.gov.tr

[email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

(TL)

IL) 102.500 TL 01/01/2016 31/12/2020

Ayni

34

Proje Özeti: Stevia rebaudiana i, 1887 Asteraceae

o -

- Paraguay ve Brezilya'da Japonya

--

Anahtar Kelimeler: Stevya, Stevia rebaudiana,

Stevya's (Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni) Adaptation to the Different Regions of Our Country and Development of Synthetic Type

Abstract: Stevia rebaudiana (Stevia, sweetleaf, sugarleaf) is the homeland of South America, was discovered in 1887 by a South American natural scientist, Antonio Bertoni. S. rebaudiana is member of Asteraceae family which -90 cm high. Detected in North America, while more than 80 varieties and South America is thought to be more than 200 native species. The main components of Stevia extract is steviosid, rebaudiosid-A and steviol molecules. Stevia is used as a sugar source for centuries by indigenous people and till 2004 Stevia is located in the positive plants list of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs. Native Americans in Paraguay have safely used Stevia for hundreds of years, valuing the herbal sweetener not only for its delicious taste but also for its medicinal healing properties. Stevia has also been used extensively as a sweetener in Japan more than thirty years. Dried form of Stevia leaves is 10-15 times sweeter than sugar. Processed powdered Stevia is 200-300 times sweeter than sugar and also non-calorie Stevia plant does not raise blood sugar levels. In recent years Stevia has started to be produced as the introduction material, attracting attention of producers in many countries. Although stevia plant is produced by enthusiasts farmers and firms in many areas in Turkey ,studies, related to adaptation and product quality are limited. With this research, it is aimed adaptation to five different locations (Antalya, Istanbul, Izmir, Eskisehir, Tokat) of stevia populations, brought to our country from different sources and standard synthetic varieties development, can be used in stevia production.

Keywords: Stevia, Stevia rebaudiana, adaptation, syntetic variety

bbi bitkiler

kadar drogun da ticaretinin ya

35

- -

matik bitkiler,

ortalama 25 -a ise 220-

hedeflenmektedir.

-Stevia rebaudiana verimleri belirlenecek - -

: Stevia

Stevia Ageratina, Chromolaena, Koanophyllon ve Mikania Stevia

veya iki karakter birlikte bulunur.

36

Stevia rebaudiana, ipliksi köklere sahip, 30-

--

- - -na

- -

- -4 mm - -

y-

--

-

www.dfgd.org.tr).

www.dfgd.org.tr).

diyet, d

-

Stevya bitkisinden elde edilen stevya

kalorio

takviyesidir. IPSOS-

dacilar.net). Stevia -

37

Stevia

Stevia i

Stevia rebaudiana Stevia) denmektedir. Steviol glikozit ise S. rebaudiana

-

Stevya bitkisinin ya -Stevia rebaudiana

ark. 2000, 2002, 2003).

Kinghorn, 2002). Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni bitkisinin

-

Kau

-

Stevya bitkisinde % 5-10 Steviosid, % 2-4 Rebaudiosid-A, % 1-2 Rebaudiosid-C ve az miktarda Dulcosid A

-%60-70, 180-40 - -

- -

Brand

38

-ana glikozitin yapraktaki profilinin %0,3 dulcosid, %0,6

rebaudiosid-C, %3,8 rebaudiosid- -270 kat, rebaudiosid- -320 kat, rebaudiosid- -60 kat ve dulcosid-

-

ek rebaudiosid-

di,

Brand

toplam glikozit seviyesine (%14) ve rebaudiosid A / stevi

Osman ve ark.

seleks

39


Metot

yonu

Üretim - Stevia

mlendirilecektir. Daha sonra 3-

-

-muhafaza edilecektir.

belirlenecektir.


n olarak belirlenecektir.

t

kabul edilecektir. Stevia bitkisindeki etkili maddeler olan Dulcoside A, Isosteviol, Rebaudioside A,

Rebaudioside B, Rebaudioside C, Rebaudioside D, Rebaudioside F, Rubusoside, Steviolbioside, Stevioside, -

Analizler -

LC-MS/MS analizleri

40

Islah -

Bit

-

1. …………… 2. Klonlar 3. 1 2 3 …… x

……

9 23

4. 5.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Tohum ve/veya fide temin edilmesi x x x x

x x

x x x x x x x x

x x x

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

x x

Bitk x x x

41

Bitki materyalinin içerik analizleri x x x x x x x

x x x x x x x x x

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

olu x x

x x x Bitki materyalinin içerik analizleri x x x x x x x

x x x x x x x x x

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Tarla

x x


x x x x x x x x x

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

x x


x x x x x x x x x * 01/01/2016

Ocak 2016-

Ocak 2016- Ocak 2016-

Ocak 2016- Ocak 2016-

Ahmet Bircan TINMAZ Ocak 2016- Ocak 2016-

Ekonomik analizler Ocak 2016- Ocak 2016-

Ocak 2016- Ocak 2016-

Ocak 2016- Ocak 2016-

Stevia rebaudiana asyonu ve Sentetik

42

- -

1 Stevia rebaudiana bitkisinin

madde verimleri belirlenecek

ulusal-

2

Projede

3

06 Sermaye Giderleri (Tl)

06 1 30.000 06 2 30.500 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000

06 5 Giderleri 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000

06 9 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Toplam 66.500 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000

Genel Toplam 102.500

i.

I II III IV Giderlerin Ekonomik

06 1 3 05 30.000

06 2 6 01 100 100 100 100 100

06 2 7 01 Kimyevi Madde

29.000 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500

06 5 2 09 400 400 400 400 400

06 5 4 02 Enerji Giderleri

2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000

06 9 2 01 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000

43

Toplam 62.500 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000

Genel Toplam 82.500

ii.


06 2 6 01 100 100 100 100 100


250 250 250 250 250

06 5 2 09 400 400 400 400 400


250 250 250 250 250

Toplam 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Genel Toplam 5.000

iii. Ege


06 2 6 01 100 100 100 100 100


250 250 250 250 250

06 5 2 09 400 400 400 400 400


250 250 250 250 250


iv.


06 2 6 01 100 100 100 100 100


250 250 250 250 250

06 5 2 09 400 400 400 400 400

06 5 4 02 Enerji Giderleri (Akaryak

250 250 250 250 250


44

v.

I II III IV Giderlerin Ekonomik 5. Y

06 2 6 01 100 100 100 100 100


250 250 250 250 250

06 5 2 09 400 400 400 400 400


250 250 250 250 250


ABDULA, R., JEPPESEN, P.B., ROLFSEN, S.E.D., 2004. Rebaudioside A Potently Stimulates Insulin Secretion From Isolated MouseIslets: Studies on the Dose-, Glucose- and Calcium –Dependency Metabolism. 53(10): 1378-1381.

BRANDLE, J., 2001. United States Patent, Patent No.:US 6,255,557. CARAKOSTAS, M.C., CURRY, L.L., BOILEAU, A.C., BRUSICK, D.J., 2008. Overview: The History,

Technical Function and safety of Rebaudioside A, a Naturally Occurring Steviol Glycoside, for Use in Food and Beverages, Food and Chemical Toxicology , 46(2008): S1-S10.

EUROPEAN PHARMACOPOEIA. Vol. 3. Maisonneuve SA, Sainte-Ruffine. p 68(1975). FAO JECFA MONOGRAPHS 10, 2010. 73rd Meeting, Compendium of Food Additive Specifications, ISSN

1817-7077 GEUNS, J.C.M., 2003. Stevioside, Pyhtochemistry , 64:913-921. JEPPESEN, P.B., GREGERSEN, S., ALSTRUP, K.K., 2002. Stevioside Induces Antihyperglysemic,

Insulinotropic and Glucagonostatic Effects In vivo: Studies in the Diabetic Goto -Kakizaki (GK) Rats. Phytomedicine, 9(1):9-14.

JEPPESEN, P.B., GREGERSEN, S., POULSEN, C.R., 2000. Stevioside Acts Directly on Pancreatic Beta Cells to Secrete Insulin: Actions Independent of Cyclic Adenosine Triphosphate Sensitive K+ channel Activity, Metabolism, 49(2): 208-214.

JEPPESEN, P.B., GREGERSEN, S., ROLFSEN, S.E.D., 2003. Antihyperglisemic and Blood Pressure-Reducing effects of stevioside in the Diabetic Goto-Kakizak i Rat, Metabolism, 52(3):372-378.

KAUSHIK, R., PRADEEP, N., VAMSHI, V., GEETHA, M., USHA, A., 2010. Nutrient Composition of Cultivated Stevia Leaves and the Influence of Polyphenols and Plant Pigments on Sensory and Antioxidant Properties of Leaf Extracts , J. Food Sci. Technol. 47(1): 27-33.

KINGHORN, D.A., 2002. Stevia, Chapter 10: Use of Stevioside and Cultivation of Stevia rebaudiana in Korea, Taylor & Francis, 202 pages

LAVINI, A., RICCARDI, M., PULVENQuality and WaTER Consumption of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni Grown under Different Irrigation Regimes in Southern Italy, Ital. J. Agron./ Riv. Agron., 2008, 2:135-143.

MARKOVIC, I.S., DARMATI, Z.A. and ABRAMOVIC, B.F., 2008. Chemical Composition of Leaf Extracts of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni Grown Experimentally in Vojvodina, Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society, 73(3): 283-297.

MIDMORE, D.J. AND RANK, A.H., 2002. A New Rural Industry - Stevia – To Replace Imported Chemical Sweeteners A Report For The Rural Industries Research And Development Corporation, Barton, A.C.T. httpps://rirdc.in foserv ices.com.au/downloads/ W02-022.pdf

45

OSMAN, M., ABDULLATEEF, R. A., AHMAT, L.W.Z., MOHAMAD, M., 2012. Stevia Breeding for Higher Productivity and Level of Rebaudioside A, Genes Genetic System, WS14, p:395.

SHU, S. Z., 1995. A Study on Good Variety Selection in Stevia rebaudiana. Scientia Agricultura Sinica 1995 Vol. 28 No. 2 pp.37-42.

WELL, C., FRANK, O., HOFMANN, T., 2013. Quantitation of Sweet Steviol Glycosides by Means of a HILIC-MS/MS-SIDA Approach, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemist ry, 61, 11312-11320.

YADAV, A.K., SINGH, S., DHYANI, D., AHUJA, P.S., 2011. A Review on the Improvment of Stevia [Stevia rebaudiana (Bertoni)]. Can. J. Plant Sci. (2011) 91: 1-27, doi:10.4141/CJPS10086

Tarih Proje/Alt Proje Lideri Dr. Ahu ÇINAR

Dr. Abdullah ÜNLÜ

46

DESTEK BA URUSUNDA BULUNULAN PROJEN N BA ARA TIRMA FIRSAT ALANI ARA TIRMA PROGRAMI PROGRAM ÖNCELI I Orta

ADI ADRESI PROJE DE ADI SOYADI Dr. Fatih Alpay VURAN KURUMU TELEFONU 0 505 6773178 E-POSTA [email protected] PROJE YÜRÜTÜCÜLE ADI SOYADI KURUMU E-POSTA

Dr. Fatih Alpay VURAN [email protected]

[email protected]

R [email protected]

[email protected]

(TL) 51.500 01/01/2016 31/12/2018

L

Teknik destek

Maddi destek Bitki Materyali Temini A Teknik bilgi Proje Özeti:

-

Pestisit

47

li aktarlardan temin edilecek olan

ve kuru (European Standard Method EN

Analitik metodun analizleri

- a gerekli

Anahtar Kelimeler: , kalite kontrol, pestisit, Quechers, ekstraksiyon, kromatografi Investigation of Pesticide Residues in Some Medicinal and Aromatic Plants

Abstract: With increasing interest of the medicinal and aromatic plants in the world day by day, there is a significant increase in the trade, and in the research and development facilities about these plants. When the quality standards are considered for medicinal and aromatic plants used for internal consumption and exportation, it is required to research the pesticide residues which is the most important test of foreign matter as well as the correct botanical name of the plant, growing area, harvesting time, sensory tests and chemical specifications. For the determination of plant material which will be made research about the pesticide residues; the most consumed medicinal and aromatic plants using as a tea (herbal infusion) were chosen firstly. Accordingly, centaury, sage, linden, camomile, hibiscus, thyme, sideritis, echinacea, melisa and helichrysum are considered to investigation of pesticide residues both as a dried product and as a herbal infusion. Pesticide residue analyses for medicinal and aromatic plants which are considered for this study, firstly will be done as a scanning in the accredited laboratory, which is Akdeniz University Food Safety and Agricultural Research Center. Thus, proper research will be able to done about pesticides in the plants which will be determined in the Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Research Laboratory of our institute. Moreover, the quality of determinated plants which will be bought from several herbalists, will be tested according to availability of European Pharmacopoeia criteria. The extraction (dry matter/herbal infusion) of the medicinal and aromatic plant species will be made by the Quechers extraction method which is applied to the samples (fresh and dried fruits, vegetables, cereals), which include low oil content (European Standard Method EN 15662). The determination of the pesticide residues will be made by using gas and/or liquid chromatographic techniques in the laboratory of our institute. The validation of the analytical method will be made in the manner of coordinate with the product group which pesticide residues will be researched. Pesticide residue analysis can not be done in our institute, however, it will be able to done between 2016 and 2019 in the Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Research Laboratory of our institute with this research. Keywords: Herbal infusion, qualtiy control, pesticide, Quechers, extraction, chromatography Projenin Ama ve Gerekçesi:

-

48

-

-

(Ekim, 2000).

-

-

pak

49

lenmelere sebep olabilirler. Son

-

edi b) -

n

bulunmama

p, genetik

etimlerinin

50

edilir, fakat pestisitler imalat, depolama,

bu maddelerin

herbisit

1990).

51

ne

–

vd., 2003; Kruve vd., 2008).

bu konuda

b

lir. Bu heteroatomlar,

(Alder vd., 2006).

-

-karma

52

Wotherspoon, 2007; Lesueur vd., 2008).

tercih edilmektedir (Hiemstra ve Kok, 2007).

(2005a, 2007) tara

a

Lehotay vd., 2005b).

LC/MS- edir (Lehotay vd., 2005b). -

-

70- -110

-

analizlenebilirken, acephate, methamidophos, omethoate, monocrotophos, dimethoate, dichorvos, oxadixyl, -

-M(Lehotay vd., 2005b).

lpet,


-MS/MS ve LC-

edilecektir. Bun

53

e aromatik bitkiler

Kantaron Hypericum L. Salvia L.

Ihlamur Tilia L. Papatya Anthemis L. Hibiskus Hibiscus L. Kekik Thymus L.

Sideritis L. Ekinezya Echinaceae Moench Melisa Melissa L.

notu Helichrysum Mill.

ISO9001-2008 ve HACCP kalite ve

Analizleri

-

-

54

aromatik bi

ara getirilmesidir.

temsili

-20 g

(Anonim, 2011).

(Anonim, 2008).

-up)

- -

omatik

-faz ekstraksiyon (SPE) clean-up sistemine dayanan, basi

(European Standard Method EN 15662)

55

- - -4) ve

-faz ekstraksiyonu

-

-

sistemin

(GC-MS/MS, LC-ait

analiz

-Technologies 7890A GC-

. -

patya,

Analiz metodunun validasyonu

P

Control Procedures for Pesticide Residues Analysis i

ve TS

56

-dip not 2) raporlama

Elma, armut

Muz Yumrulu sebzeler

Tohumlu sebzeler / kabaklar Brassica sebzeleri

otlar

Yem bitkileri

Taze baklagiller

Taze mantarlar

da yem patates

pamuk tohumu, soya

Kuru baklagiller/Baklagiller

Limon, mandarin, mandalina, portakal

Kivi, ananas

Y Bal, kuru meyveler

57

Et ve Su ürünleri

Beyaz et Sakatat(3)

Kabuklu

Süt

Peynir Süt ürünleri

Yumurtalar Yumurtalar

-Kesinlik) parametreleri kontrol edilecektir. -41, 44, 47

/ SANCO, 2011).

-

s) hesaplanacak ve LOQ= 10*s

-

-

-60, SANCO, 2011). ÇALI MA TAKV M

Yap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

malzemelerin temini x x x x

Belirlenen aktarlardan bitki materyallerinin x

Bitki materyallerinin kalite kontrol kriterlerinin test edilmesi x x x x

x x x x x x x x x x x x

x x

58

x x x

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

x x

x x x x



x x x x x x

Analiz metodu validasyon parametrelerinin incelenmesi x x x x

lendirilmesi x x x

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

x x



x x x x x x x x

Analiz metodu validasyon parametrelerinin incelenmesi x x x x x x x x

x x x x

YÖNET M DÜZE

Ad Soyad Proje Yürütücülerinin Projeye Kat lar

Y cak Faaliyetlerdeki Sorumluluklar Takvimi

Kimya Yük.

Alpay VURAN

Proje yürütücüsü. Projenin tmateryallerinin temini, bitki materyallerinin kalite kontrol kriterlerinin test

iks) olarak

tayin edilmesi, analiz metodu validasyon parametrelerinin incelenmesi, ara ve

36 ay

59

materyallerinin temini, bitki materyallerinin kalite kontrol kriterlerinin test


36 ay

materyallerinin temini, bitki materyallerinin kalite kontrol kriterlerinin test


36 ay

Uzm. Biyolog araziden hasat edilmesi, belirlenen aktarlardan bitki materyallerinin temini ve

1, 6, 7, 13, ve 25. ay

PROJE SONUÇLARININ UYGULAMAYA AKTARIMI

-

1

belirlenen pestisitle

2 re, sempozyum veya

60

3

4 aromatik bitki materyallerinin kalitesinin

da test edilecek ve piyasadaki kaliteli bitkisel

5 gili

TALEP E LEN BÜTÇE I. Y Tutar

06 SERMAYE G ERLE

1. Y l (TL)

2. Y l (TL)

(TL)

06.1- 2.500 - - 06.2- Menkul Sermaye Giderleri 18.500 14.500 14.50006.5- Gayrimenkul Sermaye Giderleri 500 500 500

Toplam 21.500 15.000 15.000Genel Toplam 51.500

EI EII EIII EIV 1. Y l (TL)

2. Y l (TL)

(TL)

06 1 3 04 2.500 - - 06 2 6 01 500 500 500 06 2 7 01 18.000 14.000 14.000 06 5 4 02 500 500 500

Toplam 21.500 15.000 15.000 Genel Toplam 51.500

KAYNAKÇA Alb

juice by matrix solid-phase dispersion and gas chromatography. Journal of Chromatography A, 1007: 137–143. Alder, L., Greulich, K., Kepme, G. and Vieth, B. 2006, Residue analysis of 500 high priority pesticides better by GC-

MS or LCMS/ MS, Mass Spectrometry Reviews, 25: 838-865. multiresidue method employing

acetonitrile extraction / partitioning and dispersive solid-phase extraction for the determination of pesticide residues in produce. Journal of AOAC International, 86: 412-431.

61

Anonim, 2002. Commission Directive 2002/63/EC of 11 July 2002 establishing Community methods of sampling for the official control of pesticide residues in and on products of plant and animal origin and repealing. Directive 79/700/EEC.

Anonim, 2006. Anonim, 2008. European Pharmacopoeia 6th edition, Council of Europe, 67075 Strasbourg Cedex, France Anonim, 2009. http://ec.europa.eu/food/rapidalert/index en.htm Anonim, 2014. 25.08.2014 tar

, Ankara. minin

-I, 437–456, 11–15 Ocak, Ankara.

ve org

(1): 65-80. hilal, R. 11-

-607. Ekim, T., Koyuncu, M., Vural, M., Duman,H

Pteridophyta And Spermatophyta), 246s, Ankara.

Fussell R.J., Hetmanski M.T., Macarthur R., Findlay D., Smith F., Ambrus A., Brodesser P.J. 2007. Measurement uncertainty associated with sample processing of oranges and tomatoes for pesticide residue analysis. J Agric Food Chemistry, 55(4):1062-70.

-41. Hiemstra, M. and Kok, A. 2007. Comprehensive multi-residue method for the target analysis of pesticides in crops

using liquid chromatography- Tandem Mass Spectrometry, 1154: 3-25. ISSC-MAP. International standard for sustainable wild collection of medicinal and aromatic plants, ISSC-MAP.

http://www.floraweb.de/proxy/floraweb/map-pro/Standard_Version1_0.pdf. IUPAC Orange Book, Conpendium of Analytical Nomenclature- Definitive Rules

(http://old.iupac.org/publications/analytical_compendium/AlphaIndex.html) Kaya -402. Kruve A. 2008. Matrix effects in pesticide multi-residue analysis by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry. Journal

of Chromatography A, 1187, 58-66.

–707. Lehotay, S.J., Mastovska, K., Lightfield, A.R. 2005a. Use of buffering and other means to improve results of

problematic pesticides in a fast and easy method for residue analysis of fruits and vegetables. Journal of AOAC International, 88(2): 615-629.

Lehotay, S.J., de Kok, A., Hiemstra, M., and Van Bodegraven, P. 2005b. Validation of a fast and easy method for the determination of residues from 229 pesticides in fruits and vegetables using gas and liquid chromatography and mass spectrometric detection, Journal of AOAC International, 88(2): 595-614.

Lesueur, C., Gartner, M., Mentler, A., Fuerhacker, M. 2008. Comparision of four extraction method for the analysis of 24 pesticides in soil samples with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography-ion trap-mass spectrometry. Talanta, 75: 284-293.

Lesueur, C., Knittl, P., Gartner, M., Mentler, A. and Fuerhacker, M., 2008, Analysis of 140 pesticides from conventional farming foodstuff samples after extraction with the modified QuECheRS method, Food Control, 19: 906-914.

NMKL Procedure No.4, (2009), Validation of chemical analytical methods (www.nmkl.org)

–19.

62

Rodrigues, A.M., Ferriera, V., Cardoso, V.V., Ferriera, E. And Benoliel, M.J. 2007. Determination of several pesticides in water by solid-phase extraction, liquid chromatography and electrospray tandem mass spectrometry, Journal of Chromatography, 1150: 267-278.

SANCO/12495/2011, Method validation and quality control procedures for pesticide residues analysis in food and feed. Schenck, F.J., Lehotay, S.J., Vega, V. 2002. Comparison of solid-phase extraction sorbents for clean-up in pesticide

residue analysis of fresh fruits and vegetables. J Sep Science, 25:883-890. -

37. Tanabe, S., Gondaria, F., Subramanian, A. 1990. Specific pattern of persistent organochlorine residues in human breast

milk from South India. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 38, 899–903.

-169. Turgut, C., 2005. Pestisitler. TMMOB Zir

-79. Wang, J. and Wotherspoon, D. 2007. Determination of pesticides in apples by liquid chromatography with tandem mass

spectrometry and estimation of measurement uncertainty, Journal of AOAC International, Vol:90, No:2: 550-567.

TEKL ONAYI Ad Soya Tarih za Proje Lideri /

Dr. Fatih Alpay VURAN 04.05.2015

neren Kurul M d 04.05.2015

rli i Yap lan Kurulu Yetkilisi / Faruk KURNAZ 08.05.2015

rli i Yap lan Kurulu Yetkilisi / Prof. Dr. Mehmet 05.05.2015

rli i Yap lan Kurulu Yetkilisi / 04.05.2015

rli i Yap lan Kurulu Yetkilisi / itki

Prof. Dr. Cafer TURGUT 06.05.2015

63


BA Optimizasyonu ARA TIRMA FIRSAT ALANI -04) ARA TIRMA PROGRAMI -06) PROGRAM ÖNCELI I Orta

ADI ADRESI PROJE DE ADI SOYADI KURUMU BATEM TELEFONU 0242-321 6797 E-POSTA [email protected] PROJE/ALT PROJE YÜRÜTÜCÜLE

ADI SOYADI KURUMU E-POSTA Ramazan TOKER BATEM [email protected]

BATEM [email protected] BATEM [email protected]

BATEM fulya.yuceol@ tarim.gov.tr BATEM [email protected]

Fatma UYSAL BATEM [email protected] Prof. Dr. Emine BAYRAM [email protected]

PROJE TOPLAM

PROJE B

21.000 01/01/2016 31/12/2019

L

Nu-

Ayni

Proje Özeti:

64

Anahtar Kelimeler: Hypericum perforatum

Optimization of Some Parameters in St. John’s Wort Oil Production Abstract:In our country, the relevance to the medicinal and aromatic plants, the products generated from them, usage areas of these products and effect of these products is increasing invariably. Centaury oil is one of them and multi-purpose usage of its is quite prevalent. There are many studies about the Hypericum perforatum and products obtained from this plant in the world. But in our country, there are few studies about the centaury oil. One of these studies is about the centaury oil products provided from the market. Centaury oil is obtained with the maceration method and for this purpose it is utilized from the olive oil. But there are many parameters affecting the production. These parameters are different from firm to firm. There are significant differences in the products present in the market because of not making the active ingredient analysis of the products. Also it is reported that the storage stability of the active ingredients in the extracts which obtained from this plant is very low. The optimization of the plant/olive oil ratio, maceration place and time parameters are purposed with this project. Also the determination of the shelf stability of the product with making monthly analysis is purposed within the project. It is thought that these results obtained from the project will be beneficial to the producers, consumers and academicals researchers. Keywords: Hypericum perforatum Projenin Ama ve Gerekçesi: -aromatik bitkiler ve bunlardan elde

Hypericum perforatum

ya Hypericum Hypericum perforatum türü

Proje ile Elde Edilmek stenilen Ç ar ve Kullan m Alanlar

65

dayanmak

Bu bitki Hypericaceae (Guttiferae Hypericum


Hypericeae H. perforatum Linn., H. maculatum Crantz, H. tomentosum Linn., H. bithynicum Boiss., H.

glandulosum Gilib., ve H. beliaricum H. perforatum

HypericumHypericum perforatum

Hypericum perforatum Haziran t


ere -bere,

(Erdelmeier vd, 2000). Bu bitkinin etken maddelerinden birisi olan hiperisin (antidepresan) naftodiantronlar grubundan bir

el drugta %2-

vd, 2000).

66

hiperisin ve pseudohiperisin bil

epresan etkilerini


Medina vd (2006) Hypericum perforatum

Hypericum

Bagchi vd (2011) bitkiseHypericum perforatum

Li vd (2014) Hypericum perforatum bitkisinin etken maddelerinden birisi olan hiperisin maddesinin

Saddiqe vd (2010) Hypericum perforatum

glusinoller, flavonol glikozitleri,


Hypericum

-

67

Hypericum boissieri Petr. olarak Hypericum perforatum

Hypericum perforatum bitkisinin hipe


sonuc

Nuevas- Hypericum H. tetrapetalum, H. nitidum ve H. styphelioides

Hypericum z

H. empetrifolium Wild., H. sinaicum Hochst. & Steud. ex Bois ve H. triqetriffolium -0,020 ve %0,013-

Hypericum perforatum bitkisinin tomurcuklanma (Haziran) ve tam


-crayophyllene

Schwob vd (2004) Hypericum perforatum

-caryophyllene, spathulenol, 1--funebrene, 1- -

Hypericum perfoliatum ve Hypericum tomentosum Hypericum perfolaiatum

Hypericum tomentosum Hypericum perfoliatum -pinene (%13,16), allo-aromadendrene (%11,48), germacrene-D (%10,65) ve n-octane (%7,32) iken Hypericum tomentosum - - -pinene (%5,24)

68

uygulamad-55

a ile Hypericum

Hypericum aviculariifolium subsp. depilatum var. depilatum (endemik), Hypericum perforatum ve Hypericum pruinatum

Hypericum aviculariifolium subsp. depilatum var. depilatum Hypericum perforatum ve Hypericum pruinatum

H. perforatum

ile 1,06


H. perforatum subsp. perforatum, H. perforatum subsp. angustifolium, H. perforatum subsp. veronense

H. perforatum subsp. perforatum

Hypericum perforatumekstra

69

birisi

kiden ekstrakte edilebilen

Trypanosoma broceirhodesiense Stahylococcus aerus aktivitesinin o

--

vd, 2005). MATERYAL ve METOT Materyal


alma yoluyla temin edilecektir. Metot Üretim (Hammadde üretimi) Temin edilen tohumlardan

2

2SO4

70

Bitki (

10 15 15 30 20 60 25 120

para-

-

optimum parametreler belirlenecektir.

-

T

eklenecek

1983).

- le

71

itrasyonu ile belirlenecektir. Bu amaçla 250 ml’lik erlene örneklerden

Para- -AV) analizi

-- -

yerde 5 ml hekzan ile 1 ml para-

p-AV= 25 x (1.2 x A2-A1))/m

ek

l saf su, 5 ml 0.2 N Folin-Ciocalteau reaktifi ve 4 ml Na2CO4

Hiperisin ve hiperforin analizi

me-

-

etanol ve

e göre

72

vd., 1987). ÇALI MA TAKV M

Faaliyetler 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

optimizasyonu x x x x x x x x

x

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 x x x x

x x x x x x x x x

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 x x x x x x x x x x x x

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

x x x x x x Songetirilmesi x x x x x x

YÖNET M DÜZE

Ad Soyad Proje Yürütüc erinin Projeye Kat lar Y cak Faaliyetlerdeki Sorumluluklar Çal Takvimi

Proje materyallerinin temini, materyal metot

getirilmesi

1-42 ay

Ramazan TOKER 1-42 Ay

1-42 Ay

Arzu BAYIR 1-42 Ay

1-24 Ay Materyal temini v

1-24 Ay

Fatma UYSAL 1-24 Ay Prof. Dr. Emine BAYRAM 1-42 Ay


73

-

1 parametreleri

2

3

TALEP E LEN BÜTÇE

06 SERMAYE G ERLE YILLARA RE DA ILIM

1.Y l 2.Y l 3 Y l 06.1- Mamul Mal Alml 12.000 9.000 06.2- Menkul Sermaye retim Giderleri 06.5- Gayrimenkul Sermaye im Giderleri 06.9- Di er Sermaye Giderleri

Toplam 12.000 9.000 Genel Toplam 21.000 TL

2016

2017

2018

6

6 1

6 1 2 6 1 2 4 12.000 8.000

6 1 2 5

6 1 2 90

6 1 3 5

6 1 3 90

74

6 2 Menkul Sermaye Üretim Giderleri

6 2 6 6 2 6 1 6 2 7 1

6 5 Gayrimenkul Sermaye Üretim Giderleri 6 5 2 Malzeme Giderleri 6 5 2 4

6 5 4 Enerji Giderleri 6 5 4 2 6 5 4 3

6 9 iderleri 6 9 2 Yolluk Giderleri 6 9 2 1 6 9 2 2 3 3 6 2 1

TOPLAM 12.000 9.000 GENEL TOPLAM 21.000 TL KAYNAKÇA AGOSTINIS, P., VANTIEGHEM, A., MERLEVEDE, W., DE WITTE, P.A.M. (2002). Hypericin in cancer

treatment: more light on the way. The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology, 34: 221–241.

-Baharat -

- -

ANYZEWSKA, M., KOWALCZUK, A., LOZAK, A., JABLCZYNSKA, R., FIJALEK, Z. (2010). Determination

Research 67(6): 587-593. BAGCHI, M., PATEL, S., ZAFRA-STONE, S., BAGCHI, D. (2011). Selected herbal supplements and

-393. Elsevier Inc. BAGDONAITE, E., MARTONFI, P., REPCAK, M., LABOKAS, J. (2010). Variation in the contents of

pseudohypericin and hypericin in Hypericum perforatum from Lithuania. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 38: 634-640.

BRISKIN, D.P., LEROY, A., GAWIENOWSKI, M.C. (2000). Influence of nitrogen on the production of Biochem

(2003). Step by step removal of hyperforin and hypericin: activity profile of different Hypericum preparations in behavioral models. Life Sciences 73: 627-639.

hypericin in some Hypericum species from Turkey during the course of ontogenesis. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 34: 1-13.

75

DE LOS REYES, G.C., KODA, R.T. (2002). Determining hyperforin and hypericin content in eight brands of St. John’s wort. Am J Health-Syst Pharm 59: 545-547.

York, 591 pp. Hypericum perforatum

-234. ERDELMEIER, C.A.J, KOCH, E., HOERR, R. (2000). Hypericum perforatum-

pharmacological and clinical aspects. (Studies in Natural Products Chemist -716, Elsevier Science, New York.

samples of Hypericum perforatum and their LC-DAD-MS anaylses. Food Chemistry 138: 870-875. FILIPPINI, R., PIOVAN, A., BORSARINI, A., CANIATO, R. (2010). Study of dynamic accumulation of

secondary metabolites in three subspecies of Hypericum perforatum. Fitoterapia 81: 115-119. FREEMAN, M.P. (2009). Complementary and alternative medicine for perinatal depression. Journal of Affective

Disorders 112: 1–10 Hypericum perforatum

-Onkolo ji Dergisi 15 (4): 212-218. HOSNI, K., MSAADA, K., TAARIT, M.B., OUCHIKH, O., KALLEL, M., MARZOUK, B. (2008). Essential oil

composition of Hypericum perfoliatum L. and Hypericum tomentosum L. growing wild in Tunisia. Industrial Crops and Products 2 7: 308–314.

ISACCHI, B., BERGONZI, M.C., CARNEVALI, F. VAN DER ESCH, S.A., VINCIERI, F.F. BILIA, A.R. (2007). Analysis and stabilitPharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 45: 756–761.

content Hypericum perforatum L.). African Journal of Biotechnology 7(13): 2163-2168. KALOGEROPOULOS, N., YANNAKOPOULOU, K., GIOXARI, A., CHIOU, A., MAKRIS, D.P. (2010).

-cyclodextrin of a flavonoid-rich Hypericum perforatum - Food Science and Technology, 43: 882–889.

KITANOV, G.M. (2001). Hypericin and pseudohypericin in some Hypericum species. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 29: 171-178.

LI, Z., QIN, C., LI, D., HOU, Y., LI, S., SUN, J. (2014). Molecularly imprinted polymer for specific extraction of hypericinfrom Hypericum perforatum L. herbal extract. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 98: 210-220.

MEDINA, M.A., MARTINEZ-POVEDA, B., AMORES- NCHEZ, M.I., QUESADA, A.R. (2006). Hyperforin: More than an antidepressant bioactive compound? Life Sciences 79: 105-111.

NUEVAS-PAZ, L., MOLINA-TORRES, J., PRIETRO-GONZALES, S. (2005). Determination of Hypericin in Hypericum Species Grown in Cuba. Acta Farm. Bonaerense 24 (1): 89-90.

PYTLAKOWSKA, K., KITA, A., JANOSKA, P., POLOWNIAK, M., KOZIK, V. (2012). Multi-element analysis of mineral and trace elements in medicinal herbs and their infusions. Food Chemistry 135: 494–501.

VATTIKUTI, U.M.R., CIDDI, V. (2005). An overview on Hypericum perforatum Linn. Natural Product Radiance 4 (5): 368-381.

SADDIQE, Z., NAEEM, I., MAIMOONA, A. (2010). A review of the antibacterial activity of Hypericum perforatum L. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 131: 511–521.

SCHWOB, I., BESSIERE, J.M., VIANO, J. (2002). Composition of the essential oils of Hypericum perforatum L. from southeastern France. C. R. Biologies, 325: 781-785.

SCHWOB, I., BESSIERE, J.M., MASOTTI, V., VIANO, J. (2004). Changes in essential oil composition in Saint Hypericum perforatum L.) aerial parts during its phenological cycle. Biochemical Systematics

and Ecology 32: 735–745. SILVA, B.A., FERRERES, F., MALVA, J.O., DIAS, A.C.P. (2005). Phytochemical and antioxidant

characterization of Hypericum perforatum alcoholic extracts. Food Chemistry 90: 157-167.

76

SOUTHWELL, I.A, BOURKE, C.A. (2001). Seasonal variation in hypericin content of Hypericum perforatum L. (St. John’s wort). Phythochemistry 56: 437-441.

SPANOS, G.A., WROLSTAD, R.E. (1990). Influence of processing and storage on the phenolic composition of Thompson seedless grape juice. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 38 (3): 817-824.

TAWAHA, K., GHARAIBEH, M., EL-ELIMAT, T., ALALI, F.Q. (2010). Determination of hypericin and hyperforin content in selected Jordanian Hypericum species. Industrial Crops and Products 32: 241-245.

WALKER, T.S., BAIS, H.P., VIVANCO, J.M. (2002). Jasmonic acid-induced hypericin production in cell suspension cultures of Hypericum perforatum L. (St. John’s wort). Phytochemistry 60: 289-293.

TEKL ONAYI Ad Soya Tarih za Proje Lideri Dr.Muharrem GÖLÜKCÜ Öneren Kurul Müdürü Dr. Abdullah ÜNLÜ


Pembegül KALAY rli i Yap lan Kurulu kili i

77


PROJE BA LI I

ARA TIRMA FIRSAT ALANI Meyve- -08) ARA TIRMA PROGRAMI Subtropik Meyveler (P-09) PROGRAM Ö

ADI

PROJE DE ADI SOYADI KURUMU BATEM TELEFONU (242) 345 28 84/513 E-POSTA [email protected] PROJE/ALT PROJE YÜRÜTÜCÜLE

ADI SOYADI KURUMU E-POSTA [email protected]

PROJE TOPLAM

(TL)

52.000 01.01.2016 31.12.2019

L

- - - Proje Özeti: e nar

Phytophthora

Phytophthora

problemlerine hangi Phytophthora Phytophthora

Anahtar Kelimeler: Nar, Punica granatum, Phytophthora

78

Determination of the Phytophthora Species Causing Root and Crown Rot on Pomegranate Trees in Antalya Provinces and the Susceptibility of Some Pomegranate Cultivars Against the Disease

Abstract: The objectives of this study are to determine the Phytophthora species causing drying of ion of

Turkey is done, and to determine the susceptibility degrees of some pomegranate cultivars against the disease.In recent years, our country has experienced a large increase in pomegranate production. However, the long-standing problem about drying of pomegranate trees has occured and complaints regarding this problem have been taken from the cultivators in this direction. However, there is not enough study in our country and the world about the detection and solving of this problem. Shortcomings in this area will have been resolved by this study significantly.In this project, surveys will be carried out in important pomegranate fields and diseased plant and soil samples will be collected. Then isolation and identification studies will be performed. Differences of virulence among the species will be revealed by pathogenicity tests. Phytophthora species were identified on the basis of the morphological characteristics and by the analysis of sequences of the rDNA. The differences of susceptibility of some pomegranate cultivars to the disease will be investigated.At the end of this study, Phytophthora species causing pomegranate decline will be determined and the new pathogen species of pomegranate trees will be determined and these data will be presented in science. Also important data regarding the use of resistant rootstocks and cultivars, the most effective method in the control of root pathogens will have been obtained.This study will be carried out my doctorate science thesis under the supervision of prAgricultural Faculty, Plant Protection Department. Keywords: Pomegranate, Punica granatum, Phytophthora, root and crown rot, cultivar reaction Projenin Ama ve Gerekçesi: Nar, Lythraceae fami Punica

olan Punica granatum Pomuni granatum

kanser ve kalp damar

-

Kaf

tutulan resmi

79

Phytophthora ar (Erwin and Riberio, 2005). Phytophthora

Phytophthora P. palmivora Theobroma cacao

- Phytophthora -

P. cinnamomi Phytophthora

bitkilerinden P. nicotianae

Antalya 55.885 104.815 34.102 66.703

Denizli 30.515 34.618 Adana 20.513 34.098 Mersin 23.351 30.370 Gaziantep 17.737 21.483 Hatay 10.902 18.429

16.191 15.483

Phytophthora rdan P. citrophthora P.

cactorum P. cactorum ve P. citrophthora P. quercina ve P. citricola P. cinnamomi ve P. cambivora

P. infestans ile biberde P. capsici

Kurbetli and Kurbetli 2013; K -

Phytophthora

(Anonim, 201

Phytophthora Phytophthora

fidanlar Phytophthora

80


Phytophthora

Phytophthora enisite testleriyle türler

testleriyle Proje ile Elde Edilmek stenilen Ç ar ve Kullan m Alanlar

Phytophthora

Phytophthora

Narlarda kurumalara neden olan Phytophthora

Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. punicae” .

Akhtar and Bhatti (1992), narda bakteriyel bir etmenin Pakis

ad -negatif bir bakteri olan Xanthomonas campestris pv. punicae

Fusarium solani o

81

in yetersizlikleri, fizyolojik

faktörlerin bir a

ksilemde kahverengi renk -Xyleborus

Ceratocystis Ceratocystis fimbriata Ellis &

Ceratocystis fimbriata’ narlarda sol

Fusarium spp. 28 aya kadar olan bitkileri en

Fusarium oxysporum

Somasekhara (2002), 1996-

Bacillus subtilis

--

Ceratocystis fimbriata izole Ceratocystis fimbriata

rapordur.

Phytophthora

olasyonlar sonucunda %19,8 Fusarium spp., %1,4 Phytophthora spp., %15,9 Rhizoctonia spp., %22,4 Alternaria spp., %14,0 Aspergillus spp., %1,2 Mucor ve %16,5

ise, %30,8 Botrytis spp., %21,1 Alternaria spp., %20,7 Aspergillus spp., %15,3 Penicillium spp., %3,7 Fusarium Mucor

- Verticillium dahliae

Verticillium dahliae’ Tzavella-Klonari, 2008).

Bakteriyel bir etmen olan Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. punicae -

82

Karnataka ve Maharashtra eyaletlerinde Ceratocystis fimbriata

fungal etmenler Rhizoctonia bataticola, Fusarium solani ve Colletotrichum gloeosporioidesAlternaria, Cercospora, Sphaceloma, Fusarium, Phomopsis,

Drechslera, Phytophthora nicotianae ve Ceuthospora phyllosticta .

Xanthomonas campestris pv. punicae

Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. punicae

ba

Coniella granati 2012). MATERYAL ve METOT Materyal

-sitosterol, thiamine hydrochloride ve tryp

Phytophthora

Miktar (1 L saf su)

MUA + Agar 17 g + 5 g Pimaricin 5 mg Ampicillin 250 mg Rifampicin 10 mg PCNB (Quintozene) 100 mg

Target DNA

Internal transcribed spacer

ITS- ITS-

900 bp

-Tubulin

989 bp

Metot

genel bi

83

Antalya

Aksu 23.765 9.072 90 Serik 19.482 8.367 83

11.192 3.881 38 9.387 7.669 76

Finike 9.204 4.733 47 Kumluca 9.000 6.552 65 Kepez 8.434 3.331 33 Manavgat 5.920 4.602 46

Fethiye 30.888 19.326 190 Ortaca 32.002 12.046 120

Toplam 159.274 79.579 788

Phytophthora

––

(CMA-PARP) (Jeffers and Martin, 1986) ––

Phytophthora

–(2- -

- –


ps et al. 1990; Erwin and Ribeiro

84

–

––

-sitosterol (30 mg/l), thiamine hydrochloride (1 mg/l) ve tryptophane (20 mg/l) ilave li

-3 hafta

belirlenerek kaydedilecektir.

Patojenisite testi

miselli agar diskleri

Phytophthora spp.

ilave edilecektir.

-

-4

zelge 5. Narda Phytophthora

85

0 Lezyon yok 1 % 1-25 lezyon 2 % 26-50 lezyon 3 % 51-75 lezyon 4 % 76-100 lezyon

DNA izolasyonu, PCR ve DNA dizileme

-

A, fungusun internal transcribed - -tub

Kroon et al. 2004) ku

4)2SO4 -Biotech), 5 mM MgCl2

(Perez-Sierra et al. 2010).

2 dk 30 sn 30 sn annealing 45 sn extension 10 dk son extension

-tub 2 dk 20 sn 25 sn annealing 50 sn extension 10 dk son extension

(40 mM Tris-borate, 1 mM EDTA, pH:8.0)

sonra elekt

der Plus (MBI Fermentas GmbH,

GenBank (NCBI-

Filogenetik analiz

86

diziler ile

analizlerinde Maksimum Parsimony (MP) MEGA 6.0 (Tamura et al. 2013)

bulunan enemelerde

tir. Bu denemede her Phytophthora

taneleri

de 2-3 cm

-

olan etkileri de belirlenecektir. Elde edilen veriler istatistiki analizlere tabi t

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 x x

x x x x x x x

x x x x x x x x x x

x x x x x x x x x x

x x

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Ara x x x x x x x

x x x x x x x x x x

87


x x x x x x Patojenisite testleri x x x x x x x x

x x x x

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

x x x x temini x x x x x x

x x x x x x

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

x x x x rin temini x x x x x x

x x x x x x

YÖNET M DÜZE


01.01.2016/31.12.2019

KARACA sorumludur. 01.01.2016/31.12.2019


Phytophthora

olan Phytophthora

1 olan Phytophthora

2 edilerek ve filogenetik analizleri

kin kongre ve sempozyumlarda sunum yapmak

3

88

ongre ve sempozyumlarda sunum yapmak

4

5

Zengin gen kaynaklar



1.Y l 2.Y l 3.Y l 06.1- Mamul Mal Alml 3.500 3.500 2.500 2.500 06.2- Menkul Sermaye Üretim Giderleri 5.500 5.500 3.500 3.500 06.5- Gayrimenkul Sermaye im Giderleri 5.500 5.500 500 500 06.9- Di er Sermaye Giderleri 2.500 2.500 03- M 5.000

Toplam 17.000 22.000 6.500 6.500 Genel Toplam 52.000

2016

2017

2018

2019

6 6 1

6 1 2

6 1 2 4 6 1 2 5

6 1 2 90

6 1 3 4 3.500 3.500 2.500 2.500

6 1 3 5

6 1 3 90

6 2

6 2 6

6 2 6 1 500 500 500 500

6 2 7 1 5.000 5.000 3.000 3.000 6 5

6 5 2 Malzeme Giderleri

6 5 2 4

89

6 5 4 Enerji Giderleri 6 5 4 2 5.000 5.000

6 5 4 3 500 500 500 500 6 9 6 9 2 Yolluk Giderleri 6 9 2 1 2.500 2.500 6 9 2 2 3

3 6 2 1 5.000 TOPLAM 17.000 22.000 6.500 6.500 GENEL TOPLAM 52.000 KAYNAKÇA

). Involvement of Phytophthora citrophthora in Kiwifruit Decline in Turkey. Journal of Phytopathology, 159 (7-8): 579-581.

Phytophthora spp. in chestnut decline in the Black Sea region of Turkey. Forest Pathology, 42 (4): 299-304.

Phytophthora citrophthora, a new pathogen causing decline on horse chestnut in Turkey. Forest Pathology, 42 (4): 299-304.

AKILLI, S. Phytophthora dieback on Narrow leaved ash in the Black Sea region of Turkey. Forest Pathology, 43 (3): 252-256.

AKHTAR, M.A. and BHATTI, M.H.R., (1992). Occurrence of bacterial leaf spot of Pomegranate in Pakistan. Pakistan J Agric Res, 13: 95–97.

Phytophthora Phytophthora spp.). Bitki

http://www.tarim.gov.tr/TAGEM/Belgeler/B%C4%B0TK%C4%B0%20HASTALIKLARI%20Z%C4%B0RA%C4%B0%20M%C3%9CCADELE%20TEKN%C4%B0K%202.05.2014).

BALCI, Y. and HALMSCHLAGER, E. (2003). Phytophthora species in oak ecosystems in Turkey and their association with declining oak trees. Plant Pathology, 52: 694-702.

04). Studies to Determine the Causal Agents of Soil-borne Fungal Diseases of Strawberries in Aydin and to Control them by Soil Disinfestation. Journal of Phytopathology, 152 (8-9): 509-513.

- CHAVAN, S.R. and DAKE, G.N. (2002). In vitro inhibition of Fusarium associated with wilt of pomegranate by

rhizobacteria. Journal of Maharashtra Agricultural Universities, 26 (3): 257-259.

granati in Turkey. Australasian Plant Disease Notes, 7: 161-162.

-LEHTIJARVI, T., ADAY KAYA, A.G., LEHTIJARVI, A. and JUNG, T. 2014. First Report of

Phytophthora syringae on Cedrus libani in Turkey. Plant Disease, 98 (6): 846. ERWIN, D.C. and RIBERIO, O.K. (2005). Phytophthora Diseases Worldwide. 2nd edn. St. Paul, MN, USA, APS

Press. p 562. EVANS, H.C., and PRIOR, C., (1987). Cocoa pod diseases: Causal agents and control. Outlook Agric., 16: 35-41.

90

GALLEGLY, M.E. and HONG, C. (2008). Phytophthora, Identifying Species by Morphology and DNA Fingerprints. The American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, MN, USA.

GÜNCÜ, M. (1989). Güney Anadolu Bölgesinde kültür bitkilerinde zarar yapan Phytophthora

HINGORANI, M.K. and MEHTA, P.P. (1952). Bacterial leaf spot of pomegranate. Indian Phytopathology, 5: 55-56. HUANG, Q., ZHU, Y.Y., CHEN, H.R., WANG, Y.Y., LIU, Y.L., LU, W.J. and RUAN, X.Y. (2003). First Report of

Pomegranate Wilt Caused by Ceratocystis fimbriata in Yunnan, China. Plant Disease, 87 (9): 1150. JAMADAR, M.M., SATARADDI, A.R., PATIL, P.V., JAVADAGI, R.S. and PATIL, D.R. (2009). Status of

Pomegranate Diseases of Northern Karnataka in India. ISHS Acta Horticulturae 890: II International Symposium on Pomegranate and Minor - including Mediterranean - Fruits: ISPMMF2009.

JEFFERS, S.N., ALDWINCKLE, H.S. and ARNESON, P.A. (1981). Excised twig assay for the study of apple tree crown rot pathogens in vitro. Plant Disease, 65:823-825.

JEFFERS, S.N. and MARTIN, S.B. (1986). Comparison of two media selective for Phytophthora and Pythium species. Plant Disease, 70:1038-1043.

JEFFERS, S.N. (2006). Identifying Species of Phytophthora. http://www.fhm.fs.fed.us/sp/sod/misc/culturing_species_phytophthora.pdf

KORE, S.S and MITKAR, P.L. (1993). Dry root rot disease of pomegranate incited by Fusarium solani. Journal of Maharashtra Agricultural Universities,18 (2): 256-258.

KROON, L.P.N.M., Bakker, F.T., van den Bosch, G.B.M., Bonants, P.J.M., and Flier, W.G. (2004). Phylogenetic analyses of Phytophthora species based on mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences. Fungal Genetics and Biology, 41: 766-782.

(2010). First report of root and crown rot of almond caused by Phytophthora spp. in Turkey. Plant Disease, 94 (10): 1261.

(2011). Phytophthora –

(2011). First report of Phytophthora taxon niederhauserii causing decline of almond in Turkey. New Disease Reports, 23: 14.

KU (2012). neden olan Phytophthora türleri. Bitki Koruma Bülteni, 52 (4): 299-312.

Phytophthora cinnamomi Associated with Root and Crown Rot of Walnut in Turkey. Journal of Phytopathology, 161: 287-289.

Occurrence of Phytophthora Root and Stem Rot of Kiwifruit in Turkey. Journal of Phytopathology, 161: 887-889.

(2014). olan Phytophthora türleri –

Involvement of Phytophthora cryptogea in Sweet Cherry Decline in Turkey. Phytoparasitica, 42 (5): 627-630.

Punica granatum A Study of Agricultural Geography: Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) Cultivation in Turkey]. Marmara

gisi, 27:551-574. Phytophthora species associated with crown and root rot

of apple in Chile. Plant Disease, 85 (6): 603-606. MCBLAIN, B.A., ZIMMERLY, M.M., SCHMITTHENNER, A.F., and HACKER, J.K. (1991a). Tolerance to

Phytophthora Crop Science. 31: 1405-1411. MCBLAIN, B.A., HACKER, J.K., ZIMMERLY, M.M., and SCHMITTHENNER, A.F. (1991b). Tolerance to

Phytophthora rot in soybean: II. Evaluation of three tolerance screening methods. Crop Science 31: 1412-1417. PALA, H., , E.,

-Adana, 17 s. PEREZ-SIERRA A., LEON, M., ALVAREZ, A., ALANIZ, S., BERBEGAL M -JIMENEZ, J. and ABAD-

CAMPOS, P. (2010). Outbreak of a new Phytophthora sp. associated with severe decline of almond trees in eastern Spain. Plant Disease, 94(5):534-541.

91

PETERSEN, Y., MANSVELT, E.L., VENTER, E. and LANGENHOVEN, W.E. (2010). Detection of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. punicae causing bacterial blight on pomegranate in South Africa. J Australasian Plant Pathol, 39 (6): 544–546.

RAVIKUMAR, M.R., JAHAGIRDHAR, S., SRINIVASCHARY, R.Y. and RYAGI, Y.H. (2001). Management of clump rot of pomegranate caused by Fusarium spp. Agricultural Science Digest. 21 (3): 123-125.

SANHUEZA, R.M.V., PERAZZorchards in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil., Acta Horticulturae, 232:213-218.

SOMASEKHARA, Y.M. (1999). New record of Ceratocystis fimbriata causing wilt of pomegranate Plant Disease, 83 (4): 400.

SOMASEKHARA, Y.M. (2002). Application of Bacillus subtilis in the management of pomegranate (Punica granatum Linn.) wilt (Ceratocystis fibriata Ell. and Halst.) disease. Research on Crop. 3 (1): 202-203.

STAMPS, D.J., WATERHOUSE, G.M., NEWHOOK, F.J. and HALL, G.S. (1990). Revised Tabular Key to the Species of Phytophthora. Mycological Papers 162. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.

http://batem.gov.tr/yeni/yayinlar/emakale/nar.pdf, Tarihi: 22.04.2014).

TAMURA, K., STECHER, G., PETERSON, D., FILIPSKI, A. and KUMAR, S. (2013). MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 30 (12): 2725-2729.

TIDBALL C.J. and LINDERMAN R.G. (1990). Phytophthora root and stem rot of apple rootstocks from stool beds, Plant Disease, 74 (2): 141-146.

TZIROS, G.T. and TZAVELLA-KLONARI, K. (2008). First report of Verticillium wilt of pomegranate caused by Verticillium dahliae in Greece. Journal of Plant Pathology, 90 (3): 589.

VAUTERIN, L., HOSTE, B., KERSTERS, K. and SWINGS, J. (1995). Reclassification of Xanthomonas. Int. J. Syst. Bacterial., 45: 475-489.

WHITE, T.J., BRUNS, T., LEE, S. and TAYLOR J. (1990). Amplification and direct sequencing of fungi ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. Pages 315-322 in: PCR protocols. A Guide to Methods and Applications. M. A. Innis, D. H. Gelfand, J. J. Sninsky, and T. J. White, eds. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.

WATERHAUSE, G.M., NEWHOOK, F.J., and STAMPS, D.J. (1983). Present criteria for classification of Phytophthora. Pages 139-147 in: Phytophthora: Its Biology, Taxonomy, Ecology, and Pathology. D.C. Erwin, S. Bartnicki-Garcia, and P.H. Tsao, eds. American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, Minn. 392 pp.

TEKL ONAYI Ad Soya Tarih za Proje Lideri 17.04.2015 Öneren Kurul Müd

rli i Yap lan Kurulu

92


PROJE BA ARA TIRMA FIRSAT ALANI (A09) ARA TIRMA PROGRAMI (P01) PROGRAM ÖNCELI I

ADI A ADRESI PROJE DE ADI SOYADI TEPE KURUMU BATEM TELEFONU 0242 724 52 92 E-POSTA [email protected] PROJE/ALT PROJE YÜRÜTÜCÜLE

ADI SOYADI KURUMU E-POSTA Dr. Aylin KA

aylin.kabas@ tarim.gov.tr

volkan.gozen@ tarim.gov.tr

Biyoteknoloji Bl.

[email protected]

isil.demirtas@ tarim.gov.tr

PROJE TOPLAM

35500 01.01.2016 31.12.2018

L

- - - Proje Özeti:

Bu

ve gener

Anahtar Kelimeler:

93

Determination of Levels of Low Temperature Tolerance in Tomato Lines for Using Breeding Program Abstract: Tomato is the most important vegetable species in our country and the world. Especially, in recent years, as a result of the occurence of healty and balanced diet awareness tomato comes to the fore as a main product. Biotic and abiotic stress conditions are the most important factors limiting for tomato production. Low temperature is a major environmental factor, the most important of abiotic stress limiting plant productivity. Especially, low temperature stress causes severe loss of yield and quality in greenhouse tomato production. In this project, low temperature tolerance of 300 tomato genotypes will determined with vegetative and generative testing. Programs of new breeding will be initiated with resistant lines according to obtained results. Keywords: Low temperature, Abiotic stress,Tomato Projenin Ama ve Gerekçesi: Domates (Solanum lycopersicum L

g vitamin B6, 1700 IU

antioksidan potansiyel

is

s i bitkilerden biri

olduunlukla 15o

yeti

ve geli

yeni genotiplerin geli tirilmesi ve rol alan mekanizmalverilmektedir (Foolad ve ark., 1998; Truco ve ark., 2000; Fellner ve Shawney,2001).

esidir. Proje ile Elde Edilmek stenilen Ç ar ve Kullan m Alanlar

0 yeti tirilen domateslerde,

Bu projede, d

94

belirlenmesi piy

birim alandan daha fazla ve daha di

belirlenecek olan genotiplerin,

-10 o

i bitkilerden biri domates

edir (Gressel ve Galun, 1994; Kerdnaimongkal ve Ark., 1997). s s s s

s skos -12 o smesi), erkek organlarda olusan

s ss se s

s sgan ve ark., 1994)

o

tozu ca

partenokarpik v

95

Domates

.

1994). Capsicum annuum

o oC ile

3. - 4. - -

96

5. -10’ dan -

karakterize edilirler)

in, 1985). s s -

,1976). Hassas bitkilerde so uk stresinin neden oldu u solma ve s ska bir deyis

hidrolik iletkenli s itkilerin

s s unda, yapraklarda meydana gelen ark., 2001; Hutchison ve ark., 2000; Venema ve ark., 2000).

s

edilmektedir (Inze ve Van Montagu, 1995; Foyer ve ark.,1997). Solanum

lycopersicum o Bigdena, Clarance, Quest, and Conchita)

o

n (Solanum habrochaites LA 1777 Humb. &

Bonpl., Sh Solanum lycopersicum Mill. cv. Moneymaker, Sl

o

S. habrochaites

aborsiyon

bulunurken sakkaroz, glikoz ve fruktozda % 23–40 azalma, prolinde ise % 50–

2005).

fasulyesi (Kokubun ve ark., 2001), bezelye (Guilioni ve ark., 1997) ve yonca (Bissuel-Belaygue ve ark.,

ek tozu

2 -

lata- -

Lagenaria siceraria

97

-

3 0 0

01-0

3 mlenmeyi

Gha

Capsicum annuum

Kinet ve Peet(1997

-2 sn-1 -2 sn-1 i kotiledon ve birinci

o -2 s-1

-

98

(Shaked ve ark., 2004).

indeki

Cushman ve Bohnert


kademesinde) ve (1 adet tolerant; Bestona ve 1 adet hassas; Batem S. hirsutum (LA 1777) denemede yer

Metot

Ön seleksiyon ; fideler 2-

- - -

Vejetatif testleme;

-

99

zararlanma 0-.

0: Zararlanma yok 1-2: 3-4: Az zararlanma %20- 5-6: Orta derece zararlanma %50- 7-8: %70-

9: %90- Kozik ve Wehner (2014), 0- -9) sahip olan hatlar is -2 sn-1

her hatta lipid peroksidasyon

o

MDA=(A532-A600)x ekstrakt hacmi(ml)/(155mM/cm

hücre membran geçirgenlikleri

1

EC2

1 / EC2 vd., 1996)

)

olarak kaydedilecektir. Stres ve kontrol b-

-

Tablo 2.

Saatler oC 18:00-19:00 14 19:00-20:00 12 20:00-21:00 10 21:00-22:00 9 22:00-23:00 8 23:00-00:00 7

100

00:00-01:00 6 01:00-02:00 5 02:00-03:00 7 03:00-04:00 8 04:00-05:00 9 05:00-06:00 10

Generatif testleme: -

-2 sn-1

a

Polenler hemositometrik lam

da

3BO3 + 300 ppm Ca(NO3)2

t

edilen ha

Ta

nin

f. . g.

kontrol edilecek.

Kriterler

101

5 5 30 25 Or 15 10 10 Yapraklarda ve tepede morarma

ÇALI MA TAKV M

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

x x x x x x

MDA analizleri x x x x

x x x x

tif testleme x x x x x x

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

x x x x x x

MDA analizleri x x lizleri x x

x x x x

x x x x x x

i x x x x

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

x x x x x x

x x x x x x x YÖNET M DÜZE

Ad Soyad Proje Yü tüc erinin Projeye Kat lar Y cak Faaliyetlerdeki Sorumluluklar Çal Takvimi

derecelendirme kriterlerinin

1-36. aylar

102

1-36. aylar

Generatianalizleri 4-30. aylar

1-36. aylar 1-24. aylar

6-18. aylar PROJE SONUÇLARI UYGULAMA AKTARIMI

is

s i stresine kar

bir varyasyonun oldu

Bu nedenle Batem domates

1

2 belirlenmesi

3 belirlenmesi TALEP E LEN BÜTÇE I.Y Tutar


1.Y l 2.Y l 3 Y l 06.1- Mamul Mal Alml 9000 2000 2000 06.2- Menkul Sermaye Üretim Giderleri 3000 06.5- Gayrimenkul Sermaye Üretim Giderleri 6000 5000 500 06.6- Menkul Mall B y k Onar m Giderleri 5000 06.7- Gayrimenkul B y Onar Giderleri 06.8- Stok Alml 06.9- Di er Sermaye Giderleri 1000 500 3. 1500

Toplam 24000 7000 4500 Genel Toplam 35500

103

2016

2017

2018

6 6 1 6 1 2

6 1 2 5

6 1 2 90 5000

6 1 3 04 3000 1000

6 1 3 90 1000 1000 2000 6 2

6 2 6

6 2 7 1 3000 6 5 6 5 2 Malzeme Giderleri

6 5 2 4 6 5 4 Enerji Giderleri 6 5 4 2 1000 500

6 5 4 3 5000 5000 6 6 7 1 5000 6 9 6 9 2 Yolluk Giderleri 6 9 2 1 Yur 1000 500 6 9 2 2 3 3 6 2 1 1500 TOPLAM 24000 7000 4500 GENEL TOPLAM 35500

104

KAYNAKÇA ALI, A. M., KELLY, W. C., 1993. Effect Of Pre-Anthesis Temperature On The Size And Shape Of Sweet Pepper

(Capsicum Annuum L.) Sci. Hort. 54:97-105 ALONI, B., PEET, M.M., PHARR, M.F. VE KARNI, L., 2001. The Effect Of High Temperature And High

Atmospheric Co2 On Carbohydrate Changes In Bell Pepper (Capsicum Annuum) Pollen In Relation To Its Germination. Physiol.Plant. 112, 505–512

AROCA, R., IRIGOYEN, J.J., SANCHEZ-DIAZ, M., 2001. Photosynthetic Characteristics And Protective Mechanisms Against Oxidative Stress During Chilling And Subsequent Recovery In Two Maize Varieties Differeing In Chilling Sensitivity. Plant Sci., 161: 719-726.

BELOUS, A.M., BONDARENKO, V. A., 1982. Structural Changes In Biological Membranes During Chilling (In Russian). Naukova Dumka, Kiev

BISSUEL-BELAYGUE, C., COWAN, A. A., MARSHALL, A. H. VE WERY, J.,2002. Reproductive Development Of White Clover (Trifolium Repens L.) Is Not Impaired By A Moderate Water Deficit That Reduces Vegetative Growth: I.Inflorescence Floret And Ovule Production. Crop Sci. 42, 406–414.

BOHNERT H.J., NELSON D.E., JENSEN R.G., (1995). Adaptations To Enviromental Stress. The Plant Cell, 7: 1099-1111

CEVRI, H., 2008, Rakamlarla Domates, Hasad Dergisi. CUSHMAN, J.C., BOHNERT. H.J., (2000). Genomic Approches To Plant Stress Tolerance. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.,

3(2): 117-124 DASGAN, H.Y., ABAK, K.,BAYTORUN, N., 1994. sen Domates

-1995, Cilt Ii, S.12-16.

k Stresine Etkisinin Toprak

Dergisi, 5, 4, 49-

58. FELLNER, M. SHAWNEY, V.K. 2001. Seed Germination In A Tomato Male-SterileMutant Is Resistant To Osmotic,

Salt And Low-Temperature Stresses. Theor Appl.Genet. 102: 215-221. FARRELL T. C., FOX K. M., WILLIAMS R. L. VE FUKAI S., 2006. Genotypic Variation For Cold Tolerance During

Reproductive Development In Rice:Screening With Cold Air And Cold Water. Field Crops Research 98 - 178–194,Elsevier.

FOOLAD, M.R., CHEN, F.Q., LIN, G.Y. 1998. Rflp Mapping Of Qtls ConferringCold Tolerance During Seed Germination In An Interspecific Cross Of Tomato. Mol. Breeding 4: 519-529

FOYER, C.H., LOPEZ-DELGADO, H., DAT, J.F. AND SCOTT, I.M. 1997.Hydrogen Peroxide- And Glutathione-Ass. Mechanisms Of Acclimatory Stress ToleranceAnd Signalling. Physiol. Plant. 100:241-254

FUJISHITA, N., 1965. Cytological, Histological And Physiological Studies On The Pollen Degeneration. Ii. On The Free Amino Acids With Reference To Pollen Degeneration Caused By Low Temperature In Fruit Vegetable Crops. J. Jpn. Soc.Hort. Sci. 34, 113–120.

GHANDOUR, M. A. EL., FADL, M. S., WALLY, Y. A., 1973. Effect Of Winter Chilling On Flowering, Fruit Setting, Shedding, Yild And Endogenus Promoters And Inhibitors In Sweet Pepper. Hort. Abst. 43(5), 2482.

GIBSON, L. R., PAULSEN, G. M., 1999. Yield Components Of Wheat Grown Under High Temperature Stress During Reproductive Growth. Crop Sci. 39,1841–1846. Crop Sci. 42, 406–414.

Domateste So uk Stresini sLisans Tezi. Toprak

Cucumis sativus L.) Lines For Chilling Tolerance. International Plant Breeding Congress 10-14 November 2013 Antalya, Turkey, Abstract Book Pp. 512.

GRESSEL, J. AND GALUN, E. 1994. Genetic Controls Of Photooxidant Tolerance. In:Fyer Ch, Mullineaux P.Eds. Causes Of Photooxidative Stress And Amelioration Of Defense Systems In Plants. Boca Raton, Fl, Usa: Crc Press,237-273.

GUILIONI, L., WERY, J., TARDIEU, F., 1997. Heat Stress -Induced Abortion Of Buds And Flowers In Pea: Is Sensitivity Linked To Organ Age Or To Relations Between Reproductive Organs? Ann. Bot. 80,159–168.

105

-

HUTCHISON, R.S., GROOM, Q., D.R., 2000. Differencial Effects OfChilling Induced Photooxidation On The Redox

Regulation Of Photosynthetic Enzymes. Biochemistry 39: 6679-6688 INZE, D.,VAN MONTAGU, M. 1995. Oxidative Stress In Plants. Curr. Opin.Biotechnol. 6: 153-158.

tezi. KERDNAIMONGKOL, K., BHATIA, A., JOLY, R.J. AND WOODSON, W.R. 1997.Oxidative Stress Ana Diurnal

Variation In Chilling Sensitivity Of Tomato Seedlings. J. Amer. Soc. Hort.Sci. 122: 485-490. KINET,J.M,AND PEET,M.M., 1997.Tomato.The Physiology and Vegetable Crops, CAB International NY/USA

Chapter 6. P: 207-257. KOROLEVA, O.Y., KRAUSE, G.H., BRUGGEMANN, W. 2000. Effects Of Long-Term Chilling Under Excessive

Light On Xanthophyll Cycle Activity Ana Non-Photochemical Fluorescence Quenching In Lycopersicon Genotypes.Journal Of Plant Physiology. 156: 341-349.

-75 Issn: 1308 - 3945, E -Issn: 1308 - 027x LEVITT, J., 1980. Responses Of Plants To Environmental Stresses, 2 Nd Ed. Vol 1.Chilling, Freezing And High

Temperatures Stresses Academic Press, New York.

Differingin Salinity Resistance. Ann. Bot. 78: 389-398. MCKERSIE, B. D., LESHEM, Y. Y., 1994. Stress And Stress Coping In Cultivated Plants. P.253 . Dordrecht / Boston /

London. Kluwer Academic Publishers. MORRISON, M. J., STEWART, D. W., 2002. Heat Stress During Flowering In Summer Brassica. Crop Sci. 42,797–

803 NAYYAR, H., BAINS, T., KUMAR, S., 2005. Low Temperature Induced Floral Abortion In Chickpea: Relationship

To Abscisic Acid And Cryoprotectants InReproductive Organs.Environmental And Experimental Botany 53 (2005) 39–47.

OQUIST, G., 1983. Effects Of Low Temperature On Photosynthesis. Plant CellEnviron, 6: 281-300

-2916 Raporu. Adana POLOWICK, P. L., SAWHNEY, V. K., 1985. Temperature Effect On Pepper (Capsicum Ssp) And The Sequence Of

Plant Domestication In Peru. American Antiquaity 34, 53-61. RAISON, J. K. VE LYONS, J. M., 1986. Chilling Injury: A Plea For UniformTerminology. Plant, Cell, Environ. 9:

685-686. RIKIN, A., BLUMENFELD, A., RICHMOND, A.E. 1976 Chilling Resistance As Affected By Stressing Environments

And Abscisic Acid. Bot.Gaz. 137:307-312 RYLSKI, I., 1972. Effect Of Early Environment On Flowering In Pepper (Capsicum Annuum L.). J. Amer. Soc. Hort.

Sci. 97 (5) : 648-651. SHAKED, R., ROSENFELD, K. VE PRESSMAN, E., 2004. The Effect Of Low Night Temperatures On Carbohydrates

Metabolism In Developing Pollen Grains OfPepper In Relation To Their Number and Functioning. Scientia Horticulturae 102(2004) 29–36.

TAYLOR A. O., ROWLEY J., 1971. I. Low Temperature, High Light Effects On Photosynthesis Plant Under Climatic Stres. Plant Physiol. (1971) 47, 713-718.

Under -14 November 2013,P: 510

TRUCO, M.J., RANDALL, L.B., BLOOM, A.J. 2000. Detection Of Qtls AssociatedWith Shoot Wilting And Root Ammonium Uptake Under Chilling Temperatures In An Interspecific Backcross Population From Lycopersicon Esculentum X Lhirsutum. Theor Appl. Genet. 101: 1082-1092.

WWW.FAOSTAT.FAO.ORG.2014 WALKER, M.A., MCKERSIE, B.D., 1993, Role Of The Ascorbate-GlutathioneAntioxidant System In Chilling

Resistance Of Tomato, Plant Physiology 141:234-239.

106

VENEMA, J.H., EEKHOF, M. VAN HASSELT P., R., 2000, Analysis Of Low temperature Tolerance Of A Tomato (Lycopersicon Esculentum) Cybrid WithChloroplast From A More Chilling -Tolerant L.Hirsutum Accession, Annals OfBotany, 85: 799-807.

VU, J. C. V., GUPTA, S. K., YELENOSKY, G. VE KU, M.S.B., 1995. Cold Induced Changes In Ribulose 1,5- Bisphosphate Carboxylase-Oxygenase Andphosphoenolpyruvate Carboxylase In Citrus. Environ. Exp. Bot. 35 (1): 25-31.

ZAURALOV, O. A. VE LUKATKIN, A. S., 1985. Kinetics Of Electrolyte Exosmosis In Heat-Loving Plants Under The Influence Of Reduced Temperature, Fiziol. Rast.32 (2): 347

ZHANG, L., XIUMING, H., YONGGENG, L., 2010. Response of Greenhouse Tomato to Varied Low Pre-night Temperatures at the Same Daily Integrated Temperature. hortScience November 2010 45:1654-1661

TEKL ONAYI Ad Soya Tarih za Proje Lideri 15/04/2016 Öneren Kurul Müdürü Dr. Abdullah ÜNLÜ


107


BA LI I Sardunya (Pelargonium sp.)’da Gen Havuzu Olu

ARA TIRMA FIRSAT ALANI ARA TIRMA PROGRAMI PROGRAM ÖNCELI I Orta

PROJE ÖN ADI ADRESI ANTALYA PROJE DE ADI SOYADI KURUMU TELEFONU 05337432144 E-POSTA [email protected] PROJE / ALT PROJE YÜRÜTÜCÜLE


Bitki

[email protected]

Fatma UYSAL [email protected]

[email protected]

PROJE TOPLAM

34.000 01/01/2016 31/12/2020

L

Antalya TARIM Bitkisel materyal temini Ayni Bitkisel materyal temini Ayni

Melisa TARIM Bitkisel materyal temini Ayni Bitkisel materyal temini Ayni

Bitkisel materyal temini Ayni Bitkisel materyal temini Ayni

Proje Özeti:

108

(Pelargonium zonale

Anahtar Kelimeler: Sardunya, Collection, Gene Pool Formation and Morphological Characterization of Pelargonium Species and

Varieties Suitable for Indoors and Outdoors Use Abstract: Interest in the use of indoor and outdoor ornamental plants has been increasing in the world and Turkey in recent years. Our country is the importer country in both indoor and outdoor ornamental plants for years. The main reason for this is to become dependent on foreign supply of production materials. Foreign dependence on production material can be reduced with breeding new varieties. Studies for development of new species / varieties in the ornamental plants sector have gained momentum in our country in recent years. Some varieties (carnations, peonies, tulips, hyacinths, irises, lilies, crocus pain, sand lilies and weeping bride) were registered or candidate for registering. In order to increase our country's ornamental plants sector development and competitiveness in world markets, at first the development of commercially important species / varieties are very important. Pelargonium (Pelargonium zonale L.) is among the most popular and most grown species in flowering ornamental plants (indoor and outdoor) in both our country and world. The objectives of the project are to form a gene pool of pelargonium which is an ornamental plant species used indoor or outdoor and to improve new pelargonium cultivar by clon selection and hybridization Keywords: Pelargonium, oor, gene pool, hybridization, selection Projenin Ama ve Gerekçesi:

-

la Antalya ili izlemektedir.

109

thalat

GEM, 2014a; .

rlikte -

Ficus sp.), difenbahya (Dieffenbachia schott), kroton (Codiaeum Schefflera Yucca flamentosa

Saintpaulia ionantha Wandl), onbira Primula obconica), sardunya (Pelargonium (Schefflera Yucca flamentosa Ficus bitkileri

-

r veya

llarda d Pelargonium zonale

110

2014). Yine son 4 y

TTSMM Ka

ir.

1.

2. 3. Yerel ve d

4. 5.

6.


1. S

TERATÜR ÖZET

havuzunda yer alan yaba

Tan, 1998).

111

re sahip yerel

Begonia, Viola, Campanula,Impatiens, geranium, Petunia, Salvia, Pelargonium, Dianthus, Hemerocallis, Alstromeria, Lilium, Verbena, Rudbeckia ve Phlox

2000; Vainstein, A, 2002; Kepkmen ve Jung, 2009).

.

Pelargonium peltatum Pelargonium domesticum

Pelargonium hortorum

Pelargonium

Pelargonium endlicherianum - -

termekte olup solucan otu yerel ismiyle bilinmektedir. Pelargonium quercetorum

Pelargonium endlicherianum -

112

Pelargonium endlicherianum

Pelargonium zonale umlar (sardunya) ticari olarak 5 gruba

1. Pelargonium hortorum- 2. Pelargonium peltatum- 3. Pelargonium floribunda- 4. Pelargonium domesticum- Martha Washington- lar 5. Pelargonium grandiflorum- P. graveolens),

P.crispum), ceviz, nane (P.tomentosum), elma (P. odoratissima 2012).

Pelargonium

-Pelargonium zonale

-

113

MATERYAL ve METOT:

–Merkez biriminde 2016- Materyal:

Metot:

I.

II.

III.

IV.

- -10 cm -

-

Saks

sulama suyuyla birlikte verilecektir. 150, P: 20, K: 200, Ca: 100, Mg: 50, Fe:

1992; Anonim, 2014b).

-2.0 mS/cm pH:6.0-

114

No Özellik 1 Bitki büyüme tipi 2 Bitki boyu (cm) 3 4 5 Dikimd

6 7

8

9 10 11 12 Yaprak rengi - -

-mor 13 Yaprak ikinci rengi 14 15 16 17 Var/yok 18 Var/yok 19 20 Petal s 21 Petal rengi 22 23 24 25 Çiçek tipi 26 Var/yok 27 Var/yok 28 Koku durumu Var/yok

ile izolasyonu

115

mesi F1

olanlar elenecektir.

d) C klonla

-30 en ve 25-30 cm boy

genellikle istenen boyutlar. ) 2. Dolgun ve hacimli bitkiler

-

-5 adet/bitki)

ÇALI MA TAKV

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

x x x

x x x x x x x x x x

Morfolojik Karakterizasyon x x x x x x x x x x

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 X X X X

116

X X X X

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

x x x x x

x x x x x x x x x x x

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12


YÖNET M DÜZE

Ad Soyad Proje Yürütücülerinin Projeye Kat lar


1-3 ay

, Fatma UYSAL

3-12 ay

, Fatma UYSAL

Morfolojik Karakterizasyonu 3-12 ay

, Fatma UYSAL

15-18 ay

Fatma UYSAL,

Bitkilerde Seleksiyon, Fenolojik ve Morfolojik 21-57 ay

58-60 ay


ve Morfolojik Karakterizasyonu

117

1

olan sardunya (Pelargonium

in ulusal ve



1.Y l 2.Y l 3 Y l

06.1- Mamul Mal Alml 1.000 500 06.2- Menkul Sermaye Üretim Giderleri 15.200 3.250 2.000 2.000 500 06.3- Gayri Maddi Hak Alml 06.4- Gayrimenkul Alml ve Kamula lmas 06.5- Gayrimenkul Sermaye im Giderleri 9.500 6000 06.6- Menkul Mall Büyük Onar m Giderleri 06.7- Gayrimenkul Büy Onar Giderleri 06.8- Stok Alml 06.9- Di er Sermaye Giderleri 500 500

Toplam 26.250 10.250 500 Genel Toplam 41.000

II. Bütçe Gerekçesi ve Yat r Tutar l

I II III IV SINIFLANDIRMASI 1. YIL 2.YIL 3.YIL

06 1 3 9 1.500 1.000 500 06 2 2 1 10.500 8.500 2.000 1.000 1.000 06 2 6 1 500 -- -- 500

06 2 7 1 Kimyevi Madde il 7.500 6.500 1000 1.000 1.000

06 2 9 1 500 250 250 06 5 2 3 2.500 2.500 06 5 4 2 7.500 4.000 3.500 06 5 6 2 5.500 3.000 2.500

06 9 2 1 1.000 500 500

TOPLAM 26.250 10.250 2.000 2.000 500 GENEL TOPLAM 41.000

118

KAYNAKÇA ANDERSON, N.O. (2007). Flower Breeding and Genetics. Issues, Challenges and Opportunities fort he 21 st Century.

848 pp. Netherlands.

-

http://www.floraplus.net/sardunya ANONYMOUS (2006). Pelargoniums. An Herb Society of America Guide. The Herb Society of America 9019

Kirtland Chardon Rd. Kirtland, Ohio 44094. P:61 ANONYMOUS (2014 a). Fisher Breeding Success. Geranium Care for the Consumer.

http://www.milmont.com/_ccLib/image/.../PDF-20.p ANONYMOUS (2014b). Producing High-Quality Geraniums. http://www.malmborgsinc com/_ccLib/

image/plants/PDF-400.pdf ANONYMOUS (2014c). Growing Quality Geraniums. http://www.extension.umn.edu/garden/yard

garden/flowers/outdoor-indoor-geranium-culture/ BONNER, F.T. (1990). Storage of seeds, potential and limitations for germplasm conservation. For ecol manage 35;35-

43. BOODLEY, J.W. (1981). The Commercial Greenhouse Handbook. Chapter 22. 568 pp.

http://www.tarim.gov.tr/Konular/Bitkisel-Uretim/Tarla-Ve-Bahce-Bitkileri/Urunler-Ve-Uretim

CRAIG, R. (1993). Intellectual Property Protection of Pelargoniums. HortTechnology . July/Sept. 1993 3(3).

-177.

L, F.,G. (2000).

- KEMPKEN, F. and JUNG, C. (2009). Genetic Modification of Plants: Agriculture, Horticulture and Forestry p:702 MIHAELA, F. and MARIA, B. (2012). Pelargonium zonale Cuttings Rooting in Different Substrates During Summer

at The Teaching Facility of The Faculty of Horticulture and Forest of Timisoara. Journal of Horticulture, Forestry and Biotechnology. Vol 16(3), 60-62.

NEUMANN, R.G., HAGILADI, A., 1992. Plant Growth and Cutting Production of Container-grown Pelargonium Stock Plants as Affected by N Concentration and N Form. J. AMER. SOC. HORT. SCI. 117(2):234 -238.

-74. STARMAN,T.W. (2012). Greenhouse Crop Production. Hort 429. aggi-horticulture.

TAN, A. (1996). Turkey: Country Report to the FAO International Technical Conferance on Plant Genetic Resource.

http://www.fao.org/ag/AGP/AGPS/Pgrfa/pdf/turkey.pdf. TAN, A. (1998). Current Status of Plant Genetic Resources Conservation in Turkey. In: N. Zencirci, Z. Kaya, Y.

Anikster, W. T. Adams (Eds.).The Proceeding of International Symposium on In situ Conservation of Plant Genetic Diversity. 4-8 November, 1996. Antalya, Turkey.

– 37. TOMPSON, P.A., SMITH, R.D., DICKIE, J.B., SANDERSON R.H., PROBERT R.J. (1981). Collection and

regeneration of populations of wild plants from seed. Biol. Conserv. 20;229-245. http://www.eski.tubitak.gov.tr/tubives/index.php?com=18000&id =

http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreIstatistikTablo.dotarihi: 10 Ekim 2014).

http://tuikapp.tuik.gov.tr/bitkiselapp/bitkisel.zulEkim 2014).

VAINSTEIN, A. (2002). Breeding for Ornamentals : Clasical and Molecular Approaches. 392 p.

119

TEKL ONAYI Ad Soya Tarih za

Proje Lideri Dr. Özgül KARAGÜZEL ../..2015 Öneren Kurul Müdürü Dr.Abdullah ÜNLÜ ../../2015

120


s Bitkileri (A09)

(P10)

ADI ntalya

ADI SOYADI KURUMU TELEFONU 0 242 321 67 97 E-POSTA [email protected]


Dr. Emine TOPUZ [email protected] [email protected]

Bengi TOPKAYA [email protected]

[email protected] Dr. Mehmet

[email protected]

[email protected] Dr. Meral YILMAZ tarim.gov.tr


Hilmi TORUN [email protected]

PROJE TOPLAM

89 200 01/01/2016 31/12/2018

ve Teknik Destek

121

Proje Özeti: rin insan

-

-

Anahtar Kelimeler:

The Studies on The Detection and Control of Diseases, Pests, Weeds of Leafy Vegetables in Western

Mediterranean Region Abstract:Green-leafy vegetables are rich sources in terms of water, vitamine, antioxidants, fibrous and mineral substances. Researches have revealed that green or colorful-vegetables are necessary for human health and can be used for the treatment of the cancer and cardiovascular diseases. As chemicals have been used in the vegetable cultivation in recent years, living creatures and environment have been under threat. Therefore, in particular, people living in the big cities have gone into the effort of growing their own vegetables. The firms cultivating vegetables for salads present their products to consumer by gathering and packaging different varieties. However, encountered with some pests during cultivation, significant economic losses in production could be seen. Attachment importance to plant protection endeavour should be fulfilled in order to prevent these losses. Determination of prevalence ratio and with regards to management of fungal, bacterial, viral diseases, beetles and weeds restricting the production of lettuce, parsley, roquette, cress and mint are aimed with this study. Survey studies are going to be conducted in the production areas of Lettuce, parsley, dill, arugula, cress, purslane, polorrosso and basil in Antalya province in 2015 and 2016. Determined pests are going to be identified and management programs are going to be formed for the significant ones according to damage and prevalance ratio. Since there is no licensed preparate for these vegetables in Turkey, in 2017 and 2018, biological efficacy experiments are going to be carried out with preferentially biological fungicides found efficient in abroad. With this project, it will be revealed the extent of the problem due to pests on these vegatables. Thus, unconsciously applying pesticides will have been precluded with the studies as regards management of the pests determined as significant. Keywords: Lettuce, parsley, dill, arugula, cress, purslane, polorrosso, basil disease, pest

0.82, rokada % 0.77, dereotunda % 0.51, nanede % 0.17, semizotunda % 1.68 ve terede % 1,68 sini i de

122

2014a).

marulda Bremia lactucae Regel, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib.) de Bary, Xanthomonas campestris pv. vitians, Tomato spotted wilt tospovirus (TSWV), Lettuce mosaic potyvirus (LMV), Cucumber mosaic cucumovirus (CMV), Alfalfa mosaic alfamovirus (AMV), Broad bean wilt fabavirus (BBWV), Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Westwood) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), Phytomyzae horticola (Goureal) (Diptera: Agromyzidae), Diglyphus isaea (Walker) (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), Tetranychus urticae (Koch) (Acarina: Tetranychidae), Uroleucon cichorii (Coch.) (Hem.: Aphididae), Aphis gossypii (Glover) (Hem.: Aphididae), Aulacorthum solani (Kaltenbach) (Hem.: Aphididae), Hyperomyzus lactucae (L.) (Hem.: Aphididae), Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Hem.: Aphididae), Nasonovia ribisnigri (Mosley) (Hem.: Aphididae), Rhopalosiphum nymphaeae (L.) (Hem.: Aphididae), Pemphigus bursarius (L.) (Hem.: Aphididae), Maydanozda Septoria petroselini Desm. ve Plasmopara petroselini Alternaria spp., dereotunda Erysiphe heraclei DC., tere ve rokada Albugo candida (Pers.) Roussel, nanede Puccinia menthae Pers., semizotunda Albugo portulacae (DC.) Kuntze ve Dichotomophthora portulacae (Onaran ve Yanar, 2009; Soylu and Soylu, 2003; Kurt, 2003; Soylu et al., 2010; Mert

1997;

Kaymak, 2007).

Septoria Botrytis cinerea usunda ise m

( -405.02/10096

ile, 2015- e survey

-

tu, roka, tere, nane, semizotu, polorosso ve

n projeden

123

bitki koruma ürünü bulunmayan ve ekonomik önemde zarara yol açan

da

en fazla üretilen maruldur (Lactuca sativa spp.) ve bunu Petroselinum crispum), roka (Eruca sativa), tere (Lepidium sativum) ve nane (Mentha

ü

Marul Maydanoz Roka Tere Nane Dereotu Semizotu Ispanak EA EA UM EA EA EA EA EA EA UM

450 675 - - - - - - - - - - - - 100 100 Finike 775 2713 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

120 270 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Korkuteli 650 1425 - - - - - - - - - - - - 150 113 Kumluca 25 63 - - - - - - - - - - - - 15 12 Manavgat 325 755 35 7 18 5 18 5 5 2 12 3 - - 160 136 Aksu 3628 7175 150 30 - - 50 15 - - - - 50 17 1500 1125

117 182 30 8 21 4 20 5 1 - 10 3 - - 120 90 Akseki 6 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - 6 2

60 72 - - - - - - - - - - - - 55 55 16 7 10 6 - - - - 6* 2 - - - - 10 15

4 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Kemer 4 12 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Serik 2250 3155 75 80 - - - - - - - - - - 1600 1440 Kepez 1265 2963 10 9 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 - 2 2 500 1250

1268 4602 98 103 14 13 13 12 1 1 2 1 8 7 - - 40 80 5 9 - - 4 3 5 3 - - - - 16 27

TOPLAM 11 003

24 155

413 247 54 23 107 41 19 9 25 7 60 26 4232 4365

124

Tür

tere ve rokalarda Albugo candida ve Boyraz, 2010). Akdeniz maydanozda Septoria petroselini Desm. ve Plasmopara petroselini

A Septoria

Microdochium panattonianum -

ch

(Wicks ve Pezzaniti, 1994).

(Bremia lactucae-

-

Septoria lactucae Sclerotinia sclerotiorum

Pythium tracheiphilum - -

Alternaria spp., Botrytis cinerea ve Rhizoctonia solani

Cercospora lactucae-sativae Antagonistik bakteri

Bacillus subtilis

(Srimai and Akarapisarn, 2014). Marulda Bremia

(Bremia lactucae e

dimethomorph 0.375 ve 0.75 g a.i./L do

125

(Wicks ve ark. 1993). Trichoderma Rhizoctonia solani

T. viride IMI 298375 Rhizoctonia solani )

-(Coley- ve ark., 1991). Sclerotinia minor ve S. sclerotiorum’ un

r. San Joaquin Vadisinde, S. sclerotiorum S. minor S. minor (%

n S sclerotiorum S. minor

-

S. sclerotiorum Salinas veSan Joaquin Vadilerinden toplanan 89 izolat

Wu and Subbarao,2006).

Trichoderma spp., Gliocladium spp. ve Ulocladium spp. fungal etmenleri ile Bacillus ve Pseudomonas (Elad and Stewart, 2007). Marulda Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib.) de Bary k bir preparat (Coniothyrium minitans) etkili bulunurken, Sclerotinia minor

Chitrampalam et al., 2010). marulda Botrytis cinerea Pers. Trichoderma

B. cinerea’ Pseudomonas ve Ulocladium sp., Epicococum sp., Trichoderma spp., Cladosporium sp.)

olarak, fluoresent Pseudomonas Ulocladium (Card et al., 2002). Fiddaman ve ark. (2000), yaprak diski

kullanarak marulda Rhizoctania solani ve B. cinerea-sporsuz aerobik bakteriden 127 tanesi B.

cinerea R. solani her Trichoderma virens B. cinerea

Trichoderma harzianum T39 T. virens

05). Erysiphe heraclei DC.)

-

-

126

Fusarium oxysporum, Fusarium solani, Pythium ultimum, Pythium irregulare ve Rhizoctonia solani izole

fidelerde en fazla Alternaria radicina Meier,Drechsler&E.D.Eddy ve Fusarium inde Cylindrocarpon destructans (Zinssm.)Scholten, Rhizoctonia

solani ve Stemphylium botryosum Sclerotinia sclerotiorum

tebuconazole, Septoria yaprak lekesine thiram, Alternaria yaprak lekesine chlorothalonil, hexaconazole, iprodione, mancozeb, thiophanate-methyl,

iprodione etkili maddeye sah Coniothyrium minitans str. CON/M/91-

kompleksidir. 2009-

Pythium intermedium, P. ultimum var. ultimum, P. rostratifingens P. dissotocum, P. mastophorum ve P. sulcatum

-

-Ya Erysiphe heraclei Puccinia menthae -

en etkili fungisit Bitertanol olurken, bu (Edwards and Bienvenu 2000).

Terede beyaz pa (Peronospora parasitica), yaprak lekesi (Cercospora nasturtiisurveylerde en fazla beyaz pas ve Fusarium

Hyaloperonospora parasitica (Pers.)Constant.

Cercospora Bacillus subtilis str. QST 713 yer vermektedir (Raid and Roberts, 2009).

P. ultimum ve R. Solani P. oligandrumP. oligandrum

P. ultimum(Tepedelen, 2008).

S.petroselinibenomyl, kresoxim-methyl, trifloxystrobin ve

oksi-

ise %95- enini Plasmopara petroselini

- -8 mm

127

daha koyu kahv

Septoria petroselini

Orta Anad Albugo candida ve

Bremia lactucae

, Phoma spp. ve Fusarium

Erysiphe heraclei és, 2004). Dereotunda Fusarium

da Phoma

exigua var. exigua Desm. -Stefaniak et al.,2008). beyaz pas [Albugo candida (Pers.)Russel)], yaprak lekesi (Alternaria

japonica

--

neden olan etmen, Alternaria japonica olarak -Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. raphani J.P. Kendr

& W.C. Snyder ve F. oxysporum f.sp. conglutinans (Wollenw.) W.C. Snyder (Catti et al., 2007). Rokada Fusarium Pseudomonas ve Achromobacter, Serratia

(Trichoderma harzianum str. KRL-AG2; Pseudomonas chlororaphis -

Tere [Peronospora parasitica (Pers.)Fr.)], yaprak lekesi (Cercospora nasturtii Pass.

Fusarium saptanm

Hyaloperonospora parasitica (Pers.)Constant. terede t Mandal et al.2008). Florida

Cercospora Bacillus subtilis str. QST 713 yer verilmektedir (Raid and Roberts, 2009).

ler ile etkin ve

128

Pseudomonas cichorii, Pseudomonas marginalis pv. marginalis, Pseudomonas viridilivida, Xanthomonas campestris pv. vitians, Erwinia caratovora subsp. carotovora bakterilerinin marulda, Pseudomonas viridiflava, P. syringae pv. coriandricola ve P. syringae pv. apii

etmenlerin saptanmashedeflenmektedir.

Xanthomonas Campestris pv.vitians

Ervinia carotovora subs. carotovor

Sul -35oC

Pseudomonas Cichorii Bakteriyel bir rla,

-35 o Pseudomonas marginalis, Pseudomonas andtropogonis

ve Ervinia carotovora subsp. atroseptica Pseudomonas cichorii (Ferreira Pint Pseudomonas viridiflava

Xanthomonas campetris pv. vitians o

Xanthomonas campetris pv. vitians

Xanthomonas campetris pv. vitians

Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum

Pseudomonas viridiflavaP. syringae pv. coriandricola ve

129

P. syringae pv. apii2011).

Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. vitians

Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. vitians (syn:campetris

-0.8 x 0.6--siyah lekelere neden olur, ilerleyen

etmenler

-

nda, Chenopodium album, C. murale, Lamium

sativum), nohut (Cicerarietinum), hardal (Sin

130

-

Marul iri

r. LBVV,

Sonchus oleraceus, Sonchmeydana getirmektedir (Kuvata, 1991).

aha

ni ve simptomlu bitkilerin

-

-9 ora

e

1 ay sonra marul fidelerinin y

.

-

131

-

e K1 -

- -

-ELISA ile testl

ine 400

marulda

(Trialeurodes vaporariorum) (Westwood)

[Phytomyzae (=Charomatomyia) horticola Goureal (Dip.:Agromyzidae)] sap -Parazitoidin Diglyphus isaea [Tetranychus urticae

Uroleucon cichorii --

Anisochrysa Autographa gamma

1997Aphis gossypii Glover, Aulacorthum solani (Kaltenbach), Hyperomyzus lactucae (L.), Myzus

persicae (Sulzer), Nasonovia ribisnigri (Mosley), Rhopalosiphum nymphaeae (L.) ve Pemphigus bursarius (L.) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) Nasonovia ribisnigri

Metasyrphus corollae (Fabr.) ve Sphaerophoria scripta entomopatojen olan Fusarium

132

Longitarsus ferrugineus (Foudras) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), Peridromasaucia Tetranychus urticae Koch (Prostigmata: Tetranychidae)

.

pestisitlerden abamectin, cyromazine, diazinon, imidacloprid, lambda-cyhalothrin, spinosad, azadirachtin, acetamiprid, acephate, bifenthrin, buprofezin, carbaryl, cryolite, cypermethrin, dimethoate, disulfoton, emamectin, endosulfan, esfenvalerate, indoxacarb, malathion, methomyl, permethrin, pymetrozine, tebufenozide, thiodicarb ve zeta-

Coccinellidae

Spodoptera frugiperda

halinde 100-

Trichoplusia ni Nasonovia ribisnigri (Mosley) (Hemiptera:

r (Stufkens et al., 2002). Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) ve Thrips tabaci

Eric et al., 2007). Lygus rugulipennis

thripsi Frankliniella occidentalis

Helicoverpa armigera (Lep.:Noctuidae) ve Aphid

Listronotus oregonensis

-30 -

L.oregonensis Torres, 2005). L.

oregonensis

Trichoplusia ni r) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), Plutella xylostella (Linnaeus) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae), Spodoptera

frugiperda (J.E. Smith),Pieris rapae Bacillus thruingiensis

133

pyrethrin+rotenone ve M- dichloropropene, telkurdu, bozkurt ve

Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Hem.:Aphididae), Phyllotreta cruciferae, Empoasca P.cruciferae

Andorno et al,.2007; Anonymous, 2014b). Longitarsus waterhousei Kutschera (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)

kurt Agrotis Semizotu

Hypurus bertrandi Perris (Coleoptera: Curculionidae, e etmeni

2014d). Bitki Paraziti Nematodlar

- -ur nematodu (Meloidogyne javanica sebze olarak marul b

daha az -

-ur nematodu populasyonunddomateste Meloidogyne arenaria

bildirilmektedir.

Meloidogyne hapla

-ur

Gomez et -

- Meloidogyne incognita (Kofoid & White, 1919) Chitwood 1949, M.hapla ve M.arenaria

r.

- Burelle and Rosskopf - rlerinin (M.incognita, M.javanica ve M.arenaria) serada

134

-ur nematodunun -ur

nematodu (M.arenaria ve M.incognita

hardal (Brassica juncea) bitkilerin -ur nematodu (M. incognita

-ur nematodu (M.hapla)

M.hapla’ ya

-

la

(Timoshenko, 1972)

ilerin rastgele herbisit

gili sorunlar iletilmektedir.

30, 40 ve

Amaranthus retroflexus L., Datura stramonium L. ve Solanum nigrum L.

-

Orobanche aegyptiaca Pers., O. Ramosa L., Calendula arvensis L. ve Cyperus rotundus

-ey

Shaddad et al., 2009).

Phalaris minor L., Anagallis arvensis L., Chenopodium album L., Convolvulus arvensis L., ve Medicago denticulata -

135

Novoselov

2

Finlandiya,

organik maddece zengin topraklard Sinapis arvensis L., Polygonum persicaria L., Galium aparine L., Polygonum lapathifolium L., Myosotis arvensis L., Stellaria media L., Chenopodium album L., Capsella bursa-pastoris L., Papaver rhoeas L., Thlaspi arvenseL., Silene noctiflora L. and Polygonum aviculare L. Galium aparine, Poa annua, Chenopodium album ve Polygonum aviculare

t MATERYAL ve METOT Materyal

Iceberg (Lactuca sativa L.var. capitata), lolorosso (L.sativa L.var. crispa), yedikule (L.sativa L.var. longifolia) vb.], maydanoz [Petroselinum crispum (Mill.) Fuss], dereotu (Anethum graveolens L.), roka (Eruca sativa Mill.), tere (Lepidium sativum L.), semizotu (Portulaca oleracea L.), polorosso (Cichorium intybus L.var. foliosum) ve

Ocimum basilicum Spinacia oleracea)

tereo

Metot

1. - marul

Maydanoz roka (Manavgat, Tere dereotu (Manavgat, Aksu) ve

semizotu polorosso ve

izelge 2).

Marul Maydanoz Roka Tere Nane Dereotu Semizotu Ispanak

EA SA EA SA EA SA EA SA EA SA EA SA EA SA EA SA 450 23 - - - - - - - - - - - - 100 5

Finike 775 39 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 120 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Korkuteli 650 33 - - - - - - - - - - - - 150 8 Kumluca 25 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - 15 1 Manavgat 325 17 35 2 18 1 18 1 5 - 12 1 - - 160 8 Aksu 3628 183 150 8 - - 50 3 - - - - 50 3 1500 75

117 6 30 2 21 1 20 1 1 - 10 - - - 120 6 Akseki 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - 6 -

60 3 - - - - - - - - - - - 55 3 16 1 10 - - - - - 6* - - - - - 10 1

136

,

ma

2.1.1.

2

--5 da ise 5 noktada, 6-10 da ise 10 noktada,

-

100-250 m2 5 adet bitki 250-1000 m2 10 adet bitki Maydanoz, roka, tere, dereotu, nane ve semizotunda ise 100-250 m2 20 adet bitki 250-1000 m2 50 adet bitki

incele2 2

herbir yaprakta 1 cm2 2

4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Kemer 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Serik 2250 113 75 4 - - - - - - - - - - 1600 80 Kepez 1265 63 10 - 1 - 2 - 1 - 1 - 2 - 500 25

1268 63 98 5 14 1 13 1 1 - 2 - 8 - - - 40 2 5 - - - 4 - 5 - - - - - 16 1

TOPLAM 11 003 554 413 21 54 3 107 6 19 - 25 1 60 3 4232 213

137

laboratuvara getirilecekti

getirilecektir.

her 0-10 dekara kadar ikzakvari bir yol izlenerek en

-

-

polietilen torbalara konularak etiketlenecektir.

-10 dekarda 8; 10-20 2

narak m2

2

(R.S)=

edilecektir.

naylon torbalara konularak buºC,-20ºC) ve derin dondurucuda (-80º

Fungal Hasta

138

gösteren bitki

-p

-

Bakteriyel H

-en ekstrakt

-

ir.

(Christie and Perry, 3

-(Hooper 1986). K -

139

Serolojik Testler:

-Adams,1977). Dkontrol OD de eklinde hesap edilecek enfekteli olarak kabul edilecektir.

Marul

Alfalfa mosaic alfamovirus (AMV) Broad bean wilt fabavirus (BBWV) Cucumber mosaic cucumovirus (CMV) Lettuce mosaic potyvirus (LMV) Lettuce big vein virus( LBVV)

(LIYV) Miraflori lettuce big vein virus (MiLBVV) Tobacco streak ilarvirus (TSV) Tobacco black ring nepovirus (TBRV) Tomato spotted wilt tospovirus (TSWV) Turnip mosaic potyvirus (TuMV) Beet western yellow luteovirus (BWYV) Tobacco necrosis necrovirus (TNV) Tobacco rattle tobravirus(TRV) Tomato infectious chlorosis closterovirus (TICV)

Maydanoz Broad bean wilt fabavirus (BBWV)

Roka Radish mosaic comovirus (RaMV) Tobacco mosaic tobamovirus (TMV) Turnip mosaic potyvirus (TuMV)

Tere Cauliflower mosaic caulimovirus (CaMV) Karn Beet western yellows luteovirus (BWYV) Tobacco mosaic tobamovirus (TMV)

Semizotu Tobacco rattle tobravirus(TRV) Tomato spotted wilt tospovirus (TSWV) Domat

140

Cucumber mosaic cucumovirus (CMV) Tobacco mosaic tobamovirus (TMV)

Moleküler Testler:

arul arak antiserumu bulunmayan LBVV, LIYV ve -

Primer Sekans Amplikon

Referans

LIYV P26-r2-(ACTATCAGTTATCGACACAACT) P26-F-(GACCACAGCTTTGACGACGGT)

675 bp NG et al., 2004

LBVV VP 248-(GTTTTTGACCCTGATAG) VP.249 (GTCGACTCTAGACACTTGTTGTTTGTCGT)

296 bp Navarro et al.,2004

TICV 5 -TCAGTGCGTACGTTAATGGG-3 5 -CACAGTATACAGCAGCGGCA-3

501 bp Hartono et al.,2003

- kstraksiyonu

-°C 10 d inkube edildikten sonra 5 d buzda bekletilecek ve

nsiyonu eklenerek 10 d oda

°

-80°

- aksiyonu(RT-PCR)

°

- e ° °

-primerler

r. -

mid ile

141

olarak Flora of Turkey (Davis 1965-

2

belirlendikten sonra 48 saat 72°

. 2.5 Patojenisite Testleri 2.5.1. Fungal Etmenlerin Patojenisite Testleri

dereot

- -

-saat

-r. Marul, maydanoz, dereotu, roka, tere ve semizotu bitkilerinde

-a uygun

R. solani

Fusarium spp., Pythium -

in vivo testlerde

-

142

an -

Bakteriyel etmenlerin patojenisitesi 24- 8

ilk üç gün polietilen torba ile örtülerek 7-- -

.

unca en az 0,5-

Bitkilerin dikim -2 haftada bir kez gidilip,

100-250 m2 5 adet bitki 250-1000 m2 10 adet bitki Maydanoz, roka, tere, dereotu, nane ve semizotunda ise; 100-250 m2 20 adet bitki 250-1000 m2 50 adet bitki

laboratuvara getirilecektir.

2 2

2 2)

Görsel y

kaydedilecektir.

143

ymous, 2014c).

lecektir.

A

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Survey x x x x x x x x x x x x

x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x

x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

x x x x x x x x x x

izlenmesi x x x x x x x x x x x x

x x x x x x x x x x x x x

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

izlenmesi x x x x x x x x x x x x

x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x

faaliyetlerden sorumludur. Ocak 2016-

Dr. Emine TOPUZ faaliyetlerden sorumludur. Ocak 2016-

144

Serap Melike SÜLÜ Projede bakteriyoloji konusunda yürütülecek tüm faaliyetlerden sorumludur. Ocak 2016-

Bengi TOPKAYA KÜTÜK Projede viroloji konusunda yürütülecek tüm faaliyetlerden sorumludur. Ocak 2016-

Projede nematoloji konusunda yürütülecek tüm faaliyetlerden sorumludur. Ocak 2016-

Projede mikoloji konusunda yürütülecek tüm faaliyetlerden sorumludur. Ocak 2016-

Projede entomoloji konusunda yürütülecek tüm faaliyetlerden sorumludur. Ocak 2016-

Dr. Meral YILMAZ Projede bakteriyoloji konusunda yürütülecek tüm faaliyetlerden sorumludur. Ocak 2016-

Projede viroloji konusunda yürütülecek tüm faaliyetlerden sorumludur. Ocak 2016-

Atilla ÖCAL Projede nematoloji konusunda yürütülecek tüm faaliyetlerden sorumludur. Ocak 2016-

Hilmi TORUN Projede herboloji konusunda yürütülecek tüm faaliyetlerden sorumludur. Ocak 2016-


Marul, ma

belirlemek,

1 Marul, maydanoz, dereotu, roka, tere, nane,

2 Marul, maydanoz, dereotu, roka, tere, nane,

145

yöntemler ve mücadele stratejileri belirlenecektir.

gereken mücadele yöntemleri önerilecektir.

06.2- 22200 10200 4200 06.5- 18200 11200 8200 06.9- 5000 5000 5000

Toplam 45 400 26 400 17 400 Genel Toplam 89200

200 200 200

PDA, pestisit) 22 000 10 000 4000

10 000 5000 5000 2 000 2 000 1000

200 200 200

6000 4000 2000 5000 5000 5000

Toplam 45 400 26 400 17 400 Genel Toplam 89 200

KAYNAKÇA

ve KarakterizasyADANA.

--72

- -grown pepper crops and some of their reservoir weed hosts in Samsun, Turkey. Phytoparasitica 33: 347-358.

of Turkey. J Turkish Phytopathology, 10 (2-3):79-87. 112

Imminosorbent Assay. J. Turkish Phytopathology, 23(1): 37-46. ANONYMOUS, 2000. Guidelines on good plant protection practice. Umbelliferous crops. European and

Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization. 22 p. ARSLAN, A., 2000.

Peronospora farinosa f.sp.spinaciae

-dl- Anadolu, J. Of Aa – 113 Mara

146

BENNETT C.W. and TANRISEVER A., 1957. Sugar Beet curly top disease in Turkey. Plant Disease Reporter 41: 721–725.

and WATSON, L., 1996. Viruses of Plants. Descriptions and Lists from The WIDE Database. CAB International, Wallingford.

BULL, C.T., CLARKE , B.A., , T.M. VE , S. 2011. Multilocus sequence

typing of Pseudomonas syringae sensu lato confirms previously described denomospecies and permits rapid identification of P. syringae pv. coriandricola and P.syringae pv. apii causing bacterial leaf spot on parsley. Phytopathology, 101(7): 847-58.

CAMBELL, R.N. and R.C. GROGAN. 1963. Big-vein virus of lettuce and its transmission by Olpidium brassicae. Phytopathology 53: 252-259

CHO, J.J., MITCHEL, W.C., MAU, R.F. L. and SAKIMURA, K., 1987. EpidemioloDisease on Crisphead Lettuce in Hawaii. Plant Disease, 71: 505- 508.

COLEY-SMITH, J. R., C. J. RIDOUT,, CHRISTINE M. MITCHELL and J. M. LYNCH , 1991. Control of bottom rot disease of lettuce (Rhizoctonia solani) using preparations of Trichoderma viride, T. harzianum or tolclofos-methyl. Plant Pathology. Volume 40, Issue 3, pages 359–366.

rus. Plant Pathol, 41: 528–54. DOROTA, S., BRALEWSKI, T.W., 2006. Dill (Anethum graveolens L.) seed stalk architecture and seeds infestation

with fungi, Not. Bot. Hort. Agrobot. Cluj, XXXIV: 75-78 -Vein Virus Disease of Lettuce in Erzurum, Turkey Journal of

Turkish Phytopathology,Vol: 22, (1) 41-43. ECKEL, C.S., C.H.O, K., WALGENBACH, J.F., KENNEDY, G.G. and MOYER, J.W., 1996. Variation in Thrips

potted wilt Epidemiology in North Carolina. Entomol.exp, 78: 19-29.

Pectobacterium carotovorum. Sci. Agric. 71 (4): p.287-291 1993. New bacterial diseases of lettuce in Portugal caused by pseudomonas cichorii

Phytopath. Medit., 32: 249-253.

R), Pseudomonas syrigae pathovars and related pathogens. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

-2): 43-56 GERMAN, T.L., ULLMAN, D.E. and MOYER, J.W., 1992. Tospoviruses: Diagnosis, Molecular Biology, Phylogeny

and Vector Relationships. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 30: 315-348. GLAWE, D.A., PELTER, G.Q., DU TOIT, L.J., 2005. First report of powdery mildew of carrot and parsley caused by

Erysiphe heraclei in Washington State, Online. Plant Health Progress doi:10.1094/PHP-2005-0114-01-HN. GUPTA, S., PRAKASH, J., 2009. Studies on Indian green leafy vegetables for their antioxidant activity, Plant Foods

Hum. Nutr., 64, 39-45

Tezi ADANA.120 s.

-76. P. 1993. Fungicidal control of downy mildew (Bremia lactucae) on

lettuce.Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 33(3) 381-384 HAGNER-HOLDER, S., 2002. Auftreten und Biologie von Septoria petroselini (Desm.)an Petersilie (Petroselinum

crispum -Wilhelms-Bonn

147

H

lettuce. HERSHMAN, D.E., 1986. Etiology of parsley damping-off and influence of temperature on disease development, Plant

Disease, 70, 927-930. HORINOUCHI, H., MUSLIM, A, HYAKUMACHI, M, 2010. Biocontrol of Fusarim wilt of spinach by the plant

growth promoting fungus Fusarium equiseti GF183, Journal of Plant Pathology, 92(1), 249-254. HORVATH, J. 1980. Viruses of Lettuce. II. Hostranges of lettuce mosaic virus and Cucumber mosaic virus. Acta

Argon. Scient. Hungaricae 29: 333-352. Pseudomonas

viridiflava in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Plant Pathology, 59 (2): 402. JAGGER, I.C. and CHANDLER. N., 1934. Big-Vein, A Disease of Lettuce. Phytopathology, 24: 1253- 1256. 119

-Bornova, 43s. KARAMANLI, A., ALTINOK, H.H. 2004. Hasta

8– media for the demonstration of pyocyanin and

fluorescein., J. Lab. Clin. Med. 44, 301 KARKANIS A., BILALIS D., EFTHIMIADOU A., KATSENIOS N., (2012). The critical period for weed competition

in parsley (Petroselinum crispum (Mill.) Nyman ex A.W. Hill) in Mediterranean areas, Greece, Crop Protection 2012 Vol. 42 pp. 268-272.

T-Bornova, 279 s.

KAMBEROGLU, M.A. and ALAN, B., 2011. Occurrence of Tomato spotted wilt virus in Lettuce in Cukurova Region of Turkey. Int. J. Agric.Biol., 13: 431–434

Brassicaceae Crops in Turkey. Plant patology, 56: 719. KURT, S., 2003. First report of Septoria blight of parsley caused by Septoria petroselini in the Mediterranean Region of

Turkey, Plant Disease, 87(1), 99

-717. University Press, Cambridge.

Plants. Oxford London Edinburg. 216.

big-vein virus, and Their Roles in Lettuce Big-Vein Etiology. LU, H. VE R. 2013. Novel Screening Method for Evaluation of Lettuce Germplasm for Bacterial Leaf Spot

Resistance. HortScience, 48: 171-174. Fungicidal control of anthracnose (Microdochium panattonianum) on lettuce .

Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 34(2) 277 - 283 MACHOWICZ-STEFANIAK, Z., ZIMOWSKA, B., ZALEWSKA E., 2008. The occurence and pathogenicity of

Phoma exigua Desm. var. exigua for selected species of herbs, Acta Agrobotanica, 61(2), 157-166 MANDAL, K., PATEL, P.R., MAITI, S., 2008. First report of downy on Lepidium sativum in India, Australasian Plant

Disease Notes, 3, 73-74

(Petroselinum crispum) in california caused by a fluorescent pseudomonad related to Pseudomonas viridiflava. Phytopathology, 101: 116.

MAVRIC PLESKO, I., VIRSCEK MARN, M. and ZERJAV, M., 2009. Identification of Lettuce Big-Vein Associated Virus And Mirafiori Lettuce Big-Vein Virus Associated with Lettuce Big-Vein Disease in Slovenia. Plant disease Vol. 93(5): 549 megep.meb.gov.tr/mte program_mod

- off in cress sugar-beet by commercial seed-coating with Pythium oligandrum. Plant Pathology, 39, 452-462.

- 276.

148

-Leaf Spot Disease, Caused by Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. vitians, on Lettuce In The Mediterranean Region of Turkey. 3rd. Balkan Sympossium on vegetables and patatoes, 6-10 September, Bursa, 67 s.

-

Of Turkey. Acta Hort. (ISHS), 729: 445-447.

L. AND HERMANSEN A. 2008. Fungal

pathogens in Norwegian lettuce fields. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B,-Soil & Plant Science. Volume 58, Issue 3.

NOVOSELOV YU. K., KUTUZOV G.P., BOLOVIK V.T., MEDVEDEVA S. E., (2009). Methods of weed control in spring winter cress crop, Russia, Journal Kormoproizvodstvo No. 12 pp. 3-5.

NAWROCKI, J., 2004. Occurence of fungal diseases on parsley seedlings (Petroselinum sativum Hoffm.), Acta fytotechnica et zootechnica, 7, 220-223.

- -aminobuyric acid (BABA) induce resistance to downy mildew (Bremia lactucae) in lettuce Lactuca sativa L.). Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 107: 861-869.

, J. E., BOER, R. F. DE, NORNG, S. , THOMSON, F. AND , E. J. 2013. Pythium species associated with root rot complex in winter-grown parsnip and parsley crops in south eastern Australia. Australasian Plant Pathology.Volume 42, Issue 4,pp403-411.

du me

France,p-8 RAID, R., ROBERTS, P., 2009. Florida Plant Disease Management Guide: Parsley, Institue of Food and Agricultural

Sciences, University of Florida (IFAS) Extension, 2p. , R. , C. AND PERNEZNY, K. 2007. First Report of Powdery Mildew of Parsley Caused

by Erysiphe heraclei in Florida. Plant diseases.Volume 91, Number 4, Page 461 REIS, A., NASCIMENTO, W.M., 2011, New apiaceous hosts of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in the Cerrado region of

Brazil, Horticultura Brasileira, 29, 122-124 SANDS, D.C. 1990. Physiological criteria-determinate tests. In Methods in Phytobacteriology. (Edts. Klement, Z.;

Rhudolp, K.; Sands, D.C.) Academia Kiado, Budapest, Hungary. SARHAN, A.T., 2007. New Record of Downy Mildew Disease on Garden Cress in Diwaniya Region in Iraq. Arab J.

Pl. Prot. 25(2), 181-182. SCHAAD, N.W., JONES, J.B. AND CHUN, W. 2001. Laboratory Guide for the Identification of Plant Pathogenic

Bacteria (3rd ed.). St. Paul, MN USA APS Press. SCHECK, H.J., KOIKE, S.T., 1999. First occurrence of white rust of arugula, caused by Albugo candida, Plant Disease

83(9), 877 Septoria Sacc. in Turkey, Mycopath 781):

21-28 SHADDAD RAM., EL- - Effect of solarization and

organic fertilizer on yield and quality of rocket and parsley fresh herbs, Egypt., Annals Agric.Sci., Ain Shams Univ., Cario, 54(1), 151-164.

Bologna 12 - 14 Settembre 2011. SOYLU, S., SOYLU, E.M., K Plasmopara petroselini in

Turkey, 59 (4), 799. Bacillus subtilis LBF02 as Biocontrol Agent Against Leaf Spot Diseases

Caused by Cercospora lactucae-sativae in Lettuce. Journal of Agricultural Science. Vol 6, No 3 Xanthomonas campetris pv. vitians in Turkey. Plant

Disease, 84: 490.

149

, , (2010). Plant p, 2010 Vol. 15 No. 1 pp. 39-

48. TOK, F. M., 2008. Chemical control of Septoria blight of parsley caused by Septoria petroselini, Turk J Agric For 32:

487-494. TIMOSHENKO M. A. (1972). Prometryne in dill culture, Zashchita Rastenii Vol. 17 No. 5 pp. 28.

Gibbs and L. Watson) pp. 719-721. University Press, Cambridge. sed by Xanthomonas campestris pv.

vitians. Phytoprotection, 80: 121-125.

ULLMAN, D.E., Cho, J.J., MAU, R.F.L., WESTCOT, D.M., and CUSTER, D.M., 1992. A midgut barrier to Tomato spotted wilt virus acguistion by adult western flower thrips. Phytopathology,82: 1333-1342.

e IV. B.K.K. Bildirileri. S:416

24(1): 70-79 VAN TREUREN, R., COQUIN, P., LOHWASSER, U., 2011. Genetic resources collections of leafy vegetables

Genet Resour Crop Evol, Received: 11 January 2011 / Accepted: 21 July 2011 The Author(s) 2011. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.

WESTERLUND, F.V., R.N. CAMPBELL, and R.G. GRO-GAN. 1978a. Effect of temperature on trans -mission, transloeation, and persistence of thelettuce bigvein agent and big -vein symptomexpression. Phytopathology. 68: 921-926.

-ing the reproduction and survival of Olpid/umbrassicae and its transmission of big -vein agentto lettuce. Phytopathology. 68: 927-935.

Wu, B. M. and SUBBARAO, K. V. ,2006. Analyses of Lettuce Drop Incidence and Population Structure of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and S. Minor. The American Phytopathological Society. Ecology and Epidemiology. Volume 96, Number 1Pages 1322-1329

YAR -mediterranean region of Turkey. African Journal of Biotechnology Vol., 8 (18): 4539-4541.

-241-250.

ZAPATA, R., ROMERO, A.M., MASEDA, P.H., 2005. First report of white rust of arugula caused by Albugo candida in Argentina, Plant Disease, 89 (2), 207

Tarih Proje Lideri

150

DESTEK BA URUSUNDA BULUNULAN PROJEN N BA LI I ARA TIRMA FIRSAT ALANI ARA TIRMA PROGRAMI r (P10) PROGRAM Ö

ADI ADRES PROJE DE ADI SOYADI KURUMU TELEFONU 05337268985 E-POSTA [email protected] PROJE / ALT PROJE YÜRÜTÜCÜLE

ADI SOYADI KURUMU E-POSTA [email protected] a [email protected]

Dr. Emine TOPUZ [email protected] [email protected]

[email protected]

PROJE TOPLAM

45.000 01/01/2016 31/12/2018 Proje Özeti:

-teren bitkilerden

edilecektir. Testl

eflenmektedir.

151

Anahtar Kelimeler: Determination of Disease and Pests Causing Trouble for Artichoke Cultivation in Antalya Province

and Investigation of Management Practices Abstract: Artichoke, perennial and native to Mediterranean Basin, is extremely suitable for being growing in the ecology of Antalya and has high nutritional value and various usage fields. Artichoke production in Turkey is done as vegetative. Artichoke plant multiplying with newly-emerging shoots from the tuber buds is below the soil for years and thus can be exposure to soilborne and airborn diseases and pests during vegetation periods. In this regard, diseases and pests may cause to yield losses and poor quality crop by damaging to root, tuber, root-crown, leaf, stem and head of the artichoke plant. Determination of diseases and pests leading to problems for the artichoke cultivation and taking necessary management measures are important in terms of getting the more crop per unit area and high quality crop for marketing. For these aims, the present research will be carried out in the locations of Antalya, where artichoke cultivation are done, between 2016 and 2018. In the study, with the surveys, isolations are going to be conducted by taking samples from the plants displaying disase symptoms and pests. The pathogens (fungi, bacteria, etc.) isolated are going to be identified according to their morfological features and their pathogenicities will be tested in the greenhouse conditions. Efficacy of some fungicides against the fungi detected as pathogens in consequence of the tests and existing frequently among the isolates are going to be established in the greenhouse conditions. It is a serious gap that there has been no research on diseases and pests in artichoke cultivation in Turkey. Thus, filling the gap of this field by detecting diseases and pests causing problems for artichoke production and convenient management guide for the farmers growing artichoke have been aimed with the study. Keywords: Artichoke, fungal diseases, management Projenin Ama ve Gerekçesi: Enginar (Cynara scolymus L.) Asteraceae (papatyagiller) mavi- -

–

luteolin, dicaffeoylquinic asitler ve flavonoidler gibi

Lattanzio ve ark., 2009).

b

152

Verticillium Sclerotinia sclerotiorum Botrytis cinerea Bremia lactucae (Leveillula taurica f.sp. cynarae) gibi baz Agwah ve ark., 1990; Bhat ve Subbarao, 1999; Armengol ve ark., 2005; Jabnoun-Khiareddine ve ark., 2008; Lazarovits ve Subbarao, 2009) Antalya, iklim


- - - - B -

TERATÜR ÖZET

(Anonim, 2014b).

2014e).

[Erwinia carotovora (L.R. Jones) Holland] hasta

-50'sinin enfekt

Ralstonia (Pseudomonas) solanacearum

153

Tablo 1. (Anonim, 2014e).

Cinsi Euro/100 Kg Usd/Kg (Karayolu)

ne Fob Usd/Kg (Denizyolu)

Domates 62,60 0,77 0,55 0,61 60,50 0,75 0,53 0,59

Enginar 94,30 1,16 0,94 1,00 Kabak

48,80 0,60 0,38 0,44

Portakal 35,40 0,44 0,22 0,28 Klemantin 64,90 0,80 0,58 0,64 Mandarin vb. 28,60 0,35 0,13 0,19 Limon 46,20 0,57 0,35 0,41 Elma 45,70 0,56 0,34 0,40 k Armut 51,00 0,63 0,41 0,47

nfekte eden

[(Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV)] tespit ettiklerini ve enginarda

Artichoke Italian latent nepovirus (AILV), Artichoke mottled crinckle tombusvirus (AMCV), Artichoke vein banding cheravirus (AVBV), Artichoke yellow ringspot nepovirus (AYRSV), Cucumber mosaic cucumovirus (CMV), Tobacco mosaic tobamovirus (TMV), Artichoke latent potyvirus (ArLV) ve Tomato spotted wilt tospovirus (T

-

Verticillium

e toprak solarizasyonu ve solarizasyon + Metil bromit (34 g/m2

Verticillium dahlia

(Tjamos ve Paplomatas, 1988).

154

- Leveillula taurica f.sp. cynarae) , hexaconazole, penconazole, pyrazophos ve triadimefon

pyrazophos likte test

(Fiori ve ark., 1996). Star

Verticillium

ninin Verticillium dahlia ve Bhat ve Subbarao, 1999). -

Verticillium dahliae

V. dahliae e

V. dahliae

V. dahliae

--grimsi sporulasyon

etmeninin Bremia lactucae

(Carranza 2000-

Botrytis cinereaark., 2004).

Verticillium dahliae izole

V. dahliae engi

-Khiareddine ve ark., 2008). Enginarda sorun olan Sclerotium sclerotiorum in vitro ve sera

iprodione ve boscalid; biyofungisit olarak da Trichoderma harzianum ve Bacillus subtilis fungisitlerden carbendazim, iprodione ve boscalid; biyofungisitlerden ise B. subtilis, S.

sclerotiorum’ . Sera denemesinde ise boscalid, iprodione, carbendazim ve T. harzianum Matos, 2009). Bunun

155

Sclerotium sclerotium

V. dahliae -

Verticillium dahliae

olgunluk

Copitarsia decolora (Guenee), Syngrapha gammoides (Blanchard), Agrotis bilitura olarak Capitophorus elaeagni (del Guercio), Aphis fabae Scopoli, Dysaphis cynerea (Theobald) ve Aphis gossypii Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande);

Liriomyza huidobrensis (Blanchard); salyangozlardan ise Helix aspersa (Muller), Deroceras reticulatum Tetranychus urticae (Koch)

rakbitinin (Capitophorus horni

Aphis fabae

Autographa gamma

ak da Acanthiophilus helianthi, Lriomyza sp., Lygus


tereo

Metot

156

Ekilen Alan (Da)

Aksu 255 255 Serik 550 550 Manavgat 10 -

15 - Kepez 100 100

630 630 Toplam 1560 1535

Fungus izolasyonu

obligat ol

steril-45 dakika bekletilerek

kurutulduktan sonra her bir petri kutusuna 6-7 bit-

Patojenisite Testleri

hemositometre -

1985).

157

Bakteriyel etmenin izolasyonu Tipik sar

-

o

- Patojenisite Testleri

en

o -eltme

6

-

1.

-izolatlar, 48-72 saat 25o -Schaad vd., 2001).

2.Potasyum Hidroksit testi (KOH)

izolatlar ve re-

158

ha -

3. Arginine Dihidrolaz Testi

ve 27 o -olarak kabul edilecektir.

-HR) Testi Nicotiana tabacum - 8

-sonucu inokule edilen alanlarda olu 5. Oksidaz Testi

- Tetramethyl-

1956). 6.Katalaz Testi

o n sonra petrilere - o

7. Pektolitik Aktivite Testi Y

o

8. H2

ye, 1962)

o

o - o

159

Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV), Artichoke yellow ringspot virus (AYRSV) ve Artichoke latent virus -

Etmen Sekans Amplikon

Referans

CMV - GTA GAC ATC TGT GAC GCG A –

- GCG CGA AAC AAG CTT CTT ATC -

540 bp

De Blas ve ark., 1994; Samuitiene and

Navalinskieene, 2008 AYRSV - GAA CGC AAC ATC GGA GA –

- GCT CCA CAA AGT GAC TTG – 530 bp Maliogka ve ark.,

2006 ArLV F 5 - GAT CTA GCG ATA CAC ATG CAC

AAC A -3 R 5 -CGC TCA AGC TCT CGA ACT AAC

TGA AC -3

282 bp Lumia ve ark., 2003

-

-PCR)

i

sentezlenecektir. -PCR tes

-ONE DNA

unca 2-

160

aspiratörü ile toplanarak kaydedilecek ve numuneler tüplere konularak

yaprak

s

n örnekler

labaratuvara getirilere

-

ngisit .

ki Analiz

161

ÇALI MA TAKV M

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 x x x x x x x x

x x x x x x x x x x x x x x

x x x x x x Patojenisite Testleri x x x x x x x x in vitro x x x x x x Serada fungisit denemesi x x x x x x

x x x x x x

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 x x x x x x x x x x

x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x

x x x x x x x x Patojenisite Testleri x x x x x x in vitro x x x x x x Serada fungisit denemesi x x x x x x

x x x x x x

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 eyi x x x x x

x x x x x x x x x x

x x x x x x x Patojenisite Testleri x x x x x x in vitro x x x x x x Serada fungisit denemesi x x x x x x


YÖNET M DÜZE

Ad Soyad Proje Yü tüc erinin Projeye Kat lar


edilmesi, fungal

3.-5. 8.-17. 20.-

t denemesinin

3.-5. 8.-17.

20.-

3.-5. 8.-17.

20.-

162

Dr. Emine TOPUZ belirlenmesi

3.-5. 8.-17. 20.-

Serap Melike SÜLÜ patojenisite testleri

3.-5. 8.-17. 20.-

3.-5. 8.-17. 20.-


AMACI:

1

edilecektir

lara

2

etkinlikleri belirlenecektir. Yine

bakteriyel ve viral etmenlere ve

bitki k t dbi l i

3

163


06 SERMAYE G ERLER YILLARA GÖRE DA ILIM

1.Y l 2.Y l 3 Y l 06.1- Mamul Mal Alml 9.000 4.000 3.000 06.2- Menkul Sermaye Üretim Giderleri 2.500 2.500 1.500 06.5- Gayrimenkul Sermaye Üretim Giderleri 6.500 7.500 8.500

Toplam 18.000 14.000 13.000 Genel Toplam 45.000

2016

2017

2018

6 6 1

6 1 2 6 1 2 4 Laboratuar Cihaz 5.000 - - 6 1 2 5

6 1 2 90

6 1 3 4 3.000 3.000 2.000

6 1 3 5

6 1 3 90 1.000 1.000 1.000

6 2

6 2 6

6 2 6 1 500 500 500 6 2 7 1 2.000 2.000 1.000 6 5 Gayrimenkul

6 5 2 Malzeme Giderleri 6 5 2 4 6 5 4 Enerji Giderleri

6 5 4 2 6.000 7.000 8.000 6 5 4 3 500 500 500 6 9

6 9 2 Yolluk Giderleri 6 9 2 1 6 9 2 2

3 3 6 2 1 TOPLAM 18.000 14.000 13.000

GENEL TOPLAM 45.000

164

KAYNAKÇA Agwah, E. M. R., El-Fadaly, K. A. and El-Hassan, E. A. A., 1990. Effect of some fungicides on earliness, yield and

quality of globe artichoke (Cynara scolymus L.). Bulletin of Faculty of Agriculture, University of Cairo 1990 Vol. 41 No. 3 pp. 767-775.

Anonim

Anonymous, 2015. Artichoke Pest and Disease Problems. http://luv2garden.com/artichoke_disease_pests.html

Aly, M., M. and Abd El Ghafar, N. Y., 2000. Bacterial wilt of artichoke caused by Ralstonia solanacearum in Egypt. Plant Pathol, 49, 807.

Armengol, J., Berbegal, M., -Jaime, A., Romero, S., , R., Vicent, A., Ortega, A., - , J., 2005. Incidence of Verticillium wilt of artichoke in eastern Spain and role of inoculum sources on crop infection. Phytoparasitica, Volume 33, Issue 4, pp 397-405.

Bhat, R. G., and Subbarao, K. V., 1999. First Report of Verticillium dahliae Causing Artichoke Wilt in California. August 1999, Volume 83, Number 8 Page 782.

Berbegal, M., Ortega, A ., -Jiménez, J., and Armengol, J. 2007. Inoculum density-disease development relationshio in Verticillium wilt of artichoke caused by Verticillium dahliae. Plant Dis. 91:1131- 1136. Carranza, MLarran, S., and Alippi, H., 2001. First Report of Artichoke Downy Mildew Caused by Bremia lactucae in

Argentina. Plant Disease, April 2001, Volume 85, Number 4 Page 446. - II).

- Dye, D . W., (1962). The inadequacy of the usual determinative tests for he identification of Xanthomonas spp. New

Zealand Journal of Science 5 , 393-416. Cucumber mosaic virus in globe artichoke in Turkey. Canadian Journal of

Plant Pathology, Volume 35, Issue 4, pages 514-517.

1-322. Fiori, M., Prota, V. A., Carta, C., Garau, R., 1996. Control trials against powdery mildew on artichoke in 1994-95 in

Sardinia. Difesa delle Piante, 1996 Vol. 19 No. 1 pp. 23-26. Jabnoun-Khiareddine, H., Daami-Remadi, M., Ayed, F., and El Mahjoub, M., 2008. First report of verticillium wilt of

artichoke caused by Verticillium dahliae in Tunisia. Plant Pathology, Volume 57, Issue 2, page 377. Kovaks, N., 1956. Identification of Pseudomonas pyocyoanea by the oxidase reaction. Nature (London) 178:703. Larran, S., Ronco, L., Carranza, M. R., and Zuccaro, M., 2004. Grey mould of the globe artichoke in Argentina.

Australasian Plant Pathology September 2004, Volume 33, Issue 3, p 461. Larrain, P. S., Salas, C. F., Jana, A. C. and Grana, S. F., 2012. Major Artichoke Pests (Cynara cardunculus sub.

scolymus L.) in Coquimbo Region, Chile. 8th International Symposium on Artichoke, Cardoon and their Wild Relatives, Viterbo, ITALY, APR 10-13, 2012.

Lattanzio, V., Kroon, P. A., Linsalata, V., Cardinali, A., 2009. Globe artichoke: A functional food and source of nutraceutical ingredients. Journal of Functional Foods , Volume 1, Issue 2, April 2009, Pages 131–144.

Lazarovits, G., and Subbarao, K., 2009. Challenges in Controlling Verticillium Wilt by the Use of Nonchemical Methods, Recent Developments in Management of Plant Diseases, Plant Pathology in the 21st Century Volume 1, 2009, pp 247-264.

Lelliot, R. A., and Stead, D. E., 1987. Media and Methods. In: Methods for the Diagnosis of Bacterial Diseases of Plants. Oxford London Edinburg. 216.

Marcucci, E., Aleandri, M. P., Chilosi G., and Magro, P., 2010. Induced Resistance by -Aminobutyric Acid in Artichoke against White Mould Caused by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Journal of Phytopathology,Volume 158, Issue 10, pages 659–667, October 2010.

165

Matos, L. S. T., 2009. Biological and chemical control of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib.) De Bary in artichoke. Thesis for the degree of master, National Agrarian University Graduate School of Specialization in plant pathology, Lima, Peru. Abstract.

Perennec, S., and Collet, J. M., 2009. Artichoke's Pests in Brittany, 7th International Symposium on Artichoke. Cardoon and Their Wild Relatives, Saint-Pol de Leon, FRANCE, JUN 16-19, 2009.

Martelli, G.P., and Gallitelli, D., 2008. Viruses of Cynara. Characterization, diagnosis and management of plant viruses. In G.P. Rao, S.M.P. Khurana and S.L. Lenardon (Eds.). Characterization, Diagnosis

Gallitelli, D., Rana, G. L., Vovlas, C., and Martelli, G. P., 2004. Viruses of globe artichoke: an overview. J. Plant Pathol., 86, 267–281

Sands, D. C., 1990. Physiological criteria-determinate tests. In Methods in Phytobacteriology. (Edts. Klement, Z.; Rhudolp, K.; Sands, D. C.) Academia Kiado, Budapest, Hungary.

Schaad, N. W., Jones, J. B and Chun, W. 2001. Laboratory Guide for the Identification of Plant Pathogenic Bacteria (3rd ed.). St. Paul, MN USA APS Press.

Sonnante, G., Pignone, D.,and Hammer, K., 2007. The Domestication of Artichoke and Cardoon: From Roman Times to the Genomic Age. Ann Bot (2007) 100 (5): 1095-1100.

Temperini, O. Calabrese, N. Temperini, A., Rouphael, Y., Tesi, R., Lenzi, A., Carito, A., and Colla, G., 2013. Grafting artichoke onto cardoon rootstocks: Graft compatibility, yield and Verticillium wilt incidence. Scientia Horticulturae, Volume 149, 4 January 2013, Pages 22–27.

Tjamos, E. C. and Paplomatas, E. J., 1988. Long-term effect of soil solarization in controlling verticillium wilt of globe artichokes in Greece. Plant Pathology Volume 37, Issue 4, pages 507–515.

-29 Mart 1985, Ankara.

[Erwinia caratovora -57. Yuan, Z. Q., and Mohammed, C., 1999. Pathogenicity of Fungi Associated with Stem Cankers of Eucalypts in

Tasmania, Australia. Plant Disease, Volume 83, Number 11 Pages 1063-1069. TEKL ONAYI Ad Soya Tarih za

Proje Lideri 24.04.2015 Öneren Kurul M d

166


BA LI I (Triticum aestivum L.) Belirlenmesi

ARA TIRMA FIRSAT ALANI ARA TIRMA PROGRAMI -01) PROGRAM Ö

ADI ADRES No : 11 Pk:35 Antalya PROJE DE ADI SOYADI KURUMU TELEFONU 0505 9284827 E-POSTA [email protected] PROJE / ALT PROJE YÜRÜTÜCÜLE


[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

PROJE TOPLAM

24.650 01/01/2016 31/12/2019

L

- - -

Proje Özeti: Triticum aestivum L.)

300, 400, 500 ve 600 tohum/m2 -

167

Anahtar Kelimeler: Ekmeklik Determination of Suitable Sowing Dates and Densities for Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in the

Western Mediterranean Region Coast Conditions Abstract: This study will be conducted to determine suitable sowing dates and densities for bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in coastal areas of the Western Mediterranean Region in the field of Agricultural Research Institute Aksu unit and Kayaburnu unit in Serik for three years. This research will be conducted according to factorial arrangement on split plots in randomized complete block design with three replications. In the trial, Osmaniyem, Meta 2002 and Ziyabey 98 varieties will be used. The varieties will be sown on four different sowing dates (starting is 1 October and with an interval of three weeks) with five different sowing densities (200, 300, 400, 500 and 600 seeds m-2). Sowing dates main plots, sub-plots will be established in the form of varieties-sowing densities combination. During the experiment, yield, yield components, phenological period and observations and measurements about some quality traits will be taken. Determined suitable sowing date and density will be recommended to the region farmers. Keywords: Bread wheat, sowing date, sowing density Projenin Ama ve Gerekçesi: Tanesindeki uygun beslenme

besinlerden a

lam 218

--

168

1994

(T

a

- - -

belirlenmesi gerekmektedir.


kullan Verim ve kalited

TERATÜR ÖZET

-

169

belirlem -kg/dekar, Lachish ve Gediz-

Akkaya (1994), 400, 475, 550 ve 600 tohum/m2 ) Lancer ve H

2 Kahraman

-

tohum/m2 2

1993-2

2

2

Seri- -2

verim, tane verimi, vejetatif periyot, tane dolum periyodu ve ekim-

2

periyodu ve ekim--

- -1

Triticum aestivum

-

-

son

170

-750 tane/m2 erdir.

-

-2004 ve 2004-

2 )

2003–2004 ve 2004– ekmeklik bu day (Triticum aestivum

tlerinde bitki s im, veri ik ve kali ikleri üzerine etkiler -Cumhuriyet-

–8–16– –500–700 bitki/m2

–

Cumhuriyet– –95, –300–400–500–600 bitki/m

2)

üzerine etkisinin öntohum/m

2

(0–8–16–24 kg/da) ve bitki (300–500–700 bitki/m2)

Ertekin (2011), Diy

(Triticum durum -

-2

2

pme -2

(Triticum aestivum L. ssp vulgare Vill. v. leucospermum 2006-07 ve 2008-

-2

171

esi -

-500-650-

a 2004-(Altay- - - -

-

v

- 75 kg/ha ekim

D

MATERYAL ve METOT 1.Materyal Denem

Çizelge-1:Denemede kulla

Osmaniyem 2006 Meta 2002 2002

2015

172

- oC)

2. Metot

2

-ekim s 2.2. Toprak Analizleri: -

al

Toprak reaksiyonu (pH) :

Kalsiyum karbonat (CaC03): edilecektir. Eriyebilir toplam tuz:

173

iletkenlik Kondaktivite aletiyle öl Bünye:

Organik madde: Modifiye Walkley-Black met Toplam azot:

1982).

1 N amonyu

belirlenecektir.

verilecektir. 2.4. Ekim ve

2.5. Hasat ve Harman

-döveri

2):

2

Bitki Boyu (cm):

Biyolojik Verim: 3-

174

Tane Verimi (kg/da):

Hasat indeksi: Her parsele ait tane verimi o parsele ait biyolojik verime oranlanacak, daha sonra % olarak

Yatma (%/Derece):

kabul edilerek bu e

o

rnekler 575 o

ifade edilecektir (Monneveux ve ark., 2005).

-Azo

2SO4) ile 4)2SO4 , asit

n 2SO4

reaksiyonunu h zland(CuSO4 2

4+ iyonlar n n amonyak (NH3) gaz mesi kolayla t

amonyak serbest hale gelecektir. Olu an amonyak miktar numunedeki azot miktar ile orant l

m = V1 = (mL) V0 = (mL) N = Titrasyonda kullan 0,014007 =

Ya

175

Gluten indeksi: omatik Santrifüj 2015 (index) aleti

ka Sedimantasyon testi:


. ÇALI MA TAKV M

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

- Analizi x x x

Den x x x x x x x x x x

x x x x x x x x x Hasat ve Harman x x

x x x x

x x

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 - Analizi x

x x x x

x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x

Hasat ve Harman x x x x

x x x x

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

- Analizi x x x

x x x x x x x x x x

x x x x x x x x x Hasat ve Harman x x Depoda ya x x

x x x x

176

YÖNET M DÜZE


Proje Lideri

Hasat ve Harman,

1-36. ay

Hasat ve Harman

1-36. ay

Hasat ve Harman

1-36. ay

11,12,23,24,35,36.aylar

PROJE SONUÇLARININ UYGULAMAYA AKTARIMI

Belirlenmesi

belirlenmesi,

mak,

veri elde etmek.

177

Metot ya

1

optimum oranlar tespit edilecektir.

Elde edilen bulgular kongre ve sempozyumlarda bildiri, hakemli dergilerde ya

2



1.Y l 2.Y l 3 Y l

06.1- Mamul Mal Alml 700 900 1050 1100 06.2- Menkul Sermaye Üretim Giderleri 750 4400 4750 5000 06.5- Gayrimenkul Sermaye Üretim Giderleri 500 850 1000 1150 06.9- Di er Sermaye Giderleri 750 850 900

Toplam 1950 6900 7650 8150 Genel Toplam 24.650,00

NDIRMASI 2016

2017

2018

2019

6 6 1

6 1 2

6 1 2 4

6 1 2 5

6 1 2 90

6 1 3 5 400 500 550 550 6 1 3 90 300 400 500 550 6 2

178

6 2 6 6 2 6 1 350 400 450 500 6 2 7 1 400 4000 4300 4500 6 5 6 5 2 Malzeme Giderleri

6 5 4 Enerji Giderleri 6 5 4 2 300 500 600 700 6 5 4 3 200 350 400 450 6 9 6 9 2 Yolluk Giderleri 6 9 2 1 750 850 900 6 9 2 2 3 3 6 2 1

TOPLAM 1950 6900 7650 8150 GENEL TOPLAM 24.650,00

KAYNAKÇA

309.

-168. AKKAYA

-923. ICC Standart No:116. Determination of the Sedimentation Value (According to Zeleny) As An

Approximate Measure of Baking Quality. ICC Standart No:137, Mechanical Determination of The Wet Gluten Content of Wheat Flour

(Glutomatic).

(2013). (Triticum spp.)

http://www.ttsm.gov.tr/ AUSTIN, R.B., BINGHAM,J., R.D., EVANS, L.T., FORD, M.A., MORGAN, C.L. and TAYLOR, M., (1980), Genetic

Improvements In Winter Wheat Yields Since 1900 And Associated Physiological Changes, J. Agric. Sci., 94: 675-689.

BAKER, R. J., (1982). Effect Of Seeding Rate On Grain Yield, Straw Yield and Harvest Index of Eight Spring Wheat Cultivars, Can. J. Plant. Sci. 62, 285-291.

BLACK, C.A., (1965). Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2, Amer. Society of Agronomy Inc., Publisher, Maadison, Wisconsin; U.S.A., 1372-1376.

BOUYOUCOS, G.J., (1955). A Recalibration of The Hydrometer Metod for Making Mechanical Analysis of The Soil. Agronomy Journal, 4 (9): 434.

Ç Triticum turanicum

179

ri Dergisi 14(3) 276-283

Bitkileri Kongresi 25- -344. DAY, A. D., ALEMU, A., JACKSON, E. B. (1976). Effect Of Cultural Practices On Grain Yield And Yield

Components In Irrigated Wheat. Agron. J., 68: 132-134.

(Triticum durum L.)

Verim Ve Verim

FAOSTAT,(2014). http://faostat.fao.org/ GELETA, B., ATAK, M., BAENZIGER, P.S., NELSON, L.A. BALTENESPERGER, D.D., ESKRIDGE, K.M.,

SHIPMAN, M.J., and SHELTON, D.R. (2002). Seeding Rate and Genotype Effect on Agronomic Performance and End- Use Quality of Winter Wheat. Crop Sci. 42:827-832

-182 6-9 Ekim, Bursa. Triticum aestivum Triticum durum L.)

IQBAL, J.,HAYAT, K.,HUSSAIN, S., ALI, A. ve BAKHSH,M.A.A.H.A. (2012). Effect of Seeding Rates and Nitrogen

Levels on Yield and Yield Components of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Pakistan Journal of Nutrition 11 (7): 531-536, 2012.

JACKSON, M.L., (1962). Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice-Hall Inc. 183:219-284. JACKSON, M.L., (1967). Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice-Hall of India Private Limited, New Delhi. JOSEPH, K. D. S. M., M. M. ALLEY, D. E. BRANN and W. D. GRAVELLE. (1985). Row Spacing And Seeding Rate

Effect On Yield And Yield Components Of Soft Red Winter Wheat. Argon. J. 77:211-214. KACAR, B., (1962). Plant and Soil Analysis. University of Nebraska College of Agriculture, Deparment of Agronomy,

Lincoln, Neraska, U.S.A u

KA

323 Triticum aest. var. aest.

-76

LINDSAY, W. L. and W. A. NORVELL, (1978). Development of a DTPA Soil Test for Zing, Iron, Manganese and Copper. Soil Sci.Soc.Amer.Jour. Vol. 42. No: 3

OLSEN, S. R. and L.E. SOMMERS., (1982). Phosphorus Availability Indices. Phosphorus Soluble in Sodium Bicarbonate. Metod of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Chemical and Microbiolagical Prosperies. Edit: A.L.Page, R.H. Miller, D.R. Keeney, 404-430.

MONNEVEUX, P., REYNOLS P. M., TRETHOWAN, R., GONZALEZ- SANTOYO H., PENA, J.R. and ZAPATA, F. (2005). Relationship Between Grain Yield and Carbon Isotope Discrimination in Bread Wheat Under Four Water Regimes. Europ. J. Agronomy 22:231-242.

180

ÖZTÜRK, A. (1996).

(Doktora Tezi). SHARMA, R. C., SMITH, E. L. (1987), Effects Of Seedings Rates On Harvest Index, Grain Yield, And Biomass Yield

in Winter Wheat. Crop Sci., 27: 528-531. SLAFER, G.A., CALDERINI, D.F. and MIRALLES, D.J. (1996), Yield components and compensation in wheat:

Opportunities for further increasing yield potential, In M.P. Reynolds, S. Rajaram and A. McNab, eds. Increasing yield potential in wheat: breaking the barriers, 101-133, Mexico, DF, CIMMYT.

Triticum aestivum

Triticum aestivum

ANADOLU, J. of AARI 20 (2) 2010, 28 – 44 MARA.

Triticum aestivum

TANNER, G. A., GORFU, A. & ZEWDE, K. (1991). Wheat Agronomy Research in Ethiopia, in: Wheat Research in

Ethiopia, A Historical Perspective. Haila ciebre- Mariam, Tanner, G.A. and Mengistu Hulluka (eds.). 73-94. Addis Ababa, LAR/CIMMYT

TKACHUK, R.(1969). Nitrogen-to-Protein Conversion Factors for Cereals and Oilseed Meals. Grain Research Laboratory, Winnipeg 2, Manitoba.

http://www.tuik.gov.tr/ T. aestivum

17- - YILDIRIM, M., (1995).

TEKL ONAYI Ad Soya Tarih mza Proje Lideri Öneren Kurul M d

181


BA LI I ARA TIRMA FIRSAT ALANI A-13 ARA TIRMA PROGRAMI P-02 PROGRAM Ö Yüksek

ADI

PROJE DE ADI SOYADI Dr. KURUMU BATEM TELEFONU 0242 429 73 31/235 E-POSTA [email protected] PROJE/ALT PROJE YÜRÜTÜCÜLE

ADI SOYADI KURUMU E-POSTA [email protected] [email protected]

A [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

Ramazan TOKER [email protected]

PROJE TOPLAM

62 000 01/01/2016 31/12/2018

L Teknik Analiz

Proje Özeti:

182

y

unda

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Irrigation Scheduling of Soybean Irrigated by Surface and Subsurface Drip Irrigation System Abstract: Increase of world population, pollution of current natural resources, global warming and climate change are increasing pressure on water resources. To maintain food security of increased population, it is essential to increase sustainably the agricultural production and to use optimally current limited water resources. As water resources limited and water demand by other sectors (domestic, urban, industrial) increased, efficient use of water is getting more and more important. Global warming and disorderliness in rainfall as well as competition of water resources by other sectors will cause to decrease the water used by agriculture. To meet food demand by increasing population is another problem that has to be elaborated. Therefore, it is important to develop and apply methods that save on irrigation water and increase agricultural production. One of those methods that save water, do not pollute environment, and increase crop yield and quality is pressurized irrigation systems. Especially, efficient use of water in agriculture can be realized by surface and subsurface drip irrigation system as well as precise irrigation timing. The aim of this project is to determine irrigation scheduling program of soybean irrigated by surface and subsurface drip irrigation system. The study will carried out in Bati Akdeniz Agricultural Research Institute located in Aksu Campus. Randomized split plots with three replications will be used in the study. Irrigation treatments will be formed as the percentages of available water capacity of the soil profile (100%, 80%, 60%, and 0%). The crop will be irrigated when 30% of the available water capacity of control treatment (100%) is used. Soil water content will be monitored using TDR and gravimetrically. Some of the physiological growing parameters such as crop height, number of branches and leaf area and parameters related with yield and quality will be determined. Also, yield response function of sorghum under surface and subsurface drip irrigation system will be determined. The goal of the project is to answer how the water resources could be used to meet energy requirement of the nation. An economic analysis will also be carried out and the results that will be obtained will be shared with farmers as well as related public organizations. Keywords: Soybean, drip irrigation, subsurface drip irrigation, water use efficiency Projenin Ama ve Gerekçesi:

183

m3

(Anonim, 2010). Bu projenin

- um


-

-tepki etmenini belirlemek,

-

- isine

184

ektir. (IPCC, 2001) Bunun sonucunda;

3 3 3 olan

3

2009).

etkilenmektedir. Glycine max L.) hem insan ve hayvan beslenmesinde, hem de sanayide

-

ktedir.

- -45 protein, %30

edilmektedir (Golbitz, 2004).

çimlendiri

landan daha fazla ve ucuz

185

Rhizobium

(Bradyrhizobium) japonicum bakte

edilmektedir (Keyser ve Li 1992).

261 milyon ton seviyelerindedir (Anonim 2013).

-700 mm; Kanemasu (1981), 380–730 mm; Hobbs ve Muendel (1983), 426-482 mm; Evett ve ark. (2005), 589-1092 mm; Karam ve ark. (2005), 762.5

fasulyesinde olarak 450-

- (2009), 795.2-

- -

lumsuz

Taylor ve ark., 1982; Hodges ve Heatherly, 1983; Griffin ve ark., 1985, Al-Tawaha ve ark., 2007). MATERYAL ve YÖNTEM Materyal

Deneme Antalya-

o 52 o

186

Çizelge 1. Deneme yeri topra

Sulama Suyu Özellikleri

Sulama suyu 2A1

uk, sodiklik vb gibi) iyi kalitede bir

Katyonlar (me/l) Anyonlar (me/l) pH EC

(dSm-1) Na+ K+ Ca++ Mg++ CO3= HCO3

- Cl- SO4=

0.49 0.05 4.23 1.85 0.0 5.03 0.53 1.06 7.3 0.56

Derinlik (cm)

Kum (%)

Kil (%)

Silt (%)

CaCO3

(%) EC

(dS/m) pH TK (g/g)

SN (g/g)

Hacim

(gr/cm3)

0-30 13 44 43 SiC 25.6 0.103 8.3 23.38 12.80 1.31 30-60 13 40 47 SiC 24.8 0.108 8.3 23.56 11.30 1.38 60-90 13 38 49 SiCL 23.7 0.156 8.4 22.16 11.95 1.43

187

Çizelge 3. Antalya il

Aylar

(oC)

Oransal Nem (%)

(m/s)

(mm)

(h/D)

(mm)

Buhar

(hPa)

Ocak 9.7 70.9 2.9 214.2 5.21 72.0 8.2

10.1 70.6 3.1 161.8 5.54 77.1 8.3

Mart 12.5 71.9 2.8 96.8 6.53 108.6 9.7

Nisan 15.9 71.4 3.0 56.5 8.59 131.8 12.3

20.4 66.2 3.0 30.0 9.51 179.4 15.9

Haziran 25.3 55.2 3.0 7.3 11.36 245.5 18.9

Temmuz 28.3 54.3 3.0 3.3 11.54 280.1 21.7

27.9 56.7 3.0 1.7 11.26 254.4 22.1

Eylül 24.5 58.8 2.8 11.3 9.54 202.7 18.4

Ekim 19.7 64.1 2.4 76.7 8.03 145.4 14.1

14.4 70.1 2.5 160.2 6.24 85.8 10.8

10.9 71.4 2.9 248.7 5.07 69.3 8.9

(Ort. Top.) 18.3 65.1 2.9 1068.5 8.2 1852.1 14.1

Bitki Materyali

- -130 cm, 1000 dane -160 g, erkencilik durumu orta, - -24,

8-33, verimi 350-

Yöntem

3

–

188

-7 soya bitkisi ve tohumu.

O

, 1954).

3

105 0 Tarla kapasitesi (%): P

su eklemek yoluyla belir Kalsiyum (Ca++) ve Magnezyum (Mg++

Sodyum (Na+) ve Potasyum (K+

Karbonat (CO3

=) ve Bikarbonat (HCO3-

(Richards, 1954). Klor (Cl-

4

= 2 olarak tayin edilecektir. Nitrat-N (NO3

-

189

Deneme deseni p(I1=%100, I2=%80, I3=%60 ve I0

2 ktir.

Deneme Konular

I1 (%100) kapasitesine getirilen kontrol konusu.

I2 (%80) 1 konusuna uygulanan suyun 1x0.80).

I3(%60) 1 konusuna uygulanan suyun 1x0.60).

I0 (%0) Sulanmayan konu.

I1 (%100) kapasitesine getirilen kontrol konusu.

I2 (%80) 1 konusuna uygulanan suyun 1x0.80).

I3(%60) 1 konusuna uygulanan suyun 1x0.60).

I0 (%0) Sulanmayan konu.

190

Su

arsellerine 125 ve

191

-line) 16 PE

estlerinin

erdeki eksik nem tarla

1

1

192

TK = Tarla kapasitesi (mm)

Konulu sulamalara; 100)

dn TK: Tarla kapasitesi (%), MN: mevcut nem (%)

3)

Dene

T: Sulama suyu dn

2)

-30, 30-60 ve 60-

I = Sulama suyu (mm)

193

ET = Bitki su tüketimi (mm)

IWUE -1), V : Verim (kg ha-1) ve SS : Uygulanan sulama suyudur (mm).

WUE -1), V : Verim (kg ha-1) ve ET : Bitki su t Verim Tepki Etmeni (ky)

y

Stewart vd (1977) k

11 11 mm ETETkyYY

Y -1), Ym

-1), ky ET ETm

(mm).

194

ikte;

YAI: Yaprak alan indeksi, YA 2), ve BA 2

1-30, 30-60 ve 60-

edilen parsellerden hemen

gerekli

maddede toplam P, K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn, Zn ICP-OES

belirlenecektir. Bitki boyu (cm)

ortala

ecektir. Tane verimi (kg/da)

195

Ya

-ktan

-

Hesaplama:

-M1/m)*100

M1 M M

-

(Agilent 5975C) -

- (m/z) 35- lerinin

Toprak, 15-

ya tohumu

-- -15

196

2.5 kg /da saf azot, 6 kg/da saf fosfordur. Hasat Soyad - Ekonomik Analiz

(Sezen ve ark., 2013). de verilmektedir.

KONULAR

I0 I1 I2 I3 I0 I1 I2 I3

Tohum bedeli Zir. M

Su bedeli

Ekim

Ot temizleme (el ile)

Hasat

TOPLAM Toplam giderlerin nom. faiz ka

2)

197

Gayri Safi Net kar Brüt marj Oransal kar

-C istatistik paket

(Gomez ve Gomez, 1984).

1* 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

x x

x x x x x x x

x x x x x x x x x x

Çapa x x Yaprak ve toprak analizleri x x x x Hasat x

x x x x x

x x

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

x x x x x x x

x x x x x x x x x x

Çapa x x Yaprak ve toprak analizleri x x x x Hasat x

x x x x x x x

x x x x

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12


198

YÖNET M DÜZE


1-36 ay

3-9 ve 16-21. Aylar

analiz.

4-9 ve 16-21. Aylar

4-8 ve 17-20. Aylar 6-9 ve 18-21. Aylar

Toprak ve su analizleri, 6-9 ve 18-21. Aylar

Ramazan TOKER

9-11 ve 21-23. aylar

PROJE SONUÇLARININ UYGULAMA AKTARIMI

1 damla sul

2 kul

3 etkisinin belirlenmesi.

4 potansiyeline etkisinin belirlenmesi. TALEP E LEN BÜTÇE I.Y Tutar


1.Y l 2.Y l 3 Y l 06.1- Mamul Mal Alml 21100 3250 06.2- Menkul Sermaye retim Giderleri 7750 2550 500 06.5- Gayrimenkul Sermaye im Giderleri 11250 4500 900 06.9- Di er Sermaye Giderleri 5600 2300 2300

Toplam 45700 12600 3700 Genel Toplam 62000

199

2016

2017

2018

06 06 1

06 1 2 06 1 2 4 15500 06 1 2 5 1000

06 1 3 5 4600 3250

06 2

06 2 6

06 2 6 1 500 500 500 06 2 7 1 7250 2050 06 5

06 5 2 Malzeme Giderleri 06 5 2 02 Elektrik tesisat giderleri 2000 06 5 2 04 isat Giderleri 5500

06 5 4 Enerji Giderleri 06 5 4 02 2000 2500 900 06 5 4 03 1750 2000

06 9 06 9 2 Yolluk Giderleri 06 9 2 01 2000 500 500 06 9 2 06 3600 1800 1800 TOPLAM 45700 12600 3700 GENEL TOPLAM 62000 KAYNAKÇA ABI SAAB, M.T., ALBRIZIO, R., NANGIA, V., KARAM, F., ROUPHAEL, Y., 2014. Developing scenarios to

assess sunflower and soybean yield under different s owing dates and water regimes in the Bekaa valley (Lebanon): simulations with Aquacrop. International Journal of Plant Production 8(4): 457–482

AL-TAWAHA, A.M., SEGUIN, P., SMITH, D.L., BONNELL, R.B., 2007. Irrigation level affects isoflavone concentrations of early maturing soya bean cultivars. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 193: 238–246.

-605-137-388- aostat.org.

-70, sayfa 198. ASHLEY, D.A., ETHRIDGE, W.J., 1978. Irrigation effects on vegetative and reproductive development of three

soybeans cultivars. Agron. J. 70, 467–471.

http://www.sektorler.web.tr/cevre_su/genel/kuresel_isinma_su_kaynaklari_ve_tarim_uzerine_etkileri.htm.

200

BAYRA -

-

COMLEKCIOGLU, N., SIMSEK, M. 2011. Effects of deficit irrigation on yield and yield components of vegetable soybean (Glycine max L.) in semi-arid conditions. African Journal of Biotechnology 10: 6227-6234.

DERVITOK-

DOORENBOS, J., KASSAM, A.H., 1979. Yield Response to Water. FAO Irrigation and Drainage paper No. 33, FAO, Rome, Italy, p. 193.

DOSS, B.D., PEARSON, R.W., ROGERS, H.T., 1974. Effect of Soil Water Stress at Various Growth Stages on Soybean Yield. Agron. J. 66, 297–299.

19.

EVETT, S.R., HOWELL, T.A., SCHNEIDER, A.D., UPCHURCH, D.R., WANJURA, D.F., 2000. Automatic

drip irrigation of corn and soybean. In Proc. of the 4th Decennial National Irrigation Symp. Robert G. Evans, Brian L. Benham, and Todd P. Trooien (eds.). November 14-16, Phoenix, AZ. (pp. 401-408)

GOLBITZ, P., 2004. Soya and oilseed bluebook 2004. Soyatech, Bar Harbor, ME. GOMEZ, K.A., GOMEZ, A.A. 1984. Statistical Procedures For Agricultural Research . An Int. Rice Res. Inst.

Book. John Wiley And Sons, Inc. New York. pp.680. GRIFFIN, J.L., TAYLOR, R.W., HABETZ, R.J., REGAN, R.P., 1985. Respons of solid -seeded soybeans to flood

irrigation. I. Application Timing Agronomy Journal, Vol. 77, No. 4, 551-554. HOBBS, E.H. MUENDEL, H.H., 1983. Water requirements of irrigated soybeans in southern Alberta. Can. J.

Plant Sci. 63:855-860. HODGES, H.F., HEATHERLY, L.G., 1983. Principles of Water Management for Soybean Production in

Mississippi. Mississippi Agricultural Forestry Experiment Station Bulletin No. 919. HOLT, S., 1997. Soya: the health food of the next millenn ium. J. Kor. Soybean Dig. 14, 77–90. IPCC, 2001. - JAMES, L.G., 1988. Principles Of Farm Irrigation System Design . John Wiley And Sons Inc.New York, pp, 543.

KADHEM, F.A., SPECHT, J.E., WILLIAMS, J.H., 1985. Soybean irrigation serially timed during stages R1 to

R6. II. yield component responses. Agron. J. 77, 299–304. KANEMASU, E.T., 1981. Irrigation water requirement and water stress. Irrigated soybean production in arid and

semi-arid regions. International Agriculture Publications. Judy, W.H. and Jacksobs, J.A. eds. Pp 82-85. KARAM, F., MASAAD, R., SFEIR, T., MOUNZER, O., ROUPHAEL, Y., 2005. Evapotranspiration and seed

yield of field grown soybean under deficit irrigation conditions. Agric. Water Manage. 75: 226–244. KARAM, F., MASAAD, R., SFEIR, T., MOUNZER, O., ROUPHAEL, Y., 2005. Evapotranspiration and seed

yield of field grown soybean under deficit irrigation conditions. Agricultural Water Management 75: 226-244.

KORTE, L.L., WILLIAMS, J.H., SPECHT, J.E., SORENSEN, R.C., 1983. Irrigation of Soybean Genotypes during Reproductive Ontogeny. II. Yield Component Responses. Crop Sci. 23, 528–533.

-28.

and Bahri, A. pp. 1-2.

-224. Samsun. Keyser, H.K. and F. Li. 1992. Potential for increasing biological nitrogen fixation in soybeans. Plant Soil 141:119-135.

OZKARA, M.M., 1991. Second-crop soya Menemen Region Water Consumption. Menemen Agricultural Research Institute Publications. Publ No: 170/R-11, Turkey

201

RICHARDS, L.A., 1954. Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. Agricultural handbook No:6 USA (203)s.

SCOTT, H. D., FERGUSON, J.A., WOOD, L.S., 1987: Water use, yield, and dry matter accumulation by determinate soybean grown in a humid region. Agron. J. 79, 870–875.

Kalitesine Etkilerin in Belirlenmesi. TAGEM-BB- SHAW, R.H., LAING, D.R., 1966. Moisture stress and plant response. In: Pierre, W. H. (Ed.), Plant Environment

and Efficient Water Use. ASA and SSSA, Madison, W.I., pp. 73–94. SIONIT, N., KRAMER, PJ., 1977. Effect of Water Stress during Different Stages of Soybeans Growth. Agron. J.

69, 274–278. STEWART, J.L., CUENCA, R.H., PRUITT, W.O., HAGAN, R.M., TOSSO, L. 1977. Determination and

Utilization of Water Production Functions For Principal California Crops. W -67 Ca Contributing Project Report, University Of California, Davis, USA.

TAYLOR, H.M., MASON, W.K., BENNIE, A.T.P, ROUSE, H.R., 1982. Response of soybeans to two sow spacing and two soil water levels. I. an analysis of biomas accumulation, canopy development and solar radiation, interception and components of seed yield. Field Crops Res. 5: 1-14.

WOODS, S.J., SWEARINGEN, M.L., 1977. Influence of Simulated Early Lodging upon Soybean Seed Yield and

Its Components. Agron. J. 69, 239–242.

5.3.3.

: 55-61.

TEKL ONAYI Ad Soya Tarih za

Proje Lideri Öneren Kurul M d

rli i Yap lan Kurulu Yetkilisi

202


BA LI I Belirlenmesi

ARA TIRMA FIRSAT ALANI A13 ARA TIRMA PROGRAMI P-02 PROGRAM Ö

ADI

PROJE DE ADI SOYADI KURUMU BATEM TELEFONU 05062658341 E-POSTA [email protected] PROJE/ALT PROJE YÜRÜTÜCÜLE

ADI SOYADI KURUMU E-POSTA Mesu [email protected]



PROJE TOPLAM

84 000 01/01/2016 31/12/2019

L

Teknik Analiz Proje Özeti:

1=%100, I2=%67 ve I3=%33) su uygulama

t(I1

ve kalite

203

Anahtar Kelimeler: Determination of Yield and Quality Characteristics of Grapefruit Deficit Irrigated Subsurface Drip

Irrigation System Abstract: The study will be carried out to examine the effect of subsurface drip irrigation on yield and

irrigation levels (I1 = 100%, I2 and I3 = 67% = 33%) will be used in randomized block design with three replication. First irrigation will start when the soil moisture capacity reached 50% of readily available water. All treatments will be irrigated as much as the field capacity Irrigation applications will be start when the soil moisture consumed 30% of the moisture. Soil moisture content will be monitored gravimetrically. The amount of irrigation water to be applied will be determined taking into account the depleted water in the soil profile. Plant physiological development, body cross-sectional area and tree crown volume will be observed and measured during the growing period. Additionally, yield and quality criteria such as fruit yield, fruit weight, fruit width, fruit length, fruit shell thickness, number of cores, juice yield, acid, pH, and the amount of soluble solids will be determined. The research results obtained will be shared with farmers and related public institutions. Keywords: Grapefruit, subsurface drip irrigation, yield, quality, water use efficiency Projenin Ama ve Gerekçesi:

grubudur. -

k

- -

a

.251 tonu mandarin, 790.211 tonu limon, 218.988 tonu

ada 2.

204

u nedenlerle minimum

si Ziraat Fakültesinin ortak

Proje ile Elde Edilmek stenilen Ç ar ve Kullan m Alanlar - - , -

d

3

3

205

i su

-

-

i, tuzluluk-sodyumluluk ve

--

e kalitesi

sulamada daha az su ku

Charlot (1991), ce

206

du

k

--2.9 ile -

Perez-

g

Proebsting vd (1984), D

207

tep

-

)

--1987

kuru ma

MATERYAL ve YÖNTEM Materyal

).

Derinlik (cm)

Kum (%)

Kil (%)

Silt (%)

CaCO3

(%) EC

dSm-1 pH TK (g/g)

SN (g/g)

As (gr/cm3)

0-30 59 13 28 SL 32.2 0.060 8.3 16.75 7.76 1.45 30-60 55 17 28 SL 30.8 0.095 8.6 16.43 8.49 1.52 60-90 65 13 22 SL 33.3 0.094 8.4 18.46 9.22 1.48

208

Sulama Suyu Özellikleri

olarak C2S1


(dSm-1) SAR Na+ K+ Ca++ Mg++ CO3= HCO3

- Cl- SO4=

0.49 0.05 4.23 1.85 - 5.03 0.53 1.06 7.3 0.56 0.28

ay

-Mera,

greyfurttur.

Aylar

(oC)

Oransal Nem (%)

(m s-1)

(mm)

(h D-1)

(mm)

Buhar

(hPa) Ocak 9.7 70.9 2.9 214.2 5.21 72.0 8.2

209

10.1 70.6 3.1 161.8 5.54 77.1 8.3 Mart 12.5 71.9 2.8 96.8 6.53 108.6 9.7 Nisan 15.9 71.4 3.0 56.5 8.59 131.8 12.3

20.4 66.2 3.0 30.0 9.51 179.4 15.9 Haziran 25.3 55.2 3.0 7.3 11.36 245.5 18.9 Temmuz 28.3 54.3 3.0 3.3 11.54 280.1 21.7

27.9 56.7 3.0 1.7 11.26 254.4 22.1 24.5 58.8 2.8 11.3 9.54 202.7 18.4

Ekim 19.7 64.1 2.4 76.7 8.03 145.4 14.1 14.4 70.1 2.5 160.2 6.24 85.8 10.8 10.9 71.4 2.9 248.7 5.07 69.3 8.9

Toplam/Ort. 18.3 65.1 2.9 1068.5 8.2 1852.1 14.1

Alan Dekar Ton

Adana 390.011 30.6 955.903 26.0 Mersin 275.467 21.6 835.514 22.7 Hatay 205.835 16.2 643.533 17.5 Antalya 159.729 12.5 619.317 16.8

105.682 8.3 310.900 8.4 Toplam 1.273.426 3.681.158

Alan Dekar P Ton

Adana 48.001 74.8 170.414 74.5 Hatay 4.751 7.4 25.126 11.0 Mersin 7.213 11.2 23.320 10.2 Antalya 2.161 3.4 5.714 2.5

1.399 2.2 3.621 1.6 Toplam 64.195 228.799

Bitki Materyali

--20

- tar. Meyveleri -

210

Yöntem

3 le –

Tuz (dS/m)

eti ile belirlenecektir.

3) : Richards (195105 0

, 1990 ).

54).

tayin edilecektir. Kalsiyum (Ca++) ve Magnezyum (Mg++

Sodyum (Na+) ve Potasyum (K+

al Karbonat (CO3

=) ve Bikarbonat (HCO3-

(Richards, 1954). Klor (Cl-

irlenecektir. 4

=2

olarak tayin edilecektir. Nitrat-N (NO3

-

211

verilmeyecektir.

temizlenecektir. 2O5 ve

0.3 kg K2

-

sxSa) 7x7 m dir. Parsel 2

1=%100, I2=%67 ve I3tirilecektir. Kontrol konusundaki

d

Konu I1 I2 I1 I3 I1

Sulama siste

212

elek filtre yer alacak ve sulama suyu deneme parsellerine 75 ve

m-line)

TK : Tarla kapasitesi (mm) MN Konulu sulamalara; her sulamada eksik ne 100)

dn TK : Tarla kapasitesi (%), MN : Mevcut nem (%) Ry D

3) P Deneme konula

213

T dn A 2) q N : Parseld

-30, 30-60 ve 60-

(James, 1988).

214

ET I :Sulama suyu (mm) P (mm) K D R

ilecektir ve

IWUE -1), V : Verim (kg ha-1) ve SS : Uygulanan sulama suyudur (mm).

WUE -1), V : Verim (kg ha-1) ve ET

a)

.

Kabuk kal

belirlenecektir.

215

2):

3): kuzey- -

3),

a b

sen verim (kg/cm2):

sen verim (kg/m3):

b) Kimyasal Analizler

pH ve asitlik analizi:

8,1 olu1992).

mineral madde (K, Ca, Mg, Na, Fe, Zn, Mn ve

CIE

216

(CR-- -

0 - -- -60 (mavi) ile

Organik asit analizi:

-

Nucleosil 5 C18 kolonu ve Diyod Arr

C vitamini analizi: -

-

Dalga Boyu: 254 nm

-turrax ile homojenize edildikten sonra 5000

Toplam flavonoid madde tayini: 2 ilave

3.6H2O eklenecektir. 5 dk sonr

-

217

6ml’y-

Antioksidan aktivite tayini (TEAC Yöntemi):

-

10, 15,

Ekonomik Analiz

r (Sezen ve ark., 2011).

I1 I2 I3

Sulama suyu (mm) (1)

Sulama suyu (m3 ha

-1) (2)

-1

) (4)

-3

) (6) -1

) (7) (2x6)

Sulama sistem gideri (1ha) ($ ha-1

) (8)

lama sistem gideri ($ ha-1

) (9) -1

-1

) (10) (5+7+9)

Verim (kg ha-1

) (11)

Marjinal Verim (kg ha-1

) (12)

218

-1) (13)

Marjinal Gelir ($ ha-1

-1

) (14) (12x13) -1

-1

)

-C istatistik paket

Gomez ve Gomez, 1984).

Aylar (I-

1* 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

x x x x x x


x x x x x x x


x x x x x x

Yaprak ve toprak analizleri x x x x

Hasat x

Meyve analizleri x x x x

x x x

x x x

YÖNET M DÜZE

Ad Soyad Proje Yü tücülerinin Projeye Kat lar Y cak Faaliyetlerdeki Sorumluluklar Çal Takvimi

1-48 ay 1-48 ay

1-48

11-12

Analizlerin 10-12,1-2 1-2,4-10

219

Proje Sonuçlar Uygulamaya Aktar

enmesi

belirlemek

1

2 mla sulama sisteminin su

3 n

4 verim ve meyve kalite kriterlerine etkisini belirlemek



2016 2017 2018 2019

06.1- Mamul Mal Alml 19000 - - 06.2- Menkul Sermaye Üretim Giderleri 5000 2500 06.5- Gayrimenkul Sermaye im Giderleri 40000 2700 2500 06.9- Di er Sermaye Giderleri 4200 7300 800

Toplam 68200 12500 3300 Genel Toplam 84 000

2016 2017 2018 2019 06 06 1 06 1 2 06 1 2 04 Laboratuvar Cihaz

3000

06 1 3 06 1 2 90

makinesi)

4000

06 1 3 04 seti, Toprak

5000

06 1 3 05

7000

06 2

220

06 2 6 06 2 6 01 500 500 06 2 7

06 2 7 01

9500 2000

06 5 im Giderleri 06 5 2 Malzeme Giderleri 06 5 2 02

Elektrik panosu ve pano malzemeleri) 3000

06 5 2 03 5000

06 5 2 04 (Sulama havuzu) 25000 06 5 4 Enerji Giderleri 06 5 4 02 1000 1500 1250 06 5 4 03 1000 1200 1250 06 9 06 9 2 Yolluk giderleri 06 9 2 01 1000 2500 800 06 9 2 06 3200 4800 Toplam 68200 12500 3300 Genel Toplam 84 000 KAYNAKÇA

-262-278

ANONYMOUS, 1989. Analytical Methods Varian Australia Pty. Ltd. Mutgrave Victoria, Publication No: 85, Australia.

BARAGAN, J., WU, IP. 2001. Optimal Scheduling of A Micro – Irrigation System under Deficit Irrigation. Journal of

Agricultural Engineering Research, 80(2), 201-208. CHARLOT, G., 1991. irrigation of Walnuts, Hort Absl. 61 (7): 5759.

-27

-79.

Ankara. -180-181, Ankara.

. Alanya

Dergisi, D2, 9,2, 167-176. COHEN A, GOELL A. (1988) Fruit growth and dry matter accumulation in grapefruit during periods of water

withholding and after reirrigation. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 15, 633-639. DOORENBOS J., KASSAM A.H., (1979). Yield Response to Water. Irrigation and Drainage Paper: 33, Food and

Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy, 193p.

221

FAO (2013). http://www.fao.org (08.08.2013) FARES, A., ALVA, A.K., 1999. Estimation of citrus evapotranspiration by soil water mass balance. Soil Sci. 164, 302–

310.

-46.

371 s, Ankara. GOMEZ, K.A., GOMEZ, A.A. 1984. Statistical Procedures For Agricultural Research. An Int. Rice Res. Inst.

Book. John Wiley And Sons, Inc. New York. pp.680. -

Yield and fruit quality effects. J. Hort. Sci. Biotech. 74 (6), 706-713. -Consuming Banana, Hort. Abst. 61

(9): 8549. -

Irrigation on the Water Use, Growth and Yield of Olive Trees, Europ. J. Agronomy, 30, 258–265.

Productive Status of cv. Valencia Late Orange, Hort. Abst. 59 (12): 10409. IONESCU, P., GRUMEZA, N., 1988. Drip Irrigation of Peaches in the Dobrojea Region, Hort. Abst. 58 (6): 3278. JAMES, L.G. (1988). Principles Of Farm Irrigation System Design . John Wiley And Sons Inc.New York, pp,

543.

– 172. KARHAN; M., AKSU,M

ascorbic acid in rose hip (Rosa canina L) pulp. J Food Quality. 27, 311-319. and

vegetables grown in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 29: 297-303.

ve Kaliteye Etkisi. Proje No: TOAG-901

KRUSE E. G., BUCKS D. A., BERNUTH R. D., (1990). Comparision of Irrigation Systems. Irrigation of Agricultural Crops. 475-508, Ed: Stewart, B. A., Nielsen D. R., American Society of Agricultural Engineers, Argon, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

-11.

Fruit Grown Under Water Deficit Conditions. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science, 24: 159-166

int Emitter (Trickle) Irrigation in the Establishment of a High density Peach Orchard. Department of Agriculture, Irrigation Research Institute, Tatura, Victoria 3616, Australia.

NEDIM, T., IRFAN, T., OZIYC.,H., I, KARHAN., M. 2011. Determination of D-pinitol in carob syrup. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, 62(6): 572–576

222

Dergisi 2001, 15;99-106.

Thesis. Istanbul Technical University, 161 pp.

Physiology and Fruit Quality in Apricot Trees, Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 8(2), 86-94. Storage Life

of Apple. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 109(2): 229-232. RICHARDS, L. A., 1954. Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. Agricultural handbook No:6 USA

(203)s. uvian Area, Acta Hort., No. 203, 443-

449.

Kalitesine Etkilerin in Belirlenmesi. TAGEM-BB- SPANOS, G.A. ve WROLSTAD, R.E., 1990. Influence of processing and storage on the phenolic composition of

Thompson seedless grape juice. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 38 (3): 817-824.

ean Environments. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 59, 785–794.

TOLEDO, E.N., CARDENAS, R., ABREU, A., 1989. Response of Valencia Orange (Citrus inensis ) to Three irrigation Systems and Determination of the Most Eeonomic System, Hort

alya

-TOVAG 105-O-538.

, M., PEETERS, A., BEN-GAL, A., 2014.

Irrigation scheduling of grapefruit trees in a Mediterranean environment throughout evaluation of plant water status and evapotranspiration. Turk J Agric For. 38:908-915.

WESTWOOD, M.N., 1978. Temperate Zone Pomology. W.H. Freeman and Company. San Fransisco.

m


neren Kurul M d rli i Yap lan Kurulu

Yetkilisi

223


BA LI I ARA TIRMA FIRSAT ALANI A13 ARA TIRMA PROGRAMI P-02 PROGRAM Ö

ADI

PROJE DE ADI SOYADI KURUMU TELEFONU 0538 569 18 19 E-POSTA [email protected] PROJE/ALT PROJE YÜRÜTÜCÜLE


Dr. [email protected] [email protected]

Dr. [email protected] [email protected]

[email protected]

PROJE TOPLAM

61.550 01.01.2016 31.12.2018

L

Teknik

Teknik Proje Özeti:

224

(ky

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Comparison of Surface and Sub-Surface Drip Irrigation Systems on Sesame Cultivation Abstract: When global warming and increasing competition over water resources is also taken into consideration irregularities in the consequent precipitation, the water allocated to agriculture is increasingly recognized that it had to be reduced. If sufficiently to meet the growing population's demand for food will increase in the future is another important issue. Therefore, methods that increase the product yield and saving of applied irrigation water, application and development is very important. In this study, aboveground and underground drip irrigation aimed to investigate the effect of sesame yield and quality characteristics. And increase yield per from unit area obtained and used to reduce the amount of irrigation water. Research will be conducted in the West Mediterranean Agricultural Research Institute Campus Practice Field to Aksu. Research will be organized in randomized plot design with tree replications. Irrigation in four different subjects (100%, 80%, 60% and 0%) water application level will be established. All parcels will be watered until brought to field capacity after planting. When consumed favorable moisture to %30 in the topic of control will be started other topics watering. Soil moisture content will be monitored by gravimetric method. The favorable moisture in the plant roots will complete the field of diminishing the capacity will be applied as irrigation water. Some of the physiological parameters related to plant development in research (plant height, pod number, number of branches, leaf area) will be observed. Research on the yield and quality values (number of seeds in the capsule, the capsule weight, thousand grain weight per unit area obtained seed yield, oil content and fatty acid components) will be determined. Drip and subsurface drip irrigation under of sesame plant the value of yield response factor (ky), water use efficiency, irrigation water use efficiency values, evapotranspiration will be determined. Economic analysis of the results of the study will be used for irrigation methods. The results obtained in this study will be shared with our farmers and relevant public institutions. Keywords: Sesame, drip irrigation, sub-surface drip irrigation, water use efficiency Projenin Ama ve Gerekçesi:

225

zorunluluk haline gelmektedir.

3

-

e,

-10 dal) olan susam bitkisinin yaprak ve ka

-

226

bir

m tohumu

Ekilen Alan

(da)

(ton) Ekilen Alan

(da) (ton) Verim (kg/da)

2008 292 236 20 338 79 870 6 145 77 30.2 2009 280 916 21 036 50 469 3 905 77 18.6 2010 318 242 23 460 51 010 3 003 59 12.8 2011 266 455 18 000 49 005 3 435 70 19.1 2012 292 063 16 221 58 835 3 661 63 22.6 2013 248 070 15 457 51 211 3 197 62 20.7

Susamdan bi

--

-

edeflenmektedir. Proje ile Elde Edilmek stenilen Ç ar ve Kullan m Alanlar -

- -

227

belirlenmesi. - erim potansiyeline etkisinin belirlenmesi.

Sesamum

Sesamum indicum

-

minin (991.27 kg/ha) elde -

Kassab (2005)

sulama y

2

3 3/da

kg/da

3

3 3

dde

228

tir.

-

-120.8; 160.5-115.3; 155.5-115.3 ve 113.2-59.9 kg da-1 ola -2.82 kg (ha mm)-1

-an konuda 182.5 kg/da olarak

olarak 0.5-03, 0.7-0.3. 0.8-0.4, 0.7-

verim 1913kg/ha olarak 0.5--

-0.8-1.0-

229

654--

tohum veriml


o o

-

Derinlik (cm)

Kum (%)

Kil (%)

Silt (%)

CaCO3

(%) EC

dSm-1 pH

0-30 13 44 43 CS 25.6 0.103 8.3 30-60 13 40 47 CS 24.8 0.108 8.3 60-90 13 38 49 CSL 23.7 0.156 8.4

Bitki Materyali

- -

- - -

-5 g; erkencilik durumu: orta erkenci (95- -150 kg/da; -60 -

230



- Cl- SO4=

0.49 0.05 4.23 1.85 0.0 5.03 0.53 1.06 7.3 0.561

2A1

ndirilebilir.

Metot

231

(1970-2010)

Aylar

(oC)

Oransal Nem (%)

(m s-1)

(mm)

me

(h D-1)

(mm)

Buhar

(hPa) Ocak 9.7 70.9 2.9 214.2 5.21 72.0 8.2

10.1 70.6 3.1 161.8 5.54 77.1 8.3 Mart 12.5 71.9 2.8 96.8 6.53 108.6 9.7 Nisan 15.9 71.4 3.0 56.5 8.59 131.8 12.3

20.4 66.2 3.0 30.0 9.51 179.4 15.9 Haziran 25.3 55.2 3.0 7.3 11.36 245.5 18.9 Temmuz 28.3 54.3 3.0 3.3 11.54 280.1 21.7

27.9 56.7 3.0 1.7 11.26 254.4 22.1 Eylül 24.5 58.8 2.8 11.3 9.54 202.7 18.4 Ekim 19.7 64.1 2.4 76.7 8.03 145.4 14.1

14.4 70.1 2.5 160.2 6.24 85.8 10.8 10.9 71.4 2.9 248.7 5.07 69.3 8.9

(Ort. Top.) 18.3 65.1 2.9 1068.5 8.2 1852.1 14.1

Konu

YA100 getirilen kontrol konusu.

YA80 100

YA60 100

YA0 Susuz konu.

YU100 getirilen kontrol konusu.

YU80 YU100

YU60 YU100

YU0 Susuz konu.

Pa 2

232

YA

YÜ

233

-20

15 0 – - -15

kg/da P2O5

2O5

kg/da P2O5 2O5

U

TK: Tarla kapasitesi(%), SN: S

3)

234

Bitki Su Topraktaki nem içerikleri 0-

James, 1988). ET = I+P+C-Dp-

I = Sulama suyu (mm)

Dp

p 100 ve YA100

SSVIWUE

-1),

V: Verim (kg ha-1) ve SS: Uygulanan sulama suyudur (mm).

ETVWUE

-1),

V: Verim (kg ha-1) ve etimidir (mm)

Verim Tepki Etmeni (ky)

y

Stewart vd (1977) kul

11 11 mm ETETkyYY

235

-1),

etimine -1),

ky

BAYAYAI

YAI: Yaprak alan indeksi,

2), ve 2

100 ve YA100 kapasitesine getirilecek

elirlemek ve

-30, 30-

60, 60-

(Jackson, 1967); CaCO3 Scheib -Black

absorbsiyon spektrofotometre ile belirlenecektir (Lindsay ve Norvell,1978).

236

maddede toplam P, K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn, Zn ICP-

parseldeki

Bitki kaps

a-

-bittikten sonra

Hesaplama:

-M1/m)*100

g)

237

-Heptan ilave edilip tekrar vortekslenmesinden

-

- -

Hasat

Ekonomik Analiz

(Sezen ve ark., 2013)

KONULAR YU0 YU60 YU80 YU100 YA0 YA60 YA80 YA100

UTAR

Tohum bedeli

Su bedeli

238

Rotövatör E Ekim

Zirai mücadele Ot temizleme (el ile)

Hasat

Sistem

TOPLAM

2)

Net kar Brüt marj Oransal kar

-C istatistik paket

(Gomez ve Gomez, 1984)

1* 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

x x

x x x x x x x

x x x x x x x x x x

x x Yaprak ve toprak analizleri x x x x Hasat x

x x x

239

x x x x

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

x x x x x x x

x x x x x x x x x x

x x Yaprak ve toprak analizleri x x x x Hasat x

x x x x x x x

x x x x

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12


YÖNET M DÜZE


rumludur. 1-36 ay

3-9 ve 16-21. Aylar

ekonomik analiz, istatistik analiz 4-9 ve 16-21. Aylar

4-8 ve 17-20. Aylar 6-9 ve 18-21. Aylar

Toprak ve su analizleri 6-9 ve 18-21. Aylar

9-11 ve 21-23. aylar

PROJE SONUÇLARININ UYGULAMA AKTARIMI

1

240

2

3 etkisinin belirlenmesi.

4 verim potansiyeline etkisinin belirlenmesi. lde edilen



1.Y l 2.Y l 3 Y l 06.1- Mamul Mal Alml 26 850 3 250 06.2- Menkul Sermaye Üretim Giderleri 3 000 2 500 500 06.5- Gayrimenkul Sermaye im Giderleri 11 250 4 500 500 06.9- Di er Sermaye Giderleri 4 600 2 300 2 300

Toplam 45 700 12 550 3 300 Genel Toplam 61550

2016

2017

2018

6 6 1 6 1 2

6 1 2 4 15 500 6 1 2 5 4 000

6 1 2 90

6 1 3 5 4 600

6 1 3 90 2 750 3 250

6 2

6 2 6 6 2 6 1 500 500 500 6 2 7 1 2 500 2 000

6 5 6 5 2 Malzeme Giderleri 6 5 2 4 7 500

6 5 4 Enerji Giderleri

241

6 5 4 2 2 000 2 500 500

6 5 4 3 1 750 2 000 6 9 6 9 2 Yolluk Giderleri 6 9 2 1 1 000 500 500 6 9 2 2 3 600 1 800 1 800 3 Ma

3 6 2 1 TOPLAM 45 700 12 550 3 300 GENEL TOPLAM 61 550 KAYNAKÇA

l ve -272

Sesamum indcum f Biology 24 (3): 503-512.

Oil, Oleic and Linoleic Fatty Acids in The Turkish Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) Populations. Turkish Journal Of Agriculture And Forestry 23:431-441.

BLACK, C. A. (1965). Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2, Amer. Society of Agronomy Inc., Publisher Madisson, Wilconsin, U.S.AA. 1372-1376.

BOUYOUCOS, G.J. (1951). A Recalibration of The Hydrometer Method for Making Mechanical Analysis of Soil. Agronomy Jour. 43:435-438.

Effect Of Irrigation Methods and Irrigation Intervals On Yield and Some Yield Components of Sesame Growing in Semi-Arid Area. Journal Of Agronomy, 6(3): 439-443

Toprak Bilgisi

on Growth and Yield of Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) in A Mediterranean Type Of Environment. Asian Journal Of Plant Sciences, 3(5): 610-613.

Yield Components of Sesame [Sesamum indicum (L.)]. Pakistan Journal Of Biological Sciences 7(12): 2149-2154.

GOMEZ, K.A., GOMEZ, A.A. (1984). Statistical Procedures For Agricultural Research . An Int. Rice Res. Inst. Book. John Wiley And Sons, Inc. New York. pp.680.

JACKSON, M.L. (1967). Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice Hall of India Private Limited, New Delhi. JAMES, L.G. (1988). Principles Of Farm Irrigation System Design . John Wiley And Sons Inc.New York, pp, 543. KACAR, B. (1995).

Ara Bitki Analizleri

KASSAB,O. M., EL- -Regimes on Growth and Yield of Sesame Plants. Journal of Agronomy 4(3): 220-224.

V. and Bahri, A. pp. 1-2. LINDSAY, W.L., NORVELL, W.A. (1978). Development of DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese and copper.

Soil Sci.Amer. Jour., 42 (3): 421-428.

242

Kalitesine Etkilerin in Belirlenmesi. TAGEM-BB-090201C3 Nolu sonu OLSEN, S. R., SOMMERS, E.L. (1982). Phosporus Soluble in Sodium Bicarbonate, Methods of Soil Analysis,

Part 2, Chemical and Microbiological Properties. Edit: A.L. Page, P.H. Miller, D.R. Keeney, 404-430. ion and Monitoring of Soil Water Content. Turkish Journal of

Agricultural and Natural Sciences Special Issue: 1, 1067-1071.

47-65. AN, O. (2012). Effects Of Different Plant Densities on The Yield and Quality of Second Crop

Sesame. World Academy Of Science, Engineering And Technology (Waset) International Conference. Oral Presentation. Berlin, 69, 958-964.

- -142. SONDARVA, K.N., RANK, H.D., JAYSWAL, P.S. (2014). Summer Sesame Response To Moisture and Thermal

Regimes. African Journal Of Agricultural Research.Vol. 9(27), pp. 2095-2103. STEWART, J.L., CUENCA, R.H., PRUITT, W.O., HAGAN, R.M., TOSSO, L. (1977). Determination and

Utilization of Water Production Functions For Principal California Crops. W -67 Ca Contributing Project Report, University Of California, Davis, USA.

-28.

ram1=25&Param2

Water Use Efficiency and Yield of Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) Under Field Conditions. Field Crop Research, 101. 249-258.

TEKL ONAYI Ad Soya Tarih za Proje Lideri Öneren Kurul M d


GEOFLOW rli i Yap lan Kurulu kili i

DEVAM EDENPROJELER

244

Proje No TAGEM/TBAD/12/A01/P01/007 Proje Lideri Proje Yürütücüsü Kurulu Raporun gili Oldu u Dönem 01.01.2015/31.12.2015 Proje Özeti: Crataegus

-

h

Araziden toplanan antimikrobiyal-

1.Ba ca Faaliyetlerin Gerçekle Durumu:

2015

1-Antimik

Staphylococcus aureus Listeria monocytogenes

yapr

2-LC- leri

in Crateagus monogyna var. monogyna taksonuna ait -2,49 ppm) ve meyvelerde (Antalya- - 2,89 ppm) en

3-

Crataegus orientalis

4-

5- Crataegus monogyna var. lasiocarpa -

245

2.Y a Dü nülen Ara Yay lar:

(Crataegus spp.) Bil -

Crataegus -50, sayfa: 59-61, Antalya.

N., Toker Meyveler, II. Ulusal Botanik -

3.Dar zlar: -

C.monogyna ve C. azaralus

D 4.2.Proje Faaliyet Takvimi: 4.3.Personel:

246

- Vicia sativa

Proje No TAGEM/TBAD/12/A03/P01/001 Proje Lideri Dr. Proje Yürütücüsü Kuru Raporun gili Oldu u Dönem 01.01.2015/31.12.2015 Proje Özeti:

Bu proje; GAP Uluslarar

temin edilen materyal

Dönem Bulgular

lokasyon olarak Adana lokasyonu

:

4.2.Proje Faaliyet Takvimi: 4.3.Personel: Proje personelinden proje lideri Dr.

proje lideri, Dr. .

247

Proje No TAGEM/TBAD/14/A04/P01/12-1 Proje Lideri Projeyi Yürütücü

01.01.2015/31.12.2015 Proje Özeti:

-7 ve Halisbey) bir adet -492 kg/da

-88426, NC-3033, PI-420333, 75/1073-A, PI-596514, ICGV-88448, PI-291985, GP-NC- 424, 422, 411,

-hatlardan NC-3033, 75/1073-A, PI-596514, ICGV-

-

-- -

olarak NC- -- -

F1- Halisbey)

:

4.2.Proje Faaliyet Takvimi: 4.3.Personel:

248

Pro Proje No TAGEM/TBAD/14/A04/P01/06-5 Proje Lideri

01.01.2015/31.12.2015

Proje Özeti:

-

denemeleridenemelerde ATAEM-7, Batem- -

ATAEM-7, Batem-

3.Darb :

4.2.Proje Faaliyet Takvimi: 4.3.Personel: Pr

249

Proje No TAGEM/TBAD/14/04/01/08-01 Proje Lideri

01.01.2015/31.12.2015

Proje Özeti:

sahip, verimli

n

Durumu

-1-2, B-2/1, Ant-33/2, 22/9-1-1, B.Aksu, B.Uzun, 30/9-10-1, WSC256, 7/10-10-1 ve Mug- -dane verimini 98 kg/da ile 29/9-1- -60

Ver-

33/2, 7/10-10-1, WSC208, B.Uzun ve S46 ilk grubu olu-

pit

2.Yap

.

dir. 4.2.Proje faaliyet Takvimi : Herhangi 4.3.Personel: .

250

Proje No TAGEM/TBAD/14/A04/P02/03-3 Proje Lideri Dr. Proje Yürütücüsü Kuru Raporun gili Oldu u Dönem 01.01.2015/31.12.2015

Proje Özeti:

1. Ba ca Faaliyetlerin Gerçekle Durumu: Dönem Bulgular

2. Y a Dü nülen Ara Yay lar:

3. Dar zlar:

4. Projede Önerilen iklikler:

4.2.Proje Faaliyet Takvimi: 4.3.Personel:

251

Proje Ba Stevia rebaudiana

Proje No TAGEM/TBAD/12/A04/P06/004 Proje Lideri Proje Yürütücüsü Kuru B Raporun gili Oldu u Dönem 01.01.2015/31.12.2015

Proje Özeti: Stevia rebaudiana, Stevia rebaudiana Candy ve Stevia rebaudiana

parselleri kurularak a

fidelerle

. 1.

: 22-

of Stevia rebaudiana 3.Dar zlar:

4. :

: 4.2.Proje Faaliyet Takvimi: 4.3.Personel: Proje per

Parsellere ait

252

Blok Tekr. Bitki Boyu Yan Dal

Parsel Bitki

Herba Verimi

Parsel Tek

Herba Verimi

Bitki Herba Verimi

Yaprak Verimi

Tek Bitki

Yaprak Verimi

1 SR 1 90,4 11,2 17 12110 712,4 712,4 5074,0 298,5 1 SR 2 96,0 8,6 19 9870 519,5 550,0 1084,0 216,8 1 SR 3 94,0 5,3 3 2810 936,7 936,7 1150,0 383,3 1 SRC 1 112,2 19,6 20 16108 805,4 805,4 5508,0 275,4 1 SRC 2 100,8 15,0 21 14450 688,1 678,0 1370,0 274,0 1 SRC 3 94,4 14,4 21 10998 523,7 611,6 1328,0 265,6 1 SRO 1 95,4 11,2 20 13368 668,4 741,6 1280,0 256,0 1 SRO 2 90,0 9,0 20 10632 531,6 586,4 1306,0 261,2 1 SRO 3 113,8 9,6 11 7076 643,3 615,2 1278,0 255,6 2 SR 1 94,8 11,6 11 7342 667,5 627,6 1354,0 270,8 2 SR 2 83,7 7,0 3 1946 648,7 648,7 720,0 240,0 2 SR 3 119,0 12,0 2 4766 2383,0 2383,0 1518,0 759,0 2 SRC 1 118,6 10,4 16 17330 1083,1 952,0 1680,0 336,0 2 SRC 2 120,2 14,4 17 19328 1136,9 962,0 1780,0 356,0 2 SRC 3 119,4 24,8 15 17816 1187,7 1295,2 2314,0 462,8 2 SRO 1 115,4 12,6 13 9678 744,5 1072,8 2186,0 437,2 2 SRO 2 90,6 16,0 15 9286 619,1 724,4 1486,0 297,2 2 SRO 3 109,2 11,8 18 16922 940,1 741,2 1575,0 315,0 3 SR 1 126,8 18,0 12 14294 1191,2 1437,6 2326,0 465,2 3 SR 2 112,0 9,3 6 8458 1409,7 1409,7 3090,0 515,0 3 SR 3 3 SRC 1 112,8 14,6 13 9180 706,2 1032,4 1330,0 266,0 3 SRC 2 121,4 22,3 14 14262 1018,7 1390,4 2400,0 480,0 3 SRC 3 105,0 13,4 14 12076 862,6 1007,2 1800,0 360,0 3 SRO 1 113,6 8,6 10 12834 1283,4 1296,0 2290,0 458,0 3 SRO 2 96,2 7,0 14 10398 742,7 793,6 1640,0 328,0 3 SRO 3 93,6 10,4 12 10822 901,8 970,4 2220,0 444,0

253

Proje Ba Thymus ve Origanum

Belirlenmesi Proje No TAGEM/TBAD/13/A04/P06/02 Proje Lideri Proje Yürütücüsü Kuru Raporun gili Oldu u Dönem 01.01.2015/31.12.2015 Proje Özeti: Thymus ve Origanum

ere toplam sekiz Origanum Thymus

-

Penicillium digitatum, Penicillum italicum, Penicillum ekspancum kansere neden olan Aspergillus flavus insan patojeni olanProteus vulgaris ATCC 13315, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATTC 27853, Staphylococcus aureus ATTC 43300, Salmonella typhimirum ATTC 14028, Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 , Escherichia coli ATCC 1.Ba ca Faaliyetlerin Gerçekle Durumu: Dönem Bulgular B Thymus ve Origanum

Origanum Thymus Thymbra spicata var. spicata ve Satureja thymbra

Origanum sipyleum, T. cilicicus , O. minutiflorum ve O. majarona r. Toplanan

Bitkiler-

-MS Penicillium digitatum,

Penicillum italicum, Penicillum expansum ve Aspergillus flavus Proteus vulgaris ATCC 13315, Pseudomonas aeruginosa

ATTC 27853, Staphylococcus aureus ATTC 43300, Salmonella typhimuirium ATTC 14028, Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Escherichia coli ATCC

-MS FID

Karvakrol: % 83 Gama- terpinen: % 2,686 p-Simen: % 3,964 Karvakrol metil eter % 1,88

Karvakrol: % 67 Timol: % 5,961 Gama- terpinen : % 7,83 Alfa terpinen % 1,269 p-simen % 8,984

254

Borneol: % 10,623 Alfa terpineol: % 10,881 Geraniol : % 15,464 Geranial: % 1,358 Neril asetat: % 1,539 Karyofilen oksit: % 6,597 Kamfor: %3,537

Kampen: % 2,224 1 okten 3 ol: % 1,594 Geraniol : % 15,833 Geranial: % 2,382 p-simen % 12,561

P-simen: % 3,34 Linalool: % 11,769 Borneol: % 6,824 Alfa terpineol: % 26,502 Karyofilen oksit: % 12,074 Verbenone: % 3,503 Geraniol : % 5,442 Timol: % 1,247 Karvakrol : % 3,081

15 NO P-simen: % 76,232 Linalool: % 11,769 Borneol: % 6,824 Alfa terpineol: % 26,502 Karyofilen oksit: % 12,074 Verbenone: % 3,503 Geraniol : % 5,442 Timol: % 1,247

Karvakrol : % 3,081

P-simen: % 49,481 Gama terpinen: % 12,557 Timoquinon: % 0,192 Karvakrol: % 1,792 Beta karyofilen: % 1,843 Borneol: % 8,193 Linalol : % 3,653

- 1-S. aureus ATCC 43300- Penicillin (24 mm)

S. aureus

17

255

2-Salmonella typhimurium ATCC 14028 Ampicillin-23mm

Salmonella typhimurium

3-Proteus vulgaris ATCC 13315 Sefepim-38 mm

1, 11, 12, 13, 15, 17,10

4-E. coli ATCC 35218 (b-l pozitif)Amoksisilin/Klavulonik asit 17 mm

E. coli ATCC 35218 (b-l pozitif)

17 nolu u. y

mm

256

5-E.coli ATCC 25922 (b-l negatif) Amoksisilin/Klavulonik asit 23 mm

E. coli ATCC 25922 (b-

Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 :

Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 metabo

2.Y a Dü nülen Ara Yay lar: Antibacterial activity and essential oil composition of the Achillea wilhelmsii c. koch, from turkey, Ayas F., Tanriseven M.,Vuran F.A.,

n of antibacterial and antioxidant activity of Phlomis lycia

Determination the antibacterial activity of Stevia rebaudiana essential oil,

Chemical composition of the T. var. Jalas essential oil, from Turkey, ISEO 2014,

3.Dar zlar:

--

257

4.Projede Önerilen iklikler: 4.1.Materyal ve Yöntem: Materyal ve yöntemde . 4.2.Proje Faaliyet Takvimi:

- -

4.3.Personel:

258

Proje Ba Orthurus heterocarpus

Proje Numaras TAGEM/TBAD/15/A04/P06/04 Proje Lideri Proje Yürütücüsü Kuru

01.01.2015/31.12.2015 Proje Özeti:

Orthurus heterocarpus

rizom,

1.Ba ca Faaliyetlerin Gerçekle Durumu: D nem Bulgular

onlara (10 Lokasyon)

getirilecek bitki

Tablo 1. Orthurus heterocarpus

Orthurus heterocarpus Juzz.

fil)

Eugenol

(%)

Toplam fenolik

(mg GAE/bitki)

Antioksidan aktivite

- 95,05 129540 0,8279

80,25 191520 1,0021

82,51 138180 0,6114

lanya Gevne vadisi) 88,15 70140 0,4870

90,68 121200 0,7777

- 93,40 126600 0,8289

259

Proje ile il . D :

: 4.2.Proje Faaliyet Takvimi: Herhangi 4.3.Personel:

260

Proje Ba Proje Numaras TAGEM/TBAD/15/A04/P06/03 Proje Lideri Proje Yürütücüsü Kuru

01.01.2015/31.12.2015 Proje Özeti:


azot

k v

(Laurus nobilis)

(Pimpinella anisum)

(Rosa damascena) 1.4652 1.5342 1.4612

-1,2 0 -0,4 1,8-cineole (%) 63.95 trans-anethole (%) 90.81

-citronellol (%) 26.44 Geraniol (%) 19.63

(Rosmarinus officinalis)

(Origanum majorana)

(Origanum minutiflorum)

1.4657 1.5039 1.5091 0 -0,4 -0,4

1,8-cineole (%) 51.62 -pinene (%) 14.77

Carvacrol (%) 70.52 79.72 Linalool (%) 11.33

261

.

4.2.Proje faaliyet Takvimi : Herhangi 4.3.Personel:

262

Baz

Proje No TAGEM/HSGYAD/14/A05/P01/49 Proje Lideri YILDIRIM

Raporun Dönemi 01.01.2015/31.12.2015

Proje Özeti:

Cymbapogon citratus Origanum majorona L.)

Ocimum basilicum

-

-

-

-

-28).

analizlerine devam edilmektedir.

263

Peak R.T. Limonotu Pct Total 1 13,193 methyl-5-hepten-2-one 2,55 2 13,397 beta-myrcene 3,79 3 18,605 delta-3-carene 1,45 4 22,556 cis-chrysanthenol 1,05 5 25,337 neral 33,68 6 25,856 neryl acetate 4,97 7 26,695 geranial 48,67 8 27,057 6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one 0,42 9 31,474 nerol 2,78

0,65

Peak R.T. Pct Total 1 10,555 alpha-thujene 0,47 2 10,87 alpha-pinene 0,65 3 12,815 1-octen-3-ol 0,33 4 13,403 beta-myrcene 1,31 5 14,639 alpha-terpinene 1,10 6 15,025 cymene 5,61 7 15,233 beta-phellandrene 0,35 8 16,668 gamma-terpinene 3,43 9 18,632 linalool 8,16 10 21,812 borneol 0,50 11 22,352 terpinen-4-ol 0,80 12 22,975 alpha-terpineol 0,64 13 27,539 thymol 1,27 14 28,13 carvacrol 74,01 15 33,136 beta-caryophyllene 1,09 16 33,93 aromadendrene 0,30

Peak R.T. Pct Total 1 12,799 beta-pinene 0,40 2 15,336 1,8-cineole 3,62 3 17,322 cis-linalool oxide 0,37 4 18,084 trans-linalool oxide 0,35 5 18,731 linalool 55,38 6 22,967 beta-fenchyl alcohol 0,34 7 23,329 allyl anisole 4,33 8 25,826 geraniol formate 0,32 9 30,415 eugenol 1,80 10 31,584 methyl cinnamate 25,58 11 31,955 beta-elemene 1,21 12 33,718 alpha-cis-bergamotene 1,38 13 33,866 alpha-guaiene 0,44 14 36,591 alpha-bulnesene 0,74

264

15 36,915 gamma-cadinene 1,22 16 41,703 delta-cadinene 1,65

tanimlanamayanlar 0,87 Çizelge 4. Hammadde Analizleri Özellikler

60,32 Meyve boyu (cm) 6,02 Meyve eni(cm) 4,52 TEA (g/100 g) 0,99 pH 4,10

4,30 Toplam kuru madde (%) 5,94 Su aktivitesi (aw) 0,99 Çizelge 5. Taze Domate

Taze Domates TEA g/100 g pH SÇKM (%) KM(%) aw

0,99 4,10 4,30 5,94 0,99 Kurutma

Uygulamalar TEA g/100 g pH SÇKM (%) KM (%) aw

SA 9,94 5,12 5,50 91,56 0,45 AS 8,36 5,10 5,42 93,21 0,42 NaMBS 7,52 5,14 5,40 92,56 0,42 LG0.2 7,44 5,18 5,44 91,56 0,41 LG0.5 7,12 5,20 5,31 92,01 0,44 OG0.2 6,89 5,18 5,35 93,23 0,41 OG0.5 7,32 5,14 5,52 93,25 0,40 F0.2 7,54 5,22 5,44 92,87 0,46 F0.5 7,15 5,20 5,44 93,12 0,47 KOM0.2 7,62 5,13 5,36 92,89 0,51 KOM0.5 7,53 5,19 5,60 93,22 0,50 Kontrol 6,89 5,20 5,59 93,56 0,48

LG0.2: %

Çizelge 6. Taze Domates i

Taze Domates TEA g/100 g pH KM(%) aw

0,99 4,10 4,30 5,94 0,99 Kurutma

Uygulamalar TEAg/100 g pH KM(%) aw

SA 9,23 5,18 5,42 90,88 0,42 AS 8,12 5,19 5,41 92,50 0,40 NaMBS 7,32 5,22 5,39 91,47 0,41 LG0.2 7,23 5,20 5,35 90,25 0,41 LG0.5 7,22 5,19 5,33 91,36 0,44 OG0.2 7,01 5,29 5,28 92,55 0,42 OG0.5 7,29 5,20 5,46 92,80 0,41 F0.2 7,62 5,26 5,35 92,01 0,44 F0.5 7,28 5,31 5,31 93,65 0,42 KOM0.2 7,69 5,19 5,35 92,14 0,45

265

KOM0.5 7,61 5,23 5,47 92,58 0,46 Kontrol 7,06 5,21 5,50 92,36 0,43

Taze DomatesL* a* b* C

40,05 33,28 26,55 42,59 38,55 Kurutma

Uygulamalar L* a* b* C


Taze DomatesL* a* b* C

40,05 33,28 26,55 42,59 38,55 Kurutma

Uygulamalar L* a* b* C


Taze Domates

Likopen (mg/kg. KM)

Toplam Fenolik Madde (mg/kg. KM)

Antioksidan Aktivite

1684,95 16290,75 10,83

Kurutma

Uygulama Likopen (mg/kg.

KM) Toplam Fenolik Madde

(mg/kg. KM) Antioksidan Aktivite

SA 452,47 5779,1 17,12 AS 248,36 11052,8 3,12 NaMBS 512,32 5536,2 24,38 LG0.2 252,81 5876,2 26,49 LG0.5 478,01 6112,7 23,39

266

OG0.2 375,17 4224,5 24,51 OG0.5 389,06 6351,6 17,14 F0.2 285,13 5720,5 19,87 F0.5 178,54 4932,4 26,02 KOM0.2 257,40 5526,7 25,81 KOM0.5 242,11 6022,8 29,10 Kontrol 285,68 5432,9 27,78

Taze Domates

Likopen (mg/kg. KM) Toplam Fenolik Madde (mg/kg. KM)

Antioksidan Aktivite

1684,95 16290,75 10,83

Kurutma

Uygulama Likopen (mg/kg. KM) Toplam Fenolik Madde

(mg/kg. KM) Antioksidan Aktivite

SA 406,85 7415,90 17,12 AS 420,26 9869,30 3,12 NaMBS 388,57 6472,60 24,38 LG0.2 257,40 5587,00 26,49 LG0.5 321,36 5519,00 23,39 OG0.2 324,56 5074,10 24,51 OG0.5 378,40 6268,00 17,14 F0.2 324,48 6822,80 19,87 F0.5 382,46 7065,40 26,02 KOM0.2 342,31 5624,50 25,81 KOM0.5 310,34 6114,90 29,10 Kontrol 287,18 6683,80 27,78

Uygulama Ort Uygulamalar 3. ay 6. ay 9. ay 12. ay

SA 0,45 0,45 0,47 0,48 0,50 0,47 AS 0,42 0,43 0,46 0,48 0,51 0,46 NaMBS 0,42 0,41 0,43 0,48 0,48 0,44 LG0.2 0,41 0,42 0,46 0,45 0,46 0,44 LG0.5 0,44 0,44 0,47 0,48 0,48 0,46 OG0.2 0,41 0,41 0,46 0,48 0,49 0,45 OG0.5 0,40 0,42 0,45 0,45 0,46 0,44 F0.2 0,46 0,45 0,49 0,49 0,49 0,48 F0.5 0,47 0,45 0,50 0,52 0,52 0,49 KOM0.2 0,51 0,48 0,50 0,50 0,53 0,50 KOM0.5 0,50 0,50 0,50 0,50 0,54 0,51 Kontrol 0,48 0,49 0,50 0,50 0,50 0,49

0,45 0,45 0,47 0,48 0,50

267

Uygulama

Ortal Uygulamalar 3. ay 6. ay 9. ay 12. ay

60°


0,43 0,44 0,45 0,46 0,47

Uygulama Uygulamalar 3. ay 6. ay 9. ay 12. ay

50°


3,14 3,22 3,27 3,30 3,36

268

Muhafaza Süresi Uygulama

Uygulamalar 3. ay 6. ay 9. ay 12. ay

60°


Muh. Sür. Ort. 3,10 3,19 3,28 3,37 3,45

Muhafaza Süresi Uygulama Uygulamalar 3. ay 6. ay 9. ay 12. ay

50°


Muh. Sür. Ort. 32,44 29,22 26,72 26,77 24,61

269

Muhafaza Sürelerinin Etkileri

Çizelge 17. 50°C Hava ile Kurutulan DomateslerMuhafaza Sürelerinin Etkileri



60°


Muh. Sür. Ort. 33,61 31,82 31,39 30,13 33,61

Kurutma


50°


Muh. Sür. Ort. 26,80 24,72 20,82 19,04 17,34

270



Kurutma


60°


Muh. Sür. Ort. 22,26 20,21 19,77 18,88 16,38

Kurutma


50°


Muh. Sür. Ort. 13,68 14,61 15,50 14,36 13,16

271


Çizelge 21. 50Muhafaza Sürelerinin Etkileri

Kurutma


60°


Muh. Sür. Ort. 15,07 15,40 15,39 15,20 13,92


50°


Muh. Sür. Ort. 7,61 7,58 7,49 7,38 7,27

272

Çizelge 22.

Uygulama


60°


7,56 7,50 7,43 7,35 7,25

Uygulama Uygulamalar 3. ay 6. ay 9. ay 12. ay


5,45 5,41 5,37 5,28 5,19

273

Çizelge 24. 60°C Hve Muhafaza Sürelerinin Etkileri

Çizelge 25.



60°


Muh. Sür. Ort. 5,39 5,35 5,33 5,30 5,28

Kurutma

Muhafaza Süresi Uygulama Uygulamalar 6. ay 12. ay

50°

SA 5779,1 5527,86 4898,53 5401,83 AS 11052,8 4554,87 6528,29 7378,65 NaMBS 5536,2 5151,39 5690,22 5459,27 LG0.2 5876,2 4127,77 4789,35 4931,11 LG0.5 6112,7 4372,43 4723,45 5069,53 OG0.2 4224,5 3990,10 3765,29 3993,30 OG0.5 6351,6 4810,85 3640,99 4934,48 F0.2 5720,5 5401,43 5944,21 5688,71 F0.5 4932,4 3191,26 3386,43 3836,70 KOM0.2 5526,7 4520,13 3987,25 4678,03 KOM0.5 6022,8 3984,37 3861,05 4622,74 Kontrol 5432,9 4999,47 4326,60 4919,66

Muh. Sür. Ort. 6047,37 4552,66 4628,47

274

Kurutma

Uygulama Ortalamas Uygulamalar 6. ay 12. ay

60°


6543,11 4963,61 4467,69

Kurutma

Muhafa Uygulama Uygulamalar 6. ay 12. ay

50°


t. 329,76 283,72 204,41

275

Herhangi 4. Proje 4.1. Materyal ve 4.2. Proje Faaliyet Takvimi:

de dilmektedir. 4.3. Personel:

Kurutma

Uygulama Uygulamalar 6. ay 12. ay

60°


345,35 314,14 235,23

276

Multipleks RT-PCR Proje No TAGEM-BS-12/08-02/02-20 Proje Lideri

01.01.2015/31.12.2015

psorosis virus (CPsV), Citrus exocortis multipleks RT- -PCR optimizasyonu

-

1–kiti, RT-

1. Tersine Transkripsiyon PCR (RT-PCR)

-

makines

nlerin (CTV, CPsV, CTLV, CCaVd, CEVd) iki -

Enzim Aktivasyonu Etmen

0,25 Taq DNA Polimeraz 10,75

CTV CPsV CTLV CCaVd CEVd

-

277

-

tekli inokulasyon

278

-

CTV + CPsV, CTLV +CEVd, CTLV + CPsV, CPsV + CEVd, CTV + CEVd

kombinasyo

279

1-

4.1. Materyal ve 4.2. Proje Faaliyet Takvimi: 4.3. Personel: Herhangi bir per

280

Çekirdeksiz, Dikensiz ve Periyodisite Göstermeyen Mutant Yerli Mandarin ve Antalya Yerli Yuvarlak Limon Tiplerinin Belirlenmesi Projesi

Proje No TAGEM/BBAD/15/A08/P02/04 Proje Lideri

01.01.2015/31.12.2015

Proje Özeti:

1.Ba ca Faaliyetlerin Gerçekle Durumu: D nem Bulgular M1V3

e yer alan 1825 adet

kuruyan bi

4.1. Materyal ve Projenin mate 4.2. Proje Faaliyet Takvimi: 4.3. Personel:

281

TAGEM/BBAD/15/A08/P02/01

Proje Lideri

nem 01.01.2015/31.12.2015 Proje Özeti:

ve pazarlana

1.Ba ca Faaliyetlerin Gerçekle Durumu: D nem Bulgular Melez-

-

sonra Melez- Melez-II parselinde bulunan Satsuma X Klemantin ve Satsuma X SRA-

a

-90

2.Y a Dü nülen Ara Yay lar: Proje verileri 3.Dar zlar:

4.Projede Önerilen iklikler: Varsa proje ile ilgili nerilen de i iklik nerileri yaz lmal 4.1.Materyal ve Y tem: Projede herhangi bir materyal- 4.2.Proje Faaliyet Takvimi: 4.3.Personel:

282

Proje Ba Türkiye Turunç Proje No TAGEM/BBAD/92/A08/P02 Proje Lideri Proje Yürütücüsü Kuru Raporun gili Oldu u Dönem 01.01.2015/31.12.2015 Proje Özeti:

1.Ba ca Faaliyetlerin Gerçekle Durumu: Dönem Bulgular Rapor d nemi için planlanan ba l ca faaliyetlerden, tamamlananlar ile elde edilen sonuçl zetlenmelidir.

2014

bitkilerin elde ile 2015-

Tür Programa giren

p kontrol

kontrol indeksleme (Biyolojik) s

Exo Ca Ps Tr Stb TL Portakal 121 184 14 8 19 1 3 - Mandarin 56 98 2 4 17 1 2 - Limon 56 107 10 1 19 1 2 -

14 25 2 2 2 - - - 20 25 - - 1 - - -

Toplam 267 439 28 15 58 3 7 0 2.Y a Dü nülen Ara Yay lar:

3.Dar zlar:

4.Projede Önerilen iklikler: Varsa proje ile ilgili nerilen de i iklik nerileri yaz lmal 4.1.Materyal ve Y tem: Projede herhangi bir materyal- 4.2.Proje Faaliyet Takvimi: 4.3.Personel:

283

Proje No TAGEM/BBAD/A08/P02/02 Proje Lideri Zeynep ERYILMAZ

01.01.2015/31.12.2015

Citrus aurantium

Citrus aurantium L.var

te (Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck), Cara Cara (Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck), Fukumoto (Citrus sinensis

, alternatif olarak ise C-35 (Poncirus trifoliata Raf.x Citrus sinensis (Poncirus trifoliata Raf.x Citrus sinensis

Navel (Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck)

Projede bu rapor d nem alanda bulunan sera ve alanda

azlar:

4.1. Materyal ve Projenin materyal v 4.2. Proje Faaliyet Takvimi: 4.3. Personel:

284

Mutasyon Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck) (TUR020-438

Proje No TAGEM/BBAD/11/A08/P02/ Proje Lideri Zeynep ERYILMAZ

Rapor 01.01.2015/31.12.2015

eme

tarrantino ve ark.,1988).

Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck) (TUR020-438

1V2 bireyleri

bireylerini elde etmek

elde edilen ge

konulu bildiri

4.1. Materyal ve ntem: 4.2. Proje Faaliyet Takvimi: 4.3. Personel: .

285

Proje No TAGEM-BS-12/08-05/02-28(5) Proje Lideri

01.01.2015/31.12.2015

Proje

Bois noir Flavescens dore

Flavescens dore

1. Ba Faaliyetlerin Durumu:

Bul ve

-200

u

0C su

-

-

-

-

0C su banyosunda 15 dk bekletildikten sonra DNA

-18 0

Stolbur grubu fitoplazma Bois noir

286

Bois noir

Elm yellow grubu fitoplazma Flavescens dore . Flavescens dore

2. Y

4.1. Materyal ve 4.2. Proje Faaliyet Takvimi: 4.3. Personel: .

287

tlerin

Proje No Proje Lideri Serkan AYDIN Proje

01.01.2015/31.12.2015 Proje Özeti:

parse


4.1. Materyal ve 4.2. Proje Faaliyet Takvimi: 4.3. Personel: .

288

Proje No TAGEM /BBAD/15/A08/P09/03 Proje Lideri

01.01.2015/31.12.2015

Proje Özeti:

in tam olarak her zaman -

1.Ba ca Faaliyetlerin Gerçekle Durumu: D nem Bulgular -

.

4.1. Materyal ve Projenin mat 4.2. Proje Faaliyet Takvimi: 4.3. Personel:

289

Proje Ba

Proje No TAGEM/BBAD/16/A08/P09/03 Proje Lideri Dr. Seyla TEPE

em 01.01.2015/31.12.2015

Proje Özeti: Yenidünya (Eriobotrya japonica Lindl.) meyvesi pazarlarda gereksinim duyulan bir devrede


u ise ilk kez 17 (Gn X Chm 105)

ler

4.1. Materyal ve 4.2. Proje Faaliyet Takvimi: 4.3. Personel: Projede herhangi bir personel de

290

Proje No TAGEM/BBAD/16/A08/P09/04 Proje Lideri Dr. BAYRAM

01.01.2015/31.12.2015

Proje Özeti:

-

du

ve klonal


Bu proje; 2010-

291

2010-

iklikler

4.1. Materyal ve 4.2. Proje Faaliyet Takvimi: 4.3. Personel: Projede herhangi bir person

292

Proje No TAGEM-BS-12/08-09/01-30 Proje Lideri

01.01.2015-31.12.2015

paraziti -

: Projede 2013-2014- - -

alanlardan 108 adet . rnekler 0- r .

ip h

-

- -4

-

Esinnar, Ba-

293

Bu skalaya göre;

1: Kökte 1-2 2: Kökte 3- 3: Kökte 11- 4: Kökte 31-

üzerinde kök-

0- Batem Onurnar 4

3 Batem Esinnar 3 Hicaznar 2 Batem Hicrannar 1

1 1

Bu dönemd

4.1. Materyal ve Projenin materyal ve 4.2. Proje Faaliyet Takvimi:

4.3. Personel:

294

n n Belirlenmesi Proje No TAGEM-BS-12/08-09/02-25 Proje Lideri Proje Yürütücüsü Kuru Raporun gili Oldu u Dönem 01.01.2015/31.12.2015

Proje Özeti:

belli olmay

izolat 2014 Xanthomonas

axonopodispv. punicae

ait DNA-gyrase t edilen etmen Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. punicae Survey

1. Ba ca Faaliyetlerin Gerçekle Durumu

:

- Kumluca, Aksu, Manavgat, Serik, ,

ve .

Kumluca 4 1 Aksu 2 1 Manavgat 6 - Serik 9 2

3 1 4 2

9 2 TOPLAM 37 9

295

-

Labor 1.1.

tulup temiz bir

-

YDC Agar, SX Agar, GYC Agar ve CKTM besi yerine

1.2.

-60 saat 25o

2.3.1

-72 saat 27o

2.3.1.1.c. SX Agar

- o

7- o

1991; 1992). -HR) Testi

n

Nicotiana tabacum

2.3.1.3. Potasyum Hidroksit testi (KOH)

-

296

1.3. 2013- itkisinde Hipersensitif Reaksiyon (HR) Testleri

1.3.1.

7 ve 108

Nicotiana tabacum

ve Stead, 1987).

1.3.2. Domates Bitkisinde Hipersensitif Reaksiyon (HR) Testi

zamanda domates bitkisine de inokule edilerek

7 ve 108 ile elde Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)

- inokulasyonun

1.4. 2013-

-onopodis pv. punicea culture-collection ITCC<IND>

gyrase

ILKNR_F: GCTGTCCTTCCTCAATTCT ILKNR_R: CTTCTGCGGGATGTTGTT MELIKE_R: CGGTAGAAGAAGGTCAGCA MELIKE_F: AACAACATCCCGCAGAAG -

P

MgCl2

dNTP (0.1 mM) Forward Primer

ddH2O

7dk son uzama

737 bp

255

297

Bulgular 1.

Toplam Kumluca Aksu Manavgat Serik Yen

- - - - 1 1 1 Meyvede derin

3

- - - 1 -

belli olmayan lezyonlar

1

2.

-72 saat 25o

t r lae ik olarak haz rlanm YDC agar besi yerinde geli tirilmi ve +4o nda saklanm t r (Lelliott ve Stead, 1987).

3.

a

hale bulunan sar koloni geli inokulasyon

Hidroksit (KOH) testinde, -

r biyokimyasal testlere

4. 2013-Reaksiyon (HR) Testleri 4.1.

s Nicotiana tabacum

itif (Lelliot ve Stead, 1987).

4.2. Domates Bitkisinde Hipersensitif Reaksiyon (HR)

298

(Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. -

5. 2013-

- -234469

MELIKE_F-MELIKE_R ve ILKNR_F- Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. punicae ile

4. Pr 4.1. Materyal ve 4.2. Proje Faaliyet Takvimi: 4.3. Personel: Projeni

299

Elde Edilmesi

Proje No TAGEM/BBAD/15/A08/P09/02 Proje Lideri M. Alper ARSLAN Proje Yürütücüsü Kuru Raporun gili Oldu u Dönem 01.01.2015/31.12.2015

Proje Özeti: Avokado (Persea americana

yenidir. Geleneksel metotla avok

Bu projede Avokado (Persea americana

bulunan 60

1.Ba ca Faaliyetlerin Gerçekle Durumu: Dönem Bulgular

60

azlar:

.

er 4.1. Materyal ve 4.2. Proje Faaliyet Takvimi: 4.3. Personel:

300

Proje No TAGEM /BBAD/15/A08/P09/01 Proje Lideri Proje Yürütücüsü Kuru Raporun gili Oldu u Dönem 01.01.2015/31.12.2015

Proje Özeti: fungusitine alternatif olarak, ya da fungusit dozun

kalite

yuna

-

fiziksel, kimyasal

incelenecektir. 1.Ba ca Faaliyetlerin Gerçekle Durumu: Dönem Bulgular

Projenin bu

4.1. Materyal ve Pr

4.2. Proje Faaliyet Takvimi: 4.3. Personel:

301

Proje Ba Domates Isla

Proje No TAGEM/BBAD/10/A09/P01/10 Proje Lideri Proje Yürütücüsü Kuru Raporun gili Oldu u Dönem 01.01.2015/31.12.2015

Proje Özeti:

erada

1. Ba ca Faaliyetlerin Gerçekle Durumu: Dönem Bulgular Domates (Solanum lycopersicum

biyotik

-etim izni

gen havuzundaki domates

Tomato Yellow Leaf Curl Virus=TYLCV), Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus

Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. radicis lycopersici =FORL) ve nematoda (Meloidogyne incognita ve

e ve

2. Y a Dü nülen Ara Yay lar: Projenin bu

ler

4.1. Materyal ve

302

4.2. Proje Faaliyet Takvimi: 4.3. Personel: .

303

Proje Ba Proje No TAGEM/BBAD/10/A01/P01/12 Proje Lideri Dr. H. Filiz BOYACI Proje Yürütücüsü Kuru Raporun gili Oldu u Dönem 01.01.2015/31.12.2015

Proje Özeti:

n temin edilmesi

seviyede kalmakta ve uzun

ge


2014 sonbahar d

genotipte Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis (Cmm in

Fusarium

adet hat Fusarium

Cmm

Fusarium ve Cmm

1. Boyaci, H. F., Topcu, V., Tepe, A., Yildirim, I. K., Oten, M., & Aktas, A., 2015. Morphological and Molecular Characterization and Relationships of Turkish Local Eggplant Heirlooms. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 43(1), DOI 10.15835/ nbha4319773. 43.1 (2015): 100-107.

304

2. Boyaci, H. F., Unlu, A., Gumrukcu, E., Kusvuran, S., Ellialtioglu, S. S., 2015. The Potential for Rootstock Breeding of Some Inbred Lines and Local Populations in Eggplant. II. International Plant Breeding Congress, 1-5 November 2015, WOW Kremlin Palace, Antalya/TURKEY.

2. Y a Dü nülen Ara Yay lar: 12 - th EUCARPIA

3.

4.1. Materyal ve 4.2. Proje Faaliyet Takvimi: 4.3. Personel:

305

Proje Ba Materyali) Gel Proje No TAGEM/BBAD/10/A09/P01/15 Proje Lideri Proje Yürütücüsü Kuru Raporun gili Oldu u Dönem 01.01.2015/31.12.2015 Proje Özeti: Kavun

n kavun

enotipleri toplanacak, Fusarium

1.Ba ca Faaliyetlerin Gerçekle Durumu: Dönem Bulgular Bu proje kapsam nda ör yeti iricili ine uygun, verimli, erkenci, ha ra ve nakliyeye daya l ay ca paza talebini ka ayacak çe ebeveyni olabilecek lah materyalleri geli irilerek, yerli hibrit çe tler retimde yay la amaçlanmakta

Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. melonis

heteroz .

hibrittir. 2015 sonbaha

4F

4

Podosphaera xanthii Podosphaera xanthii (1-sporulasyon yok),olarak

Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. melonis

2.Y a Dü nülen Ara Yay lar: Projenin bu

306

4.1. Materyal Yöntem: 4.2. Proje Faaliyet Takvimi: Proje 4.3. Personel:

307

Proje Ba Domates (S. lycopersicum) ve Karpuzda (C. lanatus

Proje No TAGEM/BBAD/10/A09/P01/09 Proje Lideri Dr. Meral YILMAZ Proje Yürütücüsü Kuru Raporun gili Oldu u Dönem 01.01.2015/31.12.2015

Proje Özeti:

ve (Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Mansf.). Her

Doma Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. Michiganensis(Cmm) Cmm

Acidovorax avenae subsp. Citrulli(Aac) e Lekesi (Bacterial fruit blotch (BFB)

tiledon infeksiyonundan

, thriam, captan metalaxyl-

. Bu projede domateste Cmm ve karpuzda

hidroksid (%54), in

vitro, in vivo

1. Ba ca Faaliyetlerin Gerçekle Durumu: Dönem Bulgular Domates (S. lycopersicum L.) ve karpuz (C. lanatus

Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis (Cmm) ve Acidovorax citrulli Bu projede Cmm ve

2010-

308


3. Dar zlar:

acido

4. Projede Önerilen iklikler: 4.1. Materyal ve Y tem:

dahil edilm 4.2. Proje Faaliyet Takvimi: H 4.3. Personel:

309

Proje Ba çin Nitelikli Genitörlerin (Y Materyali)

Proje No TAGEM/BBAD/10/A09/P01/02 Proje Lideri Proje Yürütücüsü Kuru Raporun gili Oldu u Dönem 01/01/2015-31/12/2015 Proje Özeti: Biber (Capsicum annuum

ü

- 1 Hibrit -

(Capsicum annuum -


89414 ton miktar ile 78.3 milyon $ gelir eld

2 5 kademe

6

310

2015 Sonbahar Dönemi: vuzuna dahil edilerek,

desteklenen 109G029 nolu 1007 KAMAG projesi

sivri tipte aday

hibrit ismiyle iki

e F1

1 adet

Konu ile ilgili


15. Molecular Characterization of Fungicides Resistance of Botrytis Cinerea on Pepper and Host-Resistance of Selected Breeding Materials. Evolutionary Genomics of Plant Summer Workshop Pathogens. COST European Cooperation in Science and Technology. 26th August-28th August 2015. Kiel-Germany. P:49.

C. annuum L.) Varieties For Protected Cultivation. II. International Plant Breeding Congress. Abstract Book. Poster presentation. 1-5 November 2015, Antalya. On press.

(TSWV). II. International Plant Breeding Congress. Abstract Book. Poster presentation. 1-5 November 2015, Antalya. On press.

311

Capsicum annuum L.) seed quality of different seed production dates, storage and moisture content. XVIII. International Plant Protection Congress, 24-27 August 2015, p: 482. Yanmaz, R., Du

-16 Ocak 2015, Ankara. S:579-604.

(Capsicum annuum L.)

- 35. Capsicum annuum

-

-

Botrytis cinerea

- -Haziran

-78. ISSN:2147-6551. Özalp isi, Temmuz- -75.

1. - - 2. Cost Action FA 1204 2nd Steering Committe Meeting 2-4 March 2015, Antalya 3. - 4.

- 22 Haziran 2015) 5. - menistan Heyeti, 04.08.2015, Batem 6. -

II. International Plant Breeding Congress. 1-5 November 2015, Antalya.

:


312

Proje Ba Y yol

M Proje No TAGEM/BBAD/10/A09/P01/13 Proje Lideri Proje Yürütücüsü Kuru Raporun gili Oldu u Dönem 01.01.2015/31.12.2015

Proje Özeti:

1. Ba ca Faaliyetlerin Gerçekle Durumu: Dönem Bulgular uygun, verimli, abiyotik-Bu kapsa

5-

de yer alan -


-morfolojik

under Chilling Stress in Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). II. International Plant Breeding Congress, 1-5 November 2015, WOW Kremlin Palace, Antalya/TURKEY. 24-

3. Dar zlar:

1- -

-250

313

dengesizliklerin ol

2-gereksinim duyar. -

4. Projede Önerilen iklikler: 4.1. Materyal ve Yöntem:

4.2. Proje Faaliyet Takvimi: Varsa proje faaliyet takviminde nerilen de iklikler yaz lmal r. 4.3. Personel:

314

Proje Ba Proje No TAGEM/BBAD/10/A01/P01/14 Proje Lideri Dr. Rana KURUM Proje Yürütücüsü Kuru Raporun gili Oldu u Dönem 01.01.2015/31.12.2015 Proje Özeti:

ricilikte -

1.Ba ca Faaliyetlerin Ger ekle Durumu: Dönem Bulgular

Herhang


315

Proje Ba Gypsophila (Gypsophyla spYeni Gypsophila (Gypsophyla sp esi

Proje No TAGEM/BBAD/12/A09/P08/01 Proje Lideri Proje Yürütücüsü Kuru Akdeniz Raporun gili Oldu u Dönem 01.01.2015/31.12.2015 Proje Özeti:

-

–

i


– n Ga 8 nolu bireyin


-47. 3.Dar zlar:

-

projenin deva

316

4.Projede Önerilen iklikler: 4.1.Materyal ve Yöntem: Materyal ve y ntemde 4.2.Proje Faaliyet Takvimi: Proje faaliyet takviminde 4.3.Personel: Proje personeli ile ilgili herhangi bir konusu

317

Proje Ba Proje No TAGEM/TA/09/A12/P03/07 Proje Lideri Proje Yürütücüsü Kuru Raporun gili Oldu u Dönem 01.01.2015/31.12.2015 Proje Özeti:

- lah

- -

ri

1, 146 S2 ve 19 S4-S8 kademelerinde toplam 234 hatta

melezi - – 1160

Ant-YM-13003 ile Ant-YM-13005 melezleri stand- – -YM-

tane verimleri 739-1169 kg/da aras

318

a Melezi Verim Denemesi-1 Ekim Tarihi :17.04.2015

HasatTarihi: 10.09.2015

No

Bitki Boyu (cm) (cm)

Bitki

(adet)

(adet)

Bitki

(1-5)

(1-5)

Hasat Nemi (%)

Taneleme

(%)

Tane verimi (kg/da)

1 P31A34(std) 69 250 88 50 51 1 2 15.0 86 1160 a 2 DKC6589(std) 67 252 92 44 46 1 2 14.6 87 1099 ab 3 Ant-YM-13003 68 233 92 46 48 2 2 14.3 84 1071 ab

4 Ant-YM-13005 68 234 83 47 49 2 3 14.3 86 1057 ab 5 Ant-YM-13014 65 230 77 46 48 2 3 14.1 83 996 bc

6 Ant-YM-13004 67 232 78 43 45 2 2 14.6 88 958 bd 7 Ant-YM-13001 64 232 92 49 51 2 1 14.3 82 948 be

8 Ant-YM-13006 65 218 78 48 50 1 2 14.3 87 932 be 9 Ant-YM-13031 63 207 85 41 40 2 3 13.9 84 877 cf

10 Ant-YM-13034 64 217 82 42 41 2 2 13.8 84 862 cg 11 Ant-YM-13007 64 223 88 47 49 2 2 14.6 85 832 ch

12 Ant-YM-13036 68 233 90 38 40 2 2 13.8 83 830 ch 13 Ant-YM-13021 64 225 80 50 49 1 3 14.3 85 825 ch

14 Ant-YM-13012 66 247 98 49 51 2 3 14.2 84 822 dh 15 Ant-YM-13008 65 240 95 44 49 2 3 14.3 88 815 dh

16 Ant-YM-13028 68 233 102 44 37 1 2 25.6 85 799 dh 17 Ant-YM-13026 69 233 92 51 52 2 3 14.2 85 781 eh 18 Ant-YM-13015 66 228 90 49 51 2 3 13.9 88 743 fh

19 Ant-YM-13011 66 213 78 49 51 3 3 14.3 86 743 fh 20 Ant-YM-13025 67 217 90 41 40 3 4 14.2 86 722 fh

21 Ant-YM-13023 68 230 87 47 50 3 3 14.0 84 703 gh 22 Ant-YM-13018 63 213 78 51 52 1 3 13.4 75 670 h

X= 874.89 C.V.(%)= 11.87

Sx= 103.89 LSD(0.05)= 171.19

319

-2 Ekim Tarihi :17.04.2015

HasatTarihi : 10.09.2015

No


Bitki

(adet)

(adet)

Bitki

(1-5)

(1-5)

Hasat Nemi (%)

Taneleme

(%)

Tane verimi (kg/da)

1 Ant-YM-13098 66 218 82 52 52 1 2 14.8 86 1160 a 2 DKC6589(std) 66 243 92 50 50 1 2 14.6 87 1136 ab

3 P31A34(std) 68 245 83 50 50 1 3 14.9 86 1081 ac 4 Ant-YM-13093 68 232 77 49 50 1 3 14.5 88 1032 ad

5 Ant-YM-13096 68 248 95 47 47 2 3 14.7 84 974 be 6 Ant-YM-13104 66 208 78 48 49 2 3 14.7 87 952 cf

7 Ant-YM-13051 66 223 87 49 50 1 3 14.6 84 950 cf 8 Ant-YM-13073 67 232 92 52 53 2 3 15.1 87 913 dg

9 Ant-YM-13103 64 220 75 52 52 2 3 15.3 85 898 dg 10 Ant-YM-13087 65 207 70 50 51 2 4 14.9 85 895 dg 11 Ant-YM-13086 64 208 83 51 51 2 3 14.7 85 874 dg

12 Ant-YM-13037 68 222 82 50 52 1 3 14.7 86 873 dg 13 Ant-YM-13084 67 227 80 51 51 2 3 14.5 85 859 eg

14 Ant-YM-13102 66 215 78 50 51 2 3 14.5 86 852 eg 15 Ant-YM-13054 68 223 83 49 50 2 3 15.4 86 824 eh

16 Ant-YM-13076 65 218 83 52 52 2 3 14.4 87 788 17 Ant-YM-13079 64 212 85 50 51 2 4 14.7 88 753

18 Ant-YM-13078 64 203 68 50 51 2 4 14.8 89 751 19 Ant-YM-13077 63 178 62 47 49 2 4 15.1 86 680

20 Ant-YM-13059 66 210 90 45 45 2 4 14.6 86 673 21 Ant-YM-13099 66 228 83 51 52 2 4 14.7 86 663

22 Ant-YM-13057 64 217 85 44 45 2 4 14.9 83 644 X= 873.75 C.V.(%)= 11.52

Sx= 100.72 LSD(0.05)= 165.96

320

Ekim Tarihi :17.04.2015

HasatTarihi : 10.09.2015

No


Bitki

(adet)

(adet)

Bitki

(1-5)

(1-5)

Hasat Nemi (%)

Taneleme

(%)

Tane verimi (kg/da)

1 ADA 12.20 72 240 90 49 49 1 3 83 15.9 1169 a 2 ADA 12.44 72 225 78 54 54 1 3 87 14.5 1155 a 3 P.31A34(std) 68 230 80 49 49 1 2 86 14.2 1153 a 4 ADA 12.56 72 225 72 49 49 2 3 84 15.4 1147 ab 5 ADA 13.4 69 240 85 56 56 1 3 85 14.0 1122 ac

6 DKC 6589(std) 66 220 75 52 52 1 2 87 13.8 1117 ac

7 ADA 13.7 68 230 87 50 50 2 2 86 13.3 1092 ad 8 P.31G98(std) 69 205 72 56 56 2 2 88 14.1 1084 ad 9 ADA 13.29 68 220 85 52 52 1 3 87 14.8 1083 ad 10 ADA 13.26 71 220 85 51 51 2 3 87 14.7 1077 ad 11 SASA-28 69 215 77 56 56 1 3 85 14.2 1071 ad 12 ADA 12.18 70 230 70 53 53 1 3 85 14.7 1067 ad 13 ADA 10.15 73 230 88 53 53 1 2 87 15.0 1065 ad 14 SASA-98 70 225 82 47 47 2 3 80 14.2 1061 ad 15 SASA-111 68 230 87 55 55 2 2 87 14.1 1061 ad 16 ADA 11.19 70 215 82 51 51 2 3 84 15.4 1055 ad 17 SASA-99 70 225 82 52 52 1 3 80 16.1 1034 ae 18 ADA 13.20 72 225 88 55 55 2 3 84 15.8 1014 be 19 ADA 12.1 73 210 67 41 41 2 3 87 14.8 1013 be 20 ADA 8.6 68 225 78 51 51 2 3 86 14.5 993 ce 21 ADA 9.2 67 200 65 48 48 2 3 85 14.4 991 ce 22 ADA 12.39 70 235 87 44 44 2 3 86 14.2 975 de 23 ADA 523 69 225 88 55 55 1 2 88 14.1 971 de 24 SASA-18 68 225 98 53 53 2 3 87 14.3 968 de 25 ADA 351 66 210 78 49 49 2 2 89 14.4 915 e 26 SASA-96 70 235 83 49 49 2 3 85 13.7 739 f

** X= 1045.89 C.V.(%)= 8.05 Sx= 84.27 LSD(0.05)= 138.2

hamur olumunda ya -

-7461 - – 50,

–

321

--7246 kg/da

-YM-14422, Ant-YM-melez olarak dah

-1


No


Bitki

(adet) bitki

Yaprak /sap

(%)

Bitki

(1-5)

Kuru Madde

(%) (kg/da)

1 BURAK(std) 73 270 110 49 36 37 1 28 7461 a

2 Ant-YM-13003 70 235 90 50 44 46 1 31 6631 ab 3 Ant-YM-13036 70 225 100 49 49 52 2 35 6349 bc

4 Ant-YM-13014 66 215 80 50 48 46 2 37 5631 bd

5 Ant-YM-13005 69 230 85 50 46 51 2 35 5596 bd 6 Ant-YM-13012 67 220 85 47 49 51 2 33 5547 ce

7 Ant-YM-13007 66 215 85 51 44 54 2 38 5499 ce

8 Ant-YM-13018 66 200 75 50 44 56 2 37 5259 de 9 Ant-YM-13001 68 215 75 51 49 58 2 30 5195 de

10 Ant-YM-13023 68 200 75 50 50 60 3 36 5106 de

11 Ant-YM-13026 69 225 100 49 41 47 2 32 5091 de 12 Ant-YM-13006 67 220 85 49 49 58 2 39 5033 de

13 Ant-YM-13008 68 215 90 53 44 43 2 33 4987 de

14 Ant-YM-13004 69 245 95 53 45 43 2 35 4962 df 15 P.31Y43(std) 68 235 90 48 48 54 2 35 4940 df

16 Ant-YM-13028 71 230 100 49 36 52 1 30 4918 df

17 Ant-YM-13034 66 205 80 49 49 54 3 35 4606 dg 18 Ant-YM-13025 68 220 80 48 48 44 2 34 4483 eg

19 Ant-YM-13015 69 220 90 49 47 53 3 38 3917 fh

20 Ant-YM-13031 62 195 80 49 44 55 4 42 3789 gh 21 Ant-YM-13011 67 220 85 49 45 50 2 37 3685 gh

22 Ant-YM-13021 67 215 85 49 41 63 3 38 3095 h

X= 5080.81 C.V.(%)= 12.71 Sx= 646.26 LSD(0.05)= 1064.9

-2 Ekim Tarihi :17.04.2015

322

No


Bitki

(adet) bitki

Yaprak /sap

(%)

Bitki

(1-5)

Kuru Madde

(%)

ot verimi (kg/da)

1 BURAK(std) 71 260 120 55 33 38 1 26 7246 a

2 Ant-YM-14422 71 228 102 53 39 42 2 26 6572 ab

3 Ant-YM-13096 69 227 93 53 46 62 3 36 6255 ac 4 Ant-YM-13093 68 223 87 52 51 60 1 34 5631 bc

5 Ant-YM-13037 69 220 87 50 48 51 2 34 5283 be

6 P.31Y43(std) 69 240 87 50 45 57 2 33 5111 cf 7 Ant-YM-13054 68 232 87 52 47 58 2 36 4962 cg

8 Ant-YM-13098 68 210 88 51 45 56 2 38 4824 dh

9 Ant-YM-13087 66 220 83 50 52 60 2 33 4789 dh 10 Ant-YM-13103 68 227 90 49 44 50 3 37 4705 dh

11 Ant-YM-13102 68 213 78 50 44 47 2 36 4690 dh

12 Ant-YM-13099 69 213 82 49 52 71 3 33 4566 dh 13 Ant-YM-13104 69 208 78 49 47 57 2 32 4467

14 Ant-YM-13073 69 230 93 48 46 67 2 35 4388

15 Ant-YM-13051 68 223 93 48 45 59 2 36 4210 16 Ant-YM-13084 68 222 78 51 52 70 2 35 4185

17 Ant-YM-14421 68 223 82 50 47 66 3 36 4140

18 Ant-YM-13077 66 205 77 49 53 69 3 38 4096 19 Ant-YM-13079 66 217 78 49 51 57 3 38 4083

20 Ant-YM-13086 67 217 82 49 50 63 2 36 3947

21 Ant-YM-13059 66 212 82 47 51 72 3 41 3858 22 Ant-YM-13076 66 212 83 48 48 59 3 36 3803

23 Ant-YM-13057 65 208 80 47 49 62 3 36 3561

24 Ant-YM-13078 66 208 80 47 50 74 3 40 3194

X= 4690.18 C.V.(%)= 16.92 Sx= 793.88 LSD(0.05)= 1304.8

323


No

Çi

(adet)


Bitki

(adet)

bitki

(%)

Yaprak /sap

(%)

Bitki

(1-5)

Kuru Madde

(%)

Kuru madde verimi (kg/da)

verimi (kg/da)

1 BURAK(std) 74 265 110 53 29 41 1 37.4 2455 a 6592 a

2 SASA-5 75 270 95 53 36 45 1 32.6 2259 ab 6864 a

3 SASA-105 69 220 87 53 41 48 2 34.3 2056 ac 6007 ab

4 ADA 13.20 72 240 93 52 45 62 2 35.1 1873 bc 5315 bc

5 SASA-98 70 222 95 49 45 60 2 38.6 1791 bc 4640 ce

6 SAMADA-07 (std) 71 245 97 51 41 63 1 34.6 1775 bc 5101 bd

7 P.31Y43(std) 69 263 95 49 42 54 2 39.8 1754 bc 4413 ce

8 SASA-73 67 248 97 49 45 59 2 34.3 1745 cd 5111 bd

9 SASA-88 68 233 87 50 46 56 2 36.9 1678 cd 4502 ce

10 ADA 12.44 72 262 108 51 43 54 2 35.1 1665 cd 4710 ce

11 ADA 12.10 72 247 93 49 33 60 1 37.2 1663 cd 4467 ce

12 ADA 12.20 73 237 77 51 43 58 2 32.7 1658 cd 5086 bd

13 SASA-99 70 232 90 47 44 60 2 38.3 1634 cd 4269 de

14 65 260 107 48 45 60 2 39.8 1616 cd 4061 e

15 ADA 13.29 71 248 97 47 43 66 2 34.4 1492 d 4338 ce

X= 531.66 C.V.(%)= 11.73 Sx= 590.44 LSD(0.05)= 987.54

Kuru Madde Verimi: X= 187.51 C.V.(%)= 16.94

Sx= 306.21 LSD(0.05)= 512.14

0, 236 adet S1, 25 adet S2-S3, 30 adet S4-S7 kademelerinde hatta

324

:

4.2.Proje Faaliyet Takvimi: 4.3.Personel: Proje person

325

Proje Ba Sulama Suyu Tuzluluk Seviyelerinin Verim ve Kaliteye Etkisi Proje No TAGEM/TSKAD/11/A13/P02/02 Proje Lideri Proje Yürütücüsü Kuru Raporun gili Oldu u Dönem 01.01.2015/31.12.2015 Proje Özeti: erin

-1, kontrol+1.5 dS m-1, kontrol+3.0 dS m-1, kontrol+4.5 dS m-1)

1.Ba ca Faaliyetlerin Gerçekle Durumu: Dönem Bulgular a)

b)

326

c)

d)

e) m 2015 tarihinde Rosa odorato

tir.

f) 5

327

g) Sera içi nem %50-

h) Dikimi takiben fid -

i) ml/bitki (EC:1.5 dS/m; pH:5.5-

j)

2.Y a Dü nülen Ara Yay lar 12-

3.Dar zlar:

4.2.Proje Faaliyet Takvimi: Proje faaliyet takviminde de 4.3.Personel:

328

TAGEM/TSKAD/09/A13/P02/01

Proje Lideri

01.01.2015/31.12.2015

edilmesi, n eni

Denemede BATEM H

2

. Deneme Yeri Topr

Derinlik (cm)

Kum (%)

Kil (%)

Silt (%)

CaCO3

(%) EC

dSm-1 pH TK (g/g)

SN (g/g)

As (g/cm3)

0-30 29.18 21.24 49.58 L 24.0 0.633 7.50 24.04 12.78 1.35 30-60 32.65 17.28 50.07 L 29.7 0.443 7.70 23.52 12.81 1.30 60-90 36.59 15.25 48.17 L 30.1 0.380 7.80 21.67 11.30 1.32

90-120 36.96 15.16 47.88 L 32.0 0.380 7.80 21.14 11.95 1.30

2. Katyonlar (me/l) Anyonlar (me/l) pH EC


- Cl- SO4=

0.49 0.05 4.23 1.85 0.0 5.03 0.53 1.06 7.3 0.561

4’t

329

Çizelge 3 Sulama Sistemi Özellikleri : PC- Inline- 4/L/h

: 50 cm : Ø 16 PE

: Ø 32 PE : Ø 75 PE

Hidrosiklon : 3” : 120 L

Elek filtre : 3” Çizelge 4.

Çizelge 5.

ANA KONULAR

ALT KONULAR

K4 (1.25)

K3 (1.00)

K2 (0.75)

K1 (0.50)

D1 D1K4 D1K3 D1K2 D1K1 D2 D2K4 D2K3 D2K2 D2K1

I = Qfc-Qc

Qfc = Tarla kapasitesi (mm)

I = A. Ep . K . P

2

I: Parsele uygulanan sulama suyu, mm Ep

.75 ve 0.50)

1xS2 ) (m) : 4x3 : 6

: 3 Parsel ala 2 ) : 216

: 24 : 18

: 432 Toplam alan ( m2 ) : 5184

330

ET= I+P+K-D-R S

timi, mm I: Sulama suyu, mm

IYIWUE

ETYWUE

Ey: Ekonomik verim, Kg/ha I: Sulama suyu, mm

lar ve Gözlemler -

2012- arihleri ile birlikte

6’da

6. er

2012 2013 2014 2015 Budama 01.02.2012 07.02.2013 13.01.2014 07.01.2015

05.03.2012 01.03.2013 01.03.2014 15.03.2015 16.04.2012 13.04.2013 15.04.2014 20.04.2015

10.05.2012 10.05.2013 10.05.2014 10.05.2015 23.05.2012 21.05.2013 23.05.2014 25.05.2015

08.06.2012 08.06.2013 27.05.2014 18.05.2015 17.07.2012 20.07.2013 15.07.2014 20.07.2015

Son Sulama 30.09.2012 29.09.2013 30.09.2014 30.09.2015 15.10.2012 14.10.2013 13.10.2014 15.10.2015

Hasat 15.10.2012 14.10.2013 14.10.2014 15.10.2015 15.11.2012 20.11.2013 20.11.2014 20.11.2015 20.10.2015 15.12.2013 20.12.2014 20.12.2015

331

ve Bitki Su Tüketimleri -60

.

ermektedir. Bu ne lama

8-

- -

7. -2015)

K4 K3 K2 K1

2009 856 271.8 271.8 271.8 271.8 2010 782 415.0 336.8 258.6 180.4 2011 757 403.5 327.8 252.1 176.4 2012 764 417.0 340.6 264.2 187.8 2013 786 430.0 351.4 272.8 194.2 2014 823 455.5 373.2 290.9 208.6 2015 744 410.0 335.6 261.2 186.8

Ortalama 787.4 400.4 333.9 267.4 200.9

8 -2015)

D1 K4 K3 K2 K1 K4 K3 K2 K1

2012 672.4 614.7 542.4 481.6 668.9 606.8 537.8 473.9 2013 814.2 749.7 670.5 602.6 825.6 754.2 677.3 609.7 2014 782.1 721.2 650.4 575.2 775.2 700.8 630.1 571.1 2015 794.6 727.5 661.1 595.0 789.3 723.1 654.9 591.3

Ortalama 765.8 703.3 631.1 563.6 764.8 696.2 625.0 561.5

Ticarette Stan 9 a 1

9.

Boylar g 150-200 65-74 34-25

Orta 201-300 75-84 25-17 301-400 85-94 17-13

iri 401 + 94 + 13 -

332

10’da 11’de ve pazarlanabilir verim

12’d

- --88.

10

Ana Konular

Alt Konular

Ortalama 2012 2013 2014 2015 Kg/da Kg/da Kg/da Kg/da Kg/da

D1

K4 1042 3157 3222 2869 2573 K3 702 3216 3314 2677 2477 K2 867 2415 2428 1936 1912 K1 717 1845 2092 1659 1578

D2

K4 1245 2808 3041 2440 2384 K3 1040 2653 2965 2536 2299 K2 1265 2442 2802 2120 2157 K1 875 2070 1859 1770 1644

11

Ana Konular

Alt Konular

Ortalama 2012 2013 2014 2015 % % % % %

D1

K4 19.6 10.1 10.4 11.6 12.9 K3 16.4 8.4 8.1 11.5 11.1 K2 22.3 9.9 9.1 12.7 13.5 K1 14.6 10.7 10.6 17.4 13.3

D2

K4 21.4 15.9 7.1 13.5 14.5 K3 23.5 13.1 10.9 12.7 15.1 K2 23.1 9.3 10.7 14.8 14.5 K1 22.6 12.3 9.6 17.4 15.5

12

Ana Konular

Alt Konular

Ortalama 2012 2013 2014 2015 % % % % %

D1

K4 80.4 89.9 89.6 88.4 87.1 K3 83.6 91.6 91.9 88.5 88.9 K2 77.7 90.1 90.9 87.3 86.5 K1 85.4 89.3 89.4 82.6 86.7

D2

K4 78.6 84.1 92.9 86.5 85.5 K3 76.5 86.9 89.1 87.3 85.0 K2 76.9 90.7 89.3 85.2 85.5 K1 77.4 87.7 90.4 82.6 85.2

333

-olup Duncan

13

13.

Sulama

2013** 2014** 2015**

Verim Kg/da Duncan grubu Verim

Kg/da Duncan grubu Verim Kg/da Duncan grubu

K4 (1.25) 2982 A 1.grup 3132 A 1.grup 2654 A 1.grup K3 (1.00) 2934 A 3140 A 2606 A K2 (0.75) 2428 B 2.grup 2615 B 2.grup 2028 AB 2.grup K1 (0.50) 1958 C 3.grup 1975 C 3.grup 1715 B 3.grup

e verim

-

14’te 14.

Sulama

2013** 2014** 2015**

Verim Kg/da Duncan grubu Verim

Kg/da Duncan grubu Verim Kg/da Duncan grubu

K4 (1.25) 2601 A 1.grup 2855 A 1.grup

2323 A 1.grup K3 (1.00) 2626 A 2846 A 2295 A K2 (0.75) 2196 B 2.grup 2351 A 1745 AB 2.grup K1 (0.50) 1749 C 3.grup 1773 B 2.grup 1418 B 3.grup

15’te, pazarlanabilir ortalama

m e 16’da -pazarlanabili -

T 17’de 18’de ve p 19’da

334

Çizelge 15

Ana Konular

Alt Konular

Ortalama 2012 2013 2014 2015 g g g g g

D1

K4 412.0 481.4 506.3 552.4 488.0 K3 407.3 465.2 511.4 570.8 488.7 K2 415.7 458.9 477.4 589.0 485.3 K1 404.9 470.2 515.0 557.6 486.9

D2

K4 414.3 478.9 464.8 548.0 476.5 K3 424.6 483.2 489.1 551.4 487.1 K2 417.3 465.3 503.1 539.9 481.4 K1 412.2 480.0 475.0 527.6 473.7

Çizelge 16. P

Ana Konular

Alt Konular

Ortalama 2012 2013 2014 2015 g g g g g

D1

K4 492.1 511.6 549.0 582.0 533.7 K3 467.1 497.4 557.1 600.9 530.6 K2 520.9 494.0 513.7 614.3 535.7 K1 499.4 521.7 556.9 577.5 538.9

D2

K4 509.3 488.4 512.3 585.4 523.9 K3 521.2 534.8 578.2 569.1 550.8 K2 509.5 502.3 604.4 556.5 543.2 K1 523.3 524.6 539.7 526.2 528.5

Çizelge 17

Ana Konular

Alt Konular

Ortalama 2012 2013 2014 2015 adet adet adet adet adet

D1

K4 30.6 79.3 78.5 66.7 63.8 K3 20.9 84.0 80.5 60.2 61.4 K2 24.8 63.8 61.7 41.6 48.0 K1 21.3 47.3 49.3 36.4 38.6

D2

K4 37.6 70.6 79.4 52.7 60.1 K3 29.7 66.9 73.5 56.5 56.7 K2 37.6 63.2 68.0 48.4 54.3 K1 25.3 52.8 46.9 42.3 41.8

335

Çizelge 18. Iskarta

Ana Konular

Alt Konular


D1

K4 10.0 12.2 12.6 9.8 11.2 K3 4.6 11.6 12.2 8.6 9.3 K2 8.8 10.3 9.4 6.9 8.9 K1 6.7 8.9 7.7 7.4 7.7

D2

K4 13.8 12.3 12.5 9.8 12.1 K3 11.0 14.0 16.6 8.6 12.6 K2 14.3 10.1 15.7 8.1 12.1 K1 9.8 10.3 9.3 7.1 9.1

Çizelge 19. P

Ana Konular

Alt Konular


D1

K4 20.6 67.2 65.9 53.8 51.9 K3 16.3 72.4 68.3 50.8 52.0 K2 15.9 53.5 52.3 31.8 38.4 K1 14.6 38.3 41.7 32.8 31.9

D2

K4 23.8 58.3 66.9 45.8 48.7 K3 18.7 52.9 56.9 42.5 42.8 K2 23.3 53.1 52.3 44.8 43.4 K1 15.5 42.5 37.7 37 33.2

-

20 e

Çizelge 20

Sulama

2013** 2014** 2015**

Meyve

adet Duncan grubu

Meyve

adet Duncan grubu

Meyve

adet Duncan grubu

K4 (1.25) 75.0 A 1.grup 79.0 A 1.grup 57.6 A 1.grup K3 (1.00) 75.5 A 80.0 A 56.0 A K2 (0.75) 63.5 B 2.grup 64.8 B 2.grup 43.6 B 2.grup K1 (0.50) 50.1 C 3.grup 48.1 C 3.grup 38.1 B

-2015

336

21

21

Sulama

2013** 2014** 2015**

Meyve

adet Duncan grubu

Meyve

adet Duncan grubu

Meyve

adet Duncan grubu

K4 (1.25) 62.8 A 1.grup 66.4 A 1.grup 47.8 A 1.grup K3 (1.00) 62.7 A 62.6 A 47.4 A K2 (0.75) 53.3 B 2.grup 52.3 B 2.grup 36.1 AB 2.grup K1 (0.50) 40.4 C 3.grup 39.7 C 3.grup 30.9 B 3.grup

22

22

Ana Konular

Alt Konular

IWUE kg/ha/mm

WUE kg/ha/mm Ana

Konular Alt

Konular IWUE

kg/ha/mm WUE

kg/ha/mm

2012

D1

K4 25.0 15.5

2013

D1

K4 73.4 38.8 K3 20.6 11.4 K3 91.5 42.9 K2 32.8 16.0 K2 88.5 36.0 K1 38.2 14.9 K1 95.0 30.6

D2

K4 29.9 18.6

D2

K4 65.3 34.0 K3 30.5 17.1 K3 75.5 35.2 K2 47.9 23.5 K2 89.5 36.1 K1 46.6 18.5 K1 106.6 34.0

2014

D1

K4 74.9 41.2

2015

D1

K4 70.0 36.1 K3 94.3 46.0 K3 79.8 36.8 K2 89.0 37.3 K2 74.1 29.3 K1 107.7 36.4 K1 88.8 27.9

D2

K4 70.7 39.2

D2

K4 59.5 30.9 K3 84.4 42.3 K3 75.6 35.1 K2 102.7 44.5 K2 81.2 32.4 K1 95.7 32.6 K1 94.8 29.9

23’t 2425-26’da

337

n x

23 2

Ana Konular

Alt Konular

Ortalama 2012 2013 2014 2015 cm2 cm2 cm2 cm2

D1

K4 93.75 123.96 154.97 174.43 136.78 K3 88.97 125.82 143.54 178.39 134.18 K2 96.4 116.46 138.75 170.78 130.60 K1 92.77 119.7 142.48 162.33 129.32

D2

K4 80.61 117.22 145.05 181.38 131.07 K3 88.73 119.39 156.36 171.28 133.94 K2 80.25 111.71 138.02 165.57 123.89 K1 85.58 115.92 139.77 160.04 125.33

24 3

Ana Konular

Alt Konular

Ortalama 2012 2013 2014 2015 m3 m3 m3 m3

D1

K4 7.898 9.002 9.532 9.313 8.936 K3 7.802 9.177 9.333 9.168 8.870 K2 7.742 8.601 8.617 8.064 8.256 K1 8.008 8.253 8.407 7.975 8.161

D2

K4 6.661 8.060 9.155 8.730 8.152 K3 6.756 7.583 9.018 8.590 7.987 K2 6.449 7.014 8.112 8.130 7.426 K1 6.588 7.138 8.031 7.701 7.365

25.

2012* (%5) Konular cm2 D1K2 96.403 A 1.grup D1K4 93.75 AB

2.grup D1K1 92.773 AB D1K3 88.967 B

3.grup D2K3 88.727 B D2K1 85.577 C 4.grup D2K4 80.603 D

5.grup D2K2 80.253 D

338

Çizelge 26.

Sulama

2014* 2015**

cm2 Duncan grubu cm2 Duncan grubu

K4 (1,25) 150.01 A 1.grup

177.91 A 1.grup

K3 (1,00) 149.95 A 174.83 A

K2 (0,75) 141.13 AB 2.grup 168.18 AB 2.grup

K1 (0,50) 138.39 B 3.grup 161.19 B 3.grup

27-28 e --

bul

Çizelge 27.

Sulama

2012* 2013* 2014* 2015*

m3 Duncan Grubu m3 Duncan Grubu m3 Duncan Grubu m3 Duncan Grubu

D1 7.862 A 1.grup 8.758 A 1.grup 8.972 A 1.grup 8.63 A 1.grup

D2 6.614 B 2.grup 7.449 B 2.grup 8.579 B 2.grup 8.288 B 2.grup

Çizelge 28.

Sulama

2013* 2014** 2015**

m3 Duncan Grubu m3 Duncan Grubu m3 Duncan Grubu

K4 (1.25) 8.532 A

1.grup

9.344 A 1.grup

9.022 A 1.grup

K3 (1.00) 8.38 A 9.176 A 8.879 A

K2 (0.75) 7.38 A 8.365 B 2.grup

8.097 B 2.grup

K1 (0.50) 7.696 B 2.grup 8.219 B 7.838 B

339

e 29 a e kalite kriterleri

29. Meyve kalite kriterleri

Meyve Kalite Kriterleri

D1 D2

K1 K2 K3 K4 K1 K2 K3 K4

Meyve boyu, mm 88.5 88.4 88.6 85.5 91.7 86.1 88.5 86.2

Meyve eni,mm 100.8 105.0 102.2 101.4 105.4 101.1 103.2 101.3

4.7 4.3 4.5 4.4 4.5 4.2 4.4 4.2

51.3 49.9 50.1 47.5 50.4 51.3 49.4 49.8

41.5 38.8 40.7 40.1 39.9 40.6 40.7 38.6

34.9 35.6 33.7 34.9 36.8 37.2 35.6 34.6

16.7 16.8 16.4 16.7 16.9 16.8 16.7 17.2

pH 3.45 3.43 3.51 3.47 3.48 3.41 3.42 3.45

Titre edilebilir asit,% 1.52 1.62 1.41 1.45 1.47 1.51 1.61 1.54

: Proje 3.

-

:

4.2. Proje Faaliyet Takvimi: 31.12.2015 tarihinde bitirilmesi gerekmektedir. 4.3. Personel:

340

Proje Ba Turun Anabaena sp

Proje No TAGEM/TSKAD/13/A13/P04/10 Proje Lideri Proje Yürütücüsü Kuru Raporun gili Oldu u Dönem 01.01.2015/31.12.2015 Proje Özeti:

mikroorganizmalarda

Anabaena

Anabaena sp.

-Anabaena

, K1 , K2: 1/2 KG + 3 g

alg, K3 : 3g alg, K4 : 1.5 g alg. 1.Ba ca Faaliyetlerin Gerçekle Durumu:

2-

. Anabaena sp

341

Çizelge 1. Turunçgil fidan yeti Anabaena sp

Konular Konu

ort. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Kont. (K0) 2,14 2,66 2,73 2,58 4,19 5,98 5,96 7,30 4,19 C K1 2,14 2,4 3,05 2,93 4,91 7,37 9,51 8,87 5,15 A K2 2,14 2,44 2,39 2,64 3,84 6,26 6,73 7,74 4,27 C K3 2,14 2,32 2,74 2,92 4,21 6,24 7,84 8,16 4,57 B K4 2,14 2,09 2,46 2,42 4,15 6,51 7,01 8,20 4,37 BC Zaman ort. 2,14 F 2,38 F 2,67 E 2,70 E 4,26 D 6,47 C 7,41 B 8,05 A

LSD%1 Ölçüm zam: 0.2589

Konu: 0.2046

K0:Kontrol, K1:Kimyasal gübre K2: ½ Kim.güb+3 g alg K3:3 g alg K4:1,5 g alg

2014; 8: Mart 2015 Turunçgil f Anabaena sp gövde

Çizelge 2. Anabaena sp

Konular Konu

ort. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Kont. (K0) 0,75 1,67 2,52 2,65 3,42 4,46 4,52 5,46 3,18 C K1 0,75 1,85 2,38 2,81 4,11 5,85 7,59 6,66 4,00 A K2 0,75 1,67 1,87 2,05 3,29 4,72 6,48 5,63 3,31 B K3 0,75 1,59 2,04 2,07 3,52 4,54 6,04 5,71 3,28 B K4 0,75 1,59 1,85 1,82 3,45 4,78 5,46 6,02 3,22 B Zaman ort. 0,75 F 1,67 E 2,13 D 2,03 D 3,56 C 4,87 B 5,76 A 5,89 A

LSD%1 Ölçüm zam:0,22

Konu: 0,17

K0:Kontrol, K1:Kimyasal gübre K2: ½ Kim.güb+3 g alg K3:3 g alg K4:1,5 g alg

2014; 8: Mart 2015

Anabaena sp bitki boyu

342

Anabaena spbitki boyu

Konular

Konu ort. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Kont. (K0) 7,5 11,98 18,9 20,15 41,9 57,1 58,3 73,20 36,13 D K1 7,5 11,93 25,83 29,5 54,9 90,8 93,45 101,90 51,98 A K2 7,5 10,15 15,8 19,05 40,55 61,9 63,75 75,10 36,73 CD K3 7,5 12,2 17,45 21,95 36,7 67,9 72,25 84,40 40,04 B K4 7,5 10 15 18,15 44,2 68,55 70,35 86,10 39,98 BC

Zaman ort. 7,50 F 11,25 E 18,56 D 21,76 D 43,65 C 69,25 B 71,62 84,14 A

LSD%1

3.5641 Konu: 2.8177

2014; 8: Mart 2015

Anabaena sp

Anabaena sp

Konular Konu ort. 1 2 3 Kont. (K0) 9,57 9,49 9,23 9,43 B

K1 10,72 12,03 11,57 11,44 A K2 9,11 9,07 8,81 8,99 B K3 9,30 9,96 9,56 9,61 B K4 9,58 9,50 9,09 9,39 B

Zaman ort. 9,65 A 10,01 A 9,65 A LSD%1 0.6837 Konu: 0.8826

K0:Kontrol, K1:Ki

Anabaena sp

343

Anabaena sp

Konular Konu ort. 1 2 3 Kont. (K0) 4,29 3,92 4,21 4,14 CD

K1 5,51 6,05 5,92 5,82 A K2 4,07 4,90 5,20 4,72 B K3 3,17 4,79 4,01 3,99 D K4 3,84 4,91 4,82 4,52 BC

Zaman ort. 4,17 B 4,91 A 4,83 A LSD%1 0.351 Konu: 0.4532

alg

Anabaena sp

bitki boyu

Anabaena sp bitki boyu

Konular

Konu ort. 1 2 3

Kont. (K0) 59,25 61,50 65,02 61,92 B K1 72,79 78,57 87,24 79,53 A K2 68,82 78,65 71,60 73,02 AB K3 55,93 72,38 73,96 67,42 AB K4 62,70 67,73 70,66 67,03 AB

Zaman ort. 63,90 A 71,76 A 73,69 A LSD%1 10.197 Konu: 13.164

Anabaena sp.

-

-

344

Çizelge 7. Tur Anabaena sp. biyogübre -

Konu (cm) (g) (g)

(g) K 0 8,7 A 0,92 A 1,69 A 0,41 A 0,45 A K 1 8,15 A 0,9 A 1,69 A 0,435 A 0,45 A K 2 8,35 A 0,865 A 1,69 A 0,35 A 0,45 A K 3 8,2 A 1,04 A 1,69 A 0,47 A 0,45 A K 4 8,75 A 0,97 A 1,69 A 0,435 A 0,45 A LSD%1 1.3674 0.2463 1.3115 0.1662 0.2851 K0:

Anabaena sp. biyogübre - Çize

b

Anabaena sp. biyogübre -

Konu (cm) (g) (g)

(g) (g)

K 0 27,25 B 26,25 D 9,71 B 26,07 C 9,25 B K 1 26,75 B 76,27 A 34,95 A 64,87 A 25,61 A K 2 25,75 B 26,65 CD 11,68 B 31,19 C 10,99 B K 3 31,00 A 37,08 B 14,44 B 40,86 B 14,12 B K 4 31,63 A 32,81 BC 14,24 B 40,01 B 12,49 B LSD%1 2.4897 6.2598 6.8941 7.2243 6.0935


345


Konu (cm) (g)

(g)

K 0 23,50 AB 61,24 B 30,21 B 115,76 A 48,21 A K 1 27,50 A 128,94 A 71,59 A 125,80 A 52,37 A K 2 25,50 AB 75,33 AB 37,91 B 79,93 A 36,11 A K 3 24,00 AB 75,02 AB 36,53 B 124,51 A 53,42 A K 4 23,00 B 56,10 B 32,51 B 101,43 A 38,38 A LSD%1 4.2289 62.785 28.685 86.168 34.947

anabaena

edilen veriler d

Anabaena

Mineral Madde

Miktar (%)

N (%) 2,3 P (%) 0,03 K (%) 0,73 Ca (%) 3,17 Mg (%) 0,29 Fe ppm 24 Mn ppm ESER Zn ppm 38 Cu ppm 23

%N P (%) Mg (%) Ca(%) K (%) Cu (ppm) Fe (ppm) Zn (ppm) Mn (ppm) K0 1,67 C 0,19 B 0,25 4,17 AB 0,77 C 11,24 B 79,9 14,26 11,13 K1 3,20 A 0,25 B 0,21 3,58 B 1,11 A 5,24 C 79,7 12,28 174,49 K2 2,50 AB 0,23 B 0,21 3,70 AB 0,87 BC 3,61 C 76,3 13,52 34,21 K3 1,79 BC 0,25 B 0,25 4,16 AB 0,96 AB 14,96 A 102,05 14,21 14,56 K4 2,00 BC 0,44 A 0,25 4,52 A 0,95 B 15,10 A 101,55 15,15 8,95 LSD %5 0,7479 1,2188 Ö.d Ö.d 0,14958 3,324 Ö.d Ö.d Ö.d

346


3. Dar zlar:

4. Projede Önerilen iklikler: 4.1. Materyal ve Y tem:

Anabaena . Dr.

4.2. Proje Faaliyet Takvimi: 4.3. Personel:

347

Proje Ba Otu (Conyza

canadensis Proje No TAGEM-BS-14/08-02/04-02(1) Proje Lideri Proje Yürütücüsü Kuru Raporun gili Oldu u Dönem 01.01.2015/31.12.2015 Proje Özeti:

Glyphosat bitkilerde EPSPS (5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase) sentezini engelleyerek aromatik amino asitl

1.Ba ca Faaliyetlerin Gerçekle Durumu:

2. Y a Dü nülen Ara Yay lar: 3. Dar zlar:

4. Projede Önerilen iklikler: 4.1. Materyal ve Yöntem: 4.2. Proje Faaliyet Takvimi: 4.3. Personel:

348

Proje Ba -Ekim Sistemlerinin

Proje No TAGEM/TSKAD/14/A13/P08/ Proje Lideri Proje Yürütücüsü Kuru Raporun gili Oldu u Dönem 01.01.2015/31.12.2015 Proje Özeti:

n tespit edilmesi

-ATAEM-7

nem, porozite, penetrasyon


-7

edi ksinimi,

-30 cm derinlikte

349

4.1. Materyal ve Yöntem: 4.2. Proje Faaliyet Takvimi: Projenin faaliyet ta 4.3. Personel:

350

Proje Ba Domateste Olgunluk Dönemlerinin ve Depolama Sürelerinin Mekanik Zedelenme ve Kalite Parametreleri Üzerine Etkilerinin Belirlenmesi

Proje No TAGEM/TSKAD/14/A13/P08/ Proje Lideri Proje Yürütücüsü Kuru Raporun gili Oldu u Dönem 01.01.2015/31.12.2015 Proje Özeti:

e

kulla


2. Ya

351

4.1. Materyal ve 4.2. Proje Faaliyet Takvimi: 4.3. Personel: Yrd.

352

Proje Ba Yoksulluk Analizi Proje No TAGEM/TEAD/13/A15/P01/04 Proje Lideri Musa KUZGUN Proje Yürütücüsü Kuru Raporun gili Oldu u Dönem 01.01.2015/31.12.2015

Proje Özeti:

Kahraman

:

-

a) Toplam (adet) 1-20 21-50 51-+

Aksu 9 3 3 15 Manavgat 15 3 1 19 Serik 24 6 5 35 Toplam (adet) 48 12 9 69

-

-

353

4.1. Materyal ve Yöntem: 4.2. Proje Faaliyet Takvimi:

4.3. Personel:

354

Proje Ba Yoksulluk Analizi Proje No TAGEM/TEAD/13/A15/P01/03 Proje Lideri M. Proje Yürütücüsü Kuru Raporun gili Oldu u Dönem 01.01.2015/31.12.2015

Proje Özeti:

:

-

-

4.1. Materyal ve 4.2. Proje Faaliyet Takvimi:

proje

4.3. Personel:

SONUÇLANANPROJELER

356

Proje No TAGEM/BBAD/10/A08/P01/01

iVerim ve Kalite Kriterlerine Etkileri

Effects of Different Planting Distances and Training Systems on Plum Yield and Quality Criteria

Kay

Projeyi Destekleyen Kuru

-

Dr. - 01.01.2012/31.12.2015

5.000 TL

Bu

er ve Goble sistemleri

Eld

-

et ve kabuk

Anahtar Kelimeler: Erik, d verim

357

Proje No BBMB-11-33

Evaluation of Performance Oval Kumquat Grafted on Different Citrus Rootstocks in Antalya Conditions

- 01.01.2012/31.12.2015 55.000 TL

:

kleopatra mandarini (Citrus reshni), volkameriana (Citrus volkameriana), flying dragon (Poncirus trifoliata cv. flaying dragon), kaba limon (CitT- -

uyu

Meyve

Anahtar Kelimeler:

358

Proje No TAGEM-BS-11/04-03/01-14

Planococcus citri Risso (Hem., Pseudococcoci Cryptolaemus m i ve Parazitoit Leptomastix dactylopii n

Investigations on Using Possibility of Cryptolaemus montrouzieri and Leptomastix dactylopii Based on Biological Control of Citrus mealybug which Harmful in Pomegranate Orchards of Antalya Province

-2014)

- 01.01.2011/31.12.2015

45.000 TL

-gil Unlubiti Planococcus citri Risso (Hem.,

nin ku

-5 adet

lmesi gereken doz

Anahtar Kelimeler:

359

Proje No TAGEM–BS–10/04–08 / 02-17

iti v

Investigations on Identification of the Fungal Pathogens Causing Wilt and Their Control Possibilities in Pomegranate Cultivation in Antalya Province

- hleri 01.01.2010/31.12.2015 50.000 TL

- kadar sadece

dici

Anahtar Kelimeler: Nar, Antalya , Fusarium solani, Fusarium spp., Fungisit

360

Proje No TAGEM/TBAD/12/PO1/02-001

Adapdation of Cool Season Cereals in West Mediterranean Region

Mustafa SOYSAL

- 01.01.2012/31.12.2015 40.000 TL

Bu

r. Anahtar Kelimeler:

361

Proje No TAGEM/TSKAD/12/A13/P04/9

Etkileri

Fertigation System with Nitrogen Applied in The Washington Navel Orange Effects on Yield and Quality of Different Level

B Proj

- 01.01.2012/31.12.2015 16.600 TL

(0,

-

ro ve mikro element analizleri

rilmesi gereken optimum dozun 715

Anahtar Kelimeler: Azot, Portakal, Damla Sulama, Verim, Kalite

PROJELER

363

Proje No TAGEM/BBAD/12/A08/P02/03 Proje Yürütücüsü

tüsü Projeyi Destekleyen Kurum TAGEM -

– 2012-2017 (I. dilim) Bütçe 125.500 TL Proje Özeti:

364

Proje No TAGEM/BBAD/12/A08/P02/04 Proje Yürütücüsü

Projeyi Destekleyen Kurum TAGEM -

– 2012-2017 (I. dilim) Bütçe 94.000 TL Proje Özeti:

sekt

-1 klonu) ile proje parseli tesi

365

Proje No Proje Yürütücüsü Nuri ARI

itüsü Projeyi Destekleyen Kurum BOREN

- 2013-2016 Bütçe 185.000 TL Proje Özeti:

–

örne

-

lokasyonl

s

haricinde, yapraktan ve toprak+yapraktan uygu

in domates meyve

366

-

Proje No 111 O 128 Proje Yürütücüsü Projenin Yü Projeyi Destekleyen Kurum (1001)

– 15.03.2012/15.03.2015 Bütçe 175.150 Proje Özeti:

nbahar

verilerin son

367

Seleksiyon Proje No 113 O 091 Proje Yürütücüsü Dr. Cengiz ERD

Projeyi Destekleyen Kurum

- 15.06.2013/15.06.2016 Bütçe 479.332 TL Proje Özeti: sorgum genotipi bu projede hem agro-

-ekonomik nedenler mevcut enerji

esi, marjinal alanlarda dahi

-morfoloj -

368

Proje No 113 O 086 Proje Yürütücüsü Proje Projeyi Destekleyen Kurum

- 15/07/2013-15/03/2017 Bütçe 339 580 TL Proje Özeti:

seleksiyonlarla,

Bursa

369

Proje No 112 G 073 Proje Yürütücüsü


- 2013-2017 Bütçe Toplam: 541 902 TL BATEM:31.706 Proje Özeti:

hedefle 1. -

2.

3. 4. 5.

370

Contribution of Olive History for the Management of Soil-Borne Parasites in the Mediterranean Basin (PESTOLIVE)

Proje No Proje Yürütücüsü Atilla ÖCAL Projen Projeyi Destekleyen Kurum AB FP 7 ARIMNET

– 2012-2015 Bütçe Toplam: 575400 €, Proje Özeti:

Helicotylenchus spp., Merlinius spp., Pratylenchoides spp., Rotylenchulus spp., Tylenchorhynchus spp., ve

371

Pro Developing A Pool of Novel and Eco-Efficient Applications of Zeolite for The Agriculture Sector (ECO-ZEO)

Proje No Proje Yürütücüsü Dr. Abdullah ÜNLÜ

Projeyi Destekleyen Kurum AB-FP7

– 01.03.2012/29.02.2016 Bütçe Toplam:2.7 Proje Özeti: ECO-

lde edilmesi,

ktif

372

Rethinking The Links Between Farm Modernization, Rural Development and Resilience in A World of Increasing Demands and Finite Resources (RETHINKING)

Proje No Proje Yürütücüsü Dr. Betül SAYIN

Projeyi Destekleyen Kurum AB-ERANET

– 01.08.2013/01.08.2016 Bütçe 80 000 TL Proje Özeti:

ilme nedeni, burada koyun- -

i

r.

373

Mainstreaming Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Use for Improved Human Nutrition and Wellbeing (NUTRITION PROJECT)

Proje No Proje Yürütücüsü


- 2012-2016 Bütçe Proje Özeti: ko

- Akseki-Korkuteli- -

- – Derebucak- - officinale (Su

- -Tarsus--

syon ve antioksidan analiz

374

Proje Karakterizasyonu Proje No 114 O 039 Proje Yürütücüsü

– 01.05.2014/30.09.2015

Bütçe 55.150 TL Projeyi Destekleyen Kurum Proje Özeti:

0501, Umc 12412, Umc 1336, Umc 1422, Umc 1653, Umc 1656, Umc 2227, Umc 2255, Umc 2262, Umc

375

Proje No 214 O 003-214 O 004 Proje Yürütücüsü

– 01.04.2015/01.04.2018

Bütçe 977.636,23 TL Projeyi Destekleyen Kurum Proje Özeti:

tlerinin

-

da test edilecektir.

376

Responses of European Forests and Society to Invasive Pathogens (RESIPATH)

Proje No Proje Yürütücüsü

– hi 2014-2017

Bütçe 201.000 TL Projeyi Destekleyen Kurum Proje Özeti: Erysiphe alphitoides

Ophiostoma novo-Senirkent), Den

ha

lokasyonda (Isparta-Korusunda

P. cinnamomi

377

Botrytis cinerea umunun ve Genetik

Proje No 113 O 882 Proje Yürütücüsü

– 15.01.2014/15.01.2016

Bütçe 181.050 TL Projeyi Destekleyen Kurum

Proje Özeti: Biber (Capsicum annnum

n

- -

378

Yerli Mandarin, Antalya Yerli Yuvarlak Limon Bireyleri Limon ve Mandarin Ç Genetik Fve ISSR elirlenmesi

Proje No 114 O 881 Proje Yürütücüsü Gö

- 15.11.2014/15.04.2016

Bütçe 60.000 TL Projeyi Destekleyen Kurum Proje Özeti:

nedenle bitk

Antalya Yerli Yuvarlak Limon genotipine

sonucunda genel olarak

ant Antalya Yerli Yuvarlak

-3 ve 1-6 genotipleri olarak

379

Mersin (Myrtus communis Lle Elde Edil

Proje No 114 O 878 Proje Yürütücüsü Ramazan TOKER

- 01.01.2015/31.12.2017

Bütçe 57.000 TL Projeyi Destekleyen Kurum Proje Özeti: Mersin (Myrtus communis

etkil

de bozulan

gelir

380

Proje No 214 O 066 Proje Yürütücüsü Dr.

- 01.01.2015/31.12.2017

Bütçe 145.000 TL Projeyi Destekleyen Kurum Proje Özeti: -

toplanan yonca (Medicago sativa L.) gen -3190-D1-

nda, Antalya lokasyonunda -2014 ve Isparta lokasyonunda ise Mart-

sentetik-

381

Proje No 214 O 679 Proje Yürütücüsü

- 01.05.015/01.03.2017

Bütçe 43.150 TL Projeyi Destekleyen Kurum -3001 Proje Özeti:

nedeniyle yerel populas-

Toplanan materyal Antalya ili Aksu lokasyonunda 1 y

kimyasal metodlarla tayin edilecektir.

383

Domateste Bakteriyel Kanser ve Solgunluk (Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis

Proje No TAGEM/ 12 / AR-GE /005

Personeli

Proje Yürütücüsü

Projeyi Destekleyen Kurum TAGEM/AR-GE – 2012-2015

Bütçe 143.180 TL

38.000 TL

Clavibacter michiganensis subsp.michiganensis (Smith) (Cmm

Solanumpimpinellifolium, Solanum hirsutum ve Solanum peruvianum Bu

Dr. Sjaak van Heusden Lycopersicon esculentum BATEM (

384

Ori

Proje No

Personeli Fatma UYSAL

Proje Yürütücüsü Prof. Dr. Mehmet ARSLAN

Projeyi Destekleyen Kurum – 2012-2015

Bütçe 216.500 TL

-

lokasy

lokasyonunda

se %3.90 ile Syriacum x Onites

Yalova lokasyonu-terpinen, -terpinene, sabinene, borneol, trans sabinene

Mi

385

Proje No

Personeli Dr.

Proje Yürütücüsü

BATEM


– 2012-2016 Bütçe 42.000 TL

-

386

Proje No

Personeli Dr.

Proje Yürütücüsü TAGEM


Bütçe 2013: 675.000 TL 2014: 620.000 TL 2015: 600.000 TL 2016: 555.000 TL 2017:550.000 TL

2007-

-

387

Proje No 114 O3 80

BATEM Personeli

. Dr. Keziban YAZICI

Projeyi Destekleyen Kurum - 2014-2017

148.638.17 TL

-

(Punica granatum olarak bilinmekle bi

-50

bu durum meyve

nikleri

388

Phaseolus vulgaris

Belirlenmesi Proje No

BATEM Personeli

Projeyi Destekleyen Kurum - 01.01.2014-31.12.2016

49.983 TL -

:

teryali

a)

b) c)

d) Toplanan genotiplerin e)

389

(TYLCV) Real Time PCR le Testlenmesi

Proje No

BATEM Personeli Dr. Emine TOPUZ

Projeyi Destekleyen Kurum - 13.10.2014/13.10.2016

49.790 TL

-

Real-

391

4.1.YÜKSEK L

-J

Proje No 2014.02.0121.024

Personeli

Proje Da

Projeyi Destekleyen Kurum -BATEM – 2013-2015

14.999 TL

:

Origanum minutiflorum (kekik), Eugenia caryophyllus (karanfil), Eucalyptus camaldulensis (okaliptus) ve Cymbopogon citratus

-sineol etken ma az Kromatografisi- -MS) ve Gaz Kromatografisi (GC-FID), Rezonans Spektroskopisi (1H-NMR) ve Fourier Transform Infrared Spektroskopisi (FTIR) ile karakterize edil -jel ve dondurarak

ektron Mikroskobu (SEM), FTIR, (TGA) ve 29Si-NMR Analizi ile

-

- i olarak kolloidal silika (Ludox 40)

gam:jelatin:sukroz (1:1: Origanum minutiflorum Eugenia caryophyllus

camaldulensis - -jel - -77.76

- --

verimi % 16.27-

392

Pomolojik Karakterizasyonu Proje No Tez Yürütücüsü BATEM Personeli

Prof. Dr. Fatma KOYUNCU

Projeyi Destekleyen Kurum -BATEM – 2015 – 2017

Bütçe 4990,15 TL

Proje Özeti:

bulunan normal portakallardan Belladonna, Biondo, Biondo Riccio, Calabrese, Mediterranean Sweet, Parson

Vaccaro, Maltaise douce, Sanguigno Semplice, Sanguinello, Ovaletto Sanguigno, Navelli Kan, Moro

meyvelerde p

belirlenecektir.

393

4.2.DOKTORA

Medicago sativa L.)

Proje No 3190-D1-12 Tez Yürütücüsü BATEM Personeli

P Prof.Dr. Sebahattin ALBAYRAK Projeyi Destekleyen Kurum -BATEM

– 2012-2015 Bütçe 15.000 TL

Proje Özeti:

rak

genotiplerinin ilkb-1, Alanya-1, Aksu-2, Kepez-1, Kemer-1, Finike-2, Demre- -

- -101.28 cm

-1 ve 69.66 adet ile Kemer--1 populasyonu olurke

--1 ve 176.40 ile Alanya-

949.50 g ile Gazipa - --16.27

-1, Alanya-1, Aksu-1, Aksu-2, Kepez- - -1, Kemer-1, Kumluca-2, Finike-1, Finike-2, Demre-1, Demre- -

- -39.45 ve -

analiz sonucunda Aksu-2 ve Finike- -1 ve Kumluca-

olan

-1, Alanya-1, Aksu-1, Aksu-2, Kepez- -1, Kemer-1, Finike-2, Demre- -

394

Arachis hypogaea L.) Tohum ve

Proje No Tez Yürütücüsü BATEM Personeli


Bütçe 25.000 TL Proje Özeti:

Kor koleksiyo

-morfolojik ve kalite karakterizasyonu

395

Salvia fruticosa

re Sahip Genotiplerin Belirlenmesi

Proje No 201103021009 Tez Yürütücüsü BATEM Personeli Fatma UYSAL

Prof. Dr. Kenan TURGUT

Projeyi Destekleyen Kurum -BATEM – rihi 2011-2014

Bütçe Proje Özeti (Salvia fruticosa

Salvia fruticosa

bitki boyu (cm), (adet), (kg/da), kuru herba verimi (kg/da), verimi (kg/da), kuru yaprak verimi (kg/da), r -herba verimi 1303.59- -

- -herba verimi 1357.933- -

-1603.21, 341.26--

-sineol, kafur ve karyofillen - -

ise 2.68-

396

Eriolobus trilobatus (Labill. ex Poiret)




belirt

397

Hibrit Biber (Capsicum annuum




-

(Marker Assisted Selection-

-

-- -kapya-

-Elde edilen F2 populasy

-

esi

398

Fortune Mandarininde Mutasyon Yoluyla Alternaria alternata f.sp.citri



Bütçe 24.996 TL Proje Özeti: Alternaria alternata

399

l Analizlerle

Proje No Tez Yürütücüsü BATEM Personeli Zeynep ERYILMAZ


Bütçe 24.941,68 TL Proje Özeti: Tropik ve sub

-6.

nedenle

analizi

2016 ANTALYA

Documents

Transcript of 2016 ANTALYA