Post on 20-Feb-2023
Hastjarjo/006-icbea-ajbas 1
Name : Hastjarjo
University : Doctoral Student in Management Science, Padjadjaran University, Bandung
Paper ID : 006 – icbea – ajbas
Paper Title : Mix Method in Strategic Real Estate Development Research
Abstract
Strategic Real Estate Development (Strategic RED) is the contemporary framework that
integrate both Resorce-based View (RBV) and Industrial Organization (IO) paradigm (Hastjarjo,
2014). Strategic RED is the answer of problem statement What are strategic variables in real
estate development? How do relation between them? How do they affect to financial
performances?. Strategic RED have many complex variables and indicators, to test the hypothesis
need a mix method, combination of QUANTITATIVE and qualitative methods, because the
results of the first quantitative study needs to be deepened with qualitative study. The research
design using sequential explanatory strategy, This model of combination research give more
higher weight to the use of quantitative research methods.
The first phase is Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) Analysis. This phase will test the
hypothesis of Strategic RED. The data collection from the questionare using internet method to
association members of Real Estate Indonesia (REI). The second phase is Focus Group CEO and
Senior Managers from a large real estate developers.
Key words: Strategic Real Estate Development, Mix Method, Sequential Explanatory Design.
Hastjarjo/006-icbea-ajbas 2
1. INTRODUCTION: Conceptual Fram ework of Strategic Real Estate Development
1.1. Strategic Real Estate Development : Teoritical Model
Problem Statement. What are strategic variables in real estate development? How do relation
between them? How do they affect to financial performances?
Methodological gap. Too, Harvey, and Too (2010) to identify the corporate real estate capabilities
for a hypercompetitive business environment, future research may take two streams. First,
qualitative research through case studies and/or focus group interviews. hereafter, quantitative
methods can be applied to statistically test for the existence and strength of the relationship
between corporate real estate capability and performance.
Conceptual Framework. According to Wilson (2012), and Brahma and Chakraborty (2011)
resource-based view (RBV) is not a industrial organization (IO). It is a
complement for industry level analytic tools. Peter and de Vries (2003), Scheffer, Singer, and
Marc (2006), and Lindholm (2008) the corporate real estate (CRE) strategy can help to improve
revenues and cost. Kim (2005), Tai and Huang (2006), Davies and Walters (2004) the strategy
and specific environment had significant implications for the performance. Wang, Lo, Zhang, and
Xue (2006), Goll, Nancy, and Rasheed (2007), David, Chew, Yan, and Charles (2008), and Human
and Naude (2009) the capability affect the strategy and the performance of the company.
Hastjarjo/006-icbea-ajbas 3
Figure 1. Teoritical Model of Strategic Real Estata Development
Source: Author
1.2. The Hypothesis
H1 : There is a positive relationship between the IO and RBV approach.
H2 : CRE strategy has positive relationship with firm CRE performance
H3 : The industrial CRE environment has a significant impact on CRE strategy
H4 : The industrial CRE environment have a positive relationship with firm CRE performance
H5 : CRE capabilities have a significant impact on CRE strategies
H6 :CRE capabilities to have a positive relationship with firm CRE performance .
Hastjarjo/006-icbea-ajbas 4
2. LITERATURE REVIEW: the Mix Method and Research Design
2.1. The Mix Method
Mix method research is an approach to inquiry that combines or associated both quatitative
qualitative forms of research. A Mixed methods design is useful when either the quantitative or
qualitative approach by itself is inadequate to best understand a research problem or the strengths
of both quantitative and qualitative research can provide the best understanding (Creswell, 2009).
Mix method is research in wich the investigator collects and analyzes data, integrates the findings,
and draws inference using both qualitative and quantitave methods in single study or program of
inquiry. Hence, mixed methods can rever to the use of both qualitative and quantitative methods
to answers research question in a single study (Mertens, 2010).
2.2. Research Design
This study use sequential explanatory strategy. Sequential Explanatory Strategy in mixed methods
research is characterized by the collection and analysis of quantitative data in a first phase followed
by the collection and analysis of qualitative data in a second phase that build on the result of initial
quantitative results (Creswell, 2009). Sequential Explanatory Research Design combination
models are shown in Figure 2. This model is called sequential explanatory because after proving
the next sequence is deepening.
Hastjarjo/006-icbea-ajbas 5
This model of combination research give more higher weight to the use of quantitative research
methods. Based on the figure 2, in the early stages of research in data collection and analysis both
using quantitative methods, and followed by qualitative methods. Data collection and analysis for
the two methods is carried out separately, but made continued.
Figure 2. Sequential Explanatory (QUAN qual) Research Design
Source: Author
This method is used because I think the results of the first quantitative study needs to be deepened
with qualitative study. The combination of the two method data connecting the results of the first
phase and second phase of the study.
Hastjarjo/006-icbea-ajbas 6
3. RESEARCH PROCESS
Step-by-step this research process by sequential explanatory models shown in figure 3.
Figure 3. Research Process
Source: Author
Based on figure 3. the first phase of research using quantitative methods and in the second phase
using qualitative methods. The combination of research conducted to answer the problem
statement of quantitative research and the problem formulation of qualitative research that is result
of the hypothesis test. So, qualitative research complement and reinforce the conclusion.
3.1. First Phase: QUANTITATIVE Method with SEM Analysis
SEM techniques suitable for use to (Ferdinand, 2002):
1. Confirm unidimensionalitas of various indicators to a dimension/construct/concept/factor.
2. Test the appropriateness / accuracy of a model based on empirical data studied
3. Test the suitability model and the causality between factors.
Hastjarjo/006-icbea-ajbas 9
The process of creating a complete SEM modeling steps as follows:
1. Development of a theory-based model
2. Development of a flowchart to show causality
3. Conversion of flowcharts into a series of structural equation and measurement models
specification
4. Selection of the input matrices and estimation techniques on models built
5. Assess the problem identification
6. Evaluation of the model
7. Interpretation and modification of the model.
3.1.2. Data Collection
Data collection by questionare sent via the internet to all members of the Association of Real Estate
Indonesia (REI).
3.2. Second Phase: qualitave Method – Focus Group
The second research is the confirmatory of results from hypothesis test. Data collection from Focus
Group methodts. Panel discussdion consists of CEO and Senior Managers from large scale
developer in Indonesia. The entire analysis method using to conclusion.
Hastjarjo/006-icbea-ajbas 10
References
1. Hastjarjo (2014), Empirical Model of Strategic Decision Making in Real Estate Development:
Realtion between Economies, Capabilities, CRE Sustainable Development Strategies, and
Performances, Conference Proceedings, International Conference The Global Advanced
Research Conference on Management and Business Studies (GARCOMB 2014): Sustainable
Business Practices in Asian Context, Bangkok, Thailand.
2. Brahma, S. S., & Chakraborty, H. (2011). From industry to firm resources: Resource-based
view of competitive advantage.IUP Journal of Business Strategy, 8(2), 7-21. Retrieved from
http://search.proquest.com/docview/877033053?accountid=32819
3. Chen, Z., & Khumpaisal, S. (2009). An analytic network process for risks assessment in
commercial real estate development. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 27(3), 238-
258. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14635780910951957
4. David A.S. Chew, Yan, S., & Charles Y.J. Cheah. (2008). Core capability and competitive
strategy for construction SMEs in china. Chinese Management Studies, 2(3), 203-214.
doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17506140810895898
5. Davies, H., & Walters, P. (2004). EMERGENT PATTERNS OF STRATEGY,
ENVIRONMENT AND PERFORMANCE IN A TRANSITION ECONOMY. Strategic
Management Journal, 25(4), 347-347+. Retrieved from
http://search.proquest.com/docview/225002615?accountid=32819
6. Goll, I., Nancy, B. J., & Rasheed, A. A. (2007). Knowledge capability, strategic change, and
firm performance. Management Decision, 45(2), 161.
doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00251740710727223
7. Human, G., & Naudé, P. (2009). Exploring the relationship between network competence,
network capability and firm performance: A resource-based perspective in an emerging
economy. Management Dynamics, 18(1), 2-14.
8. Kim, S. (2005). A causal model of linkages between environment and organizational structure,
and its performance implications in international service distribution: An empirical study of
restaurant and hotel industry. (Order No. 3164117, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State
University).
9. Krumm, Peter J.M.M dan de Vries, Jackie (2003), Value Creation through the Management of
Corporate Real Estate, Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 21, 1, pp. 61
10. Lindholm, A. (2008). A constructive study on creating core business relevant CREM strategy
and performance measures. Facilities, 26(7), 343-358.
11. Parayitam, S., & Guru, K. (2010). ECONOMICS OF RESOURCE BASED AND DYNAMIC
CAPABILITIES VIEW: A CONTEMPORARY FRAMEWORK. Academy of Strategic
Management Journal, 9(1), 83-93. Retrieved from
http://search.proquest.com/docview/521187298?accountid=32819
12. Scheffer, Johannes J.L. dan Singer, Bastian P., (2006), Enhancing the Contribution of
Corporate Real Estate to Corporate Strategy, Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 8, 4, pp. 188
13. Sekaran, Uma, and Bougie, Roger (2013) Research Methods for Business, jhon Wiley & Sons
Ltd.
14. Tai, D. W. -., & C-E, H. (2006). A study on relations between industrial transformation and
performance of taiwan's small and medium enterprises. Journal of American Academy of
Business, Cambridge, 8(2), 216-221. Retrieved from
http://search.proquest.com/docview/222837915?accountid=32819