The State of Afghanistan
Transcript of The State of Afghanistan
Jill Suzanne Kornetsky Managing Ethnic Conflict
The State of Afghanistan?
Introduction
The international community promised the Afghan people that
life would be better if the simply allowed us to help them
liberate their government and their soil of religious extremism.
Significant strides are being made at the national level to build
capacity, root out corruption, and expand the positive reach of
the Government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan. The
average rural Afghan is poor, illiterate, and without access to
basic infrastructure or newsmedia. To the villager, all the
outside world has brought is all it has ever brought: continued
violence, instability, and death. This paper seeks to better
understand ethnic conflict in Afghanistan, and to propose
research-supported solutions which might positively influence
capacity building and state building activities nationwide.
Conflict Background
Centuries of intertribal and international warfare combined
with unforgiving mountainous desert terrain, extreme poverty, and
10 October 2011 Page 1
Jill Suzanne Kornetsky Managing Ethnic Conflict
a culture of tribal isolationism have kept Afghanistan from
achieving any meaningful level of development, stability, or
social cohesion. President Karzai’s cabinet and the Afghan
National Assembly have not yet obtained the capacity for outreach
or action beyond Kabul, or the ability to create a unified Afghan
nation. National government remains plagued by corruption,
infighting, and insecurity atop the normal challenges of building
and refining an effective democracy. As the global community
enters its tenth year of intervention on Afghan soil, we seek to
understand if and how the effect of so much labor, capital, loss
of life and good intent is filtering down to the average Afghan.
Consensus seems to be that rampant violence and insecurity
prevent progress and democracy from reaching those most in need
of both.
Afghanistan is a landlocked country in South Asia, lying to
the west of Pakistan and to the east of Iran; to the north it
shares a border with Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, and
China. It is one of the oldest and most continually conflicted
areas of civilization known, as it occupies a strategic territory
10 October 2011 Page 2
Jill Suzanne Kornetsky Managing Ethnic Conflict
just slightly smaller than the state of Texas at the crossroads
between Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. The major ethnic
groups and their relative representation nationally are Pashtun
(42%), Tajik (27%), Hazara (9%), Uzbek (9%), Turkmen (3%), Baloch
(2%) and others (8%). Official national languages spoken are
Dari/Afghan Persian (50%) and Pashto (35%) while 30+ other minor
languages are spoken by 15% of the population; bilingualism is
very common across Afghanistan. Afghanistan’s ethnic makeup is a
mosaic of dozens if not hundreds of subdivisions of tribes1, each
fiercely loyal to their clan or village, and each suspicious of
its neighbors. The political sphere of post-2001 Afghanistan is
large and complicated2, with many former warlords starting their
own political parties and attempting something resembling
legitimacy. Ongoing dependency on NATO-ISAF for logistical,
security, training, and technical support simply adds to the
mileu of controversy and confusion.
1 See Appendix I: GIS Tribal Mosaic by Jill Kornetsky with Data from Anonymousat NPS2 See Appendix II: COIN Dynamics slide from Joint Chiefs of Staff powerpoint. To describe the dynamics in this image in prose form would result in a conflict analysis far longer than the scope of this paper…
10 October 2011 Page 3
Jill Suzanne Kornetsky Managing Ethnic Conflict
Based on minimum standards set forth by the Sphere project3,
Afghanistan has been and remains in a near-perpetual state of
humanitarian crisis. The majority Muslim (99%4) population of
Afghanistan numbers just under 30 million as of July 2011, up
from 18.4 million in 1995. Nearly 43% of the population is under
the age of 14, and life expectancy hovers around 45 years for
both males and females, ranking Afghanistan at a reflection of
just how severely underdeveloped Afghanistan is. Internally
Displaced Persons (IDPs) number over 350,000 and over 3 million
Afghan refugees currently reside in Iran and Pakistan5. An
influx of aid and reconstruction dollars since 2001 has boosted
the economy and provided some work, however unemployment has only
dropped from 40% in 2005 to 35% in 2008, and 36% of Afghans live
below the poverty line today. Much of the rural population
relies on subsistence agriculture for survival, and agriculture
accounts for 80 percent of the workforce in Afghanistan.
Expansion of the economy beyond industries of labor such as
3 Sphere Project. (2011).4 99% Nationally with 90% Sunni, 19% Shia and 1% Other. CIA. (2011)5 These first paragraphs synthesized with material from Blood (1994), the CIA World Factbook (2011), Library of Congress (2005), the National Vulnerability and Risk Assessment or NVRA (2008), the Afghanistan National Development Strategy or ANDS (2010), and UNHCR (2011).
10 October 2011 Page 4
Jill Suzanne Kornetsky Managing Ethnic Conflict
agriculture is further hampered by widespread illiteracy. In
2008, male literacy rates by province ranged from 14-64% and
female from 1-17% and 31% in Kabul6. The staggering lack of
human and physical development creates a situation rife with
conflict as the leaders of each ethnicity, tribe, and clan
scramble to divide limited resources and limited power merely to
survive.
Governance in Afghanistan is a mixture of the post-Bonn
Agreement constitutional democracy, which was modeled on Western
democracies and a revision of the old Afghan constitution from
their quasi-secular era of the 1960’s and 1970’s, and the tribal
systems of governance, with its shuras, jirgas, mullah, maliks,
and other roles and structures both unique to Afghan culture and
present in some form across Islamic states. Based on the text of
Bonn itself, the Afghan people should “freely determine their own
political future in accordance with the principles of Islam,
democracy, pluralism and social justice”7. Ongoing attempts to
6 Afghanistan National Surveillance System and ICON Institute. (2008). See Appendix III7 Government of Afghanistan. (2001)
10 October 2011 Page 5
Jill Suzanne Kornetsky Managing Ethnic Conflict
reshape the culture of Afghanistan from tribal isolationism to
active and meaningful parliamentary democracy in the style of the
West disregards the highly insular, highly decentralized system
of tribal elders and tribal councils that has been the way of
life for centuries. A modern democracy is suited to a modern or
modernizing country with the physical and communications
infrastructure to support the free exchange of ideas,
information, and people to every corner of a nation. Having
acted as the trans-continental crossroad since the times of
Hannibal and Ghengis Khan, Afghans have historically been caught
in a cycle of invasion and rebellion. In a harsh and isolated
physical environment, tribal people have learned to close ranks
around kin in the interest of self-protection, and to shut out or
fight off invaders and interlopers both foreign and domestic.
Afghanistan’s Potential for “Stateness”
In order for the disparate groups within Afghanistan to
reach a functional democracy, the literature points to the
problem of stateness, or the potential a coalescing society has
10 October 2011 Page 6
Jill Suzanne Kornetsky Managing Ethnic Conflict
to form the institutions and structures associated with being a
nation-state. In this new millennium where the definition of a
state has been challenged by the dissolution of the USSR, the
former Yugoslavia and even the former state of Czechoslovakia,
“Presumably, a truly sophisticated state theory covering the
state in its totality, at the same time not relying on any
general or essentialist assumption to grasp its uniqueness, its
processional nature and historical contingency may be a
interesting and demanding intellectual challenge. However, such a
theory would most likely also be a highly complex, cumbersome and
elusive construct. The state and its features could become fuzzy
and diffuse.8” In the case of Afghanistan, the issue of
forming a democratic state cannot be resolved without
understanding the potential Afghans have to form a socially
cohesive, functional democracy, that is, we must understand the
unique potential for stateness in this case. “Before you can
have a democracy, you must have a state, but to have a legitimate
and therefore durable state you eventually must have democracy.
The two are intertwined, but the precise sequencing of how and
8 Pfister, T. (2004).
10 October 2011 Page 7
Jill Suzanne Kornetsky Managing Ethnic Conflict
when to build the distinct but interlocking institutions needs
very careful thought.9”
Zhidas Daskalovski, in studying the democratic consolidation
in ethnically diverse Macedonia, notes the complexities of
building a collaborative democracy in pluralistic settings.
…a country is only democratically consolidated when democracy is the only game in town… [that is] when no significant political groups seriously attempt to overthrow the democratic regime… The main problems for achieving consolidation in pluralistic societies arise due to a ‘stateness’ problem, namely the disputes over the boundariesof the state, its character… the more the population of the territory of the state is comprised of plurinational, lingual, religious, or cultural societies, the more complex politics becomes because an agreement on the fundamentals of[the] democracy will be more difficult… how difficult it is to consolidate a regime if a significant group of its citizens is actively disobedient10.
While this notion is intuitive for anyone with a familiarity with
the scope and complexity of the Afghan situation, Daskalovski has
produced anecdotal evidence from the Macedonian case to warn
practitioners that the process of developing a democracy in
Afghanistan will be highly complicated.
9 Fukuyama, F. (2005). 10 Daskalovski, Z. (2004).
10 October 2011 Page 8
Jill Suzanne Kornetsky Managing Ethnic Conflict
Fukuyama notes that in cases where capacity for
statebuilding is absent often the international community must
supply some of the basic functions of the state, in order for
progress to begin. However he notes that the scope of assistance
is not a blanket policy and assisting nations must use caution
when supporting the democratic process outside of its borders.
“Outsiders are driven to supply sovereign-state functions because
of the internal weakness of the countries in question. But
stateness that is provided by outsiders often undermines the
ability of domestic actors to create their own robust
institutions. Too much state-building builds long-term
dependence, and may ultimately come to seem illegitimate to the
locals.” This is exactly the case in Afghanistan, whose people
initially embraced the assistance of a liberating force who
promised a better life under Western-style society than under the
Taliban. Ten years of stalled or insufficient progress has
eroded the confidence Afghans may have had in their international
friends. It is essential that the programs being completed in
Afghanistan today contribute to self-sufficiency alongside
statebuilding; a tangible return of power to Afghan hands is the
10 October 2011 Page 9
Jill Suzanne Kornetsky Managing Ethnic Conflict
only means of keeping anti-Western sentiment and the blame game
in check.
International “interference” is a source of much regional
discontent and global controversy about the approaches used by
the ISAF in assisting the Afghan people. While an international
military force adds another layer of complexity to the social
mix, Afghanistan’s problems of stateness and social cohesion are
not a construct of the West.
Afghanistan is a fragmented country, with its people dividedalong carious tribal, ethnic, linguistic and religious lines. The diverse and complex ethnic and linguistic structures of Afghan society have created many points of friction and flashpoints for violence… Only in times of crisis or when faced with a threat from the outside has a sense of national unity existed… These attempts [at a central authority] have failed, largely due to the resistance of and loyalty to local tribes and religious structures already in place. The vast diversity found in Afghanistan has produced many obstacles to building a liberal democracy and a strong and integrated nation11.
This is not to say that a state cannot be formed uniting the
people of Central Asia; in the past Afghans have embraced a
monarchy and for a time succeeded in building a communal Afghan
identity. As Young notes, the unity in Afghanistan is dependent 11 Young, D.O. (2007).
10 October 2011 Page 10
Jill Suzanne Kornetsky Managing Ethnic Conflict
upon collective recognition of an external threat requiring
collaboration to repel. The problem in Afghanistan at the moment
is the lack of a collective opinion about who the “bad guys” are,
and until the ISAF and its civilian counterparts can demonstrate
any kind of progress – towards stability, improved livelihoods,
security from violence, towards Afghan independence – “the West”
will continue to be just another interloping force to contend
with. Progress in good governance and development will allow
recategorization of NATO as friend, and of the Taliban as foe, to
the population.
Since contact with the West, Antonio Giustozzi argues the
tribal way of life has been threatened in Afghanistan, for better
or for worse. Tribalism finds its roots in geographic isolation
and scarcity of resources around which kin can gather to share
and protect. The influx of education, healthcare, new government
institutions, travel, media, and international military action
has exposed Afghans to ideas and opportunities previously unknown
to them. He cites the presence of the Taliban itself as an
arbiter of the end of the tribal way’s steady decline. Giustozzi
10 October 2011 Page 11
Jill Suzanne Kornetsky Managing Ethnic Conflict
sees statebuilding in Afghanistan as adhering to one of three
interestingly categorized frameworks: Hobbesian or pessimistic-
conservative-fatalistic, Kantian or liberal-progressive-hopeful,
and Machiavellian or practical-self-interested. While most of us
struggle between Hobbes and Kant, short-term versus long-term
goals and outlook; Giustozzi poses that in the case of
Afghanistan, Machiavelli’s The Prince would provide better
insight. “…The only realistic option for the evolution of a
strong Afghan state is the self-interest of Afghan political
elites, either the current or future ones. When they will see
that institution bulding enhances the survivability of the
political regime, they will start investing in it seriously.12”
A rush to presidential rule and unification into a
single nation-state overlooks the notion that while democracy is
the best known way of governing free people in the modern age,
the cooperative and centralized nature of democracy is something
that evolves naturally for each culture. The United States
didn’t start out with the legal and governmental structures of
today’s democracy. Settlements had to coalesce into colonies; 12 Giustozzi, A. (2011)
10 October 2011 Page 12
Jill Suzanne Kornetsky Managing Ethnic Conflict
colonies had to establish collegial trade and movement between
one another; a common foreign enemy acted as the impetus to unite
forces and start a revolution; a consensus that the people of the
New World would no longer find itself under the thumb of the
crown and instead would form a More Perfect Union finally led to
the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the
United States of America. The freedom embodied within America is
indeed a beautiful labor, but the same as with any birthing
processes it requires work, pain, time and blood.
Rome was not built overnight and over three hundred years
later America is still in the process of building and refining “a
more perfect union.” How then, logically, can the international
community expect the Afghan people to adopt and perfect their own
democracy in a decade or less? Afghanistan can be assisted in
its efforts to democratically consolidate and form a sovereign
state; when doing this however, special attention must be taken
to ensure that the structures and institutions being built are
suited to and owned by the people of Afghanistan.
10 October 2011 Page 13
Jill Suzanne Kornetsky Managing Ethnic Conflict
Two Proposed Approaches to Mediate Ethnic Conflict
Recent surveys show that in this time of mass movements of
IDPs and refugees, radio has become an important source of
information in rural areas; for women who are less likely to
leave the house due to local violence, a radio can be the primary
source of information about the outside world13. In rural areas,
the United Nations is using radio and television to address
illiteracy; in Kandahar14, radio programs are voicing complaints
to government and government is actually responding. Radio and
television have the ability to bridge space, bringing together
countrymen living hundreds of miles apart. Without having to
hold massive town hall meetings, these technologies taken for
granted in most places have the ability to unite a conversation,
inspire debate, and dispel rumors. It will take time for the
products of development – physical infrastructure, higher
education, primary and emergency healthcare, the ability for
13 Kamal, S. (2004). 14 http://www.irinnews.org/report.aspx?reportid=23953 and http://www.unesco.org/new/en/unesco/themes/pcpd/unesco-in-post-crisis-situations/educational-radio-and-television/
10 October 2011 Page 14
Jill Suzanne Kornetsky Managing Ethnic Conflict
professional self-determination - to reach every Afghan village.
Witnessing the progress that is being made elsewhere, through
documentaries, talk radio, and news programs, would allow those
waiting their turn a bit of faith that help is indeed on the way.
By modeling a new series of channels after America’s C-SPAN
(Cable-Satellite Public Affairs Network), this intervention would
address several key issues underlying perpetual ethnic conflict
in Afghanistan.
Firstly, a radio and television network devoted to
transparently and completely recording and transmitting meetings
of the Afghan national government, as well as those of Provincial
and District governments would provide an opportunity for every
Afghan to engage in their civic society. Just being informed of
life outside the village has the potential to increase
understanding between regions and ethnicities; it’s difficult to
argue with most news footage and directly recorded audio quotes.
The ability to watch over their elected officials may empower the
polity to be more critical of leaders whose motivations or
policies are unclear.
10 October 2011 Page 15
Jill Suzanne Kornetsky Managing Ethnic Conflict
Secondly, a radio and television network devoted entirely to
the minutiae of political meetings may inspire politicians to
more carefully consider and coordinate their standpoints.
Instead of finding the protection of a closed door, negotiations
that have been historically rife with corruption, graft, and
nepotism will be stripped bare for all to judge. As with any
nation’s politicians, there are some who operate in the right
based on principle, and some who are intent on derailing the
process based on distorted principles. The largest group,
though, are those mere mortals like us – those who strive to do
right, but occasionally falter; programming that strives to show
unbiased, unedited coverage of reality can be our big brother.
When people are watching, we tend to be on our best behavior;
when there are only a handful of broadcast channels available,
people will watch whatever is being broadcast.
While radio and television are perhaps more difficult to
distribute than a newspaper or flyer, in a country where some
provinces have an average adult literacy rate of less than 10%,
10 October 2011 Page 16
Jill Suzanne Kornetsky Managing Ethnic Conflict
information sharing by print means alone inherently favors the
elite and those lucky enough to obtain primary education. In
combination with additional educational networks, a public
affairs news network would provide a tool for villagers to become
verbally literate about issues that concern them. Properly
coordinated with national and local teachers’ curricula, this
network could also be a vehicle for adults and children learning
to read, offering relevant subject matter on tolerance, progress,
and development for motivation. Delivering radio and television
services to 30 million constituents in a mountainous area the
size of Texas will require more than just some cameras and media
training – there is a need for capacity building and creating
social acceptance for media which was banned under Taliban rule.
There is some minimal communications infrastructure available in
Afghanistan – as of 2007 there were about 8 television networks,
50 private radio stations and 30 community based radio stations,
alongside Radio Television Afghanistan’s state-owned channels.
Additional capacity will be needed in order to achieve
nationwide broadcast of at least a few channels, regional
10 October 2011 Page 17
Jill Suzanne Kornetsky Managing Ethnic Conflict
broadcasting, and local broadcasting. Technical experts will be
required initially in order to select appropriate techniques -
whether radio repeater towers, satellites, or the internet would
be the best medium for in-country distribution. Journalism and
media training programs in each of the 34 provinces which have
shown success in Africa at bridging divides, as well as technical
training for off-camera personnel would accompany distribution of
simple, user-friendly radios and televisions. A simple idea,
yes, but a C-SPAN for Afghanistan (A-SPAN) is the kind of
undertaking that requires partnerships – this isn’t the first
time radio and television have been brought successfully to
conflicted and post-conflict countries, improving the base
situation due to increased communication and transparency, and
there is no need to reinvent the wheel in Afghanistan.
The second proposed strategy for improved intergroup
relations in Afghanistan is a refocusing on grassroots
development. Rural Afghans have been oppressed and war weary for
decades now. A fiercely self-reliant and independent people have
seen their autonomy eroded by more than two decades of
10 October 2011 Page 18
Jill Suzanne Kornetsky Managing Ethnic Conflict
fundamentalist, totalitarian Taliban rule. What the outside
world sees as Afghan culture is a mere shadow of the pride of the
Afghan people; true Afghans are a people who repelled and
expelled countless conquering armies, a network of tribal
militias who outlasted the Soviets at the height of communist
power. The fabric of Afghan culture has unraveled to the point
that the youth of today have no memory of Afghanistan’s good
times; individual power must be restored in the community elders
and leaders at the village level, and it must be instilled in the
new generations before another 30 years are lost to misguided
follower fundamentalism.
Before the NATO-ISAF15 era in Afghanistan is over, peace and
development practitioners must take advantage of the wealth of
resources gathered at the Provincial Reconstruction Team secure
bases before international pressure forces military-humanitarian
withdrawal. The allied nations of NATO have brought together
experts from around the world, with experience resolving
conflicts around the world, in the interest of rebuilding the
15 See Appendix with NATO-ISAF PRT Placemat
10 October 2011 Page 19
Jill Suzanne Kornetsky Managing Ethnic Conflict
country and polity of Afghanistan. Japan16 has contributed
Demobilization, Disarmament, and Reintegration experts who work
with local communities to bring former Talib fighters back into
the fold. Canada and Europe have focused on applying the 3D
Approach17 (Diplomacy, Defense, and Development aka the Whole of
Government Approach) within their respective Regional Commands.
Norway18 operates a Sub National Governance Project to strengthen
the offices of provincial governors and councils as well as
administration of individual municipality. New Zealand19 has a
series of projects in Bamyan province; most involve improving or
repairing schools, orphanages, and local bridges so that life can
resume and progress in rural Afghanistan.
16 http://www.mofa.go.jp/region/middle_e/afghanistan/aid0403-3.html and http://www.ngo-jvc.net/jann/Documents/DDR.pdf 17 http://cicam.ruhosting.nl/teksten/act.07.grotenhuis.owen%20paper.pdf and http://www.3dsecurity.org/ 18 http://www.norway.org.af/News_and_events/prt/faryab1/ 19 http://www.nzdf.mil.nz/operations/deployments/afghanistan/nz-prt/projects.htm
10 October 2011 Page 20
Jill Suzanne Kornetsky Managing Ethnic Conflict
Conclusion
With the ethnic coexistence and co-ethnic development
situation in Afghanistan still very much up in the air after ten
years, the world continues to search for effective interventions
in the unique security and cultural environment it provides. The
history, culture, and geography of Afghanistan predisposes the
nation to strict and even violent divisions between groups. For
Afghanistan to discover its own potential for “stateness,” it
will be essential that everyday Afghan citizens recognize the
benefits of working together and the disadvantage of continued
conflict. We must seek to encourage political consciousness at
all levels of society by offering average citizens a window into
the nebulous world of Afghan national politics; without public
awareness and action, overcoming social divisions would be
impossible.
By opening top-down government processes to the public, we
might encourage greater transparency and fidelity in government
officials. No longer will Afghans be relegated to knowing only
the good and bad results of their tribal infighting; watching the
10 October 2011 Page 21
Jill Suzanne Kornetsky Managing Ethnic Conflict
process leaves room for input about negotiations and issues, and
informs Afghan citizens of how well their representatives are
serving their purpose. Refocusing international resources and
expertise at bottom-up community building will help to strengthen
capacity and improve standards of living, eliminating much of the
root cause of interethnic conflict in Afghanistan. As more
secure, happier, and healthier communities come together for
national progress, squabbling over prestige and who has it better
or worse can be replaced with genuine efforts at collaboration.
10 October 2011 Page 22
Jill Suzanne Kornetsky Managing Ethnic Conflict
Reference List
Afghanistan National Surveillance System and ICON Institute. (2008). National
Vulnerability and Risk Assessment 2007/8: A Profile of Afghanistan. Retrieved
on 12 September 2011 from http://nrva.cso.gov.af/
Afghanistan National Surveillance System , UNIFEM and WFP. (2004). 2003
National Vulnerability and Risk Assessment. Retrieved on 12 September 2011
from http://www.unifem.org/afghanistan/docs/pubs/04/NRVA_04.pdf
Blood, P. (1994). Afghanistan: A Country Study (GPO for Library of Congress).
Retrieved on 10 September 2011 from http://countrystudies.us/afghanistan/
Church C. and M. Rogers. (2006). Designing for Results: Integrating Monitoring
and Evaluation in Conflict Transformation Programs. Retrieved on 12 September
2011 from http://www.sfcg.org/Documents/manualpart1.pdf
CIA. (2011). CIA World Factbook. Retrieved on 1 October from
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/af.html
Daskalovski, Z. (2004). Democrtic Consolidation and the ‘Stateness’ Problem:
The Case of Macedonia. Global Review of Ethnopolitics 3(2), 52-66. Retrieved
on 22 September 2011 from
http://www.ethnopolitics.org/ethnopolitics/archive/volume_III/issue_2/
daskalovski.pdf
Fukuyama, F. (2005). “Stateness” First. Journal of Democracy 16 (1). Retrieved
on 12 June 2011 from
http://muse.jhu.edu/login?uri=/journals/journal_of_democracy/v016/16.1fukuyama
.html
10 October 2011 Page 23
Jill Suzanne Kornetsky Managing Ethnic Conflict
Giustozzi, A. (2011). Kant, Hobbes or… Machiavelli? Facing the grim choices
of state-building in Afghanistan. Anthony Hyman Memorial Lecture Series.
Retrieved on 10 June 2011 from
http://www.soas.ac.uk/cccac/events/anthonyhyman/file67135.pdf
Government of Afghanistan. (2010). Afghanistan National Development Strategy.
Retrieved on 12 September 2011 from
http://www.embassyofafghanistan.org/documents/Afghanistan_National_Development
_Strategy_eng.pdf
Government of Afghanistan. (2004). Constitution of Afghanistan. Retrieved on
12 September 2011 from
http://www.supremecourt.gov.af/PDFiles/constitution2004_english.pdf
Government of Afghanistan. (2001). Bonn Agreement. Retrieved on 25 September
2011 from http://www.afghangovernment.com/AfghanAgreementBonn.htm
Kamal, S. (2004). Working Paper #27: Disconnected from Discourse: Womens
Radio Listening in Rural Samangan, Afghanistan. Retrieved on 4 October 2011
from http://web.mit.edu/cis/www/migration/pubs/rrwp/27_Kamal.pdf
Lederach, J. P., Neufeldt, R., and Culbertson, H, (2007). Reflective
Peacebuilding: A Planning, Monitoring, and Learning Toolkit. Retrieved on 12
September 2011 from http://www.sais-jhu.edu/bin/y/j/reflective-peacebuilding-
toolkit.pdf
Pfister, T. (2004). From State to Stateness. Queens University Belfast
Unpublished Manuscript. Retrieved on 10 October 2010 from
http://www.qub.ac.uk/polproj/reneg/pdfs/Pfister-From_State_to_Stateness%20.pdf
10 October 2011 Page 24
Jill Suzanne Kornetsky Managing Ethnic Conflict
Sphere Project. (2011). The Sphere Project: Humanitarian Charter and Minimum
Standards in Disaster Response. Retrieved on 4 September 2011 from
http://www.sphereproject.org/content/view/720/200/lang,english/
UNHCR. (2011). UNHCR Country Operations Profile – Afghanistan. Retrieved on
16 September 2011 from http://www.unhcr.org/cgi-bin/texis/vtx/page?
page=49e486eb6
USAID. (2010) Theories of Change and Indicator Development in Conflict
Management and Mitigation. Retrieved on 12 September 2011 from
http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PNADS460.pdf
USIP. (2008). Conflict-sensitive approaches to development, humanitarian
assistance and peace building: tools for peace and conflict impact assessment.
Retrieved on 2 October 2011 from
http://www.usip.org/files/file/chapter_2__266.pdf
US Library of Congress. (2008). Country Profile: Afghanistan, August 2008.
Retrieved on 15 September 2011 from
http://lcweb2.loc.gov/frd/cs/profiles/Afghanistan.pdf
Varshney, A. (2003). Nationalism, Ethnic Conflict and Rationality. Retrived
on 10 October 2011 from http://www-personal.umich.edu/~satran/PoliSci%2006/Wk
%204-2%20Sacred%20Values%20Varshney.pdf
Young, D.O. (2007). Overcoming the Obstacles to Establishing a Democratic
State in Afghanistan. Institute for Strategic Studies. Retrieved on 15
September 2011 from
http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pdffiles/pub818.pdf
10 October 2011 Page 25
Jill Suzanne Kornetsky Managing Ethnic Conflict
Appendix I: GIS Map of Tribal Mosaic by Jill Kornetsky
Data from Anonymous at the Naval Postgraduate School: OverlaidTribal Subdivisions
10 October 2011 Page 26
Jill Suzanne Kornetsky Managing Ethnic Conflict
Appendix II: Afghanistan COIN Dynamics Chart from Joint Chiefs ofStaff PPT20
20
10 October 2011 Page 28
Jill Suzanne Kornetsky Managing Ethnic Conflict
Appendix III: Human Development Index (HDI) and Components of HDI
10 October 2011 Page 30
Jill Suzanne Kornetsky Managing Ethnic Conflict
Appendix IV: Literacy Rates (from NVRA 2007/8)
10 October 2011 Page 31
Jill Suzanne Kornetsky Managing Ethnic Conflict
Appendix V21: ISAF Regional Commands and ProvincialReconstruction Teams
Cooperation and Coordination with the PRTs is a Sine Qua Non May Provide Ideal Sites for Repeating Towers and Other Technology
21 Taken from http://www.nato.int/isaf/docu/epub/maps/graphics/afganistan_prt_rc.jpg on 24 March 2011
10 October 2011 Page 32