Post on 29-Jan-2023
Broadly tunable L-band multiwavelength BEFL
utilizing nonlinear amplified loop mirror filter
M. H. Al-Mansoori1,*
and M. A. Mahdi2
1Faculty of Engineering, Sohar University, P.O Box 44, Sohar P.C. 311, Oman 2Wireless and Photonics Networks Research Center, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM
Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.
*mmansoori@soharuni.edu.om
Abstract: We demonstrate a widely tunable L-band multiwavelength
Brillouin-erbium fiber laser utilizing a nonlinear amplified fiber loop mirror
filter (AFLMF). By manipulating polarization controllers placed in the fiber
loop, the erbium peak gain spectrum is able to be shifted. The nonlinear
AFLMF induces wavelength-dependent cavity loss and serves as an
amplitude equalizer. In addition, it provides flexibility on controlling the
amount of light reflected and transmitted into and out of the laser’s cavity.
By utilizing 100 mW 1480 nm pump and 1.1 mW Brillouin pump power, an
average of 24 stable output channels are generated by the proposed structure
that could all be tuned over the whole L-band window from 1570 nm to
1610 nm.
©2011 Optical Society of America
OCIS codes: (140.3510) Lasers, fiber; (290.5900) Scattering, stimulated Brillouin; (190.4370)
Nonlinear optics, fibers; (060.2410) Fibers, erbium.
References
1. Y. G. Han and S. B. Lee, “Flexibly tunable multiwavelength erbium-doped fiber laser based on four-wave
mixing effect in dispersion-shifted fibers,” Opt. Express 13(25), 10134–10139 (2005).
2. Y. G. Han, T. V. A. Tran, and S. B. Lee, “Wavelength-spacing tunable multiwavelength erbium-doped fiber laser
based on four-wave mixing of dispersion-shifted fiber,” Opt. Lett. 31(6), 697–699 (2006).
3. X. Liu, X. Zhou, X. Tang, J. Ng, J. Hao, T. Y. Chai, L. Edward, and C. Lu, “Switchable and tunable
multiwavelength erbium-doped fiber laser with fiber Bragg gratings and photonic crystal fiber,” IEEE Photon.
Technol. Lett. 17(8), 1626–1628 (2005).
4. W. Zhuyuan, C. Yiping, Y. Binfeng, and L. Changgui, “Multiwavelength generation in a Raman fiber laser with
sampled Bragg grating,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 17(10), 2044–2046 (2005).
5. X. Dong, P. Shum, N. Q. Ngo, and C. C. Chan, “Multiwavelength Raman fiber laser with a continuously-tunable
spacing,” Opt. Express 14(8), 3288–3293 (2006).
6. S. A. Babin, D. V. Churkin, S. I. Kablukov, M. A. Rybakov, and A. A. Vlasov, “All-fiber widely tunable Raman
fiber laser with controlled output spectrum,” Opt. Express 15(13), 8438–8443 (2007).
7. R. A. Sammut and S. J. Garth, “Multiple-frequency generation on single-mode optical fibers,” J. Opt. Soc. Am.
B 6(9), 1732–1735 (1989).
8. S. P. Smith, F. Zarinetchi, and S. Ezekiel, “Narrow-linewidth stimulated Brillouin fiber laser and applications,”
Opt. Lett. 16(6), 393–395 (1991).
9. J. C. Yong, L. Thevenaz, and B. Y. Kim, “Brillouin fiber laser pumped by a DFB laser diode,” J. Lightwave
Technol. 21(2), 546–554 (2003).
10. B. Min, P. Kim, and N. Park, “Flat amplitude equal spacing 798 channel Rayleigh assisted Brillouin/Raman
multiwavelength comb generation in dispersion compensating fiber,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 13(12), 1352–
1354 (2001).
11. A. K. Zamzuri, M. A. Mahdi, A. Ahmad, M. I. Md Ali, and M. H. Al-Mansoori, “Flat amplitude
multiwavelength Brillouin-Raman comb fiber laser in Rayleigh-scattering-enhanced linear cavity,” Opt. Express
15, 3000–3005 (2007).
12. Y. G. Liu and D. Wang, “Wavelength tunable and amplitude-equilibrium dual-wavelength lasing sources with
dual-pass Raman/Brillouin amplification configuration,” Opt. Express 16(6), 3583–3588 (2008).
13. G. J. Cowle and D. Y. Stepanov, “Multiple wavelength generation with Brillouin/erbium fiber lasers,” IEEE
Photon. Technol. Lett. 8(11), 1465–1467 (1996).
14. N. S. Kim, “Multiwavelength operation of EDFA-enhanced Brillouin/erbium fiber lasers,” Electron. Lett. 34(7),
673–675 (1998).
#152549 - $15.00 USD Received 8 Aug 2011; revised 21 Sep 2011; accepted 27 Oct 2011; published 10 Nov 2011(C) 2011 OSA 21 November 2011 / Vol. 19, No. 24 / OPTICS EXPRESS 23981
15. D. S. Lim, H. K. Lee, K. H. Kim, S. B. Kang, J. T. Ahn, and M. Y. Jeon, “Generation of multiorder Stokes and
anti-Stokes lines in a Brillouin erbium-fiber laser with a Sagnac loop mirror,” Opt. Lett. 23(21), 1671–1673
(1998).
16. M. H. Al-Mansoori and M. A. Mahdi, “Multiwavelength L-band brillouin-erbium comb fiber laser utilizing
nonlinear amplifying loop mirror,” J. Lightwave Technol. 27(22), 5038–5044 (2009).
17. D. Y. Stepanov and G. J. Cowle, “Properties of Brillouin/erbium fiber lasers,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum
Electron. 3(4), 1049–1057 (1997).
18. G. J. Cowle, D. Y. Stepanov, and Y. T. Chieng, “Brillouin/erbium fiber lasers,” J. Lightwave Technol. 15(7),
1198–1204 (1997).
19. Y. J. Song, L. Zhan, S. Hu, Q. H. Ye, and Y. X. Xia, “Tunable multiwavelength Brillouin-Erbium fiber laser
with a polarization-maintaining fiber Sagnac loop filter,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 16(9), 2015–2017 (2004).
20. Z. Zhang, L. Zhan, and Y. Xia, “Tunable self-seeded multiwavelength Brillouin-Erbium fiber laser with
enhanced power efficiency,” Opt. Express 15(15), 9731–9736 (2007).
21. Y. Huang, L. Zhan, J. H. Ji, S. Y. Luo, and Y. X. Xia, “Multiwavelength self-seeded Brillouin-erbium fiber laser
with 45-nm tunable range,” Opt. Commun. 281, 452–456 (2008).
22. M. H. Al-Mansoori, M. K. Abd-Rahman, F. R. Mahamd Adikan, and M. A. Mahdi, “Widely tunable linear
cavity multiwavelength Brillouin-Erbium fiber lasers,” Opt. Express 13(9), 3471–3476 (2005).
23. M. H. Al-Mansoori and M. A. Mahdi, “Tunable range enhancement of Brillouin-erbium fiber laser utilizing
Brillouin pump pre-amplification technique,” Opt. Express 16(11), 7649–7654 (2008).
24. M. H. Al-Mansoori, M. A. Mahdi, and M. Premaratne, “Novel multiwavelength L-band Brillouin-Erbium fiber
laser utilizing double-pass Brillouin pump preamplified technique,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 15(2),
415–421 (2009).
25. M. Ajiya, M. A. Mahdi, M. H. Al-Mansoori, S. Hitam, and M. Mokhtar, “Seamless tuning range based-on
available gain bandwidth in multiwavelength Brillouin fiber laser,” Opt. Express 17(8), 5944–5952 (2009).
26. M. Ajiya, M. A. Mahdi, and M. H. Al-Mansoori, “Widely tunable linear-cavity multiwavelength fiber laser with
distributed Brillouin scattering,” Chin. Opt. Lett. 9, 1–3 (2011).
27. B. Dong, D. P. Zhou, and L. Wei, “Tunable multiwavelength Brillouin-Erbium fiber laser by controlling self-
lasing cavity modes' oscillation,” Opt. Fiber Technol. 16(1), 17–19 (2010).
28. K. Inoue, “Brillouin threshold in an optical fiber with bidirectional pump lights,” Opt. Commun. 120(1-2), 34–38
(1995).
29. M. Ajiya, M. A. Mahdi, M. H. Al-Mansoori, Y. G. Shee, S. Hitam, and M. Mokhtar, “Reduction of stimulated
Brillouin scattering threshold through pump recycling technique,” Laser Phys. Lett. 6(7), 535–538 (2009).
30. H. A. Al-Asadi, M. H. Al-Mansoori, M. Ajiya, S. Hitam, M. I. Saripan, and M. A. Mahdi, “Effects of pump
recycling technique on stimulated Brillouin scattering threshold: a theoretical model,” Opt. Express 18(21),
22339–22347 (2010).
31. G. P. Agrawal, Application of Nonlinear Fiber Optics, 2nd ed., (Academic Press, 2008).
1. Introduction
Nonlinear phenomena in optical fibers have been widely utilized to generate multiple
wavelengths fiber lasers such as the use of four-wave mixing in dispersion-shifted and
photonic crystal fibers [1–3], Raman scattering in dispersion compensating fiber (DCF) [4–6],
Brillouin scattering in single mode fiber (SMF) [7–9], combination of Raman and Brillouin
scattering in DCF [10–12], and combination of erbium and Brillouin gains in SMF and DCF
[13–16]. Among these technologies, multiwavelength Brillouin-erbium fiber laser (MBEFL)
has attracted huge interest due to the inherent advantage of narrow linewidth and fixed Stokes
lines spacing of about 0.08 nm [13–18]. The lasing gain of MBEFL is mainly determined by
the erbium gain while the Brillouin gain contributes to setting the operating wavelength of the
laser. However, the major disadvantage of MBEFL is limited wavelength tunability owing to
the mode competition generated from the laser cavity itself.
The presence of free-running modes together with Brillouin Stokes lines in the cavity
causes instable operation of the laser and adds to the difficulty in achieving multiwavelength
generation in a wide wavelength range [19]. Several schemes employed to overcome this
problem include; injection of the Brillouin pump (BP) signal at a wavelength close to the
lasing wavelength of the erbium gain [17,18], spectrum filtering [19–21], utilization of large
BP power [22], BP pre-amplification technique [23,24], virtual reflectivity [25,26] and
deployment of variable optical attenuator to control the cavity modes oscillations [27].
Twelve C-band Brillouin Stokes lines with highest peak power of −25 dBm and
wavelength tunability of 14.5 nm using Sagnac loop filter was reported recently [19].
However, incorporating a Sagnac loop filter in a ring cavity to manipulate the spectral loss
#152549 - $15.00 USD Received 8 Aug 2011; revised 21 Sep 2011; accepted 27 Oct 2011; published 10 Nov 2011(C) 2011 OSA 21 November 2011 / Vol. 19, No. 24 / OPTICS EXPRESS 23982
has led to lower output powers. On the other hand, wide tuning range was achieved by self-
seeded MBEFL at the expense of low OSNR of Brillouin Stokes lines [20,21]. Large BP
power was utilized to achieve wide tunability at the expense of output Stokes lines number
[22]. In another work, single-pass and double-pass BP pre-amplification techniques were
employed to enhance the wavelength tunability of Stokes lines [23,24]. Nineteen Stokes lines
with a tunability of 10 nm and sixteen Stokes lines with a tunability of 14 nm were obtained
for single-pass and double-pass Brillouin pump pre-amplification techniques, respectively. In
recent reported works, virtual reflectivity [25,26] and variable optical attenuator [27] were
used to reduce the cavity modes oscillations and overcome the tuning range limitation, but
both laser structures operate on C-band and provides low Stokes lines power with less number
of lasing lines. Although the previous schemes were able to improve the tunability of C-band
MBEFL, the improvement of laser tunability was either at the expense of less number of
output channels with low peak power or at high threshold power level with low signal-to-
noise ratio. In addition, most of the previous improvements of MBEFL tunability focus on C-
band, only a few works were reported on the improvement of tunability in L-band MBEFL
[23,24].
In this paper, a new design of MBEFL that utilizes nonlinear amplified fiber loop mirror
filter (AFLMF) is demonstrated. The nonlinear AFLMF which induces wavelength-dependent
cavity loss and serves as spectral amplitude equalizer is employed to shift the erbium-doped
fiber gain spectrum. By properly adjusting the polarization controller in the fiber loop in
conjunction with the wavelength adjustment of BP, the MBEFL can be tuned over the whole
L-band window from 1570 nm to 1610 nm with an average number of 24 stable output
channels. To the best of our knowledge, this is the highest number of channels with largest
tuning range reported in the development of L-band MBEFL.
2. Experimental setup and operating principle
Figure 1 shows the experimental setup of the proposed MBEFL that exploits a nonlinear
AFLMF. In the configuration, the nonlinear AFLMF consists of bidirectional erbium-doped
fiber amplifier (EDFA) and a fiber loop mirror filter (FLMF). The EDFA provides the optical
gain and consists of 10 m long erbium-doped fiber (EDF) with characteristics of 900-ppm
erbium ion concentration, an absorption coefficient of 19 dB/m at 1530 nm and a cut-off
wavelength around 1420 nm. The EDF is pumped by a 1480 nm pump laser through a
wavelength selective coupler (WSC). The FLMF is formed with the combination of a 3-dB
coupler (directional coupler, DC), a length of polarization maintaining fiber (PMF) and two
polarization controllers (PCs). At each port of the PCs, the length of PMF connected to the
PCs is 0.5 m. Therefore, the total length of PMF in the loop is 2 m. The PMF has a mode file
diameter of 10.5 µm at 1550 nm, a cladding diameter of 125 µm, an attenuation coefficient of
0.5 dB/km, a numerical aperture of 0.13, and a birefringence of 4.3 x 10−4
. The reflection and
transmission spectra of nonlinear AFLMF are adjusted by controlling the PCs. The Brillouin
gain is provided by a 6.7 km of SMF-28 fiber type placed between an optical mirror (M) with
reflectivity of 90% and the 3-dB coupler. The BP signal is provided by an external tunable
laser source having maximum power and tuning range of 3.5 mW and 100 nm respectively.
The output of the laser is measured through the output port of the circulator (port 3) by an
optical spectrum analyzer (OSA) having a resolution bandwidth of 0.015 nm.
The operating principles of the proposed laser can be explained as follows. Without an
external BP power injected, the configured laser operates as a bidirectional erbium-doped
fiber laser (EDFL) with oscillating modes at the EDF peak gain. By adjusting the PCs in the
fiber loop, control can be exerted on the wavelength and power level of EDF lasing (EDFL
cavity modes). When an external narrow linewidth BP power is injected through port 1 of the
circulator, it travels through port 2 of the circulator to the 3-dB coupler where it splits into
two counter-propagating signals. These two counter-propagating signals are both amplified in
the loop and reflected or transmitted back according to the reflection and transmission profile
#152549 - $15.00 USD Received 8 Aug 2011; revised 21 Sep 2011; accepted 27 Oct 2011; published 10 Nov 2011(C) 2011 OSA 21 November 2011 / Vol. 19, No. 24 / OPTICS EXPRESS 23983
of the nonlinear AFLMF. With sufficient transmitted BP power into the SMF-28 fiber, the
first-order Brillouin Stokes signal can be formed between the nonlinear AFLMF and the
optical mirror once the threshold power of the Brillouin gain medium is exceeded. In addition,
the optical mirror recycles the transmitted BP signal back into the SMF-28 fiber, thus
provides a bidirectional pumping scheme which initiates more stimulated Brillouin scattering
(SBS) emissions. In this case, the threshold power is reduced and the generation of Brillouin
Stokes signals is enhanced as reported in [28–30].
Fig. 1. Experimental setup of multiwavelength BEFL utilizing nonlinear AFLMF.
The first-order Brillouin Stokes signal propagates in the opposite direction to the BP
signal, passes through the nonlinear AFLMF for amplification and then gets reflected back
into the SMF-28 fiber. In the proposed laser structure, the oscillation occurs between AFLMF
and mirror. When the lasing condition is satisfied, the first-order Stokes signal operates as a
laser. This new laser can also be utilized as the BP to generate a higher order Brillouin Stokes
signals. Once its power goes beyond the SBS threshold condition, the second-order Stokes
signal emerges at a wavelength shifted from the first-order Stokes signal wavelength by 0.089
nm. The higher-order Stokes signals are generated in the same process. This cascading effect
is terminated when the lasing condition is not satisfied. Consequently the SBS threshold
condition to generate new Stokes signal is also not fulfilled. The laser output is taken from
port 1 of the 3-dB coupler that passes through the circulator (from port 2 to port 3). Therefore,
with the combination of adjusting the PCs of AFLMF and the wavelength adjustment of the
BP, tunable multiwavelength BEFL source can be achieved.
3. Results and discussions
In order to understand the filtering mechanism, the characterization of FLMF is performed
beforehand. In the ideal case, the coupler splits the light entering the input port into two
waves of equal amplitudes that propagates in the clockwise and counterclockwise direction,
both of which propagates around the loop. The PCs acts as a polarization state rotator for both
the clockwise and counterclockwise signals. The birefringence in the PMF produces a phase
difference between the wave components propagating along the fast and slow axes. The
intensity of the output light from the FLMF depends on the phase differences among the
interfacing signals which are determined by the settings of the PCs. The difference in phase
shift can be expressed as [31],
2
BLπ
φλ
∆ = (1)
#152549 - $15.00 USD Received 8 Aug 2011; revised 21 Sep 2011; accepted 27 Oct 2011; published 10 Nov 2011(C) 2011 OSA 21 November 2011 / Vol. 19, No. 24 / OPTICS EXPRESS 23984
where B = s f
n n n∆ = − is the modal birefringence of PMF, ns and nf are the refractive indexes
along the slow and the fast axes of the fiber respectively. L is the length of PMF and λ is the
wavelength. The transmittance (T12) and the transmitted optical power (PT12) of the nonlinear
AFLMF are given by,
2 2
12 1 4 (1 )[1 sin (2 )sin ( )]2
T k kφ
θ∆
= − − − (2)
2 2
121 4 (1 )[1 sin (2 )sin ( )]
2T in
P P G k kφ
θ∆ = − − −
(3)
where Pin is the input power, G is the EDFA gain, k is the cross-coupling ratio,θ is the angle
between the fast axis of the PMF and the x-axis. The transfer spectrum of the FLMF is
measured experimentally by using L-band amplified spontaneous emission (ASE) source and
an optical spectrum analyzer as illustrated in Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. Transmission spectra of the FLMF for different setting of the polarization controller.
The typical L-band ASE source spectrum of an EDFA is injected into FLMF through port
1 of the 3-dB coupler as shown in Fig. 1. The transmitted spectrum was measured at port 2 of
the 3-dB coupler. Figure 2 shows the typical L-band ASE source and the measured
transmission spectra of the FLMF for different setting of the PCs. By adjusting the PCs in the
FLMF, the transmission and reflection spectra of the FLMF can be changed so that the
amount of the optical feedback to the cavity is controllable and the peak gain of the laser can
be tuned. The peak of the bandpass spectrum of the filter which represents the lowest
insertion loss of the filter has been tuned within 40 nm, which is in agreement with the
wavelength tuning range of the EDFL cavity modes oscillation in Fig. 3. The measured
wavelength tuning of the EDFL cavity modes oscillation at 100 mW of 1480 nm pump power
for different settings of the PCs is depicted in Fig. 3. By adjusting the PCs inside the AFLMF,
the power level of the optical feedback can be set lower (cavity loss is high), thus the laser
oscillates in short wavelength region. On the other hand, the laser oscillates in long
wavelength region when the cavity loss inside the laser is low.
The EDFL cavity modes can be shifted over the whole L-band bandwidth from 1570 nm
to 1610 nm by adjustments of the PCs in the fiber loop as shown in Fig. 3. By properly setting
the PCs in the FLMF, the reflection or transmission spectrum of the nonlinear AFLMF can be
tuned to compensate for the variation in the gain profile of the EDFA over a wide bandwidth.
Thus, the flexibility on shifting and modifying the spectrum of EDFL operation leads to the
ability of tuning the multiwavelength BEFL source over a wide bandwidth.
#152549 - $15.00 USD Received 8 Aug 2011; revised 21 Sep 2011; accepted 27 Oct 2011; published 10 Nov 2011(C) 2011 OSA 21 November 2011 / Vol. 19, No. 24 / OPTICS EXPRESS 23985
Fig. 3. Wavelength tuning of the EDFL cavity modes oscillation at 100 mW of 1480 nm pump
power.
Figure 4 illustrates the tuning process of the MBEFL output over the whole L-band
window from 1570 nm to 1610 nm. In the tuning process, the EDFL oscillation is first shifted
by adjusting the PCs, and then the BP signal is injected at the wavelength of this peak gain
region as given in Fig. 3. By optimizing the 1480 nm pump power, BP power and careful
adjustment of the PCs in the nonlinear AFLMF, wide tunability and higher number of
Brillouin Stokes signals are achieved. The optimum point is found when the 1480 nm pump
power is driven to 100 mW with 1.1 mW of BP power. An average of 24 output channels can
be tuned over 40 nm from 1570 nm to 1610 nm.
This wide wavelength tunability is achieved by overlapping the cavity peak gain and BP
wavelength carefully. Owing to the additional Brillouin gain, the EDFL cavity modes can be
efficiently suppressed. In this scenario, the generation of Brillouin Stokes signals always
occur at the peak of cavity gain thus eliminating the possibility of co-existing with EDFL
oscillating modes at other wavelength. This is unlike to the conventional MBEFL, the peak
gain of EDFL is fixed. When the BP wavelength is detuned away from this region, higher
Brillouin gains are required to compete with the oscillating modes [23,24]. As a result, the
tuning range is limited due to insufficient Brillouin gain to suppress the build-up of EDFL
cavity modes.
In our experiment, without introducing the PCs with PMF in the loop and at the same
pumping powers of 1480 nm pump and BP at 100 and 1.1 mW respectively, tunability of the
output wavelength is found to be only ~2 nm. In this situation (without the PCs with PMF in
the loop), the EDFL peak gain is fixed around 1601 nm. Thus with the help of PCs and PMF
in the loop to shift the peak gain of EDFL, the tuning bandwidth of the BEFL is extended to
40 nm as depicted in Fig. 4.
This wide tunability with higher number of output channels is the highest tuning range
reported in the development of L-band multiwavelength BEFL up to date to the best of our
knowledge. The detailed spectra of the sampled multiwavelength BEFL combs in the tuning
process are shown in Fig. 5, in which the output spectra in (a), (b), (c), and (d), correspond to
the 1570, 1580, 1600, and 1610 nm respectively. The output spectra presented in Fig. 5 are
measured by the optical spectrum analyzer with its resolution bandwidth set at 0.015 nm. The
number of the generated output channels and the total laser power against the BP wavelength
are also investigated as depicted in Fig. 6. The BP wavelength is tuned from 1570 to 1610 nm
and the 1480 nm pump and BP powers are fixed at 100 and 1.1 mW, respectively.
#152549 - $15.00 USD Received 8 Aug 2011; revised 21 Sep 2011; accepted 27 Oct 2011; published 10 Nov 2011(C) 2011 OSA 21 November 2011 / Vol. 19, No. 24 / OPTICS EXPRESS 23986
Fig. 4. Wavelength tuning process at 100 mW pump power, and 1.1 mW of BP power.
Fig. 5. Output spectra of multiwavelength BEFL in tuning process at BP wavelength of (a)
1570 nm, (b) 1580 nm, (c)1600 nm and (d) 1610 nm.
Referring to Fig. 6, the number of output channels varies from 23 to 25 channels. An
average of up to 24 output channels can be tuned over the whole L-band region. In addition,
the total output power is more than 7 mW for the whole tuning range from 1570 nm to 1610
nm. The maximum output power of 9.92 mW occurs around 1580 nm which indicate the
highest gain from the Erbium gain block. At BP wavelength of 1610 nm, the output channels
dropped to 23 channels with power of 7.22 mW. This observation is a result from the
reduction of the erbium gain for BP wavelength higher than 1600 nm, which led to
insufficient signal power for the higher order Stokes signals to pump the SMF-28 fiber, thus
terminating the multiple generation of output channels. In comparison, the number of output
channels produced from the proposed laser structure is double the results presented in [19]
and [27]. In addition to this, our tuning range of 40 nm supersedes their reported values of
14.5 nm and 23 nm, respectively. Furthermore, not only the tunable range is extended, but the
average output power of the channels is also higher by more than 30 dB.
#152549 - $15.00 USD Received 8 Aug 2011; revised 21 Sep 2011; accepted 27 Oct 2011; published 10 Nov 2011(C) 2011 OSA 21 November 2011 / Vol. 19, No. 24 / OPTICS EXPRESS 23987
Fig. 6. Total output power and the number of generated channels against the BP wavelength.
Lastly, the laser power stability is tested at BP wavelength of 1600 nm with 100 mW and
1.1 mW of 1480 nm pump and BP powers, respectively. Figure 7 shows the variation of peak
power for the first ten Stokes lines. In this experiment, the laser spectrum is scanned every 5
minutes over a period of 1 hour. It is found that the Stokes lines show a good stability over the
duration. Referring to Fig. 7, from the first-order to the tenth order Stokes lines, the peak
powers fluctuate within ± 0.1 dB. This shows that the proposed laser structure has good
stability as a result of wavelength selective gain range by AFLMF section.
Fig. 7. Spectral stabilities of Stokes lines at 100m W of 1480 nm pump power and 1.1 mW BP
power with wavelength at 1600 nm.
4. Conclusion
We have successfully demonstrated a widely tunable L-band multiwavelength BEFL utilizing
a nonlinear AFLMF. The AFLMF provides flexibility in controlling the amount of light
reflected and transmitted inside and outside the laser cavity and also provides a mechanism to
control and modify the EDF gain profile. Based on this mechanism, the EDF peak gain profile
can be shifted over the whole L-band gain spectrum through adjustment of the PCs placed in
the nonlinear AFLMF. By proper manipulation of the PCs, in conjunction with manipulating
the BP signal wavelength, an average of 24 stable output channels of the configured
multiwavelength BEFL are able to be tuned over the entire L-band window from 1570 nm to
1610 nm. We believe that the proposed wide band MBEFL fiber lasers are very useful in
various applications to optical component testing and characterization, optical sensor systems,
optical switches, and dense wavelength division multiplexing systems.
#152549 - $15.00 USD Received 8 Aug 2011; revised 21 Sep 2011; accepted 27 Oct 2011; published 10 Nov 2011(C) 2011 OSA 21 November 2011 / Vol. 19, No. 24 / OPTICS EXPRESS 23988