Thermodynamic study of adsorption of linear aliphatic monohypric alcohols and monocarboxylic acids...
Transcript of Thermodynamic study of adsorption of linear aliphatic monohypric alcohols and monocarboxylic acids...
Materials Chemistrla and Ph_ysics, 21 (1989) 155-167 155
STUDY OF ADSORPTION OF LINEAR ALIPHATIC MONOHYDRIC
ALCOHOLS AND MONOCARBOXYLIC ACIDS FROM n-HEPTANE AND n-DECANE
SOLUTIONS ONTO a-IRON(II1) OXIDE IMMOBILIZED IN PHOTOSYNTHETIC
MEMBRANES*
I.R. BELLOBONO, E. SELL1 and L. RIGHETTO
Cattedra di Chimica, Dipartimento di Chimica Fisica ed Elettrochi-
mica, Universita di Milano, 20133 Milan (Italy)
F. MUFFATO
SORI S.p.A., 20070 Guardamiglio, Milan (Italy)
C. ERMONDI
Bosso Carte Speciali S.p.A., 10075 Mathi Canavese, Turin (Italy)
Received July 7, 1988; accepted August 12, 1988
ABSTRACT
Differential heats of adsorption at 298.2 K of a series of linear
aliphatic monohydric alcohols C n 2n+10H (n=2-14) and linear aliphatic H
monocarboxylic acids C H n 2n+,COOH (n=l-13), from n-heptane and n-decal
solutions (0.00005-0.03 molar fractions), onto cc-Fe,O, immobilized
by photosynthetic membranes, prepared by photochemically grafting
an epoxy-diacrylate copolymer onto cellulose, were measured. Langmuil
type treatment of data allowed us to calculate thermodynamic constanl
and adsorption heats for monolayer saturation, from which thermo-
dynamic functions (free energy, enthalpy, and entropy) (saturated
system as standard) were then computed. Mean areas occupied by
adsorbed molecules in the monolayer coincided with those obtained
for the unsupported sorbent, by allowing only about 20% of decrease
of surface area, as a consequence of immobilization. Behaviour of
immobilized sorbent is compared with that of 'free' cr-Fe,O,. The
sensitivity of adsorption measurements both to study configuration
of adsorbed molecules, solvent-solute and solute-solute interactions
* Part 10 of the series 'Photosynthetic Membranes'.
0254-0584/89/$3.50 0 Elsevier Sequoia/Printed in The Netherlands
156
for the system examined, as well as to obtain informations on the
specific surface area of immobilized sorbent, is discussed.
INTRODUCTION
In a previous paper [I] relations between the permeability of
composite membranes immobilizing sorbents and their structure, with
particular reference to the internal surface area of the porous
medium, have been investigated. For membranes prepared by photo-
chemical grafting of epoxy-diacrylate prepolymer onto cellulose,
satisfactorily linear plots of permeating volume of liquid per unit
time and unit apparent surface as a function of pressure drop have
always been observed in a certain range of membrane thickness. The
proportionality constant between these two quantities was represented
by the volume performance coefficient, that is the reciprocal of
overall hydraulic resistance. Linear portions in the graphs of
hydraulic resistance vs. - membrane thickness corresponded to constant
values of internal surface area. In this way, specific surface areas
of sorbents immobilized in the membrane structure could be evaluated
Cl]- These looked not so different from the values measured by the
classical B.E.T. method on pure sorbents at liquid nitrogen
temperature.
The investigation of adsorption properties of sorbents immobilized
in photosynthetic membranes was also aimed at, in order to obtain
further information on their active surface areas. Sorption studies
(adsorption and hydrogen ion exchange) of acetic acid from water by
photosynthetic membranes have already been carried out [2]. In the
present paper, a-iron(II1) oxide was chosen as model sorbent, both
in consideration of the fact that photosynthetic membranes immobiliz-
ing a-iron(II1) oxide had been subjected to flow dynamical character-
ization fl], and of the previous thermodynamic study of adsorption
of linear aliphatic monohydric alcohols and monocarboxylic acids
onto unsupported a-iron(II1) oxide from n-heptane and n-decane -
solutions [3]. The latter could consequently serve as a suitable
basis for comparison of behaviour between unsupported and immobilized
sorbent. This model has revealed quite useful knowledge of mean
157
areas of molecules adsorbed onto active sites under conditions of
monolayer saturation, and consequently of the configuration of these
molecules.
EXPERIMENTAL
Materials
a-Fe,O, was prepared and characterized as described previously
[II ( B.E.T. surface area 2.2kO.l m'g-I). All reagents and solvents
were of analytical grade purity. Solvents (n-heptane and n-decane)
were dehydrated by refluxing on sodium wires, followed by rectifica-
tion.
Membranes
Photochemical preparation of membranes immobilizing 30.0 wt.% of
cl-Fe,O, was carried out as in a preceding work [I].
Adsorption measurements
Differential heats of adsorption were measured microcalorimetri-
tally at 298 K, by employing the experimental device described in a
previous work [3] with some modifications, which will be reported
here. The flow microcalorimeter was fitted with an auxiliary chamber,
used as a pre-column, either filled with the sorbent membrane or
with the same membrane prepared without immobilized a-Fe,O,. This
chamber was identical to the cylindrical cell, 8 mm diameter and
height, interiorly coated by polytetrafluoroethylene, by which
adsorption heats were measured and in which an amount of membrane
material containing 48-51 mg of immobilized cc-Fe,O, was introduced.
A flux of 5.6 ml hr-1 was constantly maintained. This system allowed
us to determine simultaneously adsorbed quantities and the relative
adsorption heats. The method was based on determination of retention
times of solutes on the sorbent. When the pre-column contained the
'inert' membrane, while the calorimetric cell contained the'active'
membrane immobilizing a-Fe,O,, the solution emerged at time t,,
determined by the calorimetric peak. If, on the contrary, both pre-
column and calorimetric cell contained immobilized e-Fe203, the
158
solution emerged at time t > t,. The difference tr= t - t, may be
defined as a retention time. The adsorbed amount of solute w (mol/
g of sorbent) may then be obtained by eqn. (I):
w=fct rjm (I)
where f denotes flow rate (1 s-i ), c concentration of solute (mol
l-l), m mass (g) of sorbent immobilized in the membrane and tr
retention time (s).
Adsorption heat was then determined as usual by peak area and
previous calibration. The maximum sensitivity was about 1 uJ with
temperature variations of 10 -"C. The standard state was considered
to be that of saturated sorbent. In the specific case this corre-
sponded to equilibration with about 0.2 M solutions of investigated
alcohols and acids (about 0.03 molar fraction). To reach the standard
state the differential method was followed [4] with at least 4 or 5
series of runs, in order to evaluate uncertainty.
Experimental data were found to satisfactorily fit the Langmuir
equation in the modified form [4]:
(x,/q,) = (l/q, Ki) + (xi/q,) (2)
where xi and q, represent the molar fraction of solute in a certain
solution 1 and its corresponding differential heat of adsorption
respectively, q, the adsorption heat for monolayer saturation, and
K, the equilibrium constant at concentration x1. Some examples of
these plots are given in Fig. 1. From K, at various xi values,
following the method of adsorption competition between solute and
solvent [5], thermodynamic equilibrium constants K could be finally
calculated, by successive approximations (the fourth approximation
usually gave satisfactorily constant values).
Thermodynamic functions of adsorption
From K values standard free energy of adsorption (saturated system
as standard) AGO was obtained (= -RT 1nK). From the ratio between
159
I I I
0.01 0.02 0.03
x, hdar fraction)
Fig. 1. Some examples of Langmuir isotherms, at 298.2 K, following
eqn. (2), relative to adsorption of linear aliphatic monohydric
alcohols and monocarboxylic acids onto cl-Fe,O,, immobilized by
photosynthetic membranes, from n-heptane solutions.
qo and the corresponding moles of adsorbed solute per unit mass of
sorbent, standard enthalpy of adsorption AH' was calculated. Finally,
standard free entropy AS" was calculated by the usual relation
AGo = AH' - TAS".
Mean area occupied by adsorbed molecules
From B.E.T. values of surface area, mean areas a, occupied by
adsorbed molecules in the monolayer were also calculated by some
approximations requiring on one side the full coverage of sorbent
surface area A, so that:
A = n,A,+ n,A, (3)
(where A, and A, are partial molar surface areas of solute 1 and
solvent 2 respectively per unit mass of sorbent, and n,, n2 the
corresponding moles per unit mass, provided solute and solvent have
160
similar molecular structures), and on the other side that n,A,<< nlAl,
an approximation which was fulfilled in the conditions of the present
work. As a consequence, eqn. (3) becomes:
A " n,A, (4)
from which a, (area occupied by a single molecule of adsorbed species)
was obtained:
al : A/n, N, (5)
with N, Avogadro's number. In eqns. (3)-(51, relative to experiments
carried out in the present work, sorbent surface area A was
considered equal to the B.E.T. surface area corrected by a factor
of 0.8 (see Results and Discussion) allowing for the decrease brought
about by immobilization in the photosynthetic membranes studied.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Differential heats of adsorption at 298.2 K of a series of linear
aliphatic monohydric alcohols C H n 2n+,0H (n=2-14) and linear aliphatic
monocarboxylic acids C n 2n+,COOH H (n=l-13) onto u-Fe,O,, immobilized
by photosynthetic membranes prepared by photochemically grafting an
epoxy-diacrylate copolymer onto cellulose, from n-heptane and
n-decane solutions were measured at various concentrations
corresponding to 0.00005-0.03 molar fractions xi. Measurements have
been carried out microcalorimetrically by a technique using retention
times which allowed us to obtain adsorbed quantities and differential
heats simultaneously. Integral heats of adsorption relative to
'immobilized' sorbents resulted as 75-85% of those measured [3] in
a preceding work with 'free' a-Fe,O,.Differential heats q,, however,
were practically the same, within the limits of experimental un-
certainty, as the corresponding mass of adsorbed solute was lowered
accordingly. Ratios (x,/q,) as a function of xi satisfactorily
followed, within the limits of experimental error, the Langmuir
161
I I
6-
8 a-TAS’ IT-2982 KI
5 10
Number of carbon atoms
Fig. 2. Thermodynamic functions (J mol-lI, -AH', -AGO, and -TAS', at T = 298.2 K, for the adsorption of linear aliphatic monocarboxylic
acids from n-heptane solutions onto a-Fe,O,, as functions of the number of carbon atoms (carboxylic functions included). Data (present
work) relative to a-Fe,0 3 immobilized in the photosynthetic membrane
structure are denoted with full symbols, while open symbols refer to free, non immobilized sorbent [3].
I 1
5 10
Number of carbon atoms
Fig. 3. Thermodynamic functions (J molV1), -AH* and -AGO, at T =
298.2 K, for adsorption of linear aliphatic monocarboxylic acids
from n-decane solutions onto (X-Fe203, as functions of the number
of carbon atoms (carboxylic functions included). Data (present work)
relative to a-Fe,O, immobilized in the photosynthetic membrane
structure are denoted with full symbols, while open symbols refer
to free, non immobilized sorbent [3].
plot of eqn. (2). Adsorption heats corresponding to the monolayer
saturation and Langmuir constants K, could thus be obtained for
'free ’ [3] as well as for immobilized cr-Fe,O, (present work).
Finally, by the method of competing solute/solvent adsorption [5],
'thermodynamic ’ constants K were calculated and consequently thermo-
dynamic functions of adsorption at 298.2 K. In Fig.1 some examples
162
of linearized Langmuir plots following the form of eqn. (2) are
reported. In Figs. 2 and 3, thermodynamic functions AGO, AH', and
AS0 at 298.2 K for adsorption of linear monocarboxylic acids are
reported as functions of the number of carbon atoms (carboxylic
function included), in n-heptane (Fig. 2) and in g-decane (Fig. 3)
as solvents, respectively. In Figs. 4 and 5, thermodynamic functions
for adsorption of linear alkanols in n-heptane (Fig. 4) and in
p-decane (Fig. 5) as solvents are reported, respectively.
1 I
5 10 Number 01 carbon atans
Fig. 4. Thermodynamic functions (J mol-l), -AH", -AGO, and -TAS', at T = 298.2 K, for adsorption of linear alkanols from n-heptane solutions onto a-Fe,Og, as functions of the number of carbon atoms. Data (present work) relative to cc-Fe,03 immobilized in the photo- synthetic membrane structure are denoted with full symbols, while open symbols refer to free, non immobilized sorbent [3].
0 -AH'lwm nunbn of carbon atcmsl
6- O-AC’
I I
5 10 Number of carbon atoms
Fig. 5. Thermodynamic functions (J mol-I), -AH" and -AGO, at T = 298.2 K, for adsorption of linear alkanols from n-decane solutions - onto cr-Fe203, as functions of the number of carbon atoms. Data (present work) relative to cc-Fe20 3 immobilized. in the photosynthetic membrane structure are denoted with full symbols, while open symbols refer to free, non immobilized sorbent [3].
163
Fig. 6. Mean surface area a, (~2/molecule) of molecules adsorbed
onto cl-Fe,O, under conditions of monolayer saturation as a function
of the number of carbon atoms in the aliphatic chain (carboxylic
functions included). Data (present work) relative to cr-Fe,O, immobilized in the photosynthetic membrane structure are denoted
with full symbols, while open symbols refer to free, non immobilized
sorbent [3].
The surface area of a-Fe,O, being known, mean areas a, occupied
by single molecules saturating the monolayer were calculated.as
reported in Experimental. Their values for the various systems
examined are collected in Fig. 6.
In Figs, 2-6, results obtained for a-Fe,O, immobilized in the
membrane are compared with those relative to free, non immobilized
sorbent as measured previously.
It may be first observed that free energies of adsorption are
substantially independent of the number of carbon atoms in the
molecular chains and are nearly constant, ranging between (1.6-1.8)
x 104 J mol-i for both acids and alcohols. As a consequence, AH" and
AS' variations as a function of the number of carbon atoms follow
the same pattern.
164
The same order of magnitude of AH" values for acids and alcohols
(see Figs. 2,3 on one side and Figs. 4,5 on the other) apparently
contradicts the consideration that chemisorption of acids should
produce a greater enthalpic effect than the predominantly physical
adsorption of alcohols. As a matter of fact, however, one should
bear in mind that AH' values for acids are apparent values only,
incorporating both adsorption effects and effects of monomer 2 dimer
equilibrium, which stabilize solutions and destabilize adsorption.
The minima in AH' as well as in AS" values may be interpreted by
London-type interactions, attributable to oscillating dipole moments
even on apolar or slightly polar molecules, the relative importance
of which is magnified when both solute and solvent have comparable
size. as may be remarked from the shift of minima in Fig. 3
relative to Fig. 2 and in Fig. 5 relative to Fig. 4, when going from
n-heptane to c-decane as solvents. - This explains the minimum of AH'
for C, acid and C, alcohol, which have an almost equal molecular
'length', as well as the minimum of AH" for the C, acid in n-decane, -
which is shifted by one or two carbon atoms for the alcohols in the
same solvent. The parallel entropy effects denote clearly in these
cases a more ordered adsorption configuration on the solid surface.
By determination of mean areas of adsorbed molecules on active
sites under conditions of monolayer saturation (Fig. 6), this
hypothesis is corroborated and the configuration of adsorbed mol-
ecules may be further investigated. The values of Fig. 6 relative
to aliphatic monocarboxylic acids show a generally constant surface
area of about 22-25 A' per molecule, with some exceptions, e.g. for
C5 and C, acids on ;-heptane, for which surface areas are nearly
doubled. An array of adsorbed molecules perpendicular to the surface,
in the first kind of conformation, or rather relaxed parallel to it,
in the second kind, may be inferred. These observations are again a
clear evidence of London-type interactions with the solvent, which
also appears, though less markedly, in the alcohols.
From Figs. 4-6, a different behaviour for alcohols between even
and odd numbers of carbon atoms in the molecular chain may be
165
evidenced. It may be explained in terms of Debye-type (dipole-dipole
and dipole-induced dipole) interactions, which have a major
responsibility in physical adsorption, and which also appear in the
enthalpies of fusion [6]. A similar differentiation may also be
observed in the melting enthalpies of linear aliphatic acids, while
such a behaviour does not appear in the graphs of Figs. 2-3. This,
however, does not contradict the interpretation given for alcohols,
as for acids chemisorption is prevailing and conceals any effect
deriving from much weaker dipolar interactions. Furthermore, the
'chain matching' (which is the result of solvent-solute interactions
being important scientifically [7-81 and determinant technologically,
e.g. in extreme-pressure lubrication mechanisms [3]) is less marked
and more diffuse (peaks are less high) in alcohols than in acids.
This may mean that, due to the smaller steric hindrance of the
hydroxy group, London forces in alcohols have always a certain
importance, even if 'chain matching' is able to enhance their effect.
Finally, if behaviour of adsorption onto cr-Fe,O, is compared with
that onto a-Fe,O, immobilized by photosynthetic membranes, the
following facts deserve attention. When considering Langmuir iso-
therms (Fig. 1 and eqn. (2)), it was experimentally noted that
integral heats of adsorption at constant molar fraction of solute
per unit mass of immobilized sorbent were lower by 75-85% than the
values measured on the free one, but substantially similar q, and
K, values could be obtained (eqn. (2)). In other words, the effect
of immobilization is shown only as a certain, yet fairly limited,
decrease of surface area. Thermodynamic functions for immobilized
cr-Fe,O, calculated, as described in Experimental, from K, values
and from differential heats q0 at monolayer coverage allowing for
decrease of specific surface area of sorbent, substantially coincide
with those relative to free, non-immobilized sorbent, as may be seen
by comparison in Figs. 2-5. On the contrary, mean surface areas of
adsorbed molecules (see Fig. 6) onto immobilized u-Fe,O, give the
same values as for free cc-Fe,O,, only if the B.E.T. surface area in
eqn. (5) is corrected, by a factor of 0.8, as stated above in the
166
experimental section. Both these aspects point to the same conclusion
The lowering of specific surface area, which accompanies immobiliza-
tion during the preparation of photosynthetic composite membranes
containing sorbents, is scarce enough to require sophisticated
methods for its detection, such as that employed in the present
paper. This is not in disagreement with the statement that, when in
this kind of membrane surface area of sorbents is evaluated by
permeability measurements of liquids [1], this determination gives
values practically undistinguishable with respect to B.E.T. values.
This latter type of determination, in fact, being indirect in nature,
gives a very high uncertainty when specific surface area is low, as
for the case of a-Fe,O, [I] (about 50%), and which goes down anyhow
(but not less than 6-10%) with increasing values of surface area.
Methods based on adsorption measurements [2] are certainly more
sensitive, as it has been confirmed for the model system examined
in this work.
CONCLUSION
It may be concluded that immobilization of sorbents in a membrane
structure prepared photochemically by the technique employed is able
to leave almost entirely active the sorbent surface, a goal which
is not easy to achieve by other means.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Technical assistance by Miss Cristina Crippa is gratefully
acknowledged.
REFERENCES
1 I.R. Bellobono, E. Selli, L. Righetto and F. Muffato, Mater. Chem.
Phys ., 19 (1988) 131.
2 I.R. Bellobono, M. Zeni and E. Selli, in B. Sedlacek and J.
Kahovec teds.), Synthetic Polymeric Membranes, W. de Gruyter,
Berlin, 1987, p. 113.
3 I.R. Bellobono, C. Di Fede and B. Bonura, Tribol. Lubrif., 17
(1982) 7.
4 T. Allen and R.M. Patel, J. Appl. Chem., 20 (1970) 165.
5 J.J. Kipling, Adsorption from solutions of non-electrolytes,
Academic Press, London and New York, 1965, pp. 248-250.
6 Landolt-BErnstein, Zahlenwerte und Funktionen, II Band, 4 Teil
Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1961, pp. 306-332.
7 T.C. Askwith, A. Cameron and R.F. Crouch, Proc. Roy. Sot. A, 291
(1966) 500.
8 W.J.S. Grew and A. Cameron, Proc. Roy. Sot. A, 327 (1972) 47.