UK Aid Match II Annual Review: Narrative Report - Aidstream
-
Upload
khangminh22 -
Category
Documents
-
view
1 -
download
0
Transcript of UK Aid Match II Annual Review: Narrative Report - Aidstream
UK Aid Match II
Annual Review: Narrative Report
Please refer to the detailed guidance on completing your annual report to complete this
template accurately. You may be asked to revise and re-submit your report if it is not
completed properly.
1.0 Grant information
Organisation
1.1 Grant holder’s organisation name Street Child
1.2 Grant reference number 205210-230
1.3 Project delivery partners (if applicable) Street Child of Sierra Leone
1.4 Previous annual review score/s (if applicable)
N/A
Project
1.5 Project title Count Me in
1.6 Start date 07/08/2019
1.7 End date 06/08/2022
1.8 Project budget total
£1,610,340.59
DFID budget total
£1,416,524.21
Project budget this year
£343,805.59
DFID budget this year
£258,613.21
1.9 Country(s) of implementation Sierra Leone
1.10 Counties or districts in country(s) of implementation
Northern Province of Sierra Leone, in Falaba, Karene, Kambia, Koinadugu and Tonkolili districts.
1.11 Reporting period Year 1, August 2019 to August 2020
1.12 Provide a brief summary of the project
The aim of this £1.6 million project is to increase enrolment, retention, and quality in schools for 17,000 highly marginalised children in Sierra Leone. To achieve this, the project will
• Provide access to JSS for 5,000 highly vulnerable children and increase their chance of success by training social workers to identify and support vulnerable OOS children, give them targeted assistance, deliver preparation classes, place children in a school and give financial and emotional assistance to keep them there for at least a year.
• Improve the ability of 3750 caregivers from extremely poor households to keep their children in school and encourage 5000 of their siblings to start attending school, by working with them to develop a business plan, provide training and support to implement the plan by supplying a grant to fund the business, monitor and incentivize training.
2
• Provide increased access to quality primary education for 8,000 children in remote rural communities, with a focus on upper primary classes by working with 40 schools, training 120 teachers (including supporting some at university) using the TaRL approach, mentoring teachers and junior primary classes, improve infrastructure, advocate for education at the community and set up community income generating activities to cover school running costs.
• Provide 1,000 children with disabilities with specialist support to attend school (provision of assistive devices or referral services)
If the project is successful, by 2022 we will see:
• 17,000 children have increased access and quality education (primary and junior secondary)
• 80% of the children in (40) partner primary schools with improved literacy and numeracy outcomes
• 4900 will successfully enrol into JSS from project-supported transition classes
• 70% of the children in junior secondary schools will have improved learning outcomes
• 1,500 children will successful complete their basic education (including passing primary 6 exams)
1.13 Acronyms Avoid the use of jargon and acronyms. Only use acronyms where necessary and avoid those that are sector or context specific. If acronyms are necessary, please list them here.
BECE: Basic Education Certificate Examination
CWD: children with disabilities
JSS: Junior Secondary School
MBSSE: Ministry of Basic & Senior Secondary Education
MSWGCA: Ministry of Social Welfare, Gender & Children’s Affairs
NPSE: National Primary School Examination
TaRL: Teaching at the Right Level
2.0 Beneficiary data
2.1 Complete the Beneficiary Data Summary
2.2 Use the information in the guidance to assess the overall progress you have made against direct beneficiaries and justify your assessment
3
Assessment Tick one Justification
On track
X The project has exceeded its target for direct beneficiaries reached this year, reaching 12,716 unique individuals (11,467 children, 1130 caregivers and 119 teachers). The total targeted reach for the project has been updated to 20,990 using the new beneficiary data template (17,000 children, 3750 caregivers, 240 teachers). Indirect beneficiary reach for year one is 15,793 which includes the additional members of households supported with family business grants and caregivers taking loans from school seed banks.
Getting there
Off Track
4
3.0 Performance against outcomes
3.1 For outcome indicator one, plot your actual end of year performance against targets in a graph
Outcome indicator one: Number of project supported children with
increased access to education
3.2 For outcome indicator
one use the guidance to
assess progress [please tick]:
On track X
Getting
there
Off track
3.3 Explain the results
The total number of children reached by the project during year one significantly exceeds the
milestone for this stage in the project with 11,467 children in total (5873 female, 5594 male)
benefitting from project support to increase opportunities to access education. The target for children
directly enrolled in JSS under the individual component was met (1500) and the targets for siblings
additionally supported within households and children enrolled in supported remote rural primary
schools were both exceeded. Within the 1500 children individually supported to enrol, 301 are
children affected by disability (190 children with disabilities and 111 children whose caregivers have
disabilities) and 161 are teenage mothers. An additional 3 teenage mothers and 12 children with
disabilities have benefitted as siblings of primary beneficiaries.
A total of 1130 families (5 above target) benefitted from business support this year, to establish a
sustainable source of income from which the ongoing cost of retaining their children in school can be
met. From within these households, 2698 additional at-risk children were identified, with families
receiving a top-up grant to ensure all children in the household are able to return to education when
schools re-open. This support has therefore reached more than 1000 additional children than
originally targeted, which has been possible primarily due to exchange rate gains in the budget. In the
declining economic context, with the poorest families worst hit by the restrictions imposed by the
COVID-19 pandemic, this support has become even more critical. Although it has not yet been possible
to measure the enrolment of siblings in school (due to COVID-19 closures), 84% of caregivers are
currently making savings at target levels, providing a positive indication that families will be financially
able to enrol their children at the start of the academic year.
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9 Q10 Q11 Q12
Nu
mb
er o
f ch
ildre
n
Duration of the 3-year project
Performance against target for number of children with increased access to education at the end of Year 1
Target Actual
5
In total, 7269 children have benefitted from improvements to rural primary schools, exceeding the
anticipated reach of 4800 in year one. The higher level of enrolment in rural schools is encouraging,
with greater potential to increase transition to JSS from rural communities during the lifetime of the
project. Community participation in project activities, particularly school construction/renovation and
planning for income generating initiatives, has contributed to the high enrolment. All of the children
enrolled have benefitted from access to better resourced classrooms and provision of learning
materials, whilst teacher training and mentoring has focussed on teachers responsible for upper
primary classes.
3.4 Explain the evidence you have to verify this result
Each beneficiary supported under the individual component has an individual case file maintained by a dedicated Social Worker and monitored by the Project Coordinator in each district. The case file logs all first contact information and contains details of all project support received, including social support, school enrolment packages, and family livelihoods support. Enrolment and attandance is verified using school enrolment records and Social Workers conduct frequent monitoring of each beneficiary in the school and the home to ensure continued attendance. The case files are used to update the project database which is verified by the M&E Manager and SMT during quarterly monitoring. In the rural primary school component data is captured at the school level. Teachers use project provided registers to capture enrolment and attendance data from each class. During fortnightly in-classroom mentoring, project Teaching Specialists conduct spot checks on attendance using their own registers to cross-check against the school records.
3.5 Next steps
The next steps towards achieving targets under outcome 1.1 are to ensure that beneficiaries
supported during year one enrol in the next academic year in October and continue to attend,
complete the identification of the second intake of beneficiaries under the individual component and
prepare rural primary schools for re-opening.
Project Social Workers are conducting street-outreach and coordinating with DPOs, the MSWGCA and
other key stakeholders to accept referrals of children at-risk of not returning to school. Each potential
beneficiary will be assessed against the vulnerability criteria before being registered onto the project
and will follow the same cycle of social and livelihoods support as the year one beneficiaries.
Project Teaching Specialists are working closely with teachers across the 40 target rural communities
to ensure that schools are prepared for re-opening, with handwashing facilities and procedures in
6
place and teaching and learning resources available. Throughout September catch-up classes will be
facilitated based on the TaRL model to re-engage children in learning ahead of the new school year.
3.6 For outcome indicator two, plot your actual end of year performance against targets in a graph
Outcome indicator two: Percentage (and number) of upper primary
level children in project-supported rural primary schools
demonstrating improved literacy and numeracy
3.7 For outcome indicator
two, use the guidance to
assess progress [please tick]:
On track
Getting
there
Off track X
3.8 Explain the results
This outcome has been assessed as off-track because, despite significant progress at output level
towards improvements in the quality of education in rural primary schools, data collection to evidence
learning gains at outcome level was not possible due to the closure of schools during the COVID-19
pandemic. The rural primary schools component kicked off in January following the selection and
assessment of 40 schools. During January, the project Teaching Specialists delivered practice classes
to familiarise themselves with the TaRL-based approach adopted by the project and the initial teacher
training took place in February ahead of rolling the approach out across target schools. The baseline
literacy and numeracy assessments took place in January and the midline assessment was scheduled
to take place during term 3. As schools closed nationwide on the 31st March, there is therefore no
data to evidence gains in literacy and numeracy at the time of reporting.
3.9 Explain the evidence you have to verify this result
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9 Q10 Q11 Q12
Nu
mb
er o
f ch
ildre
n
Duration of the 3-year project
Performance against target for number of children demonstrating improved literacy & numeracy at the
end of Year 1
Target Actual
7
Baseline literacy and numeracy assessments were carried out across all 40 target rural schools in
January. The assessments were based on the ASER assessment format from Teaching at the Right Level
(TaRL) and aim to determine the highest level in literacy and numeracy that a child can complete
successfully and are administered orally. Key findings from the baseline are summarised below:
• Overall, 39% of the students were able to read a short paragraph or a short story text and 44% of
students could read a few words. 17% of students could only identify letters or were at the complete
beginner level in literacy.
• On the numeracy assessment 61% of individuals were able to identify 3-digit numbers. Only 10% of
students were assessed to be at the beginner level or 1-digit recognition level.
• 38% of students were able to complete the addition questions, meanwhile few students were able
to complete subtraction and multiplication. Only 4% of students were able to complete the division
questions.
The midline assessment will now take place during year two following the reopening of schools, at which point it will be possible to evidence progress on learning gains.
3.10 Next steps
A second cycle of teacher training has been scheduled to take place in September ahead of schools
re-opening in October. When teachers are back in the classroom in October, the Teaching Specialists
will pick up the in-classroom mentoring and coaching, initially focussing on the roll out of the TaRL
based approach to rapidly improving foundational literacy and numeracy for upper primary level
students. Data will be captured using the ASER assessment format to measure the progress children
are making. In addition to the delivery of TaRL-based classes, Teaching Specialists will also
recommence coaching on delivery of the national curriculum, classroom management and inclusion.
Once this component is underway, a schedule will be developed to roll out the cascade training for
lower primary level teachers within the 40 target schools.
3.11 For outcome indicator three, plot your actual end of year performance against targets in a
graph.
Outcome indicator three: Number of individually supported children
successfully transitioning/intending to transition to next academic year
3.12 For outcome indicator
three, use the guidance to
assess progress [please tick]:
On track
Getting
there
X
Off track
8
3.13 Explain the results
There was no milestone set for this indicator this year as it is not yet possible for project beneficiaries
to transition to the next academic year. Also, because schools remained closed during the final term,
it was not possible to measure continued attendance until the end of the year as a proxy.
The year one milestone, however, for the number of children directly enrolled in JSS has been met,
with 1500 children enrolled and attending up to term 2, and 2698 additional out of school children
within the 1130 households supported via the family business model have benefitted from top-up
grants to enable a return to education when schools reopen. This represents a significant
overachievement against the output 2.3 milestone.
The key to the retention of children in school is the family business model, which provides the poorest
families with the means to cover the ongoing costs of schooling. During year one a total of 1130 family
businesses were successfully established and at the point of reporting, 953 families (84%) have been
making savings at target levels. This falls slightly short of the target of 1000 families, however
represents a significant achievement in light of the COVID-19 context. Project Social Workers have
also continued to follow-up with vulnerable children and families throughout the pandemic, ensuring
that children are in the best possible position to re-enrol in October, and placing the project well to
meet transition targets.
3.14 Explain the evidence you have to verify this result
The results for school enrolment are verified using the school registers. Project Social Workers
facilitate the initial enrolment of the children into schools and conduct fortnightly follow-up visits to
verify continued enrolment and identify any attendance issues. A record of these visits is kept updated
in the individual beneficiary case file and logged in the project database. Spot checks are conducted
to verify enrolment records at a sample of schools as part of regular quarterly monitoring by the senior
project team.
0
2000
4000
6000
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9 Q10 Q11 Q12
Nu
mb
er o
f ch
ildre
n
Duration of the 3-year project
Performance against target for individually supported children transitioning at the end of Year 1
Target Actual
9
Each caregiver supported via the Family Business Scheme has an individual case file. Following grant
disbursement and training, Business Officers conduct follow-up visits to caregivers on a weekly basis
to conduct mentoring as required and collect savings data which is monitored weekly by the Project
Coordinator and verified by the Head of Sustainability who consolidates savings records in the central
tracker and circulates. Savings made are entered in the savings track sheet with the caregiver
appending his/her signature as confirmation. A caregiver is considered as on-track if making a regular
minimum saving of SLL 5,000 per week.
3.15 Next steps
Social Workers have continued to monitor individually supported children through home visitations
during the closure of schools. During September, these visits will focus on preparing beneficiaries and
families for the reopening of schools and identifying any potential barriers to re-enrolment in the next
academic year. When schools open in October, Social Workers will re-commence school monitoring
visits and follow-up at home for any children who have not re-enrolled. Transition data will be updated
in the individual case files and project database.
3.11 For outcome indicator four, plot your actual end of year performance against targets in a graph.
Outcome indicator four: Number of children completing basic
education with project support
3.12 For outcome indicator
four, use the guidance to
assess progress [please tick]:
On track
Getting
there
X
Off track
3.13 Explain the results
There was no milestone set for this indicator this year as it is not yet possible for project beneficiaries
to have completed basic education. The final exam (BECE) will take place in September for the 19/20
academic year and 557 project supported children in JSS 3 are expected to sit the exam. 458 children
0
500
1000
1500
2000
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9 Q10 Q11 Q12
Nu
mb
er o
f ch
ildre
n
Duration of the 3-year project
Performance against target for number of children completing basic education at the end of Year 1
Target Actual
10
participated in additional catch-up classes coordinated by the project in July. This suggests that the
project is on-track to meet the year 2 milestone of 500 children.
3.14 Explain the evidence you have to verify this result
School enrolment records verify the number of children currently in JSS 3 and catch-up class attendance records completed by teachers and verified by project Social Workers evidence the number of children attending classes to prepare for the BECE. Exam attendance records and results will be collected from schools when available later in the year.
3.15 Next steps
For children who are currently in JSS 3, Social Workers will continue to follow-up and ensure that they
are prepared to sit the exams in September. When results are available, these will be collected from
schools and recorded in the beneficiary case files and updated in the project database. Children who
have not been able to pass the BECE will be supported to liaise with families and school authorities on
next steps – for example where repeating may be the best option. Project Social Workers will register
and support another intake of beneficiaries to enrol during the next academic year, and will continue
to conduct follow-up with those enrolled during year one to troubleshoot issues and support
retention/progress towards completion.
3.16. Use the guidance provided to assess your overall performance against outcomes in the past year
Assessment Tick one Justify your assessment
On track
At this stage of the project, and particularly due to the disruption of
COVID-19 to the academic year, it is only possible to accurately measure
results against outcome indicator 1.1. The project has exceeded its year
one target significantly with 11,467 children benefitting from increased
access to education (against a milestone of 7800). Significant progress
has been made against each of the other 3 outcome indicators, placing
the project well to meet year two milestones once schools reopen.
Getting there X
Off track
11
4.0 Performance against outputs
Output one 5000 of the most vulnerable children are able to access and be retained in better monitored, more inclusive secondary education
Overall output score (Self-assessed)
A
Output Indicator 1.1
Number of the most vulnerable children benefitting from individual social support
Milestone target Achieved Self-assessed score
1500 (850F, 550M, 100CWD) 1,500 (970F, 530M, 190CWD) A
Explain how you verified the result. Describe what data you used and how it was collected
During the beneficiary selection process, project Social Workers complete a first contact form and develop a case file for each beneficiary registered onto the project. The case file captures the details of each beneficiary including their education status, individual barriers faced, etc. It also provides space for details of the caregivers including the socioeconomic status of the family. Social Workers follow-up with each child on a fortnightly basis and each individual instance of social support/counselling/family mediation is recorded in the case file and reviewed by the Project Coordinator in each district. These files are used to update the project database and are checked and verified by the Project Manager and M&E Manager during quarterly monitoring visits. Before confirming a new cycle of beneficiaries, a thorough verification process takes place:
- Project Coordinators (based in each District) check all casefiles for accuracy and use the database to visit each beneficiary in their station, assess against project selection criteria, and update the database to confirm recommendations.
- The Project Manager and M&E Manager conduct verification visits to a random sample of at least 10% of recommended families in each station, check the database for accuracy and correct any errors
- SCoSL senior management team and SC UK in-country team, conduct final verification ahead of any disbursement of financial support
Explain any differences between annual milestones and what has been accomplished. If you have scored B or C, explain what you will do to get back on track
The target of 1500 beneficiaries was met, with the target proportion of females and children living with disabilities exceeded. Strategies used to identify target numbers of children affected by disability (explained in detail under output 4) led to a higher number of CWD being reached by social workers this year.
12
Output Indicator 1.2
Number of children successfully completing project operated pre-JSS preparation classes
Milestone target Achieved Self-assessed score
1000 (550F, 350M, 100CWD) 1087 (701F, 386M, 146CWD)
A
Explain how you verified the result. Describe what data you used and how it was collected
Results from the pre- JSS preparation classes are verified using the attendance registers which include the names of every child. Class teachers are responsible for completing the attendance register on a daily basis and each day an assigned Social Worker visits each class location to monitor progress and collects records for logging centrally. Children who have attended at least 11 out of 15 days of classes are recorded as successfully completing.
Explain any differences between annual milestones and what has been accomplished. If you have scored B or C, explain what you will do to get back on track
The pre-JSS classes were intended for children who had been out of school for a longer period and required additional support to enable a smooth transition. Attendance at the classes was higher than anticipated due to additional children hoping to use them as an opportunity to catch-up and prepare for exams.
Output Indicator 1.3
Number of highly vulnerable children enrolled in junior secondary school as a result of the project
Milestone target Achieved Self-assessed score
1500 (850F, 550M, 100 CWD) 1,500 (970F, 530M, 190CWD) A
Explain how you verified the result. Describe what data you used and how it was collected
The results for school enrolment are verified using the school registers. Project Social Workers facilitate the initial enrolment of the children into schools and conduct fortnightly follow-up visits to verify continued enrolment and identify any attendance issues. A record of these visits is kept updated in the individual beneficiary case file and logged in the project database. Spot checks are conducted to verify enrolment records at a sample of schools as part of regular quarterly monitoring by the senior project team.
Explain any differences between annual milestones and what has been accomplished. If you have scored B or C, explain what you will do to get back on track
13
The target of 1500 beneficiaries was met, with the target proportion of females and children living with disabilities exceeded. Strategies used to identify target numbers of children affected by disability (explained in detail under output 4) led to a higher number of CWD being reached by social workers this year.
Output Indicator 1.4
Number of children transitioning to JSS from 40 project supported remote rural primary schools
Milestone target Achieved Self-assessed score
0 0
Explain how you verified the result. Describe what data you used and how it was collected
This will take place in year 2 when the new academic year commences.
Explain any differences between annual milestones and what has been accomplished. If you have scored B or C, explain what you will do to get back on track
Output Indicator 1.5
Number of MBSSE monitoring visits to target JSS conducted by District Teaching Monitors trained in inclusion and child protection
Milestone target Achieved Self-assessed score
15 0
C
Explain how you verified the result. Describe what data you used and how it was collected
Explain any differences between annual milestones and what has been accomplished. If you have scored B or C, explain what you will do to get back on track
This activity did not take place due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Government of Sierra Leone closed schools nationwide in March, which prevented any school-based activities from taking place for the duration of the third term.
14
Output Indicator 1.6
Number of girls and boys actively participating in life clubs
Milestone target Achieved Self-assessed score
0 0
Explain how you verified the result. Describe what data you used and how it was collected
This activity is now scheduled to commence in year 2.
Explain any differences between annual milestones and what has been accomplished. If you have scored B or C, explain what you will do to get back on track
Assess your overall performance against output one
The project has performed well against output one during its first year. All 1500 beneficiaries targeted under this component have been successfully enrolled in Junior Secondary School through tailored social support provided by trained social work teams. The project targeted 60% girls through this individual support component, but slightly exceeded this proportion reaching a total of 970 girls, 65%. Progress under output 4, including collaboration with DPOs across the target districts enabled enrolment of 190 children living with disabilities, exceeding the milestone for year one by 90. 1,125 children for whom poverty was the primary barrier to access also received education support packages, including uniforms, a school bag, and basic learning materials, and 164 teenage mothers received additional support packages to enable childcare within the family. Ahead of enrolment, catch-up classes were held to enable children who had been out of school to prepare for the transition, reaching an additional 87 children. There was no milestone for output 1.4 during year one as the first cohort of children graduating from project supported remote rural primary schools will have the opportunity to transition to Junior Secondary School in October this year when the next academic year commences. A total of 582 children were enrolled in class 6 across the 40 target schools this year and were supported by the project in July to prepare for and access the final primary school exam (NPSE). This suggests that the project is currently on-track to meet the year 2 milestone for this indicator. The COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent closure of schools and restrictions on gathering in March has meant that activities under output 1.5 and 1.6 were postponed this year and will now commence in year two. The training of District Teaching Monitors is intended to take place alongside the training of JSS teachers in inclusive education strategies (output 4.4) so that the monitoring visits can support the follow-up and measurement of whether teachers are putting the training into action in the classroom. It will be possible to catch up on these activities in year two now that the reopening of schools has been announced for the 5th October.
15
Output two 3750 caregivers from extremely poor households have increased capacity to retain their children in school
Overall output score (Self-assessed)
A
Output Indicator 2.1
Number of families implementing business or farming following training and grant distribution
Milestone target Achieved Self-assessed score
1125 (795F, 230M, 100 PWD) 1130 (891F, 239M, 99 PWD) A
Explain how you verified the result. Describe what data you used and how it was collected
Families for whom poverty is the primary barrier to education are referred by the social work team to the business team following the child’s registration and enrolment in school. The business team develops a case file for each caregiver which includes the initial assessment form, business plan, and all subsequent follow-up records. The case files are used to update the central project database which is verified by the M&E Manager during quarterly monitoring. Prior to disbursement of grants, the following verification process is followed:
- Business Officers complete a vulnerability assessment for each family and make recommendations to the Project Coordinator (in each District)
- Project Coordinators check all casefiles for accuracy and use the recommendation list to visit families and verify selection
- Project Management Team conduct verification visits to a random sample of at least 10% of recommended families in each station
During grant distribution, disbursement records are signed by each caregiver upon receipt of grant and training attendance records are signed by the caregivers attending the basic business skills training workshop. Business Officers then follow-up with the family during regular monitoring visits to ensure the business has been established and provide subsequent mentoring and advice.
Explain any differences between annual milestones and what has been accomplished. If you have scored B or C, explain what you will do to get back on track
5 additional families were able to benefit from the family business scheme support during year one of the project.
Output Indicator 2.2
Number of families successfully making savings at target levels, sufficient to retain their child in JSS
Milestone target Achieved Self-assessed score
1000 953
A
16
Explain how you verified the result. Describe what data you used and how it was collected
Each caregiver supported via the Family Business Scheme has an individual case file. Following grant disbursement and training, Business Officers conduct follow-up visits to caregivers on a weekly basis to conduct mentoring as required and collect savings data which is monitored weekly by the Project Coordinator and verified by the Head of Sustainability who consolidates savings records in the central tracker and circulates. Savings made are entered in the savings track sheet with the caregiver appending his/her signature as confirmation. A caregiver is considered to be on-track if making a regular minimum saving of SLL 5,000 per week.
Explain any differences between annual milestones and what has been accomplished. If you have scored B or C, explain what you will do to get back on track
At the point of reporting, 953 families (84%) have been making savings at target levels. This falls slightly short of the target of 1000 families, however represents a significant achievement in light of the current context. All of the businesses were established during the COVID-19 pandemic and faced restrictions on movement and closure of market places. Business Officers have worked closely with families to adapt plans and work within the current operational context. The families have not completed the 20 week savings scheme yet and will continue to be monitored closely and supported where required to remain on-track, with additional support for those families currently struggling.
Output Indicator 2.3
Number of siblings of principal beneficiaries supported in education as a result of business support
Milestone target Achieved Self-assessed score
1500 (750F, 750M) 2,698 (1,388F 1,310M 13 CWD) A++
Explain how you verified the result. Describe what data you used and how it was collected
Siblings are registered in the project database during the registration of the primary beneficiary (see output 1.1). Details of children within each household that are of school going age are entered in the same form as the primary beneficiary, including their education status – grade reached and whether currently enrolled. This information is verified alongside the selection of caregivers for business support (output 2.1). Caregivers receive a supplementary top-up to their business grant for every out of school child, or child at-risk of drop-out within the household. It has not been possible to measure enrolment yet due to school closures. The enrolment and continued attendance of children in school will be monitored by Social Workers during regular follow up and verified by school enrolment and attendance records following the start of the new academic year.
17
Explain any differences between annual milestones and what has been accomplished. If you have scored B or C, explain what you will do to get back on track
There has been a significant overachievement against this indicator, with more than 1,000 additional children supported via top-up business support. The milestones set for this indicator are an estimate based on an average of one additional child per household. As the project seeks to reach the most vulnerable, and the economic situation in Sierra Leone has been worsening with the cost of living for families increasing, target households have been found to have larger numbers of out-of-school children. Exchange rate gains throughout the year meant that it was possible to reach this higher number.
Assess your overall performance against output two
Despite the challenges of COVID-19 restrictions, in April, the first cycle of 565 caregivers took part in training workshops and received their business grants, and in July the second cycle of a further 565 caregivers was supported, slightly exceeding the year one milestone for output 2.1 by 5 families. The target for the proportion of caregivers who were female was exceeded, with 79% female caregivers reached, and a total of 99 caregivers with disabilities were supported to establish businesses. Despite an incredibly challenging context, 953 families (out of 1130) are currently on-track to meet savings targets. This represents a success rate of 84% which is commendable given the restrictions caregivers have faced in establishing their businesses during COVID-19. The business teams in each district have continued to visit, mentor and support families throughout the pandemic, providing crucial advice on adapting and responding to the current climate. Across the 1130 households which have benefitted from business support this year, 2698 additional at-risk children were identified, with families receiving a top-up grant to ensure all children in the household are able to return to education when schools re-open. This support has become even more critical for the poorest families who have been hit hardest by COVID-19 restrictions and the increasing cost of living. Although it has not yet been possible to measure enrolment of siblings in school, the positive progress recorded in the savings scheme for 84% of families provides a proxy indication that families will be financially able to enrol their children at the start of the academic year.
18
Output three Increased access to quality primary education for 8000 children in remote rural communities, with a particular focus on upper primary classes
Overall output score (Self-assessed)
A
Output Indicator 3.1
Number of upper primary teachers demonstrating improvements in teaching practice as a result of the project
Milestone target Achieved Self-assessed score
100 (70M, 30F) 119 (109M, 10F) A
Explain how you verified the result. Describe what data you used and how it was collected
A teacher assessment tool is used during fortnightly visits to each school to monitor the performance of teachers in the classroom. Teaching Specialists (each assigned to a cluster of 5 schools) observe teachers conducting lessons and complete the form, which is used to track improvements and highlight areas of focus during ongoing in-classroom mentoring. The performance data is submitted to the Head of Rural Education for analysis and follow-up during quarterly monitoring. The first teacher training workshop took place in February, following the baseline learning assessment in January, and therefore improvements in performance have been captured over a limited period of time prior to the closure of schools in March.
Explain any differences between annual milestones and what has been accomplished. If you have scored B or C, explain what you will do to get back on track
Although 119 teachers have been trained in, and observed delivering, the TaRL-based pedagogy, less female teachers than male have been reached than targeted. Where possible, the project has sought to target female teachers for coaching and mentoring, however in the majority of target communities there is a shortage of female teaching candidates due to low school completion rates amongst girls and women. When the cascade training model (output 3.2) is rolled out in year two, emphasis will be placed on identifying, where possible, female teaching candidates from within target communities.
Output Indicator 3.2
Number of lower primary teachers receiving cascade training & support from trained upper primary teachers
Milestone target Achieved Self-assessed score
0 0
Explain how you verified the result. Describe what data you used and how it was collected
Due to the closure of schools in March, this activity was postponed until year two.
19
Explain any differences between annual milestones and what has been accomplished. If you have scored B or C, explain what you will do to get back on track
Output Indicator 3.3
Number of upper primary classrooms construction/renovated and resourced
Milestone target Achieved Self-assessed score
45 48 A
Explain how you verified the result. Describe what data you use and how it was collected
A needs assessment was conducted at each of the 40 target rural schools ahead of any project intervention. This includes photographs of all schools both before and after construction or renovation work has been carried out. The results are verified during monthly monitoring of the construction site by the project rural lead with progress summarised in monthly project reporting.
Explain any differences between annual milestones and what has been accomplished. If you have scored B or C, explain what you will do to get back on track
In total, 48 classrooms were either renovated or constructed which is slightly above the agreed milestone for year one. The milestone is based on the assumption that each school will have three classrooms constructed/renovated, however in three of the schools targeted for construction this year, four classrooms were renovated.
Output Indicator 3.4
Number of school income generating initiatives successfully established
Milestone target Achieved Self-assessed score
20 20
A
Explain how you verified the result. Describe what data you used and how it was collected
Income generating grant disbursements and training sessions are logged in the IGI database, which records the type of initiative and quantity of seed received, along with estimated yield and date of harvest. Community management committees sign upon receipt of the grant and progress is recorded in monthly reporting by the Deputy Head of Rural Education. A list of all community members who have accessed loans from the school seed bank was submitted by each management committee.
Explain any differences between annual milestones and what has been accomplished. If you have scored B or C, explain what you will do to get back on track
20
Output Indicator 3.5
Number of SMC community school action plans created and implemented as a result of training
Milestone target Achieved Self-assessed score
40 20
C
Explain how you verified the result. Describe what data you used and how it was collected
Community school action plans are recorded by the rural education team, with progress captured in monthly internal reports, and verified by SCoSL SMT ahead of IGI grant distribution.
Explain any differences between annual milestones and what has been accomplished. If you have scored B or C, explain what you will do to get back on track
The 20 schools selected for disbursement of grants for income generating initiatives during year one were prioritised for training and action plan development. The was completed ahead of the April grant disbursement, by which point restrictions on movement and gathering were in place. The remaining 20 communities will catch up in year two once schools re-open, with training taking place alongside scheduled MBSSE joint monitoring visits.
Output Indicator 3.6
Number of children in classes 4, 5 & 6 accessing improved learning environments
Milestone target Achieved Self-assessed score
1800 (900F, 900M) 2,584 (1218F, 1366M)
A++
Explain how you verified the result. Describe what data you used and how it was collected
The data is verified using the school enrolment and attendance records captured in registers provided by the project for each supported class. During regular classroom monitoring, project Teaching Specialists capture attendance data in their own register and follow-up with the head teacher on any discrepancies identified.
Explain any differences between annual milestones and what has been accomplished. If you have scored B or C, explain what you will do to get back on track
A total of 2,584 children in classes 4, 5 and 6 were enrolled in, and attended, the 40 target rural schools this year and benefitted from improvements in learning environment created through
21
teacher mentoring/coaching, implementation of TaRL, classroom resourcing, access to learning materials, and community planning for sustainability and structural improvements.
Output Indicator 3.7
Number of children enrolled in lower primary classes benefitting from wider school improvements
Milestone target Achieved Self-assessed score
3000 (1500F, 1500M) 4685 (2297F, 2388M)
A++
Explain how you verified the result. Describe what data you used and how it was collected
The data is verified using the school enrolment and attendance records captured in registers provided by the project for each supported class. During regular classroom monitoring, project Teaching Specialists capture attendance data in their own register and follow-up with the head teacher on any discrepancies identified.
Explain any differences between annual milestones and what has been accomplished. If you have scored B or C, explain what you will do to get back on track
A total of 4,685 children in classes 1,2 and 3 were enrolled in, and attended, the 40 project supported rural schools this year and benefitted from school improvements including classroom resourcing, access to learning materials, monitoring by the Teaching Specialist team, and community planning for sustainability and structural improvements.
Assess your overall performance against output three
The impact of COVID-19 has been greatest on output three, with classroom-based activities on hold since March following the initial teacher training in February. This has meant that to-date the project has had very limited time to impact on the quality of teaching and learning. Since the closure of schools, however, the rural team has focused on those elements which could continue, including the successful development of school income generating initiatives to ensure the sustainability of project interventions and the construction and renovation of classrooms which has been completed across 15 schools ahead of the new academic year – ensuring that children in these communities have a safe and conducive learning environment to return to. By targeting support where the need is greatest, and ensuring the community is fully engaged in the project and bought into the success of the schools, a much higher number of children than predicted have benefitted from school improvements to-date. The project has also been able to adapt effectively during the pandemic to provide the support most needed to ensure that children in these target remote rural communities are able to successfully complete primary education and transition to JSS. This has included the development of resources for remote learning, and the provision of
22
catch-up classes for children who returned to school in July ahead of the final primary school examination on the 3rd August.
Output four 1000 children affected by disability receive specialist case management to enable their access to school in a more enabling environment
Overall output score (Self-assessed)
A
Output Indicator 4.1
Number of PWD benefitting from specialist support package including assistive devices and referral to other services
Milestone target Achieved Self-assessed score
300 (200 CWD, 100 PWD) 261 (162 CWD, 99 PWD) B
Explain how you verified the result. Describe what data you used and how it was collected
Individual beneficiary case files are updated by Social Workers to record all specialist support and referrals made. These files are monitored by the Project Coordinator at District Level and verified during quarterly monitoring visits by the Project Manager, M&E Manager and Disability Specialist. A list of children referred for medical assessments or treatment is maintained by the Project Manager and signed by the relevant referral agency. In some cases support was allocated collectively to make access improvements to school structures (including construction of ramps and placement of blackboards). This has been captured in monthly reporting by the Project Manager and verified by photographs of completed work.
Explain any differences between annual milestones and what has been accomplished. If you have scored B or C, explain what you will do to get back on track.
Assistive devices, medical support and referral to specialist services has not been required, or possible, for all PWD beneficiaries. The requirement for additional specialist support is dependent on the type of disability (the project followed the Washington Group short set of questions). From within the year one cohort of beneficiaries, 7 were not able to attend their medical assessment and this will be rescheduled to take place during year two. The targets for CWD and children of PWD caregivers supported to enrol in school and benefitting from specialist case work have been reached and it is therefore proposed that the target for output indicator 4.1 is revised to account for an estimated 80% of PWD beneficiaries who may require the additional support package (see section 5.5 below).
Output Indicator 4.2
Number of PWD benefitting from specialist case work, including family counselling and community rehabilitation
23
Milestone target Achieved Self-assessed score
300 (200 CWD, 100 PWD)
301 (190 CWD, 111 PWD) A
Explain how you verified the result. Describe what data you used and how it was collected
As with output 1, each beneficiary registered onto the project has an individual case file which captures initial details and all follow-up support provided. For children affected by disability, case files are maintained by the allocated District Disability Lead. Disability status is confirmed by administering the Washington short group of questions for CWD and PWD caregivers during the beneficiary selection process. Each individual instance of social support/counselling/mediation is recorded in the case file and reviewed by the Project Coordinator in each District. These files are used to update the project database and are checked and verified by the Project Manager and M&E Manager during quarterly monitoring visits.
Explain any differences between annual milestones and what has been accomplished. If you have scored B or C, explain what you will do to get back on track.
Although the milestone has been met overall, there was a slightly lower proportion of children with disabilities and slightly higher proportion of children who have caregivers with disabilities identified and supported. The disaggregated targets set were an estimate and the vulnerability assessments are used to ensure the most vulnerable beneficiaries are selected. Social teams will continue to liaise closely with DPO partners in year two to prioritise the inclusion of children affected by disability.
Output Indicator 4.3
Number of project supported CWDs and children with PWD caregivers enrolled in school
Milestone target Achieved Self-assessed score
300 (200 CWD, 100 PWD) 301 (190 CWD, 111 PWD) A
Explain how you verified the result. Describe what data you used and how it was collected
As with output 1.3, the results for school enrolment are verified using the school registers. Project Social Workers facilitate the initial enrolment of the children into schools and conduct fortnightly follow-up visits to verify continued enrolment and identify any attendance issues. A record of these visits is kept updated in the individual beneficiary case file and logged in the project database. Spot checks are conducted to verify enrolment records at a sample of schools as part of regular quarterly monitoring by the senior project team.
Explain any differences between annual milestones and what has been accomplished. If you have scored B or C, explain what you will do to get back on track.
Although the milestone has been met overall, there was a slightly lower proportion of children with disabilities and slightly higher proportion of children who have caregivers with disabilities. There are 13 children with disabilities who have been supported by the project this year as siblings of primary
24
beneficiaries (under output 2.3) but have not been able to enrol in school yet due to COVID-19. It is expected that these children will enrol in the new academic year in October.
Output Indicator 4.4
Number of teachers with improved knowledge of inclusive education strategies
Milestone target Achieved Self-assessed score
150 0
C
Explain how you verified the result. Describe what data you use and how it is collected
Explain any differences between annual milestones and what has been accomplished. If you have scored B or C, explain what you will do to get back on track
This activity did not take place due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Government of Sierra Leone closed schools nationwide in March, which prevented any school-based activities from taking place for the duration of the third term. It will be possible to catch-up on this indicator by conducting two cycles of training within year two now that schools are scheduled to open on the 5th October.
Assess your overall performance against output four
The project has performed well against output four this year, meeting its key target for the number of project supported CWDs and children with PWD caregivers enrolled in school. A total of 301 children and families affected by disability have benefitted to-date from counselling and targeted social support to overcome barriers to enrolment and attendance in JSS. The capacity of project Social Workers to identify and respond to the needs of children with disabilities has been increased significantly through training and coaching, placing the project well to continue to achieve against targets in future years. Less PWD than targeted benefitted from assistive technology/other specialist support during year one. This is primarily because the target was set at 100% of PWD beneficiaries, whereas not all children and caregivers with disabilities required this additional support. A medical assessment was arranged for all CWD children in order to determine the most appropriate support, ranging from glasses, crutches and referral for medical treatment, to construction of ramps and provision of blackboards for schools. 7 children were unable to attend the assessment and this will be rescheduled for them during year two. Due to the closure of schools in March, it was not possible to roll out the training of JSS teachers as scheduled, however plans are in place to catch-up on targets in year two
Add additional outputs as required
25
5.0 Approach
Plan
5.1 Complete and annex your achieved work plan from the past year.
Estimate a completion percentage and assess where you are (on track, off track, getting there)
Completion (%) 90%
On track X Getting
there
Off track
Adaptive Management
5.2 What changes did you make to your plan during the year and why?
The greatest impact on the project plan this year came from the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent
restrictions put in place to control the spread in Sierra Leone, crucially including the nationwide closure
of schools on the 31st March for the remainder of the school year.
The project was able to adapt rapidly, with project staff contributing towards a nationwide rapid needs
assessment of over 1000 households in April – reaching 369 households across the 5 districts targeted by
this project, which informed the response activities. Social work and rural education teams, unable to
continue school-based activities, focussed on prevention activities, raising awareness of COVID-19, its
signs and symptoms, and promoting and facilitating prevention practices such as handwashing and social-
distancing. Following training facilitated by the Ministry of Health, project Teaching Specialists and Social
Workers conducted house to house sensitisation, stemming the spread of misinformation and providing
families with the information needed to protect themselves. This critical support has reached over 66,000
individuals across more than 9,000 households in Northern Sierra Leone. Throughout target project
communities, a total of 210 handwashing stations were also established to ensure that the most
vulnerable families have the means to follow recommended hygiene guidance.
Following the Government announcement at the end of June that schools would reopen for exam year
students on the 1st July, plans were rapidly drawn up to deliver catch-up classes for children in class 6
across all 40 target rural primary schools and for project supported beneficiaries in JSS 3. These classes
focussed on preparing children for the upcoming exams, particularly critical for children in class 6 who
had just one month back in school ahead of the exams on the 3rd August. The project also provided
logistical support to enable children to travel long distances to exam centres in urban locations.
With continued uncertainty over when schools would reopen, the rural education team worked on
contextualising Street Child’s Last Mile Learning approach to roll out remote learning support to children
in remote rural communities who are not reached by radio education programming. Remote learning
packages of printed materials and pre-recorded lessons have been developed, however with the recent
announcement that schools will re-commence at the beginning of October, this approach will be adjusted
to focus on ‘back to school’ preparations – re-engaging teachers and children and re-introducing the
TaRL-based pedagogy in small group settings.
26
School closures have halted progress on interventions aimed at improving the quality of teaching and
learning in rural primary schools, and the establishment of in-school life clubs and inclusive education
training for JSS teachers. The revised year two work plan takes account of these delays to enable the
project to catch-up with missed activities during term three. Teacher training workshops have been
scheduled to take place in September ahead of the new school year.
Theory of Change
5.3 Is your theory of change still sound? Are assumptions holding? Submit the theory of change
The theory of change is still sound. The work plan and project outputs are largely on-track, with progress
made towards all target outcomes. COVID-19 has delayed some activities and it is expected that these
will get back on track in year two once schools have re-opened.
The year one outcome milestone for the number of children with increased access to education was
significantly exceeded, with 4198 children benefitting from individual/household level support to
overcome barriers to education and 7269 children attending rural primary schools benefitting from
improvements in the quality of education. This overachievement against outcome indicator 1.1 was due
to high enrolment in the 40 rural primary schools and a greater number of at-risk children reached per
household by the family business for education model, representing a focus on reaching the most
vulnerable households. 84% of caregivers registered onto the family business scheme during year one
are currently making savings at target levels, which places the project well to meet targets for transition
and completion of Junior Secondary School next year.
In the rural schools component, the focus and key measure of success is improvements in literacy and
numeracy as a result of improvements in the quality of teaching. During year one teachers across all 40
rural primary schools have been trained in the Teaching at the Right Level (TaRL) pedagogical approach,
designed to rapidly increase foundational skills. Although it was not possible to measure results due to
the closure of schools, Street Child has seen significant improvements in literacy and numeracy using this
model in other live projects, which we hope to replicate in year two.
5.4 Describe and explain any proposed adjustments to the theory of change?
No adjustments are proposed to the theory of change.
Logical Framework
5.5 Summarise and explain any changes you would like to make to your logframe for the next year
based on your results
Add rows if necessary
Indicator/milestone/data From To Explanation
27
Ouput 4.1 Number of
PWD benefiting from
specialist support package
including assistive devices
and referral to other
services.
700 (July 2021)
1000 (July 2022)
560 (July 2021)
800 (July 2022)
Appropriate local
services or assistive
technology may not be
available or necessary
for all CWD/PWD. A
revised target of 80% of
total CWD/PWD reach
is proposed.
Social Inclusion
5.6 Summarise, with practical examples, what you have done to identify and include people with
disabilities in your project? What changes will you make next year to strengthen your approach?
This project represents the first time Street Child has included a specific disability component in its
individual support model. Through partnership with specialist DPO WESOFOD and a focus on Social
Worker training, including in use of the Washing Group Short Set of Questions, the project has been able
to reach 190 CWD and 111 children of PWD, achieving its target for year one. As preparation for this
work, WESOFOD led a disability mapping exercise across the target districts. In each operational location
the project, and project team, were introduced to a total of 19 local disability organisations and partners.
These organisations played a key role in referral of project beneficiaries affected by disability.
One Social Worker in each project location has been appointed as the disability focal point and has
received additional training and mentoring from WESOFOD throughout the year to ensure the additional
needs of CWD and PWD (caregivers) within the project are met. In 2 districts Social Workers with
disabilities have been recruited to perform this role. The disability focal point manages the case load of
all disability affected beneficiaries within each district and advocates on their behalf at the household,
community and school level.
Additional support packages were made available where required for children and caregivers, where
additional needs posed a continued barrier to effective access. This has included the provision of
wheelchairs and crutches, access to medical assessments, treatment and referral for children with visual
and hearing impairments, and structural support for schools where CWD have been enrolled, including
construction of ramps and placement of additional or improved blackboards. Caregivers with disabilities
have benefitted from social support provided by the trained disability focal point in each district and have
been prioritised for the family business scheme, with additional support where required.
During year one training in inclusive education strategies for JSS teachers in schools where beneficiaries
have been enrolled was put on hold as a result of COVID-19. This training, alongside complementary
training and resourcing for MBSSE officials to conduct effective monitoring of inclusive practices within
28
schools, is crucial for opening up learning at JSS level for children affected by disability across target
districts. Learning from the project’s COVID-19 awareness raising will also be used to plan and deliver
larger-scale advocacy at the community level to tackle the stigma faced by CWD children and PWD
caregivers.
5.7 Summarise, with practical examples, what you have done to address gender inequality and how
well this has worked? What changes will you make next year to strengthen your approach?
Gender equality is a major goal of this project, with 60% girls targeted for individual social support to
enrol in JSS and female caregivers prioritised for livelihoods support via the family business model. 970
(or 65%) of the 1500 children individually supported to enrol in JSS during year one were girls, and 51%
of the children reached overall were girls. Additionally, 164 teenage mothers were provided with specific
targeted support to return to education and received supplementary support packages to incentivise
childcare within the family. All project Social Workers are trained in gender-responsive strategies and
district teams play a key role in advocating for the rights of all children, particularly the most vulnerable
groups of girls, to access education. 30% of project Social Workers are female, and 2 of the 4 Project
Coordinators. 79% of caregivers supported to establish businesses via the family business model were
female, exceeding the 75% target set, with a total of 891 women reached and socially and economically
empowered to provide for their families.
In the 40 project supported rural schools, girls currently make up 48% of the children enrolled. Teaching
Specialists advocate with parents, teachers and community members for the importance of educating
girls as a key aspect of their role. Despite efforts to prioritise the training of female teachers, only 10 of
the 119 teachers trained to-date have been female. In rural regions of Sierra Leone there is a shortage of
teaching candidates, and particularly female teaching candidates, due to low school completion rates,
and experience in previous projects has shown the challenges involved in brining teachers from further
afield. When the cascade training model is rolled out for lower primary teachers in year two, emphasis
will be placed on identifying female teaching candidates from within target communities where possible.
The project intends to actively contribute towards the prevention of teenage pregnancy by establishing
life clubs in schools for both girls and boys. Concerns have been raised during the COVID-19 pandemic
that teenage pregnancy rates are increasing whilst girls are out-of-school and the most vulnerable
families facing acute additional challenges to meet the cost of living. The life clubs will be established in
15 JSSs in the Northern Province and will deliver SRHE, including referral to family planning services, as
well providing life skills and a safe space for peer-to-peer learning. This activity has been delayed due to
school closures and will now commence in year two.
5.8 Summarise what you have done to identify and target the most marginalised and vulnerable
beneficiaries and reflect on how well this has worked. What changes will you make next year to
strengthen your approach?
29
The project has targeted the most marginalised and vulnerable beneficiaries through a process of street
outreach, directly identifying children who are on the streets and not in school in urban communities,
and referral from child protection actors including the MSWGCA, local family support units, DPOs and
other NGP actors, child welfare committees and schools. Children are assessed against rigorous
vulnerability criteria set to ensure that those most in need of project support, who would not be able to
access education otherwise, benefit. Social Workers work closely with identified children over time to
build a relationship of trust and an understanding of the situation faced by vulnerable children and
families. A total of 1500 children have been identified and supported in this way during the first year of
the project.
Once registered onto the project, children receive intensive social support to identify and overcome their
individual barriers and to strengthen their family’s commitment to their care and education. Social
Workers advocate on behalf of children facing stigma and/or complex social challenges in returning to
education, including teenage mothers, children with disabilities, street connected children, etc. For the
poorest families for whom the primary barrier to education is the cost involved, Street Child’s family
business for education model has been used to support 1130 caregivers to establish a sustainable source
of income.
Under the rural primary component, 40 communities were selected in close liaison with the MBSSE, local
authorities and communities following needs assessments across the 4 target districts. The assessments
looked at a range of factors including enrolment levels, school infrastructure and resources available,
current teaching capacity, and exam performance and targeted communities where despite school
enrolment, extensive barriers to learning and progression remained. Advocacy has been carried out at
the community and household level on the value of educating all children, and encouraging regular
attendance. Families in remote rural communities rely predominantly on subsistence farming, therefore
to ensure children who complete primary level education during the project are able to progress, families
from the 40 target rural communities will be prioritised for family business support in years 2 and 3.
30
6.0 Learning
Learning from implementation
6.1 Explain what has worked well and what has not worked well in the past year and why.
How did you or will you use this learning to adapt your project?
The inclusion of a specific disability component within the project, with targets set for the inclusion of
children affected by disability, has been a specific success during year one. Whilst previous projects have
strived to be inclusive for CWD, having clear targets, activities, and strategies around this has led to
greater achievements both in terms of numbers reached and impact for those children and families.
Working with inclusion specialist WESOFOD to ensure that project Social Workers are appropriately
trained and that local teams are connected to disability-focussed organisations in each region has been
critical to this success. Additional support has been provided, where required, to overcome barriers to
access, including the construction of ramps and blackboards in schools, provision of assistive devices, and
referral for medical treatment, however to-date this support has been limited to the individual JSS-
enrolment component. The project team are developing plans to extend this support to the rural
community component via additional sessions during scheduled Teaching Specialist and teacher training
in year two. This will improve the capacity to identify and better support CWD within target primary
schools.
Learning from the first year of Street Child’s other live UK Aid Match project in the Eastern Province led
to a review of the tools used to measure the impact of inclusive education training for JSS teachers. Data
from pre- and post-training tests (in the Right to Learn project) was not sufficient to demonstrate learning
and changed practice in the classroom. The revised approach developed plans to link this activity more
closely to the training and resourcing of MBSSE District Teaching Monitors so that Government school
monitoring staff play a greater role in following up on teacher performance in this area, increasing the
sustainability of this project activity. Unfortunately the first training was scheduled to take place during
the third term and was postponed due to COVID-19 school closures, but the new approach will be rolled
out in training as part of school opening preparations for the new academic year.
Feedback from teachers who piloted use of the TaRL approach in the Right to Learn project suggested
the need to increase the length of the initial training workshop before commencing delivery of practice
classes. This was taken on-board in this project, with the initial teacher training workshop extended from
3 to 5 days. The additional 2 days provided an opportunity to incorporate more practical and interactive
sessions, where teachers modelled what they have learned and received feedback from trainers and
peers.
Learning from beneficiaries
6.3 Explain how you captured and used beneficiary feedback in the past year. How did you or will
you use this learning to adapt your project?
31
Social workers gather feedback during regular follow-up visits to beneficiaries both in the home and in
school. During quarterly project monitoring, the senior project team carry out spot checks to a sample of
households and conduct informal interviews with beneficiaries and families. Feedback is also requested
from teachers and caregivers following participation in training sessions. All of this feedback is captured
in monthly and quarterly project reports and discussed by the senior project team during follow-up calls.
In August, an annual internal evaluation exercise was carried out across 4 target districts by senior SCoSL
staff external to the project team. The evaluation sought to capture feedback from children, caregivers,
teachers and community stakeholders across both the individual and rural community components using
a combination of focus group discussions and semi-structured interviews. A number of recommendations
were made which will feed into the implementation plan for year two, including suggestions for
improvements to beneficiary feedback and safeguarding incident reporting mechanisms (detailed in
section 10 below). Other suggestions which are being explored include, child protection training for
caregivers (which was raised as a suggestion following concerns that despite business support some
caregivers continue to depend on their children to support the household income) and a greater focus
on advocacy within the school and wider community setting to ensure the retention of CWD.
Learning from research and evaluations
6.4 Provide links to or annex any research or evaluations done in the past year. Explain what you did or will do with the findings to improve the project
In January, a baseline literacy and numeracy assessment was carried out across the 40 target rural
primary schools using ‘Teaching at the Right Level (TaRL)’ tools in order to better understand the
academic levels of students. A brief analysis report which presents the findings has been attached.
In April, project staff took part in a nationwide rapid needs assessment reaching 1011 households,
including 369 across the 5 districts targeted by this project, to gather accurate, relevant information on
the challenges, issues and shocks arising as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. The assessment found
that although most individuals (92%) had received information about COVID-19, there remained a key
gap between awareness and behaviour. Respondents rated hunger (65%), teenage pregnancy (28%) and
lack of opportunities for learning (25%) as the primary risks to vulnerable groups, over and above the risk
of infection from COVID-19 (21%). The needs assessment was used as a basis for planning COVID-19
response activities within this project, including developing Street Child’s remote learning approach in
response to concerns raised by caregivers around access to alternative learning, particularly in more rural
contexts which are not reached by radio programming. The report has been attached.
An annual internal project evaluation took place in August, focussed on gathering feedback from
beneficiaries, project staff, and other key stakeholders across 4 target districts. The final version of this
report will be shared once complete.
32
7.0 Challenges & Risks
Challenges
7.1 Explain the main challenges you faced in the past year.
Were you successful in addressing them and how?
The greatest challenge to project delivery faced during year one was the COVID-19 pandemic and the
global and national restrictions put in place to limit the spread. Schools closed on the 31st March and
remained closed for the duration of the third term, opening for exam year students only in July. This
closure halted progress on interventions aimed at improving the quality of teaching and learning in rural
primary schools, inclusive education training for JSS teachers, and the establishment of in-school life
clubs. During this period project teams have prioritised those activities which were able to progress,
including classroom construction, establishing school income generating initiatives, and the much-
needed business support for vulnerable families who are coming under additional pressure and facing
an increasing cost of living. Project staff have also played a significant role in the national COVID-19
response by delivering critical awareness raising and hygiene interventions (as detailed in section 5.2
above).
The COVID-19 pandemic also created a challenging context for the family business model, with families
attempting to establish businesses during restrictions on inter-district travel, closed markets and
national curfews. The family business teams worked with families in reduced group sizes and on a one-
to-one basis to develop plans which take account of the current context. Caregivers were encouraged
to invest in fast-moving essential items, for example cooking condiments, and to find alternative selling
strategies whilst markets remained closed. The ongoing mentoring from the business officers has been
effective in supporting caregivers to adapt and respond to the changing context, with 84% of families
keeping up with savings targets to-date.
Restrictions in movement both within Sierra Leone and internationally have posed additional challenges
for project monitoring, with all SC UK support being provided remotely. The constantly changing
situation also required the project to adapt rapidly. Frequent communication was critical to enabling
an agile and adaptive response, thematic WhatsApp groups were established for field teams to share
up-to-date information, feedback and photos from project locations, and regular zoom calls set-up to
reflect on progress. This has helped to facilitate shared learning across district teams and to ensure that
activities remained on-track and relevant. As we enter the second year of the project, the situation has
improved with international borders now open and free movement possible within all project locations.
Data management is an identified area for capacity strengthening within SCoSL and accessing complete
project data in a timely manner has been a challenge in the second half of the year as the number of
beneficiaries and level of data required has grown. Logistical challenges in collecting and verifying
paper-based data can create delays, particularly in the rural schools component due to the remote
locations. Street Child has continued to provide capacity support and capacity strengthening in this area
throughout the year by directly supporting data collection processes, investing in the training of key
project staff (see section 11), and regularly monitoring and verifying project data. Following external
33
training, the M&E Manager has been able to pilot and roll out the use of the KoBo Collect toolbox to
support digital data collection removing some of the timing challenges, including for a rapid needs
assessment across more than 1000 households at the on-set of the COVID-19 pandemic in Sierra Leone.
Risks
7.3 Submit an updated risk register and delivery chain risk map with this annual review.
Make sure that the challenges you have described in 7.1 are included.
34
8.0 Sustainability
8.1
What evidence is there that your sustainability strategies have started to work?
What do you need to strengthen and why? Consider economic, environmental and social
sustainability factors
Economic Sustainability
The project is supporting economic sustainability primarily via the family business model which aims
to address poverty as a root cause of school drop-out. By empowering families to retain their children
in education through removing financial barriers, the family business model ensures that the benefits
are sustained beyond the life of the project. During year one, the project was able to support 1130
caregivers via a process of training, grants and mentoring, to establish a business to provide a
sustainable source of income from which the ongoing costs of educating their children can be met.
Families in Sierra Leone have faced increasing challenges in recent months with the restrictions
imposed as a result of COVID-19 and the cost of living continuing to grow. Despite these challenges,
953 caregivers have been able to make savings at target levels to-date – a success rate of 84%.
Business Officers have worked tirelessly with caregivers on an individual basis to provide business
planning support and advice tailored to the current context and will continue to do so over a 20-week
period. For those families who are currently struggling to meet savings targets, a targeted action plan
will be developed to address issues and try to get the business and savings record back on-track.
Under the rural primary school component, following management and agriculture training in
collaboration with the Ministry of Agriculture, the first 20 communities successfully established
income generating initiatives which will provide a critical source of income from which the key costs
of running the school, including teacher salaries, can be met moving forwards. All 20 communities
have opted to implement a seed bank model whereby rice and groundnut seed will be loaned to
families with children attending the school at a favourable interest rate. Seed will be paid back
following the harvest with interest allocated by the management committee to cover school costs as
required. The rural education team have provided support and guidance to the committees in record
keeping and management of the loan process and seed grants were disbursed in April. A total of 1332
families have already taken loans from the 20 seed banks during this first planting season, with first
harvest expected in October.
The seed banks will provide an interim solution whilst schools which do not currently benefit from any
central government funding apply for approval. The long-term goal for these schools is to be adopted
into the formal government system, with teachers paid and resources provided by the MBSSE.
Although the project team have engaged with the MBSSE throughout the school selection proves and
implementation to-date, it has not been possible to complete the scheduled joint monitoring visits
this year due to schools being closed throughout the third term. These visits will be re-scheduled to
take place early in the new academic year to support a strengthened relationship between the target
schools and the regional MBSSE offices and to maximise the likelihood of future government
investment and monitoring.
35
The increased capacity of families to retain their children in school, and rural communities to invest in
education, has the potential to transform the economic opportunities available to them in the future.
The benefits of education are permanent and sustainable, with every additional year of schooling
associated with increased future earning potential.
Social sustainability
The project directly targets the most vulnerable categories of children who, without intervention,
would have been highly unlikely to ever complete basic education. Overcoming financial barriers is
part of the solution, but working with the children, their families, and communities is key to
overcoming social barriers. Counselling and family mediation are crucial to ensuring a secure and
sustainable return to school, with the support and encouragement of family. Advocating on behalf of
the child within households, communities and schools to tackle stigma and discrimination is one of
the crucial roles played by the Social Worker, particularly on behalf of groups of children who are
typically excluded from education, including children with disabilities, teenage mothers and street-
connected children. A total of 1500 children have benefitted from this intensive individual social
support during the first year of the project, including 190 children with disabilities and 161 teenage
mothers, and were enrolled in and attending schools until the end of the second term. Additional
catch-up classes facilitated for children in JSS 3 who returned to school to prepare for exams in July
saw attendance rates above 80% suggesting strong prospects for retention.
Working via local partners and investing in their capacity for social change, whilst collaborating with
the MBSSE and MSWGCA at district and national levels contributes towards strengthening national
systems and building long-term national development capacity. National partner SCoSL has led on all
aspects of implementation, whilst specialist DPO WESOFOD have provided expertise and delivery
support across the disability component, strengthening the internal capacity of SCoSL to respond to
the needs of children affected by disability and developing a strong link with regional DPOs. Rights-
based advocacy at household and community level target permanent attitude change. A key aspect of
this approach is the capacity building of JSS teachers and MBSSE officials in inclusive education
strategies which was not implemented this year due to school closures, this will be prioritised ahead
of schools reopening to ensure the project catches up to intended targets.
In addition to the economic benefits of the family business model, the scheme has been found to lead
to improvements in quality of life by empowering caregivers to respond to the needs of their children.
Alongside family counselling and advocacy on the importance of education, the family business model
aims to create a shift in prioritisation of spending, encouraging families to place greater importance
on investing in education and using the incentivised savings scheme to entrench a pattern of saving
to meet these costs. It will be possible to measure the initial success of the integrated social and family
business approach in securing retention in school following the commencement of the next academic
year in October. Project Social Workers will follow-up with each beneficiary in school to confirm re-
enrolment.
36
In rural communities, the rural education team works alongside community chiefs, elders, teachers,
parents and children to advocate for education at both the community and household levels.
Communities have been engaged at every stage of the project, have taken the lead on planning for
school construction and income generation initiatives, and are encouraged to take ownership of the
development of their school. Advocacy messages around the enrolment and regular attendance of all
children, including girls and CWD, are critical to addressing access and retention barriers. The
significantly higher than predicted enrolment rates across the 40 schools, with 7269 children enrolled
(2469 above the milestone of 4800) and 48% female enrolment, can be partially attributed to this
successful community engagement.
Environmental sustainability
Construction and renovation work has been carried out across 15 schools this year and has primarily
used locally sourced materials, including mud-blocks, stone and sand, therefore minimising the need
for imported or manufactured materials and reducing transportation. School income-generating
initiatives established across 20 communities are agriculture based following a seed bank model. Prior
to distributing the grants, communities participated in agriculture training led by the Ministry of
Agriculture which included guidance in all elements of the groundnut production cycle, including
environmental factors. During this first year it will be important to monitor the harvest against
expected yield. Changing weather conditions are a critical concern, as Sierra Leone has been
experiencing particularly harsh rainy seasons in recent years. Top-up funds for income generating
initiatives are held for year two to provide additional support where required in the event of a shortfall
from the first cycle, and the remaining 20 communities will learn from the first cycle of
implementation when planning their own initiatives next year.
37
9.0 Value for Money (VFM)
9.1 With reference to the four E’s explain how the project has provided good value for money in
the past year? Include relevant examples
This project has delivered excellent value for money during its first year, making significant progress
towards outcomes and prioritising sustainable approaches to access, completion and learning in
education – demonstrating progress towards the achievement of SDG 4 in Northern Sierra Leone. A
total of 11,467 children have been reached by the project to-date, already benefitting from increased
access to education. The benefits of education are lifelong, and investments in sustainability, including
the family business and school income generation models, will support retention in school beyond the
project intervention. Investments in developing the capacity of rural teachers will benefit the children
and communities they serve far beyond the life of the project.
Economy
By working through local partners and building on the existing expertise of local teams, both the
economy and the effectiveness of the project approach are enhanced. International Street Child staff
costs and travel have been minimised and are restricted to programme management and technical
support and oversight, enhancing the capacity of national partners to deliver the project effectively.
Overhead cost recovery for Street Child within the budget is minimal, at 2% of the total project budget.
Street Child’s family business for education model has been iteratively adapted over time and is
routinely reviewed to assess the minimum input that is required to achieve the desired business
growth, and rate of savings required, to retain a child in school. The costs of education kits, classroom
construction and other key activity costs are also reviewed annually in line with changing material
costs in-country. Robust procurement processes are in place to ensure value for money, including
securing a minimum of 3 quotations for comparison.
The project benefits from economies of scale through considered procurement, including purchasing
construction materials, school uniforms and classroom resources in bulk, realising cost savings as a
result. Investment in construction has been minimised by investing in existing local structures through
the renovation of existing classrooms and working in partnership with the community to develop
community structures, drawing as much as possible on locally available materials and labour.
Efficiency
Against project expenditure of less than £500k over the first 12 months of the project, 11,467 children
have been reached with increased opportunity to access education. This reflects an average per child
cost of £43, representing significant value for money. By operating tried and tested models at scale,
Street Child is able to reduce the per child cost whilst also ensuring long-term impact.
The project targets children from the poorest households for whom poverty is the primary barrier to
accessing education. To ensure the efficiency and sustainability of project interventions, material
38
support has been provided to children on a one-off basis (via education kits and supplementary
support packages for teenage mothers), with the family business model stepping in and empowering
families to develop their own source of income sufficient to cover the costs of education in future
years. This enables a greater number of children to benefit over the course of the project from the
resources available.
Additionally, by providing a supplementary top-up grant for families where more than one child is out
of school, the project is able to maximise reach whilst maintaining a low per-child cost. In year one,
2698 additional children within supported households were reached by supplementary grants to
enable access to education. Business support is targeted specifically at families for whom poverty is
the critical barrier to education, utilising strict vulnerability criteria, with intensive social support
provided to address other barriers. A total of 1130 of the 1500 families supported during year one
were provided with a business grant.
In the rural primary component, investment in the rural teaching workforce represents a cost-effective
approach to improving learning in remote communities with long-term impact. Target numbers of
children reached have been exceeded due to high enrolment and attendance across selected schools,
bringing down the per child cost. The TaRL pedagogical approach which has been rolled out across the
40 target schools is globally recognised as an effective, low cost, approach to rapidly improving
foundational literacy and numeracy in low resource environments.
Match funding from non-UKAID sources accounts for 20% of the total project expenditure to-date and
is budgeted at 12% over the lifetime of the project. Match funding during year one has covered high-
cost activities, including the construction and renovation of classrooms and school income generating
grants, for which funds were specifically sourced.
Effectiveness
The year one outcome milestone for the number of children with increased access to education was
significantly exceeded, with 11,467 children in total (5873 female, 5594 male) benefitting from project
support to increase opportunities to access education. The project has performed well against output
indicators with significant progress made towards the outcome of increased access, completion and
learning at primary and JSS level for the most vulnerable children in Northern Sierra Leone. Indicators
which cannot be measured at this stage of the project will measure improved literacy and numeracy,
retention/transition, and completion of basic education. These indicators remain relevant and the
project is currently on-track to meet milestones for year 2.
Local partnership, and use of local expertise, has increased the effectiveness of interventions under
both the individual and rural community components, with Social Workers playing a critical role in
supporting 1500 vulnerable children to overcome their individual barriers to education and Teaching
Specialists trained in and rolling out strategies to improve the quality of teaching and learning across
40 rural primary schools. Both of these components contribute towards the ultimate goal of seeing
more children progressing towards completion of basic education.
39
There is a key opportunity to increase the effectiveness, value for money, and overall impact of this
project through cross-project learning, as Street Child currently has two further live UKAID projects in
Sierra Leone which follow the same core models. Learning from this project has fed into the planning
and set-up of Children on the Margins which commenced on the 1st September targeting Southern
Sierra Leone and learning from the disability component in particular has also been of relevance to
the ongoing UKAID project Right to Learn in the Eastern Province.
Equity
This project specifically aims to target the most vulnerable and marginalised categories of children,
building pathways to access and completion of quality, inclusive basic education. During year one the
project has exceeded its target for direct beneficiaries reached, reaching a total of 12,716 unique
individuals. Of this total, 11,467 (90%) are vulnerable children facing acute access and quality barriers
to learning, 1130 are caregivers from households living in extreme poverty, and 119 are teachers
targeted for capacity development to deliver quality education. Indirect beneficiary reach for year one
is 15,793 which includes the additional children living within households supported with family
business grants and rural caregivers taking loans from school seed banks.
Gender equality and inclusion of children affected by disability are major goals of this project. During
year one, 970 (or 65%) of the 1500 vulnerable children individually supported to enrol in JSS were
girls. Specific additional targeted support was provided to 164 teenage mothers, 190 children with
disabilities and 111 children with caregivers with disabilities to overcome access barriers. Of the 1130
caregivers from the poorest households, 891 (or 79%) were female.
40
10.0 Safeguarding
10.1 Explain what you have done to strengthen your own and your partners’ approaches to
enhanced safeguarding in the past year?
Major developments within Street Child’s global safeguarding policies have included setting new
guidelines for safeguarding investigations; undertaking an all staff refresher training in
August/September 2020; introduction of new anonymous reporting mechanisms including an email
address and website form; appointment of a deputy global safeguarding focal point; tendering for an
external safeguarding consultant to provide advice on retainer; and the development of a child
friendly safeguarding policy.
Within SCoSL, safeguarding induction training has been carried out for all project staff, including an
introduction to SCoSL’s safeguarding policy and reporting procedures. A safeguarding awareness
workshop also took place for downstream partner WESOFOD which is providing consultancy support
on the disability component. Following feedback from the Mannion Daniels monitoring visit in
November, the project team have been focussed on improving the level of understanding at
community level of how to report safeguarding concerns. A safeguarding contact phone number has
been set up as part of this process, and updated child-friendly safeguarding posters have been
displayed in project offices with details of available mechanisms to report safeguarding concerns.
10.2 What will you do to strengthen the approach of your implementing partners in the next year?
What are the key challenges and how will you overcome them?
Although SCoSL has continued to refine and improve its internal safeguarding procedures this year, there is a recognised need to continue to strengthen mechanisms for reporting safeguarding concerns at community level. Despite staff training and display of policies and posters throughout project locations, the understanding and willingness within communities of when and how to report concerns continues to pose a barrier. One of the key challenges faced is the attitude of communities towards raising complaints – the culture of silence. To change this mindset requires continuous engagement and awareness raising, ensuring that communities understand the importance of raising safeguarding concerns and feel safe to do so. Going forward, SCoSL has appointed Regional Safeguarding Focal Points who will take the lead on ensuring that all project communities and staff are fully aware of their obligation to report safeguarding concerns and have confidence in the reporting process. The recent internal evaluation specifically sought feedback on this area – asking beneficiaries directly what would give them the confidence to report safeguarding issues. Suggestions included the appointment of local focal persons to make their complaints to, and availability of contact numbers for people outside the community. Reporting and process strengthening plans for year 2 include the following:
41
- Posters with contact numbers visible to all beneficiaries in project offices, schools and at training sessions
- Suggestion and complaints boxes in place within schools/external to offices - Greater emphasis on awareness raising and engagement on safeguarding issues - Identify and train community focal points
10.3 Has the safeguarding policy been updated during the reporting period? If yes, please give a
brief summary of the changes and include the updated policy with this submission
A safeguarding policy update is underway with the support of an external safeguarding expert; it will
be complete by the 30th September 2020 and will be shared with the PRM. No major changes are
proposed at this stage; prospective changes include a restructure to more clearly distinguish policy
from procedure. However recent related changes include an update of Street Child's code of conduct
and disciplinary procedures to more closely align with the safeguarding policy and the investigation
guidelines.
42
11. Staff development
11.1
Did you identify any gaps this year in your own or your implementing partners’ capacity
to deliver the project?
What did you do to address them? What development will you do with your own or
implementing partner staff next year and why?
MEL/data management
As highlighted in section 7 above, MEL, and particularly data management, is an identified area for
capacity strengthening within SCoSL. Street Child has provided ongoing capacity development in this
area throughout the year, and has arranged for external training/support for project staff as below:
• Recruitment of a MEL Consultant to conduct an organisational MEL assessment with SCoSL and
support the development of a MEL capacity strengthening plan
• Extension of the MEL Consultant’s contract to action the below recommendations:
- Build capacity at supervisor level on how to engage with data effectively and create learning
loops.
- Develop a detailed Planning Scheme that can guide and provide an oversight of all MEL
activities throughout a project.
- Review staffing structure, capacity, roles and responsibilities to create an effective M&E
structure.
• SCoSL’s M&E Manager attended a training course on mobile data collection using KoBoToolBox
in Nairobi to build his skills in developing and managing mobile data collection, which has
subsequently been rolled out.
Financial management
At the beginning of this project in August 2019, Street Child recruited an experienced Finance
Consultant to work specifically on partner capacity development in the area of financial management.
The consultant spent 6 months working alongside SCoSL’s finance team in Freetown supporting the
implementation of improvements in financial processes and procedures, ensuring greater efficiency
in reporting. This level of intensive support enabled rapid progress over a short period of time, with a
number of important improvements made. Following the initial 6-month period, less intensive remote
support has been provided, with follow-up visits to continue coaching and mentoring in-person
planned during year 2.
Disability component
The introduction of a specific disability component to Street Child’s established individual support
model was new to this project. Partnership with specialist DPO WESOFOD has been critical to the
success of this component, ensuring that project staff are appropriately trained in identifying and
supporting children with disabilities and advocating on their behalf. In addition to initial and refresher
training for Social Workers, WESOFOD have provided ongoing mentoring for disability focal points in
each district throughout the year. This training and support will be enhanced in year 2 to ensure that
43
staff across the family business and rural schools components are also sufficiently equipped with the
skills to support caregivers and children enrolled within rural schools.
Teaching at the Right Level (TaRL)
Street Child were able to secure a funded training place for SCoSL’s Head of Education at TaRL Africa’s
recent TaRL Community Workshop in Botswana in September 2019, during which SCoSL’s Head of
Education was asked to give a presentation of the pilot conducted as part of Street Child’s UK Aid
funded project Right to Learn in the Eastern Province. This training, and opportunity to collaborate
with, and learn from, other organisations implementing TaRL in varied contexts, was hugely beneficial
to planning for the roll out of TaRL across the 40 rural primary schools targeted by this project. SCoSL’s
Head of Education continues to collaborate with TaRL Africa and Pratham regularly and feeds in
learning to the contextualised approach in Sierra Leone.
12.0 Case studies
12.1
Provide one quality case study that exemplifies what your project is trying to achieve.
Ensure that the case study is clearly structured, briefly outlining:
• What the problem was
• How it was addressed
• The results, including any problems encountered and how they were overcome
• What was learned from the experience
Sixteen-year-old Sorie recalls a time where he and his father had to beg on the streets to support
their family. Due to his father’s disability, which has left him unable to work and provide for Sorie
and his younger children, Sorie had no choice but to drop out of school in JSS 1 to join his father on
the streets.
Whilst begging on the streets, Sorie was seen by a Street Child social worker and was enrolled into
the ‘Count Me In’ programme supported through UK Aid. As part of the programme, Sorie was
supported back into school, where he enrolled in JSS 2, with thanks to catch up classes, and was
given a uniform and educational materials. Both Sorie and his father took part in counselling sessions,
and his father benefitted from livelihood support in the form of a business grant and training,
allowing him to set up a small business selling charcoal to generate a household income. Sorie’s
father is now able to support his children’s basic needs, whilst also saving money for their continued
education.
*Names have been changed to protect identities
44
13.0 Other
13.1 Use this space to write anything else you would like us to know about the past year which
has not been covered in the other sections.
14.0 Feedback to the Fund Manager
14.1 Do you have any feedback, suggestions or requests?
15.0 Annexes
15.1 Indicate with a tick which documents you have annexed alongside this narrative report. Those denoted * are obligatory.
Completed Output Scoring Table X
Completed Beneficiary Data Summary X
Reporting logical framework* X
Updated work plan* X
Indicative next year work plan* X
Theory of Change X
Research and evaluations (if applicable) X
Updated Risk Register* X
Updated Delivery Chain Risk Map* X
Safeguarding policy (if updated during the reporting period)
Communications products
Annual audited accounts* Not yet available for 19/20
Updated asset register* X
Other (please specify)
- COVID-19 rapid needs assessment report
- TaRL baseline analysis report
X