Post on 21-Apr-2023
Jordan 1
GEOGRAPHICAL AWARENESS:
SANITY MAKES A COMEBACK
Joshua Jordan, KSC
American Military University
27 May 2009
Jordan 2
Introduction.........................................................3
Literature Review....................................................5
Theoretical Framework...............................................19
Research Design.....................................................21
Findings............................................................24
Conclusions.........................................................34
Bibliography........................................................38
Jordan 3
Introduction
It seems reasonable to suspect that many eyes that fall on this
text have seen demonstrations of American geographical ignorance on
television. The scene is often the same; someone stands on the side
of a busy street with high pedestrian traffic. A person asks
questions of passersby, and the viewer has a reasonable expectation
that those who passed through the experience of public education will
answer these basic geographical questions correctly. Viewers
invariably see the worst of these responses—as this passes for
entertainment to a significant portion of the American population.
The author has seen cases where those surveyed thought that Australia
was North Korea. While this entertainment is not scientific study and
the examples shared do not form responsible statistical inference, the
existence of this phenomenon disturbs many—including the author. The
constant reminder of the existence of people who hold this lack of
awareness begs the questions how ignorant are American citizens on
matters of geography and in what percentages? From this question came
the project in these pages.
Jordan 4
Why is this topic important? This topic is important because
geography is the discipline that allows a person to craft a mental
model of the world in one’s mind. The idea that Earth is flat is an
idea that serves humanity well so long as journeys made are over short
distances e.g. from a cave to a water hole or hunting and gathering
area. When people start navigating from the European continent to
South America, the flat Earth theory does not serve humanity and a
wider view of the globe becomes necessary. A limited view of Earth
may save time, headache, and provide amusement—for those who like to
watch people embarrass themselves on television through displays of
ignorance—but it does not serve humanity, the United States, or the
citizen. Lack of exposure to geography creates a limited world view,
which fosters limited intelligence and limited power—not only for the
citizen but ultimately for the nation.1
As the complex relationships of cultures, languages, resources,
nations, corporations, etc. have more and more impact on American
lives, knowledge of geography is not only desirable, it is essential.
Those who are unaware of certain details of world geography cannot
reason or model as effectively—in matters where a proper world model
is needed—as those who are geographically aware. While the gulf
between the flat Earth mindset and the spherical Earth mindset 1 A nation is comprised of citizens, thus this logically follows.
Jordan 5
represents a pronounced example of the difference between ignorance
and knowledge, the same dynamic exists in all matters of geographical
knowledge vs. ignorance. While the limits imposed vary based on
ignorance, the limits remain. Americans today compete in a global
society. China has more honor students than America has students.2
How can American students compete with China if they cannot identify
the nations in the G-20 on a map? Such people will not have
credibility among the educated, as they display laziness and
ignorance. Also, such people will not be highly paid—as those who are
more educated are able to demand higher wages or go into business.
Whether Americans like it or not, the world they are living in becomes
more global by the day. As Levine points out, “The stakes for
American children and the nation could not be higher. In the 21st
century, like it or not, knowledge of the world is no longer a luxury;
It is a necessity”.3 This global society will require sensitivity to
other cultures, languages, and issues. These are impossible to grasp
without a solid foundation of geography.
2 The author learned this from a presentation on global shift, the name of thesource escapes the author at this time.3 Levine, Michael H., Putting the World Into Our Classrooms: A New Vision for 21st Century Education [policy paper online] (Washington, DC: Progressive Policy Institute, 2005, accessed 13 April 2009); available from http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&ct=res&cd=1&url=http percent3A percent2F percent2Fwww.ppionline.org percent2Fppi_ci.cfm percent3FknlgAreaID percent3D110 percent26subsecID percent3D181 percent26contentID percent3D253280&ei=VRD-SYwdpri2A-KhnNMB&usg=AFQjCNG7bPDz4NTictWLt-6JjP3w0y9WFw
Jordan 6
Thus the issue becomes one of national readiness in matters of
diplomacy, defense, and economy. It is for these reasons that
geography is important. It is not possible to uphold a dominant
culture or preserve geostrategic dominance with an ignorant citizenry.
The government is made of the people, and if the people do not grasp
geography, they will not grasp the issues that require geographical
knowledge to negotiate successfully. Geography applies to every
citizen of these United States. The purposes of this piece are: to
determine if a relationship exists between the American education
establishment and American knowledge of geography, offer an
explanation of how this relationship occurs, and what important
factors may influence this relationship.
Literature Review
Finding literature for this topic was problematic as this topic
lacks readily accessible, raw data. References to studies—which are
inaccessible or require excessive fees—exist outside the reach of this
project’s budget. Despite this clear impediment, enough data exists
to make certain points. Literature reviewed includes articles from
periodicals, essays, books, and scholarly works which address the
Jordan 7
specific research question: “Does the American education
establishment contribute to significant numbers of American citizens—
in recent and current times—demonstrating a lack of knowledge vis-à-
vis geography?” Citations are not given—in this section—as there is a
bibliography. Total credit for all work—save for any mistakes or
misinterpretations—in the first paragraph of each review goes to the
author mentioned in that paragraph with the year of publication of
documents concerned in parentheses. The literature reviewed below
applies to the topic of American knowledge—or lack thereof—vis-à-vis
geography. The introduction of this piece discussed the basic
premises that this literature applies to and why this topic is
important.
Nuhfer (1988) argues that Geographers themselves—specifically in
academia—craft a convoluted understanding of what geography is as an
academic discipline. This is a chief cause of general American
ignorance vis-à-vis geography. Also, Nuhfer argues that many of the
domains which Geographers in academia try to teach are areas on the
outskirts of Geography and their attempts to explain certain processes
are rife with error. Nuhfer goes on to suggest that correcting this
problem would require geographers defining exactly what is unique
about their particular discipline. Geographers would then teach that—
Jordan 8
while allowing other departments to teach those peripheral matters
which Geography now tries to dominate through an academic power
struggle. Nuhfer also mentions that those outside the discipline
would do better to recognize the importance of geography and support
it wherever possible.
The piece is journalistic in nature. While the writer clearly
holds related experience, this piece uses intuitive analysis and
presents findings in a journalistic op-ed format. While this piece
lacks systematic analysis, it does offer possibilities for further
research or studies. Nuhfer offers a logically sound argument. The
biases here are many. In the first hand, the author is writing from
his personal sample of experience. In the second, this author is
involved in academia and may have ulterior motives in an academic
power struggle.
The piece offers a myriad of insight. Nuhfer offers the
possibility that bureaucratic infighting among academic departments,
and possibly between administration and faculty, are matters that
could contribute—or even act as a chief cause of—general American
ignorance in geography. While studies which examine the affects of
academic competition on American education are difficult to access,
this piece offers cause to undertake such studies and consider their
Jordan 9
findings. For the purposes of this research project, Nuhfer offers a
possibility other than Americans simply not caring to learn geography.
David Keeling (2007) offers the perspective of a geographer.
Keeling asserts that American ignorance of geography limits
significant progress in several areas. He goes on to assert the most
important challenges of today and the future are geographically based.
An understanding of how geography shapes these challenges is essential
to American success. Keeling continues to remind readers that polls
and surveys reveal Americans as most geographically ignorant—when
compared with other industrialized nations—and reminds readers that
most Americans have not had a geography course in high school or
university. Keeling tells of a certain student application for
acceptance into a prestigious university which listed AP Geography—
this line was met with laughter and confusion from those reviewing it.
Keeling also asserts that most teachers of geography in the K-12
schools have not taken relevant courses in a university. Keeling
covers much ground in confirming American ignorance and pointing out
where he feels blame lies.
This piece is an essay with a clear thesis. The work is mostly
intuitive analysis. The piece cites surveys, polls, and other
statistics, but offers no citations—as a professor this man should
Jordan 10
know better. These considerations also apply to data collection and
analysis. Any analysis given is mostly intuitive and no sources
appear in the essay making it difficult to confirm or challenge the
evidence given in the work—without further or prior research. Biases
are many. This professor clearly wishes to preserve his job and
advance the sensed usefulness of his position.
While this author shows heavy biases and even academic
irresponsibility, he does raise interesting points. Several questions
revealed while reading this article. Where are these studies that
show general geographic ignorance of Americans? Perhaps an inquiry at
some of the local universities in the Geography and Social Science
Departments is in order? Other questions are: Exactly how many
Americans have taken geography classes? What are the general
curriculums at schools K-12 like? Where can one find this
information? Where can one find out what types of classes K-12
teachers have taken? Do they all present transcripts to the school
when applying for work? Are these on record? Overall this author
raises interesting considerations and demands certain questions.
While the answers may not exist now, these questions and
considerations are important and would lead to answers to the specific
Jordan 11
research question outlined in the introductory paragraph of this
section.
New York Times through Shabad (1982)4 raises concerns vis-à-vis
American geographical knowledge. Shabad describes the state of
American geographical literacy in the United States as of 1982 as
severely lower than other industrialized nations. Shabad references a
24-page report which exists and seems impossible to obtain. Shabad
reveals that most answers, about geography, were wrong in a sample of
3,000 students at 185 colleges and universities in the United States.
Shabad reveals that, overall, 43 percent of the questions were
answered correctly. Shabad gets more specific through examples such
as, 42 percent of the students surveyed thought that Saudi Arabia was
not an Islamic nation. When it came to India and Hinduism, 13 percent
of the students knew of the relationship between the two. While these
may not appear as matters of geography, they are. The amount of land
in Islamic hands or the relationship between pieces of land in which
certain religions are favored does matter. While this is more social
geography than physical geography it is considered to exist within the
4 Turabian has some strange format for the footnotes and bibliography of this.Apparently the article title goes first and then the publication with no mention of the author. In this case the source is referenced in the bibliography with a line beginning as “Americans”.
Jordan 12
discipline.5 Concepts such as religion do affect geography. From the
Romans salting fields to Americans destroying the natural ecology to
build “cookie cutter”6 houses in California, human paradigms affect
physical geography and physical geography—mostly through topography
and climate—affect human paradigms. Quite simply, one cannot have an
organism without an environment. Ergo, a relationship between any
biological entity and geography exists.
This piece is a journalistic work that uses intuitive analysis.
For the most part it presents certain findings from the report it
references. It is clear the author knows something about statistics
as the terms used are those commonly used within the discipline.
Overall this piece is well-balanced. The author even mentions the
panel that wrote this report only had one geographer on it, and this
geographer thought that only 77 of the 101 questions related to
Geography. So, while every report does contain some bias—as all minds
use biases—the report is balanced and fair.
5 These considerations would vary from University to University and even person to person. However, these considerations are relevant to geography. 6 The official name for these escapes the author. These are the houses that look like every other house in the housing development. Those who lived in military quarters are familiar with the concept. Apparently these were created following WWII when young men were returning from war and needed places to live—thus the concept migrated from the military to the civilian world.
Jordan 13
This report offers interesting insights on how difficult it is to
get at data on geography and education in the United States. There
are journal articles that talk about the need for baseline studies and
such. However, even this article is not accessible through the AMU
library, or other libraries in the author’s immediate area. Any
access to the article requires excessive fees. The report offers
statistics, and these are hard to come by in this project. Even
though the numbers are old, American students do not seem to be
improving.7 This particular article is frustrating. It offers
glimmers of excellent data, only to reveal yet more mirages showing
that ignorance of geography is so marked that little accessible
information exists on the specific research question.
Morrish (2001) examines English students. While these are not
American students, the comparison data may prove useful. Morrish
discusses a shift in education in the 1970s which changed the
fundamental manner in which geography was taught. While interesting—
and parallel with events which occurred in the rest of the Anglo-
Sphere8—such discussion lies beyond the scope of this review. Morrish
7 This statement is based on personal research, there are many who agree and possibly many who do not agree. 8 The Anglo-Sphere refers to the Anglo-Saxon nations: The United States, Canada, New Zealand, Australia. One might go so far as to include Ireland, France, Germany, and Scandinavia in the Anglo-Sphere because of the interbreeding, yet this generally is not acceptable so the term applies to thefour aforementioned nations.
Jordan 14
suggests the use of case studies to provide “essential links to the
real world” making the discipline less sterile and boring to those
learning it. Morrish also suggests that such studies provide insight
to the theoretical base of geography as a discipline—making the
students more aware of how the process of Geography occurs and of
their own place in it.
This piece is an op-ed from The Times Education Supplement. The author
compares models of past and present and offers what he feels is a
better model. Biases reveal mostly because the author relies on his
personal sample of experience and research to offer his suggestions.
This piece provides interesting insights on how educational
policy changes of the 1970’s may not be for the better—at least in
England. However, the important aspects of this article are in the
solutions that he offers to overcome this ignorance.
Pajares (1989) introduces interesting improvements. The author
recalls his experiences with geographical ignorance in a lesson. In
this case, the ignorance displayed instantaneously. Immediately after
he taught the students geography, they forgot what they were taught.
Pajares decided to make geography fun by taking the children on trips
around the world inside the classroom. In addition, he imposed
measures which incorporated geographical terms, world leaders, and
Jordan 15
other associations with geography throughout the curriculum without
overhauling it. Pajares notes that this program addressed the needs
of the students with “minimal disruption”.
This is an article in a periodical told from the first person.
The article shares experience and offers methods that worked for the
teacher in his particular circumstances. Data was collected and
analyzed intuitively in the form of classroom activities. Also, data
was collected and analyzed through test scores and such. Biases here
are those associated with any human. The information comes through
the author’s lens of personal experience.
This article is interesting because it reveals the structure of
the curriculum to be a problem in this case. The article also offers
solutions which do not disrupt the bureaucracy—this is a matter of
extreme importance as bureaucracy must be served. Clearly the
educational system is a contributing factor here. Any bureaucratic
reform is painful and slow—as reform is an anathema to bureaucracy.
The methods offered through this article bypass that process through
tools and latitude already available to the educator—perhaps the
educators are not spending enough time using their creative faculties?
Perhaps the education establishment does not afford them that time?
Consider endless, pointless, tedious faculty meetings, teachers
Jordan 16
workshops, and of the other absurd administrative requirements
necessary to fulfill certain obligations to receive funds or to prove
accountability and so on.9
Lewis (2000) discusses the changes in the educational system. He
asserts that 100 years ago students had to memorize more facts. He
also says that an American attitude of isolationism and not needing to
know about the world seeped into schools and changed the curriculum.
Lewis continues to argue that globalization and integration will bring
the world into people’s lives in ways that it would not have
previously. Also raised are the points that American political
leaders, and even respected scholars, consistently display their lack
of geographical knowledge. The most important point mentioned is that
without fundamental knowledge of the planet, how can one understand
globalization? This problem is serious and the American education
establishment—from preschool to post-doctorate—is not dealing with
this problem effectively. He also asserts that foreigners are showing
contempt of American ignorance—they are not just laughing at, and
deriding, ignorant Americans now. Contempt for American ignorance is
prejudicial to the national security and the interests of the United
States. Also of note, Lewis says that eventually it will be
9 I speak from experience teaching ESL in Asia and conversations with professors and teachers.
Jordan 17
geographers who refine their craft to ensure that geography is
relevant.
This is a scholarly paper. It is lengthy; it had endnotes, and a
generous list of references. This was published in the Geographical
Review. The methods of analysis are several. He looks at individual
authors and breaks down their mistakes—rather viciously—through
exhaustive analysis of possibilities leading to the mistakes and the
mistakes themselves. Sometimes he goes too far, such as in his
indictment of Robert Kaplan—a writer for the Atlantic who wrote
several books including Warrior Politics: Why Leadership Demands a Pagan Ethos.
Kaplan fails to mention Greece in a metaphor—which is irresponsible in
this case. However, the manner in which the author deals with this is
abrupt. This illustrates that as well as expected biases, this author
seems mildly antagonistic at times, though not in such a way that he
is intellectually vulgar. It is an acceptable, healthy, and polite
antagonism. Still the reader would do better to note this. The
author is knowledgeable and wise. He seems frustrated with ignorance
and seems to have written this piece for several purposes.
This paper is profound. It references Ptolemy and his thoughts
on geography. Ptolemy saw geography as a representation of the known
world and all within it—2,000 years ago. People must know the world,
Jordan 18
lest it get smaller. This underscores the importance of geography.
Even the author was unaware of the deep importance of this discipline
until undertaking this research. Some data on the matter of American
knowledge of geography, and the effects of the education establishment
on this knowledge, exists but it is exceedingly difficult to find, why
is that? Why is so little attention paid to the subject of geography?
Is this more than just a process of the education establishment? Is
this cultural? Most importantly this paper reminds readers that what
happens in K-12 and university education environments does not
disappear simply because one goes out into the world and becomes a
scholar, intellectual, and so on. This lack of knowledge finds its
roots in the education establishment, extends out to society, and is
of dire importance. While this document assumes the educational
system—and perhaps the culture—are the impetus for this ignorance, it
also reveals the profound importance and broad influence of this
phenomenon.
The Economist (1988) discusses statistics describing American
ignorance on matters geographical. It gives some data on other
developed nations as well. The Economist also claims that American
ignorance is worsening and evidences a declining education
establishment.
Jordan 19
This is a journalistic work using intuitive analysis. It also
references several studies, but these are no longer accessible. The
analysis is systematic in that it brings in data from other developed
nations and uses them to place matters in context. The limitations
are that much of this article is general. The glittering generalities
do not give enough specific information for scholarly taste. The bias
here is that this information is for general consumption and offers no
notes for readers to follow up on the assertions of the article. What
if the author made mistakes? The data referenced here is important,
but this article does not offer access to this information.
With raw data as scarce as it is, the data in here would add some
flesh to the paper. It is becoming clear the education establishment
influences American geographical ignorance. It is also clear that
this is happening in many developed nations. This puts the paper in
global context. This data will outline important points. Again more
accessible data on this matter is lacking. This is a major finding of
this research project—that more research and data are necessary for
this profoundly important matter. An argument exists that if
geography were important, relevant data would exist. This is not
necessarily the case. There was a time in the United States where
Americans were not aware of the nutritional content of their food.
Jordan 20
One could have argued that if it was important, researchers would
focus more on this matter. Now American food displays nutritional
labels. Again, Ptolemy put it best when he said that knowledge of
geography is knowledge of your world and everything in it. Lack of
knowledge of geography makes that world smaller. A smaller world-view
does not support advanced paradigms. In this light, the argument that
geography is not important enough to warrant study holds water—if the
person making that argument is comfortable with a limited model of his
or her world and the lack of advanced paradigms that will follow. If
everyone in the United States feels like this, the nation would lose
its position of geostrategic dominance and this would lead to a lower
quality of life for American citizens.
Piscionere (2007) offers a veritable treasure trove of
information on these matters. Piscionere reminds readers that most
Americans cannot find Afghanistan on a map but know the details of a
popular reality show on television. Piscionere goes on to highlight
the dangers to national security of a nation that cannot find
countries on a map, cannot speak their languages, and has no interest
in anything outside its borders [yet routinely conducts wars outside
its borders]. Piscionere, through remarks by President Bush,
discusses American cultural apathy brought on by lack of education.
Jordan 21
Piscionere also mentions that American education focuses mostly on
developed nations—in matters of language and culture. Piscionere also
mentions that travel abroad programs also involve developed nations,
mostly. This, of course, does not help to familiarize students with
the geography of the rest of the world. In addition, Piscionere
mentions that linguistic education amounts to an unacceptable
patchwork, which does not foster human connections between American
students and foreign students. This, of course, aggravates a lack of
interest and knowledge in geography creating a cyclical negative
feedback loop.
This is a scholarly paper. It is lengthy, and has footnotes and
a good bibliography. The reasoning used is mostly intuitive. The
author points out that Americans are ignorant and undedicated because
their teachers are the same and the structure of the system supports
this ineptitude. The author points out reasons this is bad and
reasons the rest of the world will eventually become sick of the
“ignorant American” and how this impacts national security and
prosperity. Data comes from other sources and is analyzed intuitively
without system or detail. The biases here—in addition to the normal
biases—are the author’s emphasis on international affairs. The author
feels this focus is important to protect the national security.
Jordan 22
Normally this would be considered common sense, but in the mainstream
American culture it becomes a bias—as American culture is insular.
Insights offered here are great. For some reason Americans try
to preserve the isolationist culture. This would work well if only
the United States government did not get involved in foreign wars
consistently and repeatedly and if the nation did not engage in
international trade—both of which are workable possibilities. The
author offers interesting points on American education, certain
sicknesses and certain remedies. Much of this may stem from the
culture. The culture of isolationism may have influenced the
education establishment, creating a negative feedback-loop of
ignorance. The founding fathers may have been against involvement in
foreign affairs, but they did not themselves refrain from study and
travel. Unfortunately, the American culture and education
establishment seem often to support the idea that travel and study are
not necessary. Yet both also support the idea the United States
government should involve the republic in military adventures—even
though many Americans demonstrably cannot find these nations on maps,
cannot speak their languages, and know nothing of their cultures. It
seems Rome went through these problems. While the Prince of the
Jordan 23
Vatican10 and his cronies were able to survive the fall and maintain a
city-state, the circumstances are not similar with the current
American circumstances. This information is relevant because an
argument could be made that the Vatican came out of the fall in a good
position, why not the United States? Rome is relevant because
American citizens would do well to learn from Rome’s bad example and
undertake the inverse in matters of geographical knowledge.
Levine (2005) blames an education establishment that is not
evolving fast enough to meet the needs of American children. He
offers statistics and comments on the lack of education in matters of
Geography, foreign languages, and other foreign concerns. Shifts in
trade and organizational requirements, both in the government and
private sectors, demand better prepared students to deal with
international issues—if for no other reason so they act as responsible
and informed voters when deciding on matters that influence the world.
He goes over certain statistics that outline the new requirements of
life in the United States and how the American population cannot
properly assimilate these changes because of its ignorance.
10 Pope became the substitute name for Caesar. This occurred after the military and political arms of the Empire failed and the Roman Empire became the Holy Roman Empire. The Vatican remains a city state. The Pope is not only the infallible high priest of God; he is the Prince of the Vatican and the head of the Holy See.
Jordan 24
This is a policy paper. It is not as long as many scholarly
papers, but it is much longer than an article from most periodicals.
The theory behind this paper is that American students are ignorant of
international affairs—for the most part—and the education
establishment from preschool up needs changes to prepare American
children to compete globally or the United States will lose its
status. Biases—other than normal—include a heavy reliance on
statistics to make the argument work. As Korzybski would remind the
reader, the map is not the territory. The word is not what it
describes. The statistics are not necessarily the reality. Also, the
studies he cites target certain demographics. Many students do not
watch “Survivor”11, other popular reality shows, or even watch much
television at all. This survey is mostly targeted to those who have
time and inclination to watch such programming.
The statistics that appear in Levine’s work help readers
understand the education establishment is a problem. How the
education establishment got this way and how to change it will be
different for different regions of the United States, after all the
Union is made of the several States which are fifty countries. The
federal government may contribute to the problem as it gives funding—
with strings—to schools. At this point, it is possible to isolate 11 This was the show referenced in a study that Levine mentions in his paper.
Jordan 25
several contributing factors here: money, culture, federal
government, and local governments. All of these influence the
American education establishment.
Groennings and Wiley (1990) compiled a book on seven academic
disciplines and their relationship to international perspectives. The
editors site statistics about fossil fuel consumption projects and the
inability of a significant percentage in a survey being unable to
identify OPEC nations on a map. The editors go on to reveal why
geography is important. The work brings up certain studies and
statistics among college students. The work also mentions a lack of
emphasis on geography in education and the liberal arts.
This work is a book containing several scholarly essays with
endnotes. The reasoning used here is that one cannot understand one’s
own nation without knowing about others. The premise is that
geography provides context for other studies necessary to be
competitive in a global society. Data collection is secondary,
through reference studies. Analysis consists of the authors’
intuitive impressions of the data. Biases present themselves in the
usual fashions of personal experience and such. Also, this work is
written from a globalist perspective. The authors clearly wish to see
Jordan 26
integration of the world’s nations and want to manage resources and
populations. The premises are distinctively Malthusian.12
This work offers interesting statistics. Again, there are some
statistics with citations but most of the writing is what to do about
the problem with little discussion on how to fix it. Gathering data
remains problematic. Even as finding raw data from which to draw
conclusions remains elusive, no source found during research offered
an argument that something other than the education establishment of
the United States is responsible for geographic ignorance. There are
several factors that feed into how education occurs in the United
States, but all of these factors work through education i.e. culture,
money, governance, etc.
Gatto (2000) asserts that “mass dumbness” occurs by design.
Gatto discusses how children were given positions of increasing
responsibility at younger ages in older days. He uses the example of
Admiral Farragut who took his first command at the age of 12. Gatto
asserts that public education is the brainchild of the “four great
coal powers” and quotes Max Mason as saying that public education is
for controlling behavior, not education. Gatto goes on to say that in
1840 complex literacy rates were “between 93 and 100 percent”. Gatto
12 This refers to Malthus and his economic theories.
Jordan 27
goes on to say that coal and mass production compelled changes to the
education establishment in the United States.
This is a book. It is long and well-researched. Unfortunately
it does not contain citations as it is written for the masses and not
for scholars. However, occasionally it is possible to make out the
sources by looking for the nearest dates, using the book, periodical,
or speech mentioned and running Google searches. Secondary data is
used and analyzed intuitively. The biases here go beyond the norm.
The author clearly believes in either a conspiracy to dumb down the
youth of America or the author believes that good education was
sacrificed in the name of production. One is tempted to say the
author started out with the idea of finding data to support his
conclusions; however this is not the case. Yet, without researching
the author and his journey through the material he discusses, it is
not possible to come to this conclusion. The author clearly wants to
point the finger of blame at financiers, capitalists, and Fabian
Jordan 28
socialists.13 While the author does not offer other hypotheses, his
arguments are strong.
This work highlights concerns about American education.
Geography falls within the category of education. This will help
discern when and where the shift in education occurred and what it
entailed—though such considerations lay beyond the scope of this
paper. The book reminds us that an education establishment cannot
think, feel, or decide. There are people behind the faceless
bureaucracy. This point is something to focus on—the people, forces,
and other dynamics that are shaping the education establishment and
causing it to perform in an unsatisfactory manner. This book will
offer some insights about what could work through the education
establishment to cause geographical ignorance.
Theoretical Framework
13 For the purposes of this work, there are two types of socialist. There is the Stalinist socialist—the types that kick the door down and fire machine guns into the room. These are brutal dictatorships like those of China, NorthKorea, Soviet Union, etc. Another form of socialism is called Fabian socialism; the doctrine of such people is evolution by stealth or the inch-worm effect. The inch-worm moves along until it meets resistance, it changes direction laterally until it can continue forward again. When an American wakes up in the morning and reads “We’re All Socialists Now” on the cover of apopular news magazine, one is witnessing discussion of Fabian socialism.
Jordan 29
The primary gap in available literature is severe. Research
reveals that access to raw data remains outside the scope of both
timeframe and resources for this project. This study will compensate
for this gap through use of available data in the literature—placing
trust in those sources. Of course, a fundamental question of this
study’s validity is possible because of the gap and subsequent
compensation. This study calls for more research specifically
designed to produce raw data on the educational experiences of those
who teach geography at all levels of American education from K-12 to
post doctorate. With raw data this study would hold better means to
define the relationship between education in the United States and
American knowledge of geography. This study uses what is available
and draws conclusions from that data.
Through rationalism one may accept that without education, people
will not control as much knowledge as they would with education. How
can a person know about geography if that person is not educated in
geography? Ergo, education is necessary for knowledge in geography.
American citizens are educated—for the most part—in America.
Therefore, through rational thought the reader should note a
relationship between the American education establishment and American
Jordan 30
knowledge of geography. At this time, no compelling argument exists
to prove that such a relationship does not exist.
Several independent variables influence the education
establishment in the United States. These factors are identified
through rationalism: funding, culture, public policy, and law.
Nothing moves—at least not far—without money to fund the movement.
This includes educational materials, teachers, students, etc. Ergo,
funding is a major independent variable influencing the education
establishment. Culture includes the attitudes, choices, and
mannerisms which affect an interest in the education establishment and
in being educated. Public policy and law have a direct impact on how
resources are used, how education occurs, and how one ensures quality
control in matters of education. Thus the project offers the
following diagram of factors which influence the education
establishment:
Funding
Culture
American education establishment
Public Policy
Jordan 31
Law
Clearly, this model involves variables that lay far beyond the scope
of this project. Studies in American culture and its influence on
education would require a single study, as would each of the other
independent variables. This model appears in this study to reveal
the complexity of factors influencing the Education establishment—
which becomes the independent variable for this study. The
theoretical framework for this study involves one independent variable
—the education establishment—and one dependent variable—American
knowledge of geography. The diagram for this dynamic follows:
American Education establishment American
Knowledge of Geography
This more simplified theoretical model is small enough for use in this
piece. Again, the American education establishment is a gestalt made
up of several independent variables and their consideration is beyond
the scope of this piece. Note, this theoretical model flows mostly
from the author’s own analysis of all literature mentioned. Each
piece of literature reviewed in the previous section made a
contribution to the model through presentation of data, narrative,
etc. The author takes credit only for mistakes in this model—and
Jordan 32
gives equal credit for what remains to all authors aforementioned.
The American education establishment is a gestalt which directly
affects American knowledge of geography. From the specific research
question, the lines of consideration flow through a rational
theoretical framework to offer the following hypothesis: The American
education establishment directly affects American knowledge of
geography.
Research Design
This is a descriptive study and is qualitative. Again, the
specific research question is: Does the American Education
establishment contribute to significant numbers of American citizens—
in recent and current times—demonstrating a lack of knowledge vis-à-
vis geography? This question lacks a sturdy selection of referencing
literature and scholarly, scientific research. These points make the
project problematic at certain junctures. The strategy for this
project is to collect relevant literature and use the best portions of
that literature to decide whether to reject the hypothesis under
consideration.
Jordan 33
The hypothesis tested is: The American education establishment
contributes to significant numbers of American citizens’—recent and
current—demonstrating ignorance of geography. For this hypothesis,
recent and current describe, approximately, 1980-2009. As much
literature on this topic does not exist, this study will not model a
theory or add to an existing theory. This project will test a
hypothesis concerning education in the United States of America.
As this study deals with education, available data would focus on
American high school students, American university and college
students, and their educators. As law mandates all Americans attend
high school, and many attend university and college, this project will
infer the findings to all American citizens who, primarily, pass
through American education institutions. Supremely, as law mandates
all Americans attend at least two years of high school; this study
infers these findings to most of the American population. The term
“most of” is used as there always seem exceptions to any absolutist
statement. American citizens must exist who, through special
circumstances, were not subject to the same experiences as the
majority. Sampling methods depend on the studies used for this
project. As this is an 8-week course, it is problematic to collect
and analyze raw data. Also, no raw study data is accessible to the
Jordan 34
researcher now. Therefore, this project places trust in the sources,
their data, and interpretations. The data will be used to mark
whether the hypothesis is rejected. For example, if one study claims
that American high school students miss an average of 90% of questions
on geography a researcher cannot reject the hypothesis that American
education contributes to American ignorance of geography. So while
the data is not raw and verifiable, as necessary for certain other
research roles, enough data exist to decide whether to reject a
hypothesis.
This study will be single-method. While multi-method studies are
more valid, the purposes here are to confirm or refute the hypothesis.
The researcher has no role in raw data collection or analysis—such
data is not accessible and the limited time frame of the course makes
any data collection problematic. Other researchers conducting the
same collections, through the same sources, would note the same
results. The secondary sources are in order and properly vouched for
through the researcher’s familiarity with these sources through
reading and cross-referencing where possible. Data is collected from
the internet and libraries and copies are kept on the computer where
possible and notes are kept in a notebook where not possible.
Jordan 35
Analysis of collected data is minimal. As the sources are
secondary, the relevant data is presented as usable statistics. These
usable statistics measure certain information and, without access to
the raw data, it is not possible to use other analytical methods on
the data. The researcher will take the data, as it stands, and offer
certain conjectures based on that data. These conjectures reveal
through systematic methods. For example, the researcher finds that
60% of American university students in one survey did not answer
questions about geography correctly. Is information available on the
nature of the questions and their difficulty? Are there reasons other
than the hypothesis for this result? Does this survey refute the
hypothesis? Is information available on the students surveyed? If
these are university freshmen, a researcher can infer high school
education in geography, but cannot infer college courses in geography.
These are the questions the research needs to examine. If certain
information is not available, the study should mention this.
Overall reliability is ensured through transparency in the
methods used. The lack of raw data is frustrating and necessarily
costs in validity. However, this study could also become the impetus
for future research—even with data access lacking now. Therefore, it
is important that this study describe its faults with conjecture. In
Jordan 36
this way, if another researcher follows this design, this researcher
will remark the same results—though not necessarily the same
interpretations. As the students among the research samples are
expected to have passed through courses on geography, it is possible
to infer the findings to the population at large.
Problems faced in data collection are aforementioned. There is a
limited time to conduct any studies, and this limit lies beyond the
scope of the project. Access to raw data and studies conducted on
these questions is not available at this time. These two
considerations make data collection problematic. It is necessary to
rely on trusted sources of information that are not always as clear
and systematic in their writings as this study will be.
Limitations of this study are many. A chief limit is in the
culture of the United States—and the several states. The American
culture of isolationism must be a contributing cause to geographical
ignorance. However, adding this into the study would require more
time and research and is beyond the time and resources assigned for
this project. Also, the American education establishment is not a
large centrally planned apparatus. Federal requirements exist, but
the government does not micromanage all decisions made locally.
Therefore, states, counties, cities, and towns have certain amounts of
Jordan 37
autonomy in their education. This being the case, it is problematic
to consider all the details of the various education establishments,
their interactions with federal requirements, and so on. All of these
subsystems locally, and other federal entities, comprise the American
education establishment. It is simply not possible to examine every
aspect of the American education establishment in the course of this
project.
Thus, with the time and resources allotted, it is difficult to
consider other contributors to American ignorance in geography. It is
impossible to conduct a full analysis of the American education
establishment. The study time-line consists of the eight weeks in
this course. The project is due by the end of the course.14 The
researcher holds the time, skills, and resources needed to conduct the
design as presented at this time.
Findings
Before proceeding to the findings, it is necessary to offer a
brief preface. In the interests of conserving space, brief pattern
analysis occurs at the end of this section. This examination does not14 We just discussed this via email, thank you.
Jordan 38
stop at each example and point out how causality occurs or whether or
not the example supports the hypothesis. This preface is iterated at
the end of the assignment, yet appears here as a courtesy to readers
who may find themselves accustomed to a different format.
The history of education in the United States is long and varied.
A complete discussion of the history of education in the United States
is beyond the scope of this work. However, basic considerations are
necessary for the reader to recognize the state of affairs concerned.
Gatto (2001) offers much to consider: “At the age of twelve, Admiral
Farragut got his first command. I was in fifth grade when I learned of
this. Had Farragut gone to my school he would have been in seventh”.15
Today, most officers do not receive a commission without first passing
through a four-year education after K-12. An argument against this
position, based on increased reliance on technology, holds little
validity as officers make plans and give orders and noncommissioned
officers and soldiers use the technologies that support officers’
directives.16 Admiral Farragut was born in 1801. This would mean that
Farragut took his first command in 1813—during the war of 1812. Why
15 Gatto, John Taylor, The Underground History of American Education, (New York: Oxford Village Press, 2001), 2.16 The author spent time in the United States Army, Military Police Corps and began military training through JROTC. These statements reflect the author’s experiences.
Jordan 39
wasn’t Farragut in school? The institution of public schooling, as it
exists today, did not exist at that time.
It wasn’t just public schooling that did not exist in 1813. The
social construct of “adolescence” did not exist either. As Gatto
(2001) points out, “During the post—Civil War period, childhood was
extended about four years. Later, a special label was created to
describe very old children. It was called adolescence, a phenomenon
hitherto unknown to the human race”.17 While a discussion of how
changes in the culture affect the education establishment offers
further illumination, detailed discussion remains outside the scope of
this piece. Besides this new social construct, a small group of
dominant men would also influence the American education
establishment. Gatto (2001) argues,
Somehow out of the industrial confusion which followed the Civil War, powerful men and dreamersbecame certain what kind of social order America needed, one very like the British system we had escaped a hundred years earlier. This realizationdidn’t arise as a product of public debate as it should have in a democracy, but as a distillationof private discussion.18
This quotation brings us back to the subject of money and its
influence on education. However, further discussion exceeds the scope
17 Gatto, John Taylor, The Underground History of American Education, (New York: Oxford Village Press, 2001), 16.18 Ibid, 15.
Jordan 40
of the project. These pieces of information offer context. Gatto’s
offering allows readers to find the genesis of changes affecting the
education establishment and, by proxy, American knowledge vis-à-vis
geography.
Unfortunately raw data on student performance during the 1800’s
is also absent. An admissible argument is that a man who is ready to
take command of other men in time of war—or on a military vessel—
received superior education to one who cannot take said command. What
educational establishment would Admiral Farragut have experienced?
One possible answer is found in Gatto (2001) through his quotation of
Clifton Johnson on Abraham Lincoln’s education:
He acquired much of his early education at home. In the evening he would pile sticks of dry wood into the brick fireplace. These would blaze up brightly and shed a strong light over the room, and the boy would lie down flat on the floor before the hearth with his book in front of him. He used to write his arithmetic sums on a large wooden shovel with a piece of charcoal. After covering it all over with examples, he would takehis jack-knife and whittle and scrape the surfaceclean, ready for more ciphering. Paper was expensive and he could not afford a slate. Sometimes when the shovel was not at hand he did his figuring on the logs of the house walls and on the doorposts, and other woodwork that afforded a surface he could mark on with his charcoal.19
19 Ibid, 22.
Jordan 41
The style of education that Clifton Johnson ascribes to Abraham
Lincoln differs from the style of education offered to American
citizens today. A reasonable assumption follows. A man would not be
given command of a ship without some knowledge of navigation and
geography; such a man would have the lives of other men in his hands.
A man who lacked knowledge of geography would not function well as
President of the United States. How would a man lacking this
knowledge keep any pretense to competence in international affairs,
properly oversee the Civil War, or command a ship against the British
Navy in the War of 1812? Thus the piece comes again to the hypothesis
under scrutiny: The American education establishment directly affects
American knowledge of geography.
What is geography? According to Nuhfer (1998), geographers
themselves craft a convoluted understanding of what geography is as an
academic discipline.20 If the discipline itself lacks clear
definition, how can anyone expect proper teaching and learning of the
discipline? One of the first priorities of those who comprise the
American education establishment would be to describe exactly what the
discipline is, and make sure the boundaries between this discipline
and periphery disciplines are maintained. Nuhfer’s work suggests that20 Nuhfer, Edward B, “Academic Geographers Are Partly to Blame for
Americans’ Ignorance of Geography”, (The Chronicle of Higher Education, 20 April1988), B2.
Jordan 42
bureaucratic competition within academia may cause geographers to
overstep their boundaries and teach matters that others may hold
better qualifications to teach. Through rationalism a position
emerges. If competition among academic disciplines affects how
students receive education and from which teachers and professors,
then the education establishment must affect the knowledge shared with
students.
Matters of competition within academia are not the only causes at
work here. Keeling (2007) offers evidence of the problem: “Myriad
polls and surveys leave no doubt that Americans are among the most
geographically illiterate of all developed societies. The ranks of
Americans who have ever taken a geography class in high school or
university are small”.21 Could all of this flow from the competitions
within academia and the lack of definition for the discipline of
geography? Keeling (2007) offers more perspective:
Indeed, the attitude of many college admissions officers, deans, provosts, and presidents towardsgeography as critical in preparing students for success in a global society remains antediluvian.Witness the recent outburst from a Pomona College
21 Keeling, David, <i>Geographical Ignorance Limits America’s Opportunities</i> [essay online] (New York: American Geographical Society, 2007, accessed 13 April 2009); available from http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&ct=res&cd=1&url=http percent3A percent2F percent2Fwww.amergeog.org percent2Fnewsrelease percent2FAGS-OpEd-geoignorance.pdf&ei=MAn-Sb_1FImYtAOx9cXxAQ&usg=AFQjCNF-uBTypnYRKXCiqEMDJiq-O8NM5w
Jordan 43
admissions official who questioned Advanced Placement Human Geography courses for high-schoolseniors and recounted how his colleagues had reacted with confusion and laughter upon seeing an AP geography course on a potential student’s transcript.22
Advanced Placement (AP) courses are the most difficult to take in High
School and usually count as college credit. Clearly, these emotional
outbursts are evidence that admissions officials at Pomona College do
not see the value of geography. That being the case, what education
could a potential student expect in the discipline from that
institution? While Pomona College is not all universities, and a
researcher cannot necessarily infer that such a reception would occur
at all institutions of higher learning, the Pomona College reception
occurred and rationalism demands that this affects student’s knowledge
of the discipline. However raw data of Pomona College is lacking—ergo
decisive demonstration of this remains elusive.
If this is the attitude of a college admissions board toward
geography, what would one find in the K-12 level? Again the
examination turns to Keeling (2007):
Part of the problem is that most of the people teaching geography at the K-12 level, when it is taught at all, have not studied geography at the university level. Very often, they are coaches orsocial studies majors who have no idea why they
22 Ibid.
Jordan 44
are teaching geography. These educators are the ones writing the social studies content standardsfor the K-12 schools at the state level.23
Keeling’s quotation speaks volumes. Unqualified people teach
geography and craft the geographical standards for K-12 schools at the
state level. However, Keeling does not reveal which states this
occurs in.
Keeling revealed how the education establishment in the United
States would affect the manner in which geography is taught and also
how educators and administrators in the education bureaucracy deal
with the discipline. The examination turns briefly to English
education. While this portion applies to students of geography in
England, the problem of ignorance is similar and the roots are found
in the shift of education policy. Moorish (2001) identifies the
specific problem thus, “Geography candidates have long been criticized
[sp UK]24 for the inadequacies of their case studies. Examiners point
to vague and generalised [sp UK] answers, lacking in specific facts,
short, or simply irrelevant. Why do students find it so difficult to
provide the required material?”25 Moorish’s criticism applies to 15-16
23 Ibid.24 Note [sp] is normally used for misspellings; [sp UK] is used to note that this is the proper spelling in the Queen’s English with UK standing for UnitedKingdom. 25 Morrish, Mike, “Case-study Competence” (The Times Educational Supplement, 23 March 2001), 2.
Jordan 45
year old students trying to complete the requirements for the General
Certificate of Secondary Education (GCSE). When the author was 15 and
16, South Hiram Middle School did not have its students undertake case
studies on geography. Perhaps this is a reason Americans consistently
score lowest among developed nations?26 Moorish goes on to describe
the roots of the problem:
The origins of the problem go back to the curriculum changes of the 1970s. Before the "quantitative revolution" geography was largely based on regional studies that drew together a wide variety of information about particular places. The examination boards decided which countries or continents were to be covered. Emphasis was placed on learning the features of these locations and candidates were expected to reproduce the facts in detail.27
Moorish points out that examination boards decided what geographical
information was important and what geographical information was not
important. This contributed to the problem of inadequate case studies
by the secondary school students of the United Kingdom. This proves a
relationship between an education establishment and its students’ body
of knowledge on geography—assuming trust of the source. As the United
States tests behind England—and England has its own problems with its
26 Sources supporting this claim appear later in the work. 27 Morrish, Mike, “Case-study Competence” (The Times Educational Supplement, 23 March 2001), 2
Jordan 46
students’ geographical knowledge—looking here offers more insight into
the problems of American education, especially when considering the
argument of Lewis (2000): “Ironically, however, in the presumably
bygone days of American isolationism a large amount of global
information was imparted in schools. One hundred years ago, even
junior high school students [secondary education students in the UK]
were expected to acquire detailed knowledge”.28 Lewis describes a
shift in American education which took emphasis away from geography.
In the paragraphs that follow, some data on American knowledge of
geography appears.
As stated, possibly ad nauseum, much raw data on the credentials
of American teachers is lacking as is raw data on student performance.
However, this next portion will cite trusted sources who enjoyed such
access. This portion presents numbers concerning American students
and matters of geography. Shabad (1982) discusses a 24-page report
issued by The American Association of Geographers: “The survey, which
covered 3,000 students at 185 colleges and universities in the United
States, disclosed that 60 percent of the student sample, composed
equally of two-year college students and of freshmen and seniors in
four-year institutions, had taken no courses in college geography”.29 28 Lewis, Martin W. “Global Ignorance.” Geographical Review, (October 2000).29 Shabad, Theodore, “Americans Get A Failing Grade In Geography” (New York Times, 27 May 1982), sec A, p. 7.
Jordan 47
While introducing four-year freshmen into the sample may skew it
slightly, the institutional requirements do not favor geography.
Institutional requirements are a device controlled by members of the
education establishment—in this case the universities themselves. Why
does it matter that many students are not taking geography courses and
many teachers are not qualified to teach them? The Economist (1988)
cites a National Geographic Society survey:
Jordan 48
One in five of those polled could not name a single country in Europe. Three in four could notfind the Persian Gulf on a map. One in four couldnot find the Pacific Ocean. One in two could not find South Africa. More astonishing, nearly one in two could not find New York state [sic] on a map. Indeed, 14% could not even find the United States.30
Researchers may infer that such results are caused by the education
establishment of America. However, the Economist (1988) offers still
more evidence of this:
In all eight other countries sampled, people over55 years old could identify fewer places than people aged 18-24. Americans over 55 could locatenine of the 16 places, but 18-24-years olds couldname only 7.5. In that age group, Americans are more ignorant than all the other countries -- well behind Mexico and Britain. The society used the same maps for a similar poll in 1947-48. Comparing the results reveals a steady loss of geographical knowledge.31
While this steady loss of geographical knowledge could find blame in a
steady loss of American interest, this does not absolve the education
establishment of responsibility, nor does it nullify same as a cause.
How many students are not interested in mathematics, sciences, or
English? It is the challenge of educators to make these disciplines
interesting, or else to provide the proper motivation for students to
become proficient in the same. If it is not, then it is their
30 The Economist, “Here Be Foreigners.” (The Economist, 30 July 1988), 26. (no author information exists) 31 Ibid.
Jordan 49
responsibility to ensure that students meet the standard and are able
to prove certain knowledge among the liberal arts and sciences. If
students are not meeting the standards, the education establishment
must have some influence in this. It is not as if Americans were
always ignorant of geography—as the survey shows, this is a relatively
recent development. Groennings (1990) discusses a 1980 survey
conducted by the Educational Testing Service. This survey reveals
that only 29 percent of Americans polled could recognize the OPEC
nations. Groennings (1990) goes on to cite a survey of 8th grade
American students with the following results: 35 percent could find
Egypt and 31 percent could find the United Kingdom on a map.32 Through
this information, research indexes symptoms of the lack of American
knowledge vis-à-vis geography as far back as this 1980 survey.
This relatively recent development is a fact reaching the
awareness of those in the highest echelons of power in the United
States. The reader may remember when Dan Quayle embarrassed the
United States by making remarks about Latin Americans speaking Latin
when they speak Spanish or Portuguese as their main languages.
Piscionere reveals: “President Bush indicates that the primary
problem in American society today is cultural apathy, brought on by a
32 Groennings, Sven, ed. and Wiley, David S., ed., Group Portrait: Internationalizing theDisciplines (New York: American Forum, 1990), 34.
Jordan 50
lack of education”.33 This lack of education contributes to a lack of
knowledge of geography. Supported by cultural apathy, this becomes a
vicious cycle. As previously shown, American knowledge of geography
is diminishing. Levine (2005) refers to a survey saying “that 25
percent of our college-bound high school students cannot name the
ocean between California and Asia”.34 This fact comes as little
surprise considering the percentages who could not find the United
States on a map in previously cited data. Levine (2005) also says
that “with some notable exceptions, our public schools are doing a
woeful job of teaching students about the world outside America’s
borders”.35 The paragraph that follows presents one of these notable
exceptions.
Until now, this examination juxtaposed theory and data relating
to the education establishment and the results of tools designed to
33 Piscionere, Alexandra, Immediate and Long-Term Dilemma: American Ignorance in International Affairs and Foreign Languages [scholarly discourse online] (Washington, DC: George Washington University, 2007, accessed 13 April 2009); available from http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&ct=res&cd=1&url=http percent3A percent2F percent2Fwww.gwu.edu percent2F~uwp percent2Ffyw percent2Feuonymous percent2F2006-2007 percent2F06-07AlexandraPiscionerefinalczedit.pdf&ei=hA_-SZXvGIKytgOd1Z3OAQ&usg=AFQjCNF8QQSwPbQvzF6cKqojb9nb0AC1Ug34 Levine, Michael H. Putting the World Into Our Classrooms: A New Vision for 21st Century Education [policy paper online]. Washington, DC: Progressive Policy Institute, 2005, accessed 13 April 2009; available from http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&ct=res&cd=1&url=http percent3A percent2F percent2Fwww.ppionline.org percent2Fppi_ci.cfm percent3FknlgAreaID percent3D110 percent26subsecID percent3D181 percent26contentID percent3D253280&ei=VRD-SYwdpri2A-KhnNMB&usg=AFQjCNG7bPDz4NTictWLt-6JjP3w0y9WFw35 Ibid.
Jordan 51
test knowledge of geography. This final portion of the findings
narrative goes inside the classroom for an example of what is
happening in American schools. Pajares (1989) relates a story of his
teaching experience. In this story he tells us that after teaching
his students about the geography of the United Kingdom, one of the
students raised her hand and wanted to clarify whether England was the
capital of Great Britain. Another student said that it was Scotland,
and another student said that Scotland was in Ireland. Pajares was
taken aback and adjusted his curriculum accordingly. This action
remained well within his purview and made geography interesting for
his students. This resulted in better student performance in matters
of geography.36 The Pajares example proves that education
establishments affect the quality of knowledge their students are able
to show. Pajares offers an example of how the members of the
education establishment can make changes that improve student
performance.
This concludes the narrative portion of the findings section.
The project now addresses pattern analysis—as aforementioned in the
preface to this section. The findings presented prove causality.
This paragraph will focus mostly on the Pajares example and expects
36 Pajares, Frank. “Geography in a Fortnight.” Educational Leadership, (November 1989).
Jordan 52
the reader remembers enough of other examples to tie these in. Before
the Pajares paragraph, several sources united to offer evidence of
causality. However, the Pajares paragraph contains all necessary
elements to prove causality, save for the theory. Time ordering
occurs through the Pajares example. Pajares’ style of teaching
changed before his students’ ability to show their knowledge of
geography changed, other sources mentioned before Pajares concur with
this finding.37 The Pajares example demonstrates non-spuriousness. No
other variables affected events in the classroom other than
participants of the education establishment. Researchers may infer
the same dynamic among certain other evidence presented. Co-variation
is also evident in the Pajares example. As Pajares changed his style,
demonstration of student knowledge also changed. Other evidence
presented before Pajares’ example supports co-variation. Relevant
theory is found earlier in this work—in the theoretical framework
section. Simply put, the primary source of student knowledge is the
K-12 teacher and professors of any higher education the student
pursues. If this education establishment is performing poorly,
student performance will also be poor. These insights prove
causality. Analysis—and all examples offered—support the hypothesis: 37 In the interests of conserving document space and the reader’s time, these sources are not listed again. The Pajares example alone is enough to establish causality; the other sources offer supplementary evidence building to this example.
Jordan 53
The American education establishment directly affects American
knowledge of geography.
Conclusions
The findings of this study suggest much for the discipline of
geography. Geographers need to be clear about what their discipline
entails. Geographers’ efforts to perform this task would better occur
without passion or prejudice. Ideally, academic competition would
cease among departments as competition matters to bureaucratic power
and allocation of larger budgets. The competition would better center
on who is doing the better job of educating students. As Pajares
indicates—through his example—making changes in how teachers present
the material to students will also have measurable results. Children
who can answer questions aptly in class—as opposed to being unable to
do so—have greater potential to perform better on measured tests. The
education establishment must focus on educating students, not on other
goals which deprive American students of a proper education.
The theoretical model states the education establishment has a
direct effect on a student’s knowledge. Other remarks on the
Jordan 54
theoretical model suggested certain causes that would affect the
education establishment. One possible change to this theoretical
model is the introduction of a feedback loop. A simplified version
might look thus:
Public policy
Law
American knowledge of Geography
Funding
American education establishment
Culture
Education affects the variables that affect the education
establishment. President Bush argued that bad education led to
cultural apathy. Yet, cultural apathy leads to more bad education.
When teachers have no desire to be aware of what is beyond America’s
borders, how can parents be sure that their children are receiving
proper emphasis on these matters? Factors that determine exactly what
the education establishment is and does are affected by the citizens
of this nation. These citizens then educate future citizens. Thus, a
more complete theoretical framework would indicate this loop. The
Jordan 55
sources of this study reveal that this loop is a negative feedback
loop or vicious cycle. The implications for American society are
grave.
A citizenry which contains a significant portion of people who
cannot find their own nation on a map, cannot point to the nations
where their energy—fossil fuels—come from, and cannot identify oceans
surrounding their homeland cannot be taken seriously. As mentioned
earlier, the ignorant American is no longer met with laughter but with
contempt. It is simply not possible to sustain a dominant culture or
a position of geostrategic dominance with a citizenry that lacks a
proper grasp of the world in which that society exists. This state of
affairs should embarrass those who teach geography and certain members
of the education establishment. Members of academia had better ensure
that those who pass through its institutions are properly educated and
able to preserve the United States in its position of geostrategic
dominance.
If this project were to go to the next level, it would need teams
of analysts and researchers to gather raw data from various locations
among the several states. This data would include standardized
testing of students and American citizens of all levels and age
groups. The project would need data on the qualifications and
Jordan 56
academic experience of all educators who teach geography. The project
would also need standardized testing of the educators’ knowledge of
geography. Ideally, this project would continue to gather this data
over several years or even decades. This would settle, without any
doubts, the causality outlined in the theoretical model and findings
in this paper.
Such a project raises other possible implications for the
discipline of geography and education in general. It would be
preferred to have such studies occurring always in all disciplines.
Perhaps an education establishment where not only students, but
educators as well, are routinely tested on the accuracy of their
knowledge is in order? Educators could refresh themselves on lost
knowledge as needed. Perhaps a radical restructuring of how
universities work is in order? One might argue the most important
aspect of a university is the faculty. This follows from the
assertion that a university’s most important function is to educate
students. Yet, the largest buildings on campuses tend to be
administrative buildings and the goals of many institutions revolve
around how much money they can make. Certain universities are even
publicly traded companies. Perhaps this emphasis on finance forms a
problem? While the following point may seem off topic, it is
Jordan 57
relevant. The author asks for the reader’s indulgence. When the big
auto companies of the United States put financiers rather than
engineers in charge of their companies, taxpayers got the bill. What
happens when financiers run universities? Unlike the bailout policies
—which take money from taxpayers to pay for the shoddy practices of
the companies that failed—there is no solution to transfer knowledge
when shoddy American education practices lead to an intellectually
bankrupt citizenry.
This examination has shown that United States citizens are losing
knowledge of geography. The broader implications here are that action
must occur to fix this problem. More studies are needed. This
project should expand to include proper budgets and personnel to
discover the severity of the problem and offer solutions to this
problem. While this study proves causality, and moves toward
solutions, greater effort is necessary if the United States is going
to have a citizenry that is prepared to maintain its position in the
21st century.
Jordan 58
Bibliography
Economist, The. “Here Be Foreigners.” The Economist, 30 July 1988, 26. (no author information exists)
Gatto, John Taylor. The Underground History of American Education. New York: Oxford Village Press, 2001.
Groennings, Sven, ed. and Wiley, David S., ed. Group Portrait: Internationalizing the Disciplines. New York: American Forum, 1990.
Keeling, David. Geographical Ignorance Limits America’s Opportunities [essay online]. New York: American Geographical Society, 2007, accessed 13 April 2009; available from http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&ct=res&cd=1&url=http percent3A percent2F percent2Fwww.amergeog.org percent2Fnewsrelease percent2FAGS-OpEd-geoignorance.pdf&ei=MAn-Sb_1FImYtAOx9cXxAQ&usg=AFQjCNF-uBTypnYRKXCiqEMDJiq-O8NM5w
Levine, Michael H. Putting the World Into Our Classrooms: A New Vision for 21st Century Education [policy paper online]. Washington, DC: ProgressivePolicy Institute, 2005, accessed 13 April 2009; available from http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&ct=res&cd=1&url=http percent3A percent2F percent2Fwww.ppionline.org percent2Fppi_ci.cfm percent3FknlgAreaID percent3D110 percent26subsecID percent3D181 percent26contentID percent3D253280&ei=VRD-SYwdpri2A-KhnNMB&usg=AFQjCNG7bPDz4NTictWLt-6JjP3w0y9WFw
Lewis, Martin W. “Global Ignorance.” Geographical Review, (October 2000).
Morrish, Mike. “Case-study Competence.” The Times Educational Supplement, 23 March 2001.
Nuhfer, Edward B. “Academic Geographers Are Partly to Blame for Americans’ Ignorance of Geography.” The Chronicle of Higher Education, 20 April 1988.
Pajares, Frank. “Geography in a Fortnight.” Educational Leadership, (November 1989).
Piscionere, Alexandra. Immediate and Long-Term Dilemma: American Ignorance in International Affairs and Foreign Languages [scholarly discourse online].
Jordan 59
Washington, DC: George Washington University, 2007, accessed 13 April 2009; available from http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&ct=res&cd=1&url=http percent3A percent2F percent2Fwww.gwu.edu percent2F~uwp percent2Ffyw percent2Feuonymous percent2F2006-2007 percent2F06-07AlexandraPiscionerefinalczedit.pdf&ei=hA_-SZXvGIKytgOd1Z3OAQ&usg=AFQjCNF8QQSwPbQvzF6cKqojb9nb0AC1Ug
Shabad, Theodore. “Americans Get A Failing Grade In Geography.” New York Times, 27 May 1982, sec A, p. 7.