Case Examples Hfmeca (Amkdp)

download Case Examples Hfmeca (Amkdp)

of 15

Transcript of Case Examples Hfmeca (Amkdp)

  • 8/10/2019 Case Examples Hfmeca (Amkdp)

    1/15

    LANGKAH ANALISIS MODUS KEGAGALAN, DAMPAK &

    PENYEBAB

    (AMKDP)/

    HEALTHCARE FAILURE MODE EFFECT & CAUSES ANALYSYS

    (HFMECA)

    1. Pilih Proses yang berisiko tinggi dan Bentuk Tim

    2. Gambarkan Alur Proses

    3. Diskusikan & Prioritaskan Modus Kegagalan

    4. Brainstorming Dampak Modus Kegagalan

    5. Identifikasi Penyebab Modus Kegagalan

    6. Hitung Total NPR (Nilai Prioritas Risiko)

    7. Disain ulang proses / Re-disain Proses8. Analisa & uji Proses baru

    9. Implementasi & Monitor Proses baru

    HFMECA : Healthcare Failure Mode Effect , Causes and Analysis

  • 8/10/2019 Case Examples Hfmeca (Amkdp)

    2/15

    LANGKAH 1 : PILIH PROSES YANG BERISIKO TINGGI

    Pilih Proses berisiko tinggi yang akan dianalisa.

    Judul Proses :

    BENTUK TIM

    Ketua : ____________________________________________________________

    Anggota 1. _______________ 4. ________________________________________2. _______________ 5. ________________________________________

    3. _______________ 6. ________________________________________

    Notulen _________________________________________

    Apakah semua Unit yang terkait dalam Proses sudah terwakili ? YA / TIDAK

    Tanggal dimulai ____________________ Tanggal selesai ______________________________

  • 8/10/2019 Case Examples Hfmeca (Amkdp)

    3/15

    LANGKAH 2A DIAGRAM PROSES

    LANGKAH PROSES :

    Gambarkan proses secara grafis,sesuai kebijakan & prosedur untuk setiap tindakan dan nomor dibawah ini.

    Jika proses terlalu kompleks,anda memilih satu langkah proses atau sub proses untuk ditindak lanjuti

    Cantumkan beberapa sub proses untuk setiap tahapan prosesTahapan Sub Proses Tahapan Sub Proses Tahapan Sub Proses Tahapan Sub Proses Tahapan Sub Proses Tahapan Sub Proses

    A. ----------------------- A. ----------------------- A. ----------------------- A. ----------------------- A. ----------------------- A. -----------------------

    B. ----------------------- B. ----------------------- B. ----------------------- B. ----------------------- B. ----------------------- B. -----------------------

    C. ----------------------- C. ----------------------- C. ----------------------- C. ----------------------- C. ----------------------- C. -----------------------

    D. ----------------------- D. ----------------------- D. ----------------------- D. ----------------------- D. ----------------------- D. -----------------------

    E. ----------------------- E. ----------------------- E. ----------------------- E. ----------------------- E. ----------------------- E. -----------------------

    Pengadaan

    TGM

    Penerimaan &

    Pengecekan TGM

    dari Supplier

    Penyimpanan

    TGM di Instalasi

    Gas Central

    Pengecekan Ulang

    Di Unit Penerima

    Perencanaan

    Ketersediaan

    TGM

    Pendistribusian

    TGM ke

    Unit2

  • 8/10/2019 Case Examples Hfmeca (Amkdp)

    4/15

    LANGKAH 2A DIAGRAM PROSES

    LANGKAH PROSES :

    Gambarkan proses secara grafis,sesuai kebijakan & prosedur untuk setiap tindakan dan nomor dibawah ini.

    Jika proses terlalu kompleks,anda memilih satu langkah proses atau sub proses untuk ditindak lanjuti

    Cantumkan beberapa sub proses untuk setiap tahapan prosesTahapan Sub Proses Tahapan Sub Proses Tahapan Sub Proses Tahapan Sub Proses Tahapan Sub Proses Tahapan Sub Proses

    A. ----------------------- A. ----------------------- A. ----------------------- A. ----------------------- A. ----------------------- A. -----------------------

    B. ----------------------- B. ----------------------- B. ----------------------- B. ----------------------- B. ----------------------- B. -----------------------

    C. ----------------------- C. ----------------------- C. ----------------------- C. ----------------------- C. ----------------------- C. -----------------------

    D. ----------------------- D. ----------------------- D. ----------------------- D. ----------------------- D. ----------------------- D. -----------------------

    E. ----------------------- E. ----------------------- E. ----------------------- E. ----------------------- E. ----------------------- E. -----------------------

  • 8/10/2019 Case Examples Hfmeca (Amkdp)

    5/15

    LANGKAH 2B DIAGRAM SUB PROSES

    LANGKAH SUB PROSES :

    Gambarkan Subproses secara grafis,sesuai kebijakan & prosedur untuk setiap tindakan dan nomor dibawah ini.

    Jika proses terlalu kompleks,anda memilih satu langkah Subproses untuk ditindak lanjuti

    Catat Modus Kegagalan untuk setiap langkah Sub proses

    Modus Kegagalan Modus Kegagalan Modus Kegagalan Modus Kegagalan Modus Kegagalan

    ----------------------- ------------------------ --------------------------- ---------------------------- -------------------------------

    ------------------------ ------------------------- --------------------------- --------------------------- -------------------------------

    ------------------------ ------------------------- --------------------------- --------------------------- -------------------------------

    ------------------------ ------------------------ --------------------------- --------------------------- -------------------------------

    ------------------------ ------------------------ --------------------------- --------------------------- -------------------------------

    ------------------------ ------------------------ -------------------------- --------------------------- -------------------------------

    ------------------------ ------------------------ -------------------------- --------------------------- -------------------------------

  • 8/10/2019 Case Examples Hfmeca (Amkdp)

    6/15

    LANGKAH 3

    BRAINSTORMING POTENSIAL MODUS KEGAGALAN & BUAT

    PRIORITAS MODUS KEGAGALAN

    Proses Modus Kegagalan Bahaya Probabilitas Skor

    Risi

    ko

    (3X

    4)

    Bands Kontrol Deteksi NPR

    (5X7

    X8

    Ranking

    Modus

    Kegagalan

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

    1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1-25 L M H E 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 5

  • 8/10/2019 Case Examples Hfmeca (Amkdp)

    7/15

    Modus Kegagalan Dampak Bahaya Probabilitas Skor

    Risiko

    (3X4)

    Bands Kontrol Deteksi NPR(5X7X8)

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

    1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1-25 L M H E 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 5

    LANGKAH 4

    BRAINSTORMING DAMPAK MODUS KEGAGALAN

  • 8/10/2019 Case Examples Hfmeca (Amkdp)

    8/15

    Modus

    Kegagalan

    Dampak Penyebab Bahaya Probabilitas SkorRisiko

    (4X5)

    Bands Kontrol Deteksi NPR

    (6X8X9)

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

    1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1-25 L M H E 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 5

    LANGKAH 5

    IDENTIFIKASI PENYEBAB MODUS KEGAGALAN

  • 8/10/2019 Case Examples Hfmeca (Amkdp)

    9/15

    LANGKAH 6

    HITUNG TOTAL NPR

    No Modus

    Kegagalan

    NPR

    Modus

    Kegagalan

    Dampak NPR

    Dampak

    Penyebab NPR

    Penyebab

    Total NPR Ranking

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

  • 8/10/2019 Case Examples Hfmeca (Amkdp)

    10/15

    LANGKAH 7

    PROSES DISAIN ULANG

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

    Proses Modus

    Kegagalan

    Dampak Penyebab Rekomendasi

    Redisain

    Proses

    Penanggung

    jawab

    Tanggal

    Diselesaikan

    Tanggal Dilaksanakan

    Proses Baru

    Ukuran

    Outcome /

    Pengawasan

    Kinerja

  • 8/10/2019 Case Examples Hfmeca (Amkdp)

    11/15

    No injuryFirst aid

    treatmentonly with no

    lost time, norrestricted

    duty injuries

    nor illnesses

    Medical expenses,

    lost time orrestricted duty

    injuries orillness for 1 or

    2 staff

    Hospitalization

    of 1 or 2 staff or3 or more staff

    experiencing losttime or restricted

    duty

    injuries or

    illnesses

    Death or

    hospitalizationof 3 or more

    staff

    Staff

    Outcome

    Evaluated &

    First aid

    treatment

    No injury but

    increased

    LOS tomonitor

    effects

    MINOR

    2

    No injuryInjury with no

    permanent loss of

    function or

    Evaluation &

    treatment for1 or 2 visitors

    (less than

    hospitalizatin )

    Injury with

    permanent loss of

    function

    Or Hospitalization

    of 1 or 2visitors

    Death,

    hospitalization

    of 3 or more

    Visitor

    Outcome

    No injuryInjury with no

    permanent loss of

    function

    Injury with

    permanent

    loss offunction

    DeathPatient

    Outcome

    INSIGNICANT

    1

    MODERATE

    3

    MAJOR

    4

    CATASTROPHIC

    5

    SEVERITY RATINGSEVERITY RATING(Modified by IMRK)(Modified by IMRK)

  • 8/10/2019 Case Examples Hfmeca (Amkdp)

    12/15

    PROBABILITY

    (Modified by IMRK)

    Very likely to occur every monthAlmost certain5

    Likely to occur immediately or within a short period

    (may happen several times in one year )

    Likely4

    Possible will occur

    (may happen several times in 1 to 2 years)

    Possible3

    Unlikely to occur

    (may happen sometimes in 2 to 5 years)

    Unlikely2

    Very Unlikely to occur

    (may happen sometime in 5 to 30 years)

    Rare1

    DefinitionDescriptionRating

  • 8/10/2019 Case Examples Hfmeca (Amkdp)

    13/15

    RISK GRADING MATRIX

    ExtremeHighModerateLowLowRare

    1

    ExtremeHighModerateLowLowUnlikely2

    ExtremeExtremeHighModerateLowPossible3

    ExtremeExtremeHighModerateModerateLikely4

    ExtremeExtremeHighModerateModerateAlmost certain5

    Catastrophic

    5

    Major

    4

    Moderate

    3

    Minor

    2

    Insignificant

    1

    Potenci al Concequences

    Probability/Likelihood

  • 8/10/2019 Case Examples Hfmeca (Amkdp)

    14/15

    Sample Detectability Scale

    (Modified by IMRK)

    0 out of 10

    2 out 0f 10

    5 out of 10

    7 out of 10

    10 out to 10

    Probability of

    Detection

    Detection not possible at any pointAlmost certain

    not to detect5

    Unlikely to be detectedLow likelihood4

    Moderate likelihood of detectionModeratelikelihood3

    Likely to be detectedHigh likelihood2

    Almost always detected immediatelyCertain to detect1

    DefinitionDescriptionRating

  • 8/10/2019 Case Examples Hfmeca (Amkdp)

    15/15

    CONTROLLABILITY

    Controls and Status are unknown or Residual riskDifficult4

    Controls are either not practically in place not effective, not

    communicated and or not complied with no reviews undertaken or

    Controls can be introduced to reduce risk to an acceptable level butwill take longer than 1 year or entail significant effort or exp ensive

    Moderate

    difficult

    3

    Sufficient effective controls procedures are substantially in place

    for specific circumstances, communicated & are complied with

    periodic reviews are conducted or

    Controls can be introduced to reduce risk to an acceptable level

    within 1 year or at cost

    Moderate

    easy

    2

    Comprehensive effective controls fully in place, communicated,

    complied with, maintained, monitored, reviewed & tested

    regularly. All that is practicable to be done is being done orRisk can be introduced 1 month / or low cost or

    Easy1

    DefinitionDesriptionRating