Post on 30-Mar-2023
Unveiling Can Prevent Change
“They want to spread this despicable [Qabih] custom among Muslims and to
order women to remove their face veil [Niqab], so that passion and the Satan
[Shahavat va Shaytan] will be happy with them. They could then say that this is
one of the consequences of constitutionalism and national government. With
this [falsehood] they hope to make the population hate this holy order and
prevent them from progressing. They want to stop the new civilization
[Tamaddon-i-Jadid] from entering the land of Islam, even though there is perfect
harmony between Islam and the new civilization” (Fakhr al Islam, 1911: 36-37; cited in Najmabadi, 2005: 136)
Research Questions
How seemingly nonsexual subjects (such as women‟s education,
people‟s dressing, women‟s Hijab, etc) are connected to sexual
anxieties?
Who (which groups) were articulating these anxieties, and how the anxieties
were justified in their arguments?
Here I focus on the discussions about hijab.
Outline
I. The meaning and usage of Hijab (veiling) over time.
II. Sexual anxieties articulated in anti-Hijab arguments
III. Sexual anxieties articulated in pro-Hijab arguments
IV.The legacy of these anxieties in today‟s discussions about hijab?
V. Concluding remarks
But…
• Not for “every” women: not necessarily in rural areas.
• Not for all social classes: was usually for a decent, higher class women.
• Not only “limitation”, but also “opportunity” as a result of anonymity.
Unveiling idea and program was in the first place about removing the
face veil and chador.
“Women and girls baking bread” with their less
strict covering
Source: women’s World in Qajar Iran collection, http://www.qajarwomen.org/en/items/1261A171.html
Note: “A woman with chador and veiland a woman with Kurdish costume”.
Source: women’s world in Qajar Irancollection: “Two women”http://www.qajarwomen.org/en/items/1261A112.html
Un/Veiling timeline and meaning
• 1848: Qurrat al-Ayn in Badasht gathering, while introducing a new religion
• 1926: Sedighe Dowlatabadi’s unveiling while being guarded.
• 1936: Unveiling program forcing all women to leave
Chador, and use “western hats” instead of scarf.
• 1941: Reza Shah‟s forced abdication, and the law‟s abolition.
• 1981: Veiling law, forcing all women to wear hijab outside home.
Anti-Hijab Arguments
Bahār (1307/1928)
• “Namus” [honor] cannot be preserved by scarf, because a woman
is much freer behind “Chador”.
• Even harmful for chastity [Effat], as “Chador” can conceal one‟s
sinful practices.
The fear of what a „free‟ women „can‟ do is still there…
Iraj Mirza (1304/1925):
The Role of Women‟s Hijab in Men‟s
Homosexuality
• Why pederasty or sodomy is this much prevalent in Iran which even
Europeans don‟t have it?
• “As long as this nation is in the captive of Hijab, they would still be
involved in this strange thing”
• “If a woman wants to have relationship with you, neither chador, nor Ruband
(face veil) can prohibit her”,
Pro-Hijab Arguments
Adultery [Zina]: The Slippery Final Consequence of
Unveiling
“There are four things that provide the facilities of the pleasure [Talazzoz] of
men with women and women with men, in a sequence; and each is the cause
for the other:
... and stopping the way to Nazar [gaze], would lead to the stop of the way to
the next three ones.” (Bushehri, 1291/1913: 105)
Nazar[Gaze]
Talking [Takallom],
Touching [Molasemeh]
Marriage [Monakiheh]
Why Zina is a Problem?
• Harām way of [forbidden] pregnancy (Zeinab-Beygom, 1305/1927),
• Prevalence of serious disease like syphilis (Ibid),
• Parentage and Inheritance troubles in family (also monetary issues)
(Bushehri, 1291/1913)
• Murder, as a result of competition (Duel), which was believed to happen in
Western societies, for one‟s wife/lover (Navab Mirza qajar , 1266/1888).
Country-Based Pro-Hijab Arguments
• Unveiling as „foreigners‟‟ plan for decreasing the number of Iranian
population which leads to the weakness of Iran, and thus the weakness of
Islam (Marandi Khoyi, 1304/1925: 198).
• Unveiling a plan of western invaders, who finally want to penetrate into
Iranian‟s houses and sleep with Iranian woman in the name of freedom,
which would lead to so many adulteries and a lot of Farangi embryos.
“Hijab Means Not Being Exposed”
Hijab means not being exposed.
Source:Bayan
BoxWeb
site.
htt
p:/
/bay
anb
ox.
ir/v
iew
/52
25
52
83
23
24
32
02
18
/%D
8%
AD
%D
8%A
C%
D8
%A
7%
D8
%A
8-%
DB
%8
C%
D8%
B9
%D
9%
86%
DB
%8
C-%
D8%
B9
%D
8%
B1%
D8
%B
6%D
9%
87
-%
D9
%8
6%
D8
%B
4%
D8
%A
F%D
9%
86
-%D
8%
A8
%D
8%
B2%
D8
%B
1%
DA
%A
F.jp
g
The Way from Displaying Yourself to Unacceptable
Sexual Behaviors
[From khod-namayi to Khod-erzayi]
Note: This is the transcript of a girl who displaysherself [dokhtar-e-Khod-nama].
Starts with the course of displaying yourself,continuing by these course in which she had gotthe whole grade for all of them: Passionism,leaving praying, collecting sins, disobeying Quran,Saving sexy movies in mobile phone, and the verylast one: "Masturbation”.
Source: Social network of Hammihan website, a picture shared byHoda Naji. http://www.hammihan.com/post/331721
Anti-Hijab Contemporary Arguments
“I, as a man,
„consider Islamic
hijab as an insult to
men, and I support
the rights of the
my homeland‟s
women, particularly
the right to choose
the way of
covering .”
“Hijab is not immunity [Masuniat], it is limitation!”
Source: Sabz Persian blog
http://sabzpersian.wordpress.com/2011/07/08/%D8%AD%D8%AC%D8%A7%D8%A8-%D9%85%D8%B5%D9%88%D9%86%DB%8C%D8%AA-%D9%86%DB%8C%D8%B3%D8%AA-%D8%8C-%D9%85%D8%AD%D8%AF%D9%88%D8%AF%DB%8C%D8%AA-%D8%A7%D8%B3%D8%AA/