THE IMPACT OF PLANT-DERIVED SMOKE ON SEED GERMINATION IN THE CONTEXT OF SWAILING
Transcript of THE IMPACT OF PLANT-DERIVED SMOKE ON SEED GERMINATION IN THE CONTEXT OF SWAILING
PL A N T F U N C T I O N I N G U N D E R E N V I R O N M E N T A L S T R E S S P. 233-239
Cracow, 12th to the 15th September, 2012
THE IMPACT OF PLANT-DERIVED SMOKE ON SEED
GERMINATION IN THE CONTEXT OF SWAILING
Renata Bączek-Kwinta, Marcin MarkowiczUniversity of Agriculture in Krakow, Faculty of Agriculture and Economics,
Department of Plant Physiology, ul. Podłuzna 3, 30-239 Kraków, Poland
Corresponding author: : [email protected]
Abstract Smoke generated by wildfires have special ecological impact in various fire-prone
environment in Africa, Australia, and both Americas. However, in the countries of moderate
climate zones, swailing (controlled burning of meadows) is often, although illegally, prac-
ticed by farmers. Hence, the influence of smoke generated from plant debris on seed germi-
nation and radicle growth of 4 crops, popularly grown and 3 weed species, occurring in Cen-
tral Europe was studied. Smoke had stimulative effect on seeds germination of 6 from
7 studied species. There was no impact on germination of meadow cress seeds, but in this
case strong stimulation of radicle growth was noticed. The influence of smoke on germination
was the strongest in case of red cabbage, as the difference between smoke-treated and control
seeds was 60%, and the stimulation of growth of radicles was obtained. Summing up, plant-
derived smoke can stimulate seed germination and seedling vigour of some crop and weed
plants of moderate climate countries. Therefore, smoke generated by swailing can cause local
changes in both the natural and agricultural environments.
Key words: germination; seed; smoke; weed
Introduction
The role of fire-related cues (smoke and heat) in alterations of ecosystem prop-
erties in fire-prone areas such as chapparal, fynbos, kwongan or matorral, in Aus-
tralia, both Americas and Africa is obvious (Roche et al. 1997; Keeley and Foth-
eringham 1998, Brown et al. 2003; Crosti et al. 2006). Since the 1990s it has been
known that not only heat, but also smoke itself can affect seed germination (De
Lange and Boucher 1990), having both positive and negative impact (Drewes et al.
1995; Light et al. 2002; Daws et al. 2007). Physiologically active substances pres-
Renata Bączek-Kwinta, Marcin Markowicz
234
ent in smoke are mainly nitric oxides and butenolide derivatives. The latter have
wider physiological and ecological impact than nitric oxides (Flematti et al. 2004;
2005; Van Staden et al. 2005). They have been termed karrikinolides or karrikins
(KAR). The compound 3-methyl-2H-furo[2,3-c]pyran-2-one, obtained from plant-
derived smoke, has been referred to KAR1 (Chiwocha et al. 2009). Karrikins are
water soluble, thermostable, long lasting in solution and highly active at very low
concentration of 1-9 M in darkness (Flematti et al., 2004; Light et al 2005).
Physiologically active butenolide derivatives can be even synthesized in laboratory
conditions (Flematti et al. 2005; Light et al., 2005; Nagase et al 2008; Sun et al.
2008).
Physiological impact of smoke compounds on seeds of approx. 1200 species
proves their physiological and ecological role in various ecosystems. However, one
must remember that the number of 1200 is only 0.38% all known plant species
according to the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Re-
sources (total 315 000, www.iucnredlist.org/documents/summarystatistics/2010
_1RL_Stats_Table_1.pdf]. Moreover, most of species can form various ecotypes,
and cultivars of crops are bred in the majority of the countries. Hence, the studies
on the impact of smoke and its compounds should not be restricted to fire-prone
environments. It was borne in mind that swailing (burning of meadows), often
practised by farmers n the areas of moderate climate, may also have an impact on
the local vegetation. Hence, the purpose of this work was to examine the influence
of smoke on seed germination and radicle growth of selected popularly grown
crops and some weed species occurring in Central Europe.
Materials and methods
Seed material. Seeds of seven species were used. Four crops: lettuce (Lactuca
sativa L., two cultivars having seeds insensitive to light: ‘Królowa Majowych’ and
‘Rozalka’), rapeseed (Brassica napus L., cv. ‘Mlochowski’), red cabbage (B. olera-
cea L. var. capitata f. rubra, cv. ‘Langedijker Polana’) and white cabbage (B. ole-
racea L. var. capitata f. alba cv. ‘Ditmarska’) were examined, as well as three
weed species: coltsfoot (Tussilago farfara L.), meadow cress (Cardamine pratensis L.)
and sorrel (Rumex acetosa L.). Lettuce and coltsfoot belong to the Asteraceae,
whereas cabbages and meadow cress to Brassicaceae, and sorrel belongs to Poly-
gonaceae family.
The source of smoke and smoke treatment. Two sets of seeds of each species
(and cultivar in case of lettuce) were placed in sealed boxes, in Petri dishes of
a diameter 4 cm, on a moistened blotting paper. Semi-dried plant debris (leaves and
stems of various grass species, 0.5 g FW), collected from a local meadow, was
burned in a glass dish, and smoke was directed to one of the boxes by a fan from
The impact of plant-derived...
235
a distance approx. 1 m, for 3 min. Burned and cooled ash was left in the box, to-
gether with the seeds, in an open dish, for 24 h. The treatment simulated the impact
of swailing, when not only smoke affects the environment, but also the volatiles
emitted from the burned debris. Control seeds were kept with similar dish filled
with unburned debris. Germination was performed in darkness for 5 days, the tem-
perature was 20/17ºC (day/night), relative humidity ca. 90%. Germination counts
were performed daily. Germination was considered when the radicle protruded 1 mm.
Statistical analysis
Each treatment consisted of four replicates of 10 seeds. The percentage of ger-
minated seeds of individual species and cultivar was arcsine transformed and the
data were compared among the species (also cultivar) and the treatment using one-
way analysis of variance (ANOVA at p<0.05). In case of the length of the radicles,
Student t-test was used to compare two means among the species, at p=0.05.
Results and discussion
The volatile compounds contained in smoke and/or burned plant debris had
stimulative effect on seed germination of all the studied species but meadow cress
(Table 1, Fig.1). Germination stimulation was noticed just on the 1st day in case of
lettuce, rapeseed, sorrel and coltsfoot (Table 1). Lettuce seeds are often used as
a germination model, also in smoke experiments (Jager at al. 1996), but the re-
sponse of seeds may greatly vary upon the cultivar due to its differentiated light-
sensitivity. In this work, performed on two cultivars having seeds insensitive to
light (unpublished results), genotypic differentiation was shown as different germi-
nation pattern of seed of both used cultivars (‘Rozalka’ seeds germinated faster,
Table 1), but their positive response to smoke was distinct (Table 1). Moreover,
growth of ‘Rozalka’ radicles was improved, as on the 4th day they were approx.
4 mm (20%) longer than in the control ones (Table 2). Sparg et al. (2005) dis-
cussed the role of smoke at the post-germination level, based on their results as
well as these obtained by Brown et al. (2003), and the improvement of seedling
vigour was raised.
Germination of seeds of rapeseed (Table 1) and both cabbage species was
stimulated by the treatment (Table 1, Fig. 1). The impact of smoke was stronger in
the case of red than white cabbage seeds, as the differences in percentages were 60
and 25%, respectively. Additionally, the effect of smoke on growth of red cabbage
radicles was distinct (Table 2), whereas there was no such response in case of white
cabbage (data not shown). Interestingly, smoke had no effect on germination of
seeds of meadowcress, which belongs to the same family as cabbage and rapeseed
Renata Bączek-Kwinta, Marcin Markowicz
236
(Brassicaceae), but triggered strong positive growth response in meadow cress
radicles, because their length was 160% of control upon the smoke treatment
(Table 2).
Table 1. The effect of smoke on seed germination during first 3 days.
Mean percentage of seeds germinated in four Petri dishes
(number of seeds in each dish = 10) ± standard deviation (SD) were given
Day of germination, % of germinated seedsClassification
Species,
cultivar
Treatment:
control (C),
smoke (S) 1. 2. 3.
C 5 ±7.07 a 90 ±0.00 b 100 ±0.00 bLettuce,
‘Królowa
Majowych’ S 15 ±7.07 a 95 ±7.07 b 100 ±0.00 b
C 50 ±7.07 a 80 ±7.07 b 90 ±7.07 bLettuce
‘Rozalka’ S 70 ±14.2 a 95 ±7.07 b 95 ±7.07 b
C 0.0 ±0.00 a 25 ±14.1 b 50 ±0.00 cRed cabbage
S 0.0 ±0.00 a 85 ±7.07 b 85 ±7.07 b
C 0.0 ±0.00 a 65±7.07 b 80 ±0.00 cWhite cabbage
S 0.0 ±0.00 a 90 ±14.1 b 95 ±7.07 b
C 25 ±35.4 a 95 ±0.00 b 100 ±0.00 b
Crops
RapeseedS 50 ±28.3 a 95 ±14.1 b 100 ±7.07 b
C 48 ±3.18 a 48 ±3.18 a 48 ±3.18 aColtsfoot
S 55 ±7.07 a 55 ±7.07 a 55 ±7.07 a
C 100 ±0.00 a 100 ±0.00 a 100 ±0.00 aMeadowcress
S 100 ±0.00 a 100 ±0.00 a 100 ±0.00 a
C 0 ±0.00 a 85 ±7.07 b 90 ±0.00 b
Weeds
SorrelS 10 ±0.00 a 90 ±14.1 b 95 ±7.07 b
Mean values with different letters (a–c) are significantly different (P\0.05)
Physiological basis for the mode of action of smoke compounds has not been
unraveled yet. Egerton-Warburton (1998) indicated that smoke acts as a scarifying
agent to the seed surface, but in the paper of Briggs and Morris (2008) it was
shown that the mechanism is not universal. On the other hand, most researchers
agree that smoke and its main physiologically active component, butenolide, inter-
acts with gibberellin, ABA and auxin pathways in seeds (Light et al. 2005; Chiwo-
cha et al. 2009). It can probably result in up-regulation of expansins, the proteins
disrupting the hydrogen bonds within the cell wall (Jain et al, 2008). Smoke com-
pounds, possessing their oxidative role, may also interfere with the cell redox status
(Light et al. 2009). All these circumstances lead to the supposition that the key
smoke compounds, butenolides, act as a new class of plant growth regulators
(Light et al. 2009).
The impact of plant-derived...
237
Red cabbage
Control Smoke
White cabbage
Control Smoke
Fig. 1. Germinated cabbage seeds, day 2. Samples representative for 4 replicates
(Petri dishes)
The results of the studies on the impact of smoke on germination can be appli-
cable in some cases, as the smoke extract can be used in case of late sowing to ac-
celerate germination (Light and Van Staden 2004), to overcome the light require-
ment for germination (Merrit et al. 2006) and to improve the vigour of some
indigenous plants (Sparg et al. 2005; Emery and Lacey 2010). Some papers also
emphasized the role of smoke compounds as conditioning agents in unfavourable
conditions (Jain et al. 2008). In case of seeds of persistent weed or invasive spe-
cies, such as Avena fatua L. (Kępczyński et al., 2010, 2012), the experiments can
Renata Bączek-Kwinta, Marcin Markowicz
238
explain the mechanism of germination stimulation and may improve new methods
for prevention. Other valuable application is the re-vegetation of degraded areas
(Light and Van Staden 2004).
Table 2. The effect of smoke on length of the radicles on the 4th day of germination
(only the significant differences were shown). Means of 4 Petri dishes ± SD were given.
The significance of differences between means was evaluated by Student’s t-test:
* - differentiation at P=0,05, ** - P=0,01, *** - P=0,001.
Species, cultivar
Treatment:
control (C),
smoke (S)
The length of the radicles [mm]
on the 4th day of germination
C 22.7 ± 0.90 **
Lettuce ‘Rozalka’S
27.2 ± 2.01
(120%)
C 11.5 ± 6.60*
Red cabbageS
18.5 ± 6.60
(161%)
C 24.4 ± 5.70***
MeadowcressS
38.9 ± 6.20
(159%)
References
Briggs CL, Morris EC. (2008) Seed-coat dormancy in Grevillea linearifolia: little change in perme-
ability to an apoplastic tracer after treatment with smoke and heat. Ann Bot 101:623–632.
Brown NAC, Van Staden J, Daws MJ, Johnson T (2003) Patterns in the seed germination response to
smoke in plants from the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. S Afric J Bot 69:514-525
Chiwocha SDS, Dixon KW, Flematti GR, Ghisalberti EL, Merritt DJ, Nelson DC, Riseborough J-
AM, Smith SM (2009) Karrikins: A new family of plant growth regulators in smoke. Plant Sci
177:252–256
Crosti R, Ladd PG, Dixon KW, Piotto B (2006) Post-fire germination: the effect of smoke on seeds of
selected species from the central Mediterranean basin. Forest Ecol Management 221:306-312
Daws MI, Davies J, Pritchard HW, Brown NAC, Van Staden J (2007) Butenolide from plant-derived
smoke enhances germination and seedling growth of arable weed species. Plant Growth Regul
51:73-82
De Lange JH, Boucher C (1990) Autecological studies on Audouinia capitata (Bruniaceae). 1. Plant-
derived smoke as a seed germination cue, S Afr J Bot 56:700-703
Drewes FE, Smith MT, Van Staden J (1995) The effect of a plant-derived smoke extract on the ger-
mination of light-sensitive lettuce seed. Plant Growth Regul 16:205–209
Egerton-Warburton IM (1998) A smoke-induced alteration of the sub-testa cuticle in seeds of the
post-fire recruiter, Emmenanthe penduliflora Benth. (Hydrophyllaceae). J Exp Bot 49:1317-1327
Emery NJ, Lacey E. (2010) Optimizing the application of smoke water to maximize germination of
the flannel flower, Actinotus helianthi. Seed Sci Technol 38:797-801
Flematti GR, Ghisalberti EL, Dixon KW, Trengove RD (2004) A compound from smoke that pro-
motes seed germination. Science 305: 977
Flematti GR, Ghisalberti EL, Dixon KW, Trengove RD (2005) Synthesis of the seed germination
stimulant 3-methyl-2H-furo[2,3-c]pyran-2-one. Tetrahedron Lett 46:5719-5721
The impact of plant-derived...
239
International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources:www.Iucnredlist.org/ docu-
ments /summary statistics/2010_1RL_Stats_Table_1.pdf. Accessed 7 of January 2013
Jäger AK, Light ME, Van Staden J (1996) Effects of source of plant material and temperature on the
production of smoke extracts that promote germination of light-sensitive lettuce seeds. Env Exp
Bot 36:421-429
Jain N, Soos V, Balazs E, Van Staden J (2008) Changes intercellular macromolecules (DNA, RNA
and protein) during seed germination in tomato, following the use of a butenolide, isolated from
plant-derived smoke. Plant Growth Regul 54:105-113
Jain N., Ascough GD, Van Staden J. (2008) A smoke-derived butenolide alleviates HgCl2 and ZnCl2
inhibition of water uptake during germination and subsequent growth of tomato – possible in-
volvement of aquaporins. J Plant Physiol. 165:1422-1427
Keeley JE, Fotheringham CJ (1998) Smoke-induced seed germination in California chapparral, Ecol-
ogy 79:2345-2371
Kępczyński J, Cembrowska D, Van Staden J (2010) Releasing primary dormancy in Avena fatua L.
caryopses by smoke-derived butenolide. Plant Growth Regul 62:85–91
Kępczyński J, Cembrowska-Lech D, Van Staden J (2012) Necessity of gibberellin for stimulatory
effect of KAR1 on germination of dormant Avena fatua L. caryopses. Acta Physiol Plant DOI
10.1007/s11738-012-1080-1
Light ME, Burger BV, Van Staden J (2005) Formation of a seed germination promoter from carbo-
hydrates and amino acids. J Agric Food Chem 53:5936-5942
Light ME, Daws MI, Van Staden J (2009) Smoke-derived butenolide: Towards understanding its
biological effects. S Afr J Bot 75:1-7
Light ME, Gardner MJ, Jäger AK, Van Staden J (2002) Dual regulation of seed germination by
smoke solutions. Plant Growth Regul 37:135-141
Light ME, Van Staden J (2004) The potential for smoke in seed technology. S Afr J Bot. 70:97-101
Nagase R, Katayama M, Mura HH, Matsuo N, Tanabe Y (2008) Synthesis of the seed germination
stimulant 3-methyl-2H-furo[2,3-c]pyran-2-one utilizing direct and regioselective Ti-crossed aldol
addition. Tetrahedron Lett 49:4509-4512
Roche S, Dixon KW, Pate JS (1997) Seed ageing and smoke: partner cues in the amelioration of seed
dormancy in selected Australian native species. Aust J Bot 45:783-815
Sun K, Chen Y, Wagerle T, David L, Currie M, Chmura P, Song Y, Xu M (2008) Synthesis of bute-
nolides as seed germination stimulants. Tetrahedron Lett 49:2922-2925
Van Staden J, Jäger AK, Light ME, Burger BV (2004) Isolation of the major germination cue from
plant-derived smoke. S Afr J Bot 70:654–659