The Next Education Revolution: The Engaged Campus in the Disrupted University
Transcript of The Next Education Revolution: The Engaged Campus in the Disrupted University
The Next “Education Revolution”?The Engaged Campus in the Disrupted University
Keynote Presentation
Engagement Australia’s 12th International
Conference of Engaged Scholars & Practitioners
July 21, 2015
Dan ButinProfessor and Founding Dean, School of Education & Social Policy, Merrimack College, USA
Executive Director, Center for Engaged [email protected]
@danbutinpresentation available at: https://merrimack.academia.edu/DanButin
This is the Next Education Revolution:Teaching is Easy…Learning is Hard
Define what we are good at Hybridization & Revitalization
transmission transformation
Form? Function?
Relevance?
Theories of innovation
Drivers of change
The Engaged University
Technology is forcing the fundamental rethinking of teaching
& learning in the university
Theo
rist
s
Christensen (2011): The Innovative University
Kuhn (1970): The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Rogers (1962): Diffusion of Innovations
Satir (1991): The Satir Model
Multiple theoretical frameworks
This time it’s different…
• Market Pressures & Segmentation
• Technological Drivers
• Demographic Changes
• Fiscal Disinvestment
• “democratization” of knowledge
Disruption Pressures – External
• Transmission Model
• “Unbundling” of faculty work; Adjunct-driven
• Splintering of pathways
•Retention-Poor & Remediation-Prone•Loss of Vision/Mission
Disruption Pressures – Internal
Technological Drivers
LEARNING ANALYTICS (“BIG DATA”)
ADAPTIVE TESTING (“STEALTH ASSESSMENTS”)
INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEMS
NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING
CURRICULAR MODULARIZATION
Implications for the “disrupted university”
BREAKING THE “IRON TRIANGLE”:
COST, ACCESS, AND QUALITY
OVERCOMING BAUMOL’S COST DISEASE
This time is different…because technology is different…The “Iron Triangle” of Higher Education Baumol’s “Cost Disease”
This time is different…because technology is different…in mapping “knowledge domains”
1. Known constraints (no “degrees of freedom”)
2. Obvious predictable repeatable (“best practices”)
1. Knowable & unknowable constraints (n “degrees of freedom”)
2. CALCULATION + judgment (emergent practices)
1. Knowable constraints (some “degrees of freedom”)
2. JUDGEMENT + calculation (good practices)
1. Lacking or unknowable constraints2. Unpredictable (novel practices)
“Cynefin Framework”
This time is different…because technology is different…in “unbundling” faculty work
1. Known constraints (no “degrees of freedom”)
2. Obvious predictable repeatable (“best practices”)
1. Knowable & unknowable constraints (n “degrees of freedom”)
2. CALCULATION + judgment (emergent practices)
1. Knowable constraints (some “degrees of freedom”)
2. JUDGEMENT + calculation (good practices)
1. Lacking or unknowable constraints2. Unpredictable (novel practices)
“Cynefin Framework”
A Pivotal Moment
Transfer of information.....Apprenticeship into Wikipedia…..
.....Transformation of knowledge…..Apprenticeship into democracy
The key insight…Transfer of Information
• Surface
• Single-loop
• Novice
• Learning I
Transformation of Knowledge
• Deep
• Double-loop
• Expert
• Learning II
PASSIVE
Minimal instructor
substantial digital
ACTIVE
Some instructor
Some digital
CONSTRUCTIVE
More instructor
Less digital
INTERACTIVE
substantial instructor
minimal digital
declarative procedural contextual
Perry dualism multiplicity relativism commitment
Belenky received subjective procedural constructed
Baxter-Magiolda absolute transitional independent contextual
Chi active constructive interactive
Rethinking the role of the faculty and engagement: From the “Flipped Classroom” to the “Flipped
University”
Knowledge-centered
Student-centered
Project-centered
The Engaged UniversityTYPE OF
CLASSROOMGOALS
ROLE OF
INSTRUCTOR
TYPE OF
LEARNINGIMPLICATIONS
Knowledge
-centeredTraditional
Checklist;
EfficientExpert
Passive;
surface
Knowledge
transfer
Student-
centered
Flipped
classroom
Student
engagement
Curator and
guideActive
Faculty
professional
development
Project-
centered
Linking
Theory and
Practice
Impact;
Effective
Researcher;
“community as
text”
AuthenticKnowledge
exchange; 4 Rs