1 2 3 4 Change made: “The Joint Land Use Study was undertaken in ...

Comment Sheet for DRAFT JLUS Report, Camp Williams JLUS October 2012

1

# Name Concerns/Comments JLUS Document

Location Response Action Taken

Comment Number

Your name (Last name and initial of person commenting)

Your comment. Be as specific as possible. If information presented within the text, table or figure is incorrect, please provide correct information or a source to contact for the information. If you have more comments than lines provided below, just click Table | Insert | Rows Above (or Rows Below) on the menu in Microsoft Word.

Provide information on the location of your comment in the document. Chapter number Page number Table or Figure

number Paragraph on page

Please leave this column blank.

Please leave this column blank.

1 DeLuca, R. Provide table showing all acronyms/abbreviations used throughout the document and what they stand for.

Beginning pages (will adjust this upon completion of final revisions).

Change made Added an acronyms listing to the beginning of the report.

2 B. Armstrong Bryce Armstrong should be listed as an alternate on the Policy Committee

Acknowledgments page

Change to Alternate

Change made: “Utah County (Alternate)”

3 McNulty J. Remove reference to “alternate” next to City of Saratoga Springs under Technical Committee

Acknowledgments Remove “Alternate”

Change made: “City of Saratoga Springs (Alternate)”

4 Upshaw, H. Remove “the” from the following – The Joint Land Use Study was undertaken in an effort to guide planning and development in local governments surrounding “the” Camp Williams.

under JLUS Project Overview

Change as suggested

Change made: “The Joint Land Use Study was undertaken in an effort to guide planning and development in local governments surrounding the Camp Williams.”

5 Upshaw, H. Remove this duplicate sentence – Joint planning efforts on the part of the local governments and Camp Williams.

Page 1 under JLUS Project Overview

Remove sentence

Change made: “Joint planning efforts on the part of the local governments and Camp Williams.”

6 Upshaw, H. Remove “the” from the following – Joint planning efforts on the part of the local governments and “the” Camp Williams……

Page 1 under JLUS Project Overview

Change as suggested

Change made: “Joint planning efforts on the part of the local governments and the Camp Williams will establish recommended strategies that will


2



equally protect all interested parties.”

7 Fuellenbach “Camp Williams is the primary Utah National Guard training site for the Utah National Guard Troops…”

pg. 1, JLUS Project Overview, para. 1

Change as suggested

Change made: “Camp Williams is the primary Utah National Guard training site for Utah National Guard troops, and is used as supplemental training space for Fort Bragg troops.”

8 Erler, E. Add “(California)” after “Fort Bragg”. .

Ch. 1, Pg. 1, “JLUS Project Overview” section, paragraph 1

Add “(California)” Change made: “Camp Williams is the primary Utah National Guard training site for Utah National Guard troops, and is used as supplemental training space for Fort Bragg (California) troops.”

9 Fuellenbach “…used as supplemental training space for Fort Bragg troops.” Why Fort Bragg?


See Comment 8 See Comment 8

10 Erler, E. Delete penultimate sentence, which is repeated in final sentence.



11 Erler, E. Delete “the” before “Camp Williams in last sentence. Ch. 1, Pg. 1, “JLUS Project Overview” section, paragraph 1


12 Fuellenbach “Joint planning efforts on the part of the local governments and Camp Williams.” Duplicate



13 Fuellenbach “Joint planning efforts on the part of the local governments and the Camp Williams will establish….”



14 McNulty J. In the middle of the first column, the highlighted section that begins “One of the recommendations…” I do not understand this.

Page 1 of JLUS Project Overview

This is meant to say that there will be a strategy to

Change made: “One of the key recommendations is for the formation


3



develop an Implementation Team that will meet to oversee implementing the strategies from the JLUS. Suggest adding “key” before recommendations

of a JLUS Implementation Team that will be responsible for overseeing the progress on implementation in the months and years after the JLUS is completed.”

15 Erler, E. At end of paragraph, mention separate Camp Williams Background Report, which details the development of each strategy and other supporting information.


Add suggested text

Text added: “Additionally, a Background Report was prepared in conjunction with the JLUS that details the compatibility issues and process that went into the development of the strategies.”

16 Erler, E. Modify 2nd sentence to: “They also seek to address public health, safety, and welfare, and protection of quality of life in the areas surrounding Camp Williams.”


Change as suggested

Changes made: “They also seek to address public health, safety, and welfare, and safety and protection of quality of life in the areas surrounding Camp Williams.”

17 Erler, E. Spell out first use of UTARNG in report. Ch. 1, Pg. 1, “Why Do a JLUS?” section, paragraph 2

Chance as suggested

Change made: “The Federal mission is enforced by the President of the United States (U.S.) requiring the Utah Army National Guard (UTARNG) to provide well-equipped and well-trained military units to support the U.S. government in times of war and national emergencies.”

18 Upshaw, H. First sentence doesn’t make sense, should it be….In addition to being a critical Utah State “National” Guard training facility?

Page 1 under Economic Benefit to

Change “Nation” to “National”

Change made: “In addition to being a critical Utah State National Guard


4



the Region training facility…”

19 Erler, E. 1st sentence: delete “State” in “Utah State National Guard”. Ch. 1, Pg. 1, “Economic benefit to the Region?” section, paragraph 1

Change as suggested

Change made: “In addition to being a critical Utah State National Guard training facility…”

20 Erler, E. In two places, change “FY11” to FY2011”. Ch. 1, Pg. 1, “Economic benefit to the Region?” section, paragraph 1

Change made. Spelled out fiscal year first time

Change made: “In fiscal year 2011 (FY11), Camp Williams employed a total of 2,385 personnel, 148 of which are non-military positions.”

21 Erler, E. Penultimate sentence: add “housing” to “this housing revenue is directly distributed into the local economies.”

Ch. 1, Pg. 1, “Economic benefit to the Region?” section, paragraph 1

Change made. Change made: “In addition, military and civilian personnel who are not in-training or transient-status must reside off-base; therefore, thise revenue associated with housing and the purchase of goods and services is directly distributed into the local economies.”

22 McNulty J. Under Economic Benefit to the Region, the first sentence has a reference to National Guard, but it says “Nation Guard”



23 Erler, E. Make chart smaller and wording larger to fit chart at bottom of page 1, where the chart is discussed. Revise text at end of page 1 about this chart.

Ch. 1, Pg. 2, top Modified text at the end of this page.

This $57.3 million impact is broken into three categories: federal construction at $2.5 million, federal contracts procured at $42.5 million, and annual payroll at $12.5 million (see chart on next page). Adjusted size of chart and font of chart, but due to report layout, it fits on the following page best.

24 McNulty J. Last sentence of the page “The primary objectives of the Camp Williams JLUS are the following” should end in a colon not


Change the period to a colon

Change made: “The primary objectives of the Camp Williams JLUS are the


5



period following:.”

25 Erler, E. Change period (.) at end of sentence to colon (:). Ch. 1, Pg. 2, “JLUS Goal and Objectives” section, paragraph 2


26 Fuellenbach Machine Gun?? We refer to this fire as the Herriman Fire. pg. 2, Community Support, para. 3

Change “Machine Gun” to “Herriman”

Change made: “For example, the 211th Aviation Battalion assisted the Unified Fire Authority and Utah Forestry, Fire and State Lands in fighting the Machine GunHerriman Fire in 2010.”

27 Erler, E. 1st sentence: delete “Utah Army National Guard” and parentheses around “UTARNG” in “both community and Utah Army National Guard (UTARNG) perspectives and needs.”

Ch. 1, Pg. 3, “Understanding” section

Change as suggested

Change made: “Convene community and military representatives to identify, confirm, and understand the issues in an open forum, taking into consideration both community and Utah Army National Guard (UTARNG) perspectives and needs. This includes public awareness, education, and input organized in a cohesive outreach program.”

28 Erler, E. 3rd bullet: delete “other” in “other landholding and regulatory federal agencies”; replace comma (,) with semi-colon (;) in “landowner and realty associations; and other special”.

Ch. 1, Pg. 3, “JLUS Partners” section

Change as suggested

Changes made: “Other partner agencies and organizations, such as local, regional, and state planning, regulatory, and land management agencies; other landholding and regulatory federal agencies; landowner and realty associations;, and other special interest groups (including local educational institutions and school districts).”


6



29 Erler, E. Clarify text in parentheses: “(see Figure 1 Camp Williams JLUS Study Area map, page 5, for the location of each community):”.

Ch. 1, Pg. 3, “Local Communities” section

Change as suggested

Change made: “see the Camp Williams JLUS Study Area mapFigure 1, on page 5 for the location of each community”

30 Erler, E. List communities in alphabetical order. Ch. 1, Pg. 3, “Local Communities” section

Change as suggested

Change made: • “Salt Lake County • Bluffdale City • Cedar Fort Town • Eagle Mountain City • Herriman City • Lehi City • Salt Lake County • Saratoga Springs • Utah County • Cedar Fort Town • Eagle Mountain City”

31 Erler, E. Modify last sentence to: “A complete listing of the affiliated stakeholder groups that played a vital role in the development of the Camp Williams JLUS are follows:” [i.e. the complete listing . . . follows].

Ch. 1, Pg. 4, “Other Agency” section, 1st paragraph

Change as suggested

Change made: “A complete listing of the affiliated stakeholder groups that played a vital role in the development of the Camp Williams JLUS arefollows:”

32 Erler, E. Add “and its members are listed in the Acknowledgments section, page __” to the end of each committee description.

Ch. 1, Pg. 4, “JLUS Committees” section

Change made. Policy Committee (PC). This committee was responsible for leading the direction of the JLUS; its members are listed in the Acknowledgments section of this report. Technical Committee (TC). The TC identified and addressed technical issues, provided feedback on report development, and assisted in the development and evaluation of implementation strategies. The TC members are listed in the Acknowledgments section of this report.


7



33 Erler, E. Delete “and” in :Salt Lake City, and is situated to the west”. Ch. 2, Pg. 5, “Project Study Area” section, 1st paragraph

Change as suggested

Change made: “Camp Williams is located in north central Utah, 26 miles south of Salt Lake City, and is situated to the west of Interstate 15 (I-15) and straddles the boundaries of Salt Lake and Utah Counties.”

34 Erler, E. Figure 1 does not show Study Area boundary even though the text mentions “a 2.0- to 3.5-mile area”

Ch. 2, Pg. 5, “Project Study Area” section

No change made. The study area is reflected by the figures in the report as being the entire area within each figure. Each figure represents the same extent that graphically represents the JLUS study area. A legend item is not needed in the figures.

35 Erler, E. Add “and” between list of cities and list of counties for “Saratoga Springs, and the counties of Salt Lake”.

Ch. 2, Pg. 5, “Project Study Area” section, 3rd paragraph

Change as suggested

Change made: “Jurisdictions within the Study Area are the cities of Bluffdale, Eagle Mountain, Herriman, Lehi, and Saratoga Springs, and the counties of Salt Lake and Utah.”

36 Erler, E. 1st sentence: Add “Utah” to “Air National Guard” for “UTARNG and Utah Air National Guard”.

Ch. 2, Pg. 6, “Camp Williams” section, 1st paragraph

Change as suggested

Change made: “Camp Williams provides training facilities for the UTARNG Utah Army National Guard and Utah Air National Guard, U.S. Army and Army Reserve, U.S. Marine Corps and Marine Corps Reserve, U.S. Air Force and U.S. Air Force Reserve, and the Reserve Officers Training Corps.”

37 Erler, E. 2nd sentence: change “commonly” to “frequently” or “regularly” or “routinely”.

Ch. 2, Pg. 6, “Camp Williams” section, 1st paragraph

Change as suggested

Change made: “Camp Williams is also an important training site for local law enforcement agencies and is commonly frequently used by youth groups.”


8



38 Fuellenbach Change UTARNG to Utah Army National Guard Pg. 6, Camp Williams, para. 1

Change as suggested

Change made: “Camp Williams provides training facilities for the UTARNG Utah Army National Guard and Air National Guard, U.S. Army and Army Reserve, U.S. Marine Corps and Marine Corps Reserve, U.S. Air Force and U.S. Air Force Reserve, and the Reserve Officers Training Corps.”

39 Fuellenbach Change 25,000 acres to 24,000 acres Pg. 6, Camp Williams, para. 1

Change made after verified 24,000 acres is correct.

With over 245,000 acres, Camp Williams is one of the largest training facilities for the National Guard in the western U.S. Also changed 28,000 to 24,000 in Chapter 2, Page 2-6 in the Background Report.

40 Fuellenbach Change Basic Airborne to basic airborne

Pg. 6, Camp Williams, para. 2

Change as suggested

Change made: “Camp Williams offers a wide variety of training environments to soldiers, airmen, and marines, such as small arms training, artillery firing and maneuvering, Bbasic Aairborne, demolitions training, land navigation, and helicopter maneuvering.” Also made change in Background Report, Chapter 2, pg. 2-6

41 Fuellenbach “…jump master refresher courses, military academic courses…”

Pg. 6, Camp Williams, para. 3

Change as suggested

Change made: “…jump master refresher courses, military academic courses…” Also made change in Background Report, Chapter 2, pg. 2-7

42 Erler, E. Penultimate sentence: Change “a” to “per” in “approximately 50 Ch. 2, Pg. 6, “Camp Change as Change made: “Training occurs year-round,


9



weekends per year”. Williams” section, 4th paragraph

suggested approximately 50 weekends a per year and 10 to 12 annual training periods of up to 14 days each.”

43 Erler, E. Penultimate sentence: “45 percent or more” conflicts with growth information of 260% on page 2 in “Compatibility Concerns” section

Ch. 2, Pg. 6, “Local Jurisdictions” section

Change made. Removed “45 percent or more sentence” as it is not needed in the paragraph.

44 Erler, E. Last sentence: Add “greatest” or “largest” to describe the “percent change” for “In Salt Lake County, the largest percent change in population was seen in Herriman, which was 999.9%.”

Ch. 2, Pg. 6, “Study Area Growth Trends” section, 2nd paragraph

Change as suggested

Change made: “In Salt Lake County, the greatest percent change in population was seen in Herriman, which was 999.9%.”

45 Upshaw, H. Missing the word “tools” Page 7 – Item 3 Add “tools” Change made: “Evaluation of existing tools”

46 Mumford S Missing word on 3) Evaluation of Existing… (Tools). Top left – pg. 7 See Comment 45 See Comment 45

47 Erler, E. Start of new chapter – there is no heading in the text or font to indicate the start of a new chapter, as was done for Ch. 1-2. Perhaps the 1st sentence has a heading: “Assessment Process” in the same font as for Ch. 1-2.

Ch. 3, Pg. 7 Add header Header added: “Assessment Process”

48 Erler, E. 1st sentence: Delete “the following” in “JLUS included the following three steps”

Ch. 2, Pg. 7,1st paragraph

Change as suggested

Change made: “The development of the Camp Williams JLUS included the following three steps”

49 Erler, E. 3rd bullet: Add “tools” to “Evaluation of existing tools”. Ch. 2, Pg. 7,1st paragraph


50 Erler, E. No. 1 inside solid circle for “Study Area ID” is difficult to ready when printed; make number thicker to make it legible. Do same for No. 2 “Issue ID” and No. 3 “Evaluation”.

Ch. 3, Pg. 7, “Study Area” section

Formatting change made.

Formatting adjusted for all numbers surrounded by shaded circles.

51 Erler, E. Last sentence: Delete “information on” in “Information was also Ch. 3, Pg. 7, “Study Change as Change made: “This includes general and


10



collected relevant to current growth trends and information on current development applications.”

Area” section, 3rd paragraph

suggested specific plans, zoning regulations, and applicable ordinances / codes. Information was also collected relevant to current growth trends and information on current development applications.”

52 Erler, E. 1st sentence: Change “For” to “From” and add “and” in “From Camp Williams, information was collected concerning current and planned facilities, training areas, and operations.”

Ch. 3, Pg. 7, “Study Area” section, 5th paragraph

Change as suggested

Change made: “For From Camp Williams, information was collected concerning current and planned facilities, training areas, and operations.”

53 Erler, E. 2nd sentence is incomplete and seems to be missing a word. Ch. 3, Pg. 7, “Study Area” section, 5th paragraph

Remove “by” Change made: “This information covered by quantifiable use as well as geographic locations for these items.”

54 Erler, E. Add an introductory sentence between “Issue Identification” and “Issues” about how a criterion of compatibility was used to identify JLUS issues. Then, proceed into “Issues”.

Ch. 3, Pg. 7, “Issue Identification” section

Change made. Moved the subheading of “Issues” between the second and third paragraphs of this section.

55 Erler, E. 1st bullet: Capitalize “it” in “Is It a Current Impact?”; add period (.) at end of bullet.

Ch. 3, Pg. 7, “Setting Priorities” section

Make suggested changes

Changes made: “Is iIt a Current Impact? Each issue was considered based on its current impact to the compatibility of either Camp Williams or the surrounding areas. Issues posing the most extensive operational constraints or community concerns constitute the highest priority.”

56 Erler, E. 1st bullet, 2nd sentence: Delete 2nd part of sentence, which repeats first part of sentence: “Issues occurring near the installation are often more critical than those occurring remotely or in areas more distant from operational activities.”

Ch. 3, Pg. 7, “Setting Priorities” section

Change as suggested

Change made: “Issues occurring near the installation are often more critical than those occurring remotely or in areas more distant from operational


11



activities.”

57 Mumford S The timelines (2013 or 2014, 2017, 2023) for each priority don’t seem consistent with many of the actual timelines shown in the recommended plan tables.

Pg. 8 & recommended plan

Change made. Changes made to reflect consistency, and timeframe for 10 years or (2023) was deleted as no strategies are projected to take that long to accomplish.

58 Erler, E. Last sentence: Change “was” to “were” in Issues were considered based no their future potential using the same criteria that were established for current impact.”

Ch. 3, Pg. 8, “Potential Impact” section

Change as suggested

Change made: “Issues were considered based on their future potential using the same criteria that was were established for current impact.”

59 Erler, E. Start of new chapter – there is no heading in the text or font to indicate the start of a new chapter, as was done for Ch. 1-2. Perhaps the 1st sentence has a heading: “Compatibility Factors” in the same font as for Ch. 1-2.

Ch. 4, Pg. 9 Add header Header added: “Compatibility Factors”

60 Upshaw, H. During this process, the committees and public also identified a range of individual “issues” statements under each factor. Remove the (s) on issues

Page 9 – First Paragraph

Change as suggested

Change made: “During this process, the committees and public also identified a range of individual issues statements under each factor.”

61 Erler, E. 2nd sentence: Delete “s” from “issues” in “During this process, the committees and public also identified a range of individual issues statements under each factor.”

Ch. 4, Pg. 9, 1st paragraph


62 Erler, E. 1st sentence is mushy; proposed revision: “Infrastructure Extensions represent three similar issues for Camp Williams according to their location.”

Ch. 4, Pg. 9, “Infrastructure Extensions” section

Change made. Infrastructure Extensions represent compatibility issues for Camp Williams based onaccording to their proposed or planned location.

63 Erler, E. Penultimate sentence needs clarification: “The result of infrastructure extensions tends to encourage and increase development in the surrounding communities.”

Ch. 4, Pg. 9, “Infrastructure Extensions” section

Change as suggested

Change made: “The result of infrastructure extensions tends to encourage and increase development in the surrounding communities.”


12



64 Erler, E. 2nd sentence: Add “annually” to “Camp Williams annually experiences several instances of public trespassing”.

Ch. 4, Pg. 9, “Public Tresspassing” section

Change as suggested

Change made: “Camp Williams annually experiences several instances of public trespassing due to the lack of an adequate perimeter fence around the entire installation, as well as the geography that occurs in the area.”

65 Erler, E. Should there be a slash between “Anti-Terrorism” and “Force Protection” since there is a slash in “AT/FP”?

Ch. 4, Pg. 10, “Anti-Terrorism” section

Yes, change as suggested

Change made: “Anti-Terrorism / Force Protection”

66 Erler, E. 2nd sentence: Add “in Salt Lake and Utah Counties” to Dust and smoke is not only a nuisance relative to visibility, but it is also an issue for the State of Utah as it relates to air quality in Salt Lake and Utah Counties.”

Ch. 4, Pg. 10, “Dust and Smoke” section

Change as suggested

Change made: “Dust and smoke is not only a nuisance relative to visibility, but it is also an issue for the State of Utah as it relates to air quality in Salt Lake and Utah Counties.”

67 Erler, E. 1st sentence: reverse order of “both” and “for” to “structures that impede navigable airspace for both military and civilian aircraft operations.”

Ch. 4, Pg. 10, “Vertical Obstructions” section

Change as suggested

Change made: “Vertical Obstructions are structures that impede navigable airspace both for both military and civilian aircraft operations.”

68 Erler, E. Last sentence: Add “into” to “concerns relative to structures that trespass into navigable airspace.”

Ch. 4, Pg. 10, “Vertical Obstructions” section

Change made. Change made: “It is important to ensure the communities adjacent to Camp Williams plan accordingly to safeguard against unintended safety concerns relative to structures that trespass intoobstruct navigable airspace.”

69 Erler, E. Last sentence: Add “that can degrade the effectiveness of night vision devices” to “produces ambient urban sky glow that can degrade the effectiveness of night vision devices.”

Ch. 4, Pg. 11, “Light and Glare” section

Change as suggested

Change made: “New commercial development can employ unshielded, or non-cutoff lighting, whichthat produces ambient urban sky glow; thatis can degrade the effectiveness of night vision devices.”


13



70 Erler, E. 3rd sentence: Clarify by adding “, located on Camp Williams” to “Currently, there are two wind turbine facilities in the study area, located on Camp Williams.”

Ch. 4, Pg. 11, “Alternative Energy” section

Change as suggested

Change made: “Currently, there are two wind turbine facilities in the study area, located on Camp Williams.”

71 D. Sakaguchi Threatened & Endangered Sspecies—To avoid confusion about the eagle nest on Camp Williams, the sentence should be modified a follows: “. . .known designated golden eagle’s nest. . .”

p. 12, top right column, 1st paragraph

Change as suggested

Change made: “There is a known designated golden eagle’s nest on the installation to which training is off-limits.”

72 Erler, E. Last sentence: add “s” to “habitat” at end of sentence. Ch. 4, Pg. 12, “T and E Species” section

Change as suggested

Change made: “In addition, Camp Williams and the adjacent communities must collaborate in natural events, such as wildland fires, to ensure the survival of species and their habitats.”

73 Erler, E. Start of new chapter – there is no heading in the text or font to indicate the start of a new chapter, as was done for Ch. 1-2. Perhaps the 1st sentence has a heading: “Implementation Plan” in the same font as for Ch. 1-2.

Ch. 5, Pg. 13 Add header Header added: “Implementation Plan”

74 Erler, E. 1st sentence: Change “Utah Army National Guard” to “UTARNG”

Ch. 5, Pg. 13, 1st paragraph

Change as suggested

Change made: “This section identifies and organizes the recommended courses of action (strategies) that have been developed through a collaborative effort between representatives of applicable local jurisdictions, the Utah Army National GuardUTARNG, state and federal agencies, local organizations, the general public and other stakeholders that own or manage land or resources in the region.”

75 Erler, E. 3rd bullet, 1st sentence: Modify wording to “Similar to other planning processes that include numerous stakeholders, the

Ch. 5, Pg. 13, “Implementation Plan

Change as suggested

Change made: “Similar to other planning processes that include numerous


14



challenge is to create a solution or strategy that meets the needs of all parties is challenging.”

Guidelines” section stakeholders, the challenge is to create a solution or strategy that meets the needs of all parties is challenging.”

76 Erler, E. Move this “How to Read the Implementation Plan” section to follow the “Compatibilty Areas” section and to immediately precede the “JLUS Strategies” section that starts on page 21 to make this key easier to find when reading the “JLUS Strategies” tables.

Ch. 5, Pg. 13, “How to Read the Implementation Plan” section

Change made. The section on How to Read the Implementation Plan has been moved to follow Figure 7 the Land Use MCA and precede the JLUS Strategies Table.

77 Erler, E. List of codes: Move “Disc” into its correct alphabetical location. Ch. 5, Pg. 14, “Type of Strategy” section

Change as suggested

Change made: • “Acq – Acquisition • CIP – Capital Improvement

Program • Comm – Communication and

Coordination • Disc – Real Estate Disclosures • Hab – Habitat Conservation

Tools • Leg – Legislative Tools • MOU – Memorandum of

Understanding • MCA – Military Compatibility

Area • Plans – Comprehensive /

General / Master / Hazard / Airport Plans

• Disc – Real Estate Disclosures • Zon – Zoning Ordinance /

Subdivision Regulations”

78 Upshaw, H. Provide Page Number on the Strategy Summaries by Jurisdiction (in the table)

-51 Change made. Added page numbers for those pages that did not include page numbers.


15



79 Upshaw, H. only spelled wrong “onlly” Page 14, Under MCA box

Change made Jpeg corrected.

80 Erler, E. 2nd sentence: Revise wording to “This is followed by the complete strategy statement that describes states the action needed.”

Ch. 5, Pg. 14, “Strategy” section

Change as suggested

Change made: “This is followed by the complete strategy statement that states describes the action needed.”

81 Erler, E. 2013, 2014: change “I” to “I” in “Year identified for strategy”. Ch. 5, Pg. 15, “Timeframe” section

Change as suggested

Change made: “Year Iidentified for strategy completion”

82 Erler, E. List of acronyms: Show in alphabetical order by acronym. Ch. 5, Pg. 15, “Responsible Party” section

Change as suggested

Change made: “UTARNG Utah Army National Guard

BLM Bureau of Land Management

DNR Utah Department of Natural Resources

FFSL Utah Division of Forestry, Fire and State Lands

MAG Mountainland Association of Governments

UDOT Utah Department of Transportation

FFSL Utah Division of Forestry, Fire and State Lands

DNR Utah Department of Natural Resources

SITLA State Institutional Trust Lands


16



Administration

UDOT Utah Department of Transportation

UTARNG Utah Army National Guard

UFA Unified Fire Authority”

83 Erler, E. List of acronyms: UDOT and UFA are not used in table’s columns – delete from this list.

Ch. 5, Pg. 15, “Responsible Party” section

UDOT and UFA are used in the table; however, these two agencies only had a couple strategies where they are the primary party responsible for implementation. Therefore, we reflected that below the strategy as opposed to creating another row for them. Deleted rows that do not pertain to table.

Change made: “UFA Unified Fire Authority”

84 Erler, E. 1st sentence: add “s” for “The MCAOD and MCA’s are used to define the geographic areas where the JLUS strategies are to be applied.”

Ch. 5, Pg. 15, “Compatibility Areas” section, 2nd paragraph

Change as suggested

Change made: “The MCAOD and MCA’s are used to define the geographic areas where the JLUS strategies are to be applied.”


17



85 Erler, E. Bullet #4: change “the” to “an” in “Promote an awareness of the size and scope ....”

Ch. 5, Pg. 16 Change as suggested

Change made: “Promote the an awareness of the size and scope of military training areas to protect areas separate from the actual military installation (i.e., critical air space) used for training purposes.”

86 Erler, E. Bullet #5: Change spelling by adding “n” to “navigation”. Ch. 5, Pg. 16 Avigation easements is the correct terminology

No change made

87 Erler, E. Last sentence: add comma (,) to “Implementation Plan are listed below, and shown and described on the following pages.”

Ch. 5, Pg. 16 Change as suggested

Change made: “The four MCAs used in the Camp Williams JLUS Implementation Plan are listed below, and shown and described on the following pages.”

88 Mumford S Figure 3 MCAOD – the overlay district extends across SR73 for a small curved area and also leaves out a very small section on the north side of SR73. Maybe the north one should be filled in and the south one should be cut off at the road? The Land Use MCA cuts off at the road, maybe we should be consistent.

Pg. 16, figure 3 Change made. Figures corrected for consistency in the MCAOD and Aviation Safety, and Land Use MCAs.

89 Mumford S The Safety MCA – As I commented in a previous version, I really think this should be called something else, like the Flight MCA, or the Flight Safety MCA, since it is specific to the rotary-wing flight operations. If people read ‘Safety MCA” they will think that it refers to artillery or gun ranges that may have safety concerns for residents within that area. It is a little deceiving. The more clarity the better.

Pg. 19 Change made. Renamed “Aviation Safety MCA”.

90 McNulty J. Second column under Land Use MCA Subzone A, sentence that reads “Strategies for this area include a development density of not more than one dwelling unit per acre”, this seems very low. Two units per acre would be better.

Page 20 of Recommended Plan

Change made. Strategies for this area recommendinclude a development density of not more than one dwelling unit per acre, but no more than two dwelling units per acre.


18



91 McNulty J. Land Use MCA Subzone B, “This subzone area is designated to be a transitional area where higher densities / intensities than allowed in Subzone A may be considered.” Such as perhaps up to 6 units per acre?

Page 20 of Recommended Plan

Change made. Allowable densities would be one to six dwelling units per acre except where the Aviation Safety MCA overlays the Land Use MCA subzone. Where this occurs, the recommended density is one to two dwelling units per acre.

92 Erler, E. Are there any guidelines for density in this subzone? Perhaps add a comment that density is greater than 1 du/acre but less than the community’s regular density(s) on lands outside the 1-mile zone.

Ch. 5, Pg. 20, “Land Use MCA Subzone B” section

Change made, added densities.

Allowable densities would be one to six dwelling units per acre except where the Aviation Safety MCA overlays the Land Use MCA subzone. Where this occurs, the recommended density is one to two dwelling units per acre.

93 R. Allen The formatting of the columns varies between some pages. It should be uniform throughout the Table.

Pg. 21-40 – Table 1 Comment noted. Formatting checked and corrected.

94 Erler, E. Responsible Party: Change “DNR/FFSL” to “State of Utah” to include all agencies mentioned in the “Responsible Party” discussion on page 15.

Ch. 5, Pg. 21, Table 1.

These agencies are most affected by the strategies developed through this JLUS planning process. Other relevant State agencies have been identified at the end of the pertinent strategy.

No change made.

95 Erler, E. Responsible Party: What is the difference between “Camp Williams” and “UTARNG”? Clarify this difference, perhaps in the “Responsible Party” discussion on page 15.

Ch. 5, Pg. 21, Table 1.

Change made on page 15.

UTARNG Utah Army National Guard, the agency that provides oversight and administers the budget to all national guard units in the State of Utah.

96 R. Allen 1E-1A MAG is not listed as a primary participant. (Solid Square) It is not listed at the end of the document under MAG.

Pg. 21 Change made. Revised all parties relative to responsibility level for this strategy.

97 Erler, E. “MOA” is not defined in list of strategy types on page 14; “MOU” is defined but not used for this issue.

Ch. 5, Pg. 21, Table 1, Issue IE-1A

Change made. Added MOA to list of Type of Strategy found on page 14.


19



98 Erler, E. The strategy is for Camp Williams; should an MOA be with Camp Williams, not UTARNG?

Ch. 5, Pg. 21, Table 1, Issue IE-1A

Change made, corrected.

Deleted box from UTARNG.

99 Erler, E. Include UDOT as a responsible party (in text or table). Ch. 5, Pg. 21, Table 1, Issue IE-1A

Add UDOT as a primary agency

Change made: “Ptimary Agency: UDOT”

100 Erler, E. Issue IE-1B is omitted from table. Ch. 5, Pg. 21, Table 1, Issue IE-1B

No strategies have been omitted; this just needs to be re-lettered.

Strategies for Infrastructure Extensions have been re-lettered.

101 Erler, E. Delete “s” from “CIPs” for consistency. Ch. 5, Pg. 21, Table 1, Issue IE-1C

Change as suggested

Change made: “CIPs” Also made the same change for Strategy NV-1H

102 Erler, E. Does “Overhead Power Lines” include local service lines as well as regional distribution lines? Clarify.

Ch. 5, Pg. 21, Table 1, Issue IE-1C

Change made. Encourage Proposed Overhead Power Utility and Service Lines To Be Located Within Existing Utility Corridors.

103 Erler, E. Eagle Mountain has its electrical utility service; current rules require local service lines to be buried, but rules can change, so mention of Eagle Mountain along with Rocky Mtn Power.

Ch. 5, Pg. 21, Table 1, Issue IE-1C

No change made. Eagle Mountain is identified as a responsible party with the solid square in the table.

104 Erler, E. Last sentence: Delete “and” in “JLUS guidelines and to encourage future extensions”.

Ch. 5, Pg. 21, Table 1, Issue IE-1D

Change as suggested

Change made: “Update the service plans in accordance with the JLUS compatibility guidelines and to encourage future extensions in established corridors.”

105 Erler, E. Place “High Priority Issues and Strategies” at top of each page so that reader is reminded of that page’s priority level.

Ch. 5, Pg. 22 to 29. Change made. Formatting and Typesetting added and adjusted.

106 Erler, E. Type of Strategy is “MOU” while Strategy text refers to “MOA”, which is confusing.

Ch. 5, Pg. 22, Table 1, Issue IC-1A

Change made MOUMOA

107 Erler, E. Change “Utah National Guard” to “UTARNG”. Ch. 5, Pg. 22, Table 1, Issue IC-1A

Change as suggested

Change made: “Utilize the existing MOA (between the Utah National GuardUTARNG and the Utah


20



Department of Natural Resources) as a model to execute MOAs with local jurisdictions surrounding Camp Williams to enhance coordination for fire suppression and mitigate hazardous fuels.”

108 Upshaw, H. “United” Fire Authority – should be “Unified” Page 22, IC-1D IC-1E, Page 36, SA-2F

Change as suggested

Change made: “Other agencies: United Unified Fire Authority” Also changed all other occurrences in the document.

109 Erler, E. Last sentence: Add “s” to “edition” in “TV stations to air special editions on Fire Management Awareness”.

Ch. 5, Pg. 22, Table 1, Issue IC-1E

Change as suggested

Change made: “Work with local TV stations to air special editions on Fire Management Awareness during wildland fire season.”

110 Upshaw, H. “swamps” should be “swaps” Page 23, IC-2A Change as suggested

Change made: “Continue to resolve impediments to execute land transfers or conduct land swamps with SITLA and BLM in order to eliminate non-federal lands within the installation boundaries.”

111 D. Sakaguchi typo—“land swamps” should be ‘land swaps’ or ‘land trades’ p. 23, IC-2A See Comment 110

See Comment 110

112 Erler, E. Move definitions of “ACUB” and “REPI” into this issue from issues “LU-1D”, “LU-1E” and “LU-2B” on page 25.

Ch. 5, Pg. 23, Table 1, Issue IC-2B

Change as suggested

Change made to IC-2B: “Leverage Army Compatible Use Buffer (ACUB) And Readiness and Environmental Protection Initiative (REPI) Funds To Acquire Easements Of Non-Federal Lands That Are High Priority To Preserving The Mission


21



At Camp Williams.”

Change made to LU-1D: “Identify lands that meet the criteria to compete for Readiness and Environmental Protection Initiative (REPI) program funds to purchase land or establish easements from local landowners.”

Change made to LU-2B: “Pursue conservation partnering opportunities utilizing Readiness Environmental Protection Initiative (REPI) and the Army Compatible Use Buffer (ACUB) program.”

113 Erler, E. 1st sentence: Add “Or Ownership” to “Leverage ACUB And REPI Funds To Acquire Easements Or Ownership Of Non-Federal Lands That are High Priority”

Ch. 5, Pg. 23, Table 1, Issue IC-2B

Change made. ACUB and REPI funds are not used to acquire ownership. Instead, these funds are used to acquire land management rights to said land.

Change made: “Leverage Army Compatible Use Buffer (ACUB) And Readiness and Environmental Protection Initiative (REPI) Funds To Acquire Easements Or Ownership Of Non-Federal Lands That Are High Priority To Preserving The Mission At Camp Williams.”

114 Mumford S Grammer – “Invite a Camp Williams’ (should be no apostrophe) Representative to server (remove the “er”) as an ex-officio…

Pg. 23 – IC-3B Change as suggested

Changes made: “Invite A Camp Williams’ Representative To Server As An Ex-Officio Member Of The Jurisdiction Planning Commission.”

115 Mumford S IC-3C – should this strategy be changed to 2013 instead of 14? It shouldn’t be hard to incorporate Camp Williams as a review

Pg23 Change to 2013 Change made: “20134”


22



agency for applications.

116 Upshaw, H. “Server” should be “Serve” Page 23, IC-3B Page 41, IC-3B Page 42, IC-3B Page 43, IC-3B Page 44, IC-3B Page 45, IC-3B Page 46, IC-3B Page 47, IC-3B Page 48, IC-3B

Make changes to each page.

See Comment 114. Changes made to all pages identified.

117 Erler, E. 2nd sentence: Delete “s” from “conferences” in “newspaper, television, and press conferences protocols to increase”

Ch. 5, Pg. 24, Table 1, Issue IC-4A

Change as suggested

Change made: “Review and enhance existing website, newspaper, television, and press conferences protocols to increase public knowledge in advance of major training / live-fire exercises.”

118 McNulty J. For Rows IC-4A, IC-4B and IC-4C, shouldn’t cities be included too?

Page 24 Recommended Plan

Change made. Partner agency boxes are reflective of the involvement efforts of the cities as a partner to Camp Williams once Camp Williams provides the information to the respective cities.

Added partner agency “un-shaded box” to table for Strategy IC-4A.

119 Erler, E. Post public-education material on Camp Williams’ website. Ch. 5, Pg. 24, Table 1, Issue IC-4B

Add text saying that materials could be available on

Text added: “Public education materials cshould be made available on the Camp Williams website.”


23



website

120 Erler, E. Should geographic area be expanded from MCA to Study Area?

Ch. 5, Pg. 24, Table 1, Issue IC-4C

Change made. MCAStudy Area

121 Erler, E. Strategy sentence: For consistency, add commas (,) in “public health, safety, and welfare.”

Ch. 5, Pg. 24, Table 1, Issue LU-1

Change as suggested

Change made: “The jurisdiction’s future land use designations around Camp Williams may be incompatible with Camp Williams’ missions and thus may not protect the public health, safety, and welfare.”

122 McNulty J. Under Land Use LU-1A, not sure this can be completed in 12 months. (by 2013)

Page 24, Recommended Plan

Change made. Changed year to 2014.

123 Erler, E. Add “jurisdiction’s” in two places: “Update and adopt the jurisdiction’s future land use map” and The jurisdiction’s General Plan should be updated on a regular basis”.

Ch. 5, Pg. 24, Table 1, Issue LU-1B

Change as suggested

Change made: “Update and adopt the jurisdiction’s future land use map, specifically within the MCA, and supportive goals, objectives, and policies that encourage a compatible land use pattern for appropriate capital improvement investments. Include Camp Williams as one of the stakeholders in the development of the plan. The jurisdiction’s General Plan should be updated on a regular basis.”

124 Erler, E. 2nd sentence: Delete extra words in “Include all jurisdictions within the study area as one of the stakeholders in the development of the plan.”

Ch. 5, Pg. 25, Table 1, Issue LU-1C

Change as suggested

Change made: “Include all jurisdictions within the study area as one of the stakeholders in the development of the plan.”

125 Erler, E. Area: Change the area to “MCA” from “Land Use”. Ch. 5, Pg. 25, Table No change made Acquire Lands That Would Provide An Additional


24



1, Issue LU-1D to geographic location, strategy phrasing changed.

Buffer Between Camp Williams And The Community To Promote Compatible Development. Identify lands that meet the criteria to compete for Readiness and Environmental Protection Initiative (REPI) program funds to purchase land or establish easements from local landowners or consider fee simple purchase.

126 Erler, E. 2nd sentence: Use abbreviation for “REPI” and delete “Readiness and Environmental Protection Initiative”, which was defined in Issue “1C-2B” on page 23.

Ch. 5, Pg. 25, Table 1, Issue LU-1D

Change as suggested

Change made: “Identify lands that meet the criteria to compete for Readiness and Environmental Protection Initiative (REPI) program funds to purchase land or establish easements from local landowners.”

127 Paula Hill The response from Rob Smith, our CFO, is that school districts need to inform Camp Williams personnel as well as city officials when school locations are sought and acquired. In relation to this, ASD should inform Camp Williams of the current efforts to acquire property for the new elementary school. At our last meeting with the City, we discussed location, but nothing has been finalized, and there may be other property in consideration as well. However, the site will be on property on the Camp Williams side of Eagle Mountain. Please give me direction for informing Camp Williams of current plans.

Pg. 25 The JLUS process has identified the need of the school districts to coordinate on proposed / planned schools in the area. This has been identified in Strategy LU-2E. The MOU referred to in Strategy IC-3C should incorporate the school districts too.

No action taken, other than provided guidance in response cell to the left.

128 Erler, E. 1st sentence: Keep ACUB definition here as this wording needs Ch. 5, Pg. 25, Table Comment noted No change made


25



to stand on its own elsewhere in the reports. 1, Issue LU-1E

129 Erler, E. 2nd sentence: Delete definitions and add “s” in “utilizing Readiness Environmental Protection Initiative (REPI) and the Army Compatible Use Buffer (ACUB) programs.”


Change as suggested

Change made: “Pursue conservation partnering opportunities utilizing Readiness Environmental Protection Initiative (REPI) and the Army Compatible Use Buffer (ACUB) programs.”

130 Erler, E. Other agencies: Following SITLA, add “and local jurisdictions (to identify private landowners)”.


Change made. Added , Private landowners

131 Erler, E. 2nd sentence: add clarification to “other jurisdictions may want to consider an APO as a mechanism to provide”.

Ch. 5, Pg. 25, Table 1, Issue LU-2C

Change as suggested

Change made: “Using the City of Eagle Mountain’s APO as an example, other jurisdictions may want to consider an APO as a mechanism to provide a compatible land use around Camp Williams.”

132 Erler, E. Box in BLM column should be on same line as Camp Williams box under Responsible Party columns.

Ch. 5, Pg. 25, Table 1, Issue LU-2D

Change as suggested

Change made

133 Erler, E. Need year in Timeframe column; use 2013. Ch. 5, Pg. 26, Table 1, Issue LU-2E

Add timeframe Timeframe added: “2013”

134 Upshaw, H. “Schools” should be “school” Page 26, LU-2E Change as suggested

Change made: “Schools Districts should coordinate and consult with Camp Williams prior to identifying future school sites.”

135 Erler, E. Title/1st sentence is unclear: Update something, perhaps “study” or “location of 65 dB noise contour”.

Ch. 5, Pg. 26, Table 1, Issue NV-1A

Change made. Update tThe Intensity And Frequency Of Military Generated Noise in the data gathered and collected. Conduct a comprehensive acoustic and vibration study of training / firing / maneuver / detonation activities to identify current noise contours (65 dB and higher in 5 dB increments) and identify areas off installation impacted by noise levels in


26



excess of 65 dB that contribute to the creation of a 65 dB noise contour that extends to off installation lands.

136 Erler, E. Should this strategy also apply to new construction? Or, does “NV-1C” adequately cover new construction?

Ch. 5, Pg. 26, Table 1, Issue NV-1B

Change made. Impulse NoiseMCA

137 Erler, E. 2nd sentence: For consistency, add “Impulse” to “within the Impulse Noise MCA subzone.”

Ch. 5, Pg. 26, Table 1, Issue NV-1D

Change as suggested

Change made: “Inform key sensitive users (i.e., school districts, religious institutions, contractors, etc.) relative to locational, site design, and construction standards within the Impulse Noise MCA subzone.”

138 Upshaw, H. “locational” should be “location” , NV-1D Change as suggested

Change made: “Inform key sensitive users (i.e., school districts, religious institutions, contractors, etc.) relative to locational, site design, and construction standards within the Noise MCA subzone.”

139 Erler, E. Does this apply only to the Impulse Noise MCA or the whole MCAOD?

Ch. 5, Pg. 27, Table 1, Issue NV-1E

Change made. Amend / Prepare Supportive Design Guidance and Standards. For new construction, Rreview and amend existing design guidelines and construction standards to maintain appropriate interior noise thresholds 45 dB.

140 Erler, E. Add an open box for Legislature as a Responsible Party. Ch. 5, Pg. 27, Table 1, Issue NV-1E

Add as suggested

Change made: Opened box added to Legislature

141 McNulty J LU-2F, change “require” to “consider”. I am not sure this can be done in 12 months


Change made. Year completed changed from 2013 to 2014. The word ‘require’ has remained.

142 Mumford S NV-1B and NV-1F seem very similar, and should probably be Pg 26 & 27 Change made. NV-1B was deleted.


27



combined or else one should be removed. They are repetitive.

143 McNulty J NV-1F, change “require” to “recommend” and change Timeframe to 2014

Recommended Plan

Change made. Recommend and Amend Local Jurisdiction to Require Develop Sound Attenuation Building Standards For New Construction. Amend city and county building codes to require sound attenuation for new construction of noise sensitive land uses located in Impulse Noise and Safety MCA subzones. Structures shall be required permitted to be designed and constructed so as to limit their interior noise level to no greater than 45 dBLdn.

144 Erler, E. 2nd sentence: Change “45 Ldn” to “45 dB” to match strategies NV-1B and NV-1C of page 26.

Ch. 5, Pg. 27, Table 1, Issue NV-1F

Change as suggested

Change made: “45 LdndB”

145 Erler, E. 1st sentence: Clarify by modifying to “Develop A Voluntary Sound Attenuation Program For Retrofitting Residential Uses Retrofit Program.”

Ch. 5, Pg. 27, Table 1, Issue NV-1G

Change made. Develop A Voluntary Sound Attenuation Retrofit Program For Residential Uses Retrofit Program.

146 McNulty J NV-1G, Impulse, Noise and Safety, should each city really be required to do this? Elected officials may not agree.


It will be up to each individual jurisdiction as to whether they implement the strategy (there is no formal requirement), but they are shown as included parties for the purposes of the recommendation

No change made.

147 Erler, E. “FAA” is not defined; this is the first use of “FAA”. Ch. 5, Pg. 27, Table 1, Issue NV-1H

Add definition for FAA

Change made: “Leverage The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Noise Abatement Program.”


28



Also made change to Salt Lake County strategies, on pg. 48

148 Erler, E. 2nd sentence: Modify to “additional assistance and resources for noise abatement in the area around those airports.”

Ch. 5, Pg. 27, Table 1, Issue NV-1H

Change as suggested

Change made: “Consider leveraging the FAA Noise Abatement program for civilian airports in the area to provide some additional assistance and resources for noise abatement in the areaaround those airports.”

149 Erler, E. Add Utah County as a Responsible Party to include the private civilian airports in Eagle Mountain; I’m not sure which Dep’t of Airports covers the Utah County airports for FAA.

Ch. 5, Pg. 27, Table 1, Issue NV-1H

Add Utah County Change made: Closed box added for Utah County, and Strategy NV-1H was added to the Utah County strategy table on page 49

150 Erler, E. 1st sentence: Add dash (-) to “Fly Neighbor-Friendly” for consistency.


Change as suggested

Change made: “Enforce And Inform About The “Fly Neighbor- Friendly” Protocol.” Also made changes to Camp Williams (pg. 49) and UTARNG (pg. 50) primary strategies

151 Erler, E. Add Utah County as a Responsible Party. Ch. 5, Pg. 27, Table 1, Issue NV-2A

Add Utah County Change made: Opened box added for Utah County

152 D. Sakaguchi SA-1—Establish Wildfire Overlay District This should be a required real estate disclosure, similar to NV-IE (page 27), should be done for Wildfire Overlay District (WOD)

p. 27 or 35 Need more information to address?

153 McNulty J NV-3A, In most cities after 10pm and not before 7 am for quiet hours

Recommended Plan

No change made. Camp Williams must train a certain number of hours per year in order to accomplish their mission. Camp Williams is already constrained with wildfire season, so the extra hours allow Camp Williams to perform the number of hours to satisfy the training requirement.


29



154 Erler, E. Delete three “s” and add two commas (,): “Ground Training Missions From The Improvised Explosive DeviseIED Defeat Course Generates Off-Base Noise And Vibration Impacts. Military training activities, such as navigation training by the Readiness Training Institute (RTI), use of the Improvised Explosive Device IED Defeat Course, and vehicle use, creates noise and vibration that travels off-installation.

Ch. 5, Pg. 28, Table 1, Issue NV-3

Change as suggested

Changes made: “Ground Training Missions From The Improvised Explosive DeviseIED Defeat Course Generates Off-Base Noise And Vibration Impacts. Military training activities, such as navigation training by the Readiness Training Institute (RTI), use of the Improvised Explosive DeviceIED Defeat Course, and vehicle use, creates noise and vibration that travels off-installation.”

155 Erler, E. IED is defined on page 15 under “Light and Glare Issues”. Ch. 5, Pg. 28, Table 1, Issue NV-3

Change “Improvised Explosive Device” to “IED”

Change made: See Comment 154

156 Erler, E. 2nd sentence: Replace “to” with “and” in “IED course use between the hours of 6 am to and 11 pm”.


Change as suggested

Change made: “. Schedule artillery, live-fire, helicopter flights, and IED course use between the hours of 6 am to and 11 pm, whenever feasible.”

157 Erler, E. Modify wording for clarity: “perimeter passes (prior to or at the conclusion of mission training and within the boundary fenceine) around the installation”.

Ch. 5, Pg. 28, Table 1, Issue PT-1B

Change as suggested

Change made: “Utilize surveillance drones and consider scheduling additional flight time by UTARNG aviators to conduct partial or complete perimeter passes (prior to or at the conclusion of mission training and within the fence lineboundary) around the installation during typical day and night missions and report any suspected trespass activity.”


30



158 Erler, E. Issue PT-1 notes that there is an incomplete boundary fence. Ch. 5, Pg. 28, Table 1, Issue PT-1B

Change “fence line” to “boundary”

Change made: See Comment 157

159 Erler, E. Change “State National guard” to “UTARNG” Ch. 5, Pg. 28, Table 1, Issue PT-1C

Change as suggested

Change made: “In partnership with the State National GuardUTARNG, construct a physical fence barrier along the installation perimeter where the risk of trespassing is high, considering major wildlife corridors.”

160 Erler, E. Modify end of sentence to” “trespassing is high, while taking considering major wildlife corridors into consideration.”

Ch. 5, Pg. 28, Table 1, Issue PT-1C

Change as suggested

Change made: “In partnership with the State National GuardUTARNG, construct a physical fence barrier along the installation perimeter where the risk of trespassing is high, considering while taking major wildlife corridors into consideration.”

161 McNulty J PT-1D, Not sure if cities will agree. Taxes, police depts. More Page 28 Recommended Plan

It will be up to each individual jurisdiction as to whether they implement the strategy (there will be no formal requirement), but they are shown as included parties for the purposes of inter-agency coordination and involvement in implementing the

No change made


31



strategy.

162 McNulty J AT-1A and AT-1B, May put too much burden on local police. Who will pay for this?


Funding for strategies that are chosen to move forward with implementation will be identified during the implementation phase.

No change made

163 Erler, E. Responsible Party: add UTARNG as an open box. Ch. 5, Pg. 29, Table 1, Issue PT-1F

Change made. Add UTARNG. Opened box added for UTARNG

164 Erler, E. “AT-FP” is not defined anywhere in document. Ch. 5, Pg. 29, Table 2, Issue AT-1B

Change “AT-FP” to “AT / FP”

Change made throughout document.

165 Erler, E. What “non-governmental funding” would be available? Should this be “local governmental funding”?

Ch. 5, Pg. 29, Table 2, Issue AT-1B

Change made. Leverage Local Funds For Interagency AT / FP Training. Utilize local law enforcement and non- government organization funding to provide multi-agency AT / FP training to surrounding law enforcement agencies.

166 Erler, E. Place “Medium Priority Issues and Strategies” at top of each page so that reader is reminded of that page’s priority level.

Ch. 5, Pg. 30 - 32, Table 2


Text added on all tables beginning on a new page. Formatting adjusted.

167 Erler, E. 2nd sentence is confusing; suggested revision: “ Utilize, incorporate, and budget for the AT-FP unified facilities criteria using DoD minimum standards for construction of installation perimeter fence, considering with appropriate stand-off distances.”

Ch. 5, Pg. 30, Table 2, Issue AT-1C

Change as suggested

Change made: “Utilize, incorporate, and budget for the AT / -FP unified facilities criteria using DoD minimum standards for construction of installation perimeter fence, considering with appropriate stand-off distances.”


32



168 Erler, E. 2nd sentence: Modify wording to “Frequent travel on unpaved roads, the use of the IED Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Lane, and urban wildland fires generate dust and smoke on Camp Williams and surrounding lands, that create creating nuisances for sensitive uses and air quality concerns.”

Ch. 5, Pg. 30, Table 2, Issue DS-1

Make first suggested change, but not the second.

Change made: “Activities. Frequent travel on unpaved roads, the use of the Improvised Explosive DeviceIED Defeat Lane, and urban wildland fires generate dust and smoke on Camp Williams and surrounding lands that create nuisances for sensitive uses and air quality concerns.”

169 Erler, E. IED is defined on page 15 under “Light and Glare Issues”. Ch. 5, Pg. 30, Table 2, Issue DS-1

See Comment 168

See Comment 168

170 Erler, E. 2nd sentence: Modify wording to “to include ensure best management practices are utilized and to incorporates the strategic directions of the integrated wildfire management plan.”

Ch. 5, Pg. 30, Table 2, Issue DS-1B

Change as suggested

Change made: “…Camp Williams should consider updating their 2003 Fugitive Dust Plan to ensure include best management practices are utilized and to incorporates the strategic directions of the integrated wildfire management plan.”

171 Erler, E. Identify local jurisdictions and UTARNG with open boxes as Responsible Parties.

Ch. 5, Pg. 30, Table 2, Issue DS-1C

Change made. Added open box to UTARNG and jurisdictions.

172 Erler, E. 2nd sentence: Modify wording to “to enable military comment and feedback on pertinent transportation plans and expansions.”

Ch. 5. Pg. 31, Table 2, Issue RC-1B

Change as suggested

Change made: “Establish an MOU that invites a Camp Williams representative to participate as a stakeholder to enable military comment and feedback on pertinent transportation plans and expansions.”

173 R. Allen RC-1B This is a bit of a duplication of the above comment but MAG should be involved in transportation planning coordination.

Pg. 31 MAG is listed as a primary party for

No change


33



implementation

174 Erler, E. 2nd sentence: Add comma and modify wording to “and wind turbines, within the helicopter flight corridors and could . . . the safety of the public and the military pilots personnel.”

Ch. 5. Pg. 31, Table 2, Issue VO-1

Modify sentence Change made: “The presence of tall structures, such as telecommunication towers, transmission lines, and wind turbines, may pose a vertical obstruction, such as telecommunication towers, transmission lines, and wind turbines within the helicopter flight corridors and could increase the potential for collisions, endangering the safety of the public and the military pilotspersonnel.”

175 Erler, E. 1st sentence: Add word to “Restrict Obstacle Height”. Ch. 5. Pg. 31, Table 2, Issue VO-1B

Change made, re-phrased strategy

Discourage Placement of Tall Structures within Safety Flight CorridorsRestrict Height To No More Than 200 Feet Within The Safety MCA. TheDiscourage t placement of cell towers, above-ground electrical transmission lines, wind turbines, and other structures with heights exceeding 200 feet within the Aviation Safety MCA should be located in an area that does not obstruct FAA airspace. Other Agenciesy: Rocky Mountain Power, SITLA

176 Erler, E. 3rd sentence: Modify wording to “Other Agencies”. Ch. 5. Pg. 31, Table 2, Issue VO-1B

Change as suggested

Change made: “Other Agenciesy: Rocky Mountain Power, SITLA”

177 Mumford S VO-1B and VO-1D seem like the same strategy as well. Repetitive. Combine them or delete one.

Pg 31 Change made. Restrict Height To No More Than 200 Feet Within The Safety MCADiscourage Placement of Tall Structures within Safety Flight Corridors. Discourage tThe placement of cell towers, above-ground electrical transmission lines, wind turbines, and other structures with heights exceeding 200 feet within the Safety MCA should be located in an area


34



that does not obstruct FAA airspace. Other AgencyAgencies: Rocky Mountain Power, SITLA Amend Zoning Code To Include Height Restrictions Within The Safety MCA Subzone. Height restrictions should be amended to not exceed 200 feet and should comply with Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 77 to ensure unobstructed airspace.

178 Erler, E Place “Low Priority Issues and Strategies” at top of each page so that reader is reminded of that page’s priority level.

Ch. 5. Pg. 32, Table 3



179 Erler, E. 2nd sentence: Add a space between “airports within a” and “15-mile radius surrounding Camp Williams.”

Ch. 5. Pg. 32, Table 3, Issue CL-1

Change as suggested

Change made: “There exist numerous improved and unimproved public and private use airports within a 15-mile radius surrounding Camp Williams.”

180 Erler, E. Should “Airport 18” be called Salt Lake City No. 2 Airport or is this the name of the private airstrip between Jake Garn and Cedar Valley airports?

Ch. 5. Pg. 32, Table 3, Issue CL-1A

No change made. Number 18 Airport is located just South of Salt Lake City No. 2 Airport. (See Figure 2-12 in the Background Report for geographic location in the regional context and page 2-37 in the Background Report for facility description).

181 Erler, E. 2nd sentence: Change “National Guard” to “UTARNG”. Ch. 5. Pg. 33, Table 3, Issue CL-2

Change as suggested

Change made: “The arrival and departure routes for commercial aviation traffic to / from Salt Lake City International Airport (SLCIA) extend above the National GuardUTARNG rotary-wing traffic transiting above Camp Williams.”

182 Erler, E. Does this committee include the FAA and commercial aircraft? Clarify that in this Strategy.

Ch. 5. Pg. 33, Table 3, Issue CL-2B

Change made. Establish A Military-Community Airport / Airspace Advisory Committee. Creating a military


35



community partnership including FAA representation to discuss airspace and other operational capabilities will help reduce conflicts between military and civilian aircraft and training activities.

183 Erler, E. 1st sentence: Add words to “Specific Business And Employment Types Of Frequencies Can Attract” to clarify.

Ch. 5. Pg. 33, Table 3, Issue FC-1

Change made. However, this issue is talking about available bandwidth, not frequencies.

Specific Business And Employment Types Can Attract And Expand Utilization Of Bandwidth Utilized Used By The Military. The Utah Data Center (UDC) is expected to serve as a catalyst for other primary and supportive research and development entities within the surrounding area as well as the resulting increase in population that utilizes such frequencies.

184 Erler, E. The wording used in this issue needs some clarification and/or expansion so that the layman understands enough to realize the importance of the issue; otherwise, the issue will be ignored by the stakeholders.

Ch. 5. Pg. 33, Table 3, Issue FC-1 and FC-1A

Change made. Monitor Radio FrequencyBandwidth Capacity To Prevent Frequency EncroachmentDisruption of Military / Civilian Operations. Work together to monitor existing bandwidth use and establish procedures for identifying major future users that could utilize substantial available capacity.

185 Mumford S LG-1A – dark sky ordinance. Should this really wait until 2017? I guess it is not a high priority, but it is a fairly easy one. It is also very similar to LG-1B. I feel like some of these are just repetitive so that there are more strategies. It isn’t a bad thing to combine or reduce the total number of strategies. The less there are, the more likely the cities are to actually implement them. Too many just seems overwhelming.

Pg 34 Changes made. Changed 2017 to 2014. And, deleted LG-1B.

186 Erler, E. Spelling: “Wideband” in 1st sentence and “wide band” in 2nd sentence.

Ch. 5. Pg. 33, Table 3, Issue FI-1

Change “wide band” to “wideband”

Change made: “The presence and potential increase of wide band usage and development of substation, overhead electrical and other vertical structures may interrupt important ground-to-ground and air-to-ground military communications.”


36



187 Erler, E. 2nd sentence: Modify wording to “development of electrical substation, and overhead electrical and other vertical”.

Ch. 5. Pg. 33, Table 3, Issue FI-1

Wideband Use And Vertical Obstructions Can Restrict Or Degrade Communications. The presence and potential increase of wide band usage and development of electrical substation, overhead electrical, and other vertical structures may interrupt important ground-to-ground and air-to-ground military communications.

188 Erler, E. The wording used in this issue needs some clarification and/or expansion so that the layman understands enough to realize the importance of the issue; otherwise, the issue will be ignored by the stakeholders.

Ch. 5. Pg. 33, Table 3, Issue FI-1, FI-1A and FI-1B

Changes made. Encourage frequency impedance type of structures that generate frequencies and provide frequency services (i.e. radio towers) be located outside the Safety and Land Use MCA. The placement of these structures can disrupt military communication operations.To prevent incompatible uses. Coordinate Frequency Spectrum Plans. To the extent possible and when known, coordinate structures or development requiring the use of certain frequenciesy spectrum with Camp Williams to minimize potential interruption of military communications.

189 Erler, E. 3rd sentence: Modify wording to “The nighttime presence of intense light . . . development can reduce or and sometimes completely restrict visibility for limit aviators and ground personnel visibility.”

Ch. 5. Pg. 34, Table 3, Issue LG-1

Change as suggested

Change made: “The nighttime presence of intense light and glare (sky glow) from civilian development can reduce and sometimesor completely limit restrict visibility for aviators and ground personnel visibility.”

190 R. Allen LG-1B MAG does not have any jurisdiction or influence on lighting.

Pg. 34 Change made. Deleted LG-1B.

191 R. Allen L1-1B and AQ-1B, Both of these administrative Code changes have already been made and will come into effect within the next few months.

Comment noted. This recommendation will remain in the strategies table to indicate it was considered, recommended, and the Legislature can indicate this was completed prior to the end of the JLUS process.


37



192 McNulty J LG-1C, I think each entity can play a supporting role but not be responsible


Correct. Change made.

Open boxes replaced shaded boxes.

193 Erler, E. 2nd sentence; Modify wording to “work together to identify the ability to implement (and potentially retrofit) unique lighting standards along new (and potentially retrofit) roadways within the Light MCA”.

Ch. 5. Pg. 34, Table 3, Issue LG-1C

Change as suggested

Change made: “UDOT and the eight local jurisdictions should work together to identify the ability to implement (and potentially retrofit) unique lighting standards along new (and potentially retrofit) roadways within the Light MCA to balance safety with nighttime training at Camp Williams.”

194 McNulty J LG-1D, Implementation costs are placed on the cities, as with the above, I think we can play a supporting role but not be responsible


Correct. Change made.


195 Erler, E. 1st sentence: “Improvised Explosive Device” is defined on page 15 under “Light and Glare Issues”.

Ch. 5, Pg. 35, Table 3, Issue LG-2

Remove “Improvised Explosive Device”

Change made: “Improvised Explosive Device (IED) Course Generated Glare.”

196 Erler, E. 2nd sentence: Add clarifying words to “Use of the Wood Hollow Road IED Defeat Course Lane (along the northern”.

Ch. 5, Pg. 35, Table 3, Issue LG-2

Change made. IED Course Generated Glare. Use of the IED Defeat Lane (along the northern border of Camp Williams) during nighttime hours generates intense light flashes that may be visible off-base and considered a nuisance.

197 Erler, E. 2nd sentence: Modify wording for consistency to “training along the Wood Hollow Road IED Defeat Course”.

Ch. 5, Pg. 35, Table 3, Issue LG-2A

Change made. Minimize Military Glare For Civilians. Camp Williams should evaluate the off-installation occurrence of light generated by night training conducted along the Wood Hollow Road-- IED Defeat Course and determine appropriate measures to reduce any extensive light trespass nuisances.

198 Erler, E. 2nd sentence: Change “boundary” to “boundaries”. Ch. 5, Pg. 35, Table 3, Issue SA-1A

Change as suggested

Change made: “Each jurisdiction should establish a WOD that encompasses the


38



high-to-medium risk areas within their boundariesy where specialized building construction standards and landscaping design are regulated to safeguard against wildfire damage.”

199 B. Armstrong Under the safety issued for urban wildland fires, a strategy references a wildland overlay district. Utah County has created an Urban Wildland Interface area, a portion of which covers areas south and west of Camp Williams.

Page 35 Need more information to address?

200 Erler, E. Issue/Strategy numbering jumps from SA-1B to SA-2C; should SA-2C through SA-2G be SA-1C through SA-1H?

Ch. 5, Pg. 36, Table 3, Issue SA-2C

Re-lettered Re-lettered strategies to be consecutive.

201 Mumford S SA-2D – I wasn’t sure if this is referring to wildland areas or within neighborhoods. It should probably be more clear.

Pg 36 Change made. Review And Update Neighborhood Emergency Response Design Standards. Develop / update building neighborhood design standards to review proposed development to provide for promptensure adequate and efficient access by local emergency and fire response units.

202 McNulty J SA-2D, should be hollow squares. Cities to play supporting roles

Page 36 Correct. Change made.


203 Laura Ault I had our Wasatch Front Area Manager look at the document as well. Overall, there were only minor typos that I think Matrix will catch. One concern, however, was that implementation of a Wildfire plan was a low priority. Given the recent history of fire on base it seems it should have a higher priority.

Pg. 36(?) Correct. Wildfire Issues and Strategies throughout the document have been moved to High Priority.

Wildfire (Safety Issues moved to High Priority).

204 Erler, E. Where is Issue AQ-1A? Ch. 5, Pg. 37, Table 3, Issue AQ-1B

Change made. No missing issues, just needs

Strategies re-lettered.


39



to be re-lettered.

205 Erler, E. Add clarification to “(See Strategy LI-1B below)” as it took some electronic searching to find this strategy; difficult for paper-copy readers to perform.

Ch. 5, Pg. 37, Table 3, Issue AQ-1B

Add “later in this table”

Change made: “(See Strategy LI-1B later in this table).”

206 Erler, E. Add bold lines in Responsible Party columns between Utah County - Camp Williams and UTARNG - MAG/WFRC.

Ch. 5, Pg. 37, Table 3, Issue AQ-1B

Add lines as suggested

Change made: bold lines added

207 Erler, E. There are two wind turbines physically standing at Camp Williams; is one of these turbines not hooked up?

Ch. 5, Pg. 37, Table 3, Issue AE-1

There is only one wind turbine within the Study Area; it is not on Camp Williams. The other turbine mentioned here is proposed; it has not been approved or constructed.

No action taken.

208 Erler, E. Place “Awareness Issues and Strategies” at top of each page so that reader is reminded of that page’s priority level.

Ch. 5, Pg. 38, Table 4



209 McNulty J HA-1B, This sounds like a mandate, Cities play a supporting role. Utah County as a Housing Authority to assist.

Page 38 Change made. Incorporate Military Housing Needs In Local Plans. Understand the quality and type of housing the military requires and incorporate eligible, qualified housing units into comprehensive, general, and master plans.

210 Erler, E. 2nd sentence: Modify wording to “Develop legislation that to requires local jurisdictions, within a defined distance from military installations, to establish formal notice / comment from the military installation on submitted development plans, impacts associated with general / comprehensive plans, and

Ch. 5, Pg. 38, Table 4, Issue LI-1A

Modify using some of the suggested changes

Changes made: “Develop legislation to that requires local jurisdictions within a defined distance from military installations to establish formal notice /


40



their compatibility with the installation’s’ mission.” comment process on submitted development plans, impacts associated with general / comprehensive plans, and their compatibility with the installation’s’ mission.”

211 Erler, E. 2nd sentence: Delete long-form names as there are defined earlier in document: Utah School and Institutional Trust Lands Administration (SITLA) and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM).

Ch. 5, Pg. 39, Table 4, Issue NR-1

Change as suggested

Changes made: “…however, the Utah School and Institutional Trust Lands Administration (SITLA) and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) own property within and immediately surrounding the installation.”

212 Erler, E. 3rd sentence: Modify wording to “could present incompatible activities incompatible with military operations.”


Change as suggested

Change made: “Uncoordinated extraction of natural resources both within and adjacent to Camp Williams could present incompatible activities that are incompatible with military operations.”

213 Erler, E. 2nd sentence: Modify wording to “all mining operations in the MCAOD JLUS study area with Camp Williams”.


Change made. Coordinate Mining Development. Coordinate the approval of all mining operations in the MCAODJLUS study area with Camp Williams to ensure conformance with military training operations.

214 Erler, E. “UTNG AGCW” is not defined in document; UTNG should be UTARNG.

Ch. 5, Pg. 39, Table 4, Issue NR-1C

Changes mades. Continue / Enhance Vegetation Mitigation. UTNG AGCWCamp Williams shall continue to thin vegetation on the installation to enhance mission readiness and mitigate fire hazards. Implement The Noxious Weed Management Plan. Invasive weeds attack native plant species thus destroying habitat. UTNG AGCWCamp Williams and surrounding jurisdictions, in collaboration with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, should develop and


41



implement noxious weed management programs on state and private lands to enable habitat rehabilitation and revitalization of natural ecosystems near Camp Williams.

215 Erler, E. “USFWS” is not defined in document Ch. 5, Pg. 39, Table 4, Issue NR-1D

Add definition Change made: “In collaboration with the Utah Unified Fire AuthorityUFA, Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), and surrounding jurisdictions, communities should develop a plan (including the use of goats) to thin overgrown vegetation to reduce the risks of natural wildland fires and control and manage the existing ecosystems.”

216 D. Sakaguchi NR-1D It is the Utah Division of Forestry Fire and State Lands that deal with wildfire and wildland-urban interface planning for wildfire management, rather than the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources. USFWS is also probably not an appropriate agency to list here.

p. 39 Update with appropriate agencies

Change made: “In collaboration with the Utah Unified Fire AuthorityUFA, the Utah Division of Forestry Fire and State Lands, Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, USFWS, and surrounding jurisdictions…”

217 Erler, E. 2nd sentence: Modify words to “several non-listed species and sensitive habitats are known” OR to “several non-listed and sensitive species and sensitive habitat are known”.

Ch. 5, Pg. 39, Table 4, Issue TE-1

No change made. No action taken, correct as written.

218 D. Sakaguchi TE-1A “Plan and budget for the next 5-year update of the 2007 INRMP”—this sounds funny to me, since I have a document entitled “Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan Update, 2006-2011”. Should the budgeting be for a 2012-2017 update of the INRMP?

p. 39 Change made. Plan And Budget For the 2012-2017 Next 5-Year Update Oof the The 2007 Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan (INRMP). As authorized and outlined in the Sikes Act, the INRMP shall be updated every five years to ensure current natural resources control methods are employed in


42



the management plans.

219 Erler, E. For consistency, modify wording to “Tickville Channel / Gulch on Camp Williams”.

Ch. 5, Pg. 40, Table 4, Issue WS-1

Changes made. Added Channel and Gulch to references.

220 Erler, E. All cities and both counties are shown as Responsible Parties; Strategy should address ALL off-installation storm water drainage infrastructure.

Ch. 5, Pg. 40, Table 4, Issue WS-1A

Changes made. Changed shaded boxes to un-shaded boxes for less-affected jurisdictions.

221 McNulty J WS-1A, Perhaps add Saratoga Springs too. Recent flooding of City subdivision because of BLM burn scar

Page 40 Saratoga Springs is already listed as a responsible party.

No change made

222 D. Sakaguchi TE-1B In the Integrated Pest Management section (Section 7.9) of the Camp Williams Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan Update (2006-2011), Camp Williams has already been implementing their noxious weed management plan for the military base. For implementation of a noxious weed plan on private lands, additional partners in the implementation of noxious weed management should include the Salt Lake and Utah County Coordinated Weed Management Area (CWMA) programs, and their respective municipalities. Utah Division of Wildlife Resources (UDWR) does not manage or own any lands within the JLUS area, so we do not conduct noxious weed control in the JLUS area. We (UDWR) are probably not an appropriate agency to list in this issue. USFWS should also be contacted about their inclusion in this issue—generally they do not deal with noxious weeds. This section (according to title) should deal with noxious weed management only. Habitat rehabilitation issues near Camp Williams, if necessary, should be addressed in a separate section (see next comment).

p. 40 Rephrased strategy TE-1B based on input and changed responsible party.

Develop a Noxious Weed Management Plan for Each Jurisdiction (using the Camp Williams plan as a Model). Invasive weeds attack native plant species thus destroying habitat. Camp Williams currently manages weeds through their plan. Surrounding jurisdictions, in collaboration with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and using the Counties Coordinated Weed Management Area programs, should develop and implement noxious weed management programs on state and private lands to reduce destruction of habitat and natural ecosystems near Camp Williams. Other Agencies: BLM, USFWS

223 D. Sakaguchi A section TE-1C, if desired, could be created to address

p. 40 No strategy added.

No change made, but comment noted.


43



“enable habitat rehabilitation and revitalization of natural ecosystems near Camp Williams.” Partners for this issues should include the private landowners, property developers, the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS), and local municipalities (to establish and enforce “natural area” ordinances). However, one should realize that “revitalization of natural ecosystems” usually is not compatible with subdivision development projects, fenced yards, or agriculture zoning. Generally, UDWR is not heavily involved with planning or implementation of habitat rehabilitation on small parcels of private land or within urban subdivisions. If private landowners on neighboring lands want to attract wildlife to their properties, UDWR does have the publications “Creating Landscapes for Wildlife” (available at: wildlife.utah.gov/publications/pdf/landscapingforwildlife.pdf) and “Minimizing bowsing damage from deer” (available at: wildlife.utah.gov/habitat/deer-browse.php.

224 D. Sakaguchi WS-1B “Installing Natural Berms” is an oxymoron. With the installation of berms, reseeding of the berms and other disturbed areas with desireable adapted plant species is recommended, to prevent (or minimize) establishment of noxious species, rather than just ‘enable new vegetative growth”.

p. 40 Change made. Recommend Iinstall Natural Earth Berms In The Tickville Channel / Gulch. With the installation of berms, reseeding of the berms and other disturbed areas with desirable adapted plant species is recommended, to prevent (or minimize) establishment of noxious species, rather than just ‘enable new vegetative growth”.Due to decades of degradation caused by cattle grazing, installing earth berms strategically will enhance erosion control, enable new vegetation growth, and minimize future water quality issues.

225 D. Sakaguchi WS-1C Monitoring Cattle/Wildlife Trespass—rather than just monitoring, this issue should also recommend fencing and fence maintenance to exclude livestock from CW property, and proper enforcement of trespass cattle (impoundment) with local law enforcement.

p. 40 Change made, strategy re-phrased and moved to NR-1E

Develop Formal Procedures to Control Cattle / Wildlife Trespass onto Camp Williams. Camp Williams shall collaborate with private landowners, jurisdictions, and local law enforcement to control livestock trespass by impoundment or other measures to assist in the management of livestock and reduce the destruction of Camp Williams Fence. (See PT-1C for Construction of Camp Williams Perimeter Fence)


44



226 Erler, E. These tables sorted by jurisdiction are excellent for helping each entity focus on its issues.

Page 41-51, Strategy Summaries by Jurisdiction tables..

Comment noted No change made

227 Erler, E. If possible, add page numbers for each strategy to facilitate use of the strategies.

Page 41-51, Strategy Summaries by Jurisdiction tables..


Page numbers added in an additional column to strategy statement in summaries.

228 Mumford S The issue or strategy # is confusing to follow, as they are not in any alphabetic order. Maybe a page number added to the specific jurisdiction strategy tables at the end would help people find that strategy in the larger more detailed tables.

Pg 41+ Strategy Summaries by Jurisdiction

The strategies are listed in alphabetical order

No change made

229 Mumford S I’m not sure if we really need to go to the extent of having an ex-oficio planning commissioner from Camp Williams. Hopefully having the Camp review all development proposals near their boundary would suffice.

Pg 43 – IC-3B This person would not serve as a planning commissioner, they would just be a non-voting participant to see what is discussed and decided at the meetings

No change made

230 Mumford S I still don’t think school districts should be restricted or not build within the overlay zones. The kids live near Camp Williams already, and are already exposed to that environment. Having the school there doesn’t leave them more at risk than in their own home.

Schools are considered a noise sensitive use, and are not recommended for noise zones, nor for zones of safety concern.

No change made

231 Mumford S I don’t necessarily agree with all of the strategies, so it is important for all to remember that we are not bound to implement each one of the strategies. I do think we will implement many of them. I hope, again, that some can be

Pg 43 Comment noted. The strategies are meant as a toolbox to pull

No change made


45



combined or removed. from, and are not binding by being included in the JLUS

232 McNulty J 1C-3B, As needed or necessary Page 46 No change. The complete strategy recommends this should be done for projects that fall within the MCAOD

233 McNulty J 1C-3C, As needed or necessary Page 46 No change. The complete strategy recommends this should be done for projects that fall within the MCAOD

234 McNulty J LG-1A and LG-1B, as needed or necessary Page 46 No change. The complete strategy recommends this should be done for projects that fall within the Study Area and Light MCA.

235 D. Sakaguchi DNR FFSL—IE-1A Why would FFSL be involved with Regional & local transportation planning? Shouldn’t this be associated with the previous entity?

p. 51 Change made. Shaded box deleted from DNR/FFSL row.

1 2 3 4 Change made: “The Joint Land Use Study was undertaken in ...

Documents

Transcript of 1 2 3 4 Change made: “The Joint Land Use Study was undertaken in ...