Post on 29-Apr-2023
Page 1 of 14
How globalized is Malaysia?
By
Zaharul Nizam Bin Hussain
Introduction
Malaysia is a medium size economy that has benefitted from the globalization of the world
economy. Globalization includes flows of goods and services across borders, international
capital flows, reduction in tariffs and trade barriers, immigration, cultural transformation, and
the spread of technology and knowledge beyond borders.
Economic 'globalization' is generally defined as the openness, integration, and
interdependence of various economies, whereby economic activities, products, services,
capital, intellectual properties and investments are flowed across borders; whereby global
resources are operated internationally. Globalization and liberalization are no strangers to
Malaysia. An open economy even before her independence in 1957, Malaysia has from the
very beginning sought to integrate her economy with the rest of the world by carrying out a
series of liberalization policies in trade and investment – all in an effort to make trade the
engine of growth. This strategy has been very successful in the past, propelling the country
into the ranks of middle-income countries. As long as Malaysia enjoyed robust economic
growth rates, this strategy was never in question.
Malaysia showed her commitment in accepting the challenges of globalization by joining the
General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), and further ratified the establishment of
the World Trade Organization (WTO) on 6 September 1994 (to replace the GATT with effect
from 1 January 1995).
Page 2 of 14
Globalization in Theory
Robertson (1992, p.8) one of the most influential exponents of globalization defines it as:
“Globalization as a concept refers to the compression of the world and the intensification of
consciousness of the world as a whole”. While Giddens (1990, p.64) states that
“Globalization can thus be defined as the intensification of worldwide social relations which
link distant localities in such a way that local happenings are shaped by events occurring
many miles away and vice versa”. According to Bradley et al. (2000, p.15): “For Giddens, a
key aspect of modernity has been the significance of what he calls ‘time-space instantiation’.
By this Giddens is referring to the way in which, during the modern period, developments in
transportation and communications technologies have meant that local events and institutions
have come to be increasingly influenced by distant developments.”
For Tan (2002, p.82) globalization is predominantly an economic concept. Camilleri (1998,
pp.5-18) certainly will agree with Tan. Camilleri (1998, p.7) especially sees the accelerating
trade, investment, and finance and technology flow across national boundaries as the engine
of globalization. Lodge (1995, p.xi) summarizes it in the following passage: “Globalization is
a fact and a process. The fact is that the world’s people and nations are more interdependent
than ever before and becoming more so. The measures of interdependence are global flows of
such things as trade, investment, and capital, and the related degradation that constantly
reminds us that we are passengers on a spaceship, or, more ominously, a lifeboat.”
The process of globalization is both technological and human. Technologically, new systems
of global information and communication foster and link the agents of globalization-
multinational corporations, sometime with governments as their partners. On the human side,
globalization is pulled by exploding consumer desires, especially in the rapidly growing
countries of Asia, and pushed by ingenious corporate managers, who themselves are driven
by variety of urges- to serve their communities or their shareholders, to gain wealth and
power, or simply to exercise their skills and talents. Globalization is a promise of efficiency
Page 3 of 14
in spreading the good things of life to those who lack them. It is also a menace to those who
are left behind, excluding from its benefits.
Malaysian Economics
The Malaysian economy has experienced significant structural changes since the last four and
half decades. Agriculture was the main source of growth in the early phase of development.
The country has since moved rapidly away from agriculture towards manufacturing and is
presently leaning towards a service centered knowledge based economy. Since independence
in 1957, Malaysia has moved from an agriculture-centered economy to a more diversified and
export oriented industrial economy (Sunthralingam & Santiago, 2006, p.6).
The Malaysian economy has been relaying on foreign direct investment, international trade
and foreign capital to grow for many years. From an agrarian economy, Malaysia has become
industrialized in about 30 year, where many multinational corporations have their operation
here. “Seventy-five per cent of our manufacturing was produced by foreign multinational
corporations which also employed 45 per cent of the work force” (Phua & Soo, 2004, p.158).
Table 1 shows the direction of Malaysia trade with various selected countries. It shows the
volume and percentage of Malaysia total export and import from 1995 to 2005.Table 2 shows
the Malaysia’s Balance of Payments and Table 3, Malaysia’s External Trade for year 2011
and 2012. It shows that the Malaysian economy is increasing global in nature.
Page 4 of 14
Table 1: Direction of Malaysian Global Business in the World Economy from 1990 to 2005
(From Al-Amin, Abul Quasem, Siwar, Chamhuri, Jaafar, Abdul Hamid and Mazumder,
Mohammad Nurul Huda , Globalization, Environment and Policy: Malaysia Toward a
Developed Nation (August 29, 2007). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1010565)
Page 6 of 14
Chart 1 shows the Malaysian direct investment. According to Department of Statistics, DIA
stock rose by RM38.7 billion to stand at RM337.5 billion in 2011 from RM298.8 billion
attained a year ago. Such an increase was mainly attributed to equity capital & reinvested
earnings of RM23.7 billion (11.7 per cent). In terms of proportion, equity capital &
reinvested earnings represented 66.9 per cent while other capital constituted the remaining.
The bulk of this investment was generated mainly by Malaysian companies in financial &
insurance sector of 28.9 per cent, followed by oil & gas sector 27.3 per cent, and agriculture
sector 10.1 per cent. The top three destinations of DIA were Singapore, Indonesia, and
Mauritius. The level of FDI in Malaysia rose to RM363.9 billion in 2011 from RM313.0
billion in 2010, an increase of RM50.9 billion or 16.3 per cent. Equity capital & reinvested
earnings components formed the largest portion amounted to RM341.6 billion or 93.9 per
cent. The manufacturing sector remained as the leading FDI recipient of 47.5 per cent,
followed by financial & insurance sector of 22.4 per cent, and wholesale & retail trade sector
of 8.3 per cent. The top three sources of FDI were from Singapore, Japan, and USA.
On net basis, FDI showed a higher position as compared to DIA to record a net direct
investment position of -RM26.5 billion (2010: -RM14.2 billion). Equity capital & reinvested
earnings recorded a net position of -RM115.7 billion (2010: -RM91.8 billion). In contrast,
other capital showed a positive net position of RM89.2 billion from +RM77.5 billion in 2010.
Page 7 of 14
Chart 1: Direct Investment, 2001 - 2011
Source: Department of Statistics
Globalizing Phenomena in Malaysia
During the past 30 years, the Malaysian economy has changed from an agrarian based
economy to an industrialized economy; and now it is trying to develop into a K (Knowledge)
Economy. All these mega projects have made Malaysia go global in one way or another. In
order to achieve the above objectives Malaysia has to adopt a more open policy, not only
economically but also socially and culturally. Now, Malaysian youth have more access to the
alternative media, and are open to more influences from around the world (Phua and Soo,
2004, pp.151-182).
Page 8 of 14
In 1990, the NEP was replaced by the more liberal National Development Plan (1990-2010).
In 1991, in order for Malaysia to become a developed nation by the year 2020, the then Prime
Minister, Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, announced Vision 2020. Consequently, there has been
an opening up of the Malaysian market, migration of people in and out of Malaysia, opening
up of education policies, etc.; all this marks a globalized era for Malaysia. This is in fact
ambitious social engineering, and a deliberate policy choice in order to transform Malaysia.
However, after the Asian economic crisis in 1997, Malaysia is now much more cautious
about opening up its economy and other policies. However, in order to achieve the above
objective the Malaysian government still has to adopt a more open policy in a few key areas
as compared to before, thus resulting in some globalizing experience.
Malaysia and AFTA
AFTA is a free trade zone in Southeast Asia where member countries include Malaysia,
Singapore, Thailand, Philippines, Indonesia, Vietnam, Laos, Myanmar, Cambodia and
Brunei. The AFTA agreement supports the effort to relax trade barriers amongst member
countries in order to achieve direct trade benefits. AFTA was established in 1992. AFTA is a
collective effort by ASEAN member countries to reduce/eliminate tariffs on intra-ASEAN
trade. The purpose was to develop greater trade and industrial linkages among ASEAN
member countries. With a combined population of 513 million people, the establishment of
the Free Trade Area among ASEAN offers vast potential for greater economic collaboration.
AFTA has been realized through the Common Effective Preferential Tariff (CEPT) Scheme.
Under the CEPT:
a) import duties among member countries will be reduced to between 0-5% by the full
implementation of AFTA in 2010
b) elimination of quantitative restrictions (import permit, quota) & other non-tariff
barriers (NTBs) among ASEAN Member countries
Page 9 of 14
c) progressive transfer of products into the CEPT Scheme based on each ASEAN
member's capacity and capability.
The following charts show Malaysia’s trade with ASEAN countries for January 2012.
Chart 2: Exports, Jan 2012, percentage share
Page 10 of 14
Chart 3: Exports, Jan 2012, percentage share
Source: Department of Statistics
Malaysia and WTO
The World Trade Organization (WTO) is the only international organization dealing with
multi-laterally agreed rules on trade among its member countries. Through the WTO
agreements, which spell out their rights and obligations, Member countries operate a non-
discriminatory trading system that has allowed world trade to grow. The goal is to help
producers of goods and services, exporters and importers conduct their business in a manner
that ensures predictability and stability (MBAM, 2007, p.70).
WTO provides benefits to its members through the establishment of an international trading
environment which is transparent and predictable. These benefits are secured through the
implementation of members’ obligations in the form of trade rules and market access
negotiated on a multi-lateral basis. As a major trading nation, transparency and predictability
Page 11 of 14
in trade rules are important to Malaysia. Malaysia is able to comply with WTO obligations as
it has:
a) Adhered to multi-lateral trading rules as a member in the GATT;
b) Continuously been undertaking voluntary reduction and elimination of tariffs to
enhance Malaysia’s competitiveness; and
c) Adopted open and transparent trade policies and measures over the years
Malaysia already had a liberal and open import regime. On its own accord, Malaysia
liberalized its import regime by reducing duties on many products beyond its WTO
commitments. Malaysia’s specific commitments include:
a) Binding of tariffs on 6,741 tariff lines (products) comprising 5,531 non-agricultural
and 1,210 agricultural products accounting for 64% of Malaysia’s tariff lines. The
average bound tariff rate for Malaysia is 14.9%. This compares favorably with the
average bound rate of other developing countries such as Thailand (24.2%),
Philippines (23.4%), Egypt (28.3%), India (34.3%) and Mexico (34.9%).
b) Elimination of duties in stages for information technology products under the
Information Technology Agreement (ITA). Being a party to the ITA supports
Malaysia’s wider objective of encouraging greater use of information and
communication technology.
Malaysia is fully supportive of efforts in the WTO to develop multilateral rules on trade
facilitation as these measures would speed up delivery of goods, simplify custom procedures
and reduce transaction costs (MBAM, 2007, pp.71-77).
Conclusion
Malaysia is now the 14th most competitive economy in the world, according to a survey
carried out by the Institute for Management Development (IMD) of Switzerland. The IMD
survey measures how well countries manage their economic and human resources to increase
Page 12 of 14
prosperity. Malaysia’s overall improved ranking in the IMD survey reflects the impact of the
measures the Government has undertaken to improve the competitiveness of the Malaysian
economy. These wide-ranging measures include improvements in the delivery and efficiency
of public services and increased transparency and accountability. Malaysia’s enhanced
competitiveness is rooted in the innovative and bold initiatives undertaken by the
Government in the past year to drive development, growth and create a resilient private
sector. (18th APEC Ministers Responsible for Trade (MRT) Meeting in Kazan, Russia from 4
– 5 June 2012).
The IMD survey assessed countries according to 4 main competitiveness factors:
a) Economic Performance
b) Government Efficiency
c) Business Efficiency
d) Infrastructure
The simplest and usual index for measuring trade openness is ratio of trade (sum of export
and import) to the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of country. The trade openness of
countries depends on trade policy (restriction on trade) as well as the geographical and
economic characteristics of a country. Therefore, countries with small population will trade
(as a proportion of GNP) more than large countries (Samami, Lim, & Buang, 2011, p.7).
The measurement of globalization is not an easy task, given that there is lacks of uniform and
generally acceptable definition of globalization. There is variety of globalization
measurement and no standard rule for measuring it. According to Samami, Lim and Buang,
2011, the simple measurement to measure globalization are:
a) Gross capital flows
The sum of gross inflows and outflows as a ratio to national GDP is known as good ratio
that can capture two-way flows. It also provides sensible and logical picture of
globalization.
Page 13 of 14
b) Foreign assets and liabilities
The sum of gross stocks of foreign assets and liabilities as a ratio to GDP is corrected for
valuation effects. This ratio omits the problems of flow data.
c) Foreign direct investment
From production standpoint, FDI is an important vehicle of globalization. FDI is the best
kind of foreign investment that is non-debt flows. This type of foreign investment is less
volatile than other types of foreign investment. It also plays a significant role to transfers
of technology and new management knowledge to the host country.
The progress of Malaysian economy is highly influenced by three critical factors namely
public delivery system, foreign direct investments and financial markets. The opening of
Malaysia’s market has encouraged inflows of foreign direct investment and injected
competitive elements into domestic industries. The implementation of the WTO and AFTA
trade agreements will result in positive benefits for Malaysia’s globalization economy.
Overall, globalization has done a tremendous job in Malaysia, making one of the successful
world leaders. Globalization has enormous potential and as long as it is properly managed, it
will affect all parties involved.
Page 14 of 14
References
Bradley, H. et al. (2000). Myths At Work, Cambridge: Polity.
Camilleri, J. A (1998). “Globalization and the New Internationalism” in Camilleri, J. A. &
Muzaffar, C. (ed.). Globalisation: The Perspectives and Experiences of the Religious
Traditions of Asia Pacific, Petaling Jaya: International Movement for a Just World. Lodge, G.
C. (1995). Managing Globalization in the Age of Interdependence, Kuala Lumpur: Golden
Book Centre.
Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity, Cambridge: Polity Press.
MBAM. (2007). Master Builders Association Malaysia 4th
Quarter Article. Kuala Lumpur.
Phua, K. L. & Soo, K. S. (2004). What’s Ahead for Malaysia: Contemporary Challenges and
Emerging Trends, Subang Jaya: Pelanduk.
Robertson, R. (1992). Globalization: Social Theory and Global Culture, London: SAGE.
Samami, P., Lim, G.C. & Buang, A.Z. (2011) Globalization Measurement: Notes on
Common Globalization Indexes. Journal of Knowledge Management, Economics and
Information Technology, 7, 1-20.
Sunthralingam, C. & Santiago, C. (2006). The Impact of Malaysian Economic and Small
Scale Producers, Kuala Lumpur: Southeast Asian Council for Food Security and Fair Trade.
Tan, A. M. (2002). Malaysian Private Higher Education: Globalization, Privatization,
Transformation and Marketplaces, London: Asean Academic Press.