Webinar Mass Balance and Book and Claim Welcome - NEN

41
1 Webinar Mass Balance and Book and Claim Welcome

Transcript of Webinar Mass Balance and Book and Claim Welcome - NEN

1

Webinar Mass Balance and

Book and Claim

Welcome

Webinar Mass Balance and Book and Claim 2

Code of Conduct

• Microphones muted + camera’s off• Questions only via Q&A • This Webinar wil be recorded• Presentations send afterwards

Webinar Mass Balance and Book and Claim 3

Programma13.30 Welcome & opening

13.40 Introduction to ISO standardization work – Thamar Zijlstra

14.00 Presentation of preparatory work done by AHG1 – Philippe Osset

14.20 Discussion

15.30 End information session

Webinar Mass Balance and Book and Claim 4

Welcome and opening

Presentors

Philippe Osset Thamar Zijlstra

Standards and Regulations 5

Who are in the meeting?

Standards and Regulations 6

Webinar Mass Balance and Book and Claim 7

Introduction to ISO

Standardization work

Thamar Zijlstra – consultant NEN

What is a standard?

Agreement

• 3 principles: all parties concerned + transparant proces + consensus

Reliable and up-to-date information that is recognised by stakeholders

Standardization organisations are the neutral process facilitators

Standards and Regulations 8

ISO – international organisation for

standardization

Standards and Regulations 9

ISO/PC 308 – Chain of Custody

Standards and Regulations 10

Participation in ISO/PC 308

ISO/PC 308

NEN

National mirror

committee

JISC

National mirror

committee

ANSI

National mirror

committee

11

Role individual members

• Initiate new standardization

projects

• Comment and vote on ongoing

standardization projects

• Participate in national and/or

international meetings

Standards and Regulations 12

First standard is published!

ISO 22095:2020 – Chain of

Custody – General terminology

and models

Standards and Regulations 13

Webinar Mass Balance and Book and Claim 14

Presentation of preparatory

work done by AHG1

Philippe Osset -

Brainstorming Sessions Feedback

Towards Consensus!

8 of December 2020

Goal of the Session

• Summarize and report on where we are after the two brainstorming sessions

• Not duplicating technical discussions during the present meeting

• Inform people who did not participate

• Remark: synthetic views expressed in the presentation are not “final decisions”, they might not reflect the specific views of each participant

Agenda

• The brainstorming sessions context

• Feedback from session 1 – “Mass Balance” scope

• Including link with “Book and Claim”

• Feedback from session 2 – Recycling issues

• Q & A

The Brainstorming Sessions Context

• Work in addition to PC 308 work

• Exchange on key mass balance issues

• Prepare content to provide to PC 308 – this presentation will be shared to PC308

• Get contributions and feedback from a large panel of experts

• Attract additional experts for future PC 308 WG

• Contribute to align views in order to increase the level of consensus

Reminder: Proposed Introduction of the Future Mass Balance Standard

• “The mass balance model is a chain of custody model in which materials or products with specified characteristics are mixed or co-processed with materials or products without some or all of these characteristics, resulting in a claim on a part of the output proportional to the input

• For example, Mass Balance can enable a gradual shift from fossil to circular and/or biobased economy to drive a real and positive transformation of the economy. The mass balance chain of custody can be used to support an incremental use of material waste and bio-based content. In that case, fossil feedstock would be replaced within the process

• In order to drive the development of new processes and new raw materials needed for a positive transition to a circular and bio-based economy and overcoming the challenges of segregation of feeds, consistent mass balance methods and calculations are needed to have a clear transparent communication through the value chain, which is possible for consumers to understand

• The credibility of a particular Mass Balance application is ensured by reliable verification of claims which will be elaborated within the standard”

Reminder: Proposed Scope of the Future Mass Balance Standard

• “This standard provides requirements and guidelines for the application of the Mass Balance Chain of Custody model defined in ISO 22095 to any material input or process, including how to allocate inputs and outputs to products of such processes.

• This standard addresses

• Allocation of materials inputs

• System boundaries

• Granularity level of the system process, site, group

• Conversion factors rules (including creation and retirement of credits)

• Traceability principles depending on the nature of material input

• Recommendations for the use of Mass Balance within LCA

• Communication of claims”

Feedback from Session 1

1. Agenda

2. Atmosphere

3. Key outputs

1. Initial Agenda for Session 1

• Balancing period (3 or 12 months or?)

• “Mass Balance” vs. “Book and Claim” – physical link?Traceability makes the differentiation with book and claim

• Which “level of detail”: batch, process, site, groupChemical Traceability issue

• “Transfer” within a company – to be defined, including with the coverage

2. Atmosphere of Session 1

• 14 of October 2020, from 13h30 to 15h30 CEST

• Virtual meeting

• 22 participants

Name Role

Adrian Henriques Consultant

Anna Berggren Perstop

Anne-Wil Broersma NEN

Antonino Furfari PRE

Bill (William) Hoffman UL

Camille Habert TOTAL

Chaim Waibel PRE

Christian Krueger BASF

Dr Ir Leon Mol Ahold Delhaize GSO

Eugenio Longo Borealis

Francisca Melia Nesté

Frank Gort Nevedi

Holli Alexander Eastman

Isabella Tonaco Nesté

Jan-Erik Nyberg Non profit

Juliane Eykelhoff NEN

Kai-Yee Thim Skogs Industrierna

Karin Vestlund Ekerby SIS

Klas Briland BASF

Kristin Geidenmark Olofsson Trioplast

Mathias Gustavsson ECOS

Mireia Boada PRE

Neil Scott Borealis

Philippe Osset Solinnen

Steven de Boer SABIC

Tijana Duric Nesté

Urban Svensson Perstop

Ylwa Alwarsdotter Sekab

3. Key Outputs of Session 1 – Mass Balance Standardization Work Overall Goals

• “System to support circular economy, and sustainable circular economyThis system should be acceptable by NGO and brand owners”

• “Towards more sustainable sourcingMarket need strong link to sourcing, more than Book and Claim”

• “Show the value added of specific materials/productsGoing further than Book and Claim”

3. Key Outputs of Session 1 – Traceability

• Notion of “physical traceability” and “chemical traceability”

• Various existing definitions, including in schemes

• Not easy to define

• Both terms need to be precisely defined during the PC 308 work

• Both definitions will be used during the standard writing – then they need to be appropriate to chain of custody work

3. Key Outputs of Session 1 – “Mass Balance” and “Book and Claim”

• Not an easy topic to address

• Continuum between “Mass Balance” and “Book and Claim”

• The standard will define acceptable gradation between both terms

• Clarifying grey zones

• Not putting too much constraints as a start

• For credibility stake, specific claims should

• Clearly reflect what has been made

• Be clear enough to understand what is made

• Convey a common meaning to all audiences

• E.g. purchasing a commodity (e.g. electricity) from a centralized market with a “Guarantee of Origin” is “book and claim”

3. Key Outputs of Session 1 – Group Level

• Rules for “Mass Balance” at group level needs to be specific to ensure traceability

• “Mirroring” between plants of the same company

• To avoid adding transportation impacts (trucks…) between plants

• No double counting

• Clear traceability rules shall be set and verified

• Clarifying boundaries

3. Key Outputs of Session 1 – Balancing Period

• Balancing period as in ISO 22095

• Short (6 months) and long (5 years max.) period can be appropriate

• The standard will give clear guidance on the balancing period, and define how to implement in the context of Mass Balance

Feedback from Session 2

1. Agenda

2. Atmosphere

3. Key outputs

1. Initial Agenda for Session 2

• Differentiation pre- and post- consumer scraps

• Recycled content calculation

• Chemical Recycling Definition

2. Atmosphere of Session 2

• 24 of November, from 13h30 to 15h30 CEST

• Virtual meeting

• 25 participants

Adrian Henriques Consultant

Anna Berggren Perstop

Antonino Furfari PRE

Bill (William) Hoffman UL

Camille Habert TOTAL

Chaim Waibel PRE

Christian Krueger BASF

Dr Ir Leon Mol Ahold Delhaize GSO

Eugenio Longo Borealis

Francisca Melia Nesté

Frank Gort Nevedi

Holli Alexander Eastman

Isabella Tonaco Nesté

Jan-Erik Nyberg Non Profit

Juliane Eykelhoff NEN

Kai-Yee Thim Skogs Industrierna

Karin Vestlund Ekerby SIS

Klas Briland BASF

Kristin Geidenmark Olofsson Trioplast

Mathias Gustavsson ECOS

Mireia Boada PRE

Neil Scott Borealis

Philippe Osset Solinnen

Steven de Boer SABIC

Thamar Zijlstra NEN

Tijana Duric Nesté

Urban Svensson Perstop

Ylwa Alwarsdotter Sekab

3. Key Outputs of Session 2 – Differentiation between Pre- and Post-Consumer Materials

• ISO 14021 definitions on pre- and post- consumer materials are pre-existing and will be used

• Other standards use similar definitions

• These definitions are general and can be specified in future Mass Balance standard

3. Key Outputs of Session 2 – Chemical Recycling Definition

• Reference can be done to ISO 15270 – Guidelines for the recovery and recycling of plastics waste – which goes for revision next year

• European level work exist at CEN/TC 249/WG 11

• Preparation Q1 of 2021

• Potential presentation on the topic by Kristin Olofsson during future ISO/PC 308 work

3. Key Outputs of Session 2 – Recycling Rate Calculation

• No consumables or energy is integrated in the calculation of recycling rate

• Sector specific approach recommended for integration of pre-consumer material in the calculation

• Being consistent at sector level

• Traceability (see session 1) is key, including clear definitions of source materials

• Claims shall be precise on what is done

3. Key Outputs of Session 2 – Points for Recycling Rate Calculation

• Needed by certification bodies

• Confidentiality will be managed by them

• The ratio inputs/outputs is specific per process

• Request transparency on where measure is done

• Common requirements for given process families

• Existing rules at European level can be re-used when relevant

• Number of recycling before the calculation is not relevant for this calculation belonging to a chain of custody standard

3. Key Outputs of Session 2 – Recycled Content Calculation in a Chain of Custody

• Definition of ISO 14021 will be specified in the scope of a Chain of Custody work

• From ISO 14021 - “Proportion, by mass, of recycled material in a product or packaging. Only pre-consumer and postconsumer materials shall be considered as recycled content”

• Combine European work and ISO work, having on mind the speed of work

• Avoiding contradiction

Perspectives

• The current content will be provided as input to PC 308

• Maybe more experts will register to PC308 meetings, sent by the member countries?! Welcome!

Clarification Questions from the Attendees?Answer might be by any participant to the brainstorming sessions

• Rule: please state the number of the topic (or the topic itself!) on which you want to ask your clarification question when starting to ask your question

1. Standardization work goals

2. Traceability

3. “Mass Balance” and “Book and Claim”

4. Group level

5. Balancing period

6. Differentiation between pre- and post- consumer materials

7. Chemical recycling definition

8. Recycling rate calculation

9. Points for recycling rate calculation

10. Recycled content calculation in a Chain of Custody

Questions for the Attendees!

• Q1. Which future uses do you see for the standards on Mass Balance and Book and Claim?

• Q2. Which dangers/opportunities do you see around the publication of a Mass Balance standard?

• Q3. Which topics would you like to see covered during presentations that you would expect to raise your awareness?

• Clarification on Chemical Recycling (process, standards, developments…)

• Certifiers key expectations from a Mass Balance standard in relation to their schemes

We would like to welcome you!

Please contact your national standardizationorganisation : https://www.iso.org/members.html

Standards and Regulations 40

Webinar Mass Balance and Book and Claim 41

Thank you!

Questions: [email protected]