This needs YOUR input! A weapon of mass education is the goal! To set your mind straight watch a show on what this is all about. This is work in progress, under Duress! Please watch; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkIKDKtRQuY&list=UUEHsSWvrGVSIA63OV3J6vhA

The Declaration of Natural Rights

This HONESTY AFFIDAVIT PACKAGE is designed to serve MANY purposes in thematter of law and justice for the protection of all involved. This covers every crime THE STATEVS my client engage in that has no name able victim: THIS KNOWLEDGE IS POWER, Do youcome in ignorance or with malice is ...THE POINT. NO VICTIM = NO CRIME, the stand. Wefeel my client had the moral and legal duty to Hand you this in their defense and we prey, yours.I WISH THE CLEARLY PRINTED SIGNATURE OF EVERY HANDLER INVOLVED.

_______________________________________________________________ The matters you and my client meet has activated this presonal, private contract. With all

Public Servants involved. The moment you receive this. My client knowingly and willinglyentered a private contract this package outlines in detail and full disclosure as protection fromyou, & for you. Once you know, YOU KNOW. I Ed Curtis, A lawfully, legally contractedfiduciary pledged to aggressively pursue, promote, protect, defend, and build my clients; safety,rights, freedoms, money, time, and happiness. I am on call 24/7/ 365 days a year. My Email iswannabeherd@outlook.com , with a sole goal, Show over whelming force to free my clients inthe least amount of time and stress possible.

THE HONESTY AFFIDAVIT, IS A TREATY OF PEACE or declaration of war. Have YOU been tricked and failed to remain in your office? CASE NUMBER __________ victims Name; _______________________________________

PRINT CLEARLY THE STATE OF ___________________ VS Ed Curtis, fiduciary for the accused. I ENTER THIS full AFFIDAVIT OF HONESTY As Protection for ALL VICTIMS IN VICTIMLESSCRIMES. My clients; STUDY, EDIT, SIGN, PRINT, They, SUBMIT if needed. Then they SHUTUP,They Let honesty handle it! We come on a mission of peace with HONESTY and facts concerningOUR LAW. Every one has a moral, legal and human duty to his family and neighbors, town, city,state, country and all our kids to expose, confront and report crime. This is EVERYONES duty. Onceit is in the open light, It will simply shrivel and die as crime can not work in the light of honesty, nowyou know.. This affidavit Is sent in good will but under duress, under threat, and as personal protectionin all matters THE STATE has interest in this client for. It must be placed on court record, rebutted ordismissed within 10 days, In writing. If not right now. IT IS OFFICIAL RECORD. No one is above the law, No one has the right to violate a lawful contract, any ones rights, or the law.Is it a crime to stand on THE POINT of law, DO NO HARM?

This education will end crime, racism, debt, poverty, and war. About every problem we facetoday will be cured when YOUR ignorance is......SEE my first book;

http://phpromoweeblycom.weebly.com/ When you THINKDIFFERENT, this whole CRAZY world will simply go away as you are fooled no longer. It is time to

undo the wrongs of YOUR truth and upgrade your thinking to HONESTY, or YOU will live with it.Only an educated society will make the upgrade peaceful. The people who do it should care..Workingtogether, My clients WILL TAKE A BITE OUT OF CRIME! In clients defense I did convince themenough to hand you this. Our personal, private contract only allows client to remain silent and grantyou 20 minutes of time to Investigate This protection, fiduciary has offered them. YOU havetriggered this with the need to present it to you. In 20 minutes, YOU WILL ANSWER, IS MYCLIENT free to go or are you detaining them?

TRUTH VS HONESTY THIS IS A blunt, bold, BRUTALLY honest, WHELMING FORCE OF LAW, LAW,

YOU may not know, Law with my clients rights, due process, speedy and public trials in mind. This is A* EXHIBIT, evidence, submissions proofs and points any person of honor will

ever need for the protection of the public FROM a Government not sworn to protect FROMALL ENEMIES BOTH FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC. Honestly, You, Me and my client areunder contract, Gathering names and facts, seeking JUSTICE, for all. You who work in truth,we work with honesty, Only you can judge who will win. THE CLOCK STARTS NOW...

IF YOU ARE a American Citizen of the American Republic Who solemnly swore to support anddefend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; IF You tookthis obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion, IF you will truthfullydischarge the duties of your office on which You have entered on oath and in YOUR personal word ofhonor,. WE ARE YOUR BEST FRIEND! THIS IS A PEACE TREATY FOR ALL OF “US”.

I Ed Curtis freely and publicly offer this personal contract in full disclosure & free will to allwho are captured in some kind of “THE STATES” victim less crime sprees. Your actions is making.My client YOUR victim. We want YOU to STUDY THIS, YOU will be held accountable. This isbetween me and you now. My clients agreed enough to hand this to YOU, for now called “THESTATE”. They agree to remain silent, peaceful, to watch, and take names. They are under fiduciarycare. First of all, We thank you for your work on our behalf. We feel your oath of office protections touphold and defend the Constitutional provisions you have made to the public is fair as it gives uspeace of mind to know that you are working for us to ensure our best interests are protected and met.We have confidence in your abilities to help resolve this situation to all our benefit in the swiftestways possible by standing within the boundaries of your parameter and tending to the duties you haveoffered, agreed to, take paid for. You, and this fiduciary has pledged to secure law and HONESTjustice for ME! I place this file for public record, To you, Identified as THE STATE. I will need yourcontact info in 21 minutes (see last pg ), My fiduciary agrees to accept all responsibilities for clientsactions Once you receive this, HE DID IT!.

By Showing OVER WHELMING FORCE WE ALL HOPE FOR PEACE. Once the power ofhonesty is discovered, We will become A RICH, FREE, and safe nation again. It is the ultimateprotector of law, justice, freedom and YOU. I / WE ask you: What would I be If I did this to you,IN MY NAME? I want to know How does any paper give YOU, right to rule over me? How CanYOU justify with a piece of paper the subjugation of ME ? Do words on paper no matter how fancyor by whom created give you the right to force your beliefs on ME? Can YOU justify the enslavementof ME by a piece of paper? Can YOU claim divine right over ME? Is there anything in heaven or earththat justifies; YOUR actions, MY slavery and involuntary servitude or exonerate YOU from thecrimes against ME? Thinking you work for or are my master is being challenged, I WANT TOKNOW. In your court we swear to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth but, Inhonesty, What is truth? Is what YOU DO truth? Witches, Doctors,writers and Jews were killed by thetruth of Government. It has let others quietly rob, abuse and enslave us all, The more you understandit, The more you will see it. Who’s truth is the THE LAW based on? Some say the world isoverpopulated, some are seeking to thin the heard. Yet all my study shows the whole worldpopulations could live in North Dakota = comfortably, IF we grow too big, LOOK UP! Their is auniverse out their to grow into! Truth has different meanings for different people across world. It is aword that has been manipulated to pieces to fit the needs of a different, dieing mentality, the ones thatlive to take. IN IGNORANCE, THE STATE has mutated into a human predators, we seek to kill theherd. Can YOU stand in the light of honesty,Will YOU damage all trying not to? Truth, THE WORDthat has destroyed countless lives, our nation and threatens the world. Honestly, Would You putanother in slavery or a cage at your expense when they did nothing to you? Is not law for their benefit& safety too? Is it a one way street where no one is accountable, responsible or even identifiable for

these damages cause my clients and society? What would give ANYONE a right I do not have if weall are equal? Truth has no solid meaning especially in law. For an example, say, You were caughtsmoking a joint, in North Dakota, your life will be destroyed. In Colorado, or another country It iscool? Are these humans different than me? If you Drive your car without a license, you j- walked,didn’t fasten your seat belts, did not pay or did not do something THE STATE claims a crime. THESTATE will come, They will kill if you defend yourself. You owe THE STATE your time, Your moneyand OBEDIENCE? WHO SAID?????WHAT IS THIS STATE if not me? YOU assault ME for a law, Inever personally agreed too, Do not benefit from but FORCED to pay a lot of people to hunt or kill ifnecessary to enforce? HONESTLY, It is a law made to keep me in line and under YOUR control.

Is it a crime to stand on THE POINT of law? YOUR ignorance or Arrogance towards OUR LAW, your neighbors and ME, is THE

POINT. Who owns me enough to say what I can or can not do if I hurt no one, Is it not the same foryou? What is Government but people who claim to work for me? Truth is a legal trick word that madeYOU think everyone your slave. (see OFFICE OF PERSON) ALL the humans in your cages forVictim-less crimes, not meant for humans but a fiction entity of “THE STATE” are YOUR victims.Who have been Terrorized by a fiction. Who has any right to rule a human? UNTIL NOW, WEassume you did not know... WE WILL Cure YOUR ignorance or arrogance and it will cure crime. Weseek copies of any adverse documentation that would superseded YOUR personal oath of officecontract YOU and your co-workers service for us that stands over or above the oath of office as apublic servant contract. Please send all documentation of any laws, codes, or statutes that you maybelieve states any claims to supersede a contractual oath of office to uphold and defend theConstitution of the United States of America and all it’s human population. Please supply all contractsthat bind knowingly and willingly, in full disclosure signed by, This human to YOUR action Forinspection by fiduciary.If any are made, then this would have drastic implications and I feel that it is prudent in this immediatesituation to know for future actions, IN LAW.

I ask you to ascertain copies of the documentation that support any and or all your allegations.Fiduciary thinks their is a massive seditious conspiracy to overthrow OUR lawful government: that byvirtue of accepting your contractual public [oath] it is within your duty to provide all such vitalinformation or documentation made in MY NAME, BY THE STATE, for the good of the people. Inyour law books, it is treason and a crime against humanity, I warn you of here. I WANT TO KNOW,Is it ignorance or arrogance? Just who has the right to regulate and demand MY money for doingsomething without paying some EXTORTED fee? Who has the right to tell me what I can do, say,think, drink, smoke, eat or do if it hurts no one but me? Just who has the right to tell ME, I can nottravel, unless I Have a piece of plastic when 95% of accidents are caused by sober, licensed drivers? Inhonesty, we never needed a drivers license. WHAT GIVES YOU THIS RIGHT but ignorance,arrogance and MASSIVE brainwashing? To hide behind a word and not be responsible for YOURactions is why this Country fell into this police state. We were all tricked by this word truth, YOU aretricked no more. Truth is not a honest word it scattered honesty to the winds. Is law for my & clientsprotection or is It for YOUR profit and power over us? WAKE UP, THINK! Why should I be forcedto pay YOU for putting this person in a cage, Why should they need to be in one and not YOU fordoing this? THE STATE CAN DO NOTHING, IT IS NOTHING, IT TAKES YOU TO DO IT. DoYOU have more rights than we do, Yet work for us? In honesty, What is being produced is a growingpredator class that hunts, feeds, drains, and makes criminals for profit at everyones expense, evenyours. until now.. It is in your training to see the millions of “a points” but never THE POINT of law,DO NO HARM. To think “I am only doing my job” removes YOUR responsibility for YOURactions when YOUR oath is YOUR word, YOUR duty, and what YOU are paid for is NUTS!

My clients deserve full due process, equal protection, an HONEST, Aggressive defense with aspeedy and public trial. My clients deserve JUSTICE, The one we pay YOU for. I will work by myclients side As an expert witness, a legal coach, and fiduciary for the accused for laws I have found inthe same law books that has been used on me. I was made a criminal for thinking their was equalprotection of law. I learned a lot, the hard way and WILL NOT LEAVE YOUR THINKING TO MYKIDS. I will stand witness for my clients health, legal, human, & lawful issues YOUR action raises. Ipledge To help end my clients distress, protect my clients rights, freedoms county and state FROMYOU personally, for maximum benefit for all., IF you choose to continue in your criminal actions, It isYOU who belong in a cage, for the good of all.

We give 20 minutes of my clients time to decide. They HAND YOU THIS MATERIAL WITHRESPECT, & IN GOOD WILL. A simple question will be answered in 21 minutes. Do I Share thiswith you or use THIS for defense against you? If YOU Are you detain them, YOU have rejected thispeace treaty, We are now at war. I will need to get this affidavit to the clerk of court for my clientsprotection and your legal obligations to the people who pay your way.. I will need you to fill this outfor future actions in my duties. My client will remain silent and offer no resistance or threat. YOU cannot take these legal papers, they must be on official record, as defense FROM you. Under my contract,They meet you under STRESS AND DURESS YOUR chosen actions is inflicting on their life,Ignorance can be claimed only once. If you will investigate this, They should be free to go. MyClients printed this for you to, STUDY, and SIGN! They keep it IN THEIR CAR, HOME ORCOURT RECORD if needed! The number one rule and goal of law and justice is DO NO HARM.That is THE POINT. I am no lawyer, I do not charge clients for my time but the ones who force thiscontract. This is NOT the common "A "POINTS of law you have always overcome, this is THEPOINT of law. This is NOW in your court, IF you choose. AN UN REBUTTED AFFIDAVIT STANDS AS TRUTH UNTIL REBUTTED POINT FOR POINT,In 10 days A full discovery is requested. This is a recorded MOTION TO THE COURT YOU caused distress, My contract requires your full identification ( the end of this.) I ask, Why didyou not accept this offer of peace? Please write and send your full answers to ALL my questions. ON RECORD; Client is incompetent at law and under a private personal contract that is now ineffect. They agree to remain silent, to not resist you in any way or be a threat to anyone. This issuewill cause great distress having to defend from things not understood. I wish to ensure that wecompetently continue to work together to clear any confusion that may exist. This was written with myclient and YOU in mind, for defense. We welcome you to study it.. In 21 minutes, we will know whoand what we want to.My requests are not meant to undermine your efforts and are required terms to fulfill my contract; Toensure that we ALL are on the same understandings so intelligent decisions can be made, It is writtenout FOR YOU. I am not getting paid for this and it will cause a huge burden on life . Funds and timeare limited and we did not start this, YOU DID.. My client did read and understand this and openly

contracted with me by handing you this.. We ALL have duty to share this knowledge with all. It wouldbe a crime of conspiracy not. My client will remain silent, calm, cool, Kind & docile with all, whileyou investigate or be in violation of OUR contract. In law, I am a contracted fiduciary, My client is

now under fiduciaries care. Client is considered incompetent, under duress, & confused. Client agreesto my terms. I put my name on it. YOU pursue ME. In contract law, if terms of contract are violated, a

breach of contract Voids all claims, protections and obligations, personally. In my best interest, I donot wish to pay for the persecution of my client by THE STATE and offer to help client pursue justice.In the best interest to all family, friends, neighbors, city, town, state, and country. I, Ed Curtis am nowpersonally responsible for all claims and causes of actions so bring them to me personally. I DID IT,IDid have the right to remain silent! If my client feels damaged defrauded, used or abused, by ourcontractual agreements, they have every right to seek redress for MY actions in any court of law. If

any of this motion is made with intent to defraud anyone or defraud this court, THE STATE isresponsible for legal actions against me personally. If I violated the law, In any way, I ACCEPT FULLRESPONSIBILITY. I seek to end my client sufferings and fulfill my agreement as soon as possible inmy, my clients and THE STATE'S best interest. I am not an expert, I am not being paid and In honesty,

work for the best interest of all. My client agrees to supply all court records involving these actionswith this completed court exhibit as evidence; recorded, stamped and sent to me, YOU forced thisaction. This package contains samples of EVERYTHING I feel relevant or needed to defend my

clients actions from your actions. Samples of; evidence, parts of briefs, motions, affidavits, relevantpoints, discoveries, questions and stands, are included so we can close this matter in the swiftest

matter. From direct experience, Every day brings stress, damage and expense.. In 10 days, If the statewishes to pursue, these matters, I will require a $10,000 UP FRONT retainer fee sent to Ed Curtis + arate of $1800 per day to me and $ 500 per day for damages to my client personally upon fulfillment

of contract. Our charges and damages will come separate. This was read by client, We both agree withthis. Again, We wish to acknowledge our thanks and acceptance for your Public Offering, professional

assistance and of course, Your personal Oath of office protections you are paid for.; In ALL our best interest. Take the time to study it, We prey, you will walk away. DROP this in thefastest, cheapest, way.>>RIGHT NOW. In honesty, We should NEVER HAVE MET OR FEAR lights

in the mirror, cops at the door, violations of rights or law you take pay for. The predator hunters of ourtime, freedoms, money and life are now out of work here. Once on court record, This protection is,Promoted to the Public.

If I am leading my client wrong, Report this crime! I value your professional view. I hope It willprotect you from violating your oath and damage your good name for political goals and with criminal

actions. WHAT PART OF SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED CAN YOU NOT UNDER STAND? We both wish justice RIGHT? We need YOU to help round them all up! ALL who play foreignagents WILL be deported as DANGEROUS illegal aliens when this system falls or face justice for thelaws they violated under OUR LAW, Judge this honestly is all we ask.

MY CONTRACT TERMS ARE VOIDED WITH PROOF OF VICTIM. The law states that the minute you receive an affidavit, It is to be recorded.Failing to do so is crimes of obstruction of justice, statues sec; 5401, 5407,5408 of crimes against justice and too many others to list here. In crimesagainst injustice a conspiracy results. Unless YOU think YOU are “The law”,

You do not have right to make legal determination, you do not have the authority to judge, and you donot work for me. In honesty, only a criminal would deny justice. A crime way more destructive to allthan to break most of the16 million laws enforced today. This is NOT what we all agreed to pay YOUfor. Law is for MY protection, not state profit. I am contracted with my client until all issues with allactions are fully settled. And ME and my client lives,With maximum; safety, freedom & happiness. IAM duty bound as Fiduciary and expert witness for the accused. In the best interest of all, the state,the country and world. Below, I did not fix it for you, I share it to judge THE POINTS.NOTICE MOTION TO RESERVE ALL RIGHTS, Honestly, I still wonder WHY this is neededwith all you paid protectors of our rights and freedoms we pay for? Since all HONEST courts requireeither a valid contract or a damaged victim or both for a court to have lawful jurisdiction, It is nowmotioned that a contract or victim be placed into evidence or said jurisdiction is challenged and voidfor lack of evidence. Without lawful jurisdiction, an act of treason is being committed, A capitoloffense in law. Proceeding will be considered treason, Silence is conspiracy, and deliberateindifference is betrayal, breach of contract and dereliction of duty. It is further motioned that theofficers of the courts are under oath and and have no immunity as they know the law. They attest thatthey are in fact members of the judicial branch of this LAWFUL government and not under a foreignjurisdiction of Congress of the UNITED STATES, a war crime in law. Why would you remain silent, conspire, or violate rights and your lawful duties you collect pay for? Imade sure EVERY official in North Dakota knew, I will hand this out until we collect for the damagesthey did to us..1.I do warn you, now too, My time is not free, I will bill each and every officer of the court, personallyfor my time and $10,000 per violation of Constitutional rights violated or ignored. I will seek fullprosecution of the guilty for breach of contract and ALL CRIMES committed, Individually, and do itpublicly. 2. Do you fully understand these charges you pursue? Do you; Understand the implications andaccusations presented in this defense? DO YOU acknowledge and act in accordance with the USFederal court ruling to wit to the cases below?; A. The claim of Constitutional rights can not be converted to a crime Miller VS U.S. B. The Constitution is a written instrument, it does not change in meaning. U.S. VS Kruikshank. C. Silence can only be equated to fraud when their is a moral and legal duty to speak. D. A contract made in fraud is null and void in a lawful court of law. 3. All officers swear to abide by oaths to the Constitution of the United States Article VI clause 2&3 ofthe US CONSTITUTION. It is the supreme law of the land. 4. That It is YOUR DUTY; To provide full due process of law pursuant to Amendments;1,4,5,6,7,9,&14 of the US Constitution and other relevant amendments of your job descriptions withthe Constitution as required. 5. That All officers swear to provide equal protection of the law with no exceptions. I now ask you as MY public servant. DO YOU NOT TAKE MY PAY, To respect, protect and defendeach and every right of this plaintiff, An American citizen in this matter Guaranteed by all oaths of allofficers of my lawful Government?

DO NOT; All officers swear to uphold the Constitution as the Supreme law of this land and agree tohelp fully prosecute and bring to justice ALL actors working under color of law, with no jurisdictionthus violating all concepts of law and justice and bring open fraud on this court and damages for thisvictim? IS NOT THE ONLY VALID REASON FOR LAW to protect each and every human beingsNATURAL individual's rights? IS THIS NOT THE ESSENCE OF REAL LAW? I will be blunt, bold,obnoxiously honest......... but HONEST. When this system falls, YOU WILL face justice with an angry, destroyed nation unless you understandthis.Please check the ones that do not apply to YOU, ME or my client. I feel My clients rights are MYGOD GIVEN human rights They are NOT YOURS to give, take or manipulate. Rebut allmisunderstandings in Writing. I WANT TO KNOW! Read this entire package and let it go. This government can never give rights, they are not yours to give or take. Any objections to what I assume to be true, SHOULD BE REBUTTED,you are the professional. DidANY of this change? 1 - WE have the right to specifically reserve any or all of rights 2 - I have the right to remain silent (to stand mute)(5th Amendment) 3 - I have the right to say what I want and to be heard (1st Amendment) 4 - I have the right to represent myself 'pro per' 5 - I have the right to Object to any statement by the judge and/or prosecutor. 6 - I have the right to Refuse (dismiss) the judge 7 - I have the right to call Witnesses to assist in my defense (6th Amendment) 8 - I have the right to have legal Counsel for my defense (6th Amendment) 9 - I have the right to conduct my defense 'pro per', free from the professional restrictions imposedupon licensed attorneys. 10 - I have the right to submit Motions and be herd 11 - I have the right to a fair trial 12 - I have the right to Appeal any judicial decision 13 - I have the right to a speedy, public and fair trial by an impartial jury (6th Amendment) 14 - I have the right to waive court and transcript costs, on the basis of pleading 'in forma pauperis' (no money) 15 - I have the right to due process of the law (trial), before I am deprived of any liberty, property, or money (5th Amendment) 16 - I have the right to a face the inured party claiming damages (Article III and 6th Amendment) 17 - I have the right to face my accuser and witnesses against me (6th Amendment) , 18 - I have the right to inform the jury of the Truth, their rights, and their duties ( 1s t and 6th Amendments ) 19 - I have the right to put the judge on notice of my intent to preserve my rights20 - I have the right to put the judge on notice of my intent to Appeal any ruling or decision during the case 21 - I have the right to Protest and Object if any of my rights or demands are not being met 22 - I have the right to demand that the court place in evidence, any Un revealed contract, statute, law, rule, or information being used against me (6th Amendment) 23 - I have the right to challenge all relevant laws in this trial in terms of their intent, interpretation,fairness, enforcement, and whether they Serve and Protect the People of this State 24 - I have the right to personal liberty under the 13th Amendment 25 - I have the right to challenge the jurisdiction of this court 26 - I have the right to argument of recourse and remedy, under UCC 1- 103 & UCC 1-203 27 - I have the right to demand that the code be construed in Harmony with the Common Law. 28 - I have the right to require translation of any citation of law or procedure into plain English.

NOTICE of Miranda warning and understandings of law is made in good faith. And full disclosure,packed in the smallest package possible. This is some of THE POINTS TO PROSECUTIONS: Afteryou have given your name, badge number, rank and proof of agency, you will have the right to remainsilent. Anything you say from that point forward can and will be used against you in the form ofcriminal affidavits and civil sanctions. You have the right to counsel present during any interrogationsor civil disclosure. I will need all names for honesty affidavit promotions, and actions DEMANDS TO BE MET BY OFFICER TO AVOID CIVIL AND CRIMINAL PENALTIES 1. Warrant-less Arrest: You are not to arrest my client unless you have seen them commit an arrest ableact or omission, or have exigent circumstances to cause the arrest. If you are arresting my clientwithout a warrant, you must IMMEDIATELY take my client before a judicial officer of competentjurisdiction, to determine whether the arrest was lawful, or if there was enough probable cause for thearrest, pursuant to clearly established law. This demand must be met prior to booking. If you do notcomply with this Demand you will be sued and charged with kidnapping under color of law. TheSupreme Court has held that the courts are open twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week, threehundred sixty five days a year. I once spent 9 days before I saw a judge? 2. If you improperly arrest my client without a warrant in your possession, or with a warrant that doesnot comply with The Fourth Amendment requirements, you will be sued in your INDIVIDUALcapacity. Subject to personal name promotions for this honesty affidavit, We will go to the jury of ourpeers nation wide. From personal experience, in my clients best interest, With a website likehttp://thefax.webs.com/ IS the only protection from professional thieves and traitors hidden in fictionwe have left.3. Arrest Upon Warrant: the arrest warrant must be in your possession. An affidavit and probable cause statement attached to the warrant as subscribed in The FourthAmendment to The Constitution for the united States of America must support it. The arrest shall not be based upon hearsay, unless supported by a warrant accompanied by a bona fideaffidavit. Said warrant and affidavit must be based upon first-hand knowledge of the Affiant chargingmy client with a felony or other infamous crime. My client must be allowed the right to face accuser.If you deny my client that right it will be a violation of The Sixth Amendment, and if you actunreasonably in your investigation or use excessive force, it will be considered abuse, assault &battery, official oppression and in violation of The Fourth Amendment, and several others of whichviolate established law. You Stepped out your office of protector of the peace and are open to criminaland civil actions.4. If it is determined later that the warrant was invalid, you will be held liable for This assault andbattery, false arrest and sued in your OFFICIAL capacity and conspiracy of “THE STATE”. 5. You may not take property or wrongfully convert any of property, such as personal photograph s ormy fingerprints without written authority. Such is granted only after an adversary proceeding whichcomplies completely with The Fifth and The Fourteenth Amendment due process rights, concludedwith a signed order by a judicial officer of competent jurisdiction ordering the taking of said property.6. must be given contact their outside counsel or friend. WANNABEHERD@OUTLOOK.COM7. must be given pencil, paper and adequate access to a law library, to prepare my "habeas corpus." IFYOU IGNORE THESE WARNINGS, it will show bad faith on your part and prima facie evidence ofyour deliberate indifference to Constitutionally mandated Rights of my client. A copy of thisinstrument will be prima facie evidence of your bad faith. You are a Public Servant, and as such you are expected to treat all with due respect. This NOTICE has been submitted upon demand of a State issued privilege, permit, license, orviolation and therefore is a mandatory part of the official record of any ensuing action and MUST beintroduced as prima facie evidence in said action. It will be noted that willful suppression of evidenceis a felony. Any cause for action will result in a lawsuit under USC Title 18, Title 28, and Title 42,1983 AND FOR FUTURE ACTIONS , MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES 1. Arrest is presumed to be false; officer has the burden of proof. The only thing the plaintiff needs toplead and to prove is either (1) that the defendant made an arrest or imprisonment, or (2) that thedefendant affirmatively instigated, encouraged, incited, or caused the arrest or imprisonment.Burlington v. Josephson,When the plaintiff has shown that he was arrested, imprisoned or restrained of his libertyby the defendant, "the law presumes it to be unlawful." People v. McGrew,

"The burden is upon the defendant to show that the arrest was by authority of law." McAleer v. Good,65 Mackie v. Ambassador, 11 P.2d 6 (1932). "Any arrest made without a warrant, if challenged by the defendant, is presumptively invalid...theburden is upon the state" to justify it as authorized by statute, and as not violative of constitutionalprovisions. State v. Mastrian, Butler v. State, (Miss 1968) "As in the case of illegal arrests, the officer ... must keep within the law at his peril." Thiede v.Scandia, 2. Must show warrant upon request "He must show it to the accused, if requested to do so." Smith v.State, 208 S.2d 747 (Miss., 1968). "If demanded, he must produce the warrant and read it to the accused, that he may know by whatauthority and for what cause he is deprived of his liberty." State v. Shaw, "An accused person, if he demands it, is entitled to have the warrant for his arrest shown to him at thetime of arrest. Crosswhite v. Barnes, 124 S.E. 242, 245 (1924). "A special deputy is bound to show his warrant if requested to do so, and if he omit, the party againstwhom the warrant is may resist an arrest, and the warrant under such circumstances is no protectionagainst an action for an assault, battery and false imprisonment." Frost v. Thomas, "It is doubtless the duty of an officer who executes a warrant of arrest to state the nature and cause andthe substance of the process which gives him the authority he professes to exercise, and, if it isdemanded, to exhibit his warrant, that the party arrested may have no excuse for resistance." Shovlonv. Com., "It was the duty of an officer who attempts to make an arrest to exhibit the warrant if he has one."Jones v. State, 114 Ga. 79, 39 S.E. 861 (1901) 3. Warrant must be valid A constable justifying an imprisonment under a warrant must show that thewarrant on its face is legal, and that the magistrate had jurisdiction of the subject-matter. Poulk v.Slocum, 3 Blackfords A warrant is regarded as insufficient and thus void if, on its face, it fails to state facts sufficient toconstitute a crime. Wharton's Crim. Proc., 12th Ed., vol. 1, p. 152 (1974). 4. no rubber-stamp "signature" "The United States Supreme Court ... stressed the need for'individualized review' to avoid the issuance of 'rubber stamp' warrants." State v. Paulick, 277 Minn.140, 151 N.W.2d 596 (1967). 5. False arrest is assault and battery "An illegal arrest is an assault and battery. The person soattempted to be restrained of his liberty has the same right, and only the same right, to use force indefending himself as he would have in repelling any other assault and battery." State v. Robinson, 72Atl.2d 262 (1950). "An arrest without warrant is a trespass, an unlawful assault upon the person ... where one is about tobe unlawfully deprived of his liberty he may resist the aggression's of the offender, whether of aprivate citizen or a public officer, to the extent of taking the life of the assailant, if that be necessary topreserve his own life, or prevent infliction upon him of some great bodily harm." State v. Gum, 69S.E. 464 (1910). Every person has the right to resist an unlawful arrest in preventing such illegal restraint of his liberty,he may use such force as may be necessary.(Advised not too)6. No handcuffs if client is being moved when pose no danger, (OSHA)"But a constable cannot justify handcuffing a prisoner unless he has attempted to escape, or unless itbe necessary in order to prevent his doing so." 51 L.R.A. 216. "The handcuffing was utterly unlawful." Osborn v. Veitch 1 Foster & Fin Eng Rep 317. 7. Go immediately to magistrate (no photographs, no fingerprinting) The one arresting has "a duty to immediately seek a magistrate," and failure to do so "makes a case offalse imprisonment." Heath v. Boyd, ; Brock v. Stimson, 108 Mass. 520 "To detain the person arrested in custody for any purpose other than that of taking him before amagistrate is illegal." Kominsky v. Durand, 12 Atl.2d. 654 (1940). "Any undue delay is unlawful and wrongful, and renders the officer himself and all persons aiding andabetting therein wrongdoers from the beginning." Ulvestad v. Dolphin, "The taking of the plaintiff's picture before conviction was an illegal act." Hawkins v. Kuhne, "The power to arrest does not confer upon the arresting officer the power to detain a prisoner for otherpurposes." Geldon v. Finnegan, 252 N.W. 372 (1934).

"Compulsory fingerprinting before conviction is an unlawful encroachment...[and] involves prohibitedcompulsory self-incrimination." People v. Helvern, 215 N.Y. Supp. I AM on record in this court because you wanted me to be.I am NOT confused by Your thoughts, actions and in actions towards me. You, as Public Officials,Officers of the court, skilled at law and pillars of the community. I see you HONESTLY, EVERYaction taken, will be met by RE ACTION. It is not my fault we met, We met of YOUR own free will.YOU, have Sworn an Oath to Defend, Protect, and Preserve the Constitution for the united States ofAmerica against all enemies, both Foreign and Domestic, YOU are violating YOUR OATH. Are YOUa liar, a terrorist or ignorant? I have to ask tough questions if I want your honest answers for myclients protection.

NOTICE OF COURT DEFICIENCIES on record, Before the above-referenced action can proceed, the following deficiencies in the Court of the State must be resolved. These deficiencies include: 1. No effective counsel is available? The accused has diligently searched for counsel that is unfetteredand not beholden to the plaintiff. It appears the only persons who are allowed to be Counselor arethose who have taken a solemn oath to support the plaintiff, the State Attorneys are also officers of thestate and have a duty to see that defendants are punished for violating plaintiff's laws. Thus, the firstduty of attorneys is to the courts, not to their clients and when duties conflict, their duties to the courtmust take precedence. (See 7 C.J.S., Section 4, page 801-802, Footnotes 53 through 56). It seemsimpossible to obtain counsel that can present MY clients side of the conflict because an attorney's firstloyalty is to the Plaintiff.The accused is not qualified to represent himself and is unwilling to waive his right to effective,unbiased counsel. Where can an attorney be found who can practice law in your state who is free to effectively counsel MY rights and is not beholden to the plaintiff?2. The judge has taken "loyalty oaths" to support the laws of the plaintiff. He is an employee of theplaintiff and is paid large sums of money to enforce the will of the plaintiff. How can the judge beneutral and unbiased? 3. Every juror is a member of the state and is, therefore, one with the plaintiff. Jurors are also requiredto swear oaths to support the plaintiff. They, too, receive small amounts of money from the plaintiff.Some jurors also receive large sums of money from the plaintiff in the form of government jobs orhandouts. Jurors have an intimate and long standing relationship with the plaintiff, but have never metthe accused. 4. The law enforcement witnesses have a very close relationship to plaintiff and are not impartial.They are paid to go out and enforce the plaintiff's laws and then to testify in court to facts that willhelp win plaintiff's action. The whole livelihood of law enforcement officers depends on doing theplaintiff's will. 5. This court was created by the plaintiff. Specifically, it is an administrative unit of the legislature andis only a court in name and not in function. It carries out the will of its creator, the plaintiff. Therefore,the court itself has been fettered to the plaintiff and is not an impartial tribunal. It is clear in the 1958 Oregon Supreme Court decision of State ex rel Wernmark v. Hopkins (213 Or678) that the judicial power of the lower courts is under the arm of the legislature, instead of being aseparate branch of government: Since amended Art VII authorized the legislature to abolish or remake the county court, and thelegislative assembly, in embracing that power, retained only the name of the body, but changed it froma court to an administrative unit we believe that the conclusion is warranted that so far as Art XV,Section 2, is concerned, the legislature created the county court of Cass county. - (emphasis added) State ex rel Madden v. Crawford (207 Or 82) explains further the wide powers the legislature now hasover the courts: Hence, under Section 1 of Art VII, as amended in 1910, the Supreme Court is the only court createdby the constitution itself; all other courts are to be created by legislative act. If an appeal is made to the court's decision, it is handled by the appeals court that was also created bythe plaintiff. (ORS 2.510) Thus, the plaintiff makes the laws, employs the police to enforce the laws,and finally adjudicates the laws in the plaintiff's own courts. Is there any chance for a fair, impartialtrial when the judges, prosecutors, public defenders, jury and witnesses are not just

paid by the plaintiff - they are the plaintiff! 6. Public Law 97-280, 96 STAT. 1211, 1982, affirms that the Bible is the Word of God and recognizes our need to study and apply the teachings of the Holy Scriptures. The Bible declares that Jesus Christ is the highest authority: Then Jesus came to them and said, "All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me." Matthew 28:18 Jesus Christ instructs us: Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother's eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye? How can you say to your brother 'Let me take the speck out of your eye,' when all the time there is a plank in your own eye? You hypocrite, firsttake the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother's eye." Matthew 7:3-5 This "court" is attempting to take the speck out of the missionary's eye, while ignoring the plank in its own eye. This "court" is blind because of its many structural defects andcannot possibly see to remove any defects from the accused.As Jesus instructs us, "If any one of you is without sin let him be the first to throw a stone" (John 8:7). The court must first correct its own defects before attempting to correct the defects of the Churchmissionary. If the court is unable to resolve its own deficiencies, then it cannot possibly see clearly tocorrect any deficiencies of the Church. I have some questions for the court record that the Church has answered. Please correct the Church if the answers are in error: Q. What constitutes a fair trial? 1. An adequate hearing and an impartial tribunal, free from any interest, bias, or prejudice. The Reno,C.C.A.N.Y., 61 F.2d 966, 968. 2. A fair and impartial jury and a learned and upright judge to instruct jury and pass upon legal questions, and an atmosphere of calm in which witnesses can deliver their testimonywithout fear and intimidation, . . . and in which truth may be received and given credence without fearof violence, Floyd v. State 166 Miss. 15, 148 So. 226, 232. 3. An orderly trial before an impartial jury, and judge whose neutrality is indifferent to every factor intrial but that of administering justice. State ex rel. Brown v. Dewell, 131 Fla. 566, 179 So. 695, 698,115 A.L.R. 857. Bias or prejudice either inherent in the structure of the trial system or as imposed by external eventswill deny one's right to a fair trial. A fair trial in a fair tribunal is a basic requirement of due process. Considering human nature, neither party to a dispute can be trusted to render judgment justly. A thirdparty can do so only if he is unbiased and fully appraised of the facts. Who created this court But The State. Who is the plaintiff in this action but THE STATEWho pays the judge, district attorney, public defender, witnesses, jury and staff BUT ME? Where isthe impartial third party whose neutrality is indifferent to every factor in the trial except that ofadministering law against me, NOT justice for me or society? There is none. How can plaintiff legally try its own cases? Only if plaintiff acts as lord over theaccused witch is a human rights violation a form of slavery, a crime against humaniaty or pleaseprovide proof the accused has, KNOWINGLY AND WILLINGLY Volunteered to be subject to aforeign jurisdiction court. If not, It is my duty to report this crime as a crime would be committed byme not reporting this crime as my duty to all.For the record; This Church's lord is not THE STATE, I do not work for THE STATE. I work for MyLord, the King of kings and Lord of lords.My religious beliefs do not consent to allowing a human being to be tried in a secular tribunal"owned" by the plaintiff. Nor does this missionary member, submit or claim to be a part of the state orunder its supervision of a foreign entity in any way. "No man can serve two masters" (Matthew 6:24).Upon what authority does this court use state vehicle statutes to judge a missionary of their personalEmbassy, traveling under the jurisdiction of the Kingdom of Heaven in witch no mortal rules? ThisMissionary has not knowingly consented to having his God-given rights or duties to travel from placeto place exercising rights to be judged by an administrative tribunal of the legislature. (Matthew28:18-20) I am not aware that the State has supervisory authority over Jesus Christ or my church. Ifthe state insists on trying the Church missionary, I require, for my clients protection a court that is notbeholden to the legislature, a court that is part of a separate judicial branch and free to hearConstitutional issues related to separation of Church and state. I require a fair trial, due process, equal

protection, impartial public jury and court with the assistance of effective, unbiased counsel. Untilthese basic requirements of due process are met, My missionary is not ready to proceed without youranswers and it is costing time, money and life. Consider all this changed to my clients who retain meas protection from you. To ensure a fair trial, The state agrees to retain me with an up front $10,000retainer fee and a running bill of $1,800 a day, and help seek damages for my client sufferings. Toassure HONEST justice is done. Within 10 days, I will expect a discovery and retainer fee. Thisbilling will start then. I WILL Testify to damages done in the name of the law, by THE STATE. ALLpeople BEHIND fictional covers, agents in the name of the state for THE STATE against ALL thestate, BY predator driven laws for profit, Without a victim, but all who pay for this. You made myclient your victim doing this...You stepped out of your oath of office and are personally liable for youractions. I wish my client immediately submit this 52 page honesty affidavit into court recordpersonally, by friend, or by aggressor that holds them with proof of service, court stamps and publicrecord,+ mailed to me for our records, My client has no say beyond the agreed upon contract. Pleasesend all discovery, court record, motions, and affidavits to

Ed Curtis 924 5th.St s. Fargo, North Dakota 58103 This exact drat for each and every official, in every capacity that is paid by THE STATE or entityother than specific human being who stands victim on record. I wish EVERYTHING in this filediscovery mailed to Ed Curtis in 10 days. This is court exhibit. I learned to use my spy grid to recordon servers everywhere as the courts I faced do not listen. In 20 days, a website will be available to all.This is not from a court view but from a victim. I seek no fight, with full disclosure up front Whoshould I have to? If you need more time, I wish it recorded in court record, for court exhibit anddefense. We will adjust this with your names actions, reactions and remedy. It isn't right for men to judge their own cause, We will seek a public jury by promoting you , you arethe aggressor of your own actions, not THE STATE . Ignorance of the law will not excuse any person,either civilly or criminally for the actions they knowingly take that makes a victim. Is THAT NOTLAW? IS THAT IS JUSTICE? to change this to SUIT courts needs, wants and requirements WILLCOST MONEY. IF not disputed,in writing in 10 days, Fiduciary will consider this matter done. If Wewill need to proceed until remedy and justice is served and bills paid we will place a commercial leanon your person, YOU stepped out of your protections. If this does not end, websites, promotions andemails of this WILL commence. As fiduciary, I do not trust YOU, courts, ignorant juries or officials,Your ignorance is considered cured. You now pursue with maliceON RECORD; We WISH ALL DOCUMENTS RECORDED AND ON RECORD YOU HAVE INYOUR FILES BOTH client AND STATE, FOR STUDY. Today, WE WILL DISCOVER WHO YOU ARE. I live in one of the most corrupt state, in the mostdangerous countries that has ever existed, this is fact. We are BY FAR, The most brainwashed,poisoned, robbed, dumbed down, regulated, indebted and enslaved people this planet has ever seen ,some one did did this.. WE ARE this worlds most dangerous terrorists and YOU or the UN will behelping straiten us out for the good of the world, When this system ends.. Their will be public trialsand with our massive spy grid, we will seek to be recorded on a lot of servers the longer this actiontakes. USE THIS INFO for your personal wants and needs for bringing back honor to you!I have a right to bill for my time and duty to seek tort damages in civil, human and Constitutionalrights violations in criminal court. I have a right to equal protections under the law. You invited myclient into this and I am in demand of everything you plan on using against my client to meet mycontractual obligations of BOTH our contracts. FIRST REQUEST FOR A BILL OF PARTICULARS DIRECTED TO ALLEGED Complainant's 1-5,000 protected behind and under cover of the agency, The CITY, THE STATE,THE COUNTRY ;"Request for a Bill of Particulars"

INTERROGATORIES for me and client asked

1. Am I entitled to a fair hearing?

2. Who has the burden of proof or burden of providing a

preponderance of evidence?

3. Am I presumed innocent of every element of this alleged crime or alleged action at hand?

4. Am I supposed to be informed of the nature and cause of the charges and proceedings against me?

5. Is there evidence of a complaining party?

6. Did I violate someone's legal rights?

7. If yes, then please specify which rights violated.I feel that my client cannot get a fair trial in these proceedings unless I know everything.i) “ We are all entitled to a fair and honest trial, WILL my client RECEIVE ONE?” ii) “Can you please answer , who is the injured party in this case?” iii) “ Who might You and the Judge represent, ?”1. Please provide a copy of the contract, signed by both parties binding me and the State in anagreement. A unilateral agreement is not acceptable.2. Please provide me with a Bill, with the words ‘bill’ and ‘value’ upon the face of it, signed by a member of the State .3. Please provide proof of claim that you know what a " Person" is legally speaking.4. Please provide proof of claim that I am a Person or a‘Passenger’ and not a Fleshand Blood living sentient Man with unalienable rights.5. Please provide proof of claim that there is any real money backed by anything ofvalue with which to pay this alleged debt. Please note that you addressed your Notice to ‘MR EDWARD D. CURTIS which is a legal entity, afiction, a trade name. Please certify whether or not you or ANY Judge is acting as trustee for thisperson, OR MY CLIENT For and on the record I am the representative for the legal entity OF MYCLIENT Affiant is simply a Freeman Living on the Land and I offer my hand in Peace to the court. Client hasharmed no-one, your actions have harmed my client. I reserve all of Rights and Waive none of them. Ifyou force fiduciary into making a special appearance to settle the matter; an expense of $900 per dayfor expert witness testimony will apply.

Affiant will happily accept any claims made against him upon proof of claim that you have anyauthority over him. It is my understanding that; all men are created equally under one Creator, and, Weare sharing this existence together under God, and, We have been given the ability to make decisionsfor ourselves. Statutes have the force of law under mutual consent of the Governed, under full disclosure. TheGovernment is a Representative Body and, Representation can only come from consent, and, It is myRight not to consent to said representation, and, To deny me my Right is in Breach of the Law, andthose guilty will be fully liable and punishable within Common Law. These are not my clients claimsbut the fiduciary's stands YOU VIOLATE.Therefore be it now known to any and all concerned and affected parties, that I,Ed Curtis, a Freeman-on-the-Land do hereby state clearly specifically and unequivocally my intent to peacefully andlawfully exist free of all statutory obligations restrictions and maintain all rights at law to trade,exchange or barter time with my client in working for the best interest of all parties in the goals ofending these contracts.I claim the right to practice my spiritual beliefs, without scrutiny or inquiry lest it be from the level ofLaw,>I claim the right NOT to apply for licenses, permits or to seek permission to do any actions that arealready Lawful,>I claim the right NOT to pay into any system which I feel does not benefit me,>I claim the right to protect myself and my loved ones against any un-Lawful intrusions, and the Rightto use Force under the Law, only in protection from armed or dangerous aggressors.>I claim the right to cultivate any plant, Smoke, drink, ingest, any substance being fully responsiblefor my actions >I claim the right to be free,>I will only appear in court when there is a man or woman claiming I have infringed upon one of theirGod given rights or freedoms, and I claim the Right to a jury of my peers and due process,

>The failure to define between the Natural man and the State created Fiction is nothing short of fraud,theft, breach of trust and forced slavery, a heinous criminal activity of the most odious form.>I claim the right to be ignorant of legal procedures as I do not understand them.>I claim that these actions are not outside my communities' standards and will in fact support saidcommunity in our desire for truth and maximum freedom.>I claim that anyone who interferes with my lawful activities after having been served notice of thisclaim and who fails to properly dispute or make lawful counterclaim is breaking the law & cannotclaim good faith or color of right and that such transgressions will be dealt with in a properlyconvened court de jure.>I claim that the courts in the Republic of the USA are de-facto and are in fact in the profitablebusiness of conducting, witnessing and facilitating the transactions of security interests and I furthermore claim that they require the consent of both parties prior to providing any such services. Ilearned the people I faced cared not of me and learning to go public is THE CURE.>I claim all transactions of security interests require the consent of both parties and I do hereby denyconsent to any transaction of a security interest issuing under any Act for as herein stated as aFreeman-on-the-Land I am not subject to any statue, code or Act contrary. I think and prey that myclient is saying the same thing, >I state that it is my duty to Claim such rights, to protect them and ensure they exist for futuregenerations. Their is only 2 sides of a fence.>Furthermore I claim the right to use a notary to secure payment of the aforementioned fee schedule.On our books, A collection agency is being trained for this upon collapse of this script. But not all thisdo me and my client agree, It is just me.Affected parties wishing to dispute the claims made herein or make their own counterclaims mustrespond appropriately within TEN (10) days of service of notice of this action. Responses must beunder Oath, and in writing upon full commercial liability and penalty of perjury. Maybe an affidavit? Ido not speak for client but prey they think "YES, WHAT HE SAID!" as you read this.

Affiant requests the Prosecuting Attorney to supply ALL answers to this fiduciaries questions for

discovery and needs.

This information is requested to assist in defending against charges brought by the County of CASS,

For THE STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, AND ALL THE OFFICIALS THAT HIDE then TAKE MY

PAY TO PROTECT and defend the natural rights of the people who live on the lands. OBJECTIONS:

Objections to all or any portion of an interrogatory shall be set forth with specificity sufficient to allow

the alleged party propounding these interrogatories to understand the exact scope of and reason for the

objection. Where an objection relates to only a portion of the information requested in an

interrogatory, all other information not within the scope of said objection shall be provided. Legal

terms used in these Interrogatories which are not specifically described below shall have the meaning

provided in the statute, regulation, ordinance or other legal authority from which term is derived, if

any, or in my edition of Black’s Law Dictionary. Any other word or term used in these Interrogatories

which is not specifically defined below shall have its ordinary and customary meaning and usage. I am

not a lawyer, I do not speak your law, I am human I do not understand the nature and cause of the

charges, proceedings, goals, jurisdictions, Justice forced my client into.RESPONDENT’S

Respondents in this matter factually are:

1.) For the record and in few words, ALL OFFICERS of this court. You Are all Agents and actors of these actions,bonded as required by Statutes of “An Act Concerning the

Official Bonds of Officials? I have heard of a seditious conspiracy to overthrow my lawfulGovernment and wonder, who would fraudulently act in both professional and personal capacitieswithin this COUNTY,and STATE, as one of the people a regular citizen of state, defined in Article IIConstitution of North Dakota, specifically not welfare enumerated; in propria persona, sui juris, livingon the Land within the boundaries of Cass county, in North Dakota, one of the united states ofAmerica by an act of Congress at 9 Stat. 452; with express and explicit reservation for all Unalienable,Vested Natural, Inherent,human, civil and common Law Rights, account abilities and responsibilitieswhether enumerated or not in the Constitution for the state of North Dakota. SOME ONE iscommitting massive criminal acts and/or omissions in this matter such as the Cass County DistrictAttorney (a public servant) for all his acts and/or omissions in this matter, claimed to be a residenttherein, and thereby comes under this courts jurisdiction.

2.) THE COUNTY OF CASS, IS an incorporation or undefined fiction whom was present in the COUNTYOF CASS, STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, and was acting in both its professional and personalcapacities for all its acts and/or omissions in this matter, and was resident therein, (as a public servant)and thereby comes under this courts jurisdiction.

3.) The PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, was an incorporation or undefined fiction whomwas present in the COUNTY OF CASS, STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, and was acting in both itsprofessional and personal capacities for all its acts and/or omissions in this matter, (as a publicservant) and was resident therein, and thereby comes under this courts jurisdiction.

4.) John and Jane Does 1 through 5,000 PLUS were joinder parties to this matter by acts and/oromissions, and either natural born, fictitious, or corporate entities, corporations, organizations, stateagents, state actors, state or federal or third party agencies, not bonded as required by the Statute ofNORTH DAKOTA passed February 28, 1850, “An Act Concerning the Official Bonds of Officials,”and were acting in both their personal and professional capacities in this matter (as public servant(s),and were resident or had business within the COUNTY OF CASS, STATE OF NORTH DAKTOA inthis matter, and thereby come under this courts jurisdiction.

5.) All respondents are the alleged real party in interest, but are in fact, undefined and unknown entitiesacting under pretence and overt fraud under color of law and under color of authority who havesuffered no damage whatsoever.

6.) Your petitioner has been factually driven into indigence due to the continued, illegal and unlawful actsand/or omissions by respondents in this matter. Petitioner has been unlawfully incarcerated,kidnapped by public officials, falsely arrested without warrant, unjustly imprisoned, and maliciouslyprosecuted without due process of law, over his will and against his consent and has been constantlyunlawfully restrained of his liberty from that point onward, and without your petitioner having itwithin his power to confront his accuser’s at lawful trial, and without being lawfully informed of thenature and cause of the accusation against him, the venue, the jurisdiction and the real party ofinterest; was falsely and maliciously and unlawfully forced into a tribunal which was only held to findmy guilt for no crime at law, in a court without jurisdiction; without probable cause; and prior to thealleged hearing and without evidence presented at lawful trial.

8.) No lawful warrant did issue or was presented at any time to your petitioner by respondents in accordancewith the concise rule of law, and as mandated by their oath of office. No supporting affidavits,rebuttals, verifications, or subscription. no grand jury indictment as mandated by the concise rule oflaw was ever used to bring me to trial,in overt contravention to the rule of law, and over my continuedobjections and against my consent. No qualifying signature of Appellant/Petitioner is upon any validor lawful instrument and/or claim held by respondent’s in this matter.

III

QUESTIONS PRESENTED The following questions are relevant to the issue as to the lawfulness of the conviction from whichpetitioner seeks relief and reparations in the instant case:

1.) Has the North Dakota Legislature unlawfully acquiesced or assisted in the subjection of the sovereignty ofthe rightful citizens of North Dakota to the municipal power of the United States Congress (found in

Art. I, Sec. 8, Cl. 17, U.S. Const.) directly be its legislation, or indirectly through agencies created forthat purpose, which ultimately led to the unlawful acts and/or omissions of respondents in this matter,and the resultant fraudulent conviction from which your petitioner hereby seeks relief?

2.) Can the respondent’s in this matter, through the COUNTY OF CASS, by their various unlawful acts and/oromissions in this matter and unclean hands, base these fraudulent acts and/or omissions based onpublished Penal Code § 270 “Failure to Provide” and/or § 166(a)(4) “Contempt of Court” using theirpositions of power under color of law, and color of authority to use the courts of the COUNTY OFCASS, as an organized crime syndicate in which to usurp your petitioner’s natural born, common law,constitutional and/or civil rights?

3.) Can the respondent’s in this matter, through the COUNTY OF CASS, by their various unlawful acts and/oromissions in this matter and unclean hands, overcome the obligation of contract?

4.) Can the respondent’s in this matter, through the COUNTY OF CASS, by their various unlawful actsand/or omissions in this matter and unclean hands, overcome the obligation of contract between Childand Father or affiant and state force affiant to defend life, liberty and property and secured rights andliberty that: “All men are by nature free and independent and have certain inalienable rights, amongwhich are those of ENJOYING and defending life and liberty; acquiring, possessing, and protectingproperty; and pursing and obtaining safety, happiness and Justice?

5.) Can the respondent’s in this matter, use an unconscionable contract, vitiated by fraud by way ofinducement, coersion and in fraud; null and void in ab initio, as a foundational basis to use publishedPenal Codes under color of law, under color of authority as a basis to usurp your petitioner’s naturalborn, Human, common law, constitutional and/or civil rights?

6.) Can the respondent’s in this matter, use the socialist doctrine (and/or Feminist Doctrine) “In the BestInterests of the Child” as a supporting basis in which to usurp and controvert the concise rule of law,to the detriment of your petitioner; as enumerated by the Constitution for the state of NORTHDAKOTA, and/or the Constitution for the united States?

8.) Has the STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA and/or respondents in this matter violated the concise rule of law

and this petitioner’s natural born, common law, human, constitutional, and/or civil rights byderogating the concise rule of law to obtain Federal Welfare remuneration scams and/or schemes?

9.) Can the STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA and/or respondent’s in this matter prosecute a matter in the courts ofNORTH DAKOTA without lawful jurisdiction?

10.) Has your petitioner’s foundational constitutional right to have a lawful Bill of Particulars answered as amatter of substantive due process of law in order to inform me of the nature and cause of theaccusation been derogated by respondent’s in this matter by their insolent acts and/or omissionsclothed under color of authority, under color of law in direct violation of the concise rule of law?

11.) Has respondent’s the lawful authority to establish a Claim of Action based upon their own unlawful actsand/or omissions in overt arrogance to the rule of law as mandated by their oaths of office and theconcise rule of law as mandated by the Constitution of the United States (1787-1791), and theConstitution for the state of North Dakota, and the Constitution of America?

13.) Has the respondent’s in this matter the right to manufacture crime against your petitioner in direct

violation to their oath of office, and in overt and conspired violation to the concise rule of law asdefined and mandated by the Constitution of the United States (1787-1791), and the Constitution forthe state of North Dakota, Has the respondent’s in this matter the right to unlawfully arrest this petitioner in direct violationto their oath of office, and in overt and conspired violation to the concise rule of law as defined andmandated by the Constitution of the United States (1787-1791), and the Constitution for the state ofNORTH DAKOTA,?

15.) Has the respondent’s in this matter the right to maliciously prosecute your petitioner in direct violationto their oath of office, and in overt and conspired violation to the concise rule of law as defined andmandated by the Constitution of the United States (1787-1791), and the Constitution for the state ofNORTH DAKOTA?

16.) Has the respondent’s in this matter the right to falsely imprison your petitioner in direct violation totheir oath of office, and in overt and conspired violation to the concise rule of law as defined andmandated by the Constitution of the United States (1787-1791), and

17.) Has the respondent’s the enumerated authority to prosecute an action without grand jury indictmentagainst your petitioner in direct insolence and arrogance to the respondent’s oath of office, and indirect violation to the concise rule of law as enumerated and mandated by the Constitution of theUnited States (1787-1791),

18.) Have the respondent’s the enumerated authority under the concise rule of law as mandated by theConstitution of the United States (1787-1791) to arrest your petitioner without a lawful warrant?Without probable cause? Not supported by affidavits? With no Governor’s Warrant? In directcontravention to their oath’s of office and the aforementioned concise rule of law??

20.) Has the sovereignty of the petitioner been encroached upon, abrogated, or derogated in favor of legislativepowers exercised in excess of the lawful enumerated limits of the Constitution of the United States(1787-1791), and the Constitution for the state of NORTH DAKOTA under force of arms usingcohesion,force and do it all in fraud? Motion to disqualify arresting officer The Officer had no reason to fear Affiant who At the time of arrest, gave police no reason to fear for their safety. A search of was madesubsequent to arrest where no weapons were found; hands were cuffed with no effort to resist; neitherdid Affiant offer any verbal threat of physical abuse, resistance or retaliation. When directed to thepolice car, Affiant complied without physical resistance. This has cost Affiant great damages,including job and ability to work to support Affiant. who will be forced to pursue justice If this issuecan not be settled RIGHT NOW, Today. Their were NO INTERVENING CIRCUMSTANCES TO CAUSE ANY UN NECESSITARYDELAY BRINGING ME BEFORE A JUDGE. There was no flood, storm, riot, or any other intervening circumstance to necessitate the officer'simmediate attention, which would justify a delay in bringing Affiant before a magistrate. Time is morevaluable than my money and to steal it for cage profits then just waste it hurt me deeply. Affiant didnot observe the officer, through the use of police radio , cell phone, or computer make any attempt tolocate a magistrate for the purpose of securing jurisdiction to continue to hold Affiant. In endeavoringto take the arrested person before the magistrate, the officer must expend all the effort that a highlycautious person would employ in the same circumstances.[FN85] Robinson v. Lovell, 238 S.W.2d 294(Tex. Civ. App. Galveston1951), writ refused n.r.e.DUTY TO TAKE BEFORE MAGISTRATE WITHOUT OUT NECESSARY DELAYArticles of Code of Criminal Procedure directs the arresting officer to take the person arrested, with or without a warrant to the nearest magistrate. Art. 14.06. Must take offender before magistrate "Except as provided by Subsection (b), in each caseenumerated in this Code, the person making the arrest or the person having custody of the personarrested shall take the person arrested or have him taken without unnecessary delay, but not later than48 hours after the person is arrested, before the magistrate who may have ordered the arrest, beforesome magistrate of the county where the arrest was made without an order, or, if necessary to providemore expeditiously to the person arrested the warnings described by Article 15. 17 of this Code, beforea magistrate in a county bordering the county in which the arrest was made. The magistrate shallimmediately perform the duties described in Article 15.17 of this Code." Without considering the lawfulness of the warrant less, victim less arrest, for the purpose ofjurisdiction, this particular argument will only consider the actions subsequent to arrest. Theimmediate issue addresses the duty of the arresting officer to take the accused before a magistrate tosecure jurisdiction such that the State may rightfully continue to restrict Affiant of his life and liberty. [28] Maximum protection of individual rights could be assured by requiring a magistrate's review ofthe factual justification prior to any arrest, but such a requirement would constitute an intolerablehandicap for law enforcement. Thus, while the Court has expressed a preference for the use of arrestwarrants when feasible, Beck v. Ohio, at 96; Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471, 479-482(1963), it has never invalidated an arrest supported by probable cause solely because the officers failedto secure a warrant. See Ker v. California, 374 U.S. 23 (1963); Draper v. United States, 358 U.S. 307(1959); Trupiano v. United States, 334 U.S. 699, 705 (1948). [29] Under this practical compromise, a policeman's on-the-scene must make an assessment ofprobable cause & provide legal justification for arresting a person suspected of crime, with untaintedevidence and for a brief period of detention to take the administrative steps incident to arrest. Once thesuspect is in custody, however, the reasons that justify dispensing with the magistrate's neutraljudgment evaporate. There no longer is any danger that the suspect will escape or commit further

crimes while the police submit their evidence to a magistrate. And, while the State's reasons for takingsummary action subside, the suspect's need for a neutral determination of probable cause increasessignificantly. The consequences of prolonged detention may be more serious than the interference occasioned byarrest. Pretrial confinement did imperil the suspect's job, interrupt his source of income, and impair hisfamily relationships. See R. Goldfarb, Ransom 32-91 (1965); L. Katz, Justice Is the Crime 51-62 (1972. Even pretrial release may be accompanied by burdensomeconditions that effect a significant restraint of liberty. See, e. g., 18 U. S. C. 3146 (a)(2, (5). When the stakes are this high, the detached judgment of a neutral magistrate is essential if the FourthAmendment is to furnish meaningful protection from unfounded interference with liberty.Accordingly, we hold that the Fourth Amendment requires a judicial determination of probable causeas a prerequisite to extended restraint of liberty following arrest. GERSTEI( v. PUGH ET AL, 95 S.Ct. 854, 420 U.S. 103, 43 L. Ed. 2d 54, 1975.SCT,40602 THE POINT IS THE POINT. The arresting officer failed to take Affiant directly to the nearest magistrate.While certain delays can be expected in certain circumstances, simple failure to seek the authority envisioned by Gerstien v Pugh above, may not be construed as a proximate cause ofreasonable delay. The seminal case on this Affiant under State Law. see Heath v Boyd, 141 Tex. 569;175 S.W.2d 214; 1943 Tex. LEXIS 370. "Moreover, if Heath's arrest had been authorized by the statutes, his subsequent detention as pleaded proved would make a case of false imprisonment against Boyd. The undisputedfacts are that after his arrest Heath rode with the sheriff to the former's car, which he then entered anddrove several miles to the courthouse, followed by Boyd. There he was detained in Boyd's office fromone to three hours, while Boyd was seeking advice by telephone as to what to do, in the face of a plainstatutory command as to what must be done in all cases of arrest without warrant. Art. 217, C.C.P.,1925, provides, "In each case enumerated in this chapter, the person making the arrest shallimmediately take the person arrested * * before the nearest magistrate where the arrest was madewithout an order." Substantially the same requirement appears in Art. 325, C.C.P., 1925, and Art. 487,P.C., 1925. Presumably, there was a magistrate in Mertzon, the county seat. Yet Boyd offers no reasonwhy he did not take Heath before that official. Neither in his pleadings nor in his testimony does hesuggest that a magistrate was not reasonably available, although the arrest and detention all occurredbetween 8 o'clock in the morning and noon thus Disqualify Arresting Officer . If he had taken Heath tothat official, he could have gotten the information and assistance he was seeking by telephone. He wasunder no obligation to seek advice or aid from Johnson. He was under a positive duty immediately toseek a magistrate. That such failure, unexcused, makes a case of false imprisonment, as a matter oflaw, is held by all the authorities. Newby v. Gunn et al, 74 Texas, 455, 12 S.W. 67; McBeath v.Campbell, 12 S.W. (2d) 118; Alamo Downs, Inc., et [***14] al v. Briggs (Civ. App.), 106 S.W. (2d)733 (er. dism.); Box v. Fluitt (Civ. App.), 47 S.W. (2d) 1107; Maddox v. Hudgeons (Civ. App.), 72S.W. 414 (er. ref.); [**218] Karner et al v. Stump (Civ. App.), 34 S.W. 656; Petty v. Morgan et al (Civ.App.), 116 S.W. 141; Bishop v. Lucy et al (Civ. App.) 50 S.W. 1029; 35 C.J.S., p. 546, sec. 31." Heathv Boyd, 141 Tex. 569; 175 S.W.2d 214; 1943 Tex. LEXIS 370 The arresting officer in this case made no due diligent effort to locate a magistrate. To help free thecaptured person. "Although the failure to take the plaintiff before a magistrate would have beenexcused if good grounds had existed for the belief that a magistrate was not available, such was notthe case since the officers made no attempt to determine whether the magistrate was or would makehimself available. " Roberts v Bohac, 574 F2d 1232 Irrespective of any other states, Texas has specific legislation concerning this requirement to take the accused before a magistrate and real law is uniform and applies to all everywhere. Not only must the arresting officer exhaust the available magistrates in the county, theconsideration of the availability of a magistrate must be extended to include every surrounding county( Article 14.06 supra). The record offers, as the government's only justification, evidence that the magistrate, who issued thewarrants, advised of his unavailability after the early evening of Friday, September 8, 1989. There arethree other magistrates in the District. The record is bereft of any evidence as to their availability.

Likewise, the record is bereft of any evidence as to the availability of any of the district Judges. n5Absent evidence of other than the unavailability of the duty magistrate (the propriety of which is not here questioned), there is no basisto find that the delay for the entire period from the arrest to presentment was necessary. To be sure, itwas a weekend. The court was closed. But those facts do not entitle the government to presume the absence of an obligation to try to arrangethe appearance of the arrested before one of the other possible judicial officers.The law remains aforce in life even outside usual business hours and all judicial officers have the obligation to respondto the needs of parties as they are mandated by the law. Affiant to their reasonable non-judicialactivities, all judicial officers stand ready to fulfill that obligation. Here, the government has notshown the unavailability of all the possible judicial officers. The obligation of complying with the lawlies with the government, which thus has the burden of proving that an arrestee was brought before ajudicial officer without unnecessary delay. Its proof of the unavailability of one judicial officer doesnot prove that the delay to the next regular business hours, some sixty to sixty- five hours later, did notconstitute unnecessary delay if it does not exhaust the possibility of an appearance before one of theother judicial officers in the district. See United States v. Colon, 835 [*21] F.2d 27, 30-31 (2d Cir.1987). U(ITED STATES v. MORGA(, et al. 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6206 The arresting officer, acting in accordance with established police policy, took Affiant directly to jail having made no effort to locate a magistrate for the purposes stipulated byArticle 14.06 and the federal requirement articulated by Gerstien v Pugh supra. Having so acted, thearresting officer became a criminal actor ab initio and therefore is disqualified as a credible witness inthe instant matter. ARRESTING OFFICER AS TRESSPASSOR AGRESSOR It is the specific allegation that the moment the arresting started the engine on the patrol car, put it ingear and headed toward the jail instead of toward the nearest magistrate, the crime was complete.From that point onward, all the time Affiant was held in custody was in violation of law and an act ofKidnapping. § 20.03. KIDNAPPING. Texas Penal Code A person commits an offense if he intentionally or knowingly abducts another person. (1) When their is no victims of this action (2) When the site was contaminated by others before the officers involved arrived(3) When due process is willfully ignored and it makes me a victim in a Conspiracy to deprive myrights is an affirmative defense to prosecution under this section that: the abduction was not coupledwith intent to use or to threaten to use deadly force; the actor was a relative of the person abducted;and the actor's sole intent was to assume lawful control of the victim. An offense under this section isa felony of the third degree. It is the further contention of victim that, as the alleged act of kidnapping wascommitted in furtherance of an ongoing criminal conspiracy to extort funds from Affiant in the formof fines and fees collected in violation of the due course of the laws of the State and I feel conspiracyis across this country. The alleged schemes included felony acts to the detriment of Affiant , including assault and battery,the act of kidnapping is more specifically defined as 20.04. AGGRAVATED KIDNAPPI NG. A person commits an offense if he intentionally or knowingly abducts another person with the intentto: (1) hold him for ransom or reward; (2) (2) use him as a shield or hostage; (3) facilitate the commission of a felony while armed (4) the flight after the attempt or commission of a felony; (5) inflict bodily injury on him or violate or abuse him sexually; (6) terrorize him or a third person; or to officially oppress this victim.(7) interfere with the performance of any governmental or political function.A person commits an offense if the person intentionally or knowingly abducts another person and usesor exhibits a deadly weapon during the commission of the offence. Except as provided by Subsection(d), an offense under this section is a felony of the first degree. At the punishment stage of a trial, theAffiant may raise the issue as to whether he voluntarily released the victim in a safe place. If the

Affiant proves the issue in the affirmative by a preponderance of the evidence, the offence is a felonyof the second degree is established. All who participated with the arresting office in the confinement of Affiant are likewise trespassers onthe law and violators of Constitutional provisions, and therefore, cannot claim to be acting for thepublic good or under any jurisdiction as no jurisdiction allows for criminal acts to be committed undercolor of any official authority. Under the doctrine of trespass ab initio, where a party exceeds an authority given by law, They havestepped out of their oath of office protectors and become transgressors of law.. When they claim toknow the law, the party loses the benefit of the justification and is considered a trespasser ab initio,although to a certain extent the party followed the authority given. The law will then operateretrospectively to defeat all acts done under the color of lawful authority. American Mortg. Corp. v.Wyman 41 S.W.2d 270 Thus, a person who enters on real property lawfully pursuant to a conditional or restricted consentand remains after his or her right to possession terminates and demand is made for his or her removalbecomes a trespasser from the beginning, and the law will then operate retrospectively to defeat allacts done by him under color of lawful authority. Williams v. Garnett, 608 S.W.2d 794 (Tex. Civ. App.Waco 1980). The rule applies to the acts of sheriffs and other officers, as well as to the conduct of privateindividuals. American Mortg. Corp. v. Wyman The court will find a verified criminal affidavit If this is pursued alleging the act of AgravatedKidnapping and terrorisim by the arresting officer. While the act is more commonly referred to as"false imprisonment" there is no such statute, the proper citation is kidnapping. Further, my bill will continue until this matter is fully settled and names cleared as the act wasaggravated by the fact that the arresting officer was displaying a deadly weapon at the timeeliminating any possibility of resistance by Affiant of the criminal act and the act was committed inorder to facilitate the subsequent commission of the felony act of Tampering With a GovernmentDocument, Articles of Penal Code by the jailer and magistrate ( I will supply full explanation ifneeded for a fee of $150). PROSECUTORIAL PURPOSE FOR DENYING TIMELY EXAMINIG TRAILSSubjecting Affiant to unnecessary and humiliating procedures when a probable cause hearing could render them unnecessary serves the prosecutor's interest. By facilitating coercivepractices during booking, the jail psychologically softens up the accused for "thedeal" by leaving them emotionally, mentally and physically exhausted, coerced, and intimidated. Thenecessity of this will become apparent when we get to the prosecutorial practice of secreting therecords from the clerk of the court below. A clean hands policy renders any American court without jurisdictionIt must be construed the facts of the cause, Affiant was subjected to imprisonment after arrest as a matter of policy and not necessity. Therefore, the act wherein Affiant was abducted atconstructive gunpoint by the arresting officer and taken straight to jail instead of some magistrate is anact of Aggravated Kidnapping as defined by PC Article 20.04 .In as much as the rights of Affiant were violated as a matter of policy, Affiant asserts, the arrestingagency, by not seeking the proper authority became a trespasser ab inito as with all others whoparticipated in the confinement of Affiant, and the court is thereby left without jurisdiction or cause ofaction in the instant cause, a clear conspiracy. Where several people acted together in pursuit of unlawful acts, each one is in this conspiracy and willbe held liable for collateral damages and crimes, even though unplanned and unintended, if thosecrimes are foreseeable, ordinary and probable consequences of preparation or execution of theunlawful act. Curtis v. State (Cr.App. 1978) 573 S.W.2d 219. Criminal Law 59(4) Driving is not Career unless done commercially, It effects me in the most profound of ways, It stopsme from seeking employment, the right to happiness or to even exist.On showing that all persons arrested by the agency are taken directly to jail and no duediligent effort is made by the arresting officer to locate a magistrate, it must be construed the practicesare participated in by more than one person. It must further be construed those involved had to interactwith one another in an effort to standardize and co-ordinate the procedures practiced. It must therebybe construed all participants conspired with one another toward the furtherance of the above indicatedconspiratorial relationship.

Texas Penal Code § 15.02. CRIMI AL CONSPIRACY. A person commits criminal conspiracy if, with intent that a felony be committed: (1) he agrees with one or more persons that they or one or more of them engage in conduct that wouldconstitute the offense; and (2) he or one or more of them performs an overt act in pursuance of theagreement. (3) An agreement constituting a conspiracy may be inferred from acts of the parties. (4) It is no defense to prosecution for criminal conspiracy that: (5) one or more of the co conspiratorsis not criminally responsible for the object Offense; (6) one or more of the co conspirators has been acquitted, so long as two or more co conspirators have not been acquitted; (7) one or more of the co conspirators has not been prosecuted or convicted, has been convicted of a different offense, or is immune from prosecution; (8) the actor belongs to a class of persons that by definition of the object offense is legally incapable of committing the object offense in an individual capacity; (9) the object offense was actually committed. An offense under this section is one category lower than the most serious felony that is the object ofthe conspiracy, and if the most serious felony that is the object of the conspiracy is a state jail felony,the offense is a Class A misdemeanors. In the event Affiant has been subjected to a deprivation of rights, and tort damages subsequent to acriminal conspiracy by those officials responsible for the arrest and subsequent deprivation of libertyof Affiant , all are disqualified, declared not credible persons, and rendered without jurisdiction to actin the instant cause. Defendant moves the court to declare arresting officer not a credible witness consequent to thecriminal acts perpetrated against Defendant subsequent to arrest. Defendant further moves the court to strike the criminal accusation and statement of probable cause presented by Officer as unreliable. Defendant further moves the court to dismiss the instant allegation with prejudice. THE MOTIONS TO DISMISS My client, having been forced under threat, duress, and coercion, only to protect AggrievedDefendant's interests, without any appearance of an adverse party, where the Judge was not animpartial party, but also prosecution, which is a conflict of interests and gives rise to violation of dueprocess rights of the alleged defendant, who is now aggrieved because of such impartiality, and assuch this court has lost immunity and any preconceived jurisdiction. Further investigation shows that there was no probable cause for the arrest and seizure at the time ofsuch arrest and seizure. There was no disturbance of the peace, felony, or warrant for such action,leading to another cause of action against the Plaintiff and Officer for harassment and obtaining asignature under threat, duress and coercion.In the interest of justice and to preclude further injury to the Citizens and Aggrieved Defendant: MOTION # 1 Aggrieved Defendant hereby motions the court to dismiss for failure to establish probable causewithin 48 hours, or to issue a "Notice of Infraction", (officer issued a "NOTICE TO APPEAR"),therefore the court has no jurisdiction in the matter. MOTION # 2 Aggrieved Defendant hereby motions the court to dismiss for failure to establish probable cause forthe traffic stop, and a contested hearing within ninety days under the Constitution of the Untied Statestherefore any jurisdiction is lost in the matter. MOTION # 3 Aggrieved Defendant hereby motions the court to dismiss for lack of prosecution at hearing.Prosecution failed to invoke jurisdiction, wherefore this court has lost any alleged jurisdiction and hasdenied an adversarial proceeding amounting to lack of due process. MOTION # 4 Aggrieved Defendant hereby motions the court to suppress all evidence unlawfully obtained by the traffic stop "arrest" by the arresting officer who comes with unclean hands. The Constitution of the United States forbids that a standing army may be maintained in peace time. Such constitutional abuse of WAR POWERS, if not rebutted by some superior law, will be evidence of such wilful intent to injure the rights of peaceful Citizens.

MOTION # 5 My client comes into this court under the American Flag of Peace, and municipality has no expressauthority to use marital war powers upon this Citizen without lawful declaration. This Citizen alsodeclares that the venue is improper, in that the alleged infraction did not occur upon any municipalproperty and as such must be dismissed. MOTION # 6 Aggrieved Defendant hereby motions the court to dismiss the charge for failure to explain the natureand cause of the accusation, thereby leaving the Defendant in ignorance and without aid of knowledgeto prepare a knowledgeable defence, and amounts to denial of due process without answering my bill of particulars submitted or covering thesequestions, basic questions asked of this court. 1. IS MY CLIENT, Am I entitled to a fair hearing? 2. Who has the burden of proof or burden of providing a preponderance of evidence? 3. Am I presumed innocent of every element of this alleged crime or alleged action at hand? 4. Am I supposed to be informed of the nature and cause of the charges and proceedings against me? 5. Is there evidence of a complaining party? 6. Did client violate someone's legal rights? 7. If yes, then please specify which rights were violated. Is this a Civil or criminal matter and will I see a victim or signed contract ?MOTION TO DISMISS INDICTMENT ON THE GROUNDS THAT NINTH AND TENTHAMENDMENTS TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION PROHIBIT PUNISHMENT OFCRIMES WITHOUT VICTIMS. AS A VIOLATION OF THE RIGHTS RETAINED BY WE THE PEOPLE, TO BE FREE FROM CRIMINAL PROSECUTION FOR POSSESSING A SUBSTANCE HAVINGRELATIVELY HARMLESS EFFECTS ON THE USER, OTHER PERSONS OR SOCIETY BUT APOLITICAL TOOL OF PROFIT. COMES NOW the accused, Greatly aggrieved by counsel, This court and this prosecution 's theft ofmy time and resources and moves this DIS Honourable Court to dismiss the indictment against me onthe grounds that their is no victim to examine, confront or defend myself from. the Ninth Amendmentrequires this Court to declare 21 U.S.C. §841(a)(1), as it applies to marijuana, paraphernalia, OROTHER SUBSTANCE unconstitutional on its face, and as applied, constitutes a denial anddisparagement of rights retained by the people which the government has no authority under the TenthAmendment to Infringe. The right to face and cross examine his victim Is rendering me a slave of thestate. I state the following grounds for this motion. I f charged with drug paraphernalia and marijuana in a three-count indictment. Count 1 alleges that the accused to possess drug paraphernalia The historical foundation andlegislative history of the Ninth and Tenth Amendments, as well as rules of statutory interpretation, support the proposition that they were included in the Constitution to afford substantiveprotection for Un enumerated rights which are retained by the people Judicial application of the Ninth Amendment since its enactment provides precedent for a substantiveinterpretation. See, e.g., Griswold v. Connecticut, The standard to be applied in determining whether the activity or behavior constituting victim lesscrimes are protected by the Ninth and Tenth Amendments should be whether the act or behavior to beregulated causes harm to persons other than the individual engaging in this alleged crime.. Since the latest scientific evidence establishes that marijuana is a relatively harmless drug having nodetrimental effects on the individual users or society, BUT what is created by it's regulations, gangs,burglaries, and violence involved in protecting profits this illicit substance brings in. Or unlikeprescription drugs, cigarettes, whiskey or a knife. Items that are killing thousands of people with coldblooded efficiency to keep crime profitable. yet the right to possess A harmless substance, regardlessof one's intent, is a direct attack on the rights retained by the people under the Ninth and TenthAmendments. I MAINTAIN A HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATION IS BEING COMMITTED ON MY PERSON ASTHIS CHARGE PLACES LAW OVER ME, THE INDIVIDUAL AND IS NOT USED FOR MYPERSONAL OR THE PUBLIC PROTECTION BUT FOR PROFIT AND CONTROL.

THIS IS A BLATANT R.E.C.O. RACKETEERING, A PYRAMID SCHEME TO DEPRIVE MYCLIENT OF MY RIGHTS, MY MONEY AND OUR TIME. These actions are Causing client irreparable mental, emotional and physical damage and I feel you areconsidering us as less than human and are seeking to destroy in whole or part, My class of people youdeem un desirable and according to the UN international treaty, Genocide. This is the seeds ofGenocide. A grave warning sign that I feel has destroyed countless lives in this enforcement of andpersecution of actions designed to manufacture victims, crime and debt. The legal system is the onlyones who profit from this and we are forced to pay people who deny us equal protection and dueprocess. NOTICE AND COMPLAINT BREACH OF OATH "The people are the Masters of both Congress and Courts, NOT to overthrow the Constitution, but tooverthrow the men who pervert it" Abraham Lincoln

ISSUED TO: THE STATE OF NORTH DAKOTAPublic Servants

FROM:ED CURTIS Veteran never relieved of this duty An American Civilian, A victim,State Citizen and Citizen of the American Republic

I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United Statesagainst all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I take this obligation freely, without any mentalreservation or purpose of evasion, and that I will well and truthfully discharge the duties of the officeon which I am about to enter. So help me God.KNOW FOR THE RECORD, This document EFFECTIVE upon receipt, serves notice of malfeasanceto any public, executive, legislative or judicial representative of We the People concerning a primaryrequirement of public office, Breach of: their Sworn Oath to Support and Defend Our Constitution[s]of the United States OR any American of We the People; Breaching their Voluntary Contract[s] andMandatory Duty[ies] of Support and Defend. The act of promoting, enforcing, legislating, or judginganything contrary to the Constitution of the United States "The Supreme Law of the Land" AND/ORany State Constitution in our COMPOUND REPUBLIC {State & Federal Constitutions, "Federalist51"} is an Act of Insurrection violating a requirement of public office, immediately suspending allauthority granted by the people, punishable by impeachment, recall or removal and charges.Additionally, notification to a judge identifies a Breach of Good Behavior. This document RequiresGrand Jury Review of the Government or any other entity thereof. Federalist Papers 83 Paragraph 16Cl. 2. In North Dakota, Their is no Grand jury in violation to our Federal Constitution.Webster's Enc. Unabr. Dictionary © 1989 defines: I. Insurrection "any" act or instance of...open resistance to established authority. II. Good behavior 1. Conduct conformable to ALL law and justice. 2. Proper fulfillment of the duties of office, especially, a public office. All law contrary to Our Constitution[s] the established authority[ies] have no merit and are NOTenforceable. We the people's unalienable rights are beyond the encroachment of mortal man andcannot be violated by mere acts of government. I. If you, as a public servant have done anything to cause issuance of this notification and complaint,then realize the good faith under which it was issued, the Supreme Law of the Land, Our U. S.Constitution. Article II, Section 4. Removal from Office. II. If without proof of commission, you pose to act in any official public, executive, or judicialcapacity and have NOT taken an oath to support Our Constitution in violation Article VI cl.3, or movein BREACH of same, then anyone so charged could be creating a public nuisance. A List identifiedBreaches of Oath, Constitutional Transgressions or General Malfeasance ON RECORD. TREASON,CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY, ACTS OF GENOCIDE, EXTORTUNE, OFFICIALOPPRESSION,MASSIVE HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS , CONSPIRACY, KIDNAPPING,PERFIDY FRAUD UPON THE COURT AND SEDITION. Are war crimes, For the good of all, mustbe aggressively pursued. ED CURTIS and client Respectfully Submitted, "With Liberty and Justice for All", Without Prejudice UCC 1-207; 1-103 CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE: As we believe that Criminal Acts have taken place, I have reserved theFundamental Right to Be Heard, as Free Speech in a Court of Record to an impartial jury of my peersa REDRESS of GRIEVANCES. Title 28 USC requires a record to be kept of hearings. Destroying therecord (a felony) or refusal to keep oath is a violation of law initiating an automatic reversal or

mistrial. Prohibiting the defendant from testifying or challenging his accusers is Destroying the recordby prohibitive conversion. Suppression of Truth is FRAUD, therefore the Criminal Obstruction ofJustice, attempting to Obtain a False Verdict by biasing the impartial jury, denying a FULL FAIRHEARING is a DISHONOURABLE DEFAULT & Jury tampering.Therefore, attempting to adjudge, legislate, enforce OR SET any "Crime", alleged ORDERS withoutHONESTY presented by both sides to an impartial jury are EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED, by but notlimited to, the "Bills of Attainder Clause" [as Titles of Nobility, Bills of Pains and Penalties, "Fines",Bills of Credit, in violation of the Oath of Office, Breaching Good Behavior, as Extortion, Blackmailand Bribery, Criminal Acts volitive of R.I.C.O, the Hobbs Act; Title 18 § 241, 241 Colorable Law;Reid v. Covert 354 US 1; U.S. v. Throckmorton 98 U.S. 61 pg. 65 and Federalist Papers 83 Paragraph16 Cl. 2 Federalist Papers 83 Hamilton Paragraph 16 Cl. 2 Willful abuses of a public authority, to theoppression of the subject, and every species of official Extortion, are offenses against the government,for which the persons who commit them may be indicted and punished according to the circumstancesof the case. THESE ARE CAPTIOL OFFENCES.Federalist Papers 83 Hamilton Paragraph 17 Cl. 2 The Strongest argument in its favor [Trial by Jury]is that it is security against corruption.Federalist Papers 78 Hamilton Paragraph 7 Cl. 4. The Judiciary, on the contrary, has no influence overthe sword or no direction either of the strength or wealth of society and can take No active resolutionwhatever. U.S. v. Throckmorton 98 U.S. 61 pg. 65 Fraud vitiates the consent of the most solemncontracts, documents and even judgments.MOTION # 7 The Aggrieved Defendant further motions the court to dismiss for statutory authorization of officer toissue a "NOTICE TO APPEAR", or provide such statute that authorizes such form to be issued by amember of the executive branch. Aggrieved Defendant objects to the martial law war powerssummary judgment of this court and lack of due process and I reserve all my rights under the commonlaw including the right to appeal, without cost and do not voluntarily waive any rights to bill for mytime and seek damages for Constitutional, human or civil rights violations in the amount of $10,0000per violation suffered. Motion to disqualify officials and dismiss all allegationsNow comes Affiant hereinafter referred to as Defendant and moves the court to disqualify the arrestingofficer, court clerk, prosecuting attorney, and presiding judge for cause shown.Defendant moves the court to dismiss ALL allegations made by the instant cause as said allegationsand subsequent prosecution constitutes an on-going criminal conspiracy against Defendant et alintended to extort monies from Defendant in violation of the due course of the laws of the State. Saidconspiracy includes acts on the part of the presiding judge committed in concert and collusion with theprosecuting attorney intended to deny Defendant in the due course of the laws toward: coercingDefendant into entering into a deceptive contract, subjecting Defendant to unnecessary inconvenienceby forcing Defendant to submit to multiple appearances held for no legal purpose other than to harassDefendant, demonstrated bias on the part of the courts intended to undermine the confidence ofDefendant in the possibility of a fair hearing by the abuse of process wherein Defendant is forced toattend hearings for no legal purpose but rather, for the purpose of subjecting Defendant to abusivetreatment by prosecuting attorney, and subjecting Defendant to a deliberate connivance by the court topresent the prosecuting attorney as a judicial officer at a hearing wherein prosecutor presides over ahearing to which Defendant has been summoned by court process and is a simulation of a legalprocess not proper under law but intended to lend the prestige of the court to the improper threats andcoercion of the prosecutor in order to extort an improper plea bargain from Defendant., held forransom. Statement of factsDefendant received a summons from Officer, ordering Defendant to appear at the County Court for thestated purpose of being brought before a magistrate. Defendant appeared and entered a plea or for the purpose of meeting with the prosecuting attorneywherein Defendant was insulted, bullied, and coerced by prosecutor in order to deny Defendant in afair hearing before a neutral court. From experience, My public protector told me, “I WILL Take theplea or HE will help convict me”. It is on the jail phone but the phones do not work this way, for me. Improper citation By the citation issued by the arresting officer, Defendant was coerced into entering a plea to the court.As no law exists which places a duty on any person accused of a crime to enter a plea, said order isbeyond the power of the court to demand. Any plea entered at said time may not be said to have been

entered into with complete disclosure and free of coercion and bring fraud upon the court. Allegationof coercionIt is not the contention of Defendant that the notice to appear is illegal by its nature as said agreementis clearly authorized by law. It is the contention of Defendant that when said contract was offered tothe accused at the time of arrest, said offer of contract must comport with standing law and be offeredfree of coercion and with full disclosure. The coercion inherent in the offer of a contract by anarresting officer is accepted by Defendant as reasonable under the circumstances of the possibility ofphysical arrest and said coercion is not the matter brought to issue by the instant motion before thecourt. Defendant brings to issue the inherent misrepresentation of authority contained in the offeredcontract supported by fact. The courts of Texas have consistently adhered to the common law doctrineof duress as well as a more modern doctrine of duress of property. McGowen v. Bush, I have pages ofreference if needed. The Constitutional authority for the licensing and taxing of PRIVATE automobilesand drivers does NOT exist, and today is largely based on early legal word-games played by lawyersin the state legislatures acting in violation of the constitutional mandate of the "separation of powers."The "motor vehicle" statutes were designed and written to purposely confuse free civilian travel on thepublic roads with the taxable profession of "driving" -- the hauling of passengers or freight for profit.The motor vehicle statue code is a hodgepodge of self-contradicting,Machiavellian, and calculatedlyincomprehensible rules and regulations. The administration of this network of nonsense requires hugearmies of government employees, chosen for their innate indifference to other people, and rigorouslytrained to work at cross purposes with the millions of befuddled and frightened people who labor andsuffer in what is left of the private sector. It was and still is folly to put people with these loony ideasin charge of our lives and our destinies. And it is degrading to meekly submit to the torture YOU putus through as YOU wrest away our fortunes and our freedoms. Each of the states Department ofMotor Vehicles is closer to the Nazi Gestapo than most of us have the courage to admit. The use of thepolice for intimidation and armed threats to evoke stark fear in the populace is a deliberate strategy. Infact, drivers' licenses are only thinly disguised police ID cards. Do you forget how to drive whenmoving across town, or into another state? Then why isn't the driver license you got in another statethe year you graduated from high school still as "good" as the high school diploma you earned thatsame year? The answer of course, is that the government through the police, must always know yourcurrent address so that they can control you.. By signing, You sign a room full of fraud laws thatallows you to be hunted for fun and profit Your food for a greedy, hungry system with one. ANYCONTRACT MADE IN FRAUD IS VOID ANY Contract misleading on its face, enforced by force,and not fully agreed on is void, in honesty and law.The contract is so structured as to give the appearance of authority to demand a plea from Defendantwherein there is no such authority under law. Had such a contract been offered free of coercion, it isdubious as to rather the contract would be valid considering that it had the effect of enticing Defendantto unknowingly waive a right to not enter a plea, however, having been entered into at the constructivepoint of a gun, Under the threat of you can go to a cage, there can be no validity to the requirement ofa plea accepted under such circumstances. A Special plea waived by capitulation arises.If Defendant abides by the contract and makes appearance at the court and enters a plea, the right toentering a special appearance is effectively waived. As will be alleged below, the citations commonlyprepared by arresting officers are insufficient on their face. If Defendant is tricked into entering a plea,the plea acts to accept the authority of the court and waives the right to appear before a magistrate asstipulated in the promise to appear. Waiver of a right may not be construed as voluntary if said waiveris secured by trickery or deception by others enforcing it. §31.01.Texas Penal Code (1) Definitions In this chapter:"Deception" means: creating or confirming by words or conduct a false impression of law or fact thatis likely to affect the judgment of another in the transaction, and that the actor does not believe to betrue;Conspiratorial collusion on part of court officersIt is the contention of Defendant that the requirement of entering a plea was included in the plea offer,in order to circumvent laws which would require some magistrate to hold a proper examination intothe sufficiency of the allegation made against Defendant. This practice acts to serve the personalinterest and convenience of the magistrate while denying Defendant in the due course of the laws.Improper argument against right to an examination hearing. At this point it is to be expected that the

prosecuting attorney will argue that there is no right to an examining trail in the case of an allegationof a violation of a law defined as a misdemeanors. Defendant will stipulate to that there is no suchrequirement, however, by making such an argument in the instant cause, the prosecutor would defraudthe court. The instant assertion does not go the right of an examining trial on the making of anallegation; it goes to the right of an examining trial at the point that the liberty of the citizen isrestricted. It is well established that, any time a citizen is restricted at liberty, an examining trialalways attaches. §543.005. Promise to Appear; ReleaseTo secure release, the person arrested must make a written promise to appear in court by signing thewritten notice prepared by the arresting officer. The signature may be obtained on a duplicate form oron an electronic device capable of creating a copy of the signed notice. The arresting officer shallretain the paper or electronic original of the notice and deliver the copy of the notice to the personarrested. The officer shall then promptly release the person from custody.Any argument that the accused was not arrested must be put to rest by the above as no citation can beissued until such time as the accused had been arrested as indicated by the above statute authorizingthe preparation of the "promise to appear." §543.006. Time and Place of AppearanceThe time specified in the notice to appear must be at least 10 days after the date of arrest unless theperson arrested demands an earlier hearing .The place specified in the notice to appear must be before a magistrate having jurisdiction of theoffense who is in the municipality or county in which the offense is alleged to have been committed.It is clear from a reading of the above statute that the promise is to appear before some magistrate"having jurisdiction for the offense." Under normal arrest procedures, the arresting officer would berequired to bring the accused before a magistrate for some magistrate by Article 14.06 Codes ofCriminal Procedure:Art. 14.06. Must Take Offender Before MagistrateExcept as provided by Subsection (b), in each case enumerated in this Code, the person making thearrest shall take the person arrested or have him taken without unnecessary delay before the magistratewho may have ordered the arrest, before some magistrate of the county where the arrest was madewithout an order, or, if necessary to provide more expeditiously to the person arrested the warningsdescribed by Article 15.17 of this Code, before a magistrate in a county bordering the county in whichthe arrest was made. The magistrate shall immediately perform the duties described in Article 15.17 ofthis Code.A peace officer who is charging a person, including a child, with committing an offense that is a ClassC misdemeanor's, other than an offense under Section 49.02, Penal Code, may, instead of taking theperson before a magistrate, issue a citation to the person that contains written notice of the time andplace the person must appear before a magistrate, the name and address of the person charged, and theoffense charged.In the instant cause, §543.005. Texas Transportation Code allows the officer the option of fulfilling therequirement by allowing the person to bring him/herself before the magistrate. When the person hadbrought him/herself before the magistrate, the magistrate must perform an examining trial asprescribed by Chapter 16 Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. Art. 2.11. Examining CourtWhen the magistrate sits for the purpose of inquiring into a criminal accusation against any person,this is called an examining court. Magistrates were put in place to accord just this protection and prosecutor would, by making theabove referenced argument, mislead the court into denying Defendant in the most basic right a properexamination into the sufficiency of an allegation before being held to answer to an allegation. Therequirement is in place, but the magistrate would not see Defendant when Defendant made properappearance. Defendant was denied opportunity to enter evidence which would show that the causeshould not proceed and was, thereby, denied in his right to be free from an improper or unnecessaryprosecution. Clerk impersonated magistrateWhen Defendant appeared as promised at the court, the clerk of the court, in impersonation of ajudicial officer, convened a hearing and took Defendant's plea. §37.11 Impersonating Public Servant [2-10 years + $0-10,000]

A person commits an offense if he:impersonates a public servant with intent to induce another to submit to his pretended officialauthority or to rely on his pretended official acts; orknowingly purports to exercise any function of a public servant or of a public office, including that ofa judge and court, and the position or office through with he purports to exercise a function of a publicservant or public office has no lawful existence under the constitution or laws of this state or of theUnited States.(b) An offense under this section is a felony of the third degree.In the instant cause, the clerk of the court impersonated the magistrate and used said implied authorityto deny Defendant in the right to a proper examination into the sufficiency of the allegations madeagainst Defendant. Citation fails to adequately notify defendant By the instant cause, Defendant hasbeen charged with some natural language act. The citation does not stipulate some particular statute sothat Defendant my be adequately advised of the charge against same. Arresting officers made noeffort to properly charge the accused in traffic matters as it is never intended that the accused everhave the opportunity to challenge the allegation. By denying citizens a proper examining trial, officersare at liberty to make any allegation they please without consideration of judicial oversight violating,separation of powers. This is a common practice as it is never intended that Defendant have the opportunity at defense asevery step on from the point of the citation being issued is so contrived so as to exert undue pressureson Defendant that a plea bargain will be achieved with no question of the propriety of the proceduresever being raised. Citation violates specific lawThe citation and promise to appear order Defendant to appear at the court on or before the date statedon the citation. Because of the very nature of the conditions of the promise to appear it is clear thecourt has no intention of holding a proper hearing when Defendant complies with the conditions of thepromise. In the first instance, the court will not have a proper charging instrument available to it thatis necessary to invest the court with jurisdiction. In the second instance, even were there a proper charging instrument before the court, it would benecessary to enter evidence into the court record to support the citation. In an examining trial, the truth of the accusation may not be based on the accusation alone; suchconclusion, if valid, would render the examining trial a useless thing, a mere re-enactment of theearlier determination of whether an arrest warrant should issue. Ex parte Garcia, 547 S.W.2d 271 (Tex.Crim. App. 1977). Rather, the state must show that there is a reason to believe that an indictment willbe preferred for some violation of the law. Ex parte Martin, 119 Tex. Crim. 141, 45 S.W.2d 965(1932). Thus, the state has the burden of proving that there is probable cause to believe the accusedcommitted the offense charged against him or her. State ex rel. Holmes v. Salinas, 784 S.W.2d 421(Tex. Crim. App. 1990). As the accuser is not expected to be present, it must be construed the courtintended to deny Defendant in a proper hearing and allow the clerk to impersonate a judicial officer inorder to deny Defendant in the due course of the laws of the State. Rights denied toward administrative convenienceThe right to an examining trial is undeniably required by clear and long established federalrequirements. By attempting to trick Defendant into entering a plea before the clerk as if such apractice were in keeping with the due course of the laws, the accused is induced to waive the right toan examining trial on arrest and the court, in an effort to serve the administrative convenience of themagistrate, has acted to defraud Defendant by the simulation of a legal process. §32.48 Simulating Legal Process[0-1 year + $0-4,000 OR 180 days-2 years + $0-10,000]A person commits an offense if the person recklessly causes to be delivered to another any documentthat simulates a summons, complaint, judgment, or other court process with the intent to: inducepayment of a claim from another person; or cause another to:submit to the putative authority of the document; ortake any action or refrain from taking any action in response to the document, in compliance with thedocument, or on the basis of the document.Proof that the document was mailed to any person with the intent that it be forwarded to the intendedrecipient is a sufficient showing that the document was delivered.It is not a defense to prosecution under this section that the simulating document:

states that it is not legal process; orpurports to have been issued or authorized by a person or entity who did not have lawful authority toissue or authorize the document.If it is shown on the trial of an offense under this section that the simulating document was filed with,presented to, or delivered to a clerk of a court or an employee of a clerk of a court created orestablished under the constitution or laws of this state, there is a rebut table presumption that thedocument was delivered with the intent described by Subsection (a).Except as provided by Subsection(f), an offense under this section is a Class A misdemeanors.If it is shown on the trial of an offense under this section that the defendant has previously beenconvicted of a violation of this section, the offense is a state jail felony.The citation issued by the complaining officer has the effect of arrest (see Transportation Code543.005 supra), in that the Defendant has been restricted at liberty and thereby, at first appearancebefore the court, has a right to an examining trial to protect the liberty interest of the Defendant. Bythe improper requirement of an agreement to enter a plea, and the subsequent enticement to enter saidplea before the court clerk, the court attempts to circumvent said protection long considered essentialto the fair and orderly administration of justice.Abuse of processAfter appearing before the court and after having been tricked into entering a plea, Defendant wassummoned to a hearing for the alleged purpose of identifying himself and entering a plea, however,Defendant had already appeared before the court in accordance with the agreement entered into uponsigning the citation issued by the arresting office. The court, under the guise of authority granted byArticle 28.01 Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, alleged to act under it's official authority in order toforce Defendant to take a day off work and travel to the court so that the court to have Defendant dowhat Defendant had already done. If the original appearance before the court wherein Defendantidentified himself and entered a plea was not an arraignment, then the original appearance, to whichDefendant was summoned by way of the "Promise to Appear," was not a legal hearing. If the originalappearance was a legal hearing, an arraignment had already been held. Ordering redundant hearingsfor the purpose of establishing that which had already been established can only be consideredharassment and an abuse of process by the judge by summoning Defendant to a redundant hearing. Deliberate harassment of defendantIt is the contention and allegation of Defendant that the second arraignment hearing was for thepurpose of harassment of Defendant ordered solely because Defendant did not enter a guilty plea. Inorder to avoid the cost and inconvenience of holding a fair trial, the court engages in harassmenttactics in order to greatly increase the burden on the accused so as to coerce a plea bargain. Prosecutor impersonating judgeDefendant was summoned to a subsequent hearing wherein no hearing was held. The prosecutingattorney held what appeared to be a hearing with no judge present. At said hearing, the prosecutingattorney attempted to coerce a plea bargain with Defendant. When Defendant attempted to assertrights, Defendant was subjected to abusive and threatening treatment by prosecutor. Specific allegations of wrong-doingThe arresting officer, on coercing Defendant to enter into a misleading contract acted with intent thatDefendant be denied in his most basic right to an examining trial in violation of Section 39.03 TexasPenal Code and Section 32.48 Texas Penal Code.The court clerk, by purporting to hold an arraignment hearing impersonated a judicial officer andcaused Defendant to be forced to return for a second arraignment hearing in violation of Section39.03 Texas Penal Code and Section 32.48 Texas Penal Code.Presiding Judge effected abuse of process by summoning Defendant to a hearing held by prosecutingattorney wherein Defendant was threatened and berated by prosecutor in order to coerce an improperplea bargain from Defendant, in violation of Section 39.03 Texas Penal Code and Section 32.48 TexasPenal Code. Prosecuting attorney, in impersonation of a judicial officer, held a hearing to which Defendant wassummoned by process, with no judicial officer present for the purpose of extorting an improper pleabargain from Defendant in violation of Sections 37.11 and 39.03 Texas Penal Code. Where several people act together in pursuit of unlawful act, each one is liable for collateral crimes,even though unplanned and unintended, if those crimes are foreseeable, ordinary and probable

consequences of preparation or execution of the unlawful act. Curtis v. State (Cr.App. 1978) 573S.W.2d 219. Criminal Law 59(4)Arresting officer, court clerk, prosecuting attorney, and presiding judge all acted in concert andcollusion toward denying Defendant in the due course of the laws of the State of Texas in violation ofSection 15.02 Texas Penal Code. The purpose of this impressively pervasive requirement of criminal procedure is plain. A democraticsociety, in which respect for the dignity of all men is central, naturally guards against the misuse of thelaw enforcement process. Zeal in tracking down crime is not in itself an assurance of soberness ofjudgment. Disinterestedness in law enforcement does not alone prevent disregard of cherishedliberties. Experience has therefore counseled that safeguards must be provided against the dangers ofthe overzealous as well as the despotic. The awful instruments of the criminal law cannot be entrustedto a single functionary. The complicated process of criminal justice is therefore divided into differentparts, responsibility for which is separately vested in the various participants upon whom the criminallaw relies for its vindication. U.S v McNabb, 318 U.S. 332,343 *; 63 S. Ct. 608, **;87 L. Ed. 819,***; 1943 U.S. Presiding judge disqualified The presiding judge in the instant cause, having been accused of the above individual criminal actsand the act of conspiring with others toward the deprivation of the rights of the accused may not beconsidered free from bias in the instant cause. They are professionals who TAKE pay to know the law.Under the doctrine of trespass ab initio, where a party exceeds an authority given by law, the partyloses the benefit of the justification and is considered a trespasser ab initio, although to a certain extentthe party followed the authority given. The law will then operate retrospectively to defeat all acts doneunder the color of lawful authority. American Mortg. Corp. v. Wyman 41 S.W.2d 270 (Tex. Civ. App.Austin 1931 Thus, a person who enters on real property lawfully pursuant to a conditional orrestricted consent and remains after his or her right to possession terminates and demand is made forhis or her removal becomes a trespasser from the beginning, and the law will then operateretrospectively to defeat all acts done by him under color of lawful authority. Williams v. Garnett, 608S.W.2d 794 (Tex. Civ. App. Waco 1980).The rule applies to the acts of sheriffs and other officers, as well as to the conduct of privateindividuals. American Mortg. Corp. v. Wyman Criminal conspiracyThe arresting officer, court clerk, prosecuting attorney, and presiding judge have all acted in concertand collusion with one another in order to perpetrate a fraud on persons accused of crimes under theTransportation Code. Or other ABC agency list acting in concert toward the perpetration of multipleschemes which have the effect if disenfranchising the public of the due course of the laws, it mustreasonable be construed they have conspired toward the indicated outcome.15.02. Texas Penal Code Criminal ConspiracyA person commits criminal conspiracy if, with intent that a felony be committed:he agrees with one or more persons that they or one or more of them engage in conduct that wouldconstitute the offense; andhe or one or more of them performs an overt act in pursuance of the agreement.An agreement constituting a conspiracy may be inferred from acts of the parties.It is no defense to prosecution for criminal conspiracy that: one or more of the co-conspirators is not criminally responsible for the object offense;one or more of the co-conspirators has been acquitted, so long as two or more co-conspirators have notbeen acquitted;one or more of the co-conspirators has not been prosecuted or convicted, has been convicted of adifferent offense, or is immune from prosecution;the actor belongs to a class of persons that by definition of the object offense is legally incapable ofcommitting the object offense in an individual capacity; orthe object offense was actually committed.An offense under this section is one category lower than the most serious felony that is the object ofthe conspiracy, and if the most serious felony that is the object of the conspiracy is a state jail felony,the offense is a Class A misdemeanor. No claim of accident or ignoranceIt may not be construed any of the actors were somehow ignorant of the requirements of the law. Ellisv. United States, as follows: "If a man intentionally adopts certain conduct in certain circumstances

known to him, and that conduct is forbidden by the law under those circumstances, he intentionallybreaks the law in the only sense in which the law ever considers intent. "He who is threatened by asane, rational , new point of view. can hardly judge the future. He knew not what he did. Of course,willful conduct cannot make definite that which is undefined. Ignorance only needs curing one time.Willful violators of constitutional requirements, will attack which have been defined, certainly are inno position to say that they had no adequate advance notice that they would be visited withpunishment. When this game ends and the acts willfully done on record, in open defiance to facts,logic or law & in reckless disregard of any Human, Civil, Natural, or constitutional requirement whichhas been made specific and definite. When they are convicted for so acting, they are not punished forviolating an unknowable something but the law of all man.Defendant moves the court to disqualify itself until the resolution of the criminal allegations nowprepared and ready for presentation to a jury, North Dakota does not have a grand jury, a court ofredress, or an educated jury system that understands these issues of corruptions. I MADE SURE ALLEMPLOYED HERE KNEW. They did not hear us. Olmstead v U.S., 227 U.S. 485, (1928) which states, “Decency, security and liberty alike demand thatgovernment officials shall be subjected to the same rules of conduct that are commands to the citizen.In a government of laws, existence of the government will be imperiled if it fails to observe the lawscrupulously. Our government is the potent, the omnipresent teacher. For good or ill, it teaches thewhole people by its example. Crime is contagious. If the government becomes a lawbreaker, it breedscontempt for the law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy. To declarethat in the administration of the criminal law the end justifies the means … would bring terribleretribution. Against that pernicious doctrine this court should resolutely set its face. II. STATEMENT OF FACTS ACCOUNT CLOSEDClosing balance due: $0.00Sincerely, ED CURTIS AND CLIENT KNOWAffiant hereby and herein accept your oath of office as your open and binding offer of contract to forma firm and binding, private, bilateral contract between you and me in which you agree to perform all ofyour promises and uphold all of my rights.Further, I hereby and herein claim my right to common law jurisdiction andrefuse statutory jurisdiction. The foregoing "Notice of Acceptance of the Oath of Office" is aninstrument in commerce and is made explicitly under reserve and without recourse. Failure to respondto this offer of contract within three business days of receipt establishes your unconditional acceptanceof the foregoing and your promise to uphold all of rights.Verification: I declare under penalty ofperjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executedat arm's length, under duress, with the intent to protect the public need to report this crime Underwhistle blowers laws and protections. AGREEMENT TO RECEIVE FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES TENDERED AS PAYMENT S.C. 36-3-604 (1)(2) FOR BAIL OR APPELLATE BONDAffiant , the undersigned judicial officers, being duly authorized by law to collect money;for Courtcosts, BAIL, and/or APPELLATE BONDS, which shall be collected in the lawful money of account ofthe United States only, am aware that money is defined in:RCW 84.04.060 “Money,” “moneys” – (1961 Definition)“Money” or “moneys” shall be held to mean gold and silver coin, gold and silver certificates. treasurynotes, United States notes, and bank notes.” RCW 84.04.060 “Money,” “moneys.” – (1998Definition?) ““Money” or “moneys” shall be held to mean coin or paper money issued by the UnitedStates government.”I know or should know that the United States government does not issue paper money. I know orshould know that the Federal Reserve issues paper money, and loans it to the United StatesGovernment thereby making it impossible to pay!!!“Due process of law does not mean a statute passed for the purpose of working a wrong.” DENNIS v.MOSES., 18 Wash. 537, at 595 (February 15, 1898)“But the legislature specifically disclaimed any intention to change the meaning of any statute. Andbringing fraud upon the court and trespass to law. The compilers of the Code were not empowered by Congress to amend existing law, and

doubtless had no thought of doing so ...” Warner v. Goltra, 293 U.S. 155, 161, 79 L. Ed. 254, 55 S. Ct.46. ...THE ACT BEFORE US DOES NOT PURPORT TO AMEND A SECTION OF AN ACT, ONLY A SECTION OF A COMPILATION ENTITLED “REVISED CODE OF WASHINGTON,”WHICH IS NOT THE LAW. SUCH AN ACT PURPORTING TO AMEND ONLY A SECTION OFTHE PRIMA FACIE COMPILATION OF FRAUD and LEAVES THE LAW UNCHANGED. EnBanc.” PAROSA v. TACOMA, 57Wn.(2d) 409, 411, 412, 413, 415, 421 (Dec.22, 1960)RCW 89.30.724 Delinquency and sale in general improvement and divisional districts – Redemptionin coin to treasurer – To whom credited “Redemption must be made in gold or silver coin, as providedfor the collection of state and county taxes ...”The power of the state to declare a legal tender is limited to gold and silver coin. All “lawful money”of the United States is not a legal tender for private obligations by the laws of the United States; . The legal tender and gold contract decisions,taken in connection with the recent case of Woodruff v. State of Mississippi, 162 U.S. 291 (16 Sup. Ct. 820), are controllinghere.” DENNIS v. MOSES., 18 Wash. 537-601 (February 15,1898). And;Bank Note is defined as “A promissory note issued by a bank or banker authorized to do so. payable tobearer a, demand. And intended to circulate as money.” Blacks Law Dictionary (Sixth Edition)Therefore, it follows that [Federal Reserve] “Notes are not payments.” Don E. Williams Co. vs.Comm. Int. Rev., 51L. Ed. 2d 48 (1977). And;The individual cannot be compelled to use ‘federal money,’nor federal negotiable instruments, Federal Notes (Swanson v. Fuline, 248 F. Supp. 364) the federalreserve being a private corporation (Lewis v. U.S., 680 F.2d 1238 at 1241) which is engaged incommercial activity by law of merchants (UCC 721-1-103) And;I am aware that it is a violation of law to demand and/or collect any tender except the lawful moneysof account of the United States which is specified at Article I, Section 8. Paragraph 5, and Article I,Section 10. paragraph 1, of the Constitution of the United States of America,which is the supreme lawof the land and mandatory for a firm and binding contract upon this honorable court pursuant to articleI,section 23 and article VI, section’s 4 & 5of the Constitution and that lawful money meeting theseconstitutional requirements has not been available to the general public since about 1964. I know/or should know that Federal Reserve Notes are defined as “OBLIGATIONS OF THE UNITEDSTATES” at section 8 of Title 18 U.S.C. which are not taxable bythe State pursuant to 31 U.S.C 3124 and are not the “lawful money of the United States”,as the term applies in the code and Federal Reserve Notes are not specifically described in the code,because it makes NO promise to pay “money” to the bearer on demand as required by article 3 of theUniform Commercial Code and therefore does NOT even rise to the level of a note. Further tender is defined as:(UCC) South Carolina Statutes, Chapter 36, Chapter 3, Part 6 Discharge, orSection 36-3-604 - Tender of payment.“SECTION 36-3-604. Tender of payment. Any party makingtender of full payment to a holder when or after it is due is discharged to the extent of all subsequentliability for interest, costs and attorney's fees. My time defending myself with no contract or victim is$500 per hour and $10,000 per rights violations I encounter or suffer. (2) The holders refusal of such tender wholly discharges any party who has a right ofrecourse against the party making the tender.”A City employee, whether clerk of court Municipal/District/Superior Court judge or anyAdministrative Law Clerk of this County, must admit that you are a Foreign Agent as defined anddescribed at 22 USC 611, and that you have sought to defraud me, with a seditious conspiracy tooverthrow my lawful government and bring fraud to the people of this county. Have you personallyfiled with the Attorney General a true and complete registration statement for your oath of office andsupplements thereto as required by subsections (a) and (b) of 22 USC 612 I do now, by authority ofthis court of record in malfeasance, misfeasance, non-feasance and perjury of my rights and duties as ahuman and by article VI,section’s 4 & 5 Oath of Office contract to the State Constitution & Federal Constitution, I am now forced to make Written complaint to protect me and my neighbors from joining thisconspiracy of silence, I did report crime. I ask You return this with wet ink signatures of all names onrecord that the Affiant is liable to make payment or tender in Federal Reserve Notes in the amountspecified. regarding this action/Cause? When will arrest warrant be issued by this county or state formy arrest?

Refusal to sign this demand is a refusal to accept my debt payment tendered, and therefore I havedischarged the demanded Amount listed below Pursuant to the authority of SC 36-3-604(2) byrefusing to sign acknowledgment of receipt of this NC “36-3-604(1) tender of payment.for the ”LawEnforcement Agency shall present prima facia proof of a legitimate claim or account settles in fulland closes in ten days upon receipt hereof.creditor DISHONOURABLE DEFAULT.By attempting to adjudge, legislate, enforce OR SET any fee without proof of any Crime,allegedORDERS without The Truth, The Whole Truth and Nothing but the Truth presented, WITHHONESTY, by both sides, to an impartial jury are EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED, by but not limited to,the "Bills of Attainder Clause" [as Titles of Nobility, Bills of Pains and Penalties, "Fines", Bills ofCredit] in violation of the Oath of Office, Breaching Good Behavior, as Extortion, Blackmail andBribery, Criminal Acts volition of R.I.C.O, Monopoly laws, pyramid schemes, the Hobbs andSherman antitrust Acts; Title 18 § 241, 241Colorable Law; Willful abuses of a public authority, to theoppression of the subject, and every species of official Extortion, are offense s against the government,for which the persons who commit them may be indicted and punished according to the Supreme lawof the land. I, THE "Alleged Accused", give this my "Notice of Desire to Pay all Fines, Fees, Costs, &Penalties & Void Judgment " to "THE STATE", Through the Clerk of the County district court but itwould cause a criminal act and cause much duress. Due to the Constitution of the United States ofAmerica, Article 1, § 10, Clause 1, which mandates, "No state shall . . . make any Thing but gold &silver coin a Tender in Payment of Debts", said clause remains UNREPEALED to date, &,Due to the TCCrP 43.02 Payable in money, which states, "All recognizable, bail bonds, &undertakings of any kind, whereby a party become bound to pay money to the State, & all fines &forfeitures of a pecuniary character, shall be collected in the lawful money of the Untied States only",& Due to 12 USC § 152, which states, " … the terms "lawful money" & the "lawful money of theUnited States" shall be construed to mean gold & silver coin of the United States …" & Due to 12USC § 411, which states, "… Federal reserve notes, to be issued at the discretion of the FederalReserve Board … for the purpose of making advances to the Federal reserve banks through theFederal reserve agents as hereinafter set forth & for no other purpose, are hereby authorized. The saidnotes shall be obligations of the United States … They shall be redeemed in lawful money on demandat the Treasury Dept. of the United States, in the city of Washington, District of Columbia, or at anFederal Reserve bank…" & Due to 18 USC § 8, which states, "The term "obligation or other security of the United States"includes, all bonds, certificates of indebtedness, national bank currency, Federal Reserve notes, … &other representatives of value, of whatever denomination, issued under any Act of Congress" &Due to 31 USC § 5112, which states, "…The Sec. of the Treasury may mint & issue only thefollowing coins: … (7) a 50 dollar gold coin that is 32.7 millimeters in diameter, weighs 33.931grams, & contains 1 troy oz. of fine gold …" & Due to 48 stat. 2, (March 09, 1933) & 48 Stat. 113, (June 05, 1933) all gold coin was removed fromcommon circulation, at par, at the banks in these united States of America, said statutes remainUNREPEALED to date &, Due to Clark v. State 3 Cr. R 338 (1877) "A promissory note cannot be accepted for payment of afine", Additionally, the said alleged debt(s) & / or judgment(s) is/are void by reason of the fact the plaintifffailed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. I am constrained by the law from paying these fine(s) and fees… because there is no "lawful money"to be properly & lawfully accepted in the discharge of this (these) alleged debt(s), and or judgment(s). DISCUSSION: Watch; Police State 4 The Rise of FEMA. It SHOWS The camps are for Foreign agents, It is time tolook up, not down at us for sharing this with you.I mean no disrespect but when you know, YOU KNOW, I see YOU ALL as either useful idiots or themost evil people to ever walk this planet. CHOOSE WHO.. Today, I live in one of the most corrupt counties of the most corrupts of states, in the most dangerouscountries that has ever existed, I see, We are BY FAR, The most brainwashed, poisoned, robbed,numbed down, regulated, indebted and enslaved people this planet has ever seen. WE ARE this worldsterrorists. I HOPE, because you were ignorant. The fact is You TOOK my clients earnings, remained

silent to Government actions and are a paid professional, These are the only actions that has everviolated my rights, freedoms or threatened my safety. People like YOU DID THIS, you did not stopthe ones who did. Without my consent while we paid you to serve and protect US from the veryactions this action has committed on me and millions of others, thousands of times, in countless ways,EVERY DAY. Most Officers of the court seem to do things that add no benefit to my life but keep mymind bust defending from the predator kind, hunting me for sport and profit. I can not help but to seeyour whole concepts of economics, earnings, education, health care or the goals of law and justice asalmost 100% backwards and up side down. We wish to turn you right. The world I see is no wherenear the path you are on. The proof for all is; this world.. I seek to leave NONE OF IT to our kids. Oneof us is the problem YOUR WILFUL IGNORANCE. OR MY thinking, honestly. I see 2 differentmind mentalities, Yours has hurt me and Once you KNOW, you choose. I see the massive damages your system has created with deliberate actions that scatters accountabilityrespectability and responsibility to the winds so no one can be blamed and everyone can hide behind afiction called THE STATE . The curtain is falling like the WIZARD of OZZ but with an ignorant,destroyed and very angry world, what will happen when it happens and you have no where to hide?None of the people who made histories greatest tyrants and mass murderers saw the evil they weredoing. If ANY ONE in their gang had even a sliver of common sense, human decency, honor, orrespect for their neighbor, they would have stood. If you understood what power really is, You wouldsee yourself With Real the stuff. Power is what it takes to own and control your own life, It is a fulltime job. SEE the POLE sticking in your own eye QUIT trying to cut the sliver in in my clients with achain saw. I see reality the one this world is NOT IN...YET Government IS a crazy thing when you can see with open eyes. You take my money, buy canes, Breaks my legs, sell me a cane at a hefty profit. Then proclaim to all,if it was not for GOV., HE would not be able to walk!In a civilized society everyone must follow & obey the law, including public servants that are boundby oath, affirmation & bond to uphold the laws of the United States & the State . I cannot concur withthe mythology that Federal Reserves Notes are money when the law states otherwise. It is plain &clear, as a matter of law, as stated above, that Federal Reserve Notes, checks & or money orders, aredebt obligations & not within the definition of those things allowed by law by this state or to bereceived by this MUNICIPAL COURT of the CITY OF FARGO State Of NORTH DAKOTANotice: Pursuant to TPC, Title 8, § 36.09 (a) "… offers … agrees … any benefit … that he knows thepublic servant is prohibited by law from accepting. (b) Class "A" Misdemeanor's." Pursuant to TPC,Title 8, § 36.08 Any and all threats to incarcerate (me) for "Failure to Pay" will be deemed to be anattempt to solicit an honorarium, a criminal act. Like extort , defraud perfidy or TREASONAdditional Note: Pursuant to CRANE vs. STATE OF TEXAS case no. 83-1650; the U.S. Court ofAppeals, Fifth Circuit held: "We affirm the trial courts findings that the Dallas County system ofissuing misdemeanor's capias violated both Texas law & the United States Constitution…."Continuing to violate after 5th Circuit Notice, can be construed as a pattern of criminal behavior underRICO, with intent - severe criminal & civil penalties are available to end This conspiracy but I do nothave a REASONABLE, PRUDENT or desire "Notice of Desire to Pay all Fines, Fees, Costs, Penaltiesor Void Judgment. . I only see and care for THE POINT, YOU WILL un chain your slaves and makethem whole. A peoples wealth-based monetary system, is giving, Then TAKING the entire pot. THEPOINT IS, How much value did you add to this world? You claim to be my leaders but Their is NOway we will not be at war. Until you leave. You should do it before we throw you out, Who needsneighbor s that lie, cheat, steal and destroy? I DO NOT SUPPORT TERRORISM, and as proven, ThisGovernment fiction here IS the only damage I have ever suffered It would violate the law and THEPOINT of both law and justice. MOTION To Disqualify All Judges and For Change of Venue To a United States court ofConstitutional authority and respect.I Move to disqualify ALL Circuit Court judges and for a change of venue to another Circuit Courtbecause of my political views and political history on record in various states that create unavoidablebias against me. This is the only way to have a fair trial and preserve my CLIENTS rights andfreedoms, as the law is for. In closing, NOTICE OF Human right treaty violationsTo: The clerk of court, Please pass this to the governor and to the secretary of State,

Not THE STATE a religious association. whereas I have exhausted all my domestic remedies withinTHE STATE. I now give you notice I MUST CHARGE The county of WITH human rightsviolations. For each and every official's refusal to uphold the constitution. Please inform your sheriffyou have disgraced , violated, and failed to keep your word or uphold the law of the land and thelegislators have failed to remove you from office for failure to up hold the law. The countyCommissioners and the county judges failed to uphold the law, The Sheriffs, Marshals, Police, ormilitary do not collect their pay in gold or silver thus violating their oaths. The right to due process bylaw and for the good of society in general, It is time for you to leave me alone. I would be a criminalif I aided a gang of criminals terrorists that has taken my Liberty my property and have damaged mementally, physically, educationally, economically, religiously, and permanently. My property, Mytime, and my security has been used, stolen and destroyed. You have used abused, oppressed,kidnapped and violated me with no care, concern, or thought of what your actions did to a lot of lives.Their is no protection, no redress, compensation, No Bill of Rights, expectation of justice, or doubt ofyour motives. Your 17 million A POINT laws are THE LAW. YOU do not mandate a constitutionalcourt of due process law or a court be available to any one but at your leisure as their is profit in thesecages you built for us to be safe.. All courts shall be open, and all person or reputation, shall haveremedy by due course of law. Or their is to be no laws impairing the obligation of contracts, Slavery,Treason, or law means anything any gun can grab. Their is No debtors prisons, We will be heard, Notidal of nobility, or a cent of real wealth in any bank. We eat poisoned foods, water, and air. The worldhates us because we are free and the list is endless of how upside down we have really become. WHYdid everyone stand when a guy in a black dress walked in? EVERYONE, but I WHO STOOD, stood,While everyone sat? To add insult to injury, they all called them "HONOURABLE".And YOURHONOR? "What part of shall not be infringed" Confuses you? There shall be established in eachcounty in this State a County Court, which shall be a court of record in each county, with qualifiedCounty Sheriff, who shall be well informed in the law of the State and bound by oath. So what is theneed with all these people Taking my earnings to protect and defend my rights? Then taking themwhenever they want? Tricks like All rights reserved, without prejudiced , the CONSTITUTION, LAWor DUTY when all these people are taking my time, my wealth,and security to protect me from who? ISEE the hundreds of scams and schemes to keep US defending from the 17 million A POINTS,youuse, forcing us into Defending FROM your actions. I SEE YOU, THE POINT; Of life, of freedom,Law, Justice, wealth, The knowledge of Good or evil, lawful or criminal, heaven or hell is not in anyof you with your system training s? What gives ANYONE, in, ANY WAY, even the right to think theyhave a right to treat another fellow human this way? What ever, you think you fix, you destroy, bydesign. I possess NEW, solid ground that this read will show the post in your eye. Will we hunt youdown and punish you as NOT ignorant barbarian but for your actions YOU have done WITH AMALICE that clearly reveals the flaw in your reasoning a mile deep and 2 miles wide. A right is not given or taken from anyone that lives in actual reality without a crime and that is proofthat this court is dangerous and in on a world wide seditious conspiracy to overthrow MYGOVERNMENT. That if I did to you, THE EXACT SAME WAY, I would be prison. ANY thought toeven think that you have a right when bound by contract is violated, the right to force your beliefs onme with a swat team working for some of the most dangerous people this planet has ever faced is nolonger done in ignorance..

FEE SCHEDULE:A. Ten (10) troy ounces of .999 pure gold (or its equivalent) per violation of any of myunalienable rights under any and all circumstances. Included in these rights hereby claimed are myright to make use of roads, buses, train, and air stations; the right to engage in trade and habitationpeacefully.B. One (1) troy ounce of .999 pure gold (or its equivalent) per hour at a rate doubling every 24hours for any of my time consumed in detention, imprisonment, or attempts by anemployees/public officers/magistrates/judges/agents/citizens to establish jurisdiction overmyself or my family or my guests without my express written consent.C. One (1) troy ounce of .999 pure gold (or its equivalent) per hour for any of my timeconsumed while being 1) detained by any man/woman acting under color of law; 2) stopped by anystatute-enforcing officer from any legal department and/or corporation.Let it be clear that a people is not a person; a person is not a people. True sovereignty in

America and within all free nations on Earth lies with the living and breathing people who have allrights endowed by our Creator, God. Citizens are subjects of the Federal, State, and Local municipalgovernment corporations. Citizens have consented to exchange their unalienable rights for privilegesand immunity. Let it be clear, therefore, that I do not delegate my rights nor do I consent to be treatedas a Citizen. Further, I am not, nor is anyone in my Family, an Animal. Or "Person in your statues andcodes. Let it be clear that I am not a person/citizen/employee/officer and/or subject of any corporation,which may be operating under color of law. Let it be clear, therefore, that I hereby declare that I amone of the people, the competent and sovereign power that controls allgovernments. Let it be clear that I am endowed by my creator, God, with unalienable rights as vestedby God in the people within these united states of America.This is a lawful paper to be enforced by the people and for the people on the land commonly known asAmerica, in any court within a state known as North Dakota and in any court within this union knownas the united states of America.The Supreme Court has stated, 92 US 551: US v Cruikshank, “Thepeople of the United States resident within any State are subject to two Governments: one State, andthe other National; but there need be no conflict between the two. The powers which one possesses,the other does not. They are established for different purposes, and have separate jurisdictions.Together they make one whole, and furnish the people of the United States with a completegovernment,ample for the protection of all their rights at home and abroad. True, it may sometimes happen that aperson is amenable to both jurisdictions for one and the same act...It is the natural consequence of acitizenship which owes allegiance to two sovereignties, and claims protection from both. The citizencannot complain, because he has voluntarily submitted himself to such a form of government.” Wenever knowingly, willingly, or with any disclosure submitted to anything. How can fraud, backed byforce be law?NOTICE OF FEE SCHEDULE FOR PROTECTION FROM CORPORATE ABUSE, FALSEARREST, VICTIMLESS CHARGES, AND BILLS OF ATTAINDERLet it be clear that the preceding statements do not pertain to me alone, a people. I am not a “people ofthe United States,” which is a corporation, nor am I a legal or corporate person as described above. Letit be clear that I do not consent to this form of de facto corporate government, and that I am notsubmitting myself voluntarily to it.On the contrary, I am a people as recognized in America’s founding documents, including the MagnaCarta, The Articles of Confederation, the Declaration of Independence, and the original Constitutionfor the united states of America.I am putting it in this AFFIDAVIT OF HONESTY To cure the ignorance of WHY THIS IS NEEDEDHERE. Our slavery, Is a war crime. Once you know the truth, you choose who and what you reallyare, that goes for everyone. Because most do not know, We are the most brainwashed, robbed,regulated, poisoned, dumb ed down, bankrupted, enslaved and destroyed people in the history of theentire human race. Is why we are. We contracted because WE WILL NOT LEAVE THIS TO OURKIDS. Just read the declaration of independence, them people had it good. .

AFFIDAVIT OF HONESTY PUBLIC RECORD. I Ed Curtis, A lawfully, legally contractedfiduciary for the person who submitted this to you, now in distress. We come in peace and the samemission as you. To serve and protect our neighbors. My client contracted with me freely.

Fiduciary for the accused. “UNDER PENALTIES OF PERJURY”.Under God’s laws there is no contract between me and the US. The COURT OF THE CITY nor

any working for the Federal, State, or City Corporation. Therefore now having joiner under the sameflag and God in a firm-binding contract. I demand you uphold your end of the contract as laid down byour Creator in His Holy Word and declare in the organic Constitution(s) and subsequent StateCharter(s) with all other Oaths and Affirmations notwithstanding, including any registration with theSecretary of State as being a Foreign Agent. Therefore you are now liable for the protection of all mysovereign reserved rights in the common law and commerce, which are inalienable, unalienable, andimprescriptibly rights. Absent the above stated contract, I do not know who you are nor do Iunderstand the intent of your document nor can I make a legal determination about what you areasking. Absent the above stated contract you and I have, I do not recognize you, for you have failed toidentify yourself as one with delegated regulatory authority over me or made your offer under thepenalty of perjury, Without the above worded contract, you must be a Third Party Foreign Debt

Collector, and you are hereby Fired in your attempt to represent me or client. I DO NOT SPEAKGOVERNMENT. I did not give you permission to make a legal determination against me. So, I do notbelieve there is any legal or lawful significance to your correspondence, whatsoever. I do not believethere is a legal duty or lawful duty to do anything you have stated or said in your action, whether it isto file some sort of form, pay some fine, or pay some tax, or give up something. Your correspondenceis beyond me for you act as one/many that has authority NO to. Please mail your document. Withoutobtaining my permission and do not fail to sign your offer in ink stating your authority or sign underthe penalty of perjury.

Absent your adherence to the above Contract, I do not recognize you or understand what yourintent is in your document or action. Within the 3 day Contract Law,first, under the above contract,show me the law and intent that requires a living soul and sovereign and American, to do whatever itis you are trying to do. I make this redraft of your offer back to you under contract law and the penaltyof perjury, 3 days and we have the above contract, 7 days you have defaulted, 10 days, I have aSummary Judgment. I have also accepted the STATEMENT OF ELECTED/APPOINTED OFFICER/Oath of Office of the Corporate State , Mayor of the City of

NOTICE OF NON -RESPONSE SEBe it known to all interested parties that there has not been any timely response to AFFIDAVIT

OF HONESTY______________________________ dated 20__,Client and ED CURTIS by Ed Curtis; such response to have been made to:c/o Notary Acceptance (Notary name) a Notary PublicI wish EVERYTHING in this file for discovery in 10 days mailed to

Mail to : Ed Curtis 924 5th street S. Fargo, N.D. WANNABEHERD@OUTLOOK.COM I will supply 6+ gigs of study with

an email dismissing this. In the best interest of my client. I put this together as a show of overwhelming force I hope you will fully understand what massive damage ignorance has created to thisworld. I wish you the best and hope this knowledge cured you. I ask for you to dismiss this. Send me atip if this slap in the face woke you up, or for 20 bucks, I can send this to 25 thousand contacts! I have6 gigs of library collected over the years all on line and free, Write me and I will send you in the rightdirection and undo the wrongs, you did. YOU are in the perfect place to change the world before theUN TROOPS come and ..well,. They can not arrest a fiction. THE STATE cover will not protect youfrom your actions. affidavit of honesty NO FEAR! give this to ALL victims;OF THE COURT IN COURT ONRECORD<ASK<Can I be heard on this court record? yes or no? TALK LOUD MAKE THEM! {Always wait for them to answer on record} Knowledge= NO FEAR Is this an article 3 constitutional court of due process? yes or no? "Is this a civil or criminal court I am being prosecuted in?" ifCRIMINAL CORT: I wish to confront my accuser and call my victim to the stand, I do not recall anyof this crime I have committed?CIVIL COURT: I wish to examine this contract this court claims I knowingly and willingly signedwith anyone that would give this court lawful jurisdiction to pursue these charges? You are being paidto protect and defend my rights, WHY AM I HERE? people in this court have no excuse,you know thelaw. I ask this court one more time, produce a victim or contract that I have violated. I do not workfor THE STATE and am under no contract that gives this court jurisdiction or proof of claim on mytime I am here under threat of arrest and duress.

MORE VALUABLE AND NEEDED THAN OBAMACARE, give this to everyone you know!! FREE FULL LEGAL PROTECTION FOR ALL HUMANS ON VICTIMLESS CRIME SPREES!THE ONLY KNOWLEDGE LAW TOOL YOU WILL EVER NEED! THE HONESTY AFFIDAVIT,simply PRINT, STUDY, SIGN AND YOUR TRIGGERED FOR BATTLE, FOR CAR AND HOME,OR COURT DO NOT LEAVE WITHOUT IT more tools for fun and profit? Get the honesty affidavitinto all in your court! THE STATE . VS TRUTH, THE LAW & JUSTICE FOR ALL. THEYFORCED US TO MAKE OUR CHOICE, MAKE YOURS. Please key in Silent weapons for quiet

wars, We DO meet the definition, VICTIMS OF; GENOCIDE, TREASON, CRIMES AGAINSTHUMANITY, BREACH OF CONTRACT, CONSPIRACY, TERRORISM, TO NAME A FEWPROVABLE CHARGES. I have proof in my files I collected over the years. WAR CRIMES AREFOREVER.THIS IS SERIOUS ..SILENCE is not an option. We live in fear, STANDING ON THELAW WE PAY FOR? For crimes against a fiction of THE STATE? They want us in jail until we give,we want the same.IT IS IN MY BOOK. please read Our story and stand, Downloadhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/86540276/New-but-Old-Knowledge my free book & study this, Itapplies to all. Every action has a reaction. THEY HAVE IGNORED EVERYTHING AND CHARGED, US FOR TELLING THEM, THISAFFIDAVIT ON LINE http://www.scribd.com/doc/223255053/AFFIDAVIT-OF-HONESTY On mysite: http://thefax.webs.com/ Everything that was done before the fall of the Nazi's was legal and right,until justice returned, These people took and oath and OUR PAY. WE do not support terrorism, DOYOU? I have NEVER met a more dangerous and destructive bunch. THEY ARE OUR ONLY FEARHERE; It was not done in ignorance, I TOLD THEM, THEY CHOSE. watch;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fMIm9ILvhCU THESE VIDEOS WILL TAKE YOU TO YOUR PERSONAL NEW WORLD ORDER! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eVPAEoiN0_w The psychopath, You will never know UNTIL YOU learn to see them.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q4AKkF97fcE Was Your Oath Sincere?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkIKDKtRQuYThe Declaration of Natural Rightshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E3dq6he5eqQTURNING POINT FOR HUMANITY !!! It is DONE!!!This one is YOUhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pK2WJd5bXFgThe Greatest Speech Ever Made - Charlie ChaplinTHE STATE of North Dakota all deserve it, their deliberate indifference STOLE everything from us.They are terrorists in every sense of the word. To start cleaning up this country, START HERE.Treason against the United States of AmericaViolation of Your Sworn OATH of OfficeYou. as a Public Official, who has Sworn an Oath of Office, to Defend, Protect, and Preservethe Constitution for the united States of America against all enemies, both Foreign andDomestic, as well as its Citizens, and to Honor it as the Supreme Law of the Land; definedby Law as one owing Allegiance to the United States of America in your position of PublicTrust.Your failure to honor your Sworn Oath (documented by the within named Plaintiff) fulfills therequirements of an Act of Treason as cited in the United States Constitution, to wit: "inlevying war against them [the States and "We the People"], or, in adhering to their enemies,giving them aid and comfort."TREASON, by law, is punishable by the Death Penalty.Thus, any violation one's Oath of Office, by those Sworn and paid to Honor the Constitutionfor the united States of America, is an overt act of treason against "We the People."Such acts are in contempt of the law, affecting other Public Servants who may 'go along - toget along,' leading to the loss of confidence in Government and eventual corruption inGovernment. If lawlessness continues un-reported and un-punished, tyranny becomes kingand Government the Master. If enough citizens, patriots, and Christians understand thistraditional love for Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness, traditional in America - this willnot happen. You. (the Accused, are now put on notice by this letter, that your act(s) ofTreason are now part of the Public Record and war crimes are forever.This letter is delivered to you, the Accused, showing that there is a legal file being preparedfor your prosecution. The responsibility to document your Act(s) of Treason rests with thePlaintiff. The Plaintiff has a legal obligation to make your Act(s) of Treason known toGovernment Officials.(18 USC Section 4) and the moral responsibility to post this Notice inpublic places near your place of business, or in the areas of your residence, as a PublicService. All local media will, also, in this process, be fully informed.For your information, this letter will be entered as a Court Exhibit, in addition to other

evidence, to document your Act(s) of Treason against "We the People," when formal chargesand proceedings are filed against you. An Act of Treason against one individual, by another -is an act against all. I was wrong thinking these people would stop and think what they weredoing.TO START I think an educated society will end crime, These people think it would hurt their game,Under power of HUMAN honesty, I AM DEMANDING THE ARRESTS OF;Police Chief Keith A. Ternes kternes@cityoffargo.com Judge SCOTT GRIFFIN SGriffeth@ndcourts.gov SHERIFF PAUL LANEY, laneyp@casscountynd.govStates attorney BIRCH BURDICK burdickb@casscountynd.gov Either the UN TROOPS or YOU need to fix it. These are war crimes. YOU ALL are only in poweruntil this money system falls. IT Was set up to float the scum to the top on every level and way, Tobuild heaven or hell. NOW IS THE TIME EVERY ONE WHO CARES IT IS TIME TO LOOK UP& SEE! YOU are the most BRAINWASHED, ROBBED, REGULATED AND ENSLAVED people toever walk this planet. Please watch; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=63zZ6I0QiO8 YOUR OATHIS YOUR WORD. Who respects traitors ? WHO would help the people who did it to us all but othercriminals? Where will you stand when this falls? Prison, Grave, Gallows or WITH US? A crime takes a victim for EVERYONE'S protection. When law is for all, Equally, WHERE WILLYOU BE? http://www.lawfulpath.com/ref/ovk2k-scan.pdfOPERATION VAMPIRE KILLER IS NEEDED BY ALL IN THE LAW ENFORCEMENTINDUSTRY See the reading room of the Lawful path site and help educate. We know who YOU are.THAT IS WHY WE CONTACTED YOU. TO GET YOUR FREE DROP BOX, I will share morestudies. https://db.tt/MXcCvgMf

The PRIVACY ACT OF 1974 (Public Law 93-579), empowers citizens to require full, writtendisclosure from a government officials who seeks information. Citizens also have the right, not totestify against themselves. Thus, when "the government" comes I have the right to have answers.Public Law 93-579 is to provide certain safeguards for an individual against invasion of personalprivacy "The following questions are based upon that act and are necessary for this individual to makea reasonable determination concerning divulgence of information to this agency. Name of ALL publicservants involved in this cause: Please add all the NAMES and email contacts answers on a separate piece of paper as sworntestimony for discovery, :

________________________________________________________________________Name ofperson in government requesting that this investigation be made? Is this investigation "general?" or is it "special?"

DEPT; ID#City ___________________________________ State _________

NAME________________________________________________________________________________ Personal Name And of department of government, bureau, or agency by which public servant isemployed:

Supervisor's name: ____________________________________________________ Office mailing address:

Will public servant uphold the Constitution of the United States of America? Yes ______ No WILL public servant furnish proof of personal identity? Yes ______ No ______

furnish a copy of the law or regulation which authorizes this investigation? Yes ______ No

Will the public servant read aloud that portion of the law authorizing the questions he will ask? Yes______ No ____________ Are the citizen's answers voluntary Or Mandatory?? Yes ______ No ____________

Are the questions to be asked based upon a specific law or regulation? ______or are they being used as a discovery process? Yes ______ No ____________

What other uses may be made of this information?What other agencies may have access to this information? What will be the effect upon meif I should choose to not answer any part of these questions? As a contracted fiduciary of the person who this was designed to protect, I ask every chain of eventofficer of this action to fully identify themselves for my personal record of events this materialexplains. please mail answers to Ed Curtis 924 5th.st. S. Fargo, N.D, An historic event will be takingplace and we wish to be HONESTIt would be a crime not fully identifying yourself on public record or us not reporting the crimespresented here for the good of the public.Please accept this written request for a certified copy of your personal Oath of Office and copy ofyour Surety Bond, which is required of any public official. You have three days to provide thesedocuments or you are in default.

Ed Curtis 924 5th street S. Fargo, N.D. Please make copy for every chain of event officer on this.I NEED to get this fixed and mass emailed out! I sent this throughhttp://www.gorillacontact.com/pricing.php . If you help, this war will be over sooner. I collectedover 200 million contacts but NO MONEY, My car, business, career, Family and life have beendestroyed because no one knows this stuff? I will send if you contact me, I will send the info forcredits to my account and give 6 gigs of study material to start your public library! ONLY THEEDUCATED ARE FREE, everyone is a threat to all until educated. They can not do it in the light,SHINE BRIGHT!!! I will NOT leave this to our kids, will you? For $20 bucks, I can send 25thousand emails to help your cause andeducate your friends and neighbors. Ifyou send me your local area codes, Ican gather the list and promote for you!Your fixed freedom add! P R O O F O F S E R V ICE

________________________________________________________________Signed; Sui Juris, Belligerent Claimant I _____________, A legal citizen of the United States do hereby declare my legal and rightfulindividual sovereignty from any Government and it’s agencies that are in tyranny. NOTICE TOPRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT; NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL

date_____________ Case ;________________

State: _________________________ County: _______________________ Witlessness;Before me, ____________________________________, a Notary Public, on this day personallyappeared ____________________________________________known to me or proved to me withvalid identification to be the individual or living soul whose name is subscribed to the foregoinginstrument and acknowledged to me that he/she executed the same for the purposes and considerationtherein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office on this ______ day of ________________,20__. ______________________________________________ (Seal of Office)

Signature of Notary Public

___________________________________My Commission Expires: _______________________