European Journal of Scientific Research
ISSN: 1450-216X / 1450-202X Vol. 95 No 1 January, 2013, pp.50-62
© EuroJournals Publishing, Inc. 2012
http://www.europeanjournalofscientificresearch.com
Kinetic and Thermodynamic Studies of Chromium (VI)
Biosorption on Sporosarcina Pasteurii
K. Chithra
Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board, Chennai, India
E-mail Address: [email protected]
Anil Mapari
Department of Biotechnology, SRM University
Kattankulathur, Chennai, India
M. Somasundaram
Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board, Chennai, India
Lima Rose Miranda
Department of Chemical Engineering
A.C.Tech, Anna University, Chennai, India
Abstract
The removal of toxic heavy metal ions from wastewater is of great importance. In
this study, the biosorption of Cr(VI) ion onto Sporosarcina pasteurii was investigated in
the batch mode by considering the effects of various parameters like pH, contact time,
initial concentration and temperature. Optimum adsorption of Cr (VI) took place at the pH
value of 4.0, biomass dose of 0.8 g and temperature of 303K. Equilibrium isotherms,
kinetic data, and thermodynamic parameters have been evaluated. Equilibrium data agreed
well with the Langmuir isotherm model. The kinetic data was found to follow the pseudo-
second-order model. The thermodynamic parameters Gibbs free energy (∆G◦), enthalpy
(∆H◦), and entropy (∆S◦) changes were also calculated. The numerical values of
thermodynamic parameters indicated the exothermic nature, spontaneity and feasibility of
the sorption process. Further, the biosorbent was characterized by Fourier Transform
Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). FTIR studies
indicated the involvement of various functional groups present on biomass surface in the
sorption of Cr(VI).
Keywords: Biosorption, Chromium (VI), Langmuir, Freundlich
1. Introduction The removal of toxic metal ions from wastewater is an important and widely studied research area.
Chromium (VI) is a hazardous heavy metal found in the effluents of industries like electroplating, the
manufacture of dyes and pigments, wood preserving, textiles, rubbers, leather and cement. In addition,
chromium (VI) has been reported to be carcinogenic to humans (Karthikeyan et al, 2005). Due to the
toxic effect it is necessary to eliminate chromium from the contaminated effluent. Conventional
Kinetic and Thermodynamic Studies of Chromium (VI) Biosorption on Sporosarcina Pasteurii 51
technologies used for the removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous solutions includes reduction (Kim et al,
2002), reduction followed by chemical precipitation (Ozer et al, 1997), adsorption on activated
carbon(Sarin et al, 2006), ion exchange (Rengaraj et al, 2003), lime coagulation, reverse osmosis and
solvent extraction ( Volesky, 2001; Juang and Shiau, 2000; Yan and Virarghavan, 2001), most of these
methods have drawbacks such as high capital or operational cost. Besides the disposal of the residual
metal sludge, it is not suitable for small-scale industries ( Kobya et al, 2005). In such a scenario, the
removal of heavy metal from aqueous solutions by biosorption is a promising and innovative
technology using inactive and dead biomass.
The biosorption technique offers the advantages of low operating costs, reduced amount of
chemical and/or biological sludge to be disposed of and high efficiency in decontaminating effluents
with dilute metal ion content (Brady et al, 1999; Huang et al, 2003; Kumar et al, 2006; Fiol et al, 2006;
Pamukoglu and Kargi, 2006; Mack et al, 2007; Pradhan et al, 2007; Yu et al, 2007; Goksungur et al,
2005). The use of dead microbial cells is more advantageous because they are not affected by toxic
wastes and do not require a continuous supply of nutrients. They can also be regenerated and reused for
many cycles (Vijayaraghavan and Yun, 2008; Gupta and Rastogi, 2008). The biosorption mechanism
depends on the type of functional groups on the surface of the biomass, the nature of the metal and the
characteristics of the matrix around the biosorbent species. However, the exact adsorption mechanism
is not well understood yet. Numerous chemical groups have been suggested to contribute to the metal
binding by bacteria (Mann, 1990). These groups include hydroxyl, carbonyl, carboxyl, thioether,
sulfonate, amine, amide, imidazole, phosphonate, and phosphodiester.
The present work investigates the potential use of Sporosarcina pasteurii biomass as metal
sorbent for chromium removal from the aqueous solution. Optimum biosorption conditions were
determined as a function of pH, biomass dosage, contact time, and temperature. The Langmuir and
Freundlich isotherms were used to describe equilibrium isotherms. Biosorption mechanisms were also
evaluated in terms of their thermodynamics and kinetics. The role played by the functional groups
present in the biomass in sorption was also determined by FTIR and SEM
2. Materials and Methods 2.1. Biomass Preparation and Pretreatment
Gram positive microorganism Sporosarcina pasteurii (2477) used for the study was purchased from
National Collection of Industrial Microorganisms (NCIM), Pune, India. The Bacterial strain was
preserved on nutrient agar slants and sub cultured every four weeks. This strain was grown in nutrient
medium and appropriate proportion was used for the experiment. Standard sterile techniques were used
for the inoculation of culture. Medium used for the microorganism and all the glassware were properly
sterilized in an autoclave at a pressure of 15 psi and 121ºC for 30 minutes. Loop full of bacterial
culture was taken from the nutrient agar slants and used as an inoculum for 150 ml nutrient broth (seed
culture). After an overnight incubation at 120 rpm and 30ºC, 10% of this seed culture was used for
inoculating 1000 ml nutrient broth in Erlenmeyer flask. The inoculated flask was incubated in an
orbital shaker at 120 rpm and 300C for 2 days to obtain the biomass. After the incubation, biomass was
centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 minutes. The supernatant was discarded and the cells were re-
suspended in water for washing and again centrifuged as above to make sure that no media remains on
the cell surface. The biomass was heat killed in a conventional hot air oven at 60 oC for 24 hrs. This
biomass was used for the sorption experiment.
2.2. Chromium Solution and Analysis
The stock solution of Cr (VI) (1000 mgl−1
) was prepared in deionized water with potassium dichromate
(K2Cr2O7). All working concentration was obtained by diluting the stock solution with deionized water
and the pH was adjusted to the desired value using 1M HCl and 1M NaOH solution. The concentration
of the Cr(VI) ions was determined spectrophotometrically after complexation of the metal ion with 1,5-
52 K. Chithra, Anil Mapari, M. Somasundaram and Lima Rose Miranda
diphenylcarbazide (Eaton et al, 1995). The absorbance was recorded at 540 nm using UV
spectrophotometer (Elico SL 159, India) and concentration was determined from the calibration curve.
2.3. Batch Biosorption Studies
The biosorption experiment was carried out using the batch equilibrium technique at different pH
values (3.0, 3.5, 4.0 and 4.5) and temperatures (20, 30 and 40◦C). Chromium (VI) ions test solutions
were agitated in a shaker at 180rpm for adsorption equilibrium. Equilibrium biosorption study was
performed by using 8g l-1
of the dried biomass. Samples were taken at definite intervals (0, 5, 15, 30,
45, 60, 75, 90,105min) for the residual metal ion concentrations in the solution. Before analysis the
samples were centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min, and then the supernatant fractions were separated
and analyzed for the remaining metal ions. Isotherm studies were recorded by varying the
concentration of chromium from 10 to 50mgl−1
.The adsorption capacity qe (mgg−1
) after equilibrium
was calculated by the following equation:
m
xVCCmggq eo
e
)()( 1 −
=− (1)
V is the volume of the solution (l) and m is mass of adsorbent (g).
3. Result and Discussion 3.1. Effect of pH on Cr (VI) Biosorption
pH is an important factor affecting biosorption of metal ions. Fig.1 shows the adsorption capacity at
different pH. It can be observed from the figure that the uptake of Cr(VI) increases with increase in pH.
The sharp decrease in adsorption above pH 4.0 may be due to occupation of the adsorption sites by
anionic species like HCrO4-; Cr2O7
2-; CrO4
2-. These species retard the approach of such ions further
toward the sorbent surface (Das et al, 2000; Donmez and Aksu, 2002). However, at pH less than 4.0 a
decrease in adsorption capacity is observed due to the chromium being present predominantly as
H2CrO4.
Figure 1: Effect of pH on adsorption capacity at Initial concentration of 10 mg l
-1; 180rpm; Biomass: 0.8g.
Kinetic and Thermodynamic Studies of Chromium (VI) Biosorption on Sporosarcina Pasteurii 53
3.2. Effect of Biomass Dosage
The biomass dosage is an important parameter because this determines the capacity of the biosorbent
for a given initial concentration. The effect of biomass dosage for the removal Cr(VI) was studied by
varying the amount of biomass from 0.1 to 1.0 g (100 mL)−1
, while keeping other parameters (pH 4,
agitation speed 180 rpm, temperature 303Kand contact time 90min) constant and is shown in Fig. 2..
The amount of metal ions adsorbed per unit weight of adsorbent (qe) decreases with increase in
biomass dosage (6.6 to 0.92 mg g-1
).This is due to the fact that at higher biomass dose, the solution
metal ion concentration drops to a lower value and the system reaches equilibrium at lower values of
‘qe’ indicating the adsorption sites remain unsaturated.
This is due to the fact that the actual number of active sites per gram of adsorbent does not
increase proportionately and hence there is a regular decrease in adsorption capacity (Helen Kalavathy
and Lima Rose Miranda, 2010).
Figure 2: Effect of biomass dosage on the adsorption capacity at 10 mgl
-1; pH: 4; contact time: 90min;
temperature: 303K
3.3. Effect of Initial Metal Concentration and Time
When the initial metal ions concentration was varied from 10 to 50 mgl-1
at temperature 303K, the
biosorption efficiency of chromium ions to the biomass decreased as the initial concentration of metal
ions was increased (Fig.3). This may be due to the increase in the number of ions competing for the
available binding sites in the biomass for complexation of Cr (VI) ions at higher concentration (Bai and
Abraham, 2003; Puranik and Paknikar, 1999). As can be seen in Fig. 3, the percentage removal of ion
increased with the time of shaking and attained an optimum at 90 min which indicates that the
adsorption tend towards saturation. Hence the contact time of 90 minutes was taken to be the
equilibrium time.
54 K. Chithra, Anil Mapari, M. Somasundaram and Lima Rose Miranda
Figure 3: Effect of initial metal concentration and time on percentage removal at pH: 4; 180rpm; Biomass:
0.8gl-1
3.4. FTIR Analysis
One important characteristic of a biosorbent is the presence of surface functional group, which is
largely characterized by the FTIR spectroscopy method. Various researchers have suggested that the
functional groups such as carboxyl, hydroxyl, amide etc. are responsible for biosorption of metal ions
(Park et al, 2005; Tunali et al, 2006), these functional groups are the potential sites for adsorption and
the uptake of metal depends on the various factors such as abundance of site, their accessibility,
chemical state and affinity between the adsorption site and metal. The FTIR spectra of unloaded
Sporosarcina pasteurii and metal loaded Sporosarcina pasteurii biomass in the range of 450–4000cm−1
was performed to find out which functional group is responsible for the biosorption process (Fig. 4). IR
absorption bands and corresponding possible groups are tabulated in table 1. These bands are the
functional groups of Sporosarcina pasteurii which participated in Cr (VI) biosorption.
Figure 4: Infrared spectra of the biomass: (a) before and (b) after Cr(VI) sorption
Kinetic and Thermodynamic Studies of Chromium (VI) Biosorption on Sporosarcina Pasteurii 55
Table 1: IR absorption bands and corresponding possible groups
Biosorbent Surface functional group Wave numbers
Sporosarcina pasteurii biomass
–OH and –NH stretching 3400
–CH2 asymmetric stretching 2928
–CH2 symmetric stretching 2854
C=O 1654
N–H bending 1458
Sulfamide bonds (SO) 1248
C–O stretch 1021
3.5. SEM and EDAX Analysis
SEM micrographs and EDAX spectra obtained before and after chromium biosorption onto
Sporosarcina pasteurii biomass is presented in Figs. 5-8 these micrographs indicate the presence of
new particles over the surface of chromium-loaded Sporosarcina pasteurii cells confirming the
biosorption phenomenon. This observation was confirmed by EDAX analysis which revealed Cr (VI)
signals together with the presence of gold peaks in all spectra.
Figure 5: Typical SEM micrograph of Sporosarcina pasteurii
Figure 6: Typical SEM micrograph of Sporosarcina pasteurii (Cr (VI) loaded)
56 K. Chithra, Anil Mapari, M. Somasundaram and Lima Rose Miranda
Figure 7: EDAX spectra of heat inactivated Sporosarcina pasteurii
Figure 8: EDAX spectra of heat inactivated Sporosarcina pasteurii (Cr (VI) loaded).
3.6. Adsorption Isotherms
Analysis of equilibrium data is important for developing an equation that can be used for design
purposes. Langmuir and Freundlich models have been extensively used to describe the equilibrium
established between metal ions adsorbed on the biomass (qe) and metal ions remaining in the solution
(Ce) at a constant temperature. The Langmuir equation refers to a monolayer sorption onto the surface
containing a finite number of accessible sites:
The mathematical expression of the Langmuir isotherm is given as
max
1
Q bCeq
e bCe
=
+
(2)
The linearization of equation (2) is given as
1
max max
C Ce e
q Q b Qe= + (3)
where Ce is the equilibrium concentration (mg/l) and qe the amount adsorbed at equilibrium (mg/g).
The Langmuir constants Qmax (mg/g) represent the maximum adsorption capacity and b (l/mg) relates
the heat of adsorption.
Kinetic and Thermodynamic Studies of Chromium (VI) Biosorption on Sporosarcina Pasteurii 57
The Freundlich isotherm is an empirical model relating to the adsorption intensity of the
sorbent towards adsorbent. The isotherm is adopted to describe reversible adsorption and not restricted
to monolayer formation. The mathematical expression of the Freundlich model is 1/n
e F eq K C= (4)
where KF and n are the constants which denotes adsorption capacity and adsorption intensity
respectively. A linear form of the Freundlich model can be written as follows
e F e
1ln q ln K ln C
n= + (5)
A plot of ln qe versus ln Ce gives a straight line with slope KF and intercepts 1/n. The theoretical
parameters of isotherms along with regression coefficients are listed in Table 2. The isotherms are
compared based on the parameter values with experimental data at 303K as shown in Fig. 9. The
isotherm parameters for both the equations along with the values of coefficient of correlation (R2)
(table 2) shows that the data fits the Langmuir equation better than Freundlich equation.
Figure 9: Adsorption isotherms at pH 4.0 and T = 303K
Table 2: Langmuir and Freundlich model parameters at different pH conditions for (VI) by Sporosarcina
pasteurii
pH Langmuir parameters Freundlich parameters
Qmax (mg/g) b (l/mg) R2 KF (l/g) n R
2
3 5.24 0.21 0.996 1.14 2.11 0.984
3.5 5.49 0.22 0.998 1.18 2.02 0.978
4 5.71 0.27 0.999 1.26 1.90 0.964
4.5 5.5 0.23 0.994 1.17 1.98 0.956
3.7. Biosorption Kinetics
In order to study the biosorption kinetics of Cr (IV) ions onto Sporosarcina pasteurii biomass, two
kinetic models, Lagergren’s pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order were applied to the
experimental data. The linearized form of the pseudo-first-order rate equation (Karthikeyan et al,
2005), is given as
1e t e
klog(q q ) log q t
2.303− = − (6)
58 K. Chithra, Anil Mapari, M. Somasundaram and Lima Rose Miranda
where qe (mgg-1
)denotes equilibrium concentration of Cr(VI)in solution, qt (mgg-1)represents residual
concentration and k1 (min-1
) is first order rate constant the slope and intercept of plot log (qe −qt) versus
t were used to determine the pseudo-first-order rate constant k1. In order to obtain the rate constants
and equilibrium metal uptake, the straight-line plots of log (qe-qt) against t of Equation (6) were made
at different initial metal concentrations (not shown). It was concluded from the R2 values in table 3.
that the biosorption mechanism of Cr (VI) onto Sporosarcina pasteurii biomass does not follow the
pseudo-first-order kinetic model.
Experimental data was also tested by the pseudo-second order kinetic model which is given in
the following form (Karthikeyan et al, 2005).
2
t 2 e e
t 1 1t
q k q q= + (7)
where k2 (g mg-1
min-1
) is the second order rate constant. The linear plot of t/qt versus t for the pseudo-
second order model for the biosorption at 30 ◦C is shown in Fig 10.The rate constants (k2), the R
2 and
qe values are given in table 3. It is clear from these results that the R2 values are very high. In addition,
the theoretically calculated qe values are closer to the experimental qe values. In the view of these
results, it can be said that the pseudo-second-order kinetic model provided a good correlation for the
biosorption of Cr (VI) onto Sporosarcina pasteurii in contrast to the pseudo-first-order model.
Figure 10: Pseudo-second-order kinetics for adsorption of chromium on Sporosarcina pasteurii at 303K
Table 3: Kinetic parameters for chromium biosorption onto Sporosarcina pasteurii at different initial metal
concentrations
C0 (mg/l) (qe)exp
(mg/g)
Pseudo-first order Pseudo-second order
K1 (1/min) qe (mg/g) R2
K2 (g/mg
min) qe (mg/g) R
2
10 1.25 0.008 0.488 0.083 0.045293 1.42 0.992
20 2.5 0.013 1.36 0.378 0.012468 3.09 0.981
30 3.75 0.011 1.42 0.153 0.006514 4.83 0.973
40 5 0.017 3.82 0.905 0.045293 5.3 0.990
50 6.25 0.018 5.61 0.966 0.002726 6.6 0.991
Kinetic and Thermodynamic Studies of Chromium (VI) Biosorption on Sporosarcina Pasteurii 59
3.8. Effect of Temperature
The adsorption of Cr (VI) onto Sporosarcina pasteurii at different temperatures shows an increase in
the adsorption capacity with the increase in temperature (Fig.11).When temperature is increased from
293 to 323 K, the adsorption capacity increased for the initial concentration of 30 mgl-1
at pH 4.0.
Similar trend is observed for all the other concentrations also. This indicates that the adsorption
reaction is endothermic in nature. The enhancement in the adsorption capacity may be due to the
chemical interaction between adsorbate and adsorbent, creation of some new adsorption sites or the
increased rate of intraparticle diffusion of Cr (VI) ions into the pores of the adsorbent at higher
temperatures (Namasivayam and Yamuna, 1995). The standard Gibb’s energy was evaluated by
ln cG RT K∆ = − (8)
The equilibrium constants Kc was evaluated at each temperature using the following
relationship
AEc
e
CK
C= (9)
where CAE is the amount adsorbed on solid at equilibrium and Ce is the equilibrium concentration. The
other thermodynamic parameters such as change in standard enthalpy (∆H◦) and standard entropy (∆S
◦)
were determined using the following equations
lnc
S HK
R RT
∆ ° ∆ °= − (10)
∆H◦ and ∆ S
◦ were obtained from the slope and intercept of the Van’t Hoff’s plot of lnKc versus
1/T as shown in Fig. 12. Positive value of ∆H◦ indicates that the adsorption process is endothermic. The
negative values of ∆G◦ reflect the feasibility of the process and the values become more negative with
increase in temperature. Table 4 summarizes the result.
Figure 11: Effect of temperature on percentage removal at initial concentration of 30 mg l
-1 pH: 4; 180rpm;
Biomass: 0.8gl-1
.
60 K. Chithra, Anil Mapari, M. Somasundaram and Lima Rose Miranda
Figure 12: Plot of ln Kc vs. 1/T for the estimation of thermodynamic parameters for biosorption of Cr (VI) onto
Sporosarcina pasteurii biomass
Table 4: Thermodynamic parameters of Sporosarcina pasteurii at initial concentration of 10mg l
-1, pH: 4
T(K) ∆G(kJ/mol) ∆H(kJ/mol) ∆S(J/mol k)
293 -2.064
22.506 83.78018 303 -2.835
313 -3.742
4. Conclusions The experiments conducted with the biosorption showed that Sporosarcina pasteurii can remove Cr
(VI) by biosorption. It was also observed that the maximum biosorption at pH 4.0. The adsorption
equilibrium data has been fitted very well to Langmuir than Freundlich adsorption model. The sorption
capacity was found to increase with the increase in solute concentration and temperature. The rate of
sorption was found to follow pseudo-second order kinetics. Further from the value of ∆H◦ it is revealed
that the biosorption process is endothermic.
References [1] Bai, S.R. and T.E.Abraham, 2003. “Studies on Chromium (VI) adsorption–desorption using
immobilized fungal biomass”, Bioresour. Technol., 87, pp.17.
[2] Brady, J.M., J.M.Tobin, and J.C.Roux, 1999. “Continuous fixed bed biosorption of Cu2+
ions:
application of a simple two parameter mathematical model”, J.Chem. Technol. Biotechnol, 74,
pp.71.
[3] Das, D.D., R.Mahapatra, J.Pradhan, S.N.Das, and R.S.Thakur, 2000. “Removal of Cr (VI) from
aqueous solution using activated cow dung carbon”, Journal of Colloids and Interface Science
232(2), pp.235.
[4] Donmez, D. and Z. Aksu, 2002. “Removal of chromium (VI) from saline wastewaters by
Dunaliella species”, Process Biochemistry, 38 (5), pp.751.
Kinetic and Thermodynamic Studies of Chromium (VI) Biosorption on Sporosarcina Pasteurii 61
[5] Eaton, A.D., L.S.Clesceri, and A.E.Greenberg, 1995.Standards Methods for Examination of
Water and Waste Waters, American Public Health Association (APHA), AWWA, WPCF,
Washington, DC, USA..
[6] Fiol, N., I.Villaescusa, M.Martinez, N.Miralles, J.Poch, and J.Serarol, 2006. “Sorption of
Pb(II), Ni(II), Cu(II) and Cd(II) from aqueous solution by olive stone waste”, Sep. Purif.
Technol, 50, pp.132.
[7] Goksungur, Y., S.Uren, and U.Guvenc, 2005. “Biosorption of cadmium and lead ions by
ethanol treated waste baker’s yeast biomass”, Bioresour. Technol, 96, pp.103.
[8] Gupta, V.K. and A.Rastogi, 2008. “Sorption and desorption studies of chromium (VI) Nonvia
ble cyanobacterium Nostoc muscorum biomass”, J. Hazard. Mater, 154, pp.347.
[9] Helen Kalavathy, and Lima Rose Miranda, 2010. “Moringa oleifera-A solid phase for the
removal of copper, nickel and zinc from aqueous solutions”, Chem. Eng. J, 158, pp.188.
[10] Huang, C.C., C.C.Su, J.L. Hsieh, C.P.Tseng, P.L.Lin, and J.S.Chang, 2003. “Polypeptides for
heavy-metal biosorption: capacity and specificity of two heterogeneous Mer proteins”, Enzyme
Microb. Technol, 33, pp.379.
[11] Juang, R.S. and R.C.Shiau, 2000. “Metal removal from aqueous solutions using chitosan
enhanced membrane filtration”, Journal of Membrane Science, 165(2), pp.159.
[12] Karthikeyan, T., S.Rajgopal, and Lima Rose Miranda, 2005. “Chromium (VI) adsorption from
aqueous solution by Hevea Brasilinesis sawdust activated carbon”, J. Hazard. Mater, B124,
pp.192.
[13] Kim, S.D., K.S.Park, and M.B.Gu, 2002. “Toxicity of hexavalent chromium to Daphnia magna:
influence of reduction reaction by ferrous iron”, J. Hazard. Mater, 93 (2), pp.155.
[14] Kobya, M., E.Demirbas, E.Senturk, and E. Ince, 2005.“Adsorption of heavy metal ions from
aqueous solutions by activated carbon prepared from apricot stone”, Bioresour. Technol, 96,
pp.1518.
[15] Kumar,Y.P., P.King, and V.S.R.K. Prasad,2006”Zinc biosorption on Tectona grandis. L.f.
leaves biomass: equilibrium and kinetic studies”, Chem. Eng. J. 124, pp.63.
[16] Mack, C., B.Wilhelmi, J.R. Duncan, and J.E.Burgess, 2007. “Biosorption of precious metals”,
Biotechnol. Adv. 25, pp.264.
[17] Mann, H., 1990. “Biosorption of heavy metals by bacterial biomass” In: Volesky, B. (Ed.).
Biosorption of Heavy Metals, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. Pp.93.
[18] Namasivayam, C. and R.T.Yamuna, 1995. “Adsorption of chromium (VI) by a low-cost
adsorbent: biogas residual slurry”, Chemosphere. 30, pp.561.
[19] Ozer, A., H.S.Altundogan, M. Erdem, and F. Tumen, 1997. “A study on the Cr (VI) removal
from aqueous solutions by steel wool”, Environmental Pollution, 97 (1–2), pp.107.
[20] Pamukoglu, M.Y. and F.Kargi, 2006. “Batch kinetics and isotherms for biosorption of
copper(II) ions onto pre-treated powdered waste sludge (PWS)”, J. Hazard. Mater, 138,pp. 479.
[21] Park, D., Y.S.Yun, and J.M.Park, 2005. “Studies on hexavalent chromium biosorption by
chemically-treated biomass of Ecklonia sp”, Chemosphere, 60, pp.1356.
[22] Pradhan, S., S.Singh, and L.C. Rai, 2007. “Characterization of various functional groups
present in the capsule of Microcystis and study of their role in biosorption of Fe, Ni and Cr”,
Bioresour. Technol, 98, pp.595.
[23] Puranik, P.R. and K.M.Paknikar, 1999.“Biosorption of lead, cadmium and zinc by citrobacter
strain MCMB-181: Characterization studies”, Biotechnology Progress, 15(2), pp.228.
[24] Rengaraj, S., C.K.Joo, Y. Kim, and J. Yi, 2003.“Kinetics of removal of chromium from water
and electronic process wastewater by ion exchange resins: 1200H, 1500H and IRN97H”,
Journal of Hazardous Materials, 102 (2–3), pp.257.
[25] Sarin, V., T.S.Singh, and K.K. Pant, 2006. “Thermodynamic and breakthrough column studies
for the selective sorption of chromium from industrial effluent on activated eucalyptus bark”,
Bioresour. Technol, 97, pp.1986.
62 K. Chithra, Anil Mapari, M. Somasundaram and Lima Rose Miranda
[26] Tunali,S., A.Abuk, and T. Akar,2006. “Removal of lead and copper ions from aqueous
solutions by bacterial strain isolated from soil”, Chem. Eng. J, 115, pp.203.
[27] Vijayaraghavan, K. and Y.S.Yun, 2008. “Bacterial biosorbents and biosorption”,
Biotechnol.Adv, 26, pp.229.
[28] Volesky, B., 2001. “Detoxification of metal-bearing effluents: biosorption for the next
century”, Hydrometallurgy, 59, pp.203.
[29] Yan, G. and T.Virarghavan, 2001. “Heavy metal removal in a biosorption column by
immobilized M. rouxii biomass”, Bioresour. Technol, 78(3), pp.243.
[30] Yu, J.X., M.Tong, X.M. Sun, and B.H. Li, 2007. “A simple method to prepare poly (amic
acid)-modified biomass for enhancement of lead and cadmium adsorption”, Biochem. Eng. J,
33, pp.126.
Nomenclature
b Langmuir adsorption intensity constant (l/mg)
n Freundlich isotherm exponent
C0 initial concentration of Cr (VI) solution (mg/l)
Ce equilibrium concentration (mg/l)
CAE amount adsorbed on solid at equilibrium (mg/l)
qe amount adsorbed at equilibrium (mg/g)
qt amount adsorbed at time t (mg/g)
Qmax maximum chromium uptake (mg g-1
)
k1 first-order rate constant(1/min)
k2 second-order rate constant(g/mg min)
M weight of the adsorbent (g)
∆G◦ standard Gibbs energy of adsorption (kJ/mol)
∆H◦ standard enthalpy of adsorption (kJ/mol)
Kc equilibrium constant
∆S◦ standard entropy of adsorption (J/mol k)
T temperature (K)
V volume of the solution (l)
Top Related