Silabi Seminar Akuntansi 2014-2015 s1_sbd

download Silabi Seminar Akuntansi 2014-2015 s1_sbd

of 4

Transcript of Silabi Seminar Akuntansi 2014-2015 s1_sbd

  • 8/11/2019 Silabi Seminar Akuntansi 2014-2015 s1_sbd

    1/4

    SEMINAR AKUNTANSI [XKAD 203]PROGRAM S1 SWADANA TRANSFER FAKULTAS EKONOMI UNS [RAKT]

    KELAS: A, B SEMESTER: 5 SKS: 3

    SEMESTER GASAL: SEPTEMBER 2014

    JANUARI 2015D o s e n Drs.SubektiDjamaluddin,M.Si,AkKantor RuangDosenIIIGedungILt.IFE-UNS HP 0811263204/085725145758email: [email protected]

    Jadwal Kuliah

    Hari Jurusan Kelas J a m Ruang

    SeninAkuntansi

    B 18.3021.00 2202

    Selasa A 18.3021.00 2202

    DESKRIPSI MATA KULIAH:Mata kuliah ini membahas current issuesdan basic theory dalam akuntansi keuangan, akuntansi

    keperilakuan, akuntansi manajemen dan pengauditan. Issuestersebut meliputi kerangka konseptual,

    standar akuntansi keuangan, dan masalah-masalah akuntansi keuangan dalam perspektif penelitian,

    budaya, dan sosial, etika profesionalisme akuntan publik serta perkembangan terakhir akuntansi

    manajemen.

    TUJUAN PERKULIAHAN:Setelah mempelajari matakuliah ini mahasiswa diharapkan memiliki wawasan dan kemampuan

    menganalisis perkembangan akuntansi khususnya masalah current issuesdan basic theory

    bidang akuntansi keuangan, akuntansi keperilakuan, akuntansi manajemen dan pengauditan sehingga

    mampu mengikuti perkembangan isu-isu prospektif dalam bidang akuntansi.

    METODE KULIAH:Kuliah diberikan dalam bentuk ceramah, diskusi dan penugasan terstruktur. Di setiap pertemuan, mahasiswa secaraberkelompok mengumpulkan resume materi dan mempresentasikannya di depan kelas. Kelompok diskusi akanditentukan pada pertemuan awal. Partisipasi mahasiswa selama berlangsungnya diskusi dan penugasan lainnyaakan menentukan penilaian akhir semester. Ujian diselenggarakan 2 kali.

    SISTEM PENILAIAN:Nilai akhir semester ditentukan dengan memperhatikan komponen dan bobot sebagai berikut:

    Komponen Bobot

    Partisipasi kelas : 20%Penugasan lain (presentasi) : 10%Paper individu : 20%Ujian Kompetensi Dasar I : 25%Ujian Kompetensi Dasar II : 25%

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 8/11/2019 Silabi Seminar Akuntansi 2014-2015 s1_sbd

    2/4

    Mahasiswa wajib memenuhi seluruh komponen penilaian. Jika salah satu dari komponen tak terpenuhi, makadinyatakan tidak lulus. Nilai akhir semester dikonversikan dengan ketentuan sebagai berikut:

    Nilai Konversi

    80100 A (4,0)7079 B (3,0)

    60

    69 C (2,0)4059 D (1,0)039 E (0,0)

    Rencana Kuliah Tatap Muka (KTM)

    KTM

    MINGGUTOPIK BAHASAN Artikel Kelompok

    1

    Penjelasan Silabi & Penugasan

    Ball, Ray. 2005. International Financial Reporting Standards

    (IFRS) - Pros and Cons for Investors

    Barth and Landsman.2010.How did Financial Reporting

    Contribute to the Financial Crisis

    #1

    #2

    2

    Ramanna and Sletten. 2009.Why do Countries Adopt

    International Financial Reporting Standards

    Laux and Leuz. 2009. The Crisis of Fair Value Accounting

    Making Sense of the Recent Debate

    #3

    #4

    3

    Scott. 2003. Accounting Theory 3rd

    Edition Ch 12-Standard

    Setting: Economic Issues

    Wolk, Dodd and Tearney. 2003. Accounting Theory:

    Conceptual Issues. 6th

    EditionCh 4 The Economic of

    Financial Reporting Regulations.

    #5

    #6

    4

    Scott. 2003. Accounting Theory 3rd

    Edition Ch 8 -

    Economic Consequences and_Positive Accounting

    Theory

    Daske, Hail, Leuz, Verdi. 2008. Mandatory IFRS Reporting

    Around the World - Early Evidence on the Economic

    Consequences.]

    #7

    #8

    5

    Scott. 2003. Accounting Theory 3rd

    Edition Ch 9 Game

    Theory and Agency Theory

    Scott. 2003. Accounting Theory 3rd

    Edition Ch 13-

    Standard_Setting-Political_IssuesWolk, Dodd and Tearney. 2003. Accounting Theory:

    Conceptual_Issues. 6th

    Edition Ch 9 Political

    And Economic Environment

    #9

    #10

    #11

    6

    Allen and Ramanna. 2012. Towards an Understanding of the

    Role of Standard Setters in Standard Setting.

    Baskerville .2007. A Game Theory Approach to Research on

    Lobbying Activities in Accounting Regulation.

    #12

    #13

  • 8/11/2019 Silabi Seminar Akuntansi 2014-2015 s1_sbd

    3/4

    KTM

    MINGGUTOPIK BAHASAN Artikel Kelompok

    7 UJIANKOMPETENSI DASAR I

    8

    Rencana:

    1.

    Choi_and_Meek_International-Accounting_7e-Reporting_and_Disclosure

    2. Healy and Palepu. 2000. A Review of The Empirical

    Disclosure Literature

    3. Cole and Jones. 2005. Magement Discussion and

    Analysis-A Review and Implications for Future

    Research

    4. Schuster and Oconnell. 2006. The Trend Toward

    Voluntary Corporate Disclosures

    #14

    #15

    #16

    #17

    9

    1.

    Mitchell RK, Agle BR and Wood DJ (1997), Toward

    a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience:

    Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts

    The Academy of Management Review(22-4), pp. 853-

    886.

    2.

    Suhardjanto, D dan Choiriyah, U (2010), Information Gap:

    Demand Supply Environmental Disclosuredi Indonesia

    Jurnal Keuangan dan Perbankan (vol 14, No.1), pp.36-

    51.

    #18

    #19

    10

    1.

    Ullmann AA (1985), Data in Search of a Theory: A Critical

    Examination of the Relationships among Social

    Performance, Social Disclosure, and Economic

    Performance of US Firms The Academy of

    Management Review(10-3), pp. 540-557.2.

    Roberts RW (1992), Determinant of Corporate Social

    Responsibility Disclosure: An Application of

    Stakeholder TheoryAccounting, Organisation and

    Society(17-6), pp. 595-612.

    #20

    #21

    11

    1. Susan C. B, Welsh, M.J and Wentzel, K (2010), Johnson

    and Johnson: a Model for Sustainability Reporting.Strategic F inance(September): pp.29-37.

    2. Manetti, Giacomo and Toccafondi, Simone.(2012), The

    Role of Stakeholders in Sustainability ReportingAssurance.Journal Business Ethi cs(Vol. 107):

    pp.363377.

    #23

    #24

    12

    1.

    Eng LL and Mak YT (2003), Corporate Governance and

    Voluntary DisclosureJournal of Accounting and Public

    Policy(22), pp.325-345.

    2.

    Ho SSM and Wong KS (2001), A Study of the Relationship

    between Corporate Governance Structures and the

    Extent of Voluntary DisclosureJournal of

    International Accounting, Auditing & Taxation(10),

    pp.139-156.

    #25

    #26

  • 8/11/2019 Silabi Seminar Akuntansi 2014-2015 s1_sbd

    4/4

    13

    1.

    Olach, T and Weeramantri, S (2009), How COSO Has

    Improved Internal Controls in the United States.

    Internal Auditing(Vol.24, No.6): pp.3-12.

    2.

    Fatemi, A and Luft, C, (2002), Corporate RiskManagement Cost and Benefits Global Finance Journal

    (13), pp. 29-38.

    #27

    #28

    14Penyajian Artikel Individual

    15Penyajian Artikel Individual

    16 UJIANKOMPETENSI DASAR II