Post on 22-Feb-2023
Syeda Farwa Raza Shirazi 500534393
Short Essay Assignment
“Paper and plastic cups, grocery bags, bottles and foam containers are
carelessly and nonchalantly tossed out of open car windows” (Nick,
2007). Littering has been a common issue within our society for over
many decades and still is not fully resolved. There have been many
measures taken over the years to encourage a change within the
society. There has been an introduction of elements such as advisement
campaigns, increase in fines, more convenient garbage bins,
receptacles and many more yet the issue of littering still persists.
In the essay I will attempt to explore these elements through the four
modalities presented by Lawrence Lessig in the book The code 2.0. Lessig
explores the direct and indirect roles in regulating individuals of a
society emphasizing that there should be less indirect regulations. I
agree that direct regulation should be used to enforce a positive
change in the society in regards to regulating individuals but at
times the indirect method is more effective than the direct method.
When examining the issue of littering we can start by analysing the
constraints that are place on us to prevent us from littering. The
most influential one might be the fines that are placed when caught
littering in certain places such as the TTC, Ontario Highways, or
1CMN 317
Syeda Farwa Raza Shirazi 500534393
public property. Here are a few examples of laws that are in place to
prevent littering:
Figure 1: Not allowed to take pictures of TTC property of ads or signs, some stations have signs up
These laws are not applicable in all places and therefore only
controlled to a certain extent. As Lessig stated about smoking that
“There are no smoking police, and smoking courts are still quite
rare.” (Lessig, 122). Nearly the same stance can be applied to
littering, as there are no litter police and littering cases rarely go
to court. There are other means that prevent us from overflowing our
roads with garbage such as social norms and etiquettes.
We expect the social norms towards littering have changed over the
years due to the knowledge that is being provided to us. Below are
some examples of litter you might still find in your streets.
2CMN 317
Syeda Farwa Raza Shirazi 500534393
Figure 2
We now know how harmful littering can be to our future and our
environment. Though this education and knowledge we are expected “to
learn live together with fellow citizens, and above all to learn to
obey the law” (Lessig, 129). Despite this information being provided
to us in our social norms there is still a lack is discipline in
littering. There are “some things never change, like the perpetual
pile of trash between the fences at the TTC customer parking lot on
Bishop Ave.” (Lakey, 2014). There is no doubt that in 2014 individuals
in society know of the concern regarding saving our environment but
there is still the social norm to throwing garbage when you are in a
rush to get somewhere. Since these are not the practices that we want
or expect from our society there is still room for us to change these
norms. If the government places cost effective “Laws [they] can change
social norms” (Lessig, 129).
3CMN 317
Syeda Farwa Raza Shirazi 500534393
Companies have been using marketing strategies to encourage members in
our society to be aware of the environmentally friendly initiative
adopted. This is due to pressure placed by governments on companies to
control the pollutants. Even though this does not directly affect
littering but in an indirect way does play in part in encouraging
individuals to recycle or compost certain things. A good example would
be this plastic water bottle below. This might not directly tell the
water bottle buyer not to litter but it states that this was recycled
before and still can be recycled.
Figure 3
This method of indirect regulation, in my opinion is not necessarily
attempting “use nontransparent means when transparent means are
available” (Lessig, 136) since it is known to the regulated individual
that purpose of the regulation. This particular indirect method of
preventing littering is at time more effective than the laws that are
in place. There is also a second alternative that the market provides
refunding when recyclable item is returned, as stated in Figure 3.
4CMN 317
Syeda Farwa Raza Shirazi 500534393
This might not be common with water bottles but is fairly common with
beer or alcoholic beverages. This initiative taken by the market seems
to be a little more effective in reducing litter.
Lastly the fourth modality is also very effective in reducing litter.
The government has also used architecture in some means to promote
anti littering. One of the main complains in the past of
environmentalist/Reports was the lack of garbage, recycle bins or
receptacles. In 2010 at TTC Kipling station the main excuse of smokers
was lack of receptacles available “saying they wouldn't flick their
butts on the ground if receptacles were available.” (Nick, 2010). Most
of the garbage bins at now replaced with this new design allowing not
only trash but also recycling paper, plastic and also cigarette. This
design is attractive allowing individuals an excuse to throw their
garbage in the bin instead of the floor. An example of this new
garbage bin is provided in Figure 4 below.
5CMN 317
Syeda Farwa Raza Shirazi 500534393
Figure 4
Overall, I find that the regulators are using both indirect and direct
means of promoting and encouraging individuals which has resulted to a
decreased in overall littering but has not completely alter the social
norms. All of Lessig’s modalities of regulation have been used to
implement anti-littering but it is not completely effective yet. I
find that there is still more means of regulation that can be placed
to enforce anti-littering movement.
6CMN 317
Syeda Farwa Raza Shirazi 500534393
Bibliography
Lakey, J. (2014, Sep 04). Commuters' trash piles up near TTC lot.
Toronto Star Retrieved from http://ezproxy.lib.ryerson.ca/login?
url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/1559583423?accountid=13631
Lakey, J. (2010, Nov 16). Cigarette butt snowstorm at kipling TTC.
Toronto Star Retrieved from http://ezproxy.lib.ryerson.ca/login?
url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/788841926?accountid=13631
Lessig, L. (2006). Code version 2.0. New York: Basic Books.
Nick Marino, T. (2007, Aug 08). Littering hurts our world. The Spectator
Retrieved from
http://ezproxy.lib.ryerson.ca/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/
docview/270286751?accountid=13631
7CMN 317