Post on 17-Jan-2023
EuropeanURL:httpISSN:223
nJournalop://www.ej35‐767X
APR
Nipis
ofBusinessjbss.com/re
EU
ROPOSAL
Nancy(Correspon
ssingUniversNorthBa
P1Bnancym@n705‐474‐3
singscreshoenginteachintemorpraendultineeeffe
Key
T
andSocialecent.aspx
UROPEAN JO
WHENTLFORAN
MaynesdingAuthor)ity,100Colleay,OntarioB8L7nipissingu.ca3457x4388
his paphiringhiringn
gle,short, feeningapplrt‐term apgagementperview;a coievement derview.Whre time concticesfornd effortmaymatelygetdedasareectiveteach
ywords:teac
T
Sciences,V
OURNAL OF
THEINTENEWWAY
)
egeDr.
A
per outlineto revitaliznewteacheface‐to‐facelications;apprenticeshproblemsolonflictembdata actionile it isrecnsumingannewteacherybeofbentoteachanesulttobolsersfromth
cherhiring
Vol.2,No.1
F BUSINESS
ERVIEWIYOFSEL
ABSTRACT
es a nine sze the currersbasedone interview.aphoneinteip with avingtask(beddedpron planningcognized thnd labour irs,itisalsonefit in ensndthatlessster,supervheprofessio
g,teachingi
1,pp165‐
S AND SOCI
ISNOTELECTINGT
Nipiss
T
step proporent, lesseffnawritten.Thenineserview;anmaster te
(onapprentoblem solvintask; and,at thishiriintensive thohypothesisuring thatsadministrvise,andpeon.
interviews,
‐178,Febru
IAL SCIENC
NOUGH:THEBES
Blaine
singUniversiNorthBay
P1B
osal for affectivepraapplicatiosteps includobservedleeacher; aticeship);ang task;aa final scingmodel ihan currentizedthattht thebest trativetimeerhapsrem
hiringfors
uary2014
CES
TTEACH
E.Hatt
ity,100Colley,Ontario8L7
teacheracticeofnandade:pre‐esson;astudentaformalstudentreeningismuchthiringhisfronteachersmaybeoveless
schools
4.P.P.1
HERS
geDr.
165‐178
165
EuropeanURL:httpISSN:223
Intr
Teaareacertprepusedseve
mayinteprobcharactuteamtypimusconthei
hirethe manare this hirecautcont
its lthoswhepapas o
Lite
A kinstrhighschohighteaceffe
nJournalop://www.ej35‐767X
roduction
acher hiring as of the cotified teachepared culturd by schooleral reasons
In somey have littlerview quesblematic beracteristics ually involvms. Also prical teacherst try to masiders that tr families fo
Similared and the fCanadian c
ndates. Finaso effectivecan create
ed teachers,tious about tentious or r
Teacherlegitimacy ase charged en their hirier focuses o
only one com
erature Rev
key factor inructional timher influentool climatehlights the ch (Walsh &ective hiring
ofBusinessjbss.com/re
EU
is an impoountry has cers are takirally. For yl jurisdictions.
e jurisdictioe to no tra
stions are because the are of valu
ved in the hiroblematic ir-hiring inteake the besthe outcomefor the next t
ly problemfiltering procontext, ineally, it is alse at doing w
problems f and may dwhom theyrun afoul of
r hiring is aas an effectwith the ta
ing decisionon outliningmponent of
view
n the succesme (OECDtial factor ie (Dinham,crucial natu
& Tracy, 20g strategies t
andSocialecent.aspx
UROPEAN JO
ortant currencreated unpring their fi
years, some ns to select
ons, hiring aining for tbeing select
topics, scue in new te
ring, and inis the relatierview is ofst possible e of this 30-thirty years
matic is the ocesses that equities are so problema
what they wefor teacher do so even y hire for nef federation
a high staketive and unisk of hiring
ns result in tg a framewothe teacher
ss of studenD, 2004, 200in determin Ingvarsonure of effec004). Schooto increase
Sciences,V
OURNAL OF
nt topic in recedented rst teachingform of int
t the teacher
team memthe task of ted or scripcope, and eachers. Then some caseively short ften less thdecision ab
-minute dec or more!
inequity inthey may hthe result o
atic in the cere constituhiring becaif a teache
ew teachingn or union po
s process. Iiversally reg new teachthe system ork for a ne
r selection p
nts is the qu05; Rivkin,
ning who mn, & Kleinctive hiringol and jurisdthe chances
Vol.2,No.1
F BUSINESS
educationalmobility of
g positions terviewing rs they ultim
mbers may hf teacher hipted by peofocus of q
ese may nots, may refletime invest
han 30 minubout whomcision-makin
n local legishave to enduof the prov
current selecuted to do. Fause federater is ineffecg positions olicies.
t therefore bspected prohers can bugaining new
ew approachprocess.
uality of the Hanushek,
may succeednhenz, 2008g practices tdiction hirins of improvi
1,pp165‐
S AND SOCI
l contexts bf new teach
in remote has been thmately hire
have little biring. Additople other questions rt be the belect foci thatted in makiutes. In this
m to hire. Thng process c
slation that ure before t
vincial or tection proces
Federations ptions and unctive. This if they perc
behooves uocess. With uffer the usuw and highlh to hiring
e classroom , & Kain, 2d and who 8) or standto ensure thng teams haing student
‐178,Febru
IAL SCIENC
because a suhers across p
contexts, fhe main, an. This pract
backgroundtionally, in than the ac
reflect a seliefs that art are not eveing decisions brief spanhis is a daucould affect
may influethey are eveerritorial jurss that teachprotect teacnions protecmay cause
ceive that b
us to consideeffective te
ual fame orly effectivethat include
teachers w2005). The
may not, tdardized teshat the mosave a vestesuccess (OE
uary2014
CES
urplus of teprovinces afor which tnd often thetice can be
d in hiring asome inst
ctual intervet of beliere common en understoons about wn of time, iunting prost thousands
ence how ten offered arisdiction ohers’ federachers. In thect the rightshiring team
older choic
er ways we eacher selecr blame out teachers. Tes the tradit
with whom timpact of t
than other st scores. st effective d interest inECD, 2004
4.P.P.1
eachers in mand some nethey may be sole, approproblematic
approaches ances, teac
viewers. Thefs about wto those peod by the hi
whom to hirinterview tespect when of children
teachers canan interview
over educatiations or une hiring procs of the alrems to be oves may bec
might optimction procestcome of hi
To that end,tional interv
they spend tthe teacher factors sucSuch influteachers ge
n implemen; 2005).
165‐178
166
many ewly
be ill oach c for
and ching his is what eople iring re. A eams
one n and
n be w. In ional nions cess, eady verly come
mize sses, iring , this view
their is a
ch as ence et to nting
EuropeanURL:httpISSN:223
the thatiden200teac200
caseunamayGoePowhypand the n
oncgenpredGladaboudem
Whmaywhistruno twillOECinteinteappl198helpprachirinof s200
nJournalop://www.ej35‐767X
Those cmost effect
t support thentified in se7). School s
chers and th3;Harris, 20
Howevee, hiring tecknowledgey be that hie, & Bell, 2wer, 2010; othetical orthose charg
new hire.
There ie they are heral agreemdictive valudwell, 2008ut classroom
monstrations
Many jen teachersy be conducle many jur
ucture questitraining at al leverage sCD, 2004; 2rview procrview qualilicants and 5; Zhu & D
p their orgactice is inheng practiceselecting new7; Walsh &
ofBusinessjbss.com/re
EU
charged wittive teachere interview election critsystems atte
hen support 004).
er hiring teaeams may ed value juiring individ2009). DefinRabinowic
r narrow defged with hi
s no knownhired (Cashment amonue about the8; Goldhabem performas to be inclu
urisdictionss are hired fcted by one risdictions ions that brall. Jurisdictstudent achi2005: Wise,cess to impity is essenthe classroo
Dowling, 20anization ideerently probs, and especw teachers a
& Tracy, 200
andSocialecent.aspx
UROPEAN JO
th hiring tears. Interviewselection prteria and reempt to levtheir contin
ams may lacbe guided
dgments (Cduals or hirning an effz & Travefinition of tiring effecti
n method ofhin, 1994) wg researcheeir future suer & Hanseance during uded as an a
s rely heavifor teachinginterviewertrain their h
ridge the gaptions attempievement by, Darling-H
prove their ntially an eom demand002). This eentify the mblematic if cially probleas they mak04).
Sciences,V
OURNAL OF
achers can rws and otherocess. Suchetention superage stude
nuous growt
ck local or jby person
Cranston, 20ring teams
fective teachers, 1953) teacher effeive teachers
f consistentwhich furtheers that a uccesses inn, 2010; Jathe teacher
aspect of an
ily on a brg positions r, by phonehiring persop between ppt to improvy being effe
Hammond &screening
effort to mads of an effeeffort may h
most promisjurisdiction
ematic if theke such high
Vol.2,No.1
F BUSINESS
reasonably er filtering sh criteria mpports for n
ent success bth once they
jurisdictionnal percept012). To cohave differ
her is a subso there mctiveness (Cs may disag
ly predictiner complicateacher’s a
n the classrocob & Lefg
r’s preparatiinterview.
ief interviewoutside of
e or electrononnel to uspast practicve the cadreective in th
& Berry, 199practices. T
atch the orgective teachhelp potent
sing teacherns fail to ue employer h stakes dec
1,pp165‐
S AND SOCI
be assumedstrategies fo
may be statednewly hiredby ensuringy are in the
al policies ttions, idiosomplicate thrent concepbjective and
may be littlCampbell, Kgree about w
ng the effectates the taskactual classoom (Bill agren, 2006)ion program
w to identitheir local
nically throue performae and futuree of employe classroom
97) and mayThe effort ganizationaer (Herriot,
tial employer qualities (Cuse a system
relies heavcisions (Boy
‐178,Febru
IAL SCIENC
d to be tryior hiring ged in jurisdicd teachers (g that decisiprofession
to guide theyncratic as
he selectionptions of tead interpretive consensu
Kyriakides, what effecti
tiveness of k of a hiringsroom perfand Melinda. However,
m, it is not ty
ify the mosarea or int
ugh programance based ie practices,
yees who shm (Darling-Hy attempt toto improve
al needs wit 1989; Moners design aCochran-Sm
matic, reseavily upon anyd, Goldhab
uary2014
CES
ng to ensurenerally havctional polic(Young, Leon-makers (Darling-H
eir selectionssessments, n of hiring nacher effectve act (Cochus on the u
Muijs, & Riveness is in
a teacher ing team. Theformance ma Gates Fouaside from
ypical for a
st promisingternationallyms such as Sinterviewinsome hirin
how most prHammond
o improve the screeningth the avaintgomery, 1and use stramith & Powarch-based an ineffectiveber, Lankfo
4.P.P.1
re that they ve some cricy documenevin, & Wacan hire quammond, 2
n process. Inand relati
new teachertiveness (Lhran-Smithusefulness Robinson, 2n the contex
n the classrere is, howe
may have sundation, 2
m written repactual classr
g new teachy, the intervSkype. As wg technique
ng teams recromise that & Berry, 1
he quality og by improilable talent1996; Plumbategies that wer, 2010). approach toe, single meord, & Wyck
165‐178
167
hire iteria nts or allin, uality 001;
n this ively rs, it ittle, and of a 003) xt of
room ever, some 010; ports room
hers. view well, es to ceive they 999; f the ving ts of bley, will This
o the thod koff,
EuropeanURL:httpISSN:223
jurisunavveryespenewantiobta
tenssubjthatpracWhmosiden200of hand list char199jurisscho
hirinpredhirinteachirinfilte
inteprob(e.gpracthe requLieval, 2orga
nJournalop://www.ej35‐767X
Currentsdictions mvailable (Boy low confecially as th
w teachers mcipate the naining their
Interviesion betweejective pract the most ectice of relyen the subjest effective ntify the can5). Addition
hiring teachensure moof hires (Aracteristics 9). This psdictions, aool.
Hiring jng teachersdictive hirinng processechers by hirng processeers. Addition
Predictirview; the blem-solvin
g., a studentctices may horganizatio
uirements, tvens, van D2005; Sekiganizational
ofBusinessjbss.com/re
EU
t hiring pramake effectoyd et al, 20
fidence in they often hmay be unaneeds of vafirst teachin
ewing may en the use ofctice of hirieffective teaying too heaective approteachers m
ndidates’ chnally, some
hers with bere confiden
Authors, 20they perce
practice supadministrato
jurisdictions (Fullan, 2ng, that attees address ring smartees support thnal filters m
ive hiring observation
ng email ext achievemehelp hiring
on in severathe organiza
Dam & Ryaguchi, 2004culture may
andSocialecent.aspx
UROPEAN JO
actices maytive decisio007). Recenthe effectivhire new teaaware of hoarious jurisdng position
largely be af objective ing based oachers ultimavily, even oach of rely
may rely on haracteristice research shetter teachence among h13). By imive to fit th
pports the ors hire for
ns need to u2011). Someempts to finthe need to
er, thereby he tradition
may provide
approachesn of a modxercise (e.g.ent data anteams to se
al ways, incation/schoo
an, 2004; An4). A priory predomina
Sciences,V
OURNAL OF
y further beons about nt research (veness of thachers for sow to prepdictions, le(Ontario C
a subjectivecriteria for n interview
mately get hexclusively
ying on intea faulty ass
cs through thhows that srs (Darlinghiring team
mplementinghe school ahealthy desystem pos
use approae jurisdictio
nd the best fo support eflagging pr
nal resume, e better data
s can includel lesson ta., respondin
nalysis) to helect the bescluding a fil and its cuntonioni & r study shoate in hiring
Vol.2,No.1
F BUSINESS
problematwhom they(Authors, 2he interviewsystem posiare for hiriaving themollege of Te
e process, whiring (Har
ws and referhired. This y, on intervrviews is ussumption; the interviewschool-based-Hammond
m members g school-basand its needevelopment sitions and
ches that aons are nowfit among teeducational roblematic application
a upon which
ude a sequeaught by thng to an anhelp hiring st applicantt between t
ulture, and tPark, 2001
ows that assg decisions
1,pp165‐
S AND SOCI
ic in two ky hire in 012) shows
w selection itions rathering, how in
m unaware oeachers, 20
whose goal rris, Rutledgrences may tension def
views to selsed exclusivthat those rew alone (Krid hiring ma
d, 1997; Dethan hiring sed hiring, ds (Deal &of the demay have
are both sysw using a meacher candimprovemefits at som
n letter, and h to make a
ence of thehe teacher angry parent)
teams selet for the teathe applicanthe group w1; Ehrhart &sessments o(Karren & G
‐178,Febru
IAL SCIENC
key ways. Fthe selectio
s that some processes
r than for thnterviews aof how to i11).
is to yield ge, Ingle, &confuse th
fines the keect the mosvely, the higesponsible fistof-Brown
ay provide teArmond, G
that is undprincipals
& Peterson, esired schoo
little say in
stemic and multi-stageddidates (Papent by attem
me stage in interview w
a teacher hir
e followingapplicant; a); and, a prect the best aching positnt and the w
with whom & Makranskof fit betwGraves, 199
uary2014
CES
First, evidenon of teacschool admused in thheir own sc
are conducteimprove the
an objectiv& Thompson
e issue of tey weaknessst promisinggh stakes tafor hiring cn, Zimmermthose chargeGross, & Godertaken forcan select 1999; Fire
ol culture. n who is as
consistent d selection ppano, 2011mpting to pthe proces
with the addring decisio
g stages: ana face-to-farofessional
teacher. Ption. Such awork envirothey will w
ky, 2007; Keen the app
94).
4.P.P.1
nce that schers is lar
ministrators heir jurisdicchools. Seced, and howeir prospect
e outcome. n, 2007) andtrying to ens of our curg new teachask of hiringcan successfman, & Johned with the oldhaber, 2r a system-wteachers wh
estone & LoBut, in m
ssigned to t
for the tasprocess, ca
1). Multi-stapredict the ss. Multi-stadition of furn.
n initial phace interviewtask simularedictive hi
a person maonment, the
work (AnderKristof-Brow
plicant and
165‐178
168
chool rgely have tion,
cond, w to ts of
The d the nsure rrent hers. g the fully
nson, task 010) wide hose ouis,
many their
sk of alled aged best
aged rther
hone w; a ation iring
ay fit e job rson,
wn et d the
EuropeanURL:httpISSN:223
it sebetwfit, com
teacprobneedpromexpinefand suggmul
Intr
A khirinthathavbuttthe
hirinthe
engexplthe and
nJournalop://www.ej35‐767X
While teems unlikeween the inand group
mpeting goal
Complcher effectivblematic. Tds may be mmise of poerienced edffective teac
the schoolgestions forlti-staged, h
A New
roduction to
key feature ng teachers t fit their loce training itress their hstrongest po
Multi-stng process. following m
pre-sc
a pho
an ob
a shor
a stud
a form
a con
a stud
a finaHiring t
agement inlained in thstage, stratethe transiti
ofBusinessjbss.com/re
EU
these measuely that intenterviewee a
fit in the ls.
icating the ve. SimilarTheories abmore subjecositive yielducational schers is like system. Inr a way for
high impact
Way Forw
o Multi-Stag
of multi-sta can select cal circumsin all aspechiring decisiossible teac
taged high It is our co
model, inclu
creening ap
one interview
bserved less
rt term appr
dent engage
mal intervie
nflict embed
dent achieve
al screeningteams will,
n all nine ashe followingegies for gaons needed
andSocialecent.aspx
UROPEAN JO
ures of fit merviewers arand the proabsence of
teacher selrly, how hibout optimizctive than ilds, are yesupervisors ely much mn recognitiorward that mhiring proc
ward When
ged, High Im
aged high imfrom amontances. A sects of the mions by usinher candida
impact hirontention, huding:
pplications
w
on
renticeship
ement proble
ew
dded problem
ement data
g interview of course, b
spects of thg paragraph
athering relebetween st
Sciences,V
OURNAL OF
may be variere simultanfessional def a concep
lection procighly effeczing humans productivt to be prwill recogn
more costly tn of this pamay help hess.
the Interv
mpact Hirin
mpact hirinng the full raecond key f
model. Onlyng data aboates ultimate
ring has theowever, tha
with a mast
em solving
m solving ta
action plann
be subject this model fhs by identievant data aages to mak
Vol.2,No.1
F BUSINESS
ed and mayneously and emands of ttual framew
cess is the ltive teachen capital (Se, and predroven and nize that suto the superaradox, the
hiring teams
view is Not
g
ng practicesange of sugfeature of thy by attendout each canely get to te
e followingat school jur
ter teacher
task (while
ask
ning task
to the decisfor hiring nifying the gabout the peke each one
1,pp165‐
S AND SOCI
y provide sosystematic
teaching, cowork to str
lack of clarers are choSchultz, 196dictive appro
are labourupporting, srvisor, the s
remainder s acquire th
Enough: M
s is the flexggested hirinhis model isding to thesndidate whieach.
g potential risdictions w
e on apprent
ions of theiew teachers
goals of eacerformance e optimally p
‐178,Febru
IAL SCIENC
ome diverse cally assessiompetence ructure thes
ity about wsen in the
61) to get thoaches to hr intensive supervisingschool, the c
of this paphe most pro
Multi-Stage
xibility of thng practicess the absoluse two key ich they can
stages fromwould bene
ticeship)
ir jurisdictios. Each asp
ch stage, theof the teachproductive.
uary2014
CES
data in theing fit as thfor the jobse diverse
what charactselection p
he best fit iring, whileto implem
, and possichildren and
per is devotomising teac
d High Imp
he process. s to make uute need for
features can triangulat
m which to efit from usi
on about thepect of the e structure her candidat
4.P.P.1
e hiring proche compatib, organizatiand someti
teristics maprocess canof candidat
e showing sment. Howebly terminad their famied to provichers throu
pact Hiring
Those whouse of the st
hiring teaman hiring tete to ensure
design a ling all stage
e extent of ttotal procerequired wte at each st
165‐178
169
cess, bility ional imes
ake a n be te to some ever, ating ilies, iding gh a
g
o are tages ms to eams
that
local es of
their ss is ithin tage,
EuropeanURL:httpISSN:223
Pre-
Virtappl
membecasomnarrare abouare provinte
selerelascreappl
A P
the
To ghavwouthe capt
cleapriostag
nJournalop://www.ej35‐767X
-screening a
tually all slication to a
confir
confir
assesand
determto sup
Current pmbers may ause they m
metimes onlyrowing the stepping inut how eachengaging in
vide appropntions with
A moreecting appliationship proeening stagely to written
hone Interv
The secfollowing p
to dephilo
to ide
to estcandi
gather data e a pre-planuld hope to interview p
tured during
Once agar perceptioor to the nexge instead o
ofBusinessjbss.com/re
EU
application
school juriany teaching
rm the appl
rm intention
s the level
mine the levpport their aproblems wnot particip
may not aly human repool of can
nto the proch applicant n pre-screepriate filters
hin their clas
e suitable aications frooductively te to build cn applicatio
view
cond stage opurposes:
etermine if sophy of lea
entify percep
tablish comidate. from this s
nned list of hear in the process, prg the discus
gain, it is cron about itsxt stage of
of telephone
andSocialecent.aspx
UROPEAN JO
s
isdictions rg job openin
licant’s qual
ns to engag
of confiden
vel of approapplication.
with pre-screpate equallll be invitesources depndidates froess mid-strepresents he
ening, the ps for concessroom.
approach wom among through all consensus a
ons to help t
of multi-pha
the applicaarning as st
ptions of th
mmitment to
stage of the questions ocandidate’s
re-establishession.
ritical that a purposes, the process
e communic
Sciences,V
OURNAL OF
require thangs. Pre-scr
lifications f
e in ongoin
nce evident
opriate teach
eening apply in the deed to viewpartment peom among aeam, withou
er/his self inproblem is cepts embedd
would see aall applica
stages of thabout the nthem identif
ase teacher
ant can spetated in the w
he applicant
o the next p
interview por discussios discussioned response
all membersand have o
s. Technolocation, but w
Vol.2,No.1
F BUSINESS
at teacher creening app
for the posit
g profession
t in the app
hing or teac
lications at etermination
w the applicersonnel assall applicanut having a
n written forcompoundeded in a te
all hiring teants. To do
he hiring proneeds for thfy who will
hiring shou
eak in deptwritten app
’s confidenc
phases of m
process, it wn items and
n. As informes will be
s of the hirinopportunitieogies that alwhatever te
1,pp165‐
S AND SOCI
candidates lications sh
tion;
nal growth;
plicant’s sta
ching related
present aren of who mcations. Oftume respon
nts. This is an opportunirm. When hd because t
eacher’s des
eam membo this effeocess, the hihe position
move on to
uld include
th and withlication;
ce in profes
multi-staged
will be impod a pre-estabmation will essential su
ng team be es to discusllow for videchnology is
‐178,Febru
IAL SCIENC
provide whould allow
atement of a
d experienc
e of two tymoves on thften, only tnsibility forproblematicity to gathe
human resouthey lack thscription of
bers engagectively, aniring team sand determ
o the second
a phone int
h convictio
ssional comm
hiring shou
ortant for thblished list be exchangupports to
present at thss perceptiodeoconferens used it sh
uary2014
CES
written docuhiring team
application
ces offered b
ypes. First, the next stagthe school r pre-screenc because t
er comparaturces departhe professiof their philo
ed in vettind to sustaishould meet
mine criteriad stage of hi
terview. Thi
on about th
munication
uld these be
he hiring teof ideas an
ged quickly ensure that
he phone inons of the pncing couldhould allow
4.P.P.1
umentationms to:
or cover le
by the appli
the hiring tge of screeprincipals, ing and thethe interviewive impresstment persoonal traininosophy or t
ng, sorting, in the wort before the a they inteniring.
is interview
heir beliefs
n; and
e offered to
am membed concepts at this phas
t key ideas
nterview, haphone interv be used atall member
165‐178
170
n for
etter;
icant
team ening
and ereby wers sions onnel ng to their
and rking
pre-nd to
w has
and
o the
rs to they se of s are
ave a view t this rs of
EuropeanURL:httpISSN:223
the havhirin
An O
If threquapplbut immthatprofcandteacplanvarilessareawillcandsoonformman
Figu
Didgoal
in d
in fstagavaiof th
the jteac
nJournalop://www.ej35‐767X
interview tee establisheng process b
Observed L
he hiring teauire that thelying. All mat least e
mediately aft the hiring fessional skdidate and cher candidant (the learnious learninon, the teac
as they shoul also help didates’ skin as possiblmat for wrinageable (Fi
ure 1 Writte
d the teacherls for the stu
Anecdodetail.
After thfurther stepsge of the intilable to thehe process.
At this jurisdiction
cher. The te
ofBusinessjbss.com/re
EU
eam to engaed a strategybefore they
Lesson
am is impree candidatemembers ofelectronicallfter it is tau
team memkills related the hiring tate. For exaning goal) ng styles ancher candiduld improvethe intervieills. A writtle after the itten feedbaigure 1).
en Feedback
r candidate udents?
otal notes th
he observeds of the intterview proe most outst
fourth stagen who is receacher cand
andSocialecent.aspx
UROPEAN JO
age in all asy for identifengage in t
essed by the teach a les
f the hiring ly in real ught and to mbers are eq
to these goateam to havample, the and that thnd readines
date should e in such a ew team forten summardemonstrat
ack can kee
k of a Teach
meet the le
hat show evi
d lesson, botterview prococess is motanding of t
e of the proccognized andidate shoul
Sciences,V
OURNAL OF
pects of thifying whenthe phone c
e written apsson in a coteam shoultime. This identify im
qually clearals that willve poorly stteacher can
he teacher css levels byhave immelesson. Sucrmulate thery of the hition lesson ep the feedb
her Candida
earning Dipro
idence for e
th the intervcess as a sere labour inthe candida
cess, the teand valued fod be assign
Vol.2,No.1
F BUSINESS
s stage of inn and how aonversation
pplication aontext identd be involv
will allowmpressions wr about the l be assessetructured exndidate maycandidate isy tiering pa
ediate feedbch feedback eir summatiiring team’sand before back focuse
ate’s Demon
id the teaofessional s
each of thes
view team aerious showntensive andates as deter
acher candidor their profned to the m
1,pp165‐
S AND SOCI
nterviewingapplicants wn.
and the phontical to, or
ved in obserw hiring tewhile they a
students’ led in the canxpectations y be told ths to displayarts of thei
back from this a profes
ive commens evaluation
the next sted and the
nstration Le
acher candskills that w
se questions
and the teacw of interesd resource rmined by th
date shouldfessionalismmaster teach
‐178,Febru
IAL SCIENC
g. The intervwill be invite
ne interviewsimilar to,
rving the leeam membeare fresh. Inlearning gondidate. It wfor this hig
hat students y their skillsir lesson. Ihe hiring tesional cournts and oven of the lestage of the challenge
esson
idate displwere expecte
s should be
cher candidst in employdependent heir input in
d be assignedm and strongher for a pe
uary2014
CES
view team wed to the th
w of a candthe one to sson, preferers to discn this conte
oals for the would be unghly stressfare to learn
s with teachmmediately
eam as to thrtesy to the erall concluson should hiring procof writing
lay the ed?
provided fo
ate should sying the teaso it shouldn the previo
d to a teachg teaching seriod of one
4.P.P.1
will also neeird phase o
didate, they which they
rably in percuss the leext, it is cri
lesson andnfair to bothful effort byn the parts hing to addy followinghe strengthscandidate b
usions aboutbe provide
cess. A strata timely re
or the candi
see engagemacher. The d only be mous three st
her employeskills…a mae to two we
165‐178
171
ed to f the
may y are rson, esson itical d the h the y the of a
dress g the and
but it t the
ed as tegic eport
idate
ment next
made tages
ed by aster eeks.
EuropeanURL:httpISSN:223
Thishirinprocthe hirinduriteamapprteacto pmen
A St
Thiswora stcanduse in inwiththe man
of thalloquicobsestud
Figu
CrEmEnIsoleaIdereeUsdoinsDiimconEmstruSua “
nJournalop://www.ej35‐767X
s time shoung team to cess, no mateacher canng team. Ring the apprm should berenticeship
chers and thpay a profentoring proc
tudent Enga
s stage of thrking with atudent engadidate’s abian IEP as a
nstructionalh a “whatevteacher can
naging and s
Hiring the principlew them to rckly, casualervation tasdent engage
ure 2 Obser
iteria for Ombedded ngagement Tolates issuarning succeentifies engagementses an IEPcument desstruction splays c
magination ntexts
mpathizes wuggles with
upports stud“whatever it
ofBusinessjbss.com/re
EU
uld be bothgather dat
aster teacherndidate. Thiather, the hrenticeship e very clearand that li
he jurisdictiofessional sticess.
agement Pro
he interviewa master teaagement proility to: isolaa working dl contexts; ever it takes”ndidate is csupporting t
team membes and concrecord speclly, and witsk and will ment and d
rvation of an
Observation St
Task (Stageues relateess
approt strategies P as a wosigned to im
creativity in instruc
with a learneh a context dent successt takes” attit
andSocialecent.aspx
UROPEAN JO
h a learningta about ther should be is could cre
hiring team time and obr about whaist of skillson’s cultureipend to th
oblem Solvi
w process shcher on a shoblem. Sucate issues re
document deempathize w” attitude. Tchallenged the learning
bers who obepts of diff
cific observathin a dynarequire tha
ifferentiated
n Embedded
of an tudent 4)
Ob
d to
opriate
orking mprove
and ctional
er who
s with tude
Sciences,V
OURNAL OF
g time for the teacher carequired to
eate awkwamembers s
bserve the tat professios should gue related to hhe master t
ing Task
hould be emhort-term apch a task welated to leaesigned to i
with a learneTo make thi
to provideg of the rem
bserve this sferentiated iations (Figuamic lessonat the hiringd supports f
d Student E
bserver’s No
Vol.2,No.1
F BUSINESS
he teacher andidate’s evaluate th
ard collegiashould eachteacher cand
onal skills thuide their ohosting andteacher to
mbedded in pprenticeshiwill providearning succeimprove inser who strugis stage of t
e support fomainder of th
tage of the nstruction a
ure 2) of reln infused wg team memfor student s
Engagement
otes
1,pp165‐
S AND SOCI
candidate asuitability f
he work andal relationshh visit the apdidate. As whey hope to
observationsd mentoringrecognize t
the previouip, they shoe interview ess; identifystruction; diggles with athe intervieor a studenhe students
interview pand will neelated profes
with interactmber(s) is esuccess.
Task
Obserand R
‐178,Febru
IAL SCIENC
and an addfor the pos
d engagemenhips and maapprenticeshwith the leso observe ins. Depending colleaguesthe addition
us stage. Would be assig
team memy appropriatisplay their a context; anw process r
nt with this in the class
process will ed an observssional skilltion and acespecially t
rver’s ConcRecommend
uary2014
CES
itional opposition. At thnt in the appay subvert thip classrooson observan the candidng on locals, the jurisdinal work i
While teachergned the tas
mbers with te reengagemcreativity a
nd, support realistic, it
reengagem.
need a deepvation frams in a contetivity. Thistrained in is
clusions dations
4.P.P.1
ortunity forhis stage ofprenticeshipthe goals of
om at least oation, the hidate duringl contracts iction may ninvolved in
r candidatessk of addresa sense of
ment strategand imaginastudent sucis essential
ment task w
p understanmework that ext that happs is not an ssues relate
165‐178
172
r the f the p for f the once iring
g this with need
n the
s are ssing f the gies; ation ccess
that while
nding will
pens easy
ed to
EuropeanURL:httpISSN:223
Befofor procengface
A F
Recseleand procstrenthe are persquerecesomif th
enouthe provcandlead
inteorieorgawhacandInteaspe
inteposeas c
nJournalop://www.ej35‐767X
fore teacher two purposcess and haagement tase-to-face int
Formal Inte
cent past praection proce
a very bricess. Shockngth of theivalidity of anot engage
sonal commstions, the fently engage
me questionshey were in
Intervieugh informjob?; and, vide informdidate is a dership style
Intervierviewers ar
entation comanizational at questionsdidates’ res
erviewers shects of the i
After thrview teame a problem
candidates a
ofBusinessjbss.com/re
EU
candidatesses: they shave an oppsk, and theyterview.
rview
actice in maess (Authorsief (usually
kingly, someir final hirina formal inted in the pmunication, focus and ped in intervs were gettithe position
ew questionmation for in
“Will we lomation abougood fit fore.
ewers need re unaware mpared to fit theory; a
s should be sponses, thehould also nterview as
he formal inm so that them for the seladdress the f
andSocialecent.aspx
UROPEAN JO
move on thould hear aortunity to y should de
any jurisdics, 2012). Pr
y 25 to 30 e principalsng decision terview to h
process of sAugust, 2
purpose of tviews whereng at and wn of the teac
ns always nenterviewers ove workinut these thrr the organi
to be traineof the orieother inter
and, have hasked of th
e interview consider th
s they discu
nterview, aey are inforlection teamfinal three s
Sciences,V
OURNAL OF
to stage 5 oa report frodigest both
esign the qu
ctions has mrincipals whminutes) ti who have only about
help them sesetting the 2013). Withthe question
e they had nwould have cher candida
eed to be dto get answ
ng with youree questioization, the
ed in intervintations therviewers; h
had no time he candidatewill lack va
he use of viss candidate
applicants shrmed of the m. It is impostages of the
Vol.2,No.1
F BUSINESS
f the multi-om the teamh the obser
uestions to b
made the forho have hadime to interhired teachet 50% of theelect the bequestions thout the ons may not
no question no idea howate (W. Hill
designed witwers to the qu?” By ensu
ns, intervieschool team
iewing apprey have towhave no kn
with the otes and whatalidity as anideo technoes’ response
hould get sstrengths t
ortant that te selection p
1,pp165‐
S AND SOCI
-stage intervm member(srvations andbe asked du
rmal intervid only the terview canders recentlye time. Frusst teachers that will as
opportunity be clear to
design inpuw they theml, personal c
th three keyquestions: “uring that alewers will m, the job
roaches befward the jobnowledge other membet criteria then aspect of ology to tapes.
some feedbahey displaythis feedbacprocess.
‐178,Febru
IAL SCIENC
view, the ins) who obsd recomme
uring the nex
iew a very deacher canddidates repoy, report thastration amois compounsked during
to engageo intervieweut, reported mselves woucommunica
y ideas in mCan you doll interviewbe able torequiremen
fore they fab; are unawof the strucers of the iney will appthe selectio
pe interview
ack from atyed in this cck is timely
uary2014
CES
nterview teaerved the la
endations frxt stage of
difficult pardidate’s writort dissatisfat they feel cong hiring pnded when tg the interve in settingers. In fact, that they ha
uld address ation, Augus
mind. They o the job?”;
w questions o determinents, and the
ace this highware of diffcture of innterview teaply as they lon process ws so that t
t least one context and, specific, a
4.P.P.1
am should mast stage ofrom the stuthe process
rt of the teatten applicafaction withconfident inprincipals athe interviewviews (W. g the interv
principals ad no idea wthese quest
st, 2013).
should pro“Will you are designe
e if the teaadministrat
h stakes tasferences in tnterviews oam to determlisten to tea(Author, 20they can re
member ofd areas that and construc
165‐178
173
meet f the
udent s, the
acher ation, h the n the about wers Hill, view who what tions
ovide love
ed to acher tor’s
sk. If their
or of mine acher 013). evisit
f the may ctive
EuropeanURL:httpISSN:223
A C
Somthe teacteaca reemo
stresoluof c
inte
irreusuaWe
conneedwouinclprofis emailookmakthei“Whbeenof tsupp
A St
Thisdeteteacplanof acoul
nJournalop://www.ej35‐767X
Conflict Emb
me of the printeraction
cher selectioching commesponse to otionally.
This wrss; profess
utions and acommand in
An exarview proce
Exampl
The tea
I am vesponsible toally fails madon’t want
The teacerns raisedd to determuld hope to ude proper fessional maempathetic ntaining a pking for a wkes should dr professionhat is the ren heard, withe relationport the chi
tudent Achi
s stage of ermine the cher candidan to improvea single studld be data f
ofBusinessjbss.com/re
EU
bedded Pro
ofessional ts between on process w
munication tsomeone w
ritten task wsionalism; wattitude town a school co
ample of a ess.
le
acher has rec
very upset o assign so ath tests. I hanother eve
acher candidd in this em
mine what asee in the tgrammar, saturity of thto the con
positive tonwin-win soldemonstratenalism and eal concern?ll be addresship betweld’s success
evement Da
the multi-slevel of foates are proe the studen
dent in relatfor a group
andSocialecent.aspx
UROPEAN JO
oblem Solvin
tasks that a the teacherwill engagetask. This shwho is high
will allow twritten comard others wontext.
written tas
ceived the f
about the many mathhave given hening of tea
date is thenmail. In evalan ideal respeacher candspelling, andhe teacher cncerns that ne, keeping tlution. The e their abilitto consider?” The respssed in a timen the teacs.
ata Action P
stage intervcus on studovided withnt learning ttion to a sinof students
Sciences,V
OURNAL OF
ng Task
teacher mur and the se teacher cahould be a w
hlighting a
the interviewmmunicatiowho express
sk scenario
following em
homework questions fhim permiss
ars and figh
n asked to duating the sponse wouldidate’s wrid tone, this
candidate. Itwere expr
the best intewritten res
ty to distancr the parentponse and pmely mannecher and the
Planning Ta
view procesdents’ learnh an examplthat is meas
ngle piece of from a larg
Vol.2,No.1
F BUSINESS
st undertaketudents. Fo
andidates inwritten taskconcern or
w team to aon skills; ps a legitima
o will prov
mail from a
that you for him to csion not to ts to get this
develop a psuitability old include aitten answeris also an o
t should be ressed, looerests of thesponse and ce themselvt’s email bylan should er, and will e parent an
ask
ss for new ning that chle of studensured by thef evidence fge scale sta
1,pp165‐
S AND SOCI
e are not sitor this reason the opportk where the
issue and
assess the tproblem soate concern;
vide a conte
parent.
assigned tocomplete whdo any furths done agai
plan, includiof the plan aand the quar. While theopportunity evident in t
oking for ae student at the “next s
ves from why asking theallow the pbe handled
nd allows th
teachers iharacterizesnt achieveme data. The dfor a single
andardized o
‐178,Febru
IAL SCIENC
tuated in theon, the nextunity to shoteacher candisplays a
teacher canolving skill; and, their
ext for this
o my son hen you knoher math hoin.
ing a writteand the writalities of a pe criteria forfor the inte
the responsea positive a
the forefrosteps” plan hat they migemselves, “Wparent a send in a way them to con
s an oppors the teachement data andata could blearning ex
or non-stand
uary2014
CES
e classroomxt phase of ow their skndidate is reconcern ag
didates’: cols; beliefs understandi
s part of th
last night. w he hates omework th
en responsetten responprofessionar a written rerview teame that the teand constru
ont of the cothat the tea
ght perceiveWhat is these that theirthat maintaintinue to w
rtunity for er candidatend are reqube evidencexpectation. Adardized as
4.P.P.1
m or reflectivf a multi-stakills with a nequired to wggressively
omposure uabout probing of the c
he multi-sta
It was tothis subjectat is sent ho
, to addressse, interview
al response response sh
m to examineeacher candiuctive soluonversation,acher candi
e as an attace concern?”r concerns hins the integ
work togethe
interviewere. In this stuired to creae of the learAlternativelsessment fo
165‐178
174
ve of aged non-write
and
under blem chain
aged
tally t and ome.
s the wers they
hould e the idate tion, , and idate
ck on ” and have grity er to
rs to tage, ate a rning ly, it ocus.
EuropeanURL:httpISSN:223
In e
An
An
On whicandwhesourassethe take
to hand we comthey
A F
At thighto thserv
Addas cearlteac
nJournalop://www.ej35‐767X
either case, t
identi identi identi plan
identi comm
takenexample of
The studedenominat
example of
A Grade 3administer
this stage ch should bdidate’s famen assessmerces by triaessment datwritten resp
es” attitude
Experiehire teachers
indicative ocan demand
mpetency. Ify will comm
Final Screen
this final stah level of cohose candidve three mai
to cel
to off
to woprofe
ditionally, thcareer mentoy years of
cher in the p
ofBusinessjbss.com/re
EU
the teacher
ify trends oify the limitify alternatishort and lified in the
municate to n to improvef an achieve
nt is unabtors in unit t
f a standardi
class is pered to all stu
of the interbe providedmiliarity wient data shoangulating ta, and relatponse, the hto support s
enced hirings as one thaof seasonedd this level f it is clear tmit to develo
ing Intervie
age of the mompetency dates who hain purposes
lebrate the a
fer employm
ork with thessional growhis final scrors to the ttheir caree
profession.
andSocialecent.aspx
UROPEAN JO
candidate sh
f evidence atations of thive sources longer termdata; and students a
e the studenment data ta
ble to showtest question
ized, large s
rforming wudents. Wha
rview, the d in writtenith various ws areas ofdata aboutted improve
hiring team students’ lea
g teams wilat includes d and very cof professio
that this is hoping even
ew
multi-stagedat each stagave been hi, including:
achievemen
ment to the t
e teacher canwth for theireening inteeacher cand
er with adv
Sciences,V
OURNAL OF
hould:
as seen in thhe data sourof data that
m instruction
and to parennt’s (studentask for an in
w evidencens. What ac
scale, group
well below that actions w
hiring teamn format. Thtypes of as
f underachiet achievemeement planscan also assarning.
l recognize some aspec
competent teonalism amhow teacherstronger lev
d new teachge have beeighly regard
nts of the tea
teacher cand
ndidate as air first year erview shoudidate. Thisvice, suppor
Vol.2,No.1
F BUSINESS
he data; rce; t could be unal actions
nts what thts’) success.ndividual st
e of undersctions will y
p result achi
he area’s avwill you take
m should cohis will givsessment, tevement, thent from ms to all staksess the can
the precedcts of profeeachers. We
mong new ters will be hivels of comp
her hiring pren turned awded by the h
acher candid
didate; and
an early carin the profe
uld be a tims support shrt, and reso
1,pp165‐
S AND SOCI
sed to verifthat are ne
he data show. tudent on an
standing hoyou take?
evement tas
verage in ree as their cla
onsider the e the hiringthe need to e capacity o
multiple soukeholders, indidate’s lev
ding stages oessional teace would agreachers and ired, we canpetency dur
rocess, teacway. The finhiring team
date through
reer supportession.
me to outlinehould be avources as n
‐178,Febru
IAL SCIENC
fy the trendseeded to im
ws, and ho
n individual
ow to add
sk is provid
eading on thassroom tea
breadth ofg team an o
engage in of the candiurces, and including thvel of intern
of the propocher practicree with thisraise the b
n anticipate ring their pr
cher candidanal screeninat all other
h the other
t team and h
e the role ovailable to heeded, with
uary2014
CES
s evident in mprove the
w specific
l task is pro
d fractions
ded.
he standardacher?
f the candidopportunity focused, ta
idate to suppthe need to
he students nalization o
osed modelce that are vs perceptionar of expeca back filli
rofessional t
ates who hang interview
stages. Thi
stages of th
help them c
f the hiringhelp the newh the aim o
4.P.P.1
the data; trends that
actions wil
ovided.
with un
dized test th
date’s respoto consider
argeted teacport assessmo communiand parent
of a “whatev
l for a new very demann and arguectations for ting effect wtraining.
ave not showw is offered is interview
he process;
create a plan
g team memw teacher inof retaining
165‐178
175
t are
ll be
nlike
hat is
onse, r the
ching ment icate s. In
ver it
way nding e that their
where
wn a only will
n for
mbers n the g the
EuropeanURL:httpISSN:223
Disc
Thetoo hastmodknoany we lackreco
oppto minclperfteacoutlthe
Con
Thecomprofselecasetheyareais th
job orgain torieof aprocasseproc
and the cont
nJournalop://www.ej35‐767X
cussion
ere is little dunwieldy, ttily and havdel is an extw from a stother facto
encourage k confidencognize conc
The straortunities fo
manage the ude at leasformance inching positiolined in thisschool and j
nclusion
e teacher-himpared to ufessional skect teachers e that they y collected aas of practiche most effe
It is critin a profe
anizational the teachersentations in a multi-stagcess; develoessment tascess.
While tsupports ar
strength of tinuing to u
ofBusinessjbss.com/re
EU
doubt that stime consumve little traintreme departrong and g
or when we system adm
ce in the cucurrently tha
ategies outlfor school ju
immediate st one addn the classron is enrichs paper provjurisdiction
iring modelunpeeling tkills at each
who will uhave choseabout the apce. The breaective one.
tical to the eessional matheory abous they waninterview q
ged process;oping relevks); and, d
this list of inre availablethe system.
use processe
andSocialecent.aspx
UROPEAN JO
school systeming, and cning and norture from tgrowing bod
consider stministrators urrent interat other stra
ined in the urisdictions
implementitional stagroom, colle
hed by the cvide some dnal levels.
l that is outhe layers oh stage of thultimately ben the mostpplicant thradth of the i
efficacy of anner. Trainut “fit”; devnt in their questions; id; developingvant problemdeveloping p
nterview teae in all syste. Without coes in which
Sciences,V
OURNAL OF
em administcostly for tho time to forthe norm. Tdy of researtudent achieto consider
rview systeategies are n
multi-stageto upgrade
tation of allge in their ecting data collected triadirection ab
utlined in tof an onion
he hiring probe hired, thet promisingrough the stinformation
any hiring pning is neeveloping a cjurisdiction
dentifying rg criterion-bm solving tprocedures
am skills mems to deveommitmentwe lack con
Vol.2,No.1
F BUSINESS
trators will heir system.rm a commhere are twrch that the evement as r the alternam used to
needed to bo
ed interviewcurrent hiril nine stagecurrent proabout the
angulation obout how to
this paper n by graduocess. Aftere hiring tea teachers frtages of the n will help to
practice thaeded in macommonly un; developinroles and resbased obsertasks for sofor commu
may be dauntelop these int to this newnfidence.
1,pp165‐
S AND SOCI
initially rea In systems
mon vision oo responseseffective qthe most im
ative. Whenselect new
olster the int
w process asing practicees of this mocess. As skills offe
of data abouo start the pr
has severalually focusr using all nams can be rom amongprocess wi
o assure the
at the interviany areas, understood sng a commsponsibilitiervation framome stagesunication to
ting at the onterview m
w direction f
‐178,Febru
IAL SCIENC
act to this ms where hiriof who they s to the antiqualities of amportant oun we know
w teachers (terview pro
s presented ies. While jurmodel, many
with collecered by newut their skilrocess of en
l stages. Ting on deenine stages more confi
g the applicill indicate se interview
iewers are tincluding: set of chara
mon underses for team meworks fo of the proo the applic
outset of immanagement
for interview
uary2014
CES
model by deing teams arwant to hircipated cona teacher mutcome in sc
that school(Authors, 2
ocess.
in this paperisdictions my would reacting data aw teachers ls. The stagnriching hir
he staged peper and deof the prop
fident, than ants. The inskills in mateam that th
trained to dodeveloping
acteristics thstanding of members a
or the variouocess (commcants at eac
mplementatioskills gradu
wing new te
4.P.P.1
eciding that re often forre and why,ncerns. First
matter more chools. Secl administra
2012), we m
er provide mmay not be adily be ablabout studeapplying f
ges of the mring practice
process caneeper level
posed proceis currentlynformation
any professiheir final ch
o this imporg knowledghat are desirf structures at various stus stages ofmunication ch stage of
on, there is ually to supeachers, we
165‐178
176
it is rmed , this t, we than
cond, ators must
many able le to ents’ for a
model es at
n be ls of ss to y the
that ional hoice
rtant ge of rable
and tages f the and
f the
time pport e risk
EuropeanURL:httpISSN:223
Ref
nJournalop://www.ej35‐767X
ferences
1. AndersoselectioReview,
2. Antoniobehavio
3. Bill andMeasurfindings
4. Boyd, Dpreparahttp://m
5. Campbeeffectiv29,347-
6. Cashin,M.B. PaHeights
7. CochranLeaders
8. CranstoCanadi
9. DarlingYork: NUnivers
10. Darling12-17.
11. DarlingEducati
12. Darlingfor educ
13. Deal, TJossey-
14. DeArmteacher
15. Dinhamclassroohttp://re
16. Ehrhartperson-
17. FirestonHandboBass.
ofBusinessjbss.com/re
EU
on, N., Lievon: Key dire, 53, 487-50oni, D., & Pours. Persond Melinda Gres of Effects-research-pD., Goldhabation on teacmuse.jhu.eduell R.J., Kyrveness: Tow-362. , W.E. (1994aulsen (Edss, MA: Simon-Smith, Mship, 67(8), on, J. (2012)an Journal
g-HammondNational Cosity. g-Hammond
g-Hammondional Leade
g-Hammondcational equ
T.E., & PeterBass.
mond, M., Grselection in
m, S., Ingvaroms. Teachiesearch.acert, K.H. & M-vocation anne, W. A. , &ook of resea
andSocialecent.aspx
UROPEAN JO
vens, F., vanections for f01. Park, H. (20nnel PsychoGates Foundtive Teachinpaper.pdf ber, D.D., Lcher qualityu riakides, L.,
wards a mod
4). Student s.), Teachingon and Schu
M., & Power,6-13.
). Exploringof Educatio
d, L. (1997)mmission o
d, L. (2001)
d, L. (2003)ership, 60(8d, L., & Beruity. Journarson, K.D. (
ross, B., & n 10 elemenrson, L., & ing standarr.edu.au/tea
Makransky, Gnd person-jo& Louis, K
arch on educ
Sciences,V
OURNAL OF
n Dam, K., future resear
01). The efology, 54, 33dation. (201ng Project. R
ankford, H.y. The Futur
, Muijs, R.Ddel of resear
ratings of tg and learnuster. , C. (2010).
g school prinonal Admini. Doing wha
on Teaching
. The challe
. Keeping g), 6-13.
rry, B. (1999al of Negro E(1999). Shap
Goldhaber, ntary schoolKleinhenz,
rds and teacaching_standG. (2007). Tob fit. Journ
K.S. (1999). cational ad
Vol.2,No.1
F BUSINESS
& Ryan, A.rch and prac
ffect of pers31-360. 0). LearninRetrieved fr
. & Wyckofre of Childre
D., & Robinrch and teac
eaching: A ing in the c
New direct
ncipals’ hiristration anat matters m
g and Ameri
enge of staff
good teacher
9). RecruitinEducation,
aping school
D. (2010). ls. EducatioE. (2008). T
cher evaluatdards.12 Testing vocanal of CareeSchools as
dministration
1,pp165‐
S AND SOCI
. (2004). Fuctice. Appli
onality on p
ng about teafrom www.g
ff, J.H. (200en, 17, 45-6
nson, W. (20her appraisa
summary oollege class
tions for tea
ring decisionnd Policy, 13most: Investica’s Future
ffing our sch
rs: Why it m
ng teachers 68, 254-27l culture: Th
Is it better tonal AdminiTeaching tation. Retriev
ational interer Assessmecultures. Inn (2nd ed., p
‐178,Febru
IAL SCIENC
uture perspeed Psycholo
peer ratings
aching: Initigatesfounda
07). The effe68. Retrieve
003). Differal. Oxford R
of the researsroom (pp. 5
acher prepar
ns: Fitting i35. tigations in e, Teachers
hools. Educa
matters, wha
for the 21st
9. The heart of
to be good oistration Qualent: The bved from:
rests and peent, 15,206-n J. Murphy pp.297-322)
uary2014
CES
ectives on emogy: An Inte
of contextu
ial findings fation.org/…
fect of certifed from:
rential teachReview of E
rch. In K.A.531-541). N
ration. Educ
in and gettin
quality teacCollege, Co
ational Lea
at teachers c
t century: T
leadership:
or lucky? Duarterly, 46,est teachers
ersonality as-226. & K.S. Lou
). San Franc
4.P.P.1
mployee ernational
ual work
from the /preliminary
fication and
her Education,
Feldman aNeedham
cational
ng hired.
ching. New olumbia
adership, 58
can do.
he foundati
San Franci
Decentralize, 322-362. s for Austra
s predictors
uis (Eds.), cisco: Jossey
165‐178
177
y-
and
8(8),
ion
isco:
ed
lia’s
of
y-
EuropeanURL:httpISSN:223
nJournalop://www.ej35‐767X
18. Fullan, 204). E
19. Gladwewww.ne
20. Goldhabdecisionwww.ae
21. Harris, Retriev
22. Harris, principafrom ww
23. Herriot,24. Jacob, B
Retriev25. Karren,
Guideli26. Kristof-
work: APersona
27. Little, OWashinwww.tq
28. Authors29. Author 30. Montgo31. Ontario
schools32. Pappan33. Plumble
Manage34. Rivkin,
Econom35. Schultz36. Sekiguc
the liter37. Walsh,
Washin38. Young,
educati39. Zhu, C.
China. I
ofBusinessjbss.com/re
EU
M. (2011). ast Melbour
ell, M. (200ewyorker.cober, D., & Hns. Americaea.org/articlD. N. (2004ed from wwD.N., Rutleals look forww.teacher, P. (1989). B., & Lefgred from ww, R.J., & Grines for futu-Brown, A.L
A meta-analal PsycholoO., Goe, L., ngton, DC: Nqsource.oegs (2012) (2013)
omery, C. (1o College ofs. Toronto: Oo, L. (2011)ey, P. (1985ement. S. J., Hanu
metrica, 73, z, T.W. (196chi, T. (200rature. OsakK., & Tracy
ngton, DC: N J., Levin, Bonal adminJ., & DowlInternationa
andSocialecent.aspx
UROPEAN JO
Choosing trne, AU: Ce8, Decembeom/reportinHansen, M. an Economiles.php?doi4). Putting aww.nepc.coledge, S.A., Ir when hirinrqualityreseaRecruitmen
ren, L., (200ww. Educatiaves, L.M.
ure researchL., Zimmerlysis of persogy, 58, 281
& Bell, C. National Co
g/publication
1996). Orgaf Teachers. (Ontario Col). Using res5). Recruitm
ushek, E. A.417-458. R
61). Investm4). Person-o
ka Keidai Ry, C.O. (200National CoB., &Wallinistration (4ing, P.J. (20al Journal o
Sciences,V
OURNAL OF
the wrong dentre for Strer 15). Mostng/2008/12/
(2010). Usc Review: Pi=10.1257/aa high-qualilorado.edu/fIngle, W.K.
ng teachers arch.org/mint in the 19906). When pionnext.org/(1994). Ass
h. Internatiorman, R.D., son-job, per-342. (2009). A p
omprehensivns/practical
anization fit(2011). Trallege of Teasearch to prement and sel
., & Kain, JRetrieved froment in humorganizationonshu, 54(604). Increas
ouncil on Ten, D.W. (200
th ed.). Toro002). Staffinof Human R
Vol.2,No.1
F BUSINESS
drivers for wrategic Edut likely to su/15121fa_faing perform
Papers and aer.100.2.25ity teacher ifiles/EPSL_., & Thompand what itix_match.pd90s. Londonprincipals ra/journal/sprsessing pers
onal Journal& Johnson
rson-organiz
practical guve Center foGuide.pdf
t is key to joansition to teachers. Retriedict great tlection, (4th
. F. (2005). om www.ec
man capital. An fit and per6), 179-196.sing the oddeacher Qual07). Undersonto: Nelsonng practices
Resource Ma
1,pp165‐
S AND SOCI
whole systemucation. Retrucceed. The
act_gladwelmance on the
Proceeding50 in every Flo_0404-111-pson, C.C. (2t means for df n: Institute oate teachers.ring06/ son-organizl of selectio, E.C. (2005zation, pers
uide to evaluor Teacher Q
ob success. Heaching 201ieved from teachers. Haed.). Londo
Teachers, sconomics.haAmerican Erson-job fit . ds: How goolity. standing Can. s in transitio
Management,
‐178,Febru
IAL SCIENC
m reform (Srieved frome New Yorkel e job to infogs, 100, 250
orida classroEPRU.pdf2007). Mix teacher qua
of Personne. Education
ation fit in pon and Asses5). Consequon-groups a
uating teachQuality. Re
HR Magazi10: Early-cawww.oct.caarvard Eduon: Institute
schools, andarvard.edu/Economic R
in employe
od policies
anadian sch
on: Some em 13. 569-59
uary2014
CES
eminar Serim www. cse.
er. Retrieve
orm teacher0-255.Retrie
oom: Policy
and match:ality policie
el Managem Next, 6(2),
personnel sssment, 2, 1uences of inand person-
her effectiveetrieved from
ine, 41(1), 9areer teacha cation Lettee of Personn
d academic …Hanushekeview, 51, 1ee selection
can yield be
hools: An in
mpirical evi97.
4.P.P.1
ies paper Nedu.au
ed from:
r tenure eved from
y brief.
: What e.s Retrieved
ment. 59-64.
election: 146-156. ndividuals’ fsupervisor f
eness. m
94-97. ers in Onta
er 27(3). nel
achievemenkRivkinKai1-16. : A review
etter teache
troduction
idence from
165‐178
178
o.
d
fit at fit.
rio
nt. in
of
ers.
to
m