Post on 26-Apr-2023
AN EXAMINATION OF INTERNET SOCIAL MEDIA MARKETING
IN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS
A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty
of
California State University, Stanislaus
In Partial Fulfillment
of the Requirements for the Degree
of Doctor of Education
By
Adrenna B. Alkhas
May 2011
CERTIFICATION OF APPROVAL
AN EXAMINATION OF INTERNET SOCIAL MEDIA MARKETING
IN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS
by
Adrenna B. Alkhas
__________________________________________ ________________________
Dr. Jim Riggs Date
Professor of Advanced Studies in Education
__________________________________________ ________________________
Dr. Dennis Sayers Date
Professor of Advanced Studies in Education
__________________________________________ ________________________
Dr. Peter DeCaro Date
Professor of Communications Studies
Signed Certification of Approval
Page is On File with the University
Library.
iv
DEDICATION
This is dedicated to my children, Izabelle and Izaiah, who have endured
countless days of mom being away at the library or trying to be quiet in order for me
to finish this dissertation. Izaiah was with me for nine months, attending classes,
listening to lectures, and helping me with homework while pregnant with him. This
is also dedicated to my husband for his patience. I would not have been able to finish
without my husband, Peter‘s, support and encouragement. This is also dedicated to
my parents, who have shown me courage and have always taught me to never give
up. Their love and support growing up has made me who I am. To my brothers,
Ammo and Adam, who are my endless joy and love. To my one and only sister,
Mariam, without her I don‘t know what life would be like.
v
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I would like to acknowledge Dr. Riggs for his countless hours and dedication
in helping me shape my dissertation. His patience and willingness to help will never
be forgotten. I would also like to acknowledge my dissertation committee for their
support. Dr. DeCaro, who has years of marketing experience, shed a light to this
dissertation. Dr. Sayers, thank you for your qualitative expertise in this research
study. I would also like to acknowledge my colleagues in this program; we have all
endured three years of countless essay writings, group projects, homework, but most
of all we endured it together. I will never forget get the laughter, the babies born in
our cohort, the agony of getting through our dissertation, and hours of talking about
SPSS. Thank you to all for making this so special for me!
vi
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
Dedication ............................................................................................................ iv
Acknowledgments................................................................................................ v
List of Tables ....................................................................................................... ix
List of Figures ...................................................................................................... x
Abstract ................................................................................................................ xi
CHAPTER
I. Introduction .......................................................................................... 1
Social Media Sites........................................................................ 6
Facebook .......................................................................... 6 Twitter .............................................................................. 6 MySpace .......................................................................... 7
Flickr ................................................................................ 8 YouTube .......................................................................... 8
Purpose of the Study .................................................................... 9
Theoretical Framework ................................................................ 11
Operational Definitions ................................................................ 15 Assumptions ................................................................................. 17
Limitations ................................................................................... 18 Delimitations ................................................................................ 19 The Significance of the Study ...................................................... 19
Summary ...................................................................................... 21
II. Review of Literature............................................................................ 23
Social Media ................................................................................ 24
Agenda Setting Theory ................................................................ 27 Chaos Theory ............................................................................... 29
Paradigm Shift ............................................................................. 30 Mass Media Impact and Influence ............................................... 31 Technology .................................................................................. 32 Generational Characteristics of Higher Education Students ........ 34 Integrated Marketing Communications Departments in
Higher Education ......................................................................... 35
vii
Branding ....................................................................................... 36 Methodology ................................................................................ 38 Summary ...................................................................................... 39
III. Methodology ...................................................................................... 41
Methodological Overview ........................................................... 41 Phase 1 ............................................................................. 42 Phase 2 ............................................................................. 43 Phase 3 ............................................................................. 44
Guiding Framework ..................................................................... 45
Agenda-setting theory ...................................................... 46
Site and Participant Selection ...................................................... 46
Data Sources and Collection ........................................................ 47 Data Analysis ............................................................................... 48
Quantitative method ......................................................... 48
Qualitative method ........................................................... 48 Ethical Obligation ........................................................................ 50
Trustworthiness ............................................................................ 51 Summary ...................................................................................... 52
IV. Results................................................................................................ 54
Selection of Participants .............................................................. 55
Descriptive Characteristics .......................................................... 57 Data Collection ............................................................................ 57
Interviews ......................................................................... 58 Surveys ............................................................................. 60
Content data collection .................................................... 61 Demographics .............................................................................. 62
Interviews ......................................................................... 62 Survey respondents .......................................................... 63
Results and Findings .................................................................... 64 Interviews ......................................................................... 64 Interrater reliability .......................................................... 64
Theme 1: Informative ...................................................... 66
Theme 2: Engaging .......................................................... 66
Theme 3: Budget .............................................................. 67 Theme 4: Strategies.......................................................... 68 Theme 5: Policy and guidelines ....................................... 69 Survey data....................................................................... 70 Document analysis ........................................................... 80
viii
Intended audience for the guidelines and organization
of guidelines ..................................................................... 80 Principles and processes for the use of social media. ...... 82 Evidence of quality .......................................................... 86
Summary ...................................................................................... 88
V. Results and Recommendations ........................................................... 91
Summary and Discussion of Findings ......................................... 92 Interpretations of the Findings ..................................................... 102
Conclusions .................................................................................. 104
Limitations of the Study............................................................... 105
Recommendations for Policy and Practice .................................. 105
Recommendations for Future Studies .......................................... 112 Summary ...................................................................................... 113
References ............................................................................................................ 115
APPENDIX .......................................................................................................... 125
A. Draft Interview Questions ................................................................... 126
B. Pilot Test Instrument for the Interview Questions .............................. 127
C. Survey Draft Questions ....................................................................... 129
D. Pilot Test Instrument for the Survey Questions .................................. 130
E. Request Letter for Interviews and Survey Participant Consent
Form ......................................................................................................... 132
F. Survey Questions Administered to the Csu Campuses........................ 134
ix
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE PAGE
1. Agenda Setting For Public Relations Profession ..................................... 13
2. Survey Respondent Demographics .......................................................... 63
3. Interview Themes..................................................................................... 65
4. Length of Time CSU Campuses Have Been Using Social Media ........... 71
5. Social Media Sites Used at the CSU Campuses ...................................... 72
6. Social Media as a Marketing Tool ........................................................... 74
7. Social Media‘s Frequent Use in Higher Education .................................. 75
8. Social Media Satisfaction at each CSU Campus ..................................... 76
9. Frequency of Use of Social Media by CSU Campuses ........................... 77
10. Campus Goals for Social Media .............................................................. 78
11. Barriers of Adopting Social Media Within the IMC Department............ 79
12. Does the IMC Have Social Media Guidelines for the Institution? .......... 79
13. Agenda Setting for the Public Relations Profession ................................ 102
x
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE PAGE
1. Theoretical framework: Internet social media network functions of
uses by public relations personnel in higher education institutions. ........ 15
2. Summary of mixed methods sequential study. ........................................ 43
3. Internet social media network purpose of use for higher education
institutions. ............................................................................................... 45
4. Data collection procedure. ....................................................................... 46
5. Internet social media network functions of uses by public-relations
personnel in higher education institutions. .............................................. 56
6. Example illustration of chaos theory through butterfly effect at a
higher education institution...................................................................... 95
7. Agenda setting in the past and present: Illustration of who is
controlling media messages. .................................................................... 98
8. Model of return on investment through social media. ............................. 110
9. Fresno State‘s Facebook page. ................................................................. 111
10. Example of listening and participating on Facebook from CSU
Fresno‘s IMC department. ....................................................................... 111
xi
ABSTRACT
This study observes the social media network, a new phenomenon of marketing, as it
transcends into a new tool for integrated marketing communications personnel and a
way to reach target audiences (alumni, parents, recruiting purposes, current students,
internal administration, faculty, and the community). The main purpose of this study
was to explore how integrated marketing communications professionals at higher
education institutions are using social media as a marketing, communications, and
branding tool. The research design for this study was a three-part mixed methods
design, an approach increasingly used in social science research. This study first
examined the use of social media by using qualitative research methods. Interviews
were conducted with representatives from three different institutions of higher
education and their integrated marketing communications professional. The second
part of the study used qualitative methods, including an examination of how
integrated marketing communications (IMC) professionals at all of the California
State University campuses use social media through administered surveys. The third
part of the study examined the content analysis and any guidelines outlined by the
integrated marketing communications professionals about social media. By
combining interviews and surveys, this study obtained critical data that may
dramatically influence the formation of uniform standards and guidelines for higher
institutions‘ use of social media. The data results also indicated the need for social
media marketing at higher education marketing departments.
1
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
With higher education becoming a competitive industry, universities are
challenged with recruiting the best and brightest students, faculty, and administrators.
A college or university must always build and maintain a public presence in order
attract and maintain students at the institution. In order to help in the institutions
image and to maintain a strong partnership with the community, it is vital that the
university create a powerful and consistent identity that sets it apart from its
competitors (University of Tennessee, 2008).
Higher education institutions are having to migrate to Web 2.0, characterized
by mobile computing devices, two-way communication, information sharing,
collaboration and interoperability. Social networking sites such as MySpace,
Facebook and Twitter are getting a closer look by educators curious to see whether
and where they fit into the instructional landscape (Bradley, 2009). Studies have also
shown, according to Bradley (2009), that the more students are engaged in their
college experience, the more apt they are to succeed academically. Social networking
sites can be a tool in boosting engagement. Bradley (2009) states that many faculty
and administrators have become reluctant to use these types of social media networks
within their institutional settings or classroom because they are afraid of the
repercussions. The generational gap has a huge effect on why higher education
2
institutions are wary of this technology. Most faculty or administrators are between
40-60 years of age and don‘t understand social media (Bradley, 2009).
That is not to say that colleges have turned their back on social networking. Some
faculty use Facebook groups to foster peer-to-peer learning and to conduct group
projects. Blackboard, which is in use at hundreds of colleges around the country,
plans to soon add a Twitter-like messaging tool to its course management system
(Bradley, 2009). During the last decade, social and digital media have moved from
being purely the domain of tech-savvy types into a mainstream phenomenon. Twitter
was mentioned on television nearly 20,000 times in 2009, according to
SnapStream.com. As a result, companies are investing in it and – slowly – seeing
results (Oshiro, 2010).
Moreover, brand marketing in higher education has also taken a new form
with social media becoming part of the culture and as a means of connecting or
networking with people around the world. Colleges and universities are embracing
social media networks and realizing the value and power for using them as a
component of marketing and branding themselves with the outside world (Reuben,
2008). "College access marketing" efforts aimed at increasing attendance and success
have been slow to incorporate new techniques such as buzz marketing, viral
marketing, product seeding and guerrilla marketing. Yet, for a "connected
generation" of potential college students, these kinds of strategies could be crucial in
changing behaviors (Gastwirth, 2007).
3
Many students prefer to read blogs when choosing what college they will
attend. In 2007, more than 60 percent of high school seniors said they preferred
reading student and faculty blogs to other marketing information, according to the
National Research Center for College and University Admission (Gastwirth, 2007).
More than 80 percent of high school students indicated that they would consider
reading or responding to an instant message from a college representative.
Meanwhile, 57 percent of online teens have used the Internet to access information
about postsecondary education. While individual colleges and universities have
discovered that personalized web recruiting, interactive websites, and chat sessions
can contribute to growth in applications, improved quality of applicants and reduced
recruitment-related costs, organizations focused more broadly on increasing college
access and success seem to be missing this opportunity (Gastwirth, 2007).
It is vital that higher education institutions use social media marketing for
recruiting purposes as well as staying connected with current students and still
maintain integrating their traditional marketing efforts through different media
outlets. In order to have a strategic marketing plan for social media usage at a higher
education institution, it is important to understand the definition of social media and
the purpose of use for marketing professionals in higher education. For the purposes
of this study, the researcher will refer to any marketing, public relations, or
communications department as Integrated Marketing Communication (IMC)
departments or professionals. Social media comprises of activities that involve
socializing and networking online through words, pictures, and videos. Social media
4
is redefining how many people can relate to each other and how people can relate to
the organizations that serve their communities. ―It is about dialog – two way
discussions bringing people together to discover and share information‖ (Solis, 2008
p. 4). Social media needs to be a trusted forum for customers to share comments and
have discussions; it is not just about advertising.
Nonetheless, during these trying times with higher education institutions being
challenged with budget cuts, it becomes crucial that the colleges and universities have
the same consistent messaging that goes out to the public in order to maintain that
brand image, which can also be managed through social media as a marketing tool.
Branding a university is not just about logos, taglines, or a glossy brochure, but it
extends to the employees, students, the media and the general public. In order to
confirm the credibility of the university, branding is defined as a sum total of
everything that a university has to offer over time. It is also the space the university
occupies in the hearts and minds of those who matter the most (Solis, 2008). While it
cannot be controlled, the brand can be guided and shaped.
In order to thrive in today‘s market, many institutions are having to set
themselves apart from their competitors. Yet, as good as colleges and universities
have become at building brands, the game is shifting to social media, where there is
perpetual motion of technology and little control of the message that needs to be
conveyed (Lipka, 2009). Marketing research completed at the University of
Massachusetts at Dartmouth showed that as of fall 2008, 61 percent of admissions
offices at universities were using social networking sites and 41 percent had blogs, up
5
from 29 percent and 33 percent from 2007 (Lipka, 2009 a). Therefore, online social
media marketing is another form of branding that will help act as a guidepost for
business decisions and growth opportunities for fundraising efforts and recruitment of
students. A brand will capture the essence of the university so it can clearly
communicate with the people who really matter, such as alumni and donors since,
these are part of the community who donates much of the funding for the school.
Brand equity can become a significant contributor to market capitalization over time.
Tamar Weinberg described social media marketing (SMM) in her book, The
New Community Rules: Marketing on the Social Web. Weinberg (2009) stated:
Social media marketing is a process that empowers individuals to promote
their websites, products, or services through online social channels and to
communicate with and tap into a much larger community that may not have
been available via traditional advertising channels. (p. 3)
She also noted that social media marketing focuses on the concept of collective rather
than the individual (p. 3). The idea is to listen to multiple communities online via
social media and to interpret what they are saying about a specific product, service, or
brand. Social media marketing is a way of making a connection between a business or
organization and its audience. Five main goals of social media marketing are to (a)
increase traffic to the brand's website, (b) drive relevant links to the website, which
could be by partnering with another businesses website, (c) raise the number of
people who follow the brand, (d) expand brand awareness to other audiences and (e)
drive and trigger conversations (Weinberg. 2009).
There are many types of social media outlets. One type of social medium is
social networking where individuals are in communities that share ideas, interests, or
6
are looking to meet people with similar ideas and interests (Reuben, 2008). Social
networks such as Facebook, Twitter, MySpace, Flickr, and YouTube have been
popular sites for higher education marketing tools. According to an article in the
Community College Week called Whither Twitter, 75 percent of 18-24 year old
Americans have a profile on social media networking websites, which is the highest
for all demographics examined (Bradley, 2009). Fifty seven percent of 25-34 year
old adults had Twitter; and 30 percent for 35-44 year old adults.
Social Media Sites
Facebook. With over 500 million users, Facebook is a social utility that
connects people with friends, business partners, and the rest of the world (Reuben,
2008). Facebook is a social utility that connects people with family, friends,
coworkers, classmates, and other people they find interesting. It builds communities
from individuals, and gives its users a place to share information, ideas, and concerns.
Facebook is made up of six primary components: personal profiles, status updates,
networks, groups, applications, and fan pages. When Facebook launched the fan
pages concept in November 2007, many universities jumped at the opportunity to
create an official Facebook presence for their university. As of January 2008 there
were 420 colleges and universities using Facebook as a marketing tool (Cheater,
2008).
Twitter. According to Twitter.com, Twitter started as a side project in March
2006 and has now grown into a real-time short messaging service that works over
multiple networks and devices. Twitter is a cross between instant messaging and
7
blogging that allows users to send short (140 character) updates (Reuben, 2008).
Users can also follow the updates of friends they ―follow,‖ send them direct
messages, reply publicly to friends, or just post questions or comments as their
current status (Consortium 2007).
Twitter is a free social networking and microblogging service that enables
users to stay connected to one another in real time. Users can send and read other
users‘ updates known as ―tweets.‖ Tweets are text-based posts of up to 140 characters
in length, which are displayed on the user‘s profile page and delivered to other users
who have subscribed to them, known as ―followers.‖ The service is free to use over
the Internet, and users can stay connected to one another in real time (Bradley, 2009).
Since its creation in 2006, Twitter has gained popularity rapidly worldwide,
and currently is estimated to have more than 19 million users, making it the Internet‘s
second- largest social networking site, behind only Facebook (Bradley, 2009).
Businesses use Twitter to inform the public about their activities. Large corporations
use Twitter to provide updates, talk about new product launches, and relay
information about service problems (Bradley, 2009).
MySpace. MySpace empowers its global community to experience the
Internet through a social lens by integrating personal profiles, photos, videos, mobile,
messaging, games, and the world‘s largest music community, according to
MySpace.com. MySpace lets you meet your friends‘ friends, share photos, journals
and interests. It launched in January 2004 and has more than 100 million active
members on a monthly basis, with nearly 65 million United States users
8
(MySpace.com, 2009). Yet, since the launch of Facebook, MySpace‘s image has
declined because of privacy issues. The numbers also support the attractiveness; 85%
of students at 4-year universities have Facebook profiles and Facebook user
demographics in areas like higher education and discretionary income are typically
higher than those of MySpace (Qualman, 2007).
Flickr. Is an online photo site where users upload photos that can be
organized in sets and collections. Public photos may be viewed and commented on by
others (Reuben, 2008). Universities have found Flickr to be a great tool to easily
share photos with students, alumni, faculty and staff.
YouTube. Much like Flickr, YouTube organizes images and is the leader in
online video, and the premier destination to watch and share original videos
worldwide through the Web. It allows people to easily upload and share video clips
across the Internet through Web sites, mobile devices, blogs, and e-mail.
Higher education institutions have been making videos for more than 20 years
to aid in recruitment efforts (Reuben, 2008). YouTube has given institutions a
platform to easily distribute these videos to a much wider audience, and without the
costs of burning to CDs or DVDs and postage to mail to a narrow audience. (Reuben,
2008).
Moreover, the shift in controlled marketing to more of a dialogue,
multidirectional, and not as controlled, has created a revolutionary change in the way
IMC administrators at higher education institutions market their schools. Little is
known on the effects social media has on the institutions brand or image, and not
9
much research has presented any real evidence on the use of social media by
marketing and IMC professionals in higher education.
Purpose of the Study
The main purpose of this study was to explore how integrated marketing
communications (IMC) professionals at higher education institutions are using social
media as a marketing, communications, and branding tool. In order to explore the use
of social media by higher education marketing professionals, this study first examined
the use of social media from three different institutions of higher education and their
IMC professionals, all of which all are located in the Central Valley of California. A
community college, public university, and a private university marketing directors
were selected to be interviewed for this part of the study in order to provide a wide
examination of the use of social media within the three major areas of higher
education. However, because of their market-driven and for-profit business
orientation for profit, proprietary higher education institutions have been excluded
from this study. This part of the study examined higher education institutions‘ IMC
departments‘ use of the social media networks and what type of messages they send
out to the public about the institutions. The second part of the study included an
examination of the use of social media by all the California State University (CSU)
campuses‘ IMC departments. Surveys were administered to the 23 CSU campuses
and questions were asked about how social media has changed the way they market
their institution and how their message is reaching out to students or the public. The
CSU campuses were chosen by the researcher to represent a statewide system of
10
public universities. The third part of the study examined the content analysis and any
guidelines outlined by the IMC department about social media.
Another purpose for this study was to demonstrate how this new phenomena
of social media networking is a new marketing tool for their marketing strategies or
tactics. Social media is used by students and younger faculty; therefore, higher
education should remain in the forefront of branding tools. A more compelling
reason for this study was to examine any procedures or guidelines that the institutions
have put together for social media.
In order to guide this study, the following research questions were addressed.
1. How is social media used by the IMC department at each higher education
institution and how has it changed the public relations (PR) profession in
higher education?
2. How are the IMC departments in the CSU campuses using social media to
shape the university brand and other communication functions?
3. Are the higher education institutions using a procedures guideline for
social media?
The sample that was used for this study is a representative sample
representing higher education institutions social media usage: The IMC department
personnel interviews from a community college,a public university and a private
university, as well as a survey the 23 CSU campuses.
11
Theoretical Framework
As stated by Creswell (2004), a researcher must start a project with certain
assumptions about how the data and phenomenon associated with the study will be
understood and viewed; therefore, a theoretical framework or paradigm was presented
in the research. In order to examine perception and the influence of social media
networks, a theoretical framework was constructed using aspects of Agenda Setting
Theory (McCombs & Protess, 1991), Paradigm Shift (Kuhn, 1962), and Chaos
Theory by Edward Lorenz. The theoretical framework was used as a guide and
inform the exploration of the research questions (Creswell, 1994). Agenda setting
theory, will observe the important messaging that the IMC department sends. Agenda
setting theory also examines why certain messages are more important than others.
In order to observe how certain applications are used for these theories, it is
important to ask the question: what is knowledge? Why are we always at a quest to
know? Emily Robertson discusses the phenomenon of knowledge through an article
in the book titled Key Questions for Educators. Robertson (2007) stated that
knowledge is ―knowing is a relationship between a knower and what is known‖ (pp.
9-10). Therefore, many theories come into play about the public‘s right to be
informed and be knowledgeable about issues in the media, yet Agenda Setting Theory
is a key source for this study. Since a large number of beliefs are accepted on the
testimony of relevant experts, it would seem that many would know very little had
they thoroughly understood the evidence for each of their beliefs (Robertson, 2007).
Many people look at the news media as a wealth of knowledge and rely on the
12
media‘s expertise to deliver the news fair and accurately. Yet, in today‘s world,
many people are getting their information through Twitter or Facebook and other
forms of social media outlets. Nonetheless, how fair and accurate are these social
media outlets? Where are imbedded biases? How do higher education politics play
into the delivery of the messages being sent? This is where the issue of Agenda
Setting Theory takes fruition.
The public relations profession has a premeditated setting and agenda, and
ultimately controls the message that is being sent for the receiver. A rising
application of control that is currently taking shape is the emerging paradigm of
social media networks. Agenda Setting Theory has primarily been focused on the
examination of print media and television news media. Yet, with the emergence of
social media, Agenda Setting Theory helps in understanding how to prioritize a
message through what the public feels is important. With this multiple, rapid and
expansive use of social media, it is creating an increasingly complex environment for
the public relations business, and prioritizing key messages helps in organization.
This form of ―anarchy‖ has no centralized controls, which creates chaos, and can be
best understood through the lens of Chaos Theory. The name ―Chaos Theory‖ comes
from the perception that the systems are apparently disordered, but chaos theory is
really about finding the underlying order in apparently random data.
The change in the profession has turned a portion of public relations and mass
communication business upside-down and this new phenomenon questions the entire
profession of public relations. Table 1 illustrates how the public relations profession
13
has shifted and changed, which in turn exemplifies a paradigm shift in the profession.
This paradigm shift has become revolutionary in the public relations profession and
this study will examine how higher education institutions have adjusted to the new
concepts. In 1962, Thomas Kuhn wrote The Structure of Scientific Revolution, and
introduced, defined and popularized the concept of ―paradigm shift.‖
Table 1
Agenda Setting For Public Relations Profession
The emerging paradigm Old paradigm (5 to 10 years ago)
Public creates newsworthy stories. Media
scrutinizes messages and uses blogs as
trustworthy sources.
Press releases were sent to the
media through email or fax.
The public can control the message. Public relations controlled what
messages they were sending to the
media.
Businesses are compelled to hire a social
media specialist to brand their businesses
through social media.
Businesses only hired PR personnel
who had a bachelor‘s degree in PR
and experience writing press
releases.
Writers have to research several social media
network sites for exchanged information
about businesses or institutions. Must be
proactive in gathering information before
the media captures the story.
The only information to search was
publicity tracking.
News is spread in 15 minutes News was spread in 2 hours.
Kuhn argued that scientific advancement is not evolutionary, but rather is a
―series of peaceful interludes punctuated by intellectually violent revolutions,‖ and in
those revolutions ―one conceptual world view is replaced by another‖ (p.4). Social
14
media is like a paradigm shift: It is a revolution, a transformation, a sort of
metamorphosis. It just does not happen, but rather it is driven by agents of change.
The concept of social media networks is a transformation in the age of technology
and how people socialize with each other; therefore, this new paradigm shift is one
that will revolutionize how communication is established in higher education.
However, what is the public relations purpose for using social media networks
in higher education? Six categories of usage were identified as seen in Figure 1 to
explain the intention behind the agenda of IMC departments:
1. Branding: A marketing term for a use of media helps construct an image
or perception of the product.
2. Receiving information: A method of gaining information through
different sources using social media outlets. Students, alumni, faculty, or
the community can post comments about the institution.
3. Sales or marketing share: A tool to help with recruiting efforts and
increase student attendance records; also a good source to increase
revenue through grants, sponsorship dollars, or scholarships.
4. Community development: Students need a sense of belonging and that
they are making a difference at the campus.
5. Feedback forum: A medium to increase interaction from customers or
students as well as for personnel internal communication, social media is a
great tool for increasing student engagement.
15
6. Emergency notifications: Messages that can be administered through
social media outlets to quickly contact students and the public, who can
then spread the word to their personal networks. An important and
effective mechanism with so many students using social media through
their Blackberries, iPhones‘, or personal computers.
Figure 1. Theoretical framework: Internet social media network functions of uses by
public relations personnel in higher education institutions.
A more detailed discussion of the conceptual framework is provided within
Chapter 2 and the focal points of the study. The overview of the framework provided
about the study illustrates the context in which the research fits.
Operational Definitions
The following is a list of key terms and definitions used in this study.
16
Brand: A perception, image, name, term, sign, symbol or design, or a
combination of all that is intended to identify the goods and services of a product or
business that differentiate them from those of the competition (American Marketing
Association, Bennett, & NetLibrary Inc., 1995).
Brand identity: Is what the business wants to communicate to its target
audience. The identity is a unique set of brand associations that is strategically places
to aspires creation and maintain visibility. These associations represent what the
brand stands for and imply a promise to customers from the organizations members
(Aaker, 1996).
Brand image: It is how certain groups perceive a brand based on how the
groups decode all of the signals that originated from the products, services, and
communication that are encompassed by the brand (Kapferer, 2004).
Facebook Wall: Friends and family can write on someone‘s Facebook profile
page. Consumers, friends, family may write on a business or personal Wall to
communicate. A personal or business post on the Wall is a great way to correspond
with others. Businesses use this Wall to promote their business and update
consumers on their products or other business related topics that might interest their
fans.
Fan Page: A business Facebook page. Facebook does not allow businesses to
have a regular Facebook page to promote their services. A business must open a fan
page in order to accumulate fans to ―like‖ their page.
17
Public Relations: The systematized function that evaluates public attitudes and
behaviors, identifies the policies and procedures of an individual or organization,
keeping in mind the public interest, and executes a program of action to earn public
understanding and acceptance (Center & Jackson, 1995).
Social media: Relates to the sharing of information, experience, and
perspectives throughout community oriented websites (Weinberg, 2009).
Tweeting: Sending a message through a Twitter account.
Assumptions
Little is known about the effects of marketing through social media networks
in higher education institutions. Some information may be based on trying to convey
a key message through social media; the key message may not be perceived the same
by all consumers. Studies have shown that each consumer perceives messages
differently; therefore, it is important to examine how each higher education institution
chosen for this study strategically constructs their message via social media to help
shape their brand or using it for other communication purposes. Many would also
assume that because social media is a new phenomenon many higher education
institutions do not have a procedural guideline to follow within their own department.
Another assumption is that everyone has access to new media; this may not be true,
especially if a student comes from a lower socioeconomic background.
When posting a message through social media, assuming that everyone has
access and ability to work with web-based technology can create a poor marketing
strategy. Developing a greater understanding of how social media has changed the
18
public relations profession will help support some of these assumptions. Once
establishing a social media site, training and correct usage of the site could help
departments and faculty members. It should not be assumed that all faculty and
administration know how to use social media sites. Lack of familiarity with social
media among instructors is common since the average faculty age is over 40 years old
(Bradley, 2009).
Limitations
One of the limitations to this study includes a focus on the 23 CSU campuses
marketing personnel‘s perception of social media networks. Although the methods
used to analyze the key message sent through social media as well as interviewing
marketing personnel at the three selected higher education institutions may prove
useful as a framework for future research, the findings from this study may not be
widely generalized. Additionally, the 23 CSU campuses that were surveyed are not a
complete representation of all higher education campuses. Social media is a growing
and rapidly changing phenomenon and the findings from this study will be limited to
a specific time in early evolution and adoption of this medium.
The major effect of social media marketing is not to ―hard sell‖ a product or
institution. Social media usage is meant to interact with customers or students and to
make them feel as if they make a difference in the institution by creating a voice for
them through the social media platform. An additional limitation to this study is a
clear process for how higher education institutions can measure the success of the key
19
messages sent through social media sites. There is a lack of means by which to
measure social media.
Public relations professionals want to present their institution positively and
may avoid disclosing shortcomings about their institutions. Another limitation for
this study is the difficulty in retrieving statistical information related to statistical
marketing metrics for social media.
Delimitations
There are three delimitations. The first delimitation is that the interview part of
this study is limited to three institutions in Central California. Interview participants
were limited to IMC administrators from one CSU university, one private university,
and one community college. The second delimitation is that the respondents to the
survey from each of the 23 CSUs are limited to the IMC departments within each
institution and, therefore, may not be representation of campuses used on social
media. The third delimitation is that the results of the survey were exclusive to the
CSU campuses.
The Significance of the Study
This study examined the integration of the evolving social media networks
and their power to market higher education institutions. The researcher observed this
new phenomenon of marketing as it transcends into a new tool for public relations
personnel and a way to reach target audiences (alumni, parents, recruiting purposes,
current students, internal administration, faculty, and the community). Higher
20
education institutions must reach out to the new generation of students who have
constant access to the internet and social media networks. Higher education
institutions interested in examining what other institutions are doing through social
media and also interested in reaching out to a diverse pool of prospective students
may benefit from the findings of this research. This study demonstrates how
marketing directors from the selected campuses are utilizing social media and how
the IMC departments in higher education have adjusted to the paradigm shift in the
public relations field through interviews and surveys.
Higher education institutions seeking to educate students raised in a consumer
society have a responsibility to engage prospective students with sincere and honest
messages at a time when students are forming their college going aspirations. Not
only are prospective students a target audience, but so are alumni, the community,
partners within the institution, as well as potential sponsor donors. The need to
generate revenue from a variety of sources has intensified competitive market
behavior among colleges and universities and has influenced admission office
definitions of target audiences. Institutions that are able to develop a clear sense of
purpose and articulate it sincerely and honestly, using methods that resonate with
prospective students, will be more likely to succeed in their efforts to educate students
through social media. The role of social media is to not only communicate and brand
the institution, but to create knowledge and serve the community while remaining
financially solvent.
21
Summary
Social media technologies help businesses and other organizations
communicate and promote their brand identities using many different channels of
communication. Social media marketing is also known as social media optimization,
a term first used by Rohit Bhargava. In a 2006 post to his blog, Influential Marketing,
Bhargava described the concept behind social media optimization (SMO): to
"implement changes to optimize a site so that it is more easily linked to.‖ This
concept can also be related to how the public relations profession is changing.
Research question one was used as a guide to explore how higher education
institutions IMC departments have shifted in their operation as well as in their
strategic planning with the growth of social media networks. The problem addressed
in this study is not only a paradigm shift in the public relations profession, but also
how social media is being used to brand the higher education institutions as well as
used for communication.
The following chapters further examine the phenomena of social media
networks. Chapter Two reviews the literature related to internet social media.
Agenda Setting Theory will also be further discussed in Chapter Two. Since an
understanding of technology is apparent in this study, chapter two will also discuss
the use of the integration of technology in marketing. Lastly, since social media is
driven in large part through popular culture, a review of generational characteristics
will be discussed. Chapter Three focuses on the methodology used to conduct this
study, which discusses the methods used to gather data, participant selection,
22
conducting in-depth interviews, coding of data and analysis, and interpretation of the
data. Chapter Four shares the findings of the data in the form of the individual
interview analysis and the surveys. Chapter Five then gives an overview of the study
and provides recommendations for social media integrations in higher education and
future research in relation to social media in higher education.
23
CHAPTER II
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
In a crowded and competitive market, producers adopt marketing strategies
such as branding to differentiate their products and services, especially in the new era
of social media networks. Newman, Couturier, and Scurry (2004) suggested that
higher education is in the midst of a major transformation, characterized by increased
market orientation and fierce competition between institutions for students, faculty,
grants, rankings, and prestige, which puts the public purpose of higher education at
risk. Based on their analysis, the long-term commitment to broad-based access, which
has been a cornerstone of American higher education, is particularly vulnerable in a
market-driven environment. With the emerging phenomenon of social media
networks, public relations and marketing professionals have had to integrate this
marketing tool into their strategic planning.
Chapter 2 of this study focuses on several topics. First, I discuss social
media‘s history and development over time. Then, I explain agenda setting theory,
chaos theory, paradigm shifts, and branding as they apply to social media and this
study‘s theoretical framework. For societal context, I also discuss the history, trends,
and current influences of mass media and technology. For context from the education
sector, I present information on the demographic makeup and IMC departments of
higher education institutions and how these two factors affect student use of social
media. Finally, I provide a brief overview of the methodology of the study.
24
Social Media
In the new age of information superhighway and new technologies, the old
way of branding and marketing a product is unconventional and is outdated. Before
the Web, good advertising and branding were well versed in the tools and techniques
of reaching broad markets with ―lowest-common-denominator messages‖ (Scott,
2007 p.7). Traditional, nontargeted advertising via newspapers, magazines, radio,
television, and direct mail were the only means of marketing a product (Scott, 2007).
This type of advertising may still work for some organizations and products with a
target audience; for example, beer commercials when men are watching football; or
women makeup products in a high fashion magazine. The messages in advertising
are ―product-focused-one-way‖ and are now forced to compete with new marketing
on the Web that is centered on interaction, information, education, and choice (Scott,
2007). ―The Web is different…Instead of one-way interruption, Web marketing is
about delivering useful content at just the precise moment that a buyer needs it‖ (p.7).
The feedback from customers has also become vital for businesses because customers
are not able to share opinions on the web where other customers can also see this
feedback.
Social media are tools that many higher education institutions are using to
reach millions of people about the institution. The roots of social media are rooted in
the competition between bloggers to achieve greater influence for their personal
points of view, attached to their names and their identities (Gillin, 2007). Bloggers
25
are an evolution of discussion groups, the early online conversational tools that were
a hit with a small group of computer enthusiasts (Gillin, 2007).
As technology evolves, colleges feel pressure to be present in every possible
way. A suite of student blogs, now common, probably falls short of contextual depth
(Lipka, 2009). Many college or university Web sites feature a stream of students'
Twitter-style one-liners, constantly refreshed. To display dynamic images, the
University of New Mexico, for example, maintains a Flickr pool, fed by photos from
users' linked accounts. Dozens of colleges have started dispatching updates on
Twitter, and by last month two-thirds of institutions had official Facebook pages,
according to Brad J. Ward, co-founder of the Web-based-marketing firm BlueFuego
(Lipka, 2009).
Staying current is not the only challenge. With social media, anyone can
chime in. Colleges once occupied with staying on message are warily opening up to
the e-masses and trying to get used to it because "You don't own the conversation
anymore‖ (Lipka, 2009 p. 3). An example of ―not owning the conversation
anymore,‖ comes from Ohio State University, when students protested the school for
removing contents from its Facebook page about the president's relationship with an
energy company criticized by environmentalists (Lipka, 2009). The lesson for Ohio
State was that there is no censorship, unless something is threatening or obscene.
Another article by Lipka (2009) entitled ―Social Media in Admissions: No
Longer a Choice,‖ it states that college-admissions offices overwhelmingly consider
social media important for recruiting students, and more institutions are creating
26
blogs and online profiles, new studies show. About 33 percent of admissions offices
kept blogs in 2007, and 29 percent maintained social networking profiles, according
to a report released by the National Association for College Admission Counseling
(NACAC).
A survey of 536 colleges in 2008 found that 41 percent of admissions offices
kept blogs and 61 percent maintained social-networking profiles (Lipka, 2009). The
NACAC report raises some concerns about colleges‘ use of social media, primarily
which they don‘t sufficiently promote, evaluate, or keep dynamic various online
ventures. The report offers bullet-point advice, telling colleges to focus their blogs but
to line up several contributors, including students, with only minor supervision. It
also recommends starting blogs in languages other than English to recruit
international students. The NACAC report also found that some colleges not only use
social media as information sharing but to also gather information for themselves. In
2007, 26 percent of colleges examined some applicants with Web searches, and 21
percent examined on social networks (Lipka, 2009).
According to Dawley (2009), in the past five years networking sites have
rocketed to involve tens of millions of internet users, and are gaining prominence
with both adult and teen users:
About 55 percent of teens and 82 percent of undergraduates use social
networking;
More than 28 percent of teens have blogs;
27
About 28 percent of internet users have tagged or categorized content
online such as photos, news stories, or blog posts;
48 percent of internet users have been to video sharing sites such as
YouTube.
The statistics illustrate the magnitude of influence that the internet may have on
young adults. It is important to understand these trends as they relate to incoming
university students, and the exposure they have had with social networking as a
communication mechanism. Younger students are learning through technology itself
that they have a role to play in the development of knowledge (Dawley, 2009). With
technology in social media evolving higher education institutions need to stay current
with marketing efforts to reach all types of students.
Agenda Setting Theory
With the social media up rise, many students are receiving their information
through this type of media platform. In the world of news media, each network
makes judgment about news coverage which are portrayed to the audience, and now
social media networks are becoming similar. The media (mainly the TV news media)
aren‘t always successful at telling us what to think, but they are quite successful at
telling us what to think about. According to McCombs and Protess (1991), the idea
of agenda-setting has been articulated for well over a half century. Yet, it was only in
1968 that McCombs and Shaw first put this idea to empirical test (McCombs &
Protess, 1991). In 1972, McCombs, Shaw and Weaver introduced the idea that the
28
mass media could tell the public which issues are of major importance in the world by
the amount of coverage the news agencies give on each issue.
This influence of the news media on the perceived salience of key political
issues is called the agenda-setting role of mass communication (McCombs & Protess,
1991). The creation of these perceived salience‘s in the minds of the mass
communication audience is a by-product of journalistic practice, shaped by the need
to select and highlight a small number of topics each day (McCombs & Protess,
1991). What journalists consider as ―newsworthy‖ provides efficient cues about the
relative importance of the welter of issue in our time (McCombs & Protess, 1991).
The concept of agenda-setting is an assertion that the audience learns what
issues are important from the priorities set by the news media and incorporates a
similar set of weights in their own personal agendas (McCombs & Protess, 1991).
Colleges and universities also have their own agendas that need reinforcement and
use key messages to send to the public. McCombs and Protess (1991) said that
agenda-setting is a relational concept specifying a positive connection between
emphases of the news media and the perceived importance of these topics to the news
media. Agenda-setting directs our attention to an earlier state in the public opinion
process, the state at which an issue emerges (McCombs & Protess, 1991). Therefore,
social media outlets also influence what messages are important and which are not.
This study will examine the agenda for each campus participating in this research,
how social media is used to shape the university brand, and how marketing
professional in higher education use social media for other communication functions.
29
When a college or university Tweets or writes a message about a school game or an
instructor receiving funding for a grant, those are messages that are taking precedence
over other university news. Once the message is sent, the receiver weighs that
information in their own personal agenda.
Chaos Theory
Not only is part of Agenda Setting Theory used as aspects of the theoretical
framework, but Chaos Theory is another relevant aspect to the evolving social media.
The first true explorer of Chaos Theory was meteorologist Edward Lorenz.
According to Snell (2009), Chaos Theory is often associated with post modernism:
Chaos theory is associated with a definition of a theory dealing with variables
(butterflies) that are not directly related to a phenomenon and yet play
secondary but forceful stimuli to the emergence of these phenomena. It is
post-modern because it suggests that the traditional scientific method of
discovery needs improvement and that interpretation of results may be flawed.
To understand postmodernism, one must first know what came before it.
However, the standard definition is social patterns characteristic to
postindustrial societies.‖ (Snell, 2009, p. 274).
With the multiple, rapid, and expansive use of social media networks, creating a very
chaotic environment for the public relations business, and prioritizing key messages
helps in organization. This form of ―anarchy‖ has no centralized control, which
creates chaos, and can be best understood through the lens of Chaos Theory. The
name ―Chaos Theory‖ comes from the perception that the systems that the theory
describes are apparently disordered, but Chaos Theory is really about finding the
underlying order in apparently random data. Higher education institutions are finding
30
themselves in a competitive environment and the IMC departments could seem
disordered if there is no strategic plan set.
Paradigm Shift
Chaos Theory describes disorder when a new phenomenon is developing,
such as social media. With Chaos Theory comes a shift in the norm, which is
discussed through Paradigm Shift. A Paradigm Shift is like a revolution, a
transformation, or much like a metamorphosis. An example of how Paradigm Shift
with in higher education institutions is through crisis communication. Every moment
is critical and sensitive part in a crisis involving students and in the case of the
Virginia Tech Shooting, technology played a vital role in emergency notifications.
Virginia Tech did not demonstrate a proactive crisis communication plan, because
after the first initial shooting that occurred in the dorm room, administrators spent two
hours in an internal meeting before sending out an advisory email that didn‘t warn
students but told them to be the eyes and ears of security campus (Barnett, 2007).
The failure to create a field test, time sensitive communication plan specifying
immediate action was a disaster that could have been prevented and possibly save the
lives of many students trapped in the classrooms. Another misguided act was using
email to communicate to students instead of a loud speaker, text messaging students,
or using social media sites (MySpace and Facebook were popular at that time). This
should have been thought out in the initial meetings previous to any disaster (Barnett,
2007).
31
The key to social media‘s revolutionary phenomenon is time management and
the sensitivity of how quickly information can disseminate and filter through on a
daily basis. Today a two-week turnaround time is obsolete. Brand monitoring is at
least a daily—if not hourly—process if the goal is to eliminate dominos-style
catastrophes. More important, to respond to these types of crises in higher education,
having a system to identify the new brand influencers, the issues and topics they will
respond to, and an internal action plan from which to operate is significant (Paine,
2009). Figure 1 in chapter 1 illustrates the uses of Internet social media by public
relations personnel in higher education institutions and reveals how paradigm shifts
have created a change in the marketing field in higher education.
Mass Media Impact and Influence
In order to understand the agenda and background of social media, we must
look at the mass media impact and how it influences our daily lives. Americans today
are virtually bombarded with news about public affairs as well as other issues, such as
celebrity and gossip news. This bombardment influences how the society make sense
of politics, social issues, and values (framing), how society decides what is important
(agenda setting), and how society evaluates the policies and authorities as well as
social issues put forth in front of them (priming)—or so at least it is claimed (Kinder,
2007). Television, radio, films, newspapers, magazines, and the Internet—life
without these mediated forms of communication has become virtually unimaginable
for many individuals in the world today (Duran, Yousman, Walsh, & Longshore,
2008). Children are exposed to television soon after their birth, and it remains a
32
staple of their cultural diet throughout their lives. Programs are now being produced
that are specifically geared toward capturing the attention of infants.
The pervasiveness of mass media in our lives has resulted in an environment
where the media have emerged as perhaps the most powerful of socializing
institutions (Duran et al., 2008). The public‘s right to be informed has changed over
the years to better suit the media companies‘ interest and ever-growing business. In
journalistic and scientific discourse, the increases in sensationalism have generally
been attributed to the mechanisms of market-driven journalism (Vettehen, Nuijten, &
Peeters, 2008). According to this line of thought, competition in the news market
increasingly poses problems to news producers in how to attract the audiences that
are needed for journalistic and economic purposes. Increasing the amount of
sensationalism in the news is considered a convenient means to this end (Vettehen et
al., 2008).
It is important to understand mass media influence and how shaping a
message to target the audience can help shape the institutions brand image. With the
rise of social media networks, this personal and evasive type of mass media influence
targets students directly in colleges or universities.
Technology
The discussions of Chaos Theory, Paradigm Shift, and mass media impact
have generated an understanding of how social media has become apparent for our
higher education institutions. Yet, it is also important that this study examines the
history and trends of technology. The NSSE survey conducted in 2006 suggests that
33
student engagement had a ―compensatory effect‖ on grades and students‘ likelihood
of returning for a second year of college, particularly among underserved minority
students. The data indicated that activities such as collaboration with peers on
projects inside and outside the classroom helped students overcome previous
educational disadvantages (Wasley, 2006). In a study conducted by Umbach and
Wawrzynski (2005) the authors suggested that students report higher levels of
engagement and learning at institutions where faculty or administrative members use
active and collaborative learning techniques, engage students in experiences,
emphasize higher-order cognitive activities in the classroom, interact with students,
challenge students academically, and value enriching educational experiences.
Social media can engage students in their college experience by providing a
platform to make suggestions and be part of a change. As seen in Figure 1 in Chapter
1, the use of this framework is to also help in student engagement and community
development. Technology is vastly growing with computers, internet, email,
Blackberry, Blackboard, iPods, social media networks, cell phones, iPhones, online
classes, it is essential that colleges and universities make a considerable effort to use
their financial resources on technology in order to engage students in the classroom.
In a study by Laird and Kuh, students‘ responses to the technology items suggested
that many students use information technology regularly for personal and academic
uses and to communicate with other students as well as instructors. Seventy-three
percent of first-year students spent more than five hours a week online and 80 percent
of the first-year students used the internet to obtain information for their classroom.
34
Generational Characteristics of Higher Education Students
Students have been heavily influenced by technology, and in today‘s society a
―new‖ student may be one that communicates through texting or instant messaging
(millennial generation or E Generation). Another ―new‖ student could be a 27-year-
old whose idea of customer service is different from past generations (―Generation
X‖), such as taking longer to answer voicemail messages than social media or email
questions from customers. Or the ―new‖ student could be a 60-year old woman
(―Baby-Boomer‖) trying to complete her degree so she may try to balance work and
children at the same time (Oblinger, 2003).
In an article written by Mark Edmundson called Dwelling in Possibilities,
discusses how his college students at University of Virginia have evolved in the past
30 years of his teaching career. Students of today:
Have a spectacular hunger for life and more life. They want to study, travel,
make friends, make more friends, read everything (superfast), take in all the
movies, listen to every hot band, keep up with everyone they've ever known.
And there's something else, too, that distinguishes them: They live to multiply
possibilities. They're enemies of closure. For as much as they want to do and
actually manage to do, they always strive to keep their options open, never to
shut possibilities down before they have to. (p. 1)
Edmundson made a point by characterizing his students and making his readers aware
that his students have had internet technology in their hands since they were seven to
eight years old. Since Netscape browser became available to everyone in 1995,
students who are now in college have a vast knowledge of technology than their
faculty or administrators in college.
35
It is important to understand the generational characteristics of students
because in a world of trying to brand a higher education institution, the colleges or
universities need to be able to know and understand their target audience: The ―New‖
Student. Studying student‘s psychographics, demographics, and their likes or dislikes
is an important part of the IMC departments‘ role in higher education.
Integrated Marketing Communications Departments in Higher Education
The role of the IMC department in higher education can at times seem vague
to most departments within a university or college. Defining public relations in
higher education is as complicated as the number of names it is used to describe it.
For example some universities or colleges use ―public affairs,‖ ―institutional
relations,‖ ―information services,‖ ―marketing,‖ ―external relations,‖ or
―communication and marketing department.‖
The IMC department has many functions under its umbrella that all lead to
working internally with the university departments and colleges, yet there is a lack of
understanding this role throughout the institutions for promotion purposes.
Moreover, because of the complexity of numerous functions the IMC department
performs; administrators within higher education are at times perplexed at the actual
functions. According to M. Fredric Volkman, ―Defining Public Relations‖ in the
book titled, Excellence in Advancement, a typical public relations officer in higher
education has the following functions to perform:
Media relations and crisis management
Publications and the use the Internet to recruit students or raise gift dollars
36
Advertising (radio, newspapers, magazines, or television)
Internal communication for the staff, administrators, governing board, and
students
Market research to develop better strategies for donors, recruiting
students, and marketing a specialized program at the university, such as
the nursing program.
Major events and speakers
Sports information
Brand management
Direct mail programs
Volkman brings forth a number of functions that a public relations
administrator must perform. Yet with today‘s ―Paradigm Shift,‖ IMC department
should include social media tactics within their strategic plan.
Branding
With higher education institutions in competition with each other, they must
differentiate themselves from one another. In marketing and advertising, nothings
beats a good brand. Brands enjoy instant credibility and sudden recognition (Anctil,
2008, a). Brands speak to more than just their product: they bring with them a
known presence and an invisible privilege over other products like them (Anctil,
2008, a). Branding has a power to transcend trends and change the market, in other
words brands have the power to dominate. Therefore, it is important to understand
37
branding when examining social media networks and how organizations are using
branding to shape perception. Higher education institutions are focusing their
marketing strategies similar to corporate organizations and are trying to stay
connected with the new generation through technology.
In order for a brand to work, it takes the entire company to create the
paradigm shift for the world to see the difference. With brands comes market
differentiation, which is simply standing out of the crowd (Anctil, 2008 b).
According to Antcil (2008 b), the goal is not to look different but to look more
appealing than the other competitor so that the consumer is likely to take action on
the product. Differentiation in the higher education marketplace is challenging, but it
can occur. The challenge, according to Temple (2006), is that the higher education
institutions need to sell itself in the marketplace, yet it is there to search for
knowledge and help students achieve their academic goals.
There are two types of challenges in branding a college or university: (1)
Among the greatest challenges to successfully marketing higher education is the
inherently intangible nature of it (Anctil, 2008, a). Education is a vague product that
largely depends on a diploma as the only tangible evidence of the lived experience
and learning that occurred (Anctil, 2008, c). Branding does not suggest, though, that
there aren‘t any solid characteristics of a college or university. Yet finding and
marketing them requires more creativity than marketing a new product that a
company just produced (Anctil, 2008 c). (2) The challenges with branding and
market differentiation are that when highlighting class size, housing advantages,
38
social life distinctions, or quality of faculty, everyone suddenly looks the same. Some
may say that market differentiation in higher education is more about perceptions of
difference than true difference (Anctil, 2008 a).
The primary marketing goal for colleges and universities is twofold: make
the intangible tangible, and find areas of market differentiation (Anctil, 2008 b).
Anctil (2008 b) describes three general areas that enable higher education to highlight
the solid characteristics of an institution even if they are intangible: (a) perceived
academic quality, (b) perceived social life and campus amenities, and (c) a successful
and visible athletic program.
Methodology
The research design for this study is a three-part sequential mixed research
methods design, an approach increasingly used in social science research. A
sequential exploratory strategy was used for this research.
In order to understand the research problems, both the qualitative and
quantitative aspects of this study were merged together at the conclusion. The
qualitative phase of the study consisted of interviewing marketing personnel from a
community college, public university, and a private university in order to provide a
wide examination of the use of social media within the three major areas of higher
education. The qualitative phase examined the content analysis and any guidelines
outlined by the IMC department about social media. The quantitative method
consisted of surveying the marketing professionals at all 23 CSU.
39
The qualitative method was used to explore and research an issue where the
variables are unknown, and are based on the premise that knowledge about life
experiences is not possible without describing the experience as it is lived and defined
by the individuals themselves (Flick, 2006). Interviewing the three marketing
personnel from the three selected higher education institutions gave a better
description of how they utilize social media. The interview responses helped guide
the development of the survey questions and gave the researcher a better look into the
social media world. According to Flick, ―Qualitative research is a way to conduct
fieldwork without the constraints of a clear identification and isolation of variables‖
(p. 97). It provides a freedom to the researcher that is not found in an experimental,
cause and effect design. Objects in qualitative research are not reduced to single
variables, but represented in their everyday context (Flick, 2006).
Summary
Chapter Two of this study focused on the important components within this
research and further discussed the topics of social media, which examined the history
of and how this medium has taken shape. The chapter also discussed aspects of
Agenda Setting Theory and how it is used in this study. Nonetheless, Chaos Theory
is another aspect that the researcher and gave further insight through literature review
as well as Paradigm Shift. Mass media impact and influence giving readers an
understanding on how mass media has impacted society was another component in
Chapter Two as well as Technology. The generational characteristics for higher
education students were discussed. Integrated marketing communications
40
departments in higher education and branding were among the topics related to social
media that were in Chapter Two, which gave an in-depth definition with examples. A
review of the methodology was later assessed.
41
CHAPTER III
METHODOLOGY
The main purpose of this study was to examine the usage of internet social
media networks by marketing professionals to shape the perception and branding of
the public universities in California. This chapter discusses the research methods of
this study. First, the researcher provided an overview of the methodology for the
study, in the ―Methodological Overview.‖ The second section, ―Research Questions,‖
describes each research question in detail and how they pertain to the study. The third
section, ―Site and Participant Selection,‖ describes the rationale for the selection of
the setting of the study and the criteria for selection of the study participants. The
fourth section, ―Data Sources and Collection,‖ addresses the sources and methods of
data collection. The fifth section, ―Data Analysis,‖ details the specific procedures that
were utilized for analyzing the data collected during the course of this study. The
final sections discuss ―Ethical Obligations‖ and ―Trustworthiness,‖ which describe
the strategies that were utilized to ensure the trustworthiness of the research.
Methodological Overview
The research design for this study was a three-part, sequential, mixed methods
design, an approach increasingly used in social science research. Creswell (2004)
described a sequential exploratory strategy as a research design where there is an
―initial phase of qualitative data collection and analysis, which is followed by a
42
phase of quantitative data collection and analysis,‖ and ―the findings of the two
phases are then integrated during the interpretation phase‖ (p. 215). A sequential
exploratory strategy was used for this research.
To understand the research problems, both the qualitative and quantitative
aspects of this study were merged together at the end for one overall interpretation.
The qualitative phase of the study consisted of interviewing marketing personnel
from a community college, public university, and a private university to provide a
wide examination of the use of social media within the three major areas of higher
education. The qualitative portion also examined the content of the interview
responses and any guidelines outlined by the IMC department about social media.
The quantitative method consisted of surveying the marketing professionals at all 23
CSU campuses. Because of the complex nature of social media and how it is used to
shape the perceptions of its readers, this mixed methods, three-phase, sequential
research project involved conducting in-depth interviews with IMC professionals at
three different higher education institutions and then surveying the CSU public
universities.
Phase 1. For an in-depth understanding at how the IMC departments use
social media and how they shape the messages being sent, the researcher first
interviewed marketing administrators from three different institutions of higher
education. A private university; a CSU campus; and a community college were
selected for this study. The qualitative research design was intended to develop a
broad understanding of how social media is used in higher education by marketing
43
professionals. This qualitative research extracted rich and thick descriptive data from
the three individuals involved in the interview process at different hierarchical levels
within the organization in creating, implementing, and managing the social media
aspect of the IMC department at the institution.
Phase 2. After analysis and reduction of the interview data, survey research
was used to inventory information between different institution marketing efforts.
The data from the interview helped shape and guide the development of the survey
questions for the CSU surveys. Creswell (2004) described a quantitative approach as
―one in which the investigator primarily uses positivist claims for developing
knowledge, employs strategies of inquiry such as experiments and surveys, and
collects data on predetermined instruments that yield statistical data‖ (p. 18). To
obtain an overview of how universities use social media networks, a survey was
administered to all of the 23 CSU IMC department personnel. By utilizing the guiding
framework in Figure 2, the study examined the frequency of use, focus, purpose, and
methods of how these institutions use social media messages to shape the agenda that
address various aspects of Figure 2 of the framework. Many of these institutions are
using Facebook and Twitter to send messages as well as YouTube to download
videos that capture the essence of the institution.
Figure 2. Summary of mixed methods sequential study.
44
Phase 3. After the interviews and surveys were completed, content analysis
was performed. Content, such as social media guidelines from the 23 CSU campuses,
was examined.
Quantitative research is an important part of research. According to Vogt
(2007), research questions, design, measurement, and analysis are the pillars on
which a research investigation is built. Each supports different aspects of the research
enterprise, and it is important to link concepts and the empirical world (Vogt, 2007).
Nonetheless, it is imperative that the researcher gather the survey results and directly
apply them to the study at hand. The process of measurement is central to
quantitative research because it provides the fundamental connection between
observed and statistical data of quantitative relationships. It is best when conducting a
survey to use a Likert-type scale as well as open-ended questions.
The study was also exploratory because it examined an emerging
phenomenon. The objective for an exploratory study is to formulate precise questions
that may be able to answer future research (Flick, 2006).
The three research questions addressed in the study focused on the use of
social media networks as a tactical plan to shape the institutions brand. The first
question qualitatively evaluated the IMC department‘s personnel. The second
question examined other possible variables through a qualitative survey administered
to public universities. The third question explored documents or strategic plans that
the IMC departments had established. The exact questions were as follows.
45
1. How is social media used by the IMC department at each higher education
institution and how has it changed the PR profession in higher education?
2. How are the IMC departments in the CSU campuses using social media to
shape the university brand and other communication functions?
3. Are the higher education institutions using a procedures guideline for
social media?
Guiding Framework
To answer the research questions, a theoretical framework was created to
explore and view the subject of the study (Figure 3) and how each segment of the
social media framework integrated the use of social media in the higher education
departments. Interviewing marketing administrators was another concrete way to
explore the framework. In addition, I explored how vital social media is to branding,
marketing share, and crisis communication and surveyed the 23 CSU campuses.
Figure 3. Internet social media network purpose of use for higher education
institutions.
46
Agenda-setting theory. As discussed in Chapter 1, McCombs and Protess
(1991) had the idea of agenda-setting, which has been articulated for well over a half
century. In 1972, McCombs, Shaw, and David Weaver introduced the idea that
themass media could tell the public which issues are of major importance in the world
by the amount of coverage they give to each issue.
Site and Participant Selection
The participants consisted of three higher education institutions. The
researcher emailed the constituents for an interview appointment and interviewed
each participant at his or her institution or via phone. A community college, public
university, and a private university were selected for this part of the study to provide a
wide examination of the use of social media within the three major areas of higher
education. Moreover, because of their market driven and business orientation for
profit, proprietary higher education institutions were excluded from this study. This
part of the study examineed their IMC department use of the social media networks
and what type of messages they send out to the public about the institutions. These
data helped to provide a greater understanding of the relationships in Figure 4.
Figure 4. Data collection procedure.
47
The second part of the study included an examination of the use of social
media by all of the CSU campuses‘ IMC departments. Surveys were administered to
the 23 CSU campuses, and questions were asked on how social media has changed
the way they market their institutions and how they are reaching out to students or the
public. The CSU campuses were chosen by the researcher to represent a state-wide
system of public universities. The third part of the study reviewed the social media
guidelines provided by the 23 CSU campuses.
Data Sources and Collection
The data sources for examining the research questions were collected from (a)
interviews of marketing professionals from a private university, a public university,
and a community college; (b) surveys administered to the 23 CSU campuses; and (c)
a content analysis of available social media guidelines.
The original, drafted interview questions are listed in Appendix A. The
interview questions were evaluated by CSU, Stanislaus personnel not related to this
study with a checklist of questions suggested by Gloria Rogers (Appendix D). A
pilot test of the survey was administered to selected educators at CSU, Stanislaus to
provide feedback on whether the survey‘s wording and clarity were apparent to all
respondents and whether the questions meant the same thing to all respondents. Their
responses were not included in the analysis but were used to shape the survey tool.
48
Data Analysis
Quantitative method. According to Vogt (2007), a purposive sample is
gathered deliberately with a reason in mind. Purposive sampling aims to select groups
that display variation on the phenomena under investigation. The quantitative
component sample for this study was comprised of a 5-item Likert-scale survey as
well as open-ended questions. Frequencies were conducted to determine how often
IMC departments strategize the use of key messages being sent through the social
media networks. The survey led to a variety of data-collection opportunities and other
statistical analyses.
Qualitative method. Marshall and Rossman (2006) defined data analysis as
―the process of bringing order, structure, and interpretation to the mass of collected
data‖ (p. 154). They identified seven phases that typically define qualitative analytic
procedures: (a) organizing the data, (b) immersion in the data, (c) generating
categories and themes, (d) coding the data, (e) offering interpretations through
analytic memos, (f) searching for alternative explanations, and (g) writing the report
(p. 156). The web-based educational software, Dedoose, was utilized to determine
significant differences and relationships among variables. Qualified faculty provided
guidance on instructions in using Dedoose. The interviews were transcribed and
reduced into clusters of themes and analyzed.
Standard methods of qualitative research to determine codings, categories, and
themes that appeared across interviews are presented. To analyze the data, the
researcher used Dedoose and the line-by-line coding procedures described by
49
Charmaz, (2000). Action codes were generated, reviewed, and modified by utilizing
the constant comparative methodology described by Charmaz (2000) for comparing
different participant‘s views, situations, actions, accounts, and experiences. The
software was utilized to assist the researcher in managing the large number of data-
related documents of this research to address Research Question 3.
Because the study was a sequential examination of both qualitative and
quantitative research, the qualitative component (interviewing the marketing
personnel) helped develop the quantitative component (the questions for the surveys
administered to the 23 CSU campuses). Both the qualitative and quantitative data
were analyzed to further explain how social media is used in higher education.
To create a reliable coding system and clean the data analysis techniques,
intercoder and interrater reliability were measured using Cohen‘s kappa statistics.
When using content analysis it is best to use intercoder reliability when applying
codes to the text. The quality of recording and documenting data becomes a central
basis for assessing reliability and that of succeeding interpretations (Flick, 2006).
Identifying the same codes or themes within the qualitative research, it is important to
use interrater reliability.
Therefore, to establish the reliability and trustworthiness of the coding process
for this study, the researcher took the following steps. First, the researcher identified
two individuals who were knowledgeable of internet social media marketing
techniques but were not part of the study. Second, with the help of two research
assistants, the researcher coded two or three interviews separately. Third, comparing
50
the codes and themes that each person identified and came to an agreement on
appropriate codes and themes was conducted. Fourth, each person shared his or her
rationale for the codes and themes they chose. In cases when the sample coding
between each of the raters was less than 80 percent, the researcher reexamined the
codes and themes that were used and defined new ones.
Ethical Obligation
Consistent with the Institutional Review Board (IRB) policy, the researcher
provided all participants with an informed consent form for signature as seen in
Appendix E. The form explained the purpose of the study, expected duration of
participation, intended use of the data, benefits and risks of participation, and their
right to confidentiality.
To further protect the subjects, a coding system was utilized to store and
locate participants‘ information instead of personal names. The data were securely
stored in both paper and electronic format by the researcher, and no one else had
access to them except the college personnel guiding her with the research. The data
were stored in a locked cabinet. Electronic data were stored in a password protected
computer file. All the data will be destroyed after 1 year of study conclusion.
Guaranteeing the participants in the qualitative portion of this research
complete anonymity and confidentiality was impractical because interviews were
conducted with individuals who held specific positions within the university‘s
organizational hierarchy. With the permission of the participants, each of the
interviews was recorded with a digital voice recorder. The voice data files were then
51
transferred from the recording device to a laptop computer and a backup storage
device. These files remained in the researcher‘s possession throughout the research
process. The transcripts were proofread by the researcher and stored in a computer
and a backup storage device. The complete transcripts were then sent to the
interviewees electronically for member checking purposes. Through the member
checking process, the interviewees had the opportunity to clarify points that they
made during the interview sessions. Some interviewees provided written
clarifications.
All publications, public distribution, or presentations of the findings from this
study including but not limited to the researcher‘s dissertation maintained the
anonymity of all of the participating students, faculty, administrators, and other
individuals involved in this study. In addition, the identies of the three institutions
being interviewed as well as the institutions surveyed will also be protected. A
pseudonym will be assigned as the name of the three institutions used and to anyone
who is mentioned in the study. All research protocols involving human subjects will
be reviewed and approved by the CSU Stanislaus University Institutional Review
Board to assure compliance with all University regulations and applicable laws before
any data collection will occur for this research project.
Trustworthiness
As an assessment of the content validity the researcher was administering the
survey to CSU, Stanislaus personnel not related to this study to provide feedback.
The researcher used a checklist of questions suggested by Gloria Rogers as listed in
52
Appendix D. According to Gay, Mills, and Airasian (2006), pretesting the
questionnaire provides information about deficiencies and suggestions for
improvement. They suggest having three to four individuals read the cover letter and
complete the questionnaire to identify problems (2006).
Flick (2006) suggests that trustworthiness and credibility as a criteria for
qualitative research. The researcher maintained trustworthiness in the qualitative
research by recording the interviews and saving all email communication documents.
Other activities suggested by Flick to increase the likelihood of credible results are
―persistent observation‖ and ―prolonged engagement‖ (p. 376). Flick also suggested
peer debriefing, which involves having regular meetings with other people who are
not part of the research ―to disclose one‘s own blind spot‖ (p. 376).
Summary
This three-part sequential mixed-method study was designed to examine
social media marketing efforts in higher education. This research addressed the
following research questions.
1. How is social media used by the IMC department at each higher education
institution and how has it changed the IMC profession in higher
education?
2. How are the IMC departments in the CSU campuses using social media to
shape the university brand and other communication functions?
3. Are the higher education institutions using a procedures guideline for
social media?
53
The first research question was explored using both quantitative and
qualitative techniques. Marketing individuals were purposefully selected for the
interviews so that the study included different types of higher education institutions.
Marketing content was also reviewed. After the interviews, the researcher gathered
the responses from the interviews, used those responses to shape the survey questions,
and sent the surveys to the 23 CSU campuses. The second research question was also
addressed using both quantitative and qualitative techniques. The third research
question was examined with a content analysis of social media messages and
guidelines that the institutions had developed for social media marketing. After the
data were reviewed, the researcher merged the qualitative and quantitative data for
further discussion and a summary of conclusions.
54
CHAPTER IV
RESULTS
The purpose of this research study was to examine internet social media
marketing in higher education. The literature shows that there is a need to integrate
social media in all marketing efforts as a means of survival in today‘s Internet
lifestyle (Weinberg, 2010). It is clear that traditional marketing tactics are not as
effective as they once were because consumers trust in these media forms has
declined (Weinberg, 2010). Today, information about any higher education
institution is more accessible online and is effortless to find. With budgets cuts
occurring across the country in the higher education systems, institutions must be in
the ―survival of the fittest‖ mode to compete with one another.
This chapter describes the demographics, data-collection preparation, and an
analysis of the data collection. This chapter also presents the findings from
interviews conducted with marketing directors from three different higher education
institutions, surveys that were administered to public-relations directors in the CSU
system, and review of social media guidelines from various CSU campuses. This
study sought to answer the following research questions.
1. How is social media used by the IMC department at each higher education
institution and how has it changed the PR profession in higher education?
2. How are the IMC departments in the CSU campuses using social media to
shape the university brand and other communication functions?
55
3. Are the higher education institutions using a procedures guideline for social
media?
Selection of Participants
The research design for this study was a three-part, sequential mixed-methods
design, an approach increasingly used in social-science research. To understand the
research problems, both the qualitative and quantitative aspects of this study were
merged at the end for an overall interpretation of the results. The data collection
process was as follows (see Figure 2 for a visual representation).
1. The qualitative phase of the study consisted of interviewing the marketing
directors from a community college, a public university, and a private
university from the same California region. This phase was intended to
develop a broad understanding of how social media is used in higher
education by marketing professionals. This qualitative research extracted
rich and thick descriptive data from the three individuals involved in the
interview process.
2. After analyzing and reducing the interview data in to themes, survey
research was used to collect and inventory information about institutions‘
social media marketing efforts. The data from the interviews helped shape
and guide the development of the survey questions. To obtain an
overview of how universities use social media networks, surveys were
sent to public-relations managers at all of the 23 CSU campuses.
56
3. After interviews and surveys were completed, the researcher reviewed
social media guidelines from six CSU campuses that were made available
by the marketing directors.
The data from all three phases were merged to explore social media as a new
marketing tool that is fast growing and often a chaotic phenomenon facing higher
education IMC departments. To further explore the research questions, the
theoretical framework was used as a guide to inform the exploration of the research
questions (Creswell, 2004).
To further explore the research questions, the theoretical framework was used
as a guide to inform the exploration of the research questions (Creswell, 2004).
Figure 5 illustrates how each segment of the social media framework integrates the
use of social media through the higher education IMC departments.
Figure 5. Internet social-media-network functions of uses by public relations
personnel in higher education institutions.
57
Descriptive Characteristics
The CSU system started as individual California State Colleges were brought
together as a system by the Donahoe Higher Education Act of 1960. In 1972 the
system became The CSU and Colleges and in 1982 the system became The CSU
(About CSU, 2011). Today the campuses of the CSU include comprehensive and
polytechnic universities and, since July 1995, the California Maritime Academy, a
specialized campus (About CSU, 2011). Today there are 23 campuses across
California.
California‘s Central Valley consists of a private university; four community
colleges; a University of California campus and a CSU campus. The first phase of
this study consisted of interviewing the media relations director from University of
the Pacific (Pacific), which is a private university in Stockton with a student
population of 6,251. The assistant vice president of communication and public affairs
is from CSU Stanislaus campus in Turlock with over 8,300 students enrolled in Fall
2010. The public information officer from Modesto Junior College (MJC) was also
interviewed. MJC, according the Yosemite Community College District fact sheet,
MJC had over 19,500 students enrolled during the fall of 2010.
Data Collection
The data collection and analysis presented in this chapter begin with a brief
overview of the research population and broad demographics of the research sample.
Next, the data collection procedures used is discussed. Each research question is
58
introduced and followed by the presented data (see Figure 4 for a visual
representation of the data collection sequence and procedure).
Interviews. Consistent with the Institutional Review Board (IRB) policy, the
researcher provided all interview participants with an informed consent form for
signature (see Appendix E). The form explained the purpose of the study, expected
duration of participation, intended use of the data, benefits and risks of participation,
and participants right to confidentiality.
As an assessment of the content validity the researcher administered a pilot
test of the interview questions to CSU, Stanislaus personnel not involved in this study
in order to provide feedback. The researcher used a checklist of questions suggested
by Gloria Rogers as listed in Appendix B. As a result of the pilot testing and
feedback, selected interview questions were adjusted and rewritten.
The first step in conducting the interviews was emailing the three marketing
directors to schedule a time to meet or to conduct a phone interview. The researcher
also included the consent letter for them to sign and fax or email back as well as
information regarding the interview topic in the email. The first person to respond
was Kristen Olsen from CSU Stanislaus, Assistant Vice President for
Communications and Public Affairs, and she requested a face-to-face interview for
December 30, 2010. The second person to respond was Linda Hoile, Public
Information Officer for MJC and she requested for a phone interview, which was
scheduled for December 30, 2010. Patrick Giblin, media relations director for
59
Pacific, emailed in early January to schedule a phone interview on January 4, 2011.
The following questions were asked in the same order for all the participants:
1. Do you have a social media site?
2. How often do you use your social media site?
3. Do you think it is important in today‘s world to have a social media site?
4. Do you strategically target your social media messages?
5. What type of messages do you like to send out?
6. How often do you send out messages through social media? Daily, twice
a day, monthly, weekly?
7. Have you had to hire a social media specialist?
8. With today‘s budget cuts, student enrollment being slashed, do you still
feel it is necessary to market to incoming students?
9. How often have you had to train faculty or administration on social media
practices and your department?
10. Do you feel that social media will grow and be an important tool in the
next five years for higher education institutions?
11. Do you have any social media guidelines that you have presented to the
institutions?
12. Do other departments in your institutions have a social media sites and
how often do you monitor the sites?
The phone interviews lasted 30 minutes each. Typed notes were taken during
each phone interview and were on speaker while a recorder was on to ensure
60
accuracy. Each interview was summarized while the participant was on the phone.
The consent letters were faxed back to the researcher. Member checks were
completed giving the interviewees an opportunity to review their responses. The face-
to-face interview with Olsen was conducted in her office at CSU Stanislaus. She also
gave the researcher the consent letter that she signed. The interview lasted 40
minutes and the researcher had handwritten notes during the interview that were later
typed and later transcribed by the researcher Olsen also provided a draft of CSU
Stanislaus social media guidelines that had not been approved for implementation.
During the interviews, a topic guideline was followed and handwritten and
typed notes were taken. Post-interview, the handwritten notes were typed and
member checks were conducted to ensure accuracy by emailing the participants
copies of the notes. Analysis of the qualitative data began with reading and
reviewing the typed data for relevant content. The interview topics provided a broad
framework for organizing the data and initial coding.
Surveys. The researcher used a checklist of questions suggested by Gloria
Rogers as listed in Appendix D to pilot test the survey questions. As an assessment
of the content validity the researcher administered the pilot test questions using CSU,
Stanislaus personnel not related to this study in order to provide feedback. The
results of the pilot test concluded with the majority in favor of the questions.
The survey sent to the 23 CSU campuses was a web-based survey through
surveymonkey.com. Before the survey was administered the researcher had made an
excel spreadsheet of all marketing administrators at each CSU campus, which
61
included names, emails, titles, and phone numbers. The emails within the spreadsheet
were used to collect and send a mass email of a link to the survey. The email
consisted of the consent letter as an attachment as well as within the body of the
email, an explanation of the study, a deadline, and a link to the survey on
surveymonkey.com. The IMC departments at twelve CSU campuses responded to
the survey. Several attempts were made by calling each marketing director for follow
ups, and several emails were sent requesting the other marketing directors to
complete the survey. Emails were sent to the campuses that gave consent to contact
them for their social media guidelines.
Survey security was ensured using the save referring uniform resource locator
(URL) and save Internet protocol (IP) address features in surveymonkey.com. The
save referring URL and IP features ensured that participants could not make duplicate
entries and that all survey attempts were from the hyperlink posted within
surveymonkey.com. This made it easier for participants to engage in the research,
ensured that each participant could only participate once, and shifted the
responsibility to the researcher to check the list of URLs for valid referring URL
entries. There were no duplicate entries. After the survey was deactivated, all survey
data was exported into an Excel spreadsheet and the survey database was deleted
from the website. In addition, each question of the survey had a comment field for
each participant to include a brief detail of their answer.
Content data collection. Social media guidelines and policies were reviewed
for this study to answer research question three. Six of the 12 survey participants
62
provided copies of their social media guidelines. All six social media guidelines had
been completed within the last year. The social media guidelines are written as a
guide for constituents within the institution to follow and therefore were considered
internal working documents rather than public documents.
Demographics
Interviews. Linda Hoile has been the marketing and public information
officer at MJC for 11 years and has a Bachelors of Arts degree in communications
from University of Redlands. She worked at Modesto Convention and Visitors
Bureau for over 14 years.
Patrick Giblin has been the media relations manager at Pacific for over five
years. Patrick was a double major at CSU Chico and graduated with his Bachelors of
Arts in communications and international studies. He is currently pursuing his
Masters of Arts degree at Pacific. Giblin worked at the The Modesto Bee newspaper
for 16 years.
Kristen Olsen, the former Assistant Vice President of Communications and
Public Affairs at CSU Stanislaus, managed the Office of Communications & Public
Affairs, including government relations, media relations, and visual branding (graphic
design, Web design, photography, and publications). She holds a Bachelor of Arts
degree from Westmont College. Olsen was in this position for over two years, but
left the position in December of 2010 to pursue her career as California Assembly
member, 25th district.
63
Survey respondents. The demographics of the CSU campuses that responded
to the survey are listed in Table 2 with names of marketing directors as well as Fall
2010 enrollment numbers. The demographics provide a broader look at the
participants in this research as well as their role at their campuses.
Table 2
Survey Respondent Demographics
Campus Marketing Director
Institutions enrollment
for Fall 2010a
Provided
social media
guidelines
Cal Poly Pomona Uyen Mai 18,706
Cal Poly, San Luis
Obispo
Mary McNally 17,332
CSU Bakersfield Karen Langston 6,550
CSU Channel
Islands
Nancy Gill 3,593 Yes
CSU East Bay Kimberly Legocki 10,064 Yes
CSU Fresno Katie Johnson 17,876 Yes
CSU Monterey
Bay
Scott Faust 4,395
CSU San
Bernardino
Sid Robinson 13,680 Yes
CSU San Diego Greg Block 24,590 Yes
CSU San Marcos Dave Woods 8,841
CSU Sonoma Jessica Anderson 7,390
CSU Stanislaus Denise Nordell 6,921 Yes
a Enrollment data from Calstate.edu enrollment reports.
64
Results and Findings
The data reported in this section are presented in order of the three-part sequential
mixed research method.
Interviews. The first research question was used to explore how IMC
departments at higher education institutions used social media and how social media
has changed the public relations field. Because of the focus nature of this study, the
interview themes will be presented first then the evidence from the interviews will
follow.
After coding the interviews themes that were developed included:
Informative, engaging, budget, strategies, policy or guidelines. As the data were
reviewed, each code had a number of subcodes that were included within the coding
system. The data were reviewed and annotated until no additional codes were
deemed necessary.
Interrater reliability. In order to establish reliability and trustworthiness of
the coding process for this study, inter-coder and inter-rater reliability techniques
were employed by using Cohen‘s kappa statistics. The researcher read the
transcribed interviews and developed common themes and codes and, collectively
with the researchers‘ dissertation advisor, reviewed and refined the codes. Some
codes were eliminated and other were combined into one theme. To further establish
reliability and trustworthiness of the codes, the researcher provided a copy of one
transcribed interview to a marketing colleague. The researcher asked the colleague to
read the interviews and develop codes from the interview. Together, the colleague
65
and the researcher discussed the emerging codes. The colleague generated codes that
were consistent with the researcher.
These codes were entered into Dedoose, an internet based program that targets
analysis of data of mixed-methods studies. Each typed interview was uploaded into
the software application as a text file. Subsequent reviews of the data using queries
resulted in the linkage of some codes, and the elimination of some codes. Table 3
identifies five primary themes that were identified by the researcher.
Table 3
Interview Themes
Themes Subthemes
1. Informative 1a. Emergency communication
1b. Promote events
1c. Recruiting
2. Engaging 2a. Listen to students
2b. Interact
2c. Help students be successful
3. Budget 3a. Saving money due to budget cuts
3b. No man power to oversee sites
3c. Social Media is FREE
3d. Great advertising source
4. Strategies 4a. Marketing strategies the same, but incorporate
social media
4b. Business like
4c. Consistent messaging
4d. Instantaneous
4f. No Measurement of recruitment purposes
5. Policy/guidelines 5a. No guidelines for social media
5b. Do not oversee other sites within the institution
5c. No training for admin or faculty
66
Theme 1: Informative. Informative is defined as reaching out to students and
becoming the source for information to the community about events that are
occurring at the institutions. There were many uses for social media that emerged
from the interviews, including emergency notifications, promoting events, or for
recruiting purposes. Hoile said ―we haven‘t been in a crisis situation, but it we were,
social media is a good tool to use to notify people.‖ Hoile indicated that she also uses
social media to promote events at MJC.
Olsen said ―many times we will use social media to let students know of
different activities around the campus or various scholarship opportunities available
to them.‖ All three interviewees indicated that they use social media to respond to
students who are asking questions about admission, therefore, the direct recruitment
was indicated lies with the admission office.
Theme 2: Engaging. Engagement is defined as a way to create a culture of
involvement for the students at the institution. Giblin stated that when a student asks
a question on Facebook, he immediately answers their questions. Hoile explained
that interacting with the students through social media is a good engagement tool
because the ―students then have a sense of ownership.‖ One of the questions in the
interview was, How often do you use your social media sites? Giblin provided a
very in depth response into this question including:
I check it five to six times during the day and sometimes in the middle of the
night if I‘m on the computer at home. It is the continuous monitoring of the
messages you send out and what people are saying about you. Our Facebook
account is the most successful with over 6,000 followers.
67
Giblin states that it is because of Pacific‘s IMC department ―openness‖ to interact
with guests on their social media pages that has increased their numbers over the last
year. Giblin went on state:
Never take down negative comments… A lot of people don‘t understand, is
that with the negative comments, if you respond back, our students respond
back…. Diffuse by explaining.
―Diffuse by explaining,‖ has been the motto for Giblin as well as Olsen and
Hoile. They both understand that commenting to a negative post could be a positive
turnaround for the person who posted the negative comment. Yet, Olsen and Hoile
also suggest that their departments do not respond to some negative comments
because other guests will comment back and it becomes a debate between social
media users that does not need any interference from the institutions IMC department.
All three interviewees indicated that they want to help students be successful
at the institution. The key messages that each marketing director indicated they send
out is to promote events, press release information, or conversational topics that will
generate feedback. Posting photos, sharing information about student happenings,
and faculty news, are good ways to engage students through social media.
Theme 3: Budget. With budget cuts throughout the state of California, fiscal
constraints were raised in the interviews. Hoile commented that MJC lacks time,
staff, and expertise to maintain their social media sites; they are saving money due to
budget cuts. She is focused not only on her duties as the public information officer,
but also becoming the social media specialist for their department. Giblin faces the
same issues at Pacific with lack of time and staff, ―I am the media relations manager,
68
but I also manage our social media sites since we can‘t afford to hire someone full
time.‖ Olsen also faces these issues since her staff is limited, but she has a designated
staff member that focuses on updating their social media sites. Yet all three
interviewees indicated that social media is a free advertising tool that needs to be
taken advantage of.
Theme 4: Strategies. Having a social media strategy is defined as a
systematic plan for future use of this marketing tool. Social media is not a tool to sell
a product, but to build relationships (Weinberg, 2010) When participants were asked
if they strategically target their social media messages, Olsen replied: ―They are not
strategic because with social media you have to be spontaneous. It doesn‘t work if it
is too strategic.‖ Olsen indicated that her marketing strategies are the same, but she
has added social media as one of her strategies.
Hoile replied: ―The Facebook page has alumni, faculty and students, we must
always keep that in mind…Different departments coordinate certain messages with
our department to get a message out, for example, ‗graduation is cancelled due to
rain.‘‖ Hoile indicated this is the type of instantaneous messaging that occurs.
Other types of instantaneous messaging as stated by Olsen is by posting
―Sometimes fun stuff like ‗I‘m standing in line at the book store and it seems to be
moving along fast,‘ is a good way to give insider information without really trying to
sell the institution.‖
Giblin stated that ―Yes I am strategic on major events coming up. But, not
always strategic on social media.‖ He also indicated that ―We must remind people
69
that there is a human behind the curtain,‖ by inserting the staff members name when
providing feedback on a comment. Giblin also indicated that institutions are
becoming more business like because of the competitive nature.
Theme 5: Policy and guidelines. Guidelines and policies are implemented
within the institution to develop best practice among the constituents at the
institutions. Each participant was also asked if they had any social media guidelines
and if they would be willing to share them. Olsen gave the researcher a draft copy
and asked that the researcher include standard verbiage in this dissertation that stated
that the guidelines have not yet been implemented.
Giblin, however, said that Pacific does not have social media guidelines:
No we don‘t have a guideline and we should. This has been a huge debate at
our institution because most believe they don‘t need one because that as an
academic business we already have detailed freedom of speech policies. As
long as faculty members make it clear they don‘t speak on behalf of the
university then they have freedom of speech. Administrators can‘t contact
media. Students can say whatever they want, they are our customers.
Yet Giblin‘s indicated that ―There needs to be additional rules and guidelines, on who
can create that account, who is responsible, and then tie it to branding guidelines.‖
Giblin also stated that Facebook ―messed thing up on FAN and Group pages,‖ which
created a mish mash on group pages and fan pages, so one cannot unify these pages.
As Giblin states, ―it‘s a mess, and people have no rules or objectives. They are
creating pages that are dormant.‖ Hoile also indicated that she has not had the
opportunity to create a social media guideline or policy for MJC, but will in the
future.
70
One issue that each interviewee indicated that has been on the rise is the lack
of control of social media sites created by other departments with their institutions.
These include, faculty creating fan pages, financial-aid department creating a Twitter
account, and the history department having a MySpace account. Giblin states, ―I
don‘t have control over comments or other accounts being created and it could create
a huge public relations crisis if we are not aware at all times of the messages being
sent.‖ Giblin monitors all social media accounts created within Pacific.
However, Olsen‘s draft of the social media guidelines states that ―departments
or university units should contact the Office of Marketing and Communications to
ensure all institutional social media sites coordinate with other CSU Stanislaus sites
and their content…‖ Hoile from MJC states that ―Other departments have Fan Pages
on Facebook or Twitter accounts, but I do not oversee them, I only know they exist.‖
All three interviewees indicated that there is no training available for administration
or faculty on social media. However, Giblin will be starting training sessions on
campus in the near future.
The interview data in this study were then used to shape the survey data
questions that were sent to the 23 CSU campuses.
Survey data. The survey instrument was scored to determine the overall
frequency of social media use, types of social media, satisfaction of social media
sites, social media as an effective tool, and barriers of social media in the IMC
departments. Based on this research study about social media in higher education,
half of the 12 respondents indicated they have been using social media between one
71
to two years, while five indicated they have been using social media for more than
two years. Only one of the respondents has used social media less than one year (see
Table 4).
Table 4
Length of Time CSU Campuses Have Been Using Social Media
Time Frequency
Less than 1 year 1
1-2 years 6
2-3 years 5
Total 12
Marketing directors were asked which social media sites their institutions‘
IMC departments used. Respondents were asked to identify the social media sites
they use (see Table 5). Based on the data collected from the 12 CSU Campuses, all
12 campuses used Facebook; 11 campuses used Twitter; nine campuses used
YouTube; eight campuses used LinkedIn; four indicated they used Flikr; three
indicated they used Foursquare, and one campus also used MySpace. Bebo,
Friendster, Blogger.com, and Xing were listed as options in the survey, but the
marketing directors did not indicated use of these sites. Four campuses specified that
they used ―other‖ forms of social media, including Picasa, RSS Word Press, and Dig
& Delicious.
Table 5
Social Media Sites Used at the CSU Campuses
Campus Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube Flikr Foursquare MySpace Other
Cal Poly Pomona X X X X
Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo X X X X X X
CSU Bakersfield X X X RS word Press
CSU Channel Islands X X
CSU East Bay X X X X Digg & Delicious
CSU Fresno X X X X X X
CSU Monterey Bay X X X X X
CSU San Bernardino X X X X
CSU San Diego X X X X X Word press, Picasa
CSU San Marcos X X
CSU Sonoma X X X X
CSU Stanislaus X X X
Total 12 11 8 9 4 3 1 4 72
73
When asked if social media is an effective marketing tool, most marketing
directors indicated that they agreed that it is effective. Respondents were asked to
rate each statement with a 5-point likert scale ranging with 1= (strongly agree) to 5=
(as strongly disagree). Scales 1 and 2 were placed in the agree category and 4 and 5
were placed in the disagree category. Having several social media sites was an
important element to the marketing directors with 75% agreeing to the statement.
They also believe that social media is an important branding tool with 75% also
agreeing to the statement. However, five of the marketing directors disagreed that
social media is an effective tool to increase enrollment for nontraditional age
students. Yet, two thirds of the marketing directors did indicate that social media is
an effective tool to gain community support (see Table 6).
The survey asked several questions about the IMC departments‘ use of social
media. Respondents were asked to rate each statement on a 5-point Likert scale
ranging from 1 = (very frequently) to 5 = (very infrequently). Scales 1 and 2 were
placed in the frequently category and 4 and 5 were placed in the infrequently
category. The marketing directors identified that 11 of 12 frequently are strategic
about targeting their social media messages. Whereas 50% reported that faculty or
administration infrequently help the IMC department generate social media messages,
50% answered that they infrequently received help from administration or faculty in
answering questions sent through social media. This is also why one marketing
director indicated offering social media training to administration and faculty. It is
interesting that 75% infrequently target messages to incoming students (see Table 7).
74
Table 6
Social Media as a Marketing Tool
Statement Agree Neutral Disagree Total
I believe it is important to have
several social media sites at our
institution.
9
(75%)
2
(16.7%)
1
(8.3%)
12
(100%)
Social media is an important
branding tool at our institution.
9
(75%)
1
(8.3%)
2
(16.7%)
12
(100%)
Social media is an important tool
for crisis communication at our
institution.
6
(50%)
4
(33.3%)
2
(16.7%)
12
(100%)
Social media is an effective tool to
gain community support at our
institution.
8
(66.7%)
3
(25%)
1
(8.3%)
12
(100%)
Social media is an effective tool to
increase enrollment for
traditional age students.
5
(41.7%)
5
(41.7%)
2
(16.6%)
12
(100%)
Social media is an effective tool to
increase enrollment for
nontraditional age students (25
and older).
3
(25%)
4
(33.3%)
5
(41.7%)
12
(100%)
Social media is an effective tool to
gain external resources.
6
(50%)
4
(33.3%)
2
(16.7%)
12
(100%)
It is important to send out daily
social media messages to our
followers.
7
(58.4%)
2
(16.6%)
3
(25%)
12
(100)
75
Table 7
Social Media‘s Frequent use in Higher Education
Statement Frequently Neutral Infrequently Total
We use social media at
our institution.
10
(83.4%)
2
(16.6%)
0 12
(100%)
Our department
strategically targets our
social media messages.
11
(91.7)
1
(8.3)
0 12
(100%)
Our department sends out
key messages to various
constituents within our
institution.
7
(58.3%)
3
(25%)
2
(16.7%)
12
(100%)
Faculty and administration
help our department
generate social media
messages.
1
(8.3%)
5
(41.7%)
6
(50%)
12
(100%)
Faculty and administration
help our department
answer comments from
our social media sites.
1
(8.3%)
5
(41.7%)
6
(50%)
12
(100%)
Most of our social media
messages target
incoming students.
0 3
(25%)
9
(75%)
12
(100%)
Our department offers
training sessions for
faculty & administration
on social media.
1
(8.3%)
2
(16.7%)
9
(75%)
12
(100%)
Faculty and administration
take advantage of our
training sessions.
1
(8.3%)
4
(33.4%)
7
(58.3%)
12
(100%)
76
The marketing directors have to monitor their social media sites on an hourly
basis; therefore, support is important. Each respondent was asked to rate each
statement ranging from 1=(very satisfied) to 5=(very dissatisfied). Scales 1 and 2
were placed in the satisfied category and 4 and 5 were placed in the dissatisfied
category. The vast majority of marketing directors in this study 83% are satisfied
with their social media sites and satisfied 58% with the response rate they receive
through social media, while two thirds of the respondents are also satisfied with the
level of support they receive from senior management about social media (see Table
8). A comment left by Kimberly Legocki from CSU East Bay said that their ―Social
media is based upon a measurable strategy with a metrics reports generated for
CSUEB leadership on a monthly basis.‖ Measuring social media has been something
that most companies using social media are investigating further.
Table 8
Social Media Satisfaction at each CSU Campus
Statement Satisfied
Neither
satisfied or
dissatisfied Dissatisfied
How satisfied are you with the
social media sites that your IMC
department is using?
10
(83.3%)
2
(16.7%)
0
How satisfied are you with the
response rate you receive through
your IMC departments social
media sites?
7
(58.3%)
5
(41.7%)
0
How satisfied are you with the level
of support your IMC department
has received from senior
management about social media?
8
(66.6%)
2
(16.7%)
2
(16.7%)
77
The marketing directors were also asked how frequently they used social
media within the IMC department. While 10 out of 12 use it daily or one to three
times a week, one uses social media one to three times a month and one person
indicated that they use social media less than once per month. Legocki from CSU
East Bay also comments, ―We push new programs for our department of continued
education.‖ The frequency of use by the campuses can be seen in Table 9.
Table 9
Frequency of Use of Social Media by CSU Campuses
Frequency # of campuses
Daily 5
1-3 times a week 5
1-3 times a month 1
Monthly 0
Less than once a month 1
Total 12
Social media goals are important to identify for branding purposes and to
identify the strategies for the year. The marketing directors for this study were asked
to identify their goals for social media and five out of 12 identified that all of the
listed choices were part of their goals. Three out of 12 identified ―other‖ as their
goals, they did not elaborate in the comment section provided after the question (see
Table 10).
78
Table 10
Campus Goals for Social Media
Goal # of campuses
Understand student concerns and
perspectives on university related issues
0
Increase sponsors and/or grants 0
Seeking growth in enrollment 0
Recognize the institutional brand 2
Promote events 2
All of the above 5
None of the above 0
Other 3
Total 12
Eight out of 12 of the marketing directors identified that lack of time was a
barrier to adopting social media within the IMC department, while a third identified
―other‖ as a barrier (see Table 11). Some of the ―other‖ barriers identified by the
marketing directors came from Greg Block from San Diego State University who
commented that ―financial resources [are a barrier] to use more advanced methods,‖
and Nancy Gill from CSU Channel Islands commented that ―lack of resources to
support staff is a barrier.‖ Also, Mary McNally from Cal Poly San Luis Obispo listed
―lack of equipment and training for more advanced productions.‖Budget issues in
hiring new staff members to manage the social media sites seem to be a barrier.
79
Table 11
Barriers of Adopting Social Media Within the IMC Department
Barrier # of campuses
Lack of time 8
Lack of assessment measures 0
Lack of support from senior institutional leaders 0
Lack of adequate tech support 0
Resistance from other IMC staff members 0
Other 4
Total 12
The marketing directors were also asked if they had social media guidelines
established at their institutions, eight indicated ―yes‖ while four indicated they did not
have guidelines (see Table 12). Those that answered ―yes‖ were asked to provide the
guidelines and if the researcher may contact them for further questions about the
guidelines. Six of the marketing directors provided their social media guidelines to
the researcher.
Table 12
Does the IMC Department Have Social Media Guidelines for The Institution?
Response # of campuses %
Yes 8 66.7
No 4 33.3
Total 12 100.0
80
The survey data was collected to answer research question number two and
the overall frequency of use for social media at each CSU campus.
Document analysis. The survey participants were asked if the IMC
departments‘ social media guidelines could be made available to the researcher.
Those that answered ―Yes,‖ were emailed and thanked for answering the survey
questions and if they would be willing to share their social media policies. The
researcher received a total of six guidelines that were either a draft or already
implemented within the institution. The third research question was used to explore if
higher education institutions are using social media guidelines.
According to Flick (2006), there are essential features when analyzing textual
material. One of the features is the use of categories, which are often derived from
theoretical models. The other feature is to define the material and ―what one actually
wants to interpret out of them‖ (p. 312). Another feature is defining what the largest
element in the text is, which falls under ―analytic unit.‖ After defining the largest
elements, summarizing or paraphrasing the analytical content for higher level of
abstraction. Because of the focus nature of this study, the two major ―analytic units‖
were 1. Intended audience for the guidelines and organization of guidelines; 2.
Principles or processes for the use of social media.
Intended audience for the guidelines and organization of guidelines.
Social media has become a powerful communication tool that has significant impact
on institution‘s reputation. The six social media guidelines reviewed had the same
audience. The recommendations applied primarily to employees and contractors
81
communicating on behalf of the institution through the use of blogs, Twitter,
Facebook, LinkedIn, wikis, social networks, virtual worlds, and other social media
community.
Fresno State‘s guidelines address their audience by stating, ―We expect all
who participate in social media on behalf of Fresno State to understand the
technology they are utilizing and to follow these recommendations.‖ CSU Stanislaus
guidelines state:
Both in professional and institutional roles, employees need to follow the
same behavioral standards as they would in real life. The same laws,
professional expectations, and guidelines for interacting with students,
parents, alumni, Donors, media, and other university constituents apply online
as in the real world. Employees are liable for anything they post to social
media sites.
CSU East Bay guidelines rule out faculty members who use social media for
instruction, ―These guidelines and standards do not cover faculty use of social media
for instructional purposes nor academic department use of social media within
internally facing (intranet) systems, such as Blackboard or other NEtIDbased
systems.‖ The targeted audience in each social media guideline is specified and made
clear that the guidelines are only recommendations not a policy.
CSU San Bernardino defines its audience and three types of social media
participants: ―A university operated social media site; Sites in which you participate
as a recognized official or member of our University: Personal sites in which your
participation is unrelated to the university. The policy does not apply to personal
social media.‖ Each of these institutions made it clear who the target audience was in
the introduction of the guidelines.
82
The organization of the six social media guidelines consisted of an
introduction to and definition of social media. The guidelines shared a common
organization style in addressing anticipated questions from the audience that would
be beneficial. What should the reader take away after reading the guidelines? One of
the common themes that emerged from the organization style is the idea that the
social media guidelines should focus on the things that employees can rather do than
what they can’t do.
Once a clear definition of social media is introduced the guidelines created are
very simple to follow with clear and understandable language. Each guideline
defines the main points with bullet points or a sequenced outline. For example the
guidelines from CSU Stanislaus are separated in three different sections. Section one
of the guidelines discusses ―policies for all social media sites, including personal
site.‖ The rest of the guidelines follow this type of organization but do not state the
section numbers. The guidelines discuss principles/policies first, and then best
practice. CSU Stanislaus was the best model for a distinct and structured guideline.
The first section discussed policies; second section was best practices; and section
three discussed institutional social media. All six guidelines also included
bibliography sections.
Principles and processes for the use of social media. Principles are essential
in keeping order with university standards and to help clarify how best to enhance and
protect personal and professional reputations when participating in social media.
Principles applied to those posting on behalf of an official university unit. Social
83
media is a necessary channel for sharing with constituents‘ information about the
institution. CSU East Bay guidelines have clear principles that are clearly stated in
the beginning of their social media guidelines:
Don‘t engage without a clear plan, strategy, goals, and line of
responsibility
Be responsible for continuous monitoring, maintenance, and timely
response
Be transparent, and avoid misrepresentation
Both CSU Channel Islands and CSU Fresno guidelines mirror in principles by
suggesting to be ―respectful of proprietary information and content by not
copyrighting photos or copy without properly crediting the source or gaining
permission from the source prior to use.‖ San Diego State University guidelines state
that anyone using social media must ―avoid posting any content derogatory or in
defamation of SDSU, its services, employees, students, constituents or competitors.
All six sets of guidelines mention that being transparent is a key component to the
principles. Being honest or dishonest will quickly be noticed in the social media
environment. CSU Fresno guidelines state:
If you are blogging about your work at Fresno State, use your real name,
identify that you work for Fresno State, and be clear about your role. If you
have a vested interest in something your are discussing you should be the first
to point it out.‖
Part of being transparent is also having professionalism in social media. CSU
Stanislaus indicates that ―there can be a fine line between healthy debate and
incendiary reaction. You do not need to respond to every criticism or barb.‖ CSU
84
East Bay guidelines also adhere to standards of professional conduct at all times
―when engaging online on behalf of the University understand that perception is
reality.‖ These suggested principles should can become helpful for an employee who
doesn‘t understand social media. Respecting copyrights and fair use were clearly
defined in all six guidelines. For example, CSU Stanislaus guidelines state ―always
give people proper credit for their work, and make sure you have the right to use
something with attribution before you publish.‖ CSU Fresno guidelines go on further
to state, ―University representatives using social media should consult the following
policies before designing a community.‖ The guidelines for Fresno State include a
list of acceptable use; data classification; Family Education Rights and Privacy Act
(FERPA); policy on addressing harassment; standards for graphics and
communications; and web policy. Each of these components had a description
including a link to the website.
In order to help provide guidance on how best to enhance and protect personal
and professional reputations when participating in social media, all six institutions
had thorough discussion of best practices incorporated in their social media
guidelines. The organization style in the social media guidelines discuss principles
when using social media as a way to help build stronger, more successful
relationships. The principles discussed in the beginning of the guidelines are to
contribute to advancing the universities reputation and interests if used properly.
The majority of each social media guideline consists of best practice,
including strategic; judicious; listening; and reviewing content. The guidelines also
85
discussed how to make important contribution to the community and to the public
dialogue on broad range of issues.
CSU Channel Islands guidelines recommend developing a strategy for social
media, ―determine the goals and outcome of your community and how much time
realistically you will have to devote to social media.‖ CSU Fresno guidelines add
that ―in some cases social media presence is not ideal and your needs might be better
served by collaborating with other social media communities to get the word out.‖
Asking permission to publish or report on a conversation is another best practice in
the guidelines. The guidelines at CSU Fresno state that ―all statements must be true
and not misleading and all claims must be substantiated and approved. Please never
comment on anything related to legal matters, litigation, or any parties we are in
litigation without the appropriate approval.‖ CSU Stanislaus guidelines recommend
that anyone using social media ―to get the facts straight before posting them on social
media.‖ This language is used throughout the other guidelines.
Judicious in the guidelines recommends participants to listen. The guidelines
at CSU East Bay suggest that ―methodical monitoring and assessment, together with
active management, is a requirement for engaging social media successfully and
productively on behalf of CSUEB.‖ Some of the guidelines suggest either checking
the sites several times during the day; set up automated feeds using search tool such
as Google alerts to notify of new activity; ―know your community.‖ Guidelines at
CSU Fresno state ―listen before you engage,‖ which suggests using monitoring tools,
such as Google analytics or Facebook measuring tools. Listening increases student
86
engagement through the social media as well as gain trust from the members that
follow the social media sites.
The six social media guides reviewed for this study suggested that content be
reviewed before posting. CSU Fresno guidelines suggest ―writing the post first in
word processor before posting to help detect spelling and grammar errors.‖ Another
best practice tool theme that emerged from the six social media guidelines was
exercising good judgment by refrain from comments that can be interpreted as slurs,
demeaning, inflammatory.
In summary, the six social media guidelines provided for this study were
created to further emphasize any anticipated behavior before it arises. All social
media guidelines use cautionary tone because of the ease of use and volatile nature of
social media. The consequences for mistakes or misssteps can be very costly in terms
of image, brand, and liability. The nature of social media can be volatile because of
the increase in popularity with usage, there is not control of messaging and who is in
control.
Evidence of quality. Because social media use in higher education is a
quickly evolving and growing phenomenon multiple data was collected and used for
this study. This sequential explorative study followed a mixed methods approach of
inquiry. The researcher has chose to use both qualitative and quantitative measures
because of the exploratory nature of the study and the research questions. Using both
measures created a triangulation, which allows for a means to seek ―convergence
across qualitative and quantitative methods‖ (Cresswell, 2004, p. 15). This study
87
utilized several means of ensuring accuracy of data. First and foremost, the three
interviews were done either face-to-face or on the phone and were recorded.
Research questions were open questions and theory driven to reduce biases and to
prompt individual responses. In order to establish reliability and trustworthiness of
the coding process for this study, inter-coder and inter-rater reliability techniques
were used. The researcher read the transcribed interviews and developed common
themes and codes and, collectively with the researchers‘ dissertation advisor,
reviewed and refined the codes. The researcher self-transcribed each interview.
Once the transcription was completed, they were uploaded to a computer program
and were coded, analyzed, and extracted into themes.
The researcher maintained trustworthiness in the qualitative research by
recording the interviews and saving all email communication documents. Survey
security was ensured using the save referring uniform resource locator (URL) and
save Internet protocol (IP) address features in surveymonkey.com. When analyzing
content analysis it is best to use inter-coder reliability to apply codes to the text,
which was done for this research.
In addition, the researcher kept a personal journal to reflect epiphanies,
thoughts, and reflections. Different data sources including articles, news, social
media sites and biographies were explored and dissertation chair were utilized to help
narrow down important data and themes.
88
Summary
To summarize, the research design for this study was a three-part, sequential
mixed-methods design, an approach increasingly used in social-science research. The
first phase of the study consisted of interviewing marketing directors from a
community college, public university, and a private university to provide a wide
examination of the use of social media within the three major areas of higher
education. The second phase was surveying the 23 CSU marketing directors from
each campus. The third phase of the study was reviewing six social media guidelines
that were provided from the marketing directors at the CSU campuses. The
qualitative and quantitative data were collected and analyzed to answer the three
primary research questions. The interviews consisted of three marketing directors
from Modesto Junior College, University of the Pacific, and CSU Stanislaus. The
marketing director surveys included responses of the marketing directors from the 12
CSU campuses and six social media guidelines.
Based on analysis of the interview data, the marketing directors acknowledged
that social media guidelines are necessary for future implementation at any higher
education institution. The marketing directors also recognized that it is vital to have
social media as a marketing tool to keep students informed; for branding purposes;
have the community involved; for emergency notifications; as well as an engagement
tool. The themes that emerged from the interview data support the guiding
framework as seen in Figure 5.
89
The survey instrument was scored to determine the overall frequency of social
media use, types of social media, satisfaction of social media sites, social media as an
effective tool, and barriers of social media in the IMC departments. The majority
survey respondents agreed that social media is an effective branding tool for the
institution. Furthermore, the marketing directors indicated that they use social media
frequently and sometimes are strategic in their key messaging. The barriers that were
indicated by the marketing directors in the survey for using social media were lack of
resources and time. Some of the other barriers indicated in the survey were lack of
support from faculty or administration for generating newsworthy items. Yet, the
majority indicated that they were highly satisfied with level of support from senior
management. Half of the marketing directors from the CSU campuses who
responded to the survey shared their social media guidelines with the research.
The evaluation of the guidelines also indicated that the social media
guidelines are documents that provide direction for official use and apply to
employees or contractors who communicate on behalf of the institution. The
guidelines also provide principles and best practice procedures for the use of social
media platforms.
In this chapter, the data collection activities focus for the study was
summarized, demographics of participants in the study were reviewed, and the results
and findings of each data collection point were reported. In the following chapter, the
researcher will provide an analysis and interpretation of the findings, connect the
90
findings to the literature referenced in Chapter 2, and provide recommendations for
actions and further study.
91
CHAPTER V
RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This mixed-methods exploratory study examined Internet social media
marketing in higher education institutions. This chapter first provides an overview of
the study and a summary of the findings from each data collection point.
Interpretations of the findings, organized by each research question are then
reviewed. Next, the research objectives and limitations of the study are discussed.
Chapter 5 concludes with recommendations for policy and practice as well as further
study.
This study explored how IMC departments and PR professionals at higher
education institutions use social media as marketing, communications, and branding
tools. The research design for this study was a three-part sequential research methods
design, an approach increasingly used in social-science research.
This study sought to answer the following research questions.
1. How is social media used by the IMC department at each higher education
institution and how has social media changed the PR profession in higher
education?
2. How are the IMC departments in the CSU campuses using social media to
shape the university brand and other communication functions?
3. Are the higher education institutions using a procedures guideline for social
media?
92
Data were collected as described above to answer these research questions.
The results are analyzed below through the lens of a theoretical framework that
includes elements of agenda setting theory, paradigm shift, and chaos theory. Each of
these theories is relevant to the study topic and design, individually and collectively.
Agenda setting theory relates to the large influence of news media on readers,
viewers, and listeners through their prioritization of which stories to tell and how
much to tell about each. In the case of the present research, the messages the
universities want to get out to their audiences are ―newsworthy.‖
Agenda setting theory also looks at the amount of control over the agenda,
which has changed with social media‘s significant shift in greater control by the
audience. The data collected will be considered in light of the effects that university
social media marketing has on audiences through the content it chooses to publish
and how much space or time is dedicated to each segment of content. Although this
study essentially investigated a social phenomenon, quantifiable data were collected
and analyzed. The researcher also applies the butterfly effect to Chaos theory in
social media marketing. That is, a major element of chaos theory is the idea that a
small change can have a major impact, and in social media marketing, small and often
unpredictable snippets of media can ―go viral,‖ circulating rapidly among a large
audience.
Summary and Discussion of Findings
Social media marketing is more than just a part of popular culture; it is a way
of shaping life. Whereas the Internet of the past was more about ―me, myself, and I,‖
93
the past few years have brought about substantial change: Online interactions are now
more social (Weinberg, 2009). Social media marketing is a process that empowers
individuals to promote their web sites, products, or services through online social
channels and to communicate with and tap into a much larger community that may
not be available via traditional advertising channels.
Creating brand awareness, especially in higher education, can have long-term
effects on consumers. Specifically, consumers who become aware of the university
brand now are likely to remember the institution and seek it out when applying to
college or shopping for university products. Today, information is more easily
accessible online, and, more significantly, that information is easier to find
(Weinberg, 2009). Social media is about the conversations that are formed online to
gain the trust of the audience. Younger generations which make up the population of
traditional age college students are becoming more digital savvy and are becoming
aware when a company is trying to sell a product rather than gaining their trust. If a
student is seeking information about an institution, that student will not research
through newspapers or the library. Instead, students are more likely use a computer
and look for reviews and endorsements from other individuals just like them.
Social media marketers, especially those in higher education, need to
understand the rules of engagement, participate in social media forums on a regular
basis, and capitalize on emerging trends. Integrating social media into the marketing
strategy at any institution is a cost-effective tool versus advertising in newspapers or
magazines. With budget cuts, this low cost of advertising is a positive investment for
94
the long term. As higher education institutions embrace Web 2.0 and other
technologies, leveraging social media is not so very different from conventional
marketing and networking: Success is dependent first on establishing trust and then
cultivating the relationship (Brink, 2010).
This no-cost form of marketing is becoming a trend in the business sector, but
many companies are having a difficult time understanding how to use it and how to
monitor their social media sites. In an interview with Patrick Giblin from the
University of the Pacific, he referred to social media sites as being a ―mess.‖ Giblin
explained that the freedom that departments have to post on their own Facebook or
Twitter accounts is not only hard to manage but could become a liability for the
university if monitoring is lacking. He also stated that people think they know how to
market through social media, but not everyone understands the ramifications if it is
done incorrectly. The ―mess‖ that Giblin refers to can be viewed through the lens of
chaos theory.
The multiple, rapid, and expansive use of social media networks has created a
frenzied environment for the PR industry, forcing it to work even harder on key
messages to maintain the good face of organizations. This form of ―anarchy‖ has no
centralized control, which creates a disorganized, unregulated environment. Despite
the imagery of disorder that the name chaos theory conjures up, the theory‘s focus is
actually about finding the underlying order in apparently random data (Snell, 2009).
Figure 6 illustrates chaos theory through the butterfly effect. In particular, the figure
provides an example of how quickly the mass of information expands through social
Figure 6. Example illustration of chaos theory through butterfly effect at a higher education institution.
95
96
media sites for just one student, alumni, media contact, or member of the community
at a given moment. Once a guest is on the institution‘s web site, the home page has a
section for current news that directs readers to the institution‘s IMC department.
Another example of the butterfly effect is seen when visiting, for example, the
admission department‘s home page with links to its Facebook and Twitter accounts.
Annie Infinite (2011), a social media expert, explains in her blog that social
media can cause a butterfly effect when one small action (like the flap of a butterfly‘s
wings or a small comment) can create a dynamic and increasing change in any
system. For instance, when someone adds a post to a Facebook or Twitter page, a
chain reaction can begin with many other people adding comments in response. The
topic could then become a trend picked up by search engines, which might mark
certain keywords in the post as highly important. Very soon the initial post could be
ranking high in the major search engines.
The first set of data, derived from the in-person interviews with university
staff and students, presented five themes of university social media marketing. The
marketing directors from the three institutions that participated in the study reported
using social media for disseminating information in an emergency, to promote an
event, or for recruitment purposes; engaging students; listening to student concerns;
and strategically placing key messages. The marketing directors noted that some
elements of conventional marketing strategies still apply today, that new strategies are
needed in the age of social media, and that the marketing field lacks clear, universal
guidelines for how social media should be utilized.
97
These findings directly speak to the research question, how is social media used by
the IMC department at institutions of higher learning? The fact that these institutions
use social media for disseminating information, together with reports of budget
restraints as a major motivation for using social media, show that the university
administrators are working with at least a subconscious awareness of chaos theory. In
other words, the leaders of these institutions want to spread certain messages, or at
least have a presence in what is becoming the central arena for marketing to the
college-student–age generation. They realize the potential of having a message go
viral via social media, or to have a butterfly effect, for free. Integrated marketing
communications departments at institutions of higher education are using social
media to disseminate information for free in a forum that has the potential to spread
the information with unparalleled speed and to audiences of unprecedented size.
Higher education institutions are using social media to engage students
because they understand that users are living in an age where news is interesting if it
is ―all about me‖ (Weinberg, 2009). A quick glance at any Facebook wall will show
hundreds if not thousands of recent posts of people talking about themselves. Agenda
setting theory considers the effects of media on audiences according to which
messages are spread and how much is spread about each message—in the new
paradigm of the generation of social media and ―me news,‖ social media marketers
have to adjust their messages to be worthy of reading in the eyes of the audience, and
that means writing about them. In the present study, university marketing directors
reported that one of their primary uses for social media is engaging audiences, such as
98
by providing helpful information for students and asking students for their opinions
and feedback. Successful social media marketers have realized that the agenda
setting for how media influence is determined has been reversed. For example, the
people who traditionally distributed the messages can no longer count on influencing
audiences through decisions about what content to publish and how much. The
audience is now putting out its own messages and, to regain any sort of influence,
social media marketers have to compete with those bottom-up messages by adjusting
their own content to what the audience demands and dictates (see Figure 7)
Figure 7. Agenda setting in the past and present: Illustration of who is controlling
media messages.
In the data derived from the surveys, 11 out of 12 participants reported using
social media marketing for more than a year—social media marketing was only new
to 1 of the 12 university representatives. All 12 participants use Facebook, and 11
use Twitter. LinkedIn and YouTube were the next most popular, followed by Flickr,
Foursquare, MySpace, WordPress, Picasa, Digg, and Delicious. The marketing
directors in this survey indicated that social media is an important branding tool.
They also indicated that it is important to have a social media strategy.
99
These findings relate to the research question, how are the IMC
departments in the CSU campuses using social media to shape the university brand
and other communication functions? To succeed in a PR role at one of these
institutions today, one must have a good command of all of these platforms. These
institutions have been using social media as a marketing outlet for some time, and
therefore a competitive candidate cannot afford a learning curve. These platforms are
part of a new skill set in the world of PR for academic institutions and essentially any
other institution or organization.
In the survey, participants also reported, on average, that they strongly
believed that social media is an important branding tool for their institutions and that
it is important for them to have a presence on multiple platforms. Although this does
not directly answer the question of how IMC departments are using social media to
brand, it does show that IMC departments consider social media to be critical in
branding efforts—so much so that they market on as many networks as possible. Ten
of the 12 respondents also reported actively using social media marketing at least
once a week, further supporting the significance of social network marketing in
today‘s PR campaigns regardless of what institution they may be promoting.
Most participants reported being satisfied with their social media messages,
whereas fewer were satisfied with the response from the audience. Most respondents
did not believe that their social media marketing efforts affected their enrollment
numbers. This might indicate that goals other than direct ―selling‖ (or, in this study,
attracting applicants) exist for social media marketing. For example, universities put
100
a stronger emphasis on more abstract selling, such as branding and building a certain
image, rather than achieving more concrete indicators of success (Weinberg, 2009).
Social media marketing efforts at the universities are managed by an IMC
department with little if any participation by faculty or administration (Weinberg,
2009). In other words, universities have compartmentalized the relatively new and
undefined tool of social media marketing as a PR responsibility. This is interesting
because a major aim of university social network marketing is to engage past, present,
and future students, and the professors, academic advisers, and other university
personnel who have more interaction with students are not part of the marketing
process. The very fact that university administrators have designated social network
marketing as a PR and marketing tool shows that a conventional perspective is being
applied to a new phenomenon. The old school of thought was that marketing or
dissemination of information, including news, is top down, as reflected in agenda
setting theory. Of course, social networks are anything but top down. Social network
information does not exactly flow from the bottom up; rather, it flows in all directions
all at once. There is no hierarchy because all members have equal and open
opportunity to post and view information.
Despite being put in charge of the social media marketing efforts, the
respondents in this study‘s survey indicated that the IMC departments were not
provided with training in this area. Six out of 12 of the respondents indicated that
university administration did not help the IMC department generate key messages to
101
send through social media. Interviewees at a third of the institutions reported that
they did not have guidelines for social media marketing.
In the third phase of the study, the researcher reviewed social media
guidelines. In the existing guidelines, two major themes were noted: (a) intended
audience for the guidelines and organization of guidelines and principles and (b)
processes for the use of social media. Some of the principles that the participants
indicated were to avoid engagement without a clear plan; to be responsible for
continuous monitoring, maintenance, and timely responses; and to recognize that
social media behavior can impact an organization‘s image in a nearly unprecedented
way. Another principle was that people expect constant, immediate access to
information and feel entitled to continuous personal attention. The third principle
was to be transparent and avoid misrepresentation. In the early years, the Internet
was a place to hide behind a username and reinvent oneself. Today, the Internet is
about transparency and indicating a presence on the web.
The fact that this paradigm shift is well under ay is indicated in the guidelines
for the relatively new social media marketing of higher education institutions, where
transparency is prioritized as a core and seemingly established norm or expectation.
In review of the study data, one of the most prominent and unique features of the
social media guidelines was the focus on the things that employees can do rather than
what they can’t do.
102
Interpretations of the Findings
Social networks are becoming a primary source of information for increasing
numbers of college-age people. Members of this generation spend more time
engaging with social networks than reading newspapers or otherwise taking in
information that they cannot interact with in real time.
The paradigm shift to real time is of great theoretical significance here.
Society is in an age where a 2-week turnaround time is obsolete for PR (see Table
13). Social networks are ubiquitous and have set new standards across the board for
what qualifies as timely. Because social media usage is integrated not only through
Table 13
Agenda Setting for the Public Relations Profession
The emerging paradigm Old paradigm (5 to 10 years ago)
Public creates newsworthy stories. Media
scrutinizes messages and uses blogs as
trustworthy sources.
Press releases were sent to the media
through email or fax.
The public can control the message. Public relations controlled what messages
they were sending to the media.
Businesses are compelled to hire a social
media specialist to brand their businesses
through social media.
Businesses only hired PR personnel who
had a bachelor‘s degree in PR and
experience writing press releases.
Writers have to research several social
media network sites for exchanged
information about businesses or
institutions. Must be proactive in
gathering information before the media
captures the story.
The only information to search was
publicity tracking.
News is spread in 15 minutes News was spread in 2 hours.
103
computers but also through mobile applications, information is available anytime,
anywhere. ―Old‖ notions of PR must be modified or rethought with both of the
following concepts in mind for higher education marketing. First, the way to increase
an audience is to listen to the audience as well as engaging in a conversation. Second,
the old strategy sessions of sitting in boardrooms or designing printable marketing
material are over, and the only way to successfully participate in today‘s market is
through quick, almost spontaneous strategy.
It is important to note that going viral is a major conceptual change. It used to
be that the way to connect to users was through making the product look its best—
high quality and affordable. These days, to sell a product or to sell an institution, the
seller must convince the audience that everyone else is buying it. Targeted audiences
are seeking advice from their social networks, and this is a key to universities
learning to use the networks to their advantage. For example, a school is far more
likely to increase application numbers by having current or past students connect with
potential students than by the school itself reaching out. The most popular social
network, Facebook, is set up so that users essentially only connect with their
―friends.‖ Spamming is extremely limited and access to information is highly
protected. This means that for a school to be seen by a Facebook member, the school
has to send its message through people in that member‘s network. Although the word
viral sounds negative, it is actually the ultimate success for any social network
marketing campaign. It is assumed that a school whose positive image goes viral is
sure to see more applicants, raising general popularity and increasing its donors.
104
As shown in the results of the present data, institutions of higher learning have
recognized the importance of becoming involved with social networks, although they
have not quite grasped how to make the best use of the opportunity. The data in this
research indicate that the first step for succeeding in this realm is to leave ineffective
marketing concepts about marketing behind and accept the new social media
platform. The data also suggest that the core aspects of the new communication
paradigm are (a) deciding who will publish and how much, (b) keeping up with the
real-time speed of interactions, and (c) achieving the ultimate goal of going viral.
Conclusions
Studies on social media marketing are vital to defining the roles that social
networks are playing today and teaching professionals how to use them. A major
practical implication of this research is using social media effectively. According to
Weinberg (2009), social media marketing is about real, personal relationships.
Jumping into the game without being aware of the surroundings can result in
disastrous consequences. Social networks are no longer a novel phenomenon; rather,
they have become a basic factor of personal and most professional lives.
Marketing directors using social media sites have to study what works and
what does not, empirically, and devise standard guidelines for their institutions.
Additionally, IMC departments should consider involving people or groups who are
outside of the IMC department. Social media is about connecting and engaging, and
a potential student is far more likely to read a blog with the opinions of a professor
105
who might teach him or her in the future than a PR representative, who is essentially
irrelevant to the student‘s life.
Limitations of the Study
This study is bound by the population of IMC directors who were interviewed
and surveyed. Consequently, the results of this study cannot be generalized to all
populations of marketing directors and social media in the country or even the state of
California. However, this study does provide the groundwork for further study on
social media‘s impacts on students‘ perceptions of higher institutions.
Because this study was explorative in nature, the researcher did not have any
definite, preconceived notions. The researcher decided to study social media because
of the plethora of anecdotal evidence but the lack of scholarly studies focused on the
topic.
Social media use by university IMC departments is understood and received
well by students. This study has attempted to contribute to the field‘s understanding
of the specific and potential uses for social media in the realm of higher education
marketing as the impact of social media continues to increase.
Recommendations for Policy and Practice
Based on the conclusions reached through the analysis of the research
questions, the researcher has four recommendations for policy and practice. First
universities should establish criteria for recruiting and hiring a social media specialist
or online coordinator. Requirements should include an instinctive knowledge of
106
certain buzz words, an active personal blog, an account on each of the major social
networks if not the more minor networks as well, and a comprehensive understanding
of their functionality. Being responsible for monitoring the social media sites could
easily be a full-time job. As seen in the data from this study, many IMC departments
are struggling to keep up with their social media sites. The interviewee from the
University of the Pacific, Patrick Giblin, reported that ―monitoring social media sites
is a 24-hour job and I am responsible for monitoring the sites at Pacific.‖ Giblin also
mentioned that social media sites are a ―mess,‖ and this is where the need for
organization is crucial. CSU East Bay has one of the best examples for organizing
the several social media sites that are a representation of the institution, and this
system requires the daily attention of an online specialist and coordinator. The IMC
department‘s web site at this school has a page dedicated to all of the social media
sites in use, with corresponding links
(http://www20.csueastbay.edu/ua/communications/social-media-directory.html).
Additionally, all departments and faculty members must register their site through
CSU East Bay as indicated in CSU Stanislaus social media guidelines.
The second recommendation is that it is imperative that each institution create
guidelines for the use of social media to avoid chaos and to further understand the
social media process. The social media guidelines will help control and reduce the
disorganization and provide some functional order in the information-dissemination
efforts of higher education institutions. The social media policy at any higher
education institution will impact most of the university or college internally because
107
faculty and administration that are using social media will have to refocus their own
social-media strategies. Various constituents who use social media at the university
or college must be trained and have a clear understanding of the university‘s stance
on social media use. According to Kaewsurin (2008), to build and deliver a strong
corporate brand through social media, internal stakeholders, including students,
faculty, and administrators, will play important roles.
According to a study by Henkel (1997), universities are being transformed
into corporate enterprises. This movement tends to emphasize direct control over
employees (Henkel, 1997). One issue that surfaces frequently is, ―How will the
faculty adhere to this new policy?‖ The first and foremost important step is training
through the IMC department. The second step is monitoring and providing assistance
for the social media sites being developed. Third, the IMC department should develop
standard templates to use for social media efforts throughout the institution.
The third recommendation is that institutions should implement a formal
social media policy across and throughout the institution to insure conformity and
appropriate standards of use. As discussed earlier and cited in the various social
media guidelines that were reviewed for this study, the effective use of social media
can be challenging and can create significant level of vulnerability of the institution.
According to Fowler (2009), implementation is the stage of the policy process in
which a policy is formally adopted and is put into practice. The major actors in the
implementation arena are the implementers. One of the most important parts of the
implementation process is gathering resources to mobilize for policy implementation.
108
Fowler discusses several problems that arise from implementation, including time and
energy, money, arranging staff development, ongoing communication, limitations of
facilities, and resistance to the policy. As the plan is being implemented monitoring
the policy‘s implementation is critical in order to institutionalize the policy.
The fourth recommendation is that university staff members should have a
clear understanding of the evaluation of social media is necessary to provide a proper
policy evaluation. Fowler (2009) refers to policy evaluation as a ―type of applied
research in which the practices and rigorous standards of all research are used in a
specific setting for a practical purpose: determining to what extent a policy is
reaching its goals‖ (p. 311). Policies are often first put into effect through projects
(Fowler, 2009). A number of stakeholders, both individuals and groups, may be
involved in or affected by a program evaluation. With a social media policy, the
stakeholders involved are faculty, students, administrators, the president‘s council,
board members, and support staff.
There are many ways to evaluate if a social media policy is taking hold, yet
one of the most effective is measuring the Return on Investment (ROI) of social
media. According to Weinberg (2009) five separate metrics can help estimate ROI
for social media: reach, frequency and traffic, influence, conversions and transactions,
and sustainability. Wienberg also noted that ―the problem with trying to determine
ROI for social media is you are trying to put numeric quantities around human
interactions and conversations, which are not quantifiable‖ (p. 8). The researched
formed a model to illustrate these five metrics and how they can convert to an ROI
109
for higher education institutions. The model also explains how to measure the new
phenomenon of social media (see Figure 8).
The ROI in Figure 8 does not have to include dollar figures, as the most
important metrics for universities are engaging and retaining students. Once the
marketing directors know how far the message is traveling, they can strategize their
messages more effectively. Google Analytics, a tool for measuring the traffic and
other patterns of web sites and social media, is a detailed and effective way to
measure visits to and impressions of sites. Facebook has also integrated a similar tool
with its ―fan‖ pages and offers tools for businesses to track impressions per status
update, reach, click throughs, and increases in fans per week.
A critical component needed in social media guidelines is a clear evaluation
process. Figure 9 is an example of the ROI model in monitoring student discussion.
To engage students, having a conversation with them rather than selling to them will
influence their decision making. This strategy can create a trusting relationship with
guests and helps build a brand. Especially in higher education, trust is necessary (see
Figure 9 for a sample Facebook page from CSU Fresno).
As seen in Figure 9, the potential student is indecisive about CSU Fresno or
CSU Sacramento and may have made her decision in favor of CSU Fresno or
―converted‖ when the IMC department at CSU Fresno answered her right away.
Social media sites must also ―listen,‖ participate, and engage, three best practices that
the study participants clearly emphasized in the content-analysis data for the social
media guidelines (see Figure 10 for an example from CSU Fresno).
111
Figure 9. Fresno State‘s Facebook page.
Figure 10. Example of listening and participating on Facebook from CSU Fresno‘s
IMC department.
112
Recommendations for Future Studies
To further understand the ways in which higher learning institutions are using
social networks for marketing and other purposes, additional studies in this area need
to include a greater number of participants from a larger and more diverse set of
colleges and universities. A supplementary study would, similar to this study‘s
interview and survey, surveying students to understand what they have to say about
their motivation for engaging with university social network marketing. This
feedback would be invaluable for all schools running social network marketing
campaigns. In surveying students and involving them in focus groups, studies could
examine how social media messages sent by the IMC department are perceived by
students and other key constituent groups for the purpose of engagement.
By combining interviews and surveys, this study obtained critical data that can
dramatically influence the formation of uniform standards and guidelines for higher
institutions‘ use of social media. Such standards and guidelines can go a long way in
helping institutions maximize the use of social media, both in the instructional area
and in marketing. Social media marketing can take a substantial amount of staff time,
but because social networks are quickly becoming the most vital hub of human
interaction, they are essential to institutions wishing to remain relevant in the next
generation. Finally, a study is needed to better understand the congruency between
what IMC departments intend to convey in their social media messages and how
students actually perceive those messages. This comparison would help pinpoint
misinterpretations of key messages or student disengagement.
113
Summary
Chapter 5 presented an interpretation of the findings of the study.
Additionally, program objectives were re-iterated and recommendations for further
action and study were outlined. Based on the findings from the study, were derived
from interviews with three marketing directors, a survey with marketing directors at
CSU campuses, and review of social media guidelines, the researcher made important
recommendations for marketing directors at higher education institutions.
Recommendations were also outlined for further research that both directly and
indirectly connected to the issue of social media marketing in higher education.
This dissertation was presented in five chapters. The mixed-methods
exploratory study began by examining social media marketing in higher education
institutions. Data were collected through qualitative and quantitative methods and
interpreted according to relevant theoretical frameworks. Theoretical and practical
implications were drawn and recommendations made. Chapter One presented an
overview of the study, including a statement of the problem and the significance of a
study focusing on academic entitlement beliefs, behaviors, and actions. Chapter Two
provided a review of available literature on the history of community colleges, basic
skills, academic entitlement, and research methodology. Chapter Three focused on
the design of the study, and Chapter Four discussed the findings of the data.
This mixed method exploratory study has answered many questions, but also
created many more. Social media marketers, especially those in higher education,
need to understand the written and unwritten rules of using social media sites,
114
participate in communities on a regular basis, and capitalize on emerging trends.
Integrating social media marketing at any institution is a cost-effective tool versus
advertising in newspapers or magazines. Given the growing budget cuts affecting so
many universities, this cost-free form of advertising is a positive investment for the
long-term financial health of higher education institutions.
116
REFERENCES
Aaker, D. A. (1996). Building strong brands. New York, NY: Free Press.
About CSU (2011). Retrieved March 5, 2011 from http://www.calstate.edu
/explore/aboutcsu.shtml
Anctil, E. (2008a). Marketing and advertising the intangible. ASHE Higher Education
Report, 34(2), 31–47.
Anctil, E. (2008b). Market differentiation. ASHE Higher Education Report, 34(2),
49–88.
Anctil, E. (2008c). Recommendations for selling higher education. ASHE Higher
Education Report, 34(2), 89–98.
Barnett, N. (2007). The PR response to Virginia Tech and beyond. Communication
World, 24(4), 14–15.
Bell, J. (2010). Clearing the AIR. Communication World, 27(1), 27–30.
Bhargava, R. (2006, August 10). 5 rules of social media optimization. Influential
Marketing Blog. Retrieved from http://rohitbhargava.typepad.com/weblog
/2006/08/5_rules_of_soci.html
Bolman, L., & Deal, T. (2008). Reframing organization. San Francisco, CA. Josey–
Bass Imprint.
Bradley, P. (2009, May). Whither Twitter. Community College Week, 21(19), 6–8.
117
Brink-Drescher, J. (2010). The zen of social media marketing: An easier way to build
credibility, generate buzz, and increase revenue. Library Journal, 135(8), 80–
81.
Bulotaite, N. (2003). University heritage: An institutional tool for branding and
marketing. Higher Education in Europe, 28(4), 449–454.
Center, A., & Jackson, P. (1995). Public relations practices (5th ed.). Upper Saddle
River, NJ. Prentice Hall.
Chaffee, S. H., & McDevitt, M. (1996, Month). Disequilibration: Human
development and the shock of news. Presentation at the Association for
Education in Journalism and Mass Communication.
Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N.
K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.,
pp. 509–535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Cheater, M. (2008). How higher ed is using Facebook pages. Retrieved June 1, 2010
from http://www.academicagroup.com/node/4598
Christen, C., & Huberty, K. (2007). Media reach, media influence? The effects of
local media. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 84(2), 315–334.
Consortium, T. N. M. (2007). Social networking, the “third place,” and the evolution
of communication. E-book. The New Media Consortium. Retrieved from
http://www.nmc.org/pdf/Evolution-of-Communication.pdf
Crescenzo, S. (2009). Think differently. Again. Communication World, 26(4), 10–11.
118
Creswell, J. W. (2004). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating
quantitative and qualitative research (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill
Prentice Hall.
Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating
quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson
Prentice Hall.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano, V. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods
research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dawley, L. (2009). Social network knowledge construction: Emerging virtual world
pedagogy. http://edtech.boisestate.edu/ldawley/SNKC_pdf.pdf
Devrani, S. (2008, June 28). The growing role of media in our society. Merinews.
Retrieved from http://www.merinews.com/article/the-growing-role-of-media-
in-our-society/136579.shtml
Driscoll, D., Yeboah, A., Salib, P., & Rupert, D. (2007). Merging qualitative and
quantitative data in mixed methods research: How to and why not. Ecological
and Environmental Anthropology, 3(1), 19–28.
Duran, R., Yousman, B., Walsh, K., & Longshore, M. (2008). Holistic methods in
education: An assessment of the effectiveness of a college course in media
literacy. Communication Quarterly, 56(1), 49–68.
Edmundson, M. (2008, March 14). Dwelling in the possibilities. Chronicle of Higher
Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/Dwelling-in-
Possibilities/7083/
119
First Amendment: Religion and expression (n.d.). FindLaw. Retrieved from
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/constitution/amendment01/
Flick, U. (2006). An introduction to qualitative research (3rd ed.). London, England:
Sage.
Fowler, F. (2009). Policy studies for educational leaders (3rd ed.). Boston, MA.
Pearson Education.
Gastwirth, D. (2007). Reaching the Connected Generation. New England Journal of
Higher Education. 22(2), 26–27.
Gay. L. R, Mills, B., & Airasian, P. (2006). Competencies for analysis and
applications. Educational research (8th ed.). 163–173. Upper Saddle River,
NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Gillin, P (2007). The new influencers: A marketer’s guide to the new social media.
Sanger, CA: Quill Drivers Books.
Griswold, W. (2004). Culture and the cultural diamond: Cultures and societies in a
changing world (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
Gutek, G. (2001). Historical and philosophical foundations of education. Upper
Saddle River, NJ. Merrill Prentice Hall.
Henkel, M. (1997). Academic values and the university as corporate enterprise.
Higher Education Quarterly, 51(2), 134–143.
Infinite, A. (2011). Social media, chaos theory, and the butterfly effect. Retrieved
from http://www.selfgrowth.com/articles/social_media_chaos_theory_and
_the_butterfly_effect.html
120
Kaewsurin, N. (2008). Internal branding at higher education. Retrieved from
www.marketing.conferences.net/viewPDF.asp?conferenceID=1252&abstractI
D=22422
Kang, Y., & Cappella, J. (2008). Emotional reactions to and perceived effectiveness
of media messages: Appraisal and message sensation value. Western Journal
of Communication, 72(1), 40–61.
Kapferer, J. N. (2004). The new strategic brand management: Creating and
sustaining brand equity long term (3rd ed.). London, England: Kogan Page.
Kellner, D., & Share, J. (2005). Toward critical media literacy: Core concepts,
debates, organizations, and policy. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics
of Education, 26(3), 369–386.
Kinder, D. (2007). Curmudgeonly advice. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 155–
162.
Kohring, M., & Matthes, J. (2007). Trust in news media. Communication Research,
34(2), 231–252.
Kotrla, B. (2007). Sex and violence: Is exposure to media content harmful to
children? Children and Libraries: The Journal of the Association for Library
Service to Children, 5(2), 50–52.
Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of
Chicago Press.
Lipka, S. (2009). Colleges ―Don‘t Own the Conversation Anymore.‖ Chronicle of
Higher Education, 55(35), A4.
121
Lipka, S. (2009, April 29). Social media in admissions: No longer a choice. Chronicle
of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/blogs/wiredcampus
/social-media-in-admissions-no-longer-a-choice/4655
Marshall, C, & Rossman, G. B. (2006). Designing qualitative research (4th ed.).
Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
Matthes, J. (2006). The need for orientation towards news media: Revising and
validating a classic concept. International Journal of Public Opinion
Research, 18(4), 422–444.
McCombs, M., & Protess, D. L. (1991). Agenda setting: Reading on media, public
opinion, and policymaking. Hissdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
MySpace.com (2010). Press Room. Retrieved June 1, 2010 http://www.myspace
.com/pressroom/fact-sheet/
National, and Internet News on Public Opinion Inferences. Journalism and Mass
Communication Quarterly, 84(2), 315–334.
Nelson Laird, T., & Kuh, G. (2005). Student experiences with information technology
and their relationship to other aspects of student engagement. Research in
Higher Education, 46(2), 211–233.
Newman, F., Couturier, L., & Scurry, J. (2004). The future of higher education:
Rhetoric, reality, and the risks of the market (1st ed.). San Francisco, CA:
Jossey–Bass.
Oblinger, D. (2003). Understanding the new students. Educause Review, 38(4), 36.
122
Ormrod, J. E. (1999). Human learning (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice
Hall.
Oshiro, D. (2010, January 20). Why bloggers and agencies justify social media. Read
Write Start. Retrieved from http://www.readwriteweb.com/start/2010/01/why-
bloggers-and-agencies-just.php.
Paine, K. (2009). New school of thought. Communication World, 26(6), 20–24.
Qualman, E. (2007, December 27). Social search engine face-off: Facebook vs.
MySpace. Search Engine Watch. Retrieved from http://searchenginewatch
.com/article/2065089/
Reuben, R. (2008). The use of social media in higher education for marketing and
communications: A guide for professionals in higher education. Retrieved
http://www.ciff.net/seminarioformanciononline/DocumentoSeminarioII.pdf
Rideout, T., Frosse, A., & Appleton, A. (2008). News media use and Americans
perceptions of global threat. British Journal of Political Science, 38(4), 575–
593.
Robertson, E. (2007). What is knowledge? In J. P. Portelli & W. Hare (Eds.) 35 Key
Questions for Educators, (pp. 7–x). Halifax, Nova Scotia: Edphil Books.
Schultz, D., & Schultz, H. (1998). Refining brand management. Advertising Age,
69(48), 26–26.
Schwandt, T. A. (1994). Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry.
In K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp.
118–137). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
123
Scott, D. (2007). The new rules of marketing and PR. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley &
Sons.
Shaw, D., McCombs, M., Weaver, D., & Hamm, B. (1999). Individuals, groups, and
agenda melding: A theory of social dissonance. International Journal of
Public Opinion Research, 11(1), 2–24.
Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy:
Markets, state, and higher education. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins
University Press.
Snapstream.com (2009). Twitter. Retrieved June 1, 2010 from http://www
.snapstream.com/
Snell, J. (2009). Chaos theory and post modernism. Education, 130(2), 274–276.
Solis, B. (2008). Introducing the coversation prism. Retrieved from http://www
.briansolis.com/2008/08/introducing-conversationprism/
Temple, P. (2006). Branding higher education: Illusion or reality? Perspectives:
Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 10(1), 15–19.
Tromble, W. (1998). Excellence in advancement. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen.
Tsfati, Y. (2003). Does audience skepticism of the media matter in agenda setting.
Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 47, 157–160.
Umbach, P., & Wawrzynski, M. (2005). Faculty do matter: The role of college
faculty in student learning and engagement. Research in Higher Education,
46(2), 153–184.
124
University of Tennessee (2008). Marketing and communication department.
Retrieved from http://future.tennessee.edu/book/toolkit.shtml.
Vettehen, P., Nuijten, K., & Peeters, A. (2008). Explaining effects of sensationalism
on liking of television news stories. Communication Research, 35(3), 319–
338.
Volkmann, F. M. (1998). Crisis communication: Make the best of a bad situation.
Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen.
Volkmann, F. M. (1998). Public relations begin at home: Why good internal
communications are vital. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen.
Wasley, P. (2006). Underrepresented students benefit most from ‗engagement.‘
Chronicle of Higher Education, 53(13), A39–A40.
Weaver, D. (2007). Thoughts on agenda setting, framing, and priming. Journal of
Communication, 57(1), 142–147.
Weinberg, T. (2010). The new community rules: Marketing on the social web.
Sebastobol, CA: O‘Reilly.
Yosemite Community College District Fact Sheet. (2010). Retrieved March 5, 2011
from http://www.yosemite.edu/externalaffairs/2011%20FACT%20
SHEET.pdf
126
APPENDIX A
DRAFT INTERVIEW QUESTIONS
1. Do you have a social media site?
2. How often do you use your social media site?
3. Do you think it is important in today‘s world to have a social media site?
4. Do you strategically target your social media messages?
5. What type of messages do you like to send out?
6. How often do you send out messages through social media? Daily, twice a
day, monthly, weekly?
7. Have you had to hire a social media specialist?
8. With today‘s budget cuts, student enrollment being slashed, do you still feel it
is necessary to market to incoming students?
9. How often have you had to train faculty or administration on social media
practices and your department?
10. Do you feel that social media will grow and be an important tool in the next
five years for higher education institutions?
11. Do you have any Social Media guidelines that you have presented to the
institutions?
12. Do other departments in your institutions have a Social Media site and how
often do you monitor the sites?
127
APPENDIX B
PILOT TEST INSTRUMENT FOR THE INTERVIEW QUESTIONS
Protocol for Pilot Testing of Marketing Professionals Interview Questions*
Time Required: Approximately 1 hour
Subjects: 4-6 persons
Purpose: As part of a research project to fulfill a doctoral dissertation, I am
developing several interview questions designed to asses marketing professional
beliefs, behaviors, and actions about social media. I appreciate your willingness to
help pilot test the interview questions and provide me some feedback on your
understanding and perception of the interview questions. Your individual responses
in the pilot test phase are not going to be recorded or reported to anyone except those
who are designing the interview questions.
Process:
1. The researcher will make copies of the interview questions.
2. Please note how much time is required to answer all items.
3. Once you have completed the survey, please respond to each survey item in
four ways.
a. Understandable: Was the item ―understandable.‖ This is, did you
have to read the item more than once to understand what it was
asking? Was the meaning of the question clear and straightforward?
b. Only one response: Was the item written in such a way that you
could have answered it more than one way? (e.g., could you have said
BOTH ―very little‖ and ―very much‖?).
c. Loaded: In your opinion, was the item written in such a way that
there was ONLY one OBVIOUS answer to you? In other words, the
way the item is worded, it is highly unlikely that respondents,
regardless of cohort group, would be able to respond using more than
one response choice.
4. Please circle yes/no for each item.
5. If you circled ―no,‖ please explain why in the comment box.
128
Interview Question Understandable?
Only one
response? Loaded? Comments
Do you have a social media
site?
Yes No YES
NO
YES
NO
How often do you use your
social media site?
Yes No YES
NO
YES
NO
Do you think it is important in
today‘s world to have a social
media site?
Yes No YES
NO
YES
NO
Do you strategically target your
social media messages?
Yes No YES
NO
YES
NO
What type of messages do you
like to send out?
Yes No YES
NO
YES
NO
How often do you send out
messages through social
media? Daily, twice a day,
monthly, weekly?
Yes No YES
NO
YES
NO
Have you had to hire a social
media specialist?
Yes No YES
NO
YES
NO
With today‘s budget cuts,
student enrollment being
slashed, do you still feel it is
necessary to market to
incoming students?
Yes No YES
NO
YES
NO
How often have you had to
train faculty or administration
on social media practices and
your department?
Yes No YES
NO
YES
NO
Do you feel that social media
will grow and be an important
tool in the next five years for
higher education institutions?
Yes No YES
NO
YES
NO
Do you have any Social Media
guidelines that you have
presented to the institutions?
Yes No YES
NO
YES
NO
Do other departments in your
institutions have a Social
Media site and how often do
you monitor the sites?
Yes No YES
NO
YES
NO
*Format adopted from Sample Protocol for Pilot Testing Survey Items by Gloria Rogers, ABET, Inc.
These are sample interview questions. The final interview questions will be piloted in the same
manner as outlined above.
129
APPENDIX C
SURVEY DRAFT QUESTIONS
1. It is important to have a social media site for our institution.
2. We use social media at our institution daily.
3. Social media is an important branding tool for higher education.
4. Our institution strategically targets our social media messages.
5. Our institution sends out key messages to various constituents within our
institution.
6. It is important to send out social media messages daily.
7. Faculty and administration help us gather social media messages.
8. We only target incoming students
9. Our marketing office trains faculty and administration on social media on a
regular basis.
10. Our institution feels that social media will grow rapidly in the next five years.
130
APPENDIX D
PILOT TEST INSTRUMENT FOR THE SURVEY QUESTIONS
Protocol for Pilot Testing of all 23 CSU Campuses Survey Questions*
Time Required: Approximately 1 hour
Subjects: 4-6 persons
Purpose: As part of a research project to fulfill a doctoral dissertation, I am
developing a survey designed to asses marketing professional beliefs, behaviors, and
actions about social media. I appreciate your willingness to help pilot test the survey
questions and provide me some feedback on your understanding and perception of the
survey questions. Your individual responses in the pilot test phase are not going to be
recorded or reported to anyone except those who are designing the interview
questions.
Process:
1. The researcher will make copies of the interview questions.
2. Please note how much time is required to answer all items.
3. Once you have completed the survey, please respond to each survey item in
four ways.
a. Understandable: Was the item ―understandable.‖ This is, did you
have to read the item more than once to understand what it was
asking? Was the meaning of the question clear and straightforward?
b. Scale Adequate: Was the scale adequate? That is, do you feel the
scale provided you with an appropriate way to respond?
c. Only one response: Was the item written in such a way that you
could have answered it more than one way? (E.g., could you have said
BOTH ―very little‖ and ―very much‖?).
d. Loaded: In your opinion, was the item written in such a way that
there was ONLY one OBVIOUS answer to you? In other words, the
way the item is worded, it is highly unlikely that respondents,
regardless of cohort group, would be able to respond using more than
one response choice.
4. Please circle yes/no for each item.
5. If you circled ―no,‖ please explain why in the comment box.
131
Survey Questions Understandable?
Scale
Adequate?
Only one
response? Loaded? Comments
It is important to have a social
media site for our institution?
Yes No YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
We use social media at our
institution daily.
Yes No YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
Social media is an important
branding tool for higher
education.
Yes No YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
Our institution strategically
targets our social media
messages.
Yes No YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
Our institution sends out key
messages to various
constituents within our
institution.
Yes No YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
It is important to send out
social media messages daily.
Yes No YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
Faculty and administration
help us gather social media
messages.
Yes No YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
We only target incoming
students
Yes No YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
Our marketing office trains
faculty and administration on
social media on a regular
basis.
Yes No YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
Our institution feels that
social media will grow
rapidly in the next five years.
Yes No YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
132
APPENDIX E
REQUEST LETTER FOR INTERVIEWS AND
SURVEY PARTICIPANT CONSENT FORM
Letter Request for Interviews
Dear_______________
You are being asked to participate in a research project that is being done to fulfill
requirements for a Doctoral degree in Educational Leadership at CSU Stanislaus.
We are examining internet social media in higher education. If you decide to
volunteer in this study, you will be asked to answer questions regarding social
media at your institution. These questions will be asked of you during a recorded
interview with the researcher. The interview should take about one hour long and
will be schedule at a time and location that works best for you. A total of three
people will be interviewed from various levels of higher education institutions.
There are no known risks to you for your participation in this study.
It is possible that you will not benefit directly by participating in this study. The
information collected will be protected from all inappropriate disclosure under the
law. All data will be maintained for a period of one year from the completion of
the study and will be destroyed. Only the researcher and transcriber will have
access to the data which can be linked to individual subjects. The researcher will
provide each participant and institution with a pseudonym for any actual written
papers in relations to this study.
There is no cost to you beyond the time and effort required to complete the
procedure(s) described above. Your participation is voluntary. Refusal to
participate in this study will involve no penalty or loss benefits. You may
withdraw at any time without penalty or loss of benefits.
If you agree to participate, please indicate this decision by signing below. If you
have any questions about this research project, please contact me, Adrenna
Alkhas, at 209-484-2683 or my faculty sponsor, Dr. Jim Riggs at 209-664-6789.
If you have any questions regarding your rights and participation as a research
project, please contact the Campus Compliance Department, California State
University, Stanislaus at 209-667-3747.
Only people 18 years of age or older will be allowed to participate in the study.
Signature: _____________________________ Date:________________________
133
Consent Form for Survey Participants
Dear_______________
You are being asked to participate in a research project that is being done to fulfill
requirements for a Doctoral degree in Educational Leadership at CSU Stanislaus.
We are examining internet social media in higher education. If you decide to
volunteer in this study, you will be asked to answer questions regarding social
media at your institution. These questions will be asked of you through a survey
questionnaire. The survey should take about 20 minutes long. A total of 23 CSU
campuses from the institutions professional marketing department will be
partaking in this survey: There are no known risks to you for your participation in
this study.
It is possible that you will not benefit directly by participating in this study. The
information collected will be protected from all inappropriate disclosure under the
law. All data will be maintained for a period of one year from the completion of
the study and will be destroyed. Only the researcher and transcriber will have
access to the data which can be linked to individual subjects. The researcher will
provide each participant and institution with a pseudonym for any actual written
papers in relations to this study.
There is no cost to you beyond the time and effort required to complete the
procedure(s) described above. Your participation is voluntary. Refusal to
participate in this study will involve no penalty or loss benefits. You may
withdraw at any time without penalty or loss of benefits.
If you agree to participate, please indicate this decision by signing below. If you
have any questions about this research project, please contact me, Adrenna
Alkhas, at 209-484-2683 or my faculty sponsor, Dr. Jim Riggs at 209-664-6789.
If you have any questions regarding your rights and participation as a research
project, please contact the Campus Compliance Department, California State
University, Stanislaus at 209-667-3747.
Only people 18 years of age or older will be allowed to participate in the study.
Signature: _____________________________ Date:______________________
134
APPENDIX F
SURVEY QUESTIONS ADMINISTERED TO THE CSU CAMPUSES
Survey:
This questionnaire is a part of the research for a doctoral dissertation at CSU
Stanislaus Educational Leadership Program. The results of this survey will be used
for academic purposes only. The survey is anonymous and does not require any
personal details to be submitted.
Estimated time for this questionnaire completion is 8-10 minutes. Aggregated
research data will be available for you upon survey completion. By completing this
survey you are agreeing to participate.
The research team greatly appreciates your help and support with this research and
thanks you for your valuable contribution!
Social Media Definition: Social media comprises of activities that involve socializing
and networking online through words, pictures and videos. Social media is redefining
how many people can relate to each other and how people can relate to the
organizations that serve their communities.
1. Demographic information
a. Name
b. Institution
c. Email address
d. Phone number
2. How long has your PR/Marketing department been using social media
networking sites?
a. Less than 1 year
b. 1-2 years
c. 2-3 y ears
d. Our PR/Marketing Department does not use social media networking
sites
3. Click on the following social media sites you use for your institution.
a. Facebook
b. Twitter
135
c. MySpace
d. LinkedIn
e. YouTube
f. Flikr
g. Blogger.com
h. Foursquare
i. Friendster
j. Bebo
k. Xing
l. Other
4. To what level do you agree with the following statements: (5-point likert
scale, 5 being Strongly Agree to 1 being Strongly Disagree).
a. I believe it is important to have several social media sites at our
institution
b. Social Media is an important branding tool at our institution.
c. Social media is an important tool for crisis communication at our
institution.
d. Social media is an effective tool to gain community support at our
institution.
e. Social media is an effective tool to increase enrollment for traditional
age students.
f. Social media is an effective tool to increase enrollment for
nontraditional age students (25 and older).
g. Social media is an effective tool to gain external resources.
h. It is important to send out daily social media messages to our
followers.
5. Please answer the following statements (5 point likert scale, Very frequently
being 5 to very infrequently being 1)
a. We use social media at our institution
b. Our department strategically targets our social media messages
c. Our department sends out key messages to various constituents within
our institution.
d. Faculty and administration help our department generate social media
messages.
e. Faculty and administration help our department answer comments
from our social media sites.
f. Most of our social media messages target incoming students.
g. Our department offers training sessions for faculty and administration
on social media.
136
h. Faculty and administration take advantage of our training sessions.
6. How satisfied are you with the social media sites that your PR/Marketing
Department is using? (Likert-scale)
a. Very Satisfied
b. Satisfied
c. Neither satisfied or dissatisfied
d. Dissatisfied
e. Very Dissatisfied
Comment_________________________________________
7. How satisfied are you with the response rate you receive through your
PR/Marketing Departments social media sites? (Likert-scale)
a. Very Satisfied
b. Satisfied
c. Neither satisfied or dissatisfied
d. Dissatisfied
e. Very Dissatisfied
Comment_________________________________________
8. How often does your PR/Marketing department use social media networking
sites for marketing purposes?
a. Daily
b. 1-3 times a week
c. 1-3 times a month
d. Monthly
e. Less than once a month
f. Never
Comment _________________________________________
9. What are your PR/Marketing Department‘s primary goals for the use of social
media?
a. Understand student concerns/perspectives on university related issues
b. Increase sponsors and/or grants
c. Seeking growth in enrollment
d. Recognize the institutional brand
e. Promote events
137
f. All of the above
g. None of the above
h. Other
Comment _________________________________________
10. What are the most significant barriers to adopting social media within your
PR/Marketing department?
a. Lack of time
b. Lack of assessment measures
c. Lack of support from senior institutional leaders
d. Lack of adequate tech support
e. Resistance from other PR/Marketing staff members
f. Other
Comment _________________________________________
11. How satisfied are you with the level of support your PR/Marketing
department has received from senior management about social media? (5-
Point Likert Scale)
a. Very Satisfied
b. Satisfied
c. Neither satisfied or dissatisfied
d. Dissatisfied
e. Very Dissatisfied
Comment_________________________________________
12. Does your PR/Marketing department have any social media guidelines,
policies, or procedures for the institution?
a. Yes
b. No
13. If Yes, would you be willing to make these guidelines available to the
researcher?
a. Yes
b. No
138
14. Do they have specific staffing within the PR department assigned to social
media?
a. Yes
b. No
15. If yes, what are the expectations of the percent of time used on social media?
a. 0-25%
b. 26%-50%
c. 51%-75%
d. 75%-100%
Comment_________________________________________
16. May the researcher contact you?
a. Yes
b. No
17. Plaese provide any additional comments or information that may be helpful.